LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney smiles at Minister of Foreign Affairs Anita Anand during signing ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China on Thursday, Jan. 15, 2026.

BEIJING — As Prime Minister Mark Carney meets President Xi Jinping Friday in Beijing, few industries will be watching as intently as Canada’s canola producers and electric vehicle manufacturers.

For Canada’s canola industry, the hope is that Carney will secure relief from crippling Chinese tariffs ranging from 76 to 100 per cent that have effectively cut farmers off from their second largest export market. Same for Canadian pork and seafood workers, who are dealing with 25 per cent tariffs.

For Canada’s electric vehicle sector, the fear for many is that the prime minister lowers 100 per cent tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles that barred the cheap, heavily-state-subsidized autos from flooding the Canadian market.

Both issues are deeply interrelated as China imposed the canola tariffs in response to Canada’s EV tariffs, which were put in place years ago to follow the U.S. government’s lead in its battle for EV manufacturing supremacy in North America.

The high-profile meeting in Beijing’s Great Hall of the People at 11 a.m. Beijing time — the first one since 2017 and subsequent major chilling of diplomatic relationships — will be the culmination of a drastic about-face in Canadian foreign policy over the last year.

At this time last year, Canada viewed the world’s second largest economy as an “increasingly disruptive” force that was to be approached with great caution. In April, Carney described China as the greatest threat to Canada’s national security.

On Thursday in Beijing, Carney ushered in a “new era” in the Sino-Canadian relationship, describing China as a strategic partner and saying Canada is “heartened” by Xi Jinping’s leadership.

For many, the mark of success for this trip will be seeing if Carney manages to draw concessions from the Asian economic behemoth, namely on canola tariffs.

But any deal is fraught with landmines when its with China, a country infamous for its use of diplomatic and trade coercion.

One need not look farther than last August when China unveiled the 75.8 per cent tariffs on Canadian canola seed. The timing, just weeks before harvest season, was designed to deal maximum damage to the Canadian industry.

And there were the events that led to the big freeze in diplomatic relations in the first place: Canada’s arrest of Huawei top executive Wang Menzhou on behalf of the U.S., which led China to arbitrarily detain Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig for nearly three years in response.

In the weeks leading up to the trip, the Canadian government repeatedly signalled that meetings in Beijing would cover far more than just tariffs, automobiles and the agri-food industry. Officials mentioned energy, manufacturing, and increasing connections between the Chinese and Canadian people.

On Thursday, on Carney’s first day in Beijing, details of the breadth of discussion topics became clearer.

Both governments signed a half-dozen non-binding deals for further collaboration and communication in the areas of oil, gas and nuclear energy, lumber, culture, tourism, food inspection and public safety and policing. They even signed an agreement to start dealing issues related to pet food trade.

At the same time, Carney and some of his ministers met with CEOs of investment funds and Chinese giants in EV battery and electricity grid storage, e-commerce, wind energy and oil and gas.

More to come.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Four-year-old Jack Sullivan, left, and six-year-old Lily Sullivan, right, went reported missing from their home in rural Nova Scotia, in May 2025.

RCMP documents connected to the investigation into disappearance of Nova Scotia children Jack and Lilly Sullivan, are now showing that their mother told police her ex common-law partner was sometimes physically violent with her.

RCMP investigators had asked Malehya Brooks-Murray whether her then common-law partner Daniel Martell was physically abusive. She alleged that “he would try to block her, hold her down and once he pushed her. She said he would also take her phone from her when she tried to call her mom, which would sometimes be physical and hurt.”

These new allegations came to light when the RCMP recently released previously redacted portions of court documents as a result of a media application before a Nova Scotia judge. The application sought the release of more information connected to the early stages of the RCMP investigation into the children’s disappearance.

The documents were obtained by National Post on Thursday from the Nova Scotia Courts office.

Martell confirmed to police that the couple fought but denied any physical abuse. He said “they would yell at each other when they were fighting, but there was no physical violence in their relationship.”

He confessed that the couple fought over their finances. “Daniel said they were recently fighting about money,” the documents state.

Martell also told police about the development of his relationship with Jack and Lily’s mother.

According to the documents, he said “they had been together for about three years and it moved pretty quickly.”

He moved into “Malehya’s grandmother’s house with her after about two weeks. They met on Facebook dating.”

Martell told police at the time that “their relationship (was) good, they (had) ups and downs like any couple.”

It should be noted that Martell hasn’t been charged in connection with Brooks-Murray’s allegations. Therefore, they haven’t been tested in court.

The

couple later split

in the wake of the children’s disappearance.

