LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Adriana LaGrange, Minister of Health and Premier Danielle Smith.

OTTAWA — Alberta’s Health Minister Adriana LaGrange says she’s not worried about national reaction to the province’s new policy of making most residents pay out-of-pocket for COVID shots. 

In fact, she expects other jurisdictions to eventually follow in Alberta’s footsteps, after Ottawa made provinces and territories responsible for

buying their own vaccines

earlier this year.

“I know that other provinces are looking at what Alberta’s doing because we’ve all seen wastage,” LaGrange told the National Post in an interview on Monday.

LaGrange said the current norm of free COVID shots for anybody who wants one is unsustainable.

“I don’t see how the federal government, or any other province … can justify continuing that type of approach when there are so many demands on our health-care system and so many places where that money can go,” said LaGrange.

She added that she expects COVID vaccines to be a topic of conversation when she welcomes her fellow health ministers’ to Alberta in October for the next scheduled federal-provincial-territorial meeting.

LaGrange said that more than 400,000 doses, valued at around $44 million,

went unused or expired

across the province last year.

“That $44 million goes a long way: it could mean 100 new doctors, 500 registered nurses or 3,000 more hip replacements,” said LaGrange.

The Public Health Agency of Canada

wrote down $1.2 billion

for expired COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics in 2023-24, according to an annual report from the Department of Finance.

The

National Advisory Committee on Immunization

(NACI) said in guidelines published earlier that continued universal vaccine coverage for healthy non-seniors was “unlikely to be cost effective using common thresholds.”

NACI still recommended that full coverage be maintained for all adults 65 years of age and older, as well as the immunocompromised and other at-risk groups.

LaGrange wouldn’t say why the province isn’t following NACI’s recommendations to the letter but stressed that more than 85 per cent of Albertans over 65 will be eligible for a free COVID shot under Alberta’s new rules.

This group will include

seniors living in care homes, those in at-home care and those receiving low-income benefits.

Select high-risk non-seniors, including those living in group homes and experiencing homelessness, will also qualify for free shots under the new rules,

first announced in June

.

The province

added health care workers

to this list last week, after pushback from labour groups.

The rest of Alberta’s 4.8 million residents will start paying $100 per dose in mid-October.

The Alberta Medical Association said it is concerned about the move.

“Immunization is a cornerstone of public health and access should not be limited by cost or logistics,” said Shelley Duggan, the president of the AMA,

in a statement

.

“The Alberta government’s decision to offer free COVID vaccines to health care workers is a welcome step (but) (o)ur province’s immunization strategy still diverges from national recommendations and there are major concerns around pre-ordering, eliminating pharmacies from distribution and potential charges for most Albertans including those prioritized by the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI).”

Edmonton NDP MLA Heather McPherson criticized the decision on Monday and called on federal Health Minister Marjorie Michel to take action.

“I urge you and your government to engage Alberta directly to push for universal no-cost access to COVID-19 vaccines, including for all children under 12,” McPherson wrote in an open letter to Michel

posted to social media

.

McPherson’s office didn’t immediately respond to a question from the National Post about whether she thinks Ottawa should restore federal funding for COVID shots.

Two provinces, British Columbia and Manitoba, have already said that they will provide free COVID shots to visiting Albertans.

Michel’s office told the National Post it wouldn’t be commenting on the matter.

As you know, vaccines delivery is a provincial responsibility,” wrote Michel’s spokesperson Guillaume Bertrand in an email on Tuesday morning.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A United Airlines jetliner glides in for a landing at Denver International Airport on Jan. 16, 2024.

A man in Denver, Colorado, lost US$17,000 (approx. $23,500 Canadian) after his phone call was transferred to a scammer by an operator in the customer service department of United Airlines.

Multiple news outlets

in the United States are reporting on the incident, which was first brought to light by

Steve Staeger

, a consumer investigative reporter at NBC’s 9News in Denver.

Dan Smoker had reportedly been planning an 18-day trip to Europe with his wife, their children and some friends. But the flight from Denver to London was cancelled. So the next day, he called the United Airlines customer service line for help.

Smoker said his own call log showed he was on the phone for more than three hours, but a United Airlines representative told him he’d only been talking to them for 12 minutes.

Somewhere between those two extremes he was transferred to another “customer service agent” who called himself David. David said he could get Smoker and his party on a Lufthansa flight to Europe. He said Smoker would have to pay US$17,000 on his credit card but that it would be reimbursed later.

Smoker never got those tickets. He never got his money back either. This was when

Staeger stepped in

.

He assumed at first that Smoker had fallen victim to a secondary scam in which Googling a customer service number brings up a fake number that, when called, connects you to a scammer. But in fact, that’s what had happened to the United customer service rep on the first call.

On Friday, United confirmed to 9News: “The customer was transferred to an external number and the agent was not using our internal tools to validate the number.”

Smoker said David told him the cost of a new flight — US$17,000 — would have to be charged to his credit card but that United Airlines would refund the money. He said David put him on hold for a long time, then came back and said he couldn’t book the flight, but repeated that the charge would be refunded.

