LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

The United States' 50 per cent levy

Honey is one of hundreds of Canadian products that have been hit with a 50 per cent tariff to enter the United States, grinding exports to a halt. More honey staying north of the border could mean lower prices for consumers in the short term.

But over time, the loss of Canada’s largest export market for honey could take a toll on producers — and, due to honey bees’ contribution to the pollination sector, the overall food system.

“When there’s abundance, prices may plummet, but it doesn’t mean that that will be healthy for the industry in the long term,” says Armağan Özbilge, an assistant professor in Dalhousie University’s Faculty of Management . “So we may enjoy a year of cheap honey, but we’re talking about a bigger industry issue.”

According to the Alberta Beekeepers Commission , 80.2 per cent of the exported quantity of Canadian honey and 69.1 per cent of the value went to the United States between January and April 2026 alone.

The United States’ 50 per cent levy “has the potential to dramatically impact producers of honey,” says Mike von Massow, a professor at the University of Guelph’s Ontario Agricultural College . “You can’t lay bees off. You’re still producing. You have to maintain the bees. You have to keep them healthy.”

Beekeepers operate in all provinces, but the prairies house most of Canada’s honey bee colonies (63 per cent). Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta were responsible for 80 per cent of total national honey production in 2025, according to Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada . While Alberta produces the most honey (40.7 per cent by volume), Manitoba is the biggest exporter (54.5 per cent by volume).

For some honey producers, such as Podolski Honey Farms in Ethelbert, Man., the U.S. tariffs reportedly severed 90 per cent of customers. “But that’s not the whole picture,” says Paul Gregory, a commercial beekeeper and vice chair of the Manitoba Beekeepers’ Association . “We have some tools available to us. It’s serious. We are kind of hunkering down.”

For the last couple of years, producers had “fairly poor” honey prices, but they were on a trajectory to go higher. “That’s probably not going to happen now because there’s a short crop,” says Gregory. He’s heard from beekeepers across the prairies that honey yield is down, which he credits partially to climate change. “If we had a really big honey crop this year, then we could see real price deterioration. But with the short crop, I think there’ll be similar prices to last year (this fall).”

Rod Scarlett, executive director of the Canadian Honey Council , says that a significant amount of honey was shipped to the U.S. prior to the implementation of the tariffs. If that hadn’t been the case, the economic impact would likely be more keenly felt by exporters, but there’s honey stuck in limbo nonetheless.

“The economic impact may not be extreme yet, but if this extends, let’s say, into the new year, then we have a completely different set of problems that will impact not only honey production but probably pollination and the pollination sector, which is quite a bit bigger than the honey sector,” says Scarlett.

As Barbara Engelbart McKenzie, executive director of the Alberta Beekeepers Commission, highlights, flowering crops across Canada depend on pollination, from canola to blueberries — and that pollination comes from bees. “There’s a massive risk in the industry if we don’t have strong bee pollination. We could see lower crop valuations and crops actually decline as well.”

Özbilge echoes this concern: “When we talk about honey, it impacts other industries due to that pollination. And having a drop in agricultural production, it will definitely have some side effects on other food items.”

The industry is looking at ways to broaden its horizons with export partners and bolster homegrown honey with more domestic marketing. “But some of these things take time. They take a contribution from the government and action from the government,” says Scarlett.

Gregory has been beekeeping since he was a teenager, for more than 50 years. At his family-run operation, Interlake Honey Producers Ltd. , in Fisher Branch, north of Winnipeg, he has roughly 1,000 colonies. He has exported comb honey to Japan — Canada’s second-largest export market at 44.1 per cent by value in 2025, versus the U.S.’s 52.9 per cent — and sees the greatest opportunities for growth in developing other export markets for Canadian honey, such as the Middle East, India and other countries in Asia. “We’re known for quality honey, and we just have to do more work to that end.”

Canada imports more honey than it exports, “and those imports are coming in cheap,” says Scarlett, who sees an opportunity to displace foreign products with domestic ones — especially when it comes to commercial users of industrial honey.

The Canadian Honey Council has called on commercial users of industrial honey, including General Mills and Kellogg’s, “to proudly proclaim that they use Canadian honey in their products.” Neither company responded to National Post’s request for comment.

“We know that there are these huge amounts of imports coming in for the industrial market. We don’t know exactly where it’s being used, but one would hope that Canadian companies recognize the stress that this industry is under, and would proudly display one of their ingredients,” says Scarlett.

Engelbart McKenzie also sees opportunities to boost the domestic market. “Alberta could actually supply all of Canada’s honey demand, so Canada can supply itself with honey. We’re currently seeing honey imports, but some of those imports are adulterated honey, so they’re not 100 per cent pure honey, and that’s what’s coming up and winding up on consumer shelves.”

According to a 2019 Canadian Food Inspection Agency report , 21.7 per cent of imported honey samples were adulterated — often diluted with syrups, such as corn or rice. Gregory highlights the need for better testing at the border and, if honey is identified as fraudulent, that it be destroyed.

“Overall, we just want to encourage consumers to really buy Canadian honey,” says Engelbart McKenzie. “We also definitely are supporting the idea that we get these tariffs removed and that we get back into a regular flow of goods across the border.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


An undated file photo of Raj Grewal.