Lilly, 6, and Jack, 4, were

reported missing

by Brooks-Murray and Martell on the morning of May 2, 2025. Brooks-Murray called 911 around 10 a.m. to report they had wandered away while she and Martell were sleeping with their toddler at their home in the rural community of Lansdowne, N.S.

The RCMP conducted a massive search, which turned up few clues. Investigators employed 22 of 23 of the province’s ground search and rescue teams, as well as two teams from New Brunswick. They spent 12,253 hours searching for the children.

Then, in October, they police service brought in

cadaver dogs

to search 40 kilometres of territory, but they failed to find any sign of the missing children.

The Mounties continue to work on

hundreds of tips

generated by the case.

In an October press release,

the RC
MP said

“With support from agencies across Canada, the investigative team is working to validate or eliminate leads and follow the evidence wherever it takes us. At this stage, and as we’ve said all along, we’re considering all possibilities. We’ll keep going until we determine, with certainty, the circumstances of the children’s disappearance and they’re found.”

Police have been concerned sharing information about the investigation could compromise a criminal case, should criminal charges eventually be laid.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


An artist's conception of the first hotel on the moon, as planned by a company called GRU.

A California start-up company is offering travellers an early reservation at a proposed hotel on the moon. But there’s a hefty deposit of $1,000,000 required. And the tentative opening date isn’t for another six years.

Galactic Resource Utilization Space

was founded by Skyler Chan, a graduate of the department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences at UC Berkeley. The company bio for the 22-year-old says he has built vehicle software at Tesla, constructed a NASA-funded 3D printer that was sent into space, and became an U.S. Air Force trained pilot at the age of 16.

The company moniker is shortened to GRU, which is also the name of the villain in the Despicable Me movies who at one point wanted to steal the moon. Indeed, the company’s white paper outlining its plans concludes: “It’s time to steal the moon.”

GRU launched its booking website this week. It outlines an ambitious plan — first GRU mission to the moon in 2029, habitat established in 2030 or so, and then — boom. A hotel with a view of the Atlantic Ocean. And the Pacific. Also the Indian. The company’s video shows expansive rooms with large windows, while an artist’s conception of the exterior looks like a stone temple from a video game, complete with moody lighting.

GRU says it will use “a proprietary habitation modules system and automated process for transforming lunar soil into durable structures.”

The white paper is a mix of hopeful philosophy and science. It talks about the need for humanity to become intergalactic, with the moon as a vital first step, and also includes charts on transportation costs and power requirements.

But it also lays out “The ‘Top Secret’ GRU Master Plan,” which is back-of-the-napkin simple: “1. Build the first hotel on the Moon. GRU solves off-world surface habitation. 2. Build America’s first Moon base (roads, mass drivers, warehouses, physical infrastructure on the Moon). 3. Repeat on Mars.”

The company is also looking for help, with

an ad seeking

a “founding member of technical staff,” a job it says will pay US$80,000 to US$130,000 a year.

“You will be responsible for structural and mechanical systems that must eventually survive vacuum, regolith, thermal extremes, and human life support constraints,” the ad reads. “This is a systems-heavy, deeply hands-on, high-agency role.”

It adds: “You’re not ‘supporting’ a program. You are the program.”

The million-dollar deposit is presumably refundable if the hotel fails to open, but there’s an additional fee of US$1,000 (non-refundable) to keep reservations restricted to serious and well-heeled travellers. GRU says it expects the average stay to be five nights. Travel time, barring any great advances in rocketry, is about three days each way.

Those with less than seven figures to spend can still buy merch from the GRU shop, which sells hats, tees, mugs and the ever popular space hoodie.

For $1,400 you can even

purchase a “moon brick.”

The company says the bricks are “produced from simulated lunar regolith simulant, stamped with the GRU logo,” adding: “These bricks are made using the same technology we’ll use to build structures on the Moon.”

The concept of hotels in orbit or on the moon is not a new one. One of the earliest was

unveiled more than 60 years ago

at the Conrad Hilton Hotel in downtown Chicago, where dancers performed a number called “out of this world” in a mockup of a hotel called the Lunar Hilton.

A Chicago-area newspaper noted in its issue of Aug. 27, 1958: “This could mean that the Hilton chain is dickering with the idea of opening the first hotel on the Moon.”

That was some ambitious dickering, given that the first human spaceflight was still more than two years away, and the first human lunar landing still more than an decade out. Would-be lunar tourists are still waiting for the grand opening.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Pete Hoekstra says the U.S. doesn't need Canada, warning that trade choices could reshape CUSMA renegotiations.

