LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

The UAE's list of approved schools has several top schools in Europe, the U.S., and elsewhere, but none of Britain's elite universities such as Oxford due to fears of fears of student Islamist radicalization.

The United Arab Emirates has removed state funding for citizens who want to study in the United Kingdom over fears of campus Islamist radicalization there driven by the Muslim Brotherhood.

The move to formally exclude British universities from eligibility for state-funded UAE scholarship programs appears to date to last summer, and it had been informally implemented even before that, but it has come to light now after British officials inquired about the absence of any British institutions on the list of schools approved for UAE scholarship programs.

The Financial Times newspaper

quoted an anonymous source

who said UAE officials made clear to Britain that the decision was deliberate because people there “don’t want their kids to be radicalised on campus.”

The UAE’s list of approved schools has several top schools in Europe, the United States, and elsewhere, but none of Britain’s elite universities such as Oxford or Cambridge, and none of its larger modern campuses like the University of Manchester, or the various schools in London that attract many of the U.K.’s foreign student population.

The absence of those schools from the UAE’s approved list also means credentials from them are unrecognized and of lesser value in the UAE employment market.

Approximately 8,500 Emirati students were studying in Britain in 2024, the last year for which numbers are available.

Many Emirati students study in Europe and are funded by generous state backing to do so, with their tuition, board, travel and insurance covered for study in several prioritized academic areas.

The move to exclude Britain is part of a wider spoiling of relations between the U.K. and the Gulf state, though until now most of the conflict was over commercial interests such as the attempted purchase of The Daily Telegraph newspaper and the financial problems with the Manchester United football club.

It also reflects growing concern, both in Britain and abroad, about Islamist radicalism at British universities.

The UAE is a leading diplomatic voice in this debate. Since the Arab Spring uprising across the Muslim world in 2011, the UAE has moved vigorously to curb the influence of political Islamist groups, especially the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Muslim Brotherhood was a driving force of the Arab Spring in Egypt where it gained its strongest ever influence, which has since waned. It is a Sunni Islamist organization founded in Egypt almost a century ago.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance posted about this news on social media, saying, “Some of our best Muslim allies in the Gulf think the Islamist indoctrination in certain parts of the west is too dangerous.”

Britain has declined to list the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group, although Prime Minister Keir Starmer has said it is under review.

This potential British listing has become a political hot issue, with surging Reform UK Leader Nigel Farage vowing to ban the Muslim Brotherhood if he becomes prime minister.

Canada also does not include the Muslim Brotherhood on its list of proscribed entities, although Canada’s listing that bans the terror group Hamas notes that it “emerged from the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood in 1987.”

The UAE bans the Muslim Brotherhood as a proscribed organization, which puts it in the small minority of countries that do so. The UAE has also strongly advocated for other countries, including Britain and France, to ban the group, saying it is the source of rapidly spreading extremism across Europe and elsewhere.

Canada is a popular destination for students from the UAE, although Canada has recently drastically cut the number of foreign students it accepts under annual caps.

The Financial Times also reported that British officials do not regard the ban as total, as there remain some UAE military personnel on scholarships.

It is also not a ban on Emirati students going to Britain for school, as many whose families wish to fund it themselves continue to study there.

The UAE did not comment on the FT’s report, and the British Prime Minister’s officer issued a statement saying: “All forms of extremism have absolutely no place in our society, and we will stamp them out wherever they are found. We offer one of the best education systems in the world and maintain stringent measures on student welfare and on campus safety.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Premier Danielle Smith speaks during a press conference at McDougall Centre in Calgary on Friday January 2, 2026.

OTTAWA — Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is calling for Ottawa to approve a new heavy oil pipeline to the West Coast by the fall, saying that a United States-backed Venezuela threatens to undercut Canada in the global energy market.

Smith said in a social media post on Friday that she’d raised the issue earlier in the day with Prime Minister Mark Carney, stressing to him the urgency of getting more Canadian oil to non-U.S. markets.

“Today, I had a positive meeting with (Carney) during which we discussed the recent events in Venezuela, and how they underscore the necessity to greatly expedite the approval of a one million barrel per day oil pipeline to Canada’s (P)acific coast,” wrote Smith.

Smith said her government would submit an application for a heavy oil pipeline to northwest British Columbia by June “at the latest” and had asked for it to be green-lit “no later than this Fall.”

She warned that any dithering would risk “ceding market share, losing investment, and undermining Canada’s competitive position in a rapidly changing global energy landscape.”

Smith attached a letter she’d sent to Carney one day earlier expressing the same sentiment.

The U.S. sent shockwaves through the global energy landscape last weekend with a daring raid of oil-rich Venezuela, culminating in the apprehension of socialist dictator Nicolas Maduro and his wife.

