LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

LaMantia's Country Market Fresh in Lindsay, Ont., added the Beer Market sign after it started selling alcohol in 2015. It may not continue for much longer.

With the

announcement this week

of the closure of 12 more Beer Store locations in Ontario — bringing the total number of closures to almost 80 this year — consumers may need to rely more on convenience stores and grocers for their alcohol purchases.

But some independent grocers say

new rules

requiring grocery stores that sell alcohol to also accept returns of empty bottles and cans in the new year may force them to go dry.

David LaMantia is a third-generation grocer in Lindsay, Ont., a community in the Kawartha Lakes region northeast of Toronto. His store, LaMantia’s Country Market Fresh,

dates back to 1928

. He’s been selling alcohol since 2015 but is planning to get out of the market when the new laws take effect on Jan. 1.

“Are we going to take back empties?” he said to National Post. “No. I mean, the government may have the luxury of not being concerned about food safety for their customers, but we certainly are. So I can’t have contaminated products coming back into my store.”

LaMantia’s point, echoed by others in the industry, is that beer cans and wine bottles don’t generally come back clean. They may contain dregs, cigarette butts and broken glass. Some may have been collected from blue bins or even the side of the road. None of these go well in a grocery store.

“So there’s an opportunity cost,” he said. “I need really two areas. I need an area to receive it initially, when the customer returns these items, and then a place in the backroom storage area … pending it being picked up.”

Gordon Dean, another member of a long-time grocery family, owns and operates five stores in Ontario and Quebec under the name

Mike Dean Local Grocer

. He’s been collecting empties since November when the law kicked in for his business, but he’s been holding his nose. Sometimes literally.

“I’m not a fan,” he said. “We sell fresh food. We’ve made our careers and our livings in selling fresh groceries, and it really just does not mix with dirty empties in the same building.”

He added: “I ask people, where do you put your empties? Nobody leaves their empties in the kitchen. Everybody puts them in the basement, in the garage. It’s really the same principle in a grocery store.”

Receiving them puts them “in the same building as your croissants being baked and your romaine lettuce being put on display and your your hamburger being ground. There’s just nothing about it that’s that’s appealing or safe, right? It’s just a horrible idea.”

His solution: A separate storage area out of sight in the back. “But it’s still in the same building … I still struggle with that. I’m doing it because the government requires me to do it, (but) I’ve been saying since the start, this is just a bad idea.”

Then there are the bins used to carry the empties away.

“They don’t get washed in the Beer Store’s process of handling returns,” he said. “They don’t consider the food safety aspect at all. These come into our buildings gross and dirty and filled with residual broken glass, residual juices and beer and wine leftovers. I’m a grocer. Keeping things clean is what we start our day with and end our day with; the first thing we look at is cleanliness and sanitation.”

His friends in the business are shy about taking up sales themselves or, like LaMantia, plan to stop in the new year.

“Most of my friends own grocery stores in the province, and at least half of them have … firmly said they’re done, if this actually comes to fruition. They won’t be staying in the beer and wine business. They just aren’t comfortable doing it.”

Another issue is that, with fewer Beer Stores, grocers say they may find themselves picking up the slack on empties. According to its

2024 operational report

, The Beer Store that year had 407 locations, down from 424 two years earlier. In the same period, the LCBO added eight locations for a total of 688.

Ontario has mandated The Beer Store keep at least 300 stores open the end of 2025. But

the document in question

added: “After January 1, 2026, TBS (The Beer Store) shall be entitled to close any retail location as determined by TBS in its sole and absolute discretion.”

Industry groups are pushing back against the requirement to take empties. Gary Sands, senior vice-president at the Canadian Federation of Independent Grocers, said one idea is for LCBO stores to step in.

“The last time I checked, they don’t sell food, but they also don’t have to accept empties,” he said. “Why? Why can’t the LCBO, as a government agency, take them back? They don’t have to worry about the food safety issue. We’ve never received an explanation on that.”

Michael Zabaneh, vice-president of sustainability at the Retail Council of Canada, noted that grocery stores are also hampered by higher prices on alcohol — a 10 per cent discount, as opposed to the 15 per cent offered to bars, restaurants and convenience stores.

“Retailers are at a complete disadvantage,” he said, “because convenience stores have a lower costs of goods sold, as does the LCBO, obviously. And grocers, with the higher cost of goods sold, are the only ones required to take back containers.”

He added: “If grocers exit, shoppers will lose the convenience of picking up a sixpack at the grocery store, and face fewer places to buy alcohol. And with The Beer Store winding down, there’ll be less places to return alcohol containers.”

In a statement to National Post, Colin Blachar, director of media at Ontario’s Minister of Finance, said: “

Along with The Beer Store, over 400 grocery stores, LCOs (LCBO Convenience Outlets) and convenience stores currently participate in the ODRP (Ontario Deposit Return Program) with numbers expected to continue to grow over the coming months. This will provide more options to consumers looking to utilize the return system.”

