LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

NDP leadership candidates, from left: Rob Ashton, Tanille Johnston, Avi Lewis, Heather McPherson and Tony McQuail, following the NDP French language leadership debate in Montreal on Thursday, November 27, 2025.

MONTREAL — If now-backbench Liberal MP Steven Guilbeault was looking for sympathy, he won’t find it from four of the five candidates vying to be the next NDP leader.

Edmonton MP Heather McPherson had a blunt assessment when asked in a post-debate scrum about the anti-oil Guilbeault’s decision to

quit Prime Minister Mark Carney’s cabinet

in protest over an agreement with Alberta towards building a new oil pipeline.

“Mr. Guilbeault quit cabinet but he did not quit the (Liberal) party and he did not quit the caucus. If he really believed this was a fundamental problem for him, why didn’t he walk away?” said McPherson.

“This just means he’s not interested in doing the work,” she continued.

Guilbeault, a longtime campaigner for stricter climate policies, announced hours earlier that he would be stepping down as minister of Canadian identity and culture, but would continue to serve as the Liberal MP for the Montreal riding of Laurier—Sainte-Marie. This was after the

prime minister appeared in Calgary with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith to sign a memorandum of understanding.

It said that the two governments would work towards a building a new oil pipeline to the West Coast and Ottawa would suspend controversial “clean energy” regulations advanced by Guilbeault when he was formerly environment minister that would have forced provinces to find other means to generate electricity besides fossil fuels.

McPherson, the lone MP at the debate, didn’t mince words when asked if Guilbeault would be welcome in her caucus.

“I’m quite proud to say that the New Democratic Party does not accept floor-crossers,” said McPherson.

Filmmaker Avi Lewis gave a succinct “No!” when asked whether the NDP should take in Guilbeault.

The third major contender, union leader and former dockworker Rob Ashton, said that the voters in Guilbeault’s riding missed the boat by not choosing NDP candidate Nima Machouf in April’s election.

“Nima would have been fighting for her community. Nima wouldn’t have quit, because Nima’s not a quitter, she’s a fighter,” said Ashton.

The only candidate at the debate who said he’d welcome Guilbeault with open arms was Tony McQuail, an organic farmer and self-described “green progressive.”

“Yes, Today!” said McQuail in French when asked whether he thought the NDP should invite Guilbeault to join the party.

Upstart candidate Tanille Johnston, currently a local official in Vancouver Island, acknowledged that there were several disaffected Liberal MPs on B.C.’s coast, but said the NDP should look elsewhere when recruiting new candidates.

“We just really take a lot of pride in our environment in B.C., and I’m not so sure that reaching out to kind of disenchanted Liberals — because the prime minister decided to sign a (memorandum of understanding) for a pipeline — if they needed to go that far to finally realize ‘maybe this isn’t the party for me’, I’m not so sure that that’s where our relationship should start with the NDP in B.C.,” said Johnston.

Several member of the

Liberals’ B.C. caucus said publicly

in the days leading up to the announcement that they were against reversing the Trudeau-era ban on West Coast oil tanker traffic.

The next NDP debate will coincidentally take place in B.C.’s Lower Mainland in February.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Watch the first NDP leadership debate here:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The Alberta-based Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms has filed a legal challenge to the Waterloo Region District School Board's decision to mandate the reading of land acknowledgements at school council meetings.

The Alberta-based

Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

has filed a legal challenge over Waterloo Region District School Board’s decision to mandate the reading of land acknowledgements at school council meetings, while prohibiting debate on the issue.

The application has been brought on behalf of

Geoffrey Horsman

, a biochemistry professor and member of the Kitchener-Waterloo Collegiate and Vocational School Council as the father of three children attending district schools.

Horsman’s concerns began when the council started opening its meetings with land acknowledgements despite the fact that no vote or debate had ever been held on the practice, says the JCCF. In the spring of 2025, he sought to have the matter placed on the agenda for discussion. However, the council chair declined and referred him to the school principal.

On May 9, says JCCF, the principal informed Horsman that the board requires land acknowledgements at all school council meetings and that the topic could not be debated.

The judicial review challenges the Board’s conduct on three grounds:

  • mandating land acknowledgements compels Horsman to sit through a statement that contradicts his belief in the inherent dignity and equality of all people;
  • prohibiting any discussion of land acknowledgements at school council meetings suppresses his ability to raise or challenge the issue;
  • the Board has no statutory power under the Ontario Education Act or Regulation 612/00 to dictate school council practices or impose ideological recitations.

The dispute follows a related instance that arose in September, when another parent, Cristina Bairos Fernandes, raised an objection to opening parent involvement committee meetings with a land acknowledgement, reports

Juno News

.

The chair of the committee agreed to “note” her objection but

Scott Miller, the board’s director of education,

intervened stating that: “I think we’ve been pretty clear as a district school board what we believe, our commitment to Truth and Reconciliation, call to action. And that’s across the province.”

The committee ultimately voted to record the objection, but exclude mention of the director’s interference. Horseman was one of a few parent-committee members who requested the minutes include the director’s interference “rather than (leaving it out) as though it never happened.”

