LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

U.S. President Donald Trump signs Interior Secretary Doug Burghum's commission in the Oval Office on Jan. 31, 2025.

Canadians who want to visit U.S. national parks like the Grand Canyon or Yosemite will need to pay more than three times the current amount starting next year. Beginning Jan. 1, the “America the Beautiful” pass, issued by the country’s National Park service, will remain the same price for Americans, but will be much higher for “nonresidents.”

A press release from the U.S. Department of the Interior this week announces “new digital passes, new annual pass artwork, America-first pricing and expanded motorcycle access … under President Trump’s leadership.”

The America-first pricing will affect Canadians and any other visiting foreign nationals. Currently the cost is US$80 (about $112 Canadian) for a year-long pass that covers one vehicle and up to four adults. Children aged 16 and under are free.

 Visitors watch a sunset on a rock ledge near Taft Point in Yosemite National Park, Calif., Oct. 30, 2025.

“Beginning Jan. 1, 2026, the Annual Pass will cost $80 for U.S. residents and $250 for nonresidents,” the department said in its release. The new rate is equivalent to $351 Canadian.

It adds: “Nonresidents without an annual pass will pay a $100 per person fee to enter 11 of the most visited national parks, in addition to the standard entrance fee.” Entrance fees at U.S. national parks average about US$30 per person.

“President Trump’s leadership always puts American families first,” said Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum. “These policies ensure that U.S. taxpayers, who already support the National Park System, continue to enjoy affordable access, while international visitors contribute their fair share to maintaining and improving our parks for future generations.”

 Tourists flock to Mather Point at Grand Canyon National Park, Oct. 1, 2025, in Grand Canyon, Ariz.

The Department also highlighted 10 “patriotic fee-free days” for 2026, including the Independence Day weekend, Veteran’s Day and Trump’s birthday, June 14. These days are free for residents only.

Trump signed an executive order in July to raise entrance fees at national parks for overseas visitors, while also ordering the Secretary of the Interior, working with the Secretary of State, “to encourage international tourism to America’s national parks and outdoor recreation areas, and especially wider utilization of America’s many such areas that may be underutilized.”

The BBC reported in March that the Trump administration’s steep cuts to staff at national parks, forests and wildlife habitats was resulting in longer park entrance lines, reduced hours at visitor centres, closed trails and unsanitary facilities.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Iddo Moed, Israeli Ambassador to Canada.

Iddo Moed says he is “extremely concerned” that a Palestinian tribunal was hosted by the Senate of Canada earlier this month.

Israel’s ambassador to Canada was in Ottawa on Monday evening, taking part in the Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights. During the meeting, Moed was asked by Quebec Senator Leo Housakos how Israel viewed the Senate, in particular, after it

hosted the tribunal

.

“We are extremely concerned about such a phenomenon,” said Moed. “We understand the rules of democracy, the freedom of speech and all of that. But as I said earlier, we are in a new reality. In this new reality, these kinds of incidents have an impact, and so it’s different than just having a broad discussion and allowing people to come up with extreme views.”

The two-day tribunal took place on Nov. 14 and Nov. 15. It was condemned by Jewish advocacy group Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs. It featured panelists who were not allowed into the country by Canada Border Services Agency, who denied the 9/11 terrorist attack, and who believed that the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack in France in 2015 was committed by its own government, rather than the Islamic Brotherhood, said Housakos.

 Gunman walk past police officer Ahmed Merabet moments after shooting him at point blank range outside the offices of French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris on Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2015.

Moed said “such acceptance may give rise to expressions of hatred by other parts of the public and repeating messages that are inflammatory, that are hateful, that are discriminatory.” He said that although people should be able to speak freely “within the law,” there are ongoing discussions of how to conserve democracy while protecting “citizens from hateful speech, from brainwashing, from misinformation and disinformation.”

“This is one of the biggest challenges of these times, and we face that, and I would only say that the best way to do it is to do it together and share our experiences,” he said.

The committee on Monday also heard from Jewish women’s advocate Talia Klein Leighton. She is the president of nonprofit group Canadian Women Against Antisemitism. She responded to a question about whether or not public institutions, such as universities and governments and municipalities, were letting down Jewish people.

“I think that there is a total lack of law enforcement of these marauders who are on the university campuses, who are in the streets of Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and so on,” she said. “And I think this lack of law enforcement, plus the statements that are made by faculty associations, by unions, has created an environment of absolute permissiveness, so that it is socially acceptable right now to be an antisemite.”

Rachel Cook, a Jewish law student at the University of Alberta, told the committee that there is “an institutional coddling of people who have views that the administration agrees with.” After October 7,

Cook asked the university to display a menorah

alongside a Christmas tree. Rather than displaying both, the university removed the tree. (A menorah holds candles that are lit during the eight nights of Hanukkah, a Jewish holiday which usually falls around the same time as Christmas. It is referred to as the Festival of Lights.)