In an odd twist, Smoker said David eventually did also manage to rebook his party on another United flight, which went off without a hitch. But when he got his credit card statement, there was a charge for the real flight from United Airlines, and a US$17,000 charge to a generic company called “AIRLINEFARE.”

Of course, since the original flight was cancelled, there should not have been a charge to rebook. This might have raised a red flight, but the customer thought he was still talking to the airline.

“They have a system that people are supposed to trust,” Smoker told the New York Post. “I trusted that system. There was no reason that I shouldn’t have trusted that system, and I was scammed as a part of it.”

“We’ve been in direct contact with the customer to understand what happened in this case,” a United spokeswoman said in a statement to 9News. “We are reviewing this matter thoroughly. We’re committed to finding a fair resolution for him.”

Smoker reported that the credit card company is processing his fraud claim, and that United has assured him he’ll get his money back one way or another.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Liberal MP Julie Dabrusin answers a question during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Friday, May 31, 2024.

OTTAWA — With ministers due to present their proposals for a 15 per cent spending review, deciding where to cut carries inescapable “political consequences,” according to the staff of Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin.

A rare glimpse into the internal deliberations was offered to National Post — when one of her staff accidentally added a reporter to a group chat.

“Who let her in??!” one of the staffers wrote, to which another reacted with “ha ha.”

The conversation took place last Thursday, exactly one week before the Aug. 28 deadline, when ministers were due to present their plans for achieving a 15 per cent spending reduction, starting with a 7.5 per cent cut next fiscal year. An additional 2.5 per cent reduction has been set for the following year, with an additional five per cent cut in 2028-29.

During the April federal election campaign, Prime Minister Mark Carney promised to launch a “comprehensive review” of government spending, promising he would lead a more fiscally-disciplined government.

The reductions have been earmarked to help fund commitments Carney has made to boost defence spending to the tune of around $9 billion for Canada to meet its NATO defence spending target of 2 per cent of GDP, as well as finance other tax cuts.

Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne is set to table the Carney government’s first budget in October.

As he and Carney prepare to receive proposals for spending cuts, political staff, as well as those across departments and agencies, have been weighing where the cuts could come from and what impacts such decisions would have on operations.

Such was the case last Thursday, when staff in Dabrusin’s office deliberated on options, including what to do regarding the Canada Water Agency, which has the mandate to help manage the protection of Canada’s freshwater lakes and river systems.

The agency itself is headquartered in Winnipeg and has its own president, Mark Fisher, but falls under the responsibility of the federal environment minister.

In the group text, part of which the reporter was added to before being removed, Dabrusin’s senior policy advisor wrote to three others, including the minister’s chief of staff, relaying information from a conversation she had with a “Mark” that, “Yes, this cut could lead to less algal bloom restoration work across the country (notably not the Great Lakes — that will be retained)”

The staffer added that no other departments do that kind of work. “Others only do science and monitoring.”

Dabrusin’s chief of staff then directs the staffer to update Dabrusin via text.

“Eek I don’t know how to help the (minister)” the senior policy advisor wrote back.

“There is nowhere else to cut … she could ask for steeper cuts in (Environment and Climate Change Canada) or accept these (Canada Water Agency) cuts and commit to raising her concerns at (Treasury Board)? Their annual budget is so small you can’t escape political consequences with a 15 per cent cut.”

Reached for comment, a spokeswoman for Dabrusin did not explain how a reporter, who discovered the text conversation upon returning from vacation on Monday, ended up added to the group chat, nor confirm specifics around the internal conversation.

Instead, Jenna Ghassabeh pointed to Carney’s promised spending review.

“As part of that mandate, we are comprehensively reviewing government spending to ensure programming is being delivered efficiently and effectively,” Ghassabeh said.

“While this process requires candid discussions on various options, no final funding decisions have been taken at this time.”

Earlier this year, the White House dealt with the fallout from a much higher-stakes leak after The Atlantic magazine’s editor-in-chief was added to a Signal group text by U.S. President Donald Trump’s national security advisor, where he and other top administration officials discussed a strike against the Houthis in Yemen.

In Canada, Mohammad Kamal, a spokesman for the Treasury Board President Shafqat Ali, said that departments and agencies were still working on their savings plans, details of which he said would be kept secret, save for Carney’s cabinet, until decisions were finalized.

A spokesman for the Canada Water Agency did not answer direct questions about conversations between the agency’s president and Dabrusin’s office about proposed cuts.

“Organizations are being asked to bring forward ambitious savings proposals to spend less on the day-to-day running of government by targeting programs and activities that are underperforming, not core to the federal mandate, duplicative, or misaligned with government priorities,” wrote spokesman Joseph Peloquin-Hopfner.

Andrew Van Iterson, a spokesman for the Green Budget Coalition, which represents upwards of 20 different environmental and conservation organizations, said that broadly speaking, he sees value in the government undertaking a spending review.

“At the same time,” he said in an interview, “Environment Canada is one of the smallest, least funded departments.”

He said that comes as Canada and the rest of the world are trying to address climate and biodiversity issues.

