LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Prime Minister Mark Carney during the Forever Canadian Rally at the BMO Centre in Calgary on Thursday, October 15, 2026.

Prime Minister Mark Carney was in Calgary on Thursday, where he visited Cinnamon Indian Cuisine and Bar to enjoy some pakoras, met with volunteers from Public Interest Alberta and gave a speech at a Forever Canadian rally.

On Friday, Carney will attend another rally in Edmonton and visit Red Deer with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, all as part of his efforts to drum up support for keeping Alberta in Confederation.

“A vote against Canada is a dangerous bluff,” the PM warned in his speech, adding, “There are some outside our borders who are working to break us so they can own us.”

From displays of patriotism to moments of friction, here are six key moments from the PM’s visit to Calgary.

‘No to the nine’ vs ‘Yes to the rest’

Speaking to a crowd in Calgary, Carney encouraged Albertans to vote “no to the nine,” referencing a federalist advertising campaign urging voters to reject the nine ballot questions on Oct. 19, as well as voting to remain in Canada.

Four of those questions ask whether the province should work to amend Canada’s Constitution, while the other five relate to immigration — including whether Alberta should have increased control over immigration.

The comment has caused friction with Premier Smith, who responded with the counter message of “yes to the rest” in a post on X.

“The Prime Minister and I have found common ground on many things over the last 18 months. However, it appears that he has yet to fully understand just how damaging the open-border policies of his predecessor were,” she wrote.

“That’s why I’m encouraging Albertans to vote ‘yes to the rest’ to give our government a strong mandate to take more control over our immigration system.”

Autograph requests

Later in the day, Carney visited the student hall food court at the University of Calgary, where he greeted students by shaking their hands and answering questions.

While he was there, one man asked the prime minister to sign his chest. “I’m not gonna sign your chest,” Carney replied.

 Prime Minister Mark Carney greets students during the lunch hour at the University of Calgary on Thursday, October 15, 2026.

Hitting back at Hoekstra

During his speech at the Forever Canadian rally, Carney made reference to recent comments from U.S. Ambassador to Canada, Pete Hoekstra, about potential election interference.

“We are closely watching Canadian activities because it appears that some of this, from our perspective, and the way that we view our elections, could be inferred to be election interference,” Hoekstra said in a podcast appearance on Tuesday. “Keep your nose out of American politics,” he added .

Carney said in his speech on Thursday that the Pacific Link pipeline will reduce Canada’s dependence on the U.S., a statement that prompted the crowd to erupt in applause.

“Careful. They might think that’s election interference. They’re a little touchy down there. We’re not. We’re getting on with it,” he added.

Threats from the U.S.

“This referendum comes at the worst possible time,” Carney said. “The world has become more dangerous and divided. There are some outside our borders who are working to break us so they can own us.”

Though the PM didn’t directly mention the U.S. or President Donald Trump, he’s made similar comments in past speeches. “The new U.S. tariffs are designed to hurt and divide us,” he previously said in a statement following the breakdown of trade negotiations between the two countries in August. “They are a miscalculation, because Canadians will always take care of each other. We know we’re stronger together.”

Meanwhile, Carney’s speech in Calgary came the day after Trump reignited his “51st state” rhetoric at a campaign rally in Arizona on Wednesday.

“Don’t be fooled by the idea you can ‘send a message’ with your vote,” the PM also said. “This is not poker. A vote against Canada is a dangerous bluff that will lead to years of deep division and great uncertainty.”

 Prime Minister Mark Carney during the Forever Canadian Rally at the BMO Centre in Calgary on Thursday, October 15, 2026.

A medical emergency turned into a patriotic moment

Partway through his speech, Carney paused to address a medical emergency in the crowd.

“Can we get help…there at my 11 o’clock,” he directed first responders from on stage, pointing to a crowd member who needed assistance.

After a pause while the emergency was being dealt with, the crowd started chanting “Carney, Carney,” to which the PM responded by prompting them to shout “Canada” instead.

Nico the cat

During the ensuing lull while the medical emergency was being dealt with, a member of the crowd asked the PM about his cat, Nico.

“Nico’s home alone, actually,” he responded. “He’s put on a bit of weight…he’s good,” he added, before clarifying to the crowd that Nico is his cat. “A Canadian cat,” he said, prompting cheers from his audience.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Lawyer Joy Luk at her Markham, Ont., offices, Oct. 14, 2026.

Joy Luk can’t leave behind the time she spent on the front lines of Hong Kong’s massive democracy protests in 2019.

Seven years after the movement was crushed, the city’s first and only blind lawyer lives in Toronto as a refugee, and is reminded frequently of her worst moments during the uprising.

Luk says she has nightmares about being struck by police and is startled by a knock at her apartment door, a reminder of the visits to her home from belligerent officers amid a Chinese-government-backed crackdown on opposition.

But the spirit behind her extraordinary role in the Hong Kong protests hasn’t dimmed, even as she’s treated for post-traumatic stress disorder.

The 47-year-old has spoken at vigils here commemorating the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, given talks on the “criminalization” of dissent and picketed outside China’s Toronto consulate.

A ceremony on Monday, though, will mark what might be Luk’s most impressive accomplishment since arriving in Canada. After obtaining a Global Professional Master of Laws degree at the University of Toronto and passing bar-admission exams made all the more challenging by her lack of sight, she’ll be officially admitted to the profession in Ontario.

“In the very beginning, when I arrived in Canada, I didn’t think I could be a lawyer again,” Luk said in an interview Wednesday. But she says she reminded herself of a favourite message from Apple founder Steve Jobs: “I accept failure, but I do not accept not trying … The worst case is I would not pass.”

