LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - SEPTEMBER 19: Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani walks with State Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins and State Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal as they tour the Amsterdam Houses on September 19, 2025 in New York City. Mamdani briefly spoke to members of the media after touring the Amsterdam Houses with Stewart-Cousins and Hoylman-Sigal after formally receiving their endorsement for mayor in November's race. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

NEW YORK — Twenty-four years ago, a murderous yet methodical squadron of Islamic terrorists tore out the beating heart of New York City in the name of their particular understanding of God.

On Nov. 4, it is likely that a beaming, bearded young Muslim from the far left flank of American politics — a card-carrying Democratic Socialist, no less — will be elected as the 111th mayor (all of them men) of the capital of capitalism, riding a pita-in-the-sky cyclone of no-fare transit, cheap apartments, discount groceries and anti-Zionist rage from the river (Hudson) to the sea (Atlantic) and into City Hall.

This candidate is 33-year-old Zohran Kwame Mamdani, son of a “progressive” filmmaker (his mother) and a scholar of settler colonialism (his father) and recently married to a woman whom he met on Hinge. “There is still hope in those dating apps,” the groom proclaimed. Born in Uganda after the dictator Idi Amin expelled thousands of his most prosperous families because of their Indian blood, and raised in privilege in Manhattan from the age of seven, Mamdani was a little-known, fringe-lefty member of the New York State Assembly when he blew past a crowded field of more experienced, more boring partisans to win the Democratic Party primary for mayor in June.

According to the New York Police Department, assaults on Jews here have increased 583 per cent since 2020, and more than 1,400 antisemitic incidents were reported in this city in 2024. Yet the son of a Hindu father and a Shia mother won nearly half the Jewish primary vote, despite — or because of — his strident condemnation of what he calls “Israel’s genocide” in Gaza. He has promised to have both Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu arrested should the Russian or Israeli leader ever deplane in New York City — a mayor owns no such power — and he is the beneficiary of an epochal shift in voters’ attitudes toward the Jewish state. According to a

New York Times/Siena College poll

conducted in early September, 57 per cent of the city’s Democratic voters now sympathize with the people of the Gaza, and only 18 per cent with Israel.

Mamdani’s platform can be condensed to six words: free buses, free bagels, free Palestine.

As I write this, the young assemblyman leads a shrinking and unappealing list of opponents with the support of 46 per cent of likely voters. Incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, a former transit cop who was facing multiple charges of bribery before U.S. President Donald Trump told his Department of Justice to quash the investigation,

quit the race

in late September, leaving only Curtis Sliwa, a Republican famous as a subway vigilante 40 years ago, and Andrew Cuomo, the disgraced former governor of the state of New York, to oppose the youthful front-runner.

There are an estimated 1.1 million Jews living in New York City, and about 750,000 followers of Islam, the largest populations of both faiths in any city in the Western Hemisphere. Not all are of voting age, of course.

This summer, Zohran Mamdani campaigned with the choleric and indestructible 84-year-old Sen. Bernie Sanders of Brooklyn, and with Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of the Bronx and Queens, the young pasionaria of the urban left and likely 2028 presidential candidate, to packed halls and wild applause.

“Sanders said the United States should not be sending aid to ‘the government of Israel that is currently starving children to death,’ drawing a standing ovation,” reported NY Jewish Week.

The messaging is getting through.

“A new poll shows that 74 per cent of Democrats prefer Democratic socialism over capitalism,” Ocasio-Cortez blared in a fundraising email in September. Her message continued: “The poll shows that even 58 per cent of Republicans agree that our economic system is ‘rigged in favor of corporations and the wealthy.’”

Mamdani promises to un-fix the game. His mantra is “affordability” in a city where a million dollars barely buys a broom closet and a hot plate. He vows to freeze rents on a million city-owned apartments, which could include his own residence, a one-bedroom, rent-stabilized flat in a century-old building in the Borough of Queens that he found online and for which he pays only US$2,300 a month. He moved there in 2018, having spent most of his post-college, premarital 20s living — like millions of other young Americans — with his parents.

“I was looking for an apartment that I could afford on my own,” the mayoral hopeful explains, striking a chord with a city of strivers.

* * *

Donald Trump calls Mamdani “my little Communist.” The New York Post labels him “Zany Zo” and Krazy-Glues him to every far-out fantasy promulgated by the comfortable uptown left: defunding the police, closing prisons, letting petty criminals walk free, voting rights for illegal immigrants, city-owned grocery stores and so on.

Cuomo paints Mamdani and his cohort as “destructive extremist forces that would devastate our city through incompetence or ignorance, but it is not too late to stop them.”

The mayor of Miami, Francis Suarez, equates Mamdani to Fidel Castro, another “young, charismatic leader who said, ‘Give us all your property, give us all your businesses, and don’t worry, we will make everybody equal.’ And he did.”

It is true that you can’t spell Mamdani without “m-a-d-m-a-n,” but to the many who thrill to his Barack Obama-calibre rhetoric and trust his lofty promises, the chasm between plenty and poverty, between penthouse and tenement in The Greatest City in the World is no less criminally insane.

Reasonably articulate with a soccer ball, but unable to bench-press 100 pounds with cameras rolling at a

“Men’s Day” athletic festival

this summer, Mamdani is urbane if not grittily urban. Several prominent Democrats have twisted themselves into rhetorical knots rather than formally endorse him.

There is much to criticize. The probable future mayor of a city of 8.8 million inhabitants has no executive experience whatsoever; in fact, he barely has worked for a paycheque at all. He tried to gain traction as a rapper, with little success, spent a few months in Seattle and in Texas as a community organizer, and served as “music supervisor” on one of his mother’s documentaries. That is his employment resumé.

But Mamdani is hardly a newcomer to his now-fashionable beliefs. At Bowdoin College in Maine — referred to by the conservative

American Spectator

as “a seminary of sorts for those drawn to the increasingly radicalized progressive worldview” — he founded a chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine, and the archives of the student magazine Orient contain dozens of his articles.

“I had arrived in a society where privilege was a different color,” student Mamdani wrote of a visit to Cairo’s central plaza in 2013. “Gone was the image of the white Christian male that I had grown accustomed to, and in its place was a darker, more familiar picture — ­­­one that, for the first time, I fit: brown skin, black hair, and a Muslim name.

“After just a little while in Tahrir, I understood the addiction of revolution, of protest. Those who traditionally had little say on society’s direction were immediately granted the chance to speak, with the promise of an echo of thousands. Ideas of class and status were upturned, as men without means stood high on the shoulders of others, their voices loud. This new social solidarity was founded in a widespread opposition to all that the government had grown to represent — inefficiency, unjustness and sectarianism.”

“He is the candidate for Pakistanis, Indians, and Bangladeshis alike, though they are not exactly one another’s friends,” The Spectator observed, “and most of them are robust supporters of the market-driven New York economy and merit-based schools. How would they like living in Zohran’s socialist paradise? All the while he is also cultivating his base of disaffected — mostly white, and heavily female — underemployed college graduates.”

“What Western city or country has improved as the Muslim population has increased?”

Charlie Kirk posted on X

a few weeks before he was assassinated. “America’s largest city was attacked by radical Islam 24 years ago, and now a similar form of that pernicious force is poised to capture city hall.”

“We hold a common belief in the shared dignity of every person on this planet, and the refusal to draw a line in the sand when it comes to Palestinian lives,” Mamdani responded on the night Kirk died, upon being honoured in Brooklyn by a group called

Jews For Racial and Economic Justice.

“Our victory in June was evidence of many things, but truly, among them, it was a lesson that so many in this city are horrified by the genocide being perpetrated by the Israeli military in Gaza,” he went on.

