LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Liberal Leader Mark Carney speaks to supporters during a campaign stop in Brantford on April 18, 2025.

OTTAWA — A Mark Carney-led government will spend $130 billion on new measures over the next four years, with no timeline to balance the federal budget, according to the costed Liberal platform released on Saturday.

Carney said at a Saturday morning announcement in Whitby, Ont., that keeping the spending taps open was part of standing up to U.S. President Donald Trump.

“It’s said that there are no atheists in foxholes, there should be no libertarians in a crisis,” said Carney.

“In a crisis… the private sector retreats and government needs to step up.”

Big-ticket items include $18 billion in new defence spending, including $850 million for military hardware, a $6.8 billion nation-building fund and $5 billion for internal trade corridors.

Liberals claim that the upfront spending on economic integration will grow the national economy by up to $200 billion.

“To unite this country (we) will build one economy where Canadians can work wherever they want (and) (w)here goods can move freely from coast to coast to coast,” reads the platform.

The four-year plan also includes billions in gender and equity-related spending, including $160 million to make the Trudeau-era

Black Entrepreneurship Program

permanent, $400 million for a new IVF program and $2.5 billion for new infrastructure in Indigenous communities.

The platform maintains previously announced funding for Trudeau-era child, dental and pharmacare programs.

New and existing measures will blow a $1.4-trillion hole in the federal budget, with some of this blow being offset by increasing federal penalties and fines for transgressions like money laundering.

The platform also prices in a one-time infusion of $20 billion in revenue from retaliatory tariffs on the U.S.

Carney has said that this revenue

will go directly to workers

and businesses affected by the tariffs.

The Liberal platform gives no timeline for a return to balance but says that the operating budget, which accounts for more than 95 per cent of federal spending, will see a modest surplus of $220 million by the 2028-9 fiscal year.

Carney has said he’ll bring in a new system of budgeting that separates spending on government programs from investments in capital like roads, bridges and military equipment, but hasn’t given specifics on how this will work.

A similar system of capital-based budgeting was

used briefly in Alberta

in the 2010s, under former premier Alison Redford.

“This new approach will not change how Canada’s public accounts are built and will maintain generally accepted accounting principles. It will create a more transparent categorization of the expenditure that contributes to capital formation in Canada,” reads the platform.

National Post
rmohamed@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The U.S. and Canadian flags fly at Peace Arch Historical State Park on the U.S.-Canadian border in Blaine, Washington, on March 5, 2025.

In border towns and grocery stores, from the mouths of politicians campaigning and sports fans booing, from snowbirds to TikTokers there’s a parade of Canadians seemingly falling out of love with America.

Beyond the economic fear and tariff fallout, the taunts and tension from U.S. President Donald Trump are challenging Canada’s cultural comfort with the United States and straining social ties with our closest international neighbours.

National Post wants to hear from readers on both sides of the border about how you are navigating this change and how you are responding to the White House’s idiosyncratic messaging about Canada.

Have you cancelled travel plans, changed shopping patterns, lost friends, argued with family, sold property, shifted investments, embraced public patriotism? Have you retained an affinity for America and Americana? Are you upset with Canadians displaying their frustration?

Please share your personal stories of what the new continental circumstances means to you and your family, for possible use in National Post’s ongoing coverage of the changing nature of the cross-border ties that bind.

Send a summary of your experience, noting your city or town and contact information, to stories@postmedia.com.

National Post | stories@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


An HIV-positive South African woman will get another shot at Canadian permanent residency on humanitarian and compassionate grounds because an immigration officer overlooked her abusive husband's repeated threats to withdraw his sponsorship.

A senior immigration officer’s decision to refuse an HIV-positive South African woman’s bid for permanent residency in Canada on humanitarian and compassionate grounds didn’t give enough weight to her abusive husband’s repeated threats to withdraw his sponsorship, a Federal Court judge has ruled.

The officer’s failure to properly consider Grace Mabena’s “circumstances as a survivor of family violence and the hardship she will face in South Africa renders the decision unreasonable,” Justice Allyson Whyte Nowak wrote in a recent decision out of Toronto.

While the immigration officer accepted that Mabena had been the victim of domestic abuse and that her husband used his spousal sponsorship to control her, the officer gave inadequate consideration to these circumstances, the judge found.

“The officer’s failure to do so has the perverse effect of allowing spousal sponsorship within the immigration system to be used as a sword in a system meant to shield claimants from harm,” said Whyte Nowak.

Mabena — who asked the court to review the immigration officer’s decision — came to Canada on a temporary resident visa in January 2020 and that same month married a permanent resident who was her long-term boyfriend.

Three months after the couple married, Mabena’s husband sponsored her application for permanent residency.

