LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Left to right: Waleed Khan, Osman Azizov and Fahad Sadaat.

A 26-year-old Toronto man has been arrested and charged with ISIS-linked terrorism offences and two other men are charged for alleged hate-motivated extremism targeting women and members of the Jewish community.

The federal terrorism investigation and related probes by Toronto police and Peel police follow violent incidents of armed men trying to abduct women from the street, one in May and two in June.

The RCMP charged Waleed Khan, 26, of Toronto with various terrorism charges including participating in the activities of a terrorist group and conspiracy to commit murder, for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a terrorist group.

The charging information names ISIS as the terrorist entity, also known as the Islamic State or ISIL.

Khan was also charged by Toronto police and Peel police, along with two other Toronto men — Osman Azizov, 18, Fahad Sadaat, 19.

The Peel charges, in August, are for kidnapping, firearms, auto theft, and others.

Toronto police also charged the three men for separate but similar attacks. The Toronto charges include kidnapping, attempted kidnapping with firearms, conspiracy to commit sexual assault, and hostage taking classed as hate-motivated extremism.

Khan has additional Toronto police charges including possession of weapons, assault with a weapon, careless use of a firearm and other weapon and theft charges.

The arrests are related to attacks in Toronto where armed men appeared to be hunting women for capture and abuse.

“We have arrested three individuals for offences targeting women and members of the Jewish community,” said Toronto Police Chief Myron Demkiw.

On May 31, a woman was approached by three men, one of whom was armed with a handgun and another with a knife, in the Don Mills Road and Rochefort Drive area of Toronto, police said. The suspects attempted to force her into a vehicle but fled when interrupted by a passing motorist.

On June 24, two young women were targeted in Mississauga on Ellesboro Drive near Swanhurst Boulevard. Three masked men pulled up in an Audi SUV armed with a handgun, a rifle, and knife, and chased the women and tried to grab them, police said. The men again fled after being interrupted by a passerby.

Peel Regional Police connected the two attacks and a joint investigation identified and arrested the suspects, police said. The joint probe was codenamed Project Neapolitan.

Khan was arrested for the Mississauga incident on Aug. 18, and at the time, Peel police said they were searching for two more suspects, described as Middle Eastern males, late teens to mid-twenties.

In Khan’s Toronto home, police said, they found two loaded prohibited firearms: an AR-style rifle capable of automatic fire and a pistol, both equipped with prohibited high-capacity magazines, along with over 110 rounds of ammunition. At the time of arrest, Khan was on probation for prior violent offences and prohibited from possessing firearms.

In late August, the two other men, Sadaat and Azizov were arrested.

“The evidence gathered expanded the scope of the investigation to include additional offences motivated by hate — particularly targeting women and members of the Jewish community. Investigators also uncovered links to terrorism, prompting a separate but parallel RCMP investigation,” Toronto police said in a release.

Friday’s announcement comes five days after the devastating massacre at Bondi Beach in Australia when two suspected jihadists shot and killed 15 people and wounded dozens more at a Jewish community event celebrating Hanukkah.

A court-imposed publication ban is in place in the Canadian charges preventing publication of some details in the case.

Khan’s terror-linked charges focus on alleged actions between June 17 and August 17.

“Waleed Khan did participate in the activities of a terrorist group by making himself, in response to instructions from any of the persons who constitute a terrorist group, available to facilitate or commit a terrorism offence or an act or omission outside Canada,” reads one charge.

“Khan did commit an indictable offence, to wit conspiracy to commit murder, for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a terrorist group,” reads another.

A charge of participating in the activities of a terrorist group alleges he provided property to be used to carry out terrorist activity or benefit someone carry out a terror activity, and another to fund a terrorist group. One charge alleges providing property to fund a terrorist group and another for using social media accounts to the benefit of a terrorist group.

He is also charge with conspiring with persons known and unknown to commit murder.

The federal charges were laid by the Central Region’s Integrated National Security Enforcement Team (INSET), which is an RCMP-led joint task force focussing on threats to national security, criminal extremism and terrorism.

The RCMP said the investigation is ongoing.

Jewish community leaders are grateful for police arrests but fear danger looms.

“The details of the investigation indicate a grave threat, involving the Islamic State and attempts to target women and Jewish Canadians in the Greater Toronto Area,” said Noah Shack, CEO of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs.

“This goes far beyond the safety of any one group. It is a matter of national security and public safety. There is a ticking time bomb in our country that our leaders must confront before it’s too late. As we saw in Sydney, we are one intelligence failure away from a devastating loss of life. A lack of urgency on the part of our leaders puts Canadians in danger.”

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | X:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The Uber App is pictured on a smartphone in downtown Vancouver, B.C., Monday, December 30, 2019.

The Jewish community is afraid to use Uber after “disturbing reports of mistreatment and intimidation by drivers,” says the founder of Canadian Women Against Antisemitism, as the rideshare company tells National Post it’s in “listening mode.”

