LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Meta's camera glasses film women who never find out, and the warning light can be defeated.

The only sign that a pair of Meta glasses is recording you is a small white light on the frame, and it can be defeated.

Men are using the camera glasses to film women who do not know it is happening, and not only on the street. It is happening in gyms, in bathrooms and in change rooms. The footage lands on Instagram and TikTok, where the women in it are identified and mocked in the comments.

For these reasons, news outlets such as The Guardian , Wired and Vox , among countless others, have dubbed them “pervert glasses,” a term that also found its way into a recent Jimmy Kimmel monologue and skit.

The glasses are built not to be noticed. They look like ordinary sunglasses, and the light is the only warning anyone gets that a camera is running.

Meta launched a cheaper second line in June with EssilorLuxottica , the eyewear group that owns Ray-Ban and Oakley, starting at $409 in Canada and carrying neither brand name. One of the three styles was designed with Kylie Jenner. They went on sale here at launch.

 Meta’s Kylie edition glasses on display in an electronic store in New York City.

The most visible use is the pickup video, where a man approaches a woman in public, films the exchange without telling her and posts it. Suzie Dunn , an assistant professor of law at Dalhousie University who researches technology-facilitated gender-based violence, said the point is not the woman.

“I don’t think they’re genuinely trying to pick up these women,” Dunn said.

Rather, she said the videos are meant to be instructional, aimed at men who pay to learn the technique.

“Many of these people are trying to gain followers. They often sell classes or other types of subscription-based models where people pay them to show how to be a pick-up artist,” she said.

The women find out later.

“Once their images are published, they’ve been identified. Often their school will be identified, their workplace will be identified, sometimes their phone number or their social media accounts will get contacted by people who will critique their appearance, will critique the way that they reacted to this pickup artist,” Dunn said.

Dunn separates that from a second category.

“There’s the other context which is, you know, filming in bathrooms, filming in change rooms, filming during sexual activities and that’s a different category of non-consensual filming than the pick-up artists,” she said.

Olivia Avison, a peer support worker at the Digital Sexual Violence Support Centre in Mississauga and a master of social work candidate, said the settings are ordinary. It can happen anywhere “from a park to a library,” she said. She also manages a massage therapy clinic, where she said there would be “zero acceptance” of anyone recording.

Meta’s answer is the light. The company says the capture LED blinks briefly when a photo is taken and keeps blinking through a video, that it has no off switch, and that it is there so everyone around the wearer knows they are recording. Covering it with tape has disabled the camera since the second generation.

The company said in a July 7 blog post that it was going further.

“We are continuously improving our ability to detect tampering, and now we’re updating the glasses to disable the camera if they detect the LED was physically tampered with or destroyed,” Meta said in the post. The update is mandatory and covers Ray-Ban Meta, Oakley Meta and Meta’s own line.

 Meta’s Oakley glasses on display in an electronic store.

Jake Moore, a global cybersecurity advisor at the security firm ESET who bought a pair and tested them, said that is not the end of it. The light “can be switched off or hidden with a worryingly simple modification,” he said in an email to National Post.

“The fact this is possible is extremely worrying and shows that Meta has built the glasses without a privacy focus,” he wrote.

Moore has told Meta about the workaround and is holding the technical details while he waits for the company to respond. He’s not aware of any plans to fix it.

His advice does not depend on the light at all.

“If people don’t see an LED light switched on, they should still assume that the glasses could still in fact be recording,” Moore wrote.

Meta acknowledged questions from National Post about the recording light and the modifications but did not provide answers by deadline.

Dunn sees the same thing from the other side. People who want the light off find each other online, she said.

“If you go on to places on the internet where these communities exist, they provide each other with instructions on how to do it. And so far, it seems that they have been very effective in learning how to turn the light off.”

Section 162 of the Criminal Code makes it voyeurism to secretly record someone who has a reasonable expectation of privacy, and carries up to five years in prison.

Dunn said that covers the change room.

“If someone has turned off the light of their glasses, they haven’t told the person that they’re recording. And if the person is in a private place, such as a bathroom, a change room, a bedroom, even if there’s no sexual activity going on … that would be covered under voyeurism,” she said.

Voyeurism requires a sexual purpose or a private setting, and a pickup video may be neither.

“It would be interesting to see a legal case go through to see how the courts would interpret that if surreptitiously made pickup videos could be captured under something like voyeurism,” Dunn said. “It’s not clear.”

Ottawa’s most recent move is the Safe Social Media Act , introduced June 10, which targets seven kinds of harmful content and requires social media services to take down material that sexually victimizes children and intimate content shared without consent. It says nothing about a person filming a stranger in public.

Filming strangers in public is generally legal in Canada, and Dunn does not dispute that — “It’s not inappropriate to take photos in public,” she said — but what has changed is the volume and the purpose.

How much of it is happening in Canada is unknown. Avison works at one of the only Canadian organizations dedicated to digital sexual violence and has not had a single case involving the glasses. The issue “isn’t something that’s come to my attention yet, but I’m sure it’s bound to happen,” she said.

Some places have already drawn a line. Gyms and gym change rooms increasingly have explicit no-filming rules, Dunn said, and she expects more venues to follow. The Berlin nightclub Berghain covers the cameras on every phone at the door.

Removing a video is harder. People usually start with their municipal police, Avison said, who have a technological unit that deals with cybercrime but often send them back to the platform. From there it is the social media company or Google, and nobody hands you a set of steps.

“There aren’t straightforward instructions,” she said. “So it’s very, very confusing and very, very tedious.”

In her experience, it takes a few weeks, Avison said, and then it starts again.

“The second you take down one photo, another one is up,” she said, noting that people end up searching for themselves for hours, looking for copies.

For Dunn, the fix is not a better warning light.

“I think they should stop making the glasses,” she said.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Pastor Kofi Danso is seen in a still photo from a public YouTube service at Miracle Arena. He used the public broadcast to criticize those he said were making false statements about him.

Jodi says she remembers her hands shaking as her married pastor — the man she had for months been told to call “dad” — pulled her onto his lap on a cream-coloured couch in his ministry office.

Just 16 years old at the time, Jodi says she froze as Kofi Danso, a self-described “Man of God,” prophet and the leader of Miracle Arena church, then located in North York, Ont., began to unbutton her pants.

“He was like, ‘Just know that I’m here … I’m your dad.’ He’s whispering these things to me while he’s kissing my neck and fingering me,” the woman, now in her 20s, said in an interview with the Investigative Journalism Bureau (IJB).

“I just became numb.”

Jodi, whose identity is being protected because she fears repercussions for speaking out, is one of more than a dozen people who have spoken to the Investigative Journalism Bureau (IJB) alleging they experienced either sexual misconduct or financial manipulation at Miracle Arena For All Nations Church , now located in Vaughan, Ont. north of Toronto.

Danso, 44, declined interview requests from the IJB but provided a detailed written response to questions through his lawyer, in which he denies “all allegations of sexual abuse, including allegations of sexual relations with a minor.” He also denies allegations of financial exploitation. A regional police force confirmed it had investigated some sexual claims, but has closed that investigation and has not charged him with a criminal offence.

The statement from Danso’s lawyer says many of his parishioners call him “papa” as a sign of “respect and deference” common in his native Ghana.