“Throughout their marriage, the Husband repeatedly threatened to withdraw his sponsorship, and in 2022, he withdrew his sponsorship only to reinstate it weeks later,” Whyte Nowak said.

Mabena’s “marriage was punctuated with abuse,” according to the judge.

Mabena “details seven incidents of physical violence that she endured in the period between April 2020 through May 2023. The violence was perpetrated by her husband as well as his children from another relationship.”

She left him in May of 2023.

“After enduring over three years of physical, emotional and psychological abuse, the applicant left her husband and sought refuge in a women’s shelter. She converted her application for permanent residence into an application based on humanitarian and compassionate grounds,” said Whyte Nowak’s decision, dated April 15.

The immigration officer’s July 26, 2023 decision to refuse Mabena’s application “gave ‘some weight’ to factors related to the applicant’s establishment in Canada and circumstances of family violence, but gave ‘little’ weight to the hardship that the applicant claimed she would face if she were forced to return to South Africa,” the judge said.

“The officer concluded that the applicant’s desire to live in Canada was not a sufficient reason to allow her to remain in the country.”

Mabena “is highly educated, having received her Master in Business Administration from Reading University in October 2021,” Whyte Nowak said. “She has been gainfully employed since she arrived in Canada, and at the time of her (humanitarian and compassionate) application, she was working as a national client manager at a marketing company.”

Mabena has been HIV positive since 2013. She told the judge that she fears that if she is forced to return to South Africa, she will not be able to afford her medication as she sold everything she had when she left and has no prospect of employment there.

Whyte Nowak found that the immigration officer “erred in considering that domestic violence has no significance to (a humanitarian and compassionate) assessment unless linked to hardship associated with the applicant’s return to South Africa. In confining this factor to such limited consideration, the officer fettered their discretion and failed to heed the court’s direction to conduct a global assessment and consider the specific circumstances of the case.”

That made the officer’s decision unreasonable, said the judge.

“The consequence of ignoring the domestic violence experienced by the applicant is that the decision fails to acknowledge the role the immigration process had in the violence, albeit unintentionally, when the applicant remained in her marriage for fear of being deported,” Whyte Nowak said.

The judge granted Mabena’s application for a judicial review. “The matter is returned for redetermination by a different decision maker.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Ron MacLean and his Hockey Night colleagues begin their annual run as long-term Canadian houseguests on Saturday, when the playoffs start anew.

The Stanley Cup Playoffs, which begin Saturday night, are infamous for being a war of attrition unlike any other in sports. Two months of blocked shots and bodychecks, games every other night until the winner collapses over the line.

Ron MacLean — arguably Canada’s last iconic TV broadcaster, after a career of ups and downs — knows something of survival himself.

Moved into hosting duties in his rookie season with Hockey Night in Canada in 1987, when Dave Hodge departed after protesting a programming decision on-air, MacLean has been part of the hockey staple every year since, spending Saturday nights in Canadian homes all winter and for the better part of two months straight in the playoffs.

He’s seen the program avoid brushes with death, go through ownership changes, and move networks. He lost his hosting job but got it back again a couple of years later and has witnessed the departure of friends and colleagues like Harry Neale and Bob Cole and, most controversially, Don Cherry, who was fired in 2019 after he refused to apologize for complaining about immigrants who didn’t wear Remembrance Day poppies. Coach’s Corner, the long-running, first-intermission segment with Cherry and MacLean, has never returned.

And through all that, MacLean, 65, seems almost certain to end his broadcasting career with the program with which he is most associated, after Rogers Communications and the National Hockey League announced this month that their 12-year contract for the NHL’s Canadian rights will be extended by another dozen years, this time for the remarkable price of $11 billion. The deal came as a surprise to many in the industry who assumed that the league would look to bring in new partners rather than keep the whole thing, at least initially, under the Rogers roof.

MacLean says that at his age, he wasn’t worried about life after the next NHL broadcast deal, but he was pleased for his younger colleagues when the new Rogers contract was announced.

Back in his early days with the show, he recalls, there was something of a turf war over its rights between production companies, advertisers, the CBC and a couple of large brewers.

“There was some thought that the rights were going to disappear entirely away from CBC,” MacLean says. “None of that happened. But I remember, I was at a golf course, Chedoke in Hamilton, and that was the date that there was a report that Hockey Night in Canada was not going to be the same, that it was going to change ownership and potentially go to another network,” he says.

“That uncertainty when you’re young is not great,” MacLean says. “And so it was just a nice relief that I felt for a lot of my colleagues when the deal was announced.”

Whatever might have been planned in NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman’s New York offices for the next Canadian rights deal, the massive success of February’s 4 Nations Face-Off, and Rogers’ role in it, might have put the broadcaster back at the centre of the league’s plans.

