LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Premier Danielle Smith at the UCP Annual General Meeting at the Edmonton Expo Centre on Saturday, November 29, 2025.

OTTAWA — Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says she still supports Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre ahead of his high-stakes leadership review, despite her quibbles about his recent motion endorsing an oil pipeline to the West Coast.

“Yes and yes,” said Smith when asked if she thought Poilievre should stay on as Conservative leader and whether she’d be around for the party’s upcoming national convention in Calgary, which is scheduled for Jan. 29 to 31.

The convention will culminate with a confidence vote on Poilievre’s performance as party leader.

Despite her continued backing of Poilievre, she admitted to being somewhat baffled by the recent

motion he put forward

targeting her memorandum of understanding (MOU) on energy issues with Prime Minister Mark Carney.

“We were hopeful that, if Pierre was going to do that, he would have put the whole MOU forward,” said Smith, in a year-end interview with National Post.

The motion, clipping language from

the 2,000-word MOU

relating to the construction of a new West Coast pipeline and reversal of the federal oil tanker ban, was voted down on party lines.

Smith said the defeat doesn’t at all undermine the MOU’s credibility.

“Look, if (Green party leader) Elizabeth May had cherry-picked only the things in the agreement that she agreed with and put those into a motion, I would have expected the prime minister to vote against that too, because it was a package,” said Smith.

The MOU also included concessions on the industrial carbon tax and GHG emissions reduction.

Smith said she doesn’t expect much trouble for Poilievre from the party faithful.

“From what I’ve seen, he continues to have incredibly strong support,” said Smith.

Smith called Poilievre a “consistent voice in favour of the Alberta energy industry” and said that her province would be on stronger footing if he had won April’s federal election.

“(Poilievre) would not have put any concessions on us, he would have not (made) unreasonable demands, he would have repealed

the nine bad laws

and we’d probably be well underway in planning a pipeline,” said Smith.

“Unfortunately, he didn’t win in April (but I’m) delighted for his continued advocacy,” she added.

Smith endorsed Poilievre ahead of the election, returning the favour after

he publicly backed her

in Alberta’s last provincial vote in May 2023.

Her comments to National Post came just hours before

Toronto-area Conservative MP

Michael Ma announced he was crossing the floor to join the governing Liberals. He is the party’s second MP, after Nova Scotia’s Chris d’Entremont, to defect in the past month, and he put the Liberals within one seat of a majority.

Smith didn’t elaborate on whether she’d be at the Calgary convention in person but said she was looking forward to it.

“It’s going to be a fantastic convention,” said Smith.

Smith’s enthusiastic backing notwithstanding, polls show that Poilievre has some work ahead of him to convince the party rank-and-file that he’s still their guy.

A just-released Angus Reid study found that

as many as two-in-five

Conservative voters may be having second thoughts about Poilievre’s leadership ahead of next month’s review.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Shiri Gabriel and her husband were refused a ride home in February by an Uber driver after he heard them speaking Hebrew, she told National Post.

A Toronto woman says her luggage was tossed out of a vehicle by an Uber driver when he heard her speaking Hebrew to her husband. The driver then refused to take them home from the airport after they arrived from a trip in the middle of the night in February.

Shiri Gabriel’s snub at Toronto Pearson airport brings the number of antisemitic acts involving the rideshare company and Torontonians to three. In August, David Woolf, 78, who splits his time between Toronto and Israel, said an Uber driver in Europe refused to take him, his wife and their friends to a train station, because he said he was from Israel. Toronto model

Miriam Mattova recently told National Post

she was kicked out of a vehicle in the middle of the night last month after the driver heard her speaking about Israel. The driver told her “they do not drive Jewish people,” she told the Post.

Gabriel, 52, was born in Peru, moved to Israel in her teens and then later to Canada. She said her husband ordered an Uber through the app on Feb. 11 after returning to Toronto from Florida. When the vehicle arrived, her husband started putting luggage in the trunk while the male driver sat inside the vehicle. Gabriel waited in the back seat to keep warm.

As her husband was finishing up with the luggage, she said something to him in Hebrew.

“Then the Uber driver turns to me and says, ‘Get out! Get out!’” she told National Post. “He gets out of the car, literally takes our suitcases and throws them on the road, all of them.”

The driver wouldn’t tell the couple why he refused to take them, but Gabriel said it was “clearly an antisemitic act.”

Through her husband’s Uber account, they reported the incident. Uber responded via email the following day and said the behaviour they described was “completely unacceptable and not tolerated” on the platform. The company refunded them $5 in Uber Cash, and said they would not be matched with the driver again.

“It felt like a punch in the gut, like literally a slap in the face. I’m telling you this whole story, I’m writing an email about what clearly is an antisemitic act… and all you have to say is (here’s) $5,” she said. “No repercussions, nothing…not even saying, ‘We will look into it further,’ or, ‘We’re sorry that this happened to you.’”

