LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Canadian energy prices have risen moderately, largely due to inflation and infrastructure upgrades.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — As temperatures drop and golden leaves cover lawns throughout Canada and the northern United States, residents are starting to turn on the heat. Earlier this year, amid President Donald Trump’s trade war, it appeared that energy tariffs might be used as a weapon, potentially driving up electricity prices for U.S. and Canadian consumers alike.

Canadian energy prices have risen moderately, largely due to inflation and infrastructure upgrades. But with autumn in full swing and winter looming, Americans are being warned that electricity prices are set to soar, and not for the usual reasons like oil or natural gas spikes. Instead, a combination of factors — everything from weather and rising demand to climate change policies and tariffs — is contributing to the increases, and experts see no relief in sight.

Electricity rates in the U.S. are up 9.7 per cent since January and, according to the National Energy Assistance Directors Association (NEADA) in Washington, D.C., home heating prices over the coming months are set to rise by 7.6 per cent compared to last year.

“That’s a lot,” said Mark Wolfe, executive director of NEADA. “We’re not used to rates going up like that,” he added, emphasizing that electricity prices tend to go up and rarely go down.

Some regions have been hit harder than others. In 10 states — Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota — plus the District of Columbia, for example, electric bills rose more than 15 per cent between July 2024 and July 2025, according to NEADA.

While the entire country is expected to feel the pinch this winter, the highest price increases, according to Gary Hufbauer, a non-resident senior fellow at the D.C.-based Peterson Institute for International Economics, will hit the Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, New England, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

In New England, things are already tough. “We have the highest residential electricity rates in the nation, except for Alaska and Hawaii,” John Howat, senior energy analyst at the Boston-based National Consumer Law Center, explained. “Our electricity rates are 41 per cent higher than the national average.”

Electricity is the biggest driver of rising bills, while natural gas prices remain flat and propane and heating oil costs are expected to fall, Howat said. However, natural gas prices are known to fluctuate.

The average American family spends three or four per cent of their income on home energy, but that goes up to eight or nine per cent for low-income families. As a result, past-due balances are on the rise, and this comes at a time when assistance programmes are at risk as long as the U.S. government remains shut down.

“I can tell you, as a consumer advocate, that home energy expenditures – it’s sort of like the new price of eggs. People are really struggling,” Howat said.

So what’s causing the price surge? Many things, experts say, but one of the main drivers is electricity demand. “We’re seeing rising electric prices and rising demand,” said Wolfe.

The International Energy Agency has said U.S. electricity demand hit a new record in 2024 at about 2 per cent, and that rate of growth is expected to continue through 2027.

Beyond demand, which also demands upgrades, grid rebuilding and modernization efforts are putting upward pressure on costs.

“As far as I can tell, the electricity price increases are all ultimately climate-related,” said Howat, pointing to capital investment costs in states committed to climate change policies and costs for upgrading to ensure resiliency in states less committed to mitigating climate change.

“Utilities had neglected the reliability of the grid for a long time,” said Wolfe. “Now it’s catching up.”

In Massachusetts, for example, a lot of the price rise “is primarily to fund climate change activities,” said Michael Ferrante, president of the Massachusetts Energy Marketers Association. “We have a very expensive equipment upgrade programme called Mass Save … and consumers pay for that.”

Unsurprisingly, experts point fingers at AI data centres for causing much of the unexpected demand on the grid, and they note that debates continue over how much of the price burden these facilities should bear.

“Data centres are not paying their fair share of the costs, but states want to attract them — they’re economic development engines,” said Wolfe. “That’s the tension we’re hearing.”

Weather, of course, is also a top factor — the colder the winter, the higher the bills.

But trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada are also having an impact, albeit a less direct one.

“Hydroelectric tariffs are not helping matters,” said Howat, referring to the 10 per cent tariff on Canadian hydro. In New England, over five per cent of the resource need is met through Canadian hydro, and that can jump to over 10 per cent during peak winter periods. “With the tariffs, that can only put upward pressure on prices,” he added.

Tariffs on crude oil and natural gas are notably mitigated by compliance with CUSMA, but there are other tariffs having an impact on the U.S. electricity grid.

Imported energy equipment, including power plant components, steel, copper, and aluminum, faces high tariffs ranging from 25 to 50 per cent, and they are critical components for all the infrastructural upgrades and expansions.

“I don’t think (the tariffs have) had much effect yet,” said Hufbauer, “but they certainly will in time because it really boosted the price of these key ingredients of your electricity infrastructure.”

Overall, the picture for affordable U.S. energy is bleak.

“Electricity is becoming less and less affordable in the United States,” Wolfe warned. “We should view last year’s data as a wake-up call.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Miles of unused pipe, prepared for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, sit in a lot on October 14, 2014 outside Gascoyne, North Dakota.

