LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Premier Doug Ford unveils new designs for Ontario Place on June 24, 2025.

What communication did Ontario Premier Doug Ford have with developers who could have benefited from his removal of Greenbelt protections before he walked that back?

What briefing notes did he receive related to Toronto’s Billy Bishop Airport, which he wanted to expand?

What was in his calendar between Feb. 5 and April 21, 2026?

And what briefings did he get for a June 2025 meeting with U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra?

These are just some of the many things that Ontario’s government won’t tell the public.

Between April 27 and June 19, records obtained by the Investigative Journalism Bureau show government’s cabinet office refused 48 freedom-of-information requests by citing new provincial legislation that allows the premier and his cabinet to keep their office records secret from public scrutiny. The change passed as part of omnibus legislation in April.

Freedom-of-information (FOI) legislation was originally meant as a tool the public could use to ask for specific government records, with a goal of making government more accountable and open. Federal, provincial and territorial governments each have their own versions of such laws.

Two of the refused Ontario FOI requests obtained by the IJB asked questions about the redevelopment of Ontario Place, where plans for a mega-spa have run up against opposition; two took interest in the 52-kilometre Highway 413 project northwest of Toronto; one request looked for calls Ford received about the private jet he was pressured to return.

Some of the requests were newly filed. One was from last year, and three were from 2023. (The legislated timeframe for a response to an FOI request is 30 days.) At least one, filed April 2, sought records that had already been released.

All were turned down.

A snapshot of secrecy

The list of refused freedom-of-information requests, which the IJB obtained through an FOI request of its own, is not exhaustive and is missing refused requests that were made to other ministries besides the cabinet office. But it provides a snapshot into what information the Ford government will no longer make public. Ford’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

At the time the legislative change was made, Ford said it was necessary to protect himself and his cabinet from “communist China,” to update what he characterized as an outdated framework and to protect the privacy of, for example, people he corresponds with. (Personal information was already exempted from Ontario’s freedom-of-information regime.)

Journalist and freedom-of-information expert Dean Beeby told the IJB the 48-denial tally is higher than he expected given that the legislation has only been in place for a brief time.

“The law would have put off a lot of people. People who might normally have filed (a request) would have sort of read the changes and decided not to bother,” he said.

“It sounds like a lot to me.”

And it shows what is lost through legislation like this, he said.

“Cabinet is the pinnacle of decision-making in any government … That’s really the core of public-service journalism and the core of understanding why decisions are made and whether they were appropriate,” he said.

Information released through FOIs, or access-to-information requests, can mean the difference between knowing what your government is up to – and not.

Anaïs Bussières McNicoll, director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association’s Fundamental Freedoms program, said the IJB’s finding “confirms our our fears that these amendments will deprive people of the ability to really have a transparent government and to hold the government to account.”

Exposing wrongdoing – such as that brought to light through an investigation into Ontario’s Greenbelt – “is going to be made much more challenging because of those retrograde amendments,” she added.

Beeby worries about similar moves in other provinces and in the federal government, which is considering recommendations to exempt some records from access beyond those already exempt from public scrutiny, potentially dooming them to destruction.

“We are seeing a kind of FOI backlash across the country.”

The Investigative Journalism Bureau (IJB) at the University of Toronto’s Dalla Lana School of Public Health is a collaborative investigative newsroom supported by Postmedia that partners with academics, researchers and journalists while training the next generation of investigative reporters.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


National Post spoke to industry players in Quebec who felt they were excluded from the decision-making process.

OTTAWA — Just days after Quebec opted not to join the nine other Canadian provinces in signing a landmark operating agreement to allow direct-to-consumer (DTC) interprovincial sales of alcohol, Paul Cirka wrote to Premier Christine Fréchette.

The CEO and founder of CIRKA Distilleries in Montreal lamented the fact that Quebec spirits producers like him cannot yet submit applications to sell in other provinces.

“While producers in other provinces are developing relationships with new clients, building their mailing lists, and establishing their brands in new provincial markets, Quebec producers remain excluded,” Cirka wrote in a letter to Fréchette on Aug. 6.

“By the time Quebec eventually joins the agreement, our competitors may have gained a significant lead that will be difficult and costly to overcome,” he added.

Fréchette has said Quebec supports the terms of the agreement, but that certain laws need to be amended before DTC sales can take effect. She said those changes can be made after the October election on Oct. 5, when the Quebec legislature resumes its session.

National Post spoke to industry players in Quebec who felt they were excluded from the decision-making process, and to government sources who are irritated that Quebec remains the outlier.

Fréchette’s refusal to sign the agreement was especially surprising, given that her predecessor, François Legault, had agreed to a memorandum of understanding in May 2025 to allow interprovincial sales of beer, wine and spirits within one year.

While many provinces made significant progress during that time, Dominic LeBlanc, the federal minister responsible for internal trade, opted to send a strongly-worded statement on May 29, 2026 , urging all provinces to get with the program.

“Removing interprovincial trade barriers that create unnecessary costs and limit opportunities for Canadian business and consumers alike is critical to building a more competitive, integrated, and prosperous Canadian economy,” LeBlanc said.

“Canadians expect all orders of government to show leadership to realize this vision, and it’s time to deliver,” he concluded.

Nine premiers signed the final agreement less than two months later, on July 21, 2026.

One senior government official in Ontario said there is “frustration across the board” that Quebec refused to sign, but it is more acutely felt in Ontario given that Premier Doug Ford has been leading the charge on issues related to trade liberalization.

“If this is good enough for nine out of 10 provinces, why isn’t it good for Quebec?” the official said.

