LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

A former masseur in Victoria who was found guilty of sexually assaulting several women during therapeutic massages has convinced the Court of Appeal for British Columbia to order funding for his “complex” appeal against his conviction and two-year jail sentence, which is long enough to force his deportation to India at the end.

Ajesh Jacob, who was in his mid-30s at the time of the crimes, is currently in jail and does not have a lawyer.

In a recent ruling

, B.C.’s top court said there is no “obvious error” in the trial judge’s sentencing decision. But Jacob’s appeal is not obviously doomed, and he has shown he cannot afford a lawyer, so it is “in the interests of justice to appoint counsel on his behalf.”

It will be a complicated file, involving alleged Charter violations of unreasonable delay, judicial errors about appointing court interpreters, and the controversial issue of whether the women complainants were influenced in their testimony by reading each other’s stories on Instagram before the trial.

Jacob was initially charged with 11 counts of sexual assault between May 2019 and March 2021. Two were stayed by the Crown before a trial, in which a judge found him not guilty on four of them, and guilty of five.

Jacob, who immigrated to Canada in 2018, will be deported to India after serving his sentence if it is ultimately for six months or more. His trial judge decided this immigration consequence was not a mitigating factor that would justify a lesser jail term than the two years she imposed. Even his trial lawyer accepted that a sentence of less than six months would not be within the “appropriate range” for five sexual assault convictions, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Catherine Murray wrote.

The major issue at trial was the credibility and reliability of the complainants, specifically “tainting or unconscious contamination of evidence.” Jacob’s defence lawyer argued some of the women “recreated” their stories after hearing details of other complaints.

All of the complainants but one came forward, sometimes many months after the fact, after seeing a news article or posts on an Instagram account called Survivor Stories, whose administrator urged some to contact police or connected them to a lawyer pursuing a separate civil case against Jacob and the massage business.

At trial last year, Judge Murray found one complainant was a “textbook example of tainting or unconscious contamination … (she) took information she learned from others and made it her own — consciously or unconsciously.”

Another issue was identity, and whether Jacob was in fact the man known to the complainants in the massage clinic and by his name tag as “Sam,” and whether these complaints might actually be about a different employee of Korean ancestry.

Another issue was the long delay, some of which was due to Jacob’s request for an interpreter in the rare language of Malayalam and arguments over the competence of the interpreters chosen.

The issue of whether Jacob actually needed an interpreter was not argued before the trial judge, and his challenge of the interpreters’ competence failed in a pretrial ruling. Jacob grew up in southern Kerala province of India, where he was taught in English. He has a master’s degree in English language and literature, and completed a two year diploma in human resource management in Victoria, in English.

At trial, Judge Murray found much of Jacob’s evidence was contradictory, senseless and inconsistent. She found he touched these women sexually without their consent and intentionally manipulated one woman’s hand to briefly touch his penis.

She accepted his relative youth, lack of a criminal record, obedience to bail conditions, and strong support from upstanding community members as mitigating factors in his sentence.

There were also plenty of aggravating factors, not just the large number of offences. He was in a position of trust, providing a therapeutic service to women in a vulnerable situation. He stood at reception as they paid, causing fear and preventing any disclosure to the other staff. His assaults were planned and deliberate, not just opportunistic.

And Jacob’s “moral culpability is high,” she decided. There were no factors of “diminished blameworthiness” or “compelling mitigation” that would justify letting him serve his sentence in the community rather than in jail. The jail sentence of two years less a day, followed by three years probation, places him “under supervision for the maximum allowable time,” the judge ruled.

It means he will serve the time in a provincial jail, rather than a federal prison. Federal prisons take offenders sentenced to more than two years. It will also mean that he will be deported to India at the end of his sentence.

“In my view, this sentence sends a strong message to Mr. Jacob and other like-minded individuals that sexual assault will not be condoned,” the trial judge wrote.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Justice Minister Sean Fraser

OTTAWA — After a week of controversy, Justice Minister Sean Fraser broke his silence Monday about his government’s floundering deal with the Bloc Québécois to remove the religious exemption for certain hate speech in exchange for passing bill C-9.
 

On Monday afternoon, the Bloc Québécois fired a barrage at the minister during question period, accusing Fraser of reneging on the deal he had brought to the Bloc in order to pass the bill targeting hate and terror symbols.
 