While scrolling on Facebook recently, Esther Mordechai said she noticed posts by Jewish Canadians concerned about using Uber. She has been an activist and advocate for the community for decades. She is also the executive director of

B.A.M. Canada

, an organization dedicated to supporting marginalized Jewish women and the community.

“I had seen dozens of posts of people asking for alternatives (to Uber), and this is not okay,” she said. “The government is silent, and silence normalizes hate. History shows where that leads: 1930s Germany. Intimidation, denial, indifference. Calling it out is how we protect Jewish lives, and we’re also protecting and defending democracy and ensuring Canada never repeats that shameful path.”

Mordechai decided to write a letter to Uber because she felt “compelled to demand accountability and concrete action … to ensure passenger safety.”

National Post has reported on three separate incidents involving Canadian Jews using Uber. A

Canadian-Slovakian model said she was kicked out of a vehicle in Toronto

in November for being Jewish. She has since received

death threats on social media

after speaking out. A Canadian couple said they were

refused a ride while travelling in Europe

in August after they told the driver they were from Israel, and another Canadian couple said that after a driver heard them speaking Hebrew in February he would not take them home from Toronto Pearson Airport.

A spokesperson for Uber apologized for the riders’ experiences and said appropriate action was being taken.

Speaking to National Post, Uber’s head of public policy and communications for the U.S. and Canada Adam Blinick said drivers receive anti-discrimination training, adding that the company “recently re-sent to drivers the community guidelines to ensure that they understand that they do have an obligation.”

“Discrimination on our platform has no place,” he said.

When asked if Uber would say, definitively, that it is against antisemitism, or hate of any kind, and that the company would root it out, Blinick responded: “I don’t think there’s an issue with us saying that.”

The company has been speaking with Jewish leaders in the community, Blinick said. “I would say at a high level that we’re there in listening mode,” he said.

The main purpose of the discussions is to “understand the sensitivities and how people are feeling about things, and if we can be better partners in order to further enhance either communication or relationships or look at our policies again,” he said. He did not disclose when the discussions took place or with which Jewish organizations, citing that Uber did not get permission to share those details publicly.

The intention “was meaningful dialogue,” Blinick said.

Mordechai shared her letter to Uber with National Post.

“In Canada today, people are afraid to speak Hebrew in public, afraid to identify as Jewish, and afraid to disclose their identity while using ride-sharing services. This is not an abstract fear. It is a lived reality for many in the Jewish community. Following the recent tragic antisemitic incident in Australia, it is painfully clear that Canada is not immune to the same dangerous trajectory if institutions fail to act decisively,” she wrote.

“Uber has a legal and moral responsibility to ensure that all passengers without exception are safe and treated with dignity.”

She demanded that Uber “take immediate and visible action,” including enforcing a zero-tolerance policy for antisemitism, permanently removing drivers who engage in discriminatory or threatening behaviour, implementing mandatory training on antisemitism, and establishing a transparent and effective reporting and accountability mechanism.

Blinick said both drivers and passengers have to adhere to the community guidelines to use the platform. “It’s a two way street, and we want to make sure everyone on the platform feels safe and respected,” he said.

While the guidelines do not include language specific to antisemitism, they

say online

: “Do not discriminate against someone or act in a disparaging manner toward someone based on traits such as their age, skin colour, disability, gender identity, marital status, pregnancy, national origin, race, ethnicity, religion, sex, sexual orientation, language, geographical location, or any other characteristic protected under relevant law.”

Blinick said the company has been told by lawmakers that it has been “too quick to deactivate or to cause drivers to lose access to the platform.”

“We think we take a very balanced approach,” he said. “There is equal pressure on the other side of things, where there are advocates, drivers themselves, and others that … want to ensure that our system is equally fair and does not side with one or the other.”

When an incident is reported, there is a team of dedicated staff who conduct a review, which can include speaking to the driver, the passenger and reviewing relevant footage or audio recordings. Blinick said Uber does not share information about the outcome of an investigation, barring an “extraordinarily definitive” incident.

“If we confirm behaviour that violates our guidelines, consequences may include permanent loss of access to the platform,” an Uber spokesperson said.

Blinick highlighted tools to help passengers feel safe, including an audio recording tool through the app that was launched in 2023. It is encrypted and only shared with the company if the passenger wants to do so.

“We do have a sizeable team that is charged with investigating all of these complaints, and are not shy about taking action,” he said.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A new study links high-fat cheeses like those found in fondue with fewer cases of dementia.

Good news, cheese lovers. A study out of Sweden has found that eating high-fat cheese is associated with a lower risk of all forms of dementia.

Published in the

journal Neurology

under the somewhat staid title “High- and Low-Fat Dairy Consumption and Long-Term Risk of Dementia,” the long-term study followed the lives (and sometimes deaths) of 27,670 Swedes over a period of about 25 years.

The participants were 61 per cent female, with an average age of 58.1 years when they started the study between 1991 and 1996. The dementia research team piggybacked on the

Malmö Diet and Cancer

cohort, which was originally set up in the 1990s to study long-term connections between nutrition and cancer.

