LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Palestinians travel along Al-Rashid road toward Gaza City from Nuseirat in the central Gaza Strip on Oct. 10, 2025.

Palestinians in Gaza who applied to join relatives in Canada two years ago under Ottawa’s crisis immigration policy but haven’t received travel visas lost their lawsuits trying to force officials to act despite security problems in the war-torn region.

Four similar court actions asked the Federal Court to order officials with Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) to process their temporary resident visa applications.

Justice Henry S. Brown said the stories of applicants in Gaza were “heartbreaking” but he could not issue the orders they sought.

The court cases stem from Ottawa’s announcement of a “temporary public policy to facilitate temporary resident visas for certain extended family affected by the crisis in Gaza,” which took effect on Jan. 9, 2024.

It was supposed to provide quick refuge for Palestinians with relatives who are either Canadian citizens or permanent residents and willing to be an “anchor relative” in Canada.

The Gaza policy was capped at 5,000 visas. Court heard that almost two years later there are about 4,200 unprocessed applicants.

The policy was similar in purpose to emergency policies for Ukrainians fleeing Russia’s invasion, Afghans fleeing the Taliban’s return to power, and those in danger zones after an earthquake in Türkiye and Syria. The policies remove some criteria normally needed to enter Canada to speed things up in a crisis.

In the policy for Gaza, the government exempted applicants from needing to prove their financial stability and that they would leave Canada at the end of their authorized stay.

Because of the similar nature of the court cases, portions of the decisions are replicated in each decision, all of which were decided by Brown. The last three decisions were released Wednesday.

The four cases represent 10 Gazan residents. The names of each of the visa applicants in the cases was anonymized by the court.

One case involves a family of five — a mother, father, and three children. Court heard they were living in one room in their partially destroyed home in Gaza City with rats and exposed to the rain due to damage to their roof.

Another family is a mother, father and their young son. Court heard they left their home in the Gaza Strip the day after the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas on Israel from Gaza, and have been displaced several times while other family members have died in bombings.

A third case involves a Palestinian man living in the Gaza Strip. Court heard that after October 7 he was unable to continue his studies and lost his job and later his home. A court case heard in September was for a Palestinian woman living in Gaza City who said her house was flattened by a bomb, leaving her without shelter, food or water.

Court heard the special immigration policy was a three-stage process, starting with an anchor relative in Canada completing forms, then submitting documentary proof of identification, status in Canada, and other information; next documents for their Gazan kin seeking visas needed uploading.

Once Canadian immigration officials confirm an applicant is eligible, the policy process states, the applicant’s names are forwarded to the Israeli and Egyptian governments to allow access to the Rafah border crossing to provide Canada their biometric information at a collection facility, court heard. That includes fingerprinting and photographs. The border crossing was needed because there is no Canadian collection facility in Gaza.

That last stage became impossible, court heard.

In the case of the male applicant, used as an example in court, his anchor relative submitted a crisis webform on Jan. 14, 2024, and was approved for processing four days later.

Four months after the application, an entry was made in the immigration case management system noting that he had met all requirements except his security screening and biometrics, meaning his eligibility had been approved but his admissibility was pending.

IRCC officials requested more information in December 2024, including about social media accounts, which was provided the next day, court heard. Everything was in place but biometrics that are done across the border.

“While this was possible in December 2023 when the Policy was issued, the Rafah crossing was closed on May 7, 2024, and remains closed to this day,” Brown wrote in his reasons for judgment. “Therefore, the Applicant — through no fault of his own or of IRCC — has not obtained or sent his biometrics.”

Brown said lawyers for both the applicants and for the government are right, in a way.

He agreed with the applicants that the government has a legal duty to process visa applications made under the policy. He also agreed with the government that officers did not have a duty to process applications within a particular timeframe.

“I am satisfied the Applicant has a legitimate expectation to his application being dealt with in a timely manner. However, this expectation only arises when the Applicant meets all the conditions of the Policy and provides biometric information (which he is unable to do),” Brown wrote.

Brown found that Canada’s policy did not allow visa officers to override other regulations on immigration, and those regulations require a biometric check. The government argued that Ottawa has a duty to maintain the integrity of Canada’s immigration system and Brown agreed.

“The root cause of the Applicant’s failure to provide his biometric data is of course the changed operational context, namely the closure of the Rafah crossing which made obtaining and submitting biometrics impossible.”

He said because of that, the applicants did not meet the threshold for a court order forcing the government to act because that required all elements of a process to be complete before unreasonable delay can be determined.

All cases were denied.

The outcome disappoints Hana Marku, a lawyer who represents some of the visa applicants.