It wasn’t the first time a parent faced roadblocks for objecting to land acknowledgements at parent-run meeting, says the

JCCF

. In April, Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board parent Catherine Kronas raised concerns about imposing political speech in government settings. In response, she was suspended from attending council meetings. However, she was later reinstated following legal intervention from the

JCCF

.

Constitutional lawyer Hatim Kheir stated that Kronas’ comments “were a reasonable and measured expression of a viewpoint held by many Canadians.”

Further, he said: “The Board’s decision to suspend her from the Council, which she has a right to sit on as an elected parent member, is an act of censorship that offends the right to freedom of expression.”

In both instances, the parents expressed concern that reciting land acknowledgements is a form of political speech and questioned their appropriateness in government institutions.

 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Federal NDP leadership candidates, from left, Tanille Johnston, Avi Lewis, Tony McQuail, Heather McPherson and Rob Ashton.

NDP leadership candidates are taking part in the first official debate of the campaign Thursday evening in Montreal.

There are currently five contenders. Edmonton MP Heather McPherson, documentary filmmaker Avi Lewis and union leader Rob Ashton are considered the frontrunners. Campbell River, B.C., city councillor Tanille Johnston and organic farmer Tony McQuail are also running.

While the debate is taking place in Quebec, only 60 per cent of it will be in French, and the rest in English. The candidates (all anglophones) will also be allowed to wear earpieces to receive an English translation. However, if a candidate answers a French question in English, they will be cut off.

The party’s lone Quebec MP, Alexandre Boulerice, is hosting and will kick off the evening’s agenda with a welcome message.

Watch the 90-minute debate live, below, starting at 7 p.m. ET.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


When Quebec politicians talk about restrictions on religion, most of the time they mean Muslims.

Alberta’s use this month of the notwithstanding clause

to shield three controversial laws from judicial scrutiny has more or less united the chattering classes in outrage.

Even Amnesty International got in on the act

, accusing Alberta of “violat(ing) the spirit of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.”

“This is one of the most consequential actions our government will take during our time in office,”

Premier Danielle Smith said

of limiting “gender-affirming” care, including puberty-blockers and surgery, for children under 16; new parental-notification and -consent rules with respect to children who wish to “socially transition” at school; and limiting female-only sports to participants who were born female.

As ever, it will be interesting to compare the reaction now that

Quebec has redeployed Section 33 in its own culture war

— not against trans rights allegedly run amok, but against the most basic religious freedoms. Among other things, Bill 9, tabled Thursday in the National Assembly, does the following:

  • bans prayer in public, without prior authorization;
  • bans prayer in private, for example in prayer rooms provided in public institutions such as schools;
  • bans students and staff at all levels of public education, including day care, from covering their faces at school — i.e., from wearing the niqab or burqa; and
  • bans public institutions from offering only meals “based on a religious precept or tradition” — i.e., halal or kosher food.

And yes, it invokes the notwithstanding clause to protect itself from meddling judges. Somehow, though, that just never seems to be as controversial in the Rest of Canada when Quebec does it. Supporting trans rights is cool in a way that supporting religious rights isn’t.

Double standards aside, Quebec’s new legislation is fundamentally disreputable on several levels. If the province’s efforts to improve secularism have often seemed strangely deferential to Catholicism — the very religion that the Quiet Revolution rejected — Bill 9 privileges the elderly: Long-term care homes, unlike public schools, are exempt from the prayer-room prohibition.

It’s not hard to see why.

According to Statistics Canada’s General Social Survey

, in 2019, 58 per cent of Quebecers born between 1940 and 1959 were “affiliated” with a religion and that their faith was “somewhat or very important” to them. Just 28 per cent of those born between 1980 and 1999 said the same — the lowest in any region. And older people vote.

But the fact it’s easier to target younger Quebecers of faith doesn’t vindicate the effort. Quite the opposite, I would say.

It’s disreputable, too, because when Quebec politicians talk about “religion” in this context, roughly 97 per cent of the time they mean Muslims. (The other three per cent of the time they mean Jews.) Quebecers had every right to be perturbed this summer by

the sight of scores of Muslims praying to Allah with the Notre-Dame Basilica in the background

. That was an unambiguous provocation by the only religion that does that sort of thing in Canada.

If Quebec were honest, it would just make Bill 9 exclusively about Islam and leave the other religions alone. The notwithstanding clause would work just as well.

But that would be too honest, I suspect. Politicians would balk at seeing such specific discrimination laid out in black and white. They would insist on the tatty fig leaf of consistency. And so not only will Muslims who

don’t

protest-pray outside Christian landmarks now lose their spaces for quiet individual prayer, so will everyone else.

There is no reason to believe it will stop here. In provincial politics, there’s really no one to oppose the broader push to limit minority rights, both religious and linguistic. You might hope the Liberals would step up, but leader Pablo Rodriguez has argued (preposterously) that restrictions on civil servants’ attire

brought “social peace” to the province

— so there’s no help there. Plus, having briefly enjoyed a post-leadership bump in the polls, Rodriguez is now mired in

vote-buying allegations

with respect to his leadership campaign. (“What else did you expect from Pablo Rodriguez?” is a reasonable question to put to the party.)

