LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

The war of words between billionaire Elon Musk and President Donald Trump over the big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts is heating up again, with Musk claiming he may form a new political party and Trump blasting the Tesla CEO over electric vehicle subsidies.

The most prominent divide in the relationship between Musk and Trump is the president’s big bill. Musk ramped up his criticism of the bill just three days ago, arguing the legislation that Republican senators are scrambling to pass would kill jobs and bog down burgeoning industries.

Musk, who is also CEO of SpaceX, posted on X on Saturday that the bill would be “political suicide for the Republican Party.”

With the Senate working its way through a tense overnight session that dragged into Tuesday, Musk suggested he will work to get members of Congress who vote for the bill out of their seats next year.

“Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame,” he wrote on X. “And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.”

The post was viewed 26 million times on the social media platform.

A few hours later, Musk followed up with a post claiming he will create a new political party if the bill passes.

“If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,” he wrote. “Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE.”

Musk’s post about the America Party was viewed 32 million times on X.

For his part, Trump focused some of his criticisms of Musk on EV mandates and subsidies. In a post on Truth Social early Tuesday morning, Trump said Musk has known that he’s against an EV mandate and that people should not be forced to own electric vehicles.

“Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,” Trump wrote.

The President went on to say that there could be some cost savings for the nation.

“No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!” Trump posted.

Several hours later, while standing on the White House lawn before heading to Florida, Trump continued to discuss what he believes is Musk’s displeasure with potentially losing EV subsidies.

“He’s very upset. You know, he can lose a lot more than that, I’ll tell you right now,” Trump said. “Elon can lose a lot more than that.”

The President also cautioned Musk on the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, which the billionaire used to lead.

“DOGE could be the monster that turns around and eats Elon,” Trump said.

Michelle Chapman, The Associated Press



The Senate slogged through a tense overnight session that has now dragged into Tuesday morning, with Republican leaders searching for ways to secure support for President Donald Trump’s big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts while fending off proposed amendments, mostly from Democrats trying to defeat the package.

An endgame appeared to be taking shape. Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota spent the night reaching for last-minute agreements between those in his party worried the bill’s reductions to Medicaid will leave millions without care and his most conservative flank, which wants even steeper cuts to hold down deficits ballooning with the tax cuts.

It’s a pivotal moment for the Republicans, who have control of Congress and are racing to wrap up work with just days to go before Trump’s self-imposed July 4 deadline. The 940-page “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” as it’s formally titled, has consumed Congress as its shared priority with the president.

Here’s the latest:

Senate strikes AI provision from GOP bill after uproar from the states

The proposal to deter states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade was soundly defeated in the Senate on Tuesday, thwarting attempts to insert the measure into President Trump’s big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts.

The Senate voted 99-1 to strike the AI provision for the legislation after weeks of criticism from both Republican and Democratic governors and state officials.

Originally proposed as a 10-year ban on states doing anything to regulate AI, lawmakers later tied it to federal funding so that only states that backed off on AI regulations would be able to get subsidies for broadband internet or AI infrastructure.

▶ Read more about the proposal on AI regulation

Senate ‘vote-o-rama’ for Trump’s big bill already among longest-running in modern times

The all-night session has been grinding on for nearly 24 hours, having started at roughly 9:30 a.m. on Monday.

Senators have voted on more than three dozen amendments so far. More voting is likely.

The marathon voting session is part of the cumbersome process Republicans are using to try and pass the bill with a simple majority.

Republicans are letting the process drag on as they try to lock up last-minute agreements to push the bill to passage. For now, the Senate floor is at a standstill.

The Associated Press



LANSING, Mich. (AP) — A second Democrat is seeking to flip one of Michigan’s most competitive U.S. House districts as the party seeks to reclaim a majority in the 2026 midterms.

Maat Maasdam, a former Navy SEAL, announced his campaign Tuesday to unseat Tom Barrett, a former Army helicopter pilot who delivered a key win for Republicans in 2026 when he flipped the 7th Congressional District in central Michigan. Maasdam joins Bridget Brink, former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, in the Democratic primary as both seek to introduce themselves to voters in the critical district.

“I’m running for Congress to continue serving my country, not any political party,” Maasdam said in a campaign announcement.

Maasdam is emphasizing his military experience, setting up his background to compete with Barrett. According to Maasdam’s campaign, he served as former President Barack Obama’s military aide who carried the “ nuclear football,” a briefcase that contains atomic war plans and enables the president to transmit nuclear orders to the Pentagon. His campaign noted that his wife was a Navy helicopter pilot.

