LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

BYD electric vehicles wait to be loaded on an automobile carrier ship for export, at Taicang Port in Suzhou, China.

Chinese-made electric vehicles are almost invisible in Canada and the United States, but elsewhere around the globe they are a huge hit, dominating international production and sales for battery-powered cars.

The lack of visibility for popular Chinese-made electric vehicle (EVs) brands in North America is largely because both Canada and the United States imposed a tariff of 100 per cent on their importation, doubling their cost for consumers.

The presence on Canada’s roads should be changing soon after Prime Minister Mark Carney’s trip to Beijing for meetings with China’s President Xi Jinping. Carney announced a “landmark trade arrangement” Friday: China is expected to reduce tariffs on Canadian canola in exchange for Canada allowing some Chinese-made EVs into the country at a preferential tariff rate.

It might make Canada the next metaphorical racetrack for Chinese-made EVs, which have been lapping competitors in global markets in recent years.

China has become the world’s EV manufacturing heavyweight and export powerhouse. It’s EVs are less expensive than most competing vehicles and are often touted as using better technology. The head design for China’s biggest EV maker BYD Auto is Wolfgang Egger, former head of design at Alfa Romeo, Audi and Lamborghini.

Of the approximately 90 million EVs made last year, China accounted for about 35 million, while the United States manufactured about 11 million and Canada less than two million.

The rise of China’s EVs started in 2008 when the world’s second most populous country made a strategic shift towards EVs for its domestic market.

China’s government infused massive state support to make it happen.

Chinese consumers were given generous subsidies and inducements to replace gas cars with EVs, sparking huge domestic demand. That gave Chinese manufacturers a head start, working out technological, design, and manufacturing kinks, scaling up production, and leveraging volume to reduce prices.

Through growing pains, its EVs gained significant traction in the last five years.

There were an estimated 11 million

domestically made EVs sold

in China in 2024, where an estimated one in 10 cars currently on the road is electric.

China-made brands such as BYD, Nio, Aito, and Wuling HongGuang became hits as the price gap narrowed between battery-powered cars and conventional gas-powered cars.

In China, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), the vast majority of EVs sold were cheaper than cars with a conventional engine. That contrasts sharply with the United States, where EVs are typically 30 per cent more expensive.

There are plenty of complaints that Chinese EVs have an unfair advantage when they hit the sales floor in other countries.

China’s centralized system means massive government support and subsidization of manufacturing. China places national interest as a corporate and manufacturing goal. According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Chinese government subsidies

are estimated at $230.9 billion

from 2009 to 2023.

Wages for Chinese assembly line workers start at about US$4.20 an hour, vastly eclipsed by the base rate in North American auto manufacturing of US$29.

Although most of its production still feeds robust domestic market new sales abroad is increasingly important in China’s EVs manufacturing sector. Finding export markets for China’s firehose of EVs is seen as an existential pursuit.

“There are 200 EV producers in China, who collectively have created far more capacity than the domestic market can bear. Not surprisingly, production has expanded rapidly, leading to growing inventories. As a result, firms have engaged in a bitter price war at home and expanded efforts to promote export,” says a 2024 report by the U.S.-based CSIS.

“Despite the extensive government support and expansion of sales, very few Chinese EV producers and battery makers are profitable.”

Chinese gas-powered cars had struggled for years compared to the world’s automakers in Germany, North America, Japan and Korea.

Their march on the world began with a push in Bangladesh and India in 2018 and 2019, before turning to Europe and Latin America, finding success for offering vehicles with sound technology at a cheaper price.

In some export markets, Chinese EVs have achieved price parity or better compared with gas cars, such as in Thailand.

 BYD electric cars waiting to be loaded onto a ship are seen stacked at Taicang Port in Suzhou, China.

Recently, China has been manufacturing more than 70 per cent of EV exports around the world.

Tariffs, however, have been an impediment.

Even before U.S. President Donald Trump’s bullish embrace of tariffs, many Western countries have been wary of allowing a glut of Chinese EVs hit their markets. His predecessor, Joe Biden, imposed tariffs on China’s EVs, as did the European Union and Canada. Europe’s 38 per cent tariff was imposed when Chinese EVs went from being about one per cent of EVs sold in 2019 t

o more than 50 per cent by 2023

.

The China-built BYD Song, a popular pick, is almost half the price of the Tesla Model Y in Europe. Overall,

BYD outsold Tesla

in Europe.

With trade barriers in Europe, Canada and the United States, Chinese manufacturers have been pushing other global markets.

As the price gap narrowed between a Chinese-made EV and a gas car, emerging EV markets in Asia and Latin America fueled explosive sales growth, increasing more than 50 percent in Vietnam and Thailand.

Brazil — Latin America’s biggest car market — became fertile ground.

EV exports to Brazil almost doubled in 2024, according to United Nations Commodity Trade data. In the last two years, the price gap between EV and gas in Brazil shrank from EVs being twice as expensive to within 25 per cent, sparking an 85 per cent jump in EV sales with the vast majority being made in China.