Litigation over millions in alleged financial misconduct by former MP and lawyer Raj Grewal and his colleagues has brought to the fore a more chilling backdrop to the saga — a shocking murder of a Grewal associate and shootings at his home.

The recent cross-examination of a witness in one of a slew of lawsuits against the ex-Liberal member, the law firm he founded and other lawyers raised the fact that a Grewal employee, Jaskarn Dhaliwal, was shot dead eight months ago as he drove out of a Brampton, Ont., mall.

Police described the incident as an isolated attack, and within days charged three men in Dhaliwal’s murder, two from Brampton and one from Toronto, all in their 20s.

In other violent incidents, someone fired at Grewal’s Toronto-area home in 2023 and, according to sources, again more recently.

Multiple lawsuits and the Law Society of Ontario, the province’s legal regulator, have accused Grewal and associates of fraud, misappropriation of client funds and other wrongdoing in a series of real-estate transactions.

Grewal resigned his Brampton East seat in 2018 after admitting to racking up millions in gambling losses, was charged by the RCMP over loans he received to pay off the debts, then was acquitted.

There’s no evidence the shootings had any connection to the allegations now being litigated. But a businessman in a financial spat with RSG Law, the firm Grewal founded, recently talked in a deposition for one of the cases about the impact Dhaliwal’s killing had on him.

“There was a shooting that happened in December and it was one of Raj’s employees and, after that, I was really, like, I was really, really shaken up,” said Sarwan Singh, who says RSG Law owes him $4 million in unpaid loans. “That happened about, like, three or four minutes from my house…. He (the victim) was a young kid.”

The 25-year-old was ambushed as he was leaving Brampton’s Shoppers World mall, his attackers firing multiple shots, Peel Regional Police said at the time. They have never indicated the possible motive.

Lawyer Wendy Greenspoon-Soer, who represents The National Bank in one of the suits, asked Singh if he thought the murder was linked to Dhaliwal’s work at RSG.

“I am not saying that. I am saying that, in general, it just shook me up,” he replied.

“But did you continue to do business with RSG after that in terms of loans?” continued the lawyer. “No, we shut it down dramatically,” said Singh. “We really pushed back on everything.”

Simon Bieber, a lawyer for Grewal, said it would be wrong to link the murder to the current legal battles.

“Mr. Dhaliwal’s death was tragic and his parents lost their only child,” Bieber told National Post by email. “The perpetrators of that crime have been arrested and are facing serious charges. To the extent that you are interested in finding out their motivations, their criminal trial would be the best place to start.

“But raising Mr. Dhaliwal’s death alongside the current civil lawsuits and attempting to draw a connection is not only improper, and likely defamatory, it will force a young man’s family to unnecessarily revisit the tragedy.”

Asked whether Peel Regional Police are looking into possible ties between the murder and the recent cases, the force’s media office noted that the Dhaliwal case is still before the courts. “No further information can be provided at this time to protect the integrity of the ongoing court proceedings,” said Const. Laurie McCann.

In December 2023, Peel Police confirmed that someone had fired shots at Grewal’s house. No injuries were reported. A lawyer representing Grewal at the time told the Brampton Guardian the incident was one of a series of shootings at homes of prominent citizens in the area.

And two sources who asked not to be named because of the sensitivity around the matter told the National Post that his home was again targeted by a gunman recently, with no one hurt.

Grewal has no reason to believe that the 2023 shooting had anything to do with the allegations in the recent lawsuits, said Bieber. He “recognizes that there are elements of society who do not follow the law,” which is one reason he wants to ensure media reporting on the current cases is not “intended to inflame the situation,” the lawyer said.

The Law Society has applied to have Grewal’s licence to practice suspended to prevent a “significant risk of harm to the public” while its own investigation proceeds. It alleges the lawyer “has participated in, facilitated or failed to prevent mortgage fraud,” misled clients, lenders and other lawyers about money he held in trust, misappropriated client funds and provided fake title insurance to lenders.

Grewal voluntarily gave up his licence pending a decision on the suspension request by the separate Law Society Tribunal.

The regulator’s moves came after a stream of legal actions were launched in recent months against Grewal, RSG Law, lawyer Davinder Khattra, who now owns the firm, and others. The Society has already suspended Khattra’s licence.

None of the recent allegations has been proven in court. Lawyers for Grewal have said that the 40-year-old had limited involvement in the RSG firm’s day-to-day operations after handing it over to lawyer Khattra, 29, in 2024 and that the various lawsuits are a result of the “falling out” that can happen in business transactions.

Meanwhile, the allegations against Grewal and colleagues took other unusual turns recently.

One of the judges handling the numerous cases warned that the matter needs to be handled more rapidly to avoid “catastrophic” damage to the legal system.

The Law Society should act more quickly – not in “geological” time – to investigate the charges as a whole, rather than leaving the courts to deal with each new one piecemeal, said Justice Sean Dunphy of the Ontario Superior Court. Lawyers’ trust funds are supposed to be a “gold-standard” safe place for clients’ money, but the lawsuits have repeatedly made allegations of misappropriation, he noted.

“If that basic assumption of trust underlying our financial and legal system is undermined and not zealously safeguarded, the consequences to the rule of law and the broader economy are potentially catastrophic,” the judge said in one of his court orders.

Evidence emerged as well that Grewal’s own father-in-law has become a legal adversary, his lawyer predicting recently he would be involved in “a lot” of legal wrangling with Grewal.

