LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Ontario Premier Doug Ford makes an announcement regarding Ontario's agri-food manufacturing supply chain in Mississauga, Ont., on Thursday, December 4, 2025.

OTTAWA — Ontario Premier Doug Ford continued to blast Canada’s recent trade agreement with China on Monday, noting that he and Canadian automakers only learned of the deal a few hours before it was announced.

“I found out about this deal, and the auto companies found out, by the way, a few hours before it was announced, so much for the partnership,” he said, during a speech in front of the Rural Ontario Municipal Association’s annual general meeting in Toronto.

On Friday, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced a “landmark agreement” between China and Canada that would see China reduce tariffs on Canadian canola exports in exchange for Canada allowing 49,000 Chinese-made EVs to be imported at a 6.1 per cent tariff rate.

Ford said he is disappointed in the recent agreement brokered by the federal government which would see Canadian auto industry workers compete with Chinese auto workers that are making significantly lower wages.

Ontario’s premier told reporters at Queen’s Park he has not yet spoken to Carney since the deal was announced and was informed of the trade agreement by Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc.

“I’m disappointed, we had such a great relationship, and I look forward to continuing a great relationship,” said Ford. “But it’s all about communication, collaboration and partnership, they keep preaching it – at least I know where I stand now.”

The federal government has said the agreement will drive Chinese joint investment in Canada and will provide more affordable options for the Canadian consumer, with 50 per cent of the vehicles expected to be at an import price of less than $35,000.

“I can assure you, this is not a not a good move, but I’ll never apologize for standing up for our auto workers, and I will continue doing everything I can to protect their jobs and paycheques, including pushing the federal government to do the right thing,” said Ford.

Ford said it was time for the federal government to “step up” and listed several demands to support the Canadian auto industry, including the removal of the federal EV mandate, harmonizing regulations with trading partners and scrapping unnecessary fees that drive away investments.

The Canadian auto industry directly supports over 130,000 jobs and about 500,000 direct and indirect right across the country in assembly and components plants, according to the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers’ Association.

The industry has faced headwinds over the past year, as U.S. President Donald Trump moves to shore up auto manufacturing in the U.S. During a visit to a Ford plant in Dearborn, Mich. last week, Trump said “we don’t need cars made in Canada.” U.S. tariffs remain in place on Canadian autos, with some exemptions under the Canada-United-States-Mexico-Agreement (CUSMA).

In the meantime, the Canadian canola industry is applauding the deal with China, which has faced 100 per cent levy on canola oil and a 76 per cent tariff on canola seed exports since 2024, when Canada first imposed tariffs on Chinese EVs.

Effective March 1, China will reduce its tariffs on Canadian canola seed exports to 15 per cent and will remove tariffs on Canola meal.

During an appearance on CTV’s Question Period with Vassy Kapelos, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe was asked what message it sends that Canada acquiesced after China successfully pitted one region of the country against the other.

“I disagree with the framing of that question,” said Moe. “The agriculture industry, the canola industry, the oilseed industry… is important to virtually each and every part of this country, up to and including Ontario.”

Moe added the agreement will also increase opportunities in the Canadian energy and the manufacturing sectors, that will benefit different parts of the country.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney holds a press conference at the Islamic Art Museum in Doha, Qatar, on Sunday, Jan. 18, 2026.

Bloomberg News is reporting that Mark Carney is considering sending Canadian soldiers to Greenland, in the midst of U.S. President Donald Trump’s continued pressure to acquire the island for U.S. interests.

The news agency said it spoke to a person familiar with the matter, under condition that the person not be named. It confirmed earlier reports by

CBC News

and the

Globe and Mail

on the same issue. The report made it clear that Canada’s prime minister hasn’t made a decision yet. National Post has reached out to the Prime Minister’s Office for comment.

The report notes that a Royal Canadian Air Force contingent is already taking part in a pre-planned NORAD exercise in Greenland, but that Carney is pondering whether to send additional forces as part of sovereignty exercises Denmark is planning. That might include drills to protect the Greenland’s critical infrastructure.

