LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Victoria Mboko of Canada celebrates her victory against Marie Bouzkova of Czechia during their third round match on Day Five of the National Bank Open in Montrea.

Canada’s newest tennis sensation, 18-year-old Victoria Mboko, is continuing to attract attention as she moves into the fourth round of the Canadian Open in Montreal this weekend.
 

The last of nine Canadians remaining in the final tournament bracket, Mboko collected her sixth win against a top-50 player,
18-year-old Czech star, Marie Bouzkova, over three sets.
 

She will now face first seed, Coco Gauff, an American at

6 p.m. on Saturday

.

The two players have squared off before on the Women’s Tennis Association (WTA) Tour, but only once.
 
It was during the Italian Open earlier this year and Gauff prevailed. That was on clay. Now, they’ll face off on a hard court.  

“I’m going to kind of go into the match how I usually go into every other match despite the surface,” Mboko told The Tennis Gazette after her victory in the third round. “I’m going to show up with how I play, and I just hope for the best.”
 

She expressed excitement over the rematch with Gauff and expects it to be a hard-fought battle.
 

How did Mboko do in the early rounds of the Canadian Open?

Mboko kicked off the Open by besting Australian, Kimberly Birrell, in the first round, serving up 15 aces in the process.
 

In round two, she faced Sofia Kenin, an American and a seeded player (a player who is highly
ranked and placed strategically in a tournament by the organizers to prevent top players from having to face each other in early rounds).
 

Again Mboko prevailed, winning 6-2 and 6-3.
 

Against Bouzkova in the third round, Mboko appeared to falter, losing the first set 6-1, but she got her groove back in front of the home crowd and secured a place in the round of 16 (the last round before the quarter-finals).
 

Mboko told SportsNet she shifted her mindset after the opening set and sharpened her focus on court mobility.
 

“In the second set, I wanted to make sure my movement was at least twice as (good as) it was in the first set, and my concentration as well,” said Mboko. “I feel like I wasn’t really as focused as I wanted to be.”
 

What does Coco Gauff expect from Mboko?

Gauff also expects the fourth round against Mboko to be tough.
 

“She’s a great player,” Gauff told Sportsnet. “We played on clay, so it will be a different match. Obviously, she’s gotten more experience just being on tour and playing high-level players. It’s going to be a tough match.”
 

What is Mboko’s family history?

Mboko was born an American in Charlotte, North Carolina in 2006. Her family had immigrated there from the Democratic Republic of Congo. However, her parents moved the family to Toronto later that year.
 

She now hails from nearby Burlington.
 

The youngest of four children, all of her siblings play tennis. One sister and brother played at the college level in the U.S.
 

The siblings trained under former Canadian Davis Cup captain Pierre Lamarche. Then Mboko travelled to Belgium where she sharpened her skills at Justine Henin Tennis Academy.
 

What sparked Mboko’s appetite for pro tennis?

Mboko’s father Cyprien had the tennis bug originally. Back in the Congo, he and a friend were fans of Andre Agassi, Jim Courier and Steffi Graf.
 

He told Tennis Canada that the sport was good exercise for his children. “I must have bought about 1,000 balls from Walmart and they all seemed to end up in the bushes.”
 

How did Mboko’s career develop?

Mboko first found success in junior-level play, making the Under-14 final as a 12-year-old in 2018.
 
Then she competed in junior Grand Slams, reaching the semi-finals at Wimbledon and the U.S. Open in 2022.
 

Mboko has also competed in doubles play, reaching the final at the Australian Open and Wimbledon with her Canadian colleague, Kayla Cross in 2022.
 

Though just 18, she has injured her knees, inspiring her to be more vigilant about caring for her body.
 

Is 2025 Mboko’s best year?

Earlier this year, Mboko achieved four straight lower-level titles in a 22-match winning streak, not dropping a single set.
 

She competed in her first senior-level Grand Slam at the French Open, making the third round. Mboko also won both her matches during her Billie Jean King Cup debut for Canada in April.
 

The Canadian Open continues through to the finals on Aug. 7.
 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


David Cohen, the former U.S. Ambassador to Canada, being interviewed in the U.S. Embassy building in Ottawa on Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2022.

Canada’s view of its southern neighbour has understandably dimmed after President Donald Trump launched a tariff war. With Trump declaring more tariffs against Canada effective Friday, National Post spoke this week with former ambassador David Cohen, former president Joe Biden’s envoy to Ottawa from 2021 to 2025, who was tasked with resetting U.S.-Canada relations following the first tumultuous Trump term, which included its own tariff actions against Canadian goods.

Much of Cohen’s work involved navigating a landscape where bilateral co-operation could no longer be taken for granted and where he had to rebuild an alliance strained by trade disputes and fiery rhetoric. He’s since returned to private life but still gives talks boosting the U.S.-Canada relationship. 


(This interview has been edited and condensed due to length.)

 David Cohen at a Canadian Club luncheon in Ottawa on Tuesday, Oct. 31, 2023.

Q: What were your proudest achievements as ambassador?

A: “I think the most important achievement was all of Mission Canada,” said Cohen. “I set as a priority to rebuild, strengthen, and nurture the U.S.-Canada relationship, and I think we were largely successful in accomplishing that objective.”

Cohen also noted helping to shift Canada’s defence spending debate away from an almost exclusive focus on GDP percentages by arguing that commitments must be tied to existing security threats.

The public view often was, “Why does Canada have to spend money on defence? We’re surrounded by oceans on three sides, and by the United States on the fourth side.”

But, Cohen said, “that wasn’t and isn’t true. There are legitimate security threats, and Canada has a special responsibility and should have a special focus on continental defence.” He noted that under prime ministers Justin Trudeau and Mark Carney, the defence discussion has lately become centred on continental defence and the Arctic, which resonates more with Canadians.

