LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

For years now, progressive political parties in Canada have been blessed with one enduring electoral advantage.  That of course, is the inevitable occurrence of at least one 'bozo eruption' from a right-of-center, conservative candidate disparaging about LGBTQ people in one way or another.

For instance, in 2004, Liberal Prime Minister Paul Martin was trailing Stephen Harper and the Conservatives in the final week of the campaign.  That is until Conservative candidate Randy White gave an infamous interview, pledging that if elected, a Conservative government would defy the courts and reverse any action on same-sex marriage.

The Liberals wasted no time in stoking fear of a Conservative victory.  Off went the alarm bells.  Not only would homosexuals have their rights stolen from them, but the Charter itself would be trampled upon.

Sure enough, the strategy worked.  And it helped ensure the Liberals returned to power, albeit in a minority government.

The strategy would work again, year later in Alberta.

During the 2012 provincial election, the right-leaning Wildrose Party was poised to form government.  At least until Edmonton Wildrose candidate, Pastor Allan Hunsperger, gained infamy for one of his sermons, in which he preached that homosexuals would "suffer the rest of eternity in the lake of fire."

Then Alberta Premier Alison Redford might have identified as a Progressive Conservative.  But by the way she campaigned, she clearly stole a page from the Liberal playbook.  By demonizing the Wildrose for Hunsperger's homophobia, Redford rebounded in the polls and won a majority government.

However, this strategy has become less effective as of late.  And the federal Liberals should take note.  For in recent years, many card-carrying conservatives have strengthened their fortifications against attacks for being anti-LGBTQ.

In May 2016, a significant majority of Conservative party delegates voted to longer define marriage in their party's constitution as a union between one man and one woman.  It took over a decade for the Conservative party as a whole to come around in genuine support for same-sex marriage.  Still, it's better late than never.

Not only that, but conservatives have become more and more visible marching in pride parades.

Last month, Doug Ford marched in York Region Parade, flanked beside several of his beaming cabinet ministers.  No, it wasn't Pride Toronto, which would have been the more fitting parade for the premier of Ontario.  But still, there he was, Doug Ford himself.

Of course, simply marching in pride alone is unlikely to curry much favor amongst LGBTQ Canadians, who rightly expect more from their political leaders.

But the symbolism of Ford's presence is at least an improvement from a few years earlier, when he made disparaging comments about pride, "Do I condone men running down the middle of Yonge Street buck naked?  Absolutely not."

He wasn't the only conservative to march this year.  Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe, similarly attended pride this summer.  So too did Conservative Deputy Leader Lisa Raitt.  The list goes on.

Alas, progress has a tendency to move one step forward and two steps back.

After all, Doug Ford's crusade against Kathleen Wynne's updated sex-ed curriculum never did pass the homophobic smell test.

Nor did Jason Kenney's over-heated rhetoric on gay-straight alliances.  Or Kenney's role in helping overturn a law in San Francisco, thereby denying gay men afflicted with AIDS to receive hospital visits from their loved ones.  His refusal to apologize is utterly shameful.
Further troubling, was that both men secured solid majorities, no matter the outcry from many in the LGBTQ community and their progressive political allies.  In both cases, 'bozo eruptions' came not just from lowly party candidates, but from the very leaders themselves.  And no amount of fear-mongering or condemnation was enough to sink their political fortunes.

Of course, conservatives are a diverse bunch, with many having been stalwart supporters of the community, years before the acceptance of LGBTQ peoples became as mainstream as it is today.

Not only that, but some conservatives have played key roles in the political evolution of LGBTQ rights.  Roy McMurty, a lifelong Progressive Conservative, was the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Appeals who made the definitive ruling in favour of same-sex marriage back in 2003.  The late Jim Prentice deserves mention too, for his principled 2005 vote in favour of same-sex marriage, along with fellow Conservative MP's James Moore and Gerald Keddy.