She passed, on her first attempt.

Luk is grateful for the welcome she received in Canada, especially its willingness to provide care for her many health needs even before her refugee application was accepted. That said, she’s dismayed by one issue – the current federal government’s push to improve relations with China as a response to the massive tariffs imposed by the U.S.

She understands the motivation, but worries that Prime Minister Mark Carney is forsaking those whose rights Beijing tramples.

“I guess they are not eager to fight for freedom of the people in Hong Kong and other parts of China under that kind of tyranny,” she said. “Because they want to sell some things to China … We are very disappointed by this.”

The way she tells it, Luk’s own determination to combat injustice started early.

Born almost entirely blind, she said she realized from a young age the law was needed to protect the rights of the disabled. She first dreamt of being a lawyer in kindergarten, Luk says.

She later passed law school and obtained her first Masters degree, in human-rights law, though she began her career practising general law, while also becoming an advocate for the disabled.

Then China began to tighten its grip on the city, and her life changed irrevocably.

The Beijing-loyal Hong Kong government proposed a new law that would allow extradition from Hong Kong to the mainland, raising fears of dissidents and others being dragged into China’s notoriously oppressive justice system.

The legislation sparked historic protests in 2019 that brought as many as a million people into the streets. The demonstrations, generally peaceful though occasionally more unruly, led to violent clashes with the police and finally a crackdown that would erase most of Hong Kong’s political freedoms.

Despite her blindness, Luk put herself in the midst of the maelstrom, offering on-the-spot legal advice to other demonstrators and passing on information about police tactics she gleaned with her acute hearing.

“I told myself, if some young people sacrifice their future for Hong Kong, why could I not do this?” she says. “So I was not afraid of being arrested or being injured … or even dying or having my licence removed. That was not my first concern.”

Her commitment to the cause meant being struck by police, enduring repeated searches at her home and being arrested, without charges, at a demonstration outside a police station. She says she sometimes stood in the street at the front of crowds of protesters, arguing with the police to ensure demonstrators had a chance to get away if necessary.

She once broke her arm when stampeding police barrelled into her.

Yet through it all, Luk says she had a unique power that made her actions possible.

“I was not afraid because I could not see,” she said. “If you see the police, they are running toward you, your direct reaction is to leave. But I could not see.”

Luk became a well-known figure in the movement, a blind woman seemingly fearless in the face of aggressive police tactics, said Cheuk Kwan of the Toronto Association for Democracy in China.

“She stood out,” said Kwan. “Despite all the oppression and suppression by the police, she was willing to stand up front and be counted.”

In the end, Chinese-backed forces prevailed. In the protests’ wake, a Beijing-endorsed National Security Law barred most forms of dissent, independent journalists and democracy-touting politicians were jailed, and even Hong Kongers living in exile in Canada and elsewhere were targeted with charges and bounties for criticizing Beijing.

Luk says she realized she had no future as a human-rights lawyer and feared bringing more trouble to her parents, so decided to leave, choosing Canada because she felt it would be more accepting of a disabled person than other safe havens. The association helped Luk when she arrived in Toronto in 2021, one supporter providing her with 18 months of free rent in a Toronto apartment, others eagerly helping with living expenses and immigration legal costs, said Kwan.

The donors included former Conservative Senator Con DiNino, who according to Kwan called Luk the most courageous person he’d ever known.

She managed to get into the U of T Masters program in 2024 and eventually sat for the bar-admission exams. It was grueling, Luk says.

The exams were lengthy and to complete them she had to have her computer convert the text to speech, to the point where she began dreaming of the electronic voice. The computer can also convert text to braille, but that’s a much more time-consuming process.

A particular challenge were exam questions that required looking at an image, such as a land-titles document.

“I had to ask A.I. … ‘Using a blind person’s perspective, describe this picture, this figure, to me and let me know what it’s showing.”

Luk is now working part-time at a law firm in Markham, north of Toronto. But even as her career restarts in a new country, she wants the world to remember what she and thousands of others fought for in Hong Kong seven years ago.

“We believe that after several years, if we do not do anything, then people will forget what happened in 2019,” just like 1989’s Tiananmen massacre, she said. “We have no choice but to do something.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Lawyer Joy Luk at her Markham, Ont., offices, Oct. 14, 2026.

Joy Luk can’t leave behind the time she spent on the front lines of Hong Kong’s massive democracy protests in 2019.

Seven years after the movement was crushed, the city’s first and only blind lawyer lives in Toronto as a refugee, and is reminded frequently of her worst moments during the uprising.

Luk says she has nightmares about being struck by police and is startled by a knock at her apartment door, a reminder of the visits to her home from belligerent officers amid a Chinese-government-backed crackdown on opposition.

But the spirit behind her extraordinary role in the Hong Kong protests hasn’t dimmed, even as she’s treated for post-traumatic stress disorder.

The 47-year-old has spoken at vigils here commemorating the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, given talks on the “criminalization” of dissent and picketed outside China’s Toronto consulate.

A ceremony on Monday, though, will mark what might be Luk’s most impressive accomplishment since arriving in Canada. After obtaining a Global Professional Master of Laws degree at the University of Toronto and passing bar-admission exams made all the more challenging by her lack of sight, she’ll be officially admitted to the profession in Ontario.

“In the very beginning, when I arrived in Canada, I didn’t think I could be a lawyer again,” Luk said in an interview Wednesday. But she says she reminded herself of a favourite message from Apple founder Steve Jobs: “I accept failure, but I do not accept not trying … The worst case is I would not pass.”

She passed, on her first attempt.

