TRURO, N.S. – Mark Carney may be a political novice but he is quickly learning the value of staged photo ops.

The new Liberal leader is clearly not in the same league as his predecessor Justin Trudeau when it comes to apparently spontaneous, meticulously planned shots, like the time the former prime minister jogged past teenagers on their way to a prom.

Early in the campaign, Carney was in danger of losing a digit when he

tried his hand at woodworking

at a trades school in Vaughan, Ont.

But the new man is comfortable with anything to do with kids or hockey or, preferably, both.

On Saturday he painted Easter eggs with a group of youngsters in Newcastle, Ont., emblazoning his egg with that kiddie favourite: “Time to Build.”

On Monday, he donned a Team Canada jersey at a farm in Truro, N.S. to play ball hockey with a group of local children, who, fortunately, kept their elbows down.

These campaign stops are, at face value, ludicrous. But they allow the leader to prove he is a good sport and is not the desiccated technocrat his opponents claim. On Monday, a goal against a bunch of under-10s was celebrated with a display of Carney riding the stick, Tiger Williams-style. He had one eye on the cameras at all times.

“He’s a much better politician than I thought he’d be,” said one woman in the crowd.

The sneaking suspicion is that this tolerance for the performative side of politics will expire in about a week.

It helps that there has been a weightlessness to the Liberal campaign in the past two days, as if their internal polling is showing the election is in the bag.

As noisy protesters standing on the road outside the farm chanted “WEF puppet” (referring the World Economic Forum) Carney put his finger to his ear and jokingly told his audience, “Sorry, I’m listening for the order coming in.”

The Liberals’ worries of the debates and the platform launch appear to be behind them. The

$225 billion in new spending unveiled in the Liberal platform

proved to be a tempting target for Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, but his attack has been blunted by the fact the Conservatives have yet to release their own platform. (Poilievre said it’s coming Tuesday.)

“We have a fully costed plan. Pierre Poilievre doesn’t have a plan and he is hiding $140 billion in cuts,” Carney said when asked about the new spending in Prince Edward Island on Monday morning.

The Liberals claim that Poilievre’s pledge to match every dollar spent with a dollar in cuts means he will have to meet his $140 billion in new measures by taking a hacksaw to existing dental care, pharmacare and child-care programs. In reality, most of the Conservative measures are tax cuts, not traditional spending, but there’s no doubt that

Poilievre’s $14 billion-a-year income-tax cut

reduces his room for manoeuvre.

The ambiguity has taken the sting out of Poilievre’s attack.

Back in rural Nova Scotia, the feeling is that the Liberals could take the Cumberland—Colchester riding that was won by Conservative Stephen Ellis by 12 points in 2021.

The fact that Carney is here in the final days of the campaign means that the Liberals believe it is in play.

It should be fertile terrain for Poilievre. But this is Robert Stanfield country; the former Progressive Conservative leader was from Truro.

It has never embraced western conservatism, rejecting the Reform Party when it became the official opposition in 1997. And by the accounts of the people at the rally, their conservative neighbours are not embracing the current Tory leader.

Bill Casey was elected in the riding seven times, first as a Progressive Conservative, then as a Conservative, and, after being expelled from the party for voting against the 2007 budget, as an Independent. He left politics for six years, but in 2015 he ran and won as a Liberal.

Casey was at the event on Monday and said that many high-profile Conservatives he knows in the riding are not voting for Poilievre and may not vote at all.

The area is highly dependent on agriculture, and trade and tourism with the United States, and Casey said Carney’s plan to build Canada and protect jobs is resonating across the riding.

The Liberal candidate is local businesswoman Alana Hirtle, and if she emerges the winner early in the proceedings next Monday it is going to be a long night for the Conservatives.

National Post

jivison@criffel.ca

• John Ivison: Conservative hopes resurrected by Carney’s eye-watering spending plan
• John Ivison: Mark Carney’s platform relies on fiscal alchemy and hopeful assumptions

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

OTTAWA — The Chinese government is suspected of repressing the campaign of Toronto-area Conservative candidate Joe Tay, pushing a mock “wanted” poster of him online and boosting disparaging stories about the Hong Kong democracy activist while suppressing searches of his name on social media.

On Monday, Canada’s federal elections monitoring task force offered a sobering warning: the People’s Republic of China (PRC) appeared to be behind a transnational repression operation to undermine Tay, a Conservative candidate and vocal critic of the Chinese regime.

