LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Liberal Leader Mark Carney.

OTTAWA — The threat of seeing Japanese automaker Honda move some of its production south of the border, in the wake of a global tariff war, has caused Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre to stress why they should be in the driver’s seat come April 28.

Japanese news outlet Nekkei threw much of Canada into a panic early Tuesday after it reported that Honda is working on plans to switch its production from Mexico and Canada to the U.S.

However, Canadian officials came out to say the report was not accurate.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who spoke to the president of Honda Canada, said the Nekkei report was “not accurate at all” and that Honda instead wants to “increase production.”

Federal Industry Minister Anita Anand also put out a statement to calm the waters.

“Honda has communicated that so such production decisions affecting Canadian operations have been made, and are not being considered at this time,” she said.

Earlier in the day, Carney was asked to comment on the unconfirmed reports that Honda would be moving its production away from Canada. While he remained prudent in his answers, he said it was a possible downfall of U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

“It’s a war, and we can’t provide guarantees for every situation,” Carney said during a media availability in St-Eustache, a suburb north-west of Montreal.

“That just underscores how important … the negotiation with the U.S. President (is) and who is going to be across the table for that global approach, who knows how to get the deal that will build out for our auto industry and other industries in Canada,” he said.

“I’m running hard so that I can be at the table for Canada to win for Canadian workers.”

In a call last month, Carney and Trump agreed to “begin comprehensive negotiations about a new economic and security relationship” immediately after the election.

On Tuesday, Poilievre also condemned Trump’s targeting of Canada in general terms.

“President Trump deserves nothing but condemnation for the unfair targeting of Canada while he’s lifting tariffs and backing down on tariffs all around the world, continues to terrify our auto sector,” he said at an announcement in downtown Montreal.

“There’s nobody who’s going to be able to control President Trump, as Mr. Carney is learning despite his promises,” he added.

Poilievre stressed that Canadians need a change in government.

“The need is change. This is a change election, change that you can afford food and a home, change that your paycheck grows faster than your cost of living, change that you’re safe in your neighbourhood,” he said.

Until now, Canada has been hit by three waves of U.S. tariffs — on all goods that are not protected under the CUSMA agreement, on steel and aluminum, and on automobiles.

The U.S. tariffs of 25 per cent on Canadian automobiles came into effect on April 3, and Canada responded by imposing 25 per cent tariffs on non-CUSMA compliant vehicles made in the U.S. and non-Canadian content of CUSMA compliant U.S. vehicles on April 9.

This has resulted in hundreds of layoffs and suspension of production in at least two auto plants in Ontario — Stellantis in Windsor and General Motors in Ingersoll.

The news that Honda might shift its production to the U.S. had the workers in the facility in Alliston holding their breath. Just last year, Honda, with the federal and provincial governments, announced $15 billion for two new plants for electric vehicles and batteries.

The Ontario premier said that would not change: “We’re going to keep Honda here.”

“We can confirm that our Canadian manufacturing facility in Alliston, Ontario, will operate at full capacity for the foreseeable future and no changes are being considered at this time,” said Honda Canada spokesperson Ken Chiu in a statement.

“We constantly study options for future contingency planning and utilize short-term production shift strategies when required, to mitigate negative impacts on our business.”

The federal government is not waiting for the situation to worsen and

announced new support for Canadian businesses affected by tariffs

— including automakers.

On Tuesday, it announced a “performance-based remission framework for automakers” which is designed to incentivize production and investment in Canada.

The exemption to some of the countermeasure tariffs announced by Canada in response to the U.S. tariffs is contingent on automakers continuing to produce vehicles in the country and moving ahead with their planned investments, according to a press release.

“In other words, our counter-tariffs won’t apply if they continue to produce, continue to employ, continue to invest in Canada,” said Carney.

“If they don’t, they will get 25 per cent tariffs on what they are importing into Canada.”

Carney said he has been speaking with CEOs of major automotive companies. He said he has been hearing loud and clear that the auto industry is “incredibly integrated” in North America and that tariffs would effectively erase profit margins for automakers.