“No one could have anticipated the political backdrop,” says MacLean of an event that began as U.S. President Donald Trump was musing almost daily about a casual annexation of Canada. Anthems were booed lustily. Wayne Gretzky, of all people, became a villain. “There was just so much going on that it was a perfect storm,” he says.

And then it ended, of course, with Canada

defeating the United States on Connor McDavid’s overtime goal

in the gold-medal game.

“It had built to a pitch (in the arena) that when McDavid scored, it was just such a great relief, as well as a joy, that I honestly couldn’t even believe that it had happened,” MacLean says. “It wouldn’t have upset me if the Americans won, but it just felt like a nice, really nice result, right?”

He notes that the McDavid goal fits with some other Canadian hockey moments: Sidney Crosby in Vancouver in 2010, Gretzky-to-Lemieux in 1987. The ones who should score, do, he says.

“That always seems to be a kind of justice,” he adds.

MacLean speaks about these moments with an appreciation that suggests he doesn’t take them for granted.

“I moved to Oakville in 1986 to start my career at Hockey Night, and I ran into an older gentleman — who’s now my age, but at the time was an older gentleman — a guy named Cecil.”

“And we were just at Bronte Park, and he said, ‘You know, Ron, for my generation, the people on television are kind of our family. Our kids left the nest, so we tend to have you as our as our extended family.’ It was a nice way of framing it.”

“I’ve always said that what Hockey Night does, and what shows like it do is, a lot of people who are loved are in our care,” MacLean says.

“And, you know, I’ve been through some ordeals, obviously, with (Cherry) and with even Dave Hodge when he left. It hasn’t been a smooth ride, but it’s a good ride in terms of, you know, how do you deal with these adversities? How do you cope with your grief? How do you justify your place? Do you feel a need to apologize or to excuse? You have to think about all those things for everybody that’s on the show, not just you. So that’s what people, I think, hopefully, say when they when they say, ‘Ron, you’ve been a part of all these different things, and it’s been a part of my life.’ So, I love sharing that.”

MacLean and his Hockey Night colleagues begin their annual run as long-term Canadian houseguests on Saturday, when the playoffs start anew.

Almost 40 years in, he has some Stanley Cup stories to tell.

During last year’s Cup final between Edmonton and Florida, commercial travel was so challenging on tight schedules that the NHL arranged a charter flight to transport its Canadian and American broadcast crews, plus officials and some league staff. The teams had their own jets.

Because of the distance, the 767 would take off from Fort Lauderdale, land in Kansas City to refuel, then carry on to Alberta.

“And I was sitting in the pouring rain,” MacLean recalls of one stop in Missouri. “Rain just pelting on the windows, and I look out, and I see Connor McDavid sitting in his plane, across the tarmac.”

“I just thought,” MacLean says, “it was such a neat run.”

It was also a full-circle moment, in a way, because MacLean, began his Stanley Cup playoff career with Hockey Night in Canada in Missouri in 1987. Then, it was to cover the Toronto Maple Leafs visiting the St. Louis Blues in a matchup from the now-defunct Norris Division.

“I remember Bob Cole, Harry Neale, Don Cherry and myself, driving to and from St. Louis to the old rink there. And for me, that’ll always be the highlight,” MacLean says. “I opened the telecast at the Zamboni entrance, and then they dropped the puck, and there were two guys slammed into the glass behind me, and I realized, ‘Wow, the ferocity,’ you know, this is going to go on for two months.”

“I kind of got an understanding right there and then of what it takes to win a Stanley Cup.”

 Ron MacLean with Don Cherry on the final Coach’s Corner. The popular Hockey Night in Canada segment was cancelled two days later amid the controversy over some of Cherry’s comments.

One thing that’s always in the back of his mind at this time of year is the 2007 playoffs, when Kevin Bieksa, now a Hockey Night panelist, was playing with the Vancouver Canucks. They had the late game against Dallas on the first night, a Saturday as usual, and it went to four overtimes.

“I got home at five in the morning, and we start up again the next day. And I thought to myself, ‘Wow, that’s day one of possibly 65 nights.’ It’s important to be rested, I guess, is the lesson.”

And as the playoffs begin, MacLean says up front that he would like to see a Canadian team win the Stanley Cup for the first time since 1993. There’s no cheering in the press box, but he’ll still hope for that. “It’s mind-boggling that it’s been so long,” MacLean says.

He tells one more story: last year, he was booked to host an event two days after the Stanley Cup Final’s seventh game — as it happens, a Toronto gala tied to the National Post’s Heroes Among Us series on Canadian war heroes. But had the Oilers won, he probably would have had to host parade coverage.

