LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Convicted killer Christopher Gordon was caught with a loaded .40-calibre Glock semi-automatic handgun equipped with laser sights.

An Ontario killer ordered deported to St. Vincent in 2020 has been sentenced to six years in a Canadian prison after he was caught soon after he got out of custody for a manslaughter conviction with a Glock semi-automatic handgun in his Toronto nightstand that was equipped with a laser sight and loaded with seven rounds of .40 calibre ammunition.

Police also allegedly found other items in Christopher Enrique Gordon’s bedroom during their September 2022 search, including about $6,000 in cash, 18.56 grams of fentanyl, 10.13 grams of cocaine and drug trafficking paraphernalia.

“It is extremely troubling that both the previous manslaughter offence and the current firearm offences had some connection to drug trafficking. The close temporal connection between the offences exacerbates that concern. Moreover, it is well known that the combination of drug trafficking and a gun frequently leads to tragic results,” Justice Benita Wassenaar wrote in a recent decision from Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice.

“In addition to that unfortunate combination, the serious — and sometimes deadly — impact of fentanyl is something I must consider.”

The “aggravating factors” in Gordon’s case push his crimes to the higher end of the sentencing range, said the judge, “particularly those factors that speak to the normative wrongfulness of the conduct and the harm posed by it.”

Having said that, Wassenaar notes, “meaningful consideration must be given to the mitigating factors, in particular Mr. Gordon’s guilty plea, the conditions he has experienced in custody, his disadvantaged background, and his experiences with anti-Black racism.”

Evidence indicates that Gordon’s “choices were limited and influenced by his disadvantaged circumstances, which are relevant to assessing his moral responsibility,” the judge wrote in her decision, dated Nov. 17.

“I also remind myself of the principle of restraint and its applicability in the context of this offender.”

Gordon pleaded guilty to possessing a prohibited or restricted firearm without a licence, and possessing a firearm while he was under a December 2019 court-ordered lifetime gun prohibition. In turn, the drug charges were dropped.

The prosecution “sought a total sentence of eight years,” for Gordon, said the decision.

“The Crown highlighted, in particular, Mr. Gordon’s manslaughter conviction and ongoing involvement with drugs,” it said. “The Crown relied on the fentanyl and cocaine as significant aggravating factors. Moreover, Mr. Gordon re-offended within a year of his release from prison after serving his manslaughter sentence.”

The Crown “noted that the firearm was in an unlocked nightstand of an unlocked bedroom and there were several children in the house,” said the decision.

 A wanted poster for Christopher Enrique Gordon.

Gordon’s lawyer argued unsuccessfully for time served.

“She noted that there was no evidence that Mr. Gordon had used, wielded or threatened anyone with the firearm,” said the decision.

“She also outlined the facts underlying the manslaughter conviction, which she said included the victim perpetrating violence on Mr. Gordon.”

His defence lawyer initially stated “that Mr. Gordon was going to be deported, regardless of the sentence he received (for the gun crimes), and that it was humane to permit him to go home as soon as possible so that he could try to build a life in St. Vincent,” said the decision.

The court heard from the Canada Border Services Agency that once Gordon’s “legal matters are concluded, he will be deported back to St. Vincent.”

The agency “has already applied for a travel document for him, and … they will be monitoring the outcome of his court matters,” said the decision.

But “at the end of her submissions,” Gordon’s lawyer told the court he “had retained an immigration lawyer and if he is sentenced to time served up to six months he is entitled to a pre-removal risk assessment and there is a possibility that immigration would consider it.”

A pre-removal risk assessment would be Gordon’s last-ditch bid to stay in Canada.

Gordon was convicted of manslaughter in December 2019, for stabbing 54-year David Blacquiere of Angus, Ont., in the chest several times in a Shoppers Drug Mart parking lot, near Weston Road and Lawrence Avenue West in Toronto, on Nov. 15., 2018.

“On December 9, 2020, he was sentenced to six years and nine months jail. After deducting credit for pre-sentence custody, he had 586 days left to serve.”

Gordon, who recently turned 26, was born in St. Vincent, said the recent sentencing decision.

“His father had minimal involvement in his upbringing. When Mr. Gordon was seven, his mother left his father and went to Canada in an effort to improve her family’s financial situation,” it said.

