LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Prime Minister Mark Carney announces his plan to create Build Canada Homes, during a visit to Edmonton on March 20, 2025.

Over a 40-year-career, Leo de Bever has had a hand on the tiller inside eight financial institutions — in Canada, the U.S., Japan and Australia.

For nearly a decade, he ran the risk department at Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan; he was hired to advise the Norwegians on managing their sovereign wealth; and when Alberta Investment Management corporation (AIMCo) was spun off as a Crown corporation in 2008, Leo was the guy recruited by the Alberta government to manage those sovereign wealth and pension assets.

All that experience inside the machine left him with an existential question about the machine: “How do you build innovation — and innovation incentives — into a bureaucracy?”

He’s asking that question again now, because I asked to speak to him about Mark Carney’s promise to launch Canada’s most ambitious housing plan since the Second World War. Build Canada Homes, a yet-to-be-created Crown corp., will get the feds back into the business of building affordable housing, including on public lands, and is set to spend billions to “catalyze” the housing industry and finance “innovative” prefabricated home builders.

De Bever, a PhD economist born in the Netherlands now living in a small community outside Calgary, shares Canadians’ anxiety about housing affordability, especially the intergenerational divide created by historically unprecedented income and wealth inequality.

“Young families (those under 35) were equally represented across income quintiles (statistics) in 1975,” Leo shares in a recent conversation. “Today, they make up two-thirds of the bottom 50 per cent of lower-income households in Canada.”

So Leo’s not questioning the government’s ambitious plan. But he fears the Ottawa machine may not be up to it.

“Who in government has done innovation?” he asks, and gives an example of what he means:

To make housing affordable, you have to bring the costs down by about 50 per cent, Leo posits. “If you give public land, as in Crown-owned land, that property has to be in the right place, or you have to do a swap of some sort,” Leo observes. “Yeah, OK,” he says, “I just think that it will be very hard for traditional bureaucrats to do this.

“They’re just setting up another company (Build Canada Homes) and giving it a mandate,” Leo suggests. “It’s going to take 18 months,” he predicts, “and then they’ll be so-so; they’ll work with large companies because they don’t want a failure on their hands.”

Leo knows governments sometimes have a role — he cites Alberta premier Peter Lougheed’s decision decades ago to step in and co-operate with the private sector to develop oil sands technology. And he knows Canadians need more affordable housing and he’s personally investing — his own time and resources — into community-led projects to achieve that end.

In the northern Alberta town of Athabasca (home of the first post-secondary in Canada to specialize in distance education), Leo is working with the municipal council on a prefab housing project; in a rural B.C. community, he’s helping to advance an affordable recreational community overlooking a lake; in locations outside Calgary, he’s devising new ways to build accessible and health-care supported retirement subdivisions.

“There is a view that stability in home prices can be achieved by replacing urban core detached homes with more densely spaced condominiums or apartment towers,” Leo explains. But he’s not convinced that’s a solution: “The rising average cost of transportation, utilities and other urban infrastructure under already congested conditions could easily offset that effect,” he says.

Instead, Leo’s encouraging investment in housing outside of urban centres, in locations where available land offers a cost advantage and telecommunication infrastructure is reliable. In towns like Athabasca, Alta., Leo suggests “lower-cost modular homes can be brought to an attractive physical environment, as a catalyst for employment, long-distance workers, and economic activity.” What he’s envisioning in Athabasca could be a proof of concept for the Carney government’s Build Canada Homes.

Modern telecommunication technology has diminished the advantage of concentrated urban centres, he adds, “making it easier to adopt a ‘polycentric’ model, where jobs and activities can be moved to satellite communities, where land is less costly.”

With a smile, Leo assures me he isn’t necessarily suggesting companies follow in Elon Musk’s footsteps — relocating Tesla from California to set up a company town in a lower-density, lower-cost land base in Texas.

 Leo de Bever, former head of AIMCo in Alberta, is skeptical of the view that “stability in home prices can be achieved by replacing urban core detached homes with more densely spaced condominiums or apartment towers.”

Finding housing solutions across Canada — community by community — will require fresh thinking. And based on a career spent on the inside of big pension companies and government financial institutions, Leo’s skeptical of bureaucrats’ motivation to innovate. “They stay stuck in a mould,” he asserts, “that’s the problem with big companies and big government.”

How did a guy steeped in decades of big finance become a champion of “small is beautiful”? Leo doesn’t bristle at the question; he even admits to getting caught up in the “bigger is better” culture.

“At AIMCo, I had the same issue, and I only realized afterwards. If you are within that organization and you spend your time on $10 million, $20 million worth of investing, there is a notion that you’re not earning your keep. Because that’s the culture,” he says with a shrug.

“It even was the case when I did something innovative for Teachers,” he continues. “Infrastructure wasn’t a thing when I started doing it, and my colleagues hated it … on the fixed income side, they said, ‘Oh, too much risk,’ and on the private equity side, ‘Not enough money.’”

Notwithstanding, Leo persisted and invested in infrastructure. “Bob Bertram (OTPP’s first chief investment officer) let me do it,” Leo recalls, “and I realized that without the Bob Bertrams of this world, these organizations don’t change.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


People protest in St. Catharines outside the courthouse hearing the case of Daniel Senecal, who is charged with the alleged sexual assault of a three-year-old girl in an Aug. 31 incident in Welland.

Women who attended an extraordinary protest outside an Ontario court appearance this week by a man who allegedly broke into a home, choked and sexually assaulted a young child say they aimed to push authorities to ensure the child gets justice.

The case, in Welland, Ont., has drawn special attention because of the horror of the crime — the victim was under five years old, attacked in bed as the parents slept — and the fact that the suspect was on probation at the time for a similar offence.

“It should disturb people. It should make decision-makers feel uncomfortable and guilty. It should be obvious that the system is flawed and this must spark change,” Jackie Heximer said.

 A mother of two and sexual assault survivor Jackie Heximer posted photos from a protest she attended in St. Catharines, Ont. on Sept. 10, 2025, against the suspect in the sexual assault of a child.

The protest outside the St. Catharines courthouse drew hundreds of people and led police to shut the street as the suspect attended a bail hearing.

Heximer, who is a mother of two young girls and a sexual assault survivor, said it was crucial that the case not “fade into silence.”

“This case hits painfully close to home. Survivors know too well the feelings of powerlessness and shame that follow these crimes,” Heximer told National Post. “That is why we rely on those in power to protect the most vulnerable members of our community and ensure that offenders like this are kept away from society permanently.”

One of the event’s organizers, Alicia Googoo, told National Post that the idea for the event was sparked after the “whole community was expressing their outrage on social media.”

“I thought maybe we could come together in a form that would help make change in hopes this child gets the justice she deserves,” she said. “I felt a sense of love and compassion in the crowd as victims of past sexual violence shared their stories of how the justice system failed them or their children.”

She said there were petitions signed by attendees that urged the Canadian government for change, and more than $2,100 was raised for the victim.

Heximer said another reason she attended the protest was to stand up for all victims “whose stories are not widely shared and who typically don’t receive the justice they deserve.”

 A sign that reads “we deserve to know” is shown from a protest in St. Catharines, Ont., attended by mother and sex assault survivor Jackie Heximer. She was there to protest for harsher punishment for offenders after a child was sexually assaulted in August.

She said the atmosphere was both “powerful and heartbreaking.” There was power in the unity and support for the victim, but it was heartbreaking because “so many of those in attendance were survivors themselves,” she said — “living proof of how deeply and widely the system has failed.”