“(Transnational repression) is a particularly egregious form of foreign interference because it is used to suppress free speech and democratic rights,” Security and Intelligence Threats to Elections (SITE) task force spokesperson Laurie-Anne Kempton said on Monday.

SITE members told reporters that efforts online to intimidate Tay peaked around December, when he was one of six people targeted by a HK$1 million bounty by Hong Kong police for information leading to his arrest as a critic of the PRC.

They said posts — including mock “wanted” posters — began appearing on various China-based social media platforms promoting the bounty against Tay and disparaging the democracy and civil rights activist.

“Since the bounty and arrest warrant were placed on Mr. Tay, members of the SITE task force have noticed a persistent information campaign on social media platforms where Chinese speaking users in Canada are very active,” Kempton said.

But the threatening online activity against Tay increased with the launch of the federal election, particularly in late March when he was announced as the Conservative candidate for Don Valley North, Kempton said.

• Liberal candidate invited head of suspected secret Chinese police station to campaign event
• Chinese government boosted Carney posts on popular social media platform

Though the transnational repression operation bears all the hallmarks of traditional PRC-backed foreign interference tactics, task force members said they were still working on confirming who was behind it.

Kempton said confirming ties between a state and suspicious online activity can take “significant time and analysis”.

“The material that we’re seeing now is mostly linked to the bounty that was placed on Mr. Tay in December of 2024. We know who issued that bounty and what’s behind it,” added SITE member and Global Affairs Canada (GAC) executive Larisa Galadza in a thinly veiled reference to the PRC.

Kempton also told reporters the task force did not believe China’s efforts prevented voters in the riding or across the country from having a free and fair election.

“These activities are happening on a small scale. They have not reached the tipping point of threatening the integrity of our election, either at the national or the riding level,” Kempton said. “The threat actors have not succeeded.”

Tay was also the centre of attention early in the campaign after comments by Toronto Liberal candidate Paul Chiang in which he joked to an audience that they could earn bounty money if they turned in Tay to the Chinese consulate resurfaced.

Chiang eventually dropped out as a candidate

.

Kempton told reporters SITE detected repressive activity against Tay on the biggest Chinese-based social media platforms such as WeChat, TikTok, RedNote and Douyin (TikTok’s sister app in China) as well as on Facebook.

To date, SITE members said intelligence only definitively tied the PRC to a Facebook account called “Today Review” but investigations into other accounts and platforms are ongoing.

The task force said the first part of the repression campaign was “inauthentic and coordinated” amplification of information relating to the bounty and arrest warrant against Tay.

For example, posts featuring a mock wanted poster of Tay appeared “en masse” online around the time the Conservative Party announced that Tay would be its candidate in Don Valley North.

Task force members, which includes GAC, CSIS, CSE, the RCMP and the Privy Council Office, said they also discovered that Joe Tay’s name was being suppressed in searches on Chinese-based platforms like WeChat, RedNote and Douyin.

They said that when Canadian users searched Joe Tay’s Chinese name on certain platforms, the only results that would appear related to the bounty or arrest warrant. The Canadian government has already said Hong Kong’s bounties were a form of transnational repression against Tay and other dissidents.

On many of those platforms, the task force also found that positive comments or posts about Tay on those platforms were hidden from users, while disparaging or negative content was promoted.

In a short statement, Tay said his campaign had been aware of the mock “wanted” posters and other online threats against him for a while now.

“It is critical that all political parties and leaders take a clear stand against this foreign interference,” he wrote.

SITE officials noted Monday that the suspicious anti-Tay content had not generated high levels of engagement (such as comments, shares or “likes”), but was spreading to an increasing number of platforms.

“The transnational repression and its effect on the democratic process is not about a single act, but rather about the accumulated impact of many acts designed to discredit a candidate, silence criticism and dissent and manipulate the information that informs voters,” Kempton said.

“There is a profound psychological impact on victims who experience (transnational repression). They might experience fear, anxiety and stress due to continuous surveillance and harassment,” she added.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

At 9:47 a.m. on Monday, the Vatican announced the death of Pope Francis.

But what happens now?

The death of the pope sets in motion the Sede vacante or interregnum, the series of rites that ends with the election of a new pope.

The interregnum begins when the camerlengo, personal representative of the Sacred College of Cardinals, certifies the death of the pope. The office of camerlengo, held currently by Cardinal Kevin Joseph Farrell, will also temporary run the administration of the Catholic Church in place of the pope.

