LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Condo sales have fallen in Canada's two major markets, according to CMHC.

The condo market in Canada’s two largest cities has experienced significant decline from 2022 to the end of the first quarter of 2025, according to the most recent

report from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

(CMHC). Though most smaller markets are still stable.

The report, released Monday, said that condo sales in Toronto are down 75 per cent. In Vancouver they have fallen 37 per cent.

Those condo markets were hot until 2022, with lower interest rates enticing buyers, investors and builders. However, higher interest rates have reduced affordability for homebuyers and returns for investors.

Overall, CMHC expects the housing market to grow

as lower mortgage rates and changes to mortgage rules unlock pent-up demand. However, the recovery will be uneven with the condominium apartment market lagging in parts of the country where many condo owners are investors struggling with rising costs and softening rents.

What conditions are prevalent in the Toronto condo market?

Data from the

Toronto Regional Real Estate Board

(TRREB) supports the CMHC conclusion about the condo market in Canada’s largest city.

Condo sales in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) dropped 21.7 per cent year-over-year in the first quarter of 2025, with 3,794 units sold compared to 4,843 the previous year.

Inventory has surged in Toronto, with

more than 20,000 unsold condo units

, including pre-construction, under-construction, and completed units.

Meanwhile, listings are up 25.2 per cent year-over-year in the GTA, giving buyers more negotiating power and putting downward pressure on prices. While average condo prices have begun to decline that trend is not as steep as the drop in sales.

In the GTA, the average selling price in the first quarter of 2025 was $680,146, a 2.2 per cent drop from the previous year.

Resale condo prices in the GTA have

fallen 16 per cent

 from their peak in early 2022.

Echoing a CMHC observation, the TRREB says the GTA market is heavily investor-driven, with nearly 75 per cent of Toronto condos

owned by investors

.

Even more disastrous is that over 80 per cent of investors in new condos in the GTA are

losing $1,000–$1,500 per month

per unit due to high interest rates and rising costs. Many can’t raise rents enough to offset losses because of rent controls and a competitive rental market.

New condo construction starts are down 79 per cent from last year and 88 per cent from the 10-year average in the GTA, hitting the

lowest level since 1996

. With sales activity at record lows, developers cannot secure financing, leading to project delays, cancellations, and a sharp drop in new construction.

Some experts believe that once interest rates fall and economic confidence improves,

demand could rebound

, but the timing and extent of any recovery remain uncertain.

What about Vancouver’s condo market?

Rising

inventory and limited presales have stalled condominium projects in recent months, says CMHC.

A recent Greater Vancouver Realtors

report

says more than 2,000 new condos in Metro Vancouver are sitting unsold and empty. Meanwhile, there are over 16,000 listings, the most in over a decade.

“While more resales and lower mortgage rates will help with some of these concerns,” says CMHC, “developers will continue to find it difficult to build new condominium projects closer to the city centre. This is due to lower demand for presales at higher prices needed for project feasibility.”

What is happening in condo markets in other parts of the country?

While Toronto and Vancouver are experiencing the sharpest downturns in the condo market,

other Canadian cities are showing more resilience

, with some even presenting growth opportunities for buyers and investors.

In

Alberta,

more buyers are actual residents as opposed to investors, says CMHC, therefore the impact on new construction will be minimal.

The rapid price growth in

Calgary and Edmonton

real estate markets are expected to level out in 2025 because of rising interest rates.

The number of condos for sale in Edmonton is expected to increase, which will provide buyers with more options.

Calgary’s price growth may continue but more slowly, while prices in Edmonton may surge due to population growth and economic resilience.

There are fewer investors and stronger resale markets in

B.C.

, says CMHC, therefore the slowdown in condominium apartment construction will be milder and delayed.

The condo market in Surrey, B.C. is rapidly expanding, offering affordable property and strong investment opportunities.

The population is booming, nearing 684,000, with major infrastructure projects like the Surrey-Langley SkyTrain extension. It’s a buyer’s market with condos averaging $553K and detached homes around $1.53M. 

The CMHC expects housing starts in

Montreal

to increase for a second consecutive year in 2025. However, rental units will remain the most commonly built housing type.

Condominium starts will remain low in the short term because few projects offer pre-sale units. And the proportion of units sold this way is currently low.

In

Ontario outside Toronto

, there will be lower demand for pre-construction condominium apartments, often bought by investors, due to weaker resale and rental markets,

says CMHC

. This will lead to slowing of new construction in 2025.

What does the future hold for the Canadian housing market?

CMHC says housing starts in Canada will slow from 2025 to 2027 mainly due to fewer condos being built but total starts will remain above their 10-year average.

Meanwhile, housing sales and prices are expected to rebound as lower mortgage rates and changes to mortgage rules unlock pent-up demand in the short term.

In the longer term, stronger economic fundamentals such as improved job markets and income growth will support the rebound, says CMHC.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney during the G7 Leaders' summit on June 17, 2025 in Kananaskis, Alberta. Canada is hosting this year's meeting of the world's seven largest economies.

BANFF, ALTA. — The leaders of the world’s seven wealthiest democracies ended their annual summit Tuesday with promises to tackle six pressing policy issues, including artificial intelligence, transnational repression and migrant smuggling.

As the two-day summit in Kananaskis, Alta., came to a close, Canada, Japan, France, Germany, Italy, the U.S. and the U.K. issued six joint statements tackling wildfires, quantum and critical minerals as well as the three aforementioned issues.

Absent from the list was a joint statement from all leaders on the war in Ukraine, despite Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s attendance at the summit Tuesday.

Among the most comprehensive was the statement on artificial intelligence in which countries committed to developing an “AI adoption roadmap”.

Member countries agreed to accelerate their AI readiness and competitiveness and lower barriers to adoption in the private and public sector.

The statement specifically targets AI adoption in the public service, arguing that it is necessary “

to drive efficiency and better serve our publics”.

Transnational repression (TNR), a form of foreign interference, and illegal migration, which has become an issue of critical importance for many of the G7 member nations, are major issues in Canada.