“These cultural terms should be viewed in the context of Ghanaian culture,” it reads, adding that many of his parishioners are Ghanaian. “In the 15 years of the Miracle Arena’s existence, there have not been any allegations made against Mr. Danso or brought to the attention of Miracle Arena.”

Miracle Arena is a “charismatic” church situated on a gated 12-acre compound north of Toronto. It’s run by senior pastor Danso and his wife, JoAnne, who claim to “demonstrate the power of God through miracles, signs and wonders” to hundreds of congregants each week — many of whom are refugees or immigrants.

Some have been housed on-site in makeshift shelters or inside the church buildings while others say they have been asked to work for the Danso family to care for the couple’s children and have moved into their home.

Sexual misconduct allegations

Jodi is one of five women interviewed by the IJB who allege Danso engaged in a range of sexual misconduct, including grooming, arranging sexual encounters with them in his church office and arranging for them to have sex with visiting pastors.

Some of the allegations shared with the IJB against Danso go back more than a decade.

While Jodi was a teen at the time of the alleged sexual misconduct, the rest say they were in their early 20s or 30s.

Jodi says she began attending Miracle Arena with her parents in 2017 before being recruited to volunteer for the church’s media team, where she was tasked with shooting videos of Danso’s sermons.

She says Danso began to sexually abuse her in February 2018 after she was tasked with filming the popular 5 a.m. Monday gathering at the church.

Jodi alleges Danso had at least 15 sexual encounters with her over five months. The majority of the time Danso performed oral sex or digitally penetrated her, she said.

On one occasion, while in his office, Jodi says, Danso pulled her wrists, drawing her close to him before laying her flat on his white three-seater couch. He then had non-consensual, unprotected sex with her, she says.

“I would make sounds of ‘it hurts.’ He didn’t care that I was hurting,” said Jodi, who did not make a report to police. “I felt so disgusting. It really affected me to the point where I wanted to die.”

During an initial call with reporters, Danso expressed “shock” at what he called “very serious allegations.” In a later written statement from his lawyer, Danso denied all allegations of sexual misconduct including allegations of grooming and “arranging encounters in various places or for other people.”

He alleges that the allegations are part of a personal vendetta and blackmail attempt by a former minister at Miracle Arena who is facing criminal charges and who believes Danso reported him to police.

 Pastor Kofi Danso (centre, in green) prays during a service by another minister at the Miracle Arena For All Nations church in Vaughan in April, 2024.

It’s not the first time Danso has been accused of inappropriate sexual conduct with a parishioner.

In a case previously before Toronto courts, Danso contested the paternity of a child he was confirmed by DNA test to have fathered with a former congregant.

The paternity test found a 99.999996 per cent probability that Danso is the father of the woman’s child.

“The applicant is a leader in his church and he presents himself as a moral and family man; however, this is contrary to his actions in his private life,” reads a court filing from the woman who says she had a three-year sexual relationship with Danso that resulted in a child in 2018.

“I believe that (there) are other (women) who have endured similar experiences … but they are afraid of coming forward.”

The court, however, noted there was no proof before it ”that there are any other women involved in the issues in this proceeding.”

In his written statement to reporters, Danso said he would “not comment on the child support case that was before the court.”

In June 2023, an Ontario judge granted the child’s mother interim financial assistance to help continue the litigation. In May 2024, the court issued a final order requiring Danso to pay $2,019 a month in child support, based on an imputed income of $250,000. No further court appearances are scheduled.

The order states that Danso cannot bring a motion to change child support for 10 years, until March 2034, unless he becomes physically or mentally incapacitated.

Several former parishioners told the IJB they have filed complaints about Danso with Toronto and York Regional Police alleging sexual misconduct involving a minor, sex trafficking and financial exploitation. No charges have been laid.

 A gated entrance to the Miracle Arena church in Vaughan, north of Toronto. The Dansos bought the property in 2020 for $5.6 million.

Toronto Police Service said it “does not publicly comment on complaints received about an individual, or confirm whether an investigation may or may not exist, unless criminal charges have been laid or information has otherwise been released publicly through the courts or a TPS news release.”

York Regional Police said in an email to the IJB, “The investigation was concluded but we are unable to get into the specifics of the investigation in order to protect the identity of the victims.”

A York Police spokesperson told the IJB in a follow-up phone call that allegations made earlier this year against Danso concerned alleged “sexual assault” and the investigation concluded with no charges laid.

The IJB spoke with one woman — a former Miracle Arena parishioner — who gave a statement to York Police in the fall of 2025 alleging historical sexual misconduct by Danso.

She says police told her shortly after that due to a lack of corroborating evidence (text messages, emails, documents), they could not use her statement.

In an email, a York Police spokesperson said, “Any victims who have not yet come forward to police are encouraged to do so.” The spokesperson also pointed to York Region Victim Services and the Women’s Support Network.

Dagma Noelien, a former minister at Miracle Arena, says she left the church in 2018 after allegations of sexual misconduct surfaced, including the claims that Danso had fathered a child.

Noelien says multiple women contacted her, prior to and following her departure, alleging they had experienced inappropriate sexual touching by Danso or advances from him and, in some cases, by visiting ministers. Through conversations with two other women, she said, she learned that they too claimed to have experienced similar conduct.

None agreed to speak to reporters.

Noelien, who did not witness sexual misconduct, said she confronted Danso in person. A resignation letter reviewed by reporters detailed her reasons for leaving.

“I recently became aware of evidence that other young ladies in the ministry (have) been victims of sexual misconduct … I was horrified by that fact and could no longer continue to suppress the unrest,” Noelien wrote in the November 2018 letter addressed to Danso and his wife. “My trust towards you (has) been broken.”

Danso did not address her concerns, she says. She said that she urged several women to go to the police, but all refused, fearing shame or spiritual retaliation such as being “cursed” by him for speaking out.

“I think he puts fear in the people,” she said. “They always feel like if they come out, they’re going to die.”

Asked for a response to Noelien’s allegations in the 2018 letter, Danso’s lawyer said, “This is what you call evidence? The email contains no particulars of who these alleged women were.”

Reporters also identified a 2019 social media post by a former Miracle Arena pastor, alleging that, after resigning, Danso threatened “negative prayers” and “closed heavens,” and promised the pastor’s family would “never prosper.”

The former pastor’s resignation does not appear to have been linked to allegations of sexual misconduct.

Danso, through his lawyer, did not respond to questions about the post.

 The Miracle Arena Church property in Vaughan, Ont. as seen on Aug. 11 2026.

After letters requesting comment were sent to Danso by IJB reporters, he raised the IJB’s correspondence with his parishioners during church services. During a service posted to Miracle Arena’s YouTube channel , he told congregants that individuals who had spoken to reporters would be publicly identified.

“By the grace of God, we will reveal you and all your images and your pictures,” he said, prompting cheers from the congregation.

He also threatened to release audio messages and recordings he claims to possess of alleged victims.

“Those individuals who claim to have spoken … they foolishly forget themselves that they do audio recordings … we have all the messages,” he said. “No weapon formed against me shall prosper.”

In the days following the IJB’s questions to Danso, former youth minister at the church Peace Eze, who says she was not subject to sexual impropriety by Danso, said she received an anonymous threat warning her against cooperating with reporters.