Dietary intake was evaluated using a comprehensive diet history method that combined a seven-day food diary, a food frequency questionnaire and a dietary interview. Dementia cases were identified through the Swedish National Patient Register until Dec. 31, 2020. The researchers looked for all-cause dementia, a blanket term that includes Alzheimer’s, vascular dementia and other conditions.

They found that eating 50 grams or more of high-fat cheese daily correlates with a lower risk of developing dementia. High-fat cheeses are those with more than 20 per cent fat content, including cheddar, brie, parmesan, mozzarella and gruyere.

More specifically, the risk of developing dementia was calculated at about

10 per cent for those who ate 50 grams or more of high-fat cheese per day, compared to about 13 per cent of people who ate less than 15 grams a day.

Even after adjusting for age, sex, education and overall diet, people who ate more than 50 grams of high-fat cheese per day had a 13 per cent lower all-cause dementia risk than those who ate less than 15 grams.

“For decades, the debate over high-fat versus low-fat diets has shaped health advice, sometimes even categorizing cheese as an unhealthy food to limit,” said nutrition epidemiologist Emily Sonestedt of Sweden’s Lund University in a

press release

about the findings.

“Our study found that some high-fat dairy products may actually lower the risk of dementia, challenging some long-held assumptions about fat and brain health.”

No such association appeared for low-fat cheese or cream, any kind of milk, or fermented milk products such as yogurt and kefir. Butter showed mixed results, including a possible increased Alzheimer’s risk at high intake compared to people who did not eat butter.

“Not all dairy products are equal when it comes to brain health,” said Sonestedt. “The few studies that have investigated this have found a correlation with cheese, so more research is needed to confirm our results and investigate whether certain high-fat dairy products really do provide some protection for the brain.”

The

World Health Organization

estimates that 57 million people were living with dementia in 2021, with an estimated 10 million new cases diagnosed each year. A 2022 study in

The Lancet

medical journal estimated cases could rise to more than 150 million by mid-century.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Members of the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC).

OTTAWA — Canada’s largest public service union is facing at least three separate lawsuits filed by sidelined executives at its component unions, court documents show.

Two of the three lawsuits involve component union bosses who were suspended after initially supporting a campaign to vote against the tentative labour agreement that was reached between the federal government and the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) in May 2023.

According to documents filed in Ontario Superior Court, the national executive of the Canada Employment and Immigration Union (CEIU), one of PSAC’s 15 component unions, voted to campaign against the proposed deal that PSAC had negotiated with the employer.

Two of the CEIU executive members — President Eddy Bourque, and Executive Vice-President Sargy Chima — were accused of initially supporting a motion within their component union to campaign against the proposed labour deal, but then decided that they shouldn’t have taken part in the vote because of their involvement in PSAC.

PSAC accused the pair of breaching the broader union’s constitution, court documents show, and later conducted investigations of their actions. The punishment included suspensions of their PSAC memberships for one and two years respectively, which meant that they couldn’t fulfill their lucrative union executive jobs.

In separate legal actions, Bourque and Chima are each accusing PSAC of negligence and defamation and asking for compensation of more than $1 million apiece and for full reinstatement of their PSAC memberships and their jobs with the component union.

According to a statement of claim filed in June, Chima is accusing PSAC of “malicious, oppressive and high-handed behaviour.”

In the Bourque claim filed a month later, he accuses PSAC’s leadership of “abuse of power” for, among other things, announcing his suspension to members across the country and telling them that they could be disciplined or dismissed if they communicated with him.

The documents also state that his one-year suspension expired in June, but PSAC and CEIU have refused to reinstate him to his office “for no valid, or justified reason” even though his three-year term isn’t supposed to end until September 2026. The court may grant him an interim injunction early in the new year to get reinstated within the union.

Chantal Beaupré, the lawyer representing both Bourque and Chima, wouldn’t comment, instead referring National Post to court documents. PSAC hasn’t responded to numerous requests for comment.

The CEIU, a PSAC component, represents the majority of employees at a number of federal departments, including Service Canada, Employment and Social Development Canada and the Immigration and Refugee Board.

Ottawa-based PSAC represents nearly 240,000 workers across Canada and in other countries who work for the federal government, universities, casinos, community services agencies, Aboriginal communities, airports, and the security sector among others.

In the third case involving a PSAC union component executive suing PSAC, Alisha Kang, who was president of the Union of National Employees (UNE) until being effectively stripped of her role less than two months ago, said in court documents that she was set to expose “significant financial irregularities” and other union problems when she was suspended.

As

reported Wednesday in National Post

, Kang’s court statements say she would have blown the whistle on “irregularities (that) affected all of PSAC’s activities.”

Those irregularities, according to her claims, included a scheme involving the Alliance Employees’ Union (AEU), which represented UNE staff, and the former national executive of UNE. The documents allege that the AEU filed “spurious or artificially substantiated” classification grievances on behalf of union staff, which were then settled informally by granting “general damages for human rights.”

