LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

The Canada Revenue Agency headquarters' Connaught Building in Ottawa.

The national director of a Jewish charity says he was told by the Canada Revenue Agency that it was audited due to being “pressured” by “outside sources.” This week, Herut Canada became the third Jewish charity to have its status revoked since last year.

“This will never stop me from protecting the Jewish community ever,” said Aaron Hadida. “I don’t want them to think they got a win, because they didn’t. It’s laughable.”

Herut Canada

describes itself as “unapologetically Zionist.” The charity, which was registered in 2021, is dedicated to a variety of Jewish causes, including providing security and teaching self-defence to the community.

The CRA said in the

Nov. 15 edition of the Canada Gazette

that it was revoking Herut Canada’s charitable status due to “failure to meet the parts of the Income Tax Act.”

In March, the CRA audited the charity, Hadida said. During his interview, he asked why it was being audited, as it was “a very small charity.” In 2024, its total revenue was $56,111, while its expenses were $42,565,

according to the CRA

.

“They said, ‘We’ve had complaints.’ I said, ‘So, outside sources basically pressured you to audit me, is what you’re telling me,’ and they basically admitted it,” said Hadida, adding that other charities with ties to terrorist entities were given time to “clean up” instead of being shut down.

“They’re going after Jewish charities, one after the other — just because,” he said.

The CRA acknowledged National Post’s request for details about the revocation but did not respond in time for publication.

An anti-Israel group, Just Peace Advocates, said it welcomed the news that Herut’s charitable status had been revoked. In a joint

post on social media

with other anti-Israel groups, it said it made “two submissions to the CRA requesting an audit” and community members sent 19,282 letters.

“The CRA must end the Canada to Israel charity pipeline,” the post said.

In August 2024, the CRA announced that the charitable statuses for the

Jewish National Fund and the Ne’eman Foundation of Canada

were revoked.

MP Melissa Lantsman called out the agency in a post on X on Monday.

“CRA going after a third Jewish charity,” she wrote.

She also mentioned Service Canada “scrubbing Israel off passports” (in reference to a Jewish woman from Montreal being told

she couldn’t put Israel as her birthplace

) and “Global Affairs listing the

embassy address in ‘Palestine.’

” Canada’s embassy in Tel Aviv was listed as being in Palestine, rather than Israel, after Canada recognized Palestinian statehood, the

Toronto Sun reported

in September.

“But don’t worry,” wrote Lantsman. “I’m sure this is just one big, totally innocent coincidence.”

Jewish advocacy group Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) said it was “pressing the federal government for clarity and will continue advocating for full transparency and fair, consistent processes,” in

a post on X

.

“At a time when extremists have a coordinated campaign to delegitimize our community and our organizations, this development understandably raises serious concerns,” CIJA said.

Although the future of Herut Canada is up in the air, Hadida said he knows he has the support of the Jewish community. He said he will continue to work with them to keep them safe.

On Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas terrorists committed the deadliest attack on Jews since the Holocaust, murdering 1,200 people in Israel. As well as sparking a war in the Middle East, it

emboldened protesters to intimidate and target the Jewish community

in Canada and beyond, taking over

university campuses

and

parading through Jewish neighbourhoods

.

There was

an increase in antisemitic hate crimes across Canada

in 2023, compared to the previous year. The majority of hate crimes targeting a religion reported by police in 2023 (70 per cent) were directed at the Jewish community, according to Statistics Canada.

B’nai Brith Canada, a Jewish advocacy group, said 2024 was a record-breaking year,

reporting

the most antisemitic incidents — 6,219 — since it started keeping track in 1982.

Most of Hadida’s work involves organizing patrols in Jewish areas at night, during high holidays, at events, on campuses and at synagogues.

Hadida, who also runs a security company, said he must remain “steadfast” in his work, especially “until we can get a proper government in place that actually does something about it and directs the police to be able to do their job.”

“Money, no money, pennies, millions. It makes no difference to me, truly,” said Hadida. “I’m really not sure what’s going to happen (with the charity), but I can tell you for sure, the work will always continue.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Sean Feucht speaks before his performance at Ministerios Restauración in Montreal on July 25, 2025.

A Canadian Christian group is suing Quebec City under the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms after the municipality cancelled a show by U.S. Christian musician Sean Feucht.

Last summer, Feucht embarked on a tour of eastern Canada with plans to perform shows in a half a dozen locations. However, each of the six venues cancelled permits or otherwise turned him away, often citing public safety or security concerns after complaints from local residents and planned protests.

Concerts were cancelled in Charlottetown. P.E.I., Moncton, N.B., Gatineau, Que. and Vaughan, Ont., as well as Quebec City.

The City of Montreal fined a local church $2,500 for hosting a concert in a church it said did not have a permit.