National Post has reached out to The Beer Store for comment.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


An Ontario homeowner is facing assault charges after an 'altercation' with an suspected intruder inside his apartment early Monday morning.

An Ontario man involved in a violent encounter with an intruder in his own apartment has been charged with assaulting the wanted man.

Around 3:30 a.m. Monday, the 44-year-old homeowner was awoken to find an intruder inside his Kent Street apartment in Lindsay, Ont., according to

Kawartha Lakes Police.

Police said the two had an “altercation,” during which the 41-year-old intruder suffered “serious life-threatening injuries.”

The Lindsay man, already wanted by police concerning unrelated events, was taken to Ross Memorial Hospital and later airlifted to a hospital in Toronto.

Once released from the hospital, he will face charges of possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose; break, enter and theft; mischief under $5,000; and failing to comply with a probation order.

He’ll also be held in custody, pending a bail hearing.

The homeowner, meanwhile, was arrested and charged with aggravated assault and assault with a weapon. He was released and is due back in court at a later date.

This is not the first time a homeowner has been charged while allegedly defending themselves or their property.

In June, a 35-year-old Ontario man who fired a gun at five individuals attempting to steal his White Lamborghini was charged with discharging a firearm, possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose, careless storage of a firearm and unauthorized possession of a prohibited or restricted firearm.

None of the apprehended suspects — three adults and one youth — were injured.

“York Regional Police understands the fear and frustration an incident like this may cause in a neighbourhood. However, we want to make clear that discharging a firearm in a residential area is extremely dangerous,”

York Regional Police posted on X.

“You risk hurting innocent people, including neighbours, your own family, or responding officers. Taking justice into your own hands is not the answer.”

Global News

later reported that the man had already called the police before firing.

Two years prior in Milton, 22-year-old Ali Mann was charged with second-degree murder after he fired on one of four people who entered his home, killing one of them.

Police said at least one of the assailants had a gun, and the three who weren’t hit escaped.

“The charges laid in relation to the shooting … are serious and are reflective of the evidence collected by homicide and forensic investigators,” the Halton Police Service said in

a statement to National Post

at the time.

Lawyer Jag Virk issued a statement defending his client, noting Mian is a registered gun owner who was only trying to protect his single mother from an armed man.

“His intention was not to kill the intruder, he only shot at him once,” Virk wrote.

The charges were withdrawn in July, per

CBC

.

Homeowners don’t always face charges.

In January 2023, a Halifax man escaped charges after one of three people who illegally entered his residence, “at least one of whom has a firearm,” according to

police

, died following an altercation.

In early December that year, another Halifax man avoided criminal charges after he stabbed one of two people who had broken into his home. The stabbing victim, 26-year-old Anthony Robert Herritt, later died of his injuries.

“There has been a fairly substantial investigation done,” Halifax Regional Police Const. John McLeod told National Post in an interview at the time, noting the Crown was “not comfortable moving ahead with charges” against the resident.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Air Canada flight attendants and supporters march in support of striking flight attendants and their right to strike, in Montreal, on Monday, August 18, 2025.

OTTAWA — Air Canada has agreed not to discipline flight attendants who continued to strike illegally on Monday as part of a tentative agreement that would increase base salaries immediately by at least eight per cent and offer pay for ground work, CUPE says.

During a Zoom call with members, leadership of the Air Canada component at the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) said the four-year tentative agreement struck with the airline after a tumultuous strike weekend was a mixed bag.

Whereas some of the gains made for flight attendants were “monumental,” other aspects of the deal such as wage increases were not what union representatives hoped for, they told hundreds of members during the Tuesday call attended by National Post.

“Did we do the best we could? Yes. It is the best (deal)? No, none of us believe it is,” CUPE Air Canada Component President Wesley Lesosky said.

“Could we have done better? I don’t know, because interest arbitration could have ripped it apart,” he added about looming binding arbitration that was controversially ordered on the parties by Job Minister Patty Hajdu on Saturday.

During the two-hour call, Lesosky explained that almost the entirety of the tentative agreement had been approved by the bargaining team. The only exception was wage increases, which will be put to a 10-day vote to members starting this week.

He said that tentative deal included a 12 per cent salary increase for many Air Canada and all Air Canada Rouge flight attendants this year, followed by annual increases of three per cent, 2.5 per cent and 2.75 per cent by 2028.

But the 2025 pay increase falls to eight per cent for more senior mainline employees who are currently above the ninth pay step in the collective agreement.

“This, your union… feels is not deserving to bring forward to you,” Lesosky said, signalling that’s why it is the only component of the tentative agreement that is being put to a vote.

“We completely feel and have presented and maintained the full way through bargaining that we should be a couple percent at minimum above Air Transat” which is the industry leader, he added.