In fact, in December 2024, for the first time in over a decade, a majority of Canadians supported more defence spending, according to polling by the Angus Reid Institute
. This, said Cohen, “contributed to the additional defence spending that has occurred – and made it easier for (Trudeau and Carney) to make commitments about increasing the amount of investment that Canada would make toward defence, ultimately being able to sign off on the new five per cent threshold that was agreed to this year.”

Q: How well do you think Carney’s team has been doing amid the trade war and negotiations?
 

A: “Prime Minister Carney and Canada are doing about as good a job as they can do in very difficult negotiations that are not always rationality-based … President Trump has not been all that crystal clear at times about exactly what it is he wants to accomplish and the underlying reasons for his positioning,” he said. 

 Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump in Alberta for a G7 meeting, June 16, 2025.

Cohen pointed to the White House’s original 25 per cent tariff announcement and how it was premised largely on border and fentanyl issues, even though he said fentanyl imports from Canada were a very small part of the U.S. problem, especially compared to Mexico. He questioned the rationale for raising tariffs on Canadian goods from 25 to 35 per cent, given the tiny and shrinking amount of fentanyl coming from Canada.

But Cohen also pointed out that “Canada sometimes seems to overvalue its leverage, without fully recognizing the huge asymmetry in our almost trillion-dollar trade relationship. Three-quarters of Canada’s exports go to the U.S., but only 17 per cent of U.S. exports go to Canada. Sometimes that gives Canada an overinflated view of (Canada’s) leverage in negotiations.”

Q: Do you think a new U.S.-Canada trade and security deal is coming?

A: Cohen noted that Republican voices, such as Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, are publicly starting to highlight the critical importance of the U.S.-Canada trade relationship and expressing confidence that an agreement will eventually come.

Cohen agreed, saying he believes a deal is coming – he’s just not sure when.

On Canada’s path to securing the best deal, Cohen stressed that delivering concrete defence results matters far more than mere promises. “Carney has said all the right things. What he now needs to do is to deliver – that is, money actually has to be budgeted and then it has to be spent.”

He also noted that the
Golden Dome initiative
, a spending priority for the U.S., could help Canada reach pledged defence targets.

 The Golden Dome, an envisioned by U.S. President Donald Trump, would put U.S. weapons in space for the first time.

“Actually putting concrete actions behind the commitments is something that Prime Minister Carney can do.”

Cohen also noted that Canada’s supply management issues, particularly with dairy, remain politically sensitive. 

“There are a whole series and host of issues that are outstanding between the United States and Canada,” he added, “and I think bringing any of them to the table with potential solutions that would be attractive to President Trump is a good strategy and a good tactic.” 

Q: Do you expect the current trade talks to bleed into the required review of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement this coming year? Do you think Trump is looking to rip that up?

A: “I think it’s inevitable these negotiations will bleed into the statutorily required review of USMCA,” Cohen said. And while the deal is a legacy of Trump’s former U.S. trade representative, Robert Lighthizer, “I think there’s a part of Donald Trump that views it as a Donald Trump legacy too, since he was personally at the table and personally involved in closing the ultimate deal in 2018.”

While Cohen doesn’t think Trump is interested in ripping up the agreement, he acknowledged that there “may need to be adjustments to it or revisiting of issues that Canada resisted during the original negotiation.” 

“I think it’s almost inevitable that there will be certain elements of USMCA that will end up needing to be renegotiated as part of the review process.” 

But he expects it to survive because “it has been such a good deal for both sides.”

Q: Has there been long-term damage to the U.S.-Canada relationship from the last few months of trade tension, or is a reset feasible?

A: Cohen noted the trust quotient between the U.S. and Canada plummeted from about 58 per cent during the Obama era to around 10 per cent in Trump’s first term, before climbing back to the mid-50 per cent range under Biden. Today it’s at 16 per cent.

“That history says it’ll take work, it’ll take effort from the United States perspective – we’ll be dealing with a skeptical Canadian audience,” he said. “But the U.S. market is too attractive (to not repair the relationship). The Canadian market is historically too much of an integral partner within that market.”

“With a different government and a different approach, I think businesses on both sides of the border will probably be more ready to come back to the table and to engage in rebuilding the relationship. I think it’s going to take more to convince the Canadian public that the United States really does care about Canada, although I think that is achievable.”

Q: Can friction between the U.S. and Canada be a good thing? Can tariffs?

A: “I think civil friction is healthy because it respects the sovereignty of our allies and often ends up improving the United States’ decision-making,” Cohen said.

“But I don’t think just because the United States is the largest economy on earth, has 10 times the population, a much higher GDP, and just because we dominate the trade relationship, means that everything we say Canada should agree to just because we say it.” 

On tariffs, Cohen said he is mostly a free-trade supporter and believes governments should get out of the way of businesses, the true drivers of economies. 

“I think tariffs are really dangerous tools to use because I think they can interfere with the natural work of businesses in growing economies — that is what businesses do better than governments.” 

But Cohen also noted that targeted use of tariffs can be appropriate. He cited the example of softwood lumber tariffs, used by both Trump and Biden. “It is just about indisputable that Canada, through its governmental policies by the federal government and by multiple provincial governments, unfairly favours Canadian lumber producers, creates preferential treatment for Canadian lumber producers, and discriminates against U.S. lumber producers.”

“As a result, U.S. lumber producers are disadvantaged vis-à-vis Canadian lumber producers, and the mechanism for levelling that playing field is the countervailing softwood lumber tariffs.”

Cohen also said tariffs can be helpful as leverage to negotiate things like boosted defence spending for NATO. “I think that’s a good thing,” he said. 