Luk is grateful for the welcome she received in Canada, especially its willingness to provide care for her many health needs even before her refugee application was accepted. That said, she’s dismayed by one issue – the current federal government’s push to improve relations with China as a response to the massive tariffs imposed by the U.S.

She understands the motivation, but worries that Prime Minister Mark Carney is forsaking those whose rights Beijing tramples.

“I guess they are not eager to fight for freedom of the people in Hong Kong and other parts of China under that kind of tyranny,” she said. “Because they want to sell some things to China … We are very disappointed by this.”

The way she tells it, Luk’s own determination to combat injustice started early.

Born almost entirely blind, she said she realized from a young age the law was needed to protect the rights of the disabled. She first dreamt of being a lawyer in kindergarten, Luk says.

She later passed law school and obtained her first Masters degree, in human-rights law, though she began her career practising general law, while also becoming an advocate for the disabled.

Then China began to tighten its grip on the city, and her life changed irrevocably.

The Beijing-loyal Hong Kong government proposed a new law that would allow extradition from Hong Kong to the mainland, raising fears of dissidents and others being dragged into China’s notoriously oppressive justice system.

The legislation sparked historic protests in 2019 that brought as many as a million people into the streets. The demonstrations, generally peaceful though occasionally more unruly, led to violent clashes with the police and finally a crackdown that would erase most of Hong Kong’s political freedoms.

Despite her blindness, Luk put herself in the midst of the maelstrom, offering on-the-spot legal advice to other demonstrators and passing on information about police tactics she gleaned with her acute hearing.

“I told myself, if some young people sacrifice their future for Hong Kong, why could I not do this?” she says. “So I was not afraid of being arrested or being injured … or even dying or having my licence removed. That was not my first concern.”

Her commitment to the cause meant being struck by police, enduring repeated searches at her home and being arrested, without charges, at a demonstration outside a police station. She says she sometimes stood in the street at the front of crowds of protesters, arguing with the police to ensure demonstrators had a chance to get away if necessary.

She once broke her arm when stampeding police barrelled into her.

Yet through it all, Luk says she had a unique power that made her actions possible.

“I was not afraid because I could not see,” she said. “If you see the police, they are running toward you, your direct reaction is to leave. But I could not see.”

Luk became a well-known figure in the movement, a blind woman seemingly fearless in the face of aggressive police tactics, said Cheuk Kwan of the Toronto Association for Democracy in China.

“She stood out,” said Kwan. “Despite all the oppression and suppression by the police, she was willing to stand up front and be counted.”

In the end, Chinese-backed forces prevailed. In the protests’ wake, a Beijing-endorsed National Security Law barred most forms of dissent, independent journalists and democracy-touting politicians were jailed, and even Hong Kongers living in exile in Canada and elsewhere were targeted with charges and bounties for criticizing Beijing.

Luk says she realized she had no future as a human-rights lawyer and feared bringing more trouble to her parents, so decided to leave, choosing Canada because she felt it would be more accepting of a disabled person than other safe havens. The association helped Luk when she arrived in Toronto in 2021, one supporter providing her with 18 months of free rent in a Toronto apartment, others eagerly helping with living expenses and immigration legal costs, said Kwan.

The donors included former Conservative Senator Con DiNino, who according to Kwan called Luk the most courageous person he’d ever known.

She managed to get into the U of T Masters program in 2024 and eventually sat for the bar-admission exams. It was grueling, Luk says.

The exams were lengthy and to complete them she had to have her computer convert the text to speech, to the point where she began dreaming of the electronic voice. The computer can also convert text to braille, but that’s a much more time-consuming process.

A particular challenge were exam questions that required looking at an image, such as a land-titles document.

“I had to ask A.I. … ‘Using a blind person’s perspective, describe this picture, this figure, to me and let me know what it’s showing.”

Luk is now working part-time at a law firm in Markham, north of Toronto. But even as her career restarts in a new country, she wants the world to remember what she and thousands of others fought for in Hong Kong seven years ago.

“We believe that after several years, if we do not do anything, then people will forget what happened in 2019,” just like 1989’s Tiananmen massacre, she said. “We have no choice but to do something.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Lawyer Joy Luk at her Markham, Ont., offices, Oct. 14, 2026.

Joy Luk can’t leave behind the time she spent on the front lines of Hong Kong’s massive democracy protests in 2019.

Seven years after the movement was crushed, the city’s first and only blind lawyer lives in Toronto as a refugee, and is reminded frequently of her worst moments during the uprising.

Luk says she has nightmares about being struck by police and is startled by a knock at her apartment door, a reminder of the visits to her home from belligerent officers amid a Chinese-government-backed crackdown on opposition.

But the spirit behind her extraordinary role in the Hong Kong protests hasn’t dimmed, even as she’s treated for post-traumatic stress disorder.

The 47-year-old has spoken at vigils here commemorating the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, given talks on the “criminalization” of dissent and picketed outside China’s Toronto consulate.

A ceremony on Monday, though, will mark what might be Luk’s most impressive accomplishment since arriving in Canada. After obtaining a Global Professional Master of Laws degree at the University of Toronto and passing bar-admission exams made all the more challenging by her lack of sight, she’ll be officially admitted to the profession in Ontario.

“In the very beginning, when I arrived in Canada, I didn’t think I could be a lawyer again,” Luk said in an interview Wednesday. But she says she reminded herself of a favourite message from Apple founder Steve Jobs: “I accept failure, but I do not accept not trying … The worst case is I would not pass.”

She passed, on her first attempt.