OTTAWA — Federal Energy Minister Tim Hodgson says Canada is not focused on any one route when it comes to sending more energy into the United States, but stands ready to do “whatever we can” to help with a possible revival of the Keystone XL pipeline.

While trade talks with the U.S. have stalled over Trump’s apparent ire about anti-tariff ads run by Ontario, Prime Minister Mark Carney, during his most recent visit to Washington, raised the defunct pipeline during a meeting with the president as part of a strategy to secure relief from U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum.

Hodgson said the cross-border pipeline, which proposed carrying oil from Hardisty, Alta., to Nebraska, remains fully permitted on the Canadian side, should it run along the same route.

“The pipe is in the ground for a significant portion of that route. The Americans have to decide what they want to do on their side of the border,” the minister told National Post in a wide-ranging interview.

“We have said if it’s part of a bigger solution, we’re open to facilitating.”

Citing the negotiations, Hodgson declined to provide specifics on what steps Canada could take, including when it comes to putting taxpayer money towards it, only saying “there are always things that we can do to make it easier.”

“If we have a bigger solution, we will do whatever we can to help them with what they need.”

“We have indicated to the Americans, as part of a broader solution for the challenges, that we are open to sharing more of our energy with the Americans. We aren’t hung up on any one particular route,” adding that if the U.S. wants to talk about Keystone XL, Canada was open to the idea.

Other options Canada could explore when it comes to sending more energy south of the border include boosting electricity exports and uranium exports, the latter of which is used to power American nuclear reactors, with Canada serving as its biggest foreign supplier, according to Natural Resources Canada.

Critical minerals are also high on Trump’s list, with his administration recently taking equity stakes in two Canadian companies.

South Bow Corp., which owns the existing Keystone network, told The Canadian Press in a statement earlier this month that it would look for ways to “leverage our existing corridor” and was supportive of efforts to transport more Canadian crude oil.

Back in February, the operator initially said it had “moved on” from the Keystone XL pipeline, after Trump called in a Truth Social post for the project to be built “NOW.”

The long and troubled project, formally submitted back in 2008, has undergone two cancellations, first by former president Barack Obama, whose administration rejected it in 2015, and then again by former president Joe Biden, who revoked its permit on his first day in office in 2021, after Trump tried to revive it during his first term in office.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said on Monday she was encouraged that during Carney’s most recent trip to Washington, it appeared that trade talks included “an energy pipeline that would be a replacement for Keystone,” as part of an effort of Canada “leveraging” the U.S’s demand for energy to gain reprieve on 50 per cent steel and aluminum tariffs.

Asked if energy was indeed leverage, Hodgson struck a softer tone.

“The United States uses 20 million barrels of oil a day. They produce 12 (million),” he said. “I make an observation.”

Hodgson is set to meet later this week with U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright as part of a meeting of G7 energy and environment ministers, which Canada is set to host in Toronto.

The minister said the pair would continue to look for “shared interests” when it comes to the issue of energy security and suggested his upcoming discussions were separate from the issue of the terminated trade talks between Canada and the U.S.

Carney is currently in Asia and has said Canada remains ready to resume negotiations, adding both countries were close to reaching one when Trump pulled the plug.

“I believe energy security is part of a bigger conversation,” Hodgson said.

“I think we have all learned working with the current administration is never a straight line. It’s sort of their negotiating style, and I’m confident we’ll get there.”

The minister defended Canada’s offer of sending more energy to the U.S. after a year of widespread concern from political and business leaders about an over-reliance on the U.S. by saying it was combined with efforts to diversify Canada’s markets.

“We can grow our relationship with the U.S. No one’s suggesting we don’t want to have a relationship with the U.S. We want it on a fair basis,” Hodgson said.

Critical minerals were set to be a main topic of discussion at the G7 energy ministers meeting, building on the Critical Minerals Production Alliance that Carney introduced as the G7 leaders’ summit earlier this year, to strengthen countries’ critical minerals supply chains.

Hodgson said he expects to make “a number of announcements” that show Canada intends to be a leader of the effort.

With files from The Canadian Press

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Doug Ford said the Prime Minister Mark Carney and his chief of staff watched an Ontario anti-tariff ad featuring Ronald Reagan before it was aired.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford said Monday that Prime Minister Mark Carney, along with his chief of staff, watched the province’s anti-tariff television ad featuring Ronald Reagan before it first aired and later drew the retributive ire of U.S. President Donald Trump.

“They both saw it and we moved forward on it,” the Ontario premier told reporters at Queen’s Park, where he defended the quotes from the late former U.S. president that were use in the 60- and 30-second versions of the ad.

“We achieved our goal. As we say, mission accomplished, it was done. They’re talking about it in the U.S. and they weren’t talking about it before I put the ad on. So I’m glad Ronald Reagan was a free trader.”

The goal, he said, was to bring attention to the absence of certain Ontario sectors, chiefly its auto sector, from ongoing Canada-U.S. trade negotiations. The others at risk in a trade deal that favours the U.S., he said, are the steel, manufacturing and life science industries.