U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra delivered another blunt assessment of the Canada-U.S. relationship during a wide-ranging radio interview this week, saying the U.S “does not need Canada,” even as he praised the nations’ deep economic relationship.

Hoekstra, speaking with host Elias Makos on

Montreal’s CJAD 800

, defended recent rhetoric from President Donald Trump that the U.S. could easily replace Canadian-made products.

“The problem is, we don’t need their product. We don’t need cars made in Canada, we don’t need cars made in Mexico, we want to make them here,”

Trump told reporters

while visiting a Ford factory in Michigan on Tuesday.

“No, we don’t need Canada,” Hoekstra told Markos when pressed on Trump’s latest comment and similar ones he’s made about lumber, steel, energy and more.

He added, however, that businesses on both sides of the border have elected to integrate their supply chains under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and its successor, the Canada-U.S-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), under which they’ve created “a tremendous amount of prosperity and wealth and a tremendous number of high-quality, high-paying jobs.”

During his auto-plant stop, Trump, as he has repeatedly in the past, suggested the deal — which he took credit for instituting in 2016 during his first term in office — wasn’t as important to the U.S. as it is to Canada and Mexico, even calling it “irrelevant.” The agreement requires a mandatory review this year and will be extended for 16 years if all three countries agree to renewal. If they fail to do so, joint reviews will be required annually until CUSMA expires in 2036. Any of the counties is also free to leave as long as they provide six months’ notice to the others.

“Hopefully this fall we will have a new outline of how we do business together and whether those relationships that we have put in place… will foster and grow or whether Canadian companies and American companies will go their separate ways because of the decisions that are made by their governments,” Hoekstra said.

“There are key indications that the president recognizes the value of these relationships, but at the same time… we’ve got to get to a new agreement.”

Makos repeatedly turned to what he described as a growing sense of alienation among Canadians, citing polls showing declining favourability toward the U.S. and boycotts of American products.

A Nanos Research Group poll

in December found that 70 per cent of Canadians support keeping U.S. wine and spirits off the liquor store shelves, a move made by several provinces and territories as trade tensions mounted in early 2025.

Hoekstra pushed back, saying Canada is free to take whatever steps it believes strengthen its negotiating position, but warned such measures “kind of sets a tone for the relationship.”

“We haven’t banned any Canadian products in America,” he said, noting that the president, his administration and individual governors are not following suit with calls to boycott Canadian goods.

Asked about Trump’s own tone regarding Canada, Hoekstra said, “The president is his own messenger.”

He also accused Canadian premiers of engaging in unwarranted personal attacks on Trump, noting nobody on the American side is doing the same to Prime Minister Mark Carney.

“You have folks that just absolutely trash the president who are key government officials,” Hoekstra said without identifying anyone in particular. “I don’t like it, but if that’s what they want to do, that’s what they can do.”

Unprompted by Makos, the ambassador also touched on the subject of pre-clearance, which allows U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers to operate within Canadian airports to inspect and clear travellers before they head to the U.S., allowing them to bypass customs on arrival. He said if air traffic between the two countries continues to drop, as has been widely reported, the U.S. might have to re-examine the program.

“I’d have to report to Washington and say our resources may be better spent somewhere else,” he said. “That’s not a threat. It’s just a pure business analysis.”

As their conversation went on, Hoekstra warned against dumping — the practice of flooding a market with cheap goods. He said if Canada, “as a sovereign country,” wants to do business with China, which is its prerogative, it should expect a U.S. response if Chinese-made products are allowed to enter North America through Canadian channels.

“If you’re allowing EVs and other vehicles to come in from China, I would say don’t necessarily expect that the U.S. border is going to be porous,” he said.

Carney is in China for meetings this week and while

no deal had been struck to remove Canadian tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles

as of Thursday, the two nations had made progress on items such as energy, lumber and public safety.

Meanwhile, Hoekstra dismissed speculation that the U.S., following on Trump’s desire to acquire Greenland to keep it from falling into Russia or China’s hands, might intervene in Canada’s north. He highlighted the new agreement between the U.S., Canada and Finland

to advance the construction of ice breakers to patrol the waterways

indicate that the countries “are in lock step.”

Overall, Hoekstra, acknowledging “a little tension” at the moment, struck a reasonably optimistic tone and said he is “hopeful we end up in a good place.”

He said Canadians are welcome to “make it an emotional issue” and “debate the things that the president has said,” but his focus is on what’s good for American business.

“That’s my objective. I’m assuming that Mark Carney and his team are negotiating for what’s best in Canada and in eight or nine months, we’ll see exactly where that ends up.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Soldiers from the Royal Regiment of Canada walk with shovels on a snow-covered street on Jan. 15, 1999, Toronto.