“The more you investigate, the worse it becomes for everyone involved,” read the text message reviewed by reporters. “Let it go quietly.”

Another woman who had spoken with the IJB said she was the target of numerous calls from an unknown number.

The IJB requested comment from Danso about his video address to parishioners, including the threats to expose those who made allegations against him.

A written statement from Danso’s lawyer says the pastor “has every right to speak to his parishioners at the Miracle Arena in order to defend himself against your biased questions and reliance on highly questionable anonymous sources.”

Danso also threatened legal action against the IJB.

While at the ministry, Noelien says she observed that Danso often addressed female parishioners with affectionate terms such as “my baby” or “my love,” she said.

She also alleged that he regularly met with women privately in his office.

“These kinds of things create an atmosphere where you put down your guard, ” Noelien said. “You create that culture to groom without people even realizing it.”

Financial allegations

Stately black gates adorned with gold crowns mark Miracle Arena’s entrance in Vaughan, just north of Toronto. The gates open onto a long driveway leading to the church building where hundreds of parishioners flock each week.

 A car passes through an entrance gate to the Miracle Arena church in June, 2026.

Inside the main building sits an ATM, with debit and credit tap points nearby.

The Toronto congregation meets multiple times a week for hours-long services, more than 25 of which were viewed by reporters on the church’s YouTube page .

During many services, congregants publicly shared testimonies describing what they say are physical healings, financial breakthroughs and other life changes they attribute to Danso’s ministry. Danso frequently encouraged attendees to make monetary “sacrifices” to God.

Some former members describe an environment in which congregants, many of whom are newcomers, refugees or people on social assistance, are routinely pressured to give until it hurts.

Three people the IJB spoke to said they gave thousands of dollars to both the church and, often, to Danso personally for “directions” or prophetic readings. Some said no tax receipts were provided.

In one case, Danso publicly thanked a parishioner for a $16,000 donation.

All of the people who spoke with the IJB about finances said they were recruited from the congregation to be unpaid church volunteers for Miracle Arena or childcare and housekeepers for Danso’s family.

Some said the Dansos spend hundreds of dollars in church funds daily on the Danso children’s meals and other personal needs.

Stories from congregants of working upwards of 40 hours per week in the church with no pay and little food or sleep were common among those who spoke to the IJB.

Judah Rogers was 19 when a friend invited him to Miracle Arena in 2020. Shortly after attending services, he says, he was asked to become a volunteer and join the church’s music department. Rogers says he participated in week-long fasts, overnight services and back-to-back events that left him sleeping for less than an hour at a time, for days at a time.

Every month he was also directed to pay hundreds of dollars for “volunteer dues” and uniform fees, he says.

“I’m pushing myself to the physical limit while depriving myself of food. I’m literally at the brink of exhaustion,” says Rogers, who estimates he gave roughly $20,000 to the church and Danso before he left the church in 2024.

At one private workers’ meeting that year, Rogers says, Danso demanded each volunteer prepare to contribute $2,000 in celebration of his upcoming birthday the following year, in February 2025. A similar request for gifts was echoed this year during a service held on his birthday in which congregants were invited to make donations, video of the event shows.

“Change your habits and you shall see a harvest,” he said during that birthday sermon, scolding those who hadn’t contributed.

 Judah Rogers says every month he was also directed to pay hundreds of dollars for “volunteer dues” and uniform fees.

In his written statement, Danso denied allegations that he had pressured congregants to make significant donations, saying also that those who volunteer do so on their own terms and, “if they happen to be fasting while they are volunteering, then they are expected to use their own judgment to stop when they are feeling tired.”

And his birthday solicitations were based on a “light-hearted remark that he would like $2,000 donations (for the Miracle Arena) in honour of his 40th birthday milestone.” The statement says he later clarified at a meeting that it was not meant for himself personally and that those who wanted to donate were “encouraged to just make a simple gesture of appreciation, such as a birthday card.”

“No one was obligated to donate anything, and this comment was taken out of context,” the statement reads.

Danso’s statement says churches and religious institutions of all faiths depend on donations to operate.

“It is unfair to apply a higher standard to the Miracle Arena than you would to any other religious organization or entity that relies upon donations and gifts from its parishioners,” it reads. “After someone leaves the church for whatever reason, it is not surprising that they may have regrets about their past donations. However, no one is obligated to donate; it is their choice.”

The statement says ATM machines and “tap points” are set up as a “matter of convenience,” since the days of passing a plate around to parishioners are gone. It also said that receipts are issued to donors upon request. “When an individual does not receive a receipt, it is typically due to the fact that they have not asked for one,” it reads.

As for the allegations that donations were used for Danso’s family expenses, a written statement from Danso denied all allegations of financial impropriety, saying all of the church’s revenues and expenses are handled by an accountant who submits them to the Canada Revenue Agency.

“It is unfair to make bald general allegations of financial misuse. Further, many churches provide various living expenses for their pastors,” the statement reads.

Former church member charged

Separate from the allegations uncovered by the IJB, Miracle Arena is at the centre of a different financial imbroglio that has led to criminal charges, but not against Danso.

In April 2026, a former long-time Miracle Arena minister, Isaac Oppong, along with 14 other people — some of whom have worked at or were congregants affiliated with Miracle Arena — faced charges of identity fraud, laundering and conspiracy to commit an indictable offence. The charges relate to an alleged $99,600 fraud targeting York Region’s Homeless Prevention Program.

The matter remains before the courts.

Miracle Arena issued a press release shortly after the charges were announced, saying “the alleged conduct was undertaken independently and without the knowledge, authorization, or involvement of the Church.”

In a phone call with the IJB, Oppong denied the allegations of fraud or that he improperly claimed money from York Region, stating government officials never gave Miracle Arena any grants.

A regional official said in an email, “York Region has not issued grant funding to Miracle Arena For All Nations.”

Oppong provided documentation to the IJB showing Miracle Arena was, however, the recipient of several grants from the United Way and that Danso and other church administrators were included in the correspondence about those grants. That money, he says, was intended to go to supporting refugees being housed on Miracle Arena property.

The documents confirm the funds were to be directly deposited into the church’s accounts. Oppong said he does not know how the United Way grant money was spent.

 LED panels display various messages and announcements along the main entrance to the Miracle Arena Church property in Vaughan in August, 2026.

In response to reporters’ questions, Joshua McLarnon, director of communications at United Way, said Miracle Arena received a total of $44,500 to support the basic needs of African asylum seekers and refugees.

Following the charges laid against individuals connected to the church, United Way said it reviewed the portion of funding it had provided through Reaching Home, a federal program aimed at addressing homelessness, and confirmed with Infrastructure Canada that the church had met the necessary requirements.

Oppong denies all of the allegations and claims Danso made false reports to police that led to the charges against him.

In his written statement to the IJB, Danso called Oppong a “disgruntled former pastor” and said the church sent him a letter in October 2025, “which gave notice that he was prohibited from entering or trespassing on its property.”

“It is clear that Mr. Oppong has a strong vendetta” against Danso, the statement reads. “Mr. Oppong also said that he was communicating with numerous people to expose Mr. Danso’s alleged misdeeds.”

Danso said the allegations of sexual misconduct and financial exploitation were orchestrated by Oppong as part of his vendetta.