Béatrice Déry, a spokeswoman for the incumbent minister of the economy, said that, in the past year, Quebec has undertaken a process to modernize all legislation governing the alcoholic beverage sector in order to adapt it to today’s realities.

“The resulting modernization will pave the way for direct-to-consumer sales and the signing of the associated operationalization agreement,” she said.

Déry said that the Quebec government plans to table an omnibus bill amending the relevant legislation — along with the regulations required for its implementation — reflecting the direction during the modernization process “in late fall or early winter.”

Two days of consultation with the industry on how to modernize Quebec’s alcoholic beverage sector indeed took place back in May, which led to a report being tabled in June. But the report largely glossed over issues relating to interprovincial trade.

Matthieu Beauchemin, president of the Quebec Wine Council, said his industry was excluded from government discussions regarding interprovincial trade in the last year.

“Quebec chose to deal solely with the SAQ (Société des alcools du Québec) as its representative within the province; consequently, we were effectively shut out of those negotiations and had no real say in the matter,” Beauchemin said in an interview.

“So, it is not without reason that we find ourselves in a situation today where Quebec is the only one that did not sign (the DTC agreement). Certainly, if the Quebec industry had been at the table, the outcome might have been different,” he added.

Cirka said few people will come out and say that government policy is heavily influenced by the SAQ’s monopoly but said it’s “absolutely true.”

The SAQ was not immediately available to respond to questions on the matter.

Ryan Manucha, a research fellow at the C.D. Howe Institute, said governments are so dependent on the billions of dollars in revenue that monopolies like the SAQ bring into their coffers that it is hard to think about taking that profit source away.

“So, you could probably rejig the model, but I think at the end of the day, if you’re going to rip away billions from Quebec, you know you’re going to have to figure out how else you’re going to build roads and schools and hospitals,” he said.

“I think, for the time being, the monopolies are here to stay.”

Beauchemin, who owns a small winery near the Yamaska River, has decided to not sell his products through the SAQ’s distribution systems for the moment. His wines are instead available in restaurants and specialized grocery stores in the province.

He said his main hurdle, for the time being, is not being able to ship his products to businesses and consumers inside the province — only the SAQ is allowed to do that. Instead, he has to take it upon himself to make deliveries across Quebec.

Beauchemin said that even if Quebec were to sign the DTC agreement tomorrow, it would be easier to sell to another province than within his own.

“So, we would find ourselves in a situation where, ultimately, if interprovincial alcohol trade opened up, it would literally be easier for us to ship wine to Toronto than to Sherbrooke — which is completely absurd,” he said.

Jean-François Nellis, co-owner of the Gaspésie microbrewery Pit Caribou, has for his part been approached by the SAQ to sell his beers, yet he declined. That has not stopped the company from expanding massively in Quebec with 3,000 points of sale.

Now, he hopes to expand his business into New Brunswick. Nellis lives about an hour away from the Van Horne Bridge, which crosses the Restigouche River to Campbellton.

As a Quebec producer, he said the process has proven to be arduous to sell beer on the shelves of groceries and corner stores in his neighbouring province.

So, he has also invested efforts into exporting to France and Switzerland.

“It’s less complicated.”

National Post
calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


U.S. President Donald Trump looks on after disembarking from Air Force One upon arrival at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland on Sept. 7, 2026.

U.S. President Donald Trump launched a string of complaints and threats targeting Canada, levelling an attack against aircraft maker Bombardier and posting a photo of the North American continent covered in an American flag.

“No more selling Bombardier in the United States!” the president posted on his Truth Social page Monday just hours before the looming midnight trade deadline. “Their products aren’t good enough! Over 50 per cent of their revenue comes from the United States — they live off American buyers, American companies, American airports, and American service — all while Canada blocks our GREAT American Banks, and companies, throughout the U.S.A.”

The comments were part of a social media blitz in which Trump intensified his attacks on both Canada and Mexico, heaping new uncertainty onto the ongoing trade disputes between the U.S. and its neighbours. The president made more than 60 posts on Monday, taunting “Governor Carney,” threatening to change the name of the state of New Mexico to “New America,” and complaining about the “imbalance” between the value of the Canadian and U.S. dollars.

At 12:01 a.m. Tuesday, Canada’s raft of sweeping counter-tariffs, ranging from 15 per cent to 50 per cent on $28 billion worth of goods, are to come into effect. As of late Monday afternoon, Canadian officials said they were not scheduled to continue talks with U.S. negotiators.

As part of his threat to block sales of Bombardier jets in the U.S., Trump claimed the move was in response to Canada blocking U.S.-based Gulfstream Aerospace and other companies from operating in Canada.

“That era is OVER!” he said. “If they want our market, they must build here, and stop treating America like a “piggybank.” Buy American. Fly on American airliners. Enjoy American liquor and beverages. Sail on Lake America.”

Jennifer Kavanagh, senior fellow and director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, questioned whether Trump had the authority to block sales of Bombardier in the U.S. market.

“He can’t just ban their sale,” she said. “He can try to impose tariffs; he can impose other economic barriers; he can ask the FAA to decertify them. There are other things he can do, but he can’t just ban it like that.”

Kavanagh said Trump may be “frustrated” at Canada for not caving to his latest bout of trade threats and is expressing his willingness to deepen the conflict rather than level specific tariffs against specific products.

“The spirit of the post is kind of what to interpret, rather than the actual literal statement.”

The Federal Aviation Administration, not the White House, is the agency that certifies or decertifies aircraft in the U.S.

Bombardier models remain U.S. certified and the company is currently exempt from U.S. tariffs.

His Bombardier comments came just hours after the president had also voiced complaints about the value of the Canadian dollar, marking a new line of economic attack against Canada.

