LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

A protester, left, repeating “Heil, heil, heil” follows Dan Goldstein as he walks past an anti-Israel rally in Halifax on Aug. 6, in this image taken from a video.

A Montreal lawyer has filed a hate crime complaint after he and his wife, both Jewish, were confronted by a demonstrator at a Palestinian rally calling out “Heil, heil, heil” at them during their visit to Halifax.

Dan Goldstein, 51, had travelled from Montreal with his wife, Liat Lev-Ary, to visit Nova Scotia, and on Aug. 6, after touring the Halifax Public Gardens, they went for lunch. They followed their phone’s map to get to a restaurant, Goldstein said.

“It took us right through the rally,” he said in an interview.

A video taken by Lev-Ary on her phone shows protesters holding signs, waving Palestinian flags, and sidewalk chalk messages calling for immigration officials to bring Palestinian families to Canada because of the ongoing Israel-Hamas war in Gaza.

Not shy about expressing his opinions either, Goldstein can be heard saying “Remember the Bibas family, don’t forget them with the people of Gaza. And don’t forget the hostages,” as he walked along the sidewalk passing the demonstrators. It set off a loud retort, including chants of “Free, free Palestine.”

(The Bibas are a Jewish family of four kidnapped from their home in a kibbutz in Israel during the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas and held hostage. The father was eventually released but the mother and their two young children were killed.)

The video by Lev-Ary shows energetic banter between Goldstein and numerous demonstrators. He said the debate was fine, at first.

“They started shouting things like Israel is committing genocide. I disagree, but there’s nothing illegitimate about (saying) that. That’s up for debate. There’s all kinds of comments regarding Israel that, again, are within the realm of what’s acceptable and legitimate.”

Then it changed for Goldstein. A man carrying several Palestinian flags walked up close to the couple.

“This one guy comes up to us and he looks at us and he goes: ‘Heil, heil, heil.’ Now that is very clearly — because there’s no reason for a person to start invoking a German word like that — a reference to the National Socialist ideology… It was part and parcel of that movement. It’s said while giving the Nazi salute and it’s an endorsement of Nazi ideology and (Hitler’s) ‘Final Solution’ to exterminate all Jews,” Goldstein said.

He then calls both Goldstein and Lev-Ary a “f—king piece of shit.”

Although he is a secular Jew, Goldstein said it would be obvious to assume he was Jewish because he had a baseball cap on from a Yiddish theatre festival that included Hebrew lettering.

He said he saw two Halifax police officers standing on the other side of the road and he went to them to report a hate crime over the “Heil” statements, but the officers seemed unmoved by his complaint; he said they asked him how that could be a hate crime.

“Do you not know what saying ‘Heil’ to a Jew means? And they said no,” Goldstein said. He said a third officer arrived asking what was going on. Goldstein repeated his story and pointed out the man to the officers, asking that he be arrested or at least spoken to and identified.

The video shows Goldstein across the road, standing with two officers beside three police cruisers. He is pointing towards the demonstrators but what they say cannot be heard.

Goldstein said the officers declined to act, but told him to file a complaint at a police station. The third officer who arrived was belligerent, Goldstein said.

“He’s yelling at me. He’s calling me a racist. He’s saying that I’m just doing it because the first officer I spoke to was a person of colour. And he’s not letting me talk, he’s just yelling at me,” Goldstein said.

Goldstein and Lev-Ary left, went to a police station and filed a hate crime complaint, he said. He found his follow-up discussions with other police officers better. They seemed to take his complaint seriously, he said.

Halifax Regional Police said they could not provide comment or information about this case prior to publishing deadline because of stretched resources from a wildfire approaching a Halifax business park about 10 kilometres west of downtown.

Goldstein said he is disappointed with the response of the first police officers he spoke to at the scene but appreciated the follow-up by other officers. He provided police with the video and hopes they proceed with an investigation.

He is also upset by the protester’s actions.

“I take extreme issue with a lot of the things that Israel is doing at this point in Gaza,” Goldstein said. “On the one hand I’m familiar with genocide, I don’t consider it a genocide. But on a very objective level, there are war crimes that are being committed and I am very frustrated.”

He said legitimate criticism of Israel is being quashed by rampant antisemitism.

“There’s a lot of misinformation and lies, but there are certainly things that are wrong that people have the right to — and even should be — speaking out against. That wasn’t my issue. My issue is the blatant antisemitism that has permeated these things.

“Hearing somebody come up to me and go “Heil” is very — I can’t think of other words — but it shakes me to my core because for me it’s the fact that yeah, it’s 80 years later, but I don’t have family because (several ancestors died in Europe during the Nazi Holocaust).