U.S. officials, including President Donald Trump, have said subsequently that they hope to secure control over Venezuela’s massive subsoil oil reserves. Trump says U.S.-based oil and gas multinationals will invest $100 billion over the next several years to get the taps flowing.

Canada and Venezuela produce similar grades of heavy oil, meaning that Venezuelan oil can plausibly displace the Canadian product that currently flows into U.S. refineries.

Canadian oil stocks have tumbled on news of the incursion, losing $8 billion of stock market value in just four days.

The U.S. is by far the biggest customer for Canadian oil, accounting for more than 90 per cent of all exports.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Premier Danielle Smith speaks during a press conference at McDougall Centre in Calgary on Friday January 2, 2026.

OTTAWA — Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is calling for Ottawa to approve a new heavy oil pipeline to the West Coast by the fall, saying that a United States-backed Venezuela threatens to undercut Canada in the global energy market.

Smith said

in a social media post

on Friday that she’d raised the issue earlier in the day with Prime Minister Mark Carney, stressing to him the urgency of getting more Canadian oil to non-U.S. markets.

“Today, I had a positive meeting with (Carney) during which we discussed the recent events in Venezuela, and how they underscore the necessity to greatly expedite the approval of a one million barrel per day oil pipeline to Canada’s (P)acific coast,” wrote Smith.

Smith said her government would petition the Major Projects Office for

a heavy oil pipeline

to northwest British Columbia by June “at the latest” and had asked for it to be green-lit “no later than this Fall.”

She warned that any dithering would risk “ceding market share, losing investment, and undermining Canada’s competitive position in a rapidly changing global energy landscape.”

Smith attached a letter she’d sent to Carney one day earlier expressing the same sentiment.

The U.S. sent shockwaves through the global energy landscape last weekend

with a daring raid

of oil-rich Venezuela, culminating in the apprehension of socialist dictator Nicolas Maduro and his wife.

U.S. officials, including President Donald Trump, have said subsequently that they hope to secure control over Venezuela’s massive subsoil oil reserves. Trump says U.S.-based oil and gas multinationals

will invest $100 billion

over the next several years to get the taps flowing.

Canada and Venezuela produce similar grades of heavy oil, meaning that Venezuelan oil can plausibly displace the Canadian product that currently flows into U.S. refineries.

Canadian

oil stocks have tumbled

on news of the incursion, losing $8 billion of stock market value in just four days.

The U.S. is by far the biggest customer for Canadian oil, consuming

more than 90 per cent

of all exports.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree speaks to reporters ahead of a cabinet meeting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on Thursday, Dec. 11, 2025.

OTTAWA

— The federal Public Safety department says
16 people took part in a pilot of its firearms compensation program that resulted in 25 banned guns being turned over and destroyed. 

The department released the figure just days after revealing the results and “lessons learned” from the test it ran in parts of Cape Breton over six weeks last year, where it initially expected to collect up to 200 prohibited firearms.

“A total of 25 prohibited firearms, turned in by 16 participants, were destroyed,” spokesperson Noémie Allard said in a statement on Friday. 

The total compensation paid to pilot participants is $26,535.” 

Later this month, the government plans to launch the long-promised compensation program for individual gun owners with one of the more than 2,500 makes and models of firearms the federal Liberal government has banned since 2020, according to Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree’s office.

While the federal Liberals and gun control advocates say such weapons are too dangerous for public use, many firearms groups, along with the Opposition Conservatives, say the government is wasting taxpayer dollars by targeting lawful gun owners and argue the program will have no impact on public safety.

Lobby groups like the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights say the results from the pilot demonstrate that the program is destined for failure.

The federal government has instituted an amnesty period for individuals with prohibited guns until October 2026.

As the federal government prepares to launch the program nationally, the Public Safety department is trying to formalize agreements with different provinces and municipal police agencies to assist with collection efforts.

This week, officials announced that a deal had been reached with Quebec that would see the federal government compensate the province to the tune of $12 million for its coordination of that work.

Police in Halifax, Winnipeg, Cape Breton, and Fredericton have said they are willing to participate.

Meanwhile, many police forces in the Greater Toronto Area and elsewhere in Ontario say they have not yet made a decision.

A spokeswoman for the RCMP did not directly say what role RCMP officers in divisions across the country would play in the rollout of the program, saying it could not comment on the government’s “

plans or timing” of the program’s rollout. 

“As part of the rollout, the RCMP Canadian Firearms Program will notify firearms licensees about the (program) and how to participate.”

A spokesman in Anandasangaree’s office this week said that while agreements were in the works with more provinces and police, the banned weapons would be collected through special collection units to be sent around the country.

In its lists of findings from the pilot, the Public Safety department said that a much longer declaration period was needed to allow more time for firearms owners to declare they own one of the government-banned guns, as compared to the several weeks it had during the test run. 