“So broadly, we understand the drive to review … spending. But we’re also really nervous about what that could mean, because in the broader government budget, environmental spending is relatively small, and there’s a lot of really critical pieces there.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


An illustration from 1816 of the British invasion of Washington D.C., during which many military and government buildings were torched, including the White House.

The Halifax, N.S., gravesite of the British general who burned down the White House 211 years ago this week was a busy place Monday.

Larry and Connie Tremain, of Arizona, had just disembarked from their cruise ship when they visited the city’s Old Burying Ground, at the corner of Spring Garden Road and Barrington Street. The national historic site is the final resting place of British Major General Robert Ross, who led his troops to burn the White House and other public buildings in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 24, 1814, during the War of 1812, in retaliation for the American attack on Fort York, now known as Toronto.

“We’ve been looking for him,” deadpanned Larry Tremain, a retired special agent with the U.S. Treasury Department.

While he hadn’t been sure until Monday where Ross was buried, Tremain knew the particulars of when the Brits torched the residence of then U.S. president James Madison

“I’m certainly familiar with the Madisons fleeing the White House and the British general burned it down and actually ate the Madison’s last meal in the White House,” he said.

“But I did not know the general was from Canada.”

Of course, Canada didn’t exist at the time and Ross was never stationed in Halifax. But he was buried in the Nova Scotia capital after being killed at the Battle of North Point by an American sniper on Sept. 12, 1814, near Baltimore, Maryland. His body was preserved in rum aboard the HMS Royal Oak, to be returned to his native Ireland. But the British warship was diverted to Halifax to prepare for the Battle of New Orleans, and Ross was interred here with full military honours.

With the United States and Canada now embroiled in a trade war, Tremain suspects many of his fellow countrymen do not know the history of the general who once torched the official workplace and home of their presidents.

“Absolutely not,” he said. “My son’s a history teacher, but they don’t teach much history in grade school and high schools anymore. Most Americans now under the age of 20 don’t know the difference between (George) Washington and (Abraham) Lincoln, let alone (the history of the War of 1812).”

He says the same of U.S. President Donald Trump, who made headlines multiple times this year with loose talk of turning Canada into the 51st state.

“He has no understanding, and we are bumbling through,” Tremain said.

Tremain apologized for Trump’s repeated threats to use economic force to annex Canada, and believes the president is hurting the relationship between the two countries.

Trump’s supporters are only interested in one thing, Tremain said. “It’s America first. It’s unbridled nationalism.”

While the couple had just stepped ashore in Canada on their sea voyage that started in Boston, Tremain said he would “be amazed” if Canadians weren’t friendly for the remainder of their cruise, which includes a stop in Saint John, N.B. “I would be stunned; they’re good people.”

During his career, Tremain had to travel through a lot of checkpoints in the Middle East. “I always told the driver, ‘Tell them we’re Canadian,’” he said. “Because nobody is mad at Canada.”

 Jo-Anne Wilcox, left, and Jo-Ann Heikkila, both visiting Halifax from Toronto, examine the grave Monday of British General Robert Ross at the city’s Old Burying Ground. This week marks the 211th anniversary of Ross and his troops burning down the White House during the War of 1812.

That a general buried here burned down the White House often surprises Americans, said Jo-Ann Heikkila, who was using an iPhone app Monday to tour the Old Burying Ground.

“I’ve got friends in the U.S. and when you raise that, they look at us like we have three heads,” Heikkila said. “They think we’re too nice.”

Both Heikkila and her friend, Jo-Anne Wilcox, were visiting Halifax from Toronto. Wilcox was quick to chime in on recent friction with our neighbours to the south.

“They need to learn about our country,” Wilcox said. “They know nothing about Canada.”

Americans should visit sites like the general’s grave to gain some perspective on recent events, Wilcox said. “Maybe they would respect us more because I don’t think the Americans respect Canada at all.”

Joe Blixt, a former Winnipeg high school history teacher now studying law at Dalhousie University in Halifax, knew the White House had been torched during the War of 1812.

“But I didn’t know the general was buried here,” Blixt said during a visit to the cemetery. “That’s really cool.”

During his time in Manitoba classrooms, there was an emphasis on how Ross and his troops burned the White House down. “The one thing we have over America, military victory wise, is that.”

Most Americans, he said, likely don’t know about the general’s exploits 211 years ago this week.

“I feel like American exceptionalism makes them blind to all that stuff,” Blixt said. “It’s a history of victory for the Americans. I think they like to wash that away a little bit.”

He doubts schooling Americans on the role Ross played in burning down the White House would change much.

“They like to win,” Blixt said. “They don’t like a losing history.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Police in Winnipeg issued a warning after convicted rapist and repeat violent offender Jason Bard was released to live in the city.

A violent sexual offender with a slew of convictions, including for choking and raping a woman, assaulting fellow inmates and threatening law enforcement, has served his time and is expected to take up residence in Winnipeg, according to police.

In

a warning to the community late last week

, the Manitoba Integrated High Risk Sex Offender Unit said Jason Mark Bard, 35, had been released from the Winnipeg Remand Centre. He had been serving a four-year, 135-day sentence for “repeatedly stabbing” another inmate at the province’s Stony Mountain Institution, leaving them with a collapsed lung, and for later spitting in a correctional officer’s face.

