LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

An Israeli airstrike on Sanaa killed the Houthi prime minister Ahmed al-Rahawi and several cabinet ministers, marking the most senior loss of leadership.

The Houthi prime minister in Yemen, Ahmed al-Rahawi, and several of his Cabinet members were slain in an Israeli airstrike on the capital city of Sanaa on Aug. 28, the Israel Defence Forces and the Iranian-backed group confirmed on Saturday.

“The Israeli enemy targeted the prime minister and several ministers during a routine workshop held by the government to evaluate its activity and performance over the past year,” according to a formal statement carried on Houthi-run television and cited by CNN.

A Houthi spokesman said on Saturday that al-Rahawi and several of his colleagues were killed and some were wounded, without specifying their names, The New York Times reported.

The IDF stated on Saturday that it “struck a facility that hosted dozens of senior officials of the Houthi terrorist regime.” These officials were “responsible for the use of force, the military buildup of the Houthi terror regime, and the advancement of terror actions against Israel, along with other key Senior Houthi officials.”

According to the Israeli military, the strike in Yemen — a distance of over 2,000 kilometres (1,300 miles) from the Jewish state — “was made possible by seizing an intelligence opportunity and completing a rapid operational cycle, which took place within a few hours.”

Although authority in the Shi’ite Houthi group is concentrated in the hands of religious leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi, the Israeli Air Force attack marked an escalation in efforts to foil the repeated Houthi missile strikes on the Jewish state.

Before the attack on Sanaa, the Houthis fired, for the first time, a missile containing a new type of cluster sub-munition at Israel.

According to AP, citing Houthi-government sources, Israel’s airstrikes on Thursday hit several areas across the Yemeni capital, killing at least 10 people and wounding 102 others.

“The IDF is operating decisively against the Houthi terrorist regime, while simultaneously intensifying strikes against the Hamas terrorist organization in Gaza, and will continue to act to remove any threat to the citizens of the State of Israel,” the Israeli military said on Thursday.

“The Houthi terrorist organization has been operating under Iranian direction and funding to harm the state and its allies since the beginning of the war, undermining regional stability and disrupting global freedom of navigation,” the IDF statement added.

Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said in a separate statement: “As we warned the Houthis in Yemen: After the plague of darkness comes the plague of the firstborn. Whoever raises a hand against Israel—his hand will be cut off.”

Al-Rahawi served as prime minister to the Houthi-led rebels in the Yemeni territory under their control since August 2024. He was the most senior official to die in the Israeli-Houthi conflict so far.

Israeli government and cabinet meetings will be held in a secret location on Sunday following the elimination of the Houthi prime minister and other senior officials, Ynet reported.

The Houthis started attacking the Jewish state in the wake of the Hamas-led invasion and massacre on Oct. 7, 2023. The Yemeni group said it joined the war in an expression of solidarity with the Palestinians.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Israeli police evacuate a settler as another reprimands them in the  Gush Katif settlement of Gadid in southern Gaza on August 19, 2005.

Israel took a gamble in 2005 — staking national security, ideology, and an entire way of life on the hope of peace.

That August, under the Disengagement Plan launched by then prime minister Ariel Sharon — a former general once regarded as the patron of the settlement movement — Israel carried out a unilateral withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. Soldiers were deployed not to defend territory, but to uproot their own citizens.

Within days, 21 Jewish communities were abandoned. Roughly 10,000 Israelis were evacuated from their homes by their own army. Graves were exhumed, and synagogues were boarded up. In an extraordinary gesture, Israel left behind flourishing agricultural infrastructure worth millions, hoping it would provide Palestinians with the foundation for prosperity.

The move marked a dramatic concession: Israel relinquished land without securing anything in return. The expectation, or at least the hope, was that Palestinians, for the first time fully in charge of Gaza, might transform it into a showcase of self-governance and development.

But that vision quickly dissolved. Greenhouses and synagogues were looted and destroyed. Within a year, Hamas rose to power, and the group redirected aid into weapon stockpiles and a vast underground tunnel network rivaling the New York metro. Hamas then turned its rule inward, crushing rivals and minorities with violence, while projecting its terror outward. Over the next 18 years, tens of thousands of rockets were launched at Israeli population centres, culminating in the massacre of October 7, 2023.

Dave Gordon interviewed four Canadian-Israeli evacuees from the Gaza disengagement, who reflected upon their experience from 20 years ago, and what they think history will write about those turbulent times.

They are Carol Chezi, 69; Michael Shaul, 72; Ahavya Levy, 48; and Sody Naimer, 66. The interviews were edited for clarity and brevity.

 Carol Chezi, originally from Guelph, Ont.

Carol Chezi, originally from Guelph, Ont., had already been married and was living in Israel with a one year old by the time they moved to Gush Katif in 1980. At the time of the disengagement, they had six children — one married — and a granddaughter.

What did you do professionally?

I helped my husband run greenhouses and grew vegetables and sometimes flowers.

Did you have Palestinian workers?

Yeah, they made a good living. When we grew something that was more labour intensive, we’d have seven workers. Really, there was peace before the Oslo agreements (in 1993). My husband would pick the workers up at their house, and if they weren’t awake, he’d go in and wake them up. You know, go into the house and drink some tea while they were getting ready. He took one of our workers’ brothers, who was getting cancer treatments, to Tel HaShomer Hospital. He’d take the worker to go visit his brother in the hospital.

Did you feel safe in Gaza?

There was protection. There were soldiers and guard duty at night. We did not used to lock our doors in the house or even the car. But there was a gate, a fence around the community, which is why we didn’t have to lock up.

Any sort of incursions or breaches?

If you take the number of years we were there, most of the time we didn’t have any problems. Towards the end, the last three years, there were mortars shot. Towards the end it was not so safe, and the roads weren’t safe anymore.

What was the disengagement like for you and your family?

My kids stayed with my married daughter. Everybody was threatened — that if we didn’t leave by a certain date, we wouldn’t be able to take our cars out. It didn’t happen in the end. People stayed as long as they could, until the end, and were dragged out. They actually got their cars. People were told that if they didn’t leave early, the graves of their relatives wouldn’t be moved. But that never happened either. We left at the last possible minute before being pulled out physically.

I would like to say that no one left voluntarily. Some people left a bit earlier because they didn’t want their kids to experience (being taken out).