The department also emphasized the need for a clearer registration process and more “timely” guidance on how to participate.

The federal government last year opened the compensation program for businesses, which resulted in some 12,000 firearms being turned over and destroyed.

It has provided no timeline as to when it may reopen the program for dealers, despite the government announcing last fall that it would be reopened in the “coming weeks.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


A Canada Revenue Agency building. The CRA has more than 10 million unclaimed cheques.

The start of a new year means the clock is ticking closer to the deadline for taxes to be filed and money owed to be paid. Canadians have until April 30 to

file their income taxes

. If they owe money, that’s also the last day to pay before incurring penalties and interest.

But the opposite side of the ledger doesn’t work in quite the same way. As of last October, The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) says it’s been sitting on a pile of more than 10 million uncashed cheques. Here’s what to know.

How much unclaimed funds are we talking about?

The CRA says its unclaimed cheques — exactly 10,279,770 at last count — are valued at $1,752,004,000. That $1.7 billion means each cheque has an average value of about $170.

That’s equivalent to a stack of cheques a kilometre high, or tucked away in more than 3,000 filing cabinet drawers. (Though to be fair the CRA doesn’t have them all printed out and awaiting pickup.)

What do the funds represent?

The CRA website lists 42 separate types of payments that have been unclaimed. They range from the standard T1 income tax refund and the Canada Child Benefit to more obscure payouts, such as the Newfoundland and Labrador Income Supplement, the Yukon Child Benefit and the

Alberta 2005 Resource Rebate

.

That last one is more than 20 years old!

Yes. The Alberta 2005 Resource Rebate was a one-time payment made to Albertans by the Ralph Klein government under the province’s surplus that year. Tax-free cheques were sent directly to every Albertan over 18 who filed a tax return in 2004, and to any child born in the province up to 2005.

This illustrates two ways that someone might have missed out on one of these government payments. An adult who didn’t file a tax return or a baby (now in their twenties) whose parents didn’t get the cheque might still be owed that money.

“Cheques can date back as far as 1998 and, because government-issued cheques never expire or stale date, the CRA can reissue a payment once requested by the taxpayer,” a CRA spokesperson

told National Post

last year.

What other reasons are there for money not being claimed?

Lack of direct deposit is a big one. Paper cheques that are mailed can get lost, stolen or delivered to the wrong address if a person has moved or is deceased.

The CRA has long pushed Canadians to both file their taxes electronically and to receive payments through direct deposit. In fact, this year the government opted to

stop sending out paper forms

to taxpayers, though they can still request them or print them themselves.

How can I find out if I’m owed money?

The CRA has a

whole web page

devoted to uncashed cheques. The simplest way is to log into your account (conveniently called My Account) and look for the “uncashed cheques” link on the overview page.

It’s worth noting that the page won’t list cheques that are less than six months old, those for COVID-19 benefits and subsidies, those for a business or trust, or those sent by direct deposit. For all of that (or if you can’t access the account online) you’ll need to

call the CRA

directly.

What happens to it if I don’t claim it?

As satisfying as it would be to imagine a big pile of cash (or all those filing cabinets), the money just resides in the government’s general coffers, being used for general government purposes, until it is claimed.

How do I receive the money?

The CRA page has links to a form to fill out, requesting payment. The site notes that processing may take 10 to 12 weeks, and that delivery by mail may take an additional 10 days. (Another reason to sign up for direct deposit.)

What if I also owe the government money?

Ah, there’s the rub. If you’re in arrears to the government, they may take part of your requested payment away to square things before sending the remainder (if any) to you.

How much has already been claimed?

Since 2020, when the online system for uncashed cheques was set up, Canadians have received 4,960,380 cheques valued at just over $1.8 billion. However, the unclaimed tally also continues to grow each year, hitting a record high of $1.8 billion in 2024 before falling slightly to where it is now.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The ROM, located near Toronto's Yorkville area, is shown in this photo.

A Jewish advocacy group is condemning the use of the “Palestine” label for certain ancient artifacts at the Royal Ontario Museum.

“We were made aware that the label had been in place for some time,” said Tafsik CEO Amir Epstein in a statement to National Post. “This does not excuse the responsibility to correct errors. While we are willing to give the benefit of the doubt that this was an unintentional mistake, we simply ask that the information be corrected to reflect archaeological and historical facts.”

The artifacts in question have been on display at the ROM since 2012. The museum says revisions have already been underway for several months, which is prior to the online discourse that began when Tafsik posted about it on X in late December. The museum did not immediately respond to National Post’s request about what the new labels would be after its revision.

“The @ROMtoronto (Royal Ontario Museum) is rewriting history. Welcome to Canada 2025,” Tafsik posted on X last month. The group also shared a photo of

a swirled marble mosaic bottle

that is located in the museum’s Joey and Toby Tanenbaum Gallery of Rome and the Near East.