 University of Alberta law student Rachel Cook says the law school opted to remove Christmas trees displayed in a student centre after she asked to add a menorah to the decorations.

“As a Jewish student on a university campus, I did not conflate my menorah with Zionism. My Institution did when they chose not to put it up. I’m a Canadian Jew. I’m not Israeli. I asked to display a menorah, and because the institution was worried about showing support for Israel, they took the trees down instead of doing it,” said Cook. “It wasn’t me that conflated Zionists and Jews. It was them.”

The

recognition of the Palestinian state

by the Canadian government in September is what has opened “Pandora’s box against Israel, against the Jewish community in Canada,” said Klein Leighton. She said it goes against the Canadian government’s foreign policy that has existed for years, “which is, we will recognize the state of Palestine when and only when there is a negotiated settlement, when there is a path toward democracy.”

“I’m not sure that (recognition) actually has any impact on foreign policy, or has any impact on what actually goes on in Israel or in Gaza. And it certainly doesn’t help the Palestinian people,” she said. “All it does is open up the Jewish community to greater hatred, to greater targeting.”

Despite other conflicts around the world, Housakas pointed out that the one that has most disrupted Canada’s social peace has been the war in the Middle East, sparked by Hamas terrorists killing 1,200 people and kidnapping 251 hostages on Oct. 7, 2023. He asked Moed where Canada stands on the global scale of combatting antisemitism.

 Supporters stand in front of an anti-Israel encampment on McGill University campus, in Montreal, Monday, June 17, 2024.

“That’s a very tough question, because Israel is holding Canada to a very high standard, the same way that Canada holds Israel to a very high standard,” Moed said. “And the last few years, especially after October 7, when we’ve seen more and more incidents, those incidents are very quickly reported in Israel. They are reported because there is not only an interest, but an expectation from Canada to prevent that.”

He said the follow-up question in Israel when it comes to Canadian incidents of antisemitism is, “What is being done about that?”

Israel expects more from Canada, he said. It’s not a question of where Canada is on the global scale, he added, but rather “where our two countries see each other.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


A former Campbell's worker who secretly recorded a company vice president's alleged insulting remarks about customers, racist statements about workers and claims of 3D printed chicken used in soups says he was fired after raising concerns

A top executive at Campbell’s has been placed on temporary leave as of Tuesday as the world’s largest soup maker begins an internal investigation into a scandal that broke last week.

The decision regarding putting Vice President and Chief Information Security Officer Martin Bally on leave was made after audio recordings of him were released to media outlets by former employee Robert Garza on Saturday. Just two days before that, Garza had filed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging wrongful termination in Michigan on Thursday.


Here’s what we know about the controversy involving the 154-year-old company.

What ignited the Campbell’s controversy?

The scandal kickstarted after the expletive-laden audio remarks were shared with NBC Detroit affiliate

WDIV

last week and later with

Business Insider

. The remarks were part of an hour-long recording Garza said he made at a restaurant where he was allegedly meeting with Bally in November to discuss his salary as a security analyst.

Garza told WDIV he recorded the encounter because his instincts told him

“something wasn’t right” with Bally.

“We have s— for f—ing poor people. Who buys our s—, ” a man’s voice is heard asking on the recording.

The man adds that he doesn’t purchase the company’s products anymore, saying he doesn’t consider it “healthy” knowing what’s in it, alleging cans of soup contain “bioengineered meat,” a product grown in a lab or genetically modified as opposed to being raised organically.

“I don’t want to eat a f—ing piece of chicken that came from a 3D printer,” he allegedly said.

At another point, the man is heard disparaging the intelligence of Indian employees.

“F—ing Indians don’t know a f—ing thing. Like they couldn’t think for their f—ing selves,” the man says.

National Post has not independently confirmed the audio’s authenticity.

Why is the former Campbell’s employee suing the soup company?

Filed Thursday in Wayne County Circuit Court, Garza’s suit alleges that he brought the recordings and his concerns from the meeting with Bally to his supervisor, JP Aupperle, in early January, only to be fired before the end of the month.

The statement of claim alleges that Bally and Aupperle, along with the company itself, are guilty of a civil rights violation by creating a racially hostile work environment.

This situation has been very hard on Robert,” Zach Runyan, Garza’s lawyer, wrote in an email to National Post that included a copy of the statement of claim. 

“He thought Campbell’s would be thankful that he reported Martin’s behavior, but instead he was abruptly fired.”

National Post also requested the audio recording from Runyan, but it was not provided at the time of publishing.

The filing also claims that Bally repeatedly came to work high on marijuana edibles.

While the suit is centred largely on what was said in the recording, it is not included in the filing, Business Insider reported.