“In the military, whether you’re Republican or Democrat, you’re still working together on the same mission,” he said in an interview with The Associated Press ahead of his announcement. “It really gives you the opportunity to find common solutions and get the job done. And I haven’t seen a lot of that recently.”

The district — which includes the capital city of Lansing and surrounding rural areas — was previously held by rising Democratic star and former CIA analyst Elissa Slotkin before she successfully ran for U.S. Senate in the 2024 election.

In the subsequent race for the open seat in November, Barrett emerged victorious from an expensive race with a 3.7-point lead. He has already brought in more than $900,000 in the first three months of his time in Congress.

Brink, Maasdam’s Democratic competition, resigned from her position as ambassador to Ukraine in April in protest of what she says is President Donald Trump’s unfair treatment of the war-torn country. A longtime diplomat who previously held high-ranking State Department roles in other former Soviet and Eastern European countries, Trump picked Brink to be the country’s ambassador to Slovakia in 2019. Former President Joe Biden tapped her to be ambassador to Ukraine shortly after Russia invaded the country in 2022.

Isabella Volmert, The Associated Press


WASHINGTON (AP) — A proposal to deter states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade was soundly defeated in the U.S. Senate on Tuesday, thwarting attempts to insert the measure into President Donald Trump’s big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts.

The Senate voted 99-1 to strike the AI provision for the legislation after weeks of criticism from both Republican and Democratic governors and state officials.

Originally proposed as a 10-year ban on states doing anything to regulate AI, lawmakers later tied it to federal funding so that only states that backed off on AI regulations would be able to get subsidies for broadband internet or AI infrastructure.

A last-ditch Republican effort to save the provision would have reduced the time frame to five years and sought to exempt some favored AI laws, such as those protecting children or country music performers from harmful AI tools.

But that effort was abandoned when Sen. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican, teamed up with Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington on Monday night to introduce an amendment to strike the entire proposal. Voting on the amendment happened after 4 a.m. Wednesday as part of an overnight session as Republican leaders sought to secure support for the tax cut bill while fending off other proposed amendments, mostly from Democrats trying to defeat the package.

Proponents of an AI moratorium had argued that a patchwork of state and local AI laws is hindering progress in the AI industry and the ability of U.S. firms to compete with China.

Some prominent tech leaders welcomed the idea after Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, who leads the Senate Commerce committee, floated it at a hearing in May.

But state and local lawmakers and AI safety advocates argued that the rule is a gift to an industry that wants to avoid accountability for its products. Led by Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, a majority of GOP governors sent a letter to Congress opposing it.

Also appealing to lawmakers to strike the provision was a group of parents of children who have died as a result of online harms.

—-

O’Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island.

Matt Brown And Matt O’brien, The Associated Press


Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump depart following a group photo in front of the Canadian Rockies at the Kananaskis Country Golf Course during the G7 Leaders' Summit on June 16, 2025 in Kananaskis, Alberta.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Ottawa could almost taste the tax revenues.

For nearly five years, Canada has been planning a digital services tax (DST) that

would generate billions in revenue by taxing

large tech firms on their Canadian digital revenues. Just hours before the first DST payments were due on Monday, however, Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government called the whole thing off.

Carney’s move late Sunday was a capitulation to the White House — and he had little choice after President Donald Trump abruptly cancelled trade negotiations on Friday over the DST, calling it “a direct and blatant attack on our country.”

Faced with 25 per cent tariffs on most Canadian exports to the U.S. and 50 per cent tariffs on its steel and aluminum, Canada needed to keep the trade talks alive. So Carney did what had to be done, stating that the move “will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025, timeline set out at this month’s G7 Leaders’ Summit in Kananaskis.”

What led to the DST, and why did Washington oppose it?

The Liberals first introduced the DST in 2020 — a 3 per cent tax on big tech companies with Canadian digital revenues above $20 million per year — as a stopgap, with the real goal of pushing for a multilateral, OECD-led overhaul of the international tax system to curb multinational tax avoidance.

Several countries, including France, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Spain, had begun implementing DSTs in 2019 and 2020, raising alarm bells for large U.S. tech firms and advocacy groups.

The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), a U.S.-based trade association representing technology and communications companies, was one that pushed back, calling the DSTs discriminatory. The taxes “hit U.S. companies but are designed to exempt local companies, putting U.S. firms at a competitive disadvantage in the market,” said Jonathan McHale, VP of digital trade at CCIA.