 This aerial view shows snow-covered buildings in Nuuk, Greenland, on March 7, 2025.

Trump has announced a 10 per cent tariff, rising to 25 per cent in June, on eight European nations — EU members Denmark, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Finland, along with Britain and Norway — after they said they would participate in NATO military exercises in Greenland.

Bloomberg says that move has caused European Union leaders to plan an emergency summit to discuss the matter and explore possible retaliatory measures, including counter-tariffs. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer told Trump on Sunday that the U.S. tariff measure was “wrong.”

The plan is to meet in Brussels on Thursday. One option is a package of tariffs on 93 billion euros ($150 billion Cdn) of U.S. imports that could automatically kick in on Feb. 6 after a six-month suspension.

On Sunday, Carney said Greenland’s future is for Denmark and Greenland to decide, and that he’ll reiterate that message to Trump if they speak about it.

 Prime Minister Mark Carney walks with Qatar’s Minister of State for Energy Affairs Saad bin Sherida Al Kaabi, left, and Karim Morcos, Ambassador of Canada Qatar, middle right, as he arrives in Doha, Qatar on Jan. 17, 2026.

Carney made his remarks from Qatar, where he had travelled after his visit to China last week. “It’s a serious situation,” Carney said at a news conference. “We’re concerned about this escalation, to be absolutely clear.”

Carney said the security of Greenland “very much falls within the responsibilities of NATO,” adding: “We always will support sovereignty and territorial integrity of countries, wherever their geographic location is.”

Asked what he would say to Trump, he replied: “I’m going to say everything I just said.”

Carney’s next stop is the

World Economic Forum

taking place this week in Davos, Switzerland. Trump is also attending and is set to deliver a speech on Wednesday, but it’s not known if the two leaders will meet.

Over the weekend, Trump linked his claims on Greenland to not being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, in a letter he sent to Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store.

“Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace,” Trump said in the letter, which was obtained by Bloomberg. “Although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.”

“The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland,” he added.

Store said he had informed Trump several times that the prize isn’t decided by the Norwegian government but is awarded by an independent committee.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Izaak Walton Killam Hospital in Halifax, N.S.

Patient medical records are being streamlined into a single digitized record system in Nova Scotia, preventing overlap and delays in what officials say could be a valuable model for other provinces to emulate.

The new system – dubbed One Person One Record – was implemented last month at Halifax’s Izaak Walton Killam Hospital (IWK) Health Centre and is expected to go province-wide by year’s end.

“The clinical information system reduces a patient’s need to repeat health history for each provider and streamlines appointment scheduling and transitions between providers and care settings,” Nova Scotia Health and Wellness Minister Michelle Thompson said in an email to National Post.

Dr. Krista Jangaard, IWK Health’s president and CEO, said the system’s “biggest strength” is giving healthcare professionals access to patients’ complete, up-to-date health information from ambulatory clinics, emergency department visits, mental health and addictions treatment and inpatient care.

It “prevents duplication and unnecessary tests and ensures timely decision making,” she told the Post.

Officials say that more than 26,000 medical providers will have access to the new system, run by Oracle Health Canada under a 10-year, $365-million contract.

“We have heard from primary care providers that they are receiving timely information about their patients’ care at hospital facilities. This all enhances the patient’s care experience,” Thompson told the Post.

The system also helps address Nova Scotia’s doctor recruitment challenge. About 68,000 people are on the official waitlist to get a physician; a 2022

report

 found provincial recruiters discovered that medical students and incoming doctors felt paper records were a “deterrent” for entering the field in the province.

Thompson called the new portal “another attractive option to recruit and retain healthcare professionals who want to work in modern facilities with modern tools.”

There have been some minor startup issues with One Person One Record, according to Dr. Howard Conter, vice-president for medical operations at Signature Health, a private executive health and corporate wellness clinic in Halifax.

But he said the program itself was not the problem: “It was the implementation, because a lot of the people just hadn’t paid attention to the fact that we were approaching the starting line. It was very much more the fact that your players on the field had not read the playbook.”

There was never “any danger to patients or patient care,” he said.

