LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Assembly of First Nations Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak looks on during a press conference in Ottawa on Wednesday, July 16, 2025.

OTTAWA

— Assembly of First Nations National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak said the federal government will need to present a plan for how to get more infrastructure built on First Nations reserves as it tries to soothe concerns from chiefs over new powers to fast-track major infrastructure projects. 

Chiefs from across the country are

preparing to meet with Prime Minister Mark Carney and other senior ministers

to discuss the Liberals’ plan to shorten the approvals process for projects like ports and pipelines. First Nations have voiced concerns that fast tracking could neglect their land and treaty rights.

The meeting, set to take place on Thursday, was announced as the legislation, known as Bill C-5,

was passed before the House of Commons broke for summer

. Carney said he hoped to address chiefs’ concerns about ensuring the government upholds its duty to consult First Nations as it pledges to get more projects off the ground, facing economic threats from U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

“I know Trump’s at our borders, pushing colonialism,”

Woodhouse Nepinak told reporters at a press conference in the Assembly of First Nations’ (AFN) office in downtown Ottawa on Wednesday. 

“We don’t need more colonialism in our country. What we need is to get back to the table and to talk about these really hard things.”

Regional chiefs and other chiefs from different communities spoke during the press conference about the persistent issues that those living on First Nations face in terms of lack of access to clean drinking water, roads and housing, as well as the number of young people dying in communities

— issues that former prime minister Justin Trudeau had pledged to address. 

Woodhouse Nepinak said she hopes dealing with that infrastructure gap “is on the table in a very serious way,” adding that the AFN and others have produced different reports over the years that highlight the chronic issue. 

The AFN, the country’s largest organization representing more than 600 First Nation communities, has been vocal in its concerns about the pace at which the Liberals introduced and passed the major projects legislation, but has not been directly involved in planning the upcoming gathering or selecting speakers.

On Wednesday, some of the chiefs expressed concern about having received the agenda late on Tuesday. A copy seen by National Post shows the federal government plans to have Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc discuss the consultation requirements outlined in the law as well as how projects would be selected.

Other ministers expected to attend are Natural Resources and Energy Minister Tim Hodgson as well as Indigenous Services Minister

Mandy Gull-Masty, who is expected to address the issue of consultations. Members of the Liberals’ Indigenous caucus are also expected to be on hand. Chiefs are also able to submit written questions. 

Woodhouse Nepinak acknowledged the agenda was still evolving and some feel the upcoming meeting is “rushed,” but offered credit to Carney for agreeing with her ask to meet with chiefs, saying such a gathering ought to happen more often, given the last time she said one was staged was around 2012. 

The national chief said she has heard a diversity of views about the Liberals’ plan to fast-track major infrastructure projects. While some chiefs have expressed concerns, she said others have expressed support. There have also been chiefs so consumed with dealing with other issues in their communities they do not yet have a position.

“We’re going to give (Carney) the benefit of the doubt that he produces tomorrow,”

Woodhouse Nepinak said. 

“I think that he has to also listen to First Nations leadership, more listening, rather than talking about how they want to proceed forward.”

The national chief and other First Nations leaders underlined how they saw Thursday’s meeting as only the beginning of talks and should not be considered an act of consultation, something Carney confirmed at an unrelated news conference about tariffs in Hamilton, Ont.

He said the new law was “

enabling legislation” that allows discussions to take place about what constitutes a project to be “nation building” and the process that would follow to ensure rights-holders like First Nations would be consulted and be able to participate. 

Under the law, the federal cabinet would decide which projects would be added to a list that would allow the approvals process to be fast tracked through a yet-to-be-developed major-projects office. Carney has said the goal is to give selected projects the green light within two years, down from the current five.

Terry Teegee, a regional chief representing British Columbia for the Assembly of First Nations, said he had a more skeptical take about the upcoming meeting. 

“If this is a success, I think it’s getting a solid commitment from the prime minister of discussions of how free, prior and informed consent will be implemented.”

He said the problem lies in the fact there could be projects pitched “that are going to be very controversial.”

“It’s those projects that I think the vast majority of chiefs are worried about.”

Teegee named as an example Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s desire to see

a pipeline built from Alberta to B.C.’s northern coast

, a route that has received widespread pushback from some First Nations in the area in the past.

“We’ve been down that road, and it’s a very difficult situation.”

National Post

staylor@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Canadian flags being held by people flap in the wind during Canada Day festivities in Vancouver, on Tuesday, July 1, 2025.

Nearly 40,000 Canadians took a survey on happiness, revealing where the happiest people live across the country.

These results come from a recently released Leger poll, the

2025 edition of Happy Cities

. It was based on data from 39,841 Canadian adults, 18 and over, who took an online survey between March 31 and April 13.

The City of Mississauga ranked highest out of Canada’s 10 largest cities, with a happiness index of 70.3 out of 100.

The

happiness index

calculates how a person perceives their own happiness, using a scale from 0 to 100. It is based on 25 factors that participants are surveyed on, including how they feel about their community, society as a whole, the environment, their health, finances, relationships and work.

Mississauga ranked above Canada’s average of 68.7. The only other city that also had above average happiness was Montreal, which followed Mississauga closely, at 69.4.

Mississauga Mayor

Carolyn Parrish

said it was “wonderful” to see the city getting recognition.

 Mississauga Mayor Carolyn Parrish poses for a photo in her office in Mississauga, Ont., Friday, Jan. 10, 2025.

“This reflects the quality of life our residents enjoy — from green spaces and strong public services to a resilient economy and inclusive community programs,” she said, in

a news release

on Tuesday. “While these survey results are encouraging, we remain committed to listening to our residents.”