President Joe Biden supported an OECD approach to reforming the international tax system – and its moratorium halting the rollout of unilateral DSTs, adopted by the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework in late 2021. Canada waited in hopes of there being an international tax reform, but by July 11, 2023, when the OECD agreed to another year-long extension on the moratorium, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government decided it had waited long enough. It pushed ahead unilaterally to pass the Digital Services Tax Act last summer, despite warnings from U.S. diplomats and risk experts that it could spark a trade war.

While Canada’s approach was meant to tax both foreign and domestic firms, McHale said that’s simply how countries go about saying they are not formally targeting American companies. He referred to “disguised techno-trade” and proportionality, noting that “on the surface, [the DST] looks neutral, but the impact is essentially focused on a particular foreign country.” Canada’s DST, he said, would’ve mostly impacted U.S. tech firms.

But there was opposition to it at home, too, he noted, because the tax would have hurt would-be startups trying to establish themselves in the Canadian market.

“There were lots of Canadian companies that were vocal in their opposition to this, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce chief among them,” he said, noting that they didn’t want it to upset their strong startup culture and digital economy.

Biden’s team pushed back last year when the tax was passed, arguing repeatedly for a multilateral solution, and then-U.S. Ambassador to Canada David Cohen labelled it “discriminatory.”

Trump, in turn, had more leverage and threatened the cessation of trade talks and even higher tariffs, but many saw this coming.

“If you don’t push back against Canada’s [DST], isn’t that a green light for other countries to move ahead?” asked McHale. Opposition to DSTs has been a “longstanding bipartisan issue” in the U.S., he noted.

Could dropping the DST lift trade?

It can’t hurt. Besides, it was necessary to get back to the negotiating table.

After Canada rescinded the tax, Trump and Carney agreed to resume trade talks with an eye toward reaching a deal by July 21, 2025. “Canada’s preference has always been a multilateral agreement related to digital services taxation,” Carney’s statement said, reminding folks that the DST was only ever meant to be a short-term solution.

His government also remains “engaged in discussions with the U.S. and other countries to find a workable solution on international taxation that achieves our common objectives,” a Department of Finance official told National Post.

The Canada Revenue Agency issued a statement on Monday confirming the tax was suspended and noting that reimbursements will be made to companies that already paid “if legislation is tabled in Parliament and receives royal assent.”

The White House, meanwhile, viewed the decision to drop the DST as positive. Trump officials also hope the move will encourage other countries to eliminate similar taxes to avoid U.S. retaliation moving forward.

Canada’s DST “would’ve been the most burdensome tax for U.S. companies — topping the list of revenues extracted from U.S. firms,” McHale said.

But DSTs are still in effect in several countries that have strong trade links with the U.S., including the U.K., Spain, and France, and they should expect similar pushback from Washington.

“The U.S. government has been pretty clear that they oppose the policy … so it stands to reason that it would push back against these others as well,” McHale added.

France and Spain are still working to secure a favourable trade agreement with the U.S.. Although the U.K. managed to forge a deal last month, the Trump administration has publicly stated that getting Britain to rescind its DST remains a top priority.

In the meantime, while Ottawa may be left thirsty for big tech revenues, U.S.-Canada trade relations are finally getting a much-needed drink.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Republicans who control the state Legislature announced a deal Tuesday on a new two-year budget that cuts income taxes, increases funding for the Universities of Wisconsin despite a threatened cut and raises taxes to pay for transportation projects.

The deal in the battleground state, where Evers and Republicans have a long history of not working together, emerged the day after the deadline for enacting a new budget. However, there is no government shutdown in Wisconsin when the budget is late. The Legislature is scheduled to pass it this week.

Evers called the deal “a pro-kid budget that’s a win for Wisconsin’s kids, families, and our future.”

Here is what to know about Wisconsin’s budget deal:

Tax cuts

Evers and Republicans agreed to $1.3 billion in income tax cuts largely targeting the middle class. More than 1.6 million people will have their taxes cut an average of $180 annually.

The deal would expand the state’s second lowest income tax bracket and make the first $24,000 of income for people age 67 and over tax-free. It also eliminates the sales tax on electricity, saving taxpayers about $156 million over two years.

Republican legislative leaders praised the deal as providing meaningful tax relief to the middle class and retirees.

“This budget delivers on our two biggest priorities: tax relief for Wisconsin and reforms to make government more accountable,” Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said in a statement.