During another cross-examination by Greenspoon-Soer in the National Bank case, Kailash Kasal detailed how Grewal had taken over supervision of two truck stops his father-in-law owned, in Chatham, Ont., and Belleville, Ont. Kasal said he had no knowledge of how $195,000 in allegedly tainted money ended up in the account of one of the companies, transferred from RSG Law. And he said he had also never given authority for millions in mortgages to be taken out on the two properties.

“We’re going to be involved in a lot of litigation with Mr. Grewal,” Michael Simaan, Kasal’s lawyer, said at one point in the deposition.

Kasal, whose daughter works for his company, said he had not spoken to his son-in-law since June because of the legal matters, but refused to expand on what he called “personal” affairs.

Bieber told the Post Grewal is now separated from his wife, but does not want to comment on the situation and asks that his family’s privacy be respected.

Kasal said he was “working on” getting back control of the two truck-stop properties, though Grewal still oversaw them.

“Why is it that you would need to have someone who is currently being sued for over $2 million in fraud still involved in managing your business operation, (when) you say you knew nothing about the fraud that was going on?” asked Greenspoon-Soer.

“Don’t answer that,” Simaan told his client, as the examination moved on to other topics.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Dr. Michael Hart in front of his ReadyToGo clinic in London, Ont., in a 2017 file photo.

An Ontario family doctor who prescribed ketamine over the phone and asked patients to sign away their right to sue him or make a formal complaint “of any kind” has been suspended from practising for six months.

Dr. Michael Hart, a past guest of U.S podcaster Joe Rogan who was “cautioned” by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario multiple times dating back to 2016, including over his social media posts, engaged in conduct that would reasonably be regarded as “disgraceful, dishonourable and unprofessional,” according to a recent ruling.

“What is more, it was disgraceful, dishonourable and unprofessional to ask clients to sign a document promising not to take legal action against him or make a complaint to the college,” the Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal wrote.

“Physicians may not attempt to hinder the College’s regulation of the profession in the public interest by encouraging withdrawal of complaints” or attempting to discourage patients from exercising their legal rights.

The discipline panel accepted the parties’ joint submission proposing a penalty of a six-month licence suspension, effective July 8, as well as a permanent restriction prohibiting Hart from prescribing ketamine or testosterone replacement therapy upon his return to practice, among other terms and conditions.

The tribunal wrote that a joint submission must be accepted, unless it is “unhinged” from the circumstances and would bring the college’s discipline process into disrepute.

According to the college’s records, Hart was previously cautioned six times by its Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee, including over complaints involving his social media posts regarding gender-affirming care and COVID-19.

“Progressive regulation only protects patients if the physician on the receiving end responds to it, and the (Hart) file shows how long a practice can continue substantially unchanged while the warnings accumulate,” medical malpractice lawyer Paul Cahill blogged.

In a statement to National Post, the college said that while the complaints committee can make a range of dispositions, some of them remedial in nature, it doesn’t make findings of professional misconduct. “Where a matter requires the determination of disputed facts or involves allegations of professional misconduct,” the case may be referred to the discipline tribunal, which is responsible for adjudicating those matters.

What most stuck Cahill was Hart providing two patients with a document asking them to promise never to file a lawsuit or a grievance with his licensing college, which the tribunal found was itself disgraceful, dishonourable and unprofessional.

“I’ve been practising medical malpractice litigation for over 20 years now, and I’ve never come across something like that,” Cahill said in an interview with National Post.

“You do see cases where waivers are signed if you’re about to do some dangerous sport. Waivers exist. But medicine? It just didn’t seem right…. That’s an alarm bell. It’s not what happens, or should happen, in our health system, at all,” Cahill said.

“It’s worth letting the public know that.”

A lawyer who represented Hart declined to comment. Hart did not respond to requests for comment before deadline.

Hart has an active social media presence . He was profiled by local media as the first family doctor in London to write prescriptions for medical marijuana and appeared on Rogan’s podcast for a cannabis debate.

According to the discipline tribunal, his practice was found to have “multiple deficiencies” in a case stemming from complaints by two patients and a review of 34 other patients’ charts by two different assessors.

“Dr. Hart showed a lack of knowledge, skill and judgment that harmed patients in multiple ways,” according to the tribunal decision.

One concern was his prescribing of ketamine, a powerful anesthetic used for years to sedate people before surgery that has recently gained attention for its potential for treating severe depression. Actor Matthew Perry’s fatal overdose death in 2023 involved heavy doses of legal and illicit ketamine.

According to the tribunal’s findings and penalty reasons, “Dr. Hart failed to properly assess patients, obtain consent, educate patients, prescribe appropriate dosage or keep records.”

The tribunal described how an anonymized “Patient A” sought treatment for anxiety and depression in 2022 from Hart at his ReadyToGo clinic in London, where he was the sole owner and practising doctor.

Both Patient A’s encounters with Hart took place over the phone. “Dr. Hart did not see or assess Patient A in person at any time.”

Among the documents the woman received before her first appointment was a form requiring her signature that read: “I agree not to take any legal action against the assessing physician, the ReadyToGo Clinic or to make a complaint of any kind to the College of Physicians and Surgeons (of) Ontario.”