An Uber spokesperson told National Post in an emailed statement: “We’re sorry for the experience this rider had. Discrimination has no place on our platform, and we take reports like this very seriously. We’ve been in contact with both parties to understand from each of them what happened, and have taken appropriate action based on the information we were able to gather.”

Gabriel described herself as being openly Jewish and proudly displaying her Star of David. But she was reluctant to escalate the situation in person because the driver had her home address through the app. She also said she didn’t want to take the complaint further with Uber or include details about it online because she believed there wouldn’t be any point.

“This is why my expectations, especially since then, are lowered. That’s why I probably shut down and I said, ‘You know what? I’m not even talking to the media.’ Nobody wants to hear this. Nobody wants to listen,” she said.

“Nobody really cares here in Canada — in Canada specifically.”

A similar incident occurred when Woolf was travelling in Europe over the summer.

Woolf was in Belgium with his wife and another couple in late August. They decided to take a day trip to Rotterdam in the Netherlands. After visiting the city’s Market Hall, they had to go back to the train station. Woolf ordered an Uber on his wife’s account, which they share.

When the male driver arrived, Woolf asked where he was from in a friendly tone. The driver said he was from Yemen. But when the driver asked Woolf the same question, he was upset at Woolf’s response: He was from Israel.

“He said, literally yelled at us, and said, ‘Get the hell out of my Uber!’” said Woolf.

Woolf thought the driver was joking at first, but the driver said he was not, and told him to get out of the vehicle. Woolf ordered another Uber and that ride went seamlessly, but the group was still scarred from the experience. The incident involving Mattova published by National Post this month reminded Woolf of what happened to him.

He reported the incident to Uber in an email on Aug. 27. He got a response saying the company was concerned and they flagged the driver. Uber said it would ensure the driver would not be matched with Woolf again.

“I wrote back, and I said that this response was the most asinine response I’ve ever received in my life. And it’s insulting that you would think that I’m so stupid to accept a response like that,” he said, adding that he was already on his way to back to Israel at that point, so the company’s solution didn’t make sense.

He expected Uber to remove the driver from the platform altogether, he said. He called it “disgusting” that the company would respond to an antisemitic incident in such a way.

A representative from Uber later called Woolf to tell him that the company would “take action,” but could not confirm if the driver would be suspended, citing “privacy issues.” He said his fare was refunded.

“That was their big gesture, and I wasn’t asking for any more. All I wanted was closure in the sense that he should be fired, right? And all they said was, ‘We can assure you we will take care of it, but we cannot let you know what we’re going to do, and you won’t hear about it,’” he said.

Uber did not respond to National Post’s request for comment about the incident.

Throughout all of his travels over the years, Woolf said he’s been open about his identity and it has never been a problem. He often wears a kippah, a cloth cap worn by Jewish men, which usually draws intrigue, rather than hate.

“I’ve often thought…that the more you more open you are about your Judaism, the freer you are,” he said. “I think every trip, I’ve worn a kippah, wherever it was. And I’ve never had an antisemitic incident before.”

In Israel, Woolf said he does not feel antisemitism at all.

“We feel totally safe here, despite the dangers of terrorism, but we feel extremely safe,” he said. In Canada, while he said he’s “not blind to the fact that at

Bathurst and Sheppard every week

you have people standing, yelling at each other on either side of the street and that antisemitism is rising,” he still feels safe in Toronto.

“Many people are starting to remove their mezuzahs (Jewish prayer scrolls affixed to doorways) and things like that. I would not do that. I feel safe. And I think the media has blown it out of proportion. It is getting worse, but I don’t think it’s at the level yet where people are to say, ‘This is Germany, 1939,’” he said. “I don’t feel unsafe in Canada.”

He said he hoped that Uber would publicly fire the driver who refused to take him “so that other people get the message.”

“I think the real way to deal with this is for those companies to be able to stand up and say, ‘No, we really are honestly against harassment or discrimination of any kind and anybody who does that should be fired. They shouldn’t be working for us,’” he said.

“If I was running a company and I had an employee who did that to another employee, I would fire the guy. There’s no ifs, ands, or buts about it, because it may start with the Jews, but it’ll spread to everybody.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Empty shelves where U.S.-made bourbon once sat at a P.E.I. liquor store. The province is one of four returning existing U.S. stock to shelves and donating net profits from their sale to charity.

Across Canada, there are millions of dollars worth of U.S.-made alcoholic products gathering dust in warehouses, all of it pulled from liquor store shelves in most provinces in retaliation for sweeping U.S. tariffs on Canadian imports.

If the idea of some of those products finding their way back to market leaves a bitter taste in your mouth, let the knowledge that several provinces are doing so to benefit local charities be the chaser.

Here’s the latest on what Canadian provinces are doing with their U.S. booze stockpiles.

