LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Mark Carney speaks during his Liberal leader campaign launch in Edmonton, on Thursday, Jan. 16, 2025.

OTTAWA — One of Prime Minister Carney’s top advisors was hedging his bets against the Liberal government’s oil and gas emissions cap months before it was announced in late 2023, according to documents obtained through access-to-information.

Correspondence and briefing materials from early to mid-2023 show that then deputy finance minister Michael Sabia sought guidance from his staff on “potential off-ramps” from the cap, presumably to allow the government a graceful exit from the policy..

“I’m writing to provide a status update on the (Deputy Minister’s) recent request for analysis on the oil and gas emissions cap. We understand (he) has requested two things: 1) fiscal impacts of the cap; and 2) potential off-ramps,” reads one email sent on April 28.

The email was addressed to two associate deputy ministers, with two lower-level analysts also receiving copies.

An undated and heavily redacted briefing note titled “Oil and Gas Cap Off-Ramps” also appears in the 45-page package of materials.
 

Sabia left the Finance Canada that September to lead Hydro-Québec and was tapped by Carney this June as

Canada’s top civil servant

.

The Liberal government announced
it was moving ahead
with the emissions cap in December 2023, fulfilling
a 2021 campaign promise
.

Draft regulations released in late 2024 set the cap at 35 per cent below 2019 levels, starting between 2030 and 2032. Oil and gas companies who exceed their emissions quotas could be fined up to $6 million for a first offense and $12 million for subsequent offences.

Officials from Finance Canada and the Prime Minister’s Office declined to provide further information about what off-ramps were presented to Sabia or say whether any of said off-ramps are still under discussion.

Sources close to the Liberal government said the emissions cap was a “live” issue and likely a topic of discussion at

this week’s cabinet planning forum

in Toronto.

Alberta Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz said the subtext of Sabia’s request was clear.

“This type of email, looking for off-ramps, suggests that the federal government knew all along that the emissions cap was a non-starter,” said Schulz.
 

“It shows that you have senior officials within the Liberal government knowing that this is not going to work, which confirms what the data has been telling us all along.”

Independent studies by Deloitte, the Parliamentary Budget Officer and the Conference Board of Canada found that the cap could cost billions in revenue and kill tens of thousands of jobs, with losses concentrated in Western Canada.
 

Energy analyst Heather Exner-Pirot said that softening commodities prices have blocked off at least one potential off-ramp.

“If you’d asked me three moths ago, I’d have told you that the
‘grand bargain’ on carbon capture
was a possible off-ramp, in terms of something you could swap the cap out for … but I just don’t see how that works when oil is at $60 a barrel,” said Exner-Pirot.

Exner-Pirot said that one saving grace for Carney is that the regulations are still in their draft form.

“The best off-ramp on the table right now is to just not finalize the regs,” said Exner-Pirot.

Carney is expected to make a major announcement relating to Canada’s

economic competitiveness on Friday

. Some analysts have speculated that the emissions cap and other

Trudeau era climate policies

could be on the chopping block.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Kanata's Dr. Suman Khulbe, pictured here in an ice bath, 'admits' she sexually abused one male patient and

A Kanata doctor who “

admits that she engaged in sexual abuse” of

one male patient and “engaged in disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional conduct” with two others she professed her love for in writing, has been suspended.

The Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal suspended Dr. Suman Khulbe’s certificate of registration, her authority to practice medicine in the province, after 15 days of hearings.

“Dr. Khulbe did not see her patients as patients. She saw them as her friends, her social life, her athletic life and her business partners,” the five-person panel concluded in a recent decision.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario has “a zero tolerance policy when it comes to sexual contact between a doctor and a patient — even when that contact would otherwise be considered consensual,” according to the regulator’s website, which notes any sexual contact between a physician and their patient has been legally considered sexual abuse in Ontario for more than three decades.

Khulbe “had a sexual relationship with one patient and deep personal relationships with others. She had business relationships with two of these patients,” said the decision.

Khulbe said in an interview Wednesday that she plans to appeal the outcome.

“I can’t retract what I said on the record,” she said. “I only followed the advice of my lawyers.”

In a follow-up email, Khulbe wrote: “


Many facts of my case were omitted and not brought out during the public hearing.

Attending this contested hearing came at considerable financial and personal sacrifice to both me and my parents in order for my voice to be heard.”

The tribunal heard the doctor injected her patients and herself with a substance known as procaine, a local anesthetic commonly used in dental procedures. It also reduces the pain of intramuscular injections.

“Dr. Khulbe hosted social gatherings with her patients at her clinic where alcohol was consumed and procaine was administered,” said the decision. “She administered procaine to herself and others both inside and outside of her clinic.”

Khulbe started practicing as a family physician in 2001, said the decision, dated Aug. 22.

She bought a house in Kanata to use as a private clinic, it said.

An athlete all her life, Khulbe joined a local CrossFit gym in 2015.

One of her trainers at the gym, described in the decision as Patient A, was “an incredible athlete,” according to Khulbe.

“Patient A went to Dr. Khulbe’s clinic for the first time in December 2016 and remained a patient until August 2019,” said the decision.

He initially saw her for vitamin therapy. While he was never charged for that, the discipline tribunal heard she gave him a cocktail of vitamins and minerals “every week or two to assist with his athletic recovery.”

In 2017, Khulbe started treating him for back and shoulder pain, and possible pneumonia. In January 2018, she ordered blood work for him and an ultrasound of his thyroid.

When she referred him to a thyroid specialist, the specialist “found Patient A was asymptomatic and did not need thyroid treatment. Dr. Khulbe prescribed thyroid medication on May 4, 2018, and renewed that medication in May 2019. She ordered another ultrasound of the thyroid and more blood work in 2019.”