“Mr. Gordon stayed behind and was looked after by various relatives. Mr. Gordon’s mother brought him to Canada for a visit when he was eight. After seeing that he had not been well cared for, she kept him with her in Canada. However, Mr. Gordon never became a Canadian citizen.”

Gordon’s “family history, lack of citizenship and socio-economic status have intersected with anti-Black racism to compound disadvantage and exacerbate the many challenges he has faced,” said the decision. “He has experienced racism in various contexts, including at school, through police harassment and while incarcerated.”

Gordon was given the opportunity to apply for status in Canada after he was ordered deported for manslaughter, it said, though the decision does not indicate whether he tried that route to stay here.

Wassenaar said she “considered potential immigration consequences,” her sentence for gun crimes might have on Gordon.

“It seems rather speculative to suggest that the sentence I impose could have additional immigration consequences,” said the judge.

“In any event, the risk of deportation cannot justify imposing a sentence that is inconsistent with the fundamental principles of proportionality.”

Wassenaar sentenced Gordon to six years behind bars. With enhanced credit for time served, he only has one year and three months left in the sentence.

“To that I would add two years of probation,” said the judge.


Bridget Walshe of the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) speaks at a press conference in Ottawa, ON. on Monday, April 14, 2025.

OTTAWA — Canada’s cyber defence agency says hackers are increasingly targeting Canadian water systems as it called on utility companies and municipalities to take the threat seriously or risk devastating consequences.
 

On Tuesday, the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security published a new assessment of the
cyber threat to Canada’s water system
that is unequivocal: the threats are growing, constantly evolving and come from both state and non-state cyber criminals.
 

In fact, the cyber centre said state-backed hackers have almost certainly already gained access to networks used to operate water infrastructure but are laying low to keep the breach undetected… for now.
 

“Cyber threats to water infrastructure are growing, evolving quickly, and can affect every community in Canada. You don’t need to be an engineer or a cyber security expert to understand why this matters,” warned cyber centre head Rajiv Gupta.
 

“Water systems now face a threat landscape they were never designed to withstand.”
 

Last month, the cyber centre reported
that hackers had tampered with water pressure values of a municipality’s water facility which resulted in “degraded service” for the community.
 

The new report reveals that cyber criminals are not only targeting infrastructure and systems dedicated to potable water, but also those related to flood- and wastewater.
 

The main target for threat actors is the operational technology that allows utility companies or governments to monitor or control their water systems electronically, said cyber centre deputy head Bridget Walshe in an interview.
 

The Internet-connected control systems may be more convenient or cost-effective, she said, but they also lead to significant cyber risks that municipalities often aren’t prepared for.
 

“There are lots of things that an engineer needs to control right, for example, keeping the water pressure up or monitoring water levels. And today… many (systems) use computer technology to do that monitoring,” Walshe said.
 

“Anything that the engineer could do, like change the water pressure, if a cyber threat actor had the right access, they could do the same,” she added.
 

The importance of water-management systems makes them attractive targets for ransomware, which the cyber centre bills the “most significant cyber threat to the reliable supply of water in Canada”.
 

That’s because criminals suspect that breached organizations will pony up the ransom quickly to gain back access to their networks and ensure critical operations aren’t disrupted for long.
 

But hostile states also have their eyes on Canadian water systems, the cyber centre says. In fact, they’ve almost certainly already hacked into them and are maintaining their access while laying low until a time of crisis or conflict with Canada.
 

The report does not identify any particular state. The centre has frequently identified China as the most sophisticated and capable cyber threat to Canada as part of the “
axis of cyber evil”
with Russia, North Korea and Iran.
 

“Once in the target network, they collect information on assets within the network to identify opportunities for disruptive or destructive action. For example, this could mean causing water tanks to overflow or changing the chemical balance of water treatment processes,” reads the report.
 

Non-state threat actors, criminals motivated by specific causes or ideologies but aren’t linked to a government, are also a growing threat to Canada’s water, says the cyber centre.
 

Walshe says there are many things water operators can do to protect themselves, ranging from basic things like changing default system passwords to researching supply chains to ensure they know who they’re buying from.
 

Walshe said there’s another piece of advice she shares with critical infrastructure providers: does your equipment really need to be connected to the Internet?
 

“Absolutely any system where reliability is very important is a case where we’d really urge anyone to look at the trade-off between Internet connected and segregating their network,” she said.
 

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


New York City.