While Bard’s sexual assault conviction came in 2015, the unit said he “remains a high risk to re-offend in a sexually violent manner against all adult females,” even though he has completed sexual offender treatment in the past.

In September 2012, just after completing a three-year sentence for aggravated assault, a 21-year-old Bard was arrested and charged with sexual assault, confinement, choking, and uttering threats in his hometown of Edmonton.

The day before, Bard and his friends met a group of women at a local bar, where he danced and drank with one woman in particular, the Edmonton Journal reported from the subsequent court proceedings at the time.

After a night of revelry, Later that night, the woman accompanied the men to purchase drugs. During testimony, one of those men said Bard said he would have sex with the woman “whether she liked it or not” and asked if “he wanted to go halfsies on a rape charge.”

Hours later, Bard offered to walk the woman to a bus stop, only to throw her to the ground and proceed to rape her. During the attack, he choked her to near unconsciousness, punched her when she tried to call for help and threatened to stab her and her family if she told anyone.

A couple walking by heard the cries for assistance and called police, and Bard fled with the woman’s phone before they arrived.

The woman’s DNA was later found on Bard’s underwear, but he said in court that it was because they’d been sexually active inside the bar’s bathroom earlier that evening. He also claimed the woman must have been attacked after he left her at the bus stop.

Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Eldon Simpson didn’t buy it and described Bard’s “fabricated” testimony as “utter nonsense.”

“He said he’d help her, then betrayed her,” Simpson said at Bard’s sentencing in January 2015, as reported by the Journal.

After receiving three years and nine months credit for the 28 months he spent in pre-trial custody, Bard was left with 15 months to serve, followed by 18 months on probation.

At some point in 2018, Bard relocated to Inuvik, N.W.T., where it wasn’t long before he had another brush with the law, according to

Northern News Service Ltd. (NNSL).

In September of that year, RCMP officers responding to a complaint about bear spray used in a fight involving two men ended up in a foot chase with Bard. When cornered, Bard, who was bound by an Alberta probation order and barred from possessing any weapons, pointed the spray at the officers, prompting both to draw their guns and demand he drop the weapon. He was eventually tackled to the ground.

While awaiting trial at North Slave Correctional Complex in Yellowknife, Bard randomly attacked a fellow inmate, bashing his head with a plastic cup before pummelling him with his fists. NNSL reported that a three-hour standoff between Bard and correctional officers ensued.

The inmate who was attacked later tried to sue the territorial government, alleging correctional staff hadn’t done their due diligence by learning about Bard’s violent tendencies and therefore did not take reasonable measures to prevent the attack.

In the judge’s

decision dismissing the statement of claim

,, it noted that two weeks before the attack, Bard told NSCC officers he had a hidden weapon which he intended to use against them.

Less than two years earlier, records indicated that while incarcerated at the Calgary Correctional Centre, Bard “stabbed another inmate several times in the face with a pen because (he) thought the other inmate was talking about him.”

Police in Calgary also provided psychological reports that labelled Bard a “dangerous violent offender with antisocial personality disorder.”

According to NNSL, 12 weeks after the unprovoked assault on the inmate at NSCC, Bard had another standoff with officers, this time threatening to stab them in vulnerable areas with weapons he’d fashioned out of a sprinkler head and electrical siding.

Officials needed a negotiator to end the standoff, which resulted in close to $25,000 in damages to the facility when Bard decided to flood the floor of his cell.

He pleaded guilty to a raft of charges related to the three separate incidents and was sentenced to 27 months. With credit for time served, he was left with roughly a year and a half behind bars, followed by three years of probation.

By September 2021, Bard, now residing in Manitoba, was serving time at Stoney Creek for an undisclosed offence when he stabbed another inmate and received his most recent sentence.

Bard, who stands five-foot-three and weighs 183 pounds, has brown eyes and brown hair and identifies as Métis. He has several identifiable tattoos: tribal work, a devil and a backward “P” and “D” on his left upper arm; the word “KRUNK” on his right hand; and a cross reading “REST IN PEACE/EDWARD BONE” on his right calf.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


An Air Canada jet takes off from Montreal.

More than 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants will begin voting this week on a new contract between their union, the Canadian Union of Public Employees, and their employer, Air Canada.

Flight attendants went on strike on Aug. 16 after failing to reach an agreement with Air Canada on a new contract. The airline grounded hundreds of planes, stranding thousands of travellers. It started operating again on Aug. 19 after the union announced a tentative deal with the airline, although it said at the time that it would be a week to 10 days before full service returned.

Here’s what to know.

André Pratte: How Air Canada lost the flight attendants’ strike

What does the new agreement offer?

Terms of

the new contract

include a 12 per cent salary increase this year for most junior flight attendants, and an eight per cent raise for more senior members. In addition, all members will see a three per cent raise as of April 1, 2026, followed by 2.5 per cent in 2027 and 2.75 per cent in 2028.

What about the issue of unpaid work?

Flight attendants and the union had made much of the fact that workers were only paid for the time the plane was in the air, despite having duties before takeoff and after landing that included safety checks and passenger assistance.