She billed the Ontario Health Insurance Plan twice for his treatment.

“Patient A testified that in the spring of 2018, Dr. Khulbe introduced him to procaine. At the beginning, it was part of the vitamin injections and in May 2018 it became its own injection with increasing doses.”

The tribunal heard the shots can cause “agitation, nervousness and euphoria.”

In May 2018, Khulbe “started to perform deep tissue physical therapy on him with his clothes on,” Patient A testified.

“Later, it progressed to physical therapy with his boxers on and then no clothing. Patient A testified Dr. Khulbe told him he had a blockage around his groin. Dr. Khulbe would do breathing exercises while she had her hands on his genitals. In the summer of 2018, the treatments progressed to manual stimulation of his penis and a prostate massage. During the treatments, Dr. Khulbe spoke of spiritual principles and breathwork and started to ask Patient A personal questions about his life and marriage.”

Toward the end of that summer, he testified, “they began spending time outside of the treatment room.”

Patient A “said they kissed upstairs in the bedroom (above the clinic) and after that, the sexual acts accelerated. The sexual acts included Dr. Khulbe performing oral sex on Patient A approximately 15 times, kissing and manual stimulation. Some of these acts occurred in the treatment room and some in other parts of the house. Patient A said that by the winter of 2019, he was engaging in manual stimulation of Dr. Khulbe’s vagina.”

Patient A “testified that he was under the influence of procaine when the sexual acts took place,” said the decision. “After the relationship ended, he came to believe that he had been groomed, drugged and abused by Dr. Khulbe.”

While she disputed when the relationship began, “Khulbe admits that she and Patient A engaged in sexual acts that included kissing, masturbation, fellatio and erotic prostate massage. She denies that Patient A performed sexual acts on her,” said the decision. “She disputes Patient A’s evidence that she groomed and drugged him during the sexual acts.”

The discipline tribunal was not convinced of the grooming accusation. “While it is clear that Dr. Khulbe is a physician without boundaries, we are not satisfied that she acted with such premeditation.”

Patient A “was vulnerable simply because of the inherent power imbalance between any physician and patient,” said the decision.

Khulbe testified that “she never injected pure procaine on its own,” said the decision. “She used the word ‘procaine’ to refer to her vitamin shots because it was a cool name — it rhymed with cocaine and connoted high energy.”

The discipline tribunal found Khulbe’s claim “that she did not inject procaine into patients and others is not credible,” said the decision, which noted she mentioned giving procaine shots to patients in emails, texts and an electronic medical record.

Khulbe denied she used procaine on herself, but the tribunal heard she “used procaine prolifically.”

The tribunal found “Khulbe engaged in disgraceful, dishonourable and unprofessional conduct when she hosted social gatherings at her clinic with patients during which alcohol was served and procaine administered.”

In 2018, Khulbe “gave up family practice entirely and created an ‘executive practice’ where patients receive a holistic approach to healthcare which includes a focus on sleep, nutrition, exercise, baseline hormone therapy and vitamins,” said the decision.

That same year, Khulbe and Patient A talked about “embarking on a joint business venture that would focus on sports recovery and would include medical and fitness components.”

She paid for their trip to a health and wellness conference that spring, said the decision.

“Patient A described the joint venture as a recovery clinic to provide top-of-the-line treatments to athletes,” said the decision, noting she taught him how to draw up vitamin shots.

Khulbe, who is Hindu, testified “she was raised in an Indian home with traditional values” and lived with her parents at the time. “Dr. Khulbe testified Patient A was the first person that she had had an intimate relationship with.”

Patient B became Khulbe’s patient in 2015, said the decision.

“Dr. Khulbe provided him with extensive treatment, including testosterone therapy, (platelet-rich plasma) shots into his joints and penis, bloodwork, prescriptions and vitamin therapy.

Patient C became Khulbe’s patient in 2014.

“Dr. Khulbe provided extensive treatment, including testosterone therapy, (platelet-rich plasma) shots, cortisone shots, bloodwork, prescriptions, vitamin therapy and referrals to specialists,” said the decision.

According to the decision, “there are extensive records of digital communications between Dr. Khulbe and Patients B and C which establish her boundary crossings with these patients.”

In their correspondence, “Dr. Khulbe refers to Patient B as an angel, her protector, her special guide, her bodyguard, and her Godfather. She told Patient B that she loved him and continued to treat him despite acknowledging in a text message in June 2016 that their doctor-patient relationship had ended.”

Khulbe “expressed a strong emotional attachment to” Patient C in her emails, said the decision.

“In one email Dr. Khulbe states, ‘this is not an email I would send to a normal everyday patient. But to a friend. If I have made a mistake on this relation, you can ‘get off my cloud’ and ‘run like hell.’ You will not hear from me again.”

About a month later, Dr. Khulbe sent Patient C “another long, emotional email, including the statement, ‘loved you so much that I was so scared that I was getting too close to you,’” said the decision.

Khulbe “admits that she engaged in disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional conduct in her communications and conduct with Patients B and C,” said the decision. “The sheer volume of communications between these patients is inappropriate and unprofessional in and of itself. The contents further demonstrate many instances of serious boundary violations.”

Patient B is a senior director of a real estate property management company, said the decision.

He testified that he helped Khulbe “out with her real estate dealings, renovations at her home, and her rental properties,” it said.

“He described one time when he borrowed a truck from a friend to clean out one of Dr. Khulbe’s rental units that had been left in a terrible condition by a tenant. He even went to court on Dr. Khulbe’s behalf.”

Khulbe “entered into business relationships with her patients without considering the impact of those relationships on her doctor-patient relationships,” said the decision. “The business relationships with her patients are further examples of Dr. Khulbe’s lack of professional boundaries.”