The next obvious step will be to ban the niqab and burqa in all public places. Then attention will turn to the hijab, which students are still allowed to wear — for now. And anglophones and allophones still have lots of rights — maybe too many.

None of this is Ottawa’s doing. Indeed, there may not be anything anyone in Ottawa can say to affect this situation positively. But if federal politicians are going to pick and choose which rights to support and which to ignore, or

where

to support them, then they deserve to be judged just as harshly as the cowards in Quebec City targeting all religions for fear of one.

National Post

cselley@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Troy Edward William Clayton, who was just identified as a homicide victim, is escorted into Halifax provincial court in this undated photo.
Ryan Taplin - The Chronicle Herald

A self-admitted “nasty drunk” sentenced to six years in prison nearly five years ago for killing a Halifax man with one punch has just been identified as a homicide victim.

Troy Edward William Clayton pleaded guilty to manslaughter in February of 2021 for the 2017 killing of Benjamin Lokeny.

“The Nova Scotia Medical Examiner Service conducted an autopsy and identified the victim as 59-year-old Troy Clayton from Halifax,” said a Thursday news release from Halifax Regional Police spokesman Const. Martin Cromwell.

The force doesn’t “believe the incident was random.”

Halifax police “are looking for anyone who may have dashcam footage from Gottingen Street, between Charles Street and Uniacke Street, from 11 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. on Wednesday Nov. 26, to contact police. Those with video or information are asked to call police at 902-490-5020,” said the statement.

It noted “Halifax Regional Police extend their condolences to Mr. Clayton’s loved ones.”

“We are in the early stages of the investigation and, at this time, do not have information to share regarding a possible motive,” Cromwell said in an email in response to a question about whether investigators think Clayton’s death had anything to do with Lokeny’s killing.

Police won’t say how Clayton died. “We are also in the midst of collecting witness statements, so we are not ready to release further details about how Mr. Clayton was killed,” Cromwell said.

According to the January 2023 decision granting Clayton full parole, he punched Lokeny “once in the face. (Lokeny) fell backwards and hit his head on the sidewalk; (Clayton) then walked away from the scene.”

Lokeny died from his injuries a month later. His cause of death: blunt force trauma to the head.

Clayton told the parole board that Lokeny “kind of” provoked him before he struck him in the face.

After he discovered Lokeny died from his injuries, Clayton didn’t think he “would face any serious charges,” given that (he’d) only punched him once,” said the parole decision.

Clayton wasn’t arrested for the killing until March of 2019. He got out on parole in January 2023.

“Asked about your involvement in multiple assaults between 2017 and 2019, you said that when you are drunk you simply react without thinking, and that you were a ‘nasty drunk.’ The women against whom you used violence, you said, were fellow addicts who also were violent towards you,” said his 2023 parole decision.

At the time of its writing, Clayton’s criminal record stretched back more than three decades, with 76 prior convictions. He garnered 14 more between the time of Lokeny’s death and Clayton’s arrest for that killing.

“Over half of these convictions are related to failures to comply with court ordered sanctions, while the rest are made up of property related offences, drug related offences, impaired driving, failure to stop at the scene of an accident, as well as uttering threats and six convictions for assault,” said the parole board.

The judge who sentenced him for manslaughter noted Clayton’s guilty plea, the absence of weapons and that he only hit Lokeny once were mitigating factors in his case.

“Aggravating factors were your criminal record, your history of alcoholism, and the serious results of the offence,” said the parole board.

Clayton was convicted of a 2013 assault that happened during a night of drinking with his intimate partner.

“You pushed her to the ground and grabbed her by the throat,” said the parole board.

He was on bail at the time with the condition to stay away from booze.

“In 2014, you again assaulted your intimate partner while drinking, you pushed her against a wall and hit her in the face multiple times,” said the parole board.

He punched an intimate partner in the face in 2016, then acted aggressively with police when they showed up.

“In 2017 you were convicted of uttering threats. During that offence, you were intoxicated and were threatening people outside of a thrift store when you were denied entry to the store,” said the parole board.

“You were originally arrested for public intoxication, however you continued to threaten police. In 2019, you were in an altercation with your brother when a neighbour tried to break up the fight; you then both attacked the neighbour.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


This photo provided by U.S. Attorney's Office shows Rahmanullah Lakanwal on Thursday, Nov. 27, 2025.

Two members of the National Guard are in critical condition after being shot while patrolling in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday. The suspect was arrested after the “monstrous ambush-style attack,” which took place “just steps away from the White House,”

according to U.S. President Donald Trump

.

The shooter was identified by authorities as 29-year-old Rahmanullah Lakanwal on Thursday morning.

The two victims, identified as Sarah Beckstrom, 20, and Andrew Wolfe, 24, remain in critical condition.

 This photo combo created on Nov. 27, 2025 shows National Guard members, from left, Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe and Specialist Sarah Beckstrom.

Here’s what to know about the suspect and how the attack unfolded.

Who is suspect in the National Guard shooting?

