LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Jeffrey Evely said Nova Scotia’s ban on entering the woods punishes ordinary people instead of focusing on restricting the activities that actually spark fires.

A Nova Scotia man who intentionally violated the province’s ban on entering the woods says he plans to fight his $28,000 fine.

Jeffrey Evely, a veteran and former candidate for the People’s Party of Canada, recorded a video over the weekend of him first going to the Department of Natural Resources in Coxheath, N.S., and informing officers he was going into the woods to protest the ban.

“I want to challenge this order in court, and the only way to do that is to get the fine,” Jeffrey Evely says in the video. “So, I’m not trying to make trouble for you guys, I just want a piece of (Premier) Tim Houston and I want to be as accommodating and nice as I can be.”

One of the officers asked him not to enter the woods, but he followed through with his plan.

When he left the forest, he was handed a fine of $28,872.50, according to an image of the document.

The new policy came into effect on Aug. 5, and will remain until Oct. 15. It bans people from hiking, camping, fishing and the use of vehicles like ATVs in the woods due to the elevated wildfire risk. People are not even allowed to enter the woods. The fine for violating the ban is $25,000.

Evely’s fine includes taxes, fees, and surcharges.

“I know it’s the height of summer vacation and people want to do all the activities that we enjoy,” Houston said when the ban was announced. “But we have to stay out of the woods. It’s a small price to pay to avoid the devastation that we saw from wildfires in 2023.”

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) announced that they will be representing Evely in his legal fight against the “Orwellian” ban.

Evely said it punishes ordinary people instead of focusing on restricting the activities that actually spark fires, according

to a JCCF press release.

 The $28,872.50 ticket Nova Scotian Jeffrey Evely received for walking into the woods — now a banned activity amid forest fire season.

“This law views people as the problem – not dangerous activities. This law is anti-human, and should someone find themselves on the wrong end of a charge – a massive charge, $25,000 dollar fine, for going into the woods, you can expect a constitutional challenge and a judicial review of this order,” said Marty Moore, a constitutional lawyer with JCCF.

“Premier Houston would be wise to immediately review his overly broad order to avoid further legal action.”

Evely will argue that “banning citizens from enjoying nature on the assumption they could start a fire is unconstitutional,” JCCF said.

Evely is not the only one asking for the ban to be reconsidered. The Ecology Action Centre, Dal Legal Aid and the Canadian Constitution Foundation have also said the ban should be overturned.

The Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources has fined six people since the ban was put into effect, Global News reported.

Nova Scotia just handed me a fine for $28,872.50 for walking into the woods.

Posted by Jeff Evely #PPC on Friday, August 8, 2025

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A tractor bails hay.

OTTAWA — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s bid for a seat in Battle River—Crowfoot is shining a light on the growing fight among rural and remote Canadians for the right to fix the things they own.

With tractors and other specialized farm equipment increasingly reliant on proprietary software, manufacturers are using a variety of digital methods to lock out third-party repairs — effectively requiring farms and other businesses to deal exclusively with manufacturer-authorized service providers.

It’s a problem that’s bedevilling area farmers who are already reckoning with razor-thin profit margins.

“I can tell you it’s no fun ringing the manufacturer for after-hours service, and having them charge you $50 to $100 a pop for a call-out fee,” said Rick Strankman, a grain farmer who lives in the eastern part of the Alberta riding.

Strankman’s family-run farm is two hours away from the nearest service hub in Lloydminster, Alta.

He says that he’s sought to minimize his dependence on costly manufacturer servicing by using older, analog equipment but doesn’t know how much longer he can keep it going.

“Our combines are 2011 model year and will be 15 years old come Christmas-time … the simple depreciation on those things is more than the farm can bear,” said Strankman.

Battle River—Crowfoot, a sprawling riding of

more than 52,000 square kilometres

, is home

to some 4,000 farms

like Strankman’s.

Far flung, agrarian areas like Battle River—Crowfoot are at the forefront of the growing

right to repair movement

, which calls for an end to manufacturer-imposed barriers to fixing consumer appliances, such as digital locks that keep third-parties out of embedded software.

“Pretty much anyone you meet in the rural parts of the riding will talk your ear off about (right to repair),” said Libertarian candidate Michael Harris.

Harris said that several farmers he’s canvassed have identified the right to repair as their top issue in next week’s byelection.

Independent candidate Bonnie Critchley says she’ll make fighting for right to repair legislation

her top priority if elected

.

“As an Independent in such a tight minority government, I intend on using that position to push for a private member’s bill that limits how much corporations can continue to squeeze money out of us, after we’ve already purchased their product,” wrote Critchley in a recent blog post.

Critchley called a pair of federal

right to repair laws

enacted last year “complicated, bureaucratic and ultimately toothless” in an email to the National Post.

“(T)hese bills make circumventing digital locks in devices legal, but continue to prohibit the manufacture, import, or sale of the tools used to circumvent those protection measures, making repairing personal property — be it a modern combine or a cellphone — infeasible in practice,” wrote Critchley.

