LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Amidst an unparalleled pandemic, and beset with formidable domestic challenges, how much should Canada be doing to assist the very poorest in acquiring vaccines?

It is a question that many Canadians are asking themselves, especially in light of the federal government's decision to purchase vaccines from COVAX, a WHO program created to help some of the world's most disadvantaged countries access and administer COVID-19 inoculations.

For many pundits and politicians, including the Prime Minister himself, as well as a chorus of conservative voices, the decision to buy vaccines from COVAX may not be an ideal one, but it is a necessary one, particularly if it will help ensure a timelier vaccination for Canadians.

As for everyone else, well, in this competitive state, with each and every country looking out for themselves, Canada's significant contribution to the COVAX fund will help many low-income countries acquire vaccines, which is more than many other wealthy countries can say they've done.

Besides, by purchasing COVAX vaccines, Canada is technically not doing anything wrong.

After all, according to the COVAX funding agreement, half of a country's funding for the project has always been intended for the distribution of vaccines domestically with the other half going to support some of the world's poorest.

And it's not like Canada is the only wealthy country doing this.  Both New Zealand and Singapore, have donated far less to the program, while also similarly requesting "early allocations" from it.

Is Canada any less deserving as these wealthy countries for purchasing COVAX vaccines?  Should it not too reap at least some of the rewards for its generosity?

These are some of the justifications being made to support Canada's dipping into the COVAX program.

Others, however, like Stephen Lewis, Canada's former ambassador to the United Nations, as well as a United Nations' special envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa, believe there is no justification for such a self-interested play.

According to him, Canada has no business utilizing vaccines from COVAX, as "it was always understood from the outset that this was not a source of vaccines for the rich and wealthy countries of the world" but instead a fund to support those countries unable to afford the vaccines.

For Lewis, this is not only a "profound mistake" but a mistake that is "wrong morally" and flies in the face of all the righteous rhetoric that Trudeau likes to deploy when speaking about Canada and its so-called benevolence in the world.

To him, and others like Annamie Paul, "There is a very big difference between having a right and doing what's right."  And while Canada may have the right to purchase COVAX vaccines for its own usage, that does not make it the right thing to do.

Between the two conflicting camps, I tend to side with the latter, though for reasons extending far beyond COVAX, and more by looking at Canada's larger role in the global vaccine scramble.

What so many in the 'justifier' camp forget is that Canada's contributions to COVAX alone (respectful as it may be) does not absolve it of its sins against the global south.

For starters, consider Canada's complicity in the hoarding of vaccines.

As countries around the globe struggle to vaccinate their populations, wealthy countries like Canada have purchased vast amounts of vaccines, most of which they have no intention of ever administering.  With five times the number of doses per its population, Canada is arguably the worst vaccine hoarder of them all.

True, the Trudeau government has confirmed that it will be donating its excess vaccines to less wealthy countries.  But with no set timeline for when these vaccines will be donated, it will likely be long into the future before the global south ever receives them, leaving their populations desperately at risk.

Furthermore, while Canada continues to hoard vaccines, it has also helped to oppose the efforts of South Africa, India, and over one hundred other global south countries in their efforts to temporarily waive some intellectual property rights for vaccines until "widespread vaccination is in place globally."

Instead of supporting this worthwhile initiative, which advocates like Akshaya Kumar contend has the potential to boost the global south's vaccine manufacturing capabilities, and to help spur on a global economic recovery for the benefit of all countries, Canada has shamefully chosen the side of greed by supporting the status quo, a.k.a. the pharmaceutical industry.

Perhaps if the Canadian government were not hoarding vaccines and resisting the efforts of the global south in their ability to receive vaccines, I could find the justifications for dipping into the COVAX program.

But under the current circumstances, contributing to COVAX, while not purchasing any of its vaccines intended for the global south, is the least Canada could do.

Photo Credit: BBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


The intersection of church and state is one freakishly dangerous corner.  And an Alberta pastor is intent on running the red light.