The woman was prescribed ketamine after an initial phone consultation and experienced side effects she described as “horrific” and “scary,” including loss of balance, slurred speech, increased heart rate and dissociation, meaning a sense of disconnection from reality.

The effects lasted throughout the day until she went to bed that night.

“Follow-up care was limited to a phone call two weeks later,” according to the tribunal report. “During the call, Dr. Hart pressured Patient A not to complain to the College by repeatedly asking Patient A not to take any action against him or report him. This behaviour made Patient A feel uncomfortable, coerced, intimated and harassed.”

In 2020-21, Hart treated Patient B. Once again, appointments took place over the phone and Patient B was asked to sign a document with the same wording promising no legal action or complaining to the college, according to the tribunal.

Patient B was referred to Hart by therapist Tatiana Zdyb for a prescription for ketamine to be used in combination with psychotherapy. “Dr. Hart identified her as Dr. Zdyb, despite knowing that she did not have a doctoral degree in clinical psychology,” the tribunal wrote.

Zdyb’s licence was revoked last year by the College of Psychologists and Behaviour Analysts of Ontario over inappropriate use of ketamine and psilocybin, misrepresenting her credentials and violating professional boundaries by having a sexual relationship with a client.

Hart prescribed Patient B four capsules of ketamine to be taken prior to therapy sessions. He renewed the prescription six months later at a higher dose when Patient B reported that, while the therapy was helpful during sessions, there was no sustained benefit. Four months later, he prescribed at-home ketamine without assessing for a risk of addiction. He also yelled at the patient during a telephone appointment when he realized the patient was calling from a car.

Independent experts who reviewed 34 charts found frequent deficiencies, including lack of appropriate assessment and rationale for ketamine treatment and escalating doses based on the patient’s preference, rather than medical need.

Hart’s misconduct “was not a lapse or gap in one area: there are fundamental problems with Dr. Hart’s approach to the practice of medicine,” the discipline tribunal wrote.

Some of the same issues Hart was cautioned about in the past “happened in this case,” the discipline tribunal said. “This misconduct is more serious, given that it occurred after these warnings.”

Hart pleaded no contest, “saving costs for the College and avoiding the need for witnesses to testify,” according to the tribunal.

“Unlike an admission or entering into an agreed statement of facts, however, the registrant has not demonstrated insight or remorse.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


U.S. Senator Ruben Gallego holds a press conference at the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa September 1, 2026.

OTTAWA – U.S. Senator from Arizona Ruben Gallego tempered expectations around the prospect of Democrats gaining a majority in the House of Representatives and the Senate and using that power to curtail U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canada.

“I do think they’ll use their power,” said Gallego, during a press conference at the U.S. embassy in Ottawa on Tuesday. “The question is, do you have enough to overcome vetoes and things of that nature.”

Democrats are hopeful that they will have good results during the Nov. 3 midterm elections, amid Trump’s low approval ratings.

Gallego, who was in Ottawa visiting with embassy staff and Canadian politicians to discuss the ongoing trade dispute, said Congress and the Senate have historically given up too much of their power to the president when it comes to trade policy.

Trump has applied most of his tariffs through executive action. The tariffs he enacted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in February, but the president has since found other pieces of legislation to apply more levies on goods from other countries.

The president also has the power to veto legislation.

“There’s going to be a strong incentive for Democrats to actually engage on oversight when it comes to tariffs,” said Gallego. “The…number one reason why is because by the Constitution, it’s the Senate and Congress in general that actually has tariff policy.”

Canada walked away from a potential interim trade deal with the U.S. on Aug. 21, after weeks of negotiations between Canadian and American officials.

The potential deal would have provided tariff relief on Section 232 levies on Canadian autos, steel and aluminum, as well as the avoidance of a 50 per-cent tariff under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which applies to $28 billion worth of Canadian goods. In exchange, Canada would have ended its moratoriums on U.S. alcohol in several provinces and dropped tariffs on American autos.

Prime Minister Mark Carney ultimately decided to hit pause on negotiations, citing several last-minute demands on the U.S. side that made the deal untenable.

Canada has now threatened dollar-for-dollars tariffs on U.S. goods, which are set to take effect Sept. 8, in response to the Section 338 tariffs.

The prospect of Canada gaining tariff-free access to the American market remains in question for the time being.

Last week, California Governor Gavin Newsom, who is a Democrat hopeful for the presidency in 2028, told CTV News he could not guarantee the complete removal of tariffs.

Gallego said he could not clarify what Newsom meant in terms of his comments, but said it should be his party’s goal to remove tariffs.

“I think the anybody who is running for president should be very clear,” he said. “It should be the goal of a Democratic president to remove these tariffs, 100 per cent.”

Senate Democratic Leader Senator from New York Chuck Schumer also intends to introduce a bill to strike down the Section 338 on Canadian goods and the Section 301 tariffs introduced under the Trade Act of 1974 that targets forced labour in supply chains. Schumer cited the growing cost of living crisis among American consumers as the reason for the legislation.

The bill is not expected to pass the Republican-controlled Congress and does not address Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Public Services and Procurement Canada have issued a request for qualifications for companies interested in restoring 24 Sussex Drive.

In its search for a “world class design vision” to restore the official prime minister’s residence at 24 Sussex Drive in Ottawa, the federal government is prioritizing the use of Canadian materials and mandating Indigenous involvement in the multi-million-dollar project.