Nova Scotia

Atlantic Canada’s most populous province was the first to start selling off some of its estimated $14 million in remaining U.S. products, mostly wine and spirits such as whiskey, to benefit charity.

The provincial government estimates the current sale will generate $4 million in profits that will be donated to Feed Nova Scotia and other food banks.

Once the existing stock is depleted, the Nova Scotia Liquor Corporation won’t order more.

“We remain committed to a Team Canada approach to tariffs and trade. We will not be ordering any more from the United States once this inventory is gone,” Premier Tim Houston said in

a news release.

 Empty shelves where alcohol and wine from the U.S. used to be at the NSLC (Nova Scotia Liquor Commission). The province is now selling of the products to benefit local food banks.

Manitoba

This Prairie province soon followed suit, announcing the sale of “some U.S. wine and spirits at select Liquor Marts” as of this Wednesday and until Dec. 24 or until sold out.

Up to $500,000 of the proceeds will be donated to Cheer Boards in Winnipeg, Thompson and Brandon, community charities that provide holiday help to families in need.

On the first day of sales, the Manitoba Liquor & Lotteries Corporation told

CTV News

some stores had long lineups before opening and lots of foot traffic.

“Some locations have already sold through their first round of inventory of the most popular brands,” an MBLL spokesperson told the outlet.

And like N.S., Manitoba’s stock will not be replenished once sold out.

Newfoundland and Labrador

The new Progressive Conservative government and the province’s liquor corporation (NLC) started selling its $3.2 million in U.S.-made products this week, with a promise to donate the net profits to the Community Food Sharing Association, a St. John’s-based food distribution hub for the province’s food banks.

Along with an immediate donation of $500,000 already provided at a crucial time of year for food banks, the NLC anticipates the total donation amount to reach up to $1 million by the time products are sold.

“Many of the products are spirits and wine, so there is no risk of expiry anytime soon,” an NLC spokesperson told National Post in an email. “However, there are a small number of products that have shorter shelf life, like beer and (ready-to-drink beverages).”

Some liquers, they added, also have shorter shelf lives than most products.

Ontario

The province is sitting approximately $80 million in products from the U.S. — by far the largest Canadian cache — some $2 million of which is set to expire in 2026, according to

CP24

.

The province’s Liberals are calling on Premier Doug Ford to follow the example set by Houston.

“We all agreed, when we pulled American liquor off the shelves, it was the right thing to do. We sent a message. It felt good,” Liberal legislative leader John Fraser said during

Question Period at Queen’s Park on Wednesday

.

“What would be even better is to do some good at home with that action, not just let this liquor collect dust in a warehouse.”

Ford later told reporters he’d bring it up with the LCBO.

“U.S. alcohol will remain off shelves and is being held in storage until further notice. We are currently exploring options for the products,” a spokesperson for Minister of Finance Peter Bethlenfalvy told the Toronto Star.

 Ontario Premier Doug Ford dumps out a bottle of Crown Royals at a press conference in Kitchener, Ont. on Sept. 2.

Prince Edward Island

In Canada’s smallest province, the government and the liquor control commission also resumed sales of U.S. products

effective Thursday.

Officials expect the sales to generate $600,000 in net profits, all of which will be donated to island food banks.

It, too, won’t re-order any American alcohol.

New Brunswick

Neighbouring New Brunswick pulled its stock from provincial liquor store shelves in March, but the provincial authority told National Post in August that the products remained available for purchase by “grocery, agent, and licensee” because it needed warehouse space for new Canadian inventory. Once sold, it was not being restocked.

“This solution allows access to American products for those who want them and will help us minimize waste and recover investments we have made in U.S. products,” New Brunswick Liquor (ANBL) wrote.

In October, the province started selling off its remaining $3.4 million in American products at its warehouse location in Salisbury, just west of Moncton. In early December, the minister responsible for ANBL said only $2 million of that remained.

As for donations, a spokesperson for the agency told National Post in an email that while it donates to “Feed NB and a network of food banks, community gardens, and libraries through fundraising efforts and internal programs,” the profits from liquor sales are returned to the province.

National Post has asked the province directly about its charitable intentions, if any.

British Columbia

Officials in B.C. took the same approach as New Brunswick

in March

, halting imports and pulling existing products from store shelves while maintaining their wholesale availability.

National Post has contacted the province and its liquor agency to inquire about existing stock and whether they, too, have plans to return products to shelves in aid of local charities.

 U.S.-produced alcohol is removed from the shelves at a B.C. liquor store.

Quebec

The province’s liquor authority also pulled its stock, halted orders and

later donated $300,000 worth of expiring

U.S.-made alcohol to foundations, charity events and hospitality training schools.

“The products currently concerned include mainly rosé wines, boxed wines, ready-to-drink beverages, creams, certain beers, and liqueurs that are not intended for long-term storage,” the SAQ said at the time.