It is dated 25 to 50 AD. It is labelled as being from Syria or Palestine.

“From approximately 25–50 AD, the land was known as Judea by the Roman authorities and as Eretz Yisrael by the Jewish people. After the colonizing Romans killed and expelled much of the indigenous Jewish population, they imposed the colonial name ‘Palestine’ with the explicit intent of erasing Jewish history and connection to the land,” Epstein said.

“Historical revisionism is not new to the Jewish people. The Nazis used it to justify the genocide of Jews in Germany, and more recently, Palestinian religious and political leaders have employed similar tactics to justify the genocide committed against our people on October 7, 2023.”

He said that, throughout history, the erasure of Jewish identity has led to violence and genocide, driving the Jewish people to “meticulously” document its history “for thousands of years” — “documentation that has been corroborated through archaeology and, more recently, through recorded testimony.”

Tafsik has been in touch with the ROM and it is optimistic that the museum is taking the matter seriously, he said.

Another example from the ROM,

as reported by the Free Press

, shows blue glass pieces, including a jug, flask, bowl, aryballos (small, spherical flask) and flagon (large drinking container) in the same gallery of the museum.

The items are dated AD 25 to 125. They are labelled as being from Syria or Palestine.

In an emailed statement to National Post, the ROM said its curator has identified displays within the gallery “as requiring several label revisions.” The gallery was originally installed between 2011 and 2012.

“This work has been in process for several months, and related label updates (including for the swirled marbled mosaic bottle) are underway,” the statement said.

“Any changes to labels at ROM are informed by dialogue between curators, interpretive planners, and sectoral peers. Labels use the date of the object as the fixed starting point and, where known, indicate the location as it was named at the time of production. Contemporary place names are also included to aid visitor understanding. The location often includes multiple current place names if the exact area of production within a geographic region is not known, as is common curatorial practice for centuries-old objects.”

Carl Ehrlich, a York University professor of history and humanities, told National Post that labelling artifacts is “very, very complicated,” especially when words take on different meaning in the modern era.

“Until very recently — when Palestine and Palestinian became both the name of a country in preparation, as it were, and of a new ethnic group — Palestine was viewed as a very neutral geographic term, an amorphous term, for the area we could call the southern Levant or southern Canaan,” he said.

“That’s the reason why Palestine is, at least in the scholarly world, a designation that is used for a general geographic territory without necessarily being specific about ancient borders, territories or ethnicities, because there were a number of different ethnicities and a number of different peoples living in that territory.”

Judea was a “relatively small area and kingdom,” he said. “Under Herod the Great, for instance, who ruled in the last few decades BCE, it managed to expand its borders a bit…It moved out of the area of modern-day Israel into the territory of what is now Jordan, the West Bank, etc. It was a little bit larger at that time.”

Christian scholars started archeological investigations into the ancient Near East mostly in an attempt to establish a foothold in the region and look into “the biblical roots of Christianity.”

“They continued using this terminology of Palestine for the southern area, Syria for the northern area,” he said.

Over the course of time, the terms have become more complex.

“Nowadays, the term Palestine and Palestinian is loaded with political implications, and therefore the modern day Palestinians, the ethnicity, has been essentially piggybacking on that term in order to establish an ancient historical tradition leading up to the modern people, that essentially also involves the erasure of the Jewish history and the Jewish connection to the land,” he said.

“So, it’s not a neutral term anymore.”

The entire labelling system could use an overhaul when it comes to presenting ancient artifacts to a modern audience, he said, as the “old scholarly labels” have not “kept up with the changing meaning of the words involved.”

As for the artifacts at the ROM pointed out by Tafsik and mentioned in the Free Press, they don’t include a specific geography in their online profiles that would definitively determine that they came from Judea, Ehrlich said.

“(The curators) don’t know exactly where, so they use the old scholarly designations,” he said.

It only becomes problematic if objects from the territory of modern-day Israel or ancient Judea are referred to as Palestinian “because that then is an erasure of Jewish history.” He said there is an ongoing battle between “modern day labels and imposing them anachronistically on ancient times to fight modern wars of legitimacy.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney embraces Michael Ma, Member of Parliament for Markham-Unionville, who crossed the floor from the Conservatives to the Liberals hours earlier, at the Liberal caucus holiday party in Ottawa, on Thursday, Dec. 11, 2025.

OTTAWA — New backbench Liberal MP Michael Ma, who made headlines for crossing the floor from the Conservatives last month, will join Prime Minister Mark Carney on his first trip to China next week. 
 

Ma will be travelling to Beijing and Qatar alongside a coterie of Liberal cabinet members including Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand, Industry Minister Mélanie Joly and Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson. 

