LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani takes the stage at his primary election party, Wednesday, June 25, 2025, in New York.

OTTAWA — Two architects of Alberta NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi’s surprise victory in the 2010 Calgary mayor’s race say they’re feeling déjà vu after seeing another thirty-something Shia Muslim — with family ties to East Africa and Gujarat, India — upend the politics of a major North American city.

Stephen Carter, now

president of Decide Campaigns

, says he sees shades of his old boss in 33-year-old Zohran Mamdani, who rode an outsider campaign to victory in last week’s

New York City Democratic mayoral primary

.

“The similarities are hard to miss,” said Carter.

Carter said that, on top of the biographical similarities, Mamdani followed Nenshi’s playbook of using digital tools to build a strong personal brand that transcends party labels.

“I won’t pretend to be an expert on the inner workings of the Mamdani campaign but one thing I can say … is that the brand construction … was spectacularly implemented,” said Carter.

Fifteen years ago, Carter helped then 38-year-old Nenshi leverage newfangled social media platforms Facebook, YouTube and Twitter (now X) to launch a similarly powerful digital brand.

Nenshi’s then novel grassroots digital campaign helped him become the first Muslim mayor of a major North American city.

Carter says that the digital landscape has changed in the past 15 years but the fundamentals of building a political brand haven’t.

“Of all the things we talked about back in 2010, I think the strongest thing was actually the development of brand politics,” said Carter.

“Both parties and individual politicians have brands. And one thing we really thought hard about was where does the (candidate’s) brand lie?”

With Carter at the helm, the Nenshi campaign poured significant

resources into brand building

. For instance, candidate Nenshi frequently donned the colour purple

— a mixture of Liberal red and Conservative blue — to put himself above partisan politics.

Nenshi has held onto

his purple personal branding

since making the jump to provincial politics last year, despite admitting on a recent podcast appearance that purple

doesn’t coordinate especially well

with the Alberta NDP’s traditional orange.

 Naheed Nenshi participates in a mayoralty forum on Sept. 22, 2010. Jim Wells/QMI Agency.

Carter said Mamdani first crossed his radar a few weeks ago, when his social media algorithms started to feed him short videos,

known online as “reels,”

 promoting the upstart mayoral candidate.

“When you’re starting to see (reels) from a New York municipal election in Calgary, it grabs your attention. I’ll tell you that,” said Carter.

And while today’s young adults have migrated from Facebook and X to newer platforms like the China-owned TikTok, Carter says that the big picture remains pretty much the same.

“This is another one of those moments in time where a campaign comes along and captures the zeitgeist in a bottle,” said Carter.

Mamdani, a self-described democratic socialist, ran on an unabashedly far-left platform, promising New Yorkers a rent freeze, free buses and child care, a $30 dollar minimum wage and

city-run grocery stores

. He’s also aligned himself closely with

the “free Palestine” movement

, a cause

that roiled college campuses

in New York City and beyond last year.

This audacious platform, wrapped in a hip, telegenic package, propelled Mamdani past establishment rival Andrew Cuomo, formerly the governor of New York State.

Exit polling shows that

18-29 year olds

voted in the highest numbers in last week’s Democratic mayoral primary, after being one of the lowest voting demographics four years ago.

Mamdani will likely be the frontrunner in November’s general election, as the Democratic nominee in a city where Democrats dominate municipal politics.

Chima Nkemdirim, Nenshi’s longtime best friend and ex-chief of staff, stressed the ideological differences between Nenshi and Mamdani.

“The politics are a bit different. Actually, quite a bit different,” said Nkemdirim.

Nkemdirim noted that then university instructor Nenshi positioned himself as a forward-looking pragmatist to Calgarians, touting his business background and textbook knowledge of city planning.

Nenshi also differed stylistically from Mamdani, swapping out

the latter’s simple slogans

for a more detailed “politics in full sentences.”

Nkemdirim nevertheless sees a few similarities in how each candidate rose from obscurity by keeping an ear to the ground.

“I think the biggest similarity is that you’ve got two politicians that are really listening to what people want and telling them that they can get it,” said Nkemdirim.

“When you go back to 2010, study after study indicated that people wanted … a city where it was easy to walk around, where things were affordable, where you could ditch your car if you wanted to … and no politician was running on that,” remembers Nkemdirim.

“And when Naheed (Nenshi) ran, he said, well why can’t we do all that stuff?”

Nkemdirim said that Nenshi’s revolutionary idea of figuring out what sort of city Calgarians wanted, and then telling them how to get there, helped him go from

two per cent name recognition

60 days out to

an eight-point victory

on election night.

“I think that’s similar to what’s happening in New York. (Mamdani) is talking deeply about this issue of affordability … and saying, maybe we can do something about that.”

Nkemdirim admits that his friend Nenshi has yet to capture the same magic since entering provincial politics but says that listening is a skill that applies equally well in his new arena.

He notes that Premier Danielle Smith’s recent convening of

the Alberta Next panel

, a panel focused on narrowly appealing topics like

the Alberta Pension Plan

and creation of a provincial police force, gives Nenshi an opening to set up a genuine listening post.

“I think you’ll see that from Naheed over the summer. People want to talk about the issues that actually matter, as opposed to the manufactured ones the UCP is putting forward to them,” said Nkemdirim.

Nenshi won

last week’s Edmonton Strathcona byelection

in a landslide but still

trails Smith in popularity

.

