LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

Reading, working, cleaning, walking this is life for me in a time of COVID-19.

That means I've been enjoying popping in my headphones and listening to podcasts galore, mostly but not exclusively about politics and current affairs.

I thought it would be a good idea to share what I've been listening to.  So, here is a compendium of the best political podcasts I'm enjoying:

Reasons to be Cheerful

Former UK Labour leader Ed Miliband, along with BBC radio host Geoff Lloyd, host this witty, conversational discussion about big and small ideas that "could be potential reasons to be cheerful".  From basic income to a four-day work week, children's rights to etiquette on the tube, they tackle public policy in an accessible and engaging way.  Come for the ideas, stay for the buddy comedy with routine gags such as being "a borderline millennial" and lampooning Ed's campaign bacon sandwich incident and other such gaffes.

The Herle Burly 

David Herle has really hit his stride this season, combining an in-depth interview with a major newsmaker, followed by a delightfully freewheeling, often profane panel discussion between Conservative strategist and life-of-the-party Jenni Byrne, and Liberal comms guy, Scott Reid.  The banter is hilarious, the insights on point and their laughs are hilarious additions to the soundtrack.

(Full disclosure: I've worked with and am friends with almost everyone involved in this pod.)

Campaign HQ

Obama campaign veteran David Plouffe's new podcast is a fascinating series of insights featuring some of the biggest names in Democratic political circles.  Plouffe and his guests dissect the news of the day, offering compelling behind-the-scenes, expert analysis of the politics in this presidential election year.  The pod is like a weekly political-science lecture if poli sci was about winning elections.

Hacks on Tap

David Axelrod, the former Obama guru, and Mike Murphy, a never-Trump Republican strategist, take a laidback approach to analysing American politics each week, with recurring guests such as Robert Gibbs, the former Obama press secretary, and former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emmanuel.  There's a lot of "dad humour" and some cheesy sound effects, but somehow that just adds to the enjoyment of listening to some old pros shoot the breezes and condemn President Trump's reign of error.

Pod Save America

This is an old staple along with its sister pod, Lovett or Leave It.  The "Obama Bros" were at the leading edge of the new style of political coverage, with incredibly funny gags, contests and insightful discussions of American politics.  The pods are somewhere between late-night comedy, variety shows and what you wish CNN political panels were like.  They've launched an entire liberal-oriented media platform, and offer a stable of great shows, covering the gamut from foreign policy to religion.

Political Traction

Amanda Galbraith helms Navigator's weekly podcast and the worst thing I can say about it is it's too short!  She'll bring a guest on each week to dive into an issue in detail, and then ask them to engage in a bit of rapid-fire word association about various topics in the news to conclude the discussion.

Five Thirty Eight

This pod certainly has the best theme music and some of the most interesting analysis around, as Nate Silver and a group of reporters focus on the data behind the politics.  Sure, there's some typical punditry, but with the goal of focusing on the datapoints behind the headlines, the panels challenge conventional political wisdom and try to analyse the trendlines.  Nate is a contrarian, and Clare Malone one of the regulars and an ace reporter is the best.

More generally there's something I really love about podcasts as a medium.  For me, it's a solitary activity, headphones in and the conversation playing in my head.  Sometimes you can catch me laughing to a joke, and I suppose I must look a bit foolish when out for a walk.  But mostly, I find podcasts are like reading the news if the news was a group of friends having a regular conversation an auditory opinion section, if you will.

Especially in this time of physical distancing, having regular podcasts is a way to digest the news and learn something from the experiential expertise of others.

If you're not yet a podcast listener they're well worth your time, and these are the best shows I've found.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


For a little while now, I've been bothered by this nagging sense that whatever mechanism controls the flow of world history, has somehow broken down.

After all, it seems to me that throughout recorded time we could always count on history to provide humanity with exactly the kind of leadership we needed at exactly the right time we needed it.

To show you what I mean, here are some examples pulled from my memory of high school history class:

When faced with the threat of Persian invasion, ancient Athens produced the brilliant statesman, Themistocles; during World War II, Winston Churchill arrived on the scene just in time to rally a nation against the Nazis, and when America was in the moral doldrums thanks to the triple whammy of Viet Nam, Watergate and Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan amiably ambled onto the political stage to provide the country with a needed jolt of optimism.

It's like the old expression says, "Cometh the hour, cometh the man."  (Of course, the person who cometh couldeth also be a woman see the example of Britain's Margaret Thatcher)

Yet, today with the COVID-19 crisis staring us in the face and with a severe recession looming just off the horizon, where are the leaders we need today?

Looking around the world I don't see any Themistocleses or Churchills or Reagans riding to the rescue.

Indeed, the leaders we do have in power to deal with the world's current grave condition, all seem to be out of their depth — no leader seemed prepared for a pandemic, no leader seems to have any definitive answers as to how to stop it, all leaders seem to be continually behind the curve, making up their strategies as they go along.

Certainly U.S. President Donald Trump, with his rambling news conferences, his bizarre habit of prescribing drugs and his vacillating views on whether or not to open up the economy, hasn't exactly covered himself in glory during the pandemic.

Nor, must I say, has Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

And yes, I know, for Canada's mainstream media, criticizing the Prime Minister is close to heresy and I'm sure I'll be banned from the CBC for saying this, but in dealing with this virus scare, Trudeau has lost much of the charming charisma for which he is adored.

In other words, throughout this ordeal, Trudeau's leadership has been flat and uninspired.