Khulbe said her penalty hearing will take place Nov. 24.

“My licence will be revoked for five years, for sure,” she said.

Khulbe said she’ll also likely have to pay Patient A $17,500, and shell out about $140,000 to cover the tribunal’s costs.

 

 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


“Our vision is a world where we see disadvantaged children, including their families and other people in their community being embraced with dignity, compassion and opportunity,” says Carmine Nigro, chair of Friends of the Orphans Canada.

Carmine Nigro is best known in Toronto as a developer and businessman. He has chaired the LCBO and Ontario Place, serves on the board of Invest Ontario, and is principal of Craft Development Corporation. But, he says, his newest role is the one that means the most to him: chair of Friends of the Orphans Canada, a charity that funds schools, clinics and homes for vulnerable children across Latin America. Nigro spoke with National Post about Fotocan and his role in it. This interview has been edited for clarity and brevity.

How did you end up leading Friends of the Orphans Canada?

Approximately 20 plus years ago, in 1998, five of us got together and we had all done pretty good in life so we thought it’s time to pay it back. We were trying to figure out ways to pay things back and at the time one of our good friends Bill Van Haren had adopted a young girl from Guatemala.

We decided to take on a trip to Guatemala and see what was lacking there, and what we found was education was lacking. So we decided to go out and start building schools. When we started our group was called school friends.

After approximately three years, and maybe 15 or 16 schools, that were nothing fancy, just small educational facilities with two to three classrooms in Northern Guatemala and another place just south, in a town called Paramus, we connected with Nuestros Pequeños Hermanos, which is our little brothers and sisters, a group out of Mexico that was looking to expand in Guatemala. They were looking for a group like ours that was skilled in the building industry, so together we acquired a property in this little town Paramus just near Antigua, and we worked together with them and we started Friends of the Orphans Canada (FOTOCAN) and that was approximately in 2004.

I was always just on the board of directors and it was this year that I was appointed as chair, and my goal is to mentor young people through adversity and education, to help them achieve their dreams. And I feel very strongly that if we can educate the younger generation, they’ll be self-sufficient‚ so teach him how to fish instead of giving him fish.

What exactly is Friends of the Orphans Canada?

Our vision is a world where we see disadvantaged children, including their families and other people in their community being embraced with dignity, compassion and opportunity by providing essential needs, food, shelter, education, health care.

We strive to create a nurturing environment, where we hope these young lives flourish and transform themselves through the education we provide. And it is not only education where they become a lawyer or a doctor, we have trade schools where we teach how to bricklay, do concrete work, fix small engines, do automotive repair.

What moments from FOTOCAN projects have stayed with you?

One of my proudest moments was when we started in 2004, we took on a project that would take 10 years to come to fruition. So every year we would go back to this same project, we would go in for two to three weeks, we worked night and day, and built it, and once the school was built we were out of there.

But my proudest moments was going back to Paramus, and seeing the first few schools and the dormitories, and to see the kids utilizing, the teachers teaching in the classroom that I built, that was my proudest moment.

There’s a photo of you playing soccer with kids on the website, what’s the story behind it?

When we would go down, we would actually live, eat and do everything, the kids did. We stayed on the premises, whether it was in tents or in the classrooms that were converted to two bedrooms for us. And we would organize games so that the kids could get to know us better, through soccer and through helping us work. So that’s the reason we were playing soccer, to build the camaraderie between them and us.

Have you witnessed difficult or tragic moments in this work?

We have a home in Haiti and on a regular basis, there’s kidnapping, not of our children, but of the women that are cooking for the kids and the school teachers, and trying to get them back is a big struggle. That’s been my biggest dilemma .

Do these kids remind you of your own immigrant journey?

100 per cent. The only difference is a lot of these kids, their parents either have mental health issues or their mothers are single moms who can’t handle these kids and so they come to our homes.

You’ve spoken about the importance of education, yet you didn’t finish high school. How does that shape your perspective?

To my mom and dad, education was assuring that, you know, we got out of this poverty because we weren’t lacking food, but before my mother bought me a pair of running shoes she’d have to think 10 times. So things didn’t come easy to me.

My parents thought through education, we can get a good job, become a doctor, a lawyer, dentist or something like that. And as immigrants that was their dream and I disappointed them by not finishing high school and going on to university. But later on in life, you start seeing things in a different light and I decided you know what they were right. My goal now is to try to educate as many kids as humanly possible.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney arrives to meet U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington, DC, on May 6, 2025.

Most Americans still see Canada as a solid trading partner and Prime Minister Mark Carney as a respected leader despite the ongoing trade war, a new Leger poll has found.

Two thirds of Americans (66 per cent) view Canada as either a good (39 per cent) or very good (27 per cent) partner for trade with the United States, while just nine per cent see Canada as a bad (seven per cent) or very bad (two per cent) partner.

“If I were the Canadian government,” Andrew Enns, the executive vice-president at Leger, told National Post, “I’d go, okay, it’s not a bad place to be when, at some point, we got some heavy lifting to do with the U.S. government on some big issues.”

A respondent’s political affiliation influenced their views. While 80 per cent of Democrats see Canada as a good (34 per cent) or very good (45 per cent) trading partner, only 64 per cent of Republicans feel the same (49 per cent said “good” and 15 per cent said “very good”). Just three per cent of Democrats see Canada as a bad or very bad trading partner, while 17 per cent of Republicans do.

“I suspect Republicans are taking their cues from President (Donald) Trump and probably recalling some of the things that President Trump has said, that we’re not as nice as we come across,” Enns said. “If you’re a (Canadian) government official, and you’re down in a meeting with people in Washington, in the administration, when you meet with Democrats, you’re probably going to have a friendlier meeting compared to when you meet with Republicans.”