When you left, where did you go?

We spent ten months, in two hotels, that was designated for us outside of Jerusalem, and then lived in caravans. The joke was that Ariel Sharon promised all of us prefab homes, but only for people who signed up for them ahead of time. When we got a prefab, we lived in that for about eight years.

We eventually built a house in the new Netzer Hazani in central Israel.

My husband considered us too old to rebuild greenhouses and start over with farming. We never went back to being self-employed; worked at a few different things and are now retired. I imagine we’d have been better off financially if we’d still be in Gush Katif. We basically lost our livelihood.

How much compensation did you get for your home and greenhouses?

The government decided what it was worth. The house was assessed at market value, but not enough to build the same size elsewhere. We didn’t have a livelihood, so we had to live off the money they gave us for the greenhouses.

Would October 7 have happened if there was no disengagement?

I really believe that it wouldn’t have happened if we were there. Not because we were so militant, but because if you leave a place that stands empty, things start falling off, and nobody fixes them.

There were plenty of rockets fired, and they got bolder and bolder, and dug more tunnels.

I would imagine that even if October 7 had happened, with 10,000 Jews in Gaza, the casualties would be far less, because you would have several mobilized communities who would go out and do instant battle. There would have been a lot more surveillance.

 Michael Shaul.

Michael Shaul, originally from Toronto, is a retired agronomist and former Gush Katif settler. He detailed his arrival in Israel in 1974, his role in establishing Moshav Katif in 1978, and his contributions to cherry tomato cultivation. Shaul described the escalating violence from 1985, including murders and attacks, and the eventual disengagement in 2005. He expressed regret over the withdrawal, believing it weakened Israeli defences and emboldened terrorists, ultimately leading to the 2023 Gaza war.

What brought you to Gush Katif?

I’m one of the first people to come to Gush Katif. My settlement was the second one that was formed.

We wanted to join a group that would work on agriculture. There were two areas to consider. Yitzchak Rabin, the prime minister at the time, said we could go to the Golan Heights, or Gaza Strip, and there was no way I’d go to the Golan. In the southern part of Israel is where you grow vegetables. We eventually went to Moshav Gan Or in 1985.

What was your profession in Gaza?

I grew cherry tomatoes for export for 20 years. I set up the market in England. I’m the person that introduced the first Israeli variety of Cherokee tomato in 1986.

Did you hire local Arabs?

No one worked with more Palestinians than me. I had more Palestinians — I knew more Arabs — than any person. I had the most workers. They were from Khan Yunis.

What was the disengagement like?

I didn’t want to have confrontation with soldiers. I left five days before the disengagement. Two of my four boys were carried out by soldiers; two were already married. Obviously, they didn’t leave willingly.

My wish would have been that my sons and I work together to run the agriculture.

Afterwards, I went to a temporary settlement seven kilometres north of where I live today. It was called Nitzan Beit, and there I lived in a caravan for seven and a half years until they built the settlement that I’m living in today. It’s between Ashkelon and Ashdod.

So, people got different amounts of compensation. The farmers got two plots. Everybody else got one plot. So, I got two plots.

We were thrown to the wolves. I was a big farmer. I left with tremendous debts, because I had a lot of workers I owed money to, I had paid for seedlings and fertilizer, and I had to dry up my greenhouses well in advance. Today my house would have been worth much more because property in Israel is very valuable.

Did you know that after we got thrown out, some of my workers phoned me and said, “Please save us. We don’t have work.”

Do you think October 7 would have happened if there wasn’t any disengagement?

Of course not. A very foolish question. As long as we were in Gush Katif, there was an army presence. Naive question.

Would you return to Gaza?

Unless you have 100 per cent government support, and the Israeli army there at all times, you can’t. As long as there is a presence of radicalized Arabs in the Gaza Strip, I don’t think it is reasonable to suggest that Israelis should return. There is a great possibility of unrest and violence. No matter what the future holds, it is imperative that the IDF remains permanently in the Gaza Strip.

 Ahavya Levy.

Ahavya Levy, was born in London, Ont., and moved to Toronto when she was seven. She moved to Israel when she was 18 and five years later moved to Gaza, where she lived for five years with her husband, Aharon, until the disengagement.

What was it like living in Gaza?

It was the most beautiful place you could imagine.

I went there for the first time ever when I was engaged. My husband-to-be was already studying there in a program in yeshiva. The sky was so blue, the sea was so blue, the weather was so perfect. The houses were beautiful. I was able to go to the oceanfront.

Were there any complications with the Gaza expulsion for your family?

We spoke to all kinds of people to let them know it shouldn’t happen. If it did, it would be more dangerous. There were rallies we went to. But we knew it was a possibility. We didn’t give up willingly.

What I did do the day before we left, is pack up my husband’s prayer books and his holy books. I had no clue if they were going to be Arabs living in my house in a week. In terms of everything else, we just left it as is, as if we were still living there. We hoped this terrible decree wouldn’t happen.

There were twenty families living with us. And the government brought two thousand soldiers to come to our community, marching in from the two entrances. They had special uniforms. And they surrounded each caravan with about 100 soldiers.

They were obviously very psychologically prepared soldiers, because I can imagine that it was devastating for them.

When they came, we locked the door, and they broke down the door. And then I stood at the door, and I said to the soldiers that I have two sons and a baby, that I was holding.

I said to the soldier, “Listen, you don’t have to do this. You could always say to your commanders, ‘I refuse to do this, because it is very, very devastating.’ And I don’t envy you, or what you’ll feel the day after.”

I then held the candlesticks that I got when I got married, from my mother-in-law, who received them from her mother-in-law, who was a Holocaust survivor. And I said, “The last time anyone in my family was ever told they had to leave their home was in the Holocaust, where all of my family, and all of my husband’s family were either murdered or told to leave home. And now, as a Jew living in a Jewish country, I have to leave home, and it’s really devastating.”

They pushed in, and a female soldier physically held our hands and took us towards the bus. We had to wait on the buses for hours in crazy summer heat.

Different communities were different. Some were easier. Some were harder. They did carry my husband to the bus, because he wouldn’t go willingly.

What happened to the rest of your belongings?

We weren’t allowed to go back after. What happened in the end is that we were taken to hotel up north, and the soldiers packed up our belongings. There was some damage. It was in boxes for like, three, four months, and some stuff got ruined. It wasn’t the worst, but other people had mold and water damage.