Questionable honours

In 2022, Danso was awarded the title of “United Nations Eminent Peace Ambassador,” an honour IJB reporters confirmed is not recognized within the United Nations’ official structure.

The title was bestowed on Danso in a ceremony held at Miracle Arena in December 2022 by an organization called the International Association of World Peace Advocates (IAWPA). A video posted by Miracle Arena on YouTube shows the ceremony, during which he vowed to use his platform to serve the vulnerable and confront global injustices, including intervening in the kidnapping of children and the sale of mothers and daughters into slavery and sex trafficking.

The ceremony included the raising of the UN flag on a pole outside the church, sealing Miracle Arena as a so-called “UN compound.”

 Pastor Kofi Danso is shown receiving a UN ‘peace ambassador’ award in this still from a video shared publicly on YouTube. Despite video of the elaborate ceremony, the UN had not approved the award or title for him.

In response to questions from the IJB, Farhan Aziz Haq, deputy spokesperson for the UN secretary general, said in a statement that Danso is “not a UN staff” member and does not serve as an ambassador representing the UN in any capacity.

“No individual named Kofi Danso is sanctioned, authorized, or recognized by the United Nations to use the title ‘UN Ambassador,’ or to use variations implying any affiliation to the organization,” Haq said.

The use of any diplomatic title to imply affiliation with the UN is “entirely incorrect and unauthorized,” he added.

In his statement to reporters, Danso said he was appointed a peace ambassador through IAWPA, which is a non-governmental organization. The distinction honours advocates for “global peace, human rights and social justice,” the statement reads.

Danso is listed as an executive council member on the IAWPA board representing Canada.

He also provided documentation of ground passes requested from the UN by IAWPA and said Miracle Arena is proud to raise the UN flag “as a symbol of unity, peace and hope.”

The office of the UN secretary general said that IAWPA is “not a UN entity,” that the church has not been authorized by the UN to fly the flag on the property and described the designation of the church as a “UN Compound” by IAWPA as unauthorized and a “grave misrepresentation.”

The IJB shared the UN’s response with Danso.

His lawyer responded in a letter stating, “It [sic] you think that the honours and appointments he received from an organization or person was misleading in any way, then you should contact them to respond. Blaming my client for receiving and celebrating the honours is misguided.”

IAWPA did not respond to the IJB’s questions.

Danso has since removed the letters “UN” from the peace ambassador title listed in his Instagram bio .

Michael Tibollo, the MPP for Vaughan–Woodbridge and now Ontario’s associate attorney general, attended the ceremony in his former role as associate minister of mental health and addictions. On behalf of the provincial government, he presented Danso with a certificate “Award of Eminent Peace Ambassador” and offered congratulations.

In remarks, Tibollo said he was “very proud” to call Danso “friend,” adding: “I’ll always support the work you’ve done here and the work you’re doing anywhere in the world.”

Tibollo’s office declined to comment on questions from the IJB.

Danso also claimed to have received the key to New York City in October, 2024, “on behalf of” then-mayor Eric Adams, according to a press release issued at the time by Danso’s team.

In a written response to questions about the award, Danso provided the IJB with a photo of a plaque that showed a designation made by an organization called the Arit Fuller Foundation “in acknowledgement of” former mayor Adams for dedication to “humanitarian causes and public welfare.”

 The award plaque from the Arit Fuller Foundation.

Asked to comment on the evident discrepancy between the key being awarded “in acknowledgement of” mayor Adams and Danso’s team describing it as being presented “on behalf of,” the mayor, Danso’s lawyer said, “If it turns out that Mayor Adams had nothing to do with the award, then that is something the Arit Fuller Foundation should respond to; not my client.”

Reached at a phone number listed publicly for the Arit Fuller Foundation, a person who said she was founder Dr. Arit Fuller-Harris said, “The mayor has nothing to do with it.”

IJB reporters could find no New York City government records or statements from the mayor’s office confirming that Danso was awarded the key to the city. Former mayor Adams could not be reached for comment. Current Mayor Zohran Mamdani did not respond to requests for comment.

The making of a prophet

Little is known about Danso before he arrived in Toronto in 2011.

His personal online biography says he is originally from Ghana and has ministered in more than 33 countries on five continents.

Prior to arriving in Canada, Danso lived in the Netherlands where he operated a church called God’s Ambassadors.

In 2010, he married a Canadian woman, JoAnne Mensah, and the pair moved to Toronto in 2011 where they began Miracle Arena. Today, Danso, his wife and their children live on a gated Woodbridge road in a home purchased in May 2017 for $2 million. In 2020, they bought the property that is today home to Miracle Arena, in Vaughan, for $5.6 million. JoAnne Danso has not responded to any questions from the IJB.

The IJB has counted at least 17 Miracle Arena-branded campuses around the world at various times, including at least seven in Canada. Most are now shuttered, but the Vaughan headquarters remains active. Danso’s written statement says Calgary has the only other Miracle Arena now operating in Canada, along with churches in Amsterdam, St. Kitts and Antigua.

“Any other groups calling themselves Miracle Arena … are inspired by but not officially associated with Miracle Arena,” the statement from his lawyer reads.

Records from Illinois, where Danso registered a company named Prophet Kofi Danso Ministries, show annual reports as recent as 2025. A tax return from 2024 lists revenues of just under $140,000 U.S.

The same records show Danso family members, including his wife JoAnne, listed as directors of the company.

In filings in the U.S., Prophet Kofi Danso Ministries describes itself as a “religious organization whose main function is to share the gospel of Jesus Christ to the nations around the world.” The filings say the company was set up to “give financial assistance and support to widows, orphans and destitute families” as well as being involved in “small scale disaster relief.”

All financial matters of the company are handled by Danso’s financial advisers, his written statement reads. He declined to comment on the company’s revenues and expenses.

Court records from the 2020 child support claim made by the former congregant with whom he fathered a child, provide further insight into Danso’s finances.

 Signage outside the Miracle Arena Church north of Toronto.

He was ordered by an Ontario court that year to pay more than $2,300 per month in support “based on imputed income of $300,000 per annum.”

Danso later contested these amounts, filing a motion to have them changed, and claiming an income of just $66,000 a year. A judge in the case said Danso’s financial statements raised “more questions … than answers,” including discrepancies surrounding the mortgage on his home and disclosure about household expenses.

Danso told the court that four of his children attended private school at the time.

In the end, he was ordered to pay the woman $25,000 so that she could retain an expert to properly query his finances.

Ontario’s Family Responsibility Office — the body responsible for enforcing child support payments — put a charge against the Danso’s home as a result of child support arrears in October 2021. It was discharged in April 2025.

The final 2024 order in the case says that Danso must pay $2,014 per month in child support.

Danso’s written response says he will not comment on the case, adding that he is not an accountant.

‘Trying to control me’

Jodi says that the sexual abuse she alleges she suffered and the rumours about her that spread among the congregation triggered personal health issues. She stopped going to the church as frequently.

She says a constant stream of messages and calls from church officials and summonses from Danso followed, all trying to get her to see him again.

“Now I understand that it was a form of trying to control me so that I don’t leave,” says Jodi. “He was like, ‘If you quit (the church), your destiny’s going to go into someone else’s hands.’ ”

Eventually Jodi did leave.