He declined a request to be interviewed for this article.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Bobby Vylan of Bob Vylan crowdsurfs in front of the stage during day four of the annual Glastonbury Festival in Glastonbury, England, on June 28, 2025.

Montreal Liberal MP Anthony Housefather is calling on the Canadian government to bar the British rap duo Bob Vylan from Canada after the group led the crowd in a chant of death to the Israeli military at the Glastonbury Festival in the United Kingdom over the weekend.

On Monday, the U.S. State Department said that it had “revoked the U.S. visas” of the band members who performed at the festival in southwest England on Saturday, ahead of several American tour dates in October and November. “Foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country,” Christopher Landau, the deputy secretary of state

wrote

on X.

The announcement prompted Housefather, a former 

special adviser

on antisemitism and Jewish community relations under then prime minister Justin Trudeau, to demand the Carney government follow suit. Bob Vylan is set to perform in Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Toronto and Montreal in December.

“This is a good decision by the United States,” Housefather wrote on Monday afternoon. “The incitement by Bob Vylan and his band at Glastonbury have no place in North America. I have been in touch with the minister of public safety and believe that Mr. Vylan’s actions should render him inadmissible to Canada.”

On Saturday, frontman Bobby Vylan shouted “Free, free Palestine” while on stage, before leading the crowd to chant “Death, death to the IDF (Israel Defense Forces).”

On social media on Sunday, Vylan, whose real name is Pascal Robinson-Foster, appeared to stand by his comments. In an Instagram post captioned “I said what I said,” he wrote that he has received “messages of both support and hatred” over his performance.

“Teaching our children to speak up for the change they want and need is the only way that we make this world a better place,” he wrote.

In an email to National Post Monday afternoon, Housefather said that “Vylan’s conduct in Glastonbury should render him inadmissible for entry and I sent the information on what occurred to the minister (of public safety) and his team.”

The ministry did not respond to the Post’s request for comment in time for publication.

Members of the Conservative party have echoed Housefather’s call to ban Bob Vylan from Canada.

“The U.K.’s Labour government has decried this person’s performance as ‘hate speech,’ and the United States will not allow them entry to do the same,” Conservative NP Michelle Rempel Garner, the MP for Calgary Nose Hill,

wrote

shortly after Housefather’s initial post, tagging the minister of immigration, refugees and citizenship in her message. “I call upon Canada’s government to do the same and deny any requests from this group to enter Canada.”

Rempel Garner reiterated her demand after one user commented on her original message with a list of several Canadian tour stops. “They should not be allowed into Canada to spread their hate,” she

responded

.

Vylan’s comments before a packed crowd filled with Palestinian and Lebanese flags drew the condemnation of the Glastonbury Festival’s organizers and even British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The Labour Party leader

said

in a statement, “There is no excuse for this kind of appalling hate speech,” and said the BBC “needs to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast.” The publicly funded news network has faced

allegations

of anti-Israel bias in its coverage of the war in the Middle East.

On Monday, the BBC

apologized

for streaming the event with an on-screen warning and said Vylan’s comments were “utterly unacceptable and have no place on our airwaves.”

The Avon and Somerset Police also issued a

statement

saying “a criminal investigation is now being undertaken” into Vylan’s comments. “There is absolutely no place in society for hate,” the police added. The Northern Irish group Kneecap, which also performed at the Glastonbury Festival, was also listed in the police announcement. The group had its American visa pulled over anti-Israel comments made during a performance at Coachella earlier this year after the band displayed the following

message

: “F–k Israel/Free Palestine.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A tax cut lowering the lowest federal income rate takes effect on Canada Day, offering modest savings to most Canadians but drawing doubts.

With a middle-class tax cut promised by Prime Minister Mark Carney and the Liberal government coming into effect Tuesday, some Canadians in the lowest tax brackets may find extra cause to celebrate Canada Day.

While dropping the lowest marginal personal income tax rate from 15 to 14 per cent is expected to offer immediate relief to some, there are questions about how much people are actually saving and whether those who need it most are benefiting.

Here’s what you need to know about the tax cut.

Bottom brackets benefit best

When announced after the election and cabinet swearing in, Minister of Finance François-Philippe Champagne said the measure would deliver upwards of $27 billion in tax savings to more than 22 million Canadians over five years, starting in the 2025-26 tax year.

Since the change is being implemented in July, the full-year tax rate for 2025 is adjusted to 14.5 per cent, dropping to 14 in subsequent years.

Those with a job or other income where tax is taken out automatically might notice slightly more money on the paystubs starting in July, while others won’t realize the savings until they file their taxes in spring 2026.

The cut lowers the rate on the first $57,365 of taxable income, regardless of their income level, according to

Finance Canada.

The department noted the majority of the tax relief would be felt by those in the bottom two tax brackets, with those earning $57,365 and under benefiting from 45 per cent and those making $114,750 or less getting a 41 per cent share in 2025.

These are the new tax brackets for Canadians in 2025

The three highest brackets — $114,750 to $177,882; $177,882 to $253,414; and over $253,414 — pay 18, 10 and 20 per cent of the taxes and gain nine, three and two per cent, respectively, of the tax relief.

It forecasted the maximum tax savings at $420 per person and $840 per couple in 2026.

In early June, a ways and means motion introduced by Champagne in the House of Commons to have the changes take effect for Carney’s promised Canada Day deadline was passed unanimously. The actual legislation will still require approval and adoption when the House resumes in September.