“They were exterminated and the two that survived, one never had kids and the other one had one child who passed away, and my family never recovered. We’re without family because of the people giving the Nazi salute and shouting ‘Heil.’”

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | X:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


ABC's Jimmy Kimmel Live! stars Jimmy Kimmel.

American TV host and comedian Jimmy Kimmel revealed that he has Italian citizenship while talking about Americans fleeing the country, on his recent participation on The Sarah Silverman Podcast.

During the podcast episode, Silverman, a fellow comedian, was talking about how a lot of people she knows are thinking about which countries they could get citizenship from in order to leave the U.S. over unhappiness with U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration.

That is when Kimmel said he had Italian citizenship.

“I did get Italian citizenship. I do have that,” Kimmel said. “What’s going on is … as bad as you thought it was gonna be, it’s so much worse. It’s just unbelievable. I feel like it’s probably even worse than (Trump) would like it to be.”

Kimmel has been a longtime critic of the Trump administration and has attended protests against Trump this year.

Despite that, Kimmel also said that he believes that people who once supported Trump and have now changed their minds should not be condemned.

“The door needs to stay open,” Kimmel said. “If you want to change your mind, that’s so hard to do. If you want to admit you were wrong, that’s so hard and so rare to do, you are welcome.”

This comes almost a month after CBS announced “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” got cancelled, and Trump suggested that Kimmel was next.

“I absolutely love that Colbert got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings. I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next. Has even less talent than Colbert! Greg Gutfeld is better than all of them combined, including the Moron on NBC who ruined the once great Tonight Show,” Trump said on a post on Truth Social.

(The Tonight Show is hosted by Jimmy Fallon.)

To that, Kimmel posted on Instagram “I’m hearing you’re next. Or maybe it’s just another wonderful secret.” This refers to Trump’s relation to Jeffrey Epstein, and the phrase he wrote to Epstein on his 50th birthday in 2003.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Air Canada flight attendants held actions at airports in Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver, and Calgary (pictured) to raise awareness among Canadians about ongoing issues related to their working conditions on Monday, Aug. 11, 2025.

The union representing Air Canada’s flight attendants gave notice of a strike early Wednesday, leaving the plans of many travellers up in the air. A strike could occur on Saturday.

The airline then issued lockout notice, which it said in

a news release

was to “mitigate the strike’s customer impact” and “allow orderly shutdown.” Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge flights are being “gradually suspended over the next 72 hours.”

The Air Canada Component of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) represents 10,000 flight attendants. Its president, Wesley Lesosky, said in a news release that it has put forward “solid, data-driven proposals on wages and unpaid work, all rooted in fairness and industry standards.”

“Air Canada’s response to our proposals makes one thing clear: they are not interested in resolving these critical issues,” he said.

President and chief executive of Air Canada Michael Rousseau

said

the airline regrets the impact a disruption will have on customers, stakeholders and communities it serves.

“However, the disappointing conduct of CUPE’s negotiators and the union’s stated intention to launch a strike puts us in a position where our only responsible course of action is to provide certainty by implementing an orderly suspension of Air Canada’s and Air Canada Rouge’s operations through a lockout,” said Rousseau.

“As we have seen elsewhere in our industry with other labour disruptions, unplanned or uncontrolled shutdowns, such as we are now at risk of through a strike, can create chaos for travellers that is far, far worse.”

 Air Canada flight attendants held actions at airports in Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver and Calgary (pictured) to raise awareness among Canadians about ongoing issues related to their working conditions on Monday, Aug. 11, 2025.

Is your Air Canada flight impacted?

Customers should check to see if their flights are confirmed before going to the airport, the airline says. If a flight is not confirmed, travellers should not go to the airport.

“The first flights will be cancelled August 14, with more on August 15, with a complete cessation of flying by Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge on August 16,” according to an Air Canada news release.

Air Canada Express flights, the airlines’ regional flights, are not affected.

The union said it does not want a travel disruption of any duration, CUPE spokesperson Hugh Pouliot told National Post in an emailed statement on Wednesday.

“The union’s goal is to achieve a fair contract and avert a disruption at Air Canada,” he said. “Flight attendants love their jobs, and they want to be operating those flights and welcoming the public onboard. The last thing our members want is to be on strike or locked out.”

Air Canada did not immediately return National Post’s request for comment.

 Air Canada flight attendants protest what they call “poverty wages” and unpaid labour when working on a plane when it’s not in the air, at Trudeau Airport in Dorval on Monday, Aug. 11, 2025.

Will you get a refund for a cancelled Air Canada flight?

Yes, according to the airline, customers whose flights are cancelled “will be notified and can obtain a full refund.”

Air Canada

said in a news release on Wednesday

that customers who have a flight booked between Aug. 15 and Aug. 18 and would like to make other travel plans can change their flight for free if the ticket was purchased (or Aeroplan points were redeemed for the flight) no later than Aug. 13.