“Canada’s (currency) Dollar imbalance with the U.S. is unacceptable,” he said. “It has been that way for years — but no longer!”

Those comments somewhat resemble complaints that Trump levelled against China for more than a decade, calling the country a “currency manipulator” for the way it artificially depressed the value of its Yuan.

Lower value currencies are viewed as advantageous for exporting nations, as it lets companies receive a higher-value currency in exchange for the goods they sell. Still, stronger currencies are generally viewed more favourably than weak ones for the buying power it affords consumers. Trump, whose bellicose trade policy has long sought to expand export capacity by attracting more manufacturers back inside U.S. borders, has long viewed the strong U.S. dollar as a detriment.

Charles St-Arnaud, chief economist at Servus Credit Union, said Trump’s decision to target the Canadian dollar likely reflects the president’s desire to eliminate the U.S.’s trade deficit with Canada.

“The problem is that a stronger Canadian dollar would do next to nothing to reduce the U.S. trade deficit with Canada, because most of that deficit is due to U.S. oil imports,” he said.

On Monday, the Canadian dollar was valued at $0.72 per US$1. The loonie was last valued higher than the U.S. in 2011, when high oil prices had rapidly inflated the value of the Canadian dollar.

Additional reporting from Tracy Moran

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks about the trade dispute with the United States at the Davie Shipyard in Levis, Que., on Aug. 24, 2026.

OTTAWA — Canada’s retaliatory tariffs are set to take effect on Tuesday and with an American response almost inevitable, trade watchers are warning Canada should prepare itself for economic pain.

“We may be in an escalating war, and the question is who’s going to have the greater threshold for pain in this, and are Canadians ready for it because it’s going to be painful,” said Fen Osler Hampson, professor of International Affairs at Carleton University.

“I think it may be too early to go back to the table because the Americans will simply throw the same demands at us, and you know if they were unacceptable first-time around, are they going to be more the second time around?” said Hampson.

Negotiations between Canadian and American officials have remained stalled since Aug. 21, after Prime Minister Mark Carney paused trade talks with the U.S.

As a result, a 50 per-cent U.S. tariff on nearly $28 billion worth of Canadian goods has come into effect, under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930. In response, Carney intends to impose retaliatory tariffs ranging from 15 to 50 per cent on $27.6 billion worth of U.S. goods.

United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has said the U.S. has drawn up potential options to respond to Canada’s tariffs. He told Fox News last Thursday that negotiations remain stalled, but he has exchanged a few texts with the Canadian side.

Carney and Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc have both expressed a willingness to return to the table, but only with a change in “attitude” on the American side.

“I don’t see in the language from Carney and LeBlanc that would lead me to think that they have left themselves room to back down, and I also think there’s too much political advantage to them within Canada to keep the line that they’re taking,” said Mark Warner, trade lawyer at Maaw Law.

“The only position they seem to have left themselves open for is for the American president, in this case Trump, to basically fall on his own sword and say, ‘Okay, you win,’ and that’s just not going to happen,” he added.

Brian Clow, former deputy chief of staff to prime minister Justin Trudeau, said there is a possible scenario where the increased escalation could bring the two parties back to the negotiation table.

“I’m not betting on that,” said Clow. “I certainly wouldn’t bet my house on that, but it’s possible, and it’s one of the scenarios here.”

Clow also said it was significant that Trump’s first retaliatory response after talks broke down was to threaten an increase in tariffs on Canadian autos and trucks in January, a full four months from now.

“That is telling and shows that he can’t go too far on his tariff policies,” he said, adding that it would be interesting to see how the U.S. responds on Tuesday.

Hampson said Canada’s trade conflict with the U.S. could have a “compounding” effect on domestic pressures that are already facing the president, including the Iran war, inflation, a slowing economy and ongoing issues with the U.S. bond market.

On the political front though, Clow said the impact of the upcoming U.S. midterms in November on Trump’s tariff agenda is “overstated.”

“I’m not saying there’s no impact, but I I think some people are putting too much optimism or confidence that the House of Representatives flipping to the Democrats will somehow, therefore, resolve the tariff issue,” he said.

Carney is likely to face his own domestic economic pressures.

University of Calgary professor and economist Trevor Tombe has estimated 87,000 Canadian jobs could be at risk from the 50 per-cent Section 338 tariffs. The Canadian retaliatory tariffs could also raise costs for Canadians, with Tombe estimating $250 in additional costs per year for households with children.

Still, Carney holds significant political capital, and polling suggests Canadians support the prime minister walking away from a bad deal.

Warner said polled Canadians believe they can withstand the pain from tariff escalation with the U.S., but he wonders how long that could last.

“So the question is, what does that mean as it (trade war) starts to bite more?” he said.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Donald Trump was posting about Canada's dollar and the renaming of Lake Ontario to Lake America in the U.S. Sunday on Truth Social.

U.S. President Donald Trump took a few swings at Canada during a spate of AI-generated posts to his Truth Social platform on Sunday afternoon, including a complaint about the value of the Canadian dollar.

“Canada’s (currency) Dollar imbalance with the U.S. is unacceptable,” he wrote in the morning. “It has been that way for years – but no longer!”

Trump didn’t elaborate.

The Canadian dollar trades for about 72 U.S. cents, making their dollar CA$1.38, according to the Bank of Canada.

The U.S. is set to be hit with Canada’s retaliatory tariffs Tuesday, adding to the tension of an already complicated and costly trade war.

Early Sunday afternoon, after sharing AI-generated images of himself with George Washington — one in the Oval Office with this cabinet, another of the pair astride horses — the president posted another image of himself writing America over Ontario on a map of the suddenly disputed lake.