Member states issued a joint statement committing to further combat TNR, a particularly virulent form of foreign interference that uses coercion and threats to silence dissidents and quiet critics.

The Canadian government has been seized with the issue of foreign interference, particularly in the case of Chinese interference in elections and India, which is alleged to have carried out an assassination on Canadian soil.

“(Transnational repression) undermines national security, state sovereignty, the safety and human rights of victims, and principles of international law. It has a chilling effect in our countries,” reads the statement.

The G7’s Rapid Response Mechanism (RRM), a unit housed within Global Affairs Canada that monitors the internet for foreign state-sponsored disinformation, will also be taking on a larger role in the international combat against transnational repression.

Transnational repression was highlighted by Foreign Interference Inquiry Commissioner Marie-Josée as a “growing scourge” in her final report earlier this year.

It is also very likely to come up during Prime Minister Mark Carney’s bilateral meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday afternoon.

In its 2024 annual report, Canada’s spy agency said that India continues to be one of the main perpetrators of foreign interference operations in Canada, including transnational repression.

“Transnational repression plays a central role in India’s activity in Canada,” reads the Canadian Security Intelligence Service report.

In the statement, G7 members promised to develop a framework allowing countries to better share information about foreign TNR in their countries and how best counter it.

They also committed to creating a TNR “detection academy” with will help members and their allies with “the technical skills and tools for identifying and responding to the latest technology-enabled threats,” reads the statement.

The countries also adopted the “Kananaskis Wildfire Charter”, noting the record-breaking wildfires that have burned across every forested continent in recent years.

The charter promises to increase global cooperation when it comes to preventing, fighting and recovering from wildfires worldwide.

In 2024, more than 1,300 migrants crossed illegally into Canada and subsequently made refugee claims, according to Canadian government statistics, and even legal immigration has become controversial, given rapid increases in the growth of the Canadian population.

In a statement released Tuesday afternoon, the leaders of the G7 nations agreed to “enhance border management and enforcement and dismantle the transnational organized crime groups profiting from both migrant smuggling and human trafficking.”

The leaders said that it is in the national interest of the respective nations to counter human smuggling and human trafficking.

The leaders said that migrant smuggling is often linked to money laundering, trafficking in persons and drugs, and other serious crimes.

“It can expose vulnerable smuggled persons to grave and life-threatening risks,” the leaders said.

In 2024, the G7 adopted an action plan on migrant smuggling, and with Tuesday’s statement says the leaders have reaffirmed their commitment to implementing the plan.

The leaders vowed to use a “follow the money” strategy of using financial intelligence to identify criminals, hold them accountable and seize their assets and profits. They also pledged to increase strengthen border management and work with social media companies to prevent advertising and co-ordination of migrant smuggling via online platforms.

The statement also says that the leaders will work to tackle the use of irregular migration as a “hybrid warfare tactic” or to undermine national stability.

“We will explore, consistent with our legal systems, the potential use of sanctions to target criminals involved in migrant smuggling and human trafficking operations from countries where those activities emanate,” the statement says.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe take part in a joint press conference following a talk hosted by Enserva in  Calgary on Monday, June 16, 2025.

OTTAWA — Health Canada isn’t quarrelling with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s announcement that most Albertans will soon have to pay out of pocket for COVID-19 shots.

Nicholas Janveau, a spokesperson for the federal agency, said Tuesday that the decision is entirely the premier’s to make.

“Provinces and territories are responsible for the delivery and administration of their respective vaccination programs including determining which vaccines are publicly funded, eligibility criteria, and other relevant considerations,” wrote Janveau in an email to the National Post.

Smith announced Friday that,

starting this fall

, most of Alberta’s 4.8 million residents will need to pay out of pocket for COVID vaccines, if they choose to get them.

She said on her

weekly call-in radio show

that the change was a necessary cost-saving measure, after the Liberal government announced in January that

federal funding for vaccines

would end this year.

“Now that we have to develop our own new program for payment … we want to avoid wastage (and) make sure that people get it as a priority who are most at risk, and then make (vaccines) available to whoever else wants (them),” said Smith.

Smith noted that more than a million doses were left unused and discarded during the 2023-24 respiratory virus season, costing taxpayers $135 million.

“The sad part was we threw away over a million doses, because people just don’t want to get the (COVID) vaccine in the same rates as others,” said Smith.

“I think it’s because (the COVID vaccine) doesn’t work particularly well,” said Smith, when asked what she made of the shortfall.

A government press release said that provincially-funded vaccines will still be given free of charge to dependent seniors, the immunocompromised and those on social assistance.

All other Albertans, including those over the age of 65, will be required to pay the full cost of the vaccine.

The release doesn’t say how much this will be but references a Center for Disease Control costing estimates of $110 per vaccine dose.

Even with the changes, Alberta is budgeting $49 million for COVID vaccines for the 2025-26 respiratory season, versus $19 million for flu shots and $2 million for

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) shots.

Toronto-area physician Shawn Whatley, formerly the head of the Ontario Medical Association and a fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, said that the permissibility of out-of-pocket costs under the Canada Health Act is largely a question of whether the services involved are deemed “medically necessary.”

“If it’s listed as a medically necessary service then yes, there are CHA implications with (federal health transfer) clawbacks,” said Whatley.

Whatley noted that you have to be 65 or older to get many vaccines covered in Ontario.

He added that he wouldn’t be surprised if other provinces eventually followed Alberta’s lead on charging for COVID vaccines, if Smith manages to limit the political blowback.

“In general, anytime one province finds a way to spend less without losing office, it tends to set a precedent,” said Whatley.

Marisa Azad, an infectious disease specialist at the Ottawa Hospital, says she’s concerned by Smith’s off-the-cuff comments on the effectiveness of COVID vaccines.

“Although everyone is entitled to their opinions, certain issues should be decided upon by professionals

— there’s a mountain of scientific data supportive of the continued use of COVID-19 vaccines and their efficacy and safety,” said Azad.