Price parity, or close to it, is seen as the goal needed to spark more robust EV sales in Canada and the United States.

According to data from the IEA, average EV car prices in China had dropped below those of gas cars in 2023. In contrast, EV cars in North America were about 21 per cent more expensive and in Europe about 38 per cent more. That leaves a big gap to be bridged.

Chinese export EVs are not as cheap as they are in its domestic market, where they sell for between US$10,000 to US$20,000. A study

comparing the prices of the Chinese EVs

found that the same models were between 49 per cent and 112 per cent more expensive in Germany than in China.

The new trade deal struck by Carney and Xi Canada will allow

up to 49,000 Chinese EVs into the Canadian market

with tariff rate dropped from 100 per cent to 6.1 per cent, according to the Prime Minister’s office.

Half of the imported vehicles under the deal are “anticipated” to be affordable EVs with an import price of less than $35,000, creating new lower-cost options for Canadians, the PMO said.

The average price of a new car in Canada was recently pegged at $67,000. A recent search by Driving.ca

found the cheapest new car in Canada

was the Nissan Versa with a base price of $20,798, with the cheapest EV in Canada being the Nissan Leaf, with a base price of $41,748.

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | Twitter:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


It will take more than street protests to take down Iran’s regime, analysts say.

The last 20 days in Iran have been deadly, violent, and unbearable to witness. The authoritarian regime in Tehran has indiscriminately targeted peaceful protesters with guns and live ammunition, cut off internet access, and imprisoned thousands.

At least 3,428 civilian protesters have been killed and thousands injured, according to Iran Human Rights, an Oslo-based NGO that monitors violence inside Iran. The death toll could be much higher.

The demonstrations were first sparked by bazaaris, or shopkeepers, in Tehran’s main bazaar — the financial hub of the country — in response to currency depreciation and soaring prices.

They quickly spread across major cities, and protesters’ demands broadened into calls for an end to nearly five decades of oppressive theocratic rule.

“In Iran’s political psychology, two factors are traditionally essential for a fundamental transformation: first, the bazaar must enter into sustained strikes and protests; second, the army or national armed forces must side with the people against the ruling power,” said Hussain Ehsani, a research fellow at the Turan Research Center, a Washington, D.C.–based think tank. “At this stage, the first condition has partially materialized. However, it remains unclear whether the bazaar strikes will continue or fade.”

Over the past three years, Iran’s currency has lost two-thirds of its value, and the price of basic food items has risen by 72 per cent since last year. Economic failures are not the sole drivers of the protests; shortages of water and energy, including electricity and gas in major cities, have also fuelled public anger in recent years.

U.S. President Donald Trump, after days of threatening to strike Iran if authorities continued killing their own people, took the matter to the United Nations Security Council on Thursday. Meanwhile, his administration placed several orchestrators of civilian killings on the sanctions list, including Ali Larijani, the secretary of Iran’s National Security Council.

Trump urged protesters this week to “take over your institutions” and said that “help is on its way,” offering little clarity on whether that assistance would be logistical support or a possible military strike.

The Islamic Republic has experienced several waves of mass protests over the years, from the widely known “Woman, Life, Freedom” movement following the killing of Mahsa Amini, to the Green Movement in 2009 after a fraudulent election, whose leaders remain under house arrest by Ayatollah Khamenei.

But this protest, although reportedly calmer and slower as of Friday, differs from previous ones.

“In 2009, it was still based on a disputed election. People were asking, ‘Where is my vote?’ They were still trying to operate within the framework of the Islamic Republic,” said Kaveh Shahrooz, a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute in Ottawa. “The message has really radicalized since then. The closest comparison to what’s happening now is the 2022 ‘Woman, Life, Freedom’ movement. In both cases, the demand is for the regime to be overthrown.”

Iran has long played a central role in regional instability by building proxy forces across the Middle East, from Iraq to Lebanon and Yemen. The Quds Force, a wing of the notorious Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), has orchestrated the funding and training of militant groups in the region, including Hamas, the terrorist organization that massacred more than 1,000 Israelis on October 7, 2023.

After decades of shadow warfare, Israel and Iran confronted each other directly in a 12-day war. Israel killed several top Iranian military commanders and struck key military sites, while Iran launched barrages of missiles toward Israel. The conflict ended with U.S. strikes on Iran’s most deeply buried nuclear enrichment facility. These events have significantly weakened Iran both regionally and domestically.

“Iran’s regime was humiliated in the 12-day war. It no longer has the proxies it once relied on, so it can’t project strength,” said Shahroz. “It’s far more financially squeezed, and the economy is in freefall. Donald Trump is in the White House and appears, at least rhetorically, to be taking a much tougher line on Iran’s regime. That’s what makes this protest more significant than those we’ve seen in the past.”

Through diplomatic efforts led mainly by Arab leaders, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, and Egypt, Trump has been lobbied to refrain from striking Iran. According to The New York Times, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also asked Trump to postpone any attack.