On Thursday, Torontonians woke to a blanket of snow over the city with more coming down. Closures in the Greater Toronto Area included schools, universities, the Toronto Zoo and even the Don Valley Parkway, after black ice accumulated on the road. TTC routes and the airport were affected as Environment Canada issued a yellow alert, then upgraded it to orange.

But at least the city didn’t have to call in the army.

The memory of that day will remain as long as there are seasons. (Even if Toronto tries to forget, the rest of the country won’t.) It was almost exactly 27 years ago — Jan. 14, 1999 — and Toronto had just been hit with a walloping 41 centimetres of snow.

The blizzard of ’99 reached across the entire Quebec-City-to-Windsor corridor and down into the U.S., with Chicago getting more than 50 cm of the white stuff, and South Haven, Mich., more than 70.

Only Toronto, however, took the unprecedented step of bringing in troops to shovel it.

To be fair, it wasn’t just the blizzard that Toronto was dealing with. A record 118 cm of snow had fallen there in the first two weeks of January. And so on Jan. 13, Mayor Mel Lastman phoned federal defence minister Art Eggleton (himself a former Toronto mayor) to ask for help. More than 300 local reservists answered the call, as did 438 troops dispatched from Petawawa, Ont.

“Look, you don’t know how much snow there was,” Lastman told National Post in 2019 on the 20th anniversary of the event. “I took a drive with my driver through the residential streets in downtown Toronto. You couldn’t get an ambulance down there. You couldn’t get a fire truck through there. They were saying on the radio there was going to be another 50 cm of snow or something.”

 Soldiers from Royal Regiment of Canada shovel snow on Jan. 15, 1999, in downtown Toronto.

He added that it wasn’t even his idea.

“It wasn’t me who came up with it,” he said. “It was my wife. When I told her what the heck was going on, she said, ‘Call in the army!’ I would have been kicking myself in the ass if I hadn’t.”

Eggleton noted: “The military — the reserve military, particularly — had been called out on many emergency circumstances right across the country: floods, ice storms, forest fires. It’s not uncommon for the military to be brought in to support and supplement what the first responders and local citizens are doing.”

Be that as it may, the rest of Canada had a field day with scenes of soldiers shovelling sidewalks and steering armoured personnel carriers through downtown intersections. One clip showed Lastman himself riding in what looked like a tank. A second blizzard — of snark — fell on the city.

“Mayor Mel dials 911,” jeered a headline in Vancouver’s The Province.

“Toronto crippled — again — by snow,” sneered another in The Saskatoon StarPhoenix.

It was front-page news in the Ottawa Citizen, which wrote: “Embarrassed Toronto struggles while rest of country hides a smile.”

Prince Edward Island, an entire province with a population less than a tenth of Toronto’s, offered to help.

“I saw on CTV just the extent of the snow that Toronto had received in five or six days,” Mike Currie, P.E.I. Minister of Transportation at the time, recalled. “I had discussions with some staff here, and by the evening I contacted Toronto and said, ‘If you want, we’ll put together a team.’ They said, ‘Please, because we don’t have anything.’”

His team chartered a bus, crossed the recently opened Confederation Bridge, drove through the night and arrived in Toronto the next day, ready to pitch in. They stayed for two weeks, and Torontonians applauded the help.

 Canadian Army officer John Dunn patrols downtown Toronto on Jan. 15, 1999, in an armoured personnel carrier following heavy snow and frigid temperatures in eastern and central Canada.

“It was a great gift for P.E.I.,” said Currie. “For many years to come, a lot of people from Toronto and Ontario patronized our tourism industry, our seafood industry. We benefitted from it for a long time after, and still do.”

He added: “I felt bad for them, because a lot of people were making fun of Toronto. I just didn’t think it was the right thing to do at the time.”

Maybe not, but it continues. Lastman, who died in 2021, told National Post in 2019: “I was in a taxi the other day. The taxi driver says, ‘I came the year you brought in the army!’ It was really funny. It happens to me all the time now.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


This video grab taken on Jan. 14, 2026 from UGC images posted on social media on Jan. 9, 2026 shows cars set on fire during a protest on Saadat Abad Square in Tehran.

Foreign minister Anita Anand in a social post on Thursday said a Canadian citizen has died in Iran.

“Peaceful protests by the Iranian people — asking that their voices be heard in the face of the Iranian regime’s repression and ongoing human rights violations — has led the regime to flagrantly disregard human life. This violence must end. Canada condemns and calls for an immediate end to the Iranian regime’s violence,” she posted on X.

Anand extended her deepest condolences and said the officials are in contact with the victim’s family in Canada.