Tensions between the United States and Canada have escalated since President Trump returned to the White House in January and proceeded to repeatedly

call

then-prime minister Justin Trudeau a governor and refer to Canada as the 51st state. Trump has also

imposed

tariffs on Canadian exports and said the northern border is porous and

exploited

by drug traffickers.

Despite the ongoing tensions, Prime Minister Carney came ahead of other political leaders surveyed, with 33 per cent of Americans having a favourable opinion of him, ahead of French President Emmanuel Macron (30 per cent), Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (both with 29 per cent), the leaders of Germany and Japan, both with 27 per cent, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (26 per cent). China’s Xi Jinping (12 per cent) and Russia’s Vladimir Putin (10 per cent) came last.

“I was a bit surprised by Mr. Carney’s personal rating,” Enns said. “Interestingly, in relation to other leaders, he comes across as actually quite good. Tops the list.”

Americans view Carney in a noticeably better light than former prime minister Justin Trudeau. The last Leger study gauging American attitudes, which was taken back in January, less than two months before Trudeau left office, revealed less than a quarter (24 per cent) had a favourable opinion of him.

Americans named Great Britain (17 per cent) and Israel (14 per cent) as their country’s foremost allies, ahead of Canada (12 per cent), which Enns said shows the difference between the popularity of political leaders versus nations themselves. Enns said Canada’s ranking outside the top two was a point which should trigger some thought among federal leaders in Ottawa.

“I’d look at this question and go, I’m not sure I’m super happy that we’re suddenly third place behind Great Britain and Israel in terms of being perceived by the American public as being a good friend and ally,” Enns said. “We shared the longest undefended border for quite a long time without any issues.”

Russia came in fourth with just four per cent, followed by Japan and Mexico (both with three per cent). However, large shares answered “none” (18 per cent) or “don’t know” (24 per cent).

Enns encouraged Carney to leverage his favourability “to speak directly to Americans” to convey that Canada has “been a really good trading partner.”

The poll also found that less than half (39 per cent) of Americans have a favourable view of Trump, while 48 per cent have an unfavourable view.

The online poll of 1,014 Americans was conducted between Aug. 29 and Aug. 31, 2025. A margin of error cannot be associated with a non-probability sample in a panel survey for comparison purposes. A probability sample would have a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 per cent, 19 times out of 20.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Finance and National Revenue Minister François-Philippe Champagne.

OTTAWA — Work is underway for an upcoming review on whether the tariffs Canada applied to China’s electric vehicles, steel and aluminum should remain at the current rates, the federal finance minister’s office has confirmed.

A spokeswoman for François Philippe-Champagne says imports of these Chinese products “have declined significantly since their imposition,” adding that the government had committed to review these surtaxes one year after they were implemented last October.

“Officials are currently undertaking work on this review, including an assessment of China’s policies and trade practices, and whether the scope of the surtaxes, as well as the surtax rate, remain appropriate,” Audrey Milette said in a statement to National Post, late Thursday.

“The government will continue to provide updates as relevant.” The review itself is set to begin next month.

The statement comes the same day that the Prime Minister’s Office announced it was sending a representative on an upcoming trade mission to China and lands amid

pressure from Western premiers

to drop its tariff on Chinese-made electric vehicles in an effort to see China lift its

tariff on canola

.

In August 2024, former finance minister and deputy prime minister Chrystia Freeland announced measures that the government characterized as designed to “level the playing field” for Canadian workers in both the steel and aluminum industries and the auto sector.

Starting that October, it implemented a 25 per cent surtax on Chinese steel and aluminum as well as a 100 per cent surtax on Chinese-made electric vehicles.

The Liberal government said the measures were in response to unfair competition and labour practices from China, particularly when it came to electric vehicles, given that China is the world’s largest exporter.

Officials heard that Canada’s importation of Chinese electric vehicles, which are the cheapest to buy, posed a threat to the future development of the North American market in the sector.

Its decision to levy a 100 per cent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles followed suit with an earlier move by former U.S. president Joe Biden, whose administration hiked its own tariffs on these vehicles to 100 per cent.

U.S. officials had also cited potential national security concerns related to how these vehicles were internet-connected.

Earlier on Thursday, the Prime Minister’s Office announced that Kody Blois, Carney’s parliamentary secretary, would be traveling to China as part of a trade delegation led by Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe to address numerous “trade irritants,” including tariffs on Canadian canola.

China’s decision to levy a 76 per cent tariff on canola seed has been viewed as coming in direct response to Canada’s levy on Chinese electric vehicles.

Both Moe and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith have been calling on the federal government to remove its tariff on Chinese electric vehicles in an effort to see the dispute resolved.

The Prime Minister’s Office, in the statement announcing Blois’s travel, said it was taking steps to protect the jobs tied to Canada’s canola industry and would be announcing “additional measures in support of Canadian producers shortly.”

Sources say Carney is expected to make a wide-spanning, national-level economic announcement on Friday in Toronto, where Carney has spent the past two days meeting with his cabinet before the House of Commons resumes on Sept.15.

On Thursday, Industry Minister Mélanie Joly said there would be an announcement “in the coming days” to support Canadian industries hit by U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Carney said there was room for trade to grow between China and Canada, namely in agriculture.

“We have differences with China, different approaches to a variety of things, but they are our second largest trading partner,” he said.

“Look at the issues around canola at present and our broader agricultural export:  pea protein, other aspects and fisheries. We’re going to work hard to get that right,” he added.

“Within that context, there may be areas where… we can expand the commercial relationship with things that China does well.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks to the media, at the Liberal Cabinet Retreat, in Toronto, Wednesday, Sept. 3, 2025.