Amid fears of mass executions by the regime, Trump hinted that his sources indicated Iran had stopped killing protesters and that executions were stalled. Iran Human Rights reported that over 20,000 people have been imprisoned during the past 20 days of uprising.

As the threat of a U.S. attack has lulled, at least for now, the future of an already weakened Iran, both domestically and internationally, remains uncertain. While the collapse of the regime did not appear imminent on Friday, the question remains whether it can survive much longer.

“I think it really depends on U.S. involvement,” said Shahroz. “If the U.S. gets involved, you could very well see the regime collapse. But if it’s just ordinary people fighting, the regime may be able to hold on for another day. Still, these protests will flare up again. There’s simply no doubt.”

Analysts say defections within the security apparatus are key to regime collapse, but no such signs have emerged so far, despite claims by Iranian opposition figures in exile.

“The large number of protesters killed by security forces demonstrates the continued allegiance of the armed forces to Khamenei and the IRGC,” said Ehsani.

“First is street protests, which we have, but the other two things we don’t have,” said Kaveh. “Second is just the crippling of the economy through strikes, most importantly, the oil sector. We have not seen those. And third would be defections from the security services, and we haven’t seen that either.”


The Quebec fleur-de-lis flag flutters over the Parliament buildings in Ottawa.

If La Belle Province votes for independence, 58 per cent of Quebecers believe they should be allowed to retain their Canadian citizenship, according to a new poll.

Just over a quarter of Quebecers (26 per cent) indicated they should have to give up their Canadian citizenship in an independent Quebec, said the poll conducted last month by Leger Marketing for the Association for Canadian Studies.

Meanwhile, one third of Canadians polled indicated Quebecers should be allowed to remain Canadian citizens if Quebec becomes an independent country, while 45 per cent said they should not.

“If Quebec breaks off, clearly we’re going to have to review this issue,” said Jack Jedwab, the association’s president.

“Citizenship entails responsibilities.”

The new poll results come in the wake of Quebec Premier Francois Legault’s resignation, and months ahead of an election that could see his Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) lose power to a resurgent Coalition Avenir Québec (PQ) that’s been consistently leading in the polls. PQ Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon has promised a referendum on sovereignty if his party wins in October.

More than half (54 per cent) of Francophone Quebecers said the French language would be much more secure in an independent Quebec, with 34 per cent indicating it would not, according to the poll conducted last month.

Among Anglophone Quebecers, 27 per cent thought independence would make the French language much more secure, while 54 per cent indicated otherwise.

“What this question suggests is that the obvious driver for Quebecers is language and not a better economy, or a greater status internationally, neither of which the majority of Quebecers think would be the outcome of independence,” Jedwab said.

Among those who say independence would make the French language more secure in Quebec, 49 per cent said English-speaking Quebecers would not be better off in an independent Quebec, with 23 per cent saying they would.

Only five per cent of those who said independence would not make the French language more secure indicated English-speaking Quebecers would be better off in an independent Quebec, with 86 per cent saying the opposite.

“Quebecers acknowledge that the push for independence isn’t about the interest of all Quebecers,” Jedwab said. “It’s about protecting the language of the majority, at least from the standpoint of the vast majority of Quebecers.”

Only 13 per cent of Canadians believe ethnic minorities would be better off in an independent Quebec, with 58 per cent saying they would not. In Quebec, 15 per cent of respondents indicated ethnic minorities would be better off in an independent Quebec, and 57 per cent said they would not.

“If we go back to (the last Quebec referendum) in 1995, you’ll remember that (then Parti Québécois premier) Jacques Parizeau blamed ethnic votes and money for Quebec not achieving independence,” Jedwab said. “The reality is that the majority of Quebecers don’t think that independence is in the interest of those very ethnic minorities that voted overwhelmingly against it and then got stigmatized for doing so.”

Among Quebecers who thought ethnic minorities would fare better in an independent Quebec, 65 per cent indicated ethnic minorities should give up their customs and traditions and become more like the majority, while 28 per cent said they should not. Among those who thought ethnic minorities would not be better off in an independent Quebec, 43 per cent said they should give up their customs and traditions, versus 46 per cent who said they should not.

Two thirds of Canadians (64 per cent) believe Quebecers would not be better off in an independent Quebec, according to the poll.

Only 16 per cent of Canadians believe Quebecers would be better off in that scenario.

In Quebec, 27 per cent of respondents indicated Quebec would be better off as an independent country, and 57 per cent said the opposite.

“That’s more or less in line with the current polling on the extent to which Quebecers support independence,” Jedwab said.

Interestingly, 26 per cent of Albertans said Quebecers would be better off in an independent Quebec, with 61 per cent indicating they would not.

“I think that’s a bit of a reflection of Albertan’s separatist sentiment,” Jedwab said.

One in five Canadians (21 per cent) said Canada would be better off without Quebec, with 61 per cent indicating it would not.