It’s been 32 years; you can forgive a guy for forgetting to plan around the possible parade.

“So this year,” he says, “I’ve kept those dates clear, just in case.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Candidate signs in the Kanata federal election riding.

OTTAWA

— If you live in the Ottawa suburb of Kanata, chances are that Greg Kung has knocked on your door. 

The 37-year-old has been campaigning since February 2024, after winning the nomination to become the Conservative party’s candidate in the Liberal-held riding, one of many in and around Ottawa.

“I hate talking about numbers,” Kung says, when asked how many doors he has knocked.

“Probably by this weekend, I’ll have hit 22,000 doors, personally.”

His campaign has lapped the riding five times, he adds.

But for Kung, and every other candidate with their name on a ballot, this latest round of door-knocking will be the most important one.

With voting in advanced polls underway, campaign teams have transitioned to the all-important task of making sure each voter they have identified as a supporter actually goes to cast their ballot.

And with less than 10 days to go before the federal election concludes, it is also the last chance campaigns have to convince undecided voters.

Kung’s pitch is one of change

— a message Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is trying to send loud and clear as successive public opinion polls show his party to be either tied with or trailing the incumbent Liberals.

It is a far tighter race than the 20-point lead Conservatives enjoyed for the 18-months before Mark Carney replaced Justin Trudeau as Liberal leader, and U.S. President Donald Trump launched his trade war. 

For Marc Toste, a Conservative supporter who recently moved to the riding, the chances of the party winning were top of mind when Kung appeared at his door Friday. It marked the third time Kung had done so.

“I actually asked Mr. Kung what he thought,” Toste told National Post.

“He says internal polling looks good for us, but the mainstream media says it’s close,” Toste says, “so he’s out gallivanting trying to promote himself and the voters locally here, and see what happens.”

While the suburbs around Toronto and Vancouver form the country’s biggest battlegrounds, the suburbs around Ottawa can also swing with the prevailing electoral winds.

During the last federal election, which was held under the riding’s former boundaries, the Liberals recaptured Kanata by a little more than 2,000 votes.

In the past the region has also elected Conservatives, such as former foreign affairs minister, John Baird, whose Ottawa West—Nepean riding included parts of the newly-formed Kanata riding when he served under former prime minister Stephen Harper.

Nearby is also home to Poilievre’s own riding of Carleton, some of which now belongs in Kanata.

That means if there is a Conservative win nationally, Kung could find himself in Parliament.

As a paramedic, he says he actually has a shift booked two days after the April 28 election. It is one he still hopes to work, no matter the outcome.

“It’s a great job,” he said.

Before the election was called, Kung says he switched to nights so he could spend his afternoons campaigning.

Some of the relationships he has built were on display Friday as he walked the streets of one neighbourhood where his Conservative-blue campaign signs dotted lawns.

“Don’t worry, I’m voting for you. I told you that before,” one man says, after Kung knocked his door with a reminder that early voting was happening.

“I know,” Kung says with a laugh back to him. “We just wanted to wish you a happy Easter and just say thanks for putting up the sign, as well.”

As he walks to other homes, Kung shrugs off the concerns expressed by other Conservatives,

including from Kory Teneycke

, a senior Ontario Progressive Conservative strategist and Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s last campaign manager, about Poilievre not focusing enough of the campaign on Trump’s tariffs and too much on affordability.

The riding Kung is now trying to flip did not go Ford’s way in the most recent provincial election, as the Ontario Liberals held onto it after capturing it in a byelection from the Ontario PCs.

“It’s just noise, frankly,” Kung said of other Conservatives’ concerns.

Poilievre’s message around affordably and crime are resonating, he says.

Despite his optimism, polling aggregator

338Canada suggests the race

to be likely in incumbent Jenna Sudds’ favour.

S

ome of her support may also be buoyed by a weaker NDP vote, a factor playing out in races across the country, which poses a major challenge for the Conservatives, who have historically relied on New Democrats splitting the centre-left vote. 

First elected federally in 2021, Sudds, a former city councillor, was promoted to Trudeau’s cabinet as the minister for families in 2023. After Carney was sworn in as prime minister last month, he shuffled her out. 

In a phone interview with National Post, Sudds says she “respects those decisions” and saw Carney assemble a team of ministers whose portfolios were largely around Canada-U.S. relations.

She also notes the buzz around Carney, someone whom she expects needs no introduction in the riding, given his time spent in Ottawa, in both business and public service.

Contrast Carney’s background with Poilievre’s political style

which even some Conservative candidates and volunteers have said is being perceived by some voters as too aggressive

— Sudds says that is adding to voters’ excitement. 

