LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

An arriving passenger uses a biometric scanner at George H.W. Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston, Texas.

New Department of Homeland Security regulations in the United States will, beginning Dec. 26, require all non-citizens (including Canadians)

to be photographed

while entering or leaving the country.

The initiative is intended to build a comprehensive biometric data collection aimed at improving identity verification, combatting visa overstays and reducing passport fraud. The regulations note: “The best tool to combat passport fraud is to utilize the digital photos contained in e-passports to biometrically verify that a person who presents a travel document is the true bearer of that document.”

This is hardly the first or most intrusive measure when it comes to collection of biometric data at border crossings. Here’s what to know.

What is biometric data?

From the Greek words for “life” and “measure,”

biometrics

basically refers to any measurement that sets one person apart from another — fingerprints, DNA, retina, even something as simple as height and weight. The word was first used in the late 19th century but has become much more common since the 1990s.

Are the U.S. rules a new measure?

The specifics are new, but the U.S. (and a lot of other countries) have been engaged in this kind of information gathering for decades.

For instance, the United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology (or 

US-VISIT

) was implemented in 2003 and required visitors who required a visa to submit to the collection of biometric data. However, the program has been expanded in the years since to include almost all visitors.

Similarly, the

NEXUS program

between Canada and the U.S. uses retina scans, fingerprints and, more recently,

facial recognition

to identify frequent cross-border travellers between the two countries. That program

started in 2000

with just a few hundred participants, but it has grown widely since.

 A visitor to the United States goes through the US-VISIT biometric entry procedure at a land crossing in Washington in 2004.

What is Canada doing?

In addition to being part of NEXUS, Canada has its own

biometric information gathering

systems. For instance, newcomers to Canada must submit a photograph and fingerprints (and a fee of $85) if they are applying for temporary or permanent residence, to extend a stay on a visa, or to claim refugee or asylum status.

There are exceptions, including those under the age of 14 or over 79. Notably, U.S. tourists entering Canada do not need to provide biometric information. The government of Canada

has a website

where visitors can determine if they are exempt.

Who else is doing it?

It’s easier to ask who isn’t doing it. Almost every country on Earth collects some form of biometric data on visitors, and a large number gather data from those leaving as well as arriving.

In France, for instance, the

PARAFE

(or Passage Automatisé Rapide Aux Frontières Extérieures) lets citizens from Canada and many other countries use a “PARAFE airlock” to enter and exit the country. This is because Canadian passports contain biometric data in the form of an embedded chip, with the system reads and compares to the passport holder.

Canada has had such passports since 2013. The government notes that the only data stored on the chip is an

electronic version

of the photo that also appears on the passport.

Just this month, the European Union began using its new biometric entry/exit system (EES) for all arriving travellers from outside the

“Schengen area”

; a fancy term for the nations of the European Union, minus Ireland and Cyprus, but including Norway, Switzerland, Lichtenstein and Iceland. Canadians and others will need to provide fingerprints and photos

as the system takes effect

.

Also, Britain implemented an electronic travel authorization document for non-visa tourists (including Canadians) at the beginning of this year. Application requires a photograph, as well as a fee of 16 pounds, equivalent to about $30.

 For tourists fond of collecting physical passport stamps, the experience will be a thing of the past after nations across the European Union switch to biometric and electronic border systems.

Is the collection of biometric data mandatory?

Effectively, yes. You don’t need to provide it to nations that require it. But then they don’t need

to let you in

either. So if you want (or need) to travel to a country that demands it, there’s no way around it.

Are there issues with some countries?

A

2021 survey

by U.K.-based cyber security company Comparitech of countries’ use of biometric data at borders and elsewhere ranked China as the worst. It noted that the country has

widespread and invasive use of facial recognition technology in CCTV cameras, in part to track and monitor the country’s Muslim and Uighur minorities.

It also noted “

a concerning lack of regard for the privacy of people’s biometric data,” and raised concerns about “severe and invasive” collection of data.

However, it’s worth noting that China has recently

exempted Canadian visitors

from providing fingerprints when applying for a visa or entering the country — at least until the end of this year.

Also high on that list of countries, tied for fourth-worst alongside

Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bangladesh, the Philippines and Uganda, was the United States.

“Most concerning is its lack of a specific law to protect citizens’ biometrics,” the study noted. “While there is a handful of state laws that protect state residents’ biometrics …
this does leave many U.S. citizens’ biometrics exposed as there is no federal law in place. And this is despite the widespread and growing use of facial recognition in public places, biometrics within the workplace, and fingerprints for visas.”

At the other end of the scale was

Turkmenistan, although the study noted that this was likely due to lack of development within the country: “For example, no known biometric database exists and the use of CCTV with facial recognition isn’t known.”