His inclusion is notable because he is the only elected member of the delegation who is neither a minister nor a parliamentary secretary. He is vice-chair of the Canada-China Legislative Committee alongside 11 other MPs and senators. 
 

Ma’s inclusion in the trip so shortly after crossing the floor to join Liberal ranks could suggest he is primed for a promotion from the party’s backbench, though some critics see it as a reward for joining government ranks.
 

Asked why Ma was joining the delegation, PMO spokesperson Audrey Champoux said the Toronto-area MP has “considerable experience building relationship between people, businesses and communities, across the Indo-Pacific region.”
 

“Additionally, as the Member of Parliament representing Markham—Unionville and one of Canada’s largest Chinese-Canadian communities, Mr. Ma will add important perspectives and insights throughout the delegation’s work,” she added. 

Ma did not immediately respond to an interview request about the trip.

Ma was born in Hong Kong and immigrated to Canada at the age of 12. He was first elected for the Conservatives in Markham—Unionville in April 2025. He won the seat after Liberal candidate Paul Chiang dropped out of the race due to controversy over what he described as a joke about a bounty by China on another Conservative candidate and Hong Kong democracy activist Joe Tay.
 

But Ma created a political maelstrom when he announced he was crossing the floor to the Liberals just hours after the House of Commons rose for the winter break in December. His addition to the government ranks brought the minority Liberals to 171 MPs, one seat from a slim majority.
 

News of Ma’s attendance on the trip raised eyebrows among his former Conservative colleagues on social media.
 

“I mean … come … ! on … ! At what point do we just say, the Liberal Party of Canada has no values, no principals,”
wrote MP Dean Allison on X
.
 

Carney’s trip to Beijing is the first visit by a Canadian prime minister to China since then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2017.

Both Carney’s and Trudeau’s trips have remarkably similar objectives: rebuild Canada’s economic and diplomatic relationship with China to help diversify the country’s trading partners following the election of U.S. President Donald Trump and a cooling of bilateral relations with China under their predecessor.
 

Following trips to China in 2016 and 2017, Trudeau repeatedly said that rebuilding the relationship with the
Asian economic powerhouse was a “top priority.”
He also accused Prime Minister Stephen Harper for Canada’s frosty relationship with China.
 

But Canada’s relationship with China quickly soured after that.
 

First came the arrest by Canadian authorities of Huawei top executive Meng Wanzhou on behalf of the U.S. government. Then China detained two Canadian citizens, Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, for nearly three years in what is widely considered as retaliation for Meng’s arrest.
 

The Trudeau government’s relationship with China became frigid, leading it to release a new Indo-Pacific strategy in 2024 that focused on developing relationships in the region to get around China’s “increasingly disruptive global power.”
 

But faced with rising U.S. protectionism in Trump’s second term, Carney sees China as a crucial new trading partner to help alleviate Canada’s dependence on the Americans.
 

His trip next week will be his first meeting in China with President Xi Jinping. On top of the aforementioned ministers, Agriculture Minister Heath Macdonald, International Trade Minister Maninder Sidhu and parliamentary secretary Kody Blois will also travel to Beijing.

Carney will then travel to Doha, the capital of Qatar, before attending the World Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks at an event in Toronto, on Thursday, Oct. 30, 2025.

OTTAWA

— Conservative grassroots will debate amending the party’s policy towards diversity, as well as deleting a clause that says a future government would not support legislation restricting abortion, when they meet in Calgary later this month. 

Delegates from across the country will gather at the party’s first convention since the 2025 spring election loss to vote on Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s future as party leader, as well as changes to the party’s policy and constitution.

Late Thursday, the Conservative party published a list of policy proposals submitted by party members across riding associations.

Many of them align with Poilievre’s message about advancing a tough-on-crime agenda, faster pipeline development and cracking down on immigration, such as supporting an end to the temporary foreign workers program and speedier deportations for non-citizens convicted of a serious crime.

As party leader, Poilievre can choose whether or not to advance resolutions that members endorse, as has been the case for past leaders.

Party conventions have historically been where party members can push a leader to take a stronger stance on an issue and serve as an indicator of the direction grassroots members want a party to take.

On crime, one resolution echoes a call Poilievre has already made to amend the Criminal Code to say that the use of lethal force is presumed to be reasonable for Canadians defending their home against a person breaking into it.

Others, however, touch on social issues the leader has distanced himself from as he tries to prosecute Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government on the cost of living.

One such submission proposes to delete from the party’s current policy declaration a clause that states, “a Conservative government will not support any legislation to regulate abortion.”

Social conservatives comprise a well-organized bloc within the party, but Poilievre himself has vowed not to touch the abortion issue should his party form government. His wife, Anaida Poilievre, has previously said in a French-language interview that the couple is “pro-choice.”

Poilievre, who has been at the helm of the party since September 2022, has largely stuck to an economic agenda, squarely focused on affordability issues and concerns about crime.