TORONTO — “Tough” budget decisions, public service adjustments, incoming aid for sectors hardest hit by U.S. tariffs and the latest on ongoing trade negotiations with President Donald Trump were all on the menu for the federal Liberal cabinet meeting this week.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s cabinet met on Thursday for the second day of a two-day retreat at a hotel in the Toronto neighbourhood of North York.

Media were permitted to be at the hotel, but ministers and their staff were kept far from reporters’ eyes and ears. The only leaks came from parts of the hotel ceiling during particularly hard rain Thursday morning, rather than from government sources with information to share.

Over the summit, cabinet heard from pollsters on the “mood of the country,” head of investment funds on private-public collaboration, and top energy executives and Scotiabank Chief Economist Jean-François Perreault on the country’s economic outlook.

It also heard from former Australian prime minister and the country’s current ambassador to the U.S. Kevin Rudd on how to best deal with Donald Trump’s administration.

Tough budget decisions and public service ‘adjustments’

The day after Carney said his government’s first budget would be a

mix of “austerity and investment,”

Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne admitted that he is looking down the barrel of difficult budgetary choices.

“Will there be tough choices to make? Definitely. Is the nation ready? I would say, yes,” Champagne told reporters. “In our campaign, we said we’re going to spend less so we can invest more. And you know, people understand that.”

When asked where or what his government might cut, Champagne demurred. But he argued that the growth of government spending in recent years under the Liberals was not sustainable and needed to be reined in.

Asked if that meant there would be cuts to the public service, he replied that there would be “adjustments” as part of the 15 per cent cuts imposed on all departments and agencies within three years.

“Adjustments” are bureaucratese for layoffs. According to the government’s website,

work force adjustments

are “when the services of one or more indeterminate employees will no longer be required beyond a specified date due to a lack of work, the discontinuance of a function, a relocation in which the employee does not wish to participate or an alternative delivery initiative.”

LeBlanc won’t set deadline for new U.S. trade deal

After busting the self-imposed deadline of July 21 and then Aug. 1 for a new trade deal with the U.S., it appears the Carney government is done with dates.

Speaking to reporters on Thursday, Dominic LeBlanc, the minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, refused to set a new deadline for the end of negotiations with the Donald Trump administration.

“I like you very much and I understand that you are looking for this kind of detail,” he told reporters, refusing to detail which level of tariffs were being discussed for certain sectors.

“We are working hard to make progress because we understand the importance for workers in all regions of Canada,” he added.

LeBlanc told reporters that Canada’s ambassador to the U.S. Kirsten Hillman was in Washington D.C. this week to work on smaller, sector-specific deals on key tariffed industries like steel, aluminium, softwood lumber and autos.

Joly promises help for sectors hit by tariffs within days

If you’re in a Canadian sector impacted by U.S. tariffs, help is on the way, says Industry Minister Mélanie Joly.

Speaking to reporters on Thursday afternoon, Joly said there would be an announcement in the coming days for industries hit hardest by U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs, namely aluminium.

She said the government is evaluating potential major projects as a way to boost local steel, aluminium and lumber industries and offer them some stability in the coming years.

“There is also a difference between large companies and smaller businesses. What we see is that small businesses are also affected by this unpredictability, and so we must be there to help them,” Joly added.

Sources say Carney is expected to make an announcement in Toronto on Friday morning.

Head of controversial U.S. think-tank drops out

The Liberals made waves within progressive circles when they announced that the head of the Heritage Foundation, a controversial right-wing U.S. think-tank with deep connections to top Republicans, would speak to cabinet about how to deal with the Trump administration.

The Heritage Foundation is behind Project 2025, a right-wing policy roadmap that proposes slashing much of the U.S. public service, cracking down on undocumented immigrants and replacing top civil servants with conservative loyalists. Though Trump has denied any connection to the project, his administration has implemented many of its proposals.

Hours before Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts was slated to speak to cabinet, the Prime Minister’s Office announced that Roberts’ office said he could no longer attend. The unsigned statement did not provide a reason.

Major public service union upset at austerity

A day after Carney promised an austerity budget, the head of the largest federal public service union finally responded. And she was mad.

“Let me be clear: Prime Minister Carney’s austerity agenda is lazy, reckless and short-sighted and puts everyone in Canada at risk,” said

Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) President Sharron DeSousa.

“Carney’s government has a choice — it can be forward-looking and a model employer that creates good jobs to strengthen our economy and build a resilient Canada, or it can continue to use old-fashioned, ineffective and lazy approaches like austerity that just don’t work.”

Pierre Poilievre says federal government is a ‘fat man’

Carney can’t cut into the federal government fast enough, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre told reporters in Toronto Thursday. Poilievre argued that the Liberal government needs to focus on cutting red tape, regulation and “bloated bureaucracy”.

“Right now, the government has become a fat man and the private sector is a skinny man that is carrying that fat man up an increasingly steep hill. And that skinnier man is about to collapse under the weight of the gargantuan Carney Liberal government,” he told reporters.

“It’s time to put that government on a diet.”

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Canada's Felix Auger-Aliassime returns a shot during the quarterfinal round of the U.S. Open tennis championships on  Wednesday, Sept. 3, in New York. He plays in the semi-finals on Friday.

Even losing can feel like winning sometimes. Just look at Canadian pro-tennis players participating in the U.S. Open.

Felix Auger-Aliassime

has made his way into the men’s singles semifinals. Walking away from the court on Friday a loser will still mean $1.26 million in his pocket.

And that’s in American dollars. (All amounts mentioned hereafter are in U.S. dollars.)

The only other Canadian still in the running is Ottawa’s Gabriela Dabrowski. She and her doubles partner, New Zealand’s Erin Routliffe, advanced to the women’s doubles final, also on Friday.