A thousand Hebrews rose and cheered.

“Until recently,” noted the political newsletter City & State, “this kind of anti-Israel rhetoric would have been unthinkable in New York City politics.”

* * *

In August, Mamdani embarked on what he called a “Five Boroughs Against Trump Tour,” casting the 45th and 47th U.S. president as the enabler of Benjamin Netanyahu’s medieval siege of Gaza.

I follow a similar itinerary, travelling by subway and bus and on foot across Manhattan, Staten Island, Queens, Brooklyn and The Bronx — unlovely swaths of New York far removed from Wall Street, Greenwich Village and Broadway — to hear the voices of the voters of my home town, and to weigh the appeal of a young adherent of Islam who, when Sept. 11 next comes around, may well be the mayor of Ground Zero.

It should be noted that Mamdani’s victory on Nov. 4 is likely, but not guaranteed. Elisa Serret, Washington correspondent for Radio-Canada, observed that “it is the Israelis, the Jews, that finance American politics a lot … The big cities are run by Jews.” (

Radio-Canada apologized

for Serret’s remarks, which it described as “stereotypical, antisemitic, erroneous and prejudicial allegations against Jewish communities.”) This summer, the wealthy Hebrews who run and finance New York City — or thought they did — have been spending tens of millions of dollars to try to keep the Bowdoin grad and his Bolsheviks at bay.

Former three-term mayor Michael Bloomberg has given six of his myriad millions to keep Cuomo in the race as an “independent,” despite the ex-governor’s history of

sexual harassment allegations

, including “unwanted groping, kissing and sexual comments.”

A congress of prominent Jewish real-estate developers convened in August and anted up big-time, warning the city’s elites that “there is no more time for delay, discussion, or dithering — we must act decisively to ensure that the next mayor of New York is Andrew Cuomo.”

At about the same time, the increasingly desperate Cuomo was dismissing Mamdani as a mere “nepo baby,” conveniently ignoring the fact that his own father was the three-term governor of the state. The former staunch supporter of Israel — and a member of Netanyahu’s own legal team — now claims to have been against the Israeli leader all along.

“I never stood with Bibi,”

Cuomo said

in September.

In some ways, Mamdani risks little; a narrow loss to Cuomo still would leave him as one of America’s most promising young Democrats with half a century of activism ahead of him. (Unlike Ocasio-Cortez, however, his birth in Uganda precludes a presidential future. Mamdani did not become a U.S. citizen until 2018.)

Even if he wins, he may become nothing more than what Time magazine calls “another failed figurehead of a major Democratic city.” In this occupation, religion matters much less than results.

Still, running for any public office in the United States in 2025 is an act of conspicuous courage. In September, an Orthodox Jewish man who lives in Texas was charged with sending multiple death threats to one of the highest-profile Muslim politicians that America has ever known.

“I’d love to see an IDF bullet go through your skull,” the antagonist wrote to Mamdani.

Hunkered down in a murderous age, Gotham goes to the polls. Before that happens, we will go travelling around the city.

First stop: Liberty Street, Manhattan

On the New York City subway system, if you can complete your journey without being sprayed with bullets by a fellow passenger who is wearing a gas mask or doused with gasoline and set on fire while napping, then your day is off to a promising start. So far, so good.

It is 5:58 on a clear September morning and the elevated railway already is jammed with emigrants from a dozen other histories. Entombed in overwork and iPhones, no one speaks. Of the 200 commuters in my car, I am almost certainly the only one who was, in Walt Whitman’s words, “born here of parents born here,” but we’re all on the same train now.

The calendar reads 9/11, a date that may hold no significance to anyone on board who is under 40 or come from away. But I am over 40, and I was visiting my mother in Brooklyn on that

horrible day in 2001

and we watched the towers fall. So, it is with grim seriousness of purpose that I am heading to a rendezvous with the ghosts of the World Trade Center, an annual civic gathering of mourners, church bells and tears.

“All those people just went to work in the morning, and they died,” my mother wept on that day, though none of the dead was known personally to us.

Mamdani is present, of course, and demurely silent, as are Mayor Adams, who will be only the third NYC incumbent since the Second World War not to be re-elected and, in a wheelchair and body brace following a recent auto accident, Rudolph Giuliani, the once much-praised “Mayor of 9/11.”

The commemorative ceremony begins with the tolling of a fire-station bell at the exact moment that the first hijacked plane struck the North Tower and proceeds for four more hours as the names of each of the nearly 3,000 victims are intoned. Hundreds of bereaved relatives and co-workers stand or sit in reverence, carrying posters and wearing clothing with photographs of the dead.

The mourners grow older every year, but the victims’ faces on their T-shirts never age.

Yet even in these shattered New Yorkers, I get a sense that the lust for vengeance that was so raw in 2001 may be ebbing, even as a Muslim stands on the threshold of power in the city that al-Qaida flew to destroy.

“My son would have been 58 years old,” a father says, and he begins to cry. This is Anthony Colasanti, whose son Christopher was a bond trader at Cantor Fitzgerald on the 105th floor, a father of three and husband of his high-school sweetheart and, according to his obituary, “a bow-legged, skinny, bespectacled kid who grew up to be athletic and captain of the high school soccer team and later a triathlete.”

Cantor Fitzgerald lost 658 employees on that clear blue morning. New York City lost its highest buildings and never will walk as tall again.

But when I ask the grieving father how he feels about a Muslim becoming the mayor of this city, Colasanti replies, “It doesn’t bother me. I wouldn’t condemn all Muslims any more than I would condemn all Germans and all Japs.” (He says “Japs” and not “Japanese.” My parents, who lost cousins and friends in the Pacific, did the same for decades.)

“I can’t say I hate them,” he says, walking slowly away.

Theresa Coia has come from Paterson, N.J., which is where Trump, in one of his most absurd and dangerous hallucinations, claimed that he saw “thousands and thousands” of Muslims filling the streets in celebration of the 9/11 death flights. Nothing like this happened in the Garden State or elsewhere outside the Arab world.

Coia has brought along a two-year-old mini-goldendoodle named Maisie to comfort the mourners.

“All nations have monsters,” Coia says. “The evil is the monster, not the religion.”

The bells toll twice for Rose Whelan, who is here to remember her cousins, not that she ever forgets them. I ask her about living under a Muslim mayor.

“I don’t have a problem with the Muslim part,” says Whelan, who considers herself “a conservative Democrat.” “I have a problem with the political part. He’s a little too much to one side … I hate terrorists. But I can’t hate a whole religion.”

Next stop: Lincoln Avenue, Midland Beach, Staten Island

Nine years after the 9/11 attack, the priest of St. Margaret Mary Roman Catholic Church on Staten Island announced that a vacant convent owned by the parish was going to be sold to the Muslim American Society and turned into a mosque.

By the time I got there a few days later, hundreds of residents of the Midland Beach neighbourhood were in the street, shouting “No mosque! No sale! No mosque! No sale!” and holding up signs that said, “Save our community,” and, “Our faith is not for sale,” and, “Stereotypes are based on some truth, live with it, it’s the American way.”

“I don’t think I’m ever going to get it out of my heart that terrorists come out of mosques,” a man told me at the time. “Thirty-seven of my friends died that day,” he said.

“It’s not just here,” a woman said back then. “They’re building mosques in Brooklyn, all along the water. I think they’re trying to control the bridges.”

But it wasn’t about hatred — or the Twin Towers — the mob claimed. It was about where the faithful would leave their cars while they worshipped Allah, five times a day … 35 times a week!

“They can open a synagogue for all I care,” a woman said back then, “as long as they have enough parking.”