Regardless though, it is the federal Liberals who retain the high ground in the upcoming election.  After all, Justin Trudeau is the first Canadian Prime Minister to both march in a Pride parade and appoint his own LGBTQ advisor.  He has also delivered an apology, complete with compensation, to members of the LGBTQ community for the past injustices committed by the federal government.  And the abstinence period for gay and bisexual men to donate blood has been further reduced to three months.

Unfortunately for Trudeau and the Liberals, maintaining the moral high ground on LGBTQ issues is no guarantee of success.  One need only ask Kathleen Wynne.  Or Rachel Notley.
Furthermore, as more and more conservatives march in pride and embrace same-sex marriage, the political potency of 'bozo eruptions' will only lessen.

Personally, I'm just looking forward to the day when not even a lingering doubt remains on the commitment for LGBTQ equality, from all of Canada's political parties.

Photo Credit: Toronto Star

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Money might be the root of all evil, but in politics, it's also the root of all success.

After all, without money a political campaign can't do all the stuff political campaigns must do to win elections, i.e. pay to commission polls, rent office space, hire staffers, purchase lawns signs, buy media ads, etc.

Yes, I know this should be extremely self-evident; and believe me, I wouldn't even be bringing this topic up, if it weren't for the fact that one federal party leader in this country doesn't seem to understand the important role money plays in politics.

I'm talking about NDP leader Jagmeet Singh.

From what I've seen so far from this guy, fundraising, i.e. shaking dollars out of the wallets of party donors, seems to be extremely low on his priority list.

As a matter of fact, according to one recent media report, Singh has only attended one fundraising event this year.

One!

To me, that's stunningly unbelievable, since fundraising should be a key job for any party leader.

Keep in mind, a party leader is also that party's main star attraction, and people will pay money to see a star.

Yes, some people might give money to political parties for ideological reasons or in the hopes they will gain some influence, but many people donate simply for access; they want face time with the leader.

Why? Because it gives a donor status within his or her social group.

To see what I mean, imagine the following conversation:

Joe: Hey, last week I had lunch with Andrew Scheer.

Bob: Wow!  That's pretty cool.

Joe: Yeah, (holding up his cell phone) here's a picture of us standing together.

Of course, what Joe probably won't tell Bob is that he was joined in that lunch with Scheer by 500 other people who, like him, paid $100 for a ticket.

The point is, Joe looks like a player in the eyes of his friend, which makes the donation to Scheer's campaign a social investment.

Certainly, the Liberals understand the importance of a leader to fundraising.

If you check out their website, you'll see Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is attending fundraising events all over the country.

Heck, the Liberal Party is even holding a draw for contributors to win a trip for two worth $3,000 on Trudeau's campaign plane, during this year's federal election.

Now that's status.

My point is, Trudeau is a star, and the Liberal fundraising strategy is using that stardom to its full advantage.

So why isn't Singh more actively using his name, his status and his position, to pry dollars out of donors?

True, he isn't as much of a star as Trudeau (who is?) but within the NDP's universe, he's still a luminary.

And it's not as if he can slough off fundraising duties because his party is flush with cash, since media reports indicate the NDP only raised about $5 million last year, compared to the Conservatives who raised about $26 million.

The only guess I can come up with to explain Singh's reluctance to do fundraising, is that he just doesn't like to do it.

And he surely wouldn't be the first politician to dislike the job of fundraising.

In point of fact, many politicians hate the idea of "panhandling" for donations, they find it demeaning, if not outright embarrassing.

I've certainly worked for politicians of that mindset.

They usually prefer the loftier aspects of politics devising important policy ideas, promoting their ideology, cutting ribbons to open supermarkets to the mundane, tedious task of asking people for donations at a fundraising event held in a church basement in East Antler, Saskatchewan in the middle of January.

In Singh's case, he'd probably rather extol the virtues of his "national bike strategy" than hit up party members for cash.

This is why his staffers must keep prodding, cajoling and bullying him to not only attend fundraisers, but also to make phone calls and to write personal letters asking for donations.

Maybe Singh's staffers won't do this, or maybe he just won't listen to them.

I don't know.

All I do know is Singh's apparent reluctance to do the nitty-gritty work of fundraising is hurting his party.

Photo Credit: CTV News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.