But he also criticized Trump’s across-the-board high tariffs, like the 25 per cent tariff on potash, an essential farming input that’s scarce in the U.S., as making no sense.

Q: How is your successor, Ambassador Pete Hoekstra, doing in his job? 

A: “I think he’s in a very difficult position because (he’s not a free agent but a personal representative of President Trump, but …) he’s from a border state and has a longstanding understanding of the U.S.-Canada relationship and its importance from his Michigan roots,” Cohen said, noting how the former representative for Michigan’s 2nd congressional district has gone out of his way to repeatedly talk about the importance of the Canada-U.S. relationship.

 U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra.

“I think he’s doing the best job he can to continue to send a message about the value that he personally and that the country puts on the U.S.-Canada relationship.”

Q: Any final advice for Canadians about their relationship with the U.S.?

A: “There’s almost an inferiority complex in Canada — lines like ‘we’re the stepchild’ or ‘not big enough to matter’ — I always hated that,” he said, noting how Canada undervalues its importance as a friend, partner, and ally. 

“There are things Canada can do that the United States cannot, because internationally, (the U.S.) is the 800-pound gorilla. Canada, though, gets to be in conversations in the global south where it can express views about promoting democracy and democratic values that, if promoted by the U.S., would fall on deaf ears. Canada can open the door and help achieve America’s No. 1 foreign policy goal,

which is the promotion of democracy and democratic values around the world.

Canada should never also never undervalue the role it has played in its actions, Cohen said. “When the United States went into Afghanistan, Canada was the first country to join us. Americans should never forget what Canada did in the (Canadian) Caper, getting our last diplomats out of Iran safely (after the 1979 revolution), at great danger to the individual Canadian diplomats and to Canada on the international stage.

“On the one hand, be proud and recognize how incredibly important you are to this relationship … On the other hand, recognize that in tough negotiations, you may not have the best hand because of the asymmetry of the financial nature of the relationship.”

“That tension is one of the most interesting aspects of dealing with Canada.”

National Post

tmoran@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks to reporters in Ottawa in March.

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney expressed his disappointment on Friday about

U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to increase so-called “fentanyl tariffs” to 35 per cent

and said his government is committed to supporting the most affected sectors.

In a “fact sheet” from the White House

, the Trump administration defended its latest action by blaming Canada for reportedly failing to “cooperate in curbing the ongoing flood of fentanyl” and for having retaliated against the U.S. since their original round of tariffs.

However, goods that qualify for “preferential tariff treatment” under the Canada-U.S.-Mexico free trade agreement (CUSMA) continue to remain exempt from tariffs, it said.

“While the Canadian government is disappointed by this action, we remain committed to CUSMA, which is the world’s second-largest free trade agreement by trading volume,”

wrote Carney in a statement on X

published shortly after midnight on Friday.

The prime minister added that the application of CUSMA means that the average tariff rate on Canadian goods going to the U.S. remains one of the lowest for all its trading partners.

However, other sectors of Canada’s economy will remain heavily impacted by tariffs, he said. Steel and aluminum were already subject to 50 per cent tariffs, with copper now impacted by that same rate, but lumber and automobiles are also of great concern.

“For such sectors, the Canadian government will act to protect Canadian jobs, invest in our industrial competitiveness, buy Canadian, and diversity our export markets,” he said.

Carney said despite the U.S. justifying its action on the flow of fentanyl, Canada accounts for only one per cent of U.S. fentanyl imports and “has been working intensively to further reduce these volumes” with “historic” investments for security at the border.

Carney did not announce a new deadline to conclude a new economic and security agreement with the U.S. and rather insisted on making Canada more self-reliant.

“While we will continue to negotiate with the United States on our trading relationship, the Canadian government is laser focused on what we can control: building Canada strong,” he said, pointing to internal trade between provinces and the building of major projects.

“Together, these initiatives have the potential to catalyse over half a trillion dollars of new investments in Canada,” he added.

Carney concluded his statement by saying Canadians will become their own best customers and create “more well-paying careers at home” while the government continues to “strengthen and diversify” its trading partnerships around the world.

“We can give ourselves more than any foreign government can ever take away by building with Canadian workers and by using Canadian resources to benefit all Canadians.”

According to the Canadian Press, Trump said on Thursday he had not “spoken to Canada” but referenced that “he’s called”— suggesting Carney may have reached out hours before the tariff increase.

That is exactly what U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick suggested Carney do hours before in an interview with FOX News to stop the increase to 35 per cent.

“If he makes that call and if he starts turning on the charm, and if he takes off his retaliation… it stops the silliness. Maybe the president will let it down a bit,” he said.

It remains to be seen if Canada will retaliate further. Back in March, the federal government imposed $30 billion in tariffs on U.S. goods such as orange juice, wine, spirits and appliances. It also imposed 25 per cent tariffs on U.S. steel and aluminum, and on automobiles.

Lutnick pointed out that Canada was one of two countries in the world — with China — to have retaliated against the U.S.

In a post on X, Ontario Premier Doug Ford said the federal government should “hit back” with a 50 per cent tariff on U.S. steel and aluminum.

“Now is not the time to roll over. We need to stand our ground,” he said.

But Brian Clow, who served as former prime minister Justin Trudeau’s deputy chief of staff and his executive director of Canada-U.S. relations, said other countries’ refusal to stand up to Trump’s actions “emboldened” him and has put Canada in a difficult position.

“Although generally, I’ve been a fan of retaliation, and I think the world should have stood up to this President, I’m not sure it makes sense for Canada to be strongly retaliating all on its own when the rest of the world is caving,” he said in a recent interview.

“We might just find ourselves on the receiving end of even more punishment from this president.”