In the autumn of 2025, as I return to Midland Beach, St. Margaret Mary Roman Catholic Church is boarded up and the former convent is a centre for ex-Soviet seniors called Happy Island, as if Staten Island were a palm-treed Aruba. And a gleaming, spotless, multi-storey Muslim American Society mosque and community centre stands a few blocks away. Tolerance and acceptance — or demographics and money — won the day.

“How did you get it done?” I ask a young man named Abdullah Akl, who is the “advocacy director” for the mosque, recalling the protests and the suspicion.

“Barbecues and bouncy castles,” he tells me. “We broke down the misconceptions through community outreach and disconnected from the stereotype as terrorists. We showed that we are not only the Muslim American Society — we recognize our American identity as well.”

Yet there is a video on X of 23-year-old Akl — he holds a master’s degree in government from Harvard University — on the New York City subway, leading riders in a chant of, “There is only one solution — Intifada revolution!” — a call to take violent action against the Jewish state.

Akl says that he has known Mamdani since the latter first ran for the state assembly, and he says that “there is still a level of stereotyping, even against Zohran.”

As for Mamdani’s only remaining viable opponent, Akl says that Cuomo “has aligned himself with Netanyahu and a lot of New Yorkers are not onside with that.”

“Why should the mayor of New York City have anything to do with U.S. foreign policy?” I ask Akl when I visit the mosque.

“That’s the biggest question that Zohran hears at every debate,” he answers.

“And his promises of free transit and frozen rents and all the rest?”

“We hear promises from every mayor,” Akl says.

Next stop: 30th Street, Astoria, Queens

“Socialist Softball!” beckons the events listing of the local branch of the Democratic Socialists of America.

And indeed, at a municipal diamond underneath the Ed Koch Bridge that links midtown Manhattan and the Borough of Queens, there are a dozen or so young fellow travellers wearing JEWS FOR ZOHRAN and F**K ICE T-shirts running the bases, badly.

When I ask about one of their own moving into the mayor’s mansion, “We are very excited,” is all the on-deck hitter will divulge without consulting the politburo. Everyone else on the team is out in far left field.

A few blocks away, in the Astoria neighbourhood that Mamdani represents in the state parliament in Albany, another coterie of eager young comrades can be found at a street fair, raising money “to end the Palestinian genocide by putting pressure on key links in the military supply chain.”

At one of the tables is Kristen Michelle, “gig worker, actor, singer, also in education, sometimes a ventriloquist,” representative of Queens Families for Palestine, and a fervent supporter of the possibly-soon-to-be first Muslim mayor.

“Before this started, I was like an activist without a cause,” Michelle tells me. She is selling tchotchkes donated by local artists, with all the proceeds going directly to families in the Gaza Strip.

“Why this cause?” I ask.

“Honestly, because I grew up with so many Jewish friends that I became very obsessed with the Holocaust,” she says. “I was horrified that someday it could happen to them, too, people that I loved so dearly. I was like, how could the world be so cruel towards these friends of mine who I love so much, just because of their religion or whatever. So, I swore to myself, if something like that ever happens again, I would help people. And that’s how it started. Now I’m very close with many people in Gaza, so it’s very personal.”

“What does Mamdani say to you?” I ask Michelle.

“He goes against the establishment,” Michelle answers, “and at first it seemed like he didn’t bend to the ruling class. He just seemed like one of us, like he was fighting for the little guy.”

“Are you the little guy?”

“Yeah, I think I’m the little guy. I definitely struggle financially. But I’m a white woman. I’m not oppressed.”

Michelle says she is concerned that her man Mamdani seems to be moving toward the political centre as election day approaches.

“He’s going back on his word a little bit,” she says, and this is true — Mamdani has apologized for a tweet from 2020 in which he called the New York Police Department “racist, anti-queer & a major threat to public safety.”

“Do you see him tumbling down the slope of being just another politician?” I ask the part-time ventriloquist.

“That’s my fear,” Michelle responds. “I’m hoping that it’s just because he’s getting so much pressure right now. I can’t even imagine, as a brown person and a Muslim in New York, what racism he’s faced. I’m just hoping that he continues to speak for those who are oppressed, because it just seems like he is kind of switching.”

“Do you believe in the free transit, the frozen rents, the city-owned grocery stores?” I ask.

“I think that would be awesome. I don’t know if it will really happen, but I feel like any steps toward it would be good,” Michelle says.

One more note from Astoria, Queens. Five years ago, Mamdani posted a photograph of himself giving the finger to the statue of Christopher Columbus that stands in his home riding. In July, a gaggle of Italian-Americans with long memories showed up there, as did a group of Mamdani fans, for a mannerly exchange of views.

The pro-Columbians waved Israeli flags and called the other team Nazis.

“F–k Columbus, man,” one of the pro-Mamdani zealots retorted. “I’m all for an Italian Day but pick a cool Italian.”

And the crown began chanting, “Danny DeVito! Danny DeVito! Danny DeVito!”

Next stop: Glenwood Road, Brooklyn

“One of the most beautiful things about this city is its rich legacy of a Jewish community,”

Mamdani told a podcaster

just after Labour Day.

“I remember coming back from my sixth bar mitzvah and asking my dad, ‘Why don’t we do these?’” he said.

The probable next mayor of New York City did not get his wish.

But I did, in February 1963, at Congregation B’nai Jacob in the Flatbush section of Brooklyn. I remember the rabbi whispering to me, just before I had to stand up and squeak out my portion of the Torah, “it’s the bottom of the ninth and the bases are loaded and you’re up.”

Sixty-odd years later, the old congregation still exists, but with a newer rabbi, Shmuel Mor, whose grandfather was the last Chief Rabbi of Alexandria, Egypt, in the moments before the Six-Day War. Mamdani, the cleric avows, poses an existential threat to the safety of his congregation, no matter what he might say for public podcast or publication.

“I think people are very nervous,” Mor says. “Based on his rhetoric, they don’t see this person as somebody who’s really going to take their safety seriously as mayor. If safety is not taken care of, then nothing else makes sense.

“Obviously, there’s a big shift happening. A lot of young voters who are new to the political arena are connecting with someone who’s young and very articulate and who can relate to them. College students, the newly graduated — that’s where a lot of his support comes from.

“He’ll probably be the most liberal mayor in New York City’s history if he is elected. He has out-of-the-box ideas, very progressive ideas that New York City never really had before. A lot of them sound very enticing — whether it would be in housing or public supermarkets that he would like to implement, or free college. That’s where students connect to that, because a lot of them carry student loans, and that’s a hefty bill. If he’s saying he’s going to pick up the tab, people are like, ‘You know what, I’m in.’

“It comes from social media, where Israel and the Gaza war is talked about much more than the Russian and Ukrainian war, even though the numbers of people dying is not even close,” says Mor.

“Israel is always No. 1 — it’s always the easy target. And then you start blaming every single Jew,” Mor continues.

To some of New York’s 1.1 million Jews, it’s the bottom of the ninth and the bases are loaded with anti-Semites.

Last stop: 161st Street, The Bronx

One Monday morning several years ago, Charlie Powell of The Bronx was in Manhattan applying for a vendor’s permit to operate a legitimate souvenir business and never to return to his previous address, which was the Mount McGregor Correctional Facility in Saratoga County.

“Twenty years a crack addict, 26 years clean,” Powell proudly tells me. He had served three and a half years for selling what he calls “a dime of heroin and 20 grams of coke” to an undercover cop. This was long before the Democratic Socialists of America were advocating the legalization of all “recreational” drugs.

We’re across the street from the second incarnation of Yankee Stadium. The Bronx Bombers are hosting the Detroit Tigers in a game heavy with 9/11 ceremony. There are enough NYPD, Secret Service, Transportation Security Administration and Homeland Security officers flooding the district to invade Venezuela.