Garza is seeking recompense for legal fees, economic damages and non-economic damages, legal fees and “other damages to be discovered through the course of litigation.”

How has Campbell’s responded to the allegations?

Campbell’s Company,

which dropped “Soup” from its official name in 2024

, said if it were Bally on the recording, the comments “are unacceptable.”

“Such language does not reflect our values and the culture of our company. We do not tolerate that kind of language under any circumstances,” it wrote in

a statement on Tuesday.

The company also defended the quality of its products and said the accusations on the recording “are not only inaccurate — they are patently absurd.”

“The chicken meat in our soups comes from long-trusted, USDA approved U.S. suppliers and meets our high quality standards. All our soups are made with No Antibiotics Ever chicken meat. Any claims to the contrary are completely false.”

It also highlighted that Bally works in the company’s IT division and is in no way involved with how the food is made.

Meanwhile, a spokesperson also told

ABC News

that Garza, who’d only been with the company for under five months, was terminated for good reason.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith takes questions from reporters as he arrives for a meeting of the Liberal caucus, on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on Wednesday, June 5, 2024.

OTTAWA — Liberal MPs tried on Wednesday to downplay concerns about any caucus divides on the eve of the expected signing of a new energy deal with Alberta, which could see Prime Minister Mark Carney offer a conditional path for a new oil pipeline to British Columbia’s coast.

Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson was expected to brief the Liberal B.C. caucus Wednesday morning, according to a government official. His appearance was meant for MPs to field questions and receive an update on the state of negotiations of a new memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Carney and Smith.

That deal, which Smith has said she wants to see include some commitment to repealing or granting a reprieve from a suite of environmental policies ushered in under former prime minister Justin Trudeau, to outline a path for a new Alberta-B.C. bitumen pipeline, has been roundly rejected by coastal First Nations, along with NDP B.C. Premier David Eby.

B.C. Liberal MPs have spent the past week lining up to say approval for any future pipeline to B.C’s coast would need to secure the support of First Nations in the region, as well as Eby’s government, conditions that Carney reiterated to the House of Commons on Tuesday.

Still, questions and concerns have nevertheless swirled about the impending deal and the prospect of offering support for a new oil pipeline, which would require at least a possible partial lifting of an oil tanker ban off B.C.’s coast, and what such a project could mean for the Liberals’ mission to reduce carbon emissions.

On his way into the Liberals’ weekly caucus meeting, outspoken Ontario Liberal MP Nate Erskine-Smith said he “lived through one grand bargain” that “I don’t think went so well,” referring to the deal the Liberals struck under Trudeau with then Alberta premier Rachel Notley. It saw Trudeau support the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion in exchange for Alberta signing on to its national carbon pricing plan.

Notley eventually pulled her support from the climate plan after a court ruling against the project. In 2018, the Trudeau government announced it was purchasing the pipeline from Kinder Morgan for $4.5 billion to ensure the expansion went ahead.

“I’m a little skeptical of grand bargains,” Erskine-Smith said. “And look, I’ll look at the overall picture of the deal in the MOU when it’s announced on Thursday, and we’ll see what Prime Minister has to say today, and I’ll have lots to say once I see the details.”

Calgary MP Corey Hogan, who worked in the Alberta government as a deputy minister during the time, said today’s situation is different from those years, given the conversation is now on the need to diversify Canada’s global market access.

“I think that before anything concrete comes out, is always a moment of maximum anxiety,” he told reporters, underscoring that the exact details of the deal were not yet known.

Hogan said he was hopeful about the prospect of Ottawa striking a deal with Alberta that would see Smith’s government commit to strengthening the province’s industrial carbon pricing system and offer more support for expanding carbon capture and storage technology, which has been Ottawa’s ask in exchange for creating a new path to a pipeline.

He said those moves, combined with Alberta taking more steps to strengthen methane regulations, “would be incredible for the climate.”

“I think that’s something that my B.C. colleagues would be very excited about.”

Several B.C. Liberal caucus members whisked by reporters heading into the Liberal caucus meeting without stopping to speak. Only Ernie Klassen, who represents the B.C. riding of  South Surrey — White Rock, quickly answered to suggest he left the meeting with Hodgson feeling assured.

One Liberal MP, who spoke to National Post on the condition they not be named, said Hodgson is respected in caucus, given his depth in the file.

Still, the MP said concerns around the impending deal with Alberta lie within two groups: Centre-left members of the Liberal caucus, who have some “hesitation” based on worries about the impact of pipelines on the environment, and then B.C. caucus members who have “anxiety.”

“Understandly so,” the MP said. The MP pointed to someone like Will Greaves, who captured the riding of Victoria, a typically NDP stronghold for the Liberals in the last election, who would likely be hearing about this pipeline proposal from constituents.