— More to come

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


New Democrat MP Leah Gazan.

OTTAWA — Winnipeg MP Leah Gazan says she’s backing activist Avi Lewis as the NDP’s next leader, becoming the first of the party’s seven-member caucus to endorse a leadership candidate.

Gazan said in a

video released Thursday morning

that Lewis was the right person to lead the party in a “critical moment” for Canada and the world.

“I’m supporting Avi (Lewis) because he can blow open the doors of our movement, making it a home for everyone who believes in economic, social and environmental justice,” said Gazan.

Gazan has been critical of Lewis’s moderate rival, Edmonton MP Heather McPherson. She wrote in

a September social media

post that McPherson’s suggestion that the NDP subjected would-be joiners to a “purity test” was an implicit rebuke of calls for justice from the various “marginalized communities” that the party has historically fought for.

Lewis

said on social media

that it was a “profound honour” to pick up the endorsement from Gazan.

Lewis is widely considered

the most hard-left

of the major candidates in the race, calling for a national wealth tax, more government control of food distribution and the

phasing-out of fossil fuels

.

He and wife Naomi Klein, a fellow activists, are two of the authors of

the 2015 Leap Manifesto

, a document calling for the NDP to embrace a radical social and ecological justice agenda.

McPherson

picked up a key endorsement

from former Timmins, Ont. MP Charlie Angus earlier this week and has also been endorsed by Rachel Notley, the former NDP premier of Alberta.

Lewis, McPherson and union leader Rob Ashton are considered the three top contenders in the NDP leadership race, with the party’s next leader to be announced on Mar. 29 in Winnipeg.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney is presented with flowers from Lu You Ci, 11, as he is officially welcomed to Beijing, China on Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2026.

BEIJING — Prime Minister Mark Carney ushered in what he called a “new era” in the Canada-China relationship Thursday by renewing and updating a series of old expired non-binding agreements with the Asian superpower on energy and public safety.

In the regal Great Hall of the People in Beijing, Carney and Chinese Premier Li Qiang — the second most powerful figure in the country — watched as their minister signed over a half-dozen memoranda of understanding (MOU) and letters of intent Thursday afternoon.

The countries also signed a Canada-China economic and trade cooperation “roadmap” that sets the foundation of how both countries plan to reignite trade after years of frigid relations.

“China is prepared to work with Canada to follow through on the important consensus between our leaders and move forward our strategic forward on a trajectory of healthy, steady and sustainable development,” Qiang said through a translator.

“This is indeed a very important meeting and the most auspicious start to the new year and a new era of relations between Canada and China. We are heartened by the leadership of President Xi Jinping,” Carney responded.

China is a key part of Carney’s plan to double non-U.S. exports within 10 years in order to reduce Canada’s dependence on the American market. Industry Minister Mélanie Joly noted Thursday that trade discussions with the Chinese are “more predictable and stable” than with Canada’s southern neighbour.

But there was no sign of tariff relief on Chinese electric vehicles or Canadian canola from either country on the first full day of Carney’s trip.

Canada imposed 100 per cent tariffs on Chinese EVs in 2024, earning a stark rebuke from China in the form of 75 to 100 per cent tariffs on Canadian canola imports and 25 per cent border levies on pork and seafood.

The tariffs on canola have effectively halted all Canadian exports to China, which was the industry’s second biggest international market, dealing it a massive blow.

With Carney and Li them overlooking them, ministers Joly, Anita Anand, Tim Hodgson, Maninder Sidhu and Heath MacDonald as well as Canada’s ambassador to China Jennifer May signed the agreements with their counterparts Thursday.

The six MOUs signed Thursday cover a range of industries such as energy, lumber, policing and public safety, culture and tourism. The two governments also signed a new agreement to facilitate inter-country trade and inspection of pet food and the trade roadmap.

But many of the MOUs were renewals or updates of previous deals that had expired during the years of diplomatic row between China and Canada beginning in 2018.

The energy MOU re-upped a 2017 memorandum on energy cooperation and another on nuclear energy signed in 2014. It aims to deepen cooperation between both countries’ energy sectors by re-establishing formal communication channels between their respective resource ministries. It specifically mentions crude oil, liquefied natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas.

But the agreement does not include purchasing commitments by either country.

“They are very clear that they would like more Canadian energy products,” Energy Minister Tim Hodgson told reporters Thursday evening. He added there would be many more trips to China in the future.

Both governments also renewed a previous deal between the RCMP and China’s Ministry of Public Security to exchange intelligence and evidence in a host of investigations such as counter-terrorism, cybercrime, organized crime and drugs.