During her last meeting with Danso, who she says had called her to come to his office, she says she told him, “I don’t want to work for you anymore. I don’t want to come here every single day. I feel like dying all the time. Just let me leave peacefully.”

Jodi, who has not been to Miracle Arena since 2022, says she only recently told her mother — who does not attend Miracle Arena anymore — about her allegations of sexual misconduct.

“I went through a lot of therapy. I had to cleanse myself from everything — spiritually, mentally, emotionally. It was affecting my relationships. I couldn’t have friends, I couldn’t have a partner. It was weird for men to even touch me. It really did mess me up.”

She owns her own business now, working in her dream career, and says she will never let anyone mistreat her again.

“When you leave … you’re not going to fail. You’re going to find people that love you and care about you that are not going to control you and manipulate you,” says Jodi.

“I’m so free.”

ejarratt@ijbureau.org , wclarke@ijbureau.org, bfitzpatrick@ijbureau.org, rcribb@ijbureau.org

The Investigative Journalism Bureau (IJB) at the University of Toronto’s Dalla Lana School of Public Health is a collaborative investigative newsroom supported by Postmedia that partners with academics, researchers and journalists while training the next generation of investigative reporters.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Toronto Maple Leafs centre John Tavares lines up for a faceoff during a game against the Buffalo Sabres, in Buffalo, N.Y. on Oct. 24, 2025.

Toronto Maple Leafs star centre John Tavares is set to take the witness stand in a Toronto courtroom Tuesday, in a trial over the taxation of his signing bonus for leaving the New York Islanders to join his hometown team in 2018.

At stake for Tavares is $8 million the Canada Revenue Agency says he owes as tax on a “signing bonus” of $15 million, which it regards as employment income, taxable at over 50 per cent. Tavares says it should be regarded as an “inducement” to sign with the Leafs, and therefore taxed in the U.S. at just 15 per cent, which he has already paid.

But for the NHL and its teams, this trial that began Monday morning is a major challenge to the increasingly common practice of paying superstar athletes in contracts that are light on salary, and heavy on signing bonuses, in part because of favourable cross-border tax treatment, but also as protection from lockouts, which stop salary payments but not bonuses.

Judge J. Scott Bodie of the Tax Court of Canada, who will hear the case over two weeks, is faced with some problems that seem closer to the world of finance than hockey.

What is a bonus? Colloquially, it means a surplus of good fortune, an extra little bit. But for many high earners, from hockey players to bankers, it is a regularly scheduled annual influx of money, undetermined in advance, but expected as part of the pay package. Crucially, it is not salary.

Tavares’s 2018 contract that is at issue here, for example, was worth about $77 million, of which fully 92 per cent was to be paid as a “signing bonus,” in annual instalments over the seven-year term. His salary, in the broader context, was modest, under a million dollars a year.

Last year, Tavares signed a four-year contract extension with the Leafs worth about $17.5 million. He used to be captain and is now alternate captain.

One question here is whether this curious “bonus” setup was agreed back in 2018 with a wink about the taxman. But there is no allegation of wrongdoing or dishonesty. It is simply a matter of interpreting tax law.

“What is an inducement? That is the question before you. You would think that the answer to that question would be straightforward, or should be straightforward,” said lawyer Devon Peavoy, for the Crown, as the trial began.

But it is not straightforward, not when the “inducement” is a “signing bonus” that gets paid out annually for years after the actual signing, indeed for the full term of the contract.

 John Tavares (left) and Patrick Marleau at Toronto Maple Leaf practice in Toronto on Nov. 2, 2018.

Former Leafs player Patrick Marleau is also a party to this appeal, allied with Tavares. He signed with the Leafs in 2017 after 20 years with the San Jose Sharks, some of that as captain. His contract was smaller but similar, $18.75 million over three years, of which $14.5 million was “signing bonus,” much of it “front loaded,” or paid early in the term.

This case is not about whether bonuses can ever be paid in this way. As Peavoy argued, the only question is whether the signing bonuses paid to Marleau and Tavares in 2017 and 2018 qualify for tax relief “as an inducement to sign an agreement relating to the performance of the services of an athlete,” under a treaty called the Canada-United States Convention With Respect To Taxes On Income And On Capital.

“The respondent’s position is that they do not,” Peavoy said. The Crown is the responding party in this appeal against an earlier determination of the CRA.

The trial’s first witness was James Nice, a Los Angeles-based agent who represented Tavares and Marleau in negotiating these contracts in 2017 and 2018.

“John was in his prime, 27 years old, and had the leverage to command the longest term available,” Nice said. “He was an elite player, one of the few players of his stature who was available on the market…. Of all the perks that are allowable in the (collective bargaining agreement), he was in a position to command the most.”

It is unusual for a player of Tavares’ stature to become an unrestricted free agent, as he was, free to sign wherever he wished, because most big stars resign with their teams. So the interest was at a fever pitch. They met with the New York Islanders, for whom Tavares had played since being the top draft pick in 2009, and also Tampa Bay, Boston, Dallas, Toronto, Las Vegas, and others.

Tavares’ main concern was the opportunity to win the Stanley Cup, and although that has not yet happened, at the time Toronto looked best.

Comparing him to other elite players such as Steven Stamkos, Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin and Jonathan Toews, Nice said they felt Tavares could get an average value of $11 million a year, and he did.

Marleau, on the other hand, was 37, at “the back end” of his career, as Nice put it. He retired in 2021, having played more regular season games than any player ever. He also wanted to win a Stanley Cup, and he wanted a place where he could play a bigger role as a veteran leader. One of the main attractions of the Leafs contract was that it was three years long, rather than the two years other teams were offering.

A signing bonus is not automatically an “inducement,” Peavoy said in opening remarks. Some signing bonuses in the NHL may well operate as inducements, she said. “It is just that these particular signing bonuses did not.”

She quoted Jonathan Swift, the 18th century Anglo-Irish writer, that a wise person should have money in their head but not in their heart.

Tavares and Marleau had hockey in their hearts, she said, and they chose the Leafs not because of the specific terms of their signing bonuses but because the team fit their goals for themselves and their families. They decided based on “fit” and the average annual value of the contract, she said, not the signing bonus.

“For Mr. Tavares in particular, it was home,” Peavoy said. Tavares grew up in Oakville, just west of Toronto.

The signing bonuses were paid in tranches, “front loaded” such that Tavares got $30 million in the first year alone. They were conditional, and would have to be repaid according to strict formulas if the player failed to live up to the contract terms. The signing bonuses, therefore, were not inducements to sign the contract in the first place, Peavoy argued.

Lawyer Justin Kutyan, for Tavares and Marleau, said there is no allegation in this case that calling the payments “signing bonuses” amounted to “window dressing” or a hidden agreement, or a label invented after the fact, or that the contracts were a “sham.”

“We’re trying to attack the Crown’s case on all fronts,” Kutyan told the judge. There is nothing in the treaty about how an “inducement” should be paid. Paying a bonus in tranches says nothing about why it was paid, he said.

One of the quirks that emerged in Nice’s testimony Monday was that NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman personally signs every player contract in the league.

Tavares is set to testify first thing Tuesday morning.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


An airplane lands at Ottawa International Airport.