“There’s real anxiety around this.”

Greaves told National Post back in October, shortly after Smith first released her pipeline proposal,

that his office had been “inundated” with emotional correspondence from constituents and that his community was “pretty overwhelming” in its opposition to another oil pipeline. 

On Wednesday, the president of a group representing coastal First Nations issued a statement, rejecting any idea of a new pipeline and blasting the federal government for its “wall of silence” about the deal with Alberta.

“As the Rights and Title Holders of the Central and North Coast and Haida Gwaii, we are here to remind the Alberta government, the federal government, and any potential private proponent that we will never allow oil tankers on our coast, and that this pipeline project will never happen,” said Marilyn Slett, President of the Coastal First Nations – Great Bear Initiative and Chief of the Heiltsuk Nation. 

Ontario MP James Maloney, who chairs the Liberal caucus, told reporters he does not believe there to be any problem with divides within caucus and that, like on any issue, there would be “several views.”

“We continue to work as a group, and we will come out of this united, as we always do.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


The home sits on three acres of property in Grand-Pré, which in 2012 was designated a UNESCO World Heritage site for its stunning views.

The house where Prime Minister Sir Robert Borden was born is up for sale for the first time in this century. The Nova Scotia residence

is listed

at $1.375-million.

The property, on Grand Pré Road in Grand-Pré, N.S., was originally built in 1792, several decades after the area was settled by New England Planters from the colonies to the south. On June 26, 1854, Borden, a descendent of these settlers, was born there.

 Current owner Brian Twohey bought the property in 1999 with his wife, and made extensive renovations to the tune of $800,000 in 2004.

“It originally was an Acadian house that had been burnt down,” Brian Twohey, the current owner, told National Post. “The new people built a house on the foundation.” The Acadians had been forcibly removed by the British in the 1750s over fears they would side with the French in the Seven Years War.

Twohey bought the property in 1999 with his wife, and made extensive renovations to the tune of $800,000 in 2004.

“Tacky we were not,” he said of the addition, which matches the style of the original home. He noted that the property’s heritage designation prohibits major changes to the outside — “if there’s a window facing east there still has to be a window facing east” — but the interior has been thoroughly modernized.

 The front of the house shows its original look.

“My wife and I loved the property because of the historical significance,” Twohey said. “That was the allure of the property. It’s not because of the design of the house or anything like that, its because of who was born there.”

Borden, who had a career as a teacher and lawyer before entering politics, was elected as a member of Parliament in 1896, running as a Conservative. In 1901 he was named party leader and became leader of the opposition, and in 1911 he became Canada’s eighth prime minister.

He served for nine years, a period that included the First World War, the Halifax Explosion, The Winnipeg general strike, and the right for female citizens over the age of 21 to vote in federal elections and run for Parliament. Borden retired from politics in 1920 and died in 1937 in Ottawa, just shy of his 83rd birthday.

 “My wife and I loved the property because of the historical significance,” Twohey said. “It’s not because of the design of the house or anything like that, its because of who was born there.”

Twohey bought the property from a British woman who worked as a midwife. She is turn had purchased it from two maiden nieces of Borden, one of whom was a nurse in the First World War. They’re buried “next door” at Covenanter Church, the oldest Presbyterian church in Canada.

Construction on the church started in 1804, so its steeple would have already towered over the property when Borden was born. His parents are also buried nearby.

“In those days they had what was called a birthing room,” Twohey said. “That became my son’s room, and now it’s one of the guest rooms.”

 Photos in the home include Borden’s wartime cabinet, and a signed picture of the prime minister.

He said he’s had relatives of Borden visit the property, and added there were still a few pieces of furniture from that time, as well as some historic photographs on the walls. One of them shows Borden surrounded by images of The Union Cabinet, a multi-party coalition government he put together during the war to help shore up support for conscription. The frame proudly declares: “These are the men.”

The home sits on three acres of property in Grand-Pré, which in 2012 was designated a UNESCO World Heritage site for its stunning views.

 A two-storey barn includes a cottage room overlooking the garden.

Details of the home include five bedrooms and three full baths. The original heritage wing includes a formal dining room and living room, while the 2004 addition includes a “great room” with a wood-burning fireplace, high ceilings and custom millwork.

The kitchen, custom-designed by DeCoste of Kingston, N.S., has a centre island and walk-in pantry. A built-in heated garage served by double driveways has space for four vehicles. Also on the property is a two-storey barn with a cottage room overlooking the garden.

The property was last sold in 1999 at a price of $135,000, a tenth of its current listing. Twohey said he plans to stay in the area and will move to nearby Windsor, N.S.