An improved kitchen and better separation of public and private space is the aim of renovations of the official residence for Quebec’s delegate general in New York.

The upgrade will cost more than $2.6 million.

A contract for $2.17 million was awarded earlier this month to a local contractor. This is on top of $505,695 for architectural modifications already completed.

“The renovation of the residence will correct security and functionality issues, while allowing better separation between ‘private’ spaces and ‘public’ spaces which are sometimes used for receptions,” Caroline Pelchat, spokesperson for the Ministry of International Relations and La Francophonie, told the

Journal de Montreal

.

“Some rooms will be reconfigured to improve their functionality, including the kitchen,” she said. “The plumbing and electrical systems, as well as the finishes, all dating from the 1980s, will be upgraded.”

The Quebec government did not award the work to the lowest bidder (approximately $547,000 less), reports

TVA Nouvelles

, but the ministry says the services offered by that bidder were incomplete.

Meanwhile, Quebec’s delegation also plans to purchase replacements for worn, damaged furniture for the residence’s public areas at a potential cost of $150,000. Earlier this year, furniture purchases for the Los Angeles delegation cost $99,909. In 2024, furniture for Quebec’s Miami office cost $122,000.

Quebec’s delegate in New York is the province’s principal representation in the United States, with a mandate is to promote its interests in investment, culture, and public affairs.

National Post has reached out to the ministry for comment. The request has been acknowledged, but a detailed response has not yet been received.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney rises during question period on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2025.

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney said Tuesday his government’s forthcoming energy deal with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith will create “necessary conditions” for a potential pipeline to British Columbia, but not provide an outright guarantee.

Carney, fresh off his trip to the United Arab Emirates and the G20 Leaders’ Summit in South Africa, is set to depart for Alberta to ink a new memorandum of understanding with Smith, defining the conditions of the two governments’ dealings on energy, expected to be formalized on Thursday.

Topping Smith’s list of demands from Carney is for his Liberal government to offer some kind of pathway to see a new bitumen pipeline built from Alberta to B.C.’s coast, a proposal that has been rejected by coastal First Nations as well as B.C. Premier David Eby.

Liberal MPs from B.C. have also lined up to say greenlighting any such project would require two key conditions to be met: Gaining acceptance from Eby’s NDP government, as well as impacted First Nations.

Standing in the House of Commons on Tuesday, Carney appeared to back those requirements, as expectations swirled around what kind of deal his government would be willing to ink with Smith’s United Conservative Party government.

“The memorandum of understanding that we’re negotiating with Alberta creates necessary conditions, but not sufficient conditions, because we believe in cooperative federalism,” Carney told the House of Commons on Tuesday.

“We believe the government of British Columbia has to agree. We believe that First Nations right holders in this country have to agree.”

Carney’s comment came in response to Opposition Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, whose party has long blamed the Liberals under former prime minister Justin Trudeau for ushering in a suite of environmental policies that it, and other political and industry critics, say have hampered new pipeline development.

Poilievre, himself an Alberta MP, panned the upcoming deal with Alberta as a public relations stunt on Tuesday and pressed Carney to offer a firm commitment for a new pipeline to B.C.

However, at least two of his MPs, who spoke to reporters that afternoon, suggested a closer look would be needed at the Ottawa-Alberta deal first.

“Devil’s always in the details,” said Alberta MP David Bexte.

Saskatchewan MP Kevin Waugh said while Alberta is the focus of Ottawa’s negotiations, his oil-producing province would benefit greatly from a new pipeline.

“We want to be a part of this pipeline,” he said. “So, Thursday’s announcement will be interesting. Hope for the best.”

While Smith entered negotiations with Ottawa in hopes of securing more commitments for a new pipeline and a reprieve from a slew of Trudeau-era environmental policies, Carney went in looking for the premier to commit to strengthening its provincial industrial carbon pricing policy, which she froze earlier this year.

The upcoming agreement is expected to include stronger commitments from Alberta around a willingness to strengthen its industrial carbon price, which Ottawa views as a win. Smith said earlier this fall that she was open to changing her policy, which is one that Carney sees as key to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions.

Much of the language around the upcoming deal is expected to be conditional, laying out a roadmap for how Ottawa and Alberta would better collaborate on energy after years of acrimony under Trudeau.