Anyone scheduled to travel between Aug. 15 and Aug. 18 can change their flight for free to another date between Aug. 21 and Sept. 12.

“If you purchased a non-refundable fare, you may cancel your itinerary and receive the value of your ticket … to use on your next Air Canada booking,” says the airline.

“If your flight is cancelled, we will do our very best to rebook you on the first available flight, exploring options with over 120 international and domestic carriers. As we are in peak summer travel season, we know that space will still be very limited. If your travel is disrupted, you can always choose a refund.”

 Air Canada flight attendants protest what they call “poverty wages” and unpaid labour when working on a plane when it’s not in the air, at Trudeau Airport in Dorval on Monday, Aug. 11, 2025.

When was the last time Air Canada flight attendants went on strike?

More than 3,000 Air Canada flight attendants, members of the Canadian Air Line Flight Attendants’ Association, went on strike over a dispute about wages in August 1985, the

New York Times reported

.

The airline did want to have any travel disruptions so it ended up training 1,800 management personnel and university students as substitutes, per the Times. They received six to 10 days of training. The union argued that this would be a safety hazard. The head of the union told the publication that nothing “compensates for experience in emergency situations.”

“After the way Air Canada has stressed safety, I can’t believe they took secretaries and students and trained them for six hours and are saying it’s safe,” said Pamela Bartlett, who was a veteran flight attendant for the airline when the strike started in 1985, the Montreal Gazette reported.

The airline maintained that the training course met government standards.

After a six-week strike, flight attendants went back to work in October 1985 after reaching a contract settlement, per the Gazette. It was the first strike for flight attendants in the airline’s history.

As part of the deal, flight attendants would work up to 80 hours a month, rather than the previous 75. Although salary would remain the same for the first year, flight attendants would receive a lump sum payment of $900 to $1,000 — or between approximately $2,348 to $2,870 today, according to the Bank of Canada’s inflation calculator.

The airline and the union agreed to a wage increase of 3 per cent in the second and third years.

In 1997, flight attendants for Air Ontario (formerly Great Lakes Airlines, now Air Canada Jazz,

per the London Free Press

) went on strike for 11 weeks, the Montreal Gazette reported.

Lisa Hutchinson, a union spokeswoman at the time, told the Gazette that flight attendants “made some gains in wages and working conditions.” Under the previous deal, attendants could work up to 15 hours a day on nine flights. The new deal offered a slightly shorter work day of 14 hours and eight flights.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


An image of retired Israel Defence Forces General Noam Tibon from the film The Road Between Us: The Ultimate Rescue, directed by Barry Avrich.

The Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) has sparked anger from filmmakers and Jewish groups after rescinding an invitation for a documentary about the October 7 attacks by Hamas terrorists, citing legal and safety concerns surrounding the project.

The film in question, The Road Between Us: The Ultimate Rescue, was produced by

Melbar Entertainment Group

 and directed by Canadian filmmaker Barry Avrich. It tells the story of retired Israel Defence Forces General Noam Tibon, who raced an hour and a half from Tel Aviv to save his son Amir’s family in Kibbutz Nahal Oz near Gaza on October 7.

“This film is not about politics, it’s about humanity, family and sacrifice,” Avrich

told Deadline magazine

last year when the film, then titled To the Last Breath, was in pre-production. “In one day, one extraordinary man reversed the fate of his family and inspired the world. We look forward to working with Noam and his family to document this jaw-dropping story.”

In a recent statement to Deadline and others, TIFF said the filmmakers did not secure “legal clearance of all footage,” which was among the conditions the festival requested to mitigate “known risks around the screening of a film about highly sensitive subject matter, including potential threat of significant disruption.”

The filmmaking team and others are decrying what they see as censorship by the festival, and a possible desire to avoid images of disruptions in and around screenings.

“We are shocked and saddened that a venerable film festival has defied its mission and censored its own programming by refusing this film,” Avrich’s team said in a statement to National Post. “Ultimately, film is an art form that stimulates debate from every perspective that can both entertain us and make us uncomfortable. A film festival lays out the feast and the audience decides what they will or won’t see.”

The team added: “We are not political filmmakers, nor are we activists; we are storytellers. We remain defiant, we will release the film, and we invite audiences, broadcasters, and streamers to make up their own mind, once they have seen it.”

The Times of Israel

, citing sources close to the film’s production, said the reason for the cancellation was that the filmmakers had not received explicit permission to use videos taken by Hamas terrorists during the attack, and livestreamed at the time.

“The topic of creators’ rights is something I work with regularly,” said Talia Harris Ram, a producer on the film, per the Times. “There’s no legal problem with showing these clips, which were already streamed live on October 7. From an intellectual property standpoint, they are clearly in the public domain.”