“They’re very concerned,” he said. “They don’t think that the (Trump) administration is taking into account how integrated the industry is.”

White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt reiterated on Tuesday Trump’s goal is to put U.S. auto workers “first.”

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.


Liberal leader Mark Carney, left, and Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre.

Public trust in the Liberals and Conservatives is nearly equal, according to a new survey. However, demographic and regional splits could shape the final outcome of the 2025 election.

The poll,

conducted by Leger for the Association for Canadian Studies

, found that 35 per cent of Canadians trust the Liberals and 34 per cent trust the Conservatives. The NDP has the trust of 29 per cent of people, followed by 22 per cent for the Bloc Québécois.

Trust is important, especially in such a close contest, said Jack Jedwab, president of the Association for Canadian Studies and the Metropolis Institute.

“Trust in the parties and their leaders is a key determinant in voter decision-making,” Jedwab said. “It’s a critical issue that could make the difference to the outcome of the election.”

The survey reveals a distinct gender divide. While men trust the Liberals and Conservatives at similar levels (37 per cent and 34 per cent, respectively), more women trust the Liberals than the Conservatives. The Conservative party is trusted by 38 per cent of men and just 27 per cent of women.

Jedwab links this to a broader trend across North America.

“Some women associate advances in gender equality with the Liberal brand more so than they do the Conservative one,” he said.

Canadians aged 55 and over (36 per cent for the Liberals compared to 30 per cent for the Conservatives) and university-educated voters (45 per cent compared to 31 per cent) also tend to trust the Liberals more.

Risk aversion and a desire for stability may explain some of the support from older Canadians, Jedwab said, while higher education levels often align with left-leaning views, creating distrust of the Conservatives among that group.

Trust varies significantly by language and region. Among English-speaking Canadians, trust in the two major parties is the same (35 per cent), but among Francophones, the Bloc Québécois is the most trusted (42 per cent) compared to 37 per cent for the Liberals and just 22 per cent for the Conservatives. Jedwab noted that the Bloc’s brand is closely tied to protecting Quebec’s interests.

“The Bloc’s key message is that they’re the most trustworthy in defence of Quebec,” he said. “But they can’t govern — and that’s a challenge when voters are also thinking about who can stand up to threats from south of the border.”

For both parties, Ontario remains the critical battleground in the trust wars. “Ontario voters are the key battleground for the parties in building their trust or eroding that of others,” said Jedwab.

The relationship between trust and voter intention is particularly stark among NDP and Bloc voters. NDP supporters express much greater trust in Liberals than in the Conservatives, while Bloc voters also tend to trust Liberals more than Conservatives. Jedwab said this puts added pressure on the Conservatives to either build trust or erode it in their rivals.

“These are the kinds of signals that parties are watching closely, especially with leaders’ debates coming up,” Jedwab said.

The online survey of 1,631 Canadians was conducted by Leger on April 5 and 6. A margin of error cannot be associated with a non-probability sample in a panel survey for comparison purposes. A probability sample of 1,631 respondents would have a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 per cent, 19 times out of 20.


What do castles in Sweden have to do with the Canadian election?

Absolutely nothing. But their cost compared to a very modest house in Kitchener, Ont., has been a recurring topic in just about every Pierre Poilievre campaign rally speech since the writ was dropped.

While laying out examples of the “lost Liberal decade” and illustrating the growing cost of housing in Canada, the Conservative Party of Canada will point out “that you can actually buy a castle in Sweden for a lower price than a midsize house in Kitchener,” or something to that effect.

It’s been a familiar refrain from Poilievre since not long after he became party leader.

It was a talking point during his first

Tory convention speech

as leader in 2023 and

again last year

. In Ottawa, he’s brought it up

in the House of Commons

multiple times and

outside the West Block

on Parliament Hill. He’s also referenced it

while speaking with people

around the country

, and in

pre-election events this year.

In an email to National Post, a Conservative party spokesperson cited Poilievre’s source as both an October 2023

CTV News story

about a couple from Fergus, Ont., who upgraded to a French castle and

a National Post piece

from months earlier about a new TikTok series from a user who goes by Millennial Moron.