If members don’t approve of the raises, the issue will go to binding arbitration but the rest of the deal will remain the same, union leadership said.

In an interview on CBC Tuesday morning, Air Canada executive vice-president Mark Nasr described the new working conditions for flight attendants as “industry leading”.

He said the company looked forward to welcoming its 10,000 flight attendants back to work and getting planes back in the air after the strike that grounded hundreds of flights and left hundreds of thousands of Canadians scrambling to find alternative travel.

The tone during the Tuesday union call was largely relief from an exhausted union bargaining team that negotiated the tentative deal into the early morning Tuesday.

Despite concerns about wage increases and a few other issues, Lesosky said that the union had manage to secure “monumental” gains for its members.

The biggest win was on unpaid “ground time,” a major sticking point between both parties. Effective immediately, Lesosky said crew will receive 50 per cent pay for 60 minutes of pre-flight time on narrowbody planes and 70 minutes on widebody jets.

That will increase gradually to 70 per cent by the end of the agreement in 2028.

“That is a huge gain,” Lesosky said, though he promised the union would continue to fight for it to be full pay because the reduced rate is “illogical.”

Union leadership also boasted improvements to some flight staffing, pensions, benefits, pay protection for Air Canada Rouge employees and a host of other gains for members.

The component president also told flight attendants there would be no discipline for having participated in the strike even after it was declared illegal by a federal labour tribunal on Sunday.

“Part of this agreement going forward is that there will be no retribution on any of you for anything you did during picketing or during the strike,” Lesosky said.

“Anyone that feels that they may have held up a bad sign or stormed a press conference or done any of that kind of stuff, you’re protected.”

Final negotiations were done under a sword of Damocles after Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu ordered negotiations go to binding arbitration and flight attendants return to work just hours after the work stoppage began Saturday morning. She also ordered an inquiry into unpaid work at Air Canada.

But CUPE leadership refused to call off the strike this weekend, even after a federal labour board ruled the work stoppage was illegal Monday morning.

By that evening, Air Canada and CUPE were back to the bargaining table. Around 5 a.m. Tuesday morning, they announced they had reached a tentative deal.

Despite the possible agreement, union leadership said the relationship with Air Canada is damaged.

“Labour relations at Air Canada is broken. It is fractured. It’s going to be very hard to come back from, that is the reality,” Lesosky said on the call.

“Labour relations with this employer are almost dead. What they did to us was absolutely horrible, we weren’t expecting that,” Component Secretary-Treasurer Guillaume Leduc added bluntly in French. “Remember that this employer was dishonest with us from the start. I think that they hate us.”

Air Canada did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


An arbitrator has ordered that Toronto teacher Gorian Surlan, who was terminated for wearing blackface to school for Halloween in October 2021, be reinstated.

An arbitrator has ordered that a white Toronto teacher who was terminated after he showed up at school in blackface for Halloween and told people he was dressed as a zombie should be reinstated and compensated for all wages and benefits lost in the last 20 months.

Gorian Surlan showed remorse for his actions, according to an arbitrator, who substituted a nearly two-year suspension for the high school teacher’s penalty. Surlan, who had been teaching for 19 years, came to work at Parkdale Collegiate Institute in black face makeup and black clothing on Oct. 29, 2021.

He wore the costume to an assembly that morning dubbed “Where Everybody Belongs” that was attended by about 250 Grade 9 students and their mentors. Three students approached their vice-principal about Surlan’s costume, saying he was in blackface. One student showed her a photo of his costume. Two of them were visibly upset and one was crying, Norm Jesin, the arbitrator, wrote in a decision dated Aug. 14.

“She told (Surlan) that students were upset at seeing him in blackface. (He) did not seem to understand the issue but apologized anyways,” according to Jesin’s decision.

“He was asked if he was aware of the controversy over Justin Trudeau appearing as Aladdin in blackface. He said he was but that he was not trying to depict any person. Rather he was attempting to portray a zombie.”

 Justin Trudeau seen wearing blackface during a 2001 Arabian Nights costume party.

Surlan, now 63, grieved his termination, arguing he “was unjustly discharged from his employment on November 15, 2021, contrary to the collective agreement between” the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation and the Toronto District School Board.

Born in Serbia, he witnessed many atrocities while working for the International Red Cross during the Bosnian war.

Those “left a deep impact on him,” said the arbitrator.

Surlan moved to Canada in 1992 to pursue a teaching career.

“He became a member of the Ontario College of Teachers and obtained qualifications in a number of disciplines including business studies, special education, librarianship, cooperative education and English as a second language,” Jesin said.

He took sabbaticals every five years, teaching in Nigeria and Vietnam, and had no previous discipline record before the blackface incident, said the arbitrator.

Surlan’s Halloween costume nearly four years back “was hastily put together that morning with the assistance of his daughter,” Jesin said.