If they lose, they still stand to share $500,000, $1 million if they win.

They play their final before Auger-Aliassime takes to the court. It will be hectic evening for Canadian tennis fans. 

How much has the U.S. Open pot grown?

This year’s total pot for players at the U.S. Open is

a record $85 million

.

The tournament generates significant revenue from worldwide broadcasting rights, sponsorships, ticket sales, and related activities. It is the biggest annual earner for tennis professionals.

In 2024, the total pot was $70 million. However, a

21 per cent increase in the winnings this year

is still only about 15 per cent of the tournament’s approximate $560 million revenue haul.

Meanwhile, the winners for the individual men’s and women’s tournaments will walk off the court with the largest winning payouts in the sport

$5 million, up from $3.6 million in 2024.

The

tournament’s prize money

has grown for participants other than the winners too. The upgraded purse for individual players has jumped too: runners-up get $2.5 million, up 39 per cent; semi-finalists $1.26 million, up 26 per cent; quarterfinalists, $660,000, up 25 per cent. Round of 16 competitors get $400,000, up 23 per cent.

Aside from increasing the prize money, the U.S. Open also looked to lower the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by players. Competitors are given a $1,000 travel stipend and two rooms in the player hotel or $600 per day if they choose to stay elsewhere. Players also get free racquet-stringing for up to five racquets per pound. All this adds up to $5 million in player support.

How does the U.S. Open compare to other major tennis tournaments?

In comparison with other major pro-tennis tournaments, U.S. Open prize money simply dwarfs them.

Wimbledon pays a total of $72.7 million. The French Open pays $65.4 million and the Australian Open pays $62.9 million.

This year’s U.S. Open pay hike came after top players hired World Tennis Association chief executive Larry Scott to speak to the event organizers, advocating for a bigger slice of the tournament revenue pie.

Team sports in the U.S. generally give players close to 50 per cent of the profit, while tennis players generally receive only 15 per cent and 20 per cent of U.S. Open revenue, according to

The New York Times

. But the tournament is the only Grand Slam regularly filling

a 20,000-plus seat stadium

every night, with significant ticket sales contributing to the overall income.

It’s annual setting in New York City, with media and business connections, also boosts its commercial appeal.

What are Auger-Aliassime’s chances?

Seeded 25th, Auger-Aliassime will now meet top seed Italian player, Jannik Sinner. However, Auger-Aliassime’s quarterfinal win wasn’t pretty. Instead, it was “an absolute grind,” according to

SportsNet

. He appeared slow in the early going, much slower than he had been in wins during the third and fourth rounds.

Auger-Aliassime has a career high singles ranking of No. 6, which came in November 2022. But he has spent most of the last two years outside of the top 20 and dropped as low as to No. 36 in April 2024.

He came into this U.S. Open ranked No. 27. As of Wednesday, his provisional ranking is No. 13.

What about Dabrowski?

Canadian

Gabriela Dabrowski

is in her second final in three years, alongside Kiwi Erin Routliffe. She is the last Canadian woman left in the U.S. Open and

one win away from her fourth career Grand Slam women’s doubles title.

The Can-Kiwi duo prevailed to win in the 2023 U.S. Open.

What has happened to other Canadian entrants?

The other big women’s doubles match-up involving a Canadian was

Leylah Fernandez

and legendary American player, Venus Williams. They lost in the quarterfinals on Tuesday, earning $125,000 each.

Canadian

Denis Shapovalov

fell short of a win in his third round match, taking home $237,000. Shapovalov has reached as high as number 10 in the world rankings. The 26-year-old Canadian has since slipped to number 29.

The newest Canadian tennis phenom,

Victoria Mboko

ended her U.S. Open debut early, losing in the first-round on Monday. Nevertheless, she walked away adding $30,000 to her bank balance.

It was her first match since claiming the National Bank Open title in Montreal earlier this month.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


U.S. President Donald Trump, right, and Prime Minister Mark Carney at the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alta., on June 26.

Terra Nord’s paintings often feature natural themes, but this year, Donald Trump inspired a more political edge to her work. When the U.S. president provoked Canadians with his “51st state” rhetoric and tariffs, Nord created products to meet the moment.

“I hit a few Canadian designs that really took off this year,” she said, referring to her images of a beaver riding a Canadian goose with statements like “Tariff this, hoser.”

While the Terrace, British Columbia-based artist saw a brief but “enormous boom” in Canadian sales, especially for those political designs, the vast majority of her sales have gone to U.S. customers for the three years she’s been in business.

Nord, 37, has largely shipped her U.S.-bound parcels duty-free because the contents, valued under US$800, qualified for the de minimis exemption. That waiver for low-value goods shipments, however, was suspended last week by Washington, leaving global exporters scrambling as they face duties and higher shipping costs.

Nord and many other small business owners and exporters have suspended shipments to the U.S., at least for now, as they face this latest hiccup amid the U.S.-Canada trade war.

Clouds gathering?

Canada is facing economic headwinds, including slowing GDP growth and persistently high unemployment.

The economy contracted significantly more in the second quarter than economists expected, with GDP decelerating by 1.6 per cent, according to Statistics Canada. The total annualized growth for January to June was modest, at just 0.4 per cent.

While the unemployment rate has held steady, it has done so at an eye-watering 6.9 per cent. Nearly 41,000 Canadians lost their jobs in July, and 83 per cent of those – some 34,000 jobs – were once held by young people, aged 15 to 24.

Business owners, meanwhile, are cutting spending and delaying hiring decisions.

Merchant Growth, a lending company specializing in finance solutions for small businesses, recently surveyed 150 of its clients and found that the majority of them are making changes. A whopping 76 per cent have cut spending, 38 per cent have delayed hiring, and over half of them believe the economy is in dire straits.