Another proposal being brought forward involves the party endorsing as policy the “parental right to body-affirming therapy for kids,” who, as the submission states, may be “gender-confused.”

“We believe that parents have the right to arrange for body-affirming talk therapy for their gender-confused child, and we oppose the federal ‘conversion therapy ban’ which criminalizes parents for doing so,” reads the resolution submitted by Conservative members in the Ontario riding of Kitchener Centre.

The resolution also states support for income splitting and exploring tax changes to support caregivers.

Conversion therapy refers to the practice of attempting to change a child’s sexual orientation or gender identity, which has widely been discredited as harmful..

A majority of the Conservative caucus under former party leader Erin O’Toole voted against banning it in 2021, when the legislation was being debated in the House of Commons, arguing that its wording was overly broad. Poilievre, however, voted in support.

At that time, some social conservative MPs spoke out about the decision to ultimately help the Liberals fast-track the bill through the House of Commons.

Opposition to policies that allow for the medical transition of gender-diverse and transgender children has gained traction as an issue in recent years, with premiers like Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s government passing a law banning such procedures for minors. Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe did likewise when it comes to a child wishing to be referred to by a different pronoun requiring parental consent.

When it comes to the federal Conservatives, Poilievre has himself stated that he opposes gender-diverse minors having access to puberty blockers. During the party’s 2023 convention in Quebec City, party members voted overwhelmingly for a proposal stating that a future Conservative government should prohibit surgical and other medical interventions for gender-diverse youth.

Other policy resolutions being presented include stating the party’s opposition to digital IDs and what one submission calls “protection from political de-banking,” which comes years after former prime minister Justin Trudeau approved emergency powers to freeze the bank accounts of those involved in the 2022 “Freedom Convoy,” in an effort to quell the protest.

Members also submitted resolutions that touch on diversity, equity and inclusion issues, which have become a more popular issue, particularly within conservative and right-wing circles, taking aim at judicial appointments and the party’s own policy on diversity.

One resolution from the Eglinton Lawrence riding association proposes adding to its policy that the “Conservative Party believes in the principle of meritocracy, defined as a system where individuals succeed based on their abilities, efforts, and achievements—not their background or social status.”

When it comes to the CBC, the promised “defunding” of which has been among Poilievre’s most popular promises, one resolution calls for party policy to state that it “believes the control and operations of the CBC/SRC as an entity should be accomplished through independent, non-governmental funding.”

Many of the proposed changes to the party’s constitution revolve around the nomination process, which the Conservative Party has already sought to address after widespread concerns following last year’s election about last-minute appointments and a lack of nomination contests.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


On Jan. 5, the U.S. Department of State posted to X,

Welcome to the era of the “Donroe Doctrine” — a reinterpretation of a 19th-century foreign policy used to justify the

United States’ attack on Venezuela

and assert dominance in the Western Hemisphere

,

encompassing North and South America and the surrounding waters. On Jan. 5, the U.S. Department of State

posted to X

, “This is OUR Hemisphere, and President Trump will not allow our security to be threatened.” A photo of U.S. President Donald Trump with a text overlay — “THIS IS OUR HEMPISPHERE” — was attached.

Two days earlier, Trump announced at a Mar-a-Lago

press conference

that the U.S. military had

captured

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, who face drug trafficking and weapons charges in a New York court. Flores and Maduro, who says he’s a prisoner of war,

pleaded not guilty

in their first court appearance on Monday.

Trump said the United States would run Venezuela until “a safe, proper and judicious transition” is possible, bringing a 202-year-old framework — the Monroe Doctrine — into the spotlight. Here’s what you need to know.

What is the Monroe Doctrine?

The

Monroe Doctrine

dates back to Dec. 2, 1823, when the fifth U.S. president, James Monroe, made a speech before Congress warning European nations against further intervention in newly independent Central and South American countries.

“As a principle in which the rights and interests of the United States are involved, the American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintained, are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for colonization by any European powers,” Monroe said.

Over time, the address became known as the Monroe Doctrine. Presidents including Theodore Roosevelt (who introduced the

Roosevelt Corollary

), Ronald Reagan and John F. Kennedy have invoked the foreign policy framework. As seen in Venezuela, the doctrine continues to affect the United States’ relationships with Latin American countries. Its reinterpretation has played a role in other U.S. interventions in the region, including the

Dominican Republic

and

Nicaragua

in the 20th century.

One of the main concepts of the doctrine was to maintain two distinct spheres of influence: the Americas and Europe.

According to the

U.S. Office of the Historian

, “The independent lands of the Western Hemisphere would be solely the United States’ domain. In exchange, the United States pledged to avoid involvement in the political affairs of Europe, such as the ongoing Greek struggle for independence from the Ottoman Empire, and not to interfere in the existing European colonies already in the Americas.”