“His daughter provided him with some black make-up, so he decided to attend as something scary. He dressed in a black shirt, black pants and black shoes. He painted his whole face black and then proceeded to put a black fabric mask over his face in order to become compliant with COVID-19 protocols in existence at the time.”

Before Halloween celebrations in 2021, the school had emailed teachers “reminding staff of the harm resulting from cultural appropriation when choosing a costume,” said the arbitrator.

“The email further provided sources that could be reviewed dealing with the topic of cultural appropriation. Those sources did not relate specifically to blackface. The grievor had read the email before choosing a costume but did not read the sources that were contained in the email.”

One student texted a photo of Surlan’s costume to his parents, later describing “the class as being shocked and upset” their business teacher, who sometimes discussed current events with them, was dressed in blackface.

When students and colleagues asked Surlan what “he was dressed as, he would respond with ‘I don’t know, a zombie.’”

At the meeting with the vice-principal after the assembly, she told Surlan “to wash his face and to return to class, which he did,” said the arbitrator’s decision.

The incident was widely reported “and resulted in a swift reaction from the Parkdale community,” it said.

A photo of Surlan with his face painted black, wearing a black T-shirt and a blue surgical mask, also made the news.

“The reaction included events such as organized marches and protests. The board received many calls from parents and community members wondering how such an event could occur.”

Surlan was placed on a leave of absence pending an investigation.

“During the investigation the grievor expressed his remorse over the incident. He stated that he did not know the significance of blackface when he donned his costume. He was horrified that he traumatized students and staff and had no intention to do so. He stated that he wished that someone had approached him earlier in the morning to warn that he would be considered as ‘cosplaying a person of colour.’ He stated further that he was trying to educate himself and that he was ashamed of his ignorance. He deeply regretted his actions now knowing how offensive they were.”

The board terminated him on Nov. 15, 2021, because he “knew or ought to have known that his conduct was contrary to board policy,” and the effect his actions had “on the school and the community at large was severe, long lasting and irreversible.”

The board determined that outweighed Surlan’s “long record of service and his clean disciplinary record.”

His termination letter said Surlan’s conduct “may reasonably be described as racist.”

Surlan completed “an individualized course of study focussing on anti-black racism and blackface” in June 2023.

“As of October 1, 2023, upon confirmation to the (Ontario College of Teachers that Surlan) had completed this program, his status with the college was restored to good standing.”

The teachers’ federation “insists that discharge was an excessive response in the circumstances,” said the decision.

The arbitrator accepted that Surlan’s decision to wear blackface to school justified “a significant penalty.”

But Jesin said he couldn’t ignore that once the teacher “realized that his costume had caused this upset, he was horrified that he had not been aware of the issue. He quickly studied the issue, apologized for his actions and was clearly very contrite.”

A significant suspension “would be likely to have the desired effect of ensuring that (Surlan) would be more sensitive to the cultural sensitivities that present in a diverse community and would be unlikely to commit such misconduct a second time,” said the arbitrator. “This is a case in which there is no reason to conclude that the employment relationship is incapable of rehabilitation. “

Jesin said he appreciated “that the reaction of the student body as well as the community at large to (Surlan’s) costume must properly be considered by the board in determining a penalty. But surely these constituents, with the passage of time, can (be) asked to accept that the (teacher) has acknowledged not only his mistake, but the pain that his mistake has caused. In my view, this is an appropriate case for reinstatement.”


Former U.S Customs border entry facility in Madawaska, Maine on the Saint John River.

The U.S. government is selling a former border crossing facility in Madawaska, Maine, across from Edmunston, New Brunswick.

An

online auction for the property

starts on Wednesday, Aug. 20. The asking price is US$25,000.

Bidding for the old Port of Entry (POE) will increase in $1,000 increments, says the U.S. General Services Administration in a press release about the sale. (The GSA is the U.S. government’s shared services arm, managing a real estate portfolio of over 360 million rentable square feet.)

 The site of the former U.S Customs border entry facility in Madawaska, Maine on the Saint John River.

The almost

one-acre property

is located along the Saint John River. The intention behind the sale seems to be for a buyer to simply convert it into a local business.

While the commercial space listing has primarily been used as an office, the real estate ad suggests other potential purposes: m

anufacturing, warehouse, storage facility, garage/shop.

“GSA is transforming an underutilized border facility into an opportunity for community and economic development,” said Public Buildings Service Regional Commissioner Glenn C. Rotondo in the release.

 The former U.S Customs border entry facility in Madawaska, Maine on the Saint John River.

The first floor of the building is 2,900 square feet. There is also a 2,900 square foot finished basement.

The southern portion of the property is flat, paved and has a one-storey brick building with two canopies, a guard shack and shed for a generator.

The northern half of the property is on a floodplain and can’t be built upon. Instead, it consists of a steep, wooded slope leading from a retaining wall down approximately 50 feet to the water line of the Saint John River. The river surrounds the northern edge of the property. A paper mill with a rail line is situated on the other perimeters.