A second tour of western Canada was also met with cancellations in Winnipeg and the B.C. cities of Abbotsford and Kelowna. Feucht did manage to perform in Saskatoon and on the south lawn of the Alberta Legislature in Edmonton, where he attracted large crowds and noisy protests.

The suit names as its plaintiff the Burn 24/7 Canada Worship Ministries Society, a non-profit group based in British Columbia that organized the tour. (In 2005 Feucht founded the U.S. group Burn 24/7, of which the Canadian group is an affiliate.) The group says on its website: “At the core of our ministry is the call to host extended times of worship and prayer, uniting people of every denomination to lift up the name of Jesus and intercede for their communities.”

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), which announced the court action, said in a release that on July 4, Burn 24/7 Canada signed a lease with Quebec City to hold a worship and prayer event at ExpoCité, a multi-site entertainment complex in the city.

“The organization paid the full rental fee of $2,609.93 on July 14,” it said. “However, without notice, the City cancelled the lease on July 23 — just one day before the scheduled event — claiming the presence of a ‘controversial’ artist had not been disclosed. Officials stated publicly that ExpoCité had terminated the contract after determining an ‘artist who generates significant controversy has consequences for ExpoCité’s reputation.’”

The suit, which names Feucht as a respondent, is seeking reimbursement of the $2,609.93 paid by Burn 24/7 as well as “a judicial declaration of unjustified infringement of … rights of freedom of religion, expression, opinion, peaceful assembly, and non-discrimination on the basis of religious or political opinion” and $5,000 in Charter damages under the same wording.

The allegations have not been proven in court.

Olivier Séguin, the lawyer for the plaintiff, said in a statement: “In this era of cancel culture, it’s easy to see why some private citizens might yield to public pressure. But when government officials do the same, it crosses a line. The City’s conduct is inexcusable and must be punished.”

In a video message, Séguin added: “I am sure that some of you may like (Feucht) or not like him. It doesn’t really matter what you think, what I think, what the media thinks and what the government thinks doesn’t matter at all, and that’s the whole point of what we do. Why? Because we live in a free country where we have every right to think and say what we think is right.”

Feucht, who describes himself as a missionary, author and activist, has spoken out against “gender ideology,” abortion and the LGBTQ+ community, and his religious and political views have earned the praise of U.S. President Donald Trump.

“Your faith is a force that our enemies can never ever extinguish,” Trump says in a video on Feucht’s website. “By uniting citizens of all denominations and backgrounds to promote faith and freedom in America, you are strengthening our entire nation.”

The Atlantic magazine has described Feucht as a Christian nationalist and “MAGA superstar,” writing: “Between praising President Donald Trump as God’s chosen one and suggesting that abortion supporters are ‘demons,’ Feucht has repeatedly advocated for the fusion of church and state.”

A spokesperson for the JCCF said the group is considering other legal challenges, including in Abbotsford, where it sent a warning letter to the city prior to the cancellation of the event there.

“I don’t presently have information to share on other anticipated court applications,” he said. “I do anticipate a release of information on an additional legal challenge within the next few weeks.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


A United Airlines flight made an emergency landing in St. Louis after a passenger's alleged bomb threat on Sunday morning.

A flight from Dallas to Chicago was forced to make an emergency landing in St. Louis on Sunday morning due to an alleged bomb threat, according to reports and authorities.

United Airlines Flight 380 was making its regular daily trip between Texas and Illinois when the pilot diverted to the Missouri airport about two-thirds of the way to the final destination “to address a potential security concern,” the airline told National Post in a statement.

Meanwhile, a source told the

St. Louis Post-Dispatch

that one of the passengers claimed that his wife’s luggage contained a bomb. The outlet reported that an unidentified man was arrested, though it remains unclear whether he has been formally charged or if he remains in custody.

The remaining 118 passengers and five crew aboard the 737-700 were evacuated shortly after touching down in St. Louis around 8:40 a.m., airport director Rhonda Hamm Niebruegge told the Post-Dispatch.

The aircraft remained parked on the taxiway for roughly two hours while law enforcement evaluated the situation, as reported by

Aviation A2Z.

United Airlines said law enforcement searched the aircraft but found no sign of an explosive device, allowing the passengers to reboard the plane and continue to Chicago, where they eventually landed more than five hours after their scheduled arrival.

According to People, the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department said the FBI is handling the investigation. National Post has contacted both for more information.

The incident follows another bomb threat on a United flight earlier this month.

As reported by

The Washington Post,

someone called the air traffic control tower at Virginia’s Reagan Washington National on Nov. 4, claiming that an inbound flight from Houston would explode upon landing if they didn’t deliver US$500,000 in cryptocurrency. Flights were immediately halted or diverted, but resumed within 90 minutes after law enforcement found no danger.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The Yellowknife courthouse.