Luk is grateful for the welcome she received in Canada, especially its willingness to provide care for her many health needs even before her refugee application was accepted. That said, she’s dismayed by one issue – the current federal government’s push to improve relations with China as a response to the massive tariffs imposed by the U.S.

She understands the motivation, but worries that Prime Minister Mark Carney is forsaking those whose rights Beijing tramples.

“I guess they are not eager to fight for freedom of the people in Hong Kong and other parts of China under that kind of tyranny,” she said. “Because they want to sell some things to China … We are very disappointed by this.”

The way she tells it, Luk’s own determination to combat injustice started early.

Born almost entirely blind, she said she realized from a young age the law was needed to protect the rights of the disabled. She first dreamt of being a lawyer in kindergarten, Luk says.

She later passed law school and obtained her first Masters degree, in human-rights law, though she began her career practising general law, while also becoming an advocate for the disabled.

Then China began to tighten its grip on the city, and her life changed irrevocably.

The Beijing-loyal Hong Kong government proposed a new law that would allow extradition from Hong Kong to the mainland, raising fears of dissidents and others being dragged into China’s notoriously oppressive justice system.

The legislation sparked historic protests in 2019 that brought as many as a million people into the streets. The demonstrations, generally peaceful though occasionally more unruly, led to violent clashes with the police and finally a crackdown that would erase most of Hong Kong’s political freedoms.

Despite her blindness, Luk put herself in the midst of the maelstrom, offering on-the-spot legal advice to other demonstrators and passing on information about police tactics she gleaned with her acute hearing.

“I told myself, if some young people sacrifice their future for Hong Kong, why could I not do this?” she says. “So I was not afraid of being arrested or being injured … or even dying or having my licence removed. That was not my first concern.”

Her commitment to the cause meant being struck by police, enduring repeated searches at her home and being arrested, without charges, at a demonstration outside a police station. She says she sometimes stood in the street at the front of crowds of protesters, arguing with the police to ensure demonstrators had a chance to get away if necessary.

She once broke her arm when stampeding police barrelled into her.

Yet through it all, Luk says she had a unique power that made her actions possible.

“I was not afraid because I could not see,” she said. “If you see the police, they are running toward you, your direct reaction is to leave. But I could not see.”

Luk became a well-known figure in the movement, a blind woman seemingly fearless in the face of aggressive police tactics, said Cheuk Kwan of the Toronto Association for Democracy in China.

“She stood out,” said Kwan. “Despite all the oppression and suppression by the police, she was willing to stand up front and be counted.”

In the end, Chinese-backed forces prevailed. In the protests’ wake, a Beijing-endorsed National Security Law barred most forms of dissent, independent journalists and democracy-touting politicians were jailed, and even Hong Kongers living in exile in Canada and elsewhere were targeted with charges and bounties for criticizing Beijing.

Luk says she realized she had no future as a human-rights lawyer and feared bringing more trouble to her parents, so decided to leave, choosing Canada because she felt it would be more accepting of a disabled person than other safe havens. The association helped Luk when she arrived in Toronto in 2021, one supporter providing her with 18 months of free rent in a Toronto apartment, others eagerly helping with living expenses and immigration legal costs, said Kwan.

The donors included former Conservative Senator Con DiNino, who according to Kwan called Luk the most courageous person he’d ever known.

She managed to get into the U of T Masters program in 2024 and eventually sat for the bar-admission exams. It was grueling, Luk says.

The exams were lengthy and to complete them she had to have her computer convert the text to speech, to the point where she began dreaming of the electronic voice. The computer can also convert text to braille, but that’s a much more time-consuming process.

A particular challenge were exam questions that required looking at an image, such as a land-titles document.

“I had to ask A.I. … ‘Using a blind person’s perspective, describe this picture, this figure, to me and let me know what it’s showing.”

Luk is now working part-time at a law firm in Markham, north of Toronto. But even as her career restarts in a new country, she wants the world to remember what she and thousands of others fought for in Hong Kong seven years ago.

“We believe that after several years, if we do not do anything, then people will forget what happened in 2019,” just like 1989’s Tiananmen massacre, she said. “We have no choice but to do something.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Lawyer Joy Luk at her Markham, Ont., offices, Oct. 14, 2026.

Joy Luk can’t leave behind the time she spent on the front lines of Hong Kong’s massive democracy protests in 2019.

Seven years after the movement was crushed, the city’s first and only blind lawyer lives in Toronto as a refugee, and is reminded frequently of her worst moments during the uprising.

Luk says she has nightmares about being struck by police and is startled by a knock at her apartment door, a reminder of the visits to her home from belligerent officers amid a Chinese-government-backed crackdown on opposition.

But the spirit behind her extraordinary role in the Hong Kong protests hasn’t dimmed, even as she’s treated for post-traumatic stress disorder.

The 47-year-old has spoken at vigils here commemorating the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, given talks on the “criminalization” of dissent and picketed outside China’s Toronto consulate.

A ceremony on Monday, though, will mark what might be Luk’s most impressive accomplishment since arriving in Canada. After obtaining a Global Professional Master of Laws degree at the University of Toronto and passing bar-admission exams made all the more challenging by her lack of sight, she’ll be officially admitted to the profession in Ontario.

“In the very beginning, when I arrived in Canada, I didn’t think I could be a lawyer again,” Luk said in an interview Wednesday. But she says she reminded herself of a favourite message from Apple founder Steve Jobs: “I accept failure, but I do not accept not trying … The worst case is I would not pass.”

She passed, on her first attempt.

Luk is grateful for the welcome she received in Canada, especially its willingness to provide care for her many health needs even before her refugee application was accepted. That said, she’s dismayed by one issue – the current federal government’s push to improve relations with China as a response to the massive tariffs imposed by the U.S.