“My intention was never to poke the president in the eye,” Ford said. “My intention was to inform the American people.”

At

a separate press conference

Monday, when asked if the federal government was kept abreast of plans for the ad, Ontario Minister of Finance Peter Bethlenfalvy said, “sure, there was lots of conversations between the prime minister and Premier Ford.”

Last Thursday night, Trump labelled the $75-million ad campaign “fake” in a Truth Social post and said “all trade negotiations with Canada are hereby terminated.”

After speaking with Carney on Friday,

Ford posted on X

that the commercial — which had already been airing in the U.S.

since Oct. 14,

including during Major League Baseball playoff broadcasts — would be pulled from U.S. stations, but not until it aired during the first two games of the World Series.

Before Game 2 on Saturday evening, Trump announced an additional 10 per cent tariff on Canada “over and above what they are paying now.” When asked by reporters on Monday, Trump did not say when the increase would take effect.

Trump said Monday he doesn’t plan on meeting with Carney “for a while.”

“I don’t care whether it’s provincial or Canada itself. They all knew exactly what the AD was. The prime minister knew. Everybody knew. The prime minister knew what the ad was,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, according to the

Toronto Star.

Carney, who’s in Malaysia for the Association of Southeast Nations meetings,

said

“very detailed, very specific, very comprehensive” discussions with the U.S. were ongoing “up until the point of those ads running.”

Canada, he said, stands by the progress made and is ready to resume talks.

Asked if he feels responsible for the latest levy on Canada, Ford noted that Trump has yet to act on his threat.

“He’s threatened a lot, but we’ll see what comes down the road,” he said Monday.

As for the ads’ effectiveness, during question period in the legislature on Monday, where Ford was also called on to defend them, he said they generated “$300 to $400 million of earned media” and “over one billion impressions” globally.

“Do you know why President Trump’s so upset right now? Because it was effective. It was working. It woke up the whole country,” Ford told reporters outside the legislature.

He also noted they would only spend a “fraction” of the anticipated $75 million because the now-paused ad buy had been scheduled to run through February.

Ford also said Carney hasn’t asked him to stop speaking out against Trump. He feels all premiers play a role and said the time has where they can “get a little more communication off the federal government and listen to the concerns of each province.”

Whereas Manitoba’s Wab Kinew and B.C.’s David Eby have supported Ontario’s initiative, with the latter promising the province’s own ads in a battle against U.S. tariffs on softwood lumber, Alberta’s Danielle Smith said on Monday that she was glad to see the ads pulled.

But she also lamented that it seemed like talks were now “back at square zero.”

“I think that we all just have to be mindful that the U.S. administration is unpredictable, and I think that the relationship building that the prime minister is doing should continue,” she told reporters. “I wish him well on that, and I hope that very soon we’ll be able to get back to where we started, so that we can move forward on some agreements.”

For his part, Ford said earlier Monday that Smith had no appreciation for the ads because Alberta’s key sector wasn’t in danger from American protectionism.

“She has a commodity called oil that Americans need and want, so she’s going to be fine,” he stated.

Meanwhile, Ford is also unbothered by threats of legal action from the Ronald Reagan Foundation, which said last week that it was exploring options regarding unauthorized use and editing of its namesake’s 1987 radio address. It also alleged the ad “misrepresents” Reagan’s message.

Ford countered, saying the government executed its due diligence to ensure the content was in the open domain, making it free for such use.

“They can do whatever they want, but they’re not going to win because it’s very clear,” he said. “They know it, I know it.”

Ford said there are no plans for further tariff or trade-related ad campaigns at this time.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Los Angeles Dodgers manager Dave Roberts speaks during a news conference ahead of Game 3 of baseball's World Series Sunday, Oct. 26, 2025, in Los Angeles.

Canada is “not trying to sabotage” the Los Angeles Dodgers, the baseball team’s manager said after he implied that he was not certain if there was “intent” behind a delay that occurred while he was travelling from Toronto to the U.S.

Dave Roberts made his original remarks on Sunday evening, as his team prepared for Game 3 of the World Series.

A reporter said his own connecting flight was delayed and asked if Roberts had his own “travel story.” The manager was late to the team’s workout at Dodger Stadium that night, the Associated Press reported.

“You know, I don’t want to get too far into it. I just arrived about 30 minutes ago. There were some delays. I don’t know if there was intent or not…the international stuff was a bear,” he said. “But we made it.”

Roberts has since walked back his comments. “Canada is not trying to sabotage the Dodgers. I know that. It was just a long day,” he said,

The Athletic reported

.

He elaborated further, saying that he knew the prime minister was not “worried about calling airline security or the FAA to make sure that they delay us.” He said it had been a long process at the airport and “a lot of it had to do with our big,

huge, four-plane travel party.”

“It’s just a part of international travel. And passports. Airline security. That’s part of it,” he said.