An Indigenous offender who got a “huge break” when a judge gave him house arrest for sexually assaulting a woman who was celebrating her engagement to another man just got another one for violating the conditions of his sentence.

Nelson Lesage was sentenced to house arrest in July 2024 for sexually assaulting a woman while she was asleep with her fiancé at Lesage’s home in Fort Providence, N.W.T.

“He was aware, or should have been, that not being sentenced to actual incarceration was a huge break,” Northwest Territories Supreme Court Justice Louise Charbonneau wrote in a recent decision out of Yellowknife.

“Even taking into account his guilty plea, his tragic circumstances and applying the principles that govern the sentencing of Indigenous offenders, the sentence he received was outside the range of what is ordinarily imposed by this court for this type of crime.”

Then on Oct. 12, 2025, Lesage was found “passed out” at another home in Fort Providence.

“None of the house arrest exceptions applied,” Charbonneau said. “Mr. Lesage was placed under arrest and taken into custody.”

The court heard it wasn’t the first time Lesage had broken the conditions of his sentence. He was spotted at a house party this past May where alcohol was being consumed.

The judge warned Lesage that breaking the conditions of his house arrest could land him behind bars.

“In the rare occasions where a conditional sentence is imposed in this court for a serious sexual assault such as the one committed by Mr. Lesage, offenders should expect that failure to comply with the conditions will generally result in actual incarceration for the balance of the sentence, or a significant portion of it,” Charbonneau said. “This is especially so where, as here, the person has already been given a chance and a warning following compliance issues.”

Despite this, the judge didn’t sentence Lesage to jail time.

“This is a highly exceptional outcome in a situation like this, which was driven by exceptional circumstances,” Charbonneau wrote in her memorandum of judgement, dated Nov. 4.

“As I told Mr. Lesage at the conclusion of the hearing, he must understand that any further issues with compliance with the conditions of the conditional sentence order are very likely to result in his incarceration.”

Lesage’s sexual assault trial heard people were drinking alcohol at his home before the newly engaged couple went to bed fully clothed.

“At some point during the night Mr. Lesage entered the bedroom and sexually assaulted (the woman, whose identity is protected by a publication ban) while she was sleeping,” said Charbonneau’s recent decision.

“She woke up on the floor at the foot of the bed, with a blanket on top of her and her pants and underwear pulled down. She was shaken awake by Mr. Lesage. He accused another person of having raped her. He told her he had found this person in the residence.”

Her partner went looking for the alleged aggressor. Meanwhile, she realized there was semen on her pants.

“The matter was reported to the police and an investigation was undertaken,” Charbonneau said.

DNA testing “ultimately showed” Lesage was the culprit.

Both the Crown and Lesage’s defence lawyer recommended he get a two-year conditional sentence, with the first 16 months on house arrest, and two years of probation. Other conditions of the sentence include abstaining “from alcohol, drugs, and other intoxicating substances,” said the recent decision.

The sentencing judge “noted Mr. Lesage’s extensive criminal record which includes convictions for crimes of violence and, notably, a 1995 conviction for break and enter and commit sexual assault,” Charbonneau said.

“The sentencing judge underscored the need to denounce and deter sexual violence, given the prevalence of this type of crime in the Northwest Territories.”

Although the sentencing judge gave Lesage the penalty both the Crown and defence were recommending, “she did not agree with it,” Charbonneau said.

“I have reviewed the joint submission,” said the judge who sentenced Lesage for sexual assault. “It is not a sentence that I feel is an appropriate sentence for this type of offence. It is at the low end of the range of appropriate sentences for this type of offence.”

But it didn’t meet “the high standard which was set out by the Supreme Court of Canada … for rejecting joint submissions, and as such, I will impose the joint submission,” said the sentencing judge.

Lesage’s pre-sentence report revealed he “had a tragic and traumatic background. He was exposed to alcoholism, family violence, and abuse in his childhood,” it said. “The dysfunction in the home culminated in his father’s death at the hands of his mother during a party at their family home, an event that he witnessed.”

When Mounties arrested Lesage last month for breaking his sentence conditions, he “had learned that day that his mother-in-law was terminally ill and that there was no treatment that could assist her,” Charbonneau said. “My understanding is that she had been out of the jurisdiction and was being sent back to the community so she could spend her final days there. She passed away while Mr. Lesage was in custody following his arrest on the breach.”

Her funeral was to take place Oct. 25, the day after Lesage was in court for breaching the conditions of his house arrest.

“Mr. Lesage was very close to his mother-in-law. He was 19 when he began his relationship with her daughter. Her family took him in as a member of the family and his mother-in-law became like a mother to him. Given his tragic background, being integrated in his spouse’s family was very significant for him.”