Canada’s Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) said in its own statement: “It is unconscionable that TIFF is allowing a small mob of extremists — who use intimidation and threats of violence — to dictate what films Canadians can see at the festival.” It added: “This shameful decision sends an unmistakable message: Toronto’s Jewish community, which has long played an integral role at TIFF, is no longer safe or welcome.”

In an email sent to tens of thousands of Canadian Jewish community members and allies on Wednesday, the CIJA called on supporters to contact TIFF CEO Cameron Bailey and urge him to reverse the decision and include The Road Between Us in the festival program. “It is a stain on the festival’s reputation and a blow to the values Canadians hold dear,” the email said.

The group Canadian Women Against Antisemitism has also

released a statement

on social media, calling on supporters to demand that TIFF reverse its decision, and to “tell Ontario and Canada: No more funding for cultural capitulation.” (The provincial and federal government are both TIFF sponsors.)

TIFF released the following statement: “The invitation for the Canadian documentary film The Road Between Us: The Ultimate Rescue was withdrawn by TIFF because general requirements for inclusion in the Festival, and conditions that were requested when the film was initially invited, were not met, including legal clearance of all footage.

”The purpose of the requested conditions was to protect TIFF from legal implications and to allow TIFF to manage and mitigate anticipated and known risks around the screening of a film about highly sensitive subject matter, including potential threat of significant disruption.

“As per our terms and conditions for participation in the Festival, TIFF may disqualify from participation in the Festival any Film that TIFF determines in its sole and absolute discretion would not be in TIFF’s best interest to include in the Festival.”

Last year the film

Russians at War

was denounced as Russian propaganda by Ukrainian groups, then-Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland and others. TIFF defended its inclusion in the festival, but then cancelled screenings and ultimately gave the film a limited release only after the festival ended.

A screening of TIFF’s opening-night film Nutcrackers by David Gordon Green

also saw protests

against the festival’s bank partner Royal Bank of Canada for its ties to Israel.

TIFF this year runs from Sept. 4 to 14 at the Lightbox and other nearby locations in downtown Toronto.


Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner holds a news conference in Ottawa, Friday, Feb. 21, 2025.

OTTAWA — An Alberta Conservative MP is blaming the Liberal government for

a pair of contentious provincial bans

on outdoor activities, saying federal officials didn’t do enough to stave off tinder dry conditions in Atlantic Canada.

Michelle Rempel Garner told reporters in Ottawa that years of Liberal inaction on wildfire preparedness forced Nova Scotia and New Brunswick to take the unprecedented action of

closing off wooded areas

to the public.

“Four full wildfire seasons ago, the Liberals promised more water bombers, more firefighters. Where are they?” said Rempel Garner, referring to a

2021 Liberal campaign promise

to dedicate $500 million to community firefighting.

“(W)henever there’s a major crisis, what the Liberal government has done by their inaction has conditioned Canadians to expect that the only response they can see … is to restrict their movement,” she continued.

Rempel Garner wouldn’t say whether she objected to the provincial bans themselves.

She made the comments at an unrelated announcement on proposed criminal code reforms for non-resident offenders.

The sweeping provincial forest bans have divided conservatives along both regional and ideological lines, with some drawing drawing comparisons to COVID restrictions.

Ontario MP Leslyn Lewis, for example,

speculated on social media

that the bans could spiral into broader lockdowns.

“While the government says this is to prevent forest fires, the approach has left many feeling discouraged, disconnected, and wondering if there’s a bigger purpose at play,” tweeted Lewis.

Other Conservatives, such as ex-national campaign manager Fred DeLorey have defended the measures.

DeLorey, who is from Nova Scotia, wrote in

a recent Substack post

that the province’s forest ban was the product of “hard-earned wisdom.”

“Here’s the problem: Nova Scotia is built differently than the rest of the country … When conditions are this dry, even low-risk activity becomes high-stakes,” wrote DeLorey.

DeLorey is a close ally of Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston, who last week announced a 12-week ban on entering the woods,

carrying a fine of $25,000

.

New Brunswick Premier Susan Holt followed Houston’s lead over the weekend in closing off the

woods to recreational activities

. No fine had been set as of press time.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre hasn’t said whether he supports the provincial restrictions.

The office of Emergency Management Minister Eleanor Olszewski did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Rempel Garner’s accusation of Liberal inaction on wildfire preparedness.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Federal Industry Minister Mélanie Joly.

OTTAWA — A week after

allowing Canada’s three major telecommunications companies

to resell fibre optics to Internet service providers on their respective networks and those of smaller players, Canada’s industry minister is facing harsh criticism from the industry.