Other policies Ottawa has put on the table as part of its negotiations include regulations around methane and clean electricity, as well as the proposed emissions cap on oil and gas, the last of which Carney opened the door to scrapping in the Nov. 4 budget, linking doing so to seeing strong methane regulations and an expansion of carbon capture and storage technologies.

When it comes to a possible lifting or carveout of the federal oil tanker ban off B.C’s northern coast, the Carney government could do so using the powers ushered in under the bill known by its legislative title of C-5, which gives cabinet the powers to sidestep existing environmental laws under a set of conditions to see infrastructure projects deemed as benefiting the “national interest” built.

Energy and Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson said the government would have “something to say very soon” regarding the deal between Ottawa and Alberta.

B.C. Liberal MP Gurbux Saini told reporters on Tuesday that he sides with comments made by Eby that B.C., as the jurisdiction impacted by Alberta’s pipeline proposal, should be at the table with Ottawa.

“I can agree with Mr. Eby, as premier of British Columbia, that he should be at all of these discussions.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Thomas King, seen here in 2008, has revealed that he is not an Indigenous person, despite believing so for most of his life.

Author Thomas King, long-celebrated for work rooted in what he believed was his partial Cherokee heritage, has revealed that he has no Indigenous ancestry to speak of.

The American-born, Canada-based writer, scholar and activist made the admission in a repentant

guest essay for The Globe and Mail

on Monday titled “A most inconvenient Indian,” a reference to his 2012 best-selling non-fiction work The Inconvenient Indian: A Curious Account of Native People in North America.

Prompted by recent “rumours” of a dubious ancestry, King wrote that he took it upon himself to get in touch with the Tribal Alliance Against Frauds (TAAF), an American Cherokee organization he would come to discover was the very

source of those rumours.

He explained how he learned the truth during a video call in mid-November with TAAF’s current director, Lianna Costantino, and a genealogist who consults for TAAF on a volunteer basis. Also on the line was Daniel Heath Justice, a Cherokee scholar at the University of British Columbia.

A call from which he’s “still reeling.”

“At 82, I feel as though I’ve been ripped in half, a one-legged man in a two-legged story,” he wrote. “Not the Indian I had in mind. Not an Indian at all.”

HarperCollins Canada, King’s publisher for more than 30 years, told the Globe it stands by the author. The publisher said it had no further comment when contacted by National Post, but had passed an interview request along to King.

Born in central California in 1943, King was the son of Kathryn Konsalas, a woman with Greek heritage, and Robert Elvin King, originally from Oklahoma, who was stationed out west during the Second World War. His parents met at a USO dance and had two children, King and his younger brother Christopher.

His father, however, abandoned his wife and sons when King was just three years old.

Growing up, King explained that he and his brother had “much darker” complexions than other family members and that he himself “looked somewhat Asian.”

He didn’t have any inkling of Indigenous roots until he told his mother that neighbourhood kids were calling him a derogatory term for Japanese people.

“No, she told me, you’re not Japanese. Your father is part Cherokee. That’s what the kids are seeing.”

In the years that followed, he put together “an intriguing if somewhat fractured story” of his father’s history as it relates to his own identity.

As he understood, his father discovered that his own father was not William King, but a man named Elvin Hunt who was allegedly part Cherokee. Upon learning this, King’s father reportedly split from the family and they “never reconciled.”

Decades later, now in their 60s, the King brothers tracked down their father’s sister, who also confirmed Hunt’s lineage.

Although his own ensuing research into the Hunt family genealogy never yielded any definitive evidence of a Cherokee link, TAAF’s genealogist, he wrote, uncovered absolutely none on the Hunt or King side.

“As you might expect, I didn’t want to believe her. I was sure she had made an error in her research, hadn’t gone back far enough, but as she talked about what she had found, as we matched the pieces of family history that I had with the pieces of family history that she uncovered, it became clear that the one piece missing was any connection to the Cherokee.”

King wrote that he won’t continue to fraudulently identify as part Cherokee, but he also won’t apologize for having lived his life under the belief, feeling that doing so is an admission of “a crime, an offence, a misdeed.”

He also vehemently denied knowing about his uncertain ancestry all along and maintaining the fraud “for fame and profit.”

But he did admit to having “ benefitted from being considered Native American” and is expecting the inevitable fallout from the truth being revealed.

“This pretty much means the end of me. It’s a brutal end, and I expect the worst,” he told The Globe and Mail in

a separate news story

.