She also condemned the fact that “predators are too often given a second chance” while victims are left with the life-altering consequences.

The suspect had reportedly been arrested in 2021 and faced similar charges. Court documents showed he was charged with the sexual assault of a minor, sexual interference of a minor and choking, CTV News reported. He was sentenced to 18 months in jail.

Public records indicate the suspect “was subject to a probation order at the time of the offence,” said Niagara Regional Police Chief Bill Fordy in a

statement posted on X

.

The case caught the attention of Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre. On Sept. 11,

Poilievre hosted a news conference

calling for “jail, not bail to bring back safety for all Canadians.”

“As a mother, this is my worst nightmare,” said Heximber, adding that a child’s bed should be a safe space, never a place where they can be “subjected to such violence and horror.”

The suspect was identified by police as Daniel Senecal. He was taken back into custody after a court appearance via video link and the date of the hearing was pushed to Oct. 15, per local radio station 610 CKTB. According to CBC News, the date was moved to “give him more time to consult with a lawyer.”

Senecal is

facing five charges

, including aggravated sexual assault on a person under 16, assault, choking, and breaking and entering.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


One Ontario union, LiUNA is leaving the Ontario Federation of Labour, in part because of the OFL's protests against the Ontario Progressive Conservative government.

A new fissure has appeared in the landscape of Ontario union politics. The Labourers’ International Union of North America (LiUNA) is leaving the Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL), stating that the OFL is engaging in “bad politics.”

In a

statement posted on LinkedIn

on Friday, LiUNA president Joseph Manincelli made his union’s case: “Recently the Ontario Federation of Labour and OPSEU HAVE ATTACKED the Skill Development Fund that has funded numerous LiUNA Training Centers and training, apprentice and mentorship programs that have empowered opportunities for marginalized communities, students, women in trades, youth at risk, second chance career paths and our indigenous partners. They have done so under the guise of protecting colleges.”

According to the province, the Skills Development Fund supports organizations looking to train or retrain workers. In a May 6 press release, the Ontario government announced almost $1 billion for it over the next three years for a total of $2.5 billion. In part, it is aimed at “reskilling” workers laid off because of U.S. tariffs.

Meanwhile there is a capital funding stream aimed at helping organizations build, expand or retrofit their training facilities.

Manincelli specifically addressed the OFL, OPSEU attacks on these facilities in his LinkedIn post: “To be clear, LiUNA has a strong partnership with our Colleges in Ontario and it is a disservice to create a conflict between private sector training centers and colleges.”

LiUNA’s business manager, Joseph Oliveira expressed similar sentiments in a letter sent to the OFL’s president, Laura Watson on Friday, formally notifying her of LiUNA’s withdrawal from the federation. (The National Post reached out to Watson for comment but has not yet received a response.)

Manincelli went on to say that the OFL is engaging in “nothing but bad politics” in its attacks on the Ford government. As a result, he continued, LiUNA won’t participate further in the OFL until it “starts treating private sector unions fairly, as opposed to favouring public sector unions to the detriment of LiUNA and its hundreds of thousand members.”

The LiUNA move has been welcomed by the Ontario government. Minister of Labour

David Piccini also wrote on LinkedIn

Friday.

“Organizations like LIUNA — who fight for their members and deliver strong, results-driven programs — are exactly the kind of partners we’re proud to support through the Skills Development Fund,” Piccini said. “Together, we’re protecting workers in these unprecedented economic times, while giving them the tools and training to land better jobs with bigger paycheques.”

LiUNA has previously endorsed Doug Ford and his Progressive Conservative government publicly, highlighting the Ontario government’s investments in skilled trades, training and infrastructure projects, and stating that the Ford government “shows up for them.”

It provided an

official endorsement

back in February before the provincial election. In a statement released at the time, Mancinelli said: “To date, Ford’s governments have invested over $60 million in LiUNA and their local chapters to boost skilled trades training across the province.”

That included a new training centre in Vaughan, Ont., aimed at helping “almost 100,000 people gain the skills and training they need to find good-paying jobs in construction. In addition, the union’s workers are involved in countless numbers of the more than $200 billion worth of publicly funded construction activity.”

Contrarily, the OFL has been highly

critical of Ford, attacking his government

over wages, public service cuts and privatization, arguing that Ford’s May 2025 budget “fails working Ontarians.”

Instead, the OFL argues, the budget was a “plan to reward Conservative insiders.” And counter to LiUNA’s appreciation for the government focus on skills development, the OFL says the Skills Development Fund “means little when the jobs being created don’t come with decent pay, security, or benefits.”

It shows a seeming preference for public sector workers, stating that “Ford continues to neglect … sectors that are key to our global competitiveness (such as) health care, childcare, public education, post-secondary, and public transit.”

The OFL has not been entirely alone. The

International Association of Machinists and Aeropsace Workers

argued, prior to the election, that the Ford government should have focused its efforts on combating the U.S. tariff threat, rather then spend money on another provincial vote.

In a statement released in late January, it said that more than 30 labour leaders from Ontario’s private, public, and trades sectors came together to demand action from Ford.

“A serious plan would include permanent investments in key publicly delivered services — not just in skilled training centres, but in restoring core post-secondary funding. Ontario needs immediate, ongoing support to ensure everyone has access to education and retaining in today’s changing economy.”

However, now there is a fresh rift amid Ontario labour with LiUNA’s withdrawal from the OFL.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Alberta Premier Danielle Smith during an announcement in Calgary in August 2025. (Gavin Young/Postmedia)