Lesage told the court he broke the conditions of his house arrest after learning about his mother-in-law’s condition.

“My understanding is that he went there essentially to seek comfort and be with family members,” Charbonneau said.

“He acknowledges that he should have contacted his conditional sentence supervisor to get permission to leave his house. He also acknowledges that unfortunately, he succumbed to the temptation to turn to alcohol to cope with his emotions.”

Lesage had already been warned about breaching his sentence conditions in May, said the decision.

Both his lawyer and the Crown recommended “that there be no further consequences” for breaching the terms of his house arrest — a position Charbonneau called “extremely lenient.”

Meaningful consequences for breaking conditions of house arrest are “essential to ensure the effectiveness of this sentencing tool,” Charbonneau said. “To be effective in achieving the objectives of sentencing, these orders must have ‘teeth,’ must be closely supervised, and the offender must understand the consequences of not adhering strictly to what has been ordered. This is also essential to preserve the confidence of the public.”

Despite this, Charbonneau agreed with “counsel’s joint position that no further action should be taken in this case.”

Lesage already spent some time in jail because he broke the conditions of his house arrest, said the judge, who issued an oral order to release him on Oct. 24.

“I also took into account that Mr. Lesage’s unfortunate choice resulted in him not being able to be with his mother-in-law and family during her final days and in the days following her passing,” Charbonneau said. “This constitutes punishment in and of itself. Finally, I took into account that the funeral was to take place on October 25. Directing that Mr. Lesage be incarcerated for a portion of the remainder of his sentence, probably preventing him from attending his mother-in-law’s funeral, would, in my view, have been disproportionate and cruel.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The opening page of X is displayed on a computer and phone in Sydney, Monday, Oct. 16, 2023.

Many social media users reported Tuesday morning that X was not working, which is likely due to an issue with Cloudflare, one of the largest networks on the Internet.

Thousands of X users were affected as the site, owned by tech billionaire Elon Musk, would not load, Reuters reported. There were 12,075 reports of issues with X as of 8:37 a.m. ET, according to

outage tracker Downdetector

.

Other websites that may have also been affected by the outage include OpenAI, Spotify and dating app Grindr, as shown on Downdetector. Associated Press reported that there were also issues with Shopify, Dropbox, Coinbase, and online game League of Legends.

Cloudflare

posted online

 just before 7 a.m. ET, saying it was “experiencing an internal service degradation.”

“Some services may be intermittently impacted. We are focused on restoring service,” it said.

It also said that customers may continue to see “higher-than-normal error rates” as it continues its “remediation efforts.”

This issue was identified just after 8 a.m. ET and “a fix is being implemented.”

A Cloudflare spokesperson told

Business Insider

they noticed “unusual traffic” online for one of their services around 6:20 a.m. ET. “We are all hands on deck to make sure all traffic is served without errors. After that, we will turn our attention to investigating the cause of the unusual spike in traffic,” the spokesperson said.

Cloudflare is used by millions of websites around the world to “protect websites against hackers and fake traffic, and to make web pages faster,” per Business Insider.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


In the first eight months of 2025, Canada experienced a drop in asylum claims from from all countries, except for those from Haiti, which went up by 130 per cent.

More Canadian residents distrust refugees than trust them, with the lowest levels of trust in refugees expressed by immigrants and non-whites, according to a new national public opinion poll.

The polling data comes as recent changes in the federal government’s immigration policies designed to reduce new arrivals in Canada seems to be hitting refugee claimants the hardest.

Among all respondents to the poll, conducted by Leger Marketing for the Association for Canadian Studies, 43 per cent said they distrusted refugees and 36 per cent said they trusted refugees. Another 21 per cent said they didn’t know or declined to answer.

The poll also found that more respondents trusted immigrants than distrusted them, a result suggesting Canadians have distinct views of different types of new arrivals to the country: 46 per cent of respondents said they trusted immigrants and 37 per cent said they distrusted them, while 17 per cent didn’t know or didn’t answer.

A refugee is someone who is fleeing their home country seeking protection from war, violence or persecution. An immigrant is someone who moves to another country to settle permanently.

The poll indicating lower trust in those arriving as refugee claimants over those arriving as immigrant applicants reflects a disproportionate drop in those seeking asylum in Canada, according to an analysis of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada data by the Association for Canadian Studies that accompanies the poll results.

In the first eight months of 2025, compared to the same period in 2024, refugee claimants to Canada plummeted by 32.7 per cent while economic immigrants dropped by 18.6 per cent and family sponsorship immigrants dropped by 8.1 per cent, the analysis says.

Those percentages correspond to a decline in the number of immigrants entering the system of 16,700 refugee claimants, 39,245 economic immigrants, and 5,635 family sponsorship immigrants.