Green Party candidate Ashley MacDonald also said that the right to repair was high on his list of priorities.

“(I) feel strongly that when you purchase a much-needed piece of equipment, whether it be a tractor for your farm, a dishwasher for your home, or a register for your small business, you should not be beholden to the high cost to repair forced upon you by the manufacturer through their monopoly on replacement parts, manuals, and control over software updates,” wrote MacDonald in an email.

“As (a) member of Parliament, I will work across the aisle to ensure that your right to repair is respected and brought into law.”

Poilievre’s campaign didn’t respond to multiple questions about whether he’d back new right to repair legislation if elected in the Aug. 18 byelection.

Alissa Centivany, a co-founder of the Canadian Repair Coalition, said that championing the right to repair would be a “no-brainer” for Poilievre if he wins the byelection.

“It’s an easy win that clearly benefits people in rural Alberta and other remote parts of the country,” said Centivany.

Poilievre said in a 2021 speech in

the House of Commons

that he supported a compromise position on the right to repair, where manufacturers could keep using digital locks but customers and third-parties would not be penalized for breaking them.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Independent MP Han Dong arrives to appear as a witness at the Public Inquiry Into Foreign Interference in Federal Electoral Processes and Democratic Institutions in Ottawa on Tuesday, April 2, 2024.

OTTAWA — Although the federal foreign interference task force said China had likely manipulated the 2019 Liberal nomination race in a Toronto-area riding, Canada’s election watchdog says she found no evidence federal election laws were broken.
 

The revelation is buried in the
Commissioner of Canada Elections’ latest annual report
published last week.
 

In the report, Commissioner Caroline Simard says she looked into two instances of alleged foreign interference that were discussed at length during a public inquiry. In both cases she found “either no evidence or not enough evidence” to support a breach of the Canada Elections Act.
 

The first instance involved allegations of manipulation by the Chinese consulate in Toronto of the controversial 2019 Liberal nomination race in Don Valley North that ultimately coronated Han Dong.
 

Both Foreign Interference Commissioner Marie-Josée Hogue and the task force monitoring for foreign interference in Canadian elections have reported suspicious behaviour by Chinese authorities during the 2019 Toronto-area Liberal nomination race that likely tainted the result.

A report from Hogue last year said some intelligence, which was not “firmly substantiated,” suggested Chinese students were provided with “falsified documents” and then bused in to the Liberal Don Valley North nomination election so they could vote for Dong despite not being residents of the riding.
 

Those documents were provided by individuals associated with a well-known Chinese proxy agent, the report read. After the vote, intelligence agencies reported that those students were in fact coerced into voting for Dong.
 

“Some intelligence reported after the election indicated that veiled threats were issued by the PRC Consulate to the Chinese international students, implying their student visas would be in jeopardy and that there could be consequences for their families back in the PRC if they did not support Han Dong,” read the report.
 

The Security and Intelligence Threats to Elections Task Force also stated in its report on the 2019 federal election that “PRC officials likely manipulated one of the nomination contests in the Toronto riding of Don Valley North,” but said that some of the allegations remained “unconfirmed.”

Dong has never been found guilty of any wrongdoing in relation to his nomination race.

In a statement, commissioner spokesperson Pierre Verriere said the office conducted “extensive research, interviews, and analysis” of the Don Valley North Liberal nomination race before deciding in February to close the review without imposing any sanctions.
 

In a
document submitted to the foreign interference inquiry
last year, the commissioner’s office said it was investigating five potential contraventions including voter intimidation, inducing others to vote outside of their electoral district and illegal electoral donations by an ineligible donor.
 

Verriere said the office looked into multiple potential Elections Act breaches but found that the evidence to support them was either non-existent or insufficient.
 

“To take formal compliance or enforcement action, the Commissioner must have tangible evidence to substantiate allegations of wrongdoing,” commissioner spokesperson Pierre Verriere said in a statement.
 

“Following our assessment of the allegations against potential CEA contraventions, we found either no evidence to support formal enforcement action or insufficient evidence, depending on the provision in question,” he added.
 

But as it was highlighted repeatedly throughout the foreign interference Inquiry last year, the commissioner’s oversight power during party nomination races is limited.
 

She
told inquiry staff
that her mandate during internal party elections is limited to political financing and that it would be a major resource challenge for her to have to oversee every nomination race for all 343 federal ridings.
 

She also noted that she does not have the mandate nor the ability to verify intelligence, which was the basis for most of the allegations in Don Valley North.
 

Dong, who stepped away from Liberal caucus after a string of media stories regarding these allegations in 2023 and did not run in the 2025 election, has always denied any wrongdoing. In June, he settled a two-year defamation lawsuit with Global News.
 

He said Tuesday that he was not aware that the commissioner’s investigation was closed until National Post contacted him for comment.
 