 The original heritage wing includes a formal dining room and living room, while the 2004 addition includes a “great room” with a wood-burning fireplace, high ceilings and custom millwork.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The Supreme Court struck down the 12-month mandatory minimum sentence for possession of child sex abuse material in October in a controversial decision. A new analysis finds judges have been issuing sentences outside the mandatory minimum for years.

Courts across Canada have been issuing sentences for years that were less than the mandatory minimum for possession of child sexual abuse material, the

Investigative Journalism Bureau

has found.

The government announced this week it will

propose amendments

that would allow the reinstatement of the mandatory minimum. The announcement follows public and political outrage over the

Supreme Court’s decision

last month to strike down the 12-month mandatory minimum for child sexual abuse material possession offences.

But a random analysis of 100 cases between 2020 and 2025 reviewed by the IJB found that one in three sentences for child sexual abuse material possession had not adhered to the previous sentencing minimum.

While the average sentence for possession of child sexual abuse material was 20 months in the cases analyzed by the IJB, judges imposed “exceptional sentences” in 30 out of 100 that fell below the mandatory minimum.

In 19 of the 30 cases, convictions for child porn possession resulted in a sentence under 12 months. In 17 of the 30 cases, the accused were allowed to serve their sentences in the community.

Mandatory minimums are being circumvented in Canada in a number of ways, legal experts say, including the justice system deeming some charges “a less serious” crime. In other cases, lower courts have deemed the mandatory minimum

unconstitutional

, arguing “the mandatory minimum leads to grossly disproportionate sentences.”

 Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Sean Fraser at the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa on Oct. 6, 2025. Fraser said this week the government will bring in proposed changes that ‘would ensure that those serious cases of abuse are met with serious penalties.’

Among the earliest examples in the IJB review of a judge sentencing outside the mandatory minimum happened in March 2020. An

Alberta judge sentenced

a man who had made and possessed child pornography of a 15-year-old girl to 24 months, to be served in the community.

“Sending this accused to prison for a minimum of one year would outrage the standards of decency of most informed Canadians,” the decision reads. The judge went on to state that, due to being eligible for early release, the full sentence would likely not be served anyway.

Janelle Blackadar, who recently retired from the Toronto Police Service where she worked in the child exploitation unit for nearly 20 years, calls the sentencing of child porn possession cases “very disheartening.”

“Most people would agree — from the policing side — that it’s not stringent enough.”

In March 2024, a

B.C. judge

sentenced a man to six months in prison following a guilty plea for possessing child sexual abuse material that depicted victims under the age of five.

In November of the same year, a

Brampton judge

sentenced a man who pleaded guilty to possession of such material, and who was diagnosed with “pedophilic attraction,” to a six-month conditional sentence, to be served in the community.

In 2025, at least eight cases specifically noted that the person being sentenced had

a previous conviction

for child pornography or other child-related sexual abuse.

The IJB analysis reviewed cases between 2020 and 2025 involving sentences for possessing or accessing child sexual abuse material. The average sentence of 20 months is well below sentences in the United States, where offenders convicted of possession of child pornography faced an average sentence of 82 months in 2024, according to the U.S. Sentencing Commission.

Other Commonwealth countries, including Australia and the U.K., have average sentences for child pornography offences generally ranging between 12 to 36 months, according to their respective national data.

Blackadar says she would like to see sentences of at least two years on convictions for child pornography possession “unless there’s some extraordinary circumstances.”

“If society … held the court system to a higher standard, then I think those decisions of reducing sentences and not following the mandatory minimum probably wouldn’t have occurred as much as it has.”

Not all agree mandatory minimums serve the public interest.

Toronto criminal defence lawyer Robb MacDonald says “mandatory minimums are one of the worst developments in North America justice.”

He said he doesn’t believe the Supreme Court’s decision will result in lower sentences — just that it gives judges latitude to find a fit sentence.

“I don’t think our justice system ever benefits from handcuffing judges.”

 Defence lawyer Robb MacDonald: “Mandatory minimums are one of the worst developments in North America justice.”

The

Supreme Court’s 5-4 split decision

in October 2025 was explained in a 118-page decision that found imposing a minimum 12-month jail term on all individuals convicted of possessing child pornography could be disproportionate in some cases.

The hypothetical scenario given was that an 18-year-old boy who received a “sext” or explicit image from his 17-year-old girlfriend would be in possession of child pornography and that a mandatory minimum of 12 months would be inappropriate.

Judges, the ruling concluded, should be given discretion in terms of sentence length and where or how the offender serves their sentence — either jail or in the community. Doing away with a mandatory minimum, it said, will facilitate that.

Following outrage from the public, premiers in Alberta and Ontario and federal Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, Justice Minister Sean Fraser told the National Post this week that the government will respond with new legislation “that addresses that narrow gap that [the Supreme Court] left.”