The AEU responded Thursday by saying that it “vigorously” denies any involvement in financial irregularities at either UNE or AEU. The AEU’s financial statements are audited every year by an external certified professional, the union said.

The union’s statement added that it’s “saddened” by Kang’s actions and “the propagation of false information.”

UNE represents 27,000 members who work for 76 different employers. Their members include foreign service employees, passport officers and other workers across the country and in embassies around the world.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Changes to Canadian income taxes and certain benefits in 2026 could result in higher take home pay for some workers.

Tax changes reflective of inflation are afoot for Canadian workers in 2026, potentially leaving more money for them after federal and provincial taxes.

Last month, the Canada Revenue Agency revealed updated income tax brackets, basic personal amounts, Canada Pension Plan (CPP) thresholds and more changes set to take effect this year.

Here’s what to know.

Inflation down, tax bracket thresholds up

Income tax brackets are indexed to inflation data from Statistics Canada’s consumer price index (CPI) and the rate for 2026 was

recently announced as two per cent

— down from 2.7 per cent in 2025. As a result, thresholds for Canada’s five progressive tax brackets will increase as of Jan. 1, with certain credits, such as GST cheques and the Canada Child Benefit, going up on July 1.

In theory, and provided one’s income doesn’t increase drastically in 2026, it could mean a little more take-home pay after taxes.

In May, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that his government would

cut the lowest incoming tax bracket

one percentage point — from 15 per cent to 14 per cent — making good on a promise made at

the outset of the federal election

. He said the move, which was estimated to cost $6 billion annually, could save the average family of two about $840 per year.

 Liberal Leader Mark Carney speaks at a campaign rally in Montreal on Thursday, March 27, 2025.

The

Parliamentary Budget Office later estimated

only $280 in savings for the same family.

Because the changes came in mid-year, the lowest tax rate was set at 14.5 per cent for the 2025 tax year.

In 2026, employees will be taxed 14 per cent on the first $58,523. Income from that amount up to $117,045 is taxed at 20.5 per cent; from $117,045 to $181,440 at 26 per cent; and from $181,440 to $258,482 at 29 per cent.

Anything above $258,482 is taxed at 33 per cent, the highest bracket.

Basic personal amount increased

As it has done in successive years, Ottawa is also increasing the basic personal amount (BPA), the amount of income you can earn without having to pay federal income tax. The non-refundable federal tax credit is automatically available to all taxpayers.

The new BPA limit for 2026 is set at $16,452, meaning if you earn that much or less, you won’t pay any tax. Using the 14 per cent rate as opposed to the tax bracket, anyone earning $181,440 or less gets the full amount of $2,303. People earning $258,482 or more are afforded the minimum BPA of $14,829, for a credit of $2,076, and those in between will be credited an amount somewhere in between.

For instance, someone earning a salary of $86,000 annually pays no tax on the first $16,452, 14 per cent on the next $42,071 ($5,889.94) and 20.5 per cent on the remaining $24,477 ($4,955.40). That means they’ll pay $10,845.34 in federal taxes.

Someone grossing $386,000, meanwhile, pays no tax on the first $14,829, but will end up paying roughly $93,000 in taxes.

 Canada Revenue Agency building.

CPP ceilings rise

Contribution rates for the

Canada Pension Plan

, for both employees and employers, are static at 5.95 per cent, but the year’s maximum pensionable earnings (YMPE) is rising to $74,600, up from $71,300 this year. The basic exemption amount of $3,500 is also unchanged.

Also known as the first earnings ceiling, YMPE is the maximum salary portion on which you need to contribute to the plan.

As of next year, the maximum annual employee and employer contribution is $4,230.45, up from $4,034.10 in 2025. Contribution maximums by self-employed persons are $8,460.90, up from $8,068.20.

Those over that $74,600 YPME will also pay an additional four per cent, to a max of $416, on earnings between $74,600 and $85,000 in what’s known as the

second ceiling.

For the self-employed, the rate is eight per cent, to a max of $832.

More money for parents

The Canada Child Benefit (CCB) is going up again in July 2026.

Families with children under six can receive up to $8,157 per child, up from just under $8,000 in 2025. Families with kids between six and 17 are eligible to receive up to $6,883, an increase of $6,748 this year.

The actual payment depends on family income, ages and the number of children, with full benefits going to families below about $38,237 of adjusted net income, $750 more than in 2025.

Minor adjustments to EI premiums

Employment insurance premiums are also set to change a little in 2026,

according to Employment and Social Development Canada.

Premiums for everyone will only apply to the first $68,900 in gross earnings, up from $65,700 this year and $63,200 in 2024.

If you live anywhere but Quebec, your employer must deduct $1.63 for every $100 earned until you hit $1,123.07, the maximum contribution for 2026. That’s down from $1.64 and $1,077.48 this tax year.

For the Quebecois, where the province’s parental insurance plan allows for a lower rate, they must deduct $1.30 from every $100 until they hit $895.70. It was $1.31 and $860.67 in 2025.

