LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Mark Wiseman, the former chairman of Alberta Investment Management Corp.

The posh digs of the Canadian ambassador to the United States are set to welcome a new tenant early next year, following the recent announcement that Ambassador Kirsten Hillman – the first woman to serve as Canada’s top diplomat in Washington —

is stepping down

.

The ambassador told Prime Minister Mark Carney last spring of her intention to resign ahead of next summer’s joint review of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA).

Hillman was appointed in March 2020, having been made the acting ambassador the year before, and she served as the deputy ambassador before that. She led the first renegotiation of CUSMA during President Donald Trump’s first term and helped secure the release of the two Michaels — Kovrig and  Spavor — who were detained in China for alleged espionage for three years.

“The woman is a national hero …,” said Jamie Tronnes, executive director of the Center for North American Prosperity and Security, a project of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, of Hillman. “… We should give her the Order of Canada or a knighthood or something.”

Andrew Hale, a senior policy fellow at Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C., does not think this is a good time for changing ambassadors. He said Carney should beg Hillman to stay in place.

Given Hillman’s diplomatic experience and the unusual circumstances of Trump’s trade war, Hale said, “the Canadian Government should ask her to stay for the sake of continuity and the expertise she brings to the table.”

While an official announcement has not yet been made about Hillman’s successor, the post is widely rumoured to be going to Mark Wiseman, a friend of Carney’s. Reuters reported last week that Carney appointed Wiseman and that his cabinet had approved it.

Wiseman is a well-known financier who has served as chair of the Alberta Investment Management Corporation’s board of directors, as senior managing director of BlackRock, and as president and CEO of the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board. He was also appointed earlier this year to Carney’s advisory council on Canada-U.S. relations.

Wiseman has no history as a diplomat, and

some are concerned by his past critiques

of Ottawa’s long commitment to supply management, which regulates the production, pricing, and importation of agricultural goods.

Conservatives have also questioned

whether Wiseman is right for the role, given that he cofounded the Century Initiative, a group that controversially lobbies for raising Canada’s population to 100 million by 2100.

Given this year’s trade tensions and Trump’s talk of making Canada the 51st state, Ottawa’s ambassador to the U.S. will undoubtedly have plenty to do for the foreseeable future. So does the tenant swap in D.C.’s upscale Woodley Park neighbourhood signal a change of diplomatic tone from Canada? Or perhaps something about Carney’s likely approach to supply management in trade talks?

Tonal changes

Whatever led to Hillman’s decision, her resignation means a reset for Canadian diplomacy. Analysts are torn, however, over whether there will be a strong signal of directional change.

Former U.S. ambassador to Canada, David Cohen, said Hillman has been “spectacular” and will be a tough act to follow.

“She was an experienced, steady hand, a valuable adviser, a significant participant in all forms of negotiations between Canada and the U.S., but a particular strength in the trade context,” Cohen said.

Still, Cohen doesn’t see any new name signalling much to the White House.

“I don’t think the United States is going to take any major signalling from a change in Canada’s ambassador to the United States,” Cohen said.

As for how the changing of the guard could impact trade talks, Cohen was sanguine. He described the role as being “like the conductor of the orchestra,” and not as one of the lead musicians — in this case, trade experts. The ambassador is there, Cohen said, to bring people together.

 Kirsten Hillman, who will soon be stepping down as Canada’s ambassador to the U.S.. At least one analyst has suggested the Prime Minister Mark Carney should beg her to stay on.

One thing America will be looking at, he added, is the successor’s relationship with Carney.

“As long as there’s a real relationship there, or a story to be told as to why the person was selected, I think that person will be effective on day one as Canada’s ambassador to the United States.”

The fact that Wiseman comes from a business background — much like Carney — is something Cohen finds encouraging.

“It’s not an easy job, but I think somebody like Mark Wiseman will be able to step into that role in a very, very capable way,” he said, adding that “successful business people bring a valuable dimension to the diplomatic service.”

The one signal the change does make, Cohen said, is to tell the White House “this is a person who we should deal with personally and substantively, because this is a person who is close to the prime minister.”

Richard Shimooka, a senior fellow at the McDonald Laurier Institute, agrees that Wiseman’s relationship with Carney is key.

“Having the imprimatur of the prime minister, I think, is important, and that can help with potentially getting things through,” Shimooka said, noting that Wiseman’s financial background also helps.

Policy implications

Some fear that Wiseman, having written in an op-ed last year that the agricultural supply management system is hurting productivity, could undermine the quota protection system Quebec farmers enjoy.

“Looking to our agricultural sector, the sacred cow of supply management, through its import restrictions, production quotas and price controls, secures the market for a protected group of settled players, impeding innovation and keeping prices artificially high for Canadian consumers,” Wiseman wrote in spring 2024.

Adding fuel, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has warned Carney against appointing Wiseman, noting that the latter has a “contempt for Quebec.”

Trump has targeted supply management quotas, demanding more U.S. dairy access to the Canadian market. And while some are concerned that Wiseman at the helm of U.S.-Canada relations could mean a looming change, Carney said this week that he will save supply management.

“We’ve been clear about our approach to supply management. We continue to stand by that. We will continue to protect supply management,” he told the press on Thursday.

Tronnes, for one, is much more concerned by Wiseman’s Century Initiative involvement and its potential to rile Trump’s base.

“I am concerned that his Century Initiative involvement will be an issue for the MAGAsphere,” she said.

Yet as CUSMA looms, Carney’s ambassador pick signals business-savvy continuity over ideological politics. Ottawa’s not shifting tone — it seems to be doubling down on pragmatic defence.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Cameco CEO Tim Gitzel: “We think about (tariffs) every day. But, let me give you some numbers: The United States has 94 nuclear plants. They consume 50 million pounds of uranium per year and produce none. They need us.”