In response, Fraser did not deny he had made a deal with the Bloc as he argued that the minority Liberals would need to work with other parties to get the contentions legislation through.
 

But he was mum on the state of that deal, which the Bloc said is on its deathbed after the Liberals twice cancelled or suspended the Commons justice committee meetings last week where amendments to C-9 are being debated.
 

One such amendment, proposed by the Bloc, is to remove an exemption in the Criminal Code to the charge of willful promotion of hateful or antisemitic speech if it is based in good faith on the interpretation of a religious text.
 

“My priority is to see this bill adopted,” Fraser said during question period. “That’s going to require that we collaborate with different parties who have different points of view.

“I thank my colleague for the conversations that we’ve been able to share,” he added in response to a Bloc question. “I look forward to seeing the decision that’s going to be taken not by an individual minister, but by the justice committee as they consider potential amendments going forward.”
 

They were his first public comments on C-9 since
National Post revealed last Monday
that the Liberals had struck a deal with the Bloc to support the legislation in exchange for removing the religious exemption.
 

Bill C-9 would create a new offence for intimidating someone to the point of blocking their access to a place of worship or another centre used by an identifiable group, as well as criminalizing the act of promoting hate by displaying a hate or terror symbol, such as one tied to a listed terrorist organization or a swastika.

News of the Liberals agreeing to remove the religious exemption for certain hate speech — a longtime Bloc ask — has earned the Liberals both fierce criticism and praise from various groups.
 

Muslim, Christian and civil liberties groups as well as the Conservatives have lambasted the proposed amendment, tagging it as an attack on both freedom of speech and religion. They have argued that it risks criminalizing individuals speaking about their faith.
 

But eliminating the religious exemption is supported by Jewish and LGBTQ groups, the Bloc as well as the Quebec government, who have called for its removal repeatedly since 2023. They all say religion should not be used as a cover for antisemitic or hateful speech.
 

On Monday, the Bloc accused the Liberals of breaking their promise after saying last week that it was Fraser who approached them proposing to remove the religious exemption in exchange for the party’s support in getting C-9 through the House of Commons.
 

They also suggested the Liberals would cancel the justice committee meetings this week where amendments to C-9 are being debated, including eventually the Bloc’s to remove the religious exemption.
 

“The Liberals are abandoning their deal with the Bloc and are abandoning Quebecers. They are pulling the plug on C-9,” charged Bloc justice critic Rhéal Fortin. “How are they going to justify this about-face after so many broken promises?”
 

On Monday, CBC News cited anonymous sources saying the progress of the bill was stalled because Fraser’s office had failed to inform the Prime Minister’s Office before brokering the deal with the Bloc. The report said the bill is stalled because the PMO has not authorized any amendments.
 

In a statement, Fraser’s office said the minister has been working in “lockstep” with the prime minister on the bill. Spokesperson Jeremy Bellefeuille also suggested Tuesday’s justice committee meeting would go forward.
 

“Our offices work together as they should, and internal discussions are entirely normal in a minority Parliament as we work with all parties, including the Bloc,” Bellefeuille said, accusing the Conservatives of stonewalling the committee with opposition to a different bill.
 

“We’re ready to keep working in good faith at tomorrow’s committee meeting.”
 

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Sophie Grégoire Trudeau in Montreal on April 22, 2024. She recently appeared on French-language singing show, Chanteurs Masqués.

Sophie Grégoire Trudeau stunned judges and an unsuspecting audience after she revealed herself to be the voice behind one of the characters on the Canadian French-language singing show, the Masked Singer.

Grégoire Trudeau appeared on a Christmas special of the show, called Chanteurs Masqués in French, which she said in a post on Instagram was recorded over the summer. The show’s premise is for panelists and the audience to learn the identity of the celebrity singers, who compete to stay on the show until they are the last one left.

Panelists on the Christmas special were unable to uncover the real identity of the person behind elaborate Christmas Fairy costume. Turns out, it was the ex-wife of Canada’s former prime minister Justin Trudeau.

“It was so fun to play and sing as the Xmas fairy for Chanteurs Masqués (Masked singers),” she said in an Instagram post on Monday. “Judges and public were so surprised! Thanks for the invite!”

Grégoire Trudeau sang two songs, I Put a Spell On You, which is a cult classic by Jay Hawkins, and a rendition of Faufile by Canadian singer Charlotte Cardin.