“Sixty-one per cent of the business owners we surveyed believed we were in a recession,” said David Gens, CEO of Merchant Growth, noting how that was a couple of months ago. “It’s only gotten worse since then.”

While some economists believe Canada is at risk of recession — it’s not officially there, as the country has avoided two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth — it’s definitely a tough time for small businesses.

Corinne Pohlmann, executive vice-president of advocacy for the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB), pointed to how demand for virtually everything has gone down.

“One of the biggest barriers right now for a lot of small companies — that’s keeping them from growing — is that customer demand has been decreasing quite a bit over the last six months.”

“Everybody’s holding onto their dollars a little bit more.”

While U.S. tariffs have been largely absorbed by Canadian businesses so far, she said, “the additional financial strain from that and from losing duty-free shipping will only exacerbate their challenges.”

 Terra Nord shows off a T-shirt featuring one of her new designs inspired by U.S. President Donald Trump’s “51st state” rhetoric and tariffs on Canadian goods. Although she normally ships mostly to U.S. customers, the new designs sparked a boom in Canadian sales. Courtesy Terra Nord.

Strained balance sheets

As a result of trade pressures, Merchant Growth is seeing a lot of lending activity this summer, a time when business is usually slower. More and more small businesses — those with revenues under $5 million annually — are increasingly seeking financing options to boost their working capital.

“We’ve seen growth of about double what we saw last year at the same time,” Gens said. He noted that the firm’s average loan is $40,000 and that it funded about $230 million in loans last year.

Small companies need more working capital to adjust to the changes they’re being forced to make. This involves either getting certified to send goods duty-free by becoming Canada-US-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) compliant, establishing new supplier relationships to qualify for CUSMA compliance, raising prices, or finding new markets.

Most of the small businesses that relied on the de minimis exemption for shipping never bothered to seek CUSMA compliance because it didn’t affect their bottom lines. Now it does.

To get certified, businesses must account for where the components of their products come from – the more that originate from Canada, Mexico, or the U.S., the better. For most products, the required threshold is 62.5 per cent. But given that it’s a self-certification process, and that businesses could be subjected to audits, Pohlmann said business owners should seek professional guidance to reduce their risks.

If products that Canadians are exporting include too many elements from further afield, they may want to shift to CUSMA-compliant suppliers to save on duties. But finding these suppliers takes time, and shifting involves its own challenges.

“You don’t have credit yet with that supplier, so you’re gonna have to pay up front for everything,” Gens said

Alternatively, simply paying the added duties and broker fees, said Pohlmann, would mean having to charge customers more. “It’s going to take a product from being 20 or 25 bucks to being 40 or 50 bucks, suddenly overnight,” she said, noting how many owners are trying to figure out how to navigate the added costs without losing customers or eating into their already thin profit margins.

Another option is for small Canadian exporters to start marketing their products to alternative markets. But, again, this takes time and money. CFIB members have reported that they expect it would take up to nine months to shift customer bases, said Pohlmann.

Having adequate working capital, Gens explained, is important for filling the gaps between finding these new consumers and getting paid.

In search of lifelines

Many experts have emphasized the need for federal support to help small businesses navigate this tough period.

Merchant Growth recently asked its members what they would most like to see by way of federal help. Unsurprisingly, given their business focus, the No. 1 demand was access to more credit and liquidity. Bank loans are expensive, but government loans can be made at better rates and for longer terms, Gens noted.

Other items on the wishlist included permanent tax relief, expansion of the small business deduction limit, a refundable credit for supply chain diversification, as well as wage and hiring incentives, rent subsidies, and a lighter regulatory burden.

Pohlmann’s CFIB, meanwhile, says that loans like those from the Business Development Bank of Canada – which are meant to be easier to access to deal with the tariff costs – are fine, but not ideal. Provincial loans are also available, but they tend to require a lot of investment up front from the borrower, which excludes smaller businesses.

“A lot of our members and small businesses in general are still trying to pay off COVID debt,” she said. “So the last thing they want to do is add more debt to get through yet another crisis.”

Instead, the CFIB is trying to get Ottawa to see beyond lending – namely by returning some of the money raised from retaliatory tariffs to small businesses. Before Prime Minister Mark Carney cancelled these retaliatory duties on Sept. 1, the government raised billions.

“Much of that (money) came from smaller companies,” Pohlmann said. “We’d love to see some of that money returned to small companies to help address some of the challenges they’re facing as a result of these tariffs.”

Carney has yet to announce any de minimis-related relief measures.

The CFIB recommends that the money be returned in the form of a rebate or tax cut. Eliminating the small business tax rate, for example, could help businesses reinvest in their facilities and get through the tough period, she said.

Hazy outlook

A CFIB survey of its members showed that 19 per cent feared they would not be able to survive another six months of tariffs without facing difficult decisions – either closing shop, laying people off, or finding a new business model. But, Pohlmann said, that data was collected before Carney cancelled the retaliatory tariffs, which could offer some relief.

What would help even more, however, is getting to a point where there’s some certainty again in U.S.-Canada trade. Ideally, that involves Carney and Trump reaching an agreement, preferably one with fewer tariffs, Pohlmann said.

Barring that, “we need to make sure there are supports out there for small businesses that have been directly impacted and hurt by these just as much as some of those larger companies,” she added.

Like many Canadian exporters, Nord faces a choice: She must decide whether to get CUSMA certified so she can ship her art to U.S. customers duty-free – or find another way to pivot and thrive. For now, she’s designing a colouring book with animals engaging in human activities – without a beaver, goose, or tariff in sight.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Onlookers stand behind a police line as Municipal Civil Defense personnel inspect the area surrounding the wrecked Gloria funicular on September 04, 2025 in Lisbon, Portugal.