“Canada’s behaviour throughout its rollout of its own policy has been utterly cruel,” Marku said afterwards. “Canada has no serious intention of providing safe refuge to Palestinians. This is why we sought justice from the court…. The Federal Court has given the government a pass to do nothing while Palestinian visa applicants in the Gaza Strip face death and starvation.”

Jeffrey MacDonald, a spokesman for IRCC, declined to comment on the specific cases citing privacy considerations, but said the delay in processing the visas is beyond the Canada’s control.

“Canada is deeply concerned about the situation in Gaza,” MacDonald said. “Everyone must meet Canada’s legal requirements before travelling, including security and biometric checks, where required. Biometrics can only be done outside Gaza, as Canada has no presence there. While we continue to advocate for the safety of those in Gaza, Canada does not ultimately determine who can leave Gaza.”

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | X:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Sophie Gregoire Trudeau during the launch of her new book, Closer Together, in Montreal in April of 2024.

More than two years after separating from Justin Trudeau, Sophie Grégoire Trudeau seems to coping with her ex’s public romance with singer Katy Perry. Moreover, she credits him with stepping up to joint parent their three children.

“I’m definitely not a single mom. I have a partnership with a father who has such deep love and availability to his children,” she said when she sat down recently with Canadian businesswoman Arlene Dickinson for a YouTube episode of “

Arlene Is Alone: The Single Life

.”

The discussion with Grégoire Trudeau was wide-ranging, exploring mental health, motherhood, living in the public eye, and women finding authenticity amid constant scrutiny.

Acknowledging that being in the public eye can present many “triggers,” Grégoire Trudeau said she has learned to “listen to the music, not the noise.”

Dickinson injected her own sense of frustration with the publicity surrounding Justin and Perry (without mentioning the entertainer’s name but referring to the widely publicized photos of the couple in a Montreal restaurant and then on Perry’s yacht). “I don’t know how you stay cool … I really admire it because I would probably not be that way.”

Grégoire Trudeau responded by acknowledging “stuff affects us” and she is aware that a lot of “public stuff out there can be triggers.” However, she says she chooses not to stay triggered: “How you react to stuff is your decision. The woman I want to become through this is my decision.”

She said it’s possible to stay in a reactive state, but “you’ll suffer the consequences. Your stress levels are going to be up the roof. You’re going to become more and more judgmental because that’s a loop as well.”

 Making their first public appearance in Paris, Katy Perry and former prime minister Justin Trudeau.

Making their first public appearance in Paris, Katy Perry and former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Grégoire Trudeau married Justin Trudeau, the twenty-third prime minister of Canada, in 2005. The couple separated in 2023. There are no public plans to divorce. They have three children: Xavier James, Ella-Grace Margaret, and Hadrien Gregoire.

Dickinson asked her what’s it’s like to be a single mom. However, Grégoire Trudeau insisted she is not one, crediting her husband for his

ongoing dedication to the family

.

Regarding the very public life of a senior politician’s family, she spoke about “the scrutiny, the speed at which things are happening. You’re constantly reacting, knowing that when you go out there, the partner and the man you love, and your kids, they are under physical and psychological stress and safety issues. That’s hard to face as a family.”

“So, she said, “I can’t say I’m a single mom because we have raised these kids together.”

 Former President Joe Biden speaking with former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in the House of Commons in March 2023, with Sophie Gregoire Trudeau looking on.

Dickson asked about times when Justin might be on the road and Grégoire Trudeau is facing a parental challenge. In response, Grégoire Trudeau said: “We call each other up. We’ll text each other … We will really try to build cohesion, so that the kids feel that cohesion … We have separate lives, but we have one family life, right?”

Despite the marriage breakup, Grégoire Trudeau insisted that it has been “a common, conscious decision that our family is our greatest creation and we’re going to feed it together no matter if we are on different life paths.”

Notably, the two women did not discuss that Grégoire Trudeau has been in

a new relationship with Ottawa pediatric surgeon, Dr. Marcos Bettolli

, possibly since before breakup became public in 2023.

Still, she expressed public anguish about the failure of the marriage. For example, in May 2024,

People Magazine

reported her saying: “It hurts deeply. You know, marriage is ‘success.’ Separation and divorce is ‘failure.’”

However, Grégoire Trudeau did not express any grief on this occasion. Instead, she went on to say that at age 50 she has learned people will “meet life where they are inside” and then a person must decide how they will let that affect their happiness.

At the end of any day, she said, you must ask “what did I do to take care of myself.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark speaks at the Canadian Club Toronto in Toronto, Friday, Nov. 7, 2025.

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Thursday that his government is sending more critical minerals mining, clean electricity, and a liquefied natural gas project to a new federal office designed to streamline the regulatory approvals process.

