LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

Alberta is enduring a do-it-yourself Covid fourth wave as the provincial government disappears into the woodwork.

The province has skyrocketing case counts and rising hospitalizations. But the regime established in the summer when it appeared the plague was fading remains in place.

In the absence of guidance from the UCP government, cities and school boards are instituting their own mask mandates and regulations. A group of doctors is staging live pandemic updates as the Medical Officer of Health retreats to a tweet-only communication strategy.

With contract tracing at a bare minimum, word of mouth and social media have been deployed to alert the public to cases.

A pub in Calgary, for instance, took to Facebook to let patrons know that a vaccinated staff member had tested positive for Covid.

Edmonton’s city council decided this week to bring back a mask mandate for all indoor public spaces including retail stores and extend it to the end of the year or until case rates drop below 100 per 100,000 population for 10 straight days. The case rate at the beginning of the week was 238.2 per 100,000 people.

Some school boards across the province are tinkering with Covid masking and regulations just as classes start again.

So Albertans are taking the initiative to protect themselves. It may be better than nothing but it falls far short of what a co-ordinated provincial policy could achieve to turn back the current Covid tide.

The UCP government has been weirdly out of touch in the past three weeks as concerns rise.

Premier Jason Kenney has been “on vacation” and has chosen not to provide a designated hitter from cabinet to deal with the Covid issue.

In fact Culture Minister Ron Orr, caught by reporters at a newser to celebrate culture days, was effectively silenced by his press secretary, who brought an abrupt halt to the questioning when it turned to the absence of government comment on Covid.

Finance Minister Travis Toews decided to deflect questions at a fiscal update with comments about how the government had expected cases to rise and is keeping Albertans informed appropriately, presumably with canned press releases and social media announcements.

It appears the provincial government is trying to ride out the fourth wave. But for an increasing number of Albertans it looks more like they are drowning.

Three weeks ago, when Chief Medical Officer of Health Deena Hinshaw had to walk back plans to abandon public health pandemic measures altogether, she made it clear the province is moving forward, not backward, on dealing with Covid.

Basically the UCP is relying on vaccines to save the day.

A statement from Steve Buick, press secretary to the health minister, spells out the party line.

“The province is seeing an increase in hospitalizations due to Covid-19, overwhelmingly among unvaccinated Albertans….Vaccines remain the only sure way out of the pandemic. They protect us, our families and the wider community.”

As every good libertarian knows, you can’t force people to get vaccinated. Alberta is the province with the greatest percentage of vaccine resistant population.

The drive to get needles into arms has prompted the government to announce booster third shots for seniors in extended care settings and the immunocompromised.

That’s a sensible precaution but it doesn’t address the current crisis and runaway spread of the disease.

The fact that even the fully vaccinated can get Covid and pass it on doesn’t factor into the government’s strategy. Children under 12 still can’t get the shot. And there’s that nagging statistic that shows 17 per cent of hospitalized Covid patients are fully vaccinated.

The UCP, already battered by low popularity polls, is loathe to take responsibility for mask mandates and any lockdown measures. Kenney would have to admit that his “best summer ever” strategy of opening wide on July 1st failed.

It’s time to get back to business and take the necessary measures to wrestle down the numbers with a province-wide, science-based approach.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


It was probably inevitable, given how wretched our political culture is, but the COVID election could have been about something more than vaccines and vaccine passports.

But it’s a great shame that this is the pivotal issue the leaders — particularly Justin Trudeau and Erin O’Toole — have found themselves dancing around.

The more I think about it, the odder it is to realize that while COVID is still very much a part of our lives, and over the past year and a half has wrought untold havoc across the country, how few waves it seems to be making. We are in the middle of a profound catastrophe, where tens of thousands of people — neighbours, friends, family — have died during a pandemic that is still ravaging the country and the world.

The leaders talk about ending the pandemic, and recovering from the pandemic, but what they’re really talking about is the economy, stupid.

And yet, all we really get in terms of reckoning with that are a roving gang of lunatics swearing at and threatening Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau. The tone and tenor of the election is all about economic and other concerns, but they seem to glide effortlessly over the giant elephant sitting on all of us, the pandemic.

Yes, vaccine mandates are being made into a wedge issue, but where is the grappling with how our lives have all changed? Where are the bold pronouncements about changing the way we do things so this doesn’t happen again? Where is the acknowledgement that this is very much still going on?

It’s baffling watching things how little these questions seem to weigh on everyone. There should be profound things at stake, instead it is basically more of the same.

Perhaps we’ve all been so overwhelmed with the profundity of existence, of the slow grind of fear that each and every interaction with a stranger might come with it a death sentence for you or someone you love, that we’ve lost sight of what’s happened to us.

I’ve found myself saying on multiple occasions — including in this space — that I was glad my grandmother died at 94 in Jan. 2020, just before all of this happened. That the last year and a half would have been a slow torture for her, locked away in her room in the nursing home, where who even knows she would have survived without infection. But how ghastly is it to carry around such thoughts? That it’s for the best someone I loved is dead.

We’ll all carrying around some element of this. But because elections now narrowly fought, over slices of fractions of the electorate, depending on specific demographics, that campaigning turns into efforts by different leaders to try and find “wedge” issues that separate the opponents from their voters. There is no room for profundity when you are trying to get suburban, university educated homeowners out to vote with the promise of a municipal pool user fee tax credit.

So we get Trudeau pointing to O’Toole as responsible for the protestors following him around, instead of something meaningful.