There were around 400 people who made up the Dodgers travel party, according to The Athletic. They were split up into groups on different aircrafts, with the players staying together. The players left for Los Angeles after Saturday’s game in Toronto. Roberts did not leave Toronto until Sunday morning, the publication said.

The Dodgers and the Toronto Blue Jays are currently tied at 1-1. The video clip of Roberts posted online by TSN has been viewed nearly 95,000 times on X as of Monday afternoon.

Game 3 of the 2025 World Series takes place in Los Angeles on Monday night.


Tim Hodgson, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources.

OTTAWA — Federal Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson says the question of whether there is a business case for a new bitumen pipeline in Canada will be up to the private sector to decide.

He also suggests the question of whether the country can, in fact, build a new oil pipeline to be an “overfocusing” on a “hypothetical.”

“I think Canada can build many things,” Hodgson told National Post in a wide-ranging interview on Monday.

“The over-focusing on what right now is hypothetical… What I want to do is focus on when real proponents bring real things forward. We will help them get them done.”

The minister’s comments come as Alberta Premier Danielle Smith seeks to have Prime Minister Mark Carney include her yet-to-be-submitted proposal to build a million-barrel-a-day bitumen pipeline from Edmonton to British Columbia’s northern coast as part of his next batch of nation-building projects to be considered for fast-tracked approvals, set to be unveiled by Nov. 16.

Smith has argued that doing so would be the “trigger” companies need to come forward as proponents and that listing her project as one of national interest would be the “signal” that Carney’s government was serious, but Hodgson said the process for being designated remains the same for all proponents.

“We fully understand it is the federal government’s ultimate jurisdiction for interprovincial pipelines,” Hodsgon said, adding that the federal government has said proponents must work with impacted jurisdictions and First Nations.

“It doesn’t matter whether it’s a wind project, a port, a railway, a road. We tell every proponent the exact same thing.”

British Columbia Premier David Eby has expressed concern over Alberta’s proposal, not only over how impacted coastal First Nations have so far voiced disapproval of a new pipeline, but with her ask that Carney’s government even consider it, saying it was not a “real project,” given how it lacks any private sector proponent or money.

Earlier this year, Carney ushered in a new approvals process through the Building Canada Act, which is at the core of how his government plans to get more projects off the ground and attract hundreds of billions in new private sector investment, as a way to bolster Canada’s economy, in the face of economic threats from U.S. President Donald Trump.

The first batch of nation-building projects under review by the Major Projects Office, which Carney’s government created to be a single point of contact for proponents looking to secure the necessary approvals and permits, includes an expansion to a natural gas liquefaction project in B.C., upgrades to the Port of Montreal, two mines, and a small modular nuclear reactor in Ontario.

While Carney’s government has expressed an interest in seeing a carbon capture and storage project known as “Pathways Plus” developed, Smith announced earlier this month that Alberta would be submitting a proposal to the Major Projects Office for the construction of a new bitumen pipeline to B.C’s northern coast.

She has said the goal is for a private sector proponent to eventually take on the project, with discussions underway with several companies. For now, Smith’s United Conservative Party government said it planned to put up $14 million of taxpayer money to complete technical work on the proposal, which the premier said would be submitted for consideration no later than May 2026.

Asked whether he believes there to a business case for building a new bitumen pipeline, Hodgson said, “that’s up for the private sector proponents to decide.”

“Alberta has some work to do,” Hodgson said.

“In the spring, you can expect the federal government to be at the table, working constructively with any proponent to see what is possible.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Drake showed up to Game 1 of the World Series in Toronto wearing a letterman jacket similar to Rob Ford's and emblazoned with the late former Toronto mayor's name.

Drake was among the 44,000-plus fans at Rogers Centre to witness the Toronto Blue Jays’ decisive Game 1 World Series win Friday night and he did so while paying homage to late former Toronto Mayor Rob Ford.

While watching the series opener against the Los Angeles Dodgers from a private box in right field, Drake, celebrating his 39th birthday, was photographed sporting a green and yellow letterman jacket for the Don Bosco Eagles high school football team.

Embroidered on the right side was the name R. Ford.

The jacket, while similar, is not the same one worn by Ford during his tenure as the school’s volunteer head coach throughout the 2000s and during his time in office as a councillor and later as a mayor, based on National Post archived images.

The rapper and hip-hop artist’s jacket has decorative embroidery on the sleeves, whereas Ford’s had a patch reading “Coach” on the right and the “02” on the left.

Drake’s also has a shorter collar and uses a more modern font for the name.

Some Facebook users wondered by Drake wasn’t wearing something to support the team on the field.

“What’s with that bloody jacket? It’s the Blue Jays game. You should have worn a Blue Jay shirt instead,”

Jude Aure wrote.

“Where’s your Blue Jays Jacket Drake… aren’t you a Canadian cheering for a Canadian Team,” Laura Hunter asked in reply to a Toronto Blue Jays post. 