The proposed changes, says Fraser, “would ensure that those serious cases of abuse are met with serious penalties, but does provide some opportunity for those circumstances which were not likely contemplated at the time the mandatory minimums were drafted.”

The Investigative Journalism Bureau (IJB) at the University of Toronto’s Dalla Lana School of Public Health is a collaborative investigative newsroom supported by Postmedia that partners with academics, researchers and journalists while training the next generation of investigative reporters. This reporting was supported in part by the Canadian Centre for Child Protection.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Convicted killer Christopher Gordon was caught with a loaded .40-calibre Glock semi-automatic handgun equipped with laser sights.

An Ontario killer ordered deported to St. Vincent in 2020 has been sentenced to six years in a Canadian prison after he was caught soon after he got out of custody for a manslaughter conviction with a Glock semi-automatic handgun in his Toronto nightstand that was equipped with a laser sight and loaded with seven rounds of .40 calibre ammunition.

Police also allegedly found other items in Christopher Enrique Gordon’s bedroom during their September 2022 search, including about $6,000 in cash, 18.56 grams of fentanyl, 10.13 grams of cocaine and drug trafficking paraphernalia.

“It is extremely troubling that both the previous manslaughter offence and the current firearm offences had some connection to drug trafficking. The close temporal connection between the offences exacerbates that concern. Moreover, it is well known that the combination of drug trafficking and a gun frequently leads to tragic results,” Justice Benita Wassenaar wrote in a recent decision from Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice.

“In addition to that unfortunate combination, the serious — and sometimes deadly — impact of fentanyl is something I must consider.”

The “aggravating factors” in Gordon’s case push his crimes to the higher end of the sentencing range, said the judge, “particularly those factors that speak to the normative wrongfulness of the conduct and the harm posed by it.”

Having said that, Wassenaar notes, “meaningful consideration must be given to the mitigating factors, in particular Mr. Gordon’s guilty plea, the conditions he has experienced in custody, his disadvantaged background, and his experiences with anti-Black racism.”

Evidence indicates that Gordon’s “choices were limited and influenced by his disadvantaged circumstances, which are relevant to assessing his moral responsibility,” the judge wrote in her decision, dated Nov. 17.

“I also remind myself of the principle of restraint and its applicability in the context of this offender.”

Gordon pleaded guilty to possessing a prohibited or restricted firearm without a licence, and possessing a firearm while he was under a December 2019 court-ordered lifetime gun prohibition. In turn, the drug charges were dropped.

The prosecution “sought a total sentence of eight years,” for Gordon, said the decision.

“The Crown highlighted, in particular, Mr. Gordon’s manslaughter conviction and ongoing involvement with drugs,” it said. “The Crown relied on the fentanyl and cocaine as significant aggravating factors. Moreover, Mr. Gordon re-offended within a year of his release from prison after serving his manslaughter sentence.”

The Crown “noted that the firearm was in an unlocked nightstand of an unlocked bedroom and there were several children in the house,” said the decision.

 A wanted poster for Christopher Enrique Gordon.

Gordon’s lawyer argued unsuccessfully for time served.

“She noted that there was no evidence that Mr. Gordon had used, wielded or threatened anyone with the firearm,” said the decision.

“She also outlined the facts underlying the manslaughter conviction, which she said included the victim perpetrating violence on Mr. Gordon.”

His defence lawyer initially stated “that Mr. Gordon was going to be deported, regardless of the sentence he received (for the gun crimes), and that it was humane to permit him to go home as soon as possible so that he could try to build a life in St. Vincent,” said the decision.

The court heard from the Canada Border Services Agency that once Gordon’s “legal matters are concluded, he will be deported back to St. Vincent.”

The agency “has already applied for a travel document for him, and … they will be monitoring the outcome of his court matters,” said the decision.

But “at the end of her submissions,” Gordon’s lawyer told the court he “had retained an immigration lawyer and if he is sentenced to time served up to six months he is entitled to a pre-removal risk assessment and there is a possibility that immigration would consider it.”

A pre-removal risk assessment would be Gordon’s last-ditch bid to stay in Canada.

Gordon was convicted of manslaughter in December 2019, for stabbing 54-year David Blacquiere of Angus, Ont., in the chest several times in a Shoppers Drug Mart parking lot, near Weston Road and Lawrence Avenue West in Toronto, on Nov. 15., 2018.

“On December 9, 2020, he was sentenced to six years and nine months jail. After deducting credit for pre-sentence custody, he had 586 days left to serve.”

Gordon, who recently turned 26, was born in St. Vincent, said the recent sentencing decision.

“His father had minimal involvement in his upbringing. When Mr. Gordon was seven, his mother left his father and went to Canada in an effort to improve her family’s financial situation,” it said.

“Mr. Gordon stayed behind and was looked after by various relatives. Mr. Gordon’s mother brought him to Canada for a visit when he was eight. After seeing that he had not been well cared for, she kept him with her in Canada. However, Mr. Gordon never became a Canadian citizen.”