She understands the motivation, but worries that Prime Minister Mark Carney is forsaking those whose rights Beijing tramples.

“I guess they are not eager to fight for freedom of the people in Hong Kong and other parts of China under that kind of tyranny,” she said. “Because they want to sell some things to China … We are very disappointed by this.”

The way she tells it, Luk’s own determination to combat injustice started early.

Born almost entirely blind, she said she realized from a young age the law was needed to protect the rights of the disabled. She first dreamt of being a lawyer in kindergarten, Luk says.

She later passed law school and obtained her first Masters degree, in human-rights law, though she began her career practising general law, while also becoming an advocate for the disabled.

Then China began to tighten its grip on the city, and her life changed irrevocably.

The Beijing-loyal Hong Kong government proposed a new law that would allow extradition from Hong Kong to the mainland, raising fears of dissidents and others being dragged into China’s notoriously oppressive justice system.

The legislation sparked historic protests in 2019 that brought as many as a million people into the streets. The demonstrations, generally peaceful though occasionally more unruly, led to violent clashes with the police and finally a crackdown that would erase most of Hong Kong’s political freedoms.

Despite her blindness, Luk put herself in the midst of the maelstrom, offering on-the-spot legal advice to other demonstrators and passing on information about police tactics she gleaned with her acute hearing.

“I told myself, if some young people sacrifice their future for Hong Kong, why could I not do this?” she says. “So I was not afraid of being arrested or being injured … or even dying or having my licence removed. That was not my first concern.”

Her commitment to the cause meant being struck by police, enduring repeated searches at her home and being arrested, without charges, at a demonstration outside a police station. She says she sometimes stood in the street at the front of crowds of protesters, arguing with the police to ensure demonstrators had a chance to get away if necessary.

She once broke her arm when stampeding police barrelled into her.

Yet through it all, Luk says she had a unique power that made her actions possible.

“I was not afraid because I could not see,” she said. “If you see the police, they are running toward you, your direct reaction is to leave. But I could not see.”

Luk became a well-known figure in the movement, a blind woman seemingly fearless in the face of aggressive police tactics, said Cheuk Kwan of the Toronto Association for Democracy in China.

“She stood out,” said Kwan. “Despite all the oppression and suppression by the police, she was willing to stand up front and be counted.”

In the end, Chinese-backed forces prevailed. In the protests’ wake, a Beijing-endorsed National Security Law barred most forms of dissent, independent journalists and democracy-touting politicians were jailed, and even Hong Kongers living in exile in Canada and elsewhere were targeted with charges and bounties for criticizing Beijing.

Luk says she realized she had no future as a human-rights lawyer and feared bringing more trouble to her parents, so decided to leave, choosing Canada because she felt it would be more accepting of a disabled person than other safe havens. The association helped Luk when she arrived in Toronto in 2021, one supporter providing her with 18 months of free rent in a Toronto apartment, others eagerly helping with living expenses and immigration legal costs, said Kwan.

The donors included former Conservative Senator Con DiNino, who according to Kwan called Luk the most courageous person he’d ever known.

She managed to get into the U of T Masters program in 2024 and eventually sat for the bar-admission exams. It was grueling, Luk says.

The exams were lengthy and to complete them she had to have her computer convert the text to speech, to the point where she began dreaming of the electronic voice. The computer can also convert text to braille, but that’s a much more time-consuming process.

A particular challenge were exam questions that required looking at an image, such as a land-titles document.

“I had to ask A.I. … ‘Using a blind person’s perspective, describe this picture, this figure, to me and let me know what it’s showing.”

Luk is now working part-time at a law firm in Markham, north of Toronto. But even as her career restarts in a new country, she wants the world to remember what she and thousands of others fought for in Hong Kong seven years ago.

“We believe that after several years, if we do not do anything, then people will forget what happened in 2019,” just like 1989’s Tiananmen massacre, she said. “We have no choice but to do something.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


A shipment of Chinese electric vehicles arrives in Argentina earlier this year. The flow of Chinese-made EVs to Canada has begun, with the pace expected to ramp up in 2027, despite concerns they could be used to gather data for Beijing.

OTTAWA — As Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers boost exports to Canada, the country’s former spy chief warned that everything you do in or around one of those cars will be acquired by China.

In a rare interview with the BBC last month, former CSIS head David Vigneault did not mince his words: China’s theft of Western intellectual property amounts to a “lost generation of prosperity” for Canada. Furthermore, the Chinese government will use Chinese electric vehicles to further harvest data on Canadians and foreigners.

“Not to overhype it, but there is the reality that all of your data, what you say, where you go, with whom you are, who you associate with, everything you do around your car, will be acquired by China,” Vigneault said if had concerns about Chinese electric vehicles.

“It is not a question for me, it is a reality,” added Vigneault, who headed CSIS from 2017 to 2024.

Vigneault is not the first current or former Five Eyes intelligence chief to express concerns about Chinese-made electric vehicles. But he is the most high-profile recent Canadian intelligence official to plainly state grave concerns about how the People’s Republic of China (PRC) will use them as intelligence-collecting devices.

The Chinese government has consistently denied any claims that its domestic companies can be used as information-gathering platforms.

Vigneault’s comments come as Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government works to attract joint-venture Chinese EV manufacturing to Canada in a bid to replace fleeing U.S. automakers.

Earlier this year, Carney travelled to China where he announced wide-ranging new deals with PRC President Xi Jinping to boost trade between both countries, including dropping Canadian tariffs to the lowest level for nearly 50,000 Chinese EVs annually.