The novendiales, or nine days of mourning, begins on the day of the pope’s death. There will be a period for visitors to view the pope’s body. In 2005, when Pope John Paul II died, millions came to pay their respects.

The funeral of the pope traditionally happens four to six days after death. The funeral is typically elaborate, featuring dignitaries from around the world, and tens or even hundreds of thousands of viewers. However, Pope Francis instructed that his funeral be simple. The most notable change he requested is that he wished to be buried in a wooden, zinc-lined coffin in Santa Maria Maggiore basilica,  rather than in St. Peter’s Basilica where most popes are buried.

The most recent pope to be buried in Santa Maria Maggiore is Pope Clement IX, who died in 1669.

After the mourning period, the election for the new pope begins 15 to 20 days after the death of the pope. The election is known as the conclave, and is comprised of 120 cardinals. The cardinals then hold a mass in the Sistine Chapel where they are sworn to secrecy regarding the details of the conclave proceedings. Cardinals are sealed off for the conclave in the Domus Santae Marthae or “St. Martha’s House” for the period of the election.

The cardinals will cast their votes, through a secret ballot, inside the Sistine Chapel. The first day of the conclave will have one ballot while every day after that holds four, two in the morning and another two in the afternoon.

The cardinals write the name of a candidate on their ballot papers. Candidates must be a male and a baptized Catholic, and he needs a two-thirds majority of the cardinals in the conclave to become the next pope. The ballots are collected by three scrutineers, and the names voted are tallied and announced.

The ballots are burned in a stove and combined with chemicals to form either a black smoke, meaning no decision has been made, or white smoke, which indicates that a new pope has been elected. This smoke is visible to the public gathered in St. Peter’s Square via a chimney. Additionally, the bells of St. Peter’s Basilica are rung alongside the white smoke to help those gathered know the results.

When a pope is elected, the cardinals asks for his acceptance of the election as pope and his papal name. The conclave is disbanded by the new pope.

The new pope is introduced to the world from a balcony overlooking St. Peter’s Square as a cardinal announces “Habemus papem” or “We have a pope!”

The Pope then speaks his first words as the leader of the Catholic Church.

• The Cardinals said to have a chance at becoming the next Pope
• What is the process for choosing a new Pope?

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.

At 88 years of age, Pope Francis I was the second-oldest Pope to hold the title in the last 600 years.

Only Leo XIII

, who died aged 93 in 1903, outlived him. His death triggers the election of the 267th Pope, a

process known as a conclave

.

What is the process for choosing a Pope?

In the days after the Pope dies, eligible cardinals make their way to Rome to vote by secret ballot in the conclave, which has been held in the Sistine Chapel since 1878.

Cardinals can vote up to the age of 80. There are not supposed to be more than 120 so-called Cardinal-electors, according to a ruling by Pope Paul VI in 1975, but it has not been strictly followed. Last December, Pope Francis

created 21 new Cardinals

, and there are now about 140 of voting age.

Paper ballots are handed out, and each Cardinal writes the name of his chosen candidate below the words “Eligo in Summun Pontificem” (Latin for “I elect as supreme pontiff”). Unlike politicians, Cardinals cannot vote for themselves.

What do the Cardinals consider when voting?

During the conclave, Cardinals offer sermons on the state of the world and the church, which indicates what qualities the next Pope should have, says Megan Armstrong, a professor at McMaster University who specializes in early modern Catholicism.

“Whoever’s chosen pope, what we see is they’ve been paying attention to what’s going on in the Church itself and the state of the world at the time,” she said.

“They’re weighing in what direction the church should be.”

Armstrong said the college of cardinals is split between progressives and conservatives.

Francis, with his relatively liberal views of same-sex marriage and divorce, was seen as being in favour of a “listening church,” responsive to the concerns of the people. His predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI, was seen as more traditional.

“We’re dealing with a very interesting moment. We’ll see the temperature of the Church by who’s chosen,” Armstrong said.

How long does it take?

There’s no limit. After the votes are counted, if no one has a two-thirds majority, the ballots are

mixed with chemicals

— potassium perchlorate, anthracene and sulphur (which used to be called brimstone) — and burned to create black smoke, which tells those outside the Vatican that no Pope has been chosen.

In that case, the process repeats. Up to four votes a day can be held for up to four days in a row. The fifth day is then reserved for prayer and discussion, and then voting resumes.