Following Mississauga and Montreal in terms of happiness in Canada’s 10 largest cities are Hamilton, Ontario (67.5), Calgary, Alberta (67.4), Brampton, Ontario (66.7), Ottawa, Ontario (66.4), Edmonton, Alberta (66.3), Vancouver, B.C. (66.3), Winnipeg, Manitoba (65.9) and, coming in last, Toronto, Ontario (65.8).

Which Canadian provinces are the happiest in the country?

Although Ontario had the most cities in the top 10, it ranked low on the list of happiest provinces.

Coming in first was Quebec, followed by New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador. Those three provinces were above average for happiness.

 Despite the heat, people crowd Notre-Dame Street during the street fair in Little Burgundy in Montreal, on Sunday, July 13, 2025.

“Quebecers have a really like positive mindset in a way,” one Montreal resident

told CityNews

. “We see things a lot more optimistically.”

“We are French and English so we have both worlds, languages and vibes,” another resident told CityNews.

However, one person was shocked by the results. “I’m a little surprised honestly,” the Montrealer told CityNews, citing the economy as an issue. “It surprises me that like one of the happiest — happy, yes — but one of the happiest… I’m a little surprised not gonna lie.”

Saskatchewan came in fourth, followed by Nova Scotia, Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, Manitoba and Prince Edward Island.

Has the happiness of Canadian improved or deteriorated over the years?

Among the findings, the survey revealed what it referred to as a “concerning reality” when Canadians were asked about whether their happiness had improved, stayed the same or had deteriorated over the past year. There were 28 per cent who said they were less happy. Almost half said their happiness remained stable and 23 per cent said they saw improvement.

Young Canadians were more likely to report improvements in their happiness over the past year than older age groups.

There were 36 per cent of Canadians aged 25 to 34 years old who said their happiness grew, compared to only 20 per cent of Canadians aged 55 and over. The survey found a “sense of well-being emerging among younger age groups.” However, it said this also “highlights the importance of supporting adults in mid-life, who are more vulnerable to the pressures of working life.”

Overall, women were slightly happier than men. Women rated their happiness at 69.4, while men rated it at 68.

According to a Leger

news release

about the survey, its results show a “resilient and tested” population that is “affected by everyday uncertainty and challenges.”

“Happiness, while holding its ground overall, shows signs of fragility,” it said.

Canada ranked 18 out of 147 countries included

in the latest World Happiness Report

.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The BBC says it breached its own editorial policies after failing to disclose that the narrator of a Gaza documentary was the son of a Hamas official.

A BBC report published Monday confirmed the existence of an ethical and editorial issue in a documentary about Gaza that the broadcaster had pulled offline in February, but claimed this was the result of an honest mistake by an external production firm.

The

31-page review

by Peter Johnston, director of the BBC’s Editorial Complaints and Reviews department, upheld complaints of misleading audiences of the documentary film “Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone,” due to the fact that its main narrator, a boy named Abdullah, was later found to be the son of a Hamas government official, Ayman Alyazouri, deputy minister of agriculture in the Hamas-run Gaza government.

The London-based production company Hoto Films, which produced the documentary for the BBC, “had to bring this information to the BBC’s attention” but did not and is therefore “the party with the most responsibility for this failure,” Johnston wrote.

“However, I do not consider that the production company intentionally misled the BBC about the narrator’s father’s position,” he added. Rather, it believed that the father’s position “was a civilian or technocratic one, as opposed to a political or military position in Hamas,” Johnston added. The issue is “a breach of Guideline 3.3.17 on Accuracy, which deals with misleading audiences,” he added.

“This is the only breach of the (BBC) Editorial Guidelines I have identified in connection with the Programme,” wrote Johnston.

Avi Benlolo: Media fuels violence with false reporting on Gaza

All mentions in Arabic of the word “Jew” were translated in the film as “Israeli,” but this was not in breach of the guidelines, Johnston wrote, as Gazans often refer to the Israel Defence Forces this way. “Translating a contributor’s words to give the impression they meant to refer to Jewish people generally would therefore also risk misleading audiences,” he claimed.

“I do not find there to have been any editorial breaches in respect of the Programme’s translation; but I do find that guidance on this topic could be clarified and not just based on previous rulings, as explained further below,” he also said.

The inquiry found that the production firm provided payment to the tune of $2,448 and that this was “reasonable.” An adult earning an average salary in Gaza in 2021 would need to work for 21 months to earn that sum, according to U.N. data. Wages likely dropped even further following the outbreak of war with Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which eliminated many places of employment.

Johnston also wrote that he had “not seen or heard any evidence to support a suggestion that the Narrator’s father or family influenced the content of the Programme in any way.”

David Collier, an independent British journalist who exposed the family ties of the narrator Abdullah, dismissed the inquiry’s findings as insufficient and criticized the latter’s assertion.

“They didn’t find evidence to suggest ‘daddy’ had any input. Seriously? He only went home to his Hamas daddy EVERY NIGHT,” Collier wrote on X.


Several applications for generic semaglutide, the active compound in Novo Nordisk's injectable drugs Ozempic and Wegovy, are now before Health Canada.

In what

Science magazine

has dubbed “Novo Nordisk’s Canadian Mistake,” Ozempic is soon to come off patent in Canada, opening the door to cheaper generic copycats, after the drug giant reportedly failed to pay a few hundred dollars in annual fees to maintain the patent rights before the weight-loss drug became a blockbuster seller.

As

Science

reported, a patent, once lapsed, can’t be restored. Novo Nordisk will continue to hold its U.S. patent until 2032.