“To make Canada a leader in electric vehicle manufacturing, we’re working to attract significant new joint-venture Chinese investments,” Carney said in a statement at the time.

Last week, Chinese EV manufacturer Geely Auto — which also owns brands Lynk & Co and Zeekr — announced it would be introducing its vehicles into the Canadian market for the first time next year.

When asked about concerns linked to Chinese tech and espionage, the prime minister has repeatedly said he is entering “eyes wide open” into the new strategic partnership with China.

During the podcast, Vigneault said he understands that Canada “absolutely needs” to do business with the Asian economic behemoth. But “eyes wide open” isn’t quite enough.

“You need to have more than your eyes wide open; you need to also make sure that you’re protecting your wallet in your back pocket,” said the current chief intelligence officer at Strider.

That’s because China’s longtime efforts to steal intellectual property from Western governments, companies and research facilities has cost tens of billions to Canada and its allies, Vigneault told BBC.

CSIS and other Canadian intelligence agencies have also warned of increased Chinese efforts to steal Canadian IP, such as vaccine research during the COVID-19 pandemic or information that could be militarized by the PRC’s military.

In the interview, Vigneault suggested most people don’t fully comprehend the scope, value and impact of the PRC’s IP theft.

“The amount… of intellectual property that has been taken away from the West, from Great Britain, from Canada, the U.S. is essentially a lost generation of prosperity,” he said. “It’s not the amount of job losses in our society now, but also in the future.”

“Any new information innovation technology that comes into China is looked through the prism of, ‘Can we industrialize it to make to create jobs and opportunities’, but also, is there a way to weaponize it to essentially give new capabilities to the People’s Liberation Army.”

 A Chinese-made Geely E5 SUV electric vehicle at the International Paris Motor Show on Oct. 12, 2026.

Vigneault also expressed his concern about the rise of antisemitism across the world, noting that some anti-Jewish terrorists in Canada are radicalized by ignorance.

“With Israel, you can absolutely disagree with policies. Unfortunately, I’ve seen some of the more extreme groups recuperate some of the legitimate angst against those policies and turn that into anti-semitism,” he explained.

“I’ve seen that in terrorist attacks in my country, in Canada, where people who honestly have no idea what they’re talking about, but the radicalization online essentially brings them… to become anti-semite.”

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


The suspect who allegedly attacked another man from behind unprovoked during an anti-Israel protest in Toronto on Saturday, October 10, 2026.

A man surrendered himself to police on Monday after allegedly punching a person repeatedly in the head at an anti-Israel demonstration on Oct. 10 in Toronto.

The Toronto Police Service’s hate crime unit alleges that Martin Salgatar, 20, of Mississauga, was walking in a demonstration near Yonge and Grosvenor Streets when he attacked the victim from behind without provocation.

The blows knocked the victim to the ground, injuring his face and leg, according to police.

A police spokesman told JNS it was a “pro-Palestine event” and that the hate crime unit investigates “any arrests made at demonstrations.”

Video footage that circulated on social media appeared to show the attacker strike the victim from behind, pull him to the sidewalk and punch him repeatedly, as fellow anti-Israel protesters tried to stop him.

The protesters then appear to berate the victim, who is on the ground bleeding from the face, and a man wearing a sweatshirt with an upside-down red triangle—a Hamas terror symbol—seems to curse the victim and accuse him of “trying to pick fights.”

“You f****** deserve it, you piece of sh**,” the man yells.

After a screenshot of the suspect’s face from the video footage circulated on Monday, Salgatar turned himself in.

He was scheduled to appear at the Toronto Regional Bail Centre on Oct. 13. Police announced the charge on Oct. 14.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Quebec premier-designate Paul St-Pierre Plamondon during the swearing-in ceremony of Parti Québécois MNAs at the National Assembly in Quebec City, on Thursday, Oct. 15, 2026.

OTTAWA — Quebec premier-designate Paul St-Pierre Plamondon and the 58 members of the Parti Québécois caucus did not pledge allegiance to King Charles III at the swearing-in ceremony for the incoming PQ government on Thursday.

Instead, they pledged their loyalty to “the people of Quebec” — something that is technically possible to do under a provincial law that was adopted four years ago in the National Assembly of Quebec, but that constitutional lawyers remain skeptical about.

St-Pierre Plamondon entered the red room of the legislature to thunderous applause from his caucus and guests who were chanting for Quebec to become a country only moments before. The premier-elect looked visibly emotional.

“I, Paul St-Pierre Plamondon, solemnly declare that I will be loyal to the people of Quebec and that I will perform my duties as a Member of the National Assembly with honesty and justice, in accordance with the Constitution of Quebec,” he said.

One by one, members of his caucus repeated the same phrase to be sworn in as MNAs.

Quebec’s Lieutenant-Governor Manon Jeannotte was nowhere in sight during the swearing-in ceremony. St-Pierre Plamondon has vowed to strip her office’s funding, instead dedicating those funds to fight homelessness in the province.

The National Assembly adopted a law in December 2022 that made swearing an oath to the King optional after the PQ members — including St-Pierre Plamondon — were temporarily barred from taking their seats in the legislature for refusing to do just that.

Philippe Lagassé, a professor at the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs at Carleton University who is an expert in the Westminster system, said the constitutionality of the act remains “unclear” but is being challenged in court.

Last week, Lawrence David, a professor at the University of Ottawa’s faculty of law and president and founder of the Public Interest Litigation Institute, filed an application in Quebec Superior Court for an injunction to force MNAs to swear the oath to the King.