Only 14 per cent of Canadians believe Quebecers would be better off economically as part of an independent country, with 63 per cent indicating the opposite. In Quebec, those who believe they’d be better off in that scenario rises to 26 per cent, while 57 per cent of respondents said they would not.

Just 15 per cent of Canadians believe an independent Quebec would have more influence on the international stage, while 60 per cent said it would not.

In Quebec, 25 per cent of respondents believe an independent Quebec would have more global influence, while 56 indicated it would not.

“Those (arguments that Quebec would be better off internationally) aren’t going to be persuasive in the hypothetical event that we arrive at a referendum,” Jedwab said.

The survey involved 1,723 respondents across Canada (with an oversample of 200 Quebecers) over the period Dec.19-21, 2025. A margin of error cannot be associated with a non-probability sample in a panel survey for comparison purposes. A probability sample of 1,723 respondents would have a margin of error of +25 per cent, 19 times out of 20.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney talks to U.S. President Donald Trump at their arrival to the draw for the 2026 FIFA Football World Cup in Washington, DC, on December 5, 2025.

BEIJING AND OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney will accept a role on U.S. President Donald Trump’s newly formed Gaza “Board of Peace,” according to a senior Canadian government official.

Trump will serve as chairman of the board, which includes U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and former U.K. prime minister Tony Blair, and which is designed to oversee the U.S. peace plan to end the war between Israel and Hamas.

According to the Canadian government official, who briefed reporters travelling with Carney in Beijing, the invitation officially sent on Friday but had been discussed by the two leaders for some time.

The board will provide “strategic oversight, mobilizing international resources, and ensuring accountability as Gaza transitions from conflict to peace and development,”

according to a statement from the White House

on Friday.

The White House statement says that each board member will be responsible for a portfolio related to the “stabilization” and rebuilding of the war-torn region. Some portfolios include governance capacity-building, regional relations, reconstruction, investment attraction, large-scale funding, and capital mobilization.

The Canadian official did not say what Carney’s responsibility on the board will be.

More to come.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Conservative MP Jamil Jivani is photographed in his office in Ottawa during an interview with National Post on Friday, Jan. 16, 2026.

OTTAWA — While Parliament Hill swirls with speculation about potential floor-crossings, one Conservative MP is raising his hand, but for a different reason: To assist Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government navigate the Canada-U.S. relationship.

“I think everyone knows where I stand,” Jamil Jivani smiles and says, seated in his Parliament Hill office on Friday morning.

He proudly adds: “I am decidedly non-liberal.”

Despite political differences, Jivani is extending his hand to Carney and key cabinet ministers involved in the Canada-U.S. portfolio to offer his help, as Canada has yet to secure a deal that would see tariffs removed, if not lowered, and as the countries enter a critical review of the trilateral trade agreement with Mexico.

Jivani has made his intentions known, including through private emails to Carney and other key cabinet ministers involved in the Canada-U.S. file, such as Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc and Natural Resources and Energy Minister Tim Hodgson.

So far, nothing has been returned.

The 38-year-old is staying positive about the lack of response, which he concedes may be overly optimistic. “I hope they’re considering it.”

It is not just that the MP, who has earned a reputation for being unafraid to share his opinions, is eager to help.

He enjoys a unique relationship with U.S. Vice-President JD Vance, whom he met while attending Yale Law School.

“There are just not very many people who are in a situation where I think they can have a direct line to the White House,” Jivani says.

“I do think I can at least get my phone calls answered, and I think that counts for something.”

Jivani characterizes his friendship with Vance as being that of old, but good friends, a bond built during formative college years. The type where Jivani describes, that should his cancer come back, a battle which he has been public about before being elected to federal politics back in 2024, Vance would pick up the phone, not only to call him, but also his mother.

Their families know each other, too, he said. As for their recent communications, Jivani says that over the past several months, they have not interacted outside of being in the same fantasy football league.

Jivani’s identity as a sports fan is evident in his office. Photos of Muhammad Ali, Michael Jordan and Tom Brady, the giants of boxing, basketball and football, respectively, dot one wall. On the opposite side stands an arcade-style basketball net in the corner.

Asked who is better at fantasy football, Jivani says he has had more success.

“I think it’d be fair for me to say I’ve been better. But he might disagree.”

Disagreement could also be the term that has defined the pair’s relationship, at least when it comes to the political posturing of both their countries, with the Trump administration upending global trade through tariffs, which Canada has tried to buck, arguing that free trade has worked historically and would continue to do so in the future.

Then there were Trump’s comments about coveting Canada as his “51st state,” which set off a wave of anger.

Jivani, who represents the riding of Bowmanville—Oshawa North

, home to many autoworkers feeling the brunt of tariff anxiety and announcements of layoff notices from companies responding to Trump’s moves, says he spent the past year feeling a “tremendous amount of pressure” to distance himself from Vance and answer for the never-ending turn of developments coming from the Trump administration. 

The MP admits that the intersection of friendship and work “does make it complicated.”