Ozempic was already the third most prescribed drug in Canada last year with 7,390,000 prescriptions dispensed, a 17 per cent increase over 2023, according to drug analytics research firm IQVIA.

Several applications for generic semaglutide, the active compound in Novo Nordisk’s injectable drugs Ozempic and Wegovy, are now before Health Canada. Last week,

a U.S. telehealth service

announced plans to expand into Canada next year and offer generic semaglutide at  a significant discount.

Richard Saynor, the head of Sandoz, a global leader in generic and biosimilar drugs, told

Endpoint News

in June that his company has filed for approval for a generic semaglutide in Canada once Novo Nordisk’s patent exclusivity expires “sometime in Q1 next year.”

Canada is the globe’s second-biggest semaglutide market, Saynor told Endpoint News. “You gotta ask why. I don’t think Canadians are disproportionately large. There’s clearly a dynamic, like insulin, with cross-border business,” he said. Americans with diabetes have crossed into Canada to buy insulin at

much lower prices.

Ozempic and Wegovy cost about $5,000 per year. If money is no longer a factor, if chemically-identical drugs are cheaper and more affordable, “that’s going to change the calculus for many people,” said Justin Lehmiller, a senior research fellow at Indiana University’s Kinsey Institute and co-author of a new survey exploring the impact that weight-loss drugs — formally known as GLP-1 agonists — are having on dating and intimacy.

The survey of 2,000 single Americans (aged 18 to 91) led by Kinsey with DatingNews.com found eight per cent reported having used a GLP-1 medication for weight loss in the past year.

Among the GLP-1 users, 16 per cent said exes had reached out to reconnect, 14 per cent said they were getting more matches on dating apps and 12 per cent said they were going on more dates. The drugs seemed to be doing more to booster “online dating success” for men than for women, the researchers said.

“Some of the studies and research that I’ve seen suggest that men only match one in 100 times on dating apps where for women, it’s more like one in 10,” Lehmiller said. “An attractiveness boost for men, which often accompanies using these drugs, could translate into a much bigger impact for them in the world of dating.”

Men, however, were nearly twice as likely to women to say they feared being judged or shamed for taking Ozempic or other GLP-1 drugs.

“There are some masculinity concerns that are tied up in this,” said Lehmiller, a social psychologist. Men might worry about being accused of cheating, he said. “It might be viewed as a sign of weakness for turning to a drug as opposed to losing weight through ‘hard work.’”

About half of the GLP-1 users also said the medications impact their sex lives, in both positive and negative ways: 18 per cent said their sexual desire increased, while 16 per cent said it dropped. Sixteen per cent said their sexual function improved; 12 per cent said it worsened. It’s a nuanced picture, Lehmiller said. “These drugs seem to be affecting different people in different ways.”

“And I think that makes sense: There is a lot of variability in the side effects people experience on these drugs.” More side effects might mean more negative impact on intimacy, he said. The drugs have also been associated with a slightly higher risk o

f erectile dysfunction and testosterone deficiency

in men taking semaglutide for obesity compared to men not taking the drug.

About one in five in the dating survey said the drugs are creating more stigma against being overweight. “Changing standards of attractiveness might be creating more pressure for people to look a certain way or use these medications,” Lehmiller said.

A study published this week in the

Canadian Medical Association Journal

found 32.7 per cent of adults in Canada (10.6 million people) were obese in 2023, an eight per cent jump over 2009.

Generic semaglutide won’t be as cheap as Aspirin. “It’s still going to be a cost,” said Dr. Hertzel Gerstein, an endocrinologist and professor in McMaster University’s department of medicine. “And that does not relieve a responsible health practitioner of assessing a patient before they prescribe the medication,” he said.

“Is it possible that more people would be willing to pay out of pocket if they don’t have insurance coverage for the drug? Sure, if it’s cheaper,” Gerstein said.

“There may be more demand for it. People need to understand the risks and benefits.”

Taken once a week by injection, Ozempic and Wegovy work by mimicking a hormone — glucagon-like peptide-1 — the small intestine releases when people eat. GLP-1 tricks the body into thinking it’s full. It works on the brain to reduce appetite and interest in continuing to eat, and works on the stomach to slow how fast it empties so that food lingers in the stomach longer.

Semaglutide has been studied extensively, Gerstein said. The amount of weight lost is related to the dosage: the higher the dose, the more weight dropped. In people with type 2 diabetes, the drug can reduce the need for insulin, or the dosage. “But most importantly these drugs unequivocally reduce the future risk of serious health outcomes, including heart attacks, strokes, death from cardiovascular causes” and heart failure symptoms when used long-term, “in the two- to five-year window of time,” Gerstein said.

A

major analysis

published earlier this year based on health data from more than two million Americans veterans with diabetes found that, compared to more traditional drugs, GLP-1 use was associated with a reduced risk of substance use (alcohol, cannabis, stimulants and opioids), psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia, seizures, several respiratory conditions and neurocognitive diseases like Alzheimer’s and dementia.

The magnitude of the associated benefits — about a 10 to 20 per cent reduction for most outcomes — was modest, according to a background release, though the researchers said they don’t “negate” the potential value of the drugs.

There were, however, several drawbacks, including an increased risk of gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), low blood pressure, fainting, arthritic disorders, kidney disorders and drug-induced pancreatitis associated with GLP-1 drugs compared to usual care.