On X, Barstool Sports host

Kevin Clandy wrote

, “No matter what you think of Drake, rocking the Rob Ford varsity jacket in Toronto for the WS is a legendary move.”

Ford coached the Eagles to a Toronto District Catholic Athletic Association title in 2012, but lost in the subsequent Metro Bowl final to decide GTA high school football supremacy.

His time at the Eagles’ helm ended unceremoniously the following year when he was fired by the board over allegations of egregiously improper behaviour, some of which was detailed in 300 pages of documents disclosed through a freedom of information request.

As reported by

National Post

at the time, Ford allegedly ordered teenage players to roll in goose scat, called them derogatory terms, challenged a co-coach to a fight and arrived at a practice for the 2012 Metro Bowl Championship Game while inebriated.

The allegations came at a fraught time in Ford’s personal and political life, brought on by substance abuse, to which he would later admit and begin treatment to resolve. He abandoned another run for mayor in 2014 after a stomach cancer diagnosis and won a seat on council instead.

Ford died on March 22, 2016, after chemotherapy was ineffective.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Donald Trump said October 23, 2025 he was ending trade talks with Canada over an anti-tariff advertising campaign, a sudden about-face soon after a cordial White House meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney.

Donald Trump says he would not meet with Mark Carney “for a while.” Meanwhile, the Canadian prime minister told reporters they were close to reaching a trade deal before the fallout caused by

an anti-tariff advertisement

.

Both leaders are in Asia this week. On Friday, the U.S. president spoke to reporters before travelling to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to attend the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) summit. He was asked if he would see Carney. “I don’t have any intention of it. No,” Trump

responded

.

On Monday, after the summit, while Trump was en route to Japan,

he reasserted

that he did not want to meet with Carney “for a while.”

“No, I’m very happy with the deal we have right now with Canada,” he said.

Trump

said

last week that negotiations with Canada were “terminated” after

an anti-tariff ad

 by the Ontario government featured the late former American president Ronald Reagan. Trump called the ad “fake” and said that tariffs are “very important to the national security and economy of the U.S.A.”

He then

said

that the U.S. would increase Canada’s tariffs by 10 per cent.

When asked by reporters on Monday, Trump did not say when the increase would take effect. “Ronald Reagan loved tariffs,” he said, adding that the former president used them “sparingly.”

“I was the biggest fan of Ronald Reagan, but on finance, on trade, it wasn’t his strong suit,” said Trump. He said that Canada has been “ripping off” the U.S. for “a long time.”

“One of the most difficult countries to deal with has been Canada. As much as I love Canada itself and the people of Canada, they’ve just had bad representatives,” he said.

Before trade talks disintegrated, Carney said there were “very detailed, very specific, very comprehensive” negotiations about steel, aluminum and energy “up until the point of those ads running,” he

said

on Monday in Malaysia.

“We stand ready to pick up on those discussions,” he said. “In any complicated high stakes negotiation, you can get unexpected twists and turns. You have to keep your cool during those situations. It doesn’t pay to be upset. Emotions don’t carry you very far. We had made progress … and we stand by the progress that had been made.”

Both of the leaders are expected to be in South Korea for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit this week.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


An office romance can accrue real-world benefits to the subordinate's salary.

It’s the stuff HR nightmares are made of. A trio of international researchers — based in British Columbia, California and Finland — has co-authored a paper that examines the links between romantic relationships with the boss and salary.

The bottom line: entering a relationship with a manager increases the subordinate’s earnings by an average of six per cent, while breaking up triggers an “abrupt” 18 per cent earnings decline. Breaking up isn’t just hard to do; it’s expensive.

What’s more, retention of other workers falls when romantic relationships take hold, and the more the subordinate gains in wages, the greater the effect on others.

The paper,

“The Impacts of Romantic Relationships With the Boss,”

was published this month by the National Bureau of Economic Research, which is based in Cambridge, Mass.

The researchers used data from Statistics Finland to analyze the employment administration statistics of Finnish office workers across a variety of sectors over 30 years, from 1988 to 2018. They studied salary information for 1,010 manager-subordinate workplace couples, as well as 728 instances of breakups.

It’s messy work, as the researchers freely admit. They identified the end of a relationship as the moment when the workplace couple stopped living together. But determining the beginning was more difficult.

Since most couples start dating before moving in together, they wrote, “we specify the two years before cohabitation as the ‘dating period’ and define the first year of this period as the event year of interest when estimating the impact of forming a relationship with a coworker.”

They also noted that they didn’t study colleagues who start a relationship but never move in together, nor those who were asked out by a coworker but declined. “Understanding the economic impact of these interactions would be interesting, but it is beyond the scope of our data,” they admitted.

The study looked mostly at female subordinates dating male managers, and found that these women saw a raw earnings growth of 22 per cent between the year before the dating period began and the year after, compared to 16 per cent growth over the same period among women in a control group.