The new contract says flight attendants would receive 50 per cent their hourly wage rate for 60 minutes of ground time on narrow-body aircraft and 70 minutes on wide-body planes. That would rise to 60 per cent next April, 65 per cent in 2027, and 70 per cent in 2028.

A narrow-body aircraft is one with a single aisle, which usually means four to six seats in each row, while a wide-body aircraft has multiple aisles and more seats across.

How does this pay compare with other airlines?

Lack of pay for ground time has long been an industry standard, but that is changing. In 2022, Delta Air Lines began paying its flight attendants at half their hourly rate for 40 to 50 minutes of boarding, depending on the type of aircraft and where it’s headed,

according to NPR

.

Delta is the only major U.S. airline whose flight attendants are not unionized, and the broadcaster suggested the move might have been an effort by the airline to discourage unionizing. After Delta’s decision, American Airlines and its union also agreed to a similar plan.

Meanwhile, flight attendants at WestJet will see their current contract expire at the end of this year, and ground pay could be part of their bargaining considerations.

When does voting on the new Air Canada agreement take place?

Voting beings on Wednesday, Aug. 27, and runs until Sept. 6. The union has said it will make results of the vote public within a day of that date.

Several news outlets including CP24 and Reuters have said they spoke to multiple flight attendants who plan to reject the deal, saying it’s not enough.

Could there still be a strike then?

It’s unlikely. The flight attendants are voting on just the pay portion of the new agreement. Other changes, including modifications to health and pension benefits and vacation time, are considered final. So if attendants vote against the pay hikes, the other terms would still form part of the new collective agreement, with the wages portion proceeding to third-party arbitration.

The government of Canada ruled the brief strike by flight attendants this month illegal after they refused a back-to-work order before then reaching an agreement with Air Canada. Any new strike would also be deemed illegal, but they did ignore that the last time.

How long does the new agreement last?

The tentative agreement expires on March 31, 2029.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Valley of the Sun catching day's last light near Phoenix, Arizona.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Residents in Gold Canyon, Arizona, enjoy stunning views of desert landscapes and panoramic vistas — especially the majestic Superstition Mountains — which is why it’s a highly sought-after area for vacation homes.

In the past, it has been a prime target for Canadians seeking warm retirement or seasonal homes, but not anymore.

“All my Canadian clients I had, I sold their homes earlier this year, and they have no interest in buying anything at all,” said Redfin real estate agent Heather Mahmood-Corley. “They all left.”


The Phoenix-area realtor explained that her colleagues have seen the same drop in Canadian business. Their fleeing clients had owned second homes — spending up to six months each year in the Copper State — for years, many of them long before COVID. But this year, Mahmood-Corley’s clients told her they wanted out.

This is part of a larger trend. Strained U.S.-Canada relations have led to falling Canadian interest in buying American properties, a trend that is intersecting with a cooling U.S. housing market.

Redfin, a real estate brokerage company that offers a popular search tool for home buyers, has seen a huge drop in Canadian traffic this year. The number of Canadian
Redfin.com
searchers for U.S. properties has dropped roughly 22 per cent year-over-year. The decline started in February, just as U.S. President Donald Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian exports, and the biggest drop, 34.2 per cent (YoY), came in April, coinciding with the so-called “Liberation Day.” Declines have continued through July, though it eased slightly last month to a 19.4 per cent decline.

The falling interest coincides with a slowdown in domestic U.S. home sales as well, but Chen Zhao, Redfin’s head of economics research, says the drop has been far more pronounced for Canadian buyers. While overall searches “are down a little bit,” Chen says, “they’re not down anything close to what we’re seeing from Canadian buyers.”

Canadians have long represented a strong proportion of foreign purchases in the U.S. Recent data from the National Association of Realtors (NAR), which spanned from April 2024 to March 2025 — notably pre-tariffs — showed that Canadians last year made up 14 per cent of foreign buyers, spending about $6.2 billion. That’s up from 13 per cent and $5.9 billion, respectively, for the year before.

Their most popular destinations? Florida has long been No. 1, followed by Arizona, California, and Hawaii. 

Foreign-buyer purchases for April 2024 to March 2025, according to NAR, saw a 44 per cent increase from the year before, the first year-over-year increase recorded since 2017. 

Matt Christopherson, NAR’s director of business and consumer research, says there have been more buying opportunities in the U.S. for foreign investors because domesti
c homebuyers have been drastically slowed down in recent years by soaring interest rates, with many “waiting on the sidelines for better affordability conditions.”

Canadians buying in the U.S., however, are unhampered by the interest rates, he says, because they most likely don’t need mortgages. “Fifty-seven per cent of Canadian buyers paid all cash this past year,”
Christopherson said. 

Canada’s U.S. purchases were beaten last year only by Chinese buyers, who represented 15 per cent of international transactions, for a whopping US$13.7 billion worth of sales. “China’s housing market has had a much slower recovery coming out of the pandemic. So their investors are looking elsewhere for exposure to other markets,” Christopherson noted.