Nothing is guaranteed, Gerstein said. “I always tell patients we don’t know exactly what it’ll do in you. And weight loss, if it’s going to happen, usually takes a month or two to start” and plateaus at around eight months. People don’t lose weight indefinitely. “There’s definitely a plateau. You do not keep losing weight,” he said. The drugs yield an average weight loss of around 15 per cent, and weight can also rebound rapidly once the drugs are stopped.

Ozempic has been approved in Canada for diabetes but is often used “off label” for obesity. Wegovy has been approved for obesity.

In an email to National Post, Novo Nordisk, the only current company in Canada with Health Canada-approved products containing semaglutide, said “all intellectual property decisions are carefully considered at a global level.

“Periods of exclusivity for pharmaceutical products end as part of their normal lifecycle and generic treatments may become available over time.”

“Currently, no Health Canada-approved generic versions of semaglutide exist and we cannot speculate on other manufacturers’ plans,” the company said.

National Post

 

 

 

 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Health Minister Marjorie Michel poses for a portrait on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Thursday, May 29, 2025.

MONTREAL – Marjorie Michel never wanted to run for office. She didn’t want to come out of the shadows, she said.

To most Canadians, she’s a complete unknown. In Montreal, though,

she just replaced Justin Trudeau as the MP for Papineau

. And in Ottawa, she was recently appointed as minister of health. Yet since the April 28 election, she has remained almost invisible, trying to acclimate to a life she knows well, but never imagined for herself.

Behind the scenes, Michel is praised for being “direct,” serious, organized, calm, pragmatic and “blunt.” And in Montreal’s Haitian community and in Quebec’s Liberal circles, she’s known as a heavyweight, and called a “pioneer.” Several people spoken to for this story referred to her as the “godmother” of the Liberal Party in Quebec.

Before 2025, Michel was deputy chief of staff and close adviser to former prime minister Justin Trudeau. Being a politician, the public face of the government, has required some adjustment.

 To most Canadians, she’s a complete unknown. In Montreal, though, Marjorie Michel replaced Justin Trudeau as the MP for Papineau. Pictured, Michel with a note from Trudeau.

“When you are a staffer, you’re there to advise, you’re there to protect, but you’re not there to make decisions, either. So, you often have to live with advice you’ve given that isn’t taken,” she tells National Post, in French.

But it’s a life she grew up with. She’s the daughter of a former prime minister of Haiti: Smarck Michel held the post for a year from 1994 to 1995, appointed by the country’s first democratically elected president, Jean-Bertrand Aristide when Aristide returned to power after being deposed by a coup d’état.

Marjorie Michel had worked in Haitian politics, too. But the political instability and the country’s inability to embrace a peaceful democracy became too much. In even their upscale Port-au-Prince neighbourhood, kidnappings were common.

“It was a very tense situation because there were kidnappings of people we knew,” said Marjorie Michel’s daughter, Maxim Kernisant. “So, it was very, very anxiety-provoking. And I know that my sister was also having panic attacks; she didn’t want to go to school anymore. It had really become unbearable.”

‘Happy coincidence’ or master plan: How Carney’s team full of Quebecers wants to govern Canada

One morning, in 1999, Marjorie Michel told her two daughters they wouldn’t be going to school. That’s when she decided to leave Haiti.

They settled in Montreal in 2000. She lived alone with her two daughters in a tiny apartment in the Outremont neighbourhood, with a limited salary, and a teenager attending a French private school in the city. Money was tight, but education and security were Michel’s priorities for her family.

After a year, two of Maxim’s cousins moved in with them. And Michel was left raising four children aged between five and 12 all by herself.

“She was truly the rock of the family. The person you could always count on, and whenever you needed guidance or information, she was the one,” said Kernisant.

Politics never left Michel. She dived into the provincial scene for several years with the Quebec Liberal party as an organizer and an advisor to MNA Emmanuel Dubourg, who was also born in Haiti. He would eventually move to Ottawa, where he was the Liberal MP for Bourassa from 2013 to 2025. Eventually the two of them ended up as a couple and got married.

 Gregor Robertson, left to right, Rebecca Alty, Tim Hodgson, Marjorie Michel arrive for a cabinet swearing-in at Rideau Hall in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 13, 2025.

Just like Dubourg, Michel found her way into the federal Liberal party. In 2019 she became chief of staff to then president of the Treasury Board Jean-Yves Duclos. She was made deputy chief of staff to Trudeau in 2021.

In 2024, Michel was briefly the federal Liberal party’s deputy campaign director, but soon left that role. Andrew Bevan, who was campaign director, describes her as a “confident and expressive” woman who makes sure you know she is in the room.

“She takes up space in that room, making clear that people know what her point of view is, and making clear what she thinks of the situation at hand,” he said.

When National Post first met Michel at a public event in June, she quickly admitted she wasn’t a very media-savvy politician. But she said her staff encourages her to make public appearances and to accept interview requests. It’s clearly not her favourite part of the job.

But she agreed to sit for one in her constituency office in Montreal, a beige office in a nondescript office building. The name on the door still reads “The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, MP Papineau”. There’s a wooden gate; evidently some kind of security barrier into the office.

Finance minister directs cabinet colleagues to find billions in spending cuts

“I don’t know why we have that,” said Michel.

“We had a prime minister as an MP here before. Things are, I guess, different,” suggested one of her aides.

In her office, she shows off a note on Trudeau’s stationery, signed by the former prime minister. “Congratulations my dear friend! You have the best riding in the country,” reads the note in French. Trudeau left it after she won the riding with 53 per cent of the vote in April.

For years, Liberal insiders had urged Michel to run. She preferred to stay behind the scenes, finding candidates and organizing on the ground.