The cross-Canada employer’s rate, 2.28 per cent up to a max of $1,572.30, remains unchanged.

RRSP and Old Age Security 

CRA also

announced new limits on registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs)

in November, allowing Canadians to put a bit more in them.

The new maximum is $33,810, up $750 over last year, but is still limited to 18 per cent of your 2025 income.

Come 2026, the income threshold at which Old Age Security benefit clawback begins increases to $95,353. Any amount above that will result in reduced OAS payments.

Provincial tax changes

A few provinces also instituted tax changes in 2025 that will carry over into 2026 and beyond,

according to CRA.

Manitoba has frozen indexation of its BPA and tax brackets, with a 2026 basic amount of $15,780 and new brackets of 10.8 per cent below $47,000, 12.75 per cent from $47,000 to $100,000 and 17.4 per cent above $100,000.

Nova Scotia will drop its income-tested BPA and apply the maximum amount for everyone in 2026 and P.E.I. is raising its BPA to $15,000.

Saskatchewan, meanwhile, will continue scheduled $500 increases to basic personal, spousal, dependent and senior amounts, lifting its 2026 BPA to $20,381.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney  and Premier of Ontario Doug Ford arrive for a news conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Canada, on December 18, 2025.

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Thursday that efforts to see U.S. President Donald Trump remove or lessen tariffs on Canadian sectors will now be dealt with alongside their joint review of the trilateral trade agreement with Mexico.

Carney said there won’t be time to negotiate a tariff reprieve, given that Canada failed to reach a deal with the U.S. before the president broke talks off in late October and with both countries now heading into their first review of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico-Agreement (CUSMA), slated for 2026.

“We’re unlikely, given the time horizons coming together, to have a sectoral agreement,” the prime minister told reporters at a news conference, alongside Ontario Premier Doug Ford.

“Although if the United States wants to come back on that, in those areas, we’re always ready there. We’re very ready.”

Before Trump suspended negotiations, Carney said on Thursday the two countries were “close” to reaching an agreement, which would have covered tariffs on steel and aluminum as well as energy.

U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra told National Post in an interview last week that it would also have covered uranium, adding he believes that both parties would eventually restart their talks, with the question being only a matter of when.

On Thursday, speaking at a signing ceremony with Ford on an agreement to speed up the approvals process for major infrastructure projects, Carney said he believes “that is now going to roll into the broader (CUSMA) negotiation.”

Earlier this month, U.S. Trade Representative

Jamieson Greer

held a series of hearings and heard submissions on how the agreement was working, ahead of its first joint review, scheduled for July 1, 2026, six years after it came into effect.

That agreement replaced the former North American Free Trade Agreement, which had been in place since the early 1990s. Trump had blamed that deal for the loss of manufacturing jobs across the U.S.

His first term saw Canada and Mexico renegotiate their three-way trading relationship, resulting in the current agreement, which is scheduled to undergo the first joint review in 2026.

Under the agreement, countries could choose to extend it, including with specific changes, or withdraw from it completely.

Greer recently confirmed in interviews and other public appearances that withdrawal remains an option. 

A transcript of recent remarks he made to a closed-door meeting of the U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means and Senate Finance Committee about the upcoming joint review also summarized the irritants he wants Canada to address as part of that process.

Greer named, as one of those conditions, market access for U.S. dairy products, taking direct aim at Canada’s supply management system, which Carney said on Thursday, “is never on the table,” speaking in French.

In his remarks, Greer also pointed to two major pieces of Canadian digital policy, the Online Streaming Act and the Online News Act.

He also singled out provinces that have removed U.S. booze from their shelves as well as “discriminatory procurement policies” in Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia.

Greer also said in his remarks his office “will keep the president’s options open,” but would only recommend a renewal of the agreement “if resolution can be achieved.”

He also added that he would work to determine which issues with Canada and Mexico could be dealt with on both a trilateral and bilateral basis.

Ford, who ordered the LCBO to pull American alcohol from its shelves earlier this year as Trump hit Canada with his first wave of tariffs, suggested on Thursday he has no plans on backing down.

“When the prime minister and President Trump come up with a great deal for both countries, we’d be more than happy to bring in some, maybe Kentucky bourbon,” Ontario’s premier said.

“But until then, we’re going to hold off.”

Ford also defended his decision to run a set of anti-tariff television and radio ads in the U.S., which Trump named as the reason he suspended trade negotiations with Carney.

Calling it a “great ad,” Ford added that it was Trump’s public remarks about the ad campaign that generated the attention it did.

The campaign nevertheless drew the ire of not only Trump, but also

Hoekstra

, who reportedly laid into Ontario’s provincial trade representative during a public event in Ottawa shortly after the ad was pulled.

Ford, at the time, called on

Hoekstra

to apologize.

Speaking to National Post last week, the U.S. ambassador, who said he speaks to Ford “every once and a while,” dismissed the notion of offering an apology for his behaviour, saying he believes in “direct communication.”