One goal of these agreements is to signal to businesses in each country which sectors are primed for new investments.

“If they’re going to invest in our country, they need to make sure that our companies are able to invest and have access to stability and have access to a form of certainty,” Joly told reporters.

She said that she would be meeting with Canadian auto parts company Magna International, Manulife and BMO on Friday.

But the biggest meeting Friday will be Carney’s bilateral with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the first such meeting for a Canadian prime minister in China since 2017.

Before the document signing and dinner with Qiang, Carney and a couple of his ministers met with six major Chinese private and state-run enterprises Thursday.

The companies included e-commerce and investment mastodon Alibaba, state-run giants China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) and Industrial & Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), electric vehicle battery and grid storage manufacturer CATL, investment firm Primavera and wind energy company Envision.

Each of those organizations are among the biggest in the world in their respective fields.

The Prime Minister’s Office does not share readouts of Carney’s meetings with businesses.

Speaking to press before a meeting with his Canadian counterpart Anand, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said in Mandarin that both countries are “doing the right things” diplomatically.

He also described Carney’s visit to China as a “turning point” after years of frigid diplomatic relations.

Much like her successor on Wednesday, Joly refused to say if she still believed China was an “increasingly disruptive” force in the global market, as described in the 2022 Indo-Pacific strategy she spearheaded.

Chinese media’s coverage of Carney’s trip has been relatively muted so far, with a few brief articles from state-run websites noting the prime minister’s arrival.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


A Toronto lawyer facing a string of weapons charges has seen his license to practice law in Ontario suspended.

A Toronto lawyer charged last year with a string of criminal offences, including allegedly driving with a suspended licence with a machete in his car and threatening people at a store with a box cutter, has seen his licence to practice law in Ontario suspended temporarily.

The Law Society of Ontario learned last August that Behrouz Shafiei-Sararoodi, who goes by Shafiei, was facing criminal charges that he hadn’t told them about.

“There is no dispute that Mr. Shafiei has struggled with mental health and substance abuse difficulties. It appears likely that these difficulties have resulted in alleged criminal conduct and eviction from his residence,” according to a recent decision from a Law Society Tribunal.

“What is clear is that Mr. Shafiei’s life has been chaotic and that this appears to be connected to mental health and substance abuse. While Mr. Shafiei’s position is that this has not affected his clients, the complaint from (one who was convicted for driving while under suspension and operating a motor vehicle without insurance after Shafiei failed to show up to defend him at trial) suggests otherwise.”

His participation in the tribunal hearing “was chaotic,” said the decision dated Jan. 7.

“He failed to comply with directions concerning filing evidence and, in the end, failed to provide any reliable evidence in support of his position. He asked that the motion be held down until his lawyer appeared, but no lawyer appeared and no explanation was provided.”

The tribunal concluded “that the evidence and Mr. Shafiei’s conduct in this proceeding demonstrates reasonable grounds for believing that there is a significant risk of harm to members of the public, and to the public interest in the administration of justice if an order is not made.”

Shafiei’s “essential position is that the chaos that has plagued him since the spring of 2025 has ended and that he has put a proper plan in place such that he should be permitted to practise with restrictions,” said the tribunal.

“We disagree.”

The tribunal indicated it has no “medical evidence supporting this claim of change. Nor is there any evidence to support his claim that he has a plan of support in place that can be relied on to reasonably ensure that the change is maintained and that clients and the public interest in the administration of justice are not at risk. ”

The tribunal suspended his licence to practice law on an interlocutory basis.

“Mr. Shafiei appears thoughtful and … he appears to be doing his best to cope with and surmount important and difficult challenges,” said the tribunal.

“While we are unable to conclude on the evidence that he is at a point that continued practice should be permitted even with restrictions, we note that (an) interlocutory suspension or restriction order may be varied or cancelled on the basis of fresh evidence or a material change in circumstances.”

Shafiei “disputes the criminal allegations made against him,” said the decision.

But he “does not dispute that he has struggled with mental health and substance abuse difficulties. He acknowledges that he has experienced a crisis,” it said.

Police charged Shafiei on April 22, 2025, with possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose, when he was allegedly caught driving with “an accessible machete” in his vehicle.

When a Law Society investigator interviewed him last September, Shafiei “claimed that it was there because he had been helping his mother with landscaping.”

He also “claimed that he did not know that his driver’s licence had been suspended,” said the tribunal’s decision.

Police charged Shafiei on July 24, 2025, with possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose and uttering threats, for allegedly threatening people in a Shoppers Drug Mart while armed with a box cutter.

He told the investigator that the box cutter incident started with a store employee following him around.