The SAQ told National Post on Thursday that the program is still underway and “there are no other plans at this time.”

The province had roughly $27 million in products stored, according to

CBC

.

Northern Canada

A spokesperson for the Yukon Liquor Commission told National Post via email that it also stopped importing U.S. products in March and pulled them from shelves at its six stores, but they can still be purchased by licensees until existing stocks are sold. They did not say how much remained.

“We are reviewing the current position and considering options for changes in the new year,” they wrote.

When contacted in August, Nunavut’s department of finance told National Post via email that the sale of about $600,000 worth of existing U.S.-made inventory resumed on July 3 and, once gone, would not return until next year.

Such products are only resupplied during the territory’s short summer shipping season, and the already-completed 2025-26 order “did not include any U.S.-made product.”

The Northwest Territories also stopped importing new products in March, but permitted the sale of existing stock. National Post has reached out to the authority for an update on the stock quantity.

Alberta and Saskatchewan

When others were pulling products from the shelves, these Prairie provinces continued to permit the sale of existing stock and temporarily stopped importing new products. Alberta first, followed by Saskatchewan, later lifted their respective purchasing moratorium, making U.S. products readily available to customers.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at Mount Airy Casino Resort in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania on Dec. 9, 2025.

OTTAWA — Most Canadians with a view say they don’t like the populist wave washing over much of the world, a new poll has found, even though a healthy chunk of respondents also said they support some of the same movement’s key pillars.

The poll, conducted by Pollara Strategic Insights, found that 28 per cent of respondents described themselves as either “frustrated” (10 per cent) or “angry” (18 per cent) with the concept of populist politics, while a smaller group (22 per cent) opted for the positive descriptors “excited” (four per cent) or “”comfortable” (18 per cent).

But 22 per cent of respondents said they aren’t familiar with the term, while 28 per cent said none of those words described their feelings about populism.

Many Canadians, however, are sympathetic toward some of populism’s key pillars. For example, 80 per cent of respondents said they agree that “politicians in government need to follow the will of the people,” compared to just 11 per cent who disagreed. About two-thirds of respondents (66 per cent) said they agree that “politicians should listen more to the people and less to the experts,” while 23 per cent disagreed. And 59 per cent of respondents said “the people, and not politicians, should make our most important policy decisions.”

The results of the poll, an online survey of 2,702 adult Canadians conducted in mid-October, could be good news for parties on both the left and right, more than centrists, said André Lecours, a political science professor at the University of Ottawa, because it shows there’s dissatisfaction with the status quo.

The Conservative party and its leader, Pierre Poilievre, have in recent years been criticized by some analysts for being too populist for the Canadian electorate’s tastes, but Lecours said populism should be viewed more as “a way of doing politics,” such as suspicion of institutions and intellectuals, than a set of policies.

“It’s a style of politics,” said Lecours. “I’m not sure it has anything to do with policies.”

Most Canadians, however, are “excited” or “comfortable” with the non-populist descriptors “common sense” (62 per cent), “moderate” (54 per cent) and “progressive” (52 per cent), the poll found.

But respondents also showed a modest increase in support for the broader concept of conservatism than three years ago.

Compared to a similar poll conducted in 2022, Pollara found that the sentiment for “conservative” is up a net 19 percentage points (the gap between positive and negative responses), with “populist” gaining a net 13 points and “right wing” up 14 points.

In general, the poll found that younger Canadians are more open to many of the political labels, such as “socialist,” “woke” and “populist” than older generations, although only four per cent of respondents said they were “excited” by the term populism. Younger respondents, meanwhile, showed less support for terms such as “moderate,” “pragmatic” and “centrist.”

Those words associated with ideological positions on the left or right, however, still received more negative responses than positive.

Dan Arnold, Pollara’s chief strategy officer, said more young Canadians are looking for a “disruptor,” whether that person or movement would come from the left or right, compared with older generations.

“It really feels like the biggest fissure in Canadian politics is stability versus disruptor.”

Arnold said political terms such as “populist” and “socialist” often mean different things depending on the time and place. In recent days, he said, it has been difficult not to think of populism without connecting it to U.S. President Donald Trump.

Populism has been defined in a variety of ways but generally refers to a political approach that aims to appeal and listen to ordinary voters instead of experts, the rich and other elites.

Although the term “populism” can be traced back to the late 19th century, the notion went fully mainstream in 2016 with the election of Trump and the electorate’s decision in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union. Both votes were seen as the will of the average person, despite the widespread disapproval in both cases of the political and intellectual elite.

While Trump is often seen as the face of the movement, Hungary’s Viktor Orban, Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro, and Argentina’s Javier Milei are among the populists who have gained power in recent years. While the specific brands of populism vary from country to country, most from this era have been viewed as right wing and have adopted platforms that included nationalism and skepticism toward immigration as key planks.