Not only does the trade war and Trump’s comments about annexing Canada come up often, she suggests it is impacting how seriously Canadians are taking their vote.

“People are really paying attention,” she says. “Based on the conversations I’m having, I do expect the turnout will be quite high.”

Suspicions that could be the case were heightened when across the country on Friday voters and local campaigns saw hour-long lineups at advanced polling stations. One complicating factor is the fact early voting is happening over Easter weekend.

Which party will benefit most from Canadians who have already gone to the polls won’t be known until the election concludes.

For her part, Sudds’ campaign estimates having knocked on “tens of thousands of doors” from “every corner of the riding.”

For Kung, who worked on Parliament Hill the last time the Tories were in government, one of his biggest takeaways from the transition to candidate from staffer has been the amount of work it takes.

“People care about this country and the only way that you can really find out what they’re actually thinking is by knocking on their doors,” he says.

He also suggests he would be open to running again, should he be unsuccessful this time around.

“I wouldn’t rule it out, for sure.”

National Post
staylor@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Xixi Li, a city councillor in Brossard, Que., and the head of an organization suspected by the RCMP of hosting a secret Chinese police station, attends an invitation-only campaign event hosted by local Liberal candidate and outgoing MP Alexandra Mendès.

MONTREAL — A Montreal-area Liberal candidate invited to a campaign event this week the head of two organizations suspected by the RCMP of operating a secret Chinese police station.

The invitation by Alexandra Mendès, the Liberal incumbent running for re-election in Brossard—Saint-Lambert, sowed consternation within the Liberal party, which has faced scrutiny over multiple candidates’

comments about or apparent links to the Chinese government

.

In a picture provided to National Post, Xixi Li, the head of two controversial Chinese community organizations and a Brossard city councillor, is seen attending an invitation-only dinner hosted by Mendès Tuesday evening.

“I’m pleased to invite you to a rallying spaghetti dinner for the 2025 federal election campaign,” reads a copy of the “invitation from Alexandra Mendès” sent to event attendees and obtained by National Post.

Li is the executive director of Service à la Famille Chinoise du Grand Montréal (SFCGM) and the Centre Sino-Québec de la Rive-Sud (CSQRS). In 2023, the RCMP announced that it was investigating suspicions that the

organizations secretly housed a Chinese “police station”

that may be supporting efforts to intimidate or silence critics of China’s ruling communist regime.

At the time, the RCMP said the investigation was part of a larger probe aiming to “detect and perturb criminal activities supported by a foreign state that can threaten the safety of people living in Canada.” One month later, it said it had “shut down illegal police activity in Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia.”

No charges have been laid against Li or the organizations she heads.

 MP Alexandra Mendès delivers a speech in the House of Commons prior to voting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2023.

SFCGM and CSQRS leadership as well as Li have vehemently denied the RCMP’s allegations and filed a $4.9-million defamation lawsuit against the national police force in 2024.

“These allegations only serve to stigmatize and reinforce stereotypes and prejudices against a historically marginalized group,” SFCGM leadership said in

a January statement detailing

the impacts of the investigation on the organization.

Earlier this month, the RCMP requested that the lawsuit be put on pause for a third time until it completes its investigation by January.

“Since the investigation is still ongoing and there are legal steps to be taken, we cannot offer any comments at this time,” RCMP spokesperson Cpl. Erique Gasse said in response to the National Post’s request for comment.

Li’s attendance at Mendès’ event was first reported

by Le Journal de Montréal

. National Post obtained photos and confirmation of Li’s attendance at the event independently.

“I was invited in my role as a citizen of Brossard and a sitting city councillor,” Li wrote in an email to National Post.

 English language version of the invitation that was one sent out to all event guests.

Two Liberal sources said there was much discomfort and consternation within the party after learning that Mendès had once again invited Li to an event she organized. The sources were granted anonymity to speak freely of internal party affairs.

Questions for Mendès’ campaign were redirected to the Liberals’ national campaign team, who noted that Li’s invitation was at the behest of the Mendès campaign.

“The individual you mention attended a local community event hosted and organized by the local candidate. There was no donation taken from this individual,” wrote Liberal spokesperson Guillaume Bertrand, adding that the party has “no formal ties” with the SFCGM.

His statement did not say if the party supported Mendès’ decision to invite Li.

The links between SFCGM and the Chinese government go back years and the organization likely received funding directly from Beijing, according to a 2023 report by the Toronto Star.

The newspaper cited Chinese media reports in 2016 that the SFCGM was designated as an Overseas Chinese Service Centre by China’s Overseas Chinese Affairs Office (OCAO), which became part of China’s controversial United Front Work Department in 2018. That designation generally comes with funding from the Chinese government.