Conter noted the new format allows patients, parents and medical professionals to “get a much better looks at files” that “aren’t in bits and pieces,” and typed out for clarity. Previously, he lamented the “freehand” notes that “could have been in Swahili, as far as that was concerned.”

Jangaard said 100% percent of providers, physicians and nurse practitioners had completed training, but some disruptions were “to be expected with any undertaking of this magnitude,” as staff adapt.

Thompson agreed “a period of learning and stabilization, as teams become more comfortable using the new clinical information” is to be expected. But the eventual advantages, include less time spent on charting and repetitive administrative tasks, she said.

Jangaard noted that only authorized medical staff are permitted to collect, use and disclose personal health information, obviating any privacy concerns.  She added: “Patients have the right to see who has looked at their electronic health record by requesting a Record of User Activity” under the province’s Personal Health Information Act.

Jangaard said the IWK has “embedded lessons learned and practices from the experiences of other Canadian health organizations,” and there may be opportunity for the hospital to impart “example and guidance” to other institutions.

“Once the clinical information system is fully implemented, we look forward sharing our experience as a resource for other provinces who are looking to embark upon a similar province-wide implementation.”

The portal will expand to the greater Halifax area in the spring, Thompson said.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Wild dingoes are occasionally spotted on K'gari, formerly known as Fraser Island. A Canadian woman was found dead on the island on Jan. 19, 2026 surrounded by a pack of dingoes.

The body of a 19-year-old Canadian woman was discovered on an Australian island reportedly surrounded by a pack of dingoes.

Police were called to the beach on K’gari, formerly known as Fraser Island, around 6:35 a.m. local time due to reports that a woman was unresponsive. The island is located off of the Queensland coast. Police believe she “may have gone for a swim around 5 a.m.,” according to a

news release

. The woman was found north of the

Maheno shipwreck

, an ocean liner that was driven ashore during a cyclone in 1935. It is a popular tourist attraction.

“I can confirm that the dingoes had physically been in contact with the body,” said police Insp. Paul Algie, the

Australia Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) reported

.

“There (were) markings on her body consistent with having been touched and interfered with by the dingoes.”

However, cause of death has yet to be determined.

The woman, who was has not been identified, was working at a backpacker hostel on K’gari. She had been living and working on the island with a friend for six weeks, said Algie,

according to news.com.au

.

 A shipwreck along the beach of K’gari, an island off the coast of Queensland, Australia.

“(Her friend) is very traumatized. She’s been supported by her friends at the backpackers’ (hostel) where they were working,” he said.

Two men were driving past the area and saw about 10 dingoes surrounding the body, the publication reported.

“We simply can’t confirm whether this young lady drowned or died as a result of being attacked by dingoes,” said Algie.

“K’gari is a wilderness area, dingoes are wild animals, and while they are very culturally and significant to the local First Nations people and to the people that live on the island, they are still wild animals and need to be treated as such.”

He said that authorities could not specify cause of death until the body was examined and urged anyone with information to come forward. He also warned people not to feed or go near the dingoes on the island.

The body was taken to Queensland on Monday,

The Independent reported

. According to ABC, police contacted the RCMP.

Global Affairs Canada and the RCMP did not immediately return National Post’s request for comment.

K’gari is listed as a UNESCO World Heritage site. It is the largest sand island in the world.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney meets with President of China Xi Jinping at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China on Friday, Jan. 16, 2026.

Michael Kovrig, a former Canadian diplomat and Chinese detainee, weighed in on Canada’s newly announced trade arrangements with China following Prime Minister Mark Carney’s meetings with President Xi Jinping this week.

In a series of social media posts on Saturday, Kovrig, who spent more than three years in the Chinese Communist Party’s custody following the arrest of a Huawei executive in 2018, warned that the long-term risks could outweigh the short-term economic relief.

 Prime Minister Mark Carney is presented with flowers from Lu You Ci, 11, as he is officially welcomed to Beijing, China on Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2026.