The uproar is coming first and foremost from her hometown of Montreal, where three major telecommunication companies are headquartered and where the frustration is still intense.

“I am in shock. In shock. I am profoundly disappointed,” said Cogeco’s CEO Frédéric Perron in an interview with National Post.

The Montreal-based company is not thrilled with the new minister’s first consequential move. So much so that he wanted to “ring the alarm bell” because he never thought that “such a damaging, dangerous decision” as the one she made last week “would or could be made.”

“We had high hopes that this new government would make better decisions for business and the Canadian economy,” Perron said. “And what we saw last week, by the minister’s decision, is more reminiscent of old Trudeau era, superficial policies.”

Within the industry, Mélanie Joly was expected to announce her rebuttal of a controversial decision by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) that allows, for example, a company like Telus, which is strong in Western Canada, to use other providers’ networks to attract thousands of customers in Ontario and Quebec instead of building its own infrastructure.

The regulator said the measure was intended to reduce costs for consumers. Cogeco and other stakeholders say there is no concrete evidence to support its assertion

“It discourages investment, weakens competition, and ultimately harms Canadian consumers,” said Robert Ghiz, the president and CEO of the Canadian Telecommunications Association.

This was such a hot issue that last year that Joly’s predecessor,François-Philippe Champagne, heard the industry’s call to overturn the CRTC decision by asking the regulator to “reconsider” its decision to “respond to concerns about the business case for future and ongoing investments in infrastructure in less densely populated areas.”

At the time, Joly was minister of foreign affairs and a member of cabinet when

the order was given

.

Companies like Cogeco or Eastlink were especially challenging the fact that the big three telecom players in Canada can resell their networks and that they’re forced to open it to them.

But last week, Joly

posted a message on her X account

confirming she would uphold the regulator’s decision.

“By immediately increasing competition and consumer choice, the CRTC’s decision aims to reduce the cost of high-speed Internet for Canadians and will contribute toward our broader mandate to bring down costs across the board,” she wrote.

Joly’s office did not provide any comments on time for this story.

The decision was made the day before Bell Canada’s quarterly results were announced. Bell’s stock was down that morning, and observers noted a correlation with the minister’s decision.

 Frédéric Perron, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cogeco Inc. and of Cogeco Communications Inc.

In an analyst call that morning, Bell’s CEO Mirko Bibic said he was “disappointed” and urged the government and the CRTC “to ensure that network builders are fully compensated for significant build costs and investment risks they take in building.”

It also came a few weeks after Cogeco announced a new mobile service with an introductory one-year free offer.

“With this decision, the minister is essentially saying it’s okay if the Big Three get even bigger. It’s okay if the regional, local players suffer, and it’s okay if there’s a re-monopolization of telecoms in Canada,” Perron said.

“We don’t think it’s okay. Consumers won’t think it’s okay, and we’ll fight to make sure it doesn’t happen.”

Cogeco and Eastlink, which announced last week it was “suspending further planned upgrades to many smaller communities across Canada,” filed an appeal in July asking the Federal Court of Appeal to quash the decision.

But in Ottawa, overriding a decision from the CRTC was seen as a “bold move” and that could “rattle the cage” not even six months after an election and a new prime minister in charge. Sources said the minister had a duty to ensure the sustainability of institutions and protect the national interest.

Champagne, who has since become minister of finance, did not comment for this story. His office confirmed that he attended the cabinet meeting in which the decision was confirmed and that “Canada’s new government has a strong mandate to bring costs down and to build one, strong, Canadian economy.”

“We would have liked to see a lot more courage, and I’m happy to be quoted on that. It seems to me like deferring to the CRTC and maintaining the status quo was the easy way, but not the right way. Sometimes the best decision is the hard decision in life, and we are saddened that the hard decision was not made,” said Perron.

Sources in the industry support Perron’s comments about the decision.

In a statement last week, Rogers Communications said “the Carney government has declared its priority is to build a strong Canada and this decision does the exact opposite.”

A recent PwC study

shows that the telecommunication sector directly contributed $87.3 billion in GDP to Canada’s economy and supported over 661,000 jobs in 2024.

By 2035, the Canadian telecom industry could contribute another $112 billion to Canada’s overall GDP, according to the study.

But for Cogeco and other players, this decision could threaten these expectations.

“The decision from last week is not sending the right signal, and it’s concerning to me,” said Perron.

National Post

atrepanier@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Jeffrey Evely said Nova Scotia’s ban on entering the woods punishes ordinary people instead of focusing on restricting the activities that actually spark fires.

A Nova Scotia man who intentionally violated the province’s ban on entering the woods says he plans to fight his $28,000 fine.

Jeffrey Evely, a veteran and former candidate for the People’s Party of Canada, recorded a video over the weekend of him first going to the Department of Natural Resources in Coxheath, N.S., and informing officers he was going into the woods to protest the ban.