“I have always said that I have always followed the election rules. Unfortunately, my family, my team and I have suffered irreversible harm,” Dong said in a text message.
 

“I remain hopeful that this conclusion of Commissioner Simard’s investigation will bring DVN electors, especially Liberals, full closure and restore public confidence in our democratic process and institutions.”
 

The other instance Simard reviewed pertained to allegations of Chinese interference against Conservative candidate Kenny Chiu during the 2021 federal election in the B.C. riding of Steveston–Richmond East.
 

During her testimony before the Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference last year, Simard said her office had already concluded there was insufficient evidence to support charges of “undue foreign influence” or any other breaches of the Elections Act.
 

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


An image of a Sea-Doo from Gordons Watersports in Sarnia, Ont.

A watersports rental company in Sarnia, Ont., lost one of its Sea-Doos on the weekend when the man who rented it failed to return. He is believed to have taken it to Michigan, which is just a few hundred metres away on the American side of the St. Clair River.

Sarnia police say they received a call on Saturday night at 9:40 p.m. regarding a missing person. “A male party, identified as Romeo Bajrami, had rented a Sea-Doo with cash at 6:45 p.m. with a scheduled return time of 7:45 p.m. and had failed to return,”

police said

in a statement.

Taylor Gordon, president of

Gordons Watersports

in Sarnia, told National Post that the renter had used a debit card for his transaction but also plunked down $500 cash as a deposit on the rental.

That money is now forfeit, Gordon said, “unless he wants to come back to Canada, come back and see us, but he has a warrant out for his arrest in Canada for stealing a Sea-Doo.”

Sarnia Police confirmed they have issued an arrest warrant for Bajrami, aged 40, of Lakeshore Road in Toronto on a charge of theft of a motor vehicle.

The renter paid for the “Sea-Duo and Dine” package, which includes dinner for two at the dockside restaurant, plus an hour on the Sea-Doo. “He brought the staff the second meal that was provided to him,” Gordon said, adding: “They didn’t eat the meal.”

He added that the renter was in contact with the staff at his company. “Until he wasn’t.”

“He was late, he said he was just 10 minutes behind, and then he spoke with the staff again and had another excuse, and then after that there was no communication,” Gordon said. “That’s when the staff called the authorities.”

Sarnia Police alerted nearby agencies of the man’s disappearance. “At this time officers suspected possible theft or intentional disappearance due to forfeited deposit and evasive behaviour,” they said. The Canadian Coast Guard, Sarnia Fire and nearby Point Edward Fire were all involved to conduct a marine search of the St. Clair River near the rental establishment.

“A search of these waterways (Canadian side) was unsuccessful,” police said. CBSA and Toronto Police were also notified.

Then, shortly after midnight, the U.S. Coast Guard located the Sea-Doo on the American shore south of Sarnia. “With the Sea-Doo was a shirt that Bajrami was last seen wearing, a life jacket, and keys to the Sea-Doo,” police reported. “It is believed that Bajrami was successful in conducting an illegal border crossing. U.S. Customs and Immigration were notified and are investigating this incident.”

Taylor said the U.S. Coast Guard still has the Sea-Doo. “They said give them a few days and then they’ll contact us to pick it up,” he said. “We don’t know what shape it’s in it yet but we’ll see and then we’ll go from there.”

Taylor said this is the first time something like this has happened in the four years that Gordons Watersports has been in business.

“We tell renters where the invisible border line is and to stay on Canadian waters and definitely do not cross the border into the States,” he said. The distance between the two countries is quite small, just a few hundred metres across the St. Clair River between Sarnia and Port Huron, Michigan.

The case is reminiscent of one just a few days earlier, when police in LaSalle, Ont., opposite Detroit, Michigan, noticed a a man at the water’s edge with two backpacks and a kayak.

“The officer investigated and discovered the man was attempting to illegally enter Canada,”

police said

. A 51-year-old from the U.S. was turned over to the

Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

For Gordon, however, “this is definitely a first, a first and a last, that’s what we’re hoping. It’s been an eventful and a little stressful weekend for us but we’re trying to make the best out of the horrible situation.”

Indeed,

the Facebook page

for Gordons Watersports is playing up the lighter side of the affair. A post on Tuesday morning included the line “catch waves, not warrants,” and reminded renters to “keep it fun and legal,” adding: “Gordons Watersports — where the only thing you’ll be crossing is the wake.”

It also thanked “our staff, border control, and law enforcement for their quick action in … this very rare case of an illegal entry to the U.S.”

By Tuesday afternoon an additional post invited visitors to answer the question: “Why did Romeo cross illegally?” It suggested “To find his Juliet,” “Audition for Fast and Furious Sea-Doo Drift” and “Heard Tim Hortons was out of Timbits.” Best answer gets a $50 gift card.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Anti-Israel protesters march in Toronto on Oct. 9, 2023, two days after Hamas slaughtered about 1200 people, mostly civilians, in southern Israel.