To show you what I mean, if Trudeau was the British Prime Minister on the eve of the Battle of Britain, he'd probably give a speech like this:

My Fellow Britons: According to all the experts, Nazi Germany's military power is vastly superior to ours, which means we're probably going to lose.  So, don't get your hopes up.  Just stay in your bomb shelter and await the inevitable.  And please don't anybody mention that Nazism originated in Germany because that would be racist.  In the meantime, I will take adorable selfies whatever the cost may be.  I shall take them on the beaches, I shall take them on the landing grounds, I shall take them in the fields and in the streets, I shall take them in my swanky cottage; I shall never surrender my right to be cute!

You get my point, right?

So, the question before us is why don't we have real leadership when we need it?

Well, perhaps it's not history that's broken, perhaps the fault lies with our corporate, mainstream media.

And yes, I know blaming the media is a lazy thing to do, but let me explain.

The problem, as I see it, is that our media is biased against any politician who they deem to be boring or non-telegenic or too policy-wonkish;  in other words, they only approve of politicians who exude the hipness or coolness of Hollywood celebrities.

And when they come across a politician who could double for a movie star, they will use all their massive powers of promotion to give him or her a boost with tons of positive coverage.

That includes even Trump; yes, the media hates him today, but they also essentially created him, since early on in his primary run in 2016, the American media, intrigued by the candidacy of an ex-reality TV star, gave him billions of dollars worth of free publicity.

They simply couldn't help themselves.

As for Trudeau, well, as we all know, the Canadian media has adored Trudeau's rock-star persona for decades and the rosy coverage the prime minister has consistently received, reflects this adoration.

Hence, the bottom line of all this, is we now have leaders in power, who are long on celebrity cred, but short on actual governing experience.

Of course, in relatively normal times, this might not matter too much, but in times of crisis it might matter a lot.

Surely, it'd be nice to have leaders in power right now who know how to make tough decisions in tough times and also know how to inspire a populace gripped by fear.

And don't forget, virus aside, we will need all the experienced and inspiring leadership we can get to help guide us through the oncoming economic recession.

Mind you, I could be totally wrong about all this; perhaps my pessimism about leadership is misplaced.

Maybe Trump and Trudeau will shine like stars in the months and weeks ahead.

Time will tell.

Yet, I got to tell you, given the state of world, I'm wishing we had a non-telegenic, non-celebrity, non-hip leader like Winston Churchill in charge right now.

Photo Credit: BBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


When you pay for something, you expect to get something.  Pretty basic principle in a market economy, isn't it?  So it is good business practice to reimburse consumers when the expected goods or services are not delivered.  There are even laws protecting consumers all over the world, to prevent companies from just taking people's money for nothing.  That would be fraud.  Or theft.  And there would be major consequences.

Yet, none of Canada's major airlines have been sending cash back to former travellers, forced to postpone their flights since mid-March.  They are above such a normal procedure, you see.

And why wouldn't they expect to be?  The Trudeau government has their back.  Transport Minister Marc Garneau made it very clear: "I understand the frustration of people who would have preferred a refund right now.  However, the industry is going through very difficult times."

Ah yes, the airline industry is suffering.  Well, many industries are going through very difficult times.  The lodging industry is one.  Yet hotels are not keeping people's money.  Even Air BnB has been issuing refunds!  What about cruise companies?  Full refund, of course.  Event tickets?  Well, they are dragging their feet, as long as the events are not "officially" cancelled, and they have a pretty loose definition of "officially", but they also end up ponying up.

What about the food industry?  Do grocery stores process your online order, fail to deliver and simply state that your food might be coming within two years, meanwhile we'll keep your money anyway!  And restaurants?  Thank you for ordering from Pizza Canada.  Due to the current pandemic, we cannot deliver your pizza.  However, we will keep your money for now.  Here is a coupon, good for a pizza of equal or lesser value, that expires in two weeks, that is not transferable and not cashable.  We may not be able to deliver then and we may not even be in business.  Thank you, come again!

Unthinkable?  Yet, that is exactly how the airline industry is behaving in Canada.  Not in the US or Europe, mind you.  Airlines are required to offer a full refund for cancelled flights.  Have you heard the crumbling sound of all those European and American airlines collapsing because consumers cannot be counted on to subsidize them?

The National Airlines Council of Canada, which includes Air Canada, Air Transat, Jazz and WestJet, has been calling for the Government of Canada to bail them out.  Canadian airlines are special, you see.

Canada's Emergency Wage Subsidy program is not good enough for them even though they are using it.  The Large Employer Emergency Financing Facility program is also available.  The loans start at $60-million for companies with at least $300-million in annual revenues.  But there is a catch:  the LEEFF allows Ottawa to take an ownership stake in publicly traded companies and bars executives from earning more than $1-million.

In 2019, Air Canada CEO Calin Rovinescu exercised his stock options and racked in $52.7 million in profit.  Add to that $10.4 million in compensation, plus bonuses.  Please help!

CIBC analyst Kevin Chiang calculated that Air Canada, Transat and Jazz were able to survive for months and months with their current liquidity.  Add to that the amounts retained by the airlines, which are considerable: Air Canada has at least $ 2.6 billion of its customers' money.  Transat reported an amount of $ 809 million paid by people as "deposit".  Keep in mind, these deductions are authorized by the Canadian Transportation Agency.

Of course, it is true that the United States and several European countries have moved in to specifically support their carriers.  That is fine, because people have been getting their money back.  In Canada, the burden is left on the shoulders of working families, some of them having lost their jobs or seen a drop in income and are relying on the Canada Emergency Relief Benefit and other aid programs to make ends meet.

One of the reasons the Trudeau government moved fast with these aid programs was because they knew people couldn't wait.  That remains true, and many families, who've been working and saving for months to go to Disneyland or a Caribbean beach, sure could use the thousands of dollars they have given airlines for a service they never got, and may never get.

Photo Credit: Global News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.