Lakanwal was identified by U.S. attorney for D.C. Jeanine Pirro at

a news conference

Thursday as a 29-year-old Afghan national. He came to the United States in 2021 “under Biden’s Operation Allies Welcome, a program following the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan,” said Pirro.

She said he was living in Bellingham in Washington state, with his wife and children.

Lakanwal had been a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) partner in Afghanistan, CIA Director John Ratcliffe

told Fox News Digital

.

“The Biden administration justified bringing the alleged shooter to the United States in September 2021,” after the U.S. pulled out of Afghanistan, “due to his prior work with the U.S. government, including CIA, as a member of a partner force in Kandahar, which ended shortly following the chaotic evacuation,” Ratcliffe said in a statement.

FBI Director Kash Patel said at the news conference Thursday that he was aware the suspect “had a relationship in Afghanistan with partner forces.”

 Members of law enforcement, including the U.S. Secret Service and the Washington Metropolitan Police Department, respond to a shooting near the White House on Nov. 26, 2025 in Washington, DC.

“We are fully investigating that aspect of his background as well to include any known associates that are either overseas or here,” he said.

He called it an “ongoing investigation of terrorism.”

The suspect’s home in Washington state was searched by authorities overnight. Cellphones, laptops, iPads and other material were seized. Patel also said interviews were being conducted in San Diego pursuant to the investigation at the suspect’s Washington state house.

It was “too soon” to say what his motive could be, said Pirro.

How did the attack unfold?

According to Pirro, the attack was “targeted.”

The suspect allegedly drove his vehicle from Washington state to Washington, D.C. “with the intended target of coming to our nation’s capital,” she said.

 Two National Guard soldiers were shot in downtown Washington on Nov. 26, 2025.

She said the two guardsmen were “ambushed” while on patrol around 2:15 p.m. The shooter opened fire without provocation, armed with a .357 Smith and Wesson revolver.

“One guardsman is struck, goes down, and then the shooter leans over and strikes the guardsman again. Another guardsman is struck several times,” Pirro said.

Other members of the National Guard “responded immediately” and were able to subdue the suspect. He was taken to hospital, where he remains “under heavy guard.”

What charges does the suspect face?

Lakanwal faces “three counts of assault with intent to kill while armed,” said Pirro.

“He will also be charged with possession of a firearm during a crime of violence. He faces 15 years under the assault with the intent to kill,” she said. However, the charges could change based on the well-being of the two victims.

 Members of National Guard respond to a shooting near the White House on Nov. 26, 2025 in Washington, D.C.

“We are praying that they survive and that the highest charge will not have to be murder in the first degree. But make no mistake, if they do not, that will certainly be the charge,” she said.

Who were the victims?

Beckstrom and Wolfe were members of the West Virginia National Guard and had volunteered to go to Washington, D.C. to “protect the people of the district pursuant to a crime emergency” declared by Trump, Pirro said.

“They are receiving the finest medical care. Their families are with them now,” she said, although she could not elaborate on their injuries.

One of Wolfe’s neighbours, Michael Langone, described him as

a “great guy” to CNN

. Langone said Wolfe was the type of person who would “give the shirt off of his back to somebody.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney and China's President Xi Jinping met at the end of October during an APEC meeting, resolving to strengthen bilateral ties. Xi invited Carney to visit China.

Canadian ambassador Jennifer May says her country is working rapidly on key issues it has with China aiming to strengthen bilateral ties, according to a report in a state-controlled Chinese newspaper.

She told

China Daily

on Thursday that she is looking forward to a visit to China from Prime Minister Mark Carney’s visit to China. He has accepted Beijing’s invitation to visit China at “a mutually convenient time,” she said this week at a reception marking the 55th anniversary of the founding of diplomatic ties with the Asian superpower. The reception was co-hosted by the

Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries

, a state-affiliated organization, and the Canadian embassy on Wednesday evening in Beijing.

The two countries shifted toward improved relations during a bilateral meeting last month in the Republic of Korea. Carney met with Chinese president Xi Jinping on the margins of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Economic Leaders’ Meeting in Gyeongju. It was the

first Canada-China leaders’ meeting since 2017

.

According to a

statement from the Prime Minister’s Office

the leaders acknowledged a long history of cooperation rooted in 55 years of diplomatic relations and trade and “agreed that their meeting marked a turning point in the bilateral relationship.” Both leaders directed their officials to resolve outstanding trade issues such as canola, seafood and electric vehicles. They also discussed a framework to deepen cooperation in the areas of clean and conventional energy, climate change, manufacturing and international finance.

“We highly appreciate the proactive stance of the new Canadian government in promoting the improvement and development of bilateral relations,” Yang Wanming, president of the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries, told China Daily.

While the world is going through “a period of profound global upheaval, an era shaped by shifting geopolitics and economic volatility,” China Daily quotes May as saying

,

“within this uncertainty, there is also opportunity.” She reportedly noted the prime minister has committed to doubling Canada’s non-U.S. exports over the next decade, increasing engagement with economies such as China’s.