If a two-thirds majority is reached, the ballots are burned with potassium chlorate, lactose and rosin. The resultant white smoke signals “Habemus papam,” Latin for “We have a Pope.”

One of the longest conclaves in history was held from May 1, 1314, to Aug. 7, 1316, resulting in the

election of Pope John XXII

. In contrast, Pope Francis was elected after just four ballots stretching over two days in 2013.

What are the qualifications for becoming Pope?

There are only two rules, but they disqualify a lot of people. You must be Roman Catholic and you must be male. But since 1379, every Pope has also come from the College of Cardinals, the same small group that votes at the conclave.

How many Cardinals are Canadian?

Canada has five Cardinals

, four of voting age: Frank Leo, Michael Czerny, Gerald Cyprien LaCroix and Thomas Christopher Collins, as well as Marc Ouellet,

who turned 80 last year.

Did Francis have to die before a new Pope was chosen?

No. He could have chosen to resign. In fact, in 2022 he revealed that, shortly after he was elected Pope, he wrote

a letter of resignation

to be invoked if he became medically incapacitated. Pope Paul VI did something similar in 1965, but it was never invoked.

Has any other Pope ever resigned?

Yes. In fact, Pope Francis was elected after his predecessor, Benedict XVI, stepped down in 2013. He became the first Pope to do so since Gregory XII in 1415. He retained the title of Pope Emeritus until his death in 2022.

The 2019 film

The Two Popes

tells a fictionalized version of this transfer of power. It stars Jonathan Pryce as the future Pope Francis, and Anthony Hopkins as Pope Benedict XVI. You can watch it on Netflix.

Is there another recent movie about Popes?

Yes. Conclave, starring Ralph Fiennes, Stanley Tucci, Isabella Rossellini and John Lithgow, imagines the death of a Pope and the election of a new one. Based on the 2016 novel by Robert Harris, it is full of politics, scheming and some wild plot twists. It’s available on Amazon Prime and AppleTV.

How similar is that movie to the real thing?

The basics of the conclave are factual, but

the twist ending (which we won’t spoil here) is made up. And

Slate magazine

points out that the appearance of a previously unknown Cardinal, as happens in the movie, couldn’t take place.

In the movie, Cardinal Benitez (Carlos Diehz) was secretly named Cardinal of Kabul, Afghanistan, by the Pope before he died. And while such secret Cardinals do exist in reality (often to keep them safe in troubled parts of the world), they need to be publicly named by the Pope to take full status, including voting rights.

National Post, with additional reporting by Simona Milutinovic

• Carney and Poilievre are both Catholic. Here’s how they reacted to the Pope’s death
• The Cardinals said to have a chance at becoming the next Pope

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.

Releasing a detailed, costed platform is quite rightly seen as a basic obligation of a political campaign.

You don’t necessarily need one to win

, but if everyone has one other than you

people certainly have a right to ask why you don’t

. Every party claims to have a plan; surely they should at least be able to put it down on paper and have some basic idea of how much it will cost.

All that said, the Liberals may well be worse off for releasing their platform over the weekend. Seeing Liberal Leader Mark Carney’s vision on paper, all in one place, is somehow more jarring than hearing it piecemeal. Even

straight-up headlines like

“Liberal platform promises $130 billion in new measures over four years, adding $225 billion to federal debt” (per the CBC),  will likely not have landed well with Canadians looking to move on definitively from a decade of Trudeaunomics.

When he’s at his best temperamentally, Carney is unflappable and doesn’t easily take offence. That was largely on display during both leaders’ debates last week (where Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was also at his calmest). Carney had a couple of unfortunate arrogance eruptions earlier in the campaign, including reacting with incredulity that a reporter might suggest there could be conflicts of interest hidden somewhere in

Brookfield Asset Management’s “over $1 trillion (U.S.) of assets under management

” — Carney having been chair of the company until mid-January.

But generally he has presented himself — with remarkable success, according to polls at least — as a calm, intelligent, technocratic alternative to nine years of Justin Trudeau’s vacuous, thespian melodrama. When he talks about separating capital and operating spending, distinguishing “investing” from “spending,” you can almost believe it’s something more than accounting trick … until you see the costing and, well, either way it’s still debt.

Carney promises to adjust spending as a percentage more toward capital projects and away from program spending, which few would oppose in principle, the latter having ballooned in recent years. And with “buy Canadian” being all the rage, I suspect most of us have nodded along with Carney (and other politicians) when he says we should use those capital projects to boost Canadian industry and create Canadian jobs.