On Friday, Carney announced a deal that would allow 49,000 Chinese-manufactured electric vehicles (EVs) into Canada annually at a tariff rate of six per cent, down from the 100 per cent tariff announced by the previous Liberal government in lock-step with the previous U.S. administration. In exchange, China has agreed to reduce tariffs on some Canadian canola products, excluding canola oil, and certain seafood products from between 25 and 85 per cent to either zero or 15 per cent.

In

one post on X

, Kovrig said the visit, the first by a Canadian prime minister since 2018, “was never just a courtesy call.” He posited that China was in search of tangible wins on EV access, energy and political cooperation.

“With Canada–U.S. relations under strain, the General Secretary smelled blood in the water and seized a moment of increased leverage,” Kovrig wrote.

“Carney secured limited relief for farmers and reopened dialogue channels, but Xi kept his pressure tools and is sure to keep using them.”

He compared the situation to a “rope-a-dope,” in which one side takes blows to wait out long-term advantage in a fight and said Canada should diversify exports “for vulnerable sectors” and figure out how to protect its own vehicle industry and “cybersecurity defences” amidst an influx of Chinese EVs.

In another post, he said Canada “should be able to sell China commodities like food and energy without weakening its national security.” He warned, however, that too much reliance on the Chinese market affords the CCP even more political leverage.

“That’s how pressure and elite capture accumulates — quietly, agreement by agreement, not through one dramatic concession,” he wrote.

“The lesson? Start small, keep deals reversible, protect the industrial base, and draw red lines around national security, foreign interference, coercion, and human rights abuses.

Kovrig also opined on Chinese steel, highlighting a January 2025 ruling from Canada’s International Trade Tribunal that determined that steel strapping dumped from China had caused injury to Canadian producers, leading to new anti-dumping and countervailing duties.

He said the case is an example of the importance of keeping trade enforcement separate from diplomatic matters.

“Dialogue with Beijing can continue, but it shouldn’t dilute investigations, penalties, or expectations around compliance,” he posted.

Kovrig also took issue with the optics of the visit, writing on another post with a video of Carney and Jinping shaking hands: “Diplomacy is necessary. Grinning is optional. This is not a good look.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney, speaks to the media at Ritan Park in Beijing, China, Friday, Jan. 16, 2026.

BEIJING — In April 2025, Prime Minister Mark Carney was standing on the stage of the federal election leaders’ debate when he was asked to identify the greatest threat to Canada’s national security.

Without hesitation, Carney declared: “China.”

On Thursday, Carney stood at a podium in Beijing’s Ritan Park and beamed as he announced a new “strategic partnership” with China that aims to increase trade, communication and collaboration between both countries.

It also makes a strong push for Chinese EV investments in Canada with the eventual objective of having a manufacturing plant established in Canada.

If the swing in tone gives you whiplash, you’re not alone. So, what changed in those nine months?

It’s hard to tell.

Ask Carney if he still believes China to be the greatest threat to Canada’s national security and he’ll skirt the issue.

“The security landscape continues to change in a world that is more dangerous and divided. We face many threats,” Carney told reporters in response to that question during the press conference in Ritan Park.

“My responsibility as prime minister is to manage those threats by building resilience, building security,” he added. “The threat environment has increased, the risks have multiplied, so too has our resilience and our engagement.”

Ask any other Liberal minister to explain the change and they’ll stick to roughly the same script, almost to the point where one wonders if Carney regrets pointing the finger at China back in April.

The world is changing largely due to the “transformational” presidency of U.S. President Donald Trump, the Liberals will say. So, Canada needs to diversify its trading partners and China is a prime candidate because it’s a more predictable partner than the U.S. now, they’ll add.

Likely also on the Liberals’ mind is Trump’s National Security Strategy released in December that aims to restore “American preeminence in the Western Hemisphere,” the constant threat of new U.S. tariffs against Canada and statements by top U.S. officials declaring they want to draw away Canadian auto manufacturing.

Comments like those are pushing Canada to seek non-U.S. partners to boost its fledgling EV industry. China’s EV industry, largely considered a world leader in both manufacturing and technological advancement, became a prime candidate.

That’s despite concerns that the technology in the vehicles could be used by China to spy on users and pose a threat to foreign countries’ national security.