China is Canada’s second-largest trading partner, according to the

Conference Board of Canada

, as well as the second-largest source of imports, and second-largest export market. In the first eight months of this year, Canadian exports to China increased by 7.8 percent year-on-year.

Canada began exporting liquefied natural gas to China

in April.

While

China-Canada relations reached a low ebb in recent years

, “cooperation between the two countries in trade, energy, and cultural exchanges has yielded fruitful results, and has brought tangible benefits to the people of both nations,”

Yang
told China Daily.

 “Looking ahead, China and Canada should translate the important consensus reached by our leaders into concrete actions and work together to steer our relations back to a healthy, stable, and sustainable path.”

May noted in the China Daily report that Canadian products and expertise are popular in China. This includes education, financial services, and sustainable infrastructure for clean conventional energy. “(We) can help China simultaneously meet its growing energy needs and climate goals.”

She reportedly said “this is one of our most consequential trading relationships,” and Canada is committed to working with China “as we look to address trade challenges and advance cooperation to shape a forward-looking economic relationship.”

“Fifty-five years is a milestone that invites us to reflect on our history, what we have achieved together, and how we navigated deeply complex and changing times,” May told

China Daily Asia

. “I want to be very clear that we are here to build this relationship and to build it strong.”

At the reception, both Yang and May referred to Canadian trauma surgeon, the late

Dr. Norman Bethune

, who worked in China to bring modern medicine to rural China. He is a national hero in China and a symbol of two-way friendship.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney, right, meets with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith in Calgary, Alta., Thursday, Nov. 27, 2025.

Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith signed a memorandum of understanding on Thursday that is aimed at “establishing Canada as a global energy superpower” and paving the way for a new oil pipeline. The pact will suspend clean electricity regulations in Alberta in exchange for an extension of Alberta’s industrial carbon pricing program. It also commits Carney’s government to considering an “adjustment” to the federal oil tanker ban off British Columbia’s coast.

Guilbeault reflecting on future, as Carney inks deal considering ‘adjustment’ to oil tanker ban for new Alberta pipeline

“In the face of global trade shifts and profound uncertainty, Canada and Alberta are striking a new partnership to build a stronger, more sustainable, and more independent Albertan and Canadian economy,” Carney said in a statement. “We will make Canada an energy superpower, drive down our emissions and diversify our export markets. We want to build big things, and we’re building bigger and faster together.” Read the full text of the memorandum of understanding, below.

Canada-Alberta Memorandum of Understanding

PREFACE

At this pivotal global moment, Canada and Alberta, working closely with Indigenous Peoples and industry, must work together cooperatively, and within their respective jurisdictions, to foster the conditions necessary for infrastructure, including pipelines, rail, power generation, a strong and integrated transmission grid, ports and other means that will unlock and grow natural resource production and transportation in Western Canada. As a result, Canada will be able to reach its international export goals and develop new technologies including Artificial Intelligence (AI), and, through innovation and intergovernmental cooperation, be a source of clean energy to lower global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

WHEREAS

  • Canada and Alberta remain committed to achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050;
  • Alberta and Canada will work together to achieve the shared objective of establishing Canada as a global energy superpower, unlocking the growth potential of Western Canada’s oil and gas (including liquified natural gas (LNG)), renewable energy, critical minerals, and other resources that the world needs;
  • Alberta and Canada recognize their obligations to consult with, and where appropriate accommodate, Indigenous Peoples; and
  • Canada and Alberta are committed to respecting Aboriginal and Treaty rights, engaging in early, consistent, and meaningful consultation with Indigenous Peoples, in a manner that promotes reconciliation, and respects the rights and cultures of Indigenous Peoples while advancing economic opportunities through Indigenous ownership and partnerships.

THE OBJECTIVES

The Governments of Canada and Alberta are focused on achieving the following objectives and have developed the following clear actions towards this goal:

  • Increasing production of Alberta oil and gas to reach Canada’s export and national security goals, creating hundreds of thousands of new jobs, while simultaneously reaching carbon neutrality by, in part, reducing the emissions intensity of Canadian heavy oil production to best in class in terms of the average for heavy oil by 2050.
  • Increasing electrical generation for consumer and industrial use on Alberta’s electricity grid, including meeting the needs of AI data centres, while simultaneously reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions for the electricity sector by 2050.
  • Creating electricity and energy policies that address consumer affordability, electricity grid stability, economic competitiveness and long-term competitive certainty, that attract Canadian and foreign sources of private sector capital investment.
  • Reducing layers of regulatory overlap and simplifying regulatory systems to ensure a maximum 2-year timeframe for permitting and approvals with the goal of shorter project approval timelines where feasible.
  • Providing meaningful opportunity for Indigenous rightsholders to participate in consultation processes and economic opportunities through Indigenous ownership, partnerships and benefits.