“Canadians made incredible sacrifices the past year and a half, and Erin O’Toole is siding with them instead of with Canadians who did their part and stepped up?” Trudeau said, according to one Globe and Mail reporter. “He’s talking about personal choice. What about my choice to keep my kids safe? What about our choices to make sure we’re getting through this pandemic as quickly as we can?”

And yet, as much as this pains me considering everything I’ve just written, the guy does have a point here. O’Toole isn’t the animating force behind these anti-vaccine protestors. But he is willing to play a bit soft with them, realizing to some extent that they are in one sense or another small-c conservative.

There are all sorts of people who legitimately cannot get the vaccine. Age, health conditions, and other reasons prevent them from getting the shot. So it’s necessary for the rest of us who can get it so they don’t die or get ill. There’s also the issue of new variants sprouting up when large numbers of people get infected.

I’m increasingly finding the “personal choice” arguments to be faulty. That some imaginary knowledge is being sought, one final piece of evidence, that would convince people that not dying and not making it easier for others to die is in fact a good thing. It is a strange brand of selfishness, that also makes one more likely to die, that I have difficulty understanding.

And so, look at me, I’ve been wedged.

But see how small this is? And how polluted? We live in a country of wealth vast enough to hoover up many, many more millions of vaccines than we need. And yet we’re still only able to make this narrow slice the focus of the campaigns.

Maybe the reason we’re unable to grasp the more profound and urgent questions the pandemic has presented us, is because we aren’t a country capable of providing profound answers. We have grown so small and so narrow in what we ask of our politicians, they wouldn’t dare giving us anything big to chew on.

That’s ultimately what has made this election so wretched in its opening weeks. The leaders are looking to be the most palatable, not the most bold. The deep trauma of 2020 and 2021 will have to be dealt with another time. This crop does not seem interested in grappling with it.

Whenever net time comes, it will hopefully not be too late.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


This content is restricted to subscribers

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


This content is restricted to subscribers

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Dear Unvaccinated People:

I’d love to say it’s nothing personal, but it is.

It’s really, really personal.

The fact that you refuse to get vaccinated, I mean. I’m sick of you, no pun intended. And I’m not alone.

The Globe and Mail commissioned a Nanos poll on it. My friend and former colleague John Ibbitson wrote on it.

This is the question they asked: “Would you support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose or oppose unvaccinated people being denied access to public gatherings like sporting events or indoor dining in restaurants?”

Wrote John, who has been a smallish-c conservative-minded fellow since we met in the Ottawa Citizen newsroom, more than thirty years ago: “Seventy-eight per cent of respondents said they would support (59 per cent) or somewhat support (19 per cent) such a ban. Only 15 per cent opposed a ban, and 5 per cent were somewhat opposed. Two per cent were unsure.”

That 20 per cent – Team Covid, you could call them, and I do – neatly corresponds to the number of Canadian vaccination holdouts, which I wrote about in these pages, earlier this week.

And if they’re declining to get the jab because it might make things worse – like one friend of mine, who was paralyzed for months after getting a flu shot a few years ago – then, fine. That’s a bona fide reason not to get vaccinated against Covid-19. No one will get mad at you for that.

But refusing to get it because you think Covid “is no worse than the flu?” Or because you’re comparatively young “and in good shape?”

Or because you believe the basement-dwelling epidemiologists on Twitter – the ones whose handle is typically a Teutonic name followed by a bunch of numbers, alongside a picture of a wolf – over the men and women who, you know, actually went to school and studied viruses and disease and save lives every day?

Get your head out of your arse.

Because the rest of us are sick to death – pun intended, sorry but it fits – of you. Yes, you.

Oh, and that Nanos poll Ibbitson wrote about? Don’t put on your pretend Poll Expert hat now, either. Everyone is against you, pretty much, in every region of Canada. Wrote John: “There was no difference in support between men and women. Regionally, support ranged from 75 per cent in Atlantic Canada to 81 per cent in Ontario.”

Now, nobody has deputized me to speak on behalf of the Silent Majority, Team Covid. But someone had to. And, besides, while we are decidedly the majority, we are silent no more.

If you don’t want to get vaccinated because you’re an idiot, fine. The Not-So-Silent Majority won’t force you to stop being an idiot. But we sure as Hell don’t want to rub elbows with you anymore.

That’s what the July-August poll of more than 1,000 Canadians  found, as well: the majority aren’t in favour of mandatory vaccinations. But they, we, are in favour of making a few changes in our living arrangements.

That means, wrote the Globe, limits on “any public gathering that involves people being close together, such as workplaces, college campuses, hospitals, airplanes, public transit, gyms, shops and supermarkets.”

Bottom line? Stay unvaccinated, sure. But stay home, Team Covid.

Oh, and save us your lectures about freedom, by the by. Because “freedom” explicitly and constitutionally includes the freedom to “life” as well as liberty. It includes “security of the person,” too.

Your stubborn, stupefying refusal to get a little needle that will keep you healthy and alive – and keep healthy and alive those who for some reason still care about you – is dangerous. And it’s putting the rest of us in danger.

Get the shot, or don’t. But if you don’t, stay away.

Because for the majority of us, this has become really, really personal.

Sincerely,

Etc.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


This content is restricted to subscribers

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


This content is only available to our subscribers!

Become a subscriber today!

Register

Already a subscriber?

Subscriber Login

This content is restricted to subscribers

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


This content is restricted to subscribers

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


This content is only available to our subscribers!

Become a subscriber today!

Register

Already a subscriber?

Subscriber Login