 François-Philippe Champagne.

PBO report sobering on savings

A report from the

Parliamentary Budget Office

that followed two weeks later dampened some of Finance Canada’s projected savings.

Because the tax cut is coming at the midway point of the year, the PBO analysis estimates an average savings of $90 this year, $190 in the following three years and $200 in 2029-30.

And instead of the $840 predicted by the Liberals, it estimates the average Canadian family will only save $280 on next year’s taxes.

Under the PBO’s models, a two-income couple in the second tax bracket with a child comes closest to the government prediction with a potential $750 in savings in future years.

Seniors and single Canadians, including those with a dependent, in the lowest tax bracket could see as little as $50, $100 and $140 in annual savings, respectively.

“In general, the greater the income, the greater the savings in dollars, but the lower as a share of income for individuals in the second tax bracket and above,” the PBO wrote, meaning those with a lower average income can expect to save less on the first $57,375 relative to those who earn more on average.

The Conservative Party of Canada issued a

statement

, calling out Carney and the Liberals for failing to deliver a meaningful tax cut, particularly for seniors.

“For a lower-income senior the savings would be $50 a year, or $4.16 a month,” the Tories wrote. “Not even enough to buy an Egg McMuffin or a Tim’s breakfast sandwich.”

As part of their campaign platform, the

Conservatives pledged

to drop the personal income tax rate to 12.75 per cent, potentially yielding $900 in savings to Canadians in the lowest tax tier and $1,800 for dual-income families.

The PBO report also highlighted the potential net cost of the tax cut, estimating it could be up to $28 billion over the next five years after taking into account associated reductions in federal tax credits under the plan.

— With files from The Canadian Press

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra speaks at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce B7 Summit, in Ottawa, on Friday, May 16, 2025.

OTTAWA — With Canada’s digital services tax now scrapped, a free trade deal between Canada and the Unites States is just a question of time, U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra told National Post on Monday.

In an exclusive interview, Hoekstra said he’s not sure if trade talks between the North American neighbours can be resolved by July 21, a target agreed to by the two leaders when they met in mid-June in Kananaskis, Alta. But the ambassador said he’s very confident that a deal will get done.

“We will get to an agreement. The only question is how long will it take,” he said in an interview. “I’m confident we will have an agreement.”

Hoekstra emphasized that free trade between Canada and the U.S. is good for both countries, but that policies such as Canada’s now-defunct digital services tax are irritants that get in the way.

He said the tax, however, was not the only trade irritant irking the U.S. Others include provincial policies that have pulled American alcohol off store shelves and other anti-competitive measures that make it difficult for U.S. companies to compete in this market. U.S. President Donald Trump has also made it clear that he doesn’t like Canada’s supply management policies protecting the dairy and poultry industries because they make it difficult for American producers to compete in the Canadian market.

“There’s lots of issues that need to be covered. Some of them are going to be tougher than others,” Hoekstra said. “The important thing is that this really sets the table.”

Prime Minister Mark Carney told reporters on Monday that he had always expected the digital services tax to be a casualty of the trade negotiations with the U.S., so it was pointless for the government to collect that tax revenue.

“It’s something that we expected, in the broader sense, that would be part of a final deal,” said Carney, without explaining why the decision to scrap the tax was made only hours before it came into effect at midnight on Sunday.

“It doesn’t make sense to collect tax from people and then remit them back, so it provides some certainty. And as I just said, negotiations have restarted. We’re going to focus on getting the best deal for Canadians. We’re making progress,” said Carney.

Canada’s digital services tax was considered a big deal to the U.S., Hoekstra said, because it unfairly targeted American big tech companies. The tax was raised consistently by the U.S. in every recent conversation about trade, he added.

But Carney called Trump Sunday to say that he would be cancelling the tax, just two days after Trump insisted that the U.S. would walk away from trade talks with Canada and impose retaliatory tariffs if the tax wasn’t killed. The first digital services tax payments were due Monday, although they were to be retroactive to 2022.

Hoekstra said the upcoming trade talks may face more hurdles but that both sides want a deal. “We’ve done this with the Canadians for years. I expect we’ll be able to do it again.”

Trump had said on Friday he was ending trade negotiations with Canada due to the tax, which would have targeted major U.S. tech companies like Amazon and Google.

“Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately. We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period,”

Trump wrote, on his social media network

Truth Social.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said the Liberal government shouldn’t have scrapped the digital services tax without a concession from the Americans.

“The tax is gone for good. In exchange, the Prime Minister should insist that the U.S. immediately rescind softwood lumber tariffs. We need to make gains for our workers in these talks,”

wrote Poilievre, on social media

.

On Monday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described the Canadian government’s decision to rescind the digital services tax as a big win for the United States.

“It’s very simple. Prime Minister Carney and Canada caved to President Trump and the United States of America. And President Trump knows how to negotiate,” said Leavitt.

 

National Post,

with files from the Canadian Press

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Manitoba Minister of Families, Gender equality and accessibility Nahanni Fontaine.

Manitoba’s minister responsible for accessibility Nahanni Fontaine has apologized after she groused on a hot mic about sharing the stage with an American Sign Language interpreter.

At a graduation celebration on June 26, Fontaine spoke to her press secretary, Ryan Stelter, ahead of a media scrum. Fontaine, who is also minister of families and gender equality, complained of the interpreter being distracting during her speech, according to

APTN’s video of the exchange

.