 More than just borders: Facial recognition for fans entry into the Allianz Parque stadium in Sao Paulo, Brazil on October 11, 2025.

Should travellers be worried?

Maybe. Some groups, such as the Ottawa-based International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group,

have raised fears

that data could be stolen, or that “mission creep” could result in biometrics originally taken for border-crossing purposes to be used more broadly, such as warrantless mass surveillance of citizens.

U.S. Customs and Border Patrol spokesperson Jessica Turner recently

told Radio-Canada

: “CBP is committed to its privacy obligations and has taken steps to safeguard the privacy of all travellers.” And in any case, it again comes down to whether one wants to follow another country’s rules to visit, or stay home.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


JP Saxe sings the Canadian National Anthem before game three of the 2025 World Series between the Toronto Blue Jays and the Los Angeles Dodgers at Dodger Stadium on October 27, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.

Canadian singer JP Saxe changed the lyrics of the national anthem at Monday night’s World Series game.

Before the Toronto Blue Jays faced off against the Los Angeles Dodgers, the Grammy-nominated musician appeared on the field for his rendition O Canada. But instead of saying

“our home on native land,”

as the original wording goes, he said: “our home on native land.”

Many people on social media were upset with the switch.

“I don’t know why artists feel the need to change the national anthem,”

wrote

sports commentator Ben Steiner in a post on X.

Steiner referenced a performance by Montreal-born musician Nikki Yanofsky, who sang the national anthem at the 2010 Vancouver Olympics. Her rendition had some Canadians “

fuming

” for “mangling the anthem at such a historic moment,”

Now reported

. It was described as a

“jazzy take”

on the original by CTV News.

“Just sing it as is,” wrote Steiner.

Toronto radio host Greg Brady also felt strongly about Saxe’s version. “STOP bastardizing ‘O Canada,’ OUR national anthem. It belongs to all of us – whomever our parents & grandparents are, & wherever you are born. If you’re a Canadian citizen, or striving to be one – this is OUR song. It’s awesome being in another country, especially at a sporting event, hearing our anthem,” he

said

in a post on X. “We’re not at your concert.”

He said the Canadian singer “blew it” and that the O Canada lyrics are meant to unite Canadians.

“I want that moment of unity, above all else. Stop cheating us of that in big moments. You broke the shared experience. You had a civic responsibility. This isn’t negotiable,” Brady said.

One user named Stacey called Saxe’s version a

“pathetic, attention seeking stunt.”

Toronto-based lawyer Ryan O’Connor called it an “upside-down flag moment.” But another user named Kim pointed out: “Well, Canada IS on Native land.”

Saxe was

nominated for a Grammy Award

in 2020 for his song, If The World Was Ending.

In August, he penned an

op-ed for Variety

, explaining that he had to cancel his fall tour due to low ticket sales. He was

applauded

by artists in the music and entertainment industry — including singers Natasha Bedingfield and J Balvin, and actress Sophia Bush — who took to Instagram to commend him for his honesty.

“If the ship is sinking, you announce you’ve decided to be a submarine. Instead, I told everyone the ship was sinking. And somehow… they jumped on board,” Saxe wrote in the Variety article. He said he was grateful for those who did support him.

The Jonas Brothers decided to bring

Saxe on stage to perform at their Toronto show

in late August, after hearing the singer’s story.

The band also received some

backlash

over their own MLB performance at Game 2 of the World Series in Toronto. The Jonas Brothers played a Stand Up to Cancer tribute mid-game, followed by one of their new songs. Some fans considered it to be an “ill-timed interruption,” Billboard reported.

Canadian singer Jully Black also made the same lyric change as Saxe when she sang O Canada in 2023 at the NBA All-Star Game in Utah. The Assembly of First Nations

honoured her

at a ceremony “for her strength, her voice, and her allyship,” the group said. Black kept those lyrics while singing O Canada at a law school graduation in Toronto later that year,

CBC News reported

. She said she did it “to acknowledge the country’s theft of Indigenous land.”

Toronto singer

Deborah Cox is set to sing O Canada

at Game 4 of the World Series on Tuesday in Los Angeles.


Alberta Premier Danielle Smith speaks to party members at the United Conservative Party annual general meeting in Calgary, Nov. 4, 2023.

Members of Alberta’s United Conservative Party want a detailed plan explaining the “potential benefits and negative consequences” of the province becoming an independent nation, according to a draft, obtained by National Post, of prospective policy proposals to be debated at the party’s annual general meeting.

Each year, before the convention, the party collates a list of potential policy resolutions. The party’s members then go through the list, selecting the ones that are most important to them, and the final list sees debate on the convention floor. The meeting kicks off on Nov. 28 this year.