Believe it or not, this week marks National Potato Day, National Bacon Lovers Day and, on Aug. 23, National Cheap Flight Day.

Supposedly, it’s one of the best days of the year for airfare deals. But given that it comes alongside a national day for a root vegetable and for lovers of smoked pork, you’d be forgiven for having your doubts.

Here’s everything you need to know about Cheap Flight Day, as well as how to check if you’re actually getting a good deal.

What is National Cheap Flight Day?

National Cheap Flight Day falls on Aug. 23 every year. It purportedly marks the point where airfares begin to decline, as family vacation season comes to an end and kids go back to school.

But Gunnar Olson, flight deal analyst at Thrifty Traveler , is skeptical.

“Unfortunately, the best time to book a flight is just when that individual flight, and that individual seat that you’re looking at, might be the cheapest,” he says. “Airlines are constantly changing and evaluating what to charge for each seat on every single flight, so these are complicated, complex technical things.”

Olson adds that fares can drop at any moment, rather than on pre-determined dates, and travellers have to be ready to book deals when they see them.

But while National Cheap Flight Day might not necessarily be the best day of the year to book a trip, there are other ways to grab a great flight deal this week.

 Airlines change fares all the time, and prices can drop at any moment.

What deals can travellers expect?

As Olson explained, National Cheap Flight Day is unlikely to save you much money. However, a couple of airlines do reliably put on legitimate flight sales towards the end of August.

According to flight deal alert service Jack’s Flight Club , only a handful of airlines run sales that are “the real deal” — as opposed to a price that is just marginally better than usual, or still far more expensive than competitors — and these include summer events from British Airways (BA) and Virgin Atlantic.

BA’s end-of-August sale usually lasts around a month, according to the deal-finding service, which notes that, “In the past, almost all of their long-haul routes would be discounted and as cheap as they ever go.” These days, however, “it tends to be a leaner selection, with only their North America and India routes reliably hitting those lows.”

Virgin Atlantic’s sale usually takes place at the same time, with Jack’s Flight Club pointing out that “the rivalry between Virgin and BA is so strong that whenever one of the two drops a sale, the other will usually show up within hours, sporting fares during the same period to many of the same destinations.”

These sales are almost always as good as the two airlines offer.

When is the best time of year to book flights?

Actually, it’s less about time of year and more about how far in advance you’re booking.

Flight Centre Canada shared its latest booking-window data with National Post, which showed that across five high-volume Canadian routes, economy round-trip fares booked 90 or more days before departure were 38 to 59 per cent lower than fares booked in the final week.

Trips to Europe, however, were a different story. Across five high-volume Canada–Europe routes, fares moved up and down depending on the route and booking window, with no consistent sweet spot.

 The best time to book a flight depends when and where you want to travel.

“That doesn’t mean travellers should wait,” said Amra Durakovic, head of communications for Flight Centre Canada. “Booking earlier still gives you more choice, particularly if your dates are fixed, or you want specific flights, seats or accommodation. It simply shows that the same pricing rule doesn’t apply to every trip.”

How else can travellers be sure they get a good deal?

With a combination of irregular air fares and sales that might not be as good as they look, it’s hard for travellers to know whether they’re really saving money on flights.

Olson recommends using Google Flights, which provides context travellers can use to check if they’re getting a good deal.

“When you search for a flight on Google Flights, it’ll tell you, for example, that prices are probably going to go up in the next 10 days on this flight. In which case, it’s a good time to book,” he says. “It’ll also give you a grasp of where prices have been over the last couple of weeks and months.”

This allows travellers to assess whether they’re getting a flight at a lower price than usual, while Google Flights’ price alert system notifies travellers if the price of a flight they’re watching drops.

So, while National Cheap Flight Day might not lead to the best deal, there are other ways travellers can cut the cost of their next trip.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks to the media during a press conference at the Rio Tinto aluminum smelter in Saguenay Thursday August 6, 2026.

OTTAWA – Prime Minister Mark Carney said he plans to speak with U.S. President Donald Trump, as Canada braces for a 50 per-cent tariff set to hit $29 billion worth of Canadian goods in less than two days.

During a press conference in St. John’s, N.L. on Monday, Carney would not say what a good deal for Canada would look like and described the negotiations with the Americans as very intense and delicate.

The prime minister added that it’s not the time to talk about negotiations in public.

Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc and Chief Trade Negotiator Janice Charette remained in Washington over the weekend, meeting with United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer for a fifth time on Sunday.

LeBlanc and Charette are scheduled to meet with Greer again on Monday, with U.S. Secretary Howard Lutnick also in attendance.

Sources told the National Post on Friday that the U.S. and Canada remain “very far apart” on a deal. Canada is seeking relief on Section 232 tariffs on Canadian lumber, autos, steel and aluminum.

Canadian negotiators are also working to avoid new tariffs that will take effect under Section 338 of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act on Aug. 19, which will hit a range of Canadian goods from cement, clothing to alcoholic products.

Sources also said the federal government is considering ways to financially support impacted businesses, should the Section 338 tariffs go through.

Carney told reporters on Monday that his government has a plan for every eventuality.

The U.S. trade irritants cited as the reason for this latest round of U.S. tariffs include Canadian retaliatory tariffs on autos, U.S. alcohol boycotts in Canadian provinces and the dairy supply management system.

“Ontario will be prepared for any and every scenario,” said Ontario Premier Doug Ford, during an address in front of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario’s annual conference in Ottawa on Monday.

The premier reiterated his call for a team Canada response to the latest attack on Canadian workers and businesses.

More to come.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


An Israeli flag is fixed to a street sign as police stand by off Pearl Street on the scene of an attack on demonstrators calling for the release of Israeli hostages held in Gaza, in Boulder, Co., on June 1, 2025. The FBI says U.S. hate crimes are declining, but Jewish people still account for more than two thirds of religion-based hate crimes in 2025.

Hate crimes were down about seven per cent in the United States from 11,404 incidents in 2024, to 10,606 in 2025, the Federal Bureau of Investigation said on Friday as part of an announcement of what it said was the “largest year-to-year decline in violent crime rates since FBI estimations began in 1936.”

Still, Jews were disproportionately targeted in hate crimes last year, according to FBI data. Of 2,572 religion-based hate crimes last year, 1,647 (64 per cent) targeted Jews — or 15 per cent of all hate crimes.

Jewish Americans, who number about 7.5 million, make up about 2.4 per cent of the U.S. population, according to the Pew Research Center.

Arabs were targeted in 130 incidents (5 per cent) and Muslims in 233 (9 per cent) last year, according to FBI data.

Of the 1,818 offences against Jews (13.8 per cent) last year, the overwhelming majority (1,003) involved vandalism or other property destruction. There were also 541 intimidation offences, 118 simple assaults, 51 aggravated assaults, 39 other larceny, 12 burglaries or breaking and entering, 11 thefts from buildings, seven robberies and six arson offences.

The FBI also recorded five weapon law violations, four extortion and blackmail offenses, three murders and non-negligent manslaughter offenses, three instances of pornography and obscene material, two con jobs, two thefts of motor vehicles, two instances of shoplifting and one count each of criminal sexual contact, drug or narcotic violation, hacking or computer invasion, identity theft, kidnapping or abduction, other unspecified offense, sodomy, theft from motor vehicle and weapon of mass destruction.