Last month, Public Services and Procurement Canada published its request for qualification (RFQ), the first of two stages in its design-building competition for the historic home’s rehabilitation.

The largely technical, 97-page document “defines the requirements for the qualification of respondents,” sets a “basis for selection,” and breaks down the scoring system that’ll be used to create a list of up to seven firms that will be invited to partake in stage two and submit a formal request for proposal, which is expected to be issued this winter.

The RFQ deadline is Sept. 22 at 2 p.m.

A successful bidder will be awarded in fall 2027, which is later than the July 1 date Prime Minister Mark Carney set when announcing the non-partisan fundraising campaign led by the Rideau Hall Foundation to fund the project.

“The time period between the announcement of the winning proposal and the estimated contract award of Fall 2027 is reserved for any final negotiations that may be required between Canada and the winning team,” PSPC told National Post in an email.

 Prime Minister Mark Carney takes part in a press conference at 24 Sussex in Ottawa June 25, 2026.

“Given its national and historical significance, the rehabilitated residence must be completed by Canadians for Canadians,” reads the RFQ, issued on Aug. 21.

“In that spirit, the use of Canadian materials and innovations must be considered and incorporated throughout the project.”

Respondents will be required to comply with the “Buy Canadian” policies Ottawa enacted last September in an effort to “protect, build and transform” strategic industries within the country.

Companies need not be Canadian to meet the mandatory requirement of being considered a “Canadian supplier,” but they must have a place of business and office in Canada, where they are registered and pay taxes, and employ Canadians or conduct “day-to-day business activities in Canada.”

It also means they “will not subcontract work to non-Canadian suppliers or individuals located outside Canada, in a manner that results in minimal value-added activities being performed within Canada.”

Respondents must also submit an “Indigenous Participation Plan (IPP)” that ensures at least five per cent of project work is carried out by Indigenous businesses and people. Public Services and Procurement Canada said any IPP commitments made in the RFP stage “will become deliverables in the resulting contract, subject to regular progress monitoring and reporting (and potentially other measures).”

Sussex Drive, along with the rest of Parliament Hill, is the ancestral territory of the Anishinabe Algonquin Nation, with which PSPC said “engagements have been undertaken” and will be reflected in the RFP and “inform the site’s design.”

 24 Sussex Drive in August 2007, when it was home to then-prime minister Stephen Harper and his family.

As for the design, the RFQ offers little in the way of new details about the work that’s needed to repair and modernize the more than 160-year-old house that became the official prime minister’s residence in 1950 — the last time it had “a comprehensive rehabilitation.”

“The project shall provide a secure, dignified, functional, and adaptable environment that supports residential, official, ceremonial, and administrative functions while meeting current codes, standards, and operational requirements,” it notes.

The successful bidder’s “work will include the modernization of building systems, upgrades to meet applicable codes and standards, and the integration of security, sustainability and accessibility requirements.”

The 35-room, 12,000-square-foot home has been vacant since 2015 when prime minister Stephen Harper left office. His successor, Justin Trudeau, lived there as a child when his father was prime minister but opted to move his own family to Rideau Cottage, across the street on the grounds of the Governor General’s residence at Rideau Hall. Carney and his family followed suit when he was elected last year.

The numerous problems at 24 Sussex include mould, water infiltration, corroding plumbing, asbestos and a lingering stench of dead rodents in the walls from a past infestation.

 A hallway inside 24 Sussex, the official residence of the Prime Minister of Canada, in Ottawa June 25, 2026.

The National Capital Commission decommissioned the site in 2022.

The RFQ also doesn’t indicate any construction budget, with PSPC noting it will show up in the RFP. Earlier this year, architects interviewed by National Post estimated that, depending on specifications, the bill for this type of major project could be anywhere between $40 million and $100 million.

That figure tracks with a requirement for prospective designers to submit a completed “complex building project” worth at least $50 million pre-tax as part of their RFQ response.

Meanwhile, as of July 27, Canadians had donated about $735,000 toward the project, according to the Rideau Hall Foundation . National Post has contacted it for an updated tally.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Parti-Quebecois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon kicks off the Quebec Election campaign with his caucus at Quai Hector in his riding of Camille-Laurin in Montreal, on Thursday, August 27, 2026.

OTTAWA — The Bloc Québécois may have lost the federal byelection of Chicoutimi —Le Fjord to Mark Carney’s Liberals on Monday evening, but that is not a concern for the Bloc’s provincial cousin which will be facing the Quebec electorate in just over a month.

Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon was asked on the campaign trail on Tuesday how he interprets the results in Chicoutimi—Le Fjord, which saw Liberal candidate Daniel Gobeil celebrate a smashing win at 51.3 per cent while Bloc candidate Caroline Dubé got 32.9 per cent.

“There are no real parallels to be drawn between a riding at the federal level and the fundamental choice a people makes regarding a government for a four-year term at the Quebec level,” St-Pierre Plamondon said. “So, I don’t really have an interpretation.”

Quebec Liberal Leader Charles Milliard said the PQ is happy to join forces with the Bloc when it suits them, and vice versa, but now is not one of these moments.

“They must have nice family gatherings,” Milliard said with a smirk.

The PQ is still in first position in Quebec, but the incumbent Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) has been creeping up in the polls, in part thanks to the trade war with the United States. The situation has also benefitted Carney judging by the byelection results.