When you said ‘devastating’ — can you describe that?

I have friends who still feel the psychological damage today. I work in psychology, and was speaking to one of our students last night, and I asked her how she’s doing, and she’s like, “Don’t even talk to me.” She just came back from a memorial from the community that she lived in, and it was just devastating. And she lost a lot of friends living there who were murdered. I have friends who have it much harder than I did.

Was the disengagement a mistake?

I think it was a big mistake on many, many, many different levels.

Emotionally, it was a disaster. You can imagine they even dug up cemeteries.

Before us, most of it was no man’s land, not built up. Before we came there wasn’t an agricultural industry. We had schools, medical clinics, and an army presence that prevented terror from Rafah and Khan Yunis. But once we left they were able to build tunnels, smuggle weapons for twenty years. That didn’t happen when we were living there, because we had the army there.

Did you foresee that everything would go mad after the Jews left Gaza?

Yeah. You can’t make any deals with people who don’t have respect for human life, and all they want is to kill Jews. You can’t make a deal with people who haven’t kept deals before.

 Sody Naimer.

Sody Naimer, originally from Montreal, works in the Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. He’s also a director of a clinic near Schechem, works as a pediatrician, and acts as a consultant for plastic surgery and dermatology to neighbouring physicians and clinics. While living in Gaza he invented a groundbreaking new medical bandage.

When did you arrive in Israel?

In sixth grade, and my siblings and I have been here ever since, thank goodness.

Why and when did you decide to settle in Gaza?

We were looking for rural community where our children could enjoy the expanses. So, the sand dunes and shore of Gaza seemed suitable at the time. There was no terror, no threats, there were no fences.

We sought a community with customs in line with the religious Judaism … encompassing agriculture, child rearing and growth along the breathtaking shores of the Mediterranean

We had nine children in the course of this. That was from 1988, for 16 years, until we were actually thrown out of there.

What was the disengagement like for you?

We refused to cooperate with the forces. The forces were sent to our house to uproot us.

I said, “We have absolutely no privilege by any means of law or ethics to uproot your fellow man from his livelihood, from his home. There’s no expectations of any peace agreement or any benefit that you may think. And, therefore, there’s no way that I’m going to abandon the home I built with my own hands. I’m not going to just walk out.”

And besides my wife, who was in her ninth month of pregnancy, and the little children, all the rest of us were carried out by the soldiers.

We made a point that we wouldn’t resist with any violence at all. And therefore, besides barricading the house, they had to break their way in. We were thrown in to busses.

What happened when you left?

They put our family of nine in three hotel rooms.

But you can imagine how heartbreaking it was for me, to be, for well over 10 years, the number one senior medical provider for the whole community there? You just feel hollow. I mean, there are cases that we managed, to save lives — one of a child that got a mortar shrapnel through his brain.

Today, he’s 22 years old, and he’s alive and kicking. And besides some walking disability, he has no brain deficit whatsoever.

What happened was that the terror got worse and worse until eventually we were thrown out against our will.

I actually published a paper about the evacuees, and the price they paid. There is a surge in cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, including weight gain, etc. just because of the uprooting itself, which is a terrible thing to do.

When you left Gaza, would you have foreseen October 7?

There was a

video clip of me

all over social media lately, me held by four soldiers, holding each of my limbs. I yelled out, I cried out, exactly what was going to happen. I told everyone that you’re going to see thousands of perpetrators of terror going through the Philadelphi route, there will be missiles in Ashkelon, murder in Netivot (13 km from Sderot), there’s going to be mortars in Sderot.

I yelled at the soldiers: “You’re never going to forget this deed that you’re performing right now. You’ll have nightmares at night, and you’ll never forgive yourself.”

This clip circulates each time they lob bombs and rockets.

I said: “We’re going to be bombarded by terror acts and violence and we showed weakness.

Whenever we show weakness, this is exactly what happens.”

The only way to fight terror is with heightened force.

Should Jews return to Gaza?

There was a conference lately regarding the future of Gaza, and there are solid plans to renew the settlement; not only Gaza shore, but throughout the Gaza Strip,

It could be thriving, fulfilling, prosperous for everybody.

National Post, with files from Atara Beck


Canadian businessman Mohamad Fakih at his Order of Canada induction ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa on December 14, 2022.

Members of the Jewish community and former parliamentarians are calling for Ontario restaurateur Mohamad Fakih to lose his Order of Canada honour after he wrote that Canadian supporters of Israel “do not have basic human values.”

“Three parties. Three regions. One shared belief: the Order of Canada must reflect the values that unite us,” reads a letter from former Progressive Conservative of Ontario MPP Lisa MacLeod, former B.C. NDP MLA and cabinet minister Selina Robinson and former Liberal MP Kevin Vuong, that was

published on social media

Friday afternoon.

They called Fakih’s statement “not simply divisive” but a “direct assault on the dignity and belonging of millions of Canadians,” in their letter addressed to Chief Justice Richard Wagner. “This is not a partisan matter. It is a non-political, values-driven concern about preserving the integrity of one of Canada’s highest civilian honours,” they said.

Fakih’s message came after Israel struck Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, a town in Gaza. The Gaza Health Ministry, an institution run by Hamas, said over twenty people were

killed

in the strike, with other organizations reporting five journalists and several health-care workers were among the fatalities and Israel saying at least six Hamas terrorists were killed. The Israeli army is investigating the circumstances of the attack and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called it a “tragic mishap” on Monday.

“On behalf of literally every Canadian of conscience: if you are a Canadian and a supporter of Israel, you do not have basic human values, let alone Canadian values. Your tweets and messages are saved and known to all of us. They live,” Fakih

wrote

in an X post on Monday. “Some might not comment around you, because they are polite or respectful of whatever role you have in society or just don’t want to roll in the mud with you. But know this: your lack of Canadian and human values will never be forgotten.”

Fakih is a Lebanese-Canadian immigrant based in Mississauga, Ont., and the founder of the Middle Eastern food chain, Paramount Fine Foods. He gained a

reputation

 for

philanthropic

activities such as supporting victims of an Islamophobic terrorist attack in London, Ont., and employing Syrian refugees who had recently arrived in Canada. In a statement provided to National Post on Friday, he stood by his comments on the war.