We’re nearing year-end, and there’s much doom and gloom. Canada’s economy is falling behind its OECD peers while projected equalization numbers show all provinces from Manitoba east on the receiving end of federal transfers next year.

A conversation with Tim Gitzel — CEO of Saskatoon-headquartered Cameco, the world’s largest publicly traded uranium company, valued at nearly US$40 billion — is a positive reminder of what’s working.

“We just work hard and stay humble and we work together and cooperate and we don’t look for handouts,” Tim shares. “We try and stay humble, because we’ve lived through the depression — I say that in the nuclear sense.”

What’s the nuclear depression? It’s the decade following the 2011 Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster in Japan, the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl.

“2007 to 2011, it was glory days,” he says, “everybody was building, we were producing, we were starting up new (uranium) mines, and then, bingo, March 11th, 2011, and the market went off the table. The price of uranium went from $73 US to $17… and we had all this oversupply.

“We went through 10 years, counting pencils,” he shares sombrely. “…We’re going to charge for coffee, because it was that tight. That made us really humble about our business.”

The stories told by this quiet-spoken, unassuming Saskatchewan-born CEO in his blue suit and tie almost sound too good to be true. Today, he’s now leading a vertically integrated nuclear company with uranium mines and projects in northern Saskatchewan, Wyoming, Nebraska, Kazakhstan and Australia. The company is the largest industrial employer of Indigenous people in Canada.

I detect a hint of fierceness in his tone; I heard the same, much amplified, in previous conversations with Saskatchewan’s premier, Scott Moe, talking of how he would pressure China and Ottawa to resolve market access for Canadian canola.

After a decade in the nuclear wilderness, Cameco now finds itself in the clean energy sweet spot. “In 2020, things were coming back around for nuclear,” he reports, “it was ‘climate change,’ ‘climate crisis,’ ‘climate catastrophe,’ ‘race to net zero,’ all of that was the language five years ago. And they said, ‘Well, what are we going to use for electric cars, electrification, decarbonization?’”

The nuclear renaissance, driven by AI data centres’ electricity demands and decarbonization, was further fuelled by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

“Then,” Tim explains, “it became energy security and national security.” Today, he reports, “there aren’t very many countries in the world that aren’t looking at the nuclear option, having some form of nuclear, whether it’s in the form of an SMR (small modular reactor) or large reactors.

“Here in Saskatchewan,” he continues, “we’re blessed with the largest high-grade (uranium) mines in the world. We have conversion facilities. We’re working on enrichment in the United States in Wilmington (North Carolina). We make fuel — fuel bundles, fuel rods —for the Candu fleet.”

And so, it was logical to say yes, Tim explains, when Bruce Flatt, CEO of Brookfield Asset Management, called him to ask if Cameco was interested in partnering with Brookfield Renewable to buy Westinghouse Electric Company, a major nuclear services provider. In a deal that closed in November 2023, Cameco acquired a 49 per cent stake for US$7.9 billion; Brookfield acquired a 51 per cent interest. (Incidentally, Prime Minister Mark Carney was the chair of Brookfield Asset Management when the deal with Westinghouse was struck.)

With operations on both sides of the Canada-U.S. border, Cameco has to figure out how to work with both governments. “October 28th, five weeks ago,” Tim shares, “we signed a big deal in the U.S. The U.S. government stepped up and put $80 billion on the table for new Westinghouse reactors in the U.S. You know, we’re just seeing AI and data centres and hyper scalers screaming for clean electricity, and everybody’s looking at each other and saying, ‘Yeah, we want to build, but who’s going to go first?’ And the administration down there just said, ‘OK, we’re going to kickstart this and really get it going.’

“That’s what we’re working on today, in fact this morning,” he reports, “putting that deal together. They want 10 reactors, 10 AP1000 Westinghouse reactors started by 2030. And so that’s a tall order in the nuclear business, and that’s just part of our business, so off we go.”

Back home, in Canada, Tim had a voice at the Canada-U.S. tariff committee put together by then-prime minister Justin Trudeau this year, he says, “when noise was coming over the border and we didn’t know how to react.

 Cameco Corp.’s head office in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.

“It was kind of interesting,” he explains, “because I think there were two people from west of Toronto — Rachel Notley (Alberta’s former NDP premier) and I were there.”

It was “a whole different movie” sitting in those meetings, Tim reports: “You’ve got Unifor’s president and automobile parts manufacturers and steel — they are getting crushed, they are feeling it, their people are leaving, they’re shutting down — and they come to me and say, ‘How’s it going?’ I say, ‘Well, you know, we’re just kind of keeping our heads down and doing our business and our products are CUSMA-compliant and so there’s no more tariffs on ours. So … I felt a little bit awkward.”

Tim understands why differences remain, even today, between otherwise like-minded provincial governments, and that there are fears Canada won’t be able to get its act together. Nuclear projects can be a way to collaborate, he suggests: New Brunswick has nuclear and is looking for more; Alberta is serious about small modular reactors; and Cameco supplies almost all the fuel to the 17 reactors operating in Ontario.

“I can tell you every province and country are looking to maximize the (local) supply chain,” he says, “the jobs and benefits and materials from their own jurisdiction.” If you look at a new nuclear plant, in Ontario for example, Tim estimates 60 per cent of a new plant would be cement and rebar, all locally supplied.

Tim’s experiences leading Cameco through the aftermath of the Fukushima accident make him sensitive to what’s going on around him. He’s on the board of the Mosaic Company, a potash miner also headquartered in Saskatchewan, and now evaluating what to do when the Trump administration threatens to dial up U.S. tariffs on fertilizer.

“We think about it (tariffs) every day,” he concludes. “But, let me give you some numbers: The United States has 94 nuclear plants. They consume 50 million pounds of uranium per year and produce none. They need us.” Potash is in the same situation, he suggests. The U.S. needs what Canada can supply.