The Carney government says its taking precautions in its dealing with China, described by Canada’s national security agencies as the most sophisticated and able threat actor facing the country.

Carney said Canada discussed its expectations and “red lines” with the Chinese government last week with respect to foreign interference and other public safety issues.

He also promised that the government was going into this new “strategic partnership” with “clear eyes” and guardrails preventing China from investing in certain sensitive industries. He recently cited artificial intelligence and critical minerals as examples.

But will that be enough to prevent China from continuing to be the most sophisticated and prevalent cyber and foreign interference actor against Canada, as described by Canada’s national security agencies?

In the meantime, the public service’s concerns about security while in China were certainly obvious from the start of the trip.

One hour before Can Force One entered Chinese airspace Wednesday, all public servants and political staff were required to power down their usual work and personal devices and stash them in a Faraday bag.

While in Beijing, they all used “burner” devices, which were promptly returned as soon as the delegation’s plane left Chinese airspace Saturday.

There’s no need to use burners in Qatar and Switzerland — the next stops on the eight-day trip — showing that not all allies are on equal security footing.

Carney’s emphasis at the end of the trip was on the restoration of Canada’s trade, political and cultural relationships with China, which are emerging from eight years of deep frost.

After his meeting with President Xi Jinping, the prime minister proudly announced a new “strategic partnership” with the Asian superpower built on five pillars: energy, increased trade, international governance, public safety and security, and increased “people-to-people” ties.

Part of the deal was an agreement that China would drop many of its crippling tariffs on Canadian canola. In exchange, the federal government would exempt up to 49,000 Chinese EVs from 100 per cent tariffs this year all the while pushing for Chinese auto manufacturers to build production capacity in Canada.

“We are building a web of new connections with China to create new, transformative opportunities for Canadian workers, and more stability, certainty, and prosperity on both sides of the Pacific,” he told Canadian and Chinese reporters.

Truth be told, everything about Carney’s trip to China felt like a hard break from the Trudeau era. In fact, Carney seemed more inclined to implicitly criticize his Liberal predecessor than his Chinese hosts.

Instead of Justin Trudeau’s public insistence that China do more on human and women’s rights, Carney spoke occasionally of “values-based realism” and “differences.”

“We respect the differences in each other’s systems. It does mean that our cooperation is more focused, more limited,” he said.

“We don’t grab a megaphone and have the conversations that way,” he added in an obvious swipe at Trudeau. “We take the world as it is, not as we wish it to be.”

The China section of the Trudeau government’s 2022 Indo-Pacific strategy, written during the

height of the “two Michaels” saga

and presented by then-Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly (now industry minister under Carney), also appears to have gone by the wayside.

The document described the Asian behemoth as “an increasingly disruptive global power” that “increasingly disregards” international rules and norms.

“China is looking to shape the international order into a more permissive environment for interests and values that increasingly depart from ours,” reads the document.

And yet throughout the Beijing trip, the Carney government described China as a key partner in supporting multilateral institutions left in the lurch as a still-unclear “new world order” replaces the one previously led by the United States.

Gone are the words “disruptive” or “disregards” from the federal government’s lexicon on China, replaced by terms such as “partner” and “China’s strengths.”

Carney distanced himself from the Trudeau-era policy while in China.

“I wasn’t a member of the government at the time,” Carney told reporters about the 2022 policy Thursday. “I wasn’t there; it wasn’t my view.”

The world is changing quickly, becoming more unstable and dangerous, the Liberals note repeatedly. That’s why the government is reworking its foreign policy, its Indo-Pacific strategy and is set to release a new auto-sector strategy in February. And it’s happening on the fly.

As one senior government official told reporters on the plane out of Beijing:

“I’m just dealing with sh– as it starts.”

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney, second from left, walks with Qatar's Minister of State for Energy Affairs Saad bin Sherida Al Kaabi, left, and Karim Morcos, Ambassador of Canada Qatar, middle right, as he arrives in Doha, Qatar on Saturday, Jan. 17, 2026.