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


“Dilution and duplication lead to unnecessary layers of decision making and unclear accountabilities,” federal Chief Human Resources Officer Jacqueline Bogden wrote in her memo.

OTTAWA — After 10 years of constant growth, the federal government now says there are too many senior executives in the public service, slowing productivity and creating workplace conflicts.

In an internal memo Wednesday obtained by National Post, the federal Chief Human Resources Officer Jacqueline Bogden is clear: there are more assistant deputy ministers (421) in the bureaucracy than permanent positions at that level (355).

Now, the top human resources official says her office will be cracking down on the overage, an exceptional move after years of substantial growth of the federal public service.

Bogden said just the assistant deputy minister (ADM) — the second highest ranking position in most departments — cadre ballooned by 50 per cent (or 140) since 2015.

“There is a need to take additional proactive measures to address the ADM overage situation and contain future growth of the ADM cadre,” Bogden wrote.

An ADM’s salary can range from $197,774 to $260,719 depending on their years of experience as well as their pay classification,

according to the government’s website

.

Bogden’s memo says her office is implementing two new measures until the end of the year to address the overage.

The first aims to reduce the number of ADMs by reviewing existing positions, particularly “higher risk” situations where the senior executive is on a temporary assignment with no subsequent permanent position.

The memo does not say if those positions will be demoted, eliminated or transformed into permanent positions to reduce the “overage.”

The second aims to “contain” the growth of the ADM cadre by requiring all departments to get permission from her office before promoting a new person to the position.

The internal announcement comes as Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government is asking most departments and agencies to find spending cuts worth 15 per cent by 2029.

It also comes after years of tremendous growth of the public service under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic beginning in 2020. Over his tenure, the public service grew by over 100,000, from 257,000 in 2015

to 358,000 this year

, according to government data.

Though Bogden’s memo focuses on the ADM cadre, it also included a recent report by the Public Service Management Advisory Committee warning that there are too many executives overall in the public service.

In fact, nearly half of all departments in the core public service are above the recommended average number of executives, according to the committee.

“New EX jobs at all levels are created, in many cases without a significant change in the organization’s mandate. In essence, this can mean that the same pie is being sliced in smaller pieces,” reads the July 18 document titled “Enabling a Robust Assistant Deputy Minister Cadre.”

The boon, and now excess number, of senior executives has created significant risks for the public service, the committee warns, including poor performance and productivity issues.

“Dilution and duplication lead to unnecessary layers of decision making and unclear accountabilities. It slows down productivity and can create workplace conflicts,” reads the report.

The excess of ADMs compared to permanent positions also means the number of senior executives ready to move to another job “far exceeds” the number of expected vacancies to fill in 2025.

That creates “false expectations” for ADMs and “impatience” among other lower-ranking executives hoping for a promotion, warns the report.

Kevin Page, a former Parliamentary Budget Officer, said in an email that the review was useful and timely as the government embarks on a new spending review process.

“I hope one of the outputs of the review process will be a multi-year plan to manage the growth of the public service including the size of the executive group and a plan for military service people. The focus could be on productivity in the delivery of service,” said Page, now the President and CEO of the Institute of Fiscal Studies and Democracy.

But the Parliamentary Budget Officer office said earlier this month that the federal government has missed its “full-time equivalents” reduction targets four years in a row.

“For the fourth year in a row the government said: ‘don’t worry, next year we’re going to reduce the number of full-time equivalents in the federal government’ and they blew past it again,” Jason Jacques, the PBO’s director general of economic and fiscal analysis,

told the Ottawa Citizen

.

In an email to National Post, Page encouraged individual departments to publish data on executives yearly so that the public can keep the government accountable when monitoring growth in the federal bureaucracy.

“The lack of aggregation of numbers like that provided in the report on an annual basis does not allow the executive and Parliament to monitor the upward creep in the size of the public service including the growth of higher paid executives,” he told National Post.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre with Prime Minister and Liberal Party Liberal Mark Carney debate during the federal election campaign in April.

OTTAWA — New fundraising figures show the Liberal Party of Canada has shrunk its fundraising gap with the Conservative Party of Canada, lagging by just $1.4 million in the last quarter. That’s the closest the two parties have been since Pierre Poilievre became Conservative leader.

Second-quarter fundraising reports filed with Elections Canada show Poilievre’s Conservatives raked in $9 million, while Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberals raised $7.6 million during the same period. The period, from April to June, includes most of the federal election campaign that ran from March 23 to April 28, with the Liberals eventually winning a minority government.

“Grassroots Liberals’ record-breaking support this year helped deliver our largest vote share since 1980 in the last election, with Mark Carney and our new Liberal government earning a strong mandate to unite, secure, protect, and build our country,” wrote Liberal party spokesman Matteo Rossi.

“The Liberal Party of Canada is in one of the strongest positions for fundraising and grassroots organizing in the party’s history, achieving our best-ever first and second quarters for fundraising this year, with more donors chipping in Q1 alone than in any single year in our history.”

The Conservative party has not yet responded to a request for comment.

The gap of $1.4 million is the closest the Liberals have been to their Conservative rivals since September 2022,

when Poilievre became Conservative leader

. Fundraising reports back then show the Conservatives had brought in around $730,000 more in contributions than the Liberals for the quarter.

The gap quickly widened,

with the Conservatives out-fundraising all other federal parties by millions

, particularly throughout 2024, where the party celebrated smashing the previous fundraising records for all political parties by raking in a total of $41.7 million, up from the $35.2 million it raised during Poilievre’s first full year as leader.

For the first three months of 2025, the Tories raked in $28 million from roughly 149,000 donors. The Liberals, by comparison, raised around $13 million during the first quarter from around 156,000 donors.