These are sunny thoughts as we head into the new year.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Ryan Coulson and Rebecca Bordeiasu's two chihuahua mixes, ready for travel.

A husband and wife travelling from British Columbia to Toronto for the holidays say they were prevented from boarding a Flair Airlines flight when they showed up at the gate with two dogs and their 10-month-old daughter.

Ryan Coulson, an app developer, and Rebecca Bordeiasu, a grade-school teacher, booked their flight on Nov. 3 for a Dec. 12 departure from Abbotsford Airport, near their home in Langley, B.C. Their itinerary, shared with National Post, shows two adult passengers, an infant, and two pets in the cabin.

But they say that when they arrived at the gate for the flight, they were told they couldn’t board the aircraft.

“We were told, without warning, that Flair had implemented a new internal policy on November 20 stating that a passenger cannot fly with both a dog and an infant,” Coulson said in an email to National Post. “We were never notified of this change, and there is no mention of this rule anywhere in Flair’s published policies, domestic tariff, or pet-travel webpage. In fact, Flair’s website still allows passengers to book a flight with both an infant and a dog.”

Bordeiasu joked: “The lady was almost trying to make us choose between our dog and our baby.”

National Post viewed the earlier version of the airline’s pet-travel page, which has

since been amended

and now says: “Each adult may travel with either one infant or one pet. Transport Canada regulations require that if an infant and a pet are travelling together, each must be accompanied by a separate adult.”

A Flair spokesperson confirmed the change, telling National Post: “We updated the wording on our website on December 17 to improve clarity for customers, but the policy itself did not change.”

They added: “The rule in question is longstanding and comes directly from Transport Canada approved manuals for this aircraft type.”

However, a spokesperson at Transport Canada told National Post: “There are no Transport Canada requirements related to passengers travelling with both infants and pets.” They added: “Individual airlines may have policies or restrictions for passengers transporting animals while also travelling with infants. It is therefore recommended that travellers contact their airline well in advance to inquire about their specific situation.”

Tested on Dec. 19, Flair’s website chatbot was asked: “Can I bring an infant and a dog on the flight with me?” It replied: “Yes, you can bring an infant and a dog on the flight with you, but they must meet certain requirements.”

Bordeiasu said that, on Sept. 15, she had made the same flight, minus one dog and her husband, with Flair.

“I did this exact situation, with a dog and an infant,” she said. “I flew alone, I had a dog at my feet, my infant in my lap, with Flair. And it was not a problem. Now this rule has just been added. And personally I think, what’s the point of this rule? It’s clearly not safety because other airlines are allowing it, and they’ve allowed it for so long.”

Those other airlines, she said, include Westjet and Air Canada. Unable to fly with Flair, the couple booked a flight through Air Canada for several days later, and all five passengers — two adults, one infant and two dogs — arrived in Toronto on the same flight.

“They were stellar on the Air Canada flight; no one knew they were there,” said Bordeiasu of her dogs, which are both tiny chihuahua mixes and can be stowed under the seats. “Me and my husband, we each wear a backpack. They’ve got everything they need.”

She is relieved to have made it to her family in Toronto in time for Christmas, and not to have lost much of an extended stay that lasts until Jan. 15.

“This is my daughter’s first Christmas,” she said. “If we’d booked the 23rd of December, I would have been more livid than I am now.”

Gábor Lukács, founder of the organization

Air Passenger Rights

, told National Post: “Sadly, an airline citing a non-existent Transport Canada rule is not unheard of. It appears that the airline had no legal basis to refuse the passengers transportation.”

He added: “The airline should compensate the passengers for their expenses plus the inconvenience experienced. If the airline refuses to pay, the passengers should take the airline to small claims court.”

The couple says Flair offered to reimburse the cost of their flight but did not offer any further compensation, and that they are in touch with a lawyer.

Lukács said his organization is

lobbying the government

to broaden the definition of “denial of boarding” and provide additional rights for passengers in these types of situations.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Doctors are reporting emergency departments

Matthew Miller recently had the “very unpleasant experience” of getting infected with influenza A. “Oddly enough, as someone who has spent their whole life studying flu, this was the first time that I know for sure it was a flu infection by virtue of a diagnostic test,” said Miller, who holds a Canada Research Chair in viral pandemics at McMaster University in Hamilton.

Miller got infected two days post-abdominal surgery. “Coughing after having abdominal surgery is no good to begin with. On top of that, I was really non-functional.”

He experienced fever, muscle aches. “I didn’t have energy to do even simple things, like email.”

Because the rapid response test he had could only determine if it was influenza A or B, via nose and throat swabs, Miller doesn’t know for certain that he was hit with the mutated strain of influenza A H3N2 called subclade K, which some have dubbed with the unscientific term “super flu.” But it’s likely, given the proportion of infections caused by that virus, now the dominant strain in a flu season that has hit early and hard.

F
lu activity for the week ending Dec. 13 was “high and increasing,” according to the Public Health Agency of Canada’s
most recent report
. Overall, 27.7 percent of tests were positive, “similar to the highest value recorded in the past three seasons.” (The percentage of tests positive for COVID was stable. Positive tests for RSV — respiratory syncytial virus — were increasing slowly but below expected levels.)
 

Doctors are reporting emergency departments “rammed with flu cases” and the rate of weekly flu-related hospitalizations is increasing rapidly, the federal health agency reported, with the highest rates in adults 65 and older and children aged four and under.
 

Miller is a big believer in balanced messaging. “I think this year has posed some unique challenges,” he said, partly due to an earlier-than-normal start and a mismatch with this year’s flu vaccine.
 

How worrisome is it? The National Post spoke with Miller, scientific director of the Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, and 
Dr. Jesse Papenburg, a pediatric infectious diseases specialist at the Montreal Children’s Hospital, to break things down. The interviews have been edited for clarity and brevity.
 