DOHA, QATAR — What do Céline Dion, Shania Twain, Michael Bublé, Bryan Adams and his Highness the Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani have in common?

They are all sounds Prime Minister Mark Carney heard during a formal lunch with Qatar’s leadership Sunday.

During a lunch with Qatar’s authoritarian leader to formalize a new “strategic partnership,” Carney and the Canadian delegation were regaled by music from a small ensemble of a dozen musicians from the Qatar Philharmonic Orchestra.

The tunes accompanied a regal meal of lobster, beef and camel meat in the emir’s palatial Amiri Diwan, the leader’s official office building.

The playlist was a blend of Arabic and Canadian music, the latter being an eclectic mix of iconic Canadiana from the ’80s, ’90s and 2000s.

Apparently, Qatari leadership is quite fond of Céline Dion, whose songs composed 20 per cent of the 10-song playlist.

The musical ensemble kicked off with Dion’s 1994 smash hit The Power of Love

It was followed by Shania Twain’s You’re Still The One in which she sings about two partners staying together despite obstacles and naysayers.

Dion’s music reappeared later in the meal with a rendition of her legendary Titanic theme My Heart Will Go On.

But the musical energy picked right back up again when the orchestra continued with Bryan Adams’ rock classic Summer of 69.

Michael Bublé’s Haven’t Met You Yet was next on the playlist of the meeting between both leaders and their entourages.

Interspersed throughout the Canadian tunes were Arabic classics such as the musical poem Lamma Bada Yatathanna and Qatari song Adeilk Ya Adolha.

But nowhere in sight were songs from more contemporary Canadian stars such as Drake, The Weeknd, Justin Bieber or Tate McRae.

 Canadian performer The Weeknd.

What’s particularly exceptional about the playlist is that the Canadian delegation had no part in its planning. Rather, the song choices were entirely made by the Qataris. Generally, the hosting delegation will ask Canada’s foreign service to provide musical recommendations for their bands or playlists. But not this time.

During the meal, Carney and the emir put the final touches on a partnership that the prime minister says involves a commitment by Qatar to invest significantly in yet-unidentified “nation-building projects” in Canada.

“We are announcing an ambitious new partnership. We are deepening our ties across trade, investment, defence, and AI,” Carney told reporters after the meeting.

After years of delays, the prime minister said both governments also agreed to prioritize negotiations for a new Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement and begin new ones for a double taxation deal that aims to increase mobility between both countries.

Carney also said he invited the emir to attend the Canada vs. Qatar soccer World Cup game in Vancouver, B.C., this summer.

On Sunday morning, Carney was greeted by a grand welcoming display by Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani that involved a procession of camels and horses, a band and a small military inspection.

On Monday, the prime minister will travel to Davos, Switzerland, to attend the World Economic Forum annual summit.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


A person plays the online word game Wordle on a mobile phone in 2022.

If you’re one of the millions of daily Wordle players and sometimes have trouble figuring out the correct five-letter answer, or maybe even have to ask for help, you should know you’re not alone.

Research conducted by “word unscrambling experts” at the website

unscramblerer.com

has revealed that thousands of Canadians google “Wordle hint” or variations of that phrase every day. The experts crunched those numbers to determine the most difficult puzzles for the past year, for the nation and by province.

Across Canada, the hardest Wordle word of 2025 landed on June 1, and it was ROUGH. (That’s both the word and a description of it.)

Summer seems to been a more perplexing time for puzzlers. After ROUGH came WHOLE (July 27), LOUSY (Aug. 17), FUGUE (Nov. 9) and ATRIA (July 6).

Those unscrambling experts also point out that most people just watch a nudge to get the answer — they don’t want it handed to them.

“Wordle players in Canada are 25 times more likely to search for ‘Wordle hint’ than ‘Wordle Solver,’” a spokesperson for the site said. “Canadians love to solve the puzzle themselves, even at the risk of breaking a winning streak.” They added: “Hints are a great tool that keeps the game fun when solving a hard Wordle.”