“The world has been watching a genocide unfold in Gaza, with children and women killed, hospitals and schools bombed, journalists and doctors targeted. Pro-Israel voices in Canada continue to defend the actions of Netanyahu’s Israel that are not consistent with Canadian values. This is why so many Canadians, including Jewish Canadians, are speaking out,” he said in a written statement shared via a spokesperson.

“I have consistently advocated for Palestinian rights, the protection of civilians, and for Canada to stop arming Israel and deliver urgent aid. History will remember those who speak out for justice, and those who fail to denounce Netanyahu and Israel’s war crimes. For taking this stand, I have faced intimidation and smear campaigns. I will not be silenced in bringing awareness to Israel’s ongoing crimes, a responsibility that comes with the honour of being a member of the Order of Canada.”

In November 2021, Fakih was

awarded

the Order of Canada, which

describes

itself as “the cornerstone of the Canadian Honours System.” Created in 1967, the distinction is presented by the Governor General to recognize “outstanding achievement, dedication to the community and service to the nation.” Prominent recipients include

Wayne Gretzky

,

Margaret Atwood

,

Pierre Berton

and

Leonard Cohen

.

“Mohamad Fakih is a passionate community leader and humanitarian. Exemplifying the immigrant success story, he transformed a struggling restaurant into a thriving franchise chain across North America,” the original announcement

reads

.

Condemnations were shared in the comments soon after Fakih posted his social media message Monday. Fellow Lebanese-Canadian academic Gad Saad satirized his message.

“I have a lot of family in Israel, and I care about their wellbeing. Is this something that I’m allowed to feel or does it violate Canadian and human values? I thank you for serving as my Islamic moral mentor,” the former Concordia researcher

wrote in an X post

.

The Canadian Antisemitism Education Foundation (CAEF) sent a letter on Monday addressed to

Brigadier General Marc Theriault

, the deputy secretary of honours in the Governor General’s office, requesting Fakih’s Order of Canada be rescinded.

“In our view, Mr. Fakih’s behaviour constitutes a significant departure from generally-recognized standards of public behaviour which is seen to undermine the credibility, integrity or relevance of the Order, or detracts from the original grounds upon which the appointment was based,” the

group

wrote.

“Members of the Order of Canada are intended to serve as living examples of Canada’s values,” CAEF president Michael Teper told the Post in a written statement. “Mr. Fakih’s statement that millions of Canadian supporters of Israel, including the overwhelming majority of Jewish Canadians, ‘do not have basic human values’ is disgraceful and, in our organization’s view, his continuing membership brings the Order of Canada into disrepute.”

Philippe Lagassé, an associate professor at the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs, knowledgeable about the workings of the Canadian government and the role of the Governor General, confirmed there is a “

termination policy

” for the Order of Canada when contacted by the Post.

“The Deputy Secretary has to believe that the claim for termination has merit, then the Advisory Council will get involved,” he wrote in an email. “There are quite a few steps after that. It will only get to the GG (Governor General) at the end.”

A joint letter defending Fakih was sent to the Governor General on

Friday

, featuring the signatures of leaders from several national pro-Palestinian groups, including the Canadian Muslim Public Affairs Council, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East and Independent Jewish Voices.

The signatories dismissed the calls to strip Fakih of his award as part of an attempt to “divert attention from these atrocities and canceling advocates for justice as threats to peace.”

“Mr. Fakih’s post, calling for accountability for those enabling genocide in Gaza, is not an attack on any ethnic or religious group. It is a condemnation of state violence and the targeting of civilians, journalists, and healthcare workers, as documented by the United Nations and numerous international human rights organizations,” the letter reads.

MacLeod, who is a Macdonald-Laurier Institute ambassador, told the Post in an email that she, Robinson and Vuong were “standing up for Canada” in calling for Fakih’s comments to disqualify him from being a member of the Order of Canada.

“We have no election to win, only a country to protect,” she wrote. “This is a line in the sand and it’s drawn not in anger, but in defence of who we are.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Joe Rooke, accused in the stabbing of an Ottawa Jewish woman.

An anti-religion zealot who quit his job to pursue years of unrealistic court challenges and diatribes against religious belief — such as demanding justices of the Supreme Court resign for swearing an oath of office that invokes God — increasingly turned his public ire to one group, Jews, in the months leading up to his arrest after a Jewish woman was stabbed at an Ottawa grocery store on Wednesday.

Joseph (Joe) Rooke, 71, of Cornwall, Ont., has been charged with aggravated assault and possession of a dangerous weapon. Ottawa police said Friday the case is considered a hate-motivated crime.

Ottawa police said a woman in her 70s was stabbed in the torso by a stranger as she shopped at a west-end Loblaws, a grocery store known for having the largest kosher selection in the city. She survived and has been released from hospital. A male surrendered peacefully to police. The Jewish Federation of Ottawa said the victim was a “cherished member of our community” but did not release her identity, for her privacy.

Political leaders, including Prime Minister Mark Carney and Ontario Premier Doug Ford, community leaders and Jewish groups are decrying the attack as another in a growing list of alarming antisemitic violence.

It is easier to jump to that allegation in this case because of court documents on Rooke’s failed legal pursuits and the virulence and frequency of posts on a public Facebook account that appears to be his.

After all, he declares it himself.

“Yes I am antisemitic and atheist,” says a Facebook post published on Canada Day this summer, part of a long anti-religion treatise that focuses on Judaism, Jews and Israel.

He follows his criticism of Israel for its role in the Gaza conflict by saying: “Judaism is the world’s oldest cult.” In the same post he writes “over time jews have become insidious in governments, businesses, media conglomerates, and educational institutions in order to do what they do better than anyone else. Jews are the world’s masters of propaganda, gaslighting, demonization, demagoguery, and outright lying. Using their collective wealth they have become masters of reprisal.”

About a year earlier, a post reads: “I am under no obligation whatsoever, legal, moral, or otherwise, to like jews and I do not. If that means I meet the jewish definition of an anti-semite, so be it.”

Rooke’s page documents harsh anti-religious, atheist beliefs and his increasingly frustrated obsession with pressing his point, in social media and in the courts.

His page lists his occupation as a “digital creator” and says he moved to Cornwall from Ottawa in the summer of 2020 but was originally from Hamilton, which, according to court records, he left in 2006.