Also Monday, after consulting with Indigenous communities and groups, the Edmonton Opera cancelled its planned production of Indians on Vacation, based on King’s novel that won the 2021 Stephen Leacock Memorial Medal for Humour.

“Our decision to step back was based on the overall environment of tension and division that emerged around the project, not on any single viewpoint or claim,” the opera said in

a statement

that doesn’t name King specifically. “The goal was to prioritize safety, trust, and care within our community.”

King, who moved to Canada in 1980 to teach at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, was made a member of the Order of Canada in 2004. He was elevated to Companion of the Order in 2020. He resides in Guelph, Ont.

He becomes the latest prominent Canadian whose Indigenous ancestry has been called into question, notably singer-songwriter Buffy Sainte-Marie and former federal cabinet minister Randy Boissonault.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Close up of flying bees.

OTTAWA — Canadian beekeepers are asking the government to ban all overseas bee imports, arguing the sting it would cause local industry would be less painful than risking importing a parasite that is devastating colonies in Europe and Asia.

If there’s one pest keeping the Canadian beekeeping industry abuzz these days, it’s tropilaelaps mites.

The one-millimeter-long parasite, which is currently found in Asia and small pockets of Europe, will wreak devastation on a honey bee colony. According to Curtis Miedema of the Alberta Beekeepers Commission, an infected beehive will collapse within two months.

Miedema and his colleagues flew to Ottawa this week to convince the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) to ban all overseas bee imports for the time being, even if it will be very sticky issue at first for Canadian beekeepers who sometimes use them to replace hives killed by the cold.

“It is difficult to keep bees over winter. We do have techniques, they work, but we have sometimes some very hard years where we are not rebuilding up to where it is,” said Peter Awram, director at the Canadian Beekeepers Federation, during a press conference.

“The majority of beekeepers consider this mite to be so devastating that we are better off not importing and destroying our industry and learning how to be much more self-sustaining,” he added.

Awram said Canada imports roughly 15 per cent of its bee population yearly from overseas to help rebuild populations after the winter cold.

Tuesday, Conservative Alberta MP Arnold Viersen also tabled a motion in the House of Commons asking the government to “restore free trade” of bees with the United States.

Imports of honey bee packages have been banned for years because of an

“unacceptable risk”

of importing disease or parasites.

The only bees allowed to enter Canada from the U.S. are queen bees, a necessary import on which the Canadian industry is “dependent”, said Awram.

“If that were to be shut off, that would be disastrous to our industry. We could not rebuild without those,” he noted.

The U.S. government has successfully swatted away tropilaelaps mites from entering its country to date, so Awram and Miedema said American bees should be available to import to Canada.

After initiating a review in 2023 of its restriction on U.S. bee packages,

CFIA reiterated earlier this year

that the imports pose an unacceptably high hazard risk to Canadian hives.

“Bee health is complex, and it is important that honey bee imports be controlled in such a way that they do not pose an unacceptable risk to the Canadian honey bee population,” the agency wrote.

But Awram and Miedema said the beekeeping industry’s relationship with the CFIA has been anything but sweet lately, complaining that the agency has repeatedly refused to hear their concerns.

“One of our struggles over the years has been being able to reach CFIA,” Miedema said Tuesday.

“So, I would have to say that over the years, that has not been a great relationship. We don’t feel like we’ve always been heard. But we were able to hold a meeting with them yesterday, and I would say, was very positive.”

Spokespeople for both the Health and the Agriculture minister did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson responds to a question during question period in the House of Commons in Ottawa, Friday, Nov. 7, 2025.

OTTAWA — Pressed on a Crown corporation’s decision to award a contract to a U.S.-based joint venture for the management of the country’s nuclear laboratories, Energy Minister Tim Hodgson suggested his government’s promise of “elbows up” can mean “lots of things.”

The National Post first revealed in June

that critics were sounding the alarm on the recent decision by Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) to award a contract to sole bidder Nuclear Laboratory Partners of Canada Inc. (NLPC) — a joint venture led by U.S.-based BWXT — for the management and operation of Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL).

CNL includes mainly Chalk River Laboratories, the birthplace of the CANDU reactor.

Critics raised national security concerns about giving access to Canada’s homegrown nuclear technology to companies involved with the U.S. Department of Defence at a time when Canada’s sovereignty was seemingly under attack by the Trump administration.