Canada is unapologetically back in the resource extraction business. For Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, that’s great news.
When you look at the nation-building projects announced by Prime Minister Mark Carney this week, Premier Smith said in a Friday night interview, the “mines for gold and copper, the nuclear power installation, LNG Canada 2 — these are true resource extraction, revenue-generating projects.”
“It’s about generating revenue,” she enthuses. “This isn’t supposed to be an exercise in how do we spend more government money on public infrastructure,” she says, “It’s how do we create an environment so that the private sector will build resource projects and revenue-generating projects so that we can afford to pay for the public infrastructure.”
And getting a bitumen pipeline built can help pay the bills, she suggests, including the cost to decarbonize the oil that flows in that pipeline. “You have to have new revenue in order to pay for new spending,” she reasons, quite unlike “the model that Justin Trudeau put on the table which was nothing but cost and no benefits, all shut in and no expansion.”
This is the way she sees it: The carbon capture and storage network and pipeline proposed by the Pathways Alliance, a coalition of oilsands producers, “is going to cost somewhere between $10 to $20 billion.” Expensive, yes, “but if we get a new million barrel per day bitumen pipeline, that generates $20 billion per year in revenue, and if you are able then to have that operate year after year after year,” she emphasizes, “now you have a revenue stream to be able to offset whatever the cost will be of developing a new technology to decarbonize.”
Figuring out who pays to decarbonize the bitumen is a negotiation in progress, the premier acknowledges, but she doesn’t think it needs to hold up pipeline construction. “Honestly,” she says, “I think, really, if you want the truth, both of us (the province and Ottawa) are committed.”
“We benefit almost equally from new barrels getting to the market,” the premier reports; the feds earn corporate and personal incomes taxes, and the province earns royalties. “We’re all committed to doing it,” she posits, “the bigger issue is none of this can be paid for if we don’t have new production and new revenue.”
To shed a little light on the tone of her meeting this week with the prime minister, the premier shares a snippet of that exchange: “I said to him, ‘Guess what we’re looking for is a compromise.’ And he said, ‘I’m not. I’m looking for a win-win.’” She continues: “I just thought, ‘You know what? That’s the right attitude.’ He doesn’t want a win-lose. He doesn’t want a lose-lose. He wants a win-win.”
There has been so much bad-blood between Alberta and Ottawa, I find myself listening closely to the tenor of the premier’s voice, to gauge if her optimism is genuine.
While I recognize her unrelenting rallying cry — “We can get new production. We can get achievable emissions reduction targets. We can expand our influence, not only economically, but from a security point of view, globally” — I also want assurance this Carney-led resource extraction momentum is for real.
So I poke back. How is any of this grand strategy viable with an emissions cap in place? No pipeline company or energy producer is going to invest with a federal-government imposed ceiling on oil production.
“Not a lot of folks understand how pipelines get built,” Smith readily agrees. “How pipelines get built is companies go around to people who take oil out of the ground and say, ‘Hey, are you willing to pledge some barrels for this pipeline so I can go to the bank and get financing?’” An emissions cap means oil producers aren’t prepared to make those pledges.
“I know the prime minister wants to ensure that the Pathways project goes ahead, so there’s lower carbon emissions, but in order to be able to pay for that, you need to have new production, and to have new production, you’ve got to get rid of the bad laws,” she says, reiterating her wish-list for Ottawa.
“You’ve got to get rid of emissions caps, you’ve got to get rid of the greenwashing law, you’ve got to get rid of the tanker ban, and then all of those things will allow a pipeline company to go to those same producers and say, ‘Do you want to pledge some barrels?’ and they’ll say ‘yes.’”
While the premier isn’t saying she’s been told the emissions cap will go the way of the carbon tax — and other Justin Trudeau-era greening aspirations — she says, the prime minister “seems to signal that he is prepared to do that.”
Premier Smith sees opportunity for exports of Canada’s oil, in all directions. “If I had my druthers,” she says, “I’d have a million barrel a day pipeline going to Churchill, a million barrel a day pipeline going to the West Coast, and two million barrels a day going down to the U.S., because I want to double production.”
Even the International Energy Agency has realized they must modify their expectations for future oil demand “based on reality, rather than hopes and wishes,” she confidently reports, and points to OPEC’s latest forecasts for global oil consumption (123 million barrels per day by 2050). Given those outlooks, she predicts, ”there’s room for another 2 or 3 or 4 billion barrels per day of Canadian oil.”
“You’ve even got Europe saying, yes, there’s a market; we would like to buy more Canadian energy. We’ve already seen with TransMountain and the Coastal gas link and LNG Canada opening up; the Asian markets want us as well. And the Americans too have said they’d like to do a reboot on the Keystone XL concept.”
“With all of our friends and allies and neighbours saying, ‘Please, help us, so that we don’t have to rely on despotic regimes,’ how can we say no to that?” she rhetorically asks.
The premier’s enthusiasm is unbridled, but where’s her ubiquitous sense of urgency? Could she really be as sanguine as she sounds? Prime Minister Carney has hinted he’d like to see all the premiers gather in Winnipeg for the Grey Cup in November, she says, that’s when the second tranche of nation-building projects is to be revealed.
“My urgency is still there,” she admits. “I’m going to the ADIPEC Conference in Abu Dhabi in November, and it sure would be nice for me to have a platform there, to say Canada’s open for business again.” Before that, she’s got a Throne Speech to deliver in the Alberta Legislature. “It would be nice for the prime minister and I to have a joint announcement,” she hints, “well before the end of the year.”
And there’s that niggling risk of a referendum vote, if the petition initiated by former Alberta deputy premier Thomas Lukaszuk is successful. “He’s crafting his vote: Do you want to remain in Canada?” she explains. “But those are yes/no votes. So what’s the consequence if people are disgruntled and disenfranchised? He gets the signatures; and then people have the choice of voting yes or no.”
“Anytime you get an issue like that on the table, it could go either way, especially when emotions run high,” Smith cautions. “So I’m aware of the urgency. I have told the prime minister that Justin Trudeau created the separatist movement, and I think he (Carney) can take the air out of it, but we have to see action.”
If Lukaszuk’s petition is successful, Smith says the province will have a vote in the spring. “It would be far better for us to have demonstrated some real progress,” she suggests, “so people can feel confident in the relationship that Canada and Alberta have.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Filmmaker Barry Avrich, right, and Noam Tibon, the subject of the documentary film The Road Between Us: The Ultimate Rescue, which was shown at the TIFF film festival.

It was an unusually bumpy road for Barry Avrich’s documentary to make it to the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF). The Road Between Us: The Ultimate Rescue

follows the story of retired Israeli general Noam Tibon

racing on October 7 to save his son and his family who were hiding in Kibbutz Nahal Oz, one of the hardest hit communities on the Gaza border.

In August, reports emerged that TIFF leaders had pulled the film from its roster, citing its failure to meet “legal clearance for all footage.” Avrich said at the time that the announcement blindsided him, leaving him “shocked and saddened that a venerable film festival has defied its mission and censored its own programming by refusing this film.”

Pressure

quickly mounted

against TIFF, with prominent Toronto politicians and Hollywood celebrities condemning the film festival’s decision. TIFF chief executive Cameron Bailey soon reversed the decision and expressed his “sincere apologies for any pain this situation may have caused.” On Wednesday afternoon, before a packed crowd that had gathered for the film’s premiere at Roy Thomson Hall in Toronto, Bailey apologized directly to the Jewish community.

On Thursday, Avrich and Tibon spoke with National Post about the importance of the documentary, the hurdles they faced and what lessons they wish audiences would take from the film. This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

How does it feel now that the premiere has happened and people got to see what you worked on?

Avrich:

In making a lot of films, I’ve never felt so fulfilled walking onto that stage and feeling an audience that large have your back. So there is a feeling of fulfillment and vindication. Because I’ve always said from day one, watch the film and make up your own mind. Don’t have a preconceived notion that the film is going to be political or whatever. Watch it, and then let’s have a conversation about it. So that last night was emotional, thrilling, frightening, but more importantly, very, very fulfilling.

How have the last six or eight weeks been for you both?

Avrich:

Extraordinarily emotional. I’ve entered film festivals before and have not been successful in getting films in. That’s the life of a filmmaker. This one, there were different stakes because the film had been accepted. So that was very, very difficult. I just kept saying to Noam, and we spoke two or three times a day, don’t cancel your ticket. Do not cancel your ticket. This is not going to be easy.

I can’t promise you what the ending will look like, but I can promise you that this film will be in a theatre during a film festival or not. We went into this with a strategy, and once we heard it wasn’t in, to remain as defiant as we can. I don’t think anybody anticipated the global response. However, we had a plan and we were going to stick with it, and I think it ended up being an educational process for us, as well as (TIFF CEO) Cameron Bailey.

Tibon:

This is not my world. I was very happy that we got into the TIFF festival because it’s a very, very important stage. And I was very disappointed when we were out, mainly because of the excuse of the rights of Hamas. And I think Barry handled this battle very well. And I was overwhelmed from the support that we got in the United States, of course, here in Canada and also in Israel and all over the world. People supported the movie, and that’s why I was happy that we were back in.

I appreciate that Cameron Bailey apologized, and the most important (thing) is the movie and I hope that as many people in the world will watch it. And for me, my goal is, that at the end of the day, they will sit in the car on their way back home, and they will discuss what would we do if something like this would happen in our family? And I think this is the main issue, the family, the values. And for me, it was a great honour to be here on the stage yesterday.

What message do you want Canadian audiences to take away from the documentary?