The 1959 facility was closed last year when U.S. Customs and Border Protection ceased operations there and relocated to the new Madawaska POE and International Bridge. The new facility will include room for increases in traffic. The new facility, worth roughly $73 million, is also aiming to be include administrative offices and training space.

Parts of the old bridge were saved by the town, according to Maine newspaper

The County

. A local artist pitched a plan to create a 20-foot sculpture of an Acadian star out of materials from the bridge to celebrate the Francophone cultural connection shared by the two countries, across the old bridge created.

Acadians are descendants of French settlers who originally settled in Canada’s Maritime Provinces in the 17th and 18th centuries. Aroostook County later became

a hub of Acadian culture

, with a large population still maintaining their heritage.

The invitation for bids and additional information about the property can be found on the auction

webpage

. Only registered bidders will be allowed to inspect the property by appointment.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Air Canada flight attendants picket outside of Terminal 1 at Toronto Pearson International Airport on Monday August 18, 2025.

OTTAWA — Canada’s largest union is suing the federal government to stop it from ever again invoking the controversial legal tool the Liberals used to order striking Air Canada flight attendants back to work.
 

In a lawsuit filed on Monday, the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) — which represents over 750,000 members including Air Canada flight attendants — laid bare its outrage towards the airline and the Liberal government.
 

The union accused Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu of disregarding, undermining and nullifying the flight attendants’ constitutional right to strike by invoking section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to order an end to the strike.
 

The lawsuit asks a Federal Court judge to quash the minister’s decision and declare that the power she invoked is both unconstitutional and exceeds her jurisdiction. In the meantime, CUPE is also seeking an emergency injunction against Hajdu’s order.
 

“In issuing her direction, the Minister overrode, abrogated and effectively precluded the Union’s ability to exercise its legal right to strike and its only legal means of asserting and leveraging economic power within the scheme of the Canada Labour Code,” CUPE argued in the lawsuit obtained by National Post.

“The Minister erred in law, inappropriately exercised her jurisdiction, authority and/or discretion, based her decision on erroneous findings of fact that she made in an arbitrary and abusive manner and/or issued an unreasonable decision” when she issued her order on Saturday, CUPE added.
 

The federal government has not yet filed a response to the lawsuit. A spokesperson for Employment and Social Development Canada did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
 

The controversial section says the minister can direct the Canadian Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) to do what she deems necessary to “maintain or secure industrial peace” or create favourable conditions for a deal during labour disputes.
 

In recent years, the Liberals have taken that to mean that they can order the board to declare a strike illegal, compel federally regulated employees back to work or mandate binding arbitration between parties.
 

Since 2024, they’ve invoked the power to end numerous port and railway strikes as well as a work stoppage at Canada Post in December.
 

On Saturday, barely hours after 10,000 flight attendants went on strike for better pay and hundreds of Air Canada flights were cancelled, the federal government again invoked section 107 to demand the CIRB order pickets back to work and parties enter binding arbitration.
 

Hajdu’s decision even earned condemnation from Liberals such as her caucus mate Kristina Tesser Derksen.

“I am disappointed by our Government’s decision to trigger Section 107 and the speed at which it occurred,” she wrote on social media. “While we are not in complete alignment, I acknowledge the Minister is in a position were she must consider the unprecedented uncertainty that our country faces.”

Saturday, Hajdu rejected accusations that her government is anti-union.
 

“We believe that unions are an essential part of a healthy and growing economy. However, in a case like this, where multiple efforts have been made to conclude an agreement that satisfies both parties and it is clear that they are at an impasse, it is very clear they need some help in arbitrating the final items,” she said.
 

But after the CIRB ordered flight attendants back to work Sunday, CUPE leadership publicly ripped up the decision and called on members to continue striking. On Monday morning, the board declared the strike to be illegal, but it continued regardless as the Canadian Labour Congress voiced its support for CUPE.
 

Then early Tuesday morning, CUPE announced that it had reached a tentative agreement with Air Canada and that the strike was over.
 

CUPE’s lawsuit also alleges that shortly after flight attendants overwhelmingly voted for a strike mandate in early August, Air Canada “ceased bargaining” and focused on lobbying the Liberals to block the strike.
 

“On August 12, 2025, Air Canada presented a detailed brief to the Minister requesting that the Minister intervene and preemptively order that the Union and its members not be permitted to exercise their legal and constitutional right to strike,” CUPE wrote.
 

“Relying on anticipated intervention from the Minister, Air Canada withdrew from any genuine effort to reach an agreement through good faith collective bargaining.”
 

An Air Canada spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In a statement, Prime Minister Mark Carney said he was relieved Air Canada and the union had reached a tentative agreement.

