LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Smuggling plot suspect Benlin Yuan is co-CEO of Asiacom Americas, a U.S. subsidiary of a China-based company, located in Sterling, Virginia.

Federal U.S. prosecutors in two states are scrambling to keep a 58-year-old Canadian businessman locked up until his trial, saying he poses a danger to national security and there is no other way to stop him fleeing.

That depiction of Benlin Yuan, of Mississauga, Ont., stems from Yuan’s arrest and alleged role in a US$50-million plot to smuggle restricted high-tech Nvidia computer chips used in artificial intelligence processing into China, and follows a judge’s unexpected order granting Yuan release on bail.

Prosecutors in Virginia delayed his release while prosecutors in Texas argue it is a serious mistake that will cause irreparable harm.

Yuan was born in China and moved to Canada with his wife 20 years ago, settling in Ontario. He became a Canadian citizen and worked in information technology. Yuan and his wife have a daughter and for the past decade he has been travelling back and forth between Mississauga and Sterling, Virginia, for work.

Yuan was arrested in Sterling on Nov. 28 and charged with conspiring to violate export controls, although it wasn’t announced at the time.

Almost everything now known about the case happened in secret at proceedings taking place under a court order of confidentiality, which was lifted last week.

Yuan’s arrest was a secret, his first court appearance on Dec. 1 was in secret, and his detention review two days later was also held in secret. That hearing featured testimony about the computer chip plot by an assistant special agent-in-charge of the Office of Export Enforcement in the Department of Commerce.

Court heard allegations of a cabal of technology employees with links to China buying powerful Nvidia computer chips by claiming they were being used in the United States or being sent to countries not subject to export controls, when really they were being smuggled to China. The U.S. investigation was codenamed Operation Gatekeeper.

The federal agent testified that an undercover officer who spoke Mandarin went into a warehouse in New Jersey where pallets of Nvidia components were stored. The undercover officer watched workers scraping off Nvidia labels and replacing them with branding for a fake company.

When agents later seized the large shipment, representatives of the Chinese buyers thought it had been stolen and started negotiating with the undercover officer for its return. They agreed to pay a $1-million ransom, but the buyers insisted the shipment be inspected before payment, court heard.

That’s where Yuan allegedly came into the plot, according to a transcript of the proceeding obtained by National Post.

Yuan sat in court next to his lawyer, wearing glasses and a green prison-issue jumpsuit for his three-hour hearing.

He was described as a co-CEO of Asiacom Americas, a U.S. subsidiary of a large China-based company. The company’s first work was in Canada offering IT managed services in 2013, according to its website. It expanded to the United States a year later and set up headquarters in Virginia.

Yuan has no criminal record and was working in the United States on an L-1A visa that is valid to 2028, his lawyer said. An L-1A allows a multinational company to transfer a non-American corporate executive to manage its business in the United States.

Assistant special agent-in-charge Nicholas Crane said federal authorities have a cooperating witness who participated in the plot while he was a subordinate of Yuan. He said Yuan held encrypted chats with superiors in China about the chips.

Yuan is accused of recruiting and instructing the six inspectors who arrived to examine the packages before paying the ransom. Several of them were Asiacom Americas employees and Yuan was instructed to send copies of the identification for each of the inspectors to officials at the Beijing company.

The inspectors had arranged for three trucks to carry the enormous load and were told not to say anything about China being its destination, court heard. The U.S. government prevented the shipment from leaving.

Yuan is also accused of handling the storage of a different shipment of Nvidia products destined for China at his office. A cooperating witness for U.S. prosecutors alleged that Yuan told him not to put fake labels on this one as he thought that would cause problems; he would rather the Nvidia labels just be removed.

That shipment almost made it out. It was seized from an airplane before takeoff.

As National Post first reported, U.S. authorities also seized export-controlled technology

that was addressed to an air freight facility in Mississauga,

close to Toronto’s Pearson airport, according to allegations filed in court.

Crane said Yuan wasn’t paid for his participation.

Yuan’s lawyer, Alexander Blanchard, cross examined Crane and found he had little direct knowledge of the case. The criminal complaint against Yuan had been sworn by a different agent.

“I do not know,” was a frequent answer to Blanchard’s questions. Asked if there was any evidence Yuan was involved in the purchasing of any of the computer components, Crane said: “I do not know.” Asked if there was evidence Yuan ever put a fake label on a component, or evidence Yuan filed false export information, or had personally shipped anything, Crane gave the same answer.

Blanchard turned to the judge.

“Your Honour,” he said, “I have sat through more preliminary hearings than I could possibly count over the last decade, and I have never heard an agent respond ‘I don’t know’ so many times.”

Blanchard said the evidence against Yuan was so thin the charge against him should be dropped.

After hearing the evidence and argument, U.S. Magistrate Judge Lindsey Vaala in federal court in Virginia said the government’s case was “frustrating.”

“I don’t think your evidence is particularly strong,” Vaala told prosecutor José Ortiz, but said she found “just enough” evidence for probable cause to maintain the charge, but prosecutors failed to convince her Yuan couldn’t be released on bail with conditions — including surrendering his Canadian passport — while he waited for his trial.

Prosecutors quickly asked that Yuan remain in custody while they appeal.

In a motion to stop Yuan’s release, filed on Dec. 4, prosecutors said Yuan is an “extraordinary flight risk” and a danger.

“There is substantial evidence that the Defendant is a person of financial means with international contacts,” prosecutors said. He has “the means to flee” with “co-conspirators abroad likely willing to help him.”

In 2022 Yuan traveled on a Chinese passport, they said.

If he flees to China, he would be beyond reach of U.S. courts and if he flees to Canada, prosecutors said, he would likely also evade prosecution because U.S. export restrictions do not exist in Canada, and courts in Canada might find he hasn’t breached any law punishable in Canada, which is an element of extradition.

The danger allegation stems not from Yuan being considered violent, but rather his knowledge posing a danger to U.S. national security.

When pulling the cloak of secrecy off Operation Gatekeeper, revealing the arrest of Yuan and another man, Tom Gong, a citizen of China living in New York, as well as guilty pleas by a Texas man to unlawful export activities, Nicholas Ganjei, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Texas, described the stakes of the case as being almost existential.

“These chips are the building blocks of AI superiority and are integral to modern military applications. The country that controls these chips will control AI technology; the country that controls AI technology will control the future,” Ganjei said.

In reply, filed Dec. 10, Blanchard said the case against Yuan is “glaringly weak” and complained that despite Yuan being approved for bail he remains detained.