David and the Public Interest Litigation Institute had already filed a lawsuit seeking to restore the oath in August. But given the urgency of the situation with a PQ government promising to abolish the monarchy, he sought an injunction the day after the election.

The hearing is expected to be held sometime between Oct. 19 and Nov. 9.

David claims that MNAs who do not take the oath to the King are not constitutionally authorized to sit in the National Assembly or to pass any laws.

Lagassé noted that the federal Department of Justice seems to have accepted the constitutionality of the Quebec law prima facie, as has its provincial government.

“However, we don’t know if that is the case yet, since it has not been tested before the courts. And I would say that there is a strong view amongst experts of the Constitution that this is likely not constitutional,” said the professor.

Even Governor General Louise Arbour has expressed skepticism, in recent public comments made to Radio-Canada , about MNAs refusing to swear allegiance to the monarchy, saying that Canada operates within a constitutional framework.

She added that St-Pierre Plamondon, as a lawyer, is well-aware of this reality.

Constitutional or not, the option to swear to the King or not crosses party lines. Quebec Liberal Leader Charles Milliard told FM93 radio that he does not intend to swear allegiance to the King while saying he does not want a “monarchical crisis” in Canada.

The swearing-in ceremonies for opposition MNAs should take place next week, as will St-Pierre Plamondon’s swearing-in as premier and of his members of cabinet.

Lagassé said the PQ’s decision to cast aside the lieutenant-governor will be even more interesting when forming cabinet, since members of the Executive Council — the Quebec equivalent of the Privy Council — are effectively advisors to the Crown.

“So, it’ll be interesting to see if they go out of their way to have a separate public ceremony, and then secretly do all their oaths with the lieutenant-governor behind closed doors. It’s entirely possible,” he said.

Lagassé said there are lots of things the incoming PQ government can do to reduce the symbolism of the lieutenant-governor’s office such as kicking her out of her office or cutting her budget, but the federal government can always swoop in to help.

Lagassé said he doesn’t think a PQ government would necessarily object to that, because they still need the lieutenant-governor to do certain things like sign bills into law.

“But if, symbolically, they don’t want to fund it, but then the federal government comes and backfills it and allows them to have an office somewhere and allows them to still have a small office, in a way they’d be able to have their cake and eat it too.”

— With files from Kalina Laframboise, Montreal Gazette

National Post
calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at Laughlin/Bullhead International Airport on October 14, 2026 in Bullhead City, Arizona.

U.S. President Donald Trump has reignited his rhetoric around Canada becoming the “51st state,” shortly after his administration warned Canadian politicians against getting involved in U.S. affairs.

In a podcast appearance on Tuesday, U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra said America is “closely watching Canadian activities” for election interference, referencing comments from Canada’s Industry Minister, ⁠Mélanie Joly, about retaliatory tariffs. “Keep your nose out of American politics,” he said.

Joly has hit back against his claims, saying: “We never do that, and we never accept that also being done to us in Canada,” while speaking to reporters in Ottawa on Wednesday. “What I’ve done in the U.S. is to attract investments…and that will continue to be my strategy in the U.S. and also around the world.”

Later that day, Trump reiterated his ongoing stance that Canada should become the 51st U.S. state at a campaign rally in Arizona. Here are seven key occasions the U.S. president has suggested annexing Canada.

‘They’ll end up being the 51st state’

On Wednesday, Trump listed a number of grievances he has with Canada in his speech at Laughlin/Bullhead International Airport, adding: “They’ll end up being the 51st state, because that’s the only way it works.”

He said: “Canada treats us very badly. They always have. Not anymore. It’s a whole different ball game now that Trump is in town.”

The U.S. president also suggested Canada will “be doing something just like Greenland,” adding that it “just adds to our beautiful plate,” referring to the U.S.

He made the comments the same day Hoekstra warned Canadian politicians against engaging in behaviour that could be inferred as election interference.

Canada’s technical recession

After almost a year of silence from Trump on the 51st state topic, the U.S. president renewed the rhetoric after Canada entered a technical recession in June this year.

In a post on Truth Social , Trump wrote “51st state!” with a link to a Bloomberg report about the technical recession. Hoekstra then shared the post on his X account just hours before the Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc and chief trade negotiator Janice Charette were due to meet with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Washington, D.C.

‘Join our country and you get it for free’

In September 2025, Trump referenced his desire for Canada to become the 51st state during his address to U.S. military officials in Virginia.

In the speech, he claimed work on the “Golden Dome Missile Defence Shield” was proceeding and that Canada had recently contacted him to say “they want to be a part of it.”

“To which I said, ‘Well, why don’t you just join our country? You become the 51st state and you get it for free,” he suggested.

Election Day comments

On April 28, 2025, the day of Canada’s federal election, Trump told Canadians to “elect the man” who will let Canada become the 51st state in a Truth Social post.

“Elect the man who has the strength and wisdom to cut your taxes in half, increase your military power, for free, to the highest level in the World, have your Car, Steel, Aluminum, Lumber, Energy, and all other businesses, QUADRUPLE in size, WITH ZERO TARIFFS OR TAXES, if Canada becomes the cherished 51st,” the post read.

He added: “America can no longer subsidize Canada with the Hundreds of Billions of Dollars a year that we have been spending in the past. It makes no sense unless Canada is a State!”

The post came just a few days after Trump sat down for an interview with TIME magazine ’s senior political correspondent Eric Cortellessa and editor-in-chief Sam Jacobs.

“You’ve talked about acquiring Greenland, taking control of the Panama Canal, making Canada the 51st state,” Cortellessa said. “Maybe you’re trolling a little bit on that one. I don’t know.”