In

a video clip that the show posted on Instagram

, Grégoire Trudeau beamed about the experience, speaking in French. She asked whether or not people at home were able to guess who she was.

Grégoire Trudeau previously performed publicly in 2016 at a Martin Luther King Day event. She sang an original song that she said she wrote for her daughter, Ella-Grace Trudeau.

Grégoire Trudeau is not the only person in her family with a love for music. In the comments of her Instagram post, her oldest son Xavier Trudeau, wrote, “Sign her,” insinuating that she should be signed by a record label. The 18-year-old

released R&B songs earlier this year

.

And Grégoire Trudeau’s ex-husband Justin also has connections to the music industry through his current partner, pop star Katy Perry.

The pair recently went Instagram official. They appeared together in a series of videos and photos Perry posted over the weekend.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


U.S. player Brady Tkachuk (top) fights Canada's Sam Bennett during first period 4 Nations Face-Off hockey action in Montreal on Feb. 15, 2025.

A new ad for the upcoming Winter Olympics from NBC is throwing some serious shade on Team Canada.

In the 30-second spot, called “The Speech,” actor John Hamm is giving a pep talk to hockey’s Team U.S.A. in their locker room. “It’s an honour to speak to you all before you head off to the Olympics,” he says. “You’re going to Milan to bring home the biggest prize of all.”

“Canadian tears,” Jack Eichel responds, which takes Hamm back a step.

“Exactly! Wait, what? What did Canada do?”

“Stuff,” says team member Brady Tkachuk, an Arizona native who plays for the Ottawa Senators during the NHL season.

What follows is a conversation, intercut with clips of skirmishes and roughhousing during the first game between Canada and the U.S. at the 4 Nations Face-Off, which took place Feb. 15 in front of a sold-out crowd at the Bell Centre in Montreal.

Canada beat the Americans 3-1 in that game, and won the tournament after defeating the United States 3–2 in overtime in the final.

Hamm’s character, perhaps not remembering the fight between Tkachuk and Canadian forward Sam Bennett, counters: “But they’re usually so polite!”

“Not anymore,” says Charlie McAvoy.

“Really?”

“No,” says Auston Matthews, who was born in California but currently plays for the Toronto Maple Leafs.

“Are we sure we can’t just hug it out?” Hamm wants to know. The remark gets a round of laughter, after which Hamm concludes: “No. Go get ’em, boys.”

Hamm has thrown his star power behind Canada in the past, appearing in a series of ads for Canadian food delivery service SkipTheDishes. During the pandemic he delivered a

“thanks Canada” video

in which he noted: “Obviously I’m not Canadian but it’s times like this that I really wish I was.”

He goes on to deliver a monologue on some of his favourite places in Canada, while of course mentioning the food delivery sponsor. But when it comes to hockey rivalry between the two nations, the gloves are off.

The Winter Games start Feb. 6 in Milan. Men’s preliminary rounds begin Feb. 11.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Pete Hoekstra, U.S. Ambassador to Canada, during an interview at the US Embassy in Ottawa on Dec. 8, 2025.

OTTAWA — U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra says he

does not believe the United States wants to “terminate” its trilateral trade agreement with Canada and Mexico.

Hoekstra, speaking to National Post in a wide-ranging interview on Monday, said Canadians ought to be prepared for a range of possibilities, as the three countries ready themselves for their first joint review of the agreement, which was inked during U.S. President Donald Trump’s first term in office.

“Canadians should be prepared for what they had signed up for six years ago, so should Americans,” the ambassador said from the U.S. embassy.

The sweeping trade deal, known in Canada as the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, is scheduled to undergo its first review next year, with parties already having launched consultations.

Prime Minister Mark Carney met last week with Trump and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum as part of a FIFA World Cup event, where all three met for 45 minutes and “

agreed to keep working together on” the agreement, according to a statement from Audrey Champoux, a spokeswoman for Carney. 

The agreement, which came into force in 2020, has a clause stating the deal is set to expire in 2036, with the review purposefully scheduled ahead of time. As part of the review, countries must state whether they wish to extend it for another 16-year term and present formal recommendations.

If one member decides against extending the agreement, the countries would be subject to more frequent joint reviews, with the possibility of extending it for another term available throughout any future process. Another option under the deal is that a country could provide notice to withdraw from it completely.