“Mr. Shafiei stated that he confronted the employee, claiming that the employee was discriminating against him, at which point the employee called a manager. Mr. Shafiei stated that, in the interim, he picked up a box cutter from either the floor, or a shelf, because he ‘needed to open something.’”

He “claimed that the manager was aggressive with him from the outset. Mr. Shafiei stated that the manager accused Mr. Shafiei of holding a weapon, referring to the box cutter. Mr. Shafiei appeared to deny holding the box cutter as a weapon and blamed the store for leaving the box cutter out,” said the decision.

He was charged July 28, 2025, with possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose “for allegedly possessing a hammer while threatening to fight people.”

Of that incident, Shafiei “stated that he was camping on the beach alone when he was confronted by a crowd of people who were playing volleyball and who rushed at him,” said the decision.

“He stated that he became defensive and yelled at them to back up. Mr. Shafiei acknowledged having a hammer, claiming that he was using it to set up a tent.”

He “denied running around the beach with a hammer chasing or attacking people,” said the decision.

“Mr. Shafiei acknowledged possessing what he believed was crystal methamphetamine. Mr. Shafiei advised that he had not consumed the drug when he was arrested and charged. He advised that the drug charge was later withdrawn.”

Shafiei said of the beach incident that “a large group of people suddenly confronted and surrounded (him), accusing him of attempting to break into a car; he maintains that he was the one under threat and that the narrative was inverted when the police were called.”

The Law Society heard from another lawyer last fall who had known Shafiei since 2022, said the decision. “She advised that sometime in 2024, his behaviour changed.”

Around October 2024, she’d seen Shafiei “lying on the ground in a park near his apartment building. Mr. Shafiei was ‘completely disoriented’ and ‘out of it,’” said the decision. “She saw a shattered glass drug pipe near him. She shook him awake, and he did not recognize her. He then walked home, wobbling.”

When the investigator went to Shafiei’s apartment last October “representatives of the building’s property management confirmed that eviction proceedings had been initiated against Mr. Shafiei.”

The landlord had obtained two eviction orders for Shafiei: one for “non-payment of rent. The second order was for substantial interference with the interests of the landlord concerning clutter and junk being stored in and around the parking area and damage and vandalism to the walls around the parking space.”

Shafiei asked for and was denied an adjournment at his second eviction hearing on Sept. 22, 2025, after he “alleged a medical diagnosis that would provide additional information” for the adjudicator.

“Specifically, Mr. Shafiei said that he has ongoing mental health issues, including depression and hoarding.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping react after posing for photos ahead of a bilateral meeting at Gimhae Air Base in Busan, South Korea, on Oct. 30, 2025.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — It’s been nearly a decade since a Canadian prime minister set foot in Beijing. Now, sensing an opportunity, Prime Minister Mark Carney

has arrived in the Chinese capital

, where he will meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday and attempt to reset Canada-China relations following years of tensions between the two countries. His visit is also meant to signal that Ottawa is ready to carve its own foreign policy, independent of Washington.

But the trip comes at a volatile time for Canada, when its ties to both China and the U.S. are strained. From

the Huawei affair

and tit-for-tat trade sanctions with Beijing to U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canadian steel, lumber, and copper, his 51st state rhetoric — plus the looming renegotiation of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) — pressure is building for Ottawa to bolster and expand its trade ties.

Carney has said his visit is an opportunity to continue diversifying Canadian trade away from its overwhelming reliance on the United States in a way that benefits both Canada and China.

“China is our second-largest trading partner, and the world’s second-largest economy,” Carney posted on X before his flight on Tuesday. “A pragmatic and constructive relationship between our nations will create greater stability, security, and prosperity on both sides of the Pacific.”

Forging warmer economic ties with Beijing, however, poses challenges that range from security issues to not overstepping in ways that might offend the White House. Is Carney up to the task?

Beijing’s bid

Beijing has little to lose and much to gain by hosting Carney.

Xi sees Carney’s election as prime minister as an opportunity to repair relations between the two countries, which collapsed after the 2018 Huawei arrest and the “two Michaels” crisis. Xi and former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau were known for their

frosty exchanges

.

“China sees Carney’s succession as an opportunity to patch up relations after years of deterioration,” said Dominic Chiu, senior analyst at Eurasia Group. “It wants to bring Canada closer to its economic orbit — though it knows there are limits.”

Still, China is looking to attract U.S. partners and expand its trade ties in ways that give it more leverage in those countries. In Canada’s case, it wants to see tariffs on its electric vehicles eased and to normalize trade conditions with a G7 economy, Chiu explained.