“Mr. Yuan has experienced a rapid deterioration in his vision since his arrest, suggesting that his prediabetes, diagnosed years ago, at some point developed into full-blown diabetes,” Blanchard wrote.

If convicted, Yuan faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, although he would more likely face closer to six years.

Blanchard declined to comment to National Post on the case. A request for comment from Asiacom Americas on Yuan’s arrest, status with the company, and on the allegations went unanswered prior to publishing deadline.

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | X:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Emergency workers transport a person on a stretcher after the massacre at Bondi Beach in Sydney, Sunday, Dec. 14, 2025. (AP Photo/Mark Baker)

The horror of Bondi Beach could just as easily happen in Canada — because the conditions are the same: we have allowed antisemitism to grow unchecked and infect our society.
 

Jews in Canada were already living in a climate of fear, now Hanukkah celebrations will be overshadowed by terror.
 

Robert Gregory, the CEO of the Australian Jewish Association, put it plainly in a
statement
: “What happened tonight is a tragedy but entirely foreseeable.”
 

How was it foreseeable? Because Australia — just like Canada — has seen an explosion of antisemitism. In both countries, Jewish schools, businesses, and synagogues have been attacked. Pro-Hamas/anti-Israel protests are commonplace.
 

The leaders of both countries were warned that recognizing a Palestinian state would escalate Jew hatred.
 

“By effectively demonizing Israel, (Mark Carney) opened the floodgates for more antisemitic acts in Canada,”
warned
Jack Mintz in the National Post.
 

But Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Prime Minister Mark Carney went ahead anyway, recklessly, without adequate thought for the Jewish people, and with absolutely no regard for their safety.
 

Their sanctimonious posturing merely added to the festering hate that is staining both countries.
 

It was less than two weeks ago that Jewish leaders from the world’s seven largest diaspora communities — including Canada — convened a task force in Sydney because of the rising tide of global antisemitism.
 

The group
warned
that “the sharp spike in antisemitism seen in Australia, including foreign state-linked attacks, is part of a dangerous global pattern threatening Jewish communities and democracies worldwide.”
 

In a statement, Marina Rosenberg, the senior vice-president for international affairs for the Anti-Defamation League, said, “What is happening in Australia is not an exception; it should be a wake-up call to communities worldwide.
 

“Across North America, Europe and Latin America, Jewish communities are reporting the same pattern of unprecedented harassment, threats and incitement. When synagogues can be firebombed in Melbourne and Jews threatened and attacked in New York, London, Paris, Berlin, Buenos Aires and Toronto, this is a threat not only to Jewish safety but to democratic stability itself.”
 

That warning was given only 12 days ago, but Jews in Australia — just like Canada — have been alerting governments about the dangers of rising antisemitism for over two years and nothing has been done.
 

In the ADL statement, Richard Marceau, general counsel for Canada’s Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, said, “Here in Canada, extremists have escalated their hatred and violence: openly glorifying Hamas ‘martyrs’ on our streets, attacking Jewish and pro-Israel students at events, harassing Jewish families outside their homes, and targeting synagogues and other Jewish institutions.
 

“For these extremists, this was never only about Israel’s actions in Gaza; it is about instilling fear and sowing division within our society. Canada must stand with its international partners in confronting this threat — not only to counter antisemitism, but to safeguard the future of our democratic way of life for all people.”  
 

Since the massacre of October 7, 2023, both countries have been swamped by Jew hatred.
 

A new report from the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) reveals antisemitic incidents are at record highs.
 

“Arson attacks against synagogues, preschools and other Jewish institutions, are higher than in any previous year on record,”
says
the ECAJ.
 

Here in Canada, B’nai Brith
reported
earlier this year: “Antisemitism in Canada has reached perilous, record-setting heights.”
 

How many wake-up calls do political leaders, at all levels in Canada, need before they act? Must Canada experience its own version of Bondi Beach before Carney decides that enough is enough?
 

In a
statement
on X, Carney made the usual points about being horrified and not bowing to terrorism.
 

“Horrified by the antisemitic terror attack that has stolen the lives of 11 people at a Hanukkah event on Bondi Beach today in Australia,” he said. “Canada stands with the people of Australia and Jewish people everywhere in sorrow, and determination never to bow to terrorism, violence, hatred and intimidation.”
 

He added, “May we all support and strengthen that resilience to protect our Jewish communities and to ensure more fundamentally that all people can thrive in every aspect of our society.”
 

If Carney truly wants to protect our Jewish communities he first needs to recognize the grip antisemitism has on this country and its scope. He must then resolve to use all means at his disposal to tackle it. Taking leadership on the issue will empower other political leaders, as well as police, to take appropriate action.
 

Tackling the evil of antisemitism first requires that political leaders don’t just ignore it — as they have been doing.
 

Meanwhile, Hanukkah is too sacred for Jews not to celebrate, despite the obvious dangers.
 

“We will not give in to terror,” said Rabbi Levi Gansburg of Toronto’s Chabad on Bayview, announcing that Chanukah celebrations will continue Sunday night. “Fear does not define us, and it will not silence Jewish life.”
 

These are dark days for Canada’s Jewish community and politicians need to act before they get darker.
 

National Post


This screen grab made from UGC handout video footage courtesy of Timothy Brant-Coles shows two gunmen dressed in black firing multiple shots on a bridge into a Hanukkah event at Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia on Sunday, Dec. 14

More than 1,000 Jewish people congregated on Sydney’s iconic Bondi Beach on Sunday to celebrate the first night of Chanukah, a festival of light and miracles.

What unfolded was disturbingly reminiscent of October 7. Two gunmen opened fire with automatic weapons targeting the gathering of Jews. Shouts of “Allahu Akhbar” were reportedly heard. One of the gunmen is captured

on video warning people who were not Jewish to run away

. The event was unguarded, but the nearest police station was a mere 150 metres away. Eyewitnesses say it took what seemed like an eternity for police to arrive and respond, between five and 10 minutes.

In the meantime, at last count, 12 people were murdered and dozens injured. Video circulating on social media shows beachgoers running — screaming children, the elderly, families, all ages. It was the end of a hot summer day in Sydney. The beach was jammed.

The Jews who were targeted were sitting ducks. It was like a flashback to October 7, evoking the scenes of Hamas gunmen mowing down young Nova festival party-goers who had been dancing at sunrise moments earlier.

Several hours after the Bondi attack, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese spoke to the nation:

“This is a targeted attack on Jewish Australians on the first day of Chanukah which should be a day of joy. A celebration of faith. An act of evil antisemitism, terrorism, that has struck the heart of our nation. An attack on Jewish Australians is an attack on every Australian. And every Australian tonight will be — like me — devastated on this attack on our way of life. There is no place for this hate, violence and terrorism in our nation. Let me be clear. We will eradicate it.”