GraceLife Church in Parkland County, just west of Edmonton, has for several weeks been violating public health restrictions, packing the pews well beyond the 15-per-cent capacity Covid 19 limits.

Pastor James Coates has issued public statements making it clear the church will continue to hold services, despite regular visits from Alberta Health inspectors and the RCMP.  He has been ticketed and arrested.  Most recently he turned himself in to the local Mountie detachment after receiving word the RCMP planned to arrest him again.

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedomsa Calgary-based libertarian legal nonprofit often associated with fundamentalist church causes, has jumped on the GraceLife bandwagon.  JCCFC lawyer James Kitchen, who represents Coates, has issued a press release chock full of references to charter rights, freedom of assembly and religious conviction.

"The congregants of Grace Life refuse to accept the Alberta Government's dystopian 'new normal'.  Their first loyalty is to obey their Lord, Jesus Christ, not the Government," says Kitchen.

While Kitchen puts the pastor's actions in the freedom-of-religion frame, Coates himself is not shy about broadening the issue well outside his church's walls.

"The science being used to justify lockdown measures is both suspect and selective.  In fact, there is no empirical evidence that lockdowns are effective in mitigating the spread of the virus," says a public statement on the GraceLife website.

"We are gravely concerned that COVID-19 is being used to fundamentally alter society and strip us all of our civil liberties.  By the time the so-called "pandemic" is over, if it is ever permitted to be over, Albertans will be utterly reliant on government, instead of free, prosperous, and independent."

Coates is not just ready to go to jail for his convictions.  He has offered to put himself in the line of Covid fire by volunteering to help at overburdened healthcare facilities.

Chief Medical Officer of Health declined the offer at a press conference and expressed her disappointment with houses of worship and businesses that flout the Covid restrictions.

Premier Jason Kenney has stayed mum on the latest developments in this specific case, but he has been trying to distance the government from enforcement decisions about miscreant businesses, saying it is up to law enforcement agencies to decide when to ticket, arrest and charge people violating public health orders.

But realistically it's pretty impossible for Kenney and the UCP to not be embroiled in this struggle.

GraceLife is bringing it to the premier's door by using his own words against him.  The church's public statement says church doors were thrown open in June when it was realized Covid wasn't as bad as first suspected.  "This sentiment was reflected in the assessment of the Premier of Alberta, who deliberately referred to COVID-19 as 'influenza' multiple times in a speech announcing the end of the first declared public health emergency."

Religion and politics, particularly right wing populist politics, have a long history in Alberta.  There is a strong socially conservative strain in the conservative movement that meshes with fundamental church values.  That's what makes this controversy even more sensitive than the question of easing restrictions on barbershops and restaurants.

Covid-19 is forcing the governing party to confront some fundamental issues within its own ranks.  Two UCP MLAs, Drew Barnes from Medicine Hat and Angela Pitt from Airdrie, have joined the End the Lockdowns national caucus, a conservative group agitating against Covid restrictions.

Kenney has criticized churches and businesses that violate restrictions.  He is clear in press conferences and fire-side social media chats that he feels these groups are misguided.

The majority of churches in the province are certainly toeing the line, either holding services online or with greatly diminished in-person gatherings.

But pastor Coates and the GraceLife Church aren't an insignificant issue for the UCP, which is increasingly beleaguered as the edges splinter off its base support.

Photo Credit: CTV News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


If you're wondering why politicians' conduct doesn't appal them as much as it appals us, the sad reality is that it often does.  But with a delayed fuse that only detonates once they're out of the game and ruefully wish they'd tried harder to live up to their ideals.  So life being short, I invite them to do it now.  And yes, I'm talking to you, Liberal MPs engaging in committee filibusters with childish glee and stone-faced hypocrisy.

You aren't the only ones.  But we need to talk, because right now you're in my face including over the vaccine contracts.  And your conduct is hypocrisy, because if you go and look at the 2015 campaign speeches of people with the same names as you, you'll find a lot of talk of Stephen Harper's excessive centralization, control, secrecy and deceit, and of a firm intention to give backbenchers more freedom and respect, let Parliament do its job, tell the truth and so forth.