Gordon’s “family history, lack of citizenship and socio-economic status have intersected with anti-Black racism to compound disadvantage and exacerbate the many challenges he has faced,” said the decision. “He has experienced racism in various contexts, including at school, through police harassment and while incarcerated.”

Gordon was given the opportunity to apply for status in Canada after he was ordered deported for manslaughter, it said, though the decision does not indicate whether he tried that route to stay here.

Wassenaar said she “considered potential immigration consequences,” her sentence for gun crimes might have on Gordon.

“It seems rather speculative to suggest that the sentence I impose could have additional immigration consequences,” said the judge.

“In any event, the risk of deportation cannot justify imposing a sentence that is inconsistent with the fundamental principles of proportionality.”

Wassenaar sentenced Gordon to six years behind bars. With enhanced credit for time served, he only has one year and three months left in the sentence.

“To that I would add two years of probation,” said the judge.


Bridget Walshe of the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) speaks at a press conference in Ottawa, ON. on Monday, April 14, 2025.

OTTAWA — Canada’s cyber defence agency says hackers are increasingly targeting Canadian water systems as it called on utility companies and municipalities to take the threat seriously or risk devastating consequences.
 

On Tuesday, the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security published a new assessment of the
cyber threat to Canada’s water system
that is unequivocal: the threats are growing, constantly evolving and come from both state and non-state cyber criminals.
 

In fact, the cyber centre said state-backed hackers have almost certainly already gained access to networks used to operate water infrastructure but are laying low to keep the breach undetected… for now.
 

“Cyber threats to water infrastructure are growing, evolving quickly, and can affect every community in Canada. You don’t need to be an engineer or a cyber security expert to understand why this matters,” warned cyber centre head Rajiv Gupta.
 

“Water systems now face a threat landscape they were never designed to withstand.”
 

Last month, the cyber centre reported
that hackers had tampered with water pressure values of a municipality’s water facility which resulted in “degraded service” for the community.
 

The new report reveals that cyber criminals are not only targeting infrastructure and systems dedicated to potable water, but also those related to flood- and wastewater.
 

The main target for threat actors is the operational technology that allows utility companies or governments to monitor or control their water systems electronically, said cyber centre deputy head Bridget Walshe in an interview.
 

The Internet-connected control systems may be more convenient or cost-effective, she said, but they also lead to significant cyber risks that municipalities often aren’t prepared for.
 

“There are lots of things that an engineer needs to control right, for example, keeping the water pressure up or monitoring water levels. And today… many (systems) use computer technology to do that monitoring,” Walshe said.
 

“Anything that the engineer could do, like change the water pressure, if a cyber threat actor had the right access, they could do the same,” she added.
 

The importance of water-management systems makes them attractive targets for ransomware, which the cyber centre bills the “most significant cyber threat to the reliable supply of water in Canada”.
 

That’s because criminals suspect that breached organizations will pony up the ransom quickly to gain back access to their networks and ensure critical operations aren’t disrupted for long.
 

But hostile states also have their eyes on Canadian water systems, the cyber centre says. In fact, they’ve almost certainly already hacked into them and are maintaining their access while laying low until a time of crisis or conflict with Canada.
 

The report does not identify any particular state. The centre has frequently identified China as the most sophisticated and capable cyber threat to Canada as part of the “
axis of cyber evil”
with Russia, North Korea and Iran.
 

“Once in the target network, they collect information on assets within the network to identify opportunities for disruptive or destructive action. For example, this could mean causing water tanks to overflow or changing the chemical balance of water treatment processes,” reads the report.
 

Non-state threat actors, criminals motivated by specific causes or ideologies but aren’t linked to a government, are also a growing threat to Canada’s water, says the cyber centre.
 

Walshe says there are many things water operators can do to protect themselves, ranging from basic things like changing default system passwords to researching supply chains to ensure they know who they’re buying from.
 

Walshe said there’s another piece of advice she shares with critical infrastructure providers: does your equipment really need to be connected to the Internet?
 

“Absolutely any system where reliability is very important is a case where we’d really urge anyone to look at the trade-off between Internet connected and segregating their network,” she said.
 

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


New York City.

An improved kitchen and better separation of public and private space is the aim of renovations of the official residence for Quebec’s delegate general in New York.

The upgrade will cost more than $2.6 million.

A contract for $2.17 million was awarded earlier this month to a local contractor. This is on top of $505,695 for architectural modifications already completed.

“The renovation of the residence will correct security and functionality issues, while allowing better separation between ‘private’ spaces and ‘public’ spaces which are sometimes used for receptions,” Caroline Pelchat, spokesperson for the Ministry of International Relations and La Francophonie, told the

Journal de Montreal

.