Albanese continued to address Australian Jews directly: “We stand with you. We embrace you. And we reaffirm tonight that you have every right to be proud of who you are and what you believe. You have the right to worship and study and live and work in peace and safety. And you enrich us as a nation.”

 Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese speaks to the media at Parliament House Canberra on Sunday.

Albanese should not be at all surprised that this terror attack occurred in Sydney. Since October 7, Australia has allowed Islamists to “demonstrate” and spread their virulent Jew hatred, unimpeded. In the days following October 7, Sydney and Melbourne streets were full of demonstrations calling for Intifada, to kill the Jews, and, of course, cries of “Allahu Akhbar.”

The same conduct has been permitted — even emboldened — in Canada, by successive prime ministers and leaders at every level. Law enforcement? They mostly look away. Or, as occurs frequently in Toronto, Jewish people are told that their presence is “provocative.” At weekly “demonstrations” by Islamists and other antisemites — who make a show of parading through a heavily Jewish neighbourhood in north Toronto, taunting residents with hate — police stand by.

For two years now, Canadian Jews have been told that the demonstrators are exercising their “constitutional rights” of freedom of expression and assembly.

That is simply untrue. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms does not license conduct that is clearly inciting hatred and violence against anyone. And that includes Jews.

There are many laws in civil statutes and the Criminal Code of Canada that should have been invoked to shut down these hate-fests. But they are not.

Why?

On Sunday afternoon, Chabad — the same Jewish outreach organization that hosted the event at Bondi Beach — has organized a candle lighting event at a plaza in Toronto’s north end. It happens to be the same plaza where the Jew-hating “demonstrations” have been held every week for more than two years. Where, by my count, more Jewish people have been arrested “for their own safety” than have hateful demonstrators.

Toronto Police Chief Myron Demkiw sees his role as “keeping the peace.” I disagree. His job is to serve and protect everyone, including Jews.

Across Canada, this tolerance of public violence and hatred targeting Jews has been normalized. In fact — it has been elevated — to a constitutionally protected “right.” On which planet?

 Hamas supporters protest in front of the Israeli Consulate in Toronto as people with Israel Now counter-protest, Thursday, June 5, 2025.

Speaking with the National Post on Sunday, Beni Sabti — an Israel-based Iran expert (born and raised in that country) — reported how Iranian social media channels have been cheering the Bondi massacre as a “celebration of the murder of Jews.” Among those making such comments is a close adviser to the supreme leader of Iran.

Asked what he would say to Mark Carney, today, Sabti did not hesitate: “Stop all the ‘Free Palestine’ demonstrations. All of them. Enough with the words. You must stop the regular Sunday demonstrations (in the Toronto Jewish neighbourhood). Put police and security in the streets. Otherwise, the extremists will feel free to do as they please.”

Sabti met recently in Ottawa with several MPs and senior officials from Global Affairs Canada. He said he attempted to raise the threat of Islamists — who are supported worldwide by Iran — but the bureaucrats were uninterested. They preferred to focus on Sabti’s analysis of Iranian domestic matters.

Many Western governments — Canada included — profoundly misunderstand the Islamist mindset, Sabti says. “When demonstrations by extremists are allowed — it encourages actions like we saw today in Sydney.”

Disagreeing with Israeli government policy is one thing. Demonizing all Jewish people — in Israel or elsewhere — is quite another. In Canada, we do not tolerate such smearing with any other ethnic or religious group. Are Russians accosted? Chinese people? Iranians? Afghanis? No. But Jews? For some reason, different rules apply to their respect and safety in society.

Shortly after the Bondi Beach attack, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued the following statement in Hebrew:

“Three months ago, I wrote to the Prime Minister of Australia: your policies are pouring fuel on the hatred of Jews that is spreading in Australia. Antisemitism is a cancer that spreads when leaders remain silent and fail to act.

“This did not happen elsewhere — it happened in Australia. Something terrible happened there; the number of murdered keeps rising by the minute. We saw evil in its vileness, and Jewish heroism at its peak.”

These prophetic words apply equally to Canada and Mark Carney’s handling of virulent, toxic Jew hatred in the country. Like Albanese, Carney flatly refuses to concede that there is any connection between his embrace of radical Palestinian nationalism and Islamism and the chronic hatred targeting Jews in Canada. The likelihood of there being any direct exchange between Carney and Netanyahu, regrettably, is nonexistent.

Social media has been flooded with horrifying clips of the Sydney attack, but one merits special mention. As the shooters are firing their guns, an unarmed man approaches one of the terrorists, tackles him and takes his gun.

He aims it at the terrorist. He then places the gun on the ground, leaning against a tree, and raises his hands, as if in surrender. He did that so police would know that he was not a terrorist. Extraordinarily quick thinking under pressure.

Ahmed El Ahmed, a 43-year-old man, apparently Muslim, had been shot twice and wounded before police arrived at Bondi. He reportedly owns a store in Sydney and is the father of two young children. In an act of extreme bravery and heroism he risked his life and saved so many others. Had he not inserted himself into the mayhem, it is likely dozens more would have been slaughtered.

He represents the finest of humanity and our gratitude and awe are boundless.

Now: May the political and law enforcement leadership in Canada wake up and step up to ensure that Jewish Canadians are not exposed to such madness. No one and no country can consider themselves immune to this terrorism. Certainly not Canada.


People flee after gunmen opened fire at Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia, on Dec. 14, Two suspected shooters opened fire at the iconic, killing several people and wounding multiple others.

Saying “we will not give in to terror,” a Toronto rabbi says his Chabad synagogue will carry on with public Hanukkah celebrations after today’s attack on an Australian Jewish beach party that left at least 12 people dead.

“Fear does not define us, and it will not silence Jewish life. Chanukah is about light pushing back against darkness. That message feels especially urgent right now,” Rabbi Levi Gansburg of Chabad on Bayview said in a news release.

Twelve people were killed and at least 29 injured as terrorists targeted a Chanukah party on Bondi Beach in Sydney, organized by the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. One shooter is believed to be among the fatalities, the second was injured.

Hanukah begins today, and events are planned all week across Canada.

In a statement, Prime Minister Mark Carney said he was “horrified by the antisemitic terror attack” on Bondi.

“Canada stands with the people of Australia and Jewish people everywhere in sorrow, and determination never to bow to terrorism, violence, hatred and intimidation,” Carney said on the X social media platform.