Jamieson Greer, who serves as U.S. Trade Representative, recently told POLITICO that withdrawal remains a possible scenario.

Speaking from Ottawa, Hoekstra says the joint review “covers the full gamut of potential outcomes,” from a continuation of the deal, including with “modifications,” as well as “the possibility to terminate the agreement.”

“These things are all possibilities under the framework of the agreement. It doesn’t say anything about, we’re going to do it with a bias towards any one of these outcomes.”

“It’s just that all of these outcomes are possibilities. Do I think termination, that the United States wants to terminate

no.”

The ambassador acknowledged that there were three sides around the negotiating table and said the U.S. views the agreement as having been a “very positive relationship benefiting both countries.”

He said much has changed from when the agreement replacing the former North American Free Trade Agreement was signed six years ago, such as the demand for critical minerals as well as energy needed to power AI data centres, as well as threats from China.

“Our intent is building strong, reliable relationships with our friends and allies, of which Canada is a key part,” Hoekstra said.

He also acknowledged the fact that the idea of the U.S. striking separate bilateral deals with Canada and Mexico has also been discussed.

“Is that post-CUSMA?” the ambassador said, adding how the review reflects the fact “we live in a very, very dynamic world.”

“Canada and the United States will decide exactly what that relationship will look like moving forward from here and it will be different, OK.”

Business leaders and Carney himself point to the current trade agreement as being key to Canada seeing most of its goods exempt from U.S. tariffs, with the prime minister arguing that Canada has the best arrangement compared to any other country that trades with the U.S.

Talks about striking a deal with Trump that would see the president outright remove or lessen tariffs on key Canadian sectors, such as steel and aluminum, have not restarted since Trump announced in late October that negotiations were off, blaming anti-tariff ads from Ontario Premier Doug Ford.

Hoekstra said he understands that both sides were close to securing “some kind of a framework” for a deal that would have covered steel and aluminum as well as oil and uranium by the week before American Thanksgiving in late November.

Trump recently said, “we’ll see” when asked on Sunday about restarting talks with Canada.

His ambassador expressed confidence on Monday that negotiations would resume, but said “it’s a matter of time” for when both parties feel ready to get back to it.

“But the bottom line is, we will restart negotiations.”

With a file from The Canadian Press

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada, and U.S. President Donald Trump attend the FIFA World Cup 2026 Official Draw at John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on December 05, 2025 in Washington, DC.

U.S. President Donald Trump offered mixed messages when asked pointedly on Sunday whether he would revive stalled trade talks with Canada.

“We’ll see,” he said toward the end of a scrum with reporters ahead of the 2025 Kennedy Centre Gala in Washington, D.C. “The problem is Canada makes a lot of things that we don’t need because we make them also, but we’ll work it out,” he said, as seen in a

video shared by Forbes

.

He called Canada “tough traders,” but insisted he has “a very good relationship” with Prime Minister Mark Carney and Canada at large. “Canada is a special place, and they really are good at ice hockey, aren’t they?” the U.S. president quipped.

Trump said he met with Carney and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum for 30 minutes after Friday’s World Cup draw at the Washington, D.C. venue, with their “very productive” conversation centred mostly on trade.

Carney’s office had previously said the conversation, which it clocked at 45 minutes, was “constructive” and the leaders agreed to keep working together on the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), according to

CTV News.

Trump abruptly halted the negotiations in October upon learning of Ontario’s anti-tariff advertisement featuring a radio address by former president Ronald Reagan in which the Republican is critical of tariffs.

On Truth Social, Trump called it “fake” and reinforced the importance of tariffs.

“Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED,” he wrote.

After consulting with Carney, Ontario Premier Doug Ford agreed to pause the ad campaign, but not before it aired during Major League Baseball World Series broadcasts.

 In a clip from an Ontario anti-tariff ad, U.S. President Ronald Reagan delivers a radio address on April 25, 1987, explaining why he was imposing tariffs on Japanese semiconductors contrary to his preferred trade policy.

Trump then announced an additional retaliatory 10 per cent tariff on Canadian imports over and above the existing flat rate of 35 per cent.

At the time, he and Carney were both scheduled to be in South Korea the following week for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit. Asked ahead of the trip if he planned to meet with Carney, Trump said, “I don’t have any intention of it, no,” as reported by

Bloomberg

.

“For those that are asking, we didn’t come to South Korea to see Canada,” he posted to Truth Social as Air Force One touched down in Busan a few days later.