Realtors in Florida and Arizona, Canadians’ top two destinations, have seen severe downturns this year amid tariff-related trade tensions and Trump’s fiery 51st state rhetoric.

“What drove a lot of [Canadians] out was politics,” said Mahmood-Corley. “‘I am embarrassed to own a property here in the United States,’” one client told her, while others said they didn’t want to spend their money in the U.S.

“We don’t have Canadian buyers right now,” says broker Kevin Bartlett, owner of Knowledge Base Real Estate in Estero, Florida, just south of Cape Coral and Fort Myers. Where 50 per cent of Bartlett’s clients used to be from Canada, now “everyone wants to get out of America.”

But it’s not just the trade war that’s driving down foreign business. “It’s tariffs, it’s the dollar, it’s the cost of living,” Bartlett said, referring to how recent hurricane seasons have driven up insurance and HOA costs. 

The downturn also comes amid a weakening of the Canadian dollar. A loonie at 70–72 cents U.S. adds 30 per cent to a purchase. 

Overall, Canadian purchases of U.S. properties — whether the figures soar or plummet — won’t have a huge impact. While Canadians made up 14 per cent of last year’s foreign buyers, foreign purchases overall are just two per cent of U.S. home sales. But in a cooling U.S. housing market, it certainly doesn’t help realtors in the areas most affected. Bartlett, for example, says his sales are down 50 per cent this year. 

Steven Glick, director of mortgage sales for HomeAbroad, says he’s still seeing interest from Canadian buyers, but he acknowledges that something has changed
. “
I think there’s been some hesitation from our current client base, kind of waiting things out and being a little more hesitant to pull the trigger,” he said.

Overall, the slowdown in the U.S. market hasn’t impacted prices too much — the national median price is still up 1.7 per cent from this time last year — but in markets like southern Florida, prices are falling. “You’re starting to see a decrease where a lot of people are able to buy for 20 to 30 per cent under asking price, because there’s just so much more inventory now,” Glick added.

The pivot from a sellers’ to a buyers’ market has been more sudden in the Sunbelt. According to
Realtor.com
, there has been a 2.2 per cent year-over-year decline in Florida home prices as of May this year. Redfin data, meanwhile, shows a .72 per cent year-over-year decline in median prices in Arizona. 

We won’t know the full extent of the drop in Canadian purchases until next year, when NAR releases its next report covering April 2025 to March 2026. But what we do know is that searches have plummeted since February, and Canadian purchases in places like Arizona nd Florida, normal hotspots for cross-border investments, are falling despite a drop in prices.

The overall impact of fleeing Canadians, especially in these popular areas, is being felt in other ways, too. “When [Canadians] come, they have second cars here, they go out, they spend a lot on restaurants and tourism,” said Mahmood-Corley. “And you just didn’t see the activity from that this year like you had in the past.”

Bartlett said he’s seen a huge impact in southern Florida. “We need to understand that (Canadians’) money was 100 per cent very valuable in our economy down here. They created probably a third of our tourism.”

Potential homebuyers in the U.S. have an eye on the Federal Reserve, and realtors are hoping to see a fall in interest rates in the months ahead, which would boost refinancing, sales, and, in turn, housing prices.

But Chen expects the Canadian buying trajectory to remain unchanged for the foreseeable future. “I think it’s likely to remain lower or muted, relative to what we’ve seen in the past,” she said, noting that a lot depends on the tariffs and increased trade volatility.

“Until those tensions subside,” Glick said, “I think you’re going to still see a continuing decrease in interested buyers.” But he also said the anger over trade tensions is likely to eventually subside as people become more numb to the politics. 

By early 2026, Glick said a combination of dropped interest rates and the buyers’ market should be “big
contributing factors to seeing an increase in the market.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Pierre Poilievre and Conservatives lead the Liberals in a new Abacus poll, fueled by growing concerns over affordability, cost of living and economic pressures.

Buoyed by growing anxieties around affordability and the economy, the Conservative Party of Canada has edged ahead of the Liberals for the first time since Mark Carney became prime minister in March, according to one new poll.

New figures from

Abacus Data

released Sunday show a “modest but meaningful shift” in terms of national vote intention with Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives (41 per cent) edging the Liberals (39 per cent) among decided voters. The Liberal share is down four points since early August.

Most of the interviews were conducted before the Air Canada flight attendants’ strike and the Carney government’s attempt to legislate them back to work, as well as before Poilievre’s byelection win in Alberta on Monday, Abacus noted. It also preceded Carney’s decision on Friday to withdraw counter-tariffs on some U.S. goods.

Terry Newman: Poilievre’s win means Carney’s cakewalk is over

Among those certain to vote but undecided, the two main parties are in a dead heat, each with 41 per cent of the vote intention.

Regionally, the two parties are statistically tied in B.C. and Atlantic Canada, and the Liberals are marginally ahead of both the Conservatives in Ontario and the Bloc in Quebec. The CPC continues to dominate Alberta and enjoys strong support in the Prairies.

More than two-thirds (69 per cent) believe it’s time for a change in Ottawa and 42 per cent of those say there’s a good alternative to the Liberals. Meanwhile, 31 per cent think the Liberals are worthy of re-election.