And Senate Republican Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu praised it as a compromise that cuts taxes but also stabilizes the state’s child care system and strengthens schools by increasing special education funding.

Higher education

The Universities of Wisconsin would see a $256 million increase over two years, the largest funding increase for the UW system in about two decades. UW Regents had asked for an $855 million overall increase and Republicans in June floated the possibility of an $87 million cut.

The deal also imposes a faculty minimum workload requirement and calls for an independent study on the system’s future sustainability.

Schools, roads and child care get more

There will be $200 million in additional tax revenue to pay for transportation projects, but Evers and Republican leaders did not detail where that money would come from.

The agreement increases funding for child care programs by $330 million over two years, a third of which will be direct payments to providers. The money will replace the Child Care Counts program started during the COVID-19 pandemic. That program, which provides funding to child care providers, expired on Monday. Evers, Democrats and child care advocates have been pushing for additional funding to address child care shortages throughout the state.

Funding for K-12 special education programs will increase by $500 million.

State employees, including at the university, would get a 3% raise this year and a 2% raise next year.

The budget deal was reached after Republicans killed more than 600 Evers proposals in the budget, including legalizing marijuana, expanding Medicaid and raising taxes on millionaires.

Budget deadline missed

It is the first time the Legislature has missed the June 30 budget deadline since 2017. All three prior budgets passed by the Legislature since Evers has been governor were on time, until this one. Republicans have held the majority in the Legislature since 2011.

Republicans negotiated more with Evers on this budget than the previous three when their majorities in the Senate and Assembly were larger. Democrats gained seats in November and are pushing to take majority control of at least one legislative chamber next year.

Amid the ongoing talks last week, Assembly Republicans urged bipartisanship to reach a deal.

What’s next?

The Legislature’s budget-writing committee is scheduled to vote on the plan Tuesday. The full Legislature is set to meet starting Wednesday to give it final passage.

Republicans hold a narrow 18-15 majority in the Senate, and with two GOP senators previously saying they planned to vote against the budget, some Democratic votes were expected to be needed to pass it.

Once the budget clears the Legislature, Evers will be able to make changes using his expansive partial veto powers. But his office said Evers would not veto any budget provisions that were part of the deal he reached with Republicans.

Evers, who is midway through his second term, has said he will announce his decision on whether to seek a third term after he has signed the budget. He has 10 business days to take action on the spending plan once the Legislature passes it.

___

Associated Press writer Todd Richmond contributed to this story.

Scott Bauer, The Associated Press


DALLAS (AP) — Former Texas congressman Colin Allred launched another run for the U.S. Senate on Tuesday after the Democrat’s challenge against Republican Sen. Ted Cruz last year broke records for spending but did not deliver his party the breakthrough it has sought for decades in the state.

This time, Allred is seeking the seat of Republican Sen. John Cornyn, who is facing a primary challenge from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in what is likely to be one of the GOP’s most contentious contests in 2026.

Allred’s announcement comes just seven months after he lost by nearly 9 percentage points to Cruz. That race was one of the most expensive in the country last cycle, with Democrats spending more than $130 million trying to unseat Cruz.

A former NFL linebacker and attorney, Allred is the first high-profile Democrat to declare himself a candidate in the race that Democrats see as their best shot next year at ending a 30-year drought in statewide elections in Texas. Another former Democratic congressman, Beto O’Rourke, who came within 3 percentage points of defeating Cruz in 2018, also hasn’t ruled out a run.

In a video announcing his candidacy, Allred took aim at both Cornyn and Paxton and cast himself as a fighter for those struggling to get ahead.

“I get it. Real change might feel impossible,” Allred said. “But I’m not giving up.”

Allred tried to position himself as a moderate in last year’s race and made protecting abortion rights a centerpiece of his campaign. His supporters included Texas women who had serious pregnancy complications after the state’s abortion ban took effect.

But his campaign drew criticism early on from some Democrats who grew restless with Allred’s strategy of not packing his schedule with raucous rallies or investing more in smaller corners of Texas, including cities along the border with Mexico.

In the end, Texas Democrats’ streak of losses in statewide races continued while Republicans kept making gains along the predominately Hispanic border with Mexico, which had long been a Democratic stronghold.

Allred played four seasons in the NFL, all with the Tennessee Titans, after being undrafted out of Baylor University. He entered Congress after flipping a Republican district in Dallas in 2018.

Former astronaut Terry Virts also entered the U.S. Senate race as a Democratic candidate.