The latest second-quarter fundraising data, published by Elections Canada on Wednesday evening, shows the Liberals continued to see an uptick in individual donors contributing to the party.

Figures posted for June 2025 show the Liberals had around 116,000 donors, while the Tories received donations from roughly 83,000 donors.

That represents a massive spike for the Liberals, who closed the fourth quarter of 2024 with around 34,000 donors contributing to it during that period, while the Conservatives saw roughly 62,000 donors send money into its coffers.

The Liberals have also seen a jump in the number of contributors donating $200 or less. Filings show that of the 116,00 donors who contributed in the second quarter of this year, almost 110,000 gave under $200.

Of the 156,000 contributors during the first quarter of this year, coinciding with the Liberals’ leadership race, almost 145,000 gave the same.

That reflects how, during the leadership race that ran from January to early March,

more than two-thirds of the donations

to now Prime Minister Mark Carney’s campaign for leader were less than $100, according to some of the filings at the time.

Carney was elected Liberal leader in March, replacing former prime minister Justin Trudeau, who had become deeply unpopular, including among many Liberals.

According to Elections Canada filings, the federal New Democrats raised around $1.9 million during the second quarter of 2025, from around 38,000 donors. The Bloc Québécois raised almost 675,000 from roughly 4,500 donors.

National Post

staylor@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney heads to the stage for a news conference on Canada recognizing the State of Palestine, in Ottawa on Wednesday, July 30, 2025.

OTTAWA — When Prime Minister Mark Carney was asked if he consulted with the United States prior to announcing

Canada’s intention of recognizing a State of Palestine

, he did not offer a clear “no” but his response pointed in that direction.

Carney clearly mentioned speaking this week with France President Emmanuel Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Kier Starmer — both of which have announced their intention to recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September.

Carney said he also had conversations with the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, and Canada’s Ambassador to the UN, Bob Rae.

U.S. President Donald Trump was apparently not given the same heads up, and he promptly expressed his displeasure on his social media platform hours later.

“Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine,”

he wrote on Truth Social.

“That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh’ Canada!!!”

After meeting with his cabinet Wednesday, Carney told reporters that the recognition was conditional on the Palestinian Authority, which governs the West Bank, going forward with significant reforms which include demilitarization and holding a general election in 2026.

He added Canada’s longstanding hope for a two-state solution negotiated between the Palestinian Authority and Israel was “no longer tenable” because of the war in Gaza.

Carney called the U.S. an “essential partner” for peace in the Middle East, among many areas of the world, but made it clear Canada would be moving without its neighbour.

“We make our own independent foreign policy positions,” he said, later clarifying “independent of the United States.”

Louise Blais, who was Canada’s Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York from 2017-2021, said this announcement marks a significant change of position for Canada, which has been more or less aligned with the U.S. on Israel for years.

“At minimum, I think it would have been prudent … to have had a conversation. It’s possible it took place. But it certainly doesn’t seem that way,” said Blais in an interview.

“It is always a good idea not to take allies by surprise,” she added.

A source close to Carney’s thinking, speaking on a not-for-attribution basis to speak more freely, said there has been a sharing of views between Canada, France and the U.K., but their subsequent announcements on Palestinian statehood were not a co-ordinated effort.

“This is an example of like-minded countries acting like-minded,” said the source.

Carney explained on Wednesday that “it does matter that others are moving … because it increases the prospect of success.” But he added that the “rights of people to self-determination” are at the core of this decision for the Canadian government.

“We have long … felt that this should come later in a process and that our recognition … of the State of Palestine, should come a point of maximum impact during a peace process,” he said.

“We’re now at a position … where, in our judgment and the judgment of others, the prospect of a Palestinian state is literally receding before our eyes,” he added.

Blais said Carney is clearly signalling that Canada is aligning itself with its European partners more closely, but warned he has to weigh that decision “very carefully.”

“Geography matters, and our neighbour is a superpower,” she said. “And last time I checked, we still very much depend on them for our national security, and it will be so for a while, and so we have to be fairly balanced and careful about that.”

It is also a question of timing. Blais said Trump definitely voiced “a level of annoyance” that was not preferable as Canadian negotiators were trying to get to a trade deal by Friday.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump “expressed his displeasure and his disagreement” with the leaders of France, the U.K. and Canada on that decision.

“He feels as though that’s rewarding Hamas at a time where Hamas is the true impediment to a ceasefire and to the release of all of the hostages,” she said.

But Trump is also dealing with growing displeasure towards Israel within his own ranks. This week, Marjorie Taylor Greene became the first House Republican to publicly refer to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza as “genocide.”

U.S. special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, and U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, will be travelling to Gaza on Friday to inspect food aid distribution sites in the area and hear first-hand from Gazans about their living conditions, said Leavitt.

Following their visit, they are expected to secure a plan to deliver more food.

Canada, for its part, partnered with Jordan to arrange airdrops of aid in Gaza on Thursday.

“Much more aid is needed and Canada will continue to do all it can to ensure it is delivered to the Palestinians in Gaza who so desperately need it,”

said Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand in a post on X. 

— With files from Christopher Nardi.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Illustration of dementia as memory loss due to brain degeneration and decline.

By 2050, over 1.7 million Canadians are projected to be living with dementia. This represents an increase of 187 per cent compared to 2020, when approximately 597,300 Canadians were living with dementia, according to the

Alzheimer’s Society of Canada

.

Dementia describes the decline of mental ability, while Alzheimer’s Disease is the medical term for the brain disease that commonly causes dementia.

Researchers are now saying certain lifestyle changes can stave off mental decline. A new

U.S
. study

sets out what Alzheimer’s researchers are calling the strongest evidence yet regarding what is involved in slowing the aging process and improving cognition.