St-Pierre Plamondon pushed back against suggestions that Carney’s popularity in Quebec could hurt the separatist party’s chances to form government on October 5.

The PQ leader said it is like comparing “apples and oranges.”

A federal Liberal source, speaking on a not-for-attribution basis to talk more freely, said Gobeil benefitted from the collapse of trade talks with the U.S. but he was also a known figure in the region, having been at the head of the biggest dairy lobby in the province.

The source seemingly agreed with St-Pierre Plamondon that the results in the federal byelection would not necessarily be replicated during the Quebec election.

The Saguenay—Lac-Saint-Jean region, north of Quebec City, holds a high proportion of “pragmatic separatists” who still intend to vote PQ at the provincial level but are prepared to support Carney at the federal level while Quebec is still a part of Canada.

A Bloc source agreed that the byelection results would have been vastly different if Carney had made concessions to the Trump administration on issues like supply management.

“It would have changed everything,” they said.

The Canada-U.S. relationship could still fluctuate in the next few weeks, and the political predictions in Quebec with it. Canada is expected to impose counter-tariffs on its biggest trading partner in a week, which could lead to further trade retaliation.

For Quebec, that could mean more companies closing doors and more job losses.

If the PQ forms government, St-Pierre Plamondon vowed to build a relationship with Carney based on “respect that we don’t have at the moment.” That means not waiting near the phone for Ottawa to update Quebec on the ongoing trade talks, he said.

St-Pierre Plamondon accused the federal government of not having properly consulted Quebec whilst negotiating with the U.S. on decisions that could have negatively impacted its businesses and workers. “I don’t consider that normal,” he said.

A Quebec source had confirmed to the National Post during the trade negotiations with the U.S. that Ottawa was not sharing specific details with provinces, only offering general information on what was happening at the negotiating table.

Once a deal was almost final, Carney briefed his provincial counterparts and reportedly asked them to consider bringing back U.S. alcohol on their shelves. Quebec Premier Christine Fréchette said she asked for further information before taking a final position.

Talks between Canada and the U.S. fell apart on August 21. Carney said the U.S. “asked too much and offered too little,” and asked his negotiators to come back to Ottawa.

The U.S. has since imposed 50 per cent tariffs on billions of Canadian products.

Carney has vowed to strike back with “dollar-for-dollar” retaliation, something that Fréchette said on Tuesday would be “problematic” for Quebec. She said her government has conveyed to Ottawa they would prefer “targeted” measures.

“We want to protect workers and businesses across Quebec, and we must not let these retaliatory tariffs add to the pressure,” she told reporters on the campaign trail.

Fréchette refused to go more into detail on which retaliatory tariffs she considers would hurt industries her province.

National Post
calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Flags from Canada and the U.S. fly atop the Peace Arch at the Peace Arch Border Crossing in Blaine, Washington.

Canada’s economic performance has fallen further behind that of the U.S. over the past quarter century, with the gap in GDP per person more than doubling and the Americans pulling ahead on incomes, employment, investment and productivity.

That’s according to a new study published by the Fraser Institute , which found that, in 1999, inflation-adjusted GDP per person in Canada was $48,076, while in the U.S. it was $58,842. By 2024, GDP per person had grown to $83,286 in the U.S. compared to just $59,529 in Canada — meaning the gap had widened from $10,766 to $23,757 over 25 years.

The study compared economic outcomes in the two countries by looking at measures including living standards, incomes, employment, investment, and productivity. In every category, Canada has fallen further behind over the first quarter of the century, it found.

For example, in 2010 (the earliest year of comparable data), inflation-adjusted median employment income was $6,126 higher in the U.S. than in Canada. By 2024, that gap had increased to $8,663.

“When comparing the economic performance of Canada relative to the U.S. since the beginning of the 21st century, it’s abundantly clear that Canadian policymakers have failed to create an environment where we can prosper,” said Jake Fuss, director of fiscal studies at the Fraser Institute, in a news release.

He added that the ability to transform raw materials and other inputs into demanded goods and services increased by more than double the amount (26.7 per cent versus 67.9 per cent) in the U.S. compared to Canada, “which explains much of our languishing living standards.”

The Fraser Institute outlines three factors that explain the widening gap in economic performance between the two countries.

 In 1999, inflation-adjusted GDP per person in Canada was $48,076, while in the U.S. it was $58,842. By 2024, GDP per person had grown to $83,286 in the U.S. compared to just $59,529 in Canada.

The first is a decline in private sector employment as a share of total employment in Canada. This decreased from 81.2 per cent to 78.5 per cent, meaning the government sector outgrew the private sector. The opposite occurred in the U.S., as private sector employment increased from 85.8 per cent of total employment to 86.5 per cent.

Meanwhile, labour productivity — a key driver of income growth — in the U.S. grew by 67.9 per cent between 1999 and 2025 compared to a 26.7 per cent increase in Canada during the same period.

Finally, business investment in Canada — which equips workers with the tools and technology they need to produce goods and services — dropped from nearly 90 cents per worker for every dollar invested in the U.S. to 54 cents between 2007 and 2024.

That said, the Fraser Institute study suggests that Canada’s trailing economic performance didn’t begin until 2014. Prior to this, Canada largely kept pace with, or in some cases exceeded, the U.S. across multiple measures, it said.