Nevertheless, the world leaders found themselves facing one another at a table during a state dinner hosted by South Korean President Lee Jae Myung.

Carney later told Global News he and Trump enjoyed “a very good conversation” while they dined.

A few days later, Trump revealed that Carney personally apologized for the ad but that it wouldn’t spur trade talks. Carney later confirmed he made the apology.

“It’s not something I would have done,” he said, explaining that he’d seen it before it was aired and asked Ford to pull it.

 United States President Donald Trump looks towards Prime Minister Mark Carney as they raise their glasses during a toast at a working dinner in Gyeongju, South Korea, on Wednesday, Oct 29, 2025.

While conducting a press conference at the G20 Leaders’ Summit in South Africa in late November, Carney was asked about the last time he spoke with Trump.

Who cares? I mean, it’s a detail.

I spoke to him. I’ll speak to him again when it matters.”

In the House of Commons two days later, Carney admitted he’d used “a poor choice of words about a serious issue.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Mezuzahs were torn from the doorways of Jewish senior residents of a building in North York on Sunday, Dec. 7, 2025. City councillor James Pasternak shared a photo on X of one of the homes missing a mezuzah.

Mezuzahs have been ripped from the doorways of homes belonging to Jewish seniors at an apartment building in North York over the weekend. Police say the hate crime unit is investigating.

Toronto police’s 32 Division received reports on Sunday that mezuzahs — prayer scrolls that are affixed to the doorways of Jewish homes — had been taken from apartments located at a Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation (TSCH) building, at Bathurst St. and Steeles Ave, a police spokesperson told National Post.

City councillor James Pasternak

said

on X that the incident was “an act of hate directed at Jewish residents — seniors who deserve safety, stability, and dignity.”

“There is no excuse for targeting people because they are Jewish. Toronto cannot look the other way while seniors are intimidated in their hallways,” he said.

He included a photo showing a spot where a mezuzah had been taken.

Later on Sunday evening, Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow thanked Pasternak for connecting residents with police in

a post on X

. She also condemned the incident as “vile and outrageous.”

“This is a public supportive housing building for seniors. They deserve to live in peace without fear of being targeted for being Jewish. I will be reaching out to TSCH leadership to investigate this how this could happen,” she said.

Israel’s ambassador to Canada Iddo Moed

said

on X ripping off mezuzahs from Jewish homes was “reminiscent of the darkest days of Europe.” He added: “Such a vile act of hatred and intimidation must be condemned in the strongest possible terms.”

Jewish advocacy group B’nai Brith Canada

said

in a post on X that it has “engaged” with municipal leaders and Toronto police after being made aware of the incident. It would be organizing a mezuzah drive for members of the community to donate mezuzahs for the seniors in need.

“The permissive nature of the City’s response to the rising levels of incitement and intimidation aimed at the Jewish community continues to embolden those who wish to target Jewish Torontonians,” said B’nai Brith Canada. “Now, it is a group of Jewish seniors who appear to be paying the price for the inaction of our municipal leaders. The inability to protect our elderly is a sign of the further decay of our society.”

Thornhill MP and deputy leader for the Opposition Conservatives, Melissa Lantsman, called out the incident as “cowardly” and “hateful” on social media. She also said it was “massive loser energy to target seniors.”

A mezuzah in not just an object, but rather “a reminder of our faith, heritage, and identity,” explained Jewish advocacy group, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) in a post on X.

“It is placed on our doorways to provide a sense of comfort and spiritual protection. And yet the seniors at a building in North York were targeted in a place where they should’ve felt the safest,” the CIJA post

said

. “We’ve seen hateful conduct go from shouting in the streets to targeting Jews outside our homes to now in the hallways of our own buildings.”

City councillor Brad Bradford said a full investigation should be done to determine who was responsible in a

post on X

. Meanwhile, MP from B.C. Tamara Kronis called the incident “next level antisemitism.”

“There is nothing anyone can say to justify this remarkable act of hate and intimidation,” she

said

on X.

In 2017, mezuzahs were removed from the doorways of homes at a condo building in North York, near Yonge St. and Sheppard Ave, the Canadian Jewish News

reported

. There were also notes left behind that said: “No Jews.”

More to come…

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney, right, meets with British Columbia Premier David Eby at the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia in Victoria on Monday, April 7, 2025.