“I didn’t know that he was doing it recently. But it’s been happening quite a bit over the past couple of years,” he said when contacted by National Post. “I haven’t really kept track of it since then.”

 

In the satirical series, which now has 27 parts, Millennial Moron compares two real estate listings: an average or sometimes run-down home in Toronto or Vancouver and an actual castle or chateau on a sprawling estate somewhere in Europe. It’s his way of illustrating just how unaffordable Canada’s housing market has become in some of its most densely populated areas.

In Part 17

, for instance, he compares 821 Queensway in Toronto — a very modest three-bedroom, two bath on a small lot — with a nearly 60,000 square-foot 15th-century Italian fortress with 23 beds and baths, and other opulent luxuries.

The Canadian property was listed at $9,999,999 while the estate in Italy was going for just under $9.8 million.

Millennial Moron, whose series juxtaposing homes with private islands pre-dated the castles idea, has amassed over a quarter-million followers across his social pages, almost 180,000 coming from

TikTok

. His other content has a slightly more serious tone and deals mostly with the real estate and housing sectors from a statistical standpoint, with semi-regular unbiased dabbles in the political sphere.

(More curious parties should visit his tongue-in-cheek

food pun election survey

pitting Mark Carnitas against steak au Poilievre. The Grit dish was leading 105-61 as of Monday evening.)

He told National Post doesn’t mind that his effort on

one specific video

is being indirectly referenced as part of a political campaign, since it’s bringing attention to an issue he feels should be of paramount importance to Canadians.

“But at the same time, I’m not that enthused about him referencing my work specifically and repeatedly because I think that both the Liberals and Conservatives have some responsibility for this issue over the last 20 years,” he said.

Millennial Moron said only now are governments — municipal, provincial and federal — starting to focus on addressing scarcity and building more homes instead relying on of successive federal governments that have used low interest rates, allowing people to take on onerous mortgage debt, as the primary solution.

“This is an idea for this series I had before Justin Trudeau became prime minister. I just didn’t think of a funny way to do it until a couple of years ago,” the TikToker said.

He likes the CPC and Liberal plans on housing “in principle,” but he doesn’t think either “has a well-rounded and well-developed” enough solution to tackle the significant municipal barriers that sometimes result in purpose-built housing being completed years after they are first proposed.

“So when we have politicians on a four-year electoral cycle saying that we want to get this done by 2030, it makes me quite skeptical that they have any ability to do that,” he added.

Poilievre has promised the CPC

will cut the federal portion of GST on new homes up to $1.3 million and reimburse cities 50 per cent for every dollar of development charge reduced to a max of $25,000.

Mark Carney and the Liberals’

Build Canada Strong

plan aims to “double the pace of construction to almost 500,000 new homes a year.”

They’ll do so by cutting the GST on homes at or under $1 million for first-time homebuyers, incentivizing “red tape” reduction at the municipal level, and establishing a new agency called Build Canada Homes to act “as a developer to build affordable housing at scale, including on public lands.” It will provide $10 billion in low-cost financing and capital to affordable home builders.

“For the projects to actually get built, they still need to be financially viable, particularly for purpose-built rental housing,” said Millennial Moron, who advises people explore all the parties’ position on housing to best inform their decision.

If you’re really serious about housing, he said, become more aware and involved with what’s happening in your own backyard.

“If people actually care about housing as an issue, then they need to get more aware and more involved in municipal politics, where they can’t have a bigger impact because there (are) fewer people involved.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre in Montreal on April 15, 2025.

MONTREAL — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre now says he doesn’t have a timeline for when he would defund the CBC despite promising in December to do it “very quick.”

Questioned by National Post on Tuesday on whether the Conservatives would defund the CBC within 100 days of forming government, Poilievre refused to commit to a specific timeline.

“I don’t have a time frame, but we’ve already said, I’ve already made my position clear on that, and it hasn’t changed: We’re going to defund the CBC,” Poilievre said.

His answer is a notable change from his position just a few months ago, at a time when polls suggested Conservatives held a sizeable lead in the polls over the Justin Trudeau-led Liberals.