“It’s very weird when the guy you play fantasy football with and the guy used to drink beers with in law school becomes a vice president,” says Jivani. “Like, it’s a weird experience.”

Despite the pressure, Jivani rejects any notion that he needs to disavow or “attack” his friend. Instead, he has embraced the attitude that you can be friends with someone you disagree with.

Not only does he have a personal connection to Vance, Jivani says that his U.S. network includes former classmates who have worked for other presidents and have cross-border business dealings.

“I do believe that if I took a flight down to Washington right now and said, I want to have a conversation with you (Vance) about how we can get things going between the Carney administration, the Trump administration, I think he hears me out,” Jivani says.

“I don’t know what he does with that. I don’t know all the things they have to deal with down there, but that friendship is a real friendship.”

Simply put, Jivani, who says he has proven himself as a “hustler,” has a simple pitch to the government: “Let me show what I can do.”

Others expressed skepticism about the practicalities of Jivani’s offer.

Sen. Peter Boehm, a former diplomat, questioned what the purpose would be in seeing another communication channel opened, given the prime minister’s direct line to Trump and the fact that LeBlanc speaks to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, not to mention the role played by Canada’s ambassador to the U.S, with businessman Mark Wiseman named to the post.

Then come questions about how things could work given the structure of government, which raises concerns about the sharing of co

nfidential

information and negotiating positions.

“In order to take on some sort of a role, Mr. Jivani would have to be in the tent,” he said.

Diamond Isinger, who served as a special advisor to former prime minister Justin Trudeau on Canada-U.S. relations, said “Canadians made very clear in this last election” that they believe the Liberals were the best party to deal with Trump. 

She also questioned what Jivani could add to the situation, when Canada has consulate staff across the U.S. and those in the embassy who are individuals that have forged “multi-decade relationships with key Americans.”

“Once in a while, a Canadian, whether an MP, business leader or a former prime minister has an established relationship with a foreign senior official.  Such fortuitous friendly pre-established relations can be helpful contextually and foster mutual understanding,” said Louise Blaise, a former diplomat in the U.S. 

“At the same time, official lines of communication on government business, must be kept as clear and streamlined as possible.”

Jivani describes his decision to offer his help as an evolution, saying that after his party’s election loss last year’s election he decided to stay quiet to provide Carney “space,” and did not feel it was his place to “speak for Canada.”

He began thinking differently after last fall when he observed that the progress Canada had been making towards a deal with the U.S. stalled after Trump’s uproar over a series of anti-tariff ads ran Ontario Premier Doug Ford.

Jivani, once an appointee of the Ford government, has been an outspoken critic of the premier’s.

He suggested the derailing of talks showed “we don’t have the right interlocutors.”

Another concerning development Jivani sees is Canada’s reorientation towards China, as it looks to diversify away from the U.S.

Carney has defended Canada’s position as finding itself in the best spot among other U.S. trading allies, given goods covered by the Canada-U.S-Mexico trade agreement exempt, covering the majority of products.

He also said talks about outstanding U.S. tariffs on sectors like steel and alumnium would roll into discussions around renewing that agreement.

Jivani compares what he is proposing to be similar to the efforts being made by Canadian business leaders and as well as the approach Trudeau took under the first Trump administration, when Conservatives Rona Ambrose and James Moore, served on a council struck to assist the government as it renegogiated the former North American Free Trade Agreement.

Goldy Hyder, president of the Business Council of Canada, points to how Trudeau looked to former prime minister Brian Mulroney who used his U.S. contacts to assist the Trudeau government in those years.

Hyder, who says he does not know Jivani but credits him for making outreach to the government as opposed to just “freelancing,” suggests that whether it is through him or others in the business community, the chance to gain more insights and better access should be seen as opportunities.

“The closer we are together, the closer we work together, the more likely that we’re going to have success to help bringing about the conclusion we all seek,” he said.

Several premiers’ offices were contacted for comment. Only one responded.

“I remain convinced that the path to a positive resolution with our U.S. partners lies in strong, consistent diplomacy and a commitment to working in good faith toward shared priorities, rather than angry rhetoric and retaliation,” Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, said in a statement. 

“We must continue to build new relationships and leverage existing ones, which could include MP Jamil Jivani’s relationship with U.S. Vice President JD Vance, to advance Canadian interests and restore free and fair trade with the United States.”

Jivani is scheduled to host Smith later this month when she appears alongside him at one of his “Restore the North”  campus tours in Alberta.

With plans to attend next month’s National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, an event where Jivani said he can encourage dialogue and hopes to hear back from the government before that.

As for what Opposition Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre thinks about its overtures, the MP said Poilievre has also offered to help.

Jivani hopes that he would be tapped to do the same should his party one day form government.

“I would hope that, you know, if we had won the election and he were prime minister, and you know, maybe one day he will be, that he will be asking me to help too, right?”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Air travellers at Canadian airports should expect continued delays and line-ups as the backlog from Monday's snowstorm is cleared. (File photo)

Toronto and Montreal’s major airports continue to recover from Thursday’s snowstorm and travellers should expect some delays.