While approval for Carney and company remains strong at 49 per cent, it dipped below 50 since he became party leader and disapproval of him climbed to 30 per cent from a low of 23 per cent in early June.

Carney edges Poilievre (+18 vs. -2) in net favourability — a metric calculated by subtracting the percentage of people who have an unfavourable opinion from the percentage of people who have a favourable opinion — but Abacus CEO David Coletto said, “the Conservative coalition remains firm.

“With Poilievre back in the House of Commons this fall and with a complex set of issues in front of the government, we may start to see more shifts in public opinion,” he wrote.

According to the poll, the rising cost of living remains the dominant issue for 60 per cent of respondents, dwarfing other matters like the economy (36 per cent), the housing crisis (35 per cent) and health care (33 per cent).

Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration remain the second most influential political issue (38 per cent) among poll respondents, though “his shadow is receding slightly,” having dropped from 44 per cent earlier in the summer.

Abacus said the Conservatives are increasingly seen as the best party to deal with the core affordability and economic issues, whereas there is more confidence in the Liberals to handle Trump.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Electronic music fans attend a music festival in Downsview Park in Toronto.

Concertgoers heading to the recently opened Rogers Stadium in Toronto’s Downsview Park might be surprised to find more than just standard arena food. Instead of your regular nachos and beer, the venue offers Wagyu beef burgers and sushi platters.

Behind the upgrade is Nick Di Donato, president and CEO of Liberty Entertainment Group, the company behind some of Toronto’s most celebrated restaurants and event spaces. He spoke to National Post about the Liberty Group’s new role in elevating the concert-going experience. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity and length.

How did you end up seeking the food concession at Rogers Stadium?

Liberty Entertainment Groups has a very diverse portfolio, from regular restaurants to Michelin restaurants, the only Canadian organization with two Michelin restaurants in its portfolio, from our high-end steak houses and our event spaces like Casa Loma and Liberty Grand.

The stadium identity is now changing in recent years, and one of the things that is very important to stadiums is premium hospitality. And you see that in their suites, and in the restaurants that are located in stadiums and even their food offerings. So we thought that would be a perfect fit for the Liberty Entertainment Group, to help deliver the premium quality hospitality in a stadium atmosphere.

At the Rogers Stadium, we have two lounges of 400 seats each, the Birkenstock lounge and American Express where we have a full menu. We also do the 24 suites, so premium suites in the stadium itself, and also we do some premium concession stands, so a diverse selection of casual food but done at a premium level.

What’s the concept? What are you doing to try to elevate or reinvent stadium food?

The stadium itself is a temporary stadium, so I can imagine most of the seats are on a scaffold and built for a three year period. But we built two full-size restaurants, the American Express restaurant, with a full menu which emulates some of the items that we have at our Blue Bovine Steakhouse, with sushi and casual approachable food for a stadium environment.

We’ve done that with the Birkenstock lounge, more with reflecting the brand itself, of German descent. It’s a full service restaurant in the middle of, basically, a field.

We’ve created our full-service kitchens, full bar component. Our bar menu and cocktail menu are designed by world champion Jacob Martin. Our menus are designed and supported by our Michelin chefs, so there’s a very high-level experience in what people would expect to feel.

Can you give an example or two of specific food items?

We have the beef tartar cristini, an American Express tower, which exemplifies a tasting of all our menus, and obviously in the same atmosphere we have the quality burgers, but our burgers are made with Wagyu beef. And we have a sushi program at the Blue Bovine, which is translated into the stadium atmosphere.

 The view from the stage during a media tour of Toronto’s newest music venue Rogers Stadium near Downsview Park on Thursday June 26, 2025.

What’s your personal favourite at Rogers

To me it’s from Birkenstock, the Coconut shrimp. It’s jumbo shrimp done in coconut and batter, and very easy to share.

How do you ensure quality and consistency in that environment?

Every item on our menu is quality made, made on site.

We created full service kitchens within the space itself and we’ve done that in cargo containers so, although we are outside in a very difficult challenging space to build quality food, we’ve created the kitchen in containers. We have a hotline in a container side-by-side with a cold line in a refrigeration container.

It’s not pre-prepared food, which is just heated up in a hot box. We are preparing the food as it’s been ordered.

Is this a sign of a growing sophistication of the average palate?

People are expecting a little more, and hats off to the people at Maple Leaf Sports who have introduced some of the higher quality products in their concessions. So you look at where they’ve moved and we look at where the industry is moving, people are looking for higher deliverables in their stadiums.

So this was really why Liberty Entertainment Group moved into that because it is our niche market. Premium quality, we know how to deliver that, and now we’re delivering it in higher volume in larger stadiums.

What’s the throughline in what Liberty Group is trying to do?

Our focus has always been best in class, so whether it’s a casual restaurant, whether it’s a Michelin restaurant, whether it’s a steakhouse, we always aim to be best in class.

Understanding what your target audience is, where you wanna be with that and making sure you’re the best in terms of deliverables, and we do that even in our nightclub component.

What’s next, any more surprises?