She believed in what Trudeau was doing. After the Liberal party began collapsing and lost a 2024 byelection in its long-held riding of LaSalle—Émard—Verdun (which she said she fully expected) she said she promised Trudeau she would fight to the end to preserve his legacy.

She offered to recruit candidates and, if necessary, run herself, anywhere, even in an unwinnable riding.

After Trudeau resigned and now Prime Minister Mark Carney was installed as Liberal leader, Trudeau summoned her to his office in downtown Ottawa, across from Parliament Hill.

 Walking past federal election posters of Marjorie Michel of the Liberals and generic poster of the Bloc leader Yves-Francois Blanchet in the ridding of Papineau on Tuesday March 25, 2025.

“I want you to run in Papineau,” he said.

She said she told him that was out of the question. She did not want to be elected. Her husband had already decided to leave politics and she wanted to join him living in Montreal.

Trudeau told her to think about it. Then, Carney’s close advisers pushed her to do it. So she made the leap.

Carney would soon make her Canada’s first-ever Haitian-born cabinet minister.

“You have to be there when it’s difficult, and I think I’m strong enough to be there when it’s difficult,” she said. “Then there were the questions that I was a woman, and also that I was a racialized woman. At one point there were a lot of men who were running. So, I said to myself, well, if I accept, it’s going to be a seat for a woman,” she said.

Now her priority, she says, is to be a good MP for her constituents first, and to manage the Department of Health calmly — but firmly.

As minister, mental health was one of her top priorities, she said. Canadians are anxious, she explained, mostly because of the difficult relationship between Canada and the United States. She wants to help the prime minister weather the storm and “reduce the level of anxiety” in the country.

 Minister of Health Marjorie Michel rises during question period on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Monday, June 2, 2025.

With the Liberals in a minority government, she doesn’t know how long she’ll be in the House of Commons.

“If we had won a majority, I would have run once and then prepared the next generation. Now, I don’t know. We’ll see,” she said.

National Post

atrepanier@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Olivia Collins of London enjoys a run this week through Greenway Park in London under smoky skies due to the far-away wildfires.

Wildfires are becoming more common in Canada and that means more smoke and air quality warnings. Here’s what you need to know about air quality to better understand how it could impact your health and outdoor activities.

What is the Air Quality Health Index?

In Canada, the

Air Quality Health Index (AQHI)

is a scale developed to help people understand what the current air quality means for your health. It is an initiative

among

Environment Canada, Health Canada and the provincial governments.

“When we look at the AQHI, it’s really an indication of the impact of the air quality on our health,” said Dr. Samantha Green, a family physician at Unity Health Toronto.

The index takes into consideration

three pollutants to determine

the air quality. First, ground-level ozone, which is formed by photo-chemical reactions in the atmosphere. Second, particulate matter, which can be emitted by vehicles, industries and forest fires, forming a mix of particles that we can inhale. Finally, nitrogen dioxide comes from vehicle emissions and power plants that rely on fossil fuels, and this can normally be found near high-traffic roads. Those three pollutant levels contribute to how good or bad the air quality is in a certain area.

How do we know when the air quality is good or bad?

“The AQHI is measured in different air monitoring stations, and can provide a very accurate measurement in real time of the air quality in a particular location and it can guide us in making decisions about spending time outdoors and activity levels,” said Green.

The bigger the number, the higher risk it has to your health.

When the AQHI is low (1-3) or moderate (4-6), outdoor activities can continue as normal, and should only be modified if the person feels symptoms like coughing, for example. When the levels get a bit higher, between 7 and 10, it is advised to reconsider strenuous outdoor activities if you’re already experiencing symptoms. Whenever the levels get higher than 10, it is recommended that people reduce or reconsider strenuous outdoor activities, especially if they have symptoms. People at higher risk and children should reconsider outdoor activities when the level is seven and above and avoid the outdoors when the level is above 10, according to Air Quality Ontario.

Who is at a higher risk?

People at a higher risk of the impacts of air quality

include

, but are not limited to: seniors, pregnant people, children, and people with existing illnesses or health conditions, like cancer, diabetes, lung or heart conditions, and other chronic conditions.

What are the possible health impacts?

The immediate health impacts of poor air quality can include difficulty breathing, eye and throat irritation, cough, wheezing and chest tightness, and it can worsen any pre-existing symptoms of respiratory conditions, such as asthma.

When it comes to long-term impacts, there’s still research to be done on the impact of exposure to wildfire smoke. However, preliminary results show “an impact on lung function, a slight increased risk of lung cancer, brain tumours, potential increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, and a potential effect on childhood development and developmental disorders of childhood,” said Green.

“Wildfire smoke likely has negative health impacts on all body systems and we should avoid repeated and long term exposure,” said Green.

What is causing the poor air quality?

On July 14, until 11 a.m., Toronto had an AQHI of 10, meaning it was better to stay indoors, while in Halifax, the AQHI was 2, an ideal air quality for outdoor activities.

The poor air quality in many parts of the country, like Ontario, Manitoba and Saskatchewan, was caused mainly by the forest fires over Northern Ontario and the Prairies.

Do masks filter out air pollution?

“An N95 mask will filter out a large portion of the particulate matter. It’s not going to filter out those other air pollutants, like nitrogen dioxide and ozone and it’s not a long term solution,” Green said. However, a surgical mask won’t help, only an N95 worn correctly.

“If someone must be outside and the AQHI is high, I would say, sure, yes, it will protect you if you wear an N95 mask,” said Green.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Jenni Byrne makes her way to a Procedure and House Affairs committee meeting Thursday, May 11, 2023 in Ottawa.