“The numbers of asylum claimants has gone into a veritable free fall,” the analysis says.

The drop in asylum claims from migrants seeking refugee protection is distributed among all countries, except for Haiti.

Asylum claims by people arriving from Haiti — which is experiencing significant gang violence, civil unrest, and poverty — increased by 130 per cent. At the same time, asylum claims dropped, for example, by people from Bangladesh (82 per cent), Sri Lanka (79 per cent), Ghana (68 per cent), and India (59 per cent).

The analysis also shows a massive drop in airport asylum claims of 76 per cent in the first eight months of this year over the same period last year. There was a 27 per cent drop in inland claims and 62 per cent increase in land border claims.

Jack Jedwab, president of the Montreal-based Association for Canadian Studies, sees a connection between dropping refugee claims and the poll’s finding of distrust for refugees.

“There was considerable asymmetry to the cuts to overall immigration that saw much larger percentages in reductions to refugees over the 2024 to 2025 period,” Jedwab said. “It seems as though many Canadians believe that there are many asylum claims that are not legitimate, thus fuelling greater distrust in refugees.

“In previous surveys we’ve done there was much less dissonance and lesser distinction in either trust or positive sentiment towards immigrants and refugees, but we’re now seeing a widening gap between the two, owing, in my view, to a growing perception that many claims are not valid and thus raising questions about the admission process.”

Perhaps counterintuitively, trust in refugees was lower among respondents who identified themselves as immigrants (28 per cent) than non-immigrants (38 per cent). Trust for refugees was also lower among non-white respondents (26 per cent) than whites (39 per cent).

Immigrant respondents had only slightly more trust in other immigrants (47 per cent) than non-immigrants did (45 per cent).

On the survey question about trusting refugees: More men than women said they distrust refugees (49 per cent versus 36 per cent, with a higher percentage of women declining to answer). The youngest (ages 18 to 24) and the oldest (age 65 and over) tended to trust refugees the most, but, overall, age divisions didn’t show wide variation.

On the question about trusting immigrants, demographic patterns of respondents were similar: More men than women said they distrust immigrants (41 per cent versus 34 per cent, and, again, a higher percentage of women declined to answer). The youngest and oldest showed the highest levels of trust in immigrants.

Geographically, trust in refugees was lowest in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, which are pooled together by the pollsters, at 31 per cent, and Ontario at 33 per cent; trust in refugees was highest in Quebec and Alberta, both at 42 per cent.

Trust in immigrants was lowest in Manitoba and Saskatchewan (37 per cent) and in Quebec (41 per cent), and highest in Atlantic Canada (53 per cent) and Alberta (50 per cent).

International students were trusted by 44 per cent of respondents while distrusted by 35 per cent. Distrust was again higher among men (41 per cent) than among women (29 per cent) with more women not providing an answer.

Refugee advocates said polling data should be approached with caution.

“We regularly see that polls produce different results depending on how the question is framed, and people’s answers are also impacted by the narratives they see being replicated in the media and by political leaders,” said Gauri Sreenivasan, a co-executive director of the Canadian Council for Refugees, a long-time refugee advocacy organization.

“Canadians consistently place a high value on welcoming newcomers and a culture of inclusion,” Sreenivasan said. “We call on our political leaders not to divide us through messages that pit communities against each other. We need to work together to secure a future where every family has safety.”

Adam Sadinsky, an advocacy co-chair for the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers and a Toronto-are lawyer at Silcoff Shacter, said a robust refugee determination system protecting those in need is important to meet Canada’s international and constitutional obligations.

“In recent years we have seen politicians and others use untrue or misleading rhetoric to divide and confuse the public on the issue of immigration. Canada’s immigration system has multiple equal objectives, including economic immigration, family reunification, and refugee protection.”

The online poll questioned 1,537 adults in Canada from Oct. 24 to 26. As a non-probability sample in a panel survey traditional margins of error do not apply. For comparison purposes, a probability sample of the same size would have a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 per cent, 19 times out of 20.

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | X:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Two elderly B.C. men were sentenced for sexual crimes involving children recently.

Warning: This story contains disturbing details

A pair of B.C. men in their 80s found guilty of sexual crimes involving children were sentenced to prison time recently — one a former elementary school teacher who assaulted multiple male students more than 40 years ago, the other a man caught with more than 60,000 images and videos of child pornography.

Last week, a provincial court judge in Vancouver handed down

an eight-year federal sentence

to 85-year-old Brian Melicke Moore for sexually interfering with 12 boys between 1976 and 1982, despite defence counsel making a plea for their client, “an old and frail man”, to receive a conditional sentence allowing him to serve his time under house arrest at a long-term care facility.