The think tank doesn’t look into the potential reasons for the change in 2014, but Grady Munro, senior policy analyst at the Fraser Institute and one of the study’s authors, offers some insight into the major factors that he says likely played a role.

“One example is that in 2014 we saw a collapse in oil prices in Canada, which resulted in a decline in business investment in the economy,” he said in an interview with National Post. “But that can’t necessarily explain the decade of economic stagnation that followed, and so that’s where, in large part, government policy factors played a role.”

He suggested that increased regulation on sectors like energy resources, combined with tax increases on high- and middle-income earners and increases in federal debt, reduced the attractiveness of Canada for business investment.

In 2015, the Trudeau government introduced a new top tax bracket on income over $200,000, which raised the top federal personal income tax rate from 29 per cent to 33 per cent. And the national debt doubled in less than a decade, increasing from $687 billion in 2014-15 to nearly $1.5 trillion in 2025-26.

“We know that investment is a huge determinant of productivity,” Munro added, “which then impacts the incomes that Canadians earn.”

Canada slightly outperformed the United States on inflation-adjusted GDP per person between 1999 and 2014, with Canada’s growing 19.9 per cent compared to 17.8 per cent in the U.S. However, since then, Canada’s GDP per person as a share of the United States’ has fallen from 83.1 per cent to 71.5 per cent as of 2024.

The Fraser Institute says this reflects the fact that per-person GDP growth in Canada largely stagnated during this time, while growth continued in the United States at a strong pace. From 2014 to 2024, GDP per person in Canada grew just 3.2 per cent compared to 20.1 per cent in the U.S.

When it comes to improving Canada’s economic performance, Munro suggested that a reemphasis on balanced budgets, spending restraint, and beginning to limit debt accumulation are the places to start.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on July 21, 2026.

Anti-Canadian rhetoric by U.S. officials is being characterized by two political experts as “really weird, really bizarre” and “frat house humour.”

The latest example comes from U.S. Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, who posted to social media yesterday an image of a female cadet and instructor at a Canadian military training camp, seeming to mock the picture by commenting with a Canadian flag and the words: “(this is real).”

The original image was posted a week ago by the Instagram account of the Vernon cadet training facility in British Columbia, with the caption: “Congratulations and well done to all recipients who received awards on the final day of Vernon CTC 2026! This is recognition of the amazing effort you have all put in as course cadets and staff!”

Hegseth did not explain his comment but it was widely taken to be a poke at the instructor’s size, given his repeated use of the phrase “fit not fat” in relation to the desired state of the U.S. military.

Asked about recent remarks by the Trump administration on Tuesday, Prime Minister Mark Carney said: “It’s beneath their office.” He added: “When the Americans stop doing memes, stop throwing shade, stop trying to be tough and start being serious about having those discussions, we can have those discussions.”

Phil Triadafilopoulos, a professor of political science at the University of Toronto, called remarks by Hegseth and others “weird” and “novel,” adding they were also unchecked.

“In the second Trump administration, there’s been no real effort to restrain rhetoric, to not post really defamatory and tasteless videos, to go after opponents with the full power of the American state,” he said. “And to do all sorts of things that would have been hard to fathom not that long ago.”

In fact, he still finds them hard to fathom. “I don’t see other administrations in other advanced industrialized democracies doing similar things,” he said. “We expect elected officials, especially executives, premiers, presidents, prime ministers, to comport themselves differently, to hold to higher standards.”

“I wish I could say it was unbelievable,” said Ryan Hurl, assistant professor of political science at the U of T, of the recent attacks. “But I feel like we’re in the movie Idiocracy,” a reference to a 2005 comedy that imagines a distant future where people have spent centuries getting stupider.

Here are just a few other instances of recent rudeness by American officials.

‘Two submarines’

In a weekend appearance on CNBC, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent brushed off the suggestion that the U.S.-Canada trade dispute could be categorized as a war, while taunting Canada for its lack of naval power.

“We’re not at war with Canada,” he said. “How are we going to be at war with Canada? What, are they going to take their two submarines from the Edmonton mall and sic them on us?”

Canada did in fact have four submarines at West Edmonton Mall as part of its Deep Sea Adventure ride, which opened in 1985 and closed more than 20 years ago. They were dismantled in 2012. During operation of the ride, many Canadians joked that there were more subs in the mall than in the Canadian Forces.

 A submarine in West Edmonton Mall, March 1988.

‘Do I care about how the Quebecois speak?’

Last week, U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick claimed that Canada had walked away from the trade deal over political rather than economic reasons, driven by fear over separatist movements in Quebec and Alberta. He was specifically pushing back on reports that Canada took issue with U.S. demands regarding the use of French language, and seemed to take a swing at Quebec .

“This is politics only.” he said. “If you think I ever said the words ‘French’ — do I care about how the Quebecois speak? I mean, what could matter less to America? We don’t care! So, the fact is we never brought those words up. This is manufactured and that’s why the president put out a truth saying it was a complete lie.”

 U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick testifies during a subcommittee hearing with the Senate Committee on Appropriations in Washington, DC, on April 22, 2026.

‘Freudian slip’

Speaking at a manufacturing facility in Maine last month, U.S. Vice-President JD Vance referred to Canada as a state, echoing Donald Trump’s repeated references to the “51st state,” before claiming it was a Freudian slip.