But then you see it on paper: “We will prioritize Canadian contractors in our defence procurement (and) Crown corporations with major capital acquisitions, like Via Rail, will also be encouraged to meet this standard.”

Canadian military procurement isn’t a mess because Canadian shipyards can’t build ships; it’s a mess because military procurement hasn’t really been about military procurement for decades. Rather, it’s about having something to promise Canadian industry during each election cycle. But if we were suddenly dead serious about having a proper military

in order to have a proper military,

 surely we would prioritize getting what we need over where it comes from. There are plenty of options other than the United States.

The bit about Via Rail is one of my favourite little details in the platform, and a fine example of how thoroughly Trudeau-esque this document is. Via’s biggest forthcoming capital acquisitions include

new long-distance train sets

for the company’s heavily subsidized cruise-ship-on-rails division. In 2023 taxpayers shelled out $1,015 per passenger on The Canadian, the route between Toronto and Vancouver, and it’s still a very expensive way to travel. It’s crying out for privatization.

But much bigger than that, should it come to pass, will be the Liberals’ back-of-a-napkin plan for high-frequency rail between Toronto and Quebec City,

or maybe it’s high-speed rail, or maybe it’s a bit of both

. Just tell them what you want to hear and they’ll say it for you. Indeed, out of nowhere, the Liberal platform extends the project westward from Toronto to Windsor! And it says that’ll just be the “start” of high-speed rail plans.

Listen to Carney talk about government efficiency and you might think, well, if anyone knows a thing or two about that, it certainly ought to be him. But then you see the promise of finding a whopping $30 billion in savings across government, which is the sort of thing every party platform always promises, only it rarely pans out. And then you remember Carney has never actually led or been part of any government, and suddenly the promise looks just as suspect as always, if not more.

You look at Carney’s vague carbon-tax plan — big emitters will pay, and somehow consumers won’t — and you remember that Carney certainly supported the consumer carbon tax that he axed out of political expediency as one of his first order of prime ministerial business. You see the promise to “revoke gun licences for individuals convicted of violent offences,” which is already in the Criminal Code, and you realize that Carney is flying just as blind-and-happy as the Liberals always do on guns. You see the platform’s proposal to “allow for consecutive sentencing for serious and violent offences,” which Poilievre has been assailed for supporting, and you realize they’re the same beet-red hypocrites as ever.

Search the platform for your own personal annoyances about Trudeau-era Liberal governance, and you’re unlikely to come up empty.

National Post

cselley@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha

Kheiriddin

get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

• Liberals and Conservatives fighting for support from centrist voters, poll shows
• Carney and Poilievre are both Catholic. Here’s how they reacted to the Pope’s death

Canada has long been held up as a shining example in a number of areas, whether it’s democratic principles, human rights, universal healthcare, and others.

But is there a chance that we’re getting things wrong? A new book from a National Post writer takes a look at that exact question.

Tristin Hopper joins Dave Breakenridge to discuss the inspiration for the book, where Canada is getting things wrong, and how these issues overlap with the federal election.

Background reading:

The weird moments you missed from the French leaders’ debate

Subscribe to 10/3 on your favourite podcast app

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.

The death of Pope Francis has elicited response from politicians and world leaders across the planet. And in the midst of a national election that is just one week away, two of Canada’s federal leadership hopefuls are also of the same faith as the deceased pontiff.

Early Monday morning, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre released a statement on X offering his “

deepest condolences to all Catholics on the passing of Pope Francis.”

I offer my deepest condolences to all Catholics on the passing of Pope Francis.

His humility, compassion, and steadfast faith had a profound impact on millions of Canadians and others around the world from every faith background.

We remember especially his historic “penitential…

— Pierre Poilievre (@PierrePoilievre) April 21, 2025

“His humility, compassion, and steadfast faith had a profound impact on millions of Canadians and others around the world from every faith background,” Poilievre wrote. “We remember especially his historic ‘penitential pilgrimage’ to Canada, when he sought to begin a process of Reconciliation by the Church with his apology ‘for the evil committed by so many Christians against the Indigenous Peoples.’”

He added: “We join in thankful prayer with the Catholic faithful for his legacy of humble service and his message of love that will continue to inspire a world in need of hope.”

Poilievre was raised

Roman Catholic, and

last June visited three

Toronto-area evangelical churches in Liberal-held ridings

on the same day

to deliver short political speeches.