Speaking in Terrance, B.C., he announced that six more projects would be forwarded to the Major Projects Office, saying they met the government’s criteria of what constituted “nation-building” efforts to spur development and attract billions more in private investment, which the prime minister said would lead to new jobs.

Topping the new list was the North Coast Transmission Line, a project identified by British Columbia Premier David Eby’s NDP government as “essential” to expanding the province’s electricity grid, in part to support the development of other sectors, such as critical minerals and liquefied natural gas.

Carney announced on Thursday that to support its development, the Canada Infrastructure Bank had approved a nearly $140 million loan for B.C. Hydro, which seeks to twin an existing transmission line from Prince George to Terrance, B.C., to better meet growing demands for electricity. The B.C. government had been seeking financial support from the federal government, with the first stages of the project expected to cost $6 billion.

The prime minister also announced on Thursday that his government was sending the proposed Ksi Lisims liquefied natural gas project, also located in B.C., which was being partly led by the Nisga’a Nation.

“(Liquefied natural gas) is an essential fuel for the energy transition,” Carney said Thursday. “(Liquefied natural gas) can help Canada build new trading relationships, especially in fast-growing markets in Asia.”

Carney noted that Canada has the fourth-largest natural gas reserves in the world and said the country stands ready to help meet the growing demand for the fuel, predicted through to 2040.

Back in September, when Carney announced the first batch of major projects to be reviewed for fast-tracked approvals, he included on that list an LNG Canada export terminal expansion, which seeks

to double LNG Canada’s production of liquefied natural gas off B.C.’s coast.

Canada’s first major shipment of liquefied natural gas set off from the Kitimat, B.C., facility back in June.

On Thursday, Carney defended his selection of projects, such as Ksi Lisims, which seeks to build a floating natural gas facility and terminal on Pearse Island, B.C.,  against First Nations’ criticism by saying it was simply being sent to the federal projects office for further review.

The prime minister said that Indigenous participation in such projects was “crucial.”

As it stands, the

Lax Kw’alaams Band and the Metlakatla First Nation in northwestern B.C., separately filed judicial review applications in Federal Court last month after the federal government granted its approval under its “one project, one review” process following B.C.’s own approval.

In terms of other projects, Carney announced Thursday that his government had selected three more critical mining projects across Ontario, Quebec, and New Brunswick, as it seeks to boost Canada’s critical minerals supply.

Those projects themselves were the tungsten mine in Sisson Brook, N.B., a nickel mine Timmins, Ont., as well as a graphite mine in Quebec.

The final project selected was a hydro project in Nunavut, which Carney said would be the territory’s first fully Indigenous-owned one of its kind, and seeks to replace its long-term reliance on diesel shipments for power.

Dawn Farrell, the CEO of the Major Projects Office, appeared alongside Carney at Thursday’s announcement and told reporters that many of the projects forwarded to her office had been in development for “quite a while.”

The goal, she explained, was to bring them over the finish line by streamlining the finals approvals process to around two years, down from the current five.

“There’s a lot of work as you get to the end of the line,” Farrell said.

To do so, the Carney government ushered into law new powers under legislation, known by its legislative title of Bill C-5, which would give his cabinet the powers to fast-track project approvals by, if needed, stepping around existing environmental laws, such as the Impact Assessment Act.

The prime minister has promised Indigenous-rights holders, such as First Nations, that they would be fully consulted on projects being developed on their territories and that Indigenous participation was one of the criteria the government would use to select which projects would be eligible for its new streamlined approvals process.

One proposal absent from Thursday’s announcement was Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s pitch to build a new bitumen pipeline from her province to B.C.’s northern coast.

Before Carney formally announced his latest batch of projects on Thursday, Smith’s office released a statement on Wednesday to say she was supportive of the choices, as her United Conservative Party government remained locked in negotiations with Ottawa on a new memorandum of understanding, which she hopes would see Carney’s government commit to repealing a suite of environmental policies, which she and other industry leaders argue hamper future pipeline construction.

“Currently, we are working on a (Memorandum of Understanding)  agreement with the federal government that includes the removal, carve out or overhaul of several damaging laws chasing away private investment in our energy sector, and an agreement to work towards ultimate approval of a bitumen pipeline to Asian markets,” wrote Smith spokesman, Sam

Blackett.

Carney told reporters on Thursday that talks were “going well,” but suggested a conclusion may come in the “coming weeks.” That would be passed the Nov.16 deadline of which Smith had initially said she hoped to see a resolution.

While Alberta wants the federal government to repeal environmental laws it sees as standing in the way of a new pipeline to B.C’s coast, Carney said his government wants to see major investments in a massive carbon capture and storage proposed in Alberta, which was added to its earlier list of nation-building projects.