We’re going to extend this across Canada, in terms of the stadium approach, in terms of bringing up the level of expertise in stadiums. We are expanding in Miami, so that’ll be coming up, probably in October. And we’re expanding our portfolio in the lounge and club business. We’re creating a place called powder room in Yorkville, which will be a high-level cocktail lounge, which is really needed in the Yorkville area.


A close-up photo of cocaine lines.

A Brantford, Ont., drug dealer who sold cocaine mixed with fentanyl to a man fresh off a round of golf with his brother has been found guilty of manslaughter.

Matthew Grout and Robert Davies played a round together at the local course on June 13, 2020, before splitting a pitcher of beer at a nearby tavern. Then they picked up their friend Sheldon Gittens and decided to buy some cocaine.

During a stop at the home of Jeremy Folk on Grand River Avenue, Grout shelled out $180 for two grams of cocaine, which was laced with fentanyl. Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice heard both the customer and dealer snorted some of the drug before Grout returned to his older brother and their buddy in the car.

“I accept Matt’s evidence that he has little memory of the events that occurred after he got back into Rob’s car. His next memory was waking up in Rob’s residence lying on the kitchen floor. The only partial memory he has of this time was a memory of sitting in the rear of Rob’s car and Sheldon turning around to tell Matt that he was acting weird,” Justice Joseph Henderson wrote in a recent decision.

Once they got to Davies’ place, his younger brother was slow to get out of the car.

“Rob then walked back to the vehicle and leaned in to talk to Matt. Eventually, Matt opened the car door and exited the vehicle, but he appeared to be very unsteady on his feet and took a circuitous route to get to the rear door of Rob’s building,” said the judge’s decision.

Despite this odd behaviour, the three pals chopped up some of the drugs and each snorted a line.

Grout “did his line first,” said Henderson’s decision, dated Aug. 19.

“Thereafter, I accept Sheldon’s testimony that Matt started behaving in a strange manner. I find that Matt laid on the coffee table and was very fidgety to the point that Sheldon and Rob looked at each other wondering what was happening. Sheldon then did his line of the substance, and thereafter Sheldon admittedly has no memory until he woke up in hospital.”

Davies was the last man to try the drugs.

”After they each consumed a line of the substance, I find that all three of the friends passed out or lost consciousness,” said the judge.

“Matt was the first to wake up. When he regained consciousness, he was lying on the floor in the kitchen and the fridge door was open. I accept Matt’s evidence that he knew something was wrong and he started to panic. Matt saw that Rob and Sheldon were sitting beside each other on the couch in the living room. They were both unconscious, but Sheldon was breathing. Rob was not breathing.”

Grout called 911 at 9:15 p.m. “The 911 dispatcher instructed him to move Rob and Sheldon to the floor, which he did. Matt also performed CPR on Rob under the direction of the 911 dispatcher.”

When paramedics arrived, Davies “had no vital signs and was unconscious. His respiration was zero, blood pressure was zero, and heart rate was zero.”

One paramedic “conducted or directed CPR on Rob, applied a defibrillator, and gave Rob two injections of epinephrine. Rob never regained consciousness and his vital signs remained absent. At 9:41 p.m., after consulting with a medical doctor by phone, the paramedics terminated their efforts to resuscitate Rob. Sheldon and Matt were both taken by ambulance to the Brantford hospital.”

Davies was 44 when he died.

Police sent the small bags of drugs found in his pocket to Health Canada for analysis. That “shows that the substance in the bag contained cocaine, fentanyl, phenacetin, and caffeine,” said the decision.

According to the judge, “there is little dispute as to the medical cause of Rob’s death. Dr. Daryl Mayers, a toxicologist, testified that Rob’s blood contained both fentanyl and cocaine at the time of his death. Dr. Tyler Hickey, the forensic pathologist who conducted the postmortem examination, testified that Rob’s death was caused by an overdose of a combination of fentanyl and cocaine.”

Grout knew Folk from previous drug transactions. The court heard he’d bought coke from Folk six times between May and June of 2020.

On the day Davies died, Folk offered Grout a deal on cocaine “to compensate for the poor-quality product from a prior sale.”

The Crown argued that by trafficking cocaine and fentanyl, the drug dealer “raised an objectively foreseeable risk of bodily harm.”

Folk countered “that the Crown is unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt” that he sold anything to Grout, or if he did, it couldn’t prove the nature of the substance. “Further, it is the defendant’s position that if I find that he sold a controlled substance to Matt, the Crown is unable to prove that the unlawful act of trafficking in that substance was a significant contributing cause of Rob’s death,” said the judge’s decision.

But according to Henderson, “the evidence is overwhelming with respect to the first two elements of the offence, namely that the defendant committed an unlawful act by intentionally trafficking in cocaine and/or fentanyl, and that the defendant’s unlawful act presented an objectively foreseeable risk of bodily harm.”

Grout “was a regular cocaine user at the time,” Henderson said. “I accept Matt’s evidence that he was using cocaine in recreational quantities approximately four or five times per week. I also accept Matt’s evidence that he used cocaine with his brother Rob when they got together to play golf or play cards approximately once or twice per month.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.