In December, Poilievre told

Toronto Sun columnist Brian Lilley

that he would defund the public broadcaster quickly after taking power. The public broadcaster receives roughly $1.4 billion in annual government funding.

“I’m going to defund the CBC. That’s my commitment. My commitment has been the same since I first said it at my very first leadership rally in Regina. I said, ‘We will defund the CBC to save a billion dollars.’ That was my commitment then, it’s my commitment now,” he told Lilley.

On Tuesday, he also provided some new detail about what would happen to the public broadcaster’s English service under a Conservative government. He said that Canadians would continue to “enjoy” the CBC as a “nonprofit, self-funded organization”.

He reiterated his commitment to maintaining funding for Radio-Canada.

CBC has previously said that separating its funding from Radio-Canada’s would require legislative change. In January, the new head of CBC/Radio-Canada Marie-Philippe Bouchard said that cutting funding to the public broadcaster would “cripple” both the English and French services.

“It is to some extent an existential threat because it wouldn’t be the same corporation that we have today,” Bouchard said on

CBC radio show The Current

.

“If we are imagining that we are going to go forward with only French, the math just doesn’t work. There’s a serious risk that it will, in fact, cripple not only the English services, but also the French service,” she continued.

A CBC spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for details on what the public broadcaster’s services would look like if it were transformed into a “nonprofit, self-funded” organization.

Defunding the CBC was a key policy plank for Poilievre from the moment he won the leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada in 2022.

He often repeated his promise to defund the English service at rallies and public events, earning raucous applause from party faithful.

But the Conservative leader has quietly stopped including the promise in public speeches in recent months as his party’s significant polling lead on the Liberals has melted away. Earlier this month,

a Postmedia-Leger poll

suggested the Mark Carney-led Liberals (44 per cent) held a six-point lead on Poilievre’s Conservatives (38 per cent).

Liberal leader Mark Carney has gone the opposite route of Poilievre, promising to double the funding of CBC/Radio-Canada in coming years all the while allowing the public broadcaster to continue running advertisements.

On Tuesday, he criticized Poilievre for his commitment to slash the CBC’s budget and promising tax cuts to supports workers and companies affected by sweeping U.S. tariffs

“How is (Poilievre) going to finance his big tax cut? He’s going to get rid of the CBC. He’s going to get rid of foreign aid. He’s going to get rid of dental care. He’s going to get rid of childcare,” Carney said.

“He’s going to get rid of all those aspects and then think that 1,000 flowers are going to bloom. Well, that’s not the way things work.”

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.


LaSalle-Émard-Verdun Bloc Québécois candidate Louis-Philippe Sauvé.

MONTREAL — “Ma’am, there is a squirrel in your apartment.”

Louis-Philippe Sauvé was standing at the doorstep of three undecided voters when he witnessed an improbable scene. The family wasn’t wealthy. Quite the opposite, in fact. But their votes count in this election, where about a third of the LaSalle—Émard—Verdun electorate appears undecided.

“Why would we vote for you?” asked a man who lives with his parents in the apartment that “cost too much and that is barely heated.”

The squirrel quickly vacated the home, but the Bloc Québécois candidate continued to fight for their votes, relentlessly, for more than 10 minutes.

Sauvé’s pitch is simple.

Elected in a September 2024 massive byelection upset,

he fought tirelessly for his constituents. He lives in the riding. He rents and knows what it’s like to deal with a landlord. He wants the riding to be proud of its history. Nationally, he declared that his party would fight for the aerospace industry, supply management in agriculture and Quebec culture.

In September, he implored voters to grant him a one-year probation. He won with 269 votes in a three-way race against the Liberals and the NDP. Seven months have passed, and now he’s demanding a full term. “I will fight for you,” he promised.

They agreed. It was in the bag. On to the next door.

At the time, his victory created a veritable tsunami in Ottawa, which ultimately led to the resignation of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in January. It’s actually a line he uses when he needs to demonstrate the Bloc’s relevance.

Because this riding is the very definition of a Liberal stronghold. Former prime minister Paul Martin represented the old riding for over 15 years, and David Lametti, former attorney general, represented the current riding for eight years.