On the flip side, the study found a “clear and stark pattern” for women who broke up with a workplace manager; their earnings fall by 18 per cent the year after the breakup. (In contrast, women broke up with a manager from a different workplace saw a slowdown in earnings growth but no drop in earnings.)

In terms of actual dollars — or in this case euros, since the couples were drawn from data in Finland — the boost in pay from dating a manager amounted to about 4,000 euros (about $6,500) while the hit from breaking up came to 6,000 euros (about $9,700). “These negative effects persist for at least four years after the breakup,” the researchers wrote.

They also tried to tease out whether the salary bump was due to favouritism or merit, the second possible if the subordinate was learning new skills or receiving mentoring from the new partner.

“While it is challenging to distinguish between the two, we provide some suggestive evidence,” they concluded. Among the findings — salary increases dropped dramatically if either partner moved to a new workplace while the relationship continued.

“Regardless of the cause,” they wrote, “higher earnings gains for those in relationships with a workplace manager could lead to resentment among coworkers who might (rightly or wrongly) view this as preferential treatment.”

Sure enough, workplaces that were home to manager/subordinate relationships saw a higher number of departing workers of both sexes. On average, a workplace with 71 employees would see an additional four departures.

“A potentially useful firm-level intervention based on our results is to prevent managers from having a direct influence on the career trajectories of their subordinate partners,” they wrote. “Our findings suggest that other employees dislike these relationships, particularly when they are associated with higher earnings for the subordinate partner. This means that regardless of whether the earnings gains obtained by subordinate partners are due to favouritism, the appearance of favouritism should be curtailed, as it can lead other workers to leave the firm.”

A more direct intervention is to ban such relationships altogether, as is the case with McDonald’s. The restaurant chain fired CEO Stephen Easterbrook in 2019 for a consensual relationship with a subordinate.

“Yet such bans come with their own costs,” they wrote. “If similar rules had existed at Microsoft or Sidley Austin Law Firm, Bill and Melinda Gates and Barack and Michelle Obama would have been barred from dating.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


The French flag flies over France's embassy in Bagdad, located in the Lawee family mansion.

Mayer Lawee, an 86-year-old Montreal man, remembers a childhood in his family’s elegant mansion, built by his father and uncle in the heart of Baghdad, Iraq’s quixotic capital, especially family weddings in the walled gardens with its tiered fountains, palm trees and statues.

The outdoor nuptials for his three sisters were like something from old Hollywood movies, but Mayer, the baby of the family, was always sent to bed early, which during the summer meant sleeping on the roof where the night air was cooler. It was hard to sleep knowing what he was missing.

“There’d be the wedding parties underneath me and I’d be throwing things on the party,” he says. “I was a bit mischievous.”

The family now has only Mayer Lawee’s memories, old photographs, and documents pulled from archives to show for the grand house built in the 1930s by two brothers, Ezra Lawee and Khedouri Lawee.

The family’s mansion is now at the heart of a contentious international dispute shining light on a dark past.

It currently houses the embassy of France in Iraq, for which Paris pays rent only to the Iraqi government, despite the property having been plucked from the Lawee family by Iraqi officials after they fled anti-Jewish pogroms in the 1950s, the family says.

After decades of quietly campaigning for compensation from France, descendants of the Lawee brothers, who resettled in Canada, have turned in frustration to the courts, filing a lawsuit in Paris against the French government.

“It’s really a very odd story,” said Philip Khazzam, a Montreal businessman who is the grandson of Ezra Lawee, and nephew of Mayer.

If not for contemporary history, the location of the house would sound magical. It stands near the bank of the winding Tigris River in the historically crucial region once called Mesopotamia, the cradle of civilization. Recent decades have reduced Baghdad to a synonym for conflict and chaos.

Before Iraq’s authoritarianism and pogroms, before Saddam Hussein’s wars, before the coalition bombings, insurgency, and civil war, there was a time of tranquility, including for the Jewish minority in the majority Muslim country.

Ezra Lawee, Mayer’s father, and Khedouri Lawee, both now dead, were born into a Jewish family in Iraq. As adults the brothers owned the General Motors distribution rights for much of the oil-rich region, making them wealthy enough to jointly buy neighbouring parcels of land in central Baghdad in 1935 and 1937.

There they erected a large mansion to house both of their growing families. It has a stately entrance of stone steps curving to a rounded portico of four columns topped by an ornate balcony.

Mayer, the youngest of the Lawee children — and the last family member to have lived in the home — was born in 1939, a year that also brought trouble. “We were a big family,” he said. “We used to play in the yard. The war was on so most of my activities were in the yard or inside the house.”

During the Second World War, pro-Nazi sentiment in Iraq brought trouble for the long-standing Jewish community, including a period of mass violence targeting Jews. Post-war, Iraq joined the Arab military coalition against Israel in 1948 after it was established as a Jewish homeland, making life harder for Iraqi Jews. There were discriminatory laws, public violence, executions, looting and religious repression.