What is so different about subclade K and is it as bad as some people are making it sound?
 

Papenburg: We won’t know for sure until we hit the peak and then we’ll be able to better assess the impact of the season. (He expects the season will peak around New Year’s Day.) But there are a few things that do distinguish this season. It started relatively early and that did mean that there were some people who intended to get vaccinated but just hadn’t been able to get around to it. It’s remarkable that, even though the influenza seasons tend to have a steeple-shaped epidemic curve, this one is very sharp. Rates have been rising quite precipitously these past few weeks. What is also remarkable is how hard the school-age group has been hit in terms of attack rates, or the number of infections. In Quebec and Ontario, school-aged kids have a roughly 60 per cent (test) positivity right now. Overall, at the peak of influenza season, it’s usually somewhere between 25 and 40 per cent.”
 

Miller: Certainly, in Ontario the flu season has been earlier than we often see by about a month or so. In general, H3N2 tends to cause more severe infections. Often in the years where H3N2 is dominant, which appears to be the case this year, we do see more severe cases, more hospitalizations. And those, often, tend to be more common in elderly populations, because they tend to be at high risk for severe illness all the time. There have been a lot of reports of really busy children’s hospitals. Unlike COVID-19, children are at higher risk of flu. Especially children between birth and four years old. They can be at very high risk of severe flu infections.
 

What gives this variant a “transmission fitness advantage”?
 

Miller: The mutations in this particular virus are mutations at sites where our antibodies tend to recognize the virus. When our antibodies (from past infections or vaccines) have a harder time recognizing the virus, the virus has an easier time replicating in our bodies. There’s more of it in our bodies and then, as a result, the more you are able to transmit the virus when you talk or cough or sneeze — all the things that shoot the virus into the air or immobilize it on surfaces, which are the main ways we get infected with flu.

Papenburg: This subclade is substantially different from what it has evolved from. And, unfortunately, there was evolution from the time that the WHO (World Health Organization) had to make recommendations for what strains should be included in the vaccine. The choices need to be made in February to give vaccine manufacturers sufficient time to produce and distribute millions upon millions of vaccine doses to the Northern Hemisphere. (Canadian researchers 
were the first to report
 that a new variant with “immune escape potential” emerged at the tail end of the Southern Hemisphere’s flu season.) For the genetic analyses, we suspected this change would lead to the virus evading not just immunity produced by the vaccine, but it also makes the virus quite different from the H3N2 viruses that have circulated recently. This evolution is partly one of the reasons we see such high levels of transmission.
 

Is it any more virulent? Does it cause the same illness and symptoms?
 

Miller: There’s nothing to suggest that the illness is inherently different. I’m not aware of any data at this point to suggest that the overall severity on the population level is massively different from what we see in other H3N2-dominated years.
 

Papenburg: The proportion requiring hospitalization remains the same. But it’s also a numbers game: Due to the high number of infections, I expect that we’re going to see a lot more hospitalizations to come.
 

Is it still worth getting a flu shot?
 

Papenburg: Absolutely it’s worth it, and it’s not too late. We don’t yet know how well the flu shot will work in the field. We suspect it’s not going to be as good as we’d like. But there is one study out of the UK — they had a very early season so they were able to accrue cases to do a very early analysis — and they reported the vaccine was 60 to 70 per cent effective in children at reducing the risk of emergency department visits or hospitalizations. In adults, it was 30 to 40 per cent effective. My point here is there’s not zero protection. That is for sure. The vaccine does protect. People who are at higher risk of complications, if you reduce your risk by 30 per cent, that’s still a third less chance of something very bad happening to you.”
 

Miller: My colleague Mark Loeb and I published a paper this year where we specifically looked to see whether, in cases where people got a flu shot but got infected anyway, does the shot offer any benefits relative to someone who gets infected and didn’t have the flu shot. We looked at every paper that’s ever been published on this topic and, very reassuringly, it’s extraordinarily consistent: there is a big reduction in what we would consider severe outcomes, things like hospitalizations or ICU admissions or death in cases where people still get infected even after getting the flu shot. Even in years where there is a (vaccine) mismatch, there’s still significant reductions in the severity of illness that happens.
 

How do you know if it’s the flu, COVID or a cold?
 

Miller: Fever is the big thing with flu that people underestimate. As soon as your body temperature elevates even a couple of degrees, it really impacts how well you can function, and that is very different from other common cold-type viral infections that circulate this time of year.
 

Papenburg: The classic symptoms of influenza are sudden onset high fever, usually with a cough. You can have sore throat and muscle aches and fatigue. COVID can also cause that, but there is so much more flu right now than anything else. If you have that influenza-like illness, that constellation of fever, sore throat, cough and fatigue and muscle aches it’s very likely you have the flu.
 

When do people need to seek medical attention?
 

Papenburg: That will vary a bit by age and how vulnerable you are, medically. So, babies during their first three months of life, any fever can be a serious infection, and you should seek medical attention. With older children, we’re looking more at things like fast breathing, difficulty breathing, lethargy, so really low levels of energy, even in between fever bouts, and dehydration — dry mouth, dry lips, decreased urine output and just wilting like a flower that hasn’t been given any water. With older adults, it tends to be complications of underlying medical illnesses they have, so worsening of a heart condition, worsening of an underlying respiratory condition.
 

How it it treated?
 

Papenburg: Most people who get influenza infection don’t need to get tested. If they are otherwise healthy and don’t have any danger signs, most don’t need to be treated. But we do have antivirals that are specific to influenza. When we recommend them to be used, they’re best used early in the disease, the first 48 hours. People who are at very high risk or who are getting progressively worse disease, that might be an indication for antiviral treatment.
 

National Post
 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


When Ontario resident Cindy McKay was preparing for a month in Europe this year, travelling with her 12-year-old grandson and living out of the contents of two carry-on bags, she knew she had homework to do.