Threats of “Danforth takeover,” a planned anti-Israel protest in Toronto’s east end is “just a way to harass Israel and the Jewish community,” says Toronto City Councillor James Pasternak.

“We’ve been putting up with this lawlessness for close to two years, and as long as there’s minimal consequences, it will continue,” he told National Post on Tuesday over the phone. “These threats against city critical infrastructure are very serious, whether it turns into a hoax or not.”

He called on police and the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) to ensure public safety in a social media post on Monday.

Anti-Israel protests have been widespread around the world particularly after Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas terrorists killed 1,200 people. It triggered a war in the Middle East that is still ongoing.

The protest is being organized by “pro-Palestinian groups,” Pasternak said. It is set to start at 5 p.m. and estimated to last until 7 p.m. on Tuesday. The plan is for protesters to “bring signs, pots and pans” to make noise with at every subway stop from Kipling to Main stations on the Bloor-Danforth line. The group is demanding “an immediate arms embargo” and an end to “Canada’s complicity” in the war.

On Aug. 2, Minister of Foreign Affairs Anita Anand

said in a statement

that Canadian-made weapons will not be allowed “to fuel this conflict in any way.”

“Canada continues to deny any export permits for materials that could be used in Gaza,” the statement said.

In

a report by Israel’s Ministry for Diaspora Affairs and Combating Antisemitism

, the potential protest in Toronto is listed as high risk. The protest is being organized by East End Acts with involvement from other groups including World BEYOND War Canada, Palestinian Youth Movement Toronto, Palestine Solidarity Network, Canadians for Peace and Justice in the Middle East. They have more than 137,000 followers on Instagram combined. The protest is intended to be part of the “Arms Embargo Week of Action” in Toronto. Organizers for the protest did not immediately return National Post’s request for comment.

“(The protest’s) extended footprint across multiple public transit nodes increases potential disruption to pedestrian and vehicular movement in a densely populated area,” says the report. “While there are no explicit calls for violence, the confrontational tone and location in busy public corridors present a risk of clashes with passersby or counter protesters.”

City councillor Brad Bradford said he agreed with Pasternak’s concerns in

a post on X on Monday

.

“Threats to shut down transit are dangerous and unacceptable,” he wrote.

In a news release on Monday, East End Acts reacted to Pasternak’s condemnation, saying his “characterization of our actions, subsequently restated by Councillor Brad Bradford, constitutes a deliberate misrepresentation designed to shut down and scare people in Canada who are deeply horrified by the ongoing genocide in Gaza.”

On Tuesday morning, MP for Eglinton-Lawrence Vince Gasparro, appointed as the Parliamentary Secretary (Combatting Crime),

shared a letter

addressed to Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow on X.

He said the planned “demonstrations today threaten to shutdown access to transportation infrastructure while widening divisions between our communities.” In the letter, he noted the escalation of “hatred and intimidation” toward the Jewish community since October 7.

Gasparro said he was “ready to facilitate any federal support the city may need to protect our infrastructure while combatting crime and antisemitism.”

Both the TTC and Toronto Police Services are aware of the planned protest.

“As with any public demonstration, our priority is to ensure public safety and keep disruptions to a minimum. Officers will attend to monitor the situation and respond to any issues that may arise,” Toronto police spokesperson Stephanie Sayer told National Post in an emailed statement. She said police are in contact with the TTC.

Similarly, TTC spokesperson Stuart Green told National Post that its Special Constables are in contact with the police and “will be ready to respond accordingly to ensure everyone is kept safe and that our service can continue without disruption.”

He continued: “The original post indicates it will be on the street and not on our property and the organizers have confirmed this. The safety of our customers and employees is paramount to all we do.”

Pasternak stressed that people trying to use the subway “have every right to do so without harassment and without feeling threatened.”

“We have to protect the rights of people just wanting to go about their daily life and peace and security right,” he said. “This visceral hatred for Israel is infecting the wider society. There are currently 100 wars going on in the world. And people come to Toronto to escape world conflict zones, to escape demonization, harassment, prejudice and intolerance. They don’t want these fights played out on the streets of Toronto.”

Josh Landau, Director of Government Relations, Ontario at the at the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs said that it warned “that extremists would be emboldened at home and abroad” after Prime Minister Carney’s “premature plan” to recognize Palestinian statehood.

 Prime Minister Mark Carney heads to the stage for a news conference on Canada recognizing the State of Palestine, in Ottawa on Wednesday, July 30, 2025.

“Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen

attacks in Montreal with a Jewish father beaten

in front of his children and one of Canada’s oldest synagogues in Victoria desecrated with vicious antisemitic graffiti. And now we’re seeing violence and intimidation in public spaces in Toronto,” he told National Post in an emailed statement.

“We urge leaders at every level of government to confront extremism — whether at home or abroad — as well as urgently boost Jewish community security, and ban the glorification of terrorism in our streets. And it is our firm expectation that the authorities enforce the law and ensure everyone’s safety.”