The draft resolutions, obtained by National Post, contain a much wider set of policy proposals than the final list of resolutions, and gives insight into the priorities of a swathe of the party’s membership.

“We do know that (Danielle) Smith is very closely attuned to the concerns of the party base, and that’s where this is,” said Duane Bratt, a University of Calgary political scientist, in an interview.

There are three separatist-adjacent proposals, coming at a time when Alberta alienation seems to once again be on an upswing. Over the weekend, thousands of supporters of Alberta independence rallied at the Alberta legislature, and there are duelling initiatives to get a secession referendum on the ballot. One of the proposals aims to ensure that a secession referendum appears alone, alongside no other referendums, if the question of leaving Canada is ever put to Albertans. Another aims to push for “Canada 2.0,” with an established Alberta Constitution “establishing Alberta’s sovereignty” and then negotiating “the terms of a new federation.” The third is the explanation of the benefits and consequences of secession.

“Many are in support of independence already but many aren’t either because of lack of real facts and education,” the resolution’s rationale explains.

The resolutions are wide-ranging. One says that cursive writing should be taught to schoolchildren, to ensure they have a connection to their past. Another suggests that the Calgary International Airport be renamed Calgary-Ralph Klein International Airport. (There was a failed push in 2015 to get the airport named after former prime minister Stephen Harper.)

There are some proposed resolutions that will be of interest only to locals, and only some locals at that, such as a proposal to allow for five-year vehicle registrations or allowing for single-egress stairs in apartment buildings to “unlock apartment construction affordability.”

Others are no surprise to anyone who follows conservative politics, such as allowing for publicly funded, privately delivered and privately funded and delivered medical services, restoring a 10-per-cent income-tax rate as the highest bracket in the province or pushing for innovation and economic diversification within the province.

Others, though, expose some of the tensions that exist — and have long existed — within Alberta’s right wing, between the concerns of the grassroots members and the more mainstream concerns that might appeal to a broader cohort of Alberta’s voting public. For years, Alberta’s occasionally unhappy conservative parties have struggled to hold together a large-tent party comprising many of the factions of Alberta’s right, from old-school progressive conservatives to those demanding the right to bear arms.

For example, member Dione Martin proposes an “immediate moratorium on the administration of mRNA technology to Albertans.” The COVID-19 vaccines are mRNA vaccines. There’s a call to create a “strategic Bitcoin reserve.”

Three constituency associations are calling on the province to push for greater transparency from the federal government on “weather modification or geoengineering programs.” Five constituency associations have banded together, calling for an end to water fluoridation, which they suggest “constitutes medical treatment without informed consent.” The constituency association of Grande Prairie calls on the province to study the “health impacts from devices that emit electromagnetic frequencies,” such as telecommunications towers near where people live.

“Public concern is growing and they need facts and data that come from non-bias trusted sources,” the resolution states.

Some of the proposals are likely to appeal to a broader cohort of United Conservative Party members, such as ensuring university instructors don’t “promulgate their personal worldviews in their classrooms” or that only official government flags can be flown over government buildings. The Calgary-Buffalo constituency association wants a ban on contractors of the public service and Crown corporations from including their personal pronouns in official communications, such as emails, in order to avoid perceptions of bias and prevent those who don’t have pronouns in their email signatures from feeling pressured to include them.

“The unilateral use of personal pronouns in official communications may be perceived as signalling a stance on gender identity, a contentious social issue,” the proposed resolution states.

There are also several policy proposals that have existed in Alberta for a long time — adopting an Alberta pension plan and a provincial police force, for example, and a resolution from Calgary-Buffalo calls on the government to ensure that temporary residents, visitors and “unsuccessful asylum-seekers” must pay for their health care while in Alberta. (The Alberta Next panel, which met over the summer to weigh options for increasing Alberta’s autonomy from Ottawa, considered whether Alberta should withhold social programs from newcomers if the “number or kind of newcomers moving to our province” isn’t in line with what the provincial government wants.”

“Alberta’s culture embodies personal responsibility,” the resolution states.

 Leader Danielle Smith speaks to party members at the United Conservative Party annual meeting in Red Deer, Alta., Nov. 2, 2024.

In perhaps a nod to Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency in the United States, two constituency associations are calling on the government to establish an “Independent Reform Commission” to “reduce wasteful spending, eliminate excessive regulation and streamline government operations,” as, the resolution argues, reform “through normal political channels” has been unsuccessful.

Still others are fun, though perhaps a pipe dream. A proposed resolution from Lac Ste. Anne-Parkland suggests that Alberta should explore a merger with the Yukon and Northwest Territories, in order to get access to tidewater, in this case in the form of the Arctic Ocean, to move goods out of the province to international markets, in addition to changing the equalization formula for Alberta, and “Alberta would once again be a land of opportunity for business development and create jobs.”