The former star first baseman of the New York Military Academy — Donald J. Trump —

was at the ballgame, too,

booed and cheered in equal measure. In 2020, Trump got 23 per cent of the vote in this part of The Bronx. Last year, he won 46 per cent. New York is hardly a political monolith.

The uniformed forces are shooing vendors off the stadium side of the avenue and these rivals are spreading out their wares in proximate competition to Powell. The cops, however, are not hassling Powell, a veteran of the 416th U.S. Army Engineer Command, now in his mid-70s, who is selling Yankee caps and jerseys on the up and up — a rarity in New York — thanks to that permit he holds.

“I had to go down to the World Trade Center to get that licence,” he says. “I was the last one they took care of on that day. There was a lady behind me in line. They told her to come back tomorrow.”

“Tomorrow” was Sept. 11, 2001.

“Do you hate the men who flew those planes in the name of their God?” I ask him.

“I hate the act of what they did,” Powell replies. “But I don’t hate all Muslims because of it. It’s like I can hate all white people for slavery. But I don’t.”

“What would you say to Trump if he came over here to buy a hat?” I ask Powell.

“I would say, ‘You got to stop dividing people’,” he replies. “A leader is someone who puts people together. We don’t need politicians who divide us — we’re already divided.”

On Nov. 4, the parochial and mutually incomprehensible multitudes of New York City will try to find a unifying leader of their own. Now enters a beaming, bearded Muslim, stage left.

When I ask him about Mamdani, Powell tells a story from his impoverished and imperilled childhood in the shadow of the big ballpark.

“We had no money to go to a game,” he recalls, and this would have been back in the golden age when the Bombers were winning the American League pennant 14 years out of 16.

“One day, the nuns took us to the stadium, and they just waved us inside,” the vendor relates. “They must have felt sorry for us poor kids. But we were hungry and had no money for food. Then we saw this famous actor, a really short guy …“

“Danny DeVito?” I suggest, remembering those Italians for Zohran in Astoria, Queens.

“No, this was way before Danny DeVito,” Powell says.

“Mickey Rooney?” I offer.

“Mickey Rooney!” Powell yelps. “Here comes Mickey Rooney and he looks at us and he turns to the food guy and he says, ‘Give ’em all a hotdog!’”

Alas, Mickey Rooney died in 2020. But now here comes a mayoral front-runner promising the same thing, which in this megalopolis would amount to eight million free wieners, three times a day, and a free bus ride home, too.

“That’s what Mamdani says: ‘Give EVERYBODY a hotdog!’ But who’s going to pay for them?” jibes Powell. “Sure, it sounds good — everything will be free — that’s great. But who’s going to want to go to work? Who’s going to want to pay into the system?”

Free buses, free bagels, free Palestine.

“Is New York better than it was when you were a kid?” I wonder.

“Yeah,” says Powell. “It’s better. Back then, The Bronx was burnin.’ It was so bad, my aunt grabbed me out of here and took me to New Jersey.”

For a New Yorker, being exiled to Jersey was worse than the Mount McGregor Correctional Facility.

“Am I safe on the subway?” I ask, turning homeward.

“Yeah,” says Powell in The Greatest City in the World, where everything and everyone soon will be free. “Just don’t fall asleep.”


Minister of AI and Digital Innovation Evan Solomon speaks to media following an announcement during a visit to Scale AI, in Montreal on Thursday, July 10, 2025.

OTTAWA — A Canadian organization focused on combatting the spread of child sex abuse images says a new analysis has found the presence of such images in a dataset used to train AI models.

The Canadian Centre for Child Protection said the findings include images of more than 120 victims across Canada and the United States and raise serious ethical concerns when it comes to the development of AI technologies.

“Many of the AI models used to support features in applications and research initiatives have been trained on data that has been collected indiscriminately or in ethically questionable ways,” Lloyd Richardson, the Winnipeg-based centre’s director of technology, said in a statement on Wednesday.

“This lack of due diligence has led to the appearance of known child sexual abuse and exploitation material in these types of datasets, something that is largely preventable.”

The centre for child protection said its analysis focused on an image collection known as NudeNet, which features tens of thousands of images used by researchers to develop AI tools for detecting nudity and whose images are collected from sources like social media and adult porn sites

It says its analysis found around 680 images known to the centre as being suspected or verified as child sex abuse and exploitation material.

Of those images, the centre reported that more than 120 images show victims in Canada and the U.S. Other images included minors in sexually explicit acts.

As a result of its findings, the centre said it issued a removal notification to Academic Torrents, a website used by researchers and universities to download datasets, adding that the flagged images were no longer available.

It says additional steps ought to be taken by those distributing datasets, used by researchers and academics, to ensure they do not include child sex abuse images and calls for regulation when it comes to AI technologies.

The centre’s analysis comes after a

2023 investigation

by Stanford University’s Cyber Policy Centre, which found the presence of child sex abuse images in a dataset used in developing text-to-images AI models.

It warned that models being developed on that dataset were then being used to generate realistic-looking nudes, including those of minors.

Prime Minister Mark Carney has made developing Canada’s AI capacity a priority of his government’s approach to digital policy.

Artificial Intelligence Minister Evan Solomon, who became the first federal minister to hold such a title, has been tasked with steering that work, and so far signalled the government is not keen on pushing a regulation-focused approach.

He he said the government’s focus on an upcoming bill would be around privacy and data.

At the same time, Carney’s government has promised to criminalize the creation of non-consensual sexualized images known as “deepfakes,” which are generated by tools, including AI.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


The Calgary Courts Centre in Calgary.

Alberta’s top court has quashed the contempt conviction for a Crown attorney who ran afoul of a justice of the peace who wouldn’t listen to him at a bail hearing.

Justice of the Peace Diane T. Luttmer ejected prosecutor James D. Wilson from her courtroom and convicted him of contempt this past May. The Court of Appeal recently overturned Wilson’s conviction.

“The right of a party to be heard … is a fundamental principle of natural justice,” said a recent decision out of Calgary from the three-judge panel.

“Breach of that right leads to a denial of natural justice, harms the reputation of the administration of justice, and raises concerns regarding the appearance of impartiality. It is clear that the (justice of the peace) in this case — for reasons not apparent in the transcript — was simply not willing to hear Crown counsel’s submissions on the facts and the law. Judicial officers may accept or reject submissions of counsel, but only after hearing and considering them. We recognize that judicial officers are only human and subject to being frustrated or irritated. However, regardless of a judicial officer’s frame of mind, counsel must be given the opportunity to present their submissions. The JP’s overall conduct in this case prevented the Crown from fulfilling its important role in the bail hearing.”

The court heard Luttmer was conducting a bail hearing on May 11, 2025, for a young man charged with mischief for damaging his grandfather’s garage door. Wilson was the prosecutor.

The young man’s lawyer objected to an abstinence clause and a weapons prohibition in his proposed release conditions, said the Appeal Court decision, dated Oct. 16.

Wilson asked for an adjournment because the young man’s lawyer was disputing “the admissibility of certain information in the police bail package,” and he wanted to “marshal the relevant evidence,” said the decision.

Luttmer denied Wilson’s request. She asked the Crown for the facts that would support a drug prohibition while the young man was out on bail.

Wilson “read directly from the police synopsis. The JP interrupted him. She stated she was losing patience, accused (Wilson) of overstepping and asked him directly what the allegation was. He began to answer but she interrupted him again. The JP admonished the appellant for interrupting her, then asked him for the factual nexus between the allegation and drug involvement. When he began to answer, she interrupted him again. After some overtalk, she admonished the appellant for getting into ‘extraneous information.’”