Meanwhile, in October, a Supreme Court judge in Victoria meted out

a custodial sentence of two years less a day

to William Lee Tate, 82, whom police found in possession of 60,491 unique images and 2,272 unique videos depicting the “violent sexual abuse of prepubescent girls, some of them infants.”

‘Insistence on nudity’

According to a decision published on Nov. 12, Moore was a popular Grade 6 teacher at an unnamed North Vancouver school in the 1970s, and often invited male students on activities outside of school, such as swimming and water and snow skiing.

“He even let the young boys steer his unique sports car in the SFU (Simon Fraser University) parking lot after swimming,” judge Robert Hamilton wrote.

“These were fun activities and the students enjoyed participating in these activities and the special attention from Mr. Moore.”

Some boys, with the blessing of their parents, even spent weekends away with Moore, where they learned of “his insistence on nudity,” requiring them to change in front of him and sleep naked.

“Invariably, Mr. Moore was also naked in the bed with the child he chose to sleep next,” the judge explained.

While in bed with the boys, he would touch their genitalia and force them to touch his.

Moore retired from teaching in 1982 after three of the victims came forward and he was confronted about the allegations. Police became involved in 1988, but it was decided at the time there wasn’t enough evidence for the Crown to move forward with charges.

Two more victims came forward 34 years later in June 2022, prompting police to launch an investigation that ultimately led to charges of indecent assault against the former students and one charge of touching for a sexual purpose involving the eight-year-old son of close friends, a boy who regarded Moore as a grandfather figure.

Following a 31-day trial that concluded in April, Moore was convicted on eight charges of sexual interference against eight victims and touching.

In determining a fit sentence for his crimes, in addition to mitigating and aggravating factors, Hamilton also had to consider Moore’s deteriorating health and his “rapidly increasing need for assistance in meeting his activities of daily living and his ongoing medical needs.”

A medical assessment supplied as evidence shows he has heart disease, late-stage kidney failure, along with a host of other conditions, and has had cancer three times (bladder, nasal and lymphoma).

Given all that, his lawyers argued that his “exceptional” circumstances warranted a conditional sentence followed by three years of probation.

Hamilton, however, said such a sentence “would fall woefully short of meeting the fundamental purposes and principles of sentencing an offender who repeatedly took advantage of his position as the teacher of his victims or the friend of the family of his last victim.”

Saying he was confident Moore’s medical needs could be met while incarcerated, the judge sided with the Crown, which had asked for 16 years reduced by half when factoring in Moore’s health.

Because he selected and “groomed” his victims, Hamilton said Moore’s blameworthiness was “extremely high” and his sentence had to reflect a strong “denunciation” of the crimes.

“Other like-minded adults who sexually offend against a child must know that they will receive a significant jail sentence if they are caught,” he write.

“The point here is that knowing of the serious consequence they face if they commit that offence will deter that person from committing the crime.”

The decision also noted that Moore is facing three civil lawsuits stemming from his offences — one from the victims, a complainant not involved in his case and the North Vancouver School District.

‘Human nature at its cruellest and most malevolent’

The investigation into Tate began in October 2019 when the U.S.-based Child Protection Service alerted Victoria police that an IP address linked to him was sharing a “large volume of child sexual abuse material” through a peer-to-peer network.

“That IP address was in the top 10 uploaders and sharers of child pornography in the Greater Victoria area,” Justice Gareth Morley wrote in his Oct. 24 sentencing decision.

When police searched his home in February 2022, they uncovered the images and the videos — which had a total run time of 5,742 hours and 54 minutes — on electronic storage devices.

“The images and videos show human nature at its cruellest and most malevolent directed against the most vulnerable,” the judge noted.

“In the inadequate language we must use in the sentencing of child pornography offences, this collection is at the high end of the spectrum both in quantity and in terms of the extreme violence and immorality of what is depicted.

Tate, who admitted to possessing the content, pleaded guilty to one count of possessing child pornography and one count of transmitting child pornography earlier this year in court.

His lawyer was seeking a conditional sentence to be served under house arrest in the community, whereas the Crown asked the judge to apply a custodial sentence.

Morley, said that while Tate’s age and guilty plea are mitigating factors, the size and nature of his collection are “overwhelming aggravating factors.”

The judge also noted that Tate minimized his conduct, denied sexual interest in children and offered implausible explanations like not being aware that possessing child pornography was illegal and that he collected it “as part of a research project.”

“He is either lying to himself or to the court,” Morley wrote.”Either way, I do not see any serious expression of remorse.”

Like Hamilton in Moore’s case, Morley said a conditional sentence wouldn’t meet the need to denunciate such crimes.