“Constitutionally, this is achievable,” the resolution states. “Many in the north would want to be part of a province and shedding the Federal Vassal Status that currently exists.”

A prohibition on abortion is also unlikely. A call to allow for “clean coal” to fuel Alberta’s electricity grid is, even in fossil-fuel enthusiastic Alberta, unlikely, as the province just phased out coal power entirely in 2024. There’s a call for Alberta to establish a provincial senate of part-time, elected members to provide sober second thought; its unlikely many conservative Albertans see adding more politicians in Edmonton as a solution to any political problems.

In the end, only a few-dozen of the proposals will make it on the final list, but they normally nod at several of the different constituencies of the conservative party. In 2024, the party adopted a resolution that called on the government to “recognize the importance of carbon dioxide to life,” while also endorsing a resolution that wanted the government to make membership in the Alberta Teachers’ Association optional.

“We are a raucous family that has a lot of robust discussions,” said Smith last November.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Canadian energy prices have risen moderately, largely due to inflation and infrastructure upgrades.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — As temperatures drop and golden leaves cover lawns throughout Canada and the northern United States, residents are starting to turn on the heat. Earlier this year, amid President Donald Trump’s trade war, it appeared that energy tariffs might be used as a weapon, potentially driving up electricity prices for U.S. and Canadian consumers alike.

Canadian energy prices have risen moderately, largely due to inflation and infrastructure upgrades. But with autumn in full swing and winter looming, Americans are being warned that electricity prices are set to soar, and not for the usual reasons like oil or natural gas spikes. Instead, a combination of factors — everything from weather and rising demand to climate change policies and tariffs — is contributing to the increases, and experts see no relief in sight.

Electricity rates in the U.S. are up 9.7 per cent since January and, according to the National Energy Assistance Directors Association (NEADA) in Washington, D.C., home heating prices over the coming months are set to rise by 7.6 per cent compared to last year.

“That’s a lot,” said Mark Wolfe, executive director of NEADA. “We’re not used to rates going up like that,” he added, emphasizing that electricity prices tend to go up and rarely go down.

Some regions have been hit harder than others. In 10 states — Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota — plus the District of Columbia, for example, electric bills rose more than 15 per cent between July 2024 and July 2025, according to NEADA.

While the entire country is expected to feel the pinch this winter, the highest price increases, according to Gary Hufbauer, a non-resident senior fellow at the D.C.-based Peterson Institute for International Economics, will hit the Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, New England, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

In New England, things are already tough. “We have the highest residential electricity rates in the nation, except for Alaska and Hawaii,” John Howat, senior energy analyst at the Boston-based National Consumer Law Center, explained. “Our electricity rates are 41 per cent higher than the national average.”

Electricity is the biggest driver of rising bills, while natural gas prices remain flat and propane and heating oil costs are expected to fall, Howat said. However, natural gas prices are known to fluctuate.

The average American family spends three or four per cent of their income on home energy, but that goes up to eight or nine per cent for low-income families. As a result, past-due balances are on the rise, and this comes at a time when assistance programmes are at risk as long as the U.S. government remains shut down.

“I can tell you, as a consumer advocate, that home energy expenditures – it’s sort of like the new price of eggs. People are really struggling,” Howat said.

So what’s causing the price surge? Many things, experts say, but one of the main drivers is electricity demand. “We’re seeing rising electric prices and rising demand,” said Wolfe.

The International Energy Agency has said U.S. electricity demand hit a new record in 2024 at about 2 per cent, and that rate of growth is expected to continue through 2027.

Beyond demand, which also demands upgrades, grid rebuilding and modernization efforts are putting upward pressure on costs.

“As far as I can tell, the electricity price increases are all ultimately climate-related,” said Howat, pointing to capital investment costs in states committed to climate change policies and costs for upgrading to ensure resiliency in states less committed to mitigating climate change.

“Utilities had neglected the reliability of the grid for a long time,” said Wolfe. “Now it’s catching up.”

In Massachusetts, for example, a lot of the price rise “is primarily to fund climate change activities,” said Michael Ferrante, president of the Massachusetts Energy Marketers Association. “We have a very expensive equipment upgrade programme called Mass Save … and consumers pay for that.”

Unsurprisingly, experts point fingers at AI data centres for causing much of the unexpected demand on the grid, and they note that debates continue over how much of the price burden these facilities should bear.

“Data centres are not paying their fair share of the costs, but states want to attract them — they’re economic development engines,” said Wolfe. “That’s the tension we’re hearing.”

Weather, of course, is also a top factor — the colder the winter, the higher the bills.

But trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada are also having an impact, albeit a less direct one.