“I was thrown off,” Fontaine told Stelter. “It wasn’t great — but because the woman — she shouldn’t have been on the stage.

“I couldn’t see anybody on (the left) side — all I could see was her…” she added, then started to wave her hands around to Stelter, who referred to the interpreter’s translations as “frantic hand movements.”

“Yeah! I’m like, f— why did I have her on the stage,” said Fontaine, “Jesus, I’m like, ‘You need to leave.’”

On Friday, Fontaine issued an apology in a written statement to media.

“I sincerely apologize to the deaf and hard of hearing community, and to all Manitobans for my comments,” Fontaine wrote.

“Yesterday, during a private debrief with my staff, I was reflecting on my public speaking performance and remarked I had been distracted by the interpreter’s hand movements. I was expressing frustration on my own poor planning to ensure clear sight lines at the event.”

She added: “My comments did not acknowledge signing is not simply “hand movements,” but a full and rich language used by thousands of Manitoban(s) every day.”

“As the Minister responsible for Accessibility I understand that ASL interpretation is integral to our public events, and we must continue to build understanding and respect for sign language and Manitobans who rely on it,” her statement continued.

Fontaine said she has since apologized to the interpreter, Sheryl LaVallee.

Deborah Owczar, who attended the honouring Indigenous women graduates,

told CBC

LaVallee was removed from the stage following Fontaine’s speech. Owczar, who is deaf, said the certificate she received at the event was tainted by the minister’s comments.

“I feel like my certificate is completely ruined. I got it from this event, now when I look at it, it’s associated with these negative memories, not with my accomplishment. I look at my certificate and I think about what was said,” Owczar said through an interpreter.

Barrier-Free Manitoba said interpreters are necessary to “ensuring accessible public communications” under the Accessibility for Manitobans Act.

“It is our hope that Minister Fontaine, as the minister responsible for accessibility and her colleagues will respond by reinforcing the Act’s mandate — ensuring accessible public communications through robust education and compliance,” the non-profit organization wrote

in an email to CTV

.

“Leadership means setting the tone from the top, and we trust the government will act decisively to uphold the dignity and inclusion rights of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing communities.”

Fontaine has said her team always includes ASL interpreters and that they are an important part of her speaking events.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Former Hamas prison Noa Argamani, left, with Sara Netanyahu wife of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in Washington, D.C. Demonstrators allegedly blocked an exit outside a venue where Argamani was speaking in Windsor, Ont. last week.

A Hamas captivity survivor on a speaking tour in Canada this month said she won’t “let terror sympathizers control the narrative” after anti-Israel demonstrators allegedly blocked the exit of her venue last week.

Noa Argamani, 27, was in Windsor, Ont., as part of a Jewish National Fund (JNF) fundraising event at the University of Windsor, which reportedly attracted members of the school’s Palestinian Solidarity Group.

On Saturday, Argamani shared an X post from FactsMatter describing the activists surrounding the building, “blocking the only entrance and shouting at the Jewish attendees. In a brief video clip attached, a voice is heard shouting, “Hamas is coming.”

The logo and username in the clip indicate it was a live broadcast from an account operated by the PSG. National Post is attempting to independently verify the source.

“Hamas came. Hamas kidnapped me. Hamas murdered my friends. But I won; I survived,” wrote Argamani, who spent 245 days in captivity after being abducted from the Nova music festival during the terrorist organization’s Oct. 7, 2023, insurgency.

The university student’s abduction and that of her partner, Or Avinatan, were captured on video and released by Hamas on social media. Argamani was also seen in subsequent propaganda videos.

 Noa Argamani’s abduction from southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.

She was rescued in June 2024

, but Avinatan remains in captivity. He is listed in a medical report detailing the condition of living hostages released by the Hostages and Missing Families Forum in June, per

The Times of Israel,

and described as suffering from weight loss and mental struggles.

“I’ll keep exposing Hamas’ crimes and fighting for the hostages’ release—including my partner, Avinatan,” wrote Argamani, who’s been a prominent advocate for her fellow captives since finding freedom.

Argamani was speaking at a Negev Event, named for the large desert region in southern Israel, where the goal was to raise money for the Ashdod Rehabilitation & Therapy Centre, “a vital project that will serve trauma victims, children with disabilities, and pediatric cancer patients in southern Israel,” according to

JNF

.

Idit Shamir, Consul General of Israel in Toronto and Western Canada, also

shared the clip on X

, calling it “psychological warfare against trauma survivors.”

“When Canadian campuses become no-go zones for Jews, when terror victims can’t share their stories without facing mob intimidation, you’re witnessing the normalisation of antisemitism,” she wrote.

Speaking to

The J,

event chair Miriam Kaplan condemned the attempted intimidation and said the University should, too.

“These students crossed the line from free speech into aggression,” she said.

The outlet also confirmed via the Windsor Police Service, who “monitored the situation and ensured public safety,” that it was treated as a protest and no arrests were made.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks to supporters at a campaign rally in Calgary on Friday, April 25, 2025.

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney is expected to call a byelection on Monday in the Alberta riding of Battle River—Crowfoot, where Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre will be looking to regain a seat, the National Post has learned.

Voters will be called to elect their new MP on either August 11 or 18, according to a source familiar with the prime minister’s thinking who was speaking on background because they were not authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

“The prime minister will be honouring his commitment of calling it quickly with ‘no games’ so that the byelection is complete well ahead of the House of Commons coming back in mid-September, rather than drawing it out in any way until December or January,” said the source.