“Some rooms will be reconfigured to improve their functionality, including the kitchen,” she said. “The plumbing and electrical systems, as well as the finishes, all dating from the 1980s, will be upgraded.”

The Quebec government did not award the work to the lowest bidder (approximately $547,000 less), reports

TVA Nouvelles

, but the ministry says the services offered by that bidder were incomplete.

Meanwhile, Quebec’s delegation also plans to purchase replacements for worn, damaged furniture for the residence’s public areas at a potential cost of $150,000. Earlier this year, furniture purchases for the Los Angeles delegation cost $99,909. In 2024, furniture for Quebec’s Miami office cost $122,000.

Quebec’s delegate in New York is the province’s principal representation in the United States, with a mandate is to promote its interests in investment, culture, and public affairs.

National Post has reached out to the ministry for comment. The request has been acknowledged, but a detailed response has not yet been received.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney rises during question period on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2025.

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney said Tuesday his government’s forthcoming energy deal with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith will create “necessary conditions” for a potential pipeline to British Columbia, but not provide an outright guarantee.

Carney, fresh off his trip to the United Arab Emirates and the G20 Leaders’ Summit in South Africa, is set to depart for Alberta to ink a new memorandum of understanding with Smith, defining the conditions of the two governments’ dealings on energy, expected to be formalized on Thursday.

Topping Smith’s list of demands from Carney is for his Liberal government to offer some kind of pathway to see a new bitumen pipeline built from Alberta to B.C.’s coast, a proposal that has been rejected by coastal First Nations as well as B.C. Premier David Eby.

Liberal MPs from B.C. have also lined up to say greenlighting any such project would require two key conditions to be met: Gaining acceptance from Eby’s NDP government, as well as impacted First Nations.

Standing in the House of Commons on Tuesday, Carney appeared to back those requirements, as expectations swirled around what kind of deal his government would be willing to ink with Smith’s United Conservative Party government.

“The memorandum of understanding that we’re negotiating with Alberta creates necessary conditions, but not sufficient conditions, because we believe in cooperative federalism,” Carney told the House of Commons on Tuesday.

“We believe the government of British Columbia has to agree. We believe that First Nations right holders in this country have to agree.”

Carney’s comment came in response to Opposition Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, whose party has long blamed the Liberals under former prime minister Justin Trudeau for ushering in a suite of environmental policies that it, and other political and industry critics, say have hampered new pipeline development.

Poilievre, himself an Alberta MP, panned the upcoming deal with Alberta as a public relations stunt on Tuesday and pressed Carney to offer a firm commitment for a new pipeline to B.C.

However, at least two of his MPs, who spoke to reporters that afternoon, suggested a closer look would be needed at the Ottawa-Alberta deal first.

“Devil’s always in the details,” said Alberta MP David Bexte.

Saskatchewan MP Kevin Waugh said while Alberta is the focus of Ottawa’s negotiations, his oil-producing province would benefit greatly from a new pipeline.

“We want to be a part of this pipeline,” he said. “So, Thursday’s announcement will be interesting. Hope for the best.”

While Smith entered negotiations with Ottawa in hopes of securing more commitments for a new pipeline and a reprieve from a slew of Trudeau-era environmental policies, Carney went in looking for the premier to commit to strengthening its provincial industrial carbon pricing policy, which she froze earlier this year.

The upcoming agreement is expected to include stronger commitments from Alberta around a willingness to strengthen its industrial carbon price, which Ottawa views as a win. Smith said earlier this fall that she was open to changing her policy, which is one that Carney sees as key to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions.

Much of the language around the upcoming deal is expected to be conditional, laying out a roadmap for how Ottawa and Alberta would better collaborate on energy after years of acrimony under Trudeau.

Other policies Ottawa has put on the table as part of its negotiations include regulations around methane and clean electricity, as well as the proposed emissions cap on oil and gas, the last of which Carney opened the door to scrapping in the Nov. 4 budget, linking doing so to seeing strong methane regulations and an expansion of carbon capture and storage technologies.

When it comes to a possible lifting or carveout of the federal oil tanker ban off B.C’s northern coast, the Carney government could do so using the powers ushered in under the bill known by its legislative title of C-5, which gives cabinet the powers to sidestep existing environmental laws under a set of conditions to see infrastructure projects deemed as benefiting the “national interest” built.

Energy and Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson said the government would have “something to say very soon” regarding the deal between Ottawa and Alberta.

B.C. Liberal MP Gurbux Saini told reporters on Tuesday that he sides with comments made by Eby that B.C., as the jurisdiction impacted by Alberta’s pipeline proposal, should be at the table with Ottawa.

“I can agree with Mr. Eby, as premier of British Columbia, that he should be at all of these discussions.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.