The JP asked Wilson how the young man’s charge was linked to drug use.

Wilson began speaking and Luttmer “interrupted him again,” said the decision.

Wilson told the JP “he had an obligation to put forward credible, trustworthy evidence.”

He asked to “tender the circumstances of the police investigation that led to the criminal charge,” said the decision.

“Before he finished his sentence, the JP interrupted, stating: ‘That is denied, Mr. Wilson.’ The JP directed that he answer only her question, nothing more.”

Wilson told her “drug paraphernalia had been found,” at the scene of the crime.

“The JP interrupted, telling (Wilson) he was coming very close to being removed from the courtroom for contempt of court.”

Luttmer again asked for more proof drugs were involved.

As Wilson “began to respond, the JP interrupted, stating: ‘It is a very simple question. What is the allegation about drug use?’”

Wilson told her the young man “was a habitual meth user. The JP interrupted him again. She admonished him for being non-responsive, characterizing his conduct as a refusal to answer her questions.”

The back and forth continued, with Luttmer saying she wouldn’t impose a weapons ban on the young man because Wilson wasn’t answering her questions.

Wilson informed Luttmer that knives were found on the young man during his arrest and officers had to use force to get him in custody.

“He alleged that the accused was resisting and had a history of carrying knives,” said the decision. “The JP interrupted again, asking about the history for the accused who had no record.”

Wilson started to respond when the JP interrupted him again.

Luttmer told Wilson to stop interrupting her.

“Well, you are interrupting the Crown,” Wilson responded.

Luttmer then told Wilson he was going to be removed from her courtroom.

“You are asking questions and interrupting the Crown,” he responded.

“You are in contempt of court, Mr. Wilson,” Luttmer said.

“This hearing is concluded. I am going to have the matter assigned to an alternative Crown. We are finished.”

The bail hearing continued that afternoon “with no prosecutor present at which time the accused was released on conditions which did not include a weapons ban or a prohibition on possessing illegal drugs,” said the decision.

The Appeal Court noted “there was nothing urgent” about the case.

Wilson “had a right to be heard in order to speak to the public perspective and interest,” said the decision.

Luttmer wasn’t clear on how Wilson was acting contemptuous, it said. “In summarily ejecting the appellant from the proceedings, the JP created an appearance of partiality.”

Luttmer “made a palpable and overriding error in finding (Wilson) to be in contempt of court when he was acting within his role as a Crown prosecutor and attempting to fulfill his duties and obligations to the administration of justice,” said the decision.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Doug Ford's government has tabled legislation that would end the use of automated speed enforcement devices in Ontario.

Baked into a wide-ranging bill aimed at protecting and strengthening Ontario’s economy tabled by Doug Ford’s government on Monday, was a provision that would bring about the end of speed cameras province-wide.

If passed, the government would make good on the premier’s vow to ban the automated speed enforcement (ASE) devices he has bemoaned as nothing more than a “cash grab” from taxpayers.

Red Tape Reduction Minister Andrea Khanjin introduced the legislation as the House began a new session and as a handful of demonstrations decrying the government’s plans were held throughout the province, including several in Toronto where there are 150 active devices, many of which have been the target of vandals.

Here’s a snapshot of what’s the latest on speed cameras in Ontario.

What does the legislation say about speed cameras?

The

Building a More Competitive Economy Act

’s primary purpose is to bolster the economy by streamlining permits and approvals for businesses and municipalities. It also expands labour mobility by granting workers from other provinces — predominantly those in the health care sector — the right to work in Ontario.

However, it would also repeal a section of the

Highway Traffic Act

that allows for drivers to be penalized after being caught speeding by an ASE while also empowering the minister of transportation to require municipalities to install signage in school zones.

In a

news release

, the province said the goal is to protect taxpayers and focus on “alternative traffic-calming measures such as speed bumps, speed cushions and roundabouts, as well as enhanced signage and education campaigns.”

Asked on Monday why the amendments found their way into the economy-focused omnibus bill, Transportation Minister Prabmeet Sarkaria told reporters it was about “protecting the pocketbooks of Ontario” and government’s “focus has always been on preventing speeding at the point of entry into one of these zones, not by a ticket three weeks later.”

“This is the legislative vehicle we will use to get that done,” he said in

a press conference

from Queen’s Park.

What were Monday’s speed camera demonstrations about?

Elsewhere on Monday, parents, caregivers and road safety advocates held a coordinated province-wide day of action in support of ASE programs.

Save Our Safety Cameras demonstrations were held in west end Toronto, East York, Midland, Vaughan, Caledon, and Ottawa.

Organizers, ahead of the events, said ASEs in school and community safety zones have proven effective in reducing speeds. They also cited

new research by The Hospital for Sick Children and Toronto Metropolitan University

that found speed cameras reduced the number of speeding vehicles in urban school zones by 45 per cent.

The study also found that the maximum speed of 85 per cent of vehicles fell by more than 10 km/h.

Tom DeVito, who helped put together a demonstration in Toronto, told the

Canadian Press

that while the other proposed traffic calming measures are welcome, it doesn’t make sense to remove speed cameras from the “tool kit.”

“You still need a screwdriver, and that’s what speed safety cameras are,” he said. “This would be like a carpenter saying, I don’t need a screwdriver because I’m updating and improving the hammer that I own.”

 Hundreds of automated speed enforcement devices have been deployed throughout Ontario since 2019.

At an event outside a school near a busy Ottawa roadway where an ASE is deployed, participants also promoted the effectiveness of ASEs and questioned the premier and the government’s logic.

“I need (Ford) to explain to us why fines for bad behaviour — fines for breaking the law — is a problem in this area and not in others,” Elizabeth MacDonald told

CTV

.

“I need this camera to do its job, the job it’s already done and the job it continues to do.”

Sarkaria, when asked at the press conference if the demonstrations were giving government pause, said “we agree on the end purpose” but reiterated its opposition to the use of ASE technology as a tool.

What does the Ontario Traffic Council think?

Since the campaign against speed cameras began, Ford and Sarkaria have continued to point out that only 37 municipalities have introduced them, while more than 400 have chosen not to.

Geoff Wilkinson, executive director of the Ontario Traffic Council, said it’s more likely that those municipalities simply haven’t yet explored ASE or are early in the process.

He pointed to Windsor, which was about to introduce its program the day Ford announced a ban was coming down the pike.

“I would get inquiries from municipalities on a regular basis looking for more information on how to run a program within their communities,” Wilkinson told National Post.

The council feels ASE is effective and opposes an outright ban, suggesting adjusting the existing regulations to eliminate inconsistencies, such as the “threshold speeds at which a driver may receive a ticket.”

Thresholds can vary by municipality, and the fine is based on how much the driver was speeding — $3 per kilometre for less than 20 km/h over; $4.50 for 20 to 29, $7 for 30 to 50, and $9.75 for 50 km/h or more, according to

ASE Ontario.

Wilkinson said not only do the majority of participating municipalities follow a consistent threshold, legislation passed with the spring budget made it so that “the minister has an opportunity to request data from municipalities and can actually request that the programs be amended and potentially be shut down.”

 Ontario Traffic Council executive director Geoff Wilkinson.

As for the province’s proposed measures in place of cameras, Wilkinson said all those tools have been in place since ASE legislation was first introduced in 2017, a time when OTC and other advocates were already pleading for more ways to protect children, seniors and other vulnerable road users.

When it comes to speed reduction initiatives, Wilkinson said the OTC points to the three components — educating drivers, engineering solutions like those proposed by government, and environment, which are all unique.

“Where we might have speed humps that may work in one particular area, they might not work on another road environment where automated speed enforcement may be the better solution,” he said.