The source added that the election dates in August will ensure that the byelection happens “as soon as possible” without interfering with Alberta Heritage Day, which is the first Monday of the month.

Poilievre has been without a seat in the House of Commons since he was defeated in the Ottawa-area riding of Carleton during the federal election on April 28. The member of Parliament for Battle River—Crowfoot, Damien Kurek, stepped down earlier this month to pave the way for his leader in a byelection.

Kurek was re-elected in April with more than 82 per cent of the vote, making the Alberta riding one of the safest Conservative seats in the country.

In his first press conference after the election, Carney said he would ensure that the byelection happens “as soon as possible… no games, nothing, straight.” He said he conveyed his decision to Poilievre directly during a conversation.

The Liberal Party did not respond immediately when asked if the party would be presenting a candidate in the riding.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Undated photo of Norman Spector, right, meeting with Palestinian Authority president Yasser Arafat.

Former Canadian diplomat Norman Spector doesn’t have a reputation for wishful thinking. So when he proposes we talk about how the issues around terrorism, atrocities and hostages are being framed in the aftermath of the October 7 attacks in Israel, I know I’m in for a stiff shot of realpolitik.

“By chance, I had the good fortune of being Canada’s first representative to the Palestinian Authority shortly after I landed in Israel as ambassador in 1992,”  Norman says, setting the context for our virtual conversation.

“I have some fond as well as some scary memories of walking around Gaza back then,” he continues, “but these days, I mostly wonder how Israeli-Palestinian relations would have unfolded in the wake of the Oslo accords had Yitzhak Rabin not been assassinated.”

Appointed by then-prime minister Brian Mulroney as Canada’s ambassador in 1992, the year before the Oslo accords were signed, Norman had the good fortune of living in the Middle East during a period of peace.

Reflecting back, Norman says he’s not sure the two-state solution for Israel and Palestine, envisioned in the Oslo accords, ever had a chance after the Rabin assassination. Rabin, the prime minister of Israel, was assassinated in 1995 by an Israeli extremist opposed to his peace efforts.

“I think Rabin came to the conclusion that there was no alternative — and he had the credibility that allowed him to take a chance with Arafat whom Israelis did not trust,” Norman says. “After October 7,” he muses, “there is even less trust of Palestinians and there’s no Rabin in sight.”

There is a faint hint of wistfulness in Norman’s tone; his assessment of the current situation is deeply unsettling.

From October 7 on, we’ve seen growing division and polarization and hatred in our own country. Progressives have made Gaza their cause (no one more than Alberta’s own NDP MP, Heather McPherson) and conservatives hold loyal to Israel. Media outlets pick a lane and stick with it.

Talking about Israel and the Palestinians has become so prickly, many refuse to wade into the conversation for fear of being attacked. The rhetoric is all part of the conflict, Norman accurately points out, “Folks chanting or spray painting ‘genocide’ are generally not in favour of two states, one Jewish, one Palestinian, between the river and the sea.”

Having spent considerable time in the Middle East region myself over the past 40 years, I know how this blame game twists and turns. Public opinion in Canada is heavily influenced by the atrocities of war conveyed on our television screens and in our media.

“In the first place of course one must blame Hamas — a fundamentalist organization that rejects a two-state solution — for launching an attack that has brought about so many deaths and so much misery to people living between the river and the sea,” Norman asserts. “And in the ensuing months,” he continues, “for not having put down their arms and perhaps gone into exile as Arafat did in the 1980s.

“But,” he adds, “the Government of Israel, too, is to blame — beholden as it is to Jewish fundamentalists who are the ideological twins of their Muslim counterparts.

“I still believe that the essence of the conflict (and the solution),” he reiterates, “is the existence of two states — one Jewish, one Palestinian — between the river and the sea as envisaged in the UN partition, which a Canadian was instrumental in developing and which Canada voted for in 1947.”

(I’m embarrassed to admit I’d forgotten the role played by Lester B. Pearson, then a senior Canadian diplomat, in designing a two-state solution.)

In the early 1990s, Norman’s appointment as ambassador to Israel raised eyebrows in the Arab world. As Norman explains in his 2003 book, Chronicle of a War Foretold: How Mideast Peace Became America’s Fight, Canada’s Foreign Affairs ministry had never sent a Jew to serve in Tel Aviv; Mulroney wanted to break that barrier. Norman — who had been Mulroney’s chief of staff — won over the critics with his objective grasp of regional politics and ability to speak with the locals in both Hebrew and Arabic.

Decades later, Norman — whose long career has included a stint as publisher of the Jerusalem Post — remains convinced there can be no real peace until both peoples elect governments that have campaigned on two states: one Jewish, one Palestinian.

 Undated photo of Norman Spector, right, exiting the Knesset with Israeli president Chaim Herzog.

Calls for a ceasefire, while understandable, may make us feel more comfortable — but it’s only a pause, he reminds me. “It takes the horrible images off TV screens,” Norman says, “until the next time.”

“My principal concern is the climate in Canada,” he writes, “and I wish our media and government had done a better job of explaining the true nature of the conflict, and that a ceasefire is not peace but a pause until the next war.

“Had the Netanyahu government declared that Hamas is opposed to a Jewish state and denies the Jewish people’s right to self-determination on October 7,” Norman asserts, “that would have been the truth and framed the war differently. It didn’t because it too opposes two states.