It is my hope that this will ensure flight attendants are compensated fairly at all times, while ending disruption for hundreds of thousands of Canadian families, workers, and visitors to Canada,” he wrote.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


An Ontario Beer Store location, showing the conveyor for returning empties.

On Monday, The Beer Store announced it will be closing a dozen of its Ontario locations in two months’ time, on Oct. 19. It’s not the first such announcement from the retailer. Here’s what to know.

What locations are closing?

The

12 locations include

two in Toronto and one in nearby North York, but also smaller communities. Towns that will see a Beer Store close include Bridgenorth, Eganville, Forest, Grand Bend, Harrow, Little Current, Markdale, Noëlville and Sauble Beach.

What will this mean for residents?

While Torontonians can easily pivot to another location, small-town residents may face more inconvenience.

Residents of Little Current on Manitoulin Island will have to travel 40 kilometres to Espanola for the nearest Beer Store after the closure, while those in Noelville, near French River, will have to go almost 50 kilometres to Sturgeon Falls. (Both towns are served by an LCBO outlet.)

Are these the only closures?

No. Since April, The Beer Store has made eight separate announcements of store closures, with a total of 77 locations being shut down. In each case, the closure date is two months from the announcement date.

What does The Beer Store say about it?

Each announcement mentions the “difficult decision” to close some locations, along with a similar statement from Ozzie Ahmed, retail vice-president.

The latest says: “Where we sell beer and collect empties in Ontario is changing. The Beer Store is modernizing to meet the changing marketplace and unfortunately this means making the hard decision to close retail locations. We know this is difficult news for customers and employees. As The Beer Store modernizes, our locations will continue to provide friendly customer service and a deposit return system that gets consumers their money back.

“The Beer Store recognizes the contributions our employees make to the business and in the communities where we operate. All efforts will be made to support employees through this process in alignment with commitments and agreements.”

Why is this happening?

Alcohol sales in Ontario have been changing in recent years, especially under Doug Ford’s Conservative government.

In late 2023, the Premier announced that sales of beer, wine, cider and ready-to-drink cocktails would be allowed in convenience stores and all grocery stores by 2026. Then last summer he announced that the phased expansion would begin even earlier, in August of 2024.

A 2015 agreement between the former Liberal government of Ontario and The Beer Store had given the retailer exclusive rights to sell 12- and 24-packs of beer until the end of this year. As part of the earlier expansion of alcohol sales, the province agreed to give The Beer Store up to $225 million.

In a press release at the time, the government said the money was “to make the necessary investments over the next 19 months to support a stable transition to a more open and convenient marketplace, including funding to protect jobs across the province and to keep The Beer Store locations open for the continued availability of recycling and bottle return.”

The agreement also included keeping at least 386 stores open until July of 2025, and at least 300 until Dec. 31, 2025.

The press release added: “

The Beer Store will continue to run the effective and efficient province-wide recycling program for alcoholic beverage containers until at least 2031.”

According to The Beer Store’s

2024 operational report

, The Beer Store that year had 407 locations, down from 424 two years earlier. In the same time period, the LCBO added eight locations for a total of 688.

Where will people return their empties?

That’s the million-dollar (or, given the price of empties, 10-to-20- cent) question.

Ontario’s

online alcohol sales finder

shows that the town of Little Current has three locations other than The Beer Store to purchase beer — the LCBO, the Valu-Mart and the Manitoulin Brewing Company. However, only The Beer Store accepts the return of empties.

The

province’s agreement

with The Beer Store requires grocery stores that sell alcohol to begin accepting the return of empties no later than Jan. 1, 2026.

National Post has reached out to The Beer Store and the LCBO for additional comment.

With files from The Canadian Press

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre and his wife, Anaida, arrive to cast their vote on Election Day in Ottawa earlier this year. Anaida said recently she will be writing a book in Montreal.

After dedicating a chunk of her summer to a rural Alberta byelection campaign to get Conservative Party of Canada Leader and husband Pierre Poilievre back in the House of Commons, Anaida Poilievre is poised to spend a month in Montreal writing a book.

Poilievre, editor in chief and frequent contributor to the Pretty and Smart Co. lifestyle platform she founded, revealed her intention to take her authorship to the next level in

a Facebook post

about accommodations in the city’s Griffintown neighbourhood.

In the late July message in Nous sommes des citoyens du Griffintown (We are citizens of Griffintown), Poilievre said she was in search of a short-term, furnished rental with a gym and swimming pool.

“A little getaway while I write a book,” she wrote.

“I will be coming in and out and at times bring my two kids for a weekend with me, etc. But it’s mainly just me parked at a desk writing all day.”

Poilievre said she’d had “no luck” because many buildings in the area have bylaws that explicitly prohibit short-term rentals, such as Airbnb or Vrbo. Earlier this year,

Montreal restricted such rentals to operating solely in the summer months

, except for a small zone.