He called the decision by Ontario to run ads “unprecedented.”

“Am I going to apologize for calling out Ontario for interfering in an unprecedented way in American politics? Absolutely not.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


A Canada Pension Plan statement. Cheques (or direct deposits) go out early this month.

The final Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security (OAS) payments of 2025 will be in the mail — or deposited directly into bank accounts — on Monday. Here’s what to know.

Isn’t it earlier than usual?

Yes. Government pension payments usually go out closer to the

end of the month

— next year’s schedule lists dates between the 25th and the 29th of each month — but the December payments are always timed a little early so they don’t fall in the middle of the holidays and end-of-year closures.

Who gets these payments?

Anyone 60 years of age or older and retired is

entitled to CPP

as long as they’ve made at least one payment to the plan during their employment history. The benefit then continues for the rest of their lives. (This doesn’t include Quebec, which has its own pension plan.)

Similarly, OAS kicks in at age 65, provided you’ve lived in Canada for at least 10 years since turning 18.

Canadians living outside of Canada are eligible if they were a citizen or legal resident when they left the country, and also lived here for at least 20 years since turning 18.

What do these payments cost?

Employees

contribute to CPP

through payroll deductions, which are matched by employers. The contribution rate for the current year is 5.95 per cent of earnings up to $71,300, and maxes out at $4034.10. Self-employed individuals pay double since they don’t have an employer to contribute.

OAS is funded from general revenues, so there is no payroll deduction to cover it specifically.

How much do they pay out?

There are a

number of variables

for CPP, including an individual’s average income and when they started collecting the pension. But the maximum monthly payout throughout 2025 was $1,433 for a 65-year-old retiree.

There are variables

for OAS

as well, such as how long you have lived in Canada, but the maximum for those aged 65 to 74 is $740.09 a month. At age 75 is gets bumped up 10 per cent to $814.10.

Can you both pay into and draw from CPP?

Oddly, yes. If you’re under 70 and still working, you can contribute to CPP and also receive payments from it. The contributions results in a higher payout when you do retire. Contributions stop after you turn 70, whether you’re working or not.

When’s the next payment date?

After the early December payments the government returns to an end-of-month (or so) schedule, with the next payment due on Jan. 28, 2026.

Do pension benefits go up next year?

Yes.

CPP payments

will increase by two per cent in January. OAS will go up by just 0.3 per cent, but since those increases are calculated quarterly, it works out to a two per cent rise since last January.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Miriam Mattova has received death threats on social media after speaking out about an antisemitic incident in Toronto in late November 2025.

Toronto model Miriam Mattova says she has received death threats on social media since coming forward about an antisemitic incident involving an Uber driver last month.

“It affects me emotionally and psychologically, and it forces me to become more cautious in my daily life,” she told National Post.

“When you see what has happened recently in Sydney or at (Brown) University this week, it becomes impossible to dismiss these threats…These incidents show us exactly where unchecked hate and intimidation can lead.”

On Sunday, 15 people in Australia

were killed in a terror attack

while celebrating Hanukkah at Bondi Beach. Two students were

murdered in another incident at Brown University

in Rhode Island over the weekend. Police have identified a person of interest in the Brown shooting but have not said whether they have determined a motive.

 Members of the public lay flowers at a memorial at Bondi Pavilion in the wake of a mass shooting at Bondi Beach yesterday, on December 15, 2025 in Sydney, Australia.

In late November, Mattova said she

was kicked out of a vehicle by an Uber driver for being Jewish

. She was left at an intersection in downtown Toronto in the middle of the night. The company told National Post earlier this month that it was “deeply sorry” for her experience and that they contacted Mattova “directly” and took “appropriate action on the driver.” Uber did not say what action was taken.

Since then,

more Canadian Jews have come forward

to share their experiences with Uber. That includes a Jewish couple who were travelling in Europe in August when they said an Uber driver wouldn’t take them because they were from Israel, and another Jewish couple who said an Uber driver refused to take them home from the Toronto airport in February after he heard them speaking Hebrew.

Although many people showed support for Mattova online, she also faced a deluge of antisemitic hate messages and death threats. “Should have just slit your throat lol,” one person wrote to her on Instagram.

“(I’m going to) kill you someday,” another person wrote.

She was called a “dirty Zionist Jew,” “baby killer” and an “unhuman terrorist” for sharing her support for Israel. One person sent her a private message with an image that said: “Murderer rot in hell.”

Another person commented that Mattova was a “shameless genocide lover,” and added, “one day you’ll reap what you sow.”

“So happy the Uber driver kicked you out for being a Jew,” one person wrote.

She reported the threats she received to Toronto police. She said it was “sobering” to learn how difficult it is to trace the people behind the accounts.

“Uttering threats is a serious criminal offence. All reported incidents will be investigated thoroughly,” Toronto police spokesperson Cindy Chung told National Post in an email. Anyone receiving a death threat via social media, email, or any digital platform should call 911 if it is believed to be an “imminent threat to your life or physical safety,” she said.