He also released a statement through the

Conservative Party web site

on April 2, which is officially

Pope John Paul II Day

in Canada, celebrating the life of the former pope. He referred to that pontiff as “one of the truly consequential figures of the twentieth century: a moral leader, a head of state and an inspiration to freedom-loving people across the globe.”

Mark Carney, in his role as Prime Minster, released a statement on X in which he referred to Francis as “a shepherd of deep moral clarity, spiritual courage, and boundless compassion.”

My statement on the passing of His Holiness Pope Francis: pic.twitter.com/d9FHVRr0ye

— Mark Carney (@MarkJCarney) April 21, 2025

He added: “I had the privilege of working alongside His Holiness and his team through the Council for Inclusive Capitalism, and I saw firsthand his unwavering commitment to placing human dignity at the centre of our economic and political systems.”

He noted that a challenge issued by Francis at a Vatican meeting in 2014 had guided hm ever since. “He likened humanity to wine — rich, diverse, full of spirit — and the market to grappa — distilled, intense, and at times disconnected. He called on us to ‘turn grappa back into wine,’ to reintegrate human values into our economic lives.”

In his

March 9 victory speech

as newly elected Liberal leader, Carney also mentioned a fellow parishioner, noting: “Bob goes to my church,” before adding: “Actually, I go to Bob’s church because he’s there far more often than I am.”

Carney spoke of Francis during a visit to the University of Prince Edward Island in Charlottetown on Monday morning.

“Pope Francis was a voice of moral clarity, spiritual courage and boundless compassion,” he said. “He was, in many respects, the world conscious, never hesitating to challenge the powerful on behalf of the vulnerable.”

Carney also noted: “His Holiness understood and taught that value in the market must never eclipse the values of society. He wrote about the cry of the earth and the cry of the poor, reminding us that ecological degradation and social injustice are deeply entwined. In his papal visit to Canada in 2022, his apology on residential schools was a crucial step in moving the church … forward in its journey towards meaningful reconciliation.”

New Democrat Leader Jagmeet Singh

released a statement

in which he said: “Pope Francis showed the world that faith can be a powerful force for justice.”

He added that Francis “spoke plainly about poverty, inequality, and the climate crisis — and he challenged political and economic leaders to put people before profits. He didn’t just preach humility and compassion — he lived it. And in doing so, he earned the respect of millions, including many far beyond the Catholic Church.”

In her own statement on X, Green Party co-leader Elizabeth May wrote: “

The human family has lost a great servant leader,” adding: “Yesterday as a non-

Catholic I rejoiced that he made a public appearance. To his last breath he called for peace in Gaza, for human rights in the U.S.

#LaudatoSi

called for climate action. Grief for the world.

#RIP”

The human family has lost a great servant leader – #PopeFrancis Yesterday as a non-Catholic I rejoiced that he made a public appearance. To his last breath he called for peace in Gaza, for human rights in the US. #LaudatoSi called for climate action. Grief for the world. #RIP

— Elizabeth May (@ElizabethMay) April 21, 2025

“Laudato Si” is Italian for Praise Be To You, and refers to a 2015 letter from Francis,

subtitled “on care for our common home,” in which the Pope

criticized 

consumerism,

 

irresponsible economic development

, and 

environmental degradation, calling on all people

to take “swift and unified global action.”

• The Cardinals said to have a chance at becoming the next Pope
• Raymond J. de Souza: Humble, but determined, Francis bent the papacy to his will

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.

TORONTO

—

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre says his party’s platform is coming Tuesday. 

Both the Liberals and NDP released their costed election commitments over the weekend, making the Conservatives the final major federal party to do so.

Speaking Monday at a housing announcement in Toronto, Poilievre took aim at the spending plan promised by Liberal Leader Mark Carney, saying it shows no departure from the fiscal handling seen under former prime minister Justin Trudeau.

He also confirmed he would be releasing his party’s platform “for all eyes to see” on Tuesday, “which will bring change to Canada.”

With exactly one week left in the federal election campaign, Poilievre is trying to convince Canadians that he is the only option for change, as public opinion shows him to be tied or slightly behind the incumbent Liberals.

In terms of campaign commitments, Poilievre has to find a way to pay for promises such as an income tax cut that once fully implemented, would cost $14 billion a year.

While the Liberals and NDP attack Conservatives for seeking to do so through cuts to social programs like dental and pharmacare, Poilievre pledged this election to keep those programs in place, but instead slash spending on government consultants as well as foreign aid.

More to come.