He also suggested the federal government wants to see Alberta look at its industrial carbon price, a policy that the prime minister committed to strengthening in the recent federal budget as a way to drive down carbon emissions.

With files from Christopher Nardi, Alec Lazenby of the Vancouver Sun and The Canadian Press 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


A demonstrator waves a Palestinian flag inside an anti-Israel encampment at the University of Toronto campus on May 2, 2024.

A Jewish group is urging the City of Toronto to cancel the raising of the Palestinian flag at city hall, as more than 20,000 people sign a petition saying it could “inadvertently cause division and tension.”

B’nai Brith Canada told National Post over email that the event “violates the city’s prohibition against flag raisings that promote hatred, violence, or racism.” The flag-raising is

planned for Nov. 17

, in recognition of Palestinian Independence Day, which takes place two days prior.

B’nai Brith Canada wrote to the city, warning that “commemorating Palestinian independence in this way — as it was self-declared by then-Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) chairman Yasser Arafat on Nov. 15, 1988 — would sanitize the PLO’s antisemitic ideology and acts of terror.”

Richard Robertson, B’nai Brith’s director of research and advocacy, said that the PLO’s ideology “precluded the notion of Jewish self-determination, promoted antisemitism, glorified hate-motivated violence, and perpetuated hostilities in the region.”

“Commemorating this moment, in the context of rising antisemitism in Canada, is not only insensitive but also reckless and irresponsible,” he said.

The

Change.org petition

that was created last week by Ron Jones called for other ways to support “Palestinian awareness and solidarity that do not involve flying a flag at a city-level government institution.”

“Events in the Middle East, especially those involving Israel and Palestine, are complex and deeply rooted in history, with implications that transcend borders,” says the petition. “The decision to fly a flag should respect the feelings and views of all community members, ensuring that city hall remains a place of unity rather than discord.”

In a statement to National Post, City of Toronto’s d

irector of media relations and issues management

Russell Baker said the flag-raising policy is “council-approved.” It allows non-profit or charitable organizations to request flag raisings, “including flags of nations recognized by Global Affairs Canada, Government of Canada, on existing courtesy flagpoles.”

In September, Canada

recognized Palestinian statehood

, in a move that

upset many Jewish advocacy groups

in the country.

The city approved the Nov. 17 request from advocacy group, the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians (ICJP), said Baker. The flag will be lowered at the end of the day. In 2025, there have already been dozens of flag raisings at Toronto City Hall. The Israeli flag was raised on May 1 to mark Israel’s independence day.

Flying a specific flag does not imply or express “support for the politics or policies of nations and/or organizations, but raises the flag in recognition of those citizens or members that have made the request,” Baker said.

Shane Martinez, a lawyer at ICJP Canada, 

told Now Magazine

that the flag-raising in Toronto “symbolizes Palestinian resilience and is a powerful expression of solidarity with Palestinians everywhere.”

However, Toronto City Councillor James Pasternak said in

a post on X

that those who made the request are activists, not “diplomatic representatives.” He said they were looking to “stage a political stunt under the guise of marking the anniversary of the 1988 Palestinian Declaration of Independence — on its own, a deeply partisan observance tied to a violent and unresolved conflict overseas.”

“Over the past two years, Torontonians have grown sick and tired of mobs holding rallies in neighbourhoods, blocking streets, damaging infrastructure, and endlessly draining police resources. We cannot reward these groups by giving them a platform for further political agitation,” said Pasternak.

He said what is planned for Nov. 17 in Toronto is not comparable to the reason the flag-raising program was created, which was to “honour official partners of Canada.”

Pasternak pointed out that Canada’s recognition of Palestinian statehood was “dependent on reforms, demilitarization, and elections that exclude Hamas, a listed terrorist entity in Canada.”

“To date, none of those conditions have been met,” he said. “Political activism is a sacred Charter right, but it does not grant blanket immunity to disrupt the lives of law-abiding citizens, trample laws, endanger public safety, or hijack civic spaces.”

Other Palestinian flag-raising ceremonies are planned in Canada.

One is

scheduled in Calgary on Nov. 15

, according to the city. It is set to take place at the Municipal Plaza. Another is scheduled the same day in Winnipeg at Memorial Park, across from the Manitoba Legislative Building, according to the Canadian Palestinian Association of Manitoba. It was

announced by Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew

in late October that a Palestinian flag-raising would take place.

An

open letter

written by the Israeli Canadian Council (Manitoba) urged Kinew to rethink the move, saying there were better options to show unity and bring the community together. “If the Israeli flag must be raised in secrecy while the Palestinian flag is raised in celebration, the message is unmistakable: intimidation works,” the group said.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Director of Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Daniel Rogers waits to appear as witness to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU) studying electoral interference and criminal activities in Canada by agents of the Government of India in the Parliamentary Precinct of Ottawa, on Tuesday, Oct. 29, 2024.