“Hanukkah is a time of light amidst the darkness, and a remembrance of the resilience of the Jewish people. May we all support and strengthen that resilience to protect our Jewish communities and to ensure more fundamentally that all people can thrive in every aspect of our society.”

Chabad on Bayview plans events today and Monday along Bayview Avenue in Toronto, and said members of the public are invited to “attend and stand together in celebration of faith, freedom, and community.”

“This country should and must be a safe place for Jews to live openly and proudly,” Gansburg said in the release. “The Jewish community has been, and continues to be, a positive and meaningful contributor to Canadian society. Celebrating our heritage publicly is not an act of defiance, it is an expression of belonging.”


Alberta Education Minister Demetrios Nicolaides answers questions from students after a news conference at an Edmonton elementary school in March 2025.

Demetrios Nicolaides is the father of five elementary-age daughters, but the tumult in his life doesn’t end there.

He is Alberta’s very busy minister of education and childcare, working hard to build consensus with deeply frustrated educators in the aftermath of a gnarly teachers strike. He’s also a prime target in a well-orchestrated plan to recall a growing number of United Conservative Party (UCP) MLAs, which may not be unrelated.

Perhaps the only PhD inside Premier Danielle Smith’s cabinet and caucus, Nicolaides is the standard-bearer for academically sound and evidence-based approaches to bridging deep political divides. His current challenge is to ensure complexity and aggression are addressed in K-12 classrooms, aggravated by swelling class sizes.

“We can’t ask our teachers to be interpreters, mental health experts, clinical professionals and teachers, all at the same time,” declares Nicolaides. Few would disagree.

Nicolaides says his government is “fully in alignment with what teachers are asking for… and fully in alignment with what the challenges are.”

Growing incidents of violence in the classroom have his full attention. “I’ve heard firsthand from teachers,” he reports, “stories that are just unbelievable, to be quite frank, that need to be addressed.

“One stark indicator of the growing severity of behavioural challenges is the rise in ‘room clears’ — a practice where an entire class is evacuated to ensure safety due to a student’s behaviour,” explains a November 2025 report to the minister from education leaders.

The report also states, “incidents of emotional and behavioural dysregulation are becoming increasingly common in schools, often manifesting as physical aggression — including fighting, hitting, biting, hair-pulling — and in the most extreme cases, the presence of weapons.”

 Police cars outside a Calgary high school following a stabbing incident.

Nicolaides laments the fast growth in class sizes propelled by a two-year population surge: “That needs to be addressed, no question.”

“In 2023, we saw the largest increase in our population, ever, in the history of this province,” the minister reports. That’s going to put immense pressure on our school divisions and on our teachers, he adds, “that’s why we’re calling for more responsible immigration and a provincial seat at the table when it comes to immigration.

“In 2022, the Calgary Board of Education was planning to wind down 14,000 student spaces, equivalent to 22 schools, due to lacklustre enrolment projection,” Nicolaides elaborates. “Fast forward one short year to 2023, and we’re hit with the highest ever level of population increase our province has seen.”

To be clear, Nicolaides — born and raised in Calgary to parents who emigrated from Cyprus in the ‘70s — is not blaming immigrants.

“There’s a consensus across the country that immigration needs to be managed more sustainably,” he asserts. “NDP B.C. Premier Eby has called for that … and I would argue further, even former prime minister Justin Trudeau in the spring of ’24 said they needed to be a little bit more diligent about managing immigration.”

The UCP government is willing to throw money at these issues — promising 3,000 additional teachers by 2028, and $400 million over three years to deal with classroom complexity. Early in December, the government announced a $69-million investment over three years into a mental health and well-being grant.

But, as the minister makes clear, strategies need to be evidence-based. That means tabling legislation to mandate math and reading assessments for K-Grade 3, to enable early detection of learning difficulties and enable targeted intervention. That also means deepening the conversation on classroom sizes.

“I would say, class sizes larger than 30 are too big,” the minister states, “that’s why I have commissioned and asked our school divisions to provide us with detailed classroom numbers so we can get an exact understanding of where are the outliers.”

Effective next month, class sizes will be publicly disclosed, but the minister remains a stickler for rational decision-making. Are we talking about reducing class size to improve academic performance, he asks, or are we talking about reducing class size to make classrooms more manageable for teachers, given the complexity?

Nicolaides acknowledges the frustration over the government’s use of the notwithstanding clause to legislate striking teachers back to work; and as education minister, he’s the obvious whipping boy for the Alberta Teachers’ Association.

But one group with whom he may not find consensus are those set on using recall legislation to force byelections for the 44 UCP MLAs (starting with Nicolaides) who voted to use the notwithstanding clause against teachers.

In 2019, when Nicolaides was first elected MLA, then-premier Jason Kenney campaigned on the idea of recall, stating at the time, “it should be for serious and egregious breaches of trust,” and that’s the sentiment Nicolaides says he believes in. “But I think what’s happening here,” he continues, in a recall campaign targeting 44 UCP MLAs (including the premier), “is an attempt to completely upset stable governance.

“I’m not sure who’s behind the Total Recall initiative,” says the minister, “but it seems to be quite coordinated.” Public service unions decry responsibility for weaponizing Alberta’s recall legislation, but a look at Operation Total Recall’s website, plus appeals for support by union leaders, lead one to conclude organizational effort is being dedicated to this province-wide call to action.

“Every individual MLA in a constituency has a relationship with their voters, their neighbours and constituents, and it’s the integrity of that relationship that has to be the question when a recall is brought forward,” Nicolaides says, “not an opportunity for outside interests to try and influence things.”

The UCP government has decided it will not amend recall legislation to set higher thresholds or clearer rules. Nicolaides says he doesn’t anticipate those petitioning for a byelection in his constituency will gather significant support. In Calgary-Bow constituency, the threshold for a successful recall petition is 16,006 verified signatures of constituents (that’s 60 per cent of the votes cast in the constituency in the 2023 provincial election), by Jan. 21.

Nicolaides has other plans for late January: fingers crossed, he plans to be at the summit of Mount Kilimanjaro, as part of a campaign to raise awareness and funds for domestic violence prevention in Alberta, in honour of his sister who was killed by her ex-husband nearly two years ago.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Human right lawyer Arsen Ostrovsky speaks to an Australian news station after he was injured during an attack on a Hannukah celebration on Bondi Beach on Sunday.

Human right lawyer — and frequent National Post contributor

Arsen Ostrovsky

— was injured in today’s Australia attack that targeted a Hanukkah celebration on Bondi Beach and left at least 12 people killed.