But Lecours said populists, such as some of the Prairie populist parties from the early and mid-20th century, can also come from the left. The better-known Prairie populists from that era included those from across the political spectrum. From the left, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) elected North America’s first socialist government under Tommy Douglas in 1944, and then transformed into the New Democratic Party (NDP). And from the right, the Social Credit Party rose to power in Alberta in 1935 under William Aberhart and dominated that province’s politics for decades.

There were also populists from that era that mixed policies from the left and right. The Progressive Party of Canada, for example, supported market-based policies such as free trade and lower tariffs, while also advocating for public control of railways.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Charlie the Chatbot’s “responses tended to be brief, offering limited context and minimal additional information,” wrote Auditor General Karen Hogan.

OTTAWA — The Canada Revenue Agency paid $18 million for a chatbot the auditor general says gave her team the wrong answer 66 per cent of the time.

In February 2020, then-National Revenue Minister Diane Lebouthillier

proudly announced a new tool

she promised would help taxpayers better navigate the labyrinth of Canada’s sprawling tax code:

Charlie the Chatbot

.

The chatbot could help answer general tax filing questions but was still “learning about the CRA,”

the agency warned

.

Fast forward five years and Auditor General Karen Hogan suggested that the chatbot that was present on 13 CRA web pages still has a lot of learning to do.

“Charlie’s responses tended to be brief, offering limited context and minimal additional information,” reads Hogan’s scathing report on

CRA’s call centres published in October

.

“We found that Charlie provided accurate answers in only 2 out of the 6 questions we asked it, while the other public web-based conversational artificial intelligence tools answered 5 out of 6 questions accurately.”

The finding stunned Liberal MP Anthony Housefather, who asked Hogan at the time “how is it that the government’s tool specialized for the CRA is worse than the average tool that anyone else can access anywhere?”

While reviews of Charlie the Chatbot at its inception suggested

the tool was somewhat unimpressive

, the cost to develop and maintain it were not.

New documents tabled in Parliament

this week reveal that taxpayers paid over $18 million since fiscal year 2018-2019 to develop and operate Charlie the Chatbot, with the bulk of spending beginning with its wide-scale launch in 2021-2022.

The agency says the bulk of that cost is salaries ($13.67 million), though that doesn’t include costs related to employee benefits and travel if necessary for the project. Another $3.21 million was spent on IT consultants for the project.

“Obviously, it’s a lot of taxpayer money,” said Conservative national revenue critic Gérard Deltell. “We have to recognize that 33 per cent, it’s not satisfactory at all.”

Over its nearly six years of existence, people have started over seven million “conversations” with Charlie and asked over 18 million questions, the agency said.

The document also confirms that the CRA’s chatbot has struggled to provide consistently accurate information.

The agency said there was a period where the measured “accuracy threshold” of the tool was 70 per cent, suggesting it offered inaccurate responses to the CRA’s testers 30 per cent of the time.

In November, the agency upgraded Charlie to a generative AI chatbot (closer to ChatGPT) that could respond to more questions. The agency says pre-release testing of AI Charlie suggested an accuracy rate of “approximately 90%.”

But “the exact number of questions the Generative Artificial Intelligence chatbot has answered correctly cannot be precisely determined without conducting a comprehensive review of all interaction transcripts,” the CRA added.

The data provided by the tax agency to Parliamentarians also suggests users come to Charlie with a very wide range of questions.

This year, Charlie was asked hundreds of thousands of questions on individual taxes in the months leading up to the April 30 filing deadline. Between February and April, it was also asked over 430,000 questions about the agency’s “electronic services.”

Charlie also received thousands of interactions this year about business income tax, benefits and credits, updating personal information, tax balances, payments and how to contact the agency.

In 2024, Charlie received nearly 180,000 interactions categorized as “chit chat.”

On Thursday, the CRA released the results of its “100-day service improvement plan” demanded by Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne.

 Auditor General of Canada Karen Hogan.

The agency said it doubled its responsiveness during the fall thanks in part to rehiring or extending the contracts of over 1,200 call centre employees and improving some digital services including Charlie the Chatbot.

“The GenAI chatbot beta can now answer a wider range of questions, including more complex ones for businesses, such as tax credits and compliance information,”

reads a press release

.

A spokesperson for the CRA did not answer questions by deadline about the cost of the chatbot at a time when developing such AI-powered tools is increasingly cheaper thanks to proliferating large-language model tools (such as ChatGPT).

National Post asked Charlie the Chatbot to explain why it cost $18 million to create and maintain, but the chatbot demurred.

“The context provided does not include specific information about the $18 million cost to create and maintain the CRA’s GenAI chatbot beta or any other system,” it responded while advising to contact the CRA.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


MP Michael Ma.

OTTAWA — New Toronto-area Conservative MP Michael Ma has crossed the floor to the Liberals in a stunning political move just hours after the end of the fall Parliamentary session.

Ma’s floor crossing was announced via statement sent by the Liberal Party Thursday afternoon.