There was no other weapon of mass destruction offence against any other faith group, and just one other faith group was also a victim of murder and non-negligent manslaughter — two such offences targeted the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, per FBI data.

In 2025, the only category of hate crime that exceeded the number of anti-Jewish crimes was the 3,048 anti-black hate crimes. Black people make up about 14.4 per cent of the population, according to the Pew Research Center, which suggests that in 2025, a Jewish American was about 225 per cent more likely to be the victim of a hate crime than a black person was.

Muslims are estimated to make up about one per cent of Americans, suggesting that in 2025, a Jewish American was about 190 per cent likelier than a Muslim American to be the target of a hate crime.

In 2024, Jews were targets of 2,095 (17.5 per cent) of the 11,949 hate crimes, and about 70 per cent of the 3,010 religion-based hate crimes, according to FBI data.

Arabs were targeted in 158 (5 per cent) of the religion-based hate crimes, and Muslims in 261 (9 per cent).

So far in 2026 — when FBI data draws on about 90 per cent coverage of the country in January to March, 85 per cent in April, 80 per cent in May, 75 per cent in June, 57 per cent in July and 21 per cent in August — the FBI has recorded 6,792 offenses as part of 5,741 hate crime incidents, 1,442 of which (25 per cent) have been religion-based hate crimes.

Jews have been targets of 829 hate crimes so far, or 57 per cent of all religion-based hate crimes and 14.4 per cent of all hate crimes.

Arabs have been targets of 65 (4.5 per cent) and Muslims 138 (9.6 per cent) of all faith-based hate crimes.

There have been about twice as many anti-black hate crimes as anti-Jewish ones, suggesting that so far in 2026, per available FBI data, Jews have been about 210 per cent more likely to be hate crime targets than black people have, and about 150 per cent likelier than Muslims have.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney shakes hands with employees at Rio Tinto, a major aluminum smelter in Saguenay Thursday August 6, 2026.

OTTAWA — Quebec, Newfoundland and Ottawa announced a deal Monday that would see a massive redevelopment and expansion of the Churchill Falls hydroelectric facility and both provinces set aside a decades-long conflict over electricity prices… for now.

Prime Minister Mark Carney and his Quebec and Newfoundland counterparts Christine Fréchette and Tony Wakeham were in Newfoundland to announce the new deal on Monday afternoon.

“After months of occasionally tense but always positive negotiations, we have achieved a rare win-win-win,” N.L. Premier Wakeham said, calling the original 1969 energy deal between Quebec and his province “one of the darkest chapters” of its past.

“What a great day it is for Quebec, Newfoundland and Labrador,” Fréchette added.

The renegotiated but non-binding deal promises to boost energy production at the Churchill Falls hydroelectric facilities significantly, as well as commits to build a long-debated production facility at nearby Gull Island.

Both provinces noted that the deal would not have happened without significant federal government investment. According to a release, Ottawa is committing up to $10 billion and promising to expedite approvals for the construction projects by referring it to the new Major Projects Office.

Plans to expand existing facilities and building the Gull Island power project as well as an onshore wind energy project and new transmission lines to Labrador in Quebec would triple the generating capacity of Churchill Falls to 14,000 megawatts of renewable power, Carney said.

“That is more than the entire generating capacity of BC Hydro. It’s more than double the output of Bruce Power, the largest nuclear plant on this continent. It is the equivalent of 18 Hoover Dams in America, at its current operating capacity,” the prime minister said, calling it the largest renewable energy investment in Canada’s history.

In a technical briefing for reporters Monday morning, Newfoundland government officials said much of the current agreement is non-binding until the deal if completely finalized and approved likely by the end of the year.

That means the agreement risks getting upended for the second time in two years if the Parti Québécois gets elected in the province’s upcoming provincial election in October. The PQ currently leads in provincial opinion polls.

The PQ previously told National Post that if elected, it would try to redraft any deal to include further compensation for the province’s historic loss of the territory of Labrador roughly one century ago. That could explain why both provinces moved to sign a deal before the provincial elections are called.

At the press conference, Fréchette admitted that the PQ could rip up the deal if it forms the next provincial government.

“It’s a possibility,” she argued.

With the Quebec election looming, both Hydro-Québec and N.L. Hydro hammered out a new agreement to update the terms of the 2024 memorandum of understanding to develop Gull Island and expand capacity at the Churchill Falls plant.

That deal was signed between then-Quebec Premier François Legault and former N.L. Premier Andrew Furey to replace a contentious 1969 energy deal that saw Hydro-Québec develop the Churchill Falls site and benefit from cheap hydroelectricity for decades. The deal caused generations of resentment in Newfoundland and Labrador, where it was perceived as a terrible deal on made the back of the province.

However, when Wakeham was elected N.L. premier in 2025, he promised to review the 2024 MOU. A report concluded the deal was not in Newfoundland and Labrador’s best interests and negotiations restarted between both sides.

Monday, Wakeham said that he was reneging on his promise to put the agreement to a provincial referendum and would instead reconvene the legislature in mid-September to debate the deal. The move could be tied to a desire to accelerate final negotiations before the Quebec election.

National Post, with files from Catherine Lévesque

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Despite uncertainty around whether the tariffs will actually take effect, Canadians overwhelmingly expect negative consequences if they do.

Canada is just days away from 50 per cent tariffs taking effect on hundreds of exports, after U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order last month invoking the never-before-used Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

And Canadians are divided on what Ottawa’s response should be, with 36 per cent of respondents in an Abacus Data poll favouring counter-tariffs, even if they raise prices and risk escalation, compared to 30 per cent who want continued negotiations instead.

Meanwhile, just 18 per cent favour offering concessions to the United States, such as easing dairy restrictions or ending bans on American alcohol , even if doing so gets the tariffs removed.

Abacus Data notes that these responses suggest the public “want the government to be firm, avoid escalation where possible, and get an agreement without appearing to give too much away.”

However, this point sees some differences across regions and political affiliation, with just 12 per cent of Quebecers open to concessions, compared to 23 per cent in Alberta. Only 16 per cent of Liberal supporters and 14 per cent of NDP supporters favour concessions, compared with 26 per cent of Conservatives.

The survey examined Canadians’ awareness of ongoing tariff negotiations with the U.S. and found that Canucks are paying close attention to the dispute, with 91 per cent of respondents saying they have seen, read or heard at least a little about the threatened 50 per cent tariffs.

Elsewhere, 55 per cent say Canada should prepare to move on from CUSMA and build trade relationships with other countries, compared with 34 per cent who want to keep working to preserve the agreement. That view is shared by 60 per cent of Liberal voters, compared to just 43 per cent of Conservative supporters who are prepared to move on.

Abacus Data says that this apparent openness to a future where Canada is less dependent on CUSMA gives Carney room to resist U.S. pressure.

National Post previously spoke to trade analysts about what Canada’s response to the 50 per cent tariffs should be and, much like the Canadian public, they were split on the best approach.

Lawrence Herman, senior fellow at the C.D. Howe Institute and a specialist in international trade and investment law, said he thinks a list of possible tariff countermeasures should have been produced immediately after Trump’s announcement last month.

“You maintain those tariffs and enact them on the 19th of August, here’s the list that we’re going to use for our counter-tariffs,” he offered as an example of how Ottawa should have responded to the threat.