The former political staffer and mother of two didn’t say what the book was about, but later replied to the post that “It’s full of hope and positivity, and I think you’ll love it.

“After all, kindness doesn’t cost much.”

Anaida Poilievre says she’s ‘not just a prop’ for her husband and the Tories

National Post has contacted Poilievre for comment and to learn more about the forthcoming book.

Under her bio at Pretty and Smart, it describes her as the “author of Strong Pillars: Building an Unshakable Foundation (coming soon).”

Monday night, the Poilievres were in Camrose, Alta., celebrating

Pierre’s byelection win in a safe Conservative seat

vacated by Damien Kurek, who stepped down to make way for the party leader.

Across her social media channels, Poilievre shared a “We’re back” message along with a collage of photos featuring kids Cruz, 3, and Valentina, 4, and one of her and Pierre.

In her note, she addressed the “up and down” nature of political life and the sacrifices it takes. She also talked about the “ugly side.”

“Friendships come and go as if dictated by the polls,” Poilievre stated.

“Just like the weather, people come and go. So remember, family is everything and fighting for hope is still worth it all.”

Poilievre, who immigrated to Canada from Venezuela with her family in 1995, obtained a bachelor of arts in communication from the University of Ottawa. At 19, she began working as a parliamentary affairs adviser for Senator Claud Carignan, during which time she met her would-be husband.

In 2015, she began working for Alberta MP Michael Cooper, but resigned after the 2022 leadership convention.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Anaida Poilievre and Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre celebrate the win during the Battle River-Crowfoot byelection in Camrose, Alta., Monday, Aug. 18, 2025.

OTTAWA — Embattled Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre bought himself some breathing room with a resounding byelection win in rural Alberta on Monday.

Poilievre had just over 80 per cent of the vote, with

99 per cent of ballots counted

in Battle River

—Crowfoot

, holding a 70 point edge over

independent challenger Bonnie Critchley

.

Conservative Damien Kurek won 83 per cent of the vote in April’s federal election, a mark Poilievre will just miss.

Poilievre, who lost his long-held Ottawa area seat in April, said in an emotional victory speech that he drew inspiration from the rural Alberta community’s true grit.

“Getting to know the people in this region has been the privilege of my life. In fact, I’ve had a hell of a lot of fun,” Poilievre told supporters in Camrose, Alta.

“You don’t give up, so I don’t give up,” said Poilievre, reflecting on the myriad hardscrabble stories he heard from members of the community on the campaign trail.

 From left, Anaida Poilievre, Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre, Damien Kurek and Danielle Kurek celebrate Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre’s win during the Battle River-Crowfoot byelection in Camrose, Alta., Monday, Aug. 18, 2025.

He added that the experience of running in a byelection so soon after losing in the general forced him to re-learn “humility and hard work.”

Battle River

—Crowfoot resident Lance Neilson told the National Post he was taken aback by the throng of voters who showed up to support Poilievre on election day.

“That was the longest line I’ve ever been in to vote here,” said

Neilson. 

“I don’t think other parts of Canada understand what this represents to us. No one is leaving this to chance.”

Turnout was a robust 59 per cent, with 50,434 of 85,736 registered voters showing up at the polls.

Poilievre spent much of the campaign taking aim at the Liberal government’s

controversial electric vehicle mandate

, calling the planned phase out of gas-powered vehicles akin to “banning rural life.”

The Liberal vote was down by more than half versus April, with Liberal candidate Darcy Spady at just 4.3 per cent as of Tuesday morning.

NDP candidate Katherine Swampy also had a rough night, barely breaking the 2 per cent mark.

In the end, the

much ballyhooed Longest Ballot Committee

failed to make much of a dent in the proceedings, with none of the 201 candidates sponsored by the protest group winning more than a handful of votes.

Elections Canada announced last month

that write-in ballots

would be used in the byelection, as a result of the historically large number of candidates entered into the race.

Just to be on the safe side, the Conservative

campaign set up signs

instructing voters on how to fill in “Pierre Poilievre” on their ballots outside of voting stations.

 A voter casts their vote for the Battle River-Crowfoot byelection in Camrose, Alberta on Monday August 18, 2025.

There’s also little evidence that the rising tide of Alberta separatism had much of an impact in the race.

The United Party’s Grant Abraham, who called ahead of the byelection for a

referendum on Alberta’s independence

, finished with just 1.5 per cent of the vote.

Libertarian Michael Harris, who also supports a referendum, won a paltry 0.2 per cent.

Poilievre called himself a “Canadian patriot” in a

July interview with the CBC

and said Alberta should stay in Canada even if the Liberals continue to hold onto power in Ottawa.

He’s now set to resume his role as Leader of the Official Opposition in the House of Commons, facing off directly against Prime Minister Mark Carney when the House meets again next month.

Yet even with his strong showing in the byelection, Poilievre has a long road back to relevance after losing the April election to Carney’s Liberals.