The Public Health Agency of Canada

currently recommends COVID vaccinations

for all adults aged 65 and older, as well as immunocompromised individuals, pregnant women, health care workers, Indigenous and Métis communities and other racial minorities.

The Alberta Medical Association

said in a statement Tuesday

that people in most of these categories will need to pay out of pocket for vaccines under the incoming rules.

“Creating unclear policy and barriers to vaccination for high-need groups is counter-productive to public health measures,” read the statement.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Penny Boudreau is led from court in Bridgewater, N.S., in June 2008, after her appearance in the murder of her 12-year-old daughter, Karissa Boudreau.

HALIFAX, N.S. — A parole board hearing scheduled for June 18, will give a Nova Scotia convicted killer a chance to persuade members and the public that she is not the same person who admitted to packing twine in the trunk of her car in 2008 before murdering her 12-year-old daughter.

Now 51, Penny Boudreau is serving a life sentence at the Nova Institution for Women in Truro, Nova Scotia, where she works as a cleaner and orders groceries for her unit. Seventeen years ago, Judge Margaret Stewart sentenced Boudreau to 20 years without eligibility for full parole for confessing to killing her only child, Karissa. That would have meant a release date of June 13, 2028. However, under the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, she is now eligible to apply for unescorted passes, including day parole, three years prior to completing that sentence.

Because this is Boudreau’s first application for unescorted time away from jail, it automatically prompts a review by way of a hearing. Under the Act, she is now eligible for day parole for rehabilitative purposes that allows an offender to participate in community-based activities in preparation for full parole or statutory release. Offenders must return nightly to a halfway house unless otherwise authorized by the Parole Board of Canada. In addition to standard conditions of day parole, the Parole Board may also impose special conditions that an offender must abide by during release.

Boudreau’s decision to apply for unescorted release — viewed by the public as “early” release — has provoked a backlash in a case that has gripped Atlantic Canada for almost two decades. Etched in many people’s memory is the mother’s televised pleas for the public’s help finding her daughter as she concocted a story to make people believe her child was alive and may have been abducted from a grocery store parking lot.

 Penny Boudreau makes a televised plea on Jan. 29, 2008, for the safe return of her 12-year-old daughter, Karissa. Paul Boudreau, Karissa’s father, is on the left and to the right is her boyfriend.

Emotions are already running high in Nova Scotia where the Royal Canadian Mounted Police are still searching for two other local children, Lilly and Jack Sullivan, who have been missing since May 2, after their mother and stepfather reported the kids wandered off from home. The disappearance of those children without a trace stirred up memories of Boudreau who committed what many think of as an unthinkable rare crime: filicide.

On Jan. 27, 2008, Penny Boudreau was a 33-year-old cashier living with her boyfriend who worked at the same grocery store in Bridgewater, a small town of less than 9,000 people on Nova Scotia’s South Shore. Karissa had recently moved in with the couple in their small two-bedroom apartment after living with her father. But the new arrangement caused friction for all of them.

Karissa’s diaries revealed how she resented living with the boyfriend. That Sunday afternoon, the mother and daughter went for a drive to have a heart-to-heart chat about the house rules and conflict the pre-teen and her mom were having, said Penny at the time. A winter storm set in and shortly before 6 p.m., Penny Boudreau ducked into the grocery store to pick up a few things while Karissa stayed in the car. As she exited the store, she claimed Karissa had disappeared and, two hours later, called 911 to report her daughter missing. The grade six child could be out in a snowstorm in a hoodie, vest, jeans and pink Crocs on her feet.

For 13 days, there was a frantic search involving helicopters, police dogs and worried people across southern Nova Scotia. People in Bridgewater raised money to help the family as they watched the young mother plead on TV for help finding Karissa. “Karissa, we love you. We are all looking for you, just come home or call or something,” Boudreau urged.

 The body of 12-year-old Karissa Paige Boudreau was found Feb. 9, 2008, near Bridgewater, Nova Scotia. Her mother Penny Boudreau eventually confessed to her murder.

Police contacted Karissa’s friends, including Courtney Sarty, to check their backyards to see if the child may be hiding. “I thought she ran off,” Sarty recalled 17 years later. “I was so afraid. I kept sending her messages on MSN back then urging her to let somebody know where you are and that you are OK.”

Two weeks later, Karissa’s frozen body was discovered on the LaHave riverbank less than five minutes from Boudreau’s apartment. RCMP launched an undercover operation as they focused on Penny’s boyfriend after receiving reports of yelling and fighting at their small apartment. In an elaborate plan that targeted Boudreau’s boyfriend for months, investigators tried to determine whether the couple played a role in Karissa’s death.

By June 2008, they had cleared the boyfriend and set up a Mr. Big fake crime organization scenario to elicit a confession from Boudreau. Not realizing she was speaking to police, Boudreau re-enacted how she strangled her daughter on a deserted road.

Initially, Boudreau was charged with first-degree murder but later pleaded guilty to second-degree murder, giving up her right to a trial that spared family members who had already been through agony. During the sentencing, Judge Stewart told her: “You can never call yourself ‘mother’ in conjunction with Karissa’s name again, and the words ‘Mommy don’t’ from a trusting and loving Karissa are there to haunt you the rest of your natural life.”

 Angry residents shout obsenities as Penny Boudreau is led from court to a waiting car after her appearance in Karissa’s 2008 murder in Bridgewater, N.S.

At the June 18 hearing, parole board members will consider whether Boudreau is a risk to society. They will review her psychological risk assessments that have consistently found Boudreau was in a dysfunctional relationship at the time of the murder and feared being abandoned by her boyfriend. She’s no longer in touch with him according to previous parole board decisions.

Because of her model behaviour in jail for the past seven years, Boudreau has regularly been granted escorted temporary absences to leave jail for several hours under supervision to attend church services, Bible study meetings and, more recently, to visit a friend she met in the congregation.

Personal development is part of her rehabilitation, according to the decisions. After a file review in March, two parole board members concluded Boudreau’s risk to society is low and the board does not consider Boudreau as “presenting an undue risk to society,” wrote the members in their March decision to let Boudreau attend church travelling in a Correctional Service Canada vehicle.