In court documents says he is a status Indian and on social media he posted about members of the Six Nations of the Grand River, a First Nations reserve southwest of Hamilton, saying they are his relatives.

In 2017 he posted a childhood photo and noted: “I think I was better looking and probably nicer and easier to get along with then!”

Before the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel by Hamas, his public posts and his court actions spread the hate among religions more evenly. His public ire was more focused on Catholics and Muslims.

In July 2019, he quit his job to push his legal challenges and his obsessive anti-religious ideas. He announced on Facebook: “I quit my job on Friday so I can focus all my time on getting 2 legal actions through.”

Neither action was successful, even though he fought all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada.

In 2017 he mounted a legal challenge against the Canada Revenue Agency in the Tax Court of Canada, apparently over a scholarship offered to him in 2011 by the University of Waterloo. That matter veered into his anti-religious zealotry, as he mounted a challenged over a professor at the school being called as a witness, declaring the prof has “no credibility” because he is “a staunch Catholic.”

“I know his answers already since we sparred about the issue during lectures,” he wrote. “I have had many interactions regarding the absolute nonsense of God/Allah and religion.” His case was eventually dismissed, despite Rooke’s continued objections and appeals.

 The Loblaws in Ottawa where a Jewish woman was stabbed while in the kosher section.

In 2018, Rooke launched another court case, this one in the Federal Court of Canada. Unrepresented by legal counsel, he asked for the certification of a class-action lawsuit against the federal government over dental care for status Indians.

According to his court filing, obtained by National Post, he said his application for dental coverage from his dentist for a broken front tooth in 2015 was rejected the same day it was submitted. He said the system meant “the automatic denial of applications by bureaucrats.”

He meticulously documented his journey trying to have his tooth fixed and covered by the government and tried to file a class-action suit on behalf of all First Nations members denied dental care. He also asked his fees be waived. He filed a handwritten note that said he was unemployed living on a pension income of $2,443 a month, and asked the court to tell him what to do next to press his case. His issue was dismissed.

He reapplied, this time paying the $150 filing fee. It went through several stages of the court process before it too was refused. He then sought to appeal the decision, in 2019, asking for a new judge as well as the return of his $150. He claimed the judge was biased against him.

Here too, he leaned in on his anti-religious belief.

His argument was that all judges are biased due to their “religious beliefs,” as confirmed by their oath of office that include swearing “so help me God.” A judge hearing this argument used that against him: If all judges were biased then there was no point in handing his case over to any other judge. His request for the return of his filing fee was also denied, and he was ordered to pay a modest $250 towards the government’s legal fees.

Rooke continued to push the issue, trying to turn it into a challenge of judicial authority on the grounds of religion, eventually putting his case before the Supreme Court of Canada. He became fixated on the fact that even justices of the Supreme Court swear an oath to God.

“If the nine justices of the Supreme Court are unwilling or unable to defend their religious beliefs by forwarding credible and provable facts, then they should do the honourable thing and resign from their honourable positions as respected jurists,” he wrote.

He sought declarations from each of the justices that they believe in God, otherwise, “they have proven they cannot rightly and honestly hold the position with credibility and integrity.”

In an affidavit filed in his appeal he wrote: “Notwithstanding the endless, nonsensical claims to the contrary there are no tangible gods … When a person prays, they are praying to nothing.”

The Supreme Court declined to hear his case.

His older Facebook posts do not focus on Judaism or Jews.

He frequently wrote long pieces on social issues, usually revolving around his atheist beliefs and attacking “religious leaders of all faiths.” His most frequent targets were Christianity and Islam.

On Christmas Eve 2016 he complains of “silly” Christmas content: “Contrived and ostentatious religious Christmas rituals are at the top of this list and the Vatican is silliness central. It is the centre of the absurd and the nonsensical where one man in a big hat, adorned like a bland Christmas tree, will portray himself as something he is not.”

He tries to rebrand Christmas as a non-religious celebration, calling it Humanity Day.

In 2019, in another public essay, he wrote of the “ignorance and intransience” of the world’s religions, adding: “only the brands differ —catholic, Anglican, evangelical, Muslim, Sikh, Buddhist, etc. At their base they are all nonetheless composed of nonsense.” He didn’t even mention Judaism.

Ottawa police said it has been in contact with leaders of the Jewish community after the incident.

Ottawa police said detectives have reviewed some of the accused’s social media comments as part of an ongoing investigation. Police said investigators are looking at all potential motives behind the attack.

“Directives have been issued to officers to increase their presence in areas of significance to the Jewish community,” the police said in a public release.

Ottawa Mayor Mark Sutcliffe said he has spoken to the victim.

Pauline Colwin, a spokesperson with the Jewish Federation of Ottawa said the woman’s identity was not being released out of respect for the family’s privacy.

“Federation leadership has been in touch with the family to offer support, and we are grateful to know that she is recovering at home.”

None of the allegations against Rooke have been proven in court. He is scheduled to return to court on Sept. 2.

National Post with additional reporting by Gary Dimmock, Ottawa Citizen

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | X:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Students walk on campus at the University of Calgary.

New data released by the federal government show that the number of international students coming to Canada dropped significantly in the first half of the year.

Figures show

there were 214,520 fewer arrivals in Canada between January and June of 2025 compared to the same period in the previous year.

Of those, 88,617 represented a reduction in the number of new student arrivals, while the remainder, 125,903 fewer arrivals, was a drop in new foreign workers.

For the month of June, there were 4,185 new student arrivals this year, compared to 11,287 last June. Those numbers tend to climb with the start of the new school year — last August saw an influx of almost 80,000 international students — but July and August numbers for 2025 when they are calculated are likely to continue the trend of fewer arrivals.

In 2024 the government announced a cap of approximately 360,000 approved study permits, a decrease of 35 per cent from 2023. For 2025 a further 10 per cent reduction was announced.

“We have committed to returning immigration to sustainable levels, including reducing Canada’s temporary population to less than 5 per cent,” the government said in releasing the latest figures.

It noted that the numbers only include new study and work permits. They do not cover asylum claimants, permit extensions, seasonal agricultural workers, or workers under the Temporary Foreign Worker Program who are in Canada for fewer than 270 days in the same calendar year.

“These workers meet immediate labour needs, often in industries like tourism or construction,” the government said in its release.