OTTAWA — As Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre faces calls to make changes following his April election loss, the manager who ran that campaign remains an advisor, but is taking a less visible role, at least for now.

Jenni Byrne’s future with the party has been a source of discussion among MPs and other Conservative supporters, frustrated by the party’s loss to Prime Minister Mark Carney and decisions made by the campaign in a race that became defined by which leader Canadians trusted to go toe-to-toe with U.S. President Donald Trump.

Parting ways with Byrne, a longtime Conservative organizer who ran the party’s 2025 campaign, is something that has been conveyed to Poilievre, according to several sources who spoke to National Post.

So far, Poilievre has shown no sign of being willing to do so, telling reporters before his first post-campaign caucus meeting back in April that, “e

xcluding is never the way to broaden a team,” even as some MPs and insiders pointed fingers at Byrne for operational and internal decisions they felt were mistakes. He conveyed the same sentiment to the caucus. 

Since the election, confusion has swirled as to whether Byrne, who worked as a top advisor to Poilievre since his 2022 leadership campaign, would remain in her role.

She was not present around Parliament Hill before the House of Commons broke for summer and was absent from certain internal calls and meetings, including a recent national council meeting

when members discussed the upcoming leadership review, which is set to take place in Calgary in January.

A Conservative source, who spoke on a not-for-attribution basis because they were not authorized to discuss these matters publicly, said the lack of clarity around Byrne’s role in the party has been creating tensions amongst caucus members, party members and even big party donors who are wondering if their generous donations are being used to pay for Byrne’s services.

However, the Conservative party confirmed on Tuesday that Byrne has not gone anywhere.

“Jenni Byrne is still an advisor to the Conservative Party of Canada and Pierre Poilievre,” Sarah Fischer said in a brief statement, adding that she remains the leader’s proxy at national council meetings. 

A spokesperson for Byrne’s lobbying firm,

Jenni Byrne + Associates, also confirmed that it remains a contractor for the party. 

“The arrangement with the Conservative Party of Canada was always through JB+A never personally with Jenni. This was the case before the election and continues to be the case post-election,” said the spokesperson, who declined to provide their name because they do not usually comment about their clients. 

Byrne did not respond to a request for comment on why the contract she has with the party is with her firm and not directly with her. 

Two sources close to Byrne’s thinking said she is still working in an advisory capacity with the party and with Poilievre but has been spending more time in Toronto and dedicating more hours to her lobbying firm ever since the Conservatives lost the election.

“There’s nothing to announce because nothing’s really changed,” said one of them, who added there is currently “no bad blood” with either Poilievre or his wife Anaida, who campaigned with her husband daily and has taken an active role within the party. 

 Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is seen during a news conference in Ottawa on Monday, July 14, 2025.

Sources told National Post that Byrne is spending time on more focused issues, such as Poilievre’s upcoming byelection in the rural Alberta riding of Battle River-Crowfoot, set for Aug.18, as well as his upcoming leadership review.

That review will be a crucial test for Poilievre, who will be the first Conservative leader to undergo such a review, given that his two predecessors either stepped down or were ousted by caucus before having the opportunity to do so.

One Conservative MP, who spoke on condition of anonymity, called for Byrne to be removed, pointing to widespread dissatisfaction over how the party handled the nomination of its candidates, with dozens disqualified from running and others appointed last-minute in ridings across Ontario.

The MP said there is an expectation that Poilievre demonstrates that he has changed, particularly when it comes to his tone and approach.

While no formal election review has been triggered, Poilievre has been making calls, including to conservative and right-wing influencers, and speaking with candidates and MPs about what they want done, according to sources.

Among the concerns expressed about the campaign have been the lack of visibility of candidates who ran for the party. 

Some Conservative insiders have noted that since the race, efforts have not gone unnoticed to give some of the newest Conservative MPs speaking time in the House of Commons. Poilievre himself also recently gave

his first English interview to CBC

, the public broadcaster to which he has vowed to cut public funding.

At least two sources also expressed caution about parting ways with Byrne, given her skills as an organizer and the larger issue that Poilievre has, which is to demonstrate change and present himself as an alternative to Carney. Public opinion polls suggest Carney is enjoying a high level of support among Canadians and advancing Conservative-friendly ideas, such as getting major infrastructure projects built, such as pipelines.

On Monday, National Post asked Poilievre if he was considering any changes to his team or his approach since the election.
He said “every election comes with lessons” and proceeded to explain how he needs to reach even more Canadians with his message.

“Our mission is to give people back control of their lives, to make this a country where anyone who works hard gets a good life and that homes are affordable, streets are safe, immigration works for Canada first. Those are going to be the things we focus on,” he said.

“At the same time, we have to ask how we can reach more people with that message. We ended up getting a tremendous result… but 41 per cent might not be enough in the future. So, we have to ask how we can expand even beyond that number,” he said.

Poilievre added: “We also need to present ourselves as a government in waiting so that when the time comes, Canadians can feel confident in choosing us to lead the country forward.”

National Post

staylor@postmedia.com

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner holds a news conference in Ottawa, Friday, Feb.21, 2025.

OTTAWA — An Alberta Conservative MP said she thinks the measles outbreak in her province can be traced back to the COVID pandemic and loss of trust in vaccines due to the federal government’s lack of transparency about their risks.

Years after COVID, broken trust in government health directives has not been addressed for many Canadians,” Michelle Rempel Garner, formerly the party’s health critic during the pandemic, said in a lengthy social media post.

Rempel Garner said the downplaying of

“rare but serious” side effects

of COVID vaccinations by the Liberal government, led by then prime minister Justin Trudeau, spurred broader vaccine hesitancy, leading to a drop in childhood measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccinations.