On a provincial level, Ontario and Manitoba matched the national data, with ROUGH as the toughest word. LOUSY stumped British Columbia and neighbouring Alberta, while DOWEL proved tricky for Saskatchewan and the Northwest Territories. Other regions were tripped up by ATRIA (Nova Scotia), SWING (Prince Edward Island), MINTY (Newfoundland), COVEN (Yukon), TENOR (Nunavut) and FUGUE (Quebec).

Quebec also had the lowest number of “Wordle hint” searches for the year with fewer than 60,000. That could be because French-speakers are less enthralled with the English-language game, or because they’re smarter. You decide.

For those keeping track, Canada’s hardest Wordle puzzle of the previous year was BRAWN on Dec. 22, 2024. This year has included such humdingers as GUMBO, QUARK and OOMPH, and we’re not even three weeks in.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


German Sports Guns, GSG-16 semi-automatic rimfire firearm that shoots .22 long rifle ammunition used to classified as a non-restricted is now one of many firearms banned by the federal government. Mainly used for plinking and target shooting, retail stores such as Cabela's used to carry them in both black and pink colour. Photographed on Friday, Jan. 16, 2026.

OTTAWA

— Starting Monday, gun owners will have until the end of March to declare their intention to participate in the federal program compensating individuals for turning over one of their government-banned guns, should they want the chance at money. 

After that date, gun owners who possess one of the more than 2,500 makes and models of guns which the government has deemed too dangerous for public use will not be able to receive compensation.

Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree, who formally announced the launch of the program on Saturday, suggested not every gun owner who registers to participate would be guaranteed compensation.

“I urge you to declare as early as you can because submitting a declaration does not guarantee compensation,” he announced. “Declarations will be processed on a first come, first serve basis.”

Public Safety Canada, the department responsible for administering the program, confirmed that around $250 million had been set aside for payments, in a not-for-attribution technical briefing from officials. It would determine compensation based on date of when the declaration was submitted, with the money expected to cover up to 136,000 guns.

Once submitted, participating firearms owners would be provided with information on collection efforts sometime in the spring, the department says.

Regardless of whether they choose to participate in the government program, gun owners with listed firearms face a deadline of having to turn them over to local police or have them deactivated, a process that renders them not useable, by the time an amnesty period shielding them from liability expires at the end of October, the federal government confirmed on Saturday.

Failing to participate would expose firearms owners to consequences including the possible revocation of their license, the minister said.

“The deadlines are real,” Anandasangaree said. “Please heed them.”

Speaking from Montreal, the minister referenced the Ecole Polytechnique shooting that took place on Dec.6, 1989, where a gunman shot and killed 14 women and injured others, using a Ruger Mini-14, one of the firearms the Liberals declared banned in 2020.

The minister also thanked Nathalie Provost, the Carney government’s Secretary of State for nature, who joined him at Saturday’s announcement, for her years of advocacy. Provost survived the 1989 shooting and spent years working as a gun-control advocate before entering federal politics in last year’s election.

The Quebec government has so far also been the only province to commit to assist the federal government in efforts to collect the banned firearms, having recently signed a $12-million agreement to help with coordination work.

Ontario has rejected taking part, same with Yukon and Manitoba. Anandasangaree said some “technical legal challenges,” also exist within Saskatchewan and Alberta, two jurisdictions whose provincial governments have taken legislative steps against implementing the federal program.

He confirmed on Saturday that those two provinces were not currently part of the program. Officials who briefed reporters confirmed that interested firearms owners in those jurisdictions would still be able register, given that the program was being rolled out nationally.

Anandasangaree said officials were working through issues with those provinces.

The minister on Saturday said that the federal government would work with the RCMP and local police forces to assist with collection efforts, as well as be ready to deploy mobile collection units. So far, only police in Winnipeg, Cape Breton and Halifax have confirmed plans to help, with many police across the Greater Toronto Area saying they have not yet made a decision.

Results from a six-week pilot program ran in parts of Cape Breton before Saturday’s official launch resulted in 16 people turning in 25 guns last year. The minister has defended the pilot as successful, despite how when it was initially launched officials said it could collect up to 200 guns.