Jaime Kirzner-Roberts, Senior Director of Policy and Advocacy at Holocaust education and Jewish advocacy group Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center, said the right to peaceful protest is “justly protected” in Canada, but “should never be abused to infringe on the rights and safety of others.”

“Especially since Oct. 7, anti-Israel protesters in Toronto and elsewhere have repeatedly created hazards, blocked access to streets and public spaces, and incited virulent hate – tactics that intimidate rather than inspire dialogue,” she said in an emailed statement.

“Blocking or disrupting safe access to public transit, especially during rush hour, is an act of intimidation not just against the Jewish community but against all Torontonians simply trying to get home to their families. Canadians’ right to move freely and safely through their city should never be compromised to make a political point.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Ukrainian soldiers from air-defence unit fire at Russian strike drones in Dnipropetrovsk region, Ukraine, Sunday, Aug. 10, 2025.

Almost half of Canadians believe the federal government is providing the right amount of support to Ukraine in the war against Russia, while 14 per cent think Canada is not supportive enough, according to a new poll.

The poll, which was conducted by Leger for the Metropolis Institute and the Association for Canadian Studies, compared Canadian and American opinions about the war, which started in 2014, but reached a new height in 2022 when Russia invaded Ukraine.

The poll found that Americans were more likely to think their country isn’t doing enough to support Ukraine. Just under one third (29 per cent) said the United States isn’t doing enough, while 26 per cent said support was about right and 19 per cent said the U.S. has been too supportive. In Canada, 17 per cent of respondents thought their country was doing too much.

Almost half of Canadians said they’ve been following the conflict very closely (12 per cent) or somewhat closely (36 per cent), while 32 per cent said “not very closely” and 16 per cent said they haven’t been following the war at all. Americans have been paying about the same amount of attention, with 15 per cent following it very closely, 28 per cent somewhat closely, 27 per cent not very closely and a quarter of respondents in the U.S. saying they haven’t been following the war at all.

Among the 12 per cent of Canadians who are following the events in Ukraine closely, 47 per cent of them believe Canada supports Ukraine the right amount, while 38 per cent believe that Canada is not supportive enough.

Jack Jedwab, president and CEO of the Association for Canadian Studies and the Metropolis Institute, said Canadians don’t feel like they have much control over the outcome of the war. “At this particular time, Canadians do not feel that their support is providing for a significant impact in that regard,” he said, adding that Canadians were more supportive of Ukraine at the start of the war.

“We’re not seeing the same type of mobilization that we saw at the front of the conflict. You’re not seeing a lot of Ukrainian flags or symbols out there,” he said.

Fewer than half of Canadian respondents (47 per cent) said they have a fairly good understanding of the conflict, while 11 per cent said they have barely any understanding at all.

Canadians over 35 years old feel like they have a better understanding of the conflict compared to those under 35, the poll found.

“Those people who are in those older cohorts feel they have a better understanding of the conflict than the younger cohorts do,” said Jedwab. “That doesn’t mean they’re right or not right, but that’s how they feel.”

About half (49 per cent) of Canadians between 24 and 34 years old said that they have a good understanding, while 39 per cent of Canadians between 18 and 24 years old feel like they don’t have the best understanding of the issue.

Americans and Canadians have a similar view about whether or not lasting peace can be reached. A plurality (42 per cent of Canadians and 40 per cent of Americans) think it can, while 28 per cent of Canadians and 26 per cent of Americans think lasting peace cannot be reached. In both countries, about a third said they don’t know.

“When you are in North America, we think all conflicts can be resolved. But unfortunately, in some parts of the world there’s no quick fix,” said Jedwab.

Men seem to be more optimistic than women, with 51 per cent and 34 per cent respectively believing lasting peace can be found between Russia and Ukraine.

According to the British Ministry of Defence, more than one million Russian troops have been killed or injured in the past three years, and more than 400,000 Ukrainians have been killed or injured.

The online survey of 1,511 Canadians and 1,011 Americans was conducted by Leger between June 6 and 8, 2025.

A margin of error cannot be associated with a non-probability sample in a panel survey. A probability sample of 1,511 respondents in Canada would have a margin of error of plus or minus plus or minus 2.5 per cent, 19 times out of 20.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Canadian soldiers listen as their interpreter is lectured about security issues by a local leader in an Afghanistan village, April 2006.

An Ottawa man who served in Afghanistan helping the Canadian Armed Forces during its NATO mission is begging the prime minister and the immigration minister to help save his sister and nephew from the Taliban’s imminent revenge.

“As a Canadian citizen and someone who served this country with pride and dignity, I now find myself feeling ashamed. My service not only brought danger to my family but has also ruined my entire family’s life,” he wrote in letters to Mark Carney and Lena Diab last week.

“During my service, I saved many lives of soldiers in the line of duty. Now, when it comes to my family, I find myself facing a wall of silence. Is this not a slap in the face for my services to Canada?” his letters ask.