Trudeau notably waived off a spring 2021 notice from National Advisory Council on Immunization raising a possible link between the AstraZeneca jab and rare blood clots, urging Canadians to take the

first vaccine they were offered

. (AstraZeneca

pulled the vaccine worldwide

last year.)

“(F)or individuals already harbouring concerns about vaccines such as for MMR, the lack of initial transparency on potential side effects related to the COVID-19 vaccine — or muddled public health messaging — likely reinforced narratives that deterred their vaccine uptake,” wrote Rempel Garner.

One recent study found that

two-dose MMR coverage

fell by more than 10 per cent among seven-year-olds in four provinces, including Alberta, and the Yukon between 2019 and 2023.

Coverage fell to 75.6 per cent in 2023, nearly 20 points below the 95 per cent needed to maintain herd immunity.

Rempel Garner, currently the party’s immigration critic, didn’t respond to a National Post request for an interview about her claim.

Alberta hit an alarming milestone this week, with the province surpassing the U.S.

in confirmed measles cases

.

The province reported Monday that it has seen 1,314 cases since the start of March, 26 more than the count recorded across 39 states by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rempel Garner’s post said Trudeau deserves much of the blame for making vaccinations a polarizing wedge issue before the 2021 federal election.

“Trudeau dined out on using dehumanizing and politically loaded terms to describe the vaccine hesitant, including ‘anti-vaxxer’,” writes Rempel Garner.

Rempel Garner says Trudeau made even more vaccine-hesitant Canadians “dig in” when he doubled down on this rhetoric during the early 2022 convoy protests.

“The Liberal government has never issued a public apology for its vehemently hostile rhetoric toward vaccine-hesitant individuals … As a result, it has entrenched a partisan divide in society, where vaccination status is viewed as a political virtue signal rather than a public health objective to be pursued collaboratively,” she writes.

Rempel Garner also speculated that the post-COVID surge in immigration has contributed to the measles outbreak, and suggested that health authorities track the citizenship status of infected individuals.

Olivier Jacques, a professor of health policy at the University of Montreal, said the 2021 Liberal campaign’s rhetoric surrounding vaccinations could have contributed to the drop in MMR uptake.

“It might have knocked down uptake by one or two per cent, but even that one or two per cent is dangerous when it comes to herd immunity,” said Jacques.

Jacques notes that vaccination rates have dropped in a number of different countries since the pandemic,

including the U.S.

“It’s really hard to say how much of a role our politics played. Even before COVID, you had all this misinformation about vaccines that was floating around on social media and elsewhere,” said Jacques.

A spokesman for federal Health Minister Marjorie Michel didn’t address Rempel Garner’s post directly, but reiterated the importance of vaccinations.

“What we are seeing in Alberta is concerning. Vaccines are safe and they save lives. We strongly encourage people to get vaccinated,” Guillaume Bertrand wrote in an email to the National Post.

Canada has seen an alarming spike in measles infections this year, with nine in 10 cases

occurring in Ontario and Alberta

.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Ontario Premier Doug Ford have urged parents in their respective provinces to vaccinate their children against measles.

No deaths have been reported so far in Alberta. A measles-infected Ontario

newborn died last month

in the outbreak’s first, and thus far only, reported fatality.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Obesity prevalence jumped almost 8 per cent in Canada after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a new study published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Obesity climbed 7.74 per cent in Canada thanks to the COVID-19 pandemic.

According to a

new report

released Monday in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, obesity increased at an accelerated rate after the onset of the pandemic.

Investment in research and interventions is needed, say the authors, to prevent and treat obesity in Canada. It should be an urgent priority for policymakers, they insist.

Obesity was recognized early on as a significant risk in exacerbating the severity of COVID-19, as well as the risk of death, say the authors. However, the impact of the pandemic on chronic disease, such as obesity, has received less scientific attention.

Researchers Laura N. Anderson, Rabiul Islam and Arthur Sweetman looked at a cross-section of data collected from 2009–2023 as part of the Canadian Community Health Survey. They drew on two studies, one pre-pandemic (2009-2020) and a second completed during the pandemic (2020-2023).

“The pandemic led to unprecedented and rapid changes in the daily lives of people in Canada, including adverse changes in sedentary time, physical activity, diet, food insecurity, stress, mental health, and the worsening of many socioeconomic factors, including job loss and higher costs of living,” they write in the report. “Many of these … factors have been associated with a greater risk of developing obesity.”

How have obesity numbers changed since 2009?

In 2023, 32.69 per cent of adults in Canada (10.6 million people) were overweight with a Body-Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or higher (27.5 or higher for people of Asian descent). This was an absolute increase of nearly 8 per cent from 2009, when the prevalence was 24.95 per cent.

Compared with the 11 years before the pandemic, obesity increased at a greater rate during the four years after the pandemic arrived.

Did obesity climb more in some groups of Canadians?

Specific subgroups of the population were affected more than others by increased obesity, particularly females and younger adults, the researchers concluded.

Is obesity prevalence in Canada different from elsewhere?

The overall findings of an increase in obesity during the COVID-19 pandemic are consistent with studies from several other countries and populations, according to the researchers.

What about weight-loss drugs?

GLP-1 medications (such as Ozempic, Wegovy, Contrave or Rybelsus) for treatment of diabetes and weight loss were introduced in Canada during the study period, though they were not widely available for obesity treatment. But the researchers question the impact of these medications going forward, and wonder whether they will dampen pandemic exacerbated obesity trends.

Hasn’t BMI been questioned as a measurement tool for obesity?