“After listening carefully to the people of Markham–Unionville in recent weeks and reflecting with my family on the direction of our country, I have informed the Speaker and the Leader of the Opposition that I will be joining Prime Minister Mark Carney in the government caucus,” Ma said in a statement.
 

Ma’s crossing brings the minority Liberal government within one seat of forming a majority. It also deals a major blow to Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre’s leadership just one month before he faces a leadership review.

Ma’s move was met with shock and surprise by his former Conservative colleagues,

with one source describing it as coming “out of nowhere.”

If Ma had been pondering the move for a while, he covered his tracks well.

Just the day before his crossing, Ma attended the Conservatives’ Christmas party, posing for a photo with Poilievre and his wife, Anaida, and hitting the dance floor.

The day before, he voted twice with his former caucus on a Conservative motion on pipeline construction.

Earlier in the month, he delivered multiple speeches lambasting the Liberals’ 2025 budget, going so far as calling the Liberals “team feudalism”.

“While over two million Canadians visit food banks each month and 700,000 of those are kids, the Liberals work every day to inflate asset prices, whether through deficit spending or by letting any warm body pass into the country to keep those rents sky-high,”

he said on Dec. 2 in what would

be his final speech in the House of Commons as a Conservative.

Ma was not well known within Conservative party circles before running in the last election. He narrowly captured the riding for the Conservatives from the Liberals by winning nearly 51 per cent of the vote, as compared to 47 per cent.

More to come.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


OTTAWA

— The federal Liberal government is pushing back the expected launch of its compensation program for individual gun owners, whose firearms the government has banned, from this fall until January 2026. 

Back in September, when Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree announced that the government would be piloting a small-scale version of the program in parts of Cape Breton, N.S., the minister stated that the goal was to ensure it ran smoothly “before we open the program nationwide later in the fall.”

A Public Safety Canada webpage dedicated to providing users with information on the program also states fall as the launch date. Last month, Anandasangaree’s office said the program would launch “before the end of 2025.”

With the House of Commons rising for its holiday recess on Thursday, a statement from the minister’s office clarified that the government was now working towards a new launch date in the new year.

“(The

Assault-
Style Firearms Compensation Program) for individuals will be launched in January 2026,” wrote spokesman Simon Lafortune. 

“We will share the exact date in due course.”

The minister’s office did not explain the reason behind the delay. Earlier in the day, Anandasangaree told reporters that the government was waiting for a “couple of items to be sorted out” before launching the program in the “very near future.”

“We’ve had to make some minor adjustments to our technology, so we’re confident that’s working.”

The minister added that officials encountered some “technical glitches,” which have since been corrected, with testing underway in anticipation of a national launch.

The government has committed to releasing the results from the pilot in Cape Breton ahead of the program’s national launch.

The six-week pilot included an initial period for firearms owners to register, followed by a collection and compensation process.

It targeted firearms owners living in three areas of Cape Breton: Sydney, North Sydeny, and Glace Bay, according to a letter shared with National Post, which was sent to possession and acquisition licence holders in the region.

Launching a national compensation program has been a longstanding promise of the Liberals, first made under former prime minister Justin Trudeau. It was aimed at removing what the government deemed to be “assault-style” weapons unfit for public use, such as the AR-15.

Since May 2020, the Liberals have banned more than 2,500 makes and models of firearms through three separate announcements.

In launching the pilot, officials said that no more than 200 of these firearms would be collected.

However, some reports suggest that actual interest in the program may have been much lower.

Last month, t

he chair of Cape Breton’s police board told reporters that he had heard there were between 

“10 to 22 collected.”

Firearms owners and their lobby groups pointed to those figures to underscore their opposition and belief that Carney ought to ditch the effort altogether, saying such low results show individual firearms owners reject taking part in the “buy back” program.

Meanwhile, gun-control advocates have called for the Liberals to make good on their longstanding commitment.

While not speaking to specific figures from the pilot, Anandasangaree has said that it proved successful in ensuring that the system worked.

PolySeSouvient, a group formed in the wake of the 1989 Ecole Polytechnique shooting, where 14 women were killed, has also called on the Liberals to ban new sales of more modern versions of the SKS, a semi-automatic rifle popular for hunting, particularly in Indigenous communities, warning that should it fail to do so, the national compensation program would be for naught.

The Liberals recently announced that another expert advisory group was being asked to study the issue, following an expert panel that did so last year. The government has said more consultation is needed when it comes to potential impacts on treaty-rights holders, given the popularity of the SKS for Indigenous hunters.

-National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Candidate for mayor, Rahim Jaffer unveils his plan to

OTTAWA — Former four-term MP Rahim Jaffer says he’s thinking about running for the Edmonton area seat currently held by departing Conservative Matt Jeneroux.