It comes down to three key factors: a diet heavy on leafy greens, berries and grains, regular moderate exercise and ongoing social interaction. Regular cardiovascular monitoring is also a factor.

Jessica Langbaum, senior director of research strategy at the

Banner Alzheimer’s Institute

in Phoenix was not involved directly in the research but she presented the findings at an annual conference of experts in Toronto on Wednesday.

The

Alzheimer’s Association International Conference

(AAIC) is the largest international meeting dedicated to advancing dementia science and clinical practice. This year’s gathering brought together 8,000 scientists and clinicians from all over the world, with the goal of improving diagnosis, risk reduction and treatment.

The study pulled together diet, exercise and socialization in one substantial, structured study of 2,100 people in their 60s and 70s at risk of developing dementia, showing that bad habits “can really slow down memory and thinking” in adults at risk for cognitive impairment and dementia, Langbaum told the

PBS New Hour

in an interview on Wednesday evening.

The subjects who participated in the study changed their habits, shifting from a sedentary lifestyle to an active one and improving their diet over a two-year period, resulting in cognitive function scores on par with people one or two years younger.

That might not sound like much, but Langbaum says the results are significant evidence that change can occur without medication. “And so, it’s showing that we can change the trajectory of aging,” she said.

There were two groups in the study. In one, lifestyle changes were structurally prescribed. In the other, the changes were self-directed. The results for the prescribed group were much better, but Langbaum says both groups showed improvement.

The biggest challenge that study participants faced was sustaining a new exercise regime. Langbaum recommends people find something that they enjoy doing.

“If (you’re) frustrated by it, (you’re) just going to give up. But do something that you enjoy. Better yet, do it with somebody else or others around you because socialization is key, and lastly, something that you can adhere to, if you can schedule it. It’s something that you can stay committed to.”

Regarding nutrition she notes: “We say what’s good for the heart is good for the brain, so a nice balanced … nutritious diet with … those leafy greens, low in saturated fats, all of those things.”

The American Alzheimer’s Association spent close to

US$50 million on the study

. The National Institutes of Health spent even more to ensure many of the participants underwent brain scans, blood tests and sleep studies aimed at provide additional information down the road.

Meanwhile, Langbaum expresses concern that structured intervention may not be sustainable in most communities. “I think that’s really the next stage of the research is, how do we make this scalable in communities so that people can implement these things into their daily lives?”

The American Alzheimer’s Association is planning to spend another US$40 million on implementing the lessons of the study.

Langbaum says that will come with a change in the mindsets of doctors. They “should be treating lifestyle interventions as they would a drug,” she told

NPR

. That would mean prescribing improved exercise and eating regimens and getting insurers to cover those prescriptions, she added.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Douglas Worth, convicted of killing a 12-year-old girl in 1987, has been released on parole and is living in Dartmouth, N.S., according to Halifax Regional Police.

A Nova Scotia man who raped and murdered a 12-year-old Ontario girl, later decapitating her dead body in an attempt to hide evidence, has been released on parole and is living in the Halifax area.

According to Halifax Regional Police, 73-year-old high-risk offender Douglas Worth is living in Dartmouth.

Worth, originally from the Pictou County area of Nova Scotia, was released after serving 35 years of a federal life sentence for the December 1987 second-degree murder of Trina Campbell in Brampton, Ont.

National Post has contacted the Parole Board of Canada to obtain a copy of their decision to release Worth, who police say can have no contact with children or his victims, no drugs or alcohol, and must report all relationships.

Worth has a criminal history dating back to 1968 that includes break-ins, motor vehicle theft and the 1978 rape of an Indigenous girl in Ontario, for which he was sentenced and served eight years, earning his release in June of 1987, about seven months before he killed Campbell.

The circumstances surrounding that murder are detailed in multiple news articles from the time and are also explored in

a 2005 episode of the television series Crime Stories.

In the show, it notes that shortly before his release, Worth had said he planned to kill people and go on a rampage as retribution for his incarceration. Despite those concerns, he had served his limited sentence, and nothing in Canadian law at the time established safeguards around release.

After Worth got out in the spring, however, police tracked him to Edmonton, where he reconnected with a woman named Mary Kelly and her teenage son from a different relationship, Shawn. Police said they lost track of Worth soon after, but believed he returned to Ontario.

Police said Campbell, a Metis girl who’d had a troubled life, was living in a group home in the fall of 1987 after having run away from foster parents on several occasions.

When she failed to return to the facility on Dec. 11, they thought at first she might have run away again.

A months-long investigation into her disappearance ensued, but police didn’t have any credible leads by the time February rolled around. Despite no evidence of foul play, the file was handed off to homicide detectives Edward Toye and Len Favreau.

Meanwhile, Peel police were completely unaware that Worth was living in a downtown boarding house close to where Campbell was last seen by her school bus driver.

”We had no idea this sadistic predator had moved into our area,” Inspector Rod Piukkala said on Crime Stories.

Authorities later learned Worth was soon rejoined by the Kellys, and in March of 1988, he asked Mary to rent a vehicle and accompany him so that he could move evidence related to an undisclosed crime.

“He left the car with a hockey bag and went into this ravine area. He then was seen by Mary to come from there carrying this hockey bag that was now laden with something,” assistant Crown prosecutor Al O’Marra said on the show.

The two drove about an hour north of Brampton, where Mary said Worth took the bag into the woods and came back with it empty.

Back in Brampton, he then ordered 14-year-old Shawn to clean up a stain left in the car’s trunk.

After the Kellys moved with Worth to his home province in April, Shawn asked his school’s guidance counsellor and Stellarton Police for help escaping the violence he was experiencing at home, according to a 2005 article in The Evening News in New Glasgow.