His family’s unusual situation stems from his work as an advisor for Canada’s soldiers in Afghanistan, where he was born. He immigrated to Canada in 2005, became a Canadian citizen, and was a university student in Ottawa when recruited by the Department of National Defence.

In 2010, as a Language and Cultural Advisor (LCA), he left Ottawa to join Canada’s soldiers in Kandahar, Afghanistan’s second largest city, where he had top-secret clearance to help in the dangerous mission.

Kandahar is the political base and stronghold of the Taliban, and when locals discovered his identity, his sister and her family still living in Afghanistan were targeted with threats and warnings, he said.

“In their eyes we were helping the infidels,” he said.

His sister’s husband, a police officer, was shot dead in 2013 and she was told “this is the consequence you face.” After continued threats and fears for her children as they became adults, they fled Afghanistan in 2018, he said. They sought refugee status in Turkey.

(The man’s identity was protected by Canada’s Federal Court in a recent proceeding about his case because of danger to his relatives for his work with the military. He asked that his name not be published for fear it would cause further harm to his family abroad.)

Ever since his family left Afghanistan, he has worked to get them to safety in Canada, without success.

After the Taliban returned to power in 2021, Canada announced a special immigration policy to help LCAs bring family here. It was limited to family still in Afghanistan around the time when Kabul fell to the Taliban, meaning his sister was ineligible because she left before that.

He fears it will soon be too late.

His sister and one of her adult sons have now been ordered deported back to Afghanistan from Turkey where they sought asylum. National Post has seen a copy of her deportation order. The family believes they will be targeted and punished by the Taliban if they are returned. The Taliban remains listed as a terrorist group by the Canadian government.

“My sister who lost her husband because of my service to Canada is now likely going to lose her life because of my service, and this country will not do anything,” he said in an interview.

He has been writing to officials in Ottawa for years trying to solve the problem. After seeing how imminent her deportation could be, he tried another plea to Carney and other government officials.

“How can you reconcile the sacrifices I made in service to Canada with the current neglect my family is experiencing?” he asked in his letter emailed Thursday, and read by the Post. “Why are the lives of my family members, who are at risk due to my service, not being prioritized?”

On Monday, he received a reply from the Prime Minister’s Office.

“While I am sympathetic to the circumstances you describe, Prime Minister Carney is unable to personally intervene or provide you with direct assistance in this matter,” said the PMO’s executive correspondence officer. “While the Prime Minister appreciates the time you have taken to share your concerns, he will leave your comments to be considered by the Minister (of Immigration).”

The former LCA said it is frustrating. He has asked Diab, the minister, and her predecessors for help and said he has made no progress.

He immediately wrote back to the PMO: “I kindly urge the Prime Minister to look into this situation, as it has reached a critical juncture, and it is essential that we act swiftly to prevent irreversible consequences. I appeal to the government to fulfill its moral and ethical responsibility in this case.”

National Post sent requests last week for comment from Diab and from David McGuinty, minister of defence. Neither minister responded.

A spokesman for the ministry of immigration said they declined to comment on this specific case, citing privacy legislation.

“Canada is concerned with the deportation of Afghan refugees and the situation they may face upon return to Afghanistan, and continues to engage with partners in the region,” the statement said.

Canada has helped resettle 59,000 Afghans since the fall of Kabul in August 2021, the ministry said, although intake for its special Afghan programs is now closed.

Meanwhile, the former LCA said Canada is sending a terrible message to those who might be called on in the future to use their language skills and local knowledge to help Canada abroad, wherever the next global crisis unfolds.

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | X:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Air Canada flight attendants picket at Vancouver International Airport as the Canadian Union of Public Employees has called a national day of action to highlight low pay and unfair conditions, in Richmond, B.C., Aug. 11, 2025.

Air Canada flight attendants were

planning to picket

at airports in four major Canadian cities on Monday in what the union is calling a national day of action.

The Canadian Union of Public Employees said demonstrations were set for Montreal’s Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport, Toronto Pearson International Airport, Vancouver International Airport and Calgary International Airport, all at 1 p.m. ET.

Among the issues, CUPE said, is that flight attendants are

paid only for “block time,”

which begins at takeoff and lasts until landing. The union said attendants are spending time performing “unpaid duties” during ground time before and after flights.

What unpaid duties are flight attendants performing?

In a

briefing note

released this month, CUPE noted: “Flight attendants at Air Canada are required to perform unpaid duties every day before and after flights. This includes critical safety checks, boarding and deplaning procedures, assisting passengers with special needs, and preparing the cabin.”

It concludes: “Flight attendants are not paid for a significant portion of their time on the job,” and notes that the safety-related duties are not optional, as they are mandated by Transport Canada.

How much time are we talking?

A

2023 survey

of Canadian flight attendants from CUPE’s Airline Division found that they performed unpaid work for 34.86 hours per month, on average — the equivalent of almost one full work week per month.

The survey, which ran between Dec. 10, 2022, and Jan. 11, 2023, received 9,807 responses.