OTTAWA — A potential pipeline to the West Coast has created strange political bedfellows.

Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet held a meeting with British Columbia Premier David Eby on Dec. 2, only days after

the federal government signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Alberta

paving the way for a new bitumen pipeline.

Blanchet offered his help to B.C. last week — seeing that the MOU was negotiated without the province’s input and offers to relax key climate policies such as the tanker ban — and Eby’s team and his quickly came into contact to coordinate a virtual meeting.

Blanchet said they quickly agreed that, on certain subjects, they were on the same page.

He said the MOU sets a “precedent” that he does not want to see repeated in Quebec.

“On the protection of British Columbia’s jurisdiction, of course, we will be a staunch ally of the Eby government,” said Blanchet, shortly after their meeting.

Without disclosing the details of their conversation, the Bloc leader described his exchange with Eby as “very cordial.”

“I don’t have very much contact with premiers of Canadian provinces,” Blanchet coyly admitted.

A spokeswoman for Eby confirmed that a meeting with Blanchet took place last week but downplayed its importance.

“Premier Eby regularly has conversations with leaders across the country, and this was one of those meetings,” said director of communications Bhinder Sajan in an email.

Blanchet offered to use some of his party’s time in Question Period to be an “interlocutor” that can carry some of B.C.’s concerns and “confront” Carney’s government on its “contradictions.” He, however, specified that Eby did not ask for his party’s help.

Blanchet said he had asked the government prior to the signing of the MOU whether it would not allow any pipeline to go through B.C. without the prior consent of its government and First Nations, and he got reassurances that that would be the case.

“Am I right in thinking that this matter had already been settled and that we were lied to?” he asked on Dec. 2.

Blanchet was subsequently reprimanded by the Speaker of the House of Commons, as MPs cannot accuse each other of being less than honourable in the chamber.

Prime Minister Mark Carney said he respects the rights of provinces, including B.C.

“The memorandum of understanding clearly states that the Government of Canada and the Province of Alberta will work together with British Columbia,” he said.

“An agreement is required for there to be a pipeline.”

Blanchet shot back: “When one wants to get a party’s agreement, then that party should be invited to participate in the agreement from the get-go.”

An Abacus Data poll conducted since the MOU was signed

has shown that Canadians are generally supportive of the idea of a pipeline to the West Coast. Nationally, 55 per cent of respondents either strongly or somewhat support the idea, while 18 per cent are opposed.

The support for a pipeline is significantly lower in Quebec, where 42 per cent of respondents are in favour of the idea, and 26 per cent oppose it. But a third of respondents have no clear opinion on it yet — 32 per cent are either neutral or are “not sure.”

In B.C., where the pipeline is set to go through, respondents have clear feelings about the prospective project. The poll shows that 53 per cent of respondents in the province support it while 30 per cent oppose it. Only 18 per cent are neutral or “not sure.”

To little surprise, the highest show of support for the project is in Alberta — with no less than 74 per cent of respondents who are in favour.

 Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet.

Politically, Carney’s MOU with Alberta has led to

the resignation of former environment minister Steven Guilbeault from cabinet

and fierce criticism from environmental groups and Indigenous peoples. But most Canadians seem to be on board — for now.

Numbers from Abacus Data show that 54 per cent of respondents believe this is a “worthwhile compromise that could bring major economic gains to Canada” while 24 per cent believe this is a “betrayal” of Canada’s progress on environmental policies.

Blanchet, who saw the evolution of the debate over the Energy East pipeline play in Quebec before the project was cancelled in 2017, said many people support the idea of a pipeline at first, but tend to grow skeptical once they see the details of the project.

This week, federal Conservatives will be forcing all MPs — including B.C. Liberal MPs — to make their position known publicly on the prospective pipeline to the West Coast.

They will be debating and voting on a motion on Tuesday brought forward by Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s troops to take note of the MOU with Alberta and support the construction of one or more pipeline to reach Asian markets, “including through an appropriate adjustment” to the tanker ban.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Air Transat is preparing to suspend flights after its pilots issued a 72-hour strike notice, threatening major travel disruptions mid-week.

Air Transat said it will gradually cease operations starting Monday after its pilots issued a 72-hour strike notice this weekend, raising the prospect of a walkout on Wednesday morning.