“Hydroelectric tariffs are not helping matters,” said Howat, referring to the 10 per cent tariff on Canadian hydro. In New England, over five per cent of the resource need is met through Canadian hydro, and that can jump to over 10 per cent during peak winter periods. “With the tariffs, that can only put upward pressure on prices,” he added.

Tariffs on crude oil and natural gas are notably mitigated by compliance with CUSMA, but there are other tariffs having an impact on the U.S. electricity grid.

Imported energy equipment, including power plant components, steel, copper, and aluminum, faces high tariffs ranging from 25 to 50 per cent, and they are critical components for all the infrastructural upgrades and expansions.

“I don’t think (the tariffs have) had much effect yet,” said Hufbauer, “but they certainly will in time because it really boosted the price of these key ingredients of your electricity infrastructure.”

Overall, the picture for affordable U.S. energy is bleak.

“Electricity is becoming less and less affordable in the United States,” Wolfe warned. “We should view last year’s data as a wake-up call.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Miles of unused pipe, prepared for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, sit in a lot on October 14, 2014 outside Gascoyne, North Dakota.

OTTAWA — Federal Energy Minister Tim Hodgson says Canada is not focused on any one route when it comes to sending more energy into the United States, but stands ready to do “whatever we can” to help with a possible revival of the Keystone XL pipeline.

While trade talks with the U.S. have stalled over Trump’s apparent ire about anti-tariff ads run by Ontario, Prime Minister Mark Carney, during his most recent visit to Washington, raised the defunct pipeline during a meeting with the president as part of a strategy to secure relief from U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum.

Hodgson said the cross-border pipeline, which proposed carrying oil from Hardisty, Alta., to Nebraska, remains fully permitted on the Canadian side, should it run along the same route.

“The pipe is in the ground for a significant portion of that route. The Americans have to decide what they want to do on their side of the border,” the minister told National Post in a wide-ranging interview.

“We have said if it’s part of a bigger solution, we’re open to facilitating.”

Citing the negotiations, Hodgson declined to provide specifics on what steps Canada could take, including when it comes to putting taxpayer money towards it, only saying “there are always things that we can do to make it easier.”

“If we have a bigger solution, we will do whatever we can to help them with what they need.”

“We have indicated to the Americans, as part of a broader solution for the challenges, that we are open to sharing more of our energy with the Americans. We aren’t hung up on any one particular route,” adding that if the U.S. wants to talk about Keystone XL, Canada was open to the idea.

Other options Canada could explore when it comes to sending more energy south of the border include boosting electricity exports and uranium exports, the latter of which is used to power American nuclear reactors, with Canada serving as its biggest foreign supplier, according to Natural Resources Canada.

Critical minerals are also high on Trump’s list, with his administration recently taking equity stakes in two Canadian companies.

South Bow Corp., which owns the existing Keystone network, told The Canadian Press in a statement earlier this month that it would look for ways to “leverage our existing corridor” and was supportive of efforts to transport more Canadian crude oil.

Back in February, the operator initially said it had “moved on” from the Keystone XL pipeline, after Trump called in a Truth Social post for the project to be built “NOW.”

The long and troubled project, formally submitted back in 2008, has undergone two cancellations, first by former president Barack Obama, whose administration rejected it in 2015, and then again by former president Joe Biden, who revoked its permit on his first day in office in 2021, after Trump tried to revive it during his first term in office.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said on Monday she was encouraged that during Carney’s most recent trip to Washington, it appeared that trade talks included “an energy pipeline that would be a replacement for Keystone,” as part of an effort of Canada “leveraging” the U.S’s demand for energy to gain reprieve on 50 per cent steel and aluminum tariffs.

Asked if energy was indeed leverage, Hodgson struck a softer tone.

“The United States uses 20 million barrels of oil a day. They produce 12 (million),” he said. “I make an observation.”

Hodgson is set to meet later this week with U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright as part of a meeting of G7 energy and environment ministers, which Canada is set to host in Toronto.

The minister said the pair would continue to look for “shared interests” when it comes to the issue of energy security and suggested his upcoming discussions were separate from the issue of the terminated trade talks between Canada and the U.S.

Carney is currently in Asia and has said Canada remains ready to resume negotiations, adding both countries were close to reaching one when Trump pulled the plug.

“I believe energy security is part of a bigger conversation,” Hodgson said.

“I think we have all learned working with the current administration is never a straight line. It’s sort of their negotiating style, and I’m confident we’ll get there.”

The minister defended Canada’s offer of sending more energy to the U.S. after a year of widespread concern from political and business leaders about an over-reliance on the U.S. by saying it was combined with efforts to diversify Canada’s markets.

“We can grow our relationship with the U.S. No one’s suggesting we don’t want to have a relationship with the U.S. We want it on a fair basis,” Hodgson said.