However, they did comment on police opposition to any further “liberal release.” “It is their opinion that you were issued a life sentence with no parole before 20 years served which needs to be followed,” they wrote of the unnamed police agency.

The Parole Board of Canada has received victim impact statements and a host of letters (a signed petition at one point) opposed to any type of release.  For those opposed to Boudreau being granted further freedoms, there is still a “deep sense of loss and grief, be it family members, friends or the community at large. The grief and opposition to your release continues to this day,” the parole board members wrote.

Whether jail is intended to punish someone convicted of a crime or a place to protect society until the inmate is rehabilitated is the thorny issue that divides not only the people of Nova Scotia, but politicians and Canadians.

During the recent federal election, the Conservative party vowed to re-emphasize the rights of victims and safety of communities over the rights of criminals. “The residents of the South Shore, Halifax and communities across Canada deserve to feel safe in their own neighbourhoods,” read a press release issued by Rick Perkins, the former Conservative MP for South-Shore-St. Margarets, who lost his seat.

“Like many Nova Scotians, I am appalled to learn that Penny Boudreau…has been on day passes from prison and could soon be granted unescorted leave from prison,” he said in the statement released April 25.

There will be submissions at the June 18 hearing from those impacted by Karissa’s murder. Courtney Sarty, who has the date Karissa died tattooed on her right arm, Until We Meet Again, above a yellow rose for friendship and a pink one, Karissa’s favourite colour, is unequivocal: “I think she should serve what she was sentenced to. I read that her assessment to reoffend is really low and that she’s not probable to commit the same crime,” said Sarty.

But she’s not convinced that the counselling Boudreau received during her prison stay is a guarantee she would not react again in a similar situation. “Killing Karissa was unprovoked, so who is to say it wouldn’t take the right situation for her to do something again.”

She urged the parole board to be fair. “If she is given parole, I don’t think she should have access to children whatsoever,” said Sarty, now a 29-year-old mother studying to become a licensed practical nurse.

 Courtney Sarty, Karissa’s childhood friend, isn’t confident about Penny Boudreau’s prison rehab and feels Boudreau should serve her full sentence.

Boudreau is estranged from her family since the murder but has befriended a pastor at a church she attends in an undisclosed community. The pastor has confirmed Boudreau will receive continued support as she works her way towards proving she can successfully integrate back into society.

The Corrections Conditional Release Act allows for an inmate to apply for day parole and unescorted passes as part of assisting the rehabilitation of offenders and their reintegration into the community as law-abiding citizens through the provision of programs in penitentiaries and in the community.

The Conservatives focused on toughening up the chance for early parole for criminals convicted of multiple murders. Leader Pierre Poilievre promised to use Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, known as the Notwithstanding Clause, to reintroduce the Protecting Canadians by Ending Sentence Discounts for Multiple Murders Act, which the Supreme Court of Canada struck down in 2022 because, in their opinion, it violates an offender’s Charter rights.

The Supreme Court’s decision has impacted the sentences of some of Canada’s most notorious killers like Alexandre Bissonnette, who was serving a life in prison with no chance of parole for 40 years for shooting and killing six people in a Quebec Mosque in 2017. After the Supreme Court’s decision, Bissonnette will be eligible for parole after serving 25 years.

The decision doesn’t affect Boudreau, who was convicted of one murder (not multiple murders). She is required to provide her DNA and is prohibited from owning weapons for her lifetime. She has no previous offences that offer insight into her mindset at the time of the murder. She has referenced experiencing low self-esteem, a sense of inadequacy and fears of abandonment, according to her psychological risk assessments in her prison file.

Her assessments described her overall risk for unescorted absences and/or day parole was “generally low.” These ratings, it said, have withstood the test of many years of incarceration and would not be expected to change unless “you were in an unhealthy relationship which is currently not a concern.” It also noted Boudreau has recently spoken of “how you work through the many emotions that come with accepting the offence you committed, daily feelings of guilt and shame.”

 Karissa’s memorial site along the LaHave river bank, where her body was found in 2008. The memorial still exists today.

Boudreau toured a community residential facility — halfway house — last December and met with the director. The location remains confidential. In March, the Parole Board of Canada acknowledged recent threats made to Boudreau’s personal safety increase the need for security and suggested any measures necessary will be taken when Boudreau appears before the hearing.

Today, there is still a memorial for Karissa on the LaHave riverbank where her body was found. Sarty goes there when she is struggling to make sense of how her friend’s mother, a woman she knew, could forsake her unconditional love for her daughter.

“I have my own son and my love is deep. He could curse me and put me down to the lowest, and I’m still going to look at him and say, ‘I love you.”

Sherri Aikenhead is a Nova Scotia author of Mommy Don’t: From Mother to Murderer, The true story of Penny and Karissa Boudreau.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney smiles as he rises for the first time in the House of Commons following the election of the speaker, Monday, May 26, 2025 in Ottawa.

OTTAWA — The minority Liberal government’s major projects bill is headed to a House of Commons committee to be studied on Tuesday and Wednesday,

after the Conservatives voted to fast-track the legislation

and for it to pass second reading late Monday evening.

Around 11:40 p.m. on Monday, C-5 was adopted at second reading in the House of Commons by 304-29 votes. The Liberals and Conservatives voted in favour of the bill, with only the Bloc Québécois, the NDP and Green Party Leader Elizabeth May voting against.

C-5 would give the federal government sweeping powers for five years to quickly approve natural resource and infrastructure projects once they are deemed to be in the national interest, as well as break down internal trade barriers and labour mobility issues.

According to the motion that was adopted to fast-track the legislation before Canada Day, the bill is referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities where members will hear from witnesses and amend the legislation.

That process is expected to last two days. On Tuesday afternoon, the committee will be hearing from Assembly of First Nations (AFN) National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, representatives from manufacturers and business groups as well as law professors.

The list of witnesses who will be testifying on Wednesday was not yet available, but the meeting is expected to spill well into the evening.