Airfield crews have been working non-stop to clear the 23 centimetres of snow that fell on Thursday and ensure planes can operate efficiently, according to an official at Pearson International Airport in Toronto. But he is warning travellers about long lineups.

In an early Friday morning

interview with CP 24

, Pearson Airport duty manager

John Ventresca

said “it’s recovery day.”

There are “lots of people … in the terminals today, so come a little bit earlier,” he said. “Give yourself some extra time if you need to check in a bag, as there will be some lineups, especially at check in counters, and at the security lineups.”

In an early morning tweet, Pearson posted on X that they are

“expecting 127,129 travellers to move through the terminals today, with about 40 per cent flying through Terminal 1.”

Ventresca noted that airlines have added “extra sections for some of the flights that were cancelled yesterday.”

Because of the backlog, he urged travellers to “check in on (their) mobile app or online. You’ll avoid some of the lineups, especially if you don’t have to check bags.”

He also warned of potential delays for travellers to Canadian cities hit hard by the weather, such as Winnipeg and Ottawa.

“Check with the airlines that those flights are operating on time,” said Ventresca.

He also urged patience among U.S.-bound travellers.

“Those going into New York or Washington, check with the airlines going there, as well, as they have (had) some impacts with some air traffic management initiatives.”

Pearson’s X account points to delays in the U.S., as noted in a post by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration. Bad weather may delay flights connected to several areas such as Florida, New York, Washington, Philadelphia and Seattle.

As of 3 pm Friday afternoon,

Flightstats.com

said delays at Pearson were “excessive and increasing.”

Around the same time,

Flightaware.com

said that “inbound flights (are) delayed at their origin an average of 1 hours 24 minutes” with “departure delays (at) an average of 38 minutes and increasing.”

The Trudeau airport in Montreal

“has been fully operational despite the snowfall,” according to airport spokesperson Eric Forest, who responded to a query from National Post in an email on Friday afternoon.

However, Forest suggested contacting the “

airlines directly for more information, as they are responsible for managing their flights (delays, cancellations, and customer service).”

For Montreal’s Trudeau airport, 

FlightView

said the delays for arrivals and departures were similarly delayed: 73 per cent on time, 21 per cent late and 6 per cent very late.

Flightstats

 said, delays were “low and decreasing.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Caroline Elliott, pictured in this undated Facebook photo, is a candidate in the B.C. Conservative Party leadership race. Photo credit: Facebook

OTTAWA — Caroline Elliott has never run for office, or even put her name on a ballot, but she arguably became the early favourite in the British Columbia Conservative Party leadership race before even officially jumping into the fray.

Kory Teneycke, a onetime spokesman for former prime minister Stephen Harper and current ally of Ontario Premier Doug Ford, got the ball rolling on Monday

when he revealed on a podcast

that he’d soon be B.C. bound to manage Elliott’s campaign.

“I’m going to throw a ‘hey you’ out to all the people of British Columbia, I’m going to be moving out to your fair province … to go back to the campaign management business,” said Teneycke in a clip that launched

a thousand hot takes

.

Teneycke’s podcast bombshell blew open the floodgates, with a host of

well-known conservative operatives

announcing in the following hours that they’d also be joining the campaign.

By the time Elliott put out

a terse statement reading

“I’m in” on Tuesday, a large team of backroom talent had formed around her.

Some of the big names include digital guru Jeff Ballingall, Nick Kouvalis, a former advisor to

Toronto mayors Rob Ford and John Tory

and Anthony Koch, formerly a spokesman for both federal Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre and ex-B.C. Conservative leader John Rustad.

National Post has also learned that Howard Anglin, former senior advisor to both Harper and ex-Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, will also be joining the campaign. As will

conservative pollster Brooke Pigott

, who’s worked for both Harper and Poilievre.

Koch said that, while Elliott is far from a “household name,” her outsized political appeal comes down to a rare mix of intangibles that those in the know have seen in her.

“I think (Elliott) touches on three key things: she’s very smart, eminently electable and a real conservative. That’s a very rare combination for conservative leaderships aspirants,” said Koch. “Usually, the best you can hope for is two out of three.”

Koch added that Elliott has steadily built a name in conservative circles for her bold commentary on hot-button issues like Indigenous reconciliation, with

her byline regularly appearing
in the National Post

and other right-leaning outlets.

Elliott is a co-founder of

new-right blog Without Diminishment

but will be

taking a hiatus from

the publication while she runs for B.C. Conservative leader.

Margareta Dovgal, a regular contributor to Without Diminishment, says that Elliott’s approachable political style and extensive formal education in Indigenous relations make her ideally suited to navigate the political minefield of reconciliation.

“I think we’re already seeing Caroline (Elliott) move forward the conversation on reconciliation, because she’s been approaching it in such a thoughtful, fact-based way. Not everyone agrees with her, but even those who don’t can see she’s a serious person,” said Dovgal.