“Do not engage with or block the user until you have captured evidence. Take screenshots showing the sender’s handle, the platform, and the timestamp,” Chung said, who also advised people to file a report and notify police if personal information, including address or phone number, has been exposed.

Immediately “disable location services on your devices and review your privacy settings,” said Chung.

“They told me that I should either change my Instagram username or change my number, but I shouldn’t be doing anything to change my life because I didn’t do anything wrong,” Mattova said.

“Either social media companies take responsibility and implement meaningful verification and accountability mechanisms, or governments will have to compel them to do so.”

She added that what she’s demanding of companies doesn’t equate to silencing speech.

“It’s about ensuring that speech carries responsibility. Without that, the gap between online hate and real world danger will only continue to shrink,” she said. “When threats are ignored or impossible to trace, they become normalized. When they are normalized, someone eventually acts on them.”

As one solution that Canada could implement, Mattova pointed to a new law in Australia that bans teens under the age of 16 from top social media platforms. Companies such as YouTube, Facebook and Instagram are now blocking them from joining.

“It demonstrates that regulation and action is possible, and that when there is a political will, a meaningful safeguard can be implemented,” she said.

She also said that social media platforms need stricter policies when it comes to allowing people to create accounts. Although she reported the users who threatened her on Instagram to the platform, she continued to be harassed.

“If you go to a bar, you need to show a proof of identification. It should be the same for social media,” she said.

“Complete unaccountability has empowered keyboard warriors to normalize hate and escalate threats without consequences, which can empower certain individuals to much worse — incidents like we saw this week in Sydney.”

Accounts should be linked to verified identification or financial credentials “to ensure traceability and accountability.”

Meta, the company that owns Instagram, did not return National Post’s request for comment in time for publication. It says

online

: “We remove content that could contribute to a risk of harm to the physical security of persons. Content that threatens people has the potential to intimidate, exclude or silence others and isn’t allowed on our services.”

“Like many individuals who publicly advocate for Jewish causes, I receive a significant volume of death threats and online abuse, and I am actively working to shift the narrative from reaction to prevention,” said Mattova, adding that online hate doesn’t only stay online.

“The violent rhetoric…it becomes a casual thing, and even threats start to feel casual and acceptable for the people making them,” she said.

“We are already seeing the consequences.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Alisha Kang, the national president of the Union of National Employees.

OTTAWA — The sidelined president of one of the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC)’s component unions is suing PSAC, claiming the umbrella union took away her powers just days before she was set to expose “significant financial irregularities” and other problems throughout the union.

According to court documents made public on Wednesday, Alisha Kang, who was president of the Union of National Employees (UNE) until being effectively stripped of her role less than two months ago, had conducted a review of her union’s financial operations and policies. In late October, Kang was to present with financial auditors the audited financial statements for 2023 to the union’s board.

The presentation, according to documents filed in Ontario Superior Court, would have blown the whistle on “irregularities (that) affected all of PSAC’s activities and its components and, if revealed to the entire membership, could have had a devastating effect” on the careers of PSAC President Sharon DeSousa and other PSAC leaders.

Documents filed in court by Kang state that the financial irregularities included a scheme involving the Alliance Employees’ Union (AEU), which represented UNE staff, and the former national executive of UNE.

The documents allege that the AEU filed “spurious or artificially substantiated” classification grievances on behalf of union staff, which were then settled informally by granting “general damages for human rights.” The scheme, the documents state, allowed union staff to land extra pay without membership approval, while avoiding taxes and some deductions.

According to the court documents, Kang wrote a letter in March of this year to AEU president Louis Bisson where she expressed “deep discomfort” with the scheme. About two months later, the documents state, UNE self-reported to the Canada Revenue Agency and made a restitution payment of $69,000.

Employees were disciplined, the documents state, and Ottawa police were contacted.

But on October 24, just four days before Kang was to present her concerns and the audited financial statements, her component union was placed under trusteeship by PSAC’s board. That removed Kang and other top UNE executives from their roles and their right to take part in PSAC board meetings.

DeSousa, who was elected PSAC president in 2024 in a race where Kang finished second, could not be reached for comment late Wednesday through a spokesperson. Kang, who had vowed to run again for PSAC president, could also not be reached.

In an Oct. 24 press release, PSAC said it made the move to put UNE into trusteeship because it had “heard from many members who have raised concerns about the level of representation and support” from UNE. PSAC, Canada’s largest public service union, also said that there were concerns about UNE’s financial practices and accountability, high rates of staff turnover, and complaints about Kang and other members of the executive.

The release said the trustee would assume the elected officers’ roles and work to “restore the component’s capacity” and report to PSAC’s president and board.

According to the documents filed in court, PSAC had for several months conducted a campaign to oust Kang from her role. Kang had been elected in 2023 to a three-year term to lead UNE and soon thereafter became interested in its finances.