During that chat, Sgt. Hugh Muir, knowing Worth was wanted in connection with crimes in Ontario, asked Shawn about Brampton specifically, prompting the teenager to recount the stain story and that he had heard Worth tell other family members that he had killed a man there, not a girl.

“We were both stunned,” Muir said of himself and the guidance counsellor. “We had no inkling whatsoever that this was coming.”

Armed with new information, Toye and Favreau located the rental car with the dark stain. Testing quickly revealed it to be not only human blood, but decomposed human blood. They also discovered the rare blood type is common among Indigenous persons, leading police to think there could be a “loose chance” of a Campbell connection.

The Peel detectives travelled to N.S. to begin surveilling Worth, but had little evidence to act on. Before long, Sharon and Wade Lewis, Worth’s sister and brother-in-law, agreed to interviews, during which they spoke about the murder admission overheard by Shawn and Worth’s growing paranoia that someone would find the body and connect it to him.

“They advised us that Doug had approached them requesting assistance to get back to Brampton so that he could retrieve the head of the victim,” Favreau said on Crime Stories. “Doug told them that if you can get the head of the victim, it would prevent anyone from being able to identify the victim.”

Armed with that knowledge, police devised a plan whereby they would provide money and a rented car to Sharon that she would give to Worth and urge him to hit the road and deal with his problem.

Worth took the bait, and police discreetly tailed him back to Brampton, where he and Mary arrived on the night of May 7 under constant surveillance. Worth gave police the slip overnight, but officers fanned out and eventually located the pair exiting the woods.

“I’ll never forget that sight and that immense wave of relief that washed over me when we saw the car parked there and saw Doug coming out of the bush carrying a gym bag. He didn’t seem to pay us any mind,” Peel Det. Mike Cederberg told producers for Crime Stories.

To eliminate any chance of an alibi that he had found the remains and was returning them to police, officers allowed Worth to drive past two police stations before stopping him in Brampton. In the gym bag, forensics officers found a decomposing skull wrapped in garbage bags, which they soon confirmed was that of the missing girl.

The rest of her body was recovered from the area north of the city later that day.

“He broke her leg, fractured her skull, her body was butchered, he snapped off her forearms and dumped her body,” O’Marra told the court during Worth’s 1990 trial, according to the Windsor Star.

When first apprehended, Worth told police he’d grabbed Campbell in a supermarket, and raped and beat her before leaving her to die in a ravine.

During the trial, however, he pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder. Defence lawyer Damien Frost asked the jury to accept an insanity plea, arguing Worth was hallucinating and believed Campbell was a female prison guard from his previous time in prison.

It took jurors under an hour to reject that argument and present their guilty verdict to Justice Coulter Osbourne, who handed Worth a life sentence with no chance of parole for 23 years.

Worth unleashed a confusing and contradictory rant after his sentencing, per the Star.

”I did not kill her,” he said before adding, ”I’m not saying I’m not to blame for the cause of her death.”

He went on to add that people who commit crimes like this against children “should be shot.”

“That goes for me, too,” he said.

He also told O’Marra that he is “not the cold-hearted son of a b—-” he was made out to be during the trial.

”They say I’m mentally ill, but I don’t want to go on living like this if there’s no hope. . . I’ll put a bullet through my head.”

Halifax police said its advisory this week is meant to inform the public of Worth’s presence and is “not intended to encourage any form of vigilante activity or other unreasonable conduct.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Gold medalist Summer McIntosh of Team Canada celebrates on the podium during the Women's 200-metre Butterfly medal ceremony at the Singapore 2025 World Aquatics Championships on July 31, 2025.

Canadian swimming sensation Summer McIntosh won her third gold of the Singapore world championships on Thursday in the 200-metre butterfly, coming within two tenths of a second of setting a world record in the event.

McIntosh completed the race in 2 minutes, 1.99 seconds, just behind the world mark of 2:01.81 set by Liu Zige of China in 2009.

Still, the second-fastest time in history was more than enough to beat Regan Smith of America, who placed second at 2:04.99, and Australia’s Elizabeth Dekkers, who was third with 2:06.12.

It also moved McIntosh a step closer to match Michael Phelps’ record. He is the only swimmer in history to win five individual titles at a single world championships. McIntosh has already won the 400-metre freestyle and the 200-metre individual medley in Singapore.

Coincidentally, she announced this year that after Singapore she plans to move to Austin, Texas, to train with Bob Bowman, Phelps’ former coach. McIntosh also has a cat named Mikey, in honour of Phelps and his record as the world’s most decorated Olympian (28 medals, 23 of them gold).

“I was so close, that’s what upsets me a little bit,” McIntosh told CBC after Thursday’s race. “It was so close and I know that last 15 metres I took an extra breath and I should’ve had my head down.”

She added: “This is definitely going to fuel me for next season, so it leaves a little bit more fuel in the tank and really get closer and closer to that record. If there’s one world record that I wanted to break since the start of my career it’s this one.”

The swimmer, who turns 19 in August, has already been having an amazing summer, even before Singapore. In June she broke two world records in three days at the Canadian swimming trials.

McIntosh swam the 200-metre individual medley there in 2 minutes and 5.7 seconds, breaking the previous record of 2:06.12 set by Hungary’s Katinka Hosszu in 2015. And she completed the 400-metre freestyle in 3:54.18, shaving more than a second off the old record of 3:55.38 set by Ariarne Titmus of Australia.

“I’ve been knocking on the door on this one,” she told the Associated Press, referring to the 200-metre race. “I’ve just tried to chip away, chip away at it. To finally do it, it’s kind of like, wow, I’ve finally got that done.”

“I’m really trying to take it one race at a time,” she added. “Really kind of cruising the heats and then coming to every final super locked in and focused.”