“British Airways, Ryanair, Scandinavian,” she says, ticking off the various airlines that would take them to Athens, Crete, Dubrovnik, Prague, London and back to Canada.

Her plan? “Make a spreadsheet of all of the different airlines, what their requirements are, their weight allowances, their centimetres, all of it for me and my grandson to not get, you know, buggered anywhere on any flight.”

McKay knew not only that airlines have various restrictions on luggage size and weight, but that these are lines in the sand. And sand has a way of shifting.

Just ask an authority.

“It does seem to have decreased,” says Jim Bookbinder, who teaches transportation and logistics as a professor of management science at the University of Waterloo. “The size allowed, that has decreased over the years.”

He adds, with a touch of professorial modesty: “Not that I’m an expert in this, but I fly like everybody else.”

 An empty overhead bin in the economy section of an Air Canada Airbus 321.

A

BBC report

found that maximum carry-on sizes had decreased by as much as 55 per cent since 2018, with European budget airlines being some of the biggest agents of change.

For instance, the British airline easyJet, which used to allow free hand luggage of up to 56 by 45 by 25 centimetres, has cut back to 45 by 36 by 20, shaving at least five centimetres off each of the three dimensions. Budapest-based Wizz Air made a similar move, going from 55/40/23 down to 40/30/20.

Bucking the trend just a little last year was Calgary-based WestJet, which modified its carry-on limits from 56/36/23 to 53/38/23, an increase of a modest 2.2 per cent that aligned it with some airlines, but also differed from others.

“There’s a move afoot to have a standard size for all flights within the European Union,” Bookbinder reports. “But I don’t think that’s quite passed yet. That measure has been proposed but is still under discussion.”

In any case, the name that keeps coming up is Ryanair, the Dublin-based ultra-budget airline that flies across Europe. Carry-on baggage on those flights went from 55/40/20 in 2018 to just 40/25/20 last year. That’s the 55 per cent drop. Any larger and you’ll pay a fee.

Bookbinder calls Ryanair “the worst offender, as we would define the offence of trying to keep passengers from having a carry-on bag that’s viewed as too large.”

But he adds that fees matter to the industry, particularly at the budget end of the spectrum. “Up to 30 per cent of the discount airlines’ revenue is from these extra fees.”

People will pay to keep their bags in the cabin with them, and to not have to wait at the carousel when they land. “The airline that charges for that privilege of being able to get on your way right away, I guess they found a point of vulnerability on the part of some passengers.”

Air Canada joined that club this year. While their carry-on size has remained the same for many years, it has stopped allowing free carry-on luggage at the lowest economy tier.

And even though the airline plans to expand its fleet next year with the latest Airbus 220 aircraft (featuring extra overhead bin space), it has no plans to undo its fee-for-bags rule.

Bookbinder says the trend for airlines to squeeze more passengers into existing space also reduces the overhead bin space per customer.

“They reconfigure the aircraft from time to time, and if you add a couple of more rows of seats … the volume available to each could be slightly less.”

He prefers to check his own baggage. “And the reason is I worry about getting into a fight with another passenger over the last overhead bin.”

McKay, on the other hand, prefers to run the numbers and make them work for her.

For instance, a British Airways carry-on can’t be larger than 56 by 45 by 25 centimetres, including wheels and handle, and it has to weigh less than 23 kilograms.

But transfer to Scandinavian and your limits are a few vital centimetres less, at 55 by 40 by 23, with a weight limit of just eight kilos.

At Air Canada, the size limits are the same, but there’s no upper limit on weight as long as you can pick it up. (Fun fact: You can stuff 57 kilos of lead, or almost 100 kilos of gold, in an Air Canada regulation carry-on.)

 Cindy McKay’s Bugatti suitcase fit all the sizes she needed for multiple airlines.

Armed with the data, McKay went to the Costco website and bought a bag by Bugatti, “which sounds super fancy but it was $99.” Costco delivered it to her door in Ontario’s Muskoka region, where she works remotely in the real estate appraisal industry.

“So it worked. And my new luggage, which I absolutely love, has a compartment right on the front of it for your laptop. So you don’t have to dig inside your luggage to get at it.”

(New scanners

at most Canadian airports

mean you no longer have to take your laptop out of your carry-on when you go through security, but smaller airports still have older technology.)

Suitcase manufacturers do what they can to keep up with changing (and shrinking) carry-on sizes, but it really is a case of buyer beware.

 Smaller sizes of carry-on bags from Away (left) and Briggs & Riley.

Kaitlyn Coleman, public relation and communications director at New York-based luggage maker Away, says her company offers the Carry-On and the slightly larger Bigger Carry-On.

“We don’t have plans to make adjustments at this time,” she adds, but notes that

the Away website

, like those of many suitcase manufacturers, has a list of airlines and their size requirements.

Briggs & Riley similarly produces two different standard size carry-ons “that are compliant with most carry-on baggage allowances for domestic and international flights,” says Jason Russo, an account supervisor. The company also produces the Cabin Spinner and the Underseat Duffle, designed for under-the-seat storage.

“They do not have any plans to change the dimensions of their carry-on pieces as these sizes ensure that luggage will meet the most amount of requirements put forth by various airlines,” he says.

Bookbinder notes: “For carry-on luggage, your best bet is a soft-sided bag, which you can squeeze a little bit to fit in.”

McKay says it’s all about doing your homework. Oh, and to be safe, never use those “does-it-fit” devices at the gate.

“Yeah, I never put them in there. I just breeze on through with all the confidence in the world that I’m gonna fit.”

Here are the size requirements for carry-on luggage on major Canadian airlines, in centimetres. Note that all but Westjet have the same limits for carry-on luggage, while the personal item sizes vary.

Air Canada:

Carry-on: 23/40/55. Personal article: 16/33/43.

Westjet:

Carry-on: 23/36/56. Personal item: 14/14/33.