“Because the Netanyahu government itself refuses a two-state solution,” he elaborates, “it failed to make this the issue and instead its hasbara (explanation) focused on the atrocities and the hostages.”

“Now no doubt the atrocities were atrocious and the fate of the hostages of real concern — but in the end this could not compete with the death and destruction we’ve seen in Gaza as conveyed on our TV screens and in our media,” he adds.

The debate in Canada got off on the wrong foot, Norman suggests, focusing on whether Hamas was a terrorist organization, rather than talking about the real issue. “Both sides,” he suggests, “will have to decide that two states is the only solution.

“Netanyahu simply does not believe that Palestinians are willing to live in peace with Israelis between the river and the sea,” is Norman’s opinion.

And, he adds, “a ceasefire or a truce (hudna in Arabic) rather than peace is Hamas’s position because it does not imply recognition of a Jewish state between the river and the sea within any borders living beside a Palestinian state.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Hendrik and Frederika Veldboom, who hid a Jewish couple in their rural farmhouse near the border with Germany and rescued their newborn son during the Holocaust.

It is an elite club, numbering 28,486 people from 51 countries, unimaginably courageous non-Jews who risked their lives to rescue Jews during the Holocaust.

They are the Righteous Among the Nations, honoured by Yad Vashem, Israel’s Holocaust museum and memorial, on behalf of the State of Israel.

The club was expanded last Thursday in Toronto when the honour was bestowed posthumously on two couples who sheltered Jews in Nazi-occupied Holland.

“What did they have to lose? I would say everything,” said Elizabeth Quinlan, whose honoured grandparents, Eimericus and Anna Maria Tijssen, took a young Jewish girl, Annie Muller, into their already large family in southeastern Holland.

Also honoured at the moving ceremony at Israel’s consulate in Toronto were Hendrik and Frederika Veldboom, who hid a Jewish couple in their rural farmhouse near the border with Germany and rescued their newborn son.

The ceremony, attended by Ontario MPPs and other dignitaries, was crowded by dozens of descendants of both couples who came from points across Ontario, Edmonton, Texas, and the Cayman Islands.

The dangers the Dutch couples faced were clear: Hiding Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe was punished by shipment to a concentration camp or being shot on the spot. Add to that tension food scarcity, regular Allied shellings, and neighbours and even relatives who were Nazi collaborators.

It was in 1943 when the Dutch underground brought Elia “Annie” Muller, then 2-1/2 years old, to the Thijssens after the child had been moved through several hiding places. Despite the fact that five of the couple’s seven children were still living at home, they welcomed the Jewish girl, who would call her saviours 

Opa

 (Grandpa) and 

Moeke

 (Grandma).

The Thijssens’ married daughter, Lena, helped with the cover story: She said she was friends with Annie’s mother, who was in a sanatorium. The child was kept safe until six months after Holland’s liberation in May 1945, when she was reunited with her parents.

In a video hookup from her home in Holland, Muller, now 84, recalled with deep thanks her memories of a big family, how 

Moeke

 sliced the bread, the hams hanging from the ceiling, the old telephone, playing outside with the other children “and being naughty.” No talk of fear or the sudden need to hide. An artist, her work has centred on themes of memory and resistance – “a tribute to the people who saved me.”

Presented were “certificates of honour” and medals inscribed with a quote from the Talmud: “Whosoever saves a single life, saves an entire universe.”

The Thijssens immigrated to Canada in 1950 and settled in Proton Station, Ont. with four of their children. They initially worked on a farm, then moved to Strathroy, Ont., where Eimericus became a groundskeeper at a local golf course, while his wife worked at a canning factory. They kept their counsel.

In accepting the honour on behalf of her late grandparents, Quinlan, a retired judge who lives in Barrie, Ont., noted Canada’s dismal record of admitting Jewish refugees during the war era, the lowest among western countries.

“The inactions of our country underscore the empathy and humanity of our grandparents, who could also have done nothing,” Quinlan told those assembled. “A supposed civilized country could ignore the suffering around it, but 

Moeke

 and 

Opa

 could not.”

Her grandparents never talked about their valour. The sentiment, according to one of their daughters — Quinlan’s mother — was “it was just something we did. Anyone would have done it.”

That isn’t so, Quinlan said. “It was dangerous. It was an act of heroism that until now, was unrecognized.”

Hedrick and Frederika Veldboom, meantime, were newly married and members of the Dutch underground who turned their rural farmhouse into a hiding place for Jews and young Dutch men fleeing forced labour. Among the Jews were Lena Kropveld and her husband, Yitzchak Jedwab, a cantor. Wed secretly in 1942, they spent months in a hidden space behind a wardrobe, relying on coded warning systems.

 Elizabeth Quinlan, left, and Jantina Veldboom Devries, right, with Israel’s consul general Idit Shamir. Quinlan accepted the Righteous Among the Nations honour on behalf of her grandparents, while Veldboom Devries accepted the honour on behalf of her parents, in Toronto on June 26, 2025.

The dangers rose to new heights when Lena gave birth to a baby boy. She held her newborn for an hour before Hendrik Veldboom placed him in a cardboard box and bicycled in darkness to put the baby on the doorstep of the leader of the underground resistance, who took the child in despite having eight children. The baby, registered as abandoned, was reunited with his parents after liberation.

In 1952, the Veldbooms immigrated to Brockville, Ont., where they became farmers. What would they have said about being honoured as righteous rescuers?