And according to the polls, the Liberals will easily win again this time

, with former IBM Canada president Claude Guay

as their “star” candidate.

So, in a sense, Sauvé has about as much chance of winning this election as finding a squirrel in an apartment.

“You know, we had a miracle the first time and we just need to try for another one,” he said.

But he’s not a fool. He knows a victory is unlikely. Sources within the party aren’t even suggesting they can hold onto this riding. The leader’s caravan hadn’t yet visited him by the time the National Post spent the day with Sauvé on Saturday.

Locally, his campaign is hoping that leader Yves-François Blanchet will shine in the debates this week to give the party a boost. If the Bloc Québécois wins 30 or 31 per cent of the vote in Quebec, a victory in LaSalle—Émard—Verdun might be more likely.

In Sauvé, the separatist party has a strange breed of candidate. He’s not your average politician. He’s been involved in politics for years but has only been elected for seven months.

He joined the Bloc Québécois in April 2011, in the riding of Laurier-Sainte-Marie. At the time, he went to the office of former Bloc leader Gilles Duceppe to help him prepare for the election. A few weeks later, the Bloc recorded its worst result in history, with only four seats.

At the time, he saw firsthand what defeat meant. In Duceppe’s riding, a few days before the election, people refused leaflets, avoided eye contact and expressed their disdain. The atmosphere on the ground today is nothing like it was back then, he said.

He was there when the party was trying to rebuild itself and later worked for the current leader, Blanchet. He knows what confidence and defeat feel like.

“I’m not afraid of losing anymore. I’m 32 years old and I have my life ahead of me,” he said as he was eating his breaded sole fillet at Zappy Restaurant, an institution located a few meters away from the mythical Verdun Auditorium.

The auditorium is a legendary arena where former NHL head coach and Verdun native Scotty Bowman left his mark, where epic rock bands like Metallica, Nirvana, and Foo Fighters blew the roof off, and where the greatest political figures in Quebec history galvanized crowds and captured the collective imagination.

As he grabbed a bite of his fish and a sip of his coffee, Sauvé revealed his candour. “Losing is a relief. You have nothing to do anymore. When you win, the trouble begins. You work, you have important responsibilities,” he said.

“You have to fight to remember that you must win,” he added.

The campaign is tough, he said, as he considered himself “bipolar” from the time the writ dropped up to election night.

“One day I’m depressed, the next day I think I’m winning, and I have a knife between my teeth,” he said. At this point, we were behind the auditorium, near the Saint-Lawrence River.

A local group organized a major cleanup of the banks of the St. Lawrence. Sauvé arrived with dozens of leaflets and spent more than two hours there. He didn’t distribute any. He began cleaning the beach and trails with dedication. Few hands were shaken. Some recognized them, others didn’t.

“When I want to help my constituents, I show up, and I help, for real. I don’t do photo-ops,” he said much to the dismay of Linda Mohammedi Tramoni, his communications director.

“It’s about trying to make him understand that sometimes you must do things you don’t like,” she said.

“Sometimes you do it for the image, but he has his convictions, which are very strong, he has his ideals, and it’s honestly very noble. He’s not there just to show off; he’s there to do real work,” she added.

Then, he’s told by volunteers that Liberal candidate Claude Guay was on site.

“I don’t want to meet him,” he said. Sauvé wasn’t impressed that Guay skipped the local debate the week before.

On the beach, Guay and the army of Liberal volunteers took photos. There was a dog. They seemed to be having fun.

The organizers confirmed they came over, cleaned up a bit, took videos and photos, and left 30 minutes later.

“I told you,” Sauvé said, as he was dropping off his third enormous garbage bag filled with waste.

So, Sauvé is perhaps a bit like the squirrel in the voter’s apartment. He’s on the move, he can’t stop. He’s everywhere, but people don’t necessarily notice him.

He said he’s more like a beaver, a French-Canadian symbol, an organized, hard-working and creative species.

“Louis-Philippe is a grassroots guy. He’s always there. And honestly, that counts, it’s very important,” said Alain Bourque, who is running to become Verdun’s next mayor and who knows him well.