Critical minerals were set to be a main topic of discussion at the G7 energy ministers meeting, building on the Critical Minerals Production Alliance that Carney introduced as the G7 leaders’ summit earlier this year, to strengthen countries’ critical minerals supply chains.

Hodgson said he expects to make “a number of announcements” that show Canada intends to be a leader of the effort.

With files from The Canadian Press

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Doug Ford said the Prime Minister Mark Carney and his chief of staff watched an Ontario anti-tariff ad featuring Ronald Reagan before it was aired.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford said Monday that Prime Minister Mark Carney, along with his chief of staff, watched the province’s anti-tariff television ad featuring Ronald Reagan before it first aired and later drew the retributive ire of U.S. President Donald Trump.

“They both saw it and we moved forward on it,” the Ontario premier told reporters at Queen’s Park, where he defended the quotes from the late former U.S. president that were use in the 60- and 30-second versions of the ad.

“We achieved our goal. As we say, mission accomplished, it was done. They’re talking about it in the U.S. and they weren’t talking about it before I put the ad on. So I’m glad Ronald Reagan was a free trader.”

The goal, he said, was to bring attention to the absence of certain Ontario sectors, chiefly its auto sector, from ongoing Canada-U.S. trade negotiations. The others at risk in a trade deal that favours the U.S., he said, are the steel, manufacturing and life science industries.

“My intention was never to poke the president in the eye,” Ford said. “My intention was to inform the American people.”

At

a separate press conference

Monday, when asked if the federal government was kept abreast of plans for the ad, Ontario Minister of Finance Peter Bethlenfalvy said, “sure, there was lots of conversations between the prime minister and Premier Ford.”

Last Thursday night, Trump labelled the $75-million ad campaign “fake” in a Truth Social post and said “all trade negotiations with Canada are hereby terminated.”

After speaking with Carney on Friday,

Ford posted on X

that the commercial — which had already been airing in the U.S.

since Oct. 14,

including during Major League Baseball playoff broadcasts — would be pulled from U.S. stations, but not until it aired during the first two games of the World Series.

Before Game 2 on Saturday evening, Trump announced an additional 10 per cent tariff on Canada “over and above what they are paying now.” When asked by reporters on Monday, Trump did not say when the increase would take effect.

Trump said Monday he doesn’t plan on meeting with Carney “for a while.”

“I don’t care whether it’s provincial or Canada itself. They all knew exactly what the AD was. The prime minister knew. Everybody knew. The prime minister knew what the ad was,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, according to the

Toronto Star.

Carney, who’s in Malaysia for the Association of Southeast Nations meetings,

said

“very detailed, very specific, very comprehensive” discussions with the U.S. were ongoing “up until the point of those ads running.”

Canada, he said, stands by the progress made and is ready to resume talks.

Asked if he feels responsible for the latest levy on Canada, Ford noted that Trump has yet to act on his threat.

“He’s threatened a lot, but we’ll see what comes down the road,” he said Monday.

As for the ads’ effectiveness, during question period in the legislature on Monday, where Ford was also called on to defend them, he said they generated “$300 to $400 million of earned media” and “over one billion impressions” globally.

“Do you know why President Trump’s so upset right now? Because it was effective. It was working. It woke up the whole country,” Ford told reporters outside the legislature.

He also noted they would only spend a “fraction” of the anticipated $75 million because the now-paused ad buy had been scheduled to run through February.

Ford also said Carney hasn’t asked him to stop speaking out against Trump. He feels all premiers play a role and said the time has where they can “get a little more communication off the federal government and listen to the concerns of each province.”

Whereas Manitoba’s Wab Kinew and B.C.’s David Eby have supported Ontario’s initiative, with the latter promising the province’s own ads in a battle against U.S. tariffs on softwood lumber, Alberta’s Danielle Smith said on Monday that she was glad to see the ads pulled.

But she also lamented that it seemed like talks were now “back at square zero.”

“I think that we all just have to be mindful that the U.S. administration is unpredictable, and I think that the relationship building that the prime minister is doing should continue,” she told reporters. “I wish him well on that, and I hope that very soon we’ll be able to get back to where we started, so that we can move forward on some agreements.”

For his part, Ford said earlier Monday that Smith had no appreciation for the ads because Alberta’s key sector wasn’t in danger from American protectionism.

“She has a commodity called oil that Americans need and want, so she’s going to be fine,” he stated.

Meanwhile, Ford is also unbothered by threats of legal action from the Ronald Reagan Foundation, which said last week that it was exploring options regarding unauthorized use and editing of its namesake’s 1987 radio address. It also alleged the ad “misrepresents” Reagan’s message.

Ford countered, saying the government executed its due diligence to ensure the content was in the open domain, making it free for such use.

“They can do whatever they want, but they’re not going to win because it’s very clear,” he said. “They know it, I know it.”