Air Transat:

Carry-on: 23/40/55. Personal item: 13/31/43.

Porter:

Carry-on: 23/40/55. Personal item: 16/33/43.

Flair:

Carry-on: 23/40/55. Personal item: 15/33/43.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Delayed TTC riders waiting for shuttle buses outside of St. Clair West Station in Toronto.

Users of Toronto transit may soon be compensated if they are left waiting too long for their ride.

On Wednesday, Toronto City Council voted to explore the possibility of refunding TTC riders if they are delayed 15 minutes or longer.

The motion was proposed by Councillor Brad Bradford.

Bradford intended his proposed measure to be a full money-back guarantee, but council voted to amend the proposal. Now, the TTC Board will “evaluate and consider” how a refund program could work.

Transit riders deserve better than what they are getting today, Bradford said during the council discussion.

“We’ve all had the experience when … you go down into the subway, and then the subway’s not running. And people amass on the platform, and it gets increasingly crowded and increasingly uncomfortable. You’re looking around for an information update, and it’s always a question of how long am I going to stay here waiting before I head up to the surface and then, elbows up, try to compete with everybody to get jammed on a bus?”

When somebody is paying for a service, said Bradford, that service “ought to be delivered.”

Other cities such as London, Philadelphia and

Washington D.C

. already offer refunds to commuters who experience significant delays.

Back in the Toronto region, the GO Transit system has also implemented a similar policy. 
 

Meanwhile, said Bradford, the TTC collects two thirds of its revenue from the fare box, but ridership still hasn’t returned to pre-covid 19 levels. “Fare box revenue is really important. So we need to get people back to transit.”

The council vote came amid rider complaints about slow and delayed service on a newly opened light rapid transit line in the northern part of the city.

Toronto engineer Asha Asvathaman recently launched a website called TTC Delay Insights, aiming to bridge the gap between TTC data and commuters by exploring patterns and station stats and highlighting problematic hotspots.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


BC Supreme Court in Vancouver, BC Saturday, November 8, 2025.

A 77-year-old woman with advanced Alzheimer’s has been granted protection “against the likelihood of death at the hands of her husband” by the B.C. Supreme Court.

The case involves a woman, identified as E.W., and her husband, identified as T.W., in court documents. T.W. is a strong advocate for medical assistance in dying (MAID) and even spoke openly about a “Death Plan” for his wife, who was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s in 2017, Justice B. Smith wrote in his

reasons for judgment

.

The “Death Plan,” as it was described by T.W. to family, friends and healthcare workers, was to “end” E.W.’s life if she became ineligible for MAID (which she eventually did) and then “take his own life.”

The issue was brought to the Supreme Court after the Vancouver Island Health Authority, a publicly funded health care provider, raised concerns about the well-being of E.W. “E.W. never expressed agreement with the Death Plan. On the contrary, E.W. was understandably upset by it. E.W. expressed to (their daughter) S.T. that T.W. was trying to kill her,” the court document says.

After E.W.’s diagnosis, healthcare providers suggested that she and her husband plan for future care, as her illness was progressing.

In November 2018, the couple and their daughter, S.T., made a representation agreement — a legal document that authorizes a person to be a substitute decision maker in B.C. law if a person cannot speak for themselves, according to B.C. Centre for Palliative Care.

T.W. was selected as E.W.’s authorized representative, and their daughter was an alternative.

E.W. was deemed eligible for MAID in the summer of 2020, according to the judgment. However, in September 2021, she told one of the doctors who assessed her “that she was not interested in receiving MAID in circumstances related to worsening memory or confusion.”

In a report from the doctor to Island Health, E.W. was later assessed as ineligible because “she was incapable of providing the requisite consent.”

The report determined that if “T.W. learned that E.W. was ineligible for MAID, he planned to carry out the Death Plan, which he referred to as a “dignicide.” It also said that at the time, E.W. “expressed that she was not ready to die” and that due to her “cognitive impairment…she was a vulnerable adult at risk of abuse and neglect.”

Island Health decided to petition for E.W.’s protection.

“Island Health did not believe that E.W. was then being abused or neglected by T.W., but was concerned that E.W. did not perceive herself as having any cognitive or functional limitations and therefore was unable to take care of herself in relation to the Death Plan,” wrote Smith in the judgment.

During wellness checks, T.W. told nurses about plans he was actively involved in to prepare for both his and his wife’s deaths. This included “paying for funeral services and grave sites, selling assets and distributing the proceeds, preparing obituaries and creating memorabilia as part of their collective legacy.”

In 2022, Island Health exercised its emergency powers to move E.W. from their home to a nearby hospital, as specialists said her condition was worsening. She remains in a facility.

In court documents, T.W. was described as “dominating” discussions about end-of-life planning. The couple’s daughter spoke to her mother alone to determine what she wanted. E.W. told her daughter that “if she ever became highly dependent on others, she wished to go into long-term care, as she would ‘not want to burden family with her care.’”

In the Dec. 17 document, the court ordered that the couple’s daughter replace her father as E.W.’s personal representative. T.W. was found to be unsuitable.

Critics of MAID have pointed to how it can affect vulnerable people. Commenting on a post about the case on X, British Columbia Aboriginal Network on Disability Society

wrote

: “Pretty sure this is what they told all of us…They caught this case, but how many other ‘dignicide’ (that’s apparently a new slang for murder) cases did they miss.”

Advocates say it allows eligible people the

option to die with dignity on their own terms

.

Parliament

passed federal legislation

allowing eligible adults in Canada to request MAID in June 2016.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Left to right: Waleed Khan, Osman Azizov and Fahad Sadaat.

A 26-year-old Toronto man has been arrested and charged with ISIS-linked terrorism offences and two other men are charged for alleged hate-motivated extremism targeting women and members of the Jewish community.