Tate got 18 months behind bars for the possession charge and two years less a day for the transmission, which the judge allowed to be served concurrently, thereby avoiding federal prison time.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Heffel Fine Art Auction House President David Heffel, right, and Vice President Robert Heffel next to Winston Churchill's “Marrakech“ painting, estimated to sell for $400,000 to $600,000. COURTESY OF HEFFEL

When the entire fine art collection of the bankrupt Hudson’s Bay Company goes under the auctioneer’s gavel on Wednesday, it will include major works worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

It includes paintings Canadians will recognize from HBC calendars and advertisements, grand scenes of pioneering explorations of the rugged Canadian landscape to the far north and west, including a painting of an HBC branded birchbark canoe descending rapids on the Fraser River, a portrait of Rear Admiral Lord Horatio Nelson painted two years after his death at the Battle of Trafalgar, and various historical scenes of the iconic HBC multi-coloured stripes keeping people warm out in the wilderness.

But one small painting stands out among them, not primarily for its artistic quality, and not for its subject matter of palm trees in Marrakesh, Morocco, but for the identity of the painter.

Sir Winston Churchill was out of political office, with his greatest challenges and victories as a wartime British Prime Minister still ahead of him, when he took a painting holiday through North Africa in 1935, travelling from Cairo through Tunis to Casablanca and on to Marrakesh, his first visit to Morocco.

“Here in these spacious palm groves rising from the desert, the traveller may rest assured that he will never find the world dull,” Churchill wrote in The Daily Mail on his return to London.

The Churchill painting is the centrepiece of this unusually poignant art auction taking place in Toronto on Wednesday afternoon, the liquidation of the Bay’s fine art collection.

No company occupies a more prominent place in Canadian history. From its origins as a 17th century New World fur trading mission to its modern place atop Canadian retail, HBC had centuries to collect fine art through gifts, purchases and commissions.

Many of these artworks hung in the company headquarters just north of Toronto’s financial district. Now they are on display in the Heffel Fine Art Auction House properties in Yorkville, awaiting their bids.

One famous piece, also for sale, captured a rainy evening streetscape from a bygone age of men in top hats and police officers in capes. Painted by Frederic Marlett Bell-Smith in 1894, Lights of a City Street shows the richly detailed view east from Toronto’s Yonge Street along King Street toward the spire of the Cathedral Church of St. James, which still stands today. The painting used to be owned by Robert Simpson Company, which the Bay bought in 1978 and operated as Simpson’s for another decade or so.

On a tour of the offerings, auction house executive Robert Heffel pointed out that many of the characters’ faces are based on people in Bell-Smith’s family.

Apart from this auction, Heffel is also selling many lesser items, including wool coats in the HBC striped pattern and official Olympic gear from Games past, many of them signed by athletes.

As the big ticket item, the Churchill presents a rare opportunity to buy a painting by the man who defeated the Nazis, and who is remembered today almost as much for his aphorisms, such as “if you are going through hell, keep going.”

Churchill was an avid painter, and his catalogue includes many scenes from the south of France and Italy, but he did not share them or give them away except in unusual circumstances. For example, the only painting he completed during the Second World War was also done in Marrakesh, a view of the tower of the Koutoubia Mosque painted during the Casablanca Conference in 1943. He gave that to U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

But most he gave to his wife, Lady Clementine Ogilvy Spencer-Churchill.

Churchill had family ties to the Hudson’s Bay Company going through his ancestor John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough, a British army officer who was the Company’s third governor. So after the Second World War in 1954, in recognition of Winston Churchill’s new status as an pre-eminent global statesman, the Hudson’s Bay Company gave him the honorary title of Grand Seigneur of the Company of Adventurers of England Trading into Hudson’s Bay.

It was in recognition of this honour that he decided to give the Bay the Marrakesh painting he had previously given to Lady Churchill. It has been in their collection ever since. It is expected to fetch as much as $600,000.

Barry Phipps, an art historian and fellow of Churchill College at the University of Cambridge describes the painting as a turning point in Churchill’s artistic development, away from the muted tones of the scenes he had painted in Europe toward a more “saturated” colour palette influenced by Morocco’s light, executed with a “confident yet unpretentious hand.”

 More of the paintings from the Hudson’s Bay Company collection to be auctioned by Heffel. COURTESY OF HEFFEL

Other parts of HBC are also in the process of being sold, under court supervision.

On Friday, an Ontario judge decided that several large commercial landlords for HBC’s former stores would not be forced to accept a $69-million bid from British Columbia businesswoman Ruby Liu to take over the Bay’s leases, with the intention of running a department store chain named after herself. The judge cited “significant concerns” about her ability to meet the terms of the leases.

Also on Friday came word of a bid for the Hudson’s Bay Company’s 1670 Royal Charter, a document signed by King Charles II that granted a trading monopoly over all lands that drain into Hudson Bay. Sponsored jointly by the Weston and Thomson families, both major names in Canadian business, the $18-million bid would see the document preserved and shared among four museums for rotating public display.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney exits the House of Commons after attending Question Period on Parliament Hill on November 17, 2025 in Ottawa, Canada.