Ford said there are no plans for further tariff or trade-related ad campaigns at this time.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Los Angeles Dodgers manager Dave Roberts speaks during a news conference ahead of Game 3 of baseball's World Series Sunday, Oct. 26, 2025, in Los Angeles.

Canada is “not trying to sabotage” the Los Angeles Dodgers, the baseball team’s manager said after he implied that he was not certain if there was “intent” behind a delay that occurred while he was travelling from Toronto to the U.S.

Dave Roberts made his original remarks on Sunday evening, as his team prepared for Game 3 of the World Series.

A reporter said his own connecting flight was delayed and asked if Roberts had his own “travel story.” The manager was late to the team’s workout at Dodger Stadium that night, the Associated Press reported.

“You know, I don’t want to get too far into it. I just arrived about 30 minutes ago. There were some delays. I don’t know if there was intent or not…the international stuff was a bear,” he said. “But we made it.”

Roberts has since walked back his comments. “Canada is not trying to sabotage the Dodgers. I know that. It was just a long day,” he said,

The Athletic reported

.

He elaborated further, saying that he knew the prime minister was not “worried about calling airline security or the FAA to make sure that they delay us.” He said it had been a long process at the airport and “a lot of it had to do with our big,

huge, four-plane travel party.”

“It’s just a part of international travel. And passports. Airline security. That’s part of it,” he said.

There were around 400 people who made up the Dodgers travel party, according to The Athletic. They were split up into groups on different aircrafts, with the players staying together. The players left for Los Angeles after Saturday’s game in Toronto. Roberts did not leave Toronto until Sunday morning, the publication said.

The Dodgers and the Toronto Blue Jays are currently tied at 1-1. The video clip of Roberts posted online by TSN has been viewed nearly 95,000 times on X as of Monday afternoon.

Game 3 of the 2025 World Series takes place in Los Angeles on Monday night.


Tim Hodgson, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources.

OTTAWA — Federal Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson says the question of whether there is a business case for a new bitumen pipeline in Canada will be up to the private sector to decide.

He also suggests the question of whether the country can, in fact, build a new oil pipeline to be an “overfocusing” on a “hypothetical.”

“I think Canada can build many things,” Hodgson told National Post in a wide-ranging interview on Monday.

“The over-focusing on what right now is hypothetical… What I want to do is focus on when real proponents bring real things forward. We will help them get them done.”

The minister’s comments come as Alberta Premier Danielle Smith seeks to have Prime Minister Mark Carney include her yet-to-be-submitted proposal to build a million-barrel-a-day bitumen pipeline from Edmonton to British Columbia’s northern coast as part of his next batch of nation-building projects to be considered for fast-tracked approvals, set to be unveiled by Nov. 16.

Smith has argued that doing so would be the “trigger” companies need to come forward as proponents and that listing her project as one of national interest would be the “signal” that Carney’s government was serious, but Hodgson said the process for being designated remains the same for all proponents.

“We fully understand it is the federal government’s ultimate jurisdiction for interprovincial pipelines,” Hodsgon said, adding that the federal government has said proponents must work with impacted jurisdictions and First Nations.

“It doesn’t matter whether it’s a wind project, a port, a railway, a road. We tell every proponent the exact same thing.”

British Columbia Premier David Eby has expressed concern over Alberta’s proposal, not only over how impacted coastal First Nations have so far voiced disapproval of a new pipeline, but with her ask that Carney’s government even consider it, saying it was not a “real project,” given how it lacks any private sector proponent or money.

Earlier this year, Carney ushered in a new approvals process through the Building Canada Act, which is at the core of how his government plans to get more projects off the ground and attract hundreds of billions in new private sector investment, as a way to bolster Canada’s economy, in the face of economic threats from U.S. President Donald Trump.

The first batch of nation-building projects under review by the Major Projects Office, which Carney’s government created to be a single point of contact for proponents looking to secure the necessary approvals and permits, includes an expansion to a natural gas liquefaction project in B.C., upgrades to the Port of Montreal, two mines, and a small modular nuclear reactor in Ontario.

While Carney’s government has expressed an interest in seeing a carbon capture and storage project known as “Pathways Plus” developed, Smith announced earlier this month that Alberta would be submitting a proposal to the Major Projects Office for the construction of a new bitumen pipeline to B.C’s northern coast.

She has said the goal is for a private sector proponent to eventually take on the project, with discussions underway with several companies. For now, Smith’s United Conservative Party government said it planned to put up $14 million of taxpayer money to complete technical work on the proposal, which the premier said would be submitted for consideration no later than May 2026.

Asked whether he believes there to a business case for building a new bitumen pipeline, Hodgson said, “that’s up for the private sector proponents to decide.”