He said experts are more than willing to sit down with government to discuss implementing “a responsible, consistent and transparent program” that will reduce speed and save lives.

Others who’ve spoken in support of ASE use include the

Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police

— along with a group of retired chiefs from Peel, Halton, Niagara, Ottawa and other areas, according to the

Toronto Star

— and elected officials from various municipalities, including 20 mayors who co-signed

a letter

earlier this month urging Ford to divert course and find a compromise.

If the ban goes through, they said the province should cover the costs related to cancelling the programs, which could include increases to policing and staff severance expenses, as well as shortfalls to public safety programs already funded by ASE revenue.

That campaign was co-led by Brampton Mayor Patrick Brown, whose city has a province-high 185 cameras and a just-opened $46 million ticket-processing centre staffed by 30 enforcement officers and 12 others.

Ford responded with a letter of his own days later,

sharing it on X

where he wrote: “

To the mayors asking the government to continue to allow cash grab
speed

cameras
in Ontario, I have been absolutely clear: The answer is no.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A SkyWest jet of the type that made an emergency landing in Omaha on Monday.

A flight from Nebraska to Los Angeles made a quick turnaround just a few kilometres from the airport on Monday, after the pilot heard noises outside the cockpit and thought someone was trying to break in.

SkyWest flight 6569 took off 10 minutes early from from Omaha’s Eppley Airfield, leaving at 6:23 p.m. local time, according to information from FlightAware.com.

However, ABC and other news reports say there was a malfunction in the plane’s intercom system that meant flight attendants could not contact the cockpit, which was locked as is standard practice on flights.

Unable to reach the cockpit by intercom, they started banging on the cockpit door. The captain, hearing that sound and unable to reach the cabin crew from his end, declared an emergency and returned to the Omaha airfield, landing just 36 minutes after takeoff.

The plane, an Embraer ERJ 175 with a capacity of about 80 passengers, was still climbing and was only about 65 kilometres from the airport at an altitude of about 10,000 feet when it turned around.

Video shared with ABC News showed police cars outside the plane after it landed, and police officers boarding the plane. One of them asks: “Everybody’s OK?” A passenger replies: “We don’t know what’s going on but we’re OK.”

The captain is then heard on the cabin intercom, apologizing for the sudden return. “We weren’t sure if something was going on with the airplane so that’s why we’re coming back here,” he says. “It’s going to be a little bit. We’re going to have to figure out what’s going on.”

A statement from the Federal Aviation Administration said: “After landing, it was determined there was a problem with the inter-phone system and the flight crew was knocking on the cockpit door.”

The airport in Omaha posted on social media that “there was no security related incident at Eppley Airfield this evening.” It directed any questions to American Airlines, which contracts SKyWest for some regional flights.

American Airlines told National Post: “SkyWest flight 6469, operating as American Eagle from Omaha to Los Angeles on Monday night, returned to Omaha out of abundance of caution after experiencing communication issues with a flight crew mic. The flight later continued to Los Angeles. We apologize for the inconvenience.”

News reports said the plane was able to take off again about three hours later.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


CBC/Radio-Canada CEO Marie-Philippe Bouchard in their offices in Montreal, Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2025.

The head of CBC and Radio-Canada says there’s no need to “stop everything to do a full investigation” into antisemitism within its reporting and within the organization.

Marie-Philippe Bouchard, the president and CEO of the public broadcaster, attended a Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage meeting in Ottawa on Monday. Bouchard officially took over the role in January.

She faced a wide range of questions from MPs at the meeting. Conservative MP Rachael Thomas asked about antisemitism in the CBC’s reporting, in particular since Oct. 7, 2023, when more than a thousand people were killed and hundreds taken hostage in Israel in a terror attack by Hamas.

“Statistics were often taken from

Hamas itself, which is a terrorist entity

, and used by the CBC as if it was from a government ministry itself,” said Thomas. Many articles by CBC include the

death toll of Palestinians

killed in the Israel-Hamas war as reported by Gaza’s Health Ministry,

an agency run by Hamas

. It

does not distinguish between civilian and terrorist

deaths.

A CBC article published as recently as Monday cited numbers from the Gaza ministry of Palestinians killed in a bombardment from Israel, which was prompted by a

deadly attack on two Israeli soldiers over the weekend

.

Thomas also mentioned that

CBC reported on the bombing of a hospital in Gaza last October, laying the blame on Israel for the death and destruction

. But it was later revealed the damage was

caused by a Hamas rocket that misfired

in a nearby parking lot.

“By that point you can imagine the hatred and the outrage that had already been targeted toward a vulnerable population that exists here in Canada already, of course the Jewish community,” said Thomas. “It’s been time after time after time…What are you doing to tackle this antisemitic rhetoric that exists in the CBC and its news reporting?”

Bouchard said there was a process in place for inaccurate reporting, which was upheld by the ombudsman. “This is how we get better. If there’s mistakes being made, then there is full transparency on that,” she said.

Thomas maintained that “it’s not getting better.” She brought up a more recent incident in mid-September, when a

Radio-Canada journalist made antisemitic comments on-air

.

“My understanding, and that of multiple analysts here in the United States, is that it is the Israelis, the Jews, that finance American politics a lot,” said Washington correspondent for Radio-Canada Elisa Serret. She made the comments while speaking on

sur le terrain

, a French-language show with a focus on politics.

“The big cities are run by Jews, Hollywood is run by Jews…” she said.

Bouchard called the comments “unacceptable, hurtful, and contrary to our journalist standards and practices.” She said she apologized to employees and news management apologized to viewers for the incident.

But when pressed if she would look into the matter further, Bouchard reiterated CBC’s dedication to the journalistic process. Thomas noted Bouchard’s “unwillingness to do a reexamination” to confront antisemitism within the organization.

“What I’m saying journalism is a continuous process of questions, of revisiting, of challenging. This is how we live. This is what we do. So we don’t have to stop everything to do a full investigation,” said Bouchard.

Canadian Jewish advocacy group, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, said it was disappointing that Bouchard would not “provide a clear commitment to Canadians.”

“At a time of rising hate, Canadians deserve accountability through an investigation into systemic racism and bias at the national public broadcaster,” the group said in

a post on X

.

Later in the conversation, Bouchard was pressed about the company’s hiring practices. Since 2015, Thomas said

it was reported

that 20 temporary foreign workers had been hired by the CBC in Ontario for “high-wage” positions. Bouchard said as far as she knows, there were no temporary foreign workers currently employed.

Some of the positions filled included computer programmers, computer network technicians, business management consulting, marketing researchers, announcers and broadcast technicians, said Thomas.

Thomas asked Bouchard if she would commit to not hiring any future temporary workers, given rising unemployment numbers.

“There might be incidents where, for very specific type of work, there’s a requirement. If there’s a process and it’s approved by the authority, I don’t exactly see what the issue is that you have with this process, but maybe I’m not familiar enough,” she said.

Unemployment rates in Canada are rising

and the CBC is looking elsewhere to fill its talents rather than right here at home,” said Thomas.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Liberal House Leader Steven MacKinnon.

OTTAWA — Liberal House Leader Steven MacKinnon said Tuesday he is starting to worry that Parliament’s two main opposition parties are signalling that the government should not count on their support for its upcoming budget.

Should that spending plan fail to pass, it would cause Parliament to fall and pave the way for Canadians to head back to the polls for a second time in the same year.

“If an election is necessary, we would obviously, reluctantly, because we don’t think Canadians want an election, but election there will be,” MacKinnon told reporters on his way into the government’s weekly cabinet meeting.

Carney’s government is set to table its first budget on Nov. 4.

“What I’m seeing in Parliament worries me,” MacKinnon said, noting that the date is two weeks away.