 Mayer Lawee of Montreal shows images of his family’s mansion in Baghdad which was seized by the Iraqi government.

There was a mass exodus of Jews from Iraq to Israel from 1951 to 1952 in an international airlift operation, but the Lawees’s wealth gave them other options. They left Iraq on their own. One brother travelled to Egypt and the other to England before they reunited in New York and then resettled in Montreal in 1954. Trying to replicate their former life, they bought two adjacent houses and a GM dealership, Barnabe Motors.

The brothers became Canadian citizens in 1969, and their families flourished, some in Canada, others in the United States.

After the brothers left Baghdad, a caretaker watched over their property, Khazzam said. In 1964, the brothers leased it to the French government for use as a diplomatic post, according to old documents filed in court. The deal included the mansion, the caretaker’s home, two garages, and a walled garden with a greenhouse.

It was a suitably prestigious address for France, which had a significant presence, investment and influence in Iraq.

For a time, France paid rent to the Lawee brothers, documents show. The payments suddenly stopped in the 1970s. The family later learned that rather than paying the Lawees, France had agreed in 1978 to pay only the Iraqi government. That was the year Saddam Hussein became prime minister and was consolidating his authoritarian stranglehold on the country.

The Lawee brothers sent letters to government officials in Paris about the rent without any resolution, Khazzam said. Even after Hussein was defeated and executed, France continued to pay the Iraqi governments while ignoring the family.

In 2004, when France reopened its embassy after years of war, the tricolour flag of France was once again raised over the house the Lawees built. It caught the family’s attention.

They hired Lucien Bouchard, a lawyer and former premier of Quebec, to renew their campaign for answers. Bouchard wrote a letter to Dominique de Villepin, France’s minister of foreign affairs under president Jacques Chirac. At the time, de Villepin was best known for his speech to the United Nations opposing the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. Bouchard’s intervention went nowhere.

 The Lawee family, from left, Farha, Khedouri, Muzli, Naima, Ezra and young Mayer outside their Bagdad home.

“We all thought that it was lost, that we would never get it back,” said Khazzam. However, the family later learned the Lawee brothers were still listed in Iraqi records as the property’s owners.

As a new generation of his family looked at their history, they realized it was not only an issue of an old asset, he said.

“I realized that this is not just about a house, it’s about human rights. That was my motivating factor. It is hugely unfair. They are occupying our house,” Khazzam said. He thought of it in the context of works of art looted by the Nazis during the war, often from Jewish families, that are periodically repatriated.

“If you have art that’s stolen or a house that’s stolen, it’s the same thing,” Khazzam said. “It wasn’t a person or a company who stole it, it’s a country. And France was taking advantage of our misfortune and that’s not right. They’re a G7 country and they also stand up for human rights. So how are they doing this? It doesn’t make sense.”

The family tried again, this time hiring a lawyer in Paris.

Jean-Pierre Mignard is not just any lawyer. He is an establishment figure who was close to François Hollande, president of France for years until 2017. After Hollande stepped down, Mignard was an early supporter of Emmanuel Macron, who went on to become France’s president.

Mignard wrote to his government in 2021 with the flowing grace of a diplomatic entreaty, presenting France’s foreign affairs minister, Jean-Yves Le Drian, with details of the “very painful case,” the letter says, translated from French.

A month later, Le Drian wrote back. It sounded promising.

“The facts you have exposed caught my attention,” says Le Drian’s reply. His office researched the family’s claims and found the embassy had indeed rented the building from the Lawee family in 1964 and later had a replacement lease with the Iraqi government. He asked for documentation.

The family replied with copies of 22 documents, from the architectural drawings for the house when it was being built, photos from the 1930s, title deeds, lease contracts, birth certificates, the brothers’ Iraqi passports and their wills.

 Philip Khazzam: “I realized that this is not just about a house, it’s about human rights.”

Two months later, however, a new foreign affairs minister was appointed. Mignard started again, congratulating Catherine Colonna on her appointment and outlining the “quite sensitive dossier.”

The Lawee family “were robbed of their property,” he wrote, “when the regime of Mr. Saddam Hussein ordered the confiscation of all the property of Iraqi nationals of the Jewish faith.”

Iraq’s claim to the Lawee’s house, he wrote, had no legal basis and was “purely and simply a plunder.” He said an Iraqi law for “the dispossession of Jewish people from their properties in Iraq when they returned to Israel,” didn’t apply here; not only does it abuse international human rights but because the Lawees didn’t leave in the airlift program and didn’t settle in Israel.

“It creates a very difficult situation for France, which occupies Jewish property seized in violation of rules, values of our Republic, and international law,” he wrote.

Once again there seemed to be interest in settling the matter. The family figured they were owed about US$13 million in rent. They asked for repayment of their loss and then the family would sell the property to France.