“Alberta has some work to do,” Hodgson said.

“In the spring, you can expect the federal government to be at the table, working constructively with any proponent to see what is possible.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Drake showed up to Game 1 of the World Series in Toronto wearing a letterman jacket similar to Rob Ford's and emblazoned with the late former Toronto mayor's name.

Drake was among the 44,000-plus fans at Rogers Centre to witness the Toronto Blue Jays’ decisive Game 1 World Series win Friday night and he did so while paying homage to late former Toronto Mayor Rob Ford.

While watching the series opener against the Los Angeles Dodgers from a private box in right field, Drake, celebrating his 39th birthday, was photographed sporting a green and yellow letterman jacket for the Don Bosco Eagles high school football team.

Embroidered on the right side was the name R. Ford.

The jacket, while similar, is not the same one worn by Ford during his tenure as the school’s volunteer head coach throughout the 2000s and during his time in office as a councillor and later as a mayor, based on National Post archived images.

The rapper and hip-hop artist’s jacket has decorative embroidery on the sleeves, whereas Ford’s had a patch reading “Coach” on the right and the “02” on the left.

Drake’s also has a shorter collar and uses a more modern font for the name.

Some Facebook users wondered by Drake wasn’t wearing something to support the team on the field.

“What’s with that bloody jacket? It’s the Blue Jays game. You should have worn a Blue Jay shirt instead,”

Jude Aure wrote.

“Where’s your Blue Jays Jacket Drake… aren’t you a Canadian cheering for a Canadian Team,” Laura Hunter asked in reply to a Toronto Blue Jays post. 

On X, Barstool Sports host

Kevin Clandy wrote

, “No matter what you think of Drake, rocking the Rob Ford varsity jacket in Toronto for the WS is a legendary move.”

Ford coached the Eagles to a Toronto District Catholic Athletic Association title in 2012, but lost in the subsequent Metro Bowl final to decide GTA high school football supremacy.

His time at the Eagles’ helm ended unceremoniously the following year when he was fired by the board over allegations of egregiously improper behaviour, some of which was detailed in 300 pages of documents disclosed through a freedom of information request.

As reported by

National Post

at the time, Ford allegedly ordered teenage players to roll in goose scat, called them derogatory terms, challenged a co-coach to a fight and arrived at a practice for the 2012 Metro Bowl Championship Game while inebriated.

The allegations came at a fraught time in Ford’s personal and political life, brought on by substance abuse, to which he would later admit and begin treatment to resolve. He abandoned another run for mayor in 2014 after a stomach cancer diagnosis and won a seat on council instead.

Ford died on March 22, 2016, after chemotherapy was ineffective.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Donald Trump said October 23, 2025 he was ending trade talks with Canada over an anti-tariff advertising campaign, a sudden about-face soon after a cordial White House meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney.

Donald Trump says he would not meet with Mark Carney “for a while.” Meanwhile, the Canadian prime minister told reporters they were close to reaching a trade deal before the fallout caused by

an anti-tariff advertisement

.

Both leaders are in Asia this week. On Friday, the U.S. president spoke to reporters before travelling to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to attend the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) summit. He was asked if he would see Carney. “I don’t have any intention of it. No,” Trump

responded

.

On Monday, after the summit, while Trump was en route to Japan,

he reasserted

that he did not want to meet with Carney “for a while.”

“No, I’m very happy with the deal we have right now with Canada,” he said.

Trump

said

last week that negotiations with Canada were “terminated” after

an anti-tariff ad

 by the Ontario government featured the late former American president Ronald Reagan. Trump called the ad “fake” and said that tariffs are “very important to the national security and economy of the U.S.A.”

He then

said

that the U.S. would increase Canada’s tariffs by 10 per cent.

When asked by reporters on Monday, Trump did not say when the increase would take effect. “Ronald Reagan loved tariffs,” he said, adding that the former president used them “sparingly.”

“I was the biggest fan of Ronald Reagan, but on finance, on trade, it wasn’t his strong suit,” said Trump. He said that Canada has been “ripping off” the U.S. for “a long time.”

“One of the most difficult countries to deal with has been Canada. As much as I love Canada itself and the people of Canada, they’ve just had bad representatives,” he said.

Before trade talks disintegrated, Carney said there were “very detailed, very specific, very comprehensive” negotiations about steel, aluminum and energy “up until the point of those ads running,” he

said

on Monday in Malaysia.

“We stand ready to pick up on those discussions,” he said. “In any complicated high stakes negotiation, you can get unexpected twists and turns. You have to keep your cool during those situations. It doesn’t pay to be upset. Emotions don’t carry you very far. We had made progress … and we stand by the progress that had been made.”

Both of the leaders are expected to be in South Korea for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit this week.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.