Avrich:

I don’t want to be cliché, but: family, family, family. I think the universal connection here, no matter what’s going on in the world, is to protect your family, and, more importantly, spend time with your family. Things can change in 24 hours. Things can change in an hour. So spend some time in this world that’s become very dark, and just find this ray of escape and this ray of light to hug your family, nurture them, and find a moment here. That’s what I’m asking for.

We did not set out to make a political film and have a perspective politically, and I think that’s where Noam and I found common ground. I’m not that guy. I’m going to be focusing on this moment of heroism within incredible tragedy. And so I want people to not have a preconceived notion of what the film is, because of a region that it’s set in. I’ve always said this, this is a film wrapped in a flag of family, not politics or a country per se.

Tibon:

You know, Barry took my answer. So I would add only this: as an Israeli, it was very important for me that nobody can erase what happened on October 7.

Do you have any future plans in terms of the film?

Avrich:

I’m going to work extraordinarily hard with Noam to make sure that this film is seen. It opens theatrically Oct. 3 in major markets in North America, and then I want schools and community organizations to see this. Jewish. Not Jewish. It doesn’t matter. It’s a story of family. As we’ve said, there’s a universal message. So I’m going to make sure that no stone is unturned, and that anybody who wants to see this film, anybody that should see this film, sees it.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Christina Ryan, Postmedia, Calgary, Alberta: AUGUST 18, 2025 - Megan Gallagher is assisted with her physio treatment by therapist Rebecca Lipsey (right) at Synaptic Health, for spinal cord injury and neurological rehabilitation, in Calgary on August 18, 2025. Gallagher lost the use of her legs after a plane crash in Springbank. The exoskeleton from XoMOtion, headless and battery operated, is used to assist with postural alignment and gait pattern.

In Superhumanity: Part 1, we reported on the Enhanced Games, an athletic competition that will be staged next May in Las Vegas for a willing contingent of chemically assisted swimmers, sprinters, and weightlifters. Even the last-place finishers will get a paycheque. World record-breakers will be awarded US$1 million. The Enhanced Games may or may not portend a new era of superhuman competition. Feedback from the elites who oversee world sport has been predictably harsh, while others hail this assault on Olympian hypocrisy and defend a person’s choice to jab and juice as she or he pleases.

In Part 2, our attention turns to the Age of Supermachinery that will leave none of us unchanged.

Ten years ago, the Huffington Post asked a selection of science-fiction writers to imagine the Olympic Games several decades hence.

“Someday,” an author named Max Gladstone responded, “a human mind in a robot body will run the 100-metre dash in a second. But for a long time, we’ll say that doesn’t count.”

That “long time” is about to expire.

As evidence, we look back to April 2022, when a small plane thudded and crumpled short of the runway at Springbank, Alta., just off the berm of the Trans-Canada Highway between Calgary and Banff. The propeller was sheared off and the wings of the Mooney M20K dredged themselves into the brown prairie turf.

One pilot died, and 22-year-old

Megan Gallagher

— a flight instructor who had come down from Fort St. John, B.C., for a check-out ride in the Mooney — well, as James Taylor once sang, Megan, “the plans they made put an end to you” as well, at least as an active, fully-functioning woman.

“Don’t get your hopes up on walking again. It’s very unlikely with your level of injury,” Global News reported back then, quoting Gallagher’s doctors.

But the physicians, born in an earlier century, were too pessimistic; they dealt in nerves and tendons, not in graphite and gears.

Three years after the crash at Springbank, I am in Southeast Calgary with the same Megan Gallagher, watching the epoch of Supermachinery arise. Headless and battery-powered, purposeful and confident, the contraption unfolds itself from the sitting position and stands upright and obedient, awaiting instructions from a hand-held remote.

Take a woman whose legs no longer function, or a striving young survivor of unspeakable tragedy, and strap her or him in, and you have Max Gladstone’s prophecy fulfilled: a human brain in a robot’s bones.

The machine I have come to see, designed and built in British Columbia, is called the

XoMotion

. It costs US$250,000 and gets a million smiles to the gallon. There is a woman in Vancouver who has taken more than 250,000 steps in this self-levitating, self-supporting, self-balancing, two-footed prototype — one of the most advanced and agile “exoskeletons” ever engineered. She fully expects tomorrow’s XoMotion to jump, race and dance. We’ll hear from her in a moment.

For the intrepid and cheerful Megan Gallagher, and for the other spinal-cord injury patients who have used the XoMotion as part of their slow return to verticality, just the first step alone was transformational.

“It was a little scary having a device move your body, not with your own will, right?” Gallagher tells me at the Synaptic Neurorehabilitation Centre, one of the first clinics in Canada to receive the XoMotion. “I mean, it’s hard enough to have your body break and to not be able to use your body, but then to have a device come in and move your body for you is pretty scary.

“I would say it’s kind of like a carnival ride, the anticipation and waiting as it’s standing me up, right? And it happens pretty quickly.

“I was able to give my dad a hug standing up. I was able to play catch with my mom. So, a lot of stuff that I’m not able to do.

“It’s still a little weird, but it feels very secure. If anything, it’s maybe too secure and not in a bad way, because it moves you in the exact proper patterning that you’re supposed to walk. It’s awesome because I don’t feel like I’m going to fall over.

“I think they have three speeds on it. They had me doing the fastest one, and it is weird. It got me thinking of sci-fi movies and how I could go racing into battle with robot legs, but it felt pretty cool. I haven’t moved that fast in three years. But it does feel quite unnatural.”

It’s not natural. It’s a human mind in a robot body.

“It has helped me become, I don’t want to say fully human, but mechanically more human,” she says. “And I feel like we have already gotten so removed from humanity with our phones and now, are we all going to be cyborgs?”

The answer is yes.

The original human cyborg

Twenty years ago, a congenitally colour-blind young Catalonian named

Neil Harbisson

found a surgeon who was willing to drill a hole in his skull and implant a sensor that can convert colour temperature into an auditory signal. Beep-beep for red, bloop-bloop for green, and so on. It even works where human eyes can’t: in the infrared and ultraviolet zones of the spectrum.

Soon afterward, Harbisson, who is a dual U.K.-Spanish citizen, went to renew his travel documents at the British passport office and was told that applicants with metallic antennae sprouting from their craniums were not eligible.

Unable to simply unscrew his hardwired appendage like a light bulb, Harbisson protested and eventually won his case, thereby earning the privilege of calling himself the first cyborg to be issued a passport. A popular TED-Talker and painter of portraits tinted by the hues he hears, he has been dining out on his trans-sensory uniqueness ever since. In the ensuing decades, his device has been upgraded to receive phone calls and connect to the Web.

In contemplating our future as flesh-and-metal hybrids, I thought it would be instructional to speak with Cyborg One.

“Do you consider yourself a superhuman?” I ask Harbisson, who resides in Barcelona.

“I don’t like the term ‘super’ because it feels like it means superior, and that’s not necessarily true,” he replies. “If you have more senses, organs or intelligence, that doesn’t mean you’re better. You might have new abilities but still not use them in an intelligent or meaningful way.”

“Did you do this for money?” I wonder, lucre being the overt reason for the Enhanced Games.

“For me, no,” Harbisson says. “My aim has never been to enhance the body itself but to expand the brain — specifically, to add new senses. The word ‘enhancement’ in my case is about expanding human perception, creating new ways to interact with reality. The Enhanced Games are an interesting idea but not necessarily aligned with my philosophy, which is about perception, not performance.