Polls show him

losing ground to Carney

on a number of key issues since the election.

Poilievre will face his next major test at his Conservative leadership review, set for late January in Calgary.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The Nova Scotia Police Review Board has cleared an Amherst Police Department officer of allegations that he stalked a known 'cop hater' and ticketed him for chirping his truck tires.

A “cop hater” ticketed for chirping his tires in a noisy truck has lost his appeal to the Nova Scotia Police Review Board where he claimed the officer who pulled him over in July 2023 had been stalking him due to his involvement the year before in a protest at the province’s border with New Brunswick.

Thomas Everett asked the three-member panel to review a decision made last spring by the chief of the Amherst Police Department dismissing his complaints against Cpl. Derek Hebert.

The officer, a 16-year veteran on that force, testified he was called in as back-up on July 24, 2023, to help with a traffic stop.

“During the short time he was at the scene, Mr. Everett drove by, travelling in the opposite direction. According to Cpl. Hebert, Mr. Everett slowed his vehicle as he proceeded by, then sped up, loudly revving his engine (with a loud, after market muffler, designed for noise) and ‘chirped’ his tires as he continued on his way,” said the recent decision.

The high-pitched squeaking caused by stomping on the gas caught the attention of a couple walking by, according to the officer.

“Cpl. Hebert also testified that the acceleration posed risk to a vehicle ahead of Mr. Everett,” said the decision.

“Mr. Everett denies that he ‘chirped’ his tires, although he agrees that he slowed, then sped up, and that his truck is equipped with a loud, after market muffler.”

Everett argued that Hebert had already “characterized him as a ‘cop hater,’ arising out of Everett’s possible involvement in some sort of citizen protest at the Nova Scotia/New Brunswick border in 2022.”

The decision doesn’t delve into the nature of the protest and the officer’s lawyer said Monday that wasn’t at the heart of the case.

“Hebert was aware of (the protest), and at some point, heard the expression ‘cop hater’ describing Mr. Everett. He testified that he had never met him before, but knew where he lived, and what he looked like,” said the review board decision.

After the tire chirping incident, Hebert followed Everett’s truck and pulled him over.

“Portions of the traffic stop were recorded on the dashcam in the police vehicle,” said the decision. “As well, Mr. Everett’s wife recorded the interaction on a phone, which was intentionally live streaming the events to some Facebook group.”

When the officer asked for Everett’s licence, insurance, and registration, the driver handed over a plastic envelope containing the paperwork, said the decision, dated Aug. 8.

The officer asked him to remove the documents from the envelope, but Everett “declined to do so, several times, and so Cpl. Hebert, remaining by Everett’s truck, removed the documents one at a time, and then tossed them back into Mr. Everett’s lap.”

Hebert then handed Everett a ticket. “There was no overt aggressive, or angry, behaviour visible by either Cpl. Hebert or Mr. Everett.”

Tossing the documents back into Everett’s lap, “which may have been born out of frustration, does not amount to conduct that could be considered a disciplinary violation,” said the decision.

“We also have to bear in mind that Mr. Everett was live streaming the interaction, making this something of a performance piece, intended for an audience in a Facebook world.”

Everett testified Hebert was “stalking” him on June 14, 2023. “He relates this to the idea that Cpl. Hebert saw him as a ‘cop hater.’”

For his part, Hebert said he was patrolling Amherst’s Mission Street that day, when he thought he heard someone call out to him from a social gathering beside Everett’s duplex.

“He reversed, and video evidence shows a woman quickly coming from the Everett side of the building, shouting at him,” said the decision.

“She was angry about a traffic ticket that he had issued to her, saying that he had reported the ticket matter to her social worker. There was little interaction between Cpl. Hebert and the woman, and none with Mr. Everett who was apparently part of the social gathering.”

While the two men didn’t interact that day, Everett argued that “the mere presence of Cpl. Hebert was improper, and was part of the ‘stalking,’” said the panel’s decision.

“While Mr. Everett sees his minor (if any) involvement in a citizen protest in 2022 as making him a target, and subject to surveillance by APD, we disagree. There is no evidence that Mr. Everett had any prior involvement with the criminal justice system, or otherwise with APD. It seems very highly unlikely that Cpl. Hebert, or the APD, would have any interest in the activities of Thomas Everett. He hardly seems to be a crime figure, or even a ‘serial protester,’ if a protester at all.”

The review board rejected “any possibility of Cpl. Hebert targeting Thomas Everett.”

Hebert “had a valid reason to be on Mission Street,” said the decision, which notes he was looking for someone wanted by police.

The panel also found “there was no misconduct” relating to the chirping incident. “We reject any suggestion that there was any targeting of Mr. Everett underlying that event. It was within Cpl. Hebert’s discretion to respond to the actions of Mr. Everett on that occasion by issuing a ticket.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.