The federal terrorism investigation and related probes by Toronto police and Peel police follow violent incidents of armed men trying to abduct women from the street, one in May and two in June.

The RCMP charged Waleed Khan, 26, of Toronto with various terrorism charges including participating in the activities of a terrorist group and conspiracy to commit murder, for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a terrorist group.

The charging information names ISIS as the terrorist entity, also known as the Islamic State or ISIL.

Khan was also charged by Toronto police and Peel police, along with two other Toronto men — Osman Azizov, 18, Fahad Sadaat, 19.

The Peel charges, in August, are for kidnapping, firearms, auto theft, and others.

Toronto police also charged the three men for separate but similar attacks. The Toronto charges include kidnapping, attempted kidnapping with firearms, conspiracy to commit sexual assault, and hostage taking classed as hate-motivated extremism.

Khan has additional Toronto police charges including possession of weapons, assault with a weapon, careless use of a firearm and other weapon and theft charges.

The arrests are related to attacks in Toronto where armed men appeared to be hunting women for capture and abuse.

“We have arrested three individuals for offences targeting women and members of the Jewish community,” said Toronto Police Chief Myron Demkiw.

On May 31, a woman was approached by three men, one of whom was armed with a handgun and another with a knife, in the Don Mills Road and Rochefort Drive area of Toronto, police said. The suspects attempted to force her into a vehicle but fled when interrupted by a passing motorist.

On June 24, two young women were targeted in Mississauga on Ellesboro Drive near Swanhurst Boulevard. Three masked men pulled up in an Audi SUV armed with a handgun, a rifle, and knife, and chased the women and tried to grab them, police said. The men again fled after being interrupted by a passerby.

Peel Regional Police connected the two attacks and a joint investigation identified and arrested the suspects, police said. The joint probe was codenamed Project Neapolitan.

Khan was arrested for the Mississauga incident on Aug. 18, and at the time, Peel police said they were searching for two more suspects, described as Middle Eastern males, late teens to mid-twenties.

In Khan’s Toronto home, police said, they found two loaded prohibited firearms: an AR-style rifle capable of automatic fire and a pistol, both equipped with prohibited high-capacity magazines, along with over 110 rounds of ammunition. At the time of arrest, Khan was on probation for prior violent offences and prohibited from possessing firearms.

In late August, the two other men, Sadaat and Azizov were arrested.

“The evidence gathered expanded the scope of the investigation to include additional offences motivated by hate — particularly targeting women and members of the Jewish community. Investigators also uncovered links to terrorism, prompting a separate but parallel RCMP investigation,” Toronto police said in a release.

Friday’s announcement comes five days after the devastating massacre at Bondi Beach in Australia when two suspected jihadists shot and killed 15 people and wounded dozens more at a Jewish community event celebrating Hanukkah.

A court-imposed publication ban is in place in the Canadian charges preventing publication of some details in the case.

Khan’s terror-linked charges focus on alleged actions between June 17 and August 17.

“Waleed Khan did participate in the activities of a terrorist group by making himself, in response to instructions from any of the persons who constitute a terrorist group, available to facilitate or commit a terrorism offence or an act or omission outside Canada,” reads one charge.

“Khan did commit an indictable offence, to wit conspiracy to commit murder, for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a terrorist group,” reads another.

A charge of participating in the activities of a terrorist group alleges he provided property to be used to carry out terrorist activity or benefit someone carry out a terror activity, and another to fund a terrorist group. One charge alleges providing property to fund a terrorist group and another for using social media accounts to the benefit of a terrorist group.

He is also charge with conspiring with persons known and unknown to commit murder.

The federal charges were laid by the Central Region’s Integrated National Security Enforcement Team (INSET), which is an RCMP-led joint task force focussing on threats to national security, criminal extremism and terrorism.

The RCMP said the investigation is ongoing.

Jewish community leaders are grateful for police arrests but fear danger looms.

“The details of the investigation indicate a grave threat, involving the Islamic State and attempts to target women and Jewish Canadians in the Greater Toronto Area,” said Noah Shack, CEO of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs.

“This goes far beyond the safety of any one group. It is a matter of national security and public safety. There is a ticking time bomb in our country that our leaders must confront before it’s too late. As we saw in Sydney, we are one intelligence failure away from a devastating loss of life. A lack of urgency on the part of our leaders puts Canadians in danger.”

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | X:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The Uber App is pictured on a smartphone in downtown Vancouver, B.C., Monday, December 30, 2019.

The Jewish community is afraid to use Uber after “disturbing reports of mistreatment and intimidation by drivers,” says the founder of Canadian Women Against Antisemitism, as the rideshare company tells National Post it’s in “listening mode.”

While scrolling on Facebook recently, Esther Mordechai said she noticed posts by Jewish Canadians concerned about using Uber. She has been an activist and advocate for the community for decades. She is also the executive director of

B.A.M. Canada

, an organization dedicated to supporting marginalized Jewish women and the community.

“I had seen dozens of posts of people asking for alternatives (to Uber), and this is not okay,” she said. “The government is silent, and silence normalizes hate. History shows where that leads: 1930s Germany. Intimidation, denial, indifference. Calling it out is how we protect Jewish lives, and we’re also protecting and defending democracy and ensuring Canada never repeats that shameful path.”

Mordechai decided to write a letter to Uber because she felt “compelled to demand accountability and concrete action … to ensure passenger safety.”

National Post has reported on three separate incidents involving Canadian Jews using Uber. A

Canadian-Slovakian model said she was kicked out of a vehicle in Toronto

in November for being Jewish. She has since received

death threats on social media

after speaking out. A Canadian couple said they were

refused a ride while travelling in Europe

in August after they told the driver they were from Israel, and another Canadian couple said that after a driver heard them speaking Hebrew in February he would not take them home from Toronto Pearson Airport.