Momentum, though, seemed only in words. Mignard’s further letters dropped the language of diplomats, sounding more like a debt collector.

“Apparently we did not understand each other well,” Mignard wrote in 2023. “This property is not the property of France. This property is also not the property of Iraq because it has been plundered and stolen. This building is the property of my clients and of them alone.”

He threatened that he and his clients might show up at the door of the Baghdad embassy and try to enter their house.

It is now a court battle. Friday was the deadline for both sides to submit their documentation to the administrative court in Paris.

Mignard told National Post they turned to the courts because decades of informal appeals have failed. He had even written to Macron about it.

“France refuses to acknowledge any responsibility, claiming that it is a decision made by the Iraqi government. This is false. France could at least continue to pay the rent, which would indicate that it is not complicit in the spoliation of Iraq,” Mignard said this week.

“We want France to be condemned, and we feel ashamed and sad because we are French lawyers and this is our country.”

 The Lawee family outside their Bagdad mansion.

A spokesman for France’s foreign affairs ministry wouldn’t answer questions about the Baghdad mansion, saying only: “We do not comment on ongoing legal proceedings.”

Macron’s office declined to say whether the president has stayed at the embassy in the past, but his director of communications, Edouard Lafourcade, said “no visit to the site by the President of the Republic is currently scheduled.”

Estimates of the value of the house and property fluctuate from a low of US$10 million to more than US$20 million.

Mayer Lawee said he would like to see money from his childhood home distributed among the brothers’ descendants. “They should all benefit.”

If Khazzam felt it was safe, he would love to see his ancestral home in person.

“If I could go tomorrow, I’d drop everything and go. That’s how bad I want to see and feel what it was like to walk the streets and be at the parks where my grandparents and parents lived.”

A trial is expected next year.

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | X:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


In era of 'soft assets,' Canada needs to reform digital strategy, BlackBerry founder Jim Balsillie told an Ottawa audience on Sunday night.

The modern digital era, a “new era of human commodification,” violates fundamental human rights, warned BlackBerry founder Jim Balsillie in a speech on Sunday evening.

“The data generated by our experiences, choices, and even our thoughts, are captured, processed, and traded as raw material for manipulative algorithms deployed for profit and power, all with catastrophic costs to society, including mental health crisis, democratic erosion, societal polarization, lost economic dynamism and misinformation to name a few,” said Balsillie, according to notes of Balsillie’s speech, obtained by National Post in advance of his talk.

In his remarks, made to the Ditchley Foundation’s conference in Ottawa, the Canadian tech entrepreneur argued that we’re now living in a new economy where “wealth, power and security” are obtained via soft assets — intellectual property and data/artificial intelligence — rather than hard, tangible assets.

“With the shift to a knowledge-based economy 35 years ago, companies and countries focused on strategically generating valuable IP assets, and more recently, to strategically controlling valuable data assets,” Balsillie’s notes say. “Wealth accrues to the owners who amass these two rent-generating assets.”

 Jim Balsillie says Canada needs to reform its digital strategy to create accrue assets.

Balsillie warned that Canada has no national data strategy and that there are only limited programs to build Canada’s IP assets, something, he said, which costs the country around $100 billion per year.

He argued that Canada needs to shift the way it thinks about innovation and make “a pivot to deliberate strategies that drive productivity, prosperity, and sovereignty in the 21st-century economy,” as Canada’s GDP is growing slowly compared to other countries, especially the United States.

“Because Canada missed the shift, we are seeing Canada’s standard of living in steady decline,” he warned, according to the notes.

Balsillie argued that Canada is spending $7.5 billion on research annually, but without a strategy to own and commercialize outcomes. One potential solution, he argued, is legislation to help Canada own its intellectual property. As one example, Balsillie says that Canada’s publicly funded research built the foundations of the artificial intelligence boom, but Canada is not on the list of top 100 patent holders globally.

“AI is transforming industries at scale in ways we haven’t seen since the rise of the internet,” Balsillie’s notes say.

There are structural forces that reshape the labour market. Globalization and offshoring or a data-driven economy that inspired gig work or the knowledge economy comprised of intangible assets, for example. But this also includes machine knowledge, which Balsillie identifies as a new “factor of production.”

In order to tackle the problems of rights violations and the languishing Canadian economy, Balsillie proposes a four-point plan, which he first articulated in a speech to the International Monetary Fund in 2018. Canada must protect national security in the digital era; ensure there’s fair access to the new means of production in the economy; enhance citizen welfare in the areas of “privacy, democracy, mental health, human rights”; and comply with all international agreements.

“Helping shape this in an integrated fashion is technically complex but also an opportunity and imperative for Canada,” said Balsillie on Sunday.

Balsillie, 64, was co-CEO of Waterloo-based Research in Motion, later renamed after its BlackBerry device. He founded the Balsillie School of International Affairs and the Centre for Canadian Innovation.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.