THE PROJECTS

  • Construction of one or more private sector constructed and financed pipelines, with Indigenous Peoples co-ownership and economic benefits, with at least one million barrels a day of low emission Alberta bitumen with a route that increases export access to Asian markets as a priority. The application for this pipeline project will be ready to submit to the Major Projects Office on or before July 1, 2026. It is agreed this new pipeline would be in addition to the expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline for an additional 300,000 to 400,000 barrels per day destined for Asian markets.
  • Construction and financing of the world’s largest carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) project (Pathways) for the purpose of making Alberta oil among the lowest carbon intensity produced barrels of oil in the world.
  • Construction of thousands of megawatts of AI computing power, with a large portion dedicated to sovereign cloud for Canada and its allies.
  • Construction of large transmission interties with British Columbia and Saskatchewan to strengthen the ability of the western power markets to supply low carbon power to oil, LNG, critical minerals, agricultural, data centres and CCUS industries in support of their sustainability goals.

THE COMMITMENTS:

Alberta commits to:

  • Act as proponent for advancing the development of a bitumen pipeline to Asian markets, that offers the opportunity for Indigenous co-ownership and other forms of economic benefits, for designation and authorization under the Building Canada Act.
  • In consultation with Indigenous leadership, utilize the Alberta Indigenous Opportunities Corporation (AIOC) to help backstop Indigenous co-ownership of the bitumen pipeline project and, if appropriate, Pathways.
  • Extend the Alberta Carbon Capture Incentive Program (ACCIP) to support Pathways.
  • Foster the development of sequestration permitting, worker training, and the capability for Alberta exports of CCUS-related products and services.
  • On or before July 1, 2026, implement a policy framework to incentivize large investments in data centre development, including incentives for Canadian sovereign computing.
  • On or before January 1, 2027, collaborate with Canada to develop a nuclear generation strategy to build and operate competitive nuclear power generation that can serve the Alberta and inter-connected markets by 2050.
  • Collaborate with Canada to significantly increase the inter-tie transfer capability between the western provinces (with consideration to the northern regions) to build the low carbon generation and transmission grid that supports the growth of low intensity heavy oil, LNG, critical minerals, agriculture, data centres and CCUS industries for export growth and domestic use.
  • Collaborate with B.C. to ensure British Columbians share substantial economic and financial benefits of the proposed pipeline.

Canada commits to:

  • In consideration for the mutual commitments agreed to in this MOU, Canada will not implement the Oil and Gas Emissions Cap, which has not yet been put into effect.
  • Acknowledge Alberta’s approach to regulating heavy electricity generation emitters through Alberta’s Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction (TIER) program for Alberta to provide long-term certainty and time needed by industry and innovators to develop the needed CCUS, direct air capture, nuclear infrastructure and other emissions technologies necessary to achieving a net-zero power grid by 2050.
  • Suspend immediately the Clean Electricity Regulations (CER) in Alberta pending a new carbon pricing agreement, which includes the electricity sector, administered through Alberta’s TIER program to be negotiated by the parties on or before April 1, 2026. Upon completion of the new carbon pricing agreement and factoring all other measures to the satisfaction of both parties, Canada will place the CER in Alberta in abeyance.
  • Declare that an Alberta bitumen pipeline to Asian markets as a priority, that offers opportunities for Indigenous co-ownership and economic benefits, is a project of national interest and can be referred to the Major Projects Office for consideration of designation under the Building Canada Act.
  • Collaborate with Alberta to provide a clear and efficient approval process for the Alberta bitumen pipeline under the Building Canada Act.
  • In consultation with Indigenous leadership, utilize Canada Indigenous Loan Guarantee Corporation to help backstop Indigenous co-ownership of the bitumen pipeline project and, if appropriate, Pathways.
  • If an Alberta bitumen pipeline is ultimately approved under the Building Canada Act and provides opportunities for Indigenous co-ownership and shared economic benefits, Canada confirms that it will enable the export of bitumen from a strategic deep-water port to Asian markets, including if necessary through an appropriate adjustment to the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act.
  • Extend federal ITCs and other policy supports to encourage large scale CCUS investments, including Pathways and enhanced oil recovery in order to provide the certainty needed to attract large additional sources of domestic and foreign capital.
  • Work collaboratively with Alberta to design policy supports that enable deployment of nuclear technology, CCUS and energy storage to enable decarbonization of the electricity system, while ensuring its reliability and affordability.
  • As outlined in Budget 2025, propose amendments to the Competition Act to remove some of the “greenwashing” provisions that are creating investment uncertainty.
  • Undertake to conduct good faith consultations with Alberta on the development and implementation of federal regulatory or policy measures that might impact Alberta industry and the shared goal of making Canada a global energy superpower.