In his salvo against Canada 10 days ago, Trump ordered the U.S. Geographic Names Information System to change the hydronym, after which Google Maps said it would make the change for users in the U.S. Apple followed suit last week.

On Friday, Trump said Bing Maps, a Microsoft product, has also made the change.

“People, especially Patriots from the United States of America, love the name change of Lake Ontario to Lake America,” he wrote. “The support has been overwhelming, including affirmation from Google Maps, Apple Maps, and Microsoft’s Bing Maps.”

Trump claimed business on the U.S. side of the border has been “booming” since the change.

National Post has contacted Microsoft for confirmation and comment.

Amid his flood of posts on Sunday, Trump shared a graphic reading: “If you have a problem with Lake Ontario being renamed Lake America just remember, the Left renamed the following.”

His list of things include various renamed U.S. military bases, commercial products, as well as the NFL’s Washington Commanders (formerly Redskins) and the MLB’s Cleveland Guardians (formerly Indians).

Later, while he didn’t mention Canada specifically, he posted three separate graphics explaining “Non-tariff cheating” and the “8 hidden tricks by foreign countries.”

Some of the examples of “cheating” include banning U.S. food, cheapening their money and applying “weird tests” to make it hard for American firms to enter their market.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Pete Hoekstra (left) was appointed U.S. Ambassador to Canada in April 2025. Bruce Heyman (right) held the role between 2014 and 2017.

A former U.S. ambassador to Canada is taking a strikingly different approach to cross-border relations than the current diplomat in office, as the trade war between the two countries continues to escalate.

Bruce Heyman, who served as ambassador to Canada under U.S. president Barack Obama between 2014 and 2017, has been increasingly vocal in his support for Canada. In contrast, current U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra has offended some Canadians to the point that a parliamentary petition calling for his removal has gathered more than 260,000 signatures.

Both Midwesterners, Heyman grew up in Ohio and served as a managing director of private wealth management at Goldman Sachs before Obama appointed him as U.S. ambassador to Canada. Hoekstra spent most of his childhood in Michigan and is a long-serving Republican, first as a member of Congress representing Michigan’s 2nd District from 1993 to 2011.

Ohio and Michigan are among the states most affected by the Canada-U.S. trade war. Last year, 38 per cent of all exports from Michigan and 32 per cent from Ohio went to Canada , according to data from the U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (ITA), with motor vehicles and parts both states’ top northbound exports.

In a series of recent posts on X, Heyman has been emphatic in his support for Canada, writing “never underestimate a Canadian,” “this American is proudly pro-Canadian,” and “love you, Canada.”

He also shared a photo of himself wearing a hat with “Lake Ontario” stitched on the front, after U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order to rename the body of water “Lake America,” and on Wednesday claimed that he’d previously been told by senior U.S. military officers that “if they were ever stuck in a foxhole under fire and they couldn’t have an American at their side they would undoubtedly want a Canadian.”

Since leaving the role of U.S. ambassador to Canada in 2017, Heyman co-founded the company Uncharted with his wife, Vicki Heyman, which connects Canadians and Americans to create a positive impact across the Canada-U.S. relationship, political engagement and philanthropy.

Heyman’s vocal support for Canada is likely good for his business. But regardless of the motivation, his public posture stands in stark contrast to that of Hoekstra, who took on the role of U.S. ambassador to Canada in April 2025.

Among the objectionable comments Hoekstra has made about Canada are his bafflement at why Canadians are angry about “51st state” comments , suggesting Canada’s response to Trump’s actions has been “nasty and mean,” and reportedly aiming an expletive-laden rant at Ontario’s trade representative .

He also reiterated Trump’s claim that the U.S. “does not need Canada” during a radio interview in Montreal, and suggested that the U.S. president’s “51st state” comments could be taken as a “term of endearment.”

More recently, Hoekstra claimed that Canada paying to construct the Gordie Howe International Bridge was a “big myth,” a comment that former prime minister Stephen Harper’s director of communications, Andrew MacDougall, branded a “punch in the face.”

The petition calling for his removal accuses the ambassador of undermining Canada-U.S. diplomatic relations and normalizing “51st state” language, and is sponsored by Green Party MP Elizabeth May.

That said, the stark difference between the two ambassadors isn’t explained by personal politics alone.

Heyman, whose current business relies on maintaining a positive relationship with Canada, served under Obama, whose administration committed to forming stronger trade ties with Canada through instructing aides to make it easier for goods and people to move between the two nations, and looking to solve a dispute over exports of Canadian softwood lumber.

Hoekstra, meanwhile, represents Trump during a dramatically different period in the bilateral relationship, characterized by tariffs and the trade war. The fallout has caused Canadians’ views of America to become increasingly negative, with a recent Angus Reid poll finding that 45 per cent of Canadians say their views on Americans are unfavourable or very unfavourable .

And it’s not just Canada that Hoekstra has had a fractured relationship with. During his time as ambassador to the Netherlands during Trump’s first term, he was forced to apologize after making false claims that the “Islamic movement” in Europe was creating “no-go zones” and burning politicians.

Meanwhile, it would be wrong to suggest that Heyman didn’t have to navigate policy differences between Canada and the U.S. during his time as ambassador. Most notable was the Keystone XL pipeline, for which Obama denied the cross-border permit in 2015, stating the project did not serve U.S. national interests .

Heyman later wrote in a book he co-authored with his wife, Vicki, that disagreements between former prime minister Stephen Harper’s government and the Obama administration over the pipeline briefly led to an “ice age in relations.”