A spokesperson for Uber apologized for the riders’ experiences and said appropriate action was being taken.

Speaking to National Post, Uber’s head of public policy and communications for the U.S. and Canada Adam Blinick said drivers receive anti-discrimination training, adding that the company “recently re-sent to drivers the community guidelines to ensure that they understand that they do have an obligation.”

“Discrimination on our platform has no place,” he said.

When asked if Uber would say, definitively, that it is against antisemitism, or hate of any kind, and that the company would root it out, Blinick responded: “I don’t think there’s an issue with us saying that.”

The company has been speaking with Jewish leaders in the community, Blinick said. “I would say at a high level that we’re there in listening mode,” he said.

The main purpose of the discussions is to “understand the sensitivities and how people are feeling about things, and if we can be better partners in order to further enhance either communication or relationships or look at our policies again,” he said. He did not disclose when the discussions took place or with which Jewish organizations, citing that Uber did not get permission to share those details publicly.

The intention “was meaningful dialogue,” Blinick said.

Mordechai shared her letter to Uber with National Post.

“In Canada today, people are afraid to speak Hebrew in public, afraid to identify as Jewish, and afraid to disclose their identity while using ride-sharing services. This is not an abstract fear. It is a lived reality for many in the Jewish community. Following the recent tragic antisemitic incident in Australia, it is painfully clear that Canada is not immune to the same dangerous trajectory if institutions fail to act decisively,” she wrote.

“Uber has a legal and moral responsibility to ensure that all passengers without exception are safe and treated with dignity.”

She demanded that Uber “take immediate and visible action,” including enforcing a zero-tolerance policy for antisemitism, permanently removing drivers who engage in discriminatory or threatening behaviour, implementing mandatory training on antisemitism, and establishing a transparent and effective reporting and accountability mechanism.

Blinick said both drivers and passengers have to adhere to the community guidelines to use the platform. “It’s a two way street, and we want to make sure everyone on the platform feels safe and respected,” he said.

While the guidelines do not include language specific to antisemitism, they

say online

: “Do not discriminate against someone or act in a disparaging manner toward someone based on traits such as their age, skin colour, disability, gender identity, marital status, pregnancy, national origin, race, ethnicity, religion, sex, sexual orientation, language, geographical location, or any other characteristic protected under relevant law.”

Blinick said the company has been told by lawmakers that it has been “too quick to deactivate or to cause drivers to lose access to the platform.”

“We think we take a very balanced approach,” he said. “There is equal pressure on the other side of things, where there are advocates, drivers themselves, and others that … want to ensure that our system is equally fair and does not side with one or the other.”

When an incident is reported, there is a team of dedicated staff who conduct a review, which can include speaking to the driver, the passenger and reviewing relevant footage or audio recordings. Blinick said Uber does not share information about the outcome of an investigation, barring an “extraordinarily definitive” incident.

“If we confirm behaviour that violates our guidelines, consequences may include permanent loss of access to the platform,” an Uber spokesperson said.

Blinick highlighted tools to help passengers feel safe, including an audio recording tool through the app that was launched in 2023. It is encrypted and only shared with the company if the passenger wants to do so.

“We do have a sizeable team that is charged with investigating all of these complaints, and are not shy about taking action,” he said.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A new study links high-fat cheeses like those found in fondue with fewer cases of dementia.

Good news, cheese lovers. A study out of Sweden has found that eating high-fat cheese is associated with a lower risk of all forms of dementia.

Published in the

journal Neurology

under the somewhat staid title “High- and Low-Fat Dairy Consumption and Long-Term Risk of Dementia,” the long-term study followed the lives (and sometimes deaths) of 27,670 Swedes over a period of about 25 years.

The participants were 61 per cent female, with an average age of 58.1 years when they started the study between 1991 and 1996. The dementia research team piggybacked on the

Malmö Diet and Cancer

cohort, which was originally set up in the 1990s to study long-term connections between nutrition and cancer.

Dietary intake was evaluated using a comprehensive diet history method that combined a seven-day food diary, a food frequency questionnaire and a dietary interview. Dementia cases were identified through the Swedish National Patient Register until Dec. 31, 2020. The researchers looked for all-cause dementia, a blanket term that includes Alzheimer’s, vascular dementia and other conditions.

They found that eating 50 grams or more of high-fat cheese daily correlates with a lower risk of developing dementia. High-fat cheeses are those with more than 20 per cent fat content, including cheddar, brie, parmesan, mozzarella and gruyere.

More specifically, the risk of developing dementia was calculated at about

10 per cent for those who ate 50 grams or more of high-fat cheese per day, compared to about 13 per cent of people who ate less than 15 grams a day.

Even after adjusting for age, sex, education and overall diet, people who ate more than 50 grams of high-fat cheese per day had a 13 per cent lower all-cause dementia risk than those who ate less than 15 grams.

“For decades, the debate over high-fat versus low-fat diets has shaped health advice, sometimes even categorizing cheese as an unhealthy food to limit,” said nutrition epidemiologist Emily Sonestedt of Sweden’s Lund University in a

press release

about the findings.

“Our study found that some high-fat dairy products may actually lower the risk of dementia, challenging some long-held assumptions about fat and brain health.”

No such association appeared for low-fat cheese or cream, any kind of milk, or fermented milk products such as yogurt and kefir. Butter showed mixed results, including a possible increased Alzheimer’s risk at high intake compared to people who did not eat butter.

“Not all dairy products are equal when it comes to brain health,” said Sonestedt. “The few studies that have investigated this have found a correlation with cheese, so more research is needed to confirm our results and investigate whether certain high-fat dairy products really do provide some protection for the brain.”

The

World Health Organization

estimates that 57 million people were living with dementia in 2021, with an estimated 10 million new cases diagnosed each year. A 2022 study in

The Lancet

medical journal estimated cases could rise to more than 150 million by mid-century.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.