“Unpaid work is a dirty secret in this industry, and one we are determined to stamp out,” said Wesley Lesosky, President of CUPE’s Airline Division, at the time. “The bottom line is, if we’re on the jobsite, in our uniforms, performing work duties then we should be getting paid — full stop.”

What does Air Canada say?

In

its own statement

, Air Canada notes that “the current compensation model was negotiated with and unanimously endorsed by the union’s eight-member bargaining committee, and ratified by the flight attendants, in the last bargaining round.”

It adds: “This model had also been used in previous contracts dating back many years. Air Canada’s approach to flight attendant compensation, including for ground time, is consistent with that at most global carriers. In fact, CUPE reached a new contract with a large Canadian carrier in 2024 that uses this same approach.”

That would be the agreement between

CUPE and Air Transat

, which gave flight attendants at that airline a 30 per cent pay increase over the five years of the contract. It did not, however, address ground time and block time. “The issue of ground time is discussed with the union as part of a more general conversation about overall compensation,” the airline said.

Do other airlines pay for ground time?

Most do not. However, in 2022

Delta Air Lines began

paying its flight attendants at half their hourly rate for a set 40 to 50 minutes of boarding, depending on the type of aircraft and where it’s headed, according to NPR. Delta is the only major U.S. airline whose flight attendants are not unionized, and the broadcaster suggested the move might be an effort by the airline to discourage unionizing.

After Delta’s decision, American Airlines and its union also agreed to a similar plan.

What does Pierre Poilievre have to say on the issue?

The leader of the Conservative Party of Canada wrote a letter last week to Patty Hajdu, Minister of Jobs and Families and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario. In it, he called on her to amend the Canada Labour Code “to require that federally regulated airlines pay flight attendants for all hours they are on duty, not just time spent on the air.”

This would effectively circumvent the union negotiations and also require other airlines in Canada to make similar payments to their flight attendants. “No other federally regulated worker would accept being on the job without being paid,” Poilievre noted.

What other issues is the union highlighting?

The other core issues under discussion are scheduling and wages not keeping up with inflation. F

light attendants could walk off the job as soon as Aug. 16 at 12:01 a.m. with at least 72 hours’ notice provided, if their demands are not met.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


A report released by the Jewish Educators and Families Association of Canada is urging the ministry of education to depoliticize Ontario's public school curriculum.

A Jewish advocacy group released a report on Monday with recommendations to depoliticize Ontario classrooms. It called on the ministry of education to build a curriculum based on achievement, rather than identity.

The report from Jewish Educators and Families Association of Canada (JEFA) comes after recent

data from a survey

commissioned by the Office of the Special Envoy on Preserving Holocaust Remembrance and Combatting Antisemitism found that

Ontario students were targeted by hundreds of antisemitic incidents

.

Speaking in downtown Toronto on Monday, JEFA co-founder Tamara Gottlieb said that Ontario’s education system has lost its morals and its academic purpose, adding that this isn’t “only a Jewish concern.”

The same policies that have made Jewish students feel unsafe have also created inhospitable environments for Hindu, Christian and Asian students, she said, adding that the human rights department at the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) trains staff on “who qualifies as an oppressor,” singling out Christians. The TDSB did not immediately respond to National Post’s request for comment.

“We discovered a system that has replaced reading, writing and arithmetic with politicized content, union-driven equity agendas and identity based labeling,” she said. “When we hear the word equity, we think it means equality. But it doesn’t. Equity is defined this way in school board policies as guaranteed outcome — not guaranteed opportunity.”

According to the

TDSB’s own multi-year strategic plan

, equity is its “guiding principle.”

The JEFA report, entitled End the crisis in education: A plan for equal rights and real learning, says that antisemitism is a “flashing warning sign” of the education system’s dysfunction. Antisemitism is not simply occurring in Ontario schools; it’s being tolerated, said Gottlieb.

Amid the myriad concerns, Gottlieb said that Ontario school board trustees, teachers and parents are “muzzled” because code of conduct policies are “weaponized” against them. Trustees are intended to give “parents and local communities a meaningful voice,” per the report, but over time, they have become “increasingly centralized and bureaucratic.”

“They are actually precluded from speaking publicly about any concerns in the system and precluded from speaking privately with parents who come to them,” said Gottlieb.

As a solution, the report says there should be a requirement of governance qualifications for school board leadership.

Similarly, Gottlieb said that teachers “can’t actually speak up publicly when they have concerns…but at the same time, they have absolute professional discretion in their classes to use whatever resources they want.”

One example given by Gottlieb included a Grade 6 teacher who was part of the TDSB — the largest school board in Canada and one of 72 in Ontario — wearing a keffiyeh to class right after October 7, when Hamas terrorists murdered 1,200 Israelis, sparking an ongoing war in the Middle East.