“Canada and China have been the two worst countries when it comes to trade policy anywhere in the world,” he began, adding: “I would expect that from China. I would not expect that from Canada. We have to remember, Canada is a state — sorry, Freudian slip. That was actually an accident — Canada is a country.”

The remark drew laughter and scattered applause from the crowd. He continued: “Canada is a country that has underinvested in its military, that quite literally would get invaded by a foreign country were it not for the umbrella of protection provided by the United States of America.”

 U.S. Vice President JD Vance delivers remarks at CompoTech, a defense technology and advanced manufacturing company, in Brewer, Maine on August 24, 2026.

Eagle vs. goose

A social media post form the White House last week showed a bald eagle — long a symbol of America — in a fight with a Canadian goose. Although the eagle appears victorious, it was soon revealed that the picture came from a series shot by Canadian photographer Mervyn Sequeira a year and a half ago in Burlington, Ont. — and that the goose survived the attack while the eagle eventually flew off without a meal.

 The Mervyn Sequeira photograph posted on X by the White House.

‘Flunkies,’ ‘Clowns’ and ‘The worst’

Donald Trump hasn’t minced words when it comes to Canada, referring to our officials and leaders as “nasty people,” and specifically to Ontario premier Doug Ford as “the less charismatic, intelligent, and overall unimpressive brother of the late, great, Rob Ford.” (Rob Ford, former mayor of Toronto, died of cancer in 2016.)

Trump has also called Ford the “Flunky” of “Governor” Mark Carney, and referred to Canada as “one of the worst abusers” in the world of trade.

“They’ve been ripping us off for decades, and it’s going to stop,” he posted to social media. “This should have happened long ago with other Presidents, just as stopping Iran should have happened long ago. They want to be treated like a State, but they aren’t one. I deal with the Leadership of many Countries, but I find Canada to be the worst.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks to journalists outside his office the day after the Liberal's won three byelections.

Prime Minister Mark Carney was asked if he plans to lead the Liberals into the next federal election during a brief scrum outside the prime minister’s office in Ottawa Tuesday morning.

Notably, in the more than 100 words of Carney’s response, the word “yes” didn’t appear.

Carney was speaking to reporters after the federal Liberals reclaimed a majority in the House of Commons Monday with three byelection victories , bringing them back to 173 seats.

Here’s how he responded to the question about his future:

“I’ve just led the party into two byelections, and I’m very pleased that we won all three. (Editor’s note: three byelections were held Monday night.)

“I’m pleased to have a remarkable caucus. I view my role as my colleagues do: to do our job. We’re sent to Ottawa for a reason. We’re sent here at a critical time.

“I’m blessed by having three great colleagues who are going to be coming in from very different backgrounds, very different ridings, and we’re going to stand up for Canada.

“We’re going to build this country. We’re going to help unite this country and we’re going to build it for all.

“And I’m going to focus on that and that’s my that’s my concern.”

Dropping the writ and calling a snap election is at Carney’s discretion. The next general federal election in Canada must be held by Oct. 15, 2029 — the third Monday in October of the fourth calendar year since the last polling day, per the Elections Canada Act.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks to journalists outside his office in Ottawa on Sept. 1, 2026.

OTTAWA — The conflict between the Canadian and U.S. government has evolved from a trade war into a war of words.

After days of strident comments and insults towards Canada from multiple U.S. government officials, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Americans should “stop doing memes, stop throwing shade, stop trying to be tough, and start being serious.”

The prime minister was reacting Tuesday to various insults and online memes lobbed at Canada from Trump government officials as the dust settles on the failed bilateral negotiations and renewed trade war between both countries.

For example, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Monday laughed off a suggestion that Canada and the U.S. were at war while jokingly questioning if Canada would attack the U.S. with its fleet of defunct submarines that were once part of a West Edmonton Mall tourist attraction.

“We’re not at war with Canada. How are we going to be at war with Canada? What, are they going to take their two submarines from the Edmonton mall and sic them on us?”

Then on Monday evening, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared a picture of two women from the Cadet Training Centre in Vernon, B.C., with a demeaning comment about their appearance in an effort to belittle the Canadian Armed Forces.

Carney took particular offence to that post on Tuesday morning.

“It’s beneath their office,” Carney grumbled to reporters in Ottawa Tuesday.

More generally, Carney said the jokes, memes and “shade” thrown by U.S. officials towards Canada are “not constructive” and are not helping mend the ailing trade relationship after a series of tit-for-tat tariffs announced in recent weeks.

“But that’s their democracy,” Carney shrugged.

The prime minister spoke to reporters within hours of the Liberals sweeping three byelections in ridings in B.C., Ontario and Quebec, scoring over 50 per cent of the vote in each. Two of the ridings were already held by the Liberals, whereas the Quebec riding was won over from Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives.

Carney celebrated his candidates’ handy wins, though he was far more evasive when asked if he would lead this party into the next election.

“I’m pleased to have a remarkable caucus. You know, I my view my role, as my colleagues do, to do our job… and we’re going to stand up for Canada, we’re going to build this country, we’re going to help unite this country and we’re going to stand up for Canada,” he said.

“I’m going to focus on that, that’s my concern,” he added without ever confirming that he would stay on as Liberal leader next election.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.