He said China’s goal is to build closer economic links and encourage strategic independence in Ottawa’s policymaking, but other experts warn that Canada risks being used as a diplomatic “wedge state” against the U.S.

“Beijing’s goal is to create wedges — between the U.S. and Canada, but also Japan, Korea, and Taiwan,” said Stephen Nagy, a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute and professor of politics and international studies at the International Christian University.

“(Beijing) would like to pull Canada into a tighter economic relationship … but they understand that if they just pull Canadian trade three or four per cent away from the United States, that this increases Chinese interest in Canada.”

Strengthening the bilateral relationship depends upon economic interdependence for China, said Colin Tessier-Kay, research fellow and program manager with the China Center at Hudson Institute.

“Right now, Beijing’s aiming to promote cooperation across trade — the energy and agriculture sectors, in particular,” he said, noting that Chinese officials are expecting discussions to broaden cooperation in areas that are mutually beneficial while also seeking progress on alleviating commercial obstacles, like the existing EV tariffs.

The trouble, Nagy points out, is that “deep economic relations with China are often weaponized,” as seen with South Korea, Japan, Lithuania, Norway, France, Australia, Germany, and many other countries.

“We have to be very cautious about how we engage,” he added, referring to Canada.

Risks and rewards for Canada

Carney’s willingness to engage signals both his electoral pragmatism and frustration with Washington’s unpredictability over the past year.

“Standing up to the United States goes down well with voters,” said Andrew Hale, fellow at Washington-based Advancing American Freedom, referring to Carney’s tough-on-America — aka “Elbows Up” — campaign and how Trump’s rhetoric netted the Liberals a surprise win last year.

“Whether it’s economically wise or not — that’s another story,” Hale added.

Carney is looking for a reset in relations and an opportunity to secure relief from China’s steep duties on Canadian canola, which have effectively closed the Chinese market to Canadian farmers from Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba.

The prime minister is facing pressure from these Western provinces that rely on trade with China. He wants to help those farmers and avoid appearing anti-West.

Getting that movement, however, will be tough, said Chiu.

“China will want Canada to lower tariffs on its EVs before conceding on or reciprocating by lowering tariffs on canola products,” he said, pointing to China’s strict quid pro quo on that front.

But, Nagy said, Carney is unlikely to see any movement from China this week because he has arrived in Beijing without any real leverage.

“The relationship with the United States is shaky, and (Carney) hasn’t signed any trade or economic security agreements with close partners like Japan and South Korea,” said Nagy.

Such agreements might have given Beijing reason to play ball, he explained, questioning the timing and sequence of Carney’s diplomatic efforts.

Xi and Carney are both aware of each other’s limitations and are likely just looking at this as a baby step toward rebuilding ties.

“This is just a starting point for (Canada) to actually engage in a much more meaningful way … It’s about re-establishing trust between both sides,” said Reza Hasmath, a politics professor at the University of Alberta.

Trump’s red lines

Trying to draw Beijing closer to Ottawa, however, risks angering Trump, who tends to react poorly to perceived betrayal, and this comes just months before this summer’s tariffs renegotiation.

The president already

shared some harsh words

about CUSMA this week, just as Carney was setting off on this trip.

“There’s no real advantage to (CUSMA), it’s irrelevant,” Trump said on Tuesday in Detroit. “Canada would love it. They need it.”

So what would set Trump off? Canada eliminating tariffs on Chinese EVs would be a red line for Washington, Chiu said, as would any concessions on national security intelligence, critical minerals, or dual-use technologies, to a point where it could jeopardize U.S. national security.

“A strategic partnership must not be a blank check,” said Hale, noting how any movement on tariffs will take time. “It should be calibrated with security safeguards, reciprocity, and principles based on democratic norms.”

So deep trade concessions are off the table — as are any agreements related to critical minerals, security, and technology, which narrows any room for deal-making.

“This is the impossible task,” said Nagy. “If he signs anything significant with China, the Trump administration’s going to be quite upset with Canada and accuse Canada of being a liability to the United States.”

That is why none of the experts are expecting a breakthrough this week.

“I would lower my expectations significantly,” said Hasmath, noting that just speaking to each other is an accomplishment after so many years of strained relations.

Chiu agreed: “This is not the grand finale; it’s the end of the beginning of improved ties between Canada and China.”

Still, Nagy sees room for hope that Canada can strategically engage with Beijing in the long term without China being able to weaponize its economy and economic relations to shape Ottawa’s behaviour.

Canada, he said, can balance closer ties with China by quietly strengthening deterrence with Taiwan, Japan, Southeast Asia, and the U.S. — and prioritizing non-weaponizable sectors to avoid coercion.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.