However, Ed Fast, Canada’s former minister for international trade under PM Stephen Harper, cautioned against retaliation, urging negotiators to keep the economic asymmetry between the two countries front of mind.

“If we retaliate with tariffs, as some have suggested, the Americans are much better able to absorb that retaliation than we are to absorb their tariffs against us,” he said. “As more and more tariffs get levied, the more difficult it becomes for Canada.”

Meanwhile, three senior federal or provincial government sources recently told National Post that despite frequent meetings between the Canadian and American negotiating teams, the two camps are “not even close” to making a deal .

Now, the sources say, the Canadian side is refocusing its efforts to find an “interim” deal to prevent sweeping new tariffs on Aug. 19.

That said, the Abacus Data poll found that Canadians aren’t convinced this latest round of tariffs will actually take effect, with 40 per cent of respondents putting the odds at 50/50, compared to 38 per cent who believe they will happen and just 10 per cent who think they are unlikely or definitely will not happen.

Despite this uncertainty, Canadians overwhelmingly expect negative consequences of new tariffs, with 70 per cent believing they would have a negative impact on the economy in their area, including 29 per cent who expect a very negative impact.

This view crosses regional lines, with 75 per cent in Quebec expecting a negative effect, along with 74 per cent in B.C. and Alberta, 68 per cent in Ontario, 65 per cent in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, and 58 per cent in Atlantic Canada. Overall, just nine per cent expect a positive impact.

Meanwhile, 74 per cent say the ongoing trade war over the past year and a half has had an impact on their household, including 30 per cent who describe the impact as major, a finding that remains consistent across regions and age groups.

The Abacus Data poll was conducted with 1,499 Canadians from August 7 to 12, 2026. The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is plus or minus 2.5 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


On July 25, Belgian authorities announced the arrest of a

OTTAWA — The House of Commons public safety committee will meet Monday to decide whether to investigate potential security screening failures, after a Canadian woman was arrested in Belgium for allegedly spying on NATO.

On July 25, Belgian authorities announced the arrest of a “Canadian national of Chinese origin” on suspicion of spying for a third country while working as an intern at NATO’s central military headquarters in southern Belgium. The suspect was subsequently identified as Biwei “Claire” Zhang, a computer science and systems engineering graduate in her early 30s who’d previously held positions at multiple Canadian federal agencies.

Its also been reported that the overseas NATO internship was sponsored by Global Affairs Canada, and that the agency was responsible for conducting Zhang’s security clearance.

Five committee members — four Conservative MPs and a Bloc Québécois MP — said in a joint letter to Liberal MP Jean-Yves Duclos, the committee’s chair, that the “serious allegations of espionage” against Zhang warranted a special out-of-session meeting.

“These allegations raise urgent questions about how an individual now accused of spying was able to obtain an internship within one of Canada’s most important military alliances and what security screening, information-sharing and monitoring processes were in place at the time,” reads the letter.

The five MPs invoked a special order of House procedure to force Duclos to call a meeting on the matter.

The meeting is scheduled to start at 3 p.m. ET on Parliament Hill.

More to come.

National Post
rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Cape Breton-born fiddler Ashley MacIsaac has dropped his lawsuit against Google alleging that the tech giant is liable for the AI Overview’s statements, as well as the “foreseeable republication” that resulted in the concert cancellation.

Maritime musician Ashley MacIsaac has ended his defamation lawsuit against Google over an AI overview that falsely labelled him a sex offender.

The Cape Breton-born fiddler launched his $1.5-million claim earlier this year in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, alleging that he lost a gig at a Nova Scotia First Nation after community members came across Google AI Overview descriptions falsely suggesting that MacIsaac had been sentenced for “sexual assault and internet luring” and placed on a sex offender registry for 20 years, among other erroneous statements.

However, MacIsaac’s lawyer filed a notice of discontinuance with the court on July 29 that ends his legal action. Reached by phone, MacIsaac declined to elaborate on the reason for the discontinuance.

“I have no comment. I’ll have to leave it at that,” he said. “I appreciate the opportunity to speak to media when I feel it’s necessary, but today I don’t.”

Toronto lawyer Maanit Zemel is one of many defamation lawyers mourning the missed opportunity for a full trial in the case.

“This generally means they’ve come to some kind of agreement and they can’t provide the settlement details because they’re privileged,” she explains.

MacIsaac’s now-withdrawn claim alleged that Google was liable for the AI Overview’s statements, which appeared to confuse him for a Newfoundland man with a similar name who was convicted of sexual assault, as well as the “foreseeable republication” that resulted in the concert cancellation.

“As the creator and operator of the AI Overview, Google is also liable for injuries and losses arising from the AI Overview’s defective design,” the claim continued, alleging that the tech giant had not taken reasonable steps to prevent harm to individuals when its AI system returns false information.

 The Google logo at the company’s Bay View campus in Mountain View, California.

Google’s Canadian lawyer did not respond to a request for comment, but in press coverage at the time of the concert cancellation, a company spokesperson pointed out that the search results linking MacIsaac to the criminal offences no longer appeared in the AI Overview, adding that: “When issues arise — like if our features misinterpret web content or miss some context — we use those examples to improve our systems, and may take action under our policies.”

Zemel says she was not surprised to see the case cut short, noting that few individuals have the resources to take on a company the size of Google. Importantly, she says the tech giant may have had its own incentive to settle the case without a formal ruling.

“Google do tend to fight if they think they can set their own precedent, but this is not the kind of case they want to make a precedent of,” she says. “I certainly wouldn’t be advising them that it’s one worth fighting if I was Google’s lawyer.”

While Google and other search engines enjoy considerable protection when indexing or linking to defamatory material thanks to a landmark 2011 Supreme Court of Canada decision known as Crookes v. Newton, Zemel says that the facts in MacIsaac’s case were quite different.

In Crookes, a majority of the nation’s top court ruled that hyperlinking to a defamatory statement does not constitute “publication” of the material, as long as the hyperlink itself does not repeat or endorse the defamatory material.

Meanwhile, in MacIsaac’s case — which remains unproven in court — there was a strong case for arguing that Google itself was the publisher of the allegedly defamatory material, Zemel says.

“It’s never simple in a defamation case, but I think a court is likely to consider the AI-generated overview as content created by Google itself. At that point, they would no longer be a re-publisher, but the original author,” she says. “The law is pretty tech-neutral, so my position would be that it doesn’t matter whether it was their software or a person who wrote it; they’re liable the same way.”

Howard Winkler, a veteran media and defamation lawyer with more than 40 years of experience, had also been following proceedings eagerly and was disappointed with the outcome.

“This is unfortunate in terms of the development of important and timely legal principles,” he says.

Unanswered questions left by the discontinued case include whether an AI creator can indeed be considered a publisher of information, whether the owner of an AI platform can rely on an “innocent dissemination” defence and whether cases involving AI hallucinations could be handled under product liability law dealing with defective products.

“Regrettably, we will now have to wait a little longer to get clarity,” he added.

Zemel won’t be holding her breath, considering the notoriously slow progress that cases make through the court system.

“Eventually there will be a decision. It’s just a matter of time,” she says. “And by then, the technology will probably have changed.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.