It appeared to be also contrary to Prime Minister Mark Carney’s “elbows up” campaign promise, even though AECL awarded the contract independently from the government.

NLPC is spearheaded by Virginia-based BWXT — an important supplier to the U.S. Defence Department. The other partners are Amentum — also based in Virginia — and Kinectrics Inc. — a company based in Toronto but bought by BWXT earlier this year.

Its key subcontractor, Ohio-based Batelle Memorial Institute, is the world’s largest research and development organization and manages national laboratories, including for the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

The management contract is valued at $1.2 billion per year on average, for six years, but could be extended up to a total of 20 years based on performance indicators.

The contract was originally planned to start on Sept. 13, but after the National Post reported on the transaction,

a news release from AECL

announced that it was delayed to a further date pending an “outstanding regulatory review of the transition” to be completed by the Competition Bureau.

“The Bureau works to complete our merger reviews as quickly as possible. That said, we must complete a thorough examination of the facts of a transaction before reaching an evidence-based conclusion,” said John Power, a spokesman for the Competition Bureau.

“As such, it would be inappropriate to speculate as to when the Bureau will reach its conclusion.”

A spokesman for AECL, Jeremy Latta, could not provide an exact date as to when the transition would occur. He would also not say if AECL would wait for the Competition Bureau to complete its investigation before proceeding with the hand-off to NLPC.

In the meantime, Canadian National Energy Alliance (CNEA), a consortium led by AtkinsRéalis, is continuing to manage CNL, as it has been doing for the past decade.

Hodgson, who was appearing at the House of Commons natural resources committee on Monday, had a testy exchange with Conservative MP Corey Tochor in explaining AECL’s decision to award a contract to a U.S.-led venture for Canada’s nuclear laboratories.

Hodgson reiterated that NLPC management is based in Canada — a contractual obligation for all members, including the CEO — and that every CNL employee is in Canada. He has also previously said that 95 per cent of the money involved will be spent in Canada.

“Are you against any American company operating in Canada?” the minister asked Tochor, adding that he does not think that view is “consistent” with Conservative thinking.

Tochor shot back: “I think it’s consistent with the ‘elbows up’ campaign you just ran.”

Hodgson replied that “‘elbows up’ means lots of things.”

“Elbows up means negotiating with all of the countries in the world, doubling our exports, creating alternatives to Americans. That’s what we’re doing,” he said.

Tochor also mentioned that the Competition Bureau announced last week it has

expanded its investigation into BWXT’s acquisition of Kinetrics

in determining whether the transaction is likely to prevent competition in Canada’s live-saving medical isotopes.

Hodgson said the Competition Bureau is an “independent entity” and is not in his department but said he does not see anything wrong with the process taking place.

“Look, I was in the investment banking world for my entire life. It is normal for transactions to be reviewed. Because a transaction is being reviewed, it in no way implies there’s anything wrong. It’s a normal process,” he said.

Latta, spokesman for AECL, has said this review process by the Competition Bureau concerns a “separate transaction” than NLPC’s acquisition of CNL shares.

Later in the committee meeting, Conservative MP Jonathan Rowe tabled a motion — initially put on notice by his colleague Shannon Stubbs, who is currently on medical leave — to study AECL’s decision to award a contract to a U.S.-based joint venture.

The motion proposed to invite Hodgson, as well as representatives from AECL, Natural Resources Canada, the Treasury Board Secretariat and any other witnesses the committee deems appropriate, as well as the production of documents relevant to this decision.

Liberal MPs on the committee, however, said that the study would interfere with the Competition Bureau’s investigation and shut down debate on the motion.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


A Canadian flag flies next to the American one at the Lewiston-Queenston border crossing bridge in Niagara Falls, Canada. The Canada Border Services Agency has issued a list of tips for travellers from the U.S. into Canada during the American Thanksgiving weekend.

The

Canada Border Services Agency

has issued a set of tips to travellers from the United States intending to cross into Canada during the upcoming U.S. Thanksgiving long weekend.

Ranking high on the CBSA list are reminders not to bring cannabis, firearms or homemade food containing turkey.

“Be sure to review current

restrictions on poultry and birds from the United States

before bringing these products across the border,” the agency says in a Nov. 25 press release. “Homemade food or leftovers containing poultry (including turkey) cannot be brought into Canada.”