In 2023, stories of foreign students being unable to

find proper housing

and sometimes

turning to food banks

caused widespread discussion about whether Canada was letting in too many people, with negative effects on housing costs and availability.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks to the media during an announcement in Brampton, Ont., on Friday, August 29, 2025.

OTTAWA — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is calling on the federal government to spell out in law that Canadians have the right to use force, including deadly force, against someone who enters their home illegally and poses a threat to their safety.

It is the latest tough-on-crime proposal from Poilievre and it comes at a time when public debate has been stirring over a high-profile arrest in the country. An Ontario man was arrested earlier this month and charged with aggravated assault regarding his alleged actions in response to a suspected

cross-bow wielding intruder,

who has also been charged with carrying a weapon and break-and-enter.

Standing in the backyard of a family home in Brampton, Ont., on Friday, Poilievre proclaimed that “your home is your castle” and called for Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government to amend the section of the Criminal Code on self-defence.

Specifically, he called for a change to that section to say that “the use of force, including lethal force, is presumed reasonable against an individual who unlawfully enters a house and poses a threat to the safety of anyone inside.”

“It means you have the right to use force to defend your home and your family against someone who threatens you and who has entered illegally.”

Poilievre vowed that Conservatives would advance their own private member’s bill should Carney’s government fail to take up his proposal. On Friday, Justice Minister Sean Fraser appeared to throw cold water on the idea.

“This isn’t the Wild West. It’s Canada. Canadians deserve real solutions that make us safer, not slogans that inspire fear and chaos for Pierre’s political survival,”

wrote Fraser, on social media

.

Poilievre’s use of the term “castle” refers to provisions based on the “Castle Doctrine” that exist in U.S. states that allow residents to use force, including deadly force, without being put to the same tests that exist within Canada about whether their actions were reasonable or not.

Canadian criminal law on self-defence states that a person is not guilty when they believe “on reasonable grounds” that force or the threat of it was being used against them and that their actions could be considered to have happened in defence of themselves and to be “reasonable in the circumstances.”

The law outlines nine different factors that Crown prosecutors and police use to determine whether a person’s action constitutes being “reasonable,” including the nature of the threat, whether weapons were used, pre-existing personal relationships between those involved, as well as the physical size and gender of those involved.

Poilievre called those conditions “very complicated” and “vague” during his press conference on Friday, saying no one has time to think about them when they find their home threatened.

He says his proposal would make it clear that when someone enters a home illegally and a person inside has a reason to believe they are in danger, the force they used would be deemed reasonable.

Boris Bytensky, the president of the Criminal Lawyers’ Association, said Poilievre’s proposal would not make “anything any worse for anybody,” but at the same time says, “it’s not going to make it any better for anybody.”

He suggests that a “bit of a misunderstanding” may be at play, given there is a major difference between someone who is charged with a crime versus someone who has been convicted, and that it falls to the Crown to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that someone did not “act reasonably” or in self-defence.

“When you unpack the current proposal, it amounts to nothing more than basically confirming that the presumption of innocence applies when somebody uses force inside their own house against the intruder.”

When it comes to the case of the Ontario man charged in relation to an alleged intruder trying to enter his apartment, Bytensky said the facts of the case are not yet known.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford pointed to the situation this week to say “something is broken.” Ford has also been a vocal critic of criminal bail laws as well as judges.

Bytensky suggested the proposal from Poilievre would not prevent police from taking action should they suspect someone’s actions in the case of a break-in to have been unreasonable.

“If the police suspected that somebody wandered into your home and was not a threat to you, and you used unreasonable force — that you bludgeoned somebody with a baseball bat when they had turned their back and in the process of leaving and were no longer a threat to you — neither this new provision, nor the current law, would protect that person,” he said.

Criminal defence lawyer Alex

De Boyrie said he believes Poilievre’s proposal “would definitely have avoided a charge” in the recent case against the Ontario man, as well as the second-degree murder charge that was ultimately withdrawn in the previous case of a Milton, Ont., man who was accused in the death of a home intruder.

De Boyrie said when it comes to clients he has been involved with, charges have been “withdrawn quite often” in cases of self-defence. One issue, he says, is that assessing self-defence is difficult, adding that there is a lower threshold to lay a charge against someone than to proceed with prosecuting a case.

Bytensky said his experience has been that police tend to be “sympathetic” towards situations involving an intruder in someone’s home and do not pursue charges without “strong reason” to believe a crime has been committed, which is why he cautions against speculation.

Still, De Boyrie said many are confused by Canada’s self-defence laws and believes more clarification and even education would be useful.

“Clients are almost always confused as to why they were charged… and why the police didn’t listen to them when they advised them that they were acting in self-defence,” he said.

“There’s unfortunate circumstances where somebody swings on you and you happen to swing back and you’re stronger than them, or you land a better punch than them, and you unfortunately break their bone or break a nose … then you’re looking at a charge, and is that necessarily fair? I would say no.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Last month, the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) issued a $1.075 million fine against the British Columbia Lottery Corporation (BCLC).

OTTAWA — A single, high-rolling casino slots player is at the centre of a nasty $1 million fight between British Columbia’s gambling authority and the federal anti-money laundering watchdog, court documents allege.

Last month, the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) issued a $1.075 million fine against the British Columbia Lottery Corporation (BCLC).

The bulk of the fine was for failing to submit two suspicious transaction reports relating to one “high-risk patron.” FINTRAC says there were reasonable grounds to suspect that money laundering or terrorist activity funding was at play in those transactions.

“Due to the patron’s rate of play and the volume of funds, along with other factors, British Columbia Lottery Corporation should have identified the patron as high-risk and should have applied prescribed special measures,” reads the

violation notice published by FINTRAC

.

The investigation into the “very serious” violation also found that BCLC failed to consider numerous “money laundering and terrorist financing indicators” that required the agency to flag the transactions to FINTRAC.

The fines come just three years after Commissioner Austin Cullen published a

scathing report on money laundering in B.C

. His public inquiry concluded that BCLC and law enforcement were aware of the growing problem of money laundering under their noses but failed to act for years.

“(BCLC managers) stood by and permitted BC casinos to accept vast sums of illicit cash. BCLC’s approach reflected a completely unacceptable and unreasonable risk tolerance,” read the report.