He spoke to 9News Australia at the scene, his face and shirt covered in blood, his head wrapped in a bandage. This is a slightly edited transcript of that interview:

This was a bloodbath, it was an absolute massacre.

I was with my family, it was a Hanukkah celebration, there were hundreds of people. There were children, there were elderly, families enjoying themselves, children, kids at a festival, playing, and then all of a sudden it’s absolute chaos.

There’s guns, fire everywhere. People ducking, it was absolute chaos. We didn’t know what was happening, where the gunfire was coming from.

I saw blood gushing from me, I saw people hit, saw people fall to the ground. My only concern was, where are my kids, where’s my wife, where’s my family?

I survived October 7, I lived in Israel the last 13 years, we came here only two weeks ago to work with the Jewish community, to fight antisemitism, to fight this bloodthirsty, ravaging hatred. That’s why I’m here. We’ve lived through worse, we’re going to get through this and we’re going to get the bastards that did this.

(Ostrovsky, the new head of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council office in Sydney, had warned about rising antisemitism after coming across anti-Israel graffiti at Bondi Beach two weeks ago, the

Jerusalem Post

reported.)

I saw at least one gunman firing, looked like a shotgun, firing randomly in all directions. I saw children falling to the floor, I saw elderly, I saw invalids, I saw people just, it was just an absolute bloodbath. Blood gushing everywhere.

October 7, that’s the last time I saw this. I never thought I would see this in Australia, not in my lifetime. On Bondi Beach, of all places. This iconic place.

My children and my wife are safe, thank God. They’re OK. They managed to get away. But I didn’t know where they were, and there’s no greater fear, no greater horror not knowing where your family is. They’re OK. I’ll be OK.

I got hit in the head, I’m bleeding. I’ve lost blood. There are people around me that are far worse. I’ll be OK, we’ll be OK as a community and we will defeat this ravaging hatred.

https://twitter.com/IsraelWarRoom/status/2000165395164955029


Vadim Danilov decided to start is own car service after hearing stories of passengers having to hide their Jewish identity while using ridesharing services.

Jew Ride, a car service for the Jewish community is offering an alternative to other ridesharing companies amid reports of antisemitism in Toronto.

Founder Vadim Danilov moved to Canada with his wife and children from Israel two months before the October 7 attacks. He became a driver for Uber, during which time he heard many stories from his Jewish passengers. Some told him that they felt the need to hide their Stars of David when they got into a vehicle or avoid speaking Hebrew for their own safety.

This week, National Post reported on two more antisemitic incidents involving Toronto residents and the ridesharing company. In August, a Canadian-Israeli who was travelling with his wife in Europe said

he was refused a ride

by an Uber driver because he said he was from Israel. In February, a woman said she was kicked out of an Uber after the driver heard her speaking Hebrew to her husband.

Last month, model Miriam Mattova told the Post that she was told to get out of the vehicle by an

Uber driver because she was Jewish

in November. She was left alone on the street in the middle of the night.

“This is what made me start this company in March of this year,” Danilov told National Post. 

Jew Ride

, offers services for all passengers, but he said that 95 per cent of his clients are Jewish. “It’s to help passengers from the community and provide them with the safe, private transportation service anywhere in GTA.”

Currently, Danilov operates 24 hours a day and provides transportation all kinds, including for events, airport pickups and dropoffs, for businesses and even for pets. Danilov said he works with two other drivers from the community. Customers can book a ride online through the website.

“My passengers today say they feel safe when I pick them up and they also say … antisemitism in Canada, it’s getting worse and worse,” he said. He added that he believes the Canadian government has to get involved in order to stop the antisemitic acts that have been reported by Jewish passengers using Uber.

Former Toronto resident Leigh Elzas posted about Jew Ride on Facebook, applauding it for offering safe alternatives for the Jewish community. She lived in Toronto for her whole life but moved to the United States in July.

“One of the reasons we left was because of the antisemitism in Canada, but Toronto is especially bad,” she said.

“I wanted to help spread the good word and let people know there’s an option other than Uber, because Jews are not safe taking Lyfts, Ubers, anything, other than accepting rides from other Jews it seems these days.”

Elzas said she hasn’t used Jew Ride herself, but she said she knows someone who had an “excellent experience” with it.

“Too many Jews in Toronto have faced discrimination simply trying to get a ride,” she wrote on Facebook in August. “Some Uber drivers cancel as soon as they see a Jewish name, a person who looks Jewish, or even a mezuzah on the doorpost. It’s another harsh reality of life today for a Jew living in Canada. That’s why this service exists. I, of course, fully support it, but I hate that it has to.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Cuba's President Miguel Diaz-Canel, left, with Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in December 2024. The White House views Cuba and Venezuela as part of the same ideological threat.

U.S. President Donald Trump’s second term in office has borne witness to a dramatic and unprecedented escalation in tensions between the U.S. and President Nicolás Maduro’s Venezuela.

The White House has deployed a naval task force towards Venezuela and destroyed over 20 boats with the purported aim of preventing the flow of narcotics to American shores.

However, many view the buildup as a pretext for regime change; Trump has repeatedly suggested that Maduro’s days in power are numbered and has authorized the CIA to conduct covert operations on Venezuelan soil.

But as the Trump administration piles pressure on Venezuela, some analysts speculate that the ultimate goal of Washington’s military buildup is regime change not just in Venezuela, but in Cuba too.

“I don’t think anyone can imagine (the United States) going for regime change in Venezuela and sitting back on Cuba,” said Helen Yaffe, co-host of the podcast Cuba Analysis and professor of Latin American political economy at the University of Glasgow.

Speaking to National Post, Yaffe emphasized the likelihood of a simultaneous campaign of regime change in both Latin American nations.

According to the professor, Venezuela and Cuba are grouped together in the eyes of Washington’s foreign policy. Not only have the two been close allies since the 1998 election victory of left-wing Venezuelan revolutionary Hugo Chávez, but they are also both seen as ideological foes of the United States.

The two countries, along with Nicaragua, constitute what former U.S. national security adviser John Bolton termed the “troika of tyranny,” a triumvirate of Latin American nations with left-wing authoritarian governments. Bolton, who served in the first Trump administration, and foreign policymakers in the current U.S. administration, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio, view the three countries as their principal regional adversaries.

Yaffe thinks that targeting one element of the “troika” is likely to lead to a campaign against the other members.

Not only does the White House view Venezuela and Cuba as part of the same ideological threat, but they are also seen as key chess pieces in a broader geopolitical strategy of deterring Chinese influence in the region.

The Trump administration has explicitly expressed its desire to counter China’s growing influence in Latin America, where the Asian titan is increasingly involved in massive infrastructure and mining projects.