OTTAWA — The kids aren’t all right, warns Canada’s spy chief, as nearly one in 10 of CSIS’s terrorism investigations now involves at least one minor who was radicalized online.
 

In his first annual speech, Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) director Daniel Rogers said he’s increasingly concerned by growing violent extremism in Canada, particularly among those under 18 years old.
 

The extremism is motivated by different ideologies such antisemitism, xenophobia, misogyny, “extreme interpretations” of religion or accelerationism (the desire to accelerate the collapse of society) that spread faster and easier than ever due to online content, Rogers said.
 

That means children and teenagers are much more susceptible to falling into the trap of violent extremists online, he warned.
 

“Worryingly, nearly one in 10 terrorism investigations at CSIS now includes at least one subject of investigation under the age of 18,” Rogers told an audience of government and police officials, academics and reporters on Thursday.
 

Just this year, two minors were arrested on suspicions they were planning to commit serious violent acts.
 

The first was a minor in Montreal allegedly planning an attack on behalf of Daesh, the second was a 15-year-old Edmonton youth police suspected would commit attacks on behalf on an online transnational violent community, Rogers noted.
 

“Fortunately, only a small number of youth or adults with extreme views resort to violence. But when they do, the consequences are devastating,” he said.
 

In the last 11 years, there have been 20 violent extremist attacks in Canada that killed 29 people and injured 60, Rogers noted.
 

He said CSIS has helped disrupt 24 “violent extremist actions” that led to arrests of terrorism peace bond charges in just over three years.
 

A number of those involved individuals suspected of planning attacks either on behalf of Daesh or against the Jewish community, or both.
 

Since 2023, Rogers said CSIS assisted in the arrest of two 15-year-olds in Ottawa before they allegedly committed a mass casualty attack against the Jewish community. The agency also contributed information leading to the arrest of a man planning a Daesh-inspired attack on the Jewish community in New York.
 

The spy chief also said the agency is focusing more resources on “particularly alarming” cases involving plots by Iranian intelligence to repress — and sometimes murder — critics and dissidents of the regime in Canada.
 

“In more than one case, this involved detecting, investigating and disrupting potentially lethal threats against individuals in Canada,” Rogers said of transnational repression efforts by Iran.
 

China and India are also known perpetrators of transnational repression against Canadians perceived to be a threat to their interests, he added.
 

China’s efforts to spy on Canada to steal anything from state and military secrets to intellectual property have not relented, Rogers warned.
 

He revealed that agents of China are increasingly targeting the private sector and former government workers, namely via fake hiring schemes.
 

“Chinese spies have tried to recruit Canadians with access to government plans, intentions, information and military expertise, through social media and online job platforms,” he warned.
 

Russia and China are also aggressively pushing for more intelligence and influence in Canada’s Arctic.
 

“Both of those countries, and others, have a significant intelligence interest in our Arctic and those who influence or develop its economic or strategic potential. It’s no surprise, then, that CSIS has observed both cyber and non-cyber intelligence collection efforts targeting both governments and the private sector in the region,” he said.

Rogers ended his speech by putting Canadians on notice: the agency will need to collect and use more data than before to keep the country safe.

“CSIS will be challenged to adopt technology and use data in new and more significant ways to keep Canadians safe and to secure an advantage for Canada,” he said.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Mohamed Basil Lafir, 28, of no fixed address, is accused of breaking into homes in Oshawa and sexually assaulting multiple residents on Tuesday, Nov. 11, 2025.

A 28-year-old man has been arrested for allegedly entering several homes and sexually assaulting multiple victims in Oshawa, Ontario.

Mohamed Basil Lafir of no fixed address is charged with several suspected offences, including multiple break-and-enters, committing an indecent act, forcible confinement, and two sexual assaults.

Lafir was held after his arrest for a bail hearing.

The alleged crime spree unfolded on Nov. 11, according to

Durham Regional Police

. The service says it responded to calls received late Tuesday afternoon about a man entering homes and exposing himself.

The suspect entered one home and exposed himself to the residents before being startled by a dog and fleeing, says the DRPS in a release.

“The suspect then entered a second residence on the same street, where he sexually assaulted the homeowner when she confronted him.”

Afterward, he fled and entered a third home. While inside it, the suspect sexually assaulted an older female, who was in bed. He fled the third residence through the bedroom window.

When police arrived in the area, they located the man and took him into custody without incident.

Police are concerned there may be more victims.

However, the allegations have yet to be proven in court.