Elliott, who holds a PhD in aboriginal self-government and liberal democracy, is an avowed critic of what she calls “divisive” policies separating Indigenous and non-Indigenous British Columbians, such as

closures of some B.C. parks

to the latter.

She’s also criticized government lawyers for “

pulling punches

” in

the recent Cowichan decision

extending Aboriginal title to tracts of private property near Vancouver, arguing that they knowingly failed to marshal the strongest possible arguments in court.

Koch said that the Cowichan decision

and other recent developments

surrounding Indigenous relations in B.C. have marked a turning point making reconciliation a mainstream political issue.

“I think (reconciliation) is an issue that’s top of mind for British Columbians and also people across the country right now,” said Koch. “And I think most honest observers will see that she has a very nuanced and appropriate position on this that speaks directly to the concerns of people who are very worried about losing the most valuable asset that they own, which is their property.”

Koch added that Elliott wouldn’t “just be talking about reconciliation,” noting that she’s well-positioned to discuss the province’s soaring cost of living as a mother of two young children who lives in the Greater Vancouver area.

Brad Zubyk, a conservative strategist and former chief of staff to Rustad, said that the star power coalescing around Elliott doesn’t necessarily mean she’ll run away with the leadership race, stressing that she’ll need to build a network inside B.C.

“This is a leadership race and, at the end of the day, leadership races are about selling party memberships,” said Zubyk.

Zubyk said the high-profile Teneycke’s association with the campaign could be a double-edged sword, noting that he took attention away from Elliott right from the get-go by scooping her campaign announcement.

“The podcast stunt was one-hundred percent planned in advance,” said Zubyk.

Teneycke is a polarizing figure among grassroots conservatives after publicly, and repeatedly,

criticizing the Conservative campaign

during last spring’s federal election.

Koch says that while he “doesn’t share” Teneycke’s opinions on the federal Conservatives, the very fact that the two are working together

alongside an assortment of conservative talent from various parts of the coalition

reflects the breadth of Elliott’s appeal.

He noted that there are a good number of Poilievre alumni on the team, such as himself, Ballingall, Pigott and former federal Conservative candidate Mauro Francis.

“At the end of the day, you want to win and you want to assemble the best collection of talents that can actualize that,” said Koch.

The timeline for the leadership race and date of the leadership vote have not yet been announced. Other declared and rumoured contenders include former provincial cabinet minister Iain Black, businessman Yuri Fulmer and B.C. Conservative MLAs Sheldon Clare, Peter Milobar and Harman Bhangu.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


U.S. President Donald Trump holds up his fist to show two Stanley Cup rings presented to him by the 2025 Stanley Cup Champion Florida Panthers in the East Room of the White House on Jan. 15, 2026 in Washington.

U.S. President Donald Trump took a swipe at Canada during a White House event to mark the Stanley Cup victory by the Florida Panthers, their second win in as many years over the Edmonton Oilers. The last time a Canadian team won the cup was in 1993, when the Montreal Canadiens were victorious over the L.A. Kings.

After rattling off the Panthers’ achievements in the playoffs — 94 goals, a record 10 wins on the road, and an NHL record of holding the lead in the finals for more than 255 game minutes — Trump turned his attention to the runners-up, the Edmonton Oilers, who lost in the finals, four games to two.

“You denied Canada the Stanley Cup for the 32nd straight year by —”

 U.S. President Donald Trump is presented with a jersey and hockey stick by Florida Panthers owner Vincent Viola (L), Aleksander Barkov and Matthew Tkachuk of the Florida Panthers during a ceremony to honor the 2025 Stanley Cup Champion Florida Panthers in the East Room of the White House on Jan. 15, 2026 in Washington, DC.

He was interrupted by laughter, cheers and applause by those in attendance, before continuing: “I don’t know, what do you think about that? What do you think about that, Matthew?” That would be Matthew Tkachuk, winger and alternate captain for the Panthers.

“We have a little competition with Canada,” Trump said. “No, they’re great people though. They’re great people. We’re doing much better than Canada, but that’s OK, right? We want them to do well and they’re going to do well.”

Later in the event, Trump compared America’s might to that of the winning team.

“Good-looking people,” he said of the players in attendance. “Young, beautiful people. I hate ’em. You hate standing here with all this this power behind you. But I got power, too. It’s called the United States military. I don’t care.”

The Panthers gave Trump a Stanley Cup ring, a jersey with his name and the number 47, and a golden hockey stick.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney (R) listens as Premier of Ontario Doug Ford speaks during a news conference on Parliament Hill, December 18, 2025 in Ottawa, Canada.

BEIJING AND OTTAWA — Ontario Premier Doug Ford responded furiously on Friday to

a trade deal announced by Prime Minister Mark Carney

to allow some Chinese electric vehicles into Canada.

Carney announced the deal in the early hours of Friday morning, after a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing, and heralded it as “landmark trade arrangement.”