“I think they would be terribly surprised,” said their daughter, Jantina Veldboom Devries, who lives in Hamilton, Ont. and accepted the distinction “I think it would be almost unthinkable for them because they didn’t see themselves as heroic. They did the right thing at the right time. Doing the right and honourable thing doesn’t need recognition, they would say.”

Idit Shamir, Israel’s consul general in Toronto and western Canada, echoed that sense of humility expressed by the two couples — indeed by many other Righteous Among the Nations.

“Were they heroes?” Shamir asked. “They would laugh. They were farmers. Parents. Neighbours who kept chickens and worried about harvest.

“Were they saints? They would object. They made mistakes. They felt fear. They were gloriously, beautifully human. We call them what they were: Righteous. Not perfect. Not fearless. Not superhuman. Simply people who saw clearly when the world went blind.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Though they largely affirmed enthusiastic pride in being Canadian, only 49 per cent of respondents said Canada is one of the best countries in the world to live in.

As Canada turns 158 on Tuesday, a birthday celebrated during tumultuous political and international agitation, Canadians remain proud of their country and their place in it — with considerable intensity for a nation often too modest to boast — but riding on that red-and-white wave are hard questions of what kind of country Canadians want.

A new national opinion survey marks Canada Day by delving into how Canadians feel about their country and what boosts their patriotism and what dampens it; about what irks them so much they might leave, their sense of Canadian values, and even tries to put a finger on what Canada’s national identity looks like.

There is little doubt Canadians are proud to be Canadian — a huge majority declared it — even though there are concerns about affordability, what it means to be Canadian, and a loss of a shared sense of collective identity, according to the survey conducted by Leger Marketing Inc., for Postmedia.

“As we approach Canada Day this year, Canadians are feeling pretty good about being Canadian, and I think they’re going to be pretty boisterous about demonstrating it,” said Andrew Enns, a Leger vice president who oversaw the poll.

But, cautioned Enns, that doesn’t mean there aren’t challenges.

“It doesn’t necessarily mean things are fantastic here. I think it’s possible to be very proud to be Canadian — particularly when there’s another country that suggests you should just pack in this whole Canada thing — but still say there’s a lot of problems in the country,” Enns said.

When the poll respondents were asked how proud they were to be Canadian, 83 per cent described themselves as proud, with 45 per cent of those escalating that feeling to being very proud. Of those who dissented, 11 per cent said they weren’t very proud and four per cent said they were not at all proud to be Canadian.

“A year ago, it wasn’t like we were all wearing paper bags over our head and being ashamed — three-quarters said they felt pretty proud about being Canadians back then, but we’ve now popped that number up. There’s also an intensity that I think we’ll probably see on display in different celebrations,” said Enns.

Canada’s proudest region is Atlantic Canada, where 90 per cent said they were proud and 57 per cent even upsized to very proud.

Those least likely to declare Canadian pride were in Alberta, but even there a strong majority — 78 per cent — said they were proud to be Canadian. That result wasn’t much different that in British Columbia, where it was 79 per cent.

In Quebec, 81 per cent said they were proud to be Canadian. In Ontario it was 84 per cent, and in Manitoba and Saskatchewan (pooled together by the pollsters) it was 87 per cent.

More women than men expressed Canadian pride (86 per cent versus 80 per cent).

The younger a respondent was, the less likely they were to say they were a proud Canadian: Among those aged 18 to 34, the youngest cohort, 76 per cent expressed pride; in the middle, those aged 35 to 54, there were 81 per cent declaring pride, while 89 per cent in the oldest group (55 and over) said they were proud to be Canadian.

Political persuasion also seems to play a role.

Fewer people who voted Conservative in the last federal election expressed pride in being Canadian than those who voted for the Bloc Québécois, which is a Quebec separatist party.

Among Conservative voters, 74 per cent declared pride in being Canadian; as did 75 per cent of Bloc voters, and 69 per cent of Greens. Those who voted Liberal were by far the biggest boasters of Canadian pride, at 95 per cent, followed by New Democratic Party voters at 82 per cent.

When asked if their pride in Canada had changed over the past few months, 34 per cent of respondents said they were prouder and 21 per cent said they were less proud, with 45 per cent saying they felt the same.

Sinking Canadian pride was strongest in Alberta — where 31 per cent said they felt less proud, and was the weakest in Quebec, where only 14 per cent said their pride in Canada had sagged over the last few months ago.

The Leger pollsters looked at what was behind those changes in patriotic feelings. After all, a lot has happened in the last few months. Canadians have been pushed to rethink their affinity for their country after U.S. President Donald Trump started insulting and threatening Canada’s sovereignty. There was also a closely fought federal election.

Pollsters asked those respondents who said they were prouder being Canadian now than a few months ago if there was a connection between that boost and Trump’s commentary. The answer was overwhelmingly yes: 83 per cent said they felt more pride in Canada because of Trump.

Those respondents who were less proud being Canadian now than a few months ago were asked if their enthusiasm was dampened by the results of April’s federal election. The answer was also a strong yes: 74 per cent attributed it to the election, that returned the Liberal Party to government with a new leader promising to tackle Trump’s threats.

Despite enthusiastic pride in being Canadian, respondents were curiously cautious about boasting of Canada’s place in the world.

Not even half of all the respondents said Canada is one of the best countries in the world to live in. Only 49 per cent did. Another 20 per cent said Canada has a lot of work to do to be considered one of the best, while 19 per cent said Canada wasn’t much better than some others. Four per cent dismissed Canada as not a great place to live.