Looming over the GOP primary between Cornyn and Paxton is whether and when President Donald Trump will make an endorsement. In April, Trump praised both candidates and said he would make a decision later.

The Associated Press


Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani takes the stage at his primary election party, Wednesday, June 25, 2025, in New York.

OTTAWA — Two architects of Alberta NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi’s surprise victory in the 2010 Calgary mayor’s race say they’re feeling déjà vu after seeing another thirty-something Shia Muslim — with family ties to East Africa and Gujarat, India — upend the politics of a major North American city.

Stephen Carter, now

president of Decide Campaigns

, says he sees shades of his old boss in 33-year-old Zohran Mamdani, who rode an outsider campaign to victory in last week’s

New York City Democratic mayoral primary

.

“The similarities are hard to miss,” said Carter.

Carter said that, on top of the biographical similarities, Mamdani followed Nenshi’s playbook of using digital tools to build a strong personal brand that transcends party labels.

“I won’t pretend to be an expert on the inner workings of the Mamdani campaign but one thing I can say … is that the brand construction … was spectacularly implemented,” said Carter.

Fifteen years ago, Carter helped then 38-year-old Nenshi leverage newfangled social media platforms Facebook, YouTube and Twitter (now X) to launch a similarly powerful digital brand.

Nenshi’s then novel grassroots digital campaign helped him become the first Muslim mayor of a major North American city.

Carter says that the digital landscape has changed in the past 15 years but the fundamentals of building a political brand haven’t.

“Of all the things we talked about back in 2010, I think the strongest thing was actually the development of brand politics,” said Carter.

“Both parties and individual politicians have brands. And one thing we really thought hard about was where does the (candidate’s) brand lie?”

With Carter at the helm, the Nenshi campaign poured significant

resources into brand building

. For instance, candidate Nenshi frequently donned the colour purple

— a mixture of Liberal red and Conservative blue — to put himself above partisan politics.

Nenshi has held onto

his purple personal branding

since making the jump to provincial politics last year, despite admitting on a recent podcast appearance that purple

doesn’t coordinate especially well

with the Alberta NDP’s traditional orange.

 Naheed Nenshi participates in a mayoralty forum on Sept. 22, 2010. Jim Wells/QMI Agency.

Carter said Mamdani first crossed his radar a few weeks ago, when his social media algorithms started to feed him short videos,

known online as “reels,”

 promoting the upstart mayoral candidate.

“When you’re starting to see (reels) from a New York municipal election in Calgary, it grabs your attention. I’ll tell you that,” said Carter.

And while today’s young adults have migrated from Facebook and X to newer platforms like the China-owned TikTok, Carter says that the big picture remains pretty much the same.

“This is another one of those moments in time where a campaign comes along and captures the zeitgeist in a bottle,” said Carter.

Mamdani, a self-described democratic socialist, ran on an unabashedly far-left platform, promising New Yorkers a rent freeze, free buses and child care, a $30 dollar minimum wage and

city-run grocery stores

. He’s also aligned himself closely with

the “free Palestine” movement

, a cause

that roiled college campuses

in New York City and beyond last year.

This audacious platform, wrapped in a hip, telegenic package, propelled Mamdani past establishment rival Andrew Cuomo, formerly the governor of New York State.

Exit polling shows that

18-29 year olds

voted in the highest numbers in last week’s Democratic mayoral primary, after being one of the lowest voting demographics four years ago.

Mamdani will likely be the frontrunner in November’s general election, as the Democratic nominee in a city where Democrats dominate municipal politics.

Chima Nkemdirim, Nenshi’s longtime best friend and ex-chief of staff, stressed the ideological differences between Nenshi and Mamdani.

“The politics are a bit different. Actually, quite a bit different,” said Nkemdirim.

Nkemdirim noted that then university instructor Nenshi positioned himself as a forward-looking pragmatist to Calgarians, touting his business background and textbook knowledge of city planning.

Nenshi also differed stylistically from Mamdani, swapping out

the latter’s simple slogans

for a more detailed “politics in full sentences.”

Nkemdirim nevertheless sees a few similarities in how each candidate rose from obscurity by keeping an ear to the ground.

“I think the biggest similarity is that you’ve got two politicians that are really listening to what people want and telling them that they can get it,” said Nkemdirim.

“When you go back to 2010, study after study indicated that people wanted … a city where it was easy to walk around, where things were affordable, where you could ditch your car if you wanted to … and no politician was running on that,” remembers Nkemdirim.

“And when Naheed (Nenshi) ran, he said, well why can’t we do all that stuff?”