And yet, Heyman’s pro-Canada stance has extended beyond his time in office. After Trump first imposed tariffs in March 2025, he said in an interview on CNTV that Canada had “been there for (the U.S.) in thick and thin” and that the tariffs “shouldn’t happen.”

“I just think Donald Trump must have some other issue here, and those issues are either personal with Canada, or … personally think he’s short cash,” Heyman added.

He also called the tariffs “deeply offensive to the Canadians,” and said: “I would just say to the Canadian public, there are millions of Americans that value this relationship.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Asked if U.S. President Donald Trump leaving office would change their impression of the U.S., 64 per cent of respondents to a Leger poll said yes, 21 per cent said it wouldn’t and 14 per cent were unsure.

For as long as anyone can remember, Canada and the U.S. have arguably been the world’s closest of allies and friends. The sibling settler-colonial nations sharing the world’s longest undefended border are deeply linked, culturally and economically, with any differences historically resolved respectfully.

But as the trade war initiated by U.S. President Donald Trump drags on, getting uglier every day, a growing number of Canadians have a very different view of America: our “enemy.”

New polling by Leger found a strong plurality of Canadians (41 per cent) consider the U.S. an enemy country before an ally or neutral (both at 22 per cent).

“Donald Trump, man, he can move public opinion like nobody’s business,” Leger vice-president Andrew Enns told National Post in an interview.

More than half (51 per cent) of those 55 or older perceived the U.S. as an enemy, only 13 per cent of whom see it as neutral. Meanwhile, Quebecers were the Canadians most likely (49 per cent) see the U.S. in that light and the least likely to consider it an ally (17 per cent) or neutral (20 per cent), one of several times an “exclamation point” appeared on some Quebec results.

Enns said they related to the province’s election this fall, which the Trump factor has unavoidably entered into.

“It’s helping, I would suggest, some of those federalist parties,” he said. “It’s probably creating some grief for the PQ, the front-runner in that election, as they’re trying to sort of navigate this.”

Even with the recent sharp movement in how Canadians characterize the U.S, Leger’s results indicate most still distinguish between America the country and the Trump administration ruling it. When asked if his leaving office would change their impression, 64 per cent said yes, 21 per cent said it wouldn’t and 14 per cent were unsure.

Results indicate Quebecers and women would be most open to a change of heart, with 72 and 71 per cent saying Trump’s departure would alter their impression of the U.S. and only 16 per cent, respectively, saying it wouldn’t change a thing. British Columbians (30 per cent) and men (27 per cent) were the least amenable to a new way of thinking.

Brian Rathbun, a professor of international relations and political science at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, said that while Canadians may recognize that most Americans don’t support the way Canada’s being treated, it’s important to remember that Americans, simply as a function of their larger economy and population, are somewhat indifferent to Canadians.

“But at some point, I think Canadians will start to get frustrated if this persists, even if it’s not what the American public wants,” Rathbun told National Post in an interview.

“They can say, ‘Why is it that no one’s standing up to this particular bully?’ Then I think that you could get into something like a deeper problem that couldn’t be fixed by kicking this guy out.”

Rathbun, himself an American who moved to Canada in April 2024 from southern California, said Canadians may be starting to realize that a change in leadership — “even with a Democratic president” — won’t fix the “basket case” the U.S. has become.

“It’s become something of an ungovernable country,” he said.

Leger landed on enemy as a “black and white” catch-all against ally or neutral for people who felt negatively towards the U.S., Enns explained, acknowledging it could mean something different to some, including those who legitimately fear the U.S. will try to invade Canada.

It’s not the first time they’ve felt this way.

Last March, after months of enduring Trump’s jabs at Canada and two weeks into Prime Minister Mark Carney’s “Elbows Up” bid to see the Liberals retain government, 43 per cent saw the U.S. as an enemy. But that number dropped precipitously to 27 per cent in a poll last June after it seemed as though cooler heads might prevail.

Fast forward to this summer, noted Enns, and Trump’s “really, really deliberate comments around Canada” have permeated into “a pretty broad sentiment across the country.”

Rathbun isn’t surprised by the 41 per cent who see the U.S. as an enemy, and reasoned that, unlike Russia, for example, many “Canadians feel like American policy is more malicious vis-à-vis Canada” because it’s more direct.

Both he and Enns agree the freshly stoked rhetoric from Trump and his administration — some of it entirely separate from the trade discussion — is only making things worse. This week alone, aside from Trump blasting Canada on Truth Social, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent took a shot at the Canadian Navy’s aging submarine fleet and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth was accused of body-shaming Canadian cadets.

Enns said the proportion seeing the U.S. as an enemy could climb if Trump and his ilk continue to “double down” on disparaging Canada.

Rathbun highlighted the Lake Ontario-Lake America discussion as a “classic example.”

“It’s entirely unimportant what the Americans call Lake Ontario, and yet, at the same time, it probably galls us more than softwood lumber tariffs, unless we’re in the softwood lumber industry,” he said. “Why? Because it’s indicative of a lack of respect, and respect is so basic to our self-understanding of ourselves as people.”

 Trump’s Truth Social post about renaming Lake Ontario.

Leger also sought to gauge Canadians’ feelings on tariffs — both those initiated by Trump and those Canada has launched or promised to in retaliation.

A large majority (87 per cent) of Canadians expect Trump’s tariffs will have some level of impact on their personal financial situation, whether small (24 per cent), moderate (40 per cent) or major (24 per cent), and 38 per cent are somewhat (22 per cent) or very (16 per cent) concerned about losing their job in the next 12 months — especially in Ontario (49 per cent) and among 18-34-year-olds (46 per cent).