Anyone with information or video connected to these incidents is asked to contact the DPRS investigative division at 1-888-579-1520 ext. 2452.

Meanwhile, anonymous information can be shared with Durham Regional Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-TIPS (8477) or online at www.durhamregionalcrimestoppers.ca

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


City hall in Grande Prairie, Alberta.

An Indian man who paid a fixer $15,000 in a failed attempt to extend his work permit in Canada entered into an “illegal contract” and is not entitled to get his money back, according to a recent decision from Alberta’s Court of Justice.

Ritik Sibbal sued Rajiv Chourhary Nathyal because the letter of endorsement from the City of Grande Prairie that Nathyal had agreed to help him obtain never materialized.

“Sibbal understood that a letter of endorsement would allow him to continue to work in Canada after his (post-graduate work permit) expired and potentially obtain permanent residency. Sibbal told the court that Nathyal agreed that the $15,000 he provided would be returned if a letter of endorsement was not obtained. The application for Sibbal’s letter of endorsement was refused; however, Nathyal never returned the money to Sibbal,” Justice Susanne Stushnoff wrote in a recent decision out of Edmonton.

“Sibbal was very poised before the court and presented as a smart and articulate individual. He was motivated to enter into an illegal contract due to his authentic desire to become a permanent resident of Canada. However, one of the elements that makes Canada such a desirable place to live is its legal system,” the judge wrote in her decision, dated Nov. 7.

Nathyal was served with notice of the lawsuit, but failed to defend himself.

Sibbal testified that he “came to Canada in April 2019 to attend business college in Vancouver.”

After graduating, he obtained a work permit that was good for three years.

His goal was to obtain a work permit before that expired that would allow him to stay in Canada and obtain permanent residency here.

Sibbal moved to Grande Prairie in August 2023 under the understanding that the city in northwestern Alberta “was considered ‘rural,’” and that he might only need a letter of endorsement to work past the expiration of his post-graduate work permit.

Letters of endorsement support “a foreign national’s job offer and their application for permanent residence under a specific immigration program,” said the decision.

Sibbal got several jobs in Grande Prairie, believing his employers would help him obtain the proper documentation, said the decision.

When those fell through, Sibbal only had six months left on his post-graduate work permit, which was set to expire in August 2024, said the decision. “He became anxious about his path forward.”

Sibbal called several immigration lawyers in Edmonton, one of whom pointed him to Nathyal in Grande Prairie.

The two met in early 2024 and Nathyal offered to help Sibbal obtain a letter of endorsement so he could stay in Canada, said the decision.

The price: $35,000.

“Sibbal offered Nathyal $15,000 in advance with the remainder to be paid in installments over the next few months.”

Sibbal testified that he had “no choice” but to agree to the offer as his work permit “was soon to expire and it was his father’s dream for him to obtain permanent residency in Canada.”

Nathyal told Sibbal he was going to get him a letter of endorsement from “the relevant authorities at the City of Grande Prairie,” said the decision.

“According to Sibbal, Nathyal was to obtain the letter of endorsement by telling the authorities that he was going to employ Sibbal. This was not the truth. Nathyal was never going to be Sibbal’s employer.”

Sibbal testified that he didn’t get anything in writing about their contract. “He explained that Nathyal would not allow anything in writing as both of them knew that the contract they were entering into was ‘illegal.’”

Sibbal paid Nathyal $15,000 in cash in February 2024, said the decision, which notes Nathyal refused to provide a receipt.

Sibbal “heard nothing” from Nathyal for several months, despite repeated attempts to reach him. After he managed to get through, Nathyal told him to “wait for a few more weeks.”

Nathyal called Sibbal at the end of July 2024, saying Grande Prairie had refused the letter of endorsement.

When he met with Nathyal in August 2024, “Nathyal advised that he proceed with a ‘fake refugee case,’” said the decision.

Sibbal “consulted with his parents who wisely advised him not to go down this path,” it said.

He called Nathyal to say he wouldn’t pursue a refugee claim, then asked him for help obtaining a labour market impact assessment. That’s a “document that a Canadian employer may need to get before hiring a foreign worker,” according to the decision.

When Nathyal told him that would cost an extra $35,000 to $40,000, “Sibbal indicated that this was ‘outside of (his) budget for now,’” said the decision.

When he asked about getting his $15,000 back, Nathyal told him to give him a month and a half.

“Over the following two weeks Sibbal followed up with Nathyal on multiple occasions,” said the decision. “Nathyal would respond periodically but never returned the money.”

The last time Sibbal heard from Nathyal was on Sept. 12, 2024.

“Nathyal texted Sibbal stating that he did not receive the payment he had purportedly been waiting on,” said the decision, which notes Sibbal told the court he was returning to India.