Next up for McIntosh is the 800-metre freestyle Saturday, where she will square off against American legend Katie Ledecky, the world record holder. McIntosh early in her career had a swim cap once worn by Ledecky, who has 10 Olympic medals, seven of them gold.

If McIntosh takes gold there, Sunday’s 400-metre individual medley could offer a chance to match Phelps’ record of five.

McIntosh, the daughter of another Canadian Olympic swimmer, Jill Horstead, was at 14 the youngest member of the Canadian team selected for the Tokyo 2020 Olympics in 2021. The Toronto native took fourth place in the 400-metre freestyle that year.

A year later, in her World Aquatics Championships debut in Budapest, McIntosh won the 200-metre butterfly and the 400-metre individual medley, breaking the world junior record in both.

She went on to win six medals at the 2022 Commonwealth Games in Birmingham just weeks later, and last year she won three gold medals at the Paris Olympics in her three individual events of the 400 and 200 individual medleys and the 200 butterfly. She also won silver in the 400 free.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Google signage on a building in Toronto, Tuesday February 20, 2024.

In defending a lawsuit by a former employee claiming Google Canada fired her within days of telling her bosses she was pregnant, the tech giant claims that pregnancy is not a protected ground under the Ontario Human Rights Code.

Sarah Lilleyman filed a statement of claim in Toronto’s Superior Court of Justice last year claiming wrongful dismissal and a breach of the Ontario Human Rights Code because of “pregnancy discrimination,” as

previously reported by National Post.

Google Canada, headquartered in Toronto, filed a statement of defence in court as part of the legal process for adjudicating the claim. In it, Google, a leading provider of online search services and internet-related products, denies discrimination and wrongful dismissal.

Google says Lilleyman worked for the company from October 2021 “until her employment was terminated on March 22, 2024, as part of a workforce reduction.” She worked as an editor, responsible for user growth through writing, editing, and publishing content.

“In January 2024, due to changing business needs, Google Canada was forced to implement significant workforce reductions across various locations and divisions. Lilleyman’s role was among those impacted by this workforce reduction in Canada.” She was given two months’ notice.

“Google Canada denies it discriminated against Lilleyman in her employment or on termination on the basis of sex, gender, or any other protected ground under the Ontario Human Rights Code,” Google says in its statement of defence.

Lilleyman’s job, “along with many other positions,” was eliminated in a company-wide reduction and her pregnancy or leave were not factors.

The Google statement then continues: “Moreover, Google Canada states that Lilleyman’s allegations, even if true (which are expressly denied), do not amount to a violation of the Code…

“First, ‘pregnancy’ is not a protected ground under the Code.”

The Ontario Human Rights Commission, the provincial government’s official human rights watchdog, says otherwise.

“The Code protects a woman because she is or was pregnant, may become pregnant, has just had a baby or other pregnancy-related situations. Pregnancy includes the process of having a baby from conception up to the period following childbirth. It also includes the post-delivery period and breastfeeding,” the tribunal says in an information package

on the human rights code’s application

.

“It is contrary to the Code to fire you, demote you or lay you off (even with notice) because you are or may become pregnant. If you are or may become pregnant, you have the right to keep your job and not to be passed over for benefits and opportunities.”

Veronica Spada, a spokeswoman with the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, a body that adjudicates discrimination complaints about the code, said she cannot comment on specific complaints but confirmed the province’s human rights code prohibits discrimination and harassment on several grounds, among them sex, “including sexual harassment and pregnancy.”

Google officials declined to discuss specifics of the case.

“We cannot comment on active litigation; our position is outlined in the documents filed with the court,” a spokesperson said.

Lilleyman’s lawyer, Kathryn Marshall, said Google made the statement in their public court filing and have not recanted or amended it since.

“This is their legal position and they are standing behind it despite the fact that it is contrary to the human rights code,” Marshall said.

“I believe that Google is trying to import American law into Canada and is willfully ignoring Canadian human rights law that protects women from pregnancy discrimination.”

Daniel Del Gobbo, an assistant law professor and chair of the Law, Gender, and Sexual Justice program at the University of Windsor, said Google is wrong in its interpretation of the Ontario Human Rights Code.

“Pregnancy in the workplace is a fundamental issue of gender equality in Canada. Individuals should not suffer negative consequences because they were, are, or may become pregnant. And individuals should not suffer negative consequences because they plan to take or have taken maternity or parental leave. Human rights law is clear on these points,” Del Gobbo told National Post.

“An employer cannot consider the factor that the employee is pregnant and/or planning a maternity or parental leave when deciding whether to terminate the person’s employment,” he said.

Lilleyman, of Trent Hills, between Kingston and Oshawa, moved to Google from a job at Shopify after a career in news media, including at the Winnipeg Free Press and as an editor at Toronto’s Globe and Mail.

In her lawsuit, she asks for damages for lost compensation and benefits, as well as $250,000 in punitive damages and $150,000 for alleged breaches of the Ontario Human Rights Code. Google said she earned an annual base salary of $181,980 plus a discretionary 20-per-cent bonus, a benefits package, and Google stock eligibility.

“The Plaintiff was terminated by Google shortly after she disclosed her pregnancy and her intention to take an 18-month maternity leave and her need for medical accommodations. At the time that the Plaintiff was terminated, she was in the second trimester of her pregnancy,” her claim says.

She claims a Google human resources representative told her she “should conceal her pregnancy when seeking new jobs during the working notice period,” the claim alleges.

Google denies that any Google human resources representative made such a statement and challenged Lilleyman to prove it.

None of the allegations have been proven in court.

Google is best known for its namesake internet search engine and has an immense presence on a global scale. It is a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., which is ranked as one of the world’s largest companies and most valuable brands.

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | X:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.