The authors conceded that BMI as a measurement tool has limitations. BMI is calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in metres squared. It has been the standard measure for defining obesity because it is quick, inexpensive, noninvasive, and has some correlation to metabolic disease prevalence.

However,

BMI categories

indicating underweight, normal, overweight, obese, etc., differ for Asian Americans who have a higher risk of metabolic disease at lower BMI values. The researchers say they used different thresholds for people of Asian (South Asian, Chinese, Filipino, Southeast Asian, Korean and Japanese) descent.

Another anomaly is that some men who are deemed overweight according to BMI but don’t have excess middle-body fat can have lower overall mortality risk than men in other BMI weight categories. There is also evidence of an obesity paradox where obesity has protective effects for patients with a history of previously diagnosed heart failure.

Despite these caveats, the researchers argue that for population-level screening and surveillance, using “BMI categories as a proxy for obesity in adults continues to be recommended.”

What could future studies show?

The researchers are advocating for future studies to understand longer-term trends, specifically to evaluate whether the steep increase in obesity during the pandemic continues as a trend or falls to pre-pandemic levels.

And they wonder about the causes of upward trends among females and younger adults – whether they were driven by increased stress or adverse mental health related to occupation or caregiving during the pandemic.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Jordan Peterson and his wife Tammy are asking almost $2.3 million for their Toronto home now that they are relocating to Arizona.

Best-selling author and commentator

Jordan Peterson

and his wife, Tammy, are

selling their Toronto home

and relocating to Arizona.

The

listing

for the couple’s home at 68 Olive Avenue in the city’s Seaton Village, part of the greater community of Annex, went live last week, and the Petersons’ ownership was confirmed by their daughter, Mikhaila Fuller.

In an email to the National Post, Fuller, the CEO of Peterson Academy she co-founded with her father, said her parents are moving to Arizona to be close to her, her husband Jordan and their children Elizabeth Peterson and George Peterson Fuller.

“With the touring they do, they were hardly in Toronto at all anymore, and it didn’t make sense to keep the house,” Fuller wrote, noting her parents “are not rebuying in Toronto.”

 Jordan Peterson in his Toronto home in September 2016.

As for the property they’re leaving behind, realtor Daniel Freeman told National Post that Peterson and his family have called the 100-year-old-plus midtown home theirs since 1999, with extensive improvements and upgrades completed within the last nine years.

“A bespoke retreat that fuses bold architecture with soulful living, nestled in one of Toronto’s most neighbourly pockets,” the listing reads.

From the outside, the semi-detached brick home doesn’t look significantly different than the other two-storey homes along the quiet street. Its modesty is one of Freeman’s favourite things about the home.

“The homes that I always enjoy the most are the ones where your expectations from the outside are different from what you see on the inside. It’s like unwrapping a gift box,” he said. “For this house, it’s like you have five or six gifts that you have to unwrap, and each time there’s another surprise.”

The first comes the moment you enter a bright sun porch through a stained glass door adjacent to a beautiful stained glass window custom-designed by Toronto’s

Eve Guinan Design Restoration.

 Stained glass in Jordan Peterson’s sun porch was custom-made by Toronto’s Eve Guinan Design Restoration.

The rest of the carpet-free first and second floors — redone by interior designer

Shelley Kirsch

in 2019 — are bright and welcoming, featuring two spacious bedrooms and a newly renovated bathroom that Freeman said would rival “any Forest Hill or modern rebuilt home in the city.”

The “show stopper,” according to the listing, is a third-storey bedroom “that feels plucked from a Muskoka escape” with its vaulted ceilings and exposed wooden beams. The add-on also features two gas fireplaces, a seating area overlooking the front of the house and a rear deck above the backyard.

“One of the people that came through the open house on Saturday said ‘I feel like I’m in a large cabin staring out into the trees on the side of a mountain,’” Freeman said of the space designed by local architects

Doug Rylett and Cathy Tafler.

 Jordan Peterson’s home in Toronto features a third-storey bedroom “that feels plucked from a Muskoka escape.”

The basement features the last two of the five bedrooms, laundry and an infrared sauna. Freeman said they were able to make great use of the space by lowering, or benching, the basement floor without disturbing the existing foundation walls.

By doing so and employing the right waterproofing, heating and ventilation, Freeman said the home isn’t at risk for the usual mustiness most old basements in the area are known for.

“The lower level doesn’t feel any different than the rest of the house in this property,

The basement also features access to a stunning backyard with living plant walls, durable ipe hardwood decking, motorized retractable awnings and a “garage style shed, ideal for storage or studio.”

 The backyard at Jordan Peterson’s house in Toronto which is selling for almost $2.27 million.

Other bells and whistles inside include smart climate control and automation, central air conditioning and vacuum, tankless water heater and, as Freeman discovered over the weekend, “a filtration system that offers carbonated filtered water” from the sink.

As for the location, Freeman said it’s close to four major grocery stores and subway access, has high walkability and bike scores, sits on the doorstep of well-appointed Vermont Square Park, and features a tight-knit neighbourhood of people. He once lived on Olive, and

Freeman Real Estate

is based just around the corner on Bathurst Street.

“Olive Avenue is known to be one of the warmest, friendliest blocks in this midtown area,” he said.

“It has a historical block party once or twice a year, where everyone shares a potluck dinner on the street, where the kids play and they have a little stage they put up and they have shows.”

Because the house is “like fine art,” Freeman doesn’t think it will be on the market for long.

The psychologist and his wife are asking $2,268,000, but Freeman said, “the value is greater than the listing price” because of “so many intangibles.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.