The judge found “that the contract between Sibbal and Nathyal was breached,” but she refused to enforce it.

The two men “were equally at fault in these circumstances,” Stushnoff said.

“Although Sibbal framed his pleadings and testimony in a way that cast a sympathetic light upon him, I find that Sibbal was a willing buyer and Nathyal was a willing seller.”

Sibbal “did not come before this court with ‘clean hands,’ and I exercise my discretion and refuse to grant the equitable relief he has sought,” said the judge.

The court “has a responsibility to preserve the integrity of the legal system, and this involves ensuring that claims seeking to enforce illegal contracts or unjust enrichment claims based on illegal contracts do not result in an inconsistency in the law,” the judge said.

“Submitting fake job offers or employment contracts, providing advice to do so, and charging fees beyond those expressly permitted by the legislation are all illegal under Canada’s immigration legislation and undermine the integrity of the Canadian immigration system. The monetization of Canada’s immigration system is against Canada’s public policy.”

Grande Prairie paused its Rural Renewal Stream Immigration program this past February, citing “federal and provincial immigration policy changes that have lowered immigration allocation spaces throughout the province.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


At first, Hamilton police “strategically followed” the bus thief as he drove passengers around on a made-up route.

A man who stole an idling city bus in Hamilton took passengers on a nighttime joyride through the city — making stops, letting riders on and off, and even made someone with an expired bus pass put money in the fare box, police said.

A potentially devastating alarm came to Hamilton Police from the city’s transit operator, Hamilton Street Railway, at 9 p.m., Tuesday: A man had climbed behind the wheel of a city bus after the driver stepped out for a short break.

With about 10 passengers on board, the man pulled the bus out of the McNab Street Bus Terminal in the heart of downtown and onto the city’s dark, snowy streets.

Police officers responded quickly but initially stayed discreetly back, Const. Trevor McKenna said.

“We typically would pursue something like this, but because of this situation, for safety purposes, we strategically followed, which means that there were no lights or sirens. We kept our distance and we just kind of monitored where they were going,” he said.

“We didn’t want to spook him and make him do something suddenly or lose focus on what he was doing. He’s driving a full-size bus on our roads, pedestrians are out, it’s dark. We’re getting into the wintry weather.”

Busses have GPS trackers on board and HSR officials knew where the bus was and could guess which way it might go.

Officers were amazed at what happened next.

The driver didn’t roar off or speed recklessly. There wasn’t a rampage or injuries. Rather, he drove reasonably.

For a few minutes, everything seemed normal on board and passengers didn’t seem to notice, McKenna said.

“He was following the rules of the road. He was making the scheduled stops along the way and letting people come and go. It’s not like he was threatening in nature or holding them there.

“It was when the bus started going off the designated route — it was his own personalized route, he was going down side streets — some passengers noticed. Once they noticed that, they engaged in a conversation with him. One witness was saying that they were giving him directions.

“But when he did come to (bus) stops, he would make the stop, open the door and let people on or off. And he stopped somebody who was looking to use a Presto card that was expired. He actually charged them money and made them put it in the machine and they got on for their ride.”

The man drove the bus up the Hamilton Mountain and after about 15 minutes police moved in, on West 5th Street near Gateview Drive.

“He was confronted. We told him to exit the vehicle. He declined. So then our officers did have to go in and physically remove him,” said McKenna.

He wasn’t wearing an HSR uniform. Police don’t know if he had previous driving experience.

A 36-year-old man of no fixed address was arrested and charged with theft, possession of stolen property, obstruct police and drive while prohibited.

“Ultimately, there were no collisions, there were no injuries, not even a dent,” McKenna said.

There are also, so far, no answers to why.

“It comes across as more of like a joyride. He got on, whether he was on the influence of a drug or if it’s mental health, that I can’t answer, but it’s not like he was trying to impress anyone or filming himself or had somewhere to be. He just kind of took it for a joyride and ended in that location, and that’s where he was arrested,” McKenna said.

“Sometimes things happen with no rhyme or reason.”

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | X:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The Arctic polar vortex could bring extremely cold temperatures this holiday season.

If you’re among the Canadians hoping for a white Christmas this year, there’s good news and bad news.

The good news is that some forecast models point to conditions favourable for snowfall.

The bad news is that it’s due to the Arctic polar vortex, which could also bring extremely cold temperatures this holiday season.

Using information from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and Global Forecast System (GFS), weather researcher Andrej Flis from Severe Weather Europe recently highlighted an atmospheric warming event in late November that could result in frigid polar air moving south in mid-December and lingering for up to two weeks.