Enns wondered if those results are a sign of Canada’s supposed politeness.

“Is that the Canadian deferential thing? You know, saying ‘Canada is really good, but I don’t want to say we’re the best, that’s something Americans do,’” Enns said.

It might be because of the source of Canada’s rising pride.

“You have to look back at what’s driving this surge of patriotism right now. It is that existential threat (from Trump) as opposed to something that we’ve done ourselves internally,” he said.

“If there was something that we did internally as a collective, and we were able to show the world how great we are and it elevated pride, then I think you might see a difference on this question. Maybe that moves the needle, as opposed to we’re waving the flag and pumping our chests because we want to make sure Donald Trump appreciates that we’re not going to be the 51st state.”

It could also be a realism among Canadians, a sense that patriotic pride doesn’t mean they must ignore problems they see in the country.

“If I were the federal government and I looked at this poll and said, ‘holy cow, 83 per cent of Canadians are proud to be Canadian, we must be doing a great job,’ then that would probably be a misinterpretation. There are still some significant challenges.

In the poll, respondents were asked if they’ve ever considered leaving Canada and moving to another country; 27 per cent said they had considered leaving. Their motivations suggest what fuels Canadians’ discontent with Canada, and much of it is economic.

 People walk past a Canadian maple leaf inside in a heart on Toronto’s Queen Street West amid the tariff war with the United States.

Of those who said they’ve considered leaving Canada, 60 per cent said Canada being too expensive was a reason, which was the top answer. Taxes being too high was second, named by 55 per cent. (Respondents could give more than one reason.)

A feeling that Canada is heading in the wrong direction on a lot of things was next, at 45 per cent; 35 per cent named a desire to live somewhere nicer; 31 per cent that they’d like to try somewhere different; 26 per cent said there were too many restrictions on freedom, the same number who named crime and disorder; followed by career opportunities, at 25 per cent, and family reasons at nine per cent.

The pollsters also said that most Canadians felt their country has been losing a shared, collective identity of what it means to be Canadian over the past four or five years. A low majority of respondents, 52 per cent, said that; 30 per cent disagreed, and 19 per cent said they didn’t know or declined to answer. The poll also shows large support — 64 per cent — for pushing newcomers to adopt Canadian values, while only 22 per cent supported immigrants maintaining religious and cultural traditions. The view that newcomers should adopt Canadian values was held most strongly by Quebecers at 73 per cent and those over the age of 55, at 78 per cent. New Democrat voters, at 40 per cent, were most likely to support the retention of immigrants’ traditions, followed by Liberal voters at 28 per cent. Just 14 per cent of Conservative voters and eight per cent of Bloc Québécois voters supported that notion.

“I’m not surprised given the fact that we’ve had a couple of tough years with some of these conflicts overseas that we see boiling over in terms of some ethnic tensions within Canada,” said Enns.

The feeling of losing a shared Canadian identity was by far the strongest in Alberta, where 71 per cent of respondents said it, and lowest in Quebec, where 45 per cent said it. Other than in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, where 58 per cent said it, the remaining regions polled all weighed in at 50 per cent.

The poll also assessed what qualities Canadians most associated with Canada and as a core Canadian value.

Respondents were asked to choose the one value they most associated with Canada among 12 options.

Being a democracy with free and fair elections came out on top, with 16 per cent naming that as Canada’s top value, followed by multiculturalism, which was named by 14 per cent. Respect and inclusiveness (13 per cent) and a social safety net (12 per cent) rounded out the top four.

Next came freedom of speech (nine per cent), bilingualism (seven per cent), equality of opportunity (five), respect for all religions and clear opposition to acts of antisemitism (three), equality regardless of sexual orientation (three), free-market economy (two), equality of sexes (two), and separation of church and state (two).

Four per cent chose none of the above.

However, the ranking of those same 12 values changed when respondents were asked not to select just one, but rather to say how strongly they associated each of the values as a core value of being Canadian.

On this metric, multiculturalism plummeted from second from the top to second from the bottom.

Respondents chose between a strong association, somewhat of an association, no association, and prefer not to answer for each of the 12 values. The pollsters then calculated an average response and ranked them.

Being a democracy with free and fair elections was still the quality most associated with a core Canadian value, closely followed by a three-way tie of freedom of speech, social safety net, and equality of the sexes.

Respect and inclusiveness and equality of opportunity were tied in the next tier, followed by equality regardless of sexual orientation. The next two values were also tied: A free-market economy and separation of church and state.

Into the bottom three, the next two values were tied — respect for all religions and clear opposition to acts of antisemitism, and multiculturalism — and the last was bilingualism.

The values ranking, in essence, ranked the intensity of association, because a strong majority of respondents associated all of the 12 values as a core Canadian identity, with even the lowest ranked value, bilingualism, being associated as a Canadian value by 78 per cent, but with only 39 per cent giving it a strong association rating.

Enns said the large change in the rank multiculturalism seems to reflect a disconnect.

“Individuals, by virtue of the way Canada is often described as being multicultural, selected that term as one they associate with the country, but as we saw in the other question, it is not necessarily personally what they feel as their strongest association,” he said.

The poll survey 1,580 adult Canadians from June 20 to June 22 who were randomly recruited using an online panel. Results were weighted to ensure a representative sample of the Canadian population.

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | Twitter:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.