Paul Hare, a former British ambassador to Cuba (2001-2004) and former deputy head of mission to Venezuela who lectures in international relations at Boston University, emphasized the importance of China’s enduring support for Venezuela and Cuba.

China “has a big role to play in this too,” Hare told the National Post, pointing out that the Chinese “immediately came out saying Maduro won” after the 2024 Venezuelan elections, which were widely decried as fraudulent.

Hare also noted that “China would like to keep Cuba as a nuisance to the U.S.”

Indeed, there have been reports of increased Chinese-Cuban cooperation in the field of military intelligence and surveillance. Regime change in Cuba and Venezuela would undoubtedly curb Chinese influence in Latin America.

But Yaffe contends that accusations of Cuba becoming a “Chinese listening post” are being used to justify potential regime change in the Caribbean nation: “to turn any country into the bogeyman, you associate it with China.”

“The key issue… is oil,” argues Yaffe, who believes the White House’s end goal is for its corporations to control Venezuela’s oil supply.

The South American nation has the largest oil reserves in the world – some five times larger than those held by the United States. Maduro alleges that America’s claims of wanting to democratize Venezuela or prevent drug trafficking are a pretext to control his country’s petrol supplies.

 Massive aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford arrives in St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands on Dec. 1, 2025, amid tensions over potential military action against Venezuela.

Indeed, this week’s dramatic seizure of an oil tanker by U.S. forces off the Venezuelan coast shows that petroleum is undoubtedly a key piece of the equation.

But beyond the economic appeal for Washington to secure Venezuelan oil supplies, analysts say controlling petrol exports would also give the U.S. leverage over the Cuban regime.

Cuba has historically depended on Venezuelan oil, receiving up to 100,000 barrels per day (bpd) since 2000 to help stabilize its economy in times of crisis, although this number has dwindled in recent years.

While Havana has made an effort to diversify its trading partners to include Mexico and Russia, approximately 60 per cent of its total fuel and crude oil imports came from Venezuela in the first 10 months of 2025.

As a result, a successful regime change operation in Venezuela risks damaging the already fragile Cuban economy, as Cuba would likely be obliged to renegotiate an oil deal with Venezuela on less favourable terms. Venezuelan oil shipments to the island could also stop altogether because of American sanctions.

Notably, the oil tanker seized on Wednesday was bound for Cuba, with Politico reporting that the Cuban state firm Cubametales intended to sell the vessel carrying Venezuelan crude oil to Asian energy brokers.

Ex-ambassador Hare told National Post that a U.S. chokehold on Venezuelan oil could oblige Cuba to rely on “the Americans and to some extent the Europeans” for economic support.

He added that, in exchange for easing economic sanctions in a post-Maduro world, the U.S. would likely pressure the Cubans to enact significant reforms, such as the expansion of “elements of the private sector,” the ousting of current Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel and a potential “new business deal” with the Trump administration.

As tensions mount between Trump and Maduro, Cuba has offered support to its longstanding ally, denouncing U.S. actions as “aggressive” and reportedly sending bodyguards to protect Venezuela’s president.

However, Hare said that Cuban assistance has limits and that they simply “don’t have the resources” for a “mass commitment” of troops to Venezuela.

Yaffe agreed, noting that although any armed confrontation “would bog the U.S. down in a (drawn-out) Vietnam-style” conflict, neither Cuba nor Venezuela could ultimately defeat the U.S. militarily.

Amid reports that the Cuban regime has tried to communicate with the United States about its future in the eventuality of Maduro’s removal, the Caribbean island appears to be preparing for the worst.

Latin America Reports

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


“Research suggests that, like cisgender children, transgender and non-binary children may recognize their own gender identity as early as 2 to 3 years old or during later childhood or early adolescents,” a Statistics Canada consultation guide says.

Statistics Canada is seeking feedback from various groups on options for releasing data collected during the last census, but not publicly shared, on transgender and nonbinary children from toddlers and pre-schoolers to young teens.

In a consultation guide, the federal agency said it “may be breaking new ground” as the first national statistics office in the world to disseminate gender information for children and youth under 15.

“There are enough cases in the 2021 Census data to support basic analysis by gender diversity status for young children and youth aged 0 to 14,” the agency said, data that could provide “valuable information on the experiences and outcomes among this population.”

The 2021 census was the first in Canada to collect information on sex at birth as well as gender, how the individual identifies. According to the data, 100,815 people, or 0.33 per cent of the population aged 15 and older, identified as transgender or non-binary. The proportion was highest (0.79 per cent) for Gen Z (those born roughly between 1997 and 2012).

But only data on those aged 15 and older have so far been released.

Numbers collected on younger children “required more investigation to ensure quality and protect confidentiality,” the agency said in a statement to National Post. The goal is to ensure data are reported in a way “that does not cause undue harm to gender diverse children and youth,” according to the consultation document.

Some who have called for an urgent reappraisal of Canada’s gender-affirming model of care praised StatCan for collecting the data,

although they questioned the agency’s reluctance to release it publicly.

“Transparency as to the number of impacted youth can only be a good thing, in my view,” said Calgary pediatrician Dr. Edward Les, who added it wasn’t at all clear “what harm could arise from sharing data so openly, so as to help foster discussion around the health of these kids.”

However, he and others also said the document appears to have an ideological bent and they questioned whether asking parents to make judgments on their children’s gender is an accurate way to collect data.

The question of persistence is also a minefield.

“There are many gender nonconforming children,” said Dr. Joanne Sinai, a clinical associate professor and psychiatrist at the University of British Columbia.

“The majority of them will grow up to be gay or lesbian and not have gender dysphoria.”

“Some parents would label their gender nonconforming children as transgender, and others would not,” Sinai said. “Gender ideology is interfering with the acceptance of gender nonconforming kids as being completely normal rather than it being an indication they are transgender.”

Gender is a feeling and fluid, Sinai added. “I have no idea what non-binary even means for young kids. It’s different for everyone and there is no way to define it.”

According to the

Canadian Paediatric Society’s 2023 position statement on gender-affirming care

, some children may recognize a “degree of mismatch” between their gender identity and birth sex as early as age two or three, and, by ages six to seven, “children begin to appreciate gender as an identity independent of external features.”

“Children and youth are often assumed to be cisgender (people whose reported gender corresponds to their birth sex) from birth until they ‘come out’ as a different gender on their own accord,” reads the StatCan consultation guide.

“Researchers suggest that children aged 18 to 24 months are developmentally capable of recognizing gender norms and expressing gendered behaviours in visible ways.”