“Breaking the 100-metre record,” he says, “depends on why you’re running. The reason behind using that speed matters — it doesn’t automatically make it ‘better.’”

Most of us need an exterior antenna like we need a hole in the head, but Harbisson was hardly satisfied with just one bit of aftermarket hardware. He has had a sort of compass implanted in his knee that senses the direction he is travelling — “I don’t need to see the sun to know where I am” — and he says he is working on a so-called Solar Crown that would follow the sun in its daily arc. He calls this “an organ-in-progress” and explains that “it creates a point of heat that takes 24 hours to move around my head, allowing me to feel the passage of time and the Earth’s rotation. It could eventually help modulate jet lag.

“These implants aren’t about having a ‘better’ body — they’re about having a different perception of reality.”

Harbisson tells me about a woman he knows who had a seismic detector embedded in her leg, and someone else with a device that can measure cosmic rays.

“I think about Einstein’s Theory of Relativity in practice,” he says, “using new organs that allow us to 

feel

time differently, the way we create optical illusions visually.”

“Will we all be cyborgs?” I pose.

“Yes, I think so, in a way,” Harbisson says. “All the code we’ve developed is open source. Anyone can recreate the sensory organs we’ve built. With AI, it’s becoming easier and cheaper.

“There’s still so much to explore. Technology opens up endless possibilities for perception. Merging with chips will soon feel old-fashioned. We’ll likely print new organs using our own DNA.

“In the future, we’ll modify our DNA to add new senses. We’ll use our own body’s energy to power implants, perhaps through turbines inside our blood vessels, removing the need for external electricity.

“There will be a diversity of humans,” says Harbisson, “some who merge with technology and some who don’t. What we call ‘diversity’ will expand. There will be many coexisting perceptions of reality. Just like now, when we switch between online and off-line worlds.”

‘I forgot how tall I was’

It was clear from the arrival of the first XoMotion at the Synaptic rehab centre in Calgary that there was one young man who was a perfect candidate to try it out.

This was Ryan Straschnitzki, who was just turning 19 when his

Humboldt Broncos

’ team bus was rammed by a tractor-trailer at a Saskatchewan crossroads in 2018, leaving him paralyzed below the waist and 10 of his beautiful teammates dead (16 people were killed in the crash including two coaches, an athletic therapist, statistician, radio announcer and bus driver).

Now there was a new machine that, though powerless to cleanse away the grief and the remembrance, could at least raise him for a moment from his two-wheeled life.

“I forgot how tall I was,” the young man beamed the first time the robot stood him up. A minute later he was throwing a football and stickhandling a plastic puck across the clinic floor.

“It was an incredible experience,” Straschnitzki tells me now. “I never had the opportunity to stand and use a hockey stick normally again.

“Words can’t describe the feeling. It helped me remain hopeful for the future. There were instances I thought I would be able to walk again. It’s been a while. It kind of gave me confidence. It gave me a bit of power back.”

This is only the infancy of the Age of Supermachinery. Even the XoMotion, though it strides more smoothly than Frankenstein’s monster, is a knuckle-dragging Neanderthal compared to what someday will be.

“The opportunities that could come from this in the future are endless,” Straschnitzki predicts. “Imagine running, playing soccer, being able to be an athlete again.”

“I did not think that this was going to happen in my lifetime,” says physiotherapist Uyen Nguyen, the co-founder and executive director of the Synaptic clinic. “I used to read all the medical books and the research and still think it was science fiction. I thought that we were so far away from having it in clinical use.”

“When you look at the XoMotion, what do you see?” I ask her.

“I see possibilities, I see potential and I see progress,” she replies. “It’s really exciting for me to see this in my lifetime, where the person cannot do it and the machine is doing it for them.

“From the beginning of time, humans found that our physical abilities diminished over our lifetimes based on all the external factors of health, socioeconomics, disease, all those different things. We found that the mind can outlast the body. Science, though, is actually closing the gap and we are probably looking at a state where the physical part is going to outlast the mental and the cognitive side of humanity.

“Ryan and I joke about him being able just to go get groceries and gas at Costco. That’s like the epitome and the ultimate. It’s a really uncontrolled environment. There are people in carts everywhere. And knowing that you can do that with confidence and safety — for Ryan to compete athletically in this is one thing, but it will be more meaningful for him to be able to get gas by himself.”

This is the first generation in clinical use. Nguyen imagines Generation Five. “It runs, it climbs, it jumps. It would be lighter, it would be stronger, right? It would have more degrees of movement. Maybe by Generation Five some of this will be controlled cognitively. Or just taking away the hand control, because not everybody has hand function. Could we voice-control this?”

“A human mind in a robot body will run the 100-metre dash in a second …” I quote.

“Does it count for who wins the Olympic 100 metres? I don’t know,” says Nguyen.

“I think the physical and the soul of humanity are two very, very different things.”

Humanoid robots versus humans

In April of this year, 21 soulless automatons and more than 10,000 members of Team Homo sapiens competed in a

half-marathon through the streets of Beijing

. It was said to be the first time that robots went mano-a-metal with actual people over such a punishing distance.

The humans won.

“Stumbling and overheating, most humanoid robots fail to finish half-marathon in Beijing,” headlined WIRED.

“Chinese robots ran against humans. They lost by a mile,” gloated CNN.

“Victory tastes like lithium,” riffed RUN.

“Chinese humanoid robots get reality check,” reported the Asia Times.

Here’s another reality check: When I lived and worked in Beijing 40 years ago, there were more horses in the streets than private motor cars, an antiquity invisible and risible to the millions of hard-driven Chinese who are growing up in the epoch of Supermachinery.

“Generally, these are interesting demonstrations, but they don’t demonstrate much regarding the utility of useful work,” a professor named Fern from Oregon State University was quoted by the television network France 24, remarking on the half-marathon.

Similar ridicule often follows other inhuman competitions that Chinese engineers have been staging to showcase their machines, including boxing matches and soccer games that send audiences into fits of hilarity each time a robot’s rheostats catch fire or its ankles ankylose.

“Several had to be carried off the field on stretchers by staff, adding to the realism of the experience,” The Associated Press noted of one football match in June.

But it is early in the game. Imagine if that race was not 13 miles, but 1,300. Robot keep running. Robot don’t care.

“Your accountant, your masseuse and your butler will service your needs via a symphonic confluence of circuits and hydraulics,” author Patrick Hemstreet predicted in that Huffington Post article, back in 2016. “Lightning-fast computation and enhanced processor precision will ensure all pertinent tasks are performed efficiently and free of error.

“But I still want to see humans interact with other humans to demonstrate abilities gained through training and talent alone. To see members of our species blow past seemingly insurmountable barriers is the greatest form of entertainment. Hearing a new story or marveling at the creativity of a new artist is an experience that is firmly enshrined in flesh and bone. This exchange between souls is, dare I say, sacred and will never be yielded to non-sentient metallic automatons.

“When the day comes that we are surrounded by walking IBMs and Apples, we will come to a greater appreciation of what it means to be human, warts and all. Think of it, the sanctity of sportsmanship (and all human endeavour) resurrected and cherished.”

So, there are three finalists competing in the race for the future: the man fortified by wonder drugs; the woman re-engineered by wearable machines; and the stubborn natural clinging tight onto whatever, for better or for worse, his gods and his genetics gave him.

Which of the three are you betting on?

‘I don’t have hands’

In Part 1 of this series, I asked Aron D’Souza, the ultra-confident creator of the Enhanced Games, if he envisions a time when people will choose to have their feet amputated and replaced by carbon-fibre blades.