Still according to the fast-tracking motion, the committee’s report is set to be presented to the House on Thursday and the vote at third and final reading will likely happen on Friday — the last calendar day before all MPs will be going back to their ridings for the summer.

In parallel, the Senate is currently conducting a pre-study of C-5.

Senators heard from Transport and Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland on Monday, will be hearing from Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc and Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations Rebecca Alty on Tuesday and other officials on Wednesday.

The Senate would ensure a final vote on C-5 takes place on June 27, at the latest.

However, at least one Senator is determined to delay the more contentious portion of the bill.

Paul Prosper, a former AFN regional chief for Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, said he would be putting forward an amendment to slow down the process with respect to the major projects section of C-5.

On Monday, Prosper said he will be doing that “in hopes that more rational minds prevail in terms of consulting with Indigenous groups.”

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney (R) welcomes Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during the Group of Seven (G7) Summit at the Pomeroy Kananaskis Mountain Lodge in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada on June 17, 2025.

BANFF, ALTA. — As Prime Minister Mark Carney met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, he announced wide-ranging new support for Ukraine, including sanctions targeting Russia’s energy revenues and its 200-vessel shadow fleet, $2 billion in new funding to purchase drones, ammunition and armoured vehicles, and a new $2.3-billion loan for Ukraine to rebuild infrastructure shattered by Russia’s assault.

“To be absolutely clear, this support will be unwavering until we get a just peace for Ukraine and the Ukrainian people,” said Carney.

Zelenskyy thanked Carney for his invitation and his “very important words, warm words” and support for Ukraine.

“Ukraine has had, our family has had, a very difficult night, one of the biggest attacks from the very beginning of this war,” said Zelenskyy said, alluding to an overnight missile attack on Kyiv, which he said killed 12 people and injured 130. “It was a big attack on civilian infrastructure.”

Zelenskyy said that Ukraine is ready for peace negotiations with Russia.

Carney and Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand are meeting with Zelenskyy on Tuesday morning in Kananaskis.

Shortly before meeting with Zelenskyy, Carney welcomed NATO secretary general Mark Rutte, who will join in discussions with the remaining six G7 leaders about Russia’s war on its neighbour.

Since February 2023, Ukraine has been fending off attacks from Vladimir Putin’s Russia. Although Ukraine has the backing of some of the most powerful countries in the world, it has been unable to successfully repel Russia. Overnight, a Russian missile attack brought down a nine-storey apartment building in Kyiv, killing 14 people and wounding another 156.

The announcement came on the final day of the G7 Summit. U.S. President Donald Trump, who left the summit early on Monday evening, complained Monday that Russia, which was ejected from what was then the G8 in 2018 over its annexation of Crimea, had not been readmitted to the alliance of wealthy nations.

With additional reporting from The Canadian Press and The Associated Press. 

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


A 39-year-old Canadian man trying to enter the U.S. in a stolen Porsche SUV (pictured above) was detained and sent back to Canada last week.

A Canadian citizen trying to enter the U.S. last week was turned over to the RCMP and the Canadian border agency after it was discovered he was driving a stolen vehicle.

On Wednesday, June 11, the 39-year-old was making his way into the U.S. via the Port of Champlain border crossing in upstate New York and south of Montreal, according to

U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

During primary inspection, he told CBP officers he was bound for Plattsburgh, N.Y., about 30 minutes south, but “inconsistencies in the driver’s story” led to a more thorough inspection and screening of him and the 2023 Porsche Cayenne he was driving.

In an email, New York State CBP public affairs officer Mike Niezgoda told National Post that agency privacy laws prevent him from discussing particulars, including the “inconsistencies” that led to the accused’s secondary inspection.

“CBP officers are highly skilled at discovering inconsistencies in travellers’ statements, a skill taught at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center,” he wrote. “When this occurs, CBP officers may proceed in requiring a secondary inspection/examination of a traveller.”

U.S. man drives into Canada by mistake, gets busted with 78 pounds of pot on the way back

CBP officers soon discovered the luxury SUV,

which costs CAD$82,000 for the base trim or $194,800 for the fully-loaded hybrid model

, had been reported stolen at an undisclosed location in Canada earlier that day.

CBP contacted the RCMP to confirm the man’s identity and that the vehicle had been stolen, “a charge that is equivalent to a felony in the United States.”

Under the

Criminal Code of Canada

, possession of stolen property over $5,000 is an indictable offence and may result in jail time if found guilty.

After being processed, CBP handed the man and the Porsche over to the RCMP and the Canada Border Services Agency.

National Post has contacted both Canadian agencies for more information.

Niezgoda said anyone seeking to enter the U.S. needs to “overcome ALL grounds for inadmissibility,” of which there are more than 60 “

divided into several major categories, including health-related, prior criminal convictions, security reasons, public charge, labor certification, illegal entrants and immigration violations, documentation requirements, and miscellaneous grounds.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


As pot becomes more potent and more convenient to purchase, emergency doctors are reporting more cases of cannabis hyperemesis syndrome.

Emergency departments are seeing a spike in visits owing to a once unusual, highly unpleasant and, in rare cases, potentially life-threatening side effect of chronic cannabis use: severe bouts of vomiting lasting hours, even days.

As pot becomes more potent and more convenient to purchase, emergency doctors are reporting more cases of cannabis hyperemesis syndrome, or CHS, a gastrointestinal condition that can affect people who use cannabis frequently (several times a week, if not daily) over months or years.

In addition to “cyclical” vomiting, other signs include morning nausea, intense abdominal pain and “relief through compulsive hot showers or baths,” Western University researchers

recently wrote.

It’s increasingly affecting teens and young adults, they report. “Yet few people — including many clinicians — know it exists.”

Emergency department visits for CHS increased 13-fold in Ontario after the legalization of recreational cannabis in 2018,

one study found

. While weed’s legalization wasn’t associated with a sudden or gradual change in cases, pot’s commercialization — unlimited number of stores, more products — overlapping with the COVID-19 pandemic, was associated with an immediate bump in rates.