When he saw an apartment for rent, Sauvé told his volunteer he should take a photo to send to a business owner looking for a place to live.

Across the street, a resident called out to him: “Are you the Bloc candidate? I’m voting for you!”

The next door is another nice surprise.

“I don’t know if I’ll support you,” the lady first said. After a 15-minute conversation, she tells him she will vote for him. “You are a real human,” she said.

As he drove to the last event, a dinner for a local organization that supports families with autistic children, he admitted he was exhausted.

“I haven’t fully appreciated my win yet,” he said. And now he might lose.

In the room, an old church, an accordionist played a piece from the French film “Amélie Poulain.” The atmosphere was gentle. People smiled as Sauvé shook their hands.

One participant told us that Sauvé “was always there for his constituents” and that they had seen him more often in seven months than any of his predecessors, who were “ghosts.”

Soon, Sauvé was drinking another coffee and thanking the volunteers, speaking… Spanish.

All four of them were moved. The music rose to the heights of the old church.

“We chose you,” one of them told him. “We’re voting for you. Thank you for everything.”

Sauvé isn’t supposed to win. But who doesn’t believe in miracles? Not him.

National Post

atrepanier@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.


Cars wait in line to enter the United States at a border crossing at the Canada-U.S. border in Blackpool, Quebec, Canada, on February 2, 2025.

Border crossings from Canada into the United States dropped by close to a million travellers in March compared to the same month last year, suggesting Canadians are avoiding the United States while U.S. President Donald Trump threatens tariffs and annexation.

It’s the lowest border traffic since COVID-19 restricted travel.

The latest data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection released late Monday says 4,105,516 travellers were logged crossing into the United States through its northern border with Canada last month by air and land, which is a drop of 864,844 travellers from March 2024 when 4,970,360 travellers were logged.

That’s a decrease of 17.4 per cent.

Cross border travel from Canada into the United States was soaring at the end of 2024, shaking off the reduced travel after the COVID-19 pandemic. Through October, November, December and January, there was more U.S.-bound travellers year-over-year since 2022, when pandemic travel restrictions ended.

Trump started taunting Canada and threatening vast economic and political changes in January, after his inauguration in his second term as president.

In February, close to 500,000 fewer travellers were logged crossing into the United States from Canada. There were 3,504,873 travellers counted that month, down from 3,965,547 during the same month last year. That’s 460,674 fewer crossing.

The new U.S. statistics reflect data coming from Canada.

Last week, Statistics Canada said Canadians made far fewer return trips to the United States in March compared to the previous March.

Statistics Canada says the number of Canadians returning from the U.S. by automobile was down almost 32 per cent compared to March 2024, the third consecutive month of year-over-year declines. Return trips from the U.S. by air were down 13.5 per cent in the same periods.

The number of Canadian residents returning from trips to the United States this past March was 1,453,842, down from 2,134,069 in March 2024.

In contrast, return trips to Canada from other countries had increased by almost nine per cent.

The reduced traffic flow cut both ways.

The number of U.S.-resident trips to Canada by automobile was 770,400, a decline of 10.6 per cent from the same month in 2024. This was the second consecutive month of year-over-year decline.

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | X:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Liberal Leader Mark Carney makes announcement at Bombardier in Montreal, on Monday, April 14, 2025.

MONTREAL — Liberal leader Mark Carney says pipelines are “not necessarily” the large projects his government would prioritize to deal with the “crisis” of the trade war with the United States.

On Sunday, both Carney and Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre were interviewed on

Tout le monde en parle

, a very popular televised Quebec talk show on Radio-Canada.

While both guests brought talking points that were so similar they earned a remark from host Guy A. Lepage — “do you find Mr. Poilievre has good ideas?,” he asked Carney half-ironically — they were quizzed on very different topics.

Carney fielded questions on his promise to make Canada an energy superpower, with Lepage wondering why Carney is remaining quiet on climate change in a marked departure from his predecessor Justin Trudeau.