As for Canada’s latest economic riposte, Ottawa announced “new countermeasures on $27.6 billion in products imported from the U.S.” effective Sept. 8. The 15 to 50 per cent levies will apply to U.S. steel, aluminum, dishwashers, refrigerators, video game consoles, cheese, beauty products, plywood, paper products and clothing, among others.

Almost three-quarters of Canadians (74 per cent) agree with the counterattack, with only 13 per cent dissenting and the remaining 13 per cent unsure or preferring not to answer.

Solidarity with Canada’s reprisal peaked among the 55-plus crowd (83 per cent) and in B.C. (80 per cent), but wasn’t far off in Quebec (78 per cent). Respondents in Manitoba and Saskatchewan were most likely to disagree (22 per cent).

Canadians by and large (78 per cent) expect Ottawa’s retaliation will result in higher prices paid by Canadian consumers, but 66 per cent agree with Canada’s clapback, with the strongest support from those 55-plus (76 per cent), men (71 per cent), and people in B.C. (72 per cent). Just over a fifth of respondents (21 per cent) are against the retaliation.

Enns said the results tell him there “are some conflicting opinions within the Canadian public and at some point, the ‘Ra-Ra, Canada-proud, sticking to the American with some tariffs,’ could start to soften if it becomes really painful for households’ pocketbook.

“If this thing just sort of settles and all of a sudden we’re into the fall going into the winter, we’re not talking necessarily about Donald Trump and maybe his insults aren’t making the front pages,” he said. “But what might be making the front pages is suddenly the impact on food prices.”

That’s a topic already on respondents’ minds, evidenced by the 35 per cent who cited inflation and rising cost of items as the top issue facing Canadians. Trump, his tariffs and U.S. aggression were the second biggest (24 per cent), followed by health care (10 per cent) in a distant third.

Enns and Rathbun warned the conflict of tariffs and the cost of living could put some heat on Carney and the Liberals.

“The big question is, and the big challenge for a leader, is how long you can persist in that course and basically how much resolve ordinary Canadians will have? We don’t know,” said Rathbun. “Because it’s easy to say this now because we haven’t really paid the price yet.”

Still, he said the “childish” and “bullying” behaviour from the U.S. side is only emboldening Canadians and likely helping Carney’s cause.

Canadians may be willing to endure blows in the trade war because national pride has surged since it began, according to polling data.

A plurality of Canadians (83 per cent) say they are proud to be Canadians, but the proportion who feel very proud (56 per cent) increased by 11 points since polling last June, and up from 40 per cent in 2024. Only 13 per cent said they weren’t very proud (eight per cent) or not proud at all (five per cent).

“The overall pridefulness of Canadians hasn’t wavered much since we started asking that question around when all this sort of stuff started happening in 2025, but the intensity really, really jumped up,” Enns said.

Since the trade war hit a fever pitch this summer, 41 per cent told Leger they feel more proud, including 45 per cent of Ontarians and men. Only 15 per cent are less proud and 44 per cent said their level of pride hasn’t changed.

Overall net pride was highest in Ontario and B.C. (85 per cent, respectively), among women (86 per cent) and 55-plus Canadians (88 per cent). And while Quebecers were the most likely to say they are not proud to be a Canadian (17 per cent), 79 per cent of them still expressed pride.

Rathbun said that sense of nationalism is understandable and offered a different perspective.

“It’s also understandable that Canadians feel more pride, even though nothing about Canada has changed — it’s the Americans that are essentially reducing American pride,” he said, “So that pride is really just a reaction to something that they don’t like somewhere else.”

Canadians also remain steadfast against becoming the 51st state (85 per cent opposed), again with Quebecers (89 per cent) and the 55-plus group (93 per cent) opposed. British Columbians (13 per cent) and the 18-34 crowd (14 per cent) showed the most support.

The survey of 1,552 respondents in Canada was conducted by Leger between Aug. 28-31. For comparison purposes, a probability sample of 1,552 respondents would have a margin of error no greater than plus or minus 2.48 per cent, 19 times out of 20.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


U.S. President Donald Trump arrives before speaking at General Motors' Milford Proving Ground in Milford, Michigan, on July 27, 2026.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Unless Washington and Ottawa change course, Canada’s retaliatory tariffs on more than 700 U.S. products entering Canada — covering CA$27.6 billion in annual imports — are scheduled to take effect Tuesday.

The duties, ranging from 15 to 50 per cent, come as U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said this week that “there are no negotiations happening on trade right now.” A source close to the Canadian side said on Friday that no talks were underway.

The Canadian duties would cover a broad range of vehicle-related goods, including a 25 per cent tariff on trailers and semi-trailers, as well as higher duties on steel, aluminum and industrial inputs used in automotive and equipment manufacturing. The U.S. measures raise costs for Canadian goods entering the United States; Canada’s retaliation does the same for selected U.S. goods entering Canada.

Analysts say the Canadian package is broader in scope than the U.S. measures it answers.

“The actual tariffs imposed by the United States were really a list of annoyances,” said Patrick Anderson, CEO of Lansing-based Anderson Economic Group. “The Canadian tariffs appear to be much more pervasive… Canada’s reaction here has been both rhetorically and substantively significantly larger than what the U.S. actually imposed.”

Several U.S. states will feel the impact, including Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Texas, and Maine, but Michigan could take the hardest hit, analysts say. The mitten-shaped state is most exposed because it ships about $1.5 billion in tariff-listed products to Canada each year. Canada was the destination for 36 per cent of Michigan’s goods exports in 2025, according to U.S. trade data, and motor vehicles and auto parts accounted for a large share of that.