The potency of THC, or tetrahydrocannabinol, the main psychoactive compound in cannabis, is also off the charts, said Western’s Jamie Seabrook, rising from about three per cent in dried cannabis in the 1980s to, according to Health Canada, 15 per cent in 2023. Some strains have as high as 30 per cent THC.

“When I talk to youth, they can easily access strains that are upwards of 25 per cent. And that’s huge,” said Seabrook, a professor in the department of epidemiology and biostatistics, the department of pediatrics and the Brescia School of Food and Nutritional Sciences. The human brain continues to develop up to around age 25, he said. THC exposure over this period has been linked with problems with attention, memory and learning, as well as increased risks of paranoia, psychosis and, more recently, schizophrenia.

Here’s what to know about CHS.

What is cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome?

CHS was first documented in

2004

by researchers reporting on 10 people from South Australia in whom chronic cannabis use “predated the onset of the cyclical vomiting illness.”

Nine of the 10 “displayed an abnormal washing behaviour during episodes of active illness.”

Reported cases of CHS have since been popping up around the world.

The Ontario study documented 12,866 emergency department visits by 8,140 individuals between January 2014 and June 2021, or pre- and post-legalization. About 35 per cent were aged 19 to 24. Nearly 10 per cent of visits led to hospital admissions. Monthly rates of CHS emergency visits increased from 0.26 per 100,000 population in January 2014, to 3.43 visits per 100,000 population in 2021.

What causes cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome?

It’s not clear what causes CHS. Cannabinoids bind to cannabinoid receptors in the brain and gastrointestinal tract. One theory is that it may be due to overstimulation of the receptors leading to “issues with your body’s natural control of nausea and vomiting,” according to the Cleveland Clinic.

Paradoxically, low doses of cannabis can help with nausea. “But that’s low doses, and infrequently,” Seabrook said.

“Chronic use substantially increases the risk of nausea.”

What are the symptoms of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome?

Telltale symptoms of CHS are severe and persistent vomiting. “Scromiting” is a term that’s been used, a merger of “vomiting” and “screaming,” the Cleveland Clinic reports. “You may have intense pain, which causes you to scream while you vomit.”

Vomiting can lead to dehydration and electrolyte imbalances. Youth can mistakenly think using more pot will help with the nausea and pain, “but it’s actually exacerbating it, because they don’t even realize that they have anything called cannabis hyperemesis syndrome,” Seabrook said.

The big challenge is food and nutrition. “They’re not able to take down food without purging.” Some are mistakenly diagnosed with bulimia nervosa, an eating disorder, “simply because whoever gave that diagnosis wasn’t aware of the extent of cannabis use,” Seabrook said.

With an eating disorder, there’s a body image concern, and people are inducing purging. “Whereas with CHS, they’re not doing it on purpose. It’s the cannabis that’s causing it,” he said.

Others might get worked up for a food intolerance, suggesting “they remove this food, or that.” They might have a CT scan or an MRI, using up “a lot of health-care dollars when these simple basic questions initially could have eliminated a whole bunch of other potential diagnoses,” Seabrook said.

People can get temporary relief from hot baths and showers, but it’s a temporary fix. “When they get out, the symptoms reappear,” Seabrook said.

If left untreated, severe vomiting and dehydration can lead to acute kidney injury. In very rare cases, “it can lead to death, if you are that severely dehydrated and you’re not getting your electrolytes up,” Seabrook said.

Who is at risk?

Most people who develop CHS have used cannabis for several years, Seabrook said. There’s no evidence that, say, a teen who uses high-potency pot one day will immediately get CHS. “It’s long term, and frequency of use,” Seabrook said.

It’s also not clear why not everyone who uses cannabis chronically and frequently develops CHS, though a genetic vulnerability might play a role.

But Canada has one of the highest rates of youth cannabis use in the world, Seabrook said. “The most recent data we have from Canada — and this is kind of alarming — is that about one in five, or 20 per cent of 16- to 19-year-olds have used cannabis in the past month and close to nine per cent daily, or almost every single day,” Seabrook said.

“Potency is a huge factor. But there is also now growing social acceptance (of cannabis) and a lot of youth think there is very little harm associated with its use.”

How does CHS progress?

The first phase is called the prodromal phase, Seabrook said. “Basically, they don’t have classic symptoms at this point, but they’re starting to experience morning nausea; they feel sick to their stomach.”

In phase two — the hyperemetic stage — the severe vomiting kicks in. “It moves beyond just feeling nauseous.” Vomiting and intense pain can last one to two days, or more. Other symptoms include hot flashes, weight loss, high blood pressure, sweating and trembling.

“It’s at this stage two where they start to have baths and showers and they feel like, ‘Whoa, if I crank up this heat, it helps a bit,’” Seabrook said.

The third phase is recovery. Symptoms disappear within days or weeks of stopping cannabis use. “It’s almost 100 per cent. They completely resolve if someone quits cannabis altogether,” Seabrook said.

“But quitting isn’t easy. We always talk about things like addiction: Is cannabis an addiction? If they’re using it every day, maybe it’s more addictive than we originally thought.”

Many youth struggling with mental health turn to cannabis as a coping strategy without recognizing it increases the risk of anxiety and depression.

Some youth may need support stopping. “If you have somebody saying, ‘Look, the only way to stop this is to quit altogether’ that’s very difficult,” Seabrook said.

“A harm reduction approach would involve the use of adolescent medicine or a rehabilitation specialist that can say, ‘I’m going to meet you right where you are at. Let’s see if we can go down to this much use.’ Slowly but surely weaning them off the extent to which they’re using.”

“Lower dose potency is another really good option and slowly trying to reduce the amount and frequency that one uses.”

What else is needed?

More research is needed, including randomized trials to explore different treatment options, greater awareness among healthcare providers — emergency doctors, gastroenterologists and others — and more education in schools and through public health campaigns, Seabrook said.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Missiles fired from Iran are seen in the night sky over Jerusalem on June 14, 2025.