“I want to challenge this order in court, and the only way to do that is to get the fine,” Jeffrey Evely says in the video. “So, I’m not trying to make trouble for you guys, I just want a piece of (Premier) Tim Houston and I want to be as accommodating and nice as I can be.”

One of the officers asked him not to enter the woods, but he followed through with his plan.

When he left the forest, he was handed a fine of $28,872.50, according to an image of the document.

The new policy came into effect on Aug. 5, and will remain until Oct. 15. It bans people from hiking, camping, fishing and the use of vehicles like ATVs in the woods due to the elevated wildfire risk. People are not even allowed to enter the woods. The fine for violating the ban is $25,000.

Evely’s fine includes taxes, fees, and surcharges.

“I know it’s the height of summer vacation and people want to do all the activities that we enjoy,” Houston said when the ban was announced. “But we have to stay out of the woods. It’s a small price to pay to avoid the devastation that we saw from wildfires in 2023.”

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) announced that they will be representing Evely in his legal fight against the “Orwellian” ban.

Evely said it punishes ordinary people instead of focusing on restricting the activities that actually spark fires, according

to a JCCF press release.

 The $28,872.50 ticket Nova Scotian Jeffrey Evely received for walking into the woods — now a banned activity amid forest fire season.

“This law views people as the problem – not dangerous activities. This law is anti-human, and should someone find themselves on the wrong end of a charge – a massive charge, $25,000 dollar fine, for going into the woods, you can expect a constitutional challenge and a judicial review of this order,” said Marty Moore, a constitutional lawyer with JCCF.

“Premier Houston would be wise to immediately review his overly broad order to avoid further legal action.”

Evely will argue that “banning citizens from enjoying nature on the assumption they could start a fire is unconstitutional,” JCCF said.

Evely is not the only one asking for the ban to be reconsidered. The Ecology Action Centre, Dal Legal Aid and the Canadian Constitution Foundation have also said the ban should be overturned.

The Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources has fined six people since the ban was put into effect, Global News reported.

Nova Scotia just handed me a fine for $28,872.50 for walking into the woods.

Posted by Jeff Evely #PPC on Friday, August 8, 2025

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A tractor bails hay.

OTTAWA — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s bid for a seat in Battle River—Crowfoot is shining a light on the growing fight among rural and remote Canadians for the right to fix the things they own.

With tractors and other specialized farm equipment increasingly reliant on proprietary software, manufacturers are using a variety of digital methods to lock out third-party repairs — effectively requiring farms and other businesses to deal exclusively with manufacturer-authorized service providers.

It’s a problem that’s bedevilling area farmers who are already reckoning with razor-thin profit margins.

“I can tell you it’s no fun ringing the manufacturer for after-hours service, and having them charge you $50 to $100 a pop for a call-out fee,” said Rick Strankman, a grain farmer who lives in the eastern part of the Alberta riding.

Strankman’s family-run farm is two hours away from the nearest service hub in Lloydminster, Alta.

He says that he’s sought to minimize his dependence on costly manufacturer servicing by using older, analog equipment but doesn’t know how much longer he can keep it going.

“Our combines are 2011 model year and will be 15 years old come Christmas-time … the simple depreciation on those things is more than the farm can bear,” said Strankman.

Battle River—Crowfoot, a sprawling riding of

more than 52,000 square kilometres

, is home

to some 4,000 farms

like Strankman’s.

Far flung, agrarian areas like Battle River—Crowfoot are at the forefront of the growing

right to repair movement

, which calls for an end to manufacturer-imposed barriers to fixing consumer appliances, such as digital locks that keep third-parties out of embedded software.

“Pretty much anyone you meet in the rural parts of the riding will talk your ear off about (right to repair),” said Libertarian candidate Michael Harris.

Harris said that several farmers he’s canvassed have identified the right to repair as their top issue in next week’s byelection.

Independent candidate Bonnie Critchley says she’ll make fighting for right to repair legislation

her top priority if elected

.

“As an Independent in such a tight minority government, I intend on using that position to push for a private member’s bill that limits how much corporations can continue to squeeze money out of us, after we’ve already purchased their product,” wrote Critchley in a recent blog post.

Critchley called a pair of federal

right to repair laws

enacted last year “complicated, bureaucratic and ultimately toothless” in an email to the National Post.

“(T)hese bills make circumventing digital locks in devices legal, but continue to prohibit the manufacture, import, or sale of the tools used to circumvent those protection measures, making repairing personal property — be it a modern combine or a cellphone — infeasible in practice,” wrote Critchley.

Green Party candidate Ashley MacDonald also said that the right to repair was high on his list of priorities.