“Michigan is the single largest auto parts exporter to Canada,” said Jason Miller, a supply chain management expert and professor at Michigan State University, noting that “the auto parts suppliers in Michigan who are exporting to those plants are going to be hurt.”

“The Detroit metro area writ large is about the most export-dense manufacturing area to Canada of anywhere in the country,” he added.

“The worst affected province would be Ontario, and the worst affected states would be Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois and Texas,” Anderson predicted.

Analysts and industry groups say the earliest pain may show up not on factory payrolls but in wholesale margins and inventory decisions.

“Everybody’s focusing on manufacturing, but there are so many jobs in the wholesaling side of imported products,” Miller said, noting that he’s curious about “Michigan wholesalers getting caught up in this and being negatively affected.”

Drew Beardslee, the vice president of government affairs at the Michigan Retailers Association, says the earliest impacts will be on wholesale margins and inventory decisions, with consumers seeing effects within a quarter.

“Like when you grab a rope and sort of lift up on it, you can watch it travel down the rope. And so I think it sort of travels through the supply chain that way in terms of where the cost is,” Beardslee explained, using the rope imagery to liken how the duty is paid at entry and then moves through the importer, wholesaler, retailer, and then, often, to the consumer.

Canadian importers would pay the duty when covered U.S. goods enter Canada. They could absorb the cost, pass it along to wholesalers, retailers, and consumers, demand price concessions from U.S. suppliers, or replace those suppliers, depending on contracts and market dynamics.

Businesses were already grappling with thin margins and uncertainty caused by shifting U.S. trade policy. Tariff changes have caused a whiplash effect for everyone involved in trade this past year — from importers and retailers to consumers and customs officials. It’s been hard to keep up, but not knowing the tariff levels from one week to the next makes business planning incredibly difficult.

“The cost associated with tariffs was bad enough, but the inconsistency with which they were applied made it so hard to guess what to do,” said Beardslee. “What they’re looking for more than anything is some more consistency and certainty.”

Beardslee pointed out that grocery margins are already just two to three per cent and that 73 per cent of respondents to a Michigan Retailers Association member survey reported that tariffs have already “had a negative or strong negative impact” on them since April 2025.

Further duties mean wholesalers could be “squeezed dramatically,” Anderson said, on contracts already signed. Smaller distributors, meanwhile, have “much less room to manoeuvre” and less influence to seek exemptions.

The uncertainty also makes it hard for businesses to react to everything that’s happening, stymying both positive and negative planning decisions.

“Expansion plans get put on hold when uncertainty is high,” said Miller. “But believe it or not, layoff plans also get put on hold when uncertainty is high.

“I think especially for companies in Maine, in Michigan, in Wisconsin, northern Minnesota, where there’s a lot of cross-border business involved, what you’re going to have right now is a freezing of decisions.”

Given the time of year, Beardslee pointed to tariff volatility impacting retailers and distributors of back-to-school products as an example. Prices are already up on common school items, such as shoes, pencils, crayons, binders, and folders, he said, comparing tariff collections and effective tariff rates from March through June of this year to 2025.

“Those kinds of products are one area where you’d expect to see more (price increases),” he said. “Our retailers are trying to source things months in advance, so when that effective tariff rate is changing constantly, it could very well be that when an order is placed that there was no effective tariff rate on it, but by the time it arrives, there is.”

Anderson agreed and noted that there is a bigger risk to long-term trade between Michigan and Canada.

Some retailers, he said, “may just decide it’s too much trouble to stock them when they can get cheaper goods from China and Vietnam.”

Owing to the negative tenor of trade politics between the two countries, not to mention the unhelpful renaming of Lake Ontario, distributors and retailers may already be looking for new suppliers, he said.

“Unfortunately, raising the rhetorical temperature… makes business people start thinking really hard about finding other places to get their goods,” said Anderson.

“So unfortunately, some of the damage here is already done.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks during a press conference at Ritan Park in Beijing on Jan. 16, 2026.

OTTAWA — An Ontario company that is being threatened by a massive retroactive tax bill because its golf carts were categorized by Ottawa as electric vehicles (EVs) isn’t alone.

At least one other Canadian company that also has its motorized push carts manufactured in China says it has also received a tax bill from Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) that is large enough to threaten its business.

Hanson Xie, director of operations of Markham, Ont.-based Axglo Inc., says the federal government has told his company to pay about $500,000 in back taxes for the importation of its carts. The three and four-wheeled buggies are just large enough to carry a golf bag, but have never been confused with an electric-powered sedan or sport utility vehicle.

Xie said his six-person company, which has been in the golf cart business since 2009, is profitable but doesn’t have the money to cover an unexpected bill of that size. “What type of small business has $500,000 to pay CBSA?”

As National Post reported late last month , Xie’s tax tale is similar to JPSMGolf of Pickering, Ont., a competitor that had been hit earlier this year with a tax bill of $178,000. In both cases, the companies are facing hefty interest charges as they look for solutions.

 The owner of a small Canadian business that imports electric golf carts from China says his company is now in jeopardy because the federal government has billed him for more than $178,000 after placing his three-wheeled buggies in the same import category as electric vehicles (EVs).

The government has an appeal process for such matters, but companies say they must first either pay their tax bill or post a bond that is lost if they lose the appeal.

It’s unclear how many other Canadian companies that make small motorized products have also been hit with retroactive tax bills because they’ve been categorized as EVs. The domestic golf cart business has only a handful or so players, but small businesses that import and sell mobility scooters, power wheelchairs and other electric or battery-powered gadgets may also fall under the same automotive classification.