A Canadian citizen was among the 21 people injured in a fatal streetcar crash in Portugal’s capital city, the head of Lisbon’s Civil Protection Agency told reporters, The Canadian Press is reporting.

Authorities in Lisbon are still trying to determine how the historic Elevador da Glória funicular derailed and crashed into a building on Wednesday evening.

The death toll from the tragedy climbed to 16 on Thursday after two of the injured died in hospital, according to the

Associated Press.

National Post has contacted Global Affairs Canada to confirm a Canadian was on board and injured.

Victims ranged from a three-year-old toddler to adults up to age 65, some from Portugal, while many were tourists from throughout Europe, South Korea and Cape Verde.

 The wreckage of the Gloria funicular is pictured the day after an accident killed 16 in Lisbon, on September 4, 2025.

Emergency crews had all the people extracted from the grisly crash site within two hours.

The Elevador da Glória, one of three in the city, is a 19th-century national monument and a major tourist draw in Lisbon, linking Baixa to Bairro Alto. At its summit is Miradouro de São Pedro de Alcântara, a historic terrace offering panoramic views of the city.

“It lets you turn a steep climb into a romantic moment and was opened in 1885 as the second of its kind in the city,” the city’s tourism website describes it. “Although it was only electrified in 1915, it still retains its original characteristics.”

Carris, the company that operates the streetcar, said regular maintenance had been performed and pledged full cooperation with the investigations underway. The city’s other funiculars are out of service while they undergo inspection.

Portuguese President Marcel Rebelo de Sousa declared a national day of mourning on Thursday while Lisbon Mayor Carlos Moedas decreed three days of “municipal mourning.”

“I extend my heartfelt condolences to all the families and friends of the victims,” Moedas wrote on X.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Whether you own your home may affect what you deem to be a comfortable annual income, according to a new survey.

For many Canadians, an annual household income of $100,000 is necessary to feel comfortable, according to a new survey.

However, the amount required to feel at ease differs depending on age, the size of a given household, whether they own their home and where they live.

In June, Canadian magazine,

MoneySense

, teamed up with Leger Marketing research to survey more than 9,000 Canadians living in 79 different Canadian cities. The survey canvassed five income options between $74,200 up to $250,000.

$100,000 was the most popular option, chosen by 37 per cent of survey respondents. The next biggest group, 25.8 per cent, chose $150,000. Somewhat fewer respondents, 23.8 per cent, chose $74,200. Much smaller groups opted for the higher options of $200,000 (8.5 per cent) and $250,000 (4.9 per cent).

According to

Statistics Canada

, $100,702 was the average disposable income for Canadian households in 2024.

Looking to individual incomes, the

top 10 per cent earners in Canada

earn at least $125,945 annually. To be in the top 25 per cent, the amount to reach is $81,184. Individual Canadians earning between $57,375 and $114,750 are considered middle-class.

How does the cost of living impact income comfort?

The adequacy of income is linked to the cost of living, which changes over time. For example, $100 in 2020 is equivalent to $118.14 today. In other words, it would take $118.14 to buy the same goods/services today that took $100 in 2020. But Canadians whose wages have risen accordingly should fare better.

Canada’s major banks look at “affordability” based on the rule that average shelter costs should not exceed

30 per cent of gross household income

.

However, there are additional measures of affordability such as transportation, food, utilities, clothing and leisure.

CareerBeacon

looks at affordability based on those measures, as well as renting rather than owning a home. It looked at Canadian cities with populations of 50,000 or more and looked at the annual income required for an individual to be comfortable in each.

The results vary from about $58,000 to over $106,000. Perhaps predictably, the most expensive cities are set near major job centres such as Toronto and Vancouver, while more affordable cities are outside large metro areas and have lower housing demand.

The cities requiring the highest incomes to feel financially comfortable are:

Richmond Hill, ON – $106,536

Milton, ON – $106,392

Whitby, ON – $105,624

Coquitlam, BC – $104,928

North Vancouver, BC – $103,512

The cities where comfort comes with a lower income are:

Trois-Rivières, QC – $57,936

Sherbrooke, QC – $64,920

Medicine Hat, AB – $70,416

Fredericton, NB – $71,784

Sault Ste. Marie, ON – $72,744

How does inflation affect the buying power of income?

The adequacy of income

fluctuate

s with inflation. Statistics Canada tracks inflation by keeping tabs on the prices of a so-called “basket” of goods and services. The prices of these items add up to an average known as the

consumer price index

, or CPI.

Inflation was close to 2 per cent per year for 25 years – until COVID-19 hit. In 2022, inflation surged above 8 per cent – the highest since the 1980s. Then when the economy reopened, Canadian demand for goods and services surged, hindered by supply chain disruptions that drove prices higher and left many Canadians struggling.

In 2022, the

Bank of Canada

began an aggressive campaign to tame inflation, with 10 interest rate increases in less than two years. It worked.

How have annual incomes in Canada kept up with inflation – or not?

Still, the news still hasn’t been good for all Canadians, especially with regard to increasing income to deal with increased cost of living.

Wages increased amid the higher-income brackets, with those Canadians often coming out last five years with bigger investment portfolios boosted by the higher interest rates. (When interest rates rise, most stock prices tend to fall, making them more affordable.)

“Based on our analysis, the price of the basket of goods and services has increased by 15 per cent since 2019, but disposable income has increased by 21 per cent, supported by government transfers, wage gains and net investment income, thereby improving the purchasing power of most Canadian households,” said Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux in a 2024 press release.

However, he conceded that “since 2022 rising inflation and tighter monetary policy have reduced purchasing power for lower-income households.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.