The agency also says travellers from the U.S. should “leave (their) firearms and weapons at home. You are encouraged not to travel with firearms.”

For cannabis users, the CBSA warning is clear: “Don’t bring it in.”

While cannabis is legal in Canada, notes the CBSA, “bringing it across the border in any form, including oils, without a permit or exemption

authorized by Health Canada

is a serious criminal offence subject to arrest and prosecution.”

Moreover, says the CBSA, a medical prescription from a doctor does not count toward a Health Canada authorization.

The CBSA says it is “always watching for missing children,” so travellers with children who are not their own, or for whom they don’t have full legal custody, a consent letter from the parent or legal guardian authorizing travel with the child is recommended.

For land-border crossers the CBSA aims to help with wait times and suggests travellers check border wait times available on the

list of every crossing

provided by the agency.

“Early mornings are the best time to cross the border to avoid wait times,” says the CBSA. “The Monday of holiday long weekends tend to be the busiest. Consider an alternative port of entry with shorter wait times or less traffic.”

Travellers can also check a specific port of entry’s hours of operation on the official

CBSA Directory of Offices and Services

.

Otherwise, the CBSA suggests travellers have their

travel documents

readily available to present to a CBSA officer when coming into Canada.

“U.S. citizens must carry proper identification to enter Canada such as a valid passport or NEXUS card when travelling by land or air. This will speed up processing times at the border.”

The CBSA urges travellers to be “prepared to declare” everything they bring with them, including gifts and food. The agency notes that people arriving by land are responsible for everything inside their vehicles. It suggests that travellers who are not sure what to declare, call the CBSA at 1-800-461-9999.

For travellers flying into Canada, it is recommended that they use the

advance declaration

, which can be done up to 72 hours in advance of arrival.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Irwin Cotler, International Chair of the Raoul Wallenberg Centre speak as report authors Yonah Diamond, left, and Mutasim Ali, right, look on during a news conference in Ottawa, Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2025.

OTTAWA — A human rights group and a band of MPs issued a “wake-up call” Tuesday to Canada and other countries to help stop the genocide in Darfur, warning that the worst of the atrocities may still be ahead.

Irwin Cotler, a former Liberal MP and cabinet minister and now a human rights advocate, said Canada and its international allies need to do more to pursue peace in the western Sudanese region, help citizens evade the war zones through safe corridors, and provide other forms of humanitarian assistance.

Cotler, a key member of a “Save Darfur” coalition of MPs that was founded 22 years ago during the previous crisis, said it’s “tragic and painful” that the region is facing another genocide. The MPs told reporters that another all-party parliamentary coalition has been re-established to address the situation.

The human disaster was foreseeable, said Cotler, who is also the founder of the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights (RWCHR). “It’s not as if the compelling horrors were not known,” he said during a press conference in Ottawa. “It’s that they were not acted upon.”

Mutasim Ali, a legal advisor at the Wallenberg centre, said the terror in Darfur puts pretty much everybody in the region of 7.5-million people at risk.

Darfur, an independent region until 1874, has been facing a humanitarian crisis for most of the last 22 years due largely to a battle for political power and rivalries between domestic religious and ethnic groups.

Cotler also highlighted the findings of the centre’s recent independent inquiry on the atrocities in Sudan. The inquiry, which focused largely on the child victims, found that what began more than two years ago as a power struggle between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has escalated into one of the world’s worst crises. The atrocities include mass starvation, forced displacement, deliberate attacks on the young and vulnerable, sexual violence, enslavement and of course mass murder.

The report, titled A War on Children, A World Complicit, found substantial evidence that RSF and its allied militias are committing genocide and ethnic cleansing against non-Arab populations in Darfur, particularly around the western Sudanese city of El Fasher.

The report also pointed the finger at the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Kenya and Chad for supporting or enabling the atrocities. There is also strong evidence, the report says, that China, Russia, and the UAE have supplied arms to the two sides.

The struggle for power has hit children particularly hard, the group found. Despite the scale of the atrocities, UNICEF and some other non-governmental organizations are struggling to provide for the local population, including life-saving assistance for 15 million children.

Green Party Leader Elizabeth May said the conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine are distracting the world’s attention from the genocide and atrocities in Darfur.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Some Canadian companies appear to be based in the United States on X, but a computer expert says it doesn't mean it's true.