Jaffer told National Post that he saw the stars aligning for a possible comeback when

Jeneroux announced last month

he’d be resigning from Parliament, noting the news eerily dovetailed with a development in his personal life.

“My mom lives (in Jeneroux’s riding) and … a few weeks earlier, she’d approached me and said, oh, I want to downsize, why don’t you take over this house now?” said Jaffer. “It’s kind of funny, the timing.”

Jaffer says he’s been approached by a few different people about running for the soon-to-be-vacated seat and will take some time over the holidays to mull over a return to federal politics.

He said he’ll stand as a Conservative if he chooses to run and supports party leader Pierre Poilievre.

“(Poilievre) did not bad in the last campaign. There’s more reasons to try to continue to try to build around him than throw him out and start from scratch,” said Jaffer.

Jaffer said he liked Poilievre’s focus on common sense criminal justice measures targeting property crimes like auto thefts and home break-ins, noting that crime is a top concern across Edmonton..

He said he’s not currently a member of the Conservative party and hasn’t decided if he’ll be attending the party’s national convention in Calgary next month.

“You know, I hadn’t thought about (going to the Calgary convention) but one of the local riding association vice presidents recently told me, you gotta come, you gotta go get your membership up to date. So there’s still a window, I guess to do that,” said Jaffer.

First elected as a Reform MP in 1997, Jaffer spent 11 years representing a nearby Edmonton riding before losing a tight October 2008 race to NDP candidate Linda Duncan. He was appointed chair of the Conservative caucus in early 2006, serving until his departure from Parliament.

He was back in the headlines less than a year after his defeat, when a

late-night impaired driving arrest

raised questions about his post-government lobbying activities and business ties.

The 2009 DUI wasn’t Jaffer’s first brush with controversy. In 2001, he was caught sending an aide to impersonate him during a radio interview he was unable to attend, a stunt that got him

demoted from his committee duties

.

Jaffer returned to politics earlier this year to run for mayor of Edmonton,

finishing in fifth place

with just over four per cent of the vote.

Jeneroux has not said precisely when he will be leaving office and a byelection has not yet been scheduled.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Former Canada Pension Plan Investment Board CEO Mark Wiseman speaks during an interview in Toronto, Ontario, Tuesday, January 27, 2015.

OTTAWA — The Parti Québécois is calling on the federal government to “remove” financier Mark Wiseman’s name from their list of potential Canadian ambassadors to the United States, arguing that he is “not a friend” to Quebec.

Prime Minister Mark Carney has said that he would be announcing his new pick to replace longtime ambassador Kirsten Hillman within days. For now, the person rumoured to take her place is Wiseman, a close friend of Carney’s and longtime business executive.

On Thursday, PQ member of the National Assembly Pascal Paradis said his nomination would be “unacceptable” for Quebec.

“The Parti Québécois will never accept the nomination of Mark Wiseman as Canada’s ambassador to the U.S. Why? Because Mark Wiseman is not a friend of the Quebec nation,” Paradis said in a press conference in Quebec City.

Wiseman is known as the co-founder of the Century Initiative, a controversial lobbying group which advocates for increasing Canada’s population to 100 million by 2100.

In 2023, he retweeted a Globe and Mail column calling for that dramatic increase in immigration levels to become federal policy “even if it makes Quebec howl.”

Even though those words were not his own but rather those of the title written by columnist Andrew Coyne, Paradis said Wiseman’s publication on X is reminiscent of an infamous quote from former prime minister, Sir John A. Macdonald, comparing Quebecers to dogs.

In 1885, Macdonald was purported to have said of Métis leader Louis Riel, who was seen as a folk hero and a martyr in Quebec because of his defence of the French language and his Catholic faith: “He shall hang though every dog in Quebec bark in his favour.”

Days after Riel’s execution,

as described by historian Robert N. Wilkins in the Montreal Gazette

, 50,000 people protested in the streets of Montreal and the Conservatives never fully recovered politically in Quebec until John Diefenbaker swept the province in 1958.

The PQ is adding its voice to a growing list of politicians in Ottawa who criticized Wiseman’s potential nomination this week because of his connection to the Century Initiative, but also because of past skepticism of the supply management system.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said on Wednesday that Wiseman is “someone who has shown contempt for Quebec and who cannot negotiate on behalf of Quebec.”

“Why does the Prime Minister want to appoint him as ambassador to Washington?”

Bloc Québécois House leader Christine Normandin also took issue with the use of the word “howl” which she said is something dogs do.

As for NDP Deputy Leader Alexandre Boulerice, he said to have an ambassador in the U.S. that does not believe in supply management sends a “very, very bad signal” before the start of the review of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement next year.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Owen Sound courthouse.

An Ontario man kept his wife and four children confined in their home for years through intimidation and fear while cloaking abuse as protection that kept them healthy “in the eyes of the Lord.”