In 2017, Chinese media published pictures of

Li with directors of OCAO

, which experts say was an

integral part of China’s “united front system”

that has been accused of stifling critics of the Chinese regime abroad.

The Canadian government has warned for years

that Beijing uses the United Front Work Department “to stifle criticism, infiltrate foreign political parties, diaspora communities, universities and multinational corporations.”

 Xixi Li speaks at a public consultation hearing on systemic racism and discrimination in Montreal on in 2019. Dave Sidaway / Montreal Gazette

Former national security analyst Dennis Molinaro said Li’s meetings with OCAO and UFWD leaders in China is concerning and raises serious questions about her ties to the Chinese government.

“It is well known that China uses community organizations to engage in united front influence activities,” he told National Post. “In a general sense, inviting groups connected to the UFWD or OCAO to political events could send the wrong message to Canadians and the diaspora community and the right message to China.”

“We now have a community leader that has met UFWD leaders attending a fundraising event for a Liberal candidate,” he said.

During the English-language leaders’ debate Thursday, Liberal Leader Mark Carney said China posed the greatest threat to Canada’s national security.

This isn’t the first time Mendès’ apparent ties to Li have upset her Liberal colleagues.

Last year, now-Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne’s office expressed its discomfort after the Journal de Montréal revealed that Mendès had invited Champagne to an event where he met Li.

Champagne and then-Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc also disagreed with their colleague after Mendès criticized

the RCMP for its “so-called investigation

” into the two organizations headed by Li.

At the time, Mendès told the

Journal de Montreal

newspaper that she met frequently with Li and that she supported her “100 per cent.”

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.


Liberal Leader Mark Carney is greeted by supporters prior to departing from Montreal, Friday, April 18, 2025.

NIAGARA FALLS, ONT. — Standing against a background of the famous falls, Mark Carney was asked about his debate experience this week and turned to Charles Dickens’ famous opening line from A Tale of Two Cities.

“It was the best and worst of times as a participant,” he said, complimenting the moderators and structure of the French and English language debates but decrying the furor over the cancellation of post-debate scrums after arguments between Rebel News and other media outlets.

The Dickens quote continues that “it was the age of wisdom; it was the age of foolishness,” which sums up the tempest in a teapot nature of the scrap. Did voters really need to hear any more from the candidates after four hours of debate?

The conclusion of Dickens’ classic opening paragraph is that “it was the spring of hope; it was the winter of despair.”

The morning after the debates, the travelling Liberal contingent were on the sunny side of that paradox.

They feel that the rope-a-dope strategy of absorbing punches from three opponents, while allowing him to counter-attack when he needed to, persuaded the judges to score the bout as a tie, which is in line with the public polling.

The sun was shining as the Liberals left Montreal and headed into potentially vote-rich territory in the Niagara region, where the rupture in relations with the United States is an existential issue.

There are four seats here — Niagara Falls-Niagara on the Lake, Niagara West, Niagara South and St. Catharines. Prior to the writ drop, the first two were held by the Conservatives, Tony Baldinelli and Dean Allison; and the latter two by the Liberals, Vance Badawey and Chris Bittle.

The Liberals say they are “very positive” about picking up the Niagara Falls seat held by Baldinelli with regional councillor, Andrea Kaiser, who lost narrowly in 2019 and 2021. She was only persuaded to run again after Carney won the leadership. This is a seat that the Liberals haven’t won for 25 years.

They sound less optimistic about displacing Allison in next door Niagara West. But all the races in this region are tight and three months ago, every riding was expected to turn blue.

There are probably very few areas of Canada where Liberal fortunes have turned as dramatically. Liberal candidates who were being chased off doorsteps are now being greeted warmly.

If they don’t pick up this seat when their whole campaign is centred on border issues, and the NDP vote has collapsed, the party is destined for the opposition side of the House.

Carney, flanked by the American side of the falls and a still-busy Rainbow bridge, was in danger of being blown away by the strong wind that persuaded his team to ditch his teleprompters.

In his remarks, he talked about two towns with the same name straddling the shared border, each with a stake in the other’s success, but now divided by politics.

The Chamber of Commerce has ranked Niagara Falls as one of the most threatened communities — 16th out of 41 — because of its exposure to tariffs hitting tourism and manufacturing.

The reporter from the local Niagara Falls Review pointed out that people in the city have family and work connections over the border and asked Carney whether he thought things will ever return to normal.

The Liberal leader said the situation is fluid. “It will be better than it is now, but it will never go back to what it was before,” he said.

He ran through his greatest hits in relation to the tariff threat: “in a crisis, plan beats no plan”; “we have to act with overwhelming force”; and, who could forget?, “they’re trying to break us so they can own us.”