It’s not just the so-called Iron Dome that’s protecting Israel from hundreds of Iranian missiles.

The term Iron Dome has become “a stand-in for Israeli missile defence more broadly; so, it’s kind of like how we use Kleenex to describe every type of facial tissue,” said Wes Rumbaugh, a fellow in the Missile Defense Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.

Defence systems known as David’s Sling and The Arrow are also both helping Israel to intercept and destroy long-range missiles fired from Iran. But even Israel’s vaunted missile defence system can’t stop everything.

The Iranian missile attacks began June 13 after Israel launched what it called a pre-emptive strike to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Operation Rising Lion targeted Iranian nuclear sites and military installations, killing hundreds, including several of the country’s top military leaders.

“Iran retaliated by firing waves of ballistic missiles at Israel, where explosions flared in the skies over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv and shook the buildings below,” the Associated Press reported Saturday.

The Jerusalem Post reported Monday that the Israeli Defence Force “provided its first statistics of the war on its shoot down success against Iran’s ballistic missiles, setting it at 80-90 per cent, with only about 5-10 per cent of ballistic missiles hitting actual residential areas.”

Per the Post, “eight more Israeli civilians were killed in Iran’s Sunday-Monday middle-of-the-night attacks, bringing the total number of deaths to 24, with one more missing person expected to be declared dead in the coming hours.”

Here’s what we know about Israel’s missile defence systems, including how they work and why some missiles are still getting through.

How does Israel defend against missiles?

Israel fields three tiers of missile defence systems, Rumbaugh said. “At the lowest tier is Iron Dome, which has gotten more popularity just because it gets used a lot more often against rocket and maybe lower-tier cruise missile attacks. Every time that Hamas shoots rockets at Israel, that’s where Iron Dome comes in.”

Recent exchanges with Iran “are more illustrative of some of the higher tier systems — that’s The Arrow missile defence system or the David’s Sling missile defence system,” he said.

“Those systems intercept longer range missiles coming from Iranian territory. The Arrow system intercepts them” outside of the earth’s atmosphere, Rumbaugh said.

How do these missile defence systems work?

“When it comes to missile defence systems, all of them work in a similar way,” Rumbaugh said.

They all have radar systems that detect the incoming threat, some sort of control system that manages data coming in from all the various sensors “that allows them to form a track and then translate that information to a watcher system that then engages the threat,” he said.

“In all of these cases, the engagement system is a surface-to-air missile that goes up and intercepts the threat through kinetic energy.”

How much does this cost?

It reportedly costs about $50,000 to fire one interceptor from the Iron Dome system, and each missile fired from the other two would likely cost more than that, Rumbaugh said.

Rumbaugh noted that the U.S. contributes about $500 million a year toward Israel’s missile defence.

“Right now, I think you’re getting a lot of engagements for, most likely, The Arrow system,” he said, noting Germany is acquiring the Israeli-developed system for its own protection.

“We’re seeing long-range missiles fired from Iranian territory to Israel, and so to engage those at the higher speeds, you want to engage them a little bit farther away.”

The further a missile travels, the faster it will be moving “because it goes up to a higher apogee and then is coming down at a quicker rate, and so you need an interceptor that is just a little bit more capable. The Iron Dome is designed to be able to intercept smaller rocket systems like the Katyusha rockets that Hamas fields.”

 An Arrow-3 hypersonic anti-ballistic missile is launched at an undisclosed location in Alaska in 2019.The Arrow 3 system — designed to shoot down ballistic missiles above the Earth’s atmosphere — was jointly developed and produced by Israel and the United States.

How effective are these systems?

While the Iron Dome isn’t much use against long-range missiles, it would be capable of defending against Iranian drone attacks, Rumbaugh pointed out.

“It is far too soon to have a conclusive assessment of effectiveness of the systems,” he said.

“We saw multiple examples of reasonable effectiveness of Israeli missile defence systems against Iranian attack last year. The question going forward … will be just when do the inventories start to deplete of interceptor missiles? There’s not an infinite supply of these capabilities.”

There are also reports, he said, of the U.S. Navy intercepting Iranian missiles with their Standard Missile 3, a ship-based surface-to-air missile.

It’s difficult to determine “from grainy Twitter videos” what Iranian missiles are getting through to Israel, he said.

“There’s no such thing as a perfect air and missile defence system,” Rumbaugh said.

“It’s not going to stop every single missile…. Because it’s just a very technical, challenging mission set, it’s going to be a challenge to have a perfect defence. And as inventories sort of deplete, Israel is going to have to get more choosy and will have to make more difficult decisions about its interceptor usage and it’s going to have to prioritize certain target sets or certain areas for defence over others.”

Some Israeli citizens might be surprised to see missiles making it through the country’s defences, Rumbaugh said. “But I think the Israeli military probably knew and would have … factored into its decision to launch these strikes that at least some are going to get through. Even when Iron Dome is defending against rocket attacks, some of those rockets get through and, to some degree, that’s occasionally a decision of the system.”

If the Iron Dome detects a missile or a rocket “isn’t going toward a highly populated area, they’ll preserve interceptors by not engaging that particular missile,” Rumbaugh said.

The Israeli defence establishment is obliged to let the public know about casualties and what they can expect in terms of missile attacks, he said.

“The Israeli public does not want to live near their bomb shelters for an indefinite period of time,” Rumbaugh said.

How long can Israel keep this up?

Rumbaugh couldn’t say when Israel will run out of interceptors.

“Those sorts of inventory numbers are pretty tightly held secrets for a reason. You don’t want to say how many missiles it takes to exhaust your inventory” because that would help Iran plan its attacks, Rumbaugh said.

Though he noted Israel has “managed to make the defensive task more tractable with some of their efforts to destroy Iranian missile production bases as well as destroying Iranian missiles and launchers through some of their air strikes.”

But it’s “difficult to get them all,” he said.

“Both the United States and Israel have tried to eliminate the Houthis’ abilities to launch missiles in the Red Sea over the last couple of years with limited success.”

This is likely “the most sustained and long-term defence” Israel has mounted against ballistic missiles, Rumbaugh said.