But in a lawsuit filed last week, BCLC says FINTRAC conducted a botched investigation and is asking a Federal Court judge to quash the fine.

The lawsuit sheds light on growing tension between BCLC and the federal regulator that began when FINTRAC “ambushed” the provincial gambling corporation with the investigation into its anti-money laundering checks in late 2024, reads the document.

The lawsuit argues that the investigation was conducted unfairly, that FINTRAC ignored information provided by BCLC and the final decision failed to consider improvements the gambling agency made to its anti-money laundering program.

At the centre of the battle is the province’s biggest slot machine gambler, identified in court filings as BCLC’S “#1 High-Volume Encore Slot Patron.”

“The (FINTRAC) director relied on her subjective view, or the subjective view of the FINTRAC examination team, that the Patron was simply gambling too much,” reads BCLC’s lawsuit.

The lawsuit does not identify the patron, the source of their wealth nor how much they gamble. But the document says BCLC reported 541 “casino disbursement reports” of over $10,000 to the patron between March 1, 2017, and Feb. 28, 2018, suggesting a minimum payout of $5.41 million that year.

A FINTRAC report quoted in the lawsuit says the watchdog found the “high risk” patron uncooperative and accused the gambler of having provided “false, misleading, or incorrect information” namely about their occupation and property ownership.

But BCLC says it and the provincial gambling regulator both investigated the patron in 2024 and found “nothing unusual or suspicious” other than a frequent use of $100 bills to gamble.

“The (FINTRAC) Director failed to consider the Patron’s facility with the English language or the country from which the Patron emigrated to Canada/from which the Patron’s funds originate,” reads the lawsuit.

“(FINTRAC) failed to consider whether the perceived uncooperativeness and inconsistencies arose from linguistic and cultural differences.”

FINTRAC has not yet filed a reply to Federal Court. In a press release announcing the fine Thursday, FINTRAC Director and CEO Sarah Paquet said the watchdog is “firm in ensuring that businesses continue to their part” in fighting money laundering and terrorist financing.

The provincial agency also argued that the amount of money the gambler has bet is lower than FINTRAC claims because it doesn’t account for churn, or the amount of money bet that was obtained from previous gambling winnings.

BCLC says FINTRAC discounted its churn analysis of the patron as a mere “accounting exercise.”

“The Director also wrongly concluded that BCLC had not obtained information about the Patron’s sources of funds and wealth, and that BCLC imposed a ‘ban’ on the Patron when this was not the case,” reads the lawsuit.

BCLC also accused FINTRAC of failing to give it a reasonable amount of time to reply to its investigation before issuing the fine.

“BCLC takes its responsibilities under Canadian anti-money laundering legislation very seriously. It is confident in its position that it has fully complied with all its legal and regulatory obligations,”

the agency said in a statement Wednesday.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


An Ottawa Police Service car shown on May 6, 2025.

A man has been charged after a woman in her 70s was stabbed Wednesday afternoon at a kosher grocery store in Ottawa.

Ottawa police said one of its criminal investigations units is in charge and is being supported by the Hate and Bias Crime Unit.

According to police, the incident occurred just after 1:30 p.m. when the woman went into the store with a friend. “She was approached by a man who stabbed her leaving her with serious injuries,” police said in a news release.

Police were called and officers arrested the suspect, a 71-year-old man.

Staff from the store helped the woman until paramedics arrived. She was treated at a hospital and later released. Police said the suspect and the victim did not know each other.

“Detectives continue to investigate the matter to ensure all aspects of the case are understood and charges are expected,” police said.

In a Facebook post on Thursday, the Jewish Federation of Ottawa (JFO) said the woman is a “cherished” member of the community and she was recovering. The group said it wouldn’t be sharing further details about her out of respect for her privacy.

The group said the incident occurred at a kosher Loblaws.

We have all been deeply shaken by the stabbing incident that took place yesterday afternoon at the Baseline Kosher…

Posted by JFO: Jewish Federation of Ottawa on Thursday, August 28, 2025

JFO has been in touch with police and “relevant authorities, including hate crimes investigators and the Chief of Police.” It has also reached out to Loblaws “to begin discussions on ways to ensure Jewish community members feel safe while shopping.”

There was “no indication of increased risk to Jewish facilities or institutions,” per JFO.

The suspect appeared in court on Thursday, police said.

He was charged with aggravated assault and possession of a dangerous weapon.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A DJI Mavic 3 Pro like the one used by Canadian Xiao Guang Pan to unlawfully photograph and film U.S. military installations at Cape Canaveral, Fla. in January 2025.

A Chinese-born Canadian man caught using a drone to take over 200 unauthorized photos and videos of the Cape Canaveral Space Force Base in Florida earlier this year — later feigning ignorance about his transgression when interviewed by federal agents — pleaded guilty to charges and was sentenced recently.

And while 71-year-old Xiao Guang Pan of Brampton, Ont., got away with just 12 months probation from a U.S. district court judge in August, his sentencing included a deportation order for violating American espionage laws.

According to his bio on the

Brampton Arts Organization (BAO) website

, the Chinese national, who immigrated to Canada in 2001, is an “enthusiastic drone photographer/videographer” who has visited “almost every American state, 10 countries in Europe, New Zealand and Australia, and has been to nearly all of Canada’s famous scenic locations.”

National Post previously confirmed

with BAO that Pan had been part of a photo exhibition to celebrate Brampton’s 50th birthday last year, but a spokesperson said they’d had no contact with him since, and provided no comment on his U.S. legal troubles.

According to court documents obtained by National Post, Pan entered the U.S. on a tourist visa via the Ambassador Peace Bridge between Ontario and Michigan in early November 2024.

It’s not explained in the documents where Pan was in the following months, but an

Instagram account

operated by someone with the same name and listing the same DJI Mavic 3 Pro drone that Pan was forced to forfeit to U.S. justice officials shared images from Texas on Nov. 20 and Orlando on Dec. 5.

Regardless, officials said Pan had made his way to the Cape Canaveral area in eastern Florida in early 2025.

On Jan. 7, after NASA officials detected drone activity near the Space Force base, local sheriff’s officers found Pan operating the drone in the parking lot at Port Canaveral. After finding out it was his third day of flying and photographing the area, the matter was turned over to federal officials.