In

a statement

on Sunday, the Montreal-based airline said the notice from the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) after mediation talks ended Saturday forces it to begin a “gradual and orderly suspension” of flights over the next two days. That involves planning to cancel flights and returning passengers, crew and aircraft to Canada to prevent them from being stranded in the event of a strike.

Air Transat said travellers scheduled to fly within the next five days can change or postpone their bookings for free.

The airline said it regrets disruptions during the busy holiday travel season, but laid the blame on the union, whose expectations they deem to be “unreasonable.”

“This strike notice is premature given the progress made at the bargaining table and the generous offers made by Air Transat,” said Julie Lamontagne, the carrier’s chief human resources, corporate responsibility and communications officer.

She said the company put forward “several compromises and improvements,” including a proposal to raise their wages by 59 per cent over five years. ALPA, she said, has “shown no openness.”

“It is regrettable that the union has expressed such indifference toward Transat, its employees and clients by choosing the path of a strike at this time of year — a reckless decision that does not reflect the state of negotiations,” she stated.

The company also highlighted how a job action would impact its 4,300 other employees at this time of year.

ALPA Air Transat master executive council chair Capt. Bradley Small said in a statement that the pilots don’t want to strike, but airline management is leaving them little choice.

“Months of unproductive bargaining ends now,” Small stated. “If we cannot reach an agreement, management will be responsible for every cancelled flight and stranded passenger.”

The pilots have been working under a contract signed in 2015. Earlier this week,

Small told National Post

that they’re seeking a new agreement akin to the one signed by Air Canada and WestJet pilots in recent years.

Such a deal, he said, would address working conditions around scheduling, improved benefits, increased pay, job security and better retirement protection.

Negotiations to replace the decade-old agreement began in January. They continued past the April expiration date through the summer, with Small previously alleging the company was only present about one-fifth of the time, prompting ALPA to ask Ottawa to provide conciliators.

After roughly two months of talks proved fruitless, a 21-day cooling-off period was initiated and conciliation turned to mediation. On Dec. 2, 99 per cent of the airline’s 750 pilots voted in favour of a strike.

“There is still time to avoid a strike, but unless significant progress is made at the bargaining table, we will strike if that’s what it takes to achieve a modern contract.”

Air Transat, meanwhile, said it’s committed to reaching a deal to minimize disruptions and avoid a complete shutdown. Passengers potentially impacted can learn more on the

company’s website

.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Thomas Lukaszuk delivers boxes with more than 400,000 signatures for the Forever Canada petition to the Elections Alberta building in Edmonton, on October 28, 2025.

Thomas Lukaszuk, leader of the successful Forever Canada citizens petition, has been invited to Ottawa by the Prime Minister’s Office to explain what exactly is going on in the province.

Not surprisingly, Thomas is cautioning the feds to pay attention to the national unity implications of separatist sentiment in Alberta. More ominously, he’s suggesting rising anger could trigger national security risks.

Thomas perceives Prime Minister Mark Carney as being “very in tune with what’s going on in Alberta” and genuinely concerned. “I think not only is he concerned about, you know, just having an angry province,” Thomas says, “but in any country, you cannot have a large cohort of angry white men.”

In conversation Thursday, he remained wary despite a major victory for his unique preemptive petition against a potential separatist referendum.

Elections Alberta confirmed this week that his “Forever Canada” petition has been successful, validly signed by over 400,000 Albertans (that’s nearly 14 per cent of eligible electors in the province). It asks, simply and clearly: “Do you agree that Alberta should remain within Canada?”

But Alberta Premier Danielle Smith decides the next steps. Pursuant to Alberta’s 2021 law on citizen petitions, the premier can either call for a yes/no referendum question, or have all MLAs vote on new law or government policy affirming Alberta’s commitment to stay in Canada. The Forever Canada petition is recommending the latter option, and Thomas assures me, that’s always been his aim. But there’s confusion; some petitioners expected this campaign would result in a pro-Canada referendum.

“We gave her (the Alberta premier) a choice,” Thomas insists, “she gets to decide.” What does Thomas believe the premier will decide, I ask. “Well, she’s going to call a referendum, especially after this UCP convention,” he responds with a chuckle. “She painted herself into a corner.”

Smith was booed by some members of her own United Conservative Party at its annual convention last weekend, when she mentioned the MOU she signed with Carney to get an oil export pipeline built from Alberta to tidewater.