For those unfamiliar, the ever-spinning vortex of cold atmospheric winds is a normal part of the planet’s climate, just as is its counterpart over the Antarctic.

During the winter months, as the vortex strengthens with more cold air in the stratosphere, the polar jet stream in the troposphere shifts northward to keep it stable.

While it will often weaken at times in the winter, Flis said a burgeoning high-pressure anomaly near the pole in November could create a sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) event — when air temperatures increase well above normal in the atmospheric layer seven to 50 kilometres.

When that happens, the vortex falters, the jet stream takes on a different shape and the colder air is pushed out. Depending on weather patterns, it may spill into middle-latitude parts of Canada and the U.S. more accustomed to milder conditions, resulting in extreme cold and heavy snowfall. The timing, he noted, is happening earlier than normal.

Such was the case last January and again in March, though the latter had less severe weather outcomes for most.

“It’s extra cold, it’s got a duration to it and it’s crisp,” explained David Phillips, senior climatologist emeritus with Environment Canada. “It doesn’t even have to set a record; it’s just so bone-chilling cold that everything kind of stops and then what wears you down is the duration.”

Flis is cautious in his predictions and notes that not all SSW events produce cold and snowy surface weather.

Phillip didn’t have access to the weather models Flis used, but said, “this is about as good as science gets for something like this so far in advance.”

“And he’s got it right, and I don’t think he also overstated the situation,” he told National Post in an interview.

Phillips explained that, like weather in general, not all perturbations to the vortex will behave the same way, and this current one could very well have its own “character or personality” at ground level.

Warming temperatures in Canada and whether the continent is experiencing a La Niña or El Niño year are also factors, but he said the opposite climate patterns affected by the Pacific Ocean temperature have become less reliable predictors in recent years due to climate change.

“Those things have changed the playing field, too, so that’s another factor that has to be always worked into these recurrent things,” Phillips explained.

The approaching winter will be of the La Niña variety, which typically means colder temperatures and more snow out west, and more snow for Eastern and Altantic Canada.

It’s much too early to say where in Canada the polar vortex blast may arrive, but Flis predicts a northerly flow from Western Canada down into the U.S. and slowly moving east across the continent with no mountains to block it.

“It doesn’t stop at the border. There are no tariffs on this kind of thing,” he said, teasing that “Americans will blame Canada” for the cold snap.

Once it ends, however, Phillips said there’s still a long winter ahead.

“It doesn’t mean if we get this thing in December that we won’t get one in January or February. Sometimes we could have two or three.”

He also wants Canadians to know that not every extended period of snow is related to

the polar vortex.

“It’s just cold air travelling on the jet stream and it comes south and then freezes for a week or two weeks and then it disappears.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


This screenshot from a video taken at the Students Supporting Israel event on Nov. 5, 2025 shows a man pushing back an anti-Israel protester who broke through a glass door.

In the wake of a violent anti-Israel protest at an event hosted by Toronto Metropolitan University students on Nov. 5, two prominent Jewish organizations are calling on the Ontario government to act.

“We expect change,” the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs in Toronto wrote in a Nov. 12 post on X. “Universities must be held accountable for protecting Jewish students.”

The CIJA added that “(h)ate and intimidation have no place in our schools.”

The X post was directed at Conservative

MPP Nolan Quinn

, who is minister of colleges and universities, expressing expectations that he will “take immediate action.”

The event was organized by TMU student organization Students Supporting Israel. It was part of a university campus tour of Israel Defense Forces soldiers speaking to students about their military experiences.

The protest was spurred on by an Instagram post from another student organization, Students for Justice in Palestine, which directed protesters to the off-campus location where the event was being held.

Before the event began, protesters descended on the location, creating chaos and destroying property.

The following day, TMU manager of media relations, Jessica Leach provided a statement to NP stating: “The university is deeply concerned by an incident that happened off-campus (on Wednesday). TMU condemns any acts of aggression, intimidation, or violence and our thoughts are with any students who may have been injured during the incident.”

Leach added that TMU would cooperate fully with the police. Officers arrived at the scene after reports that “a group of demonstrators forced their way into a building.”

There were five arrests, according to Toronto police. The charges included forcible entry, obstructing a peace officer and unlawful assembly.

B’Nai Brith Canada has joined CIJA in condemning the attacks. In its own X post on Wednesday, it said a joint letter is calling on the province “to hold universities accountable for allowing hate, intimidation, and double standards to take root. Institutions have failed to act to protect Jewish students who have been threatened, targeted, ostracized, and silenced. That must end.”

Further, the organization said the province “must compel its post-secondary institutions to enforce existing policies, discipline students and university-affiliated groups that incite hate and sow division, and ensure that Jewish students receive the educational experience that they are entitled to.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.