The documents state that the move to put the smaller union under trusteeship did not follow PSAC’s own rules and was never fully explained to Kang or other UNE executives. Kang also states that her executive team was never informed about any complaints about their work and was never given a chance to respond to the PSAC charges.

The court documents state that Kang is asking for her role at UNE to be fully restored as well as court costs and any other “relief” or compensation that the court deems fair.

In the documents, Kang states that DeSousa “exerts a hold on everyone” at PSAC and tries to eliminate her political opponents and those of her allies.

Kang is not the only component union executive to feel PSAC’s wrath. In 2024, court documents state, a DeSousa ally presented a motion at the PSAC board to impose disciplinary measures against the president and executive vice-president of the Canada Employment and Immigration Union (CEIU). Both were suspended from membership, prevented from holding office for one and two years respectively, documents state, before a DeSousa ally was appointed.

UNE represents 27,000 members who work for 76 different employers. According to PSAC’s website, UNE is one of 15 components within PSAC and represents foreign service employees, passport officers and other workers across the country and in embassies around the world.

Ottawa-based PSAC represents nearly 240,000 workers across Canada and in other countries who work for the federal government, universities, casinos, community services agencies, Aboriginal communities, airports, and the security sector among others. Its board is comprised of 24 PSAC executives and presidents of its component unions.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Premier Danielle Smith at the UCP AGM.

OTTAWA — Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has Canada’s national boxing regulator in her corner as she spars with Skate Canada over the province’s policy on trans athletes.

Meanwhile, the federal government has thrown its support behind the Skate Canada boycott, which it describes as a battle against discrimination in sports.

Christopher Lindsay, executive director of Boxing Canada, said his organization would not be joining the national figure skating body in boycotting Alberta over provincial rules barring male-to-female trans athletes from competing in women’s divisions.

“Boxing Canada has no plans to stop holding competitions in Alberta,” said Lindsay in an email to National Post.

Lindsay said he hoped Alberta’s approach to navigating gender identity issues in competitive sport was the correct one.

“We are hopeful that the Alberta legislation protects the ability of all Albertans to participate in sport — while ensuring that the conditions during competition meet Boxing Canada’s priorities of safety, fairness, and then broad participation,” said Lindsay.

He added that the physicality of his sport, and dangers inherent to competitive boxing, make it necessary to err on the side of competitor safety.

“(Competitive boxing) is highly regulated with age, skill, weight, and gender-based categories. In competition, a random draw is used to match boxers so those regulations exist to build trust than an opponent’s abilities are within a prescribed range,” said Lindsay.

“We believe that access to recreation and fitness must be protected for all Canadians. But the access to competition requires attention to the existing rules to ensure safety and fairness,” he added.

The statement of support comes a day after Skate Canada announced it would

stop hosting national and international skating events

in Alberta and quickly saw support from the federal government.

Adam van Koeverden, the federal secretary of state for sport, backed Skate Canada’s Alberta boycott in

a statement on social media

.

“Our government believes in a sport system that provides opportunities for all Canadians to participate and excel without discrimination, including the transgender community, which is disproportionately vulnerable, excluded and marginalized,” wrote van Koeverden. “National sport organizations like Skate Canada operate independently from the government and make decisions with respect to the individual rights of athletes, based on science and evidence, specific to their sport.”

Skate Canada said in a statement that it was “unable to host events in the province while maintaining our national standards for safe and inclusive sport.”

Smith was quick to fire back, calling the Skate Canada boycott a “disgraceful” affront to “common sense and common decency.”

“We expect they will apologize and adjust their policies once they realize they are not only compromising the fairness and safety of their athletes, but are also offside with the international community, including the International Olympic Committee (IOC), which is moving in the same direction as Alberta,” wrote Smith in a

Tuesday evening social media post

.

Alberta Minister of Tourism and Sport Andrew Boitchenko also

spoke out against the boycott

, calling it “disappointing.”

The

IOC signalled last month

that it was moving toward a complete ban on transgender athletes in women’s Olympic events, after weighing evidence of the enduring physical advantages of being born male. It’s expected to

issue a final decision

on gender eligibility in early 2026.

Women’s boxing was at the centre of a gender controversy that

rocked the 2024 Paris Olympics

, with suspicion encircling gold medalists Imane Khelif of Algeria and Lin Yu-ting of Taiwan, who’d both failed disputed gender eligibility tests prior to the games.

Khelif became the subject of global speculation after she

dominated an early opponent

in a match that lasted just 46 seconds. The opponent said after the bout that she’d

feared for her life

being in a ring with Khelif.

Boxing Canada, which did not take a position on the Paris controversies, was one of twelve

national sporting organizations

National Post contacted on Wednesday. Three responded by the deadline for publication.

A spokesperson for Curling Canada said the organization had “no intent to move events out of Alberta.”

“The consequences would have a significant financial impact on Curling Alberta, as well as Alberta-based host clubs for events,” wrote the spokesperson.

A spokesperson for Bobsleigh Canada Skeleton (BCS) said the issue was a moot point as Alberta doesn’t have any competition-ready tracks.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.