“They’ve dealt with periods where there has been lots of rocket fire from Hamas and other groups in the area,” including Hezbollah, he said.

Those might have involved deploying more interceptors, Rumbaugh said. “But the technical sophistication of the long-range missiles that Iran is firing, combined with the period over which Israel is having to defend (itself) over multiple days,” means this has been one of the “longer range air and missile defence engagements that Israel has seen.”

What are Israel and Iran targeting?

Israeli air bases are likely on Iran’s top list of targets, he said.

“They probably need to disrupt Israeli air operations as much as possible, considering that those are what are delivering the majority of the weapons on Iranian territory right now that are destroying some of the nuclear infrastructure and are being used to carry out the attacks on Iranian military leadership,” Rumbaugh said.

“But then as the (supply of) Iranian missiles gets lower and lower, do you start to shift your focus toward civilian areas to sort of start inflicting punishment on civilian areas in an attempt to create pressure on the Israeli government to stop becomes one of the considerations that Iran’s leadership has to make.”

Israel hasn’t been able to hit some Iranian nuclear facilities “because they’re buried deep in the mountains and they would need certain munitions types that they don’t have and that the United States fields in terms of the massive ordnance penetrator type weapons,” known as Bunker Busters, Rumbaugh said.

“But is the goal to entirely roll back Iran’s civilian nuclear industry? Or is Israel’s goal to weaken (and) reduce the capacity of Iran’s missile capabilities?”

He questions whether regime change in Iran is the goal of Israeli air strikes. “I’m not seeing Israel being able to mobilize the sort of ground forces they would need to impose regime change militarily, so will air strikes be sufficient is sort of an unclear picture for me.”

Israel has said this could be a “multi-week” set of operations, according to Rumbaugh. “So, we might just be at the start of this.”


Minister of Transport and Internal Trade Chrystia Freeland arrives for the First Ministers' Meeting at TCU Place.

OTTAWA — Conservatives will be supporting the Liberal government’s internal trade and major projects bill that is expected to be passed before Canada Day, revealed Leo Housakos, the leader of the Opposition in the Senate.

Housakos confirmed the news as he was questioning Minister of Transport and Internal Trade Chrystia Freeland during a pre-study of the bill on Monday afternoon.

“Obviously, the Conservative opposition in the House (of Commons) supports this bill, as the opposition does in this chamber,” he said, before criticizing current Liberals who were in his party’s view a “little bit overzealous” under Justin Trudeau’s government in putting in place “impediments and red tape” for projects in the energy sector.

Freeland thanked Housakos for “recognizing and highlighting that Conservatives are supporting this legislation” and went on to say how proud she was as finance minister to have completed the expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline which she said will

add $1.25 billion to government coffers this year alone.

Bill C-5 would give the federal government sweeping powers for five years to quickly approve natural resource and infrastructure projects once cabinet deems them to be in the national interest, as well as break down internal trade barriers and make it easier for workers to work in other provinces.

Conservatives had so far hinted that they were in favour of the bill, which aligns with many of their election commitments, but had not confirmed that they would be voting for it.

“Of course, we Conservatives hope the government can show Canadians that big, audacious, nation-building projects can get approved and built in competitive timelines by the private sector, not by taxpayers,” said Conservative MP Shannon Stubbs, who is the party’s energy and natural resources critic, in a speech in the House last week.

Stubbs said she expects Liberals to “fix” C-5 and “make it transparent, clear and certain.” Amendments include adding a clear definition of what is in the “national interest,” a concrete two-year timeline between the final decision by cabinet on a project and its completion and ensuring project deliverables are achieved on time and on budget.

Liberal MP Judy Sgro defended her government’s decision to fast-track the legislation, saying that “it’s an opportunity for Canada to really become the economic engine that we know it can be in consultation with all of the various groups that matter to us.”

“The Conservatives are working with us,” she added.

On Monday, Conservatives voted with the governing Liberals to speed up debate on C-5 — despite intense criticism from the Bloc Québécois, the NDP and Green Party Leader Elizabeth May — and are expected to support the bill at second reading later this evening.

May said she has never seen a process to push through legislation so quickly and urged Prime Minister Mark Carney to let the bill be studied thoroughly during the summer.

“The idea that this bill will be done and dusted by Friday must be resisted,” she said during a press conference on Monday with Indigenous chiefs and environmental lawyers.

“What is the rush to pass bad legislation that will lead to court challenges?”

NDP MP Leah Gazan said her party cannot support C-5 in its current form. While she said the first part of the bill on lifting internal trade should be reviewed, the fast-tracking of major projects section deserves more scrutiny.

“The second part is riddled with lack of oversight, constitutional violations against Indigenous peoples, violations against the health and safety of workers. We are saying a clear ‘no,’ while the Liberals and Conservatives are saying a clear ‘yes’ to corporations.”

So far, at least one Liberal MP has publicly raised some concerns about the bill and another one said he has heard concerns from his constituents.

B.C. MP Patrick Weiler said while C-5’s extraordinary powers are justified to deal with the trade war, those powers will be in effect for five years and said parliamentarians need to consider how this legislation “could be used in bad faith by a future government.”

Marcus Powlowski, an MP from Northern Ontario, said he has also heard some concerns from his constituents that C-5 will be used to push through projects without sufficient environmental controls and oversight, and input from Indigenous communities.

Powlowski said he supports the fast-tracking of the bill. “I think a lot of people kind of see malice in it, but I don’t see malice in it,” he said.

The bill is expected to be studied at the House of Commons transport committee on Tuesday and Wednesday. Bloc MP and committee member Xavier Barsalou-Duval, in an attempt to hear from more witnesses, has tabled an amendment for the committee to sit from 10 a.m. until midnight on Tuesday and to hear from Carney and various ministers.

“It appears to me, and it remains to be seen, that Mr. Carney’s new majority coalition is Liberal-Conservative, delivering Pierre Poilievre policies with a more friendly face,” said May.

With files from Stephanie Taylor.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.