Carney said Canada needed to become an energy superpower to wean itself off foreign energy including U.S. oil, which he erroneously said made up 70 per cent of the barrels used in Quebec. The State of Energy in Quebec 2025 report by researchers at HEC Montréal found that roughly 40 per cent of the province’s oil comes from the U.S.

The Liberal leader said the threats against Canada from U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration are an opportunity to reduce Canada’s dependence on foreign energy and develop its own resources “if there is social acceptability.”

But when Lepage noted that building a cross-country pipeline takes time and the trade war with the U.S. is happening now, Carney appeared less committal about building such a project immediately.

“It takes time,” he agreed. “We are in a crisis, we must act. We must choose a few projects, a few big projects. Not necessarily pipelines, but maybe pipelines, we’ll see,” he added in French.

Carney has previously said that he wants to build pipelines across the country to “displace” foreign oil but would require buy-in from provinces and territories.

On Sunday, he also argued that Canada also had to invest further in carbon capture technology to reduce carbon emissions of its energy sector to be competitive internationally, particularly for the European Union.

During the Liberal leadership race earlier this year, Carney’s campaign admitted that he

had muddled messages on pipelines

. During a campaign stop in B.C., he said his government would use “emergency powers” to accelerate the building of major projects, including energy infrastructure.

“We as a nation need to build some new pipelines for conventional energy,” he told CBC in February.

But days later, he said in French that he would never impose such a project on an unwilling jurisdiction, suggesting that provinces might have a veto on projects such as an east-west pipeline. A spokesperson later clarified that he meant provinces would be consulted before projects were approved.

In March, Carney announced that the federal government and premiers had agreed to develop a national energy and trade corridor.

Part of that discussion included finding ways to move energy and critical minerals across the country more efficiently.

Asked by reporters whether his government would spend federal tax dollars to build an oil and gas pipeline, Carney said the matter is not “black and white” but didn’t rule out federal participation in the future.

“It’s about getting, yes, pipelines built across this country so we can displace imports of foreign oil,” Carney said

on the eve of the meeting

.

National Post, with files from The Canadian Press.

cnardi@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.


Ontario Premier Doug Ford speaks to media at Queen’s Park in Toronto, on Thursday, April 3, 2025.

OTTAWA — Ontario Premier Doug Ford fired off another salvo in the on-again, off-again battle between his provincial Progressive Conservatives and Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative party, saying his own campaign manager would have avoided the federal party’s current election woes.

With the Conservatives

lagging behind Liberal Leader Mark Carney’s party

since the beginning of the campaign, after enjoying a huge polling lead for the better part of two years, Poilievre’s strategy has been the subject of wide-ranging scrutiny.

Kory Teneycke, who was Ford’s campaign manager during his triumphant February election campaign, has been the sharpest and most public critic, saying last month that the Conservatives will be “obliterated”

if the party doesn’t shift its message

. And, last week, Teneycke said Poilievre’s campaign has committed “malpractice” by losing its huge polling lead over the Liberals.

On Friday, Poilievre dismissed the criticisms as coming from “Liberals and lobbyists” who are keen for him to pivot away from affordability issues.

On Monday, Ford backed his campaign manager.

“As for Kory, I’ve said right from Day One, he’s tough as nails but he’s the best campaign manager in the country. And to be very frank, if Kory was running that campaign I don’t think Mr. Poilievre would be in the position he’s in right now,” said Ford.

“It’s still a lot of time left. We still have debates. At the end of the day, the people will decide which way they want this country to move forward. But sometimes the truth hurts,” he said.

Infighting in the Conservative campaign burst into the open about a week into the campaign, with some insiders agreeing with Teneycke that the campaign had to tackle U.S. President Donald Trump head-on and others arguing it should stay the course and focus on pocketbook issues.

On March 31, Poilievre said he would not stop criticizing the government for its fiscal record, rising housing costs, the fentanyl crisis and affordability issues.

“Some people have said that … we should just ignore all of those things. I disagree. My purpose in politics is to restore Canada’s promise so that anyone from anywhere can achieve anything,” Poilievre

told reporters during a campaign stop in Saint John, N.B

.