So let me remind you that you weren't lying to get elected.  You believed it.  And you still do.  Deep down somewhere, albeit set aside due to the exigencies of the moment and the sincere conviction that you've got to keep control.  Not for very much longer.  But in order to do all the good things only you can do thanks to your superior characters and principles.

Don't balk.  It's not me talking.  It's you.  Then and now.  And if I might quote Nietzsche here (I long despised him but have come to appreciate his prophetic insight into the horrible direction our civilization was taking), "'I have done that', says my memory.  I cannot have done that says my pride and remains unshakeable.  Finally memory yields."

It's from Beyond Good and Evil and it pretty much summarizes the conversation you're now having.  But we must go beyond it because, alas, memory has its revenge one day in company with conscience.

You see, the worst part of this rather predictable and even tedious parade, for you at least, is that you will in fact still believe it in three years, or five, or ten, when you are out of office.  And on the day that ambition fades, flees or crumbles, on the day that memory overcomes pride, you will say wistfully that you wish you had stood up to the Maximum Leader, had said what you knew to be true not what you were told was expedient, and had used parliamentary procedure to advance the cause of open government instead of braying like a donkey.  Above all you will regret the silly lies you got away with, the silly lies that lowered the tone of debate long after the specific reasons you told them have stopped mattering.

There are exceptions and, as usual in life, the people most likely to live up to their convictions are the ones you'd most like to see slacking off.  For instance Xi Jinping.  And then there are the politicians who in return for swallowing their principles while in office get lucrative consulting jobs afterward from, for instance, Xi Jinping and never look back.  But you're not one of them, are you?

So we need to talk, and not just about the current vaccination contract filibuster, shabby as it is.  There's your government House Leader Pablo Rodriquez telling the press your party "respects" the independence of parliamentary committees and absolutely did not orchestrate the filibuster that erupted over the WE Charity and held off a reckoning until Trudeau prorogued Parliament on the empty pretext of having a clear and ambitious agenda.

Do you take us for fools?  If so, it might work.  The idea that MPs came up with this high-profile stunt on a vital issue without so much as a nod and a wink from the PMO insults the intelligence.  But the worst thing isn't that you won't get away with it, it's that you probably will.  Until the day that like Jacob Marley you think "What have I done?" and have lost the power to set things right.

Let me not seem partisan here.  I could mention the Tories over the Wright-Duffy affair, and did warn them at the time.  And I could mention many others because what is remarkable about such episodes is how common and how shabby they are.

For instance the governor of New York deliberately concealing the number of COVID deaths in seniors' residences.  Pride says I cannot have sat in meetings defending such reprehensible conduct on such seedy grounds.  If my opponent had done it, I'd have been filled with righteous indignation and rightly so.  And memory says "Uh, that guy sure looks like you."  And like a nasty, dirty fool.

This consideration confirms J. Budziszewski's point that conscience and morality are above all a matter of knowledge rather than feelings.  When we are caught, the most common reaction is "How could I have been so stupid?" not "How could I have been so mean?"  Because we did know better, we knew that we knew, and yet we did stuff that wasn't just wrong, it was bound to make us look like the fools we belatedly see ourselves as having been.  And you do know.

Some day the Trudeau Liberals may not regret the level of spending they engaged in.  But many will regret not tabling a budget and, even more, babbling inanities to justify not tabling one.  They will see the budget process hollowed out, and hostile partisans using their tricks, and realize it's loathsome and bad for self-government.  And memory will say "I have done that" and pride will say "I hate myself for it."

So you know what they say.  Don't hate yourself in the morning.  Sleep until noon.

No, wait.  Someone clever said that one.  But the wise say do the right thing.  Because it's who you think you are, because it's what you believe, and it's what you'll very much wish, some morning, that you had done the night before.

Photo Credit: House Of Commons

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.