“(I) feel strongly that when you purchase a much-needed piece of equipment, whether it be a tractor for your farm, a dishwasher for your home, or a register for your small business, you should not be beholden to the high cost to repair forced upon you by the manufacturer through their monopoly on replacement parts, manuals, and control over software updates,” wrote MacDonald in an email.

“As (a) member of Parliament, I will work across the aisle to ensure that your right to repair is respected and brought into law.”

Poilievre’s campaign didn’t respond to multiple questions about whether he’d back new right to repair legislation if elected in the Aug. 18 byelection.

Alissa Centivany, a co-founder of the Canadian Repair Coalition, said that championing the right to repair would be a “no-brainer” for Poilievre if he wins the byelection.

“It’s an easy win that clearly benefits people in rural Alberta and other remote parts of the country,” said Centivany.

Poilievre said in a 2021 speech in

the House of Commons

that he supported a compromise position on the right to repair, where manufacturers could keep using digital locks but customers and third-parties would not be penalized for breaking them.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Independent MP Han Dong arrives to appear as a witness at the Public Inquiry Into Foreign Interference in Federal Electoral Processes and Democratic Institutions in Ottawa on Tuesday, April 2, 2024.

OTTAWA — Although the federal foreign interference task force said China had likely manipulated the 2019 Liberal nomination race in a Toronto-area riding, Canada’s election watchdog says she found no evidence federal election laws were broken.
 

The revelation is buried in the
Commissioner of Canada Elections’ latest annual report
published last week.
 

In the report, Commissioner Caroline Simard says she looked into two instances of alleged foreign interference that were discussed at length during a public inquiry. In both cases she found “either no evidence or not enough evidence” to support a breach of the Canada Elections Act.
 

The first instance involved allegations of manipulation by the Chinese consulate in Toronto of the controversial 2019 Liberal nomination race in Don Valley North that ultimately coronated Han Dong.
 

Both Foreign Interference Commissioner Marie-Josée Hogue and the task force monitoring for foreign interference in Canadian elections have reported suspicious behaviour by Chinese authorities during the 2019 Toronto-area Liberal nomination race that likely tainted the result.

A report from Hogue last year said some intelligence, which was not “firmly substantiated,” suggested Chinese students were provided with “falsified documents” and then bused in to the Liberal Don Valley North nomination election so they could vote for Dong despite not being residents of the riding.
 

Those documents were provided by individuals associated with a well-known Chinese proxy agent, the report read. After the vote, intelligence agencies reported that those students were in fact coerced into voting for Dong.
 

“Some intelligence reported after the election indicated that veiled threats were issued by the PRC Consulate to the Chinese international students, implying their student visas would be in jeopardy and that there could be consequences for their families back in the PRC if they did not support Han Dong,” read the report.
 

The Security and Intelligence Threats to Elections Task Force also stated in its report on the 2019 federal election that “PRC officials likely manipulated one of the nomination contests in the Toronto riding of Don Valley North,” but said that some of the allegations remained “unconfirmed.”

Dong has never been found guilty of any wrongdoing in relation to his nomination race.

In a statement, commissioner spokesperson Pierre Verriere said the office conducted “extensive research, interviews, and analysis” of the Don Valley North Liberal nomination race before deciding in February to close the review without imposing any sanctions.
 

In a
document submitted to the foreign interference inquiry
last year, the commissioner’s office said it was investigating five potential contraventions including voter intimidation, inducing others to vote outside of their electoral district and illegal electoral donations by an ineligible donor.
 

Verriere said the office looked into multiple potential Elections Act breaches but found that the evidence to support them was either non-existent or insufficient.
 

“To take formal compliance or enforcement action, the Commissioner must have tangible evidence to substantiate allegations of wrongdoing,” commissioner spokesperson Pierre Verriere said in a statement.
 

“Following our assessment of the allegations against potential CEA contraventions, we found either no evidence to support formal enforcement action or insufficient evidence, depending on the provision in question,” he added.
 

But as it was highlighted repeatedly throughout the foreign interference Inquiry last year, the commissioner’s oversight power during party nomination races is limited.
 

She
told inquiry staff
that her mandate during internal party elections is limited to political financing and that it would be a major resource challenge for her to have to oversee every nomination race for all 343 federal ridings.
 

She also noted that she does not have the mandate nor the ability to verify intelligence, which was the basis for most of the allegations in Don Valley North.
 

Dong, who stepped away from Liberal caucus after a string of media stories regarding these allegations in 2023 and did not run in the 2025 election, has always denied any wrongdoing. In June, he settled a two-year defamation lawsuit with Global News.
 

He said Tuesday that he was not aware that the commissioner’s investigation was closed until National Post contacted him for comment.
 