“Research also suggests that, like cisgender children, transgender and non-binary children may recognize their own gender identity as early as 2 to 3 years old or during later childhood or early adolescents,” the document reads.

Les challenged that assumption. “The document’s contention that ‘researchers’ have found that children as young as two or three can exhibit evidence of ‘cross-gender’ identity is further evidence of ideological capture,” he wrote in an email to the Post.

“We’re expected to believe, I suppose, that a little boy that plays with dolls is therefore a girl, or that a female toddler enamoured with trucks is a boy, and that a parent observing this sort of behaviour can vouch ‘by proxy’ that their child is ‘transgender.’ What nonsense.”

Gender isn’t static and can change “from one point-in-time to another,” the document reads.

Kids can generally self-report around age 12. However, parents who report their child’s gender status by proxy may or may not do so accurately, the agency noted. “If a child has not disclosed their gender as gender diverse or if their gender is not affirmed by the proxy respondent, then the child’s gender may be reported as their assumed gender by default.”

It’s complicated, Sinai said. Typically, one person per household fills out census data. “You have one parent who has a gender non-conforming kid is who is like, ‘whatever.’ And you have another parent who doesn’t want to be seen as transphobic, and they would say ‘my kid is trans.’”

Some parents are opting “not to gender” their children based on birth sex “and rather consider the child as non-binary until they can explore and present their gender as they see fit,” the consultation paper states.

But

gender-open parenting

can be psychologically confusing for children, Sinai said.

“They’re in a world where things are boy and girl. Whether we like it or not, there is a dichotomy. They’re in a world which is male and female. They see adults. They see other kids. It can be incredibly confusing if nobody is referring to them as their sex. That could really confuse their sense of identity development.”

StatCan is exploring an age cutoff for the under-15 data, although the document noted that “there are enough cases in the 2021 Census data to support basic analysis” by gender status for typical five-year groups, such as 0 to four, five to nine and 10 to 14.

The questions select respondents are being asked include how the public might react if the data are released or not released.

Children identifying as trans and nonbinary and their families are often marginalized, “and at times targeted by groups that seek to dismiss their existence and limit their rights,” the document reads.

This week, Alberta’s United Conservatives invoked the Charter’s notwithstanding clause to pass three controversial laws that require parental consent for students changing their names or pronouns in school, a ban on the prescribing of puberty-blockers and cross-sex hormones to youth under 16 and a law prohibiting transgender girls from participating in amateur female sports.

Releasing the data on young children could help address gaps in the public’s understanding of these children, but it could also be met with negative reactions and misconceptions, the StatCan document states.

When the census data on sex and gender were first released,

Egale Canada

said the information could help minimize discrimination and improve the mental health and wellbeing of transgender and non-binary people.

Sinai is concerned the data will be used “to justify medicalization, meaning puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones in youth.”

In a statement to the Post, StatCan said its consultation guide includes a summary and literature review “that present various perspectives and considerations.” However, Les noted that the document includes only three references and makes no mention of two

studies by McMaster University-led researchers

published earlier this year that concluded “considerable uncertainty” remains about the gender-affirming medical treatment for youth, echoing a major British review that led to a ban on puberty blockers for minors.

StatCan said it is consulting with “subject-matter” experts.

The consultation was launched Nov. 10, and ended Friday, StatCan said.

“Questions were sent to multiple groups and individuals, including LGBTQ+ groups, who were identified as likely data users.”

The same questions on birth sex and gender will also be asked in the 2026 census.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Among the celebrities who could become citizens thanks to Bill C-3 are, clockwise from the left, Madonna, Hillary Clinton, Angelina Jolie, Viggo Mortensen, Lily Collins, and Jack White.

A piece of legislation making its way through Ottawa this fall and set to come into effect in January, if not earlier, will restore and grant Canadian citizenship to thousands of people around the world who were previously shut out by an earlier rule.

It also means a handful of celebrities — including Hillary Clinton, Madonna and Viggo Mortensen, among others — will also, by virtue of their Canadian ancestry, become Canadians.

“This has a huge impact on people all over the world who are descendants of Canadians,” Toronto immigration lawyer Valerie Kleinman from Green and Spiegel told National Post in an interview.

“I can imagine a situation where there are many people globally who will be Canadian and will actually have no idea that they are Canadian, which is really interesting.”

Here’s what you need to know about Bill C-3: An Act to Amend the Citizenship Act and the elimination of the first-generation limit on citizenship.

What famous people could become Canadian under Bill C-3?

According to

Perche-Quebec

, a website that explores the historical migration of people from France’s Perche region to New France, the territory colonized by France in North America, former First Lady and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has several French-Canadian ancestors in her maternal family tree.

Their descendants stayed in Quebec for generations and later emigrated to the U.S., though some, including her great-great-grandmother Mary Anne Frances McDougall, lived in Windsor at times.

“She really has a good French-Canadian line,” Gail Moreau-Desharnais of the French-Canadian Heritage Society of Michigan told

The Canadian Press

in 2016.

“And when you trace her matrilineal line, or female to female to female, her ultimate female ancestor is Jeanne Ducorps, one of the Filles du Roi (King’s Daughters).”

 Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has French-Canadian ancestry.

That was the name given to roughly 800 women sent to New France by King Louis XIV between 1663 and 1673 to correct the gender imbalance in the colony, where they were encouraged to marry and make babies.

As documented by Perche-Quebec and other genealogists, Clinton’s ancestry also makes her a distant relative of Justin Bieber, Madonna, Celine Dion, Jack Kerouac, Ryan Gosling, Alanis Morissette, not to mention two former prime ministers — Pierre Elliott and Justin Trudeau.

Award-winning actor Angelina Jolie’s great-grandmother, Marie-Louise Angélina LeDuc, who shares a similar Percheron pioneer ancestry as Clinton and the others, hails from Sainte-Anne-de-la-Pérade, Que., a town on the north shore of the St. Lawrence River, according to

Geneanet

.

As reported by the

BBC

last year, Jolie is also a distant relative of the late Queen Elizabeth II by way of her matrilineal line, which stretches back to French King Phillip II, who ruled in the late 12th and early 13th century.

As for Madonna, the singer has French-Canadian ancestry, starting with her great-great-grandparents and dating back six generations, according to a Canadian genealogist.

She was born Madonna Louise Ciccone to Silvio Ciccone and Madonna Louise Fortin, whose maternal great-grandfather was Narcisse ‘Nelson” Fortin of St-Simon, Que, as researched by Kim Kujawski, who runs a service called

The French Genealogist.

His son of the same name would later settle in Bay City, Michigan, where the singer was born four generations later in 1958.