In a letter to JPSMGolf earlier this year, CBSA confirmed its ruling that his golf carts are “undoubtedly” considered EVs because they “are conveyances used by the golfer to get their bag and associated accessories across the golf course during play.”

Finance Canada, which categorizes importers’ goods, was unavailable for comment. When contacted about the JPSMGolf case, a CBSA spokesperson said that the department couldn’t comment on specific company cases, nor does it have the authority to deviate from the wording of surtax rulings.

But an Ottawa customs broker said he regularly deals with categorization problems. Olexiy Tyshchenko, of Ambassador Customs Brokerage, said not every product fits neatly into one of the government’s specific categories, especially when it comes to new technologies and products.

“This happens quite often,” said Tyshchenko. “I’m not surprised.”

The two Ontario golf cart companies’ retroactive tax bills stem from a 17-month window in 2024-25 where Chinese-made EVs were taxed by Ottawa at a rate of 100 per cent, following a brief trade war between the two countries. The Trudeau government applied the tariff to protect the Canadian auto industry and to stay on side with similar policies by the United States and some other western countries.

That trade war and the surtax ended earlier this year after the Carney government reached a deal with Beijing to allow 49,000 Chinese EVs (about 3 per cent of the Canadian market) into the Canadian market at a tariff rate of 6.1 per cent. In exchange, China agreed to drop its tariffs on Canadian seafood and some key agricultural products.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A visitor sits at a picnic table at Old Fort Niagara State Park on the shore of Lake Ontario on Aug. 27, 2026 in Youngstown, New York.

The mayor of a New York State city on the shore of Lake Ontario has said his community is taking the lake’s renaming “very personally” and will not be using the new “Lake America” name.

Robert Corradino is a Republican and has been mayor of Oswego, in the Republican stronghold of Oswego County, since January 2024.

Despite the area’s political allegiance, he says his community is “trying to understand why a name that has endured for centuries would suddenly be changed” when there is “no practical, historical, or cultural need to change it.”

In an interview with National Post, Corradino said: “We can disagree with the current administration’s take about renaming Lake Ontario and still support some of its other initiatives. But we’re taking the renaming of the lake very personally in Oswego.”

U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order renaming Lake Ontario to “Lake America” in U.S. government records and maps on Aug. 27.

The change has since been adopted by both Google and Apple Maps for users in the U.S., but Corradino has said that Oswego does not support the renaming, and won’t be altering any signage, tourism materials or official communications to reflect the new name.

 What Google Maps app users will see for Lake Ontario depends on their country location, as determined by their device’s operating system, SIM, network and current location.

“The lake provides so much for our community as well as our identity,” Corradino said, citing the economic boost from charter boats and cruise ships as well as “beautiful sunsets.”

“Lake Ontario is in the DNA of Osweganians,” he said, adding, “Everything that we are emanates from the lake.”

The mayor shared that the souring relationship between Canada and the U.S., which re-escalated following the breakdown of trade negotiations last month, has had a negative impact on Oswego’s tourism industry.

“Our tourism from Canada is down substantially. We have stores, we have museums that depend on tourism, and Canadians are a big part of our tourism business,” he said.

It’s a trend that has been seen across the U.S., with recent data from Statistics Canada revealing that Canadian travel to the United States dropped by 10.6 per cent in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the same period in 2025.

Speaking about the direction he’d like to see Canada-U.S. relations take going forward, Corradino added: “I would hope that our two countries, because of our long-standing relationship, could sit down in a conference room and discuss issues calmly and professionally, and work these differences out without changing the name of the lake.”

His comments come after Prime Minister Mark Carney rebuffed U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s recent claim that Canada pulled out of trade talks with the U.S. due to political reasons.

Meanwhile, other politicians in the U.S. have also condemned Trump’s executive order , including former U.S. secretary of state Hillary Clinton, who simply wrote, “It’s Lake Ontario,” in a post on X, and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who said , “The American people don’t want to rename Lake Ontario Lake America.”

On the Canadian side, Carney responded to Trump’s actions shortly after the executive order was signed, explaining on social media that “the name Lake Ontario comes from the Wendat word Ontari’io, which, appropriately, means ‘the lake is beautiful, the lake is big’.”

He added that the name is more than 400 years old and predates both Canadian Confederation and the U.S. Declaration of Independence.

“We know that America is changing. Their trading relationships, their foreign policies, their national monuments, their hydronyms,” he wrote. “Canadians also know that naming reality means calling it Lake Ontario — then, now and always.”

Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre echoed Carney’s sentiment in his own post on X , adding that the lake is not Trump’s “to rename on a whim.”

On Saturday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford unveiled a new Lake Ontario sign in Winona, Ont., to remind Donald Trump “it’s Lake Ontario, now and forever.”

In a video posted on X, the Ontario premier said, “You may have heard that President Trump is trying to rename this lake all because he doesn’t like Ontario and Canada standing up for ourselves.”

Ford continued: “Long before President Trump, this lake was called Lake Ontario. And long after President Trump is gone, it will still be called Lake Ontario. But just in case President Trump or anyone else forgets, we have set up a sign to remind them, it’s Lake Ontario now and forever.”

Ford’s comments on the lake’s longstanding name were echoed in a press release issued by Corradino on Tuesday, in which he was quoted as saying: “Lake Ontario has carried its name for hundreds of years. It is a name rooted in history, geography, and the shared identity of the communities that surround it…The name Lake Ontario comes from a Huron Indigenous people’s word that means lake of shining waters. The province of Ontario took its name from the lake in 1867, over two hundred years after the name first appeared on the maps of European explorers.”

He added: “The city of Oswego will continue using the name that reflects our history and honors the generations who have lived, worked, and built their lives along its shores.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.