As a minority government, the Liberals must find another party willing to pass its budget.

Opposition Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre released a letter on Monday addressed to Carney, laying out his party’s demands.

Most notably, he said the Liberals must keep the federal deficit below $42 billion.

The Parliamentary Budget Officer, an independent watchdog of government, recently predicted the deficit could grow to nearly $70

billion for 2025-2026. That included the $5 billion in spending Carney promised last month to flow to industries hard hit by U.S. tariffs, including the auto sector. 

While his government has asked all federal departments, except for national defence, the RCMP, and Canada Border Services Agency, to find 15 per cent in savings over three years, Carney has also vowed to spend billions more on bolstering Canada’s military capabilities to meet its NATO spending target of two per cent of its GDP.

Poilievre, in his letter, also called for a slew of tax cuts, including to the industrial carbon price, which remains a core plank of the government’s plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Speaking to reporters, MacKinnon called the Conservatives’ demands “ludicrous.”

“We have two opposition parties, principally that aren’t taking this matter very seriously,” he said.

MacKinnon also criticized Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet, who has dampened expectations that his party would be willing to support the government’s budget.

The Bloc has also laid out a list of demands, including six that the party has presented as being “non-negotiable.”

They include an increase in provincial health transfers, as well as a 10 per cent increase in Old Age Security payments to those aged 64 to 75. Both proposals would result in billions of additional government spending.

The Bloc is also calling for the federal government to send Quebecers around $814 million to account for the rebates Canadians living in provinces subject to the now-cancelled federal consumer carbon tax received as the spring federal election got underway, which those in Quebec did not receive because the province has its own system.

Interim NDP Leader Don Davies has also called for more health spending and told reporters the party would not be willing to support a spending plan that takes an “austerity approach.”

Davies has met with Carney, with MacKinnon adding on Tuesday that Finance Minister

François-Philippe Champagne has had additional conversations. 

-With files from The Canadian Press and Financial Post’s Jordan Gowling

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Auditor General of Canada Karen Hogan waits to appear before the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates (OGGO) in West Block on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2025.

OTTAWA — Not only has the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) not recruited and trained the members it needs to meet its operational requirements, but the living accommodations of the existing CAF members have been found to lack basics like potable running water.

These are some of the latest findings in two alarming reports tabled in the House of Commons on Tuesday by Canada’s Auditor General Karen Hogan. She based the conclusions of her audits on government data spanning the last two or three years.

“The Canadian Armed Forces continued to have challenges attracting and training enough highly skilled recruits to staff many occupations such as pilots and ammunition technicians,” Hogan said in a press release accompanying the report.

“This could affect the army, navy and air force’s ability to respond to threats, emergencies or conflicts and accomplish their missions,” she added.

Hogan’s report on CAF recruitment revealed that nearly 192,000 people applied to join the CAF between April 1, 2022, and March 31, 2025. Of that number, only 15,000 new recruits successfully joined the forces — falling short of the CAF’s target by about 4,700 recruits.

That means that the average recruitment ratio for that period was around one in 13. The CAF blew past its overall recruitment targets in the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 fiscal years, according to the report, but slightly surpassed its target in the 2024-2025 fiscal year.

Hogan also found that, of the nearly 192,000 people who applied to join the military, more than half — 54 per cent or around 103,7000 — either voluntarily withdrew from or during the recruitment process or simply did not respond to the CAF’s outreach efforts.

However, the audit found the CAF did not conduct analyses to understand exactly why applicants had decided to drop out along the way.

“Without knowing why applicants left, it was difficult for the Canadian Armed Forces to identify what was needed to increase the number of applicants who complete the recruitment process,” read the report.

Even though recruitment has been slightly higher in the last year, the CAF’s internal analysis from 2024 predicts that 13 per cent of occupations are at risk of not reaching the minimum of 90 per cent authorized staffing levels unless “key challenges” are addressed.

Examples of these in-demand roles include pilots, combat engineers, and a number of technician roles — for aircraft structures, ammunition, aerospace telecommunications and information systems, among others.

Hogan noted in her report that the CAF has already highlighted these positions on its website as being more in demand and provided incentives, such as signing bonuses.

In a separate report, the Auditor General found that the Department of National Defence (DND) could be doing a lot more to ensure that CAF members have proper living accommodation that responds to their needs and the needs of their families.

“National Defence’s own research has shown that housing is an issue that can negatively affect the well-being of military families, with impacts on retention,” reads the report.

The Canadian Forces Housing Agency maintains approximately 11,700 residential housing units on bases and wings across the country. The CAF bases also maintain 26,000 bed spaces in 318 buildings that may be used for training courses or short-term assignments.

Hogan’s audit found that DND did not always provide bed spaces that met its own standards. Her team visited quarters that had issues such as insufficient living space, which could result in overcrowding, and a lack of modern amenities such as wi-fi access.

Her team also found that many of DND’s buildings are old, and present significant issues.

“Some of the issues we observed included quarters buildings that lacked potable water, had malfunctioning sanitary waste systems, or had deteriorating exterior walls,” reads the report.

Overall, the audit found that 25 per cent of living quarters needed “major repairs” or did not meet the operational needs of DND or CAF members staying in them.

More generally, there is a severe lack of units to meet the CAF’s needs, and that problem will only keep growing for future recruits. In spring of 2025, Hogan found that there were only 205 residential housing units available, while 3,706 applicants were still on wait lists.

“To meet operational needs, Canadian Armed Forces members can be required to move frequently. It is important for their morale and well-being that they can access affordable housing in good condition with sufficient living space for their needs,” reads the report.

The audit also found that the Canadian Forces Housing Agency — which manages those residential units — made mistakes in how it processed and prioritized applications.

In many cases, the wrong household size was entered in the agency’s system, resulting in further delays in getting the right unit, or agency staff assigned the wrong priority level to applicants, resulting in low-level priority applicants getting units before high-priority ones.

The agency is expected to spend $2.2 billion over 19 years to build 1,400 new residential units and renovate 2,500 more. DND has also been exploring options to obtain additional housing, such as partnering with the private sector to develop housing for the military.

However, the audit found that many of these initiatives are at different stages of implementation and have not yet been funded. The updated assessments also do not take into account the CAF’s plans to expand their forces to 71,500 members by 2028-2029.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Auditor General of Canada, Karen Hogan, holds a press conference at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa on Tuesday, June 10, 2025.

OTTAWA — Despite hundreds of millions of dollars of investments since a devastating 2017 audit, the Canada Revenue Agency’s call centres are still plagued with worsening reliability and accuracy problems as agents give wrong information as often as 87 per cent of the time.

That’s according to a new report by Auditor General Karen Hogan published on Tuesday. The audit found that Canadians are waiting far too long on hold to speak to an agent and, when they get through, they often receive inaccurate general information.

“I’m worried that despite a new telephony system and other improvements, Canadians still wait too long to get answers to their questions on tax,” Hogan told MPs on the Public Accounts committee.

On average, Canadians waited over 31 minutes to speak to an agent last fiscal year, more than double the agency’s service standard of a 15-minute wait, her audit found.

“When those people were able to speak to an agent, they frequently received inaccurate responses,” Hogan added.

One remarkable finding is that the CRA’s call centre gave auditors inaccurate information 87 per cent of the time when they called asking for general individual tax information.

Enquiries about general benefits or business taxes fared only slightly better, with auditors receiving accurate responses roughly half the time.

The finding is in stark contrast to the agency’s own numbers. Since 2019, CRA has reported call accuracy and quality rates of over 87 per cent.

Hogan’s report found that accuracy rates jumped significantly on calls with account-specific inquiries, hitting up to 98 per cent.