Still, as Churchill pointed out, if you have an important point to make, don’t be subtle or clever: “Hit it once, then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time with a tremendous whack.”

The Liberals are in the lead going into the final week of the campaign because they have not been subtle about the threat from the Trump administration.

They have been subtle about many things — such as their plans for an industrial carbon tax and an emissions cap — but they have been frank, some might say alarmist, about Trump’s designs on our land, resources and water. (The party platform is expected to be released on Saturday, which may add specifics on energy policy that have not been forthcoming to this point.)

Carney said he has been encouraged by Canadians coming together. “Americans are divided and that makes them weaker. We are uniting and that makes us stronger,” he said.

He was asked whether he believes people in the West really feel common cause with those in the East. He pointed to the agreement by first ministers, including the premiers of Alberta and Saskatchewan, to build a common strategy of one Canadian economy that includes trade and energy corridors.

“There is a shared sense of purpose,” he said.

He was also asked about the Conservative accusation that he is just like Justin Trudeau.

Carney has not been a politician long but he has quickly learned the art of kicking a fallen colleague in the guts for tactical advantage.

“I’m not Justin Trudeau. In the first month of my being the prime minister, you can see the differences: a huge focus on the economy; the ability to bring together the provinces; the diversification of security partnerships with France, the U.K., Australia and the EU. I have a totally different approach,” he said.

The four Liberal candidates in Niagara region are presumably very glad about that.

National Post

jivison@criffel.ca

Twitter.com/IvisonJ


Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, left, and Liberal Leader Mark Carney participate in the English-language federal leaders' debate in Montreal, Thursday, April 17, 2025.

What would you do if you were stuck in one place and every day was exactly the same and nothing you did mattered?

That was the question Phil Connors asked in the movie Groundhog Day, but it could equally have been put to the federal leaders who took part in debates over the past two nights. Everything was exactly the same and nothing much mattered.

The only spark of

life in Thursday’s English-language debate

came in the last half-hour when leaders were allowed to put their own question to another leader of their choice.

Mark Carney, the Liberal leader, was much more comfortable in his first language than in yesterday’s French, but was visibly rattled when Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative leader, accused him of being an adviser to Justin Trudeau during the “worst stagflation in a generation.”

The challenge to his fiscal competence hit close to home and Carney said that when he was responsible for inflation as a central banker in Canada, inflation was less than two per cent and the dollar was a parity. “That’s the kind of success I can deliver for Canadians,” he said.

Carney also took a hit from the NDP’s Jagmeet Singh, who accused Brookfield Asset Management, the company where Carney was recently chairman, of being “one of the biggest tax dodgers” and of hiking rents for millions of Canadians.

Carney spoke about Brookfield for perhaps the first time, saying it is a great Canadian success story that contributes to pension returns. “I always acted with integrity. I served the shareholders of Brookfield, but I have left that and am now working for the people of Canada,” he said.

That break with the traditional format was a success and forced the leaders to shift off their talking points.

But for the most part, the leaders were stuck in the same

stalemate that held sway the previous night

.

Pulses did not quicken to hear all leaders talk about the need to confront Donald Trump from “a position of strength.”

The arguments and many of the lines were repeated from the previous night — and rarely bore repeating.

Carney promised to double the rate of house building.

Poilievre said the only thing that doubled on Justin Trudeau’s watch was prices, even though the former Liberal prime minister had also said he would double house building.

Carney said Poilievre had spent his time railing against Trudeau and the carbon tax “and they’re both gone.”

If you can pick a winner out of that, you’re probably a partisan.

Poilievre has taken small bites out of Carney’s polling lead over the past week and the most likely explanation was the

Conservatives’ focus on crime

. The one time that he gathered momentum was in a discussion over his willingness to use the notwithstanding clause to impose consecutive life sentences on multiple murderers.

In Thursday’s debate, Carney suggested using the clause was a slippery slope. “It’s not about where you start but where you stop,” he said.

Poilievre’s response was visceral. “You don’t appreciate the chaos unfolding on our streets. People are living in terror because of the catch and release law (Liberal bill C-75),” he said.

It is always hard to know what will be clipped and shared but if I was a Conservative, I’d be clipping that one.

Despite his attacks on Carney, Singh spent almost as much time going after Poilievre, as if he’d been deputized by the Liberals. He said the Conservatives plan to save people $2,000 in tax cuts but will cost them tens of thousands of dollars by cutting child care, dental care and pharmacare (although Poilievre has not said he will cut any of those things).

Yves-François Blanchet, the Bloc Québécois leader, occasionally chimed in from the sidelines with a caustic comment that was generally aimed at Carney. “You are a real Canadian leader,” he said at one point, “saying one thing in French and another in English,” in reference to Carney’s different statements on pipelines.