“The threats, the unjustified threats by President Trump, further strengthen the argument in favour of the ‘Canada First’ agenda that I’ve been fighting for my whole life,” he added.

U.S. tariffs have to become Poilievre’s ballot box issue, said Teneycke during an event 

hosted by the Empire Club in March

.

“These are tsunami waves that are crashing down trees and buildings and everything in their path right now,” he said. “You’ve got to get on the f—ing ballot question or you are going to lose.”

Carney has suspended his campaign three times since the writ dropped, arguing that he needs to resume the role of prime minister to deal with the economic impact of Trump’s tariffs.

Both leaders are in Montreal this week for press events and to prepare for the upcoming leaders’ debates. Poilievre and Carney will come face to face for the first time on April 16 during the French-language debate followed by the English debate on April 17.

With files from Christopher Nardi

National Post

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.


Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre speaks to the crowd during a campaign rally in Nisku, just south of Edmonton, on Monday April 7, 2025.

OTTAWA — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre renewed his promise to use the Constitution’s notwithstanding clause to restore consecutive life sentences for mass murderers.

Poilievre said on Monday that the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down a Harper-era law that allowed consecutive life sentences would let “Canada’s most notorious killers… walk free early.”

“The worst mass murderers should never be allowed back on our streets. For them, a life sentence should mean what it says: a life sentence. They should only come out in a box,” said Poilievre, at a press conference in Montreal on Monday morning.

“I’m hear today to defend the Charters of Rights and Freedoms, particularly for law-abiding Canadians and victims of crime,” said Poilievre. “By allowing repeat murderers back out on the street, Liberals are violating the rights of law-abiding people to live in peace and security.”

Poilievre said he would only use the Constitution’s notwithstanding clause for criminal justice legislation, in response to a question from a reporter.

More to come.

National Post

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre speaks to the crowd during a campaign rally in Nisku, just south of Edmonton, on Monday April 7, 2025.

OTTAWA — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre renewed his promise to use the Constitution’s notwithstanding clause to restore consecutive life sentences for mass murderers.

Poilievre said on Monday that the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down a Harper-era law that allowed consecutive life sentences could let “Canada’s most notorious killers… walk free early.”

“The worst mass murderers should never be allowed back on our streets. For them, a life sentence should mean what it says: a life sentence. They should only come out in a box,” said Poilievre, at a press conference in Montreal on Monday morning.

“I’m here today to defend the Charters of Rights and Freedoms, particularly for law-abiding Canadians and victims of crime,” said Poilievre. “By allowing repeat murderers back out on the street, Liberals are violating the rights of law-abiding people to live in peace and security.”

Poilievre said he would only use the Constitution’s notwithstanding clause for criminal justice legislation, in response to a question from a reporter.

Liberal Leader Mark Carney said Poilievre’s plan to use the notwithstanding clause was a “very dangerous step.”

“Politicizing certain issues with respect to fundamental rights is a slippery slope that leads to further politicization,” said Carney, who was also in Montreal on Monday morning. “Being tough on crime starts with being smart on crime.”

The Conservatives have been hammering criminal justice issues since the beginning of the campaign, with several policy announcements focused on public safety. Last week, the party announced a “three strikes and you’re out” law, which would deny bail, probation, house arrest or parole to repeat serious offenders. Anyone with three major convictions would face at least 10 years in prison and be labelled a dangerous offender, with release only possible “through spotless behaviour and clean drug tests.”

Poilievre’s pledge to use the Constitution’s notwithstanding clause comes after the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Alexandre Bissonnette, the gunman who killed six people in a Quebec City mosque in 2017, couldn’t be forced to wait more than 25 years to be eligible for parole.

A sentencing provision introduced by the Harper government in 2011 allowed judges to hand out consecutive life sentences, in blocks of 25 years, for multiple first-degree murders. Crown prosecutors originally asked for six 25-year blocks of parole ineligibility for Bissonnette, one for each person murdered, adding up to 150 years. The judge handed down a life sentence, with 40 years of parole ineligibility, which was later reduced to 25 years by an appeals court, which the Supreme Court agreed with.

More to come.

National Post