The trade deal means that China will agree to reduce tariffs on certain Canadian canola imports in exchange for Canada allowing a small but growing number of Chinese electric vehicles to enter its market at a preferential tariff rate. But Ford warned this will bring “a flood of cheap made-in-China electric vehicles without any real guarantee of equal or immediate investments in Canada’s economy, auto sector or supply chain.”

“Worse, by lowering tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles this lopsided deal risks closing the door on Canadian automakers to the American market, our largest export destination, which would hurt our economy and lead to job losses,”

wrote Ford, on social media

.

Ford issues a series of demands for Carney in response to the deal with China.

“To fix this mess, Prime Minister Carney and the federal government need to urgently step up and support Ontario’s auto sector. That means making the sector more competitive by ending the electric vehicle mandate, harmonizing regulations with key trading partners and scrapping federal fees that do nothing but add thousands to the cost of making vehicles and chase away investments,” Ford wrote on X.

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe, who accompanied Carney on the trip to Beijing, applauded the deal on Friday.

“Today’s trade deal to significantly reduce Chinese tariffs on canola and other Canadian products is very good news for Canada and Saskatchewan,” wrote Moe, on social media.

Some trade analysts have warned that a deal with

China also risks provoking U.S. President Donald Trump

. The U.S. first imposed 100 per cent tariffs on Chinese EVs in a bid to prevent local companies from being undercut by cheaper, heavily state-subsidized autos from China, and Canada quickly followed suit.

More to come.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


A synagogue in Winnipeg was vandalized with red swastikas in the early hours of Jan. 2, 2026. Police are investigating.

A Jewish advocacy group says there have been 32 reported antisemitic incidents in Canada this past week alone and is asking Prime Minister Mark Carney to act urgently.

B’nai Brith Canada cited dozens of incidents across the country, including swastikas being

spraypainted on the walls of a synagogue

and other hateful graffiti in Winnipeg, a Jewish couple being harassed at a mall on their way to see a film in Toronto, and a man at a rally in Montreal referring to Israelis as “pedophile Nazis.”

The group keeps track of such incidents for

its annual audit

, which it began in 1982.

B’nai Brith

wrote a letter

to the prime minister on Thursday, requesting that he establish a Royal Commission of Inquiry into antisemitism and called for him to appoint a new special envoy to combat it.

“That is a warning signal, and it demands more than piecemeal reactions,” B’nai Brith wrote in a post on X on Wednesday, about the number of incidents this past week.

The group pointed to the targeted terror attack on Australia’s Jewish community at Bondi Beach on Dec. 14, when 15 people were murdered. “Canada cannot wait for a Bondi of its own before acting,” it said on X.

Last week, the

Australian government said it would establish an inquiry

to investigate antisemitism in the country, look further into the Bondi Beach attack and make recommendations. In Canada an inquiry is needed now, said B’nai Brith, “with the mandate and independence to assess the threat environment, identify systemic drivers, and deliver actionable recommendations for policymakers.”

Although an inquiry’s findings are not binding, the federal government says online, they are “highly influential.”

“The final reports of Commissions are therefore among the most important publications produced in Canada and have highlighted and documented matters of importance to society since pre-Confederation,” it says.

The group also pushed for a successor to Deborah Lyons as Canada’s Special Envoy on Preserving Holocaust Remembrance and Combatting Antisemitism. Lyons

retired

in July. The government is still working to nominate a successor, it says online.

A spokesperson for Carney’s office told National Post in an emailed statement that the letter from B’nai Brith had been received. The spokesperson said that the government is “taking action to combat the scourge of antisemitism and protect Jewish Canadians, who have faced a horrifying rise of hate, particularly since Hamas’s October 7th terrorist attack.”

The spokesperson said they appreciated the work that Lyons has done and are “continuing significant engagement with the community about how to best build on this crucial work for the year ahead.”

“As part of this work, we have introduced the Combatting Hate Act to make it illegal to intimidate or obstruct anyone accessing or attending services at religious or cultural buildings, and to protect against hate more broadly,” the statement said.

In Thursday’s letter to Carney, B’nai Brith Canada’s CEO, Simon Wolle, said the Act, also known as Bill C-9, is “urgent federal legislation” that the organization supports — but “Canada remains afflicted by a worsening crisis of antisemitism.”

The spokesperson for Carney’s office also said the government was looking into strengthening the

Canada Community Security Program

, which provides funding for communities at risk of hate-motivated crimes and collaborating “with provincial counterparts to ensure that Crown Prosecutors and police officers have the skills and knowledge to properly address hate crime.”

The government is fighting radicalization through initiatives such as the

Community Resilience Fund

, which funds organizations working to prevent and counter violent extremism, according to Carney’s spokesperson. “We will always protect the inalienable right of Jewish Canadians to live openly in freedom, safety, and dignity,” the statement concluded.

“Antisemitism is accelerating,” B’nai Brith said on X. “Canada cannot afford to keep playing catch-up.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.