The idea of dividing the planet into three spheres of influence has held sway over members of the Trump administration, writes American historian

Anne Applebaum

. “The U.S. would control the Western hemisphere, China would control Asia, Russia would control Europe.”

From a yearning to

annex Greenland

to a threat of

military action in Colombia

, the Trump administration has placed its foreign policy strategy under the Monroe Doctrine umbrella.

 U.S. President Donald Trump referred to the “Donroe Doctrine” when he spoke to the press on Jan. 3, following military actions in Venezuela.

What has Trump said about the Monroe Doctrine?

Monroe’s portrait reportedly

hangs in the Oval Office

near Trump’s desk.

In November 2025, the Trump administration released its

National Security Strategy

, saying it would “assert and enforce a ‘Trump Corollary’ to the Monroe Doctrine.” The objective, according to the document, is “to prevent and discourage mass migration to the United States,” to cooperate with other governments in the Western Hemisphere “against narco-terrorists, cartels and other transnational criminal organizations,” to keep the hemisphere “free of hostile foreign incursion or ownership of key assets” and supportive of supply chains, and to maintain access to strategic locations.

Trump then released a

message

on the anniversary of the Monroe Doctrine in December 2025 that he called the “Trump Corollary” to the policy: “That the American people — not foreign nations nor globalist institutions — will always control their own destiny in our hemisphere.”

Trump couched the United States’ recent Latin American intervention — in which Venezuela’s interior minister says

100 people died

— in the Monroe Doctrine.

At a press conference

at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Trump

told reporters

, “We will run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition.” U.S. secretary of state Marco Rubio later

suggested

the United States wouldn’t govern the South American country but would ​​enforce an existing “oil quarantine” on sanctioned tankers. American forces

seized two tankers

on Jan. 7, the same day Trump told

The New York Times

that “only time will tell” how long the U.S. will run Venezuela and draw oil from its reserves, but he expects it to be years.

Venezuela had been

strengthening ties

with China and Russia. With the U.S. asserting its authority, the countries’ investments in Latin America are

in question

. “This is the Western Hemisphere. This is where we live — and we’re not going to allow the Western Hemisphere to be a base of operation for adversaries, competitors and rivals of the United States,” Rubio told

NBC News

.

Why are people calling it the ‘Donroe Doctrine,’ or the ‘Trump Doctrine’?

Following the U.S. attack on the Venezuelan capital of Caracas, Trump used the Monroe Doctrine to assert the United States’ authority in the Western Hemisphere, crediting his spin on the policy — the “Donroe Doctrine,” a play on his first name that the

New York Post

is believed to have coined a year ago.

“The Monroe Doctrine is a big deal, but we’ve superseded it by a lot, by a real lot. They now call it the ‘Donroe Doctrine,’” said the U.S. president. “(The Monroe Doctrine) was very important, but we forgot about it. We don’t forget about it anymore. Under our new national security strategy, American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will never be questioned again.”

Under the Donroe Doctrine, Canada would also fall under the United States’ sphere of influence.

Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy and homeland security adviser, has reinforced this message, referring to the recast maxim as the “Trump Doctrine.”

“The United States is using its military to secure our interests unapologetically in our hemisphere. We’re a superpower, and under President Trump, we are going to conduct ourselves as a superpower,” Miller

told CNN

. “The Monroe Doctrine — and the Trump Doctrine — is all about securing the national interests of America.”

Trump’s approach now has a name, but John Bolton, the U.S. president’s former security adviser, questioned the existence of a cohesive policy, telling

The Atlantic

, “There is no Trump Doctrine: No matter what he does, there is no grand conceptual framework; it’s whatever suits him at the moment.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Ari Da Costa requested a 30-day leave to travel to Thailand but his psychiatrist suggested two weeks would be a better length of time.

A Toronto man found not criminally responsible for killing his own father with a hammer a decade back has been approved for 14 days of international travel even though he “continues to represent a significant threat to the safety of the public.”

Ari Da Costa, 30, had asked the Ontario Review Board for a 30-day leave to travel internationally so he could study mixed martial arts in Thailand. Instead, his psychiatrist suggested two weeks of travel might be a better bet.

“The treatment team would like to see some shorter ‘intermediate length’ trips prior to considering such an extended absence,” said a recent decision from the Ontario Review Board.

Da Costa’s psychiatrist “also agreed that it would be ‘preferable’ if any contemplated international trip be in the company of an approved person,” such as his mother.

The board “is unanimous in accepting that Mr. Da Costa represents a significant threat to the safety of the public,” said the decision.

“As submitted by (a lawyer representing the Attorney General of Ontario), this includes ‘the safety of the public everywhere.’”

The board acknowledged “that the terms of any disposition must be not only necessary and appropriate but at the same time, the least onerous and least restrictive.”