“I can see an age in which, just as we have hip replacement surgery and it’s commonplace today, that humans will choose to enhance themselves long before disability sets in, where the point of all technology is to enhance the human condition,” the Australian answered.

“Why should we accept our biological limits?”

At Synaptic, I meet a patient — and pioneer of bariatric surgery for the obese — named Dr. Richdeep Gill. Seven years ago, Gill suffered a grievous spinal-cord injury while boogie-boarding in Hawaii. Incisive and realistic, he operates now on the timetable of incremental rehabilitation and the fantasia of tomorrow’s Supermachinery.

“I don’t have hands,” he says. And he tells me that if — or when — a mechanical hand is perfected that can restore the fine-motor function that once allowed him to use his life-saving skills, he willingly would surrender his flesh to the machine.

“It’s just the idea of having something functional,” the surgeon says, waiting another day.

Chris Neilson is on the phone from Edmonton saying, “I’m a research partner, but I also call myself the guinea pig.”

Neilson, who lost his left arm to a workplace accident, recently returned from Zürich and the international competition for inventors and users of advanced prostheses and other such devices that is called CYBATHLON. Wearing a mechanical hand designed at the

BLINC

(“Bionic Limbs for Natural Control”) laboratory in the Department of Medicine at the University of Alberta, Neilson raced the clock in such mundane household tasks as stacking plastic cups and folding laundry, using the hand’s pressure-sensitive skin-to-silicon interface to manipulate the five-fingered bot.

Someday, a hand perfected at BLINC may restore Chris Neilson and Richdeep Gill to their professions and the fullness of their touch.

“What did you see at CYBATHLON that impressed you?” I ask Neilson.

“There was a lot of stuff using the brain that I thought was very cool,” he replies. “There were games that people were controlling with their minds — like, they’re literally just staring at a screen and they’re controlling an object on the screen just with some type of thought or something. I don’t fully understand it, but that’s what was impressing me.”

“The CYBATHLON didn’t just have, like, bionic arms competition,” says Michael Rory Dawson, lead research engineer at the BLINC lab. “There was a competition for bionic legs, for powered wheelchairs, exoskeletons, brain-computer interfaces. They had assistive technology for persons with vision difference, things like that.”

Neilson says, “When I was growing up and I was getting into computer gaming, one of my dreams was like, oh, man, how cool would it be to have a cellphone, you know, connected to the internet, and I could game wherever I wanted! Now I just keep seeing these huge leaps and bounds forward, and we are living in science fact, and science fiction just becomes more and more reality.”

Still, BLINC has not yet been able to engineer a mechanical hand that could persuade Richdeep Gill to opt for an irreversible trade-in or fully restore the appendage that Chris Neilson lost while at work.

“How far away is the tipping point?” Dawson ponders. “For as long as I’ve been doing this, it’s always seemed to be five to 10 years out for the interface technology that pushes towards peripheral implants — instead of just putting, you know, a little electronic sensor on the surface of the skin, actually implanting electrodes into the muscle or into the nerves directly. And people do this in the laboratory, but it has been very difficult to translate into something that can be used clinically.”

“I like being involved so I can kind of see a little bit further ahead than others,” says Neilson, the guinea pig. “But I still don’t see where that tipping point is, where all of a sudden I will get a prosthesis that is more life-changing than what I have now.”

There are millions of us

Like Ryan Straschnitzki, my university roommate was a heck of a hockey player.

Like Megan Gallagher, he was a pilot in love with the sky.

Like both of them, an ill-fated journey across our mortal Canada stole the use of his legs.

Kirby Rowe of Owen Sound, Ont., was 28 when the small plane his brother was piloting crashed in Northern Ontario the day before the brother’s wedding. Kirb had graduated with me from Rensselaer in 1971, after playing defence for the mighty Engineers at the NCAA Division I level. He assisted on the overtime goal that cost Cornell goalie Ken Dryden the only loss of his senior season. He was working for TD Bank in Toronto when the ship went down.

The groom and his best man suffered spinal cord injuries in the wreck. The brother healed. Kirb was in a wheelchair for more than 40 years. He still drove his car, he had a single-engine aircraft retrofitted with hand controls, he tuned his radio to the tower at YYZ and watched the big jets sail in, he joined the Air Reserve Wing of the Forces, and he served the Canadian Paraplegic Association with dignity and distinction in Ontario and B.C. — giving much, though so much already had been taken from him — but he never walked again. I will always remember skating with our wives on Grenadier Pond in Toronto and seeing him, gamely smiling, in his chair on the snowy shore.

Kirb died of cancer in 2017, too early to stickhandle in the XoMotion, and to benefit from all the Supermachine miracles that are yet — perhaps soon — to arrive.

“My heart aches every time I see someone get injured, because I know a better world is coming,” Chloë Angus is telling me now from Vancouver. Angus’s career as a designer of women’s apparel inspired by West Coast Indigenous art was, if you will pardon the sad simile, just taking off. Then, without any warning, after a short run, she began to experience tingling and numbness in her feet, then her legs.

Twenty-four hours later, diagnosed with a rare and inoperable tumour that had left four tiny drops of blood inside her spinal cord, she could no longer walk or even stand. Now she serves as “director of lived experience” for Human in Motion Robotics, the company founded by two professors from Simon Fraser University that developed the XoMotion.

“For the last 250, almost 300 years — ever since someone invented the wheelchair — mobility for the disabled has meant, ‘Here, sit in this,’” Angus says. “That shouldn’t be acceptable. We shouldn’t leave people seated, especially when they’re still able-bodied or recovering from injury or disability.

“You know how you feel after a 14-hour flight, how you can’t wait to get out of that little seat? Well, imagine living the rest of your life in an airplane seat. That’s what it feels like.

“I was told there was no point in trying to recover any lower-body function. A wheelchair and a handful of fentanyl for the pain? That didn’t seem right to me. I could already see the sedentary effects of being stuck in a chair. The limitations they talked about were based on a history where they’ve never seen recovery, so they assume it’s not possible. I thought: What if I look beyond what we have today? How do I get around this?

“Ten years ago, ‘wearable robotics’ sounded like science fiction — Iron Man, The Terminator. In the movies, the robot was always a threat. But now I look around a crowd and think, ’You’re all going to end up with a motion disability someday, because of aging.’”

“Imagine XoMotion 2.0 and 3.0,” I nudge her.

“It will be your everything,” Angus responds. “A device that walks out of your closet, sits beside your bed. I see it as my total gym, my physiotherapist, my trainer — everything. You’ll just customize it. Download the apps you want. Order it like a Tesla online. It shows up at your door and says, ‘How can I help you today?’

“Some people worry we’ll lose human connection to robots. But to me, they’ve given me back my connection. My husband spent so much time doing the things I couldn’t do. Now, I’m always trying to convince someone to race me. We’re not kidding around anymore. The future is now.”

She tells me about a lab at U of Alberta that just received $24 million to develop “soft robotics,” wearable, intelligent fabrics that sense weakness and actuate stiffness in artificial muscles.

“Is this ‘superhumanity’?” Angus asks. “Yes, absolutely. It gives people their lives back. It gives them strength — the ability to move themselves again. I’ve taken a quarter of a million steps across five countries. I can’t tell you the joy I feel when I’m in it. To see someone else get into an exoskeleton and stand up and walk — that is a superhuman feeling.

“To me, superhumanity means more than just augmenting your own strength or mobility. It’s about being strong enough to support others — to bring strength to the rest of humanity. People focusing more on one another.