“Pan told the agents that he had flown his drone to take pictures of the beauty of nature, the sunrise and the cruise ship port,” reads his June plea agreement. “He stated that he had not seen any launch pads and that he did not know that he was near a military installation.”

A forensic analysis of his equipment and data, however, suggested Pan was well aware of where he was and what he was photographing.

Between the drone and a telephoto lens on a separate camera, officials found 1,919 photos and videos, of which 243 still images and 13 videos “showed military infrastructure” at the Space Force Base.

On his first day, Pan used the telephoto lens from “several miles away” to record two videos and take 21 photos of the base, capturing fuel and munition storage areas and several military and defence contractor assets, including “a Space Launch Complex and payload processing facilities.”

Pan returned on Jan. 6, this time closer to the base, launched his drone and proceeded to take another nine videos and 166 photos of the base “in higher quality and from different angles.”

On the day of his arrest, Pan sent the drone skyward in Class D controlled airspace just outside the base’s restricted airspace border, where he got two more videos and 56 photos of roads, security checkpoints and infrastructure related to power distribution, mission control infrastructure, national security space launch, and the Navy, including a submarine wharf.

A forensic review of his phone also revealed several screenshots of Google Maps satellite overviews of the area with the base name “prominently displayed.”

During his interview, Pan also told agents that he hadn’t received any automated alerts or warnings from the drone on his handset regarding altitude or airspace violations. Again, the data betrayed him, as the device “logged several alerts and sent the operator messages” each day.

 Airspace warnings from the drone are sent to the DJI RC Pro remote control held by the operator.

According to his plea deal, Pan had been informed that “lying to federal agents is a federal crime.”

Pan was formally charged in February with three counts of using an aircraft for the unlawful photographing of defence installations without authorization. Each count carried a maximum penalty of one year in prison and/or a $100,000 fine, according to federal court records.

Following his arrest, Pan sought permission to return to Canada “for medical treatment” but was denied and was ordered to remain in the Middle District of Florida until proceedings concluded.

Judge Gregory Presnell delivered the sentence on Aug. 12 and Pan has since been returned to Canada by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials.

As part of his deportation, Pan is also barred from re-entering the U.S. without the “express permission” of the government.

National Post has contacted him for comment.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks during a press conference in the Foyer of the House of Commons in Ottawa, on Friday, Aug. 22, 2025.

OTTAWA — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre says he is waiting to speak to American lawmakers and argue Canada’s case “at the appropriate time.”

Poilievre made the comments in a podcast episode that aired Thursday as he prepares to return to the House of Commons next month, fresh off last week’s byelection win in rural Alberta.

“At some point, at the appropriate time, we will be engaging with American lawmakers to make the case for Canada and to make the case for the North American relationship,” Poilievre told The Elev8 Podcast, which comments on Canadian politics.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s efforts to strike a deal with U.S. President Donald Trump to lower or outright remove his tariffs on Canadian goods have dominated his first four months in office since winning the April federal election.

That election saw Poilievre try to keep his focus on cost-of-living and crime issues, which prompted concerns within his own party and internal debates that he was failing to pivot fast enough to address the Canada-U.S. relationship.

Before the campaign began, Poilievre decided against voicing public support for what former prime minister Justin Trudeau termed as his “Team Canada” approach for dealing with the U.S., with Conservative caucus members making scant mention of Trump.

Since then, Poilievre has stated that Conservatives were willing to work with Carney’s government to help secure a deal for Canada, but that he has not heard back.

Reached for comment, his office did not provide specifics when asked how Conservatives would decide it was “the appropriate time” to talk to American lawmakers.

A spokesman reiterated that Poilievre and his critic for Canada-U.S. relations “have reached out multiple times to offer any and all help to the Carney Liberals in negotiations with the Americans,” however, their “invitation has not been accepted yet, but it remains on the table.”

“While it is normal for Opposition leaders and (critics) to maintain relationships with their U.S. counterparts, we believe negotiations should be conducted along one official channel,” the spokesman said.

“Conservatives remain ready to assist securing the best deal for Canada. We will always put Canada first.”

A response from the office of Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc, who is Carney’s lead on negotiating with Trump officials, has not yet been returned.

LeBlanc returned on Wednesday from his latest meeting in Washington with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Carney and Trump spoke by phone on Aug. 21, the day before the prime minister announced Canada was dropping some of its retaliatory tariffs.

LeBlanc told The Canadian Press upon his arrival back in Canada that the meeting with Lutnick was “constructive.” The pair met on Tuesday morning for 90 minutes, roughly 30 minutes longer than what was initially scheduled. While the details are still being negotiated, both LeBlanc and Lutnick agreed to keep their conversations private.

During the podcast, Poilievre said his thinking when it came to getting involved in discussions with the Americans was that it should be “lawmaker-to-lawmaker” and “executive-to-executive.”

“I would not meet the executive branch, officially, of a foreign country without at least seeking some sort of cooperation with the government,” he said.

“Otherwise, the risk is that you’re trying to create a dual negotiating track, and I don’t think that is good for the country.”

The Conservative leader also pointed out that when Brian Mulroney met with former Republican president Ronald Reagan in 1984, before he would go on to win that year’s election, Mulroney did so with the “blessing” of former Liberal prime minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, and that Canada’s ambassador to Washington was present.

In terms of who Poilievre has spoken to, his office pointed to comments he made last month to CBC that he had spoken informally to Republican Rep. Pete Sessions and other American politicians who were attending the Calgary Stampede, where he reiterated Canada’s position, but has not engaged in formal discussions or travel to the U.S.

Poilievre has accused Carney of breaking the promise he made during the spring election campaign that he was the leader most able to negotiate with Trump by so far failing to strike a deal.

He has also said that Carney has offered more concessions to the American president than Canada has received in return, pointing to the scrapping of the digital services tax, which would have targeted U.S. tech companies, and the lifting of Canada’s counter-tariffs on U.S. goods in compliance with the free trade agreement between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico.

Carney has defended doing so as necessary to strike a deal with the U.S., and defended his approach by saying Canada was paying one of the lowest tariff rates, given U.S. exemptions to goods covered by the countries’ free trade agreement, which is scheduled for review in 2026.

While a large majority of Canadian goods are covered by the deal, the country is still dealing with U.S. tariffs applied to certain sectors, such as steel and aluminum, lumber, automobiles, and copper.

-With files from The Canadian Press

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.