The teacher showed students videos from Al Jazeera — a publication that has a “close connection” with Hamas,

a Tel Aviv District Court found last year

— about the Nakba as content for mandatory Holocaust education and had a Free Palestine poster with a QR code to donate funds to an “ambiguous charity.” (The Nakba refers to the displacement of Arab Palestinians during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War,

per the Times of Israel

.)

That teacher faced no consequences.

The province should step in to enforce rules that affect thousands of students, said Gottlieb, like clarifying the ambiguity surrounding what constitutes a religious or political garment.

Teachers donning keffiyehs at school

has become a point of contention among anti-Israel groups and the Jewish community in Canada.

Keffiyehs are now considered by many a symbol “associated with the annihilation of a people,” said Gottlieb, adding that they have been “codified” as cultural attire “with zero historical basis.”

“The minister has to step in and unify these policies,” she said, “so that your kid has the same rights in one board than they will in another board.”

Gottlieb also pushed for centralized resources for teachers and called for an end to “TikTok teaching.”

“Yes, the Ontario government has the

Trillium List of approved textbooks

, but it’s 2025. When’s the last time any of your kids came home with a textbook? They don’t. Textbooks aren’t being used, so having an approved list of textbooks is moot,” said Gottlieb. “What we need are all teaching or learning resources in the classroom to be centrally made by the ministry, to be approved, for teachers to be trained on how to use those materials, and then for them to exclusively use those materials.”

The JEFA report recommends that teachers be licensed directly by the ministry of education, rather than the current model, where teachers are licensed by the Ontario College of Teachers (OCT). It also includes recommendations for the entire education system, from the ministry of education to the school boards, the OCT, faculties of education (responsible for training future teachers) and the teachers’ union.

“JEFA’s message is simple. Let schools be schools. Let’s teach the basics,” she said.

The group has written to Ontario’s Minister of Education Paul Calandra, urging him to read the report and make changes.

In an emailed statement to National Post on Monday, the minister’s spokesperson Justine Teplycky said: “Discrimination and racism in all its forms have no place in our classrooms. Parents expect schools to keep divisive politics out of the classroom and instead focus on what matters most: teaching students reading, writing, and math skills to prepare them for good-paying jobs and lifelong success.”

Teplycky confirmed that the minister has received the report and will review it.

“If Ontario can find the courage to make these changes, our schools can once again be places where every child feels safe and where the measure of success is achievement, not ideology,” said Gottlieb. “We need equal rights for all students. Jewish students can’t afford to wait.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Data from Angus Reid shows the percentage of respondents in favour of each form of service.

Canadians are overwhelmingly in favour of mandatory national service for young adults but are less united about what form that service should take, a new survey has found. 

The survey, produced by the non-profit Angus Reid Institute, asked a group of Canadians if they supported the idea of mandatory national service – that is, one year of time donated for those younger than 30 years of age – across a number of fields. Many nations including Germany, France and Norway have instituted this practice in recent years.

Respondents were overwhelmingly in favour of Canada adopting the practice across a range of disciplines. For instance, 74 per cent favoured a year of public health support service, with only 18 per cent against and 8 per cent undecided.

When asked about other options for service, the numbers remained high. For environmental support service, 73 per cent were in favour. Youth service garnered 72 per cent support, and civil protection had 70 per cent in favour.

The numbers dropped, however, when respondents were asked about compulsory military service. In this category, only 43 per cent were in favour, while 44 per cent opposed the idea, and 12 per cent weren’t sure.

The breakdown between the sexes was even more stark on the question on military service. When the pollsters calculated the percentage in favour minus the percentage opposed, they found that males generated positive numbers, meaning there were more respondents for the idea than against it. (Although notably the 18-to-29 cohort who would be most affected by such a measure still created a negative number, meaning more were against the idea than for it.)

Across the female respondents, however, the same calculation resulted in a negative number for every age group, except for a slight positive in the 60-and-older respondents.

When asked: “If Canada were to introduce one form of mandatory national service for young adults, which would you prefer?” respondents overwhelmingly chose civilian (i.e., non-military) service, with 59 per cent picking that option versus 19 per cent who chose military, and 13 per cent who said neither.

Asked about the potential benefits of mandatory non-military service, most respondents said the personal development of young adults would be improved by the practice, with 40 per cent saying it would be greatly improved, and another 42 per cent saying it would be somewhat improved, for a total of 82 per cent.

Quality of public service was also seen as a potential benefit, with 71 per cent saying it would be improved or greatly improved. And social cohesion in Canada was viewed as a beneficiary by 69 per cent.

Asked about the potential benefits of military service, were it to happen, more than half (64 per cent) still thought it would help personal development of young adults, while 51 per cent said it would improve the quality of public service, and 52 per cent said it would help social cohesion. Between 21 and 26 per cent felt these areas would be worsened by compulsory military service, however.

The survey was conducted online among a sample of 1,619 Canadians who are members of the Angus Reid Forum. The results are considered to have a margin of error of plus or minus 2 per cent, 19 times out of 20.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.