“I have always said that I have always followed the election rules. Unfortunately, my family, my team and I have suffered irreversible harm,” Dong said in a text message.
 

“I remain hopeful that this conclusion of Commissioner Simard’s investigation will bring DVN electors, especially Liberals, full closure and restore public confidence in our democratic process and institutions.”
 

The other instance Simard reviewed pertained to allegations of Chinese interference against Conservative candidate Kenny Chiu during the 2021 federal election in the B.C. riding of Steveston–Richmond East.
 

During her testimony before the Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference last year, Simard said her office had already concluded there was insufficient evidence to support charges of “undue foreign influence” or any other breaches of the Elections Act.
 

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


An image of a Sea-Doo from Gordons Watersports in Sarnia, Ont.

A watersports rental company in Sarnia, Ont., lost one of its Sea-Doos on the weekend when the man who rented it failed to return. He is believed to have taken it to Michigan, which is just a few hundred metres away on the American side of the St. Clair River.

Sarnia police say they received a call on Saturday night at 9:40 p.m. regarding a missing person. “A male party, identified as Romeo Bajrami, had rented a Sea-Doo with cash at 6:45 p.m. with a scheduled return time of 7:45 p.m. and had failed to return,”

police said

in a statement.

Taylor Gordon, president of

Gordons Watersports

in Sarnia, told National Post that the renter had used a debit card for his transaction but also plunked down $500 cash as a deposit on the rental.

That money is now forfeit, Gordon said, “unless he wants to come back to Canada, come back and see us, but he has a warrant out for his arrest in Canada for stealing a Sea-Doo.”

Sarnia Police confirmed they have issued an arrest warrant for Bajrami, aged 40, of Lakeshore Road in Toronto on a charge of theft of a motor vehicle.

The renter paid for the “Sea-Duo and Dine” package, which includes dinner for two at the dockside restaurant, plus an hour on the Sea-Doo. “He brought the staff the second meal that was provided to him,” Gordon said, adding: “They didn’t eat the meal.”

He added that the renter was in contact with the staff at his company. “Until he wasn’t.”

“He was late, he said he was just 10 minutes behind, and then he spoke with the staff again and had another excuse, and then after that there was no communication,” Gordon said. “That’s when the staff called the authorities.”

Sarnia Police alerted nearby agencies of the man’s disappearance. “At this time officers suspected possible theft or intentional disappearance due to forfeited deposit and evasive behaviour,” they said. The Canadian Coast Guard, Sarnia Fire and nearby Point Edward Fire were all involved to conduct a marine search of the St. Clair River near the rental establishment.

“A search of these waterways (Canadian side) was unsuccessful,” police said. CBSA and Toronto Police were also notified.

Then, shortly after midnight, the U.S. Coast Guard located the Sea-Doo on the American shore south of Sarnia. “With the Sea-Doo was a shirt that Bajrami was last seen wearing, a life jacket, and keys to the Sea-Doo,” police reported. “It is believed that Bajrami was successful in conducting an illegal border crossing. U.S. Customs and Immigration were notified and are investigating this incident.”

Taylor said the U.S. Coast Guard still has the Sea-Doo. “They said give them a few days and then they’ll contact us to pick it up,” he said. “We don’t know what shape it’s in it yet but we’ll see and then we’ll go from there.”

Taylor said this is the first time something like this has happened in the four years that Gordons Watersports has been in business.

“We tell renters where the invisible border line is and to stay on Canadian waters and definitely do not cross the border into the States,” he said. The distance between the two countries is quite small, just a few hundred metres across the St. Clair River between Sarnia and Port Huron, Michigan.

The case is reminiscent of one just a few days earlier, when police in LaSalle, Ont., opposite Detroit, Michigan, noticed a a man at the water’s edge with two backpacks and a kayak.

“The officer investigated and discovered the man was attempting to illegally enter Canada,”

police said

. A 51-year-old from the U.S. was turned over to the

Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

For Gordon, however, “this is definitely a first, a first and a last, that’s what we’re hoping. It’s been an eventful and a little stressful weekend for us but we’re trying to make the best out of the horrible situation.”

Indeed,

the Facebook page

for Gordons Watersports is playing up the lighter side of the affair. A post on Tuesday morning included the line “catch waves, not warrants,” and reminded renters to “keep it fun and legal,” adding: “Gordons Watersports — where the only thing you’ll be crossing is the wake.”

It also thanked “our staff, border control, and law enforcement for their quick action in … this very rare case of an illegal entry to the U.S.”

By Tuesday afternoon an additional post invited visitors to answer the question: “Why did Romeo cross illegally?” It suggested “To find his Juliet,” “Audition for Fast and Furious Sea-Doo Drift” and “Heard Tim Hortons was out of Timbits.” Best answer gets a $50 gift card.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.