LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

For several weeks now, the Liberals have been on the defensive, fending off opposition attacks over their controversial decision to award the Liberal-friendly WE Charity with a lavish government contract.

For a time, it appeared as though the Liberals might weather the storm of their own making, moving on from the scandal relatively unscathed, as they done so in the past.

However, after the sudden resignation of Finance Minister Bill Morneau, it is evident that officials in the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) finally came to believe that they were not going to get away with their complicit behavior.  At least not without the use of a scapegoat.

Bereft of Gerry Butts, who already threw himself upon his own sword for the Liberal cause, the PMO found their next sacrificial lamb in the form of Morneau; a man who unconvincingly claims to have left his prestigious post to run for the leadership of the OECD.  This, even as the country remains mired in an unprecedented economic and global health crisis.

As with SNC-Lavalin, the damage done was completely preventable, brought on by the Liberal’s ineptitude (and party infighting) than anything exacted upon them from their political rivals in the House of Commons.  This is a government more masochistic, more willing to self-inflict injury, than any group, organization or association since the Opus Dei.

While they still lead in the polls, likely a result of the residual good will extended to them from their respectful handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the complete absence of compelling leadership from the Conservatives, the Liberals are undoubtedly weakened.

Already, their popularity amongst Canadians has slipped, as has the approval ratings of the prime minister himself.  For a minority government, with only a tenuous grasp on the levers of power, this is dangerous territory indeed.

In case the Liberals were not aware of their vulnerability, the opposition parties have made it abundantly clear to them.

Last week, Bloc Quebecois leader Yves-Francois Blanchet issued yet another ultimatum to Justin Trudeau, challenging the Prime Minister to an electoral dual of sorts.  In more words than written here, Blanchet demanded Trudeau’s resignation, along with the resignation of Morneau and PMO Chief of Staff, Katie Telford.

If not, the Bloc leader ominously threatened, be prepared for the possibility of snap-election, brought on by the tabling of a motion of non-confidence.

Blanchet certainly has a knack for political theatrics.  It was as fine a display of sabre-rattling as I have ever witnessed.  It was also, as NDP MP Charlie Angus astutely noted, a rather embarrassing demonstration, verging on a “hissy fit.”

While Trudeau, Telford, and all others involved for that matter, must be held accountable for their actions in the WE scandal, this is not the way to go about it.  Demanding resignations, and threatening an election, merely makes Blanchet appear like a petulant child, throwing a temper tantrum after not getting his way.

If anything, Blanchet should take a page from Jagmeet Singh and the NDP.

Instead of playing political games and pandering to his base, Singh has leveraged his influence to pressure the Liberals into adopting more progressive measures to aid Canadians in the struggle against COVID-19.

His latest efforts have been to press the Trudeau government into increasing its funding for child-care services.  Singh is pushing not only for the Liberals to immediately transfer $2 billion to the provinces, but also to increase childcare spending by an extra $10 billion in the following four years.

Logically, Singh believes the boost in childcare dollars will allow more parents to re-enter the workforce, particularly as COVID restrictions begin to be lifted and more workplaces begin to reopen.

At the same point, he has continued his advocacy for the implementation of an affordable, universal childcare program; something Canadian families would benefit immensely from and have long been promised.

So good on Singh.

It is a sign of his growing maturity as a leader that he has prioritized the needs of Canadians rather than employing crass political machinations.  I just wish I could say the same for Blanchet.

As for those concerned about Trudeau’s continued evasion of accountability, rest assured: there will come a day when judgement is levied upon him and his staff in the PMO.  It might not be today, nor tomorrow, but it will come in time, as will the right moment for the next election.

In the meantime, the opposition is better off fulfilling its obligations to Canadians by ensuring that all citizens, throughout this pandemic and afterwards, are provided the services and assistance they require.  By continuing to push the Liberals on child-care, that is exactly what Singh and the NDP have been doing.

Amid both scandal and pandemic, its reassuring to see at least one of our political leaders acting responsibly.

Photo Credit: Jeff Burney, Loonie Politics

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Alberta bird watchers thrilled to a particularly large and raucous spring migration of thousands of sandhill cranes in May.

The provincial government responded in July by opening a hunting season for the fall, because apparently blasting big birds out of the sky is way more fun that simply watching them.

The province had rejected the notion of a sandhill crane hunting season in 2009, 2013 and 2014.  Conservationists expressed concerns about the cranes longterm welfare given the decline in wetland habitat.  And they also raised the potential for accidental shooting of whooping cranes, a far more endangered bird which occasionally travels with sandhills.

The UCP government argues the hunt "will support the province's wildlife management goals and boost local economies."

The hunt is part of a pattern of rolling back conservation efforts in the province.

In February the government set the tone by announcing a plan to cut loose a number of provincial parks and protected spaces to open them up for "partnerships" or sell offs.

The government said it wanted to concentrate on "crown jewel" parks and leave smaller, less profitable parks to nonprofit or private ownership or management.

"Our government has a bold vision for the tourism industry, and opening up more facilities and areas for First Nations, non-profit and private sector operation is a great way to encourage private sector investment and create jobs across Alberta as we implement our 10-year tourism strategy." Minister of Economic Development Tanya Fir is quoted as saying in the park policy press release.

After announcing the sandhill crane season, Environment Minister Jason Nixon took aim at mule deer, appointing an advisory group to take a look at how the population can be managed.  The review of mule deer management is necessary, according to Nixon, who declares himself an enthusiastic hunter, because the mule deer population is declining in western areas of the province and increasing in the east and south.

The advisory panel consists of representatives from the Alberta Professional Outfitters Society, the Alberta Fish and Game Association, the Alberta Bowhunters Association, the Alberta Beef Producers and the Alberta Conservation Association, a weighting that suggests the "management" will include encouragement to sport hunters.

At the end of May the government also announced the end to a moratorium on open pit coal mining in a large portion of the ecologically sensitive Rocky Mountain eastern slopes.  Those areas are particularly coveted by big coal firms looking for new metallurgical coal resources.  There has been considerable lobbying on the mining industry's part to open up the wilderness.

With the crash of the province's economy thanks to collapsed oil prices and Covid, the UCP is happy to listen to those industry pitches.

The hospitality industry in the province has also been clamouring for more destination activities and attractions to bring tourists out of the national parks.  Allowing more economic development in privatized parkland plus more opportunities for hunting and fishing is a low cost way to meet those demands.

The pressure is on with the decline of oil resources in Alberta.  The UCP philosophy seems to be that all natural resources are on the table as possible economic drivers.  The environment department's press releases use a lot of "sustainable harvest" rhetoric when discussing hunting and "economic opportunity" arguments when discussing wilderness development.

It's a tough calculus to balance the issue of economic development and conservation but it's a critical one when it comes to maintaining Alberta's wilderness and wildlife.

The issue will be whether the new crowds of hikers and bird watchers created by Covid isolation will raise a ruckus as that back-country wildness wanes and the flocks thin.

The sandhill crane, described as "ribeye in the sky" by hunting proponents, is a canary in the UCP's environmental coal mine.

Photo Credit: National Wildlife Federation

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.