OTTAWA — The Liberals managed to secure one more vote to prevent a snap election.

Green Party Leader Elizabeth May announced on Monday that she will be voting for Prime Minister Mark Carney’s budget after hearing a clear commitment from him that his government will respect Canada’s international commitments to reduce emissions.

In a rare move, May directly challenged Carney in the House of Commons on Monday on the lack of mention of those targets and Carney responded.

“I can confirm to this House that we will respect our Paris commitments for climate change, and we’re determined to achieve them,” said Carney.

May had

previously said he would be voting against the budget

as it was written, but that she was open to negotiating with the Liberal government to find a path forward. She said that an oral commitment to respect and achieve those targets was enough to vote “yes.”

“Without what I heard from the Prime Minister today, I would have voted ‘no,’” she said.

May said she also came to this decision after hearing overwhelmingly from her constituents that they do not want an election to happen by “accident.”

“Maybe I’m a fool. I’ll leave that for history to decide. But I did what I thought was right,” she said.

All eyes will be on the House of Commons around 6:45 p.m. for the third and final confidence vote on the main motion of the budget. If it passes, MPs will carry on their business undisturbed. If it is defeated, Canadians are headed to a Christmas election.

The minority Liberals have 170 seats, but they can only count on 169, as Liberal MP and House Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia will only be called to vote if there is a tie. The party’s whip, Mark Gerretsen, told CBC that all Liberals will be in the House in-person for the vote.

With May’s vote, that number will go back to 170.

The rest of the opposition MPs, on the other hand, have a total of 172 votes. The opposition parties could easily defeat the government’s budget and force Canadians into a second election this year if they vote against but not all MPs on the opposition benches are on the same page.

The Bloc Québécois has already said that their 22 MPs would be all voting against.

The NDP had still not come to a decision as of Monday morning. Their seven MPs held a caucus meeting in the morning to discuss their decision. There is a chance that some of them vote either in favour or against the budget, while others abstain from the vote.

NDP leadership candidate Heather McPherson would not say how she will be voting.

“You’ll see soon,” she simply said earlier in the day.

Interim NDP Leader Don Davies is expected to speak to the media only after the vote.

The Conservatives have also said they would be voting against, but it is unclear if all of their 143 MPs will be casting a vote. On Monday, Conservative MPs who stopped to speak with reporters would not say if all their colleagues would be voting or if a few would abstain.

“I don’t know. I know I’m voting against it,” said Saskatchewan MP Kevin Waugh.

“I only worry about Kevin,” he added.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


In this photo provided by the Japan Self-Defense Forces Akita Camp, Self-Defense forces personnel unload a bear cage from a military truck in JSDF Akita Camp, Akita, northern Japan, Oct. 30, 2025.

The government of Canada has updated its travel advice for Canadians visiting Japan, warning of bears in the northern region of the country.

On the

travel page for Japan

, between warnings of tensions on the Korean peninsula and a slight increase in the crime rate, is a section labelled “Bears.”

“There is an increased presence of bears in northern Japan, including in Akita, Niigata, Hokkaido prefectures,” the warning states. “Bears have been sighted in urban areas, including resorts and hiking trails. Some encounters have resulted in casualties.”

It adds: “If you plan on visiting northern Japan: Always be aware of your surroundings and stay vigilant. Avoid walking alone in areas where bears have been sighted. Follow the warnings or alerts issued by local authorities.” The page includes

advice related to brown bears

from a website run by the Hokkaido government.

Japan has also taken note of the problem of bear encounters. The newspaper

Mainichi noted

that there have been a record 13 deaths caused by bears this year between April and Nov. 5, up from five in the previous year.

The government estimates there are some

54,000 bears

in the country.

Asiatic black bears, also known as moon bears, can be found throughout the country. Brown bears are only found in Hokkaido, the northernmost of Japan’s four main islands.

Rules were amended in September, allowing Japanese municipalities to commission hunters for “emergency shootings” of dangerous animals that entered populated areas. Police officers were also given permission to kill bears, where previously they would merely evacuate local residents and patrol school routes where bears had been seen.

On Friday, those rules were

further expanded

. To address a shortage of skilled hunters, the government moved to encourage retired police officers and former military personnel to obtain hunting licenses to help out.

Media reports note that the increase in bear attacks has been accompanied by a spate of fake AI-generated images, including videos of a horde of bears destroying solar panels at a power facility, and a bear snatching a pet dog.

Some of the videos analyzed by the non-profit Japan Fact-Check Center showed watermarks of the Sora video generator developed by OpenAI. Experts say the clips are crude but that people could be taken in when they are among a flood of short videos.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.