Nkemdirim said that Nenshi’s revolutionary idea of figuring out what sort of city Calgarians wanted, and then telling them how to get there, helped him go from

two per cent name recognition

60 days out to

an eight-point victory

on election night.

“I think that’s similar to what’s happening in New York. (Mamdani) is talking deeply about this issue of affordability … and saying, maybe we can do something about that.”

Nkemdirim admits that his friend Nenshi has yet to capture the same magic since entering provincial politics but says that listening is a skill that applies equally well in his new arena.

He notes that Premier Danielle Smith’s recent convening of

the Alberta Next panel

, a panel focused on narrowly appealing topics like

the Alberta Pension Plan

and creation of a provincial police force, gives Nenshi an opening to set up a genuine listening post.

“I think you’ll see that from Naheed over the summer. People want to talk about the issues that actually matter, as opposed to the manufactured ones the UCP is putting forward to them,” said Nkemdirim.

Nenshi won

last week’s Edmonton Strathcona byelection

in a landslide but still

trails Smith in popularity

.

He declined a request to be interviewed for this article.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


OTTAWA — Steven Guilbeault, federal minister of identity and culture, came to his new job just as the whole country was looking at itself in the mirror.

Guilbeault took on the new ministry — which replaces the old heritage ministry and takes up responsibility for Parks Canada — as U.S. President Donald Trump was ramping up a ruinous trade war and talking about annexing his country’s neighbour to the north.

In an interview with The Canadian Press, Guilbeault said most Canadians probably hadn’t reflected much on their own national identity before Washington changed its tone.

Their reaction — ten years after Guilbeault’s old boss, Justin Trudeau, described Canada as a “post-national state” — has been a surge in national pride that culminates today in Canada Day celebrations across the country.

“What we’re seeing is a … renewed sense of pride in being Canadian,” Guilbeault told the The Canadian Press. “This year, it will take on a whole new role.”

Guilbeault said he sees his role as a departure from the former heritage portfolio, which “in its very definition implies that you’re kind of looking backwards.”

He said his task is to work out what Canadian arts, identity and culture might look like in the coming years — not to attempt to pin down anything like a singular Canadian “identity.”

“I won’t stand here and pretend that I can tell you what Canadian identity is or should be,” he said.

“My role in the coming months will be to work with people across the country … to help perhaps define and better promote our identity, and maybe rejuvenate a sense of unity.

“It would be pretty rich for one member of cabinet sitting in Ottawa to tell all of Canada, ‘This is what Canadian identity should look like.’ That’s not how I roll.”

He said he sees his job as one of identifying cultural markers “that people can rally around” — a complex task in a country as big and diverse as this one.

“There’s only one language in the United States, there’s only one culture,” he noted.

In the process, he said, he hopes to encourage Canadians to see themselves in each other.

“I’ve always been fascinated, for example, by how similar Quebecers and Albertans are,” he said in French.

“They are two peoples who are very proud, very autonomist, very independent, in the philosophical sense of the term.”

He said those ties of culture and history are important to keep in mind as Canadians stare down American threats to Canada’s identity, sovereignty and economy.

“There are a lot of things that bring us together, and this is true for the whole country. And that’s what I’m going to work on, over the next few weeks and months,” Guilbeault said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 1, 2025.

Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press


OTTAWA — Ottawa’s Canada Day ceremony will be getting the royal treatment today, with Prince Edward set to make a speech during a noon event at LeBreton Flats Park.

Prime Minister Mark Carney is also expected to speak at the event on what is his first Canada Day since taking office in March.

Canada Day this year coincides with the 60th anniversary of the Canadian flag and the 45th anniversary of the official adoption of O Canada as the national anthem.

The noon ceremony in Ottawa will also mark the 45th anniversary of Terry Fox’s Marathon of Hope.

Gov. Gen Mary Simon plans to invest six individuals into the Order of Canada during the ceremony, including actor Ryan Reynolds and musician Heather Rankin.

The evening show in Ottawa will feature artists like Sarah McLachlan, Coeur de Pirate, Brenda Montana, Dear Rogue and Alex Wells.

The Ottawa event is again taking place west of Parliament Hill in the LeBreton Flats area as Centre Block continues renovations that are scheduled to last another seven years.

Other Canada Day ceremonies are happening across the country, including the Canada Together event in Vancouver and a celebration at Victoria Park in Charlottetown.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 1, 2025.

Alessia Passafiume, The Canadian Press