Canada and Alberta together will:

  • Canada and Alberta agree to engage with British Columbia immediately in a trilateral discussion on the pipeline project, and during the potential development and construction of the bitumen pipeline referred to in this MOU, and to further the economic interests of B.C. related to their own projects of interest that involve the Province of Alberta including interties. In addition, Canada will work with B.C. on other projects of national interest in their jurisdiction.
  • Canada and Alberta also agree to engage meaningfully with Indigenous Peoples in both Alberta and British Columbia on this project, with the involvement of the B.C. Government for engagement with B.C. First Nations.
  • Work collaboratively to design and commit to globally competitive, long-term carbon effective prices, carbon levy recycling protocols, and sector-specific stringency factors for large Alberta emitters in both the oil and gas and electricity sectors through Alberta’s TIER system. The TIER system will ramp up to a minimum effective credit price of $130/tonne. The parties will conclude an agreement on industrial carbon pricing on or before April 1, 2026.
  • Examples of issues to be addressed in the new agreement include the date for introduction of the effective price and the price increases over time.
  • This industrial carbon pricing agreement will include a financial mechanism to ensure both parties maintain their respective commitments over the long term to provide certainty to industry, and to achieve the intended emissions reductions.
  • Recognizing Alberta’s jurisdiction over the TIER system, Canada and Alberta agree to work co-operatively to ensure the Alberta carbon market functions reliably and provides a predictable basis for decision-making by industry and investors. This includes a shared undertaking that following the completion of this Memorandum of Understanding, the two governments will work co-operatively to ensure the application of Alberta’s carbon pricing system (including pricing and stringency) is adapted to the specific circumstances of the electricity sector, the oil and gas sector, and other large emitters such as fertilizer and cement sectors.
  • Enter into a methane equivalency agreement on or before April 1, 2026, with a 2035 target date and a 75% reduction target relative to 2014 emissions levels.
  • Work cooperatively with the Pathways partner companies to develop and enter into a tri-lateral MOU on or before April 1, 2026 for a multi-phased approach to delivering a set of emissions savings projects (the “Phase 1 Pathways Projects”), focused predominantly on carbon capture and storage, solvent-based replacements or other actions taken by Pathways that reduce emissions intensity. The Phase 1 Pathways Projects will be built and commence operations in a staged manner between 2027 and 2040 to achieve committed emissions reductions at date-certain intervals. Canada and Alberta agree this tri-lateral MOU and the approval and commencement of the initial Phase 1 Pathways Projects will be a precondition to the commencement of the approved bitumen pipeline referred to in this MOU.
  • Canada and Alberta agree that the approval, commencement and continued construction of the bitumen pipeline is a prerequisite to the Pathways project, including the extension of the Alberta ACCIP Program.
  • Canada and Alberta agree that the Pathways Project is also a prerequisite to the approval, commencement and continued construction of the bitumen pipeline, given that the two projects referred to in this MOU are mutually dependent.
  • Canada and Alberta agree that in order to hold all parties to account for all phases of the Pathways projects, the trilateral MOU with Pathways must include effective enforcement mechanisms to ensure the completion of all phases of the infrastructure and the associated emissions reductions by the Pathways companies as outlined in the MOU. Such mechanisms could include, but are not limited to, tax and regulatory measures.
  • Canada and Alberta agree to work collaboratively, including with other provinces where appropriate, to develop domestic carbon capture supply chains and Canadian steel and pipe production supply chains.
  • Negotiate a cooperation agreement on impact assessments on or before April 1, 2026, that reduces duplication through a single assessment process that respects federal and provincial jurisdictions.
  • Work cooperatively to streamline the regulatory processes among federal agencies, the Canadian Energy Regulator, the Alberta government and municipalities to achieve a maximum 2-year timeframe for approvals while targeting shorter approval timelines where feasible.
  • Work cooperatively with Indigenous parties in Alberta to consult and accommodate on the CO2 pipeline and capture and storage facilities related to Pathways.
  • Continue to work together to achieve the objectives set out in this MOU.
  • Establish a communications protocol whereas each party must agree to public communications of this MOU and its content prior to information being released.

Implementation Committee:

Canada and Alberta will appoint an Implementation Committee responsible for delivering the following outcomes:

  • A carbon pricing equivalency agreement on or before April 1, 2026.
  • A methane equivalency agreement on or before April 1, 2026.
  • A tri-lateral MOU with the Pathways companies on or before April 1, 2026.
  • A cooperation agreement on impact assessments by on or before April 1, 2026.
  • Determining the means by which Alberta can submit its pipeline application to the Major Projects Office on or before July 1, 2026.
  • Acquiring feedback from the federal government for Alberta’s policy framework for AI data centres which is to be finalized by Alberta on or before July 1, 2026.
  • Collaborating with Alberta on the design of Alberta’s nuclear power generation strategy which is to be finalized by Alberta on or before January 1, 2027.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


An image of a new CT X-ray machine at Winnipeg International Airport.

Winnipeg International Airport has just become the latest in Canada to be outfitted with new computed tomography (CT) X-ray scanners, part of an initiative to update technology and speed up security checks.

The airport announced this week that CT X-ray machines have been installed by the

Canadian Air Transport Security Authority

(CATSA) in line four at the domestic and international checkpoint.

With their bulbous shape and unearthly blue glow, the scanners look like a cross between a hospital medical scanner and a science-fiction propulsion system.

But the upshot of the new devices is that passengers travelling through screening lines will no longer have to take liquids, aerosols and gels, medical devices or electronics such as laptops out of their carry-on bags. That’s because the scanner can show security agents a 3D, rotatable image of the contents of each bag that passes through it. Previous scanners created a two-dimensional image.

The 3D view is said to enhance security officers’ ability to detect explosives and other threatening items. But for anyone who has ever had to juggle multiple items at an airport security line, and then hastily repack them before moving on, the savings in time and convenience should be obvious.