“Sometimes I consider cutting off my legs — they’re a burden to me now. They don’t work. If I could get that motion another way, I would. You’re already attached to a piece of metal. I want it enhanced. I want it all.

“Getting from a great idea in the lab to reality is hard. They say there aren’t enough people like me to justify the cost. But there are millions of us. And we’re told that the next iPhone matters more?”

“How would you define superhumanity?” I ask Megan Gallagher, the plane-crash survivor, as we reach the end of this flight of pain and possibilities. “A robot waltzing you around, is that superhuman?”

“I would define it as more what’s on the inside,” she says. “Like finding the humanity within actual people.”

We’re in a quiet room at a Calgary clinic, in the summer of supermen.

“It’s places like this, you know, right? Places like this that are trying to make people into superhumans, but not through brain chips and through a bunch of drugs and stuff, but by helping people become the best versions of themselves.

“I think the biggest superhuman would be someone who’s giving back and helping other humans. Not worrying about making themselves stronger, but what can they do to help everyone else out.”


Former CBC host Travis Dhanraj in St. John's in June 2023.

A national CBC host who resigned this past summer, accusing Canada’s public broadcaster of “performative diversity, tokenism,” and of putting up resistance when he booked conservative voices on his show, has filed a human rights complaint against the Crown corporation alleging it discriminated against him on the basis of race, colour and disability.

Travis Dhanraj, the 43-year-old former host of Canada Tonight, who is of Caribbean heritage, alleges in a complaint filed with the Canadian Human Rights Commission that he was harassed and bullied out of his job.

“Mr. Dhanraj took on the role of host of Canada Tonight because, based on representations made by CBC, he would be the driving force of the show, booking guests, and reflecting the range of opinions, lived experiences and interests of contemporary Canada. He believed he would be able to shape the editorial direction and vision of the program,” says his complaint.

Instead, Dhanraj “quickly realized that diversity was not a true practice of the CBC and would never be a part of their agenda. Throughout his employment, Mr. Dhanraj attempted to push for diversity (particularly related to political voices on the show) and racial equality. However, Mr. Dhanraj was consistently met with resistance at every point, and a toxic work environment in which harassment, bullying, and retaliation went unchecked

leading to his constructive dismissal,” the complaint alleges.

Dhanraj alleges that when he “attempted to book guests, particularly conservatives; he was met with resistance. After having the Deputy CPC leader on his show, he was threatened with discipline, including being pulled off the air,” according to his complaint.

“When the network aired an interview with the federal housing minister on Power and Politics, highlighting government talking points, Mr. Dhanraj’s attempt to book the conservative housing critic to present balance on the network was blocked.”

A CBC spokesperson said Friday that the public broadcaster has yet to receive independent confirmation that Dhanraj’s complaint has been filed.

“At this time, we can only reiterate in the strongest terms possible that CBC rejects his version of events,” Kerry Kelly said in an email.

“We are dismayed by these attacks on our hosts and newsroom leaders. We will vigorously defend against false claims, including allegations of political bias in guest selection.”

Dhanraj’s complaint alleges that it was apparent “that the CBC had systemic inequities, diversity issues, and unequal access to resources. Mr. Dhanraj quickly realized he had been chosen to host Canada Tonight because the CBC expected him to be the ‘token’ brown man. As such, Mr. Dhanraj requested a (diversity, equity and inclusion) investigation on February 20, 2024, but no such investigation took place. When Mr. Dhanraj met with CBC management in February 2024, he was sidelined. Management accused him of putting up a ‘crusade’ and he was told to ‘work within the system’ rather than challenge it. In other words, he was expected to put his head down and be compliant.”

After Dhanraj took to the social media platform X on April 19, 2024, writing that CBC President Catherine Tait declined an invitation to be on his show, he alleges “CBC began an intense investigation against Mr. Dhanraj to explore possible violations of its policies and journalistic standards and temporarily removed Mr. Dhanraj from the air.”

That removal and its associated “humiliation,” along with pressure to sign a non-disclosure agreement, “all took a drastic toll on Mr. Dhanraj’s mental health,” his complaint alleges.

“As a result of the CBC’s actions and refusal to address his toxic discriminatory and harassing workplace, Mr. Dhanraj had to take a medical leave in July 2024.”

That December he “returned to full-time hours after requiring months of treatment. Within the first week of his return, he was immediately retaliated against for not signing the NDA that CBC had tried to force him to sign before his medical leave. CBC permanently removed Mr. Dhanraj as the host of Canada Tonight and decreased his remuneration without the 30-day written notice stated in his contract, derailing his career,” his complaint alleges, which notes the Canada Tonight job paid Dhanraj “an annual base salary of $92,945.36,” plus a $43,000 top up, an overtime buyout of $10,000, and up to $10,000 in wardrobe allowance.

This past spring, his complaint alleges, “CBC once again attempted to coerce Mr. Dhanraj into signing an NDA. They erroneously claimed that Mr. Dhanraj ‘owed them’ $30,000 in ‘overpayments’ and attempted to weaponize this by trying to get him to sign an NDA and resign under duress while on medical leave by claiming that they would then waive ‘coming after him’ for the $30,000.”

According to Dhanraj, “he had no choice but to involuntarily resign.”

He’s seeking “damages for past and future wage loss as a result of discrimination and retaliation, in addition to damages for his pain and suffering.”

He also wants the CHRC to order CBC to “undergo a comprehensive investigation and review of its (diversity, equity and inclusion) and workplace harassment policies,” and ” implement a robust whistleblower policy to protect CBC employees … like Mr. Dhanraj who have blown the whistle on systemic issues of harassment, abuse, tokenism and intimidation.”

Dhanraj’s lawyer, Kathryn Marshall, said Friday she hopes to see a response from the CBC this fall.
She hasn’t put a dollar figure yet on what Dhanraj hopes to see out of the human rights case.
“His damages are still crystallizing,” Marshall said. “He actually is still being paid by the CBC because they haven’t accepted his resignation.”

Dhanraj “remains a unionized employee, currently on leave,” Kelly, the CBC spokesperson, said. “His lawyer has been aware for many weeks of what is required for CBC to process his resignation, however, CBC to this date has received no response on the matter.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


PQ leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon speaks as Alex Boissonneault is sworn-in as MNA for the riding of Arthabaska after a recent byelection at the National Assembly, in Quebec City on Thursday, Aug. 28, 2025.

OTTAWA — Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon told leaders of Alberta’s pro-independence movement that he’ll recognize a free and independent Alberta if he becomes Quebec’s Premier, the National Post has learned.

Plamondon’s office confirms that he met with three leaders of the pro-independence Alberta Prosperity Project (APP)

— Mitch Sylvestre,  Dennis Modry and Jeffrey Rath — in Calgary on Thursday evening and affirmed his support for an independent Alberta.

He also indicated that his government will back Alberta in separation negotiations with Ottawa, if a provincial referendum on independence succeeds.

Plamondon was in Calgary to kick off a two-day visit to Alberta.

Rath said he was “pleasantly surprised” by how like-minded Plamondon was on the subject of federal bloat and overreach.

“He seems to have come to the exact same conclusions that we have about provincial fiscal capacity being absorbed and wasted through the grossly bloated federal bureaucracy in Ottawa,” said Rath.

Plamondon has

vowed to redirect billions

in “wasteful” federal spending to Quebec’s coffers as premier.

Rath said that the audience with the PQ leader underscores the APP’s “significant leadership role” in the Alberta independence movement.

He added that Quebec’s backing could be a game changer in post-referendum negotiations with Ottawa.