I’d be remiss not to mention that Thomas and I know each other; we were both PC MLAs in the Alison Redford-led government. Then, he was deputy premier with an uncanny ability to manoeuvre and to campaign; he hasn’t lost his political instincts.

(As well, I need to add that Smith also knows Thomas; she was leader of the opposition Wildrose Party when he was deputy premier. She has a good nose for political traps, and when asked in a recent French-language interview with Telejournal Alberta if she would support political rallies in support of federalism, the premier replied that she had no “problem saying loud and clear that Canada can work.” It’s also worth pointing out the Alberta government proposed, late this week, legislation giving the justice minister authority to decide whether a referendum application goes forward or is referred to court.)

When he caught wind of the Alberta Prosperity Project’s intention to submit a referendum question this July, he very quickly beat them to the punch and filed a pro-Canada alternative, and hired an IT company to not only build a website, but behind the wall AI infrastructure as well.

He reports raising close to $400,000, which, he says, “we burned through because of all this AI stuff and IT stuff.” And now he has, in his own words, “half a million signatures and about 25,000 signed-up volunteers, and a campaign bus and a logo that’s recognizable.”

This unelected champion of a citizens’ initiative may arguably have a louder voice in Ottawa than Alberta’s official opposition party. And with the federal Liberals only holding two seats in the province, he arguably brings more Albertans’ voices to that national table.

“I met with the Prime Minister’s Office and with the federal caucus and most of the Senate last week,” Thomas says. “I found they’re following what’s happening in Alberta very closely,” he reports, “and they’re very concerned.” Thomas plans to return to Ottawa next week.

What did he tell folks in Ottawa? “There are issues we need to deal with immediately because we cannot have a segment of the population that is angry … this can become a national security issue also, when you have this segment of the population continuously percolating with anger.

“There are two kinds of separatists in Alberta,” Thomas says, basing his insights on conversations he’s had with people across the province over the past months while gathering signatures for the Forever Canada petition.

“The first group,” he says, “is around 10 per cent of Albertans and they are hard-core separatists. There is nothing that will change their mind. And they are just unhappy with life and often it isn’t about Ottawa or equalization formulas or seats in Parliament or Senate.”

He reports this group to be largely Caucasian males, between 20 and 45 in age. “So that’s your 10 per cent,” he reiterates, “they were pro-convoys, they were pro-border blockade, anti-mask, anti-vax, and now this, right?”

And there’s an unusual number of dual citizens in this group, he adds, American-Canadians. “So, yeah,” he concludes, this group has a “sort of evangelical, Mormon, oil and gas industry flavour to it,” and “a lot of them either work for American companies or are of American origin.”

“The second 10 per cent, which brings us to 20 per cent, are what I would call soft-core separatists,” Thomas reports. “If you were to ask them to sign on a dotted line today, they would. But they think it’s a good bargaining technique. They actually think it worked well for Quebec. So they say, ‘Why don’t we use this threat, and maybe we will get a better deal from Ottawa?’”

I ask him: “If the separatists only represent 10 per cent of the Alberta population, as you suggest, isn’t there a risk that people in Ottawa interpret what you are saying as, ‘There’s just a lot of noise in Alberta; we don’t need to really worry about separatist sentiment?’”

“I will be the first one standing up, saying ‘you’re wrong,’” Thomas counters. “These people are upset. Maybe the level of their anger is out of proportion because it’s being fed and fuelled by other interests … and it’s incumbent on us to address these issues.”

And then he shares a story that shocked me, about what he calls the “lost boys.” A Nova Scotia mayor told him, “Thomas, we have a problem with Albertans,” because many Nova Scotians go to Alberta for work and then come back radicalized, or at least angry. Most of the people protesting a federal gun “buyback” program in Cape Breton worked on the rigs in Alberta, he said. (Thomas, 56, himself spent some of his childhood in Cape Breton after his family defected from communist Poland; they moved to Alberta seeking opportunity.)

Thomas worries about what he describes as “a very small group of angry militant men, armed to their teeth.”

You can think he’s being over-dramatic; perhaps he is. And it’s understandable people are angry against a federal government that for a decade seemed intent on throwing away Albertan prosperity; that’s not a radical thought.

But there is an undeniable political firestorm blazing in Alberta. I can’t help but wonder if this is what the 400,000-plus Albertans who signed the Forever Canada petition were thinking.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.