A jury in Owen Sound, Ont.,

found a father guilty

of five counts of unlawful confinement — one count each for his wife and four children — along with sexual assault, threatening death, assault, and other charges.

The man’s family escaped their home with the help of police, and he was arrested the following day.

Court heard the confinement of his wife and one child, who is now an adult, lasted 17 years, while confinement of three younger children extended for their entire lives, ranging from six to 11 years.

The man kept them mostly indoors in homes in Bruce and Huron counties, two predominantly agricultural regions dotted by villages and towns along the shore of Lake Huron, about 200 kilometres west of Toronto.

Publication bans prohibiting identification of the victims mean the man cannot be named.

“Rather than being the loving, inclusive, tolerant father and husband that he attempted to paint himself, he believes he’s smarter than most people,” Assistant Crown Attorney Meredith Gardiner told the jury.

“He knows it all. He’s done it all. He’s been through more than anyone. He has superhuman strength. He is exceptional. And he believes he should be in control of everyone and everything, all the time.”

While the couple were dating, the man told his future wife that because of “rape culture” she couldn’t go outside unless he was with her, the wife testified. While inside the home she had to close the windows and draw the curtains, but he allowed the windows to be opened briefly if the wind was coming from the north.

In her summary of evidence to the jury last week, Ontario Superior Court Judge Gisele Miller said the children were confined to certain parts of a house and couldn’t go outside unless permitted by their father, or they were with him.

The wife testified that at first her husband let her take their children to the park before restrictions tightened and “he really pulled us in … isolating the family visually from the community,” Miller said of the woman’s testimony. The increased restrictions coincided with the birth of another child.

For a few years, his wife and eldest child were permitted to attend one community event a year, “otherwise, they could not go anywhere alone,” Miller said of the wife’s testimony.

When neighbours raised concern about not seeing the family outside, the man permitted his wife to let the children out one at a time, Miller said. He asked for pictures of this, “in case CAS would call,” a reference to child welfare authorities, Miller’s summary of evidence said.

He wouldn’t let the children ride bicycles or play with toys.

“While outside, the children were not permitted to touch the ground,” Miller said. They could go outside once a week for 10 or 15 minutes, but only if the wind was coming from the north.

Two children told court they feared their father would kill them if they disobeyed. The charges include physically assaulting a son by lifting him off the floor by his face.

The wife was asked in cross-examination about opportunities to escape when her husband left them at home to go on vacations on his own, and about their shared ownership of the house and bank account.

She said she was fearful of what he would do if they left or if she used the bank card without his permission. The woman testified she and her children complied with his restrictions because they feared they would be killed if they didn’t.

The man had pleaded not guilty to all charges and denied confining his family.

He was self-represented at his trial that started Oct. 27. The court appointed lawyer Richard Stern to assist the court and the accused.

Stern said the accused characterized his actions as acts of love and protection.

Stern told the jury the father’s position was that “he went to great lengths to protect his family, keep them safe from harm, and keep them healthy and good in the eyes of the Lord.”

Stern said the defendant felt he was shielding them from what he believed were the “evils of secular society” and that videos he made of his family showed his “love and affection” for them.

The accused said the accusations were unfounded accounts by his former wife, calling it a “false, distorted story of cruelty and intimidation when the reality was love.”

The husband argued his wife could have left at any time and “all of this could have been avoided” had his family, police, and child welfare authorities told him they wanted to leave.

He told court he took the family on trips in Ontario and the United States and often reminded his wife to let the children outside. He said he made a deal with his wife and their eldest child that he would pay for everything if they stayed home and kept house, Miller said of his evidence.

The jury was shown video clips of him taking the children out in his car. One video showed one of the children, who was almost seven, seeing a community centre and a park for the first time.

Miller said the man described the videos he supplied as showing “happiness, love, frivolity and togetherness” and their “devotion to Christianity.”

Gardiner, the prosecutor, argued he was not a credible witness, that his testimony was repeatedly contradicted by his words heard on the videos. His actions were not to protect or correct the children, as parents have the right to do, but rather were a result of his “abusive personality.”

“It is the Crown position that (the defendant) ruled his family through intimidation, threats and violence. He controlled every part of their lives,” Miller told the jury. She advised that confinement can be by way of “fear, intimidation and psychological or other means.”

The jury agreed and convicted him on 13 of the 15 charges.

He was also convicted of threatening bodily harm, criminal harassment and intimidation against an Ontario Disability Support Worker who was trying to initiate an investigation that required his eldest child to sign documents.

The jury concluded he was the masked man on a Harley Davidson motorcycle who drove by the worker’s office, waited outside, and followed him to a gas station and then to a diner. The worker testified the man on the motorcycle drove up to him and said “mess with my family and you’ll pay” several times.

The man has not yet been sentenced.

Gardiner said she may make an application for an assessment of the man for a possible dangerous offender designation. That could lead to an indeterminate prison sentence and a long-term supervision order.

Postmedia

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.