“If you put Alberta and Quebec together, that’s more than a third of Canada’s population getting the ball rolling from the start,” said Rath.

Rath said he wasn’t worried about ideological or cultural differences derailing his group’s budding alliance with the social democratic PQ.

“What really struck me from that meeting yesterday is that there’s far more that unites us than divides us. And the big thing that we really have in common is being fed up with our (provincial) economies being raided by folks in Ottawa who are only interested in taking as much money as they can,” said Rath.

He added he’d gladly return the favour when the time comes and recognize an independent Quebec.

“(Quebec’s) entitled to whatever form of democracy they want to have,” said Rath.

Plamondon said earlier on Thursday, at a talk at the University of Calgary’s School of Public Policy, that Alberta’s future in Canada is “up to Albertans.”

He also

praised Alberta Premier Danielle Smith

for “play(ing) her cards very well” in representing Alberta’s interests on the national stage.

The PQ is

well ahead in the polls

, with a provincial election expected for next fall. Plamondon has promised to hold a referendum on Quebec’s independence in his first term as premier.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A container with frozen embryos and sperm stored in liquid nitrogen is removed at a fertility clinic in Fort Myers, Fla., Tuesday, Oct. 2, 2018.

Reviews and recommendations are unbiased and products are independently selected. Postmedia may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page.

Canadian women are changing the conversation around when and how they want to have babies, with many of them opting to freeze their eggs.

And more and more, led by Gen Z, they’re having the conversation online.

Calgary Herald reporter Devika Desai joins Dave Breakenridge to discuss why the women of Gen Z are freezing their eggs, and how social media communities on apps like Tik Tok are helping them foster conversation and find support.

Background reading:
Why Gen Zs are freezing their eggs and sharing their stories

Subscribe to 10/3 on your favourite podcast app

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Salt Media President and Nectar First CEO Jordan Bortolotti.

Like their partners in the Canadian news industry, the country’s media agencies are undergoing unprecedented transformation. The National Post is holding conversations with leaders of Canada’s largest agencies on the fast-changing fundamentals. This week, Rebecca Harris speaks to Jordan Bortolotti, co-founder of media services and technology company Nectar First (N1), which was recently acquired by Salt XC, a media and experience agency. Bortolotti was named president of Salt Media and remains CEO of Nectar First (a division of Salt Media):

What are your top priorities in your new role as president of Salt Media?

I see a once-in-a-generation opportunity. With consolidation among the media-holding companies, we’re seeing declining trust — and their model is stressed.

Our vision is to build a hybrid model that puts clients first and democratizes technology like AI rather than gatekeeping. We believe in building inside our clients’ business to help them create competitive advantage and power the next generation of media.

We have two brands: Salt is our full-service hybrid media agency built for 2030. Nectar builds the technology backbone — AI agents, workflow automation, measurement products like our next generation AI-powered MMM (mixed media modelling) and an ROI forecasting tool. We’re doing a lot of work with AI as it pertains to media planning, buying and optimizing. Together, we’re a new kind of media group: fully integrated, tech-enabled and designed to scale globally. So, I’m trying to build a culture, both internally and with our clients, to embrace this revolutionary time.

How are you integrating AI and where do you see it making the biggest impact in media planning and buying?

AI is not just a buzzword for us — it’s already in production. We’ve built and shipped an AI Agent Layer that handles everything from creative production and audience segmentation to trafficking, campaign optimization, measurement, quality assurance and governance. It’s live today with clients across categories like CPG, retail and pets.

Looking ahead, I think AI is going to 10 times the output of human media teams. It’s really good at automating the work people don’t like to do, so they can focus on the work they do like to do. My vision is a hybrid world where we have creative and strategic thinkers plugged into systems that help us work faster, deploy more personalized, strategic marketing communications and tackle our clients’ diverse business challenges. Previously, we’ve been limited by how much capacity our human beings can work on their business.

For us, hybridity means keeping humans in the loop but scaling our expertise, so every single client gets the benefit of our smartest thinkers. We also know that robots make mistakes. Part of our vision for the future is allowing human beings to supervise, enhance and continue adding to the world of AI. Our flywheel includes multiple checkpoints to keep our AI agents on track.

I do believe that we’ll be able to take on more work for less cost. One example is what we’re doing in media planning. We built a fully automated media planner that’s integrated into several major platforms, and we train it on our clients’ data. What’s interesting is what used to take agencies weeks, we’re now doing in a matter of seconds. It gets us 80 per cent of the way there and then humans do the 20 per cent, the hard work — looking at it and thinking strategically.

With so many platforms fighting for consumer attention — from social media to streaming services — what’s helping brands break through today?

There’s a systemic shift happening; we’ve moved into an incredibly fragmented world where attention is fractured. At the same time, we have content overload. There are so many things happening in so many different feeds, all at the same time.

We have focused on two key areas. First, we believe live experiences and events are going to become much more prominent for brands. So, we’ve separated our business into two groups: experiences and media. We think experiences — tied to carefully targeted and placed media, with strong measurement capabilities — are going to be a unique offering and a way to break through in the future. In a world where we can easily generate AI videos, I think there will be a swing the other way. People are going to crave authentic, real human experiences.

Secondly, there is no longer “One message to hit them all.” We need to break through during the times and places where people are paying attention, using storytelling tactics and entertainment tailored to their needs. The everyday consumer is so used to seeing a personalized feed — whether it’s in their Netflix, YouTube or TikTok algorithm — that when an advertiser tries to infiltrate or hang out in that ecosystem, it can be awkward if you don’t do it authentically and don’t move at a speed that consumers are used to, with a cultural lens that consumers expect.

Our client Kraft Heinz has done an incredible job of doing marketing that matters. One example is the ‘Wienie 500,’ where Oscar Mayer Wienermobiles raced ahead of the Indy 500. It came out of their internal group and their CMO, Todd Kaplan, who is a visionary creative. This became a must-watch event. It’s a very short news cycle — these things come and go in 24 hours — but the impressions they were able to generate, and the brand love they were able to build, were huge. For brands, it’s about understanding the community — like racing fans — looking at your brand assets and where you can authentically play, and the Wienermobile is a perfect example of that.

Can you share your predictions for what’s next for the industry?

Retail media is powering a third wave of digital, alongside search and social. The media world has focused a lot on following people around the internet — building, tracking and selling profiles to advertisers. Now, we’re moving from identity to opportunity — not to follow individuals personally, but to focus on the opportunities when people are making purchase decisions. Retailers have been successful at monetizing their data and creating multi-billion-dollar advertising products, and that’s just the beginning. We’re going to see banks and financial institutions enter this space and put out compelling media offerings. I think we’ll see anyone that owns the point of sale or transaction get into the space. We’re calling it retail media, but it’s more about commerce media or unified media.

As we enter the age of AI, it will become almost impossible for consumers to know what’s real versus generated. So, another trend that’s going to be prominent is this idea of live moments in the real world. A great example is our current fan zone experience at Rogers Stadium. Consumers can film and share their live experiences at the event, and we’re able to create a curated, customized video that blends their content with real, authentic footage from that day at the concert. This custom video can then be shared with their friends.

We talk a lot about people as media. In a new world that’s a sharing economy and has endless amounts of content, people become your greatest and most important sources of media because they’re at your event with their cellphones. They’re capturing and posting it organically online, and as a brand, you’re able to intercept those moments of brand love and amplify them.

Read the rest of the series of conversations with leaders of Canada’s largest media agencies on where the business is going next: 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.