 Pop star Madonna shares some French-Canadian ancestry with Hillary Clinton, Celine Dion and Justin Trudeau, among others.

Actress Lily Collins already has U.K. and U.S. citizenship by way of her parents — famed pop rocker Phil Collins of England and his second ex-wife Jill Tavelman.

She could add a Canadian passport by way of her maternal great-grandfather,

Jack Charles Tavelman, who was born in Winnipeg in 1900 to Russian Jewish parents, according to

Ancestry.com.

He later emigrated to California, where he ran a men’s clothing store in Beverly Hills.

Detroit-born rocker Jack White has one of the shorter climbs along his family tree to find a Canadian connection.

As reported by

CBC

in 2007, his paternal grandfather, Frank Gillis, was from Sydney Mines, a small town in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia. His wife, Florence MacIsaac, while born in Boston, grew up in Antigonish, N.S., to parents from Inverness, also on Cape Breton Island.

He’s also distantly related to renowned Nova Scotia fiddlers Ashley MacIsaac, Buddy MacMaster and Natalie MacMaster.

Lord of the Rings trilogy actor Viggo Mortensen, who already has citizenship in the U.S., where he was born, and in Denmark, where his namesake father hails from, also has roots in Nova Scotia on his mother’s side.

As documented by

Geneanet

, his maternal grandfather, Walter Sydney Atkinson, was born in Parrsboro, a small town in the province’s northwest. Her Canadian ancestry in Atlantic Canada dates back several generations.

“I’ve always had an affinity (for Canada),” he told Sheridan College in 2021. “I’ve been there a lot. I like the landscapes, not just in the east but the west — I know the country fairly well.”

Why was Bill C-3 introduced?

In 2009, the Stephen Harper government eliminated the first-generation limit on citizenship by descent. That meant Canadian citizens born abroad to parents from Canada could no longer pass on their citizenship to children born outside of Canada.

For instance, if your grandfather was a Canadian, but his daughter — your mother — was born in the U.S., her offspring wouldn’t automatically be granted citizenship.

It created a new class of individuals known as

“Lost Canadians,”

a term that originally referred to people who lost or never acquired their citizenship “due to outdated provisions (sex, marital status, place of birth, naturalization status), which affected whether that person could derive, acquire, or lose Canadian citizenship.”

The second-generation cutoff was challenged in court and ultimately led to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice

ruling it unconstitutional in 2023

and requiring Ottawa to amend the Citizenship Act to correct it within six months.

Legislation tabled to eliminate the first-generation limit died with the prorogation of Parliament in March at the request of then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to allow the Liberal Party to hold a leadership contest to name his successor. The legislation was reintroduced as Bill C-3: An Act to Amend the Citizenship Act in May and received Royal Assent in the House of Commons

on Nov. 20.

The new provisions have yet to be passed into law, however, as Ottawa had already filed for and was granted its fifth extension since the original ruling. The new deadline is Jan. 20, 2026.

In her

latest ruling

, Justice Jasmine Akbarali said the federal government “has been making significant progress” and the legislation could come into force before the deadline.

“There is a reasonable expectation that the replacement legislation may come into force by the end of 2025,” she wrote.

Asked if government will meet the deadline, Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship Canada would not say.

“The bill will come into force on a date set by order in council, which will be communicated publicly,” they wrote in an email to National Post.

Who can become Canadian citizens under Bill C-3?

For people born before the legislation comes into effect — the “Lost Canadians” — their right to Canadian citizenship is retroactively restored, provided they can provide an unbroken line of descent from an ancestor, a grandparent or a great-grandparent born or naturalized in Canada.

There is no limit on how far back into the family tree, meaning that even great-great-grandparents and beyond with Canadian lineage can afford citizenship.

Certificates of citizenship are not automatically granted, however, and must be applied for individually with documentation.

Kleinman said finding the evidence could prove difficult for people going far back into their lineage to find the Canadian connection among great-great-grandparents and earlier ancestors.

“We’ll have to see what type of evidence will be accepted, but there has to be very clear proof that there is that direct lineage from generation to generation to generation,” she said.

 Valerie Kleinman, an immigration lawyer with Toronto firm Green and Spiegel.

For people born after C-3 becomes law, a Canadian born abroad hoping to pass on their citizenship to their child born abroad will need to prove “a substantial connection” to the country, which is defined as living in Canada 1,095 days — the equivalent of three calendar years — before their child was born.

“This approach supports fairness for families while reinforcing the principle that real, demonstrated ties to Canada guide citizenship by descent,” IRCC stated in

a press release.

Kleinman expects more clarity on this provision and what evidence will be required once the law is enacted, but she foresees scenarios that could make it hard to prove those three years of physical residency.

“Maybe we have a 40-year-old who lived in Canada between the ages of one and four years old and now is having a baby abroad after the legislation comes into force — how will they prove that they spent 1,095 days in Canada when they were effectively a toddler?”

Or in the case of a person or persons with Canadian ancestry who already have a toddler while living abroad, but then have a second child after the law is enshrined. The first child would retroactively be afforded citizenship, while the other would have to prove his parents spent 1,095 days in Canada before his birth.

I think we’re going to see a variety of interesting scenarios that will affect many people,” she said.

IRCC implemented

interim measures

in 2023, allowing people from both groups to apply before the prior to the legislation’s enactment.

It’s not clear how many people globally could potentially seek to apply for proof of citizenship, but Ottawa is not expecting a flood of applications.

“Based upon available evidence, we expect applications in the tens of thousands over time, not hundreds of thousands,” Diab said during her opening statement at

a
Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology last month. “

Between January 2024 and July 2025, we received just over 4,200 applications under the interim measure for those affected by the first-generation limit.”

IRCC’s spokesperson told National Post the department is not expecting a “surge in applications,” nor does it “anticipate any significant increase in processing time for proof of citizenship applications” once C-3 i enacted. The current processing time is about nine months, but

IRCC warns

that applications outside Canada and the U.S. may take longer.

Kleinman, who expects a lot of interest and a high volume of applications, said she’s personally spoken to many people about the impending changes, some of whom shed “

tears of joy when they understood what this would mean for them.” 

A lot of those people, she admitted, are Americans.

By virtue of our shared border and shared immigration history, “

There are many people in the United States who have Canadian ancestry and there is a lot of interest right now in particular.”

Another interesting scenario raised by Kleinman involves people who may have to formally renounce their Canadian citizenship if they are already citizens of a country that doesn’t allow dual citizenship, such as China, India, Japan, Saudi Arabia and several dozen more.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.