At some point in time it is necessary to “take the training wheels off,” Da Costa’s lawyer told the board.

The board “supports international travel on an itinerary approved by the person in charge while accompanied by an approved person for a period not exceeding 14 days,” said the decision dated Dec. 30, 2025.

Da Costa was found not criminally responsible on a charge of first degree murder in May 2019.

In December 2024, “Mr. Da Costa was ordered to be detained within the General Forensic Unit at Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences with privileges up to and including residing in the community in supervised accommodation,” said the decision.

His psychiatrist told the board “it has been a good year for Mr. Da Costa. He has done well in the community and there have been no issues with his supported residence at Ballantyne House. He continues to work four days a week and is given (leave of absence) passes on weekends which he tends to spend with his mother.”

Da Costa called 911 on Dec. 18, 2015.

“He stated that he needed paramedics and police, that he had struck his father in the head with a hammer, and he believed that his father was dead. Mr. Da Costa was found covered in blood and he was arrested. His father, Richard Da Costa, was found dead in the basement, with a hammer beside him,” said the decision.

Da Costa had been thinking about killing his father for six months before he did it. “He reported that he had hidden a hammer in couch cushions. He knew that striking his father on the head would kill him. He stated that he hit his father from behind, while his father was carrying a television.”

Weeks before killing his father, Da Costa “agreed to attend the Canadian Mental Health Association’s Early Psychosis Program,” said the decision.

“He reported paranoid symptoms, including messages from the television and people reading his mind. He consistently reported that he did not enjoy living with his parents but refused to elaborate.”

Da Costa “met with an occupational therapist at the program,” four days before killing his dad, “apparently in an organized and cooperative fashion.”

Da Costa has been diagnosed with schizophrenia, cannabis use disorder, and alcohol use disorder, though the last two are in remission, said the decision.

“Da Costa’s risk for violence flows primarily from his underlying major mental illness, which, when active and under treated, has led to very serious violence. He continues to have some residual symptoms of auditory hallucinations, but these do not cause significant distress or impairment at this time.”

His psychiatrist told the board “Da Costa’s symptoms are nearly completely in remission,” but that he “continues to represent a significant threat to the safety of the public.”

Da Costa is now “using the lockbox at his residence for medication distribution seven days a week. In other words, he is now 100 percent managing his own medication compliance,” said the decision.

His treatment team said Da Costa “no longer requires the high level of support provided at Ballantyne House and will be able to be managed in a less supportive residence,” said the decision. “Having said that, the treatment team do not believe that Mr. Da Costa is ready for a move to fully independent living as this would represent an unnecessary risk enhancing step.”

His psychiatrist said “that the next move will be to housing operated by Durham Mental Health Services in a less supervised home.”

Da Costa was 20 years old and living with his grandmother when he killed his dad.

“He described a happy childhood but admitted to suffering from mood problems, gender identity issues and having bad thoughts in his mid-teens, which impacted his interpersonal functioning. He admitted to using marijuana and drinking alcohol heavily at times throughout his adolescence.”

Da Costa told the board he stopped using marijuana “because of its impact on his schooling. He was not passing his grades at Humber College as he left class ‘to get high all the time.’ He stated that cannabis also ‘…agitated the voices.’ Mr. Da Costa reported also having experimented with MDMA, using it twice at age 18.”

Da Costa studied fitness and health promotion at Humber. “He stated that he enjoyed his classes, but he did not want to put in as much effort as was required. He also acknowledged missing many classes because, as he stated, ‘I was too preoccupied with getting high.’ He left Humber College after failing half of his courses in his first semester and he did not return to school afterwards. He has a limited employment history. He reported that he eventually lacked the motivation to work and lived off credit cards and his parents’ support. He reportedly ran up a $2,000 credit card debt from the purchase of alcohol.”

Da Costa used a pass to travel to British Columbia last summer, said the decision. “He also makes use of indirectly supervised passes to travel to his mother’s home on weekends. There has been no indication of substance use while Mr. Da Costa has been on approved trips.”

His psychiatrist “agreed that it was possible that Mr. Da Costa would be eligible for a 30-day trip within the next reporting year.”

Da Costa is waiting for a bed at a Durham Mental Health Services home.

“There have been no issues with violence or threats at his current residence. There have been no command hallucinations bothering Mr. Da Costa. He is aware of the symptoms of his major mental illness,” said the decision.

Da Costa’s “insight has improved over the course of the past year,” said his psychiatrist. “There have been no breaches of his abstinence condition.”

The board said that “as Mr. Da Costa moves to more independent living, his risk of stressors caused by financial responsibilities, employment and substance use may exacerbate residual symptoms of psychosis (leading) to violent behaviour. It is noted that Mr. Da Costa has historically coped with psychosocial stressors through substance use.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.