“This innovation not only improves efficiency at security checkpoints but also reflects our commitment to working with partners like CATSA to bring world-class solutions to YWG,” Winnipeg airport president and CEO Nick Hays said

in a news release

. “We’re proud to be part of this national initiative that prioritizes both security and convenience for travellers.”

CATSA began installing the machines in Canadian airports 14 months ago, with Vancouver being the first to receive them. Since then, they have also been installed in Ottawa, Montreal, Calgary, Toronto, Quebec City and Halifax.

CATSA notes on its website that liquids over 100 mL will still have to be removed from carry-on baggage. It adds that signage will be displayed in front of all lines or checkpoints that have CT X-ray technology available.

“If there is no CT sign displayed, passengers will need to remove their permitted liquids, aerosols and gels, along with large electronics from their carry-on baggage to be screened separately,” the agency says.

This month,

Edmonton International Airport

announced it would be installing its first CT X-ray scanner by the end of the month, with all six lanes of security expected to be switched over by next March.

The devices are part of a

worldwide trend

in new security measures at airports. The European Union has set an end-of-the-year deadline for mandatory CT scanner implementation, while the U.S. is taking a phased approach, prioritizing high-risk locations first.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney, left, greets Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, right, during the 2025 summer meetings of Canada's Premiers at Deerhurst Resort in Huntsville, Ont., on Tuesday, July 22, 2025.

OTTAWA — As Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith inked a new energy and pipeline pact on Thursday, a government source close to Liberal cabinet minister Steven Guilbeault, a former environment minister, says he is reflecting on his future.

Guilbeault, who currently holds the portfolio of Canadian Identity and Culture, is a long-time climate activist, and the source said he will be taking the time to read his government’s new pact with Alberta in detail before making a decision.

The deal Carney inked with Smith on Thursday in Alberta sees his government agree to suspend clean electricity regulations in the province and commit to consider making an “adjustment” to the federal oil tanker ban off British Columbia’s coast to pave the way for construction of a new oil pipeline.

The concessions from the federal government come in exchange for Alberta strengthening its industrial carbon price.

The commitments, formally outlined in a memorandum of understanding between Carney and Smith, outline the terms of how jurisdictions will work together on energy.

Before the official signing, Carney appeared alongside Smith for a sit-down, where both leaders delivered some opening remarks, with the prime minister calling Thursday “a great day for Canada” as well as a “great day for Alberta.”

Carney touted the deal as a “multifaceted agreement,” saying it sets the stage for an energy transition, “but really sets the stage for an industrial transformation.”

“At the core of the agreement, of course, it’s a priority to have a pipeline to Asia. That’s going to make Canada stronger, more independent, more resilient, more sustainable,” Carney said.

As Carney spent the past few days preparing to ink the new energy pact with Alberta, he has been dealing with some restlessness with his caucus, particularly among his more progressive Liberal MPs and those in B.C.

The source close to Guilbeault, speaking on a not-for-attribution basis because they were not authorized to discuss these matters publicly, said he believes he can be more useful to the climate cause and to Canada by sitting around the cabinet table than stepping down.

“He’s ready to make a lot of compromises,” said the source. “That remains true even today, even when it is more difficult.”

“He wants to be sure to make the right decision,” they added.

Guilbeault had a “long” and “candid” conversation with Carney on Tuesday, according to the source who could not disclose the contents of the conversation.

The document signing has been touted as an important step by both Alberta and Carney’s government to help transform Canada into a “global energy superpower,” as the prime minister promised during the spring federal election campaign. The deal also outlines how both Alberta and Canada “remain committed” to achieving net-zero emissions by 2025.

To do so, the deal spells out a series of projects both jurisdictions agree to collaborate on, including “construction of one or more private sector constructed and financed pipelines,” that would carry “one million barrels a day of low-emission Alberta bitumen” to Asian markets.

It clarifies that the new pipeline project would be in addition to the expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline.

The deal also links a new bitumen pipeline from Alberta to the advancement of a massive carbon capture and storage project in the province, a project Carney and Smith commit to negotiating a trilateral agreement on with the oilsands partner behind the proposal.

In terms of commitments, Smith signed on to work with Ottawa on negotiating a new industrial carbon pricing agreement before April 1, 2026, which would then formalize the suspension of the clean electricity regulations.

The deal spells out that Ottawa would immediately suspend the regulations in exchange for Alberta hiking its industrial carbon price, which it froze earlier this year.

The document also commits Alberta and Ottawa to negotiate on a new methane equivalency agreement before April 2026, which would set a target of reducing methane emissions by 75 per cent below 2014 levels by 2035.

When it comes to the pipeline proposal, which was Smith’s top priority entering into the negotiations, the new deal spells out that her United Conservative Party government would submit a proposal to the federal major projects office by July 1.

Carney committed his government to declaring that the pipeline proposal was a nation-building project, and if ultimately approved under a special cabinet designation, his government “would enable the export of bitumen from a strategic deep-water port to Asian markets, including if necessary through an appropriate adjustment to the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act.

More to come …

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.