Trump’s answer was short: “Actually, no, I’m not.”

Super Bowl interview

Trump’s comments in the TIME interview doubled down on statements he made earlier that month in an interview that aired during the Super Bowl pre-show.

When asked whether his talk of annexing Canada is “a real thing,” Trump told Fox News Channel’s Bret Baier: “Yeah, it is.”

“I think Canada would be much better off being the 51st state because we lose $200 billion a year with Canada. And I’m not going to let that happen,” he said. “Why are we paying $200 billion a year, essentially a subsidy to Canada?”

Trump has repeatedly claimed that the U.S. loses hundreds of billions of dollars a year to Canada during his second term as president. But according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative , the U.S. goods trade deficit with Canada was US$48.3 billion in 2025, a 21 percent decrease ($12.9 billion) over 2024 and far less than Trump has claimed.

The artificially drawn line

In January 2025, before the inauguration for his second term, Trump threatened to use “economic force” to make Canada the 51st state and called the border between the two countries an “artificially drawn line.”

“You get rid of that artificially drawn line and you take a look at what that looks like, and it would also be much better for national security,” he said at a news conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. “And don’t forget, we basically protect Canada.”

Then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau responded with a post on X, in which he said: “There isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell that Canada would become part of the United States.”

‘Governor Justin Trudeau’

Trump first floated the idea of Canada becoming the 51st state during a dinner with then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at Mar-a-Lago in November 2024.

A few days later, in December that year, Trump called Trudeau “governor.” In a Truth Social post on Dec. 10, 2024, the U.S. president said it was a pleasure to have dined “with Governor Justin Trudeau of the great state of Canada” and that he looked forward to seeing “the governor again soon” to continue their “in-depth talks on tariffs and trade.”

It was the start of a long-running commentary from Trump on the annexation of Canada, which has now lasted almost two years.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Sophie Gregoire Trudeau, left, and her former partner, former prime minister Justin Trudeau.

During her time as Canada’s unofficial first lady, Sophie Grégoire Trudeau said she never saw her “former partner as a prime minister.”

“I knew it was his job, but come on,” the soon-to-be 52-year-old told Talia Bronfman and Jessica Green, hosts of Canadian podcast Built For This , in a recent episode.

“Like snap out of every role you’re in, because if you believe it for half a second you’re doomed, and including celebrity.”

Grégoire Trudeau and former prime minister Justin Trudeau have been separated since August 2023 after 18 years of marriage and three children together — Xavier, 18, Ella-Grace, 17, and Hadrien, 12. Trudeau, 54, has been in a heavily publicized romantic relationship with American pop star Katy Perry since the summer of 2025.

Grégoire Trudeau recounted keeping herself and her ex grounded when ordinary people they would encounter in their official capacity started “losing it.”

“Right away I’m like, ‘No, no, no, no, no. This is not going to happen. Look into my eyes right now. We belong to each other. We’re doing this for each other. So, let’s put all the titles and the accolades and the lighting aside and let’s just come back to like we’re walking each other home,’” she explained.

Those were the only mentions of Trudeau during their nearly hour-long conversation posted on Oct. 10, World Mental Health Day, and focused largely on Grégoire Trudeau’s debut self-help book, Closer Together: Knowing Ourselves, Loving Each Other. Grégoire Trudeau is a long-time mental health advocate and the first national volunteer for the Canadian Mental Health Association .

But she did discuss the realities of political life, which is both an “incredible opportunity” and often quite trying.

“People still think politics is like glamorous and it’s champagne and I’m like ‘Oh my goodness, if people only knew the sacrifices that you make in your life. Like your time is not yours anymore. Your family is almost not yours anymore,” she explained.

“So to be honest, if people would ask me today, would you tell anybody to go into public service? I would say if you don’t have little kids, yes.”

 Prime Minister Justin Trudeau departs Ottawa with his wife Sophie Gregoire Trudeau, left to right, and children Xavier, Ella-Grace and Hadrien on Friday, Feb. 16, 2018., en route to India.

To keep herself grounded, she said she avoided most articles written about her because “it was already a situation in which the physical and psychological safety” of her loved ones “was at play every single day.

“I can’t even tell you as a mother what that does to your nervous system, “ she said. “So my main work was to keep that calm so that when they came back … they could feed from somebody who was grounded.”

The podcast was recorded in Montreal, where Grégoire Trudeau returned to live this year in a rented home about four streets from where she spent most of her youth. She has mixed feelings about returning to her hometown now, most of it “melancholy.” Trudeau, who also grew up in the Quebec city, bought a $4.26 million home in Outremont earlier this year.

“I’m in a period of life that there’s been a lot of years of sadness and tears because so much shedding, so much letting go, so much deconstructing what I thought my life would be like, and when you’re a separated mother and you coming into an empty home… ” she said, fighting back tears, “I’m still not used to it and I’m not built for that. So, I’m learning non-stop.”

Grégoire Trudeau said she’s not sure what chapter comes next in her life, but she did allude to a potential romantic partner when questioning out loud why she moved back to Montreal.

“And I’m like, why am I back here? Is he here? Is he waiting for me,” she asks, giving the female hosts knowing looks and drawing equally knowing replies.

Earlier in the show, she divulged that her second book — a children’s “emotional literacy” book — will be published in 2027 and will feature illustrations inspired by her childhood growing up in nature with her parents.

During the rapid-fire question round, she said her go-to karaoke track is the Four Non Blondes’ What’s Going On?, she’d recommend Little Italy for anyone looking to dine out in Montreal and once accidentally ran over a baby mouse on the road that she’d stopped to help.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.