Some Canadian companies and political parties appear to be “based” in the United States on X, even though they are Canadian. The information appeared on X accounts after the platform launched a new feature over the weekend, intended to show users where in the world an account is located.

It is supposed to help “users to verify the authenticity of the content they see on X,”

according to X head of product Nikita Bier

; however, the About This Account feature has also led to some confusion.

“If any data is incorrect, it will be updated periodically based on best available information. This happens on a delayed and randomized schedule to preserve privacy,” Bier

said

.

After the feature was launched, users on X started pointing out that the accounts for the Liberal Party and the NDP are listed as “based in United States.” Canadian companies like Tim Hortons and Lululemon, to name a few, are also listed as “based in the United States.”

However, the Liberal Party’s spokesperson Matteo Rossi confirmed to National Post in an emailed statement that all of its social accounts “are of course run from Canada.” Similarly, NDP spokesperson Aaron Zerfas said the party’s account on X was “created and is maintained in Canada.”

A spokesperson for Tim Hortons said its X account is run from Toronto, Ont. Lululemon did not immediately respond to National Post in time for publication.

Here’s what to know about X’s new location feature and some accounts’ misleading locations.

How can organizations in Canada appear to be located in the U.S. online?

Although a social media account might be “based” in the U.S., it doesn’t necessarily mean that it was set up abroad or is being run outside of Canada, Courtney Gibson told National Post. Gibson is a computer engineering professor at the University of Toronto and the the Chief Technology Officer at medical company MedixSafe.

Each device that connects to the internet has a unique identifying number assigned to it,

called an IP address

. There are several reasons why an IP address might not accurately display a location, said Gibson.

“There are a whole bunch of things that can really frustrate people’s attempt to know where traffic is coming from,” including an address being misidentified or a server being moved temporarily. IP addresses “move around” and can make it hard to pinpoint a physical location.

Gibson likened it to area codes and phone numbers.

“It used to be that 416 numbers were all Toronto phone numbers, and for a combination of convenience and competition, people now can move their phone numbers,” he said.

“I know people with 416 phone numbers who now live in Ottawa or Vancouver or Montreal, and they have taken their phone number with them as they’ve moved. The area code no longer really corresponds to geography. And the same thing happens with computer addresses.”

He said there are a lot of components in place to ensure the internet runs smoothly from a business perspective, but that can mean less clarity for internet users who want more information.

Another scenario that could lead to a Canadian organization appearing to be based in the U.S. could be if an internet service provider assigns

blocks of IP addresses

to customers.

If some addresses are not in use, the provider can sell them. It’s possible that the address used when a customer subscribed to a social media platform, such as X, belonged to the Canadian provider at the time, but was then sold to another provider in the United States, said Gibson.

“It may now be owned by a different organization, reported in a different location,” said Gibson. “It can be really hard to tell.”

Why do some Canadian X accounts say ‘based’ in the U.S.?

Gibson said he would be surprised if such accounts are really being run through a “physical server sitting in a room somewhere” in the United States.

“It’s far more likely that they are running it from (Amazon Web Services) or a Microsoft Azure service somewhere and that it is simply being routed,” he said.

“To the same extent, I could send you a package by FedEx, and if I was sending it from Saskatchewan to Toronto, it probably will travel through the United States at some point, just because that’s a more direct route. It doesn’t mean that the sender isn’t Canadian, or the recipient isn’t Canadian. It just happened to travel through some roadway that crossed the border.”

He added: “The internet was originally built without a lot of geography in mind.”

The Canadian companies and political parties that appear to be “based” in the U.S. on X include a warning from the platform.

It says: “One of our partners has indicated that this account may have used a proxy — such as a VPN, which may change the country or region that is displayed on their profile. This data may not be accurate. Some internet providers may use proxies automatically without action by the user.”

What should internet users know about trusting sources online?

Much of the information online is automatically trusted, said Gibson, despite there being “no authority anywhere to validate” it. That includes the location of IP addresses.

“I think it’s a matter of understanding what you can trust. So many of the protocols that we rely on, on the internet, were written in the days when it was an academic network, back in the 1980s,” said Gibson.

“There are some services that will point you to the organization that is plugged into the internet and hosting those addresses, and that may help lead you to where it is. But again, the source of the website or the source of the data may be a customer of theirs, as opposed to the company themselves. It’s complicated, and it lets the internet function, but it also can be abused by people who are trying to hide.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.