But Blanchet doesn’t want Carney’s job — just a role for the Bloc in a minority. “You can’t be entitled to hold all the power in two hands without being checked by serious people,” he said. “I don’t want to be prime minister, but Quebec wants to be a responsible and collaborative partner.” That tells you all you need to know about the appetite for sovereignty in the province right now.

As far as the impact on the broader election race, the debate was a nothingburger: there simply were no flashpoints that would justify anyone shifting their vote.

For the Liberals, that is mission accomplished.

National Post

jivison@criffel.ca

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. 

Sign up here

.


Michel Cormier director General of the Leader's Debate tries to avoid questions from reporters to announce the cancellation of media scrum of the Federal Leaders, following the English Federal Leaders' Debate in Montreal on Thursday April 17, 2025.

OTTAWA — In a surprise move, the Leaders’ Debates Commission abruptly cancelled the media availabilities that were set to happen with each leader after

the English-language debate.

The decision was officially announced after the debate by the commission’s executive director, Michel Cormier, after an earlier verbal altercation between employees of some right-wing media outlets and some journalists who were present to cover Thursday evening’s English-language face-off in Montreal.

“I’m sorry to announce that there will be no scrum tonight with the leaders, because we don’t feel that we can actually guarantee a proper environment for this activity,” said Cormier, who repeated the statement in French. The head of the taxpayer-funded organization did not take any questions.

The announcement came amid rising tension between various journalists and right-wing outlet members, particularly Rebel News.

The sudden decision was the third such last-minute changes announced by the commission in 48 hours. On the eve of Wednesday’s French debate, the commission suddenly decided to start it two hours earlier because the 8 p.m. start time conflicted with a key Montreal Canadiens game. On the morning of the face-off, it decided to boot Green Party co-leader Jonathan Pedneault for failing to have the requisite number of candidates to be eligible.

Part of the commission’s mandate is

to “make debates a more predictable, reliable, and stable element of federal election campaigns.” It was set up by the Trudeau Liberals in 2018, eliminating individual leaders’ election debates that had been traditionally hosted by media outlets.

Commission head Michel Cormier spent most of Thursday explaining how Rebel News was granted more questions than most mainstream outlets during the media availabilities

after Wednesday evening’s French-language debate

.

The Leaders’ Debates Commission agreed to bypass its general rule of granting only one media pass per organization after Rebel News threatened to sue the commission.

Rebel News and other right-wing outlets peppered questions at Liberal Leader Mark Carney, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh after Wednesday’s debate.

Singh in particular got four questions from Rebel News, which he refused to answer, as has been his usual practice for years with Rebel News, during his brief media availability on Wednesday.

On Thursday afternoon, Cormier told CBC that he was unaware that Rebel News founder Ezra Levant also runs a third-party campaign advertiser registered with Elections Canada.

After a tense discussion broke out between Levant and journalists who were covering the event, National Post saw Cormier and others pull Levant into a hallway adjacent to the media room, where they spoke for about 10 minutes.

Despite the cancellation of the post-debate scrums organized by the commission, Singh held his own press conference in a hotel in Montreal after Thursday’s event concluded.

Earlier in the day, Carney said he still believes Leaders’ Debates Commission should be handling the debates.

“I think there’s value in having an independent body that sets the rules for the debate and prosecutes them. I think some of the decisions, I’m sure, will be called into question but I don’t think it’s for the political leaders to be making those determinations,” he said.

With files from Christopher Nardi.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


An Air Canada Rouge Airbus A319 jet takes off in Montreal on Dec. 30, 2024.

After the smell of smoke was detected, an Air Canada flight from Las Vegas to Toronto was diverted to Des Moines International Airport on Thursday.

Air Canada Rouge Flight 1702 landed in Iowa as a precautionary measure after an acrid odour was noticed in the flight deck, Air Canada stated in an email.

No injuries were reported among the 176 passengers on board. The aircraft landed normally following standard procedure, and was met by airport first responders and was cleared to taxi to the gate, the airline said.

A replacement aircraft was dispatched, allowing passengers to arrive at Toronto early this morning, the spokesperson noted.

This incident echoes a similar emergency landing from Air Canada Jazz Flight 7962. The regional aircraft heading from Toronto to Montreal had to land on CBF Trenton on July 31, 2024,

according to InQuinte

.

That flight was diverted after pilots smelled smoke in the flight deck. A Jazz Aviation spokesperson told InQuite that no fires were found and that the aircraft was inspected after its safe arrival.

No one was harmed in the earlier incident but passengers reported they could smell the smoke as well. The source of the smell was unknown, InQuinte wrote.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.