But call center employees largely don’t have to fret about losing their job if they provide inaccurate information to taxpayers. That’s because the audit discovered that only 10 per cent of their performance review is related to accuracy.

The bulk of agent performance scores, Hogan says, are related to if they take their breaks and show up to work on time.

“Having only about 10% of an agent’s annual performance review based on the accuracy and completeness of their responses, in my mind, does not encourage a good culture where accuracy and completeness is top of mind,” Hogan told MPs.

Hogan said she also found so many red flags in the 2015 contract between the government and IBM for call center telephony services at CRA and two other departments that she will launch a standalone audit on the contract.

Her report found that the cost of the contract ballooned from a minimum guaranteed amount of $50 million to over $190 million.

In 2017, then-Auditor General Michael Ferguson revealed that the agency’s call centres blocked half the calls they received in order to say it met its service standard for wait times. He also concluded that taxpayers were given wrong information by agents 30 per cent of the time and that a large majority (64 per cent) of calls ultimately went “unanswered.”

In response, the Liberals committed $50 million to improve the call centre’s services and telephone systems and promised that Canadians would start seeing an improvement by 2018. In the meantime, the CRA dropped its service standard from 80 per cent of calls being answered within two minutes to answering 65 per cent of calls within 15 minutes.

Seven years later, the minister responsible for the CRA says the quality of service offered by agency’s call centres has

hit “rock bottom” and is “completely unacceptable”.

“It can’t get much worse than it is now,” the secretary of state responsible for the CRA Wayne Long told CTV last month. This summer, the government gave CRA 100 days to improve their services to Canadians.

The Liberals also promised an additional $400 million in the 2022 Fall Economic Statement to support the agency’s contact centres in that fiscal year and the next. The money, according to CRA, would allow the agency to “support the service standard of answering 65 per cent of calls within 15 minutes or less”.

But Hogan’s audit shows that both the number of contact centre employees and the percentage of calls answered within 15 minutes or less dropped between 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, raising questions about if that money was ever spent and, if so, how.

In June, CRA’s data showed that only five per cent of calls met the agency’s service standard.

“Since 2019–20, the agency has met its service standard only once — in the 2022–23 fiscal year,” reads the audit. “This shortfall limits callers’ access to an agent and compromises the agency’s ability to uphold its commitment stated in the Taxpayer Bill of Rights that callers have the right to complete, accurate, clear, and timely information”

Hogan says there is a link between the number of employees at the call centre and the agency’s responsiveness by phone. Call centre employee numbers have dropped progressively since 2022-2023, and so have the agency’s service standard rates.

Some issues highlighted in 2017 appear to have been addressed. Notably, the agency only blocks a small fraction of the calls it receives now (48,000 of over 32 million calls in 2024-2025).

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


A view of new homes under construction in Ontario.

OTTAWA — For every house being built in Canada’s largest metropolitan area, a new report says, there are 12 that have all of the necessary approvals but no shovels in the ground, which amounts to a backlog of about 1.2-million homes in that area alone.

The report, to be released Tuesday by cross-sectoral group CivicAction, says that backlog in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GHTA) and across the country is a major factor in Canada’s housing crisis.

The gulf between the planned homes and those actually getting built, CivicAction says, is a result of a wide variety of structural bottlenecks, including: municipal planning departments are designed for building levels of the past, not what is needed today; financing models favour high-priced developments, not the homes that middle-class Canadians can afford; and skills shortages in the construction industry.

Leslie Woo, CivicAction’s chief executive officer, said the housing crisis in the 26 municipalities that make up the Toronto-Hamilton area and other cities across the country won’t show much of a reprieve until these structural problems are resolved. The array of solutions will need to include new financial models that target affordable homes, mobilizing pension capital, and greater co-ordination and commitment among governments, developers, lenders and non-profits, she said.

“There is a solution but we’re just not getting our act together,” said Woo. “We’re just nibbling at the edges.”

Canada’s housing crisis is rooted in an unusual blend of forces that seems able to overwhelm a market where hundreds of thousands of potential buyers want to spend big bucks on something with countless social and economic benefits. The results of the disconnect between supply and demand in this case include rising home prices, foregone jobs and government revenue and homelessness. The average purchase price of a new home in Canada is now $1.07 million.

Many economists and analysts have portrayed Canada’s housing crisis as largely a function of a lack of supply, arguing that a greater stock of homes for both buyers and renters would mean more homes while also putting downward pressure on prices. They

trace the lack of supply to rising taxes and other input costs

, zoning chokeholds, and a tangled web of multi-jurisdictional bureaucracy.

While Woo emphasized the need for affordable housing, there’s little dispute that Canada needs to approximately double housing output to about 500,000 units a year by the mid-2030s.

But the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), a Crown corporation that acts as the country’s national housing agency, says housing output hasn’t shown much progress so far, despite the attention that the issue has received in recent years. CMHC recently forecast that the total number of housing starts this year will be about 237,800, down from 245,367 in 2024. The agency also forecasts a drop to about 227,734 next year and 220,016 in 2027.

The challenge has many faces, including access to land in the right places, lack of skilled trades, and, of course, rising costs.

The biggest cost in the price of a new home is taxation, with all three levels of government taking a healthy cut in the price of a new home. A recent study found that taxes and fees now comprise an average of about 35.6 per cent of the price of a new home — 16 per cent (or five percentage points) higher than at the start of the decade. About 70 per cent of those charges are for development charges for sewer, water and electricity, land-transfer taxes, and HST. The other 30 per cent is for the indirect income and corporate taxes paid throughout the supply chain, but ultimately passed on to buyers.

But the other major costs that go into a new home have also been on the rise. Those include the value of land and materials (21.2 per cent), the cost of the workers who provide home essentials such as flooring and cabinets (16.9 per cent), construction workers (12.9 per cent), developers’ margins (9.1 per cent) and supplier margins (4.2 per cent).

All three levels of government say they recognize the need for more homes and want to fix the problem. But housing industry executives, economists and groups such as CivicAction agree that there’s a long road ahead.

The federal government, which set the 500,000 target and is responsible for national housing strategies, signing cheques to provincial non-profits and indigenous housing, unveiled last month Build Canada Homes. The new $13 billion program is intended to help more homes get built more quickly, especially more affordable homes.

Prime Minister Mark Carney said the program will reduce the upfront building costs by providing flexible financial incentives to attract private investment and trigger large projects. The new organization would also use federal land in six cities for the construction of 4,000 factory-built homes. Ottawa has also eliminated the GST for first-time homebuyers who purchase homes valued at less than $1 million and tried to shave demand for housing by cutting immigration and foreign student numbers.

Some provinces and territories, the primary provider of housing delivery and public housing, are also taking steps, including making better use of underused land and cutting red tape.

Municipalities are seen as the biggest players in housing. They control zoning, land use, urban planning, and must approve housing developments. They’re also responsible for water, sewer and other services that form a costly and time-consuming part of the process for new builds.

Some municipalities have taken recent steps to spur more housing. More than a dozen municipalities in the Toronto area, for example, have temporarily trimmed or eliminated those development charges.

Demand for housing has also been on the rise for many decades, putting further pressure on prices. Population growth, fuelled largely by immigration, internal migration from rural to urban areas, and the reduction in the number of people who live in the average Canadian home are major drivers.

Beyond the social importance of housing, the lack of supply also comes with a huge economic cost.

Economists point out that home construction also creates economic activity and jobs through construction and the various purchases of furniture, appliances and other items that new homeowners typically make.

The new report by CivicAction, which was funded by TD Bank Group, also points to another another cost, saying that 68 per cent of GTHA businesses report difficulty attracting talent because of the area’s housing costs.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.