The federal government also instituted a longer declaration period for the rollout of the national program as compared to the several weeks firearms owners had during the Cape Breton pilot in hopes of encouraging more uptake.

When it comes to collection efforts, Anandasangaree said “we have the capacity, we have the ability to ensure we have nationwide coverage,” save for Saskatchewan and Alberta.

The federal government says all possession and acquisition license holders would soon be notified about taking part in the program.

The long-awaited initiative was first promised by former prime minister Justin Trudeau during the 2019 federal election campaign, with an initial cabinet order banning the first batch of firearms, including the AR-15, announced in 2020.

Hundreds of more makes and models of guns have been added to that list since then, with some gun control advocates growing impatient with the Liberals to fulfill their promise of launching the long-promised compensation program.

Meanwhile, many firearms groups and their lobbyists have been calling on Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government to abandon the initiative, warning that it unfairly targets lawful firearms owners and lacks the ability to make any meaningful improvement to public safety or deal with shootings committed with illegally guns.

Anandasangaree at one point during Saturday’s press conference spoke directly to hunters, a group whom firearms groups as well as the Opposition Conservatives and other conservative premiers say have been wrongly included in the policy.

The minister listed how over 19,000 non-restricted makes and models of firearms remain available for hunting and sports shooting, in an attempt to defend the federal prohibition list and “buyback” policy from criticism that it amounts to a ban on hunting rifles.

The government also announced Saturday that the business portion of the compensation program which ran part of last year, would be reopening in the coming months.

Whether to include versions of the SKS, a popular hunting rifle, on the government’s list of “assault-style” firearms remains under review. While some gun-control advocates urge the Liberals to add it to the list, the minister has said additional consultation was needed with Indigenous communities, given how it is used for hunting.

With files from The Canadian Press

-National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Two cats sleeping together.

Parenthood and pet ownership should not be conflated, says an Alberta judge about a case involving a bad breakup between a former couple and their fight over four cats they once owned together.

“The legal test applicable to determining parenting after separation should be different than that for deciding the placement of pets after separation,” wrote Justice Douglas R. Mah in a

court document

outlining the reasons for his decision last month.

Two of the four felines have been living with one owner and two with the other since a previous court decision in December 2024. But one owner appealed, wanting full custody of the pets and urging Mah to consider the cats’ “best interest.”

Mah wrote, respectfully, that doing so is “overstating the nature of the inquiry that is required.” Each owner would keep two cats. Mah noted the difference between the purposes of parenthood, to nurture and raise children, and pet ownership, for companionship.

As pointed out in

an overview of the case posted online

by Canadian law firm McLennon Ross, “Alberta does not recognize a ‘best interests of the pet’ test” and “joint ownership may justify dividing pets between parties.”

“As one moves down the evolutionary scale, I am less convinced that pets should be regarded in law as anything more than property. I hope that does not sound harsh or that I am anti-animal rights,” Mah wrote.

“But apart from animal welfare laws, I don’t think the Court should be concerned with inquiring into the emotional life of pets in the order of hamsters, parrots, reptiles and tropical fish in determining disputed ownership.”

Although, he added, dogs and cats are recognized by society as having “a degree of sentience, are able to feel emotions and may form real bonds with people and peer animals.” Therefore, the emotional attachment between a pet and its owner is a factor.

Kishan Singh and Reba Smith lived together as a couple from 2016 to 2022, during which time they welcomed four cats into their home. “Salem came from an online advertisement. Diablo was acquired from the SPCA. Zora and Samara were both rescued as strays,” according to court documents.

After breaking up, they remained roommates until March 30, 2023, when they got into a “heated argument.” Smith left the home. When she returned the next day for her belongings, the cats were gone. Singh had removed them from the home, and they remained in his care for roughly six months.

The pets were given back to Smith on Oct. 3 following a court order. Then, as part of the Dec. 19, 2024 decision, the cats were divided between the couple. And after Mah’s decision, they “will stay where they are,” he wrote.

Singh had also appealed a lower court decision not to award him costs associated with caring for the cats during the time period in which he had all four. Mah rejected this appeal as well.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.