LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Christina Ryan, Postmedia, Calgary, Alberta: AUGUST 18, 2025 - Megan Gallagher is assisted with her physio treatment by therapist Rebecca Lipsey (right) at Synaptic Health, for spinal cord injury and neurological rehabilitation, in Calgary on August 18, 2025. Gallagher lost the use of her legs after a plane crash in Springbank. The exoskeleton from XoMOtion, headless and battery operated, is used to assist with postural alignment and gait pattern.

In Superhumanity: Part 1, we reported on the Enhanced Games, an athletic competition that will be staged next May in Las Vegas for a willing contingent of chemically assisted swimmers, sprinters, and weightlifters. Even the last-place finishers will get a paycheque. World record-breakers will be awarded US$1 million. The Enhanced Games may or may not portend a new era of superhuman competition. Feedback from the elites who oversee world sport has been predictably harsh, while others hail this assault on Olympian hypocrisy and defend a person’s choice to jab and juice as she or he pleases.

In Part 2, our attention turns to the Age of Supermachinery that will leave none of us unchanged.

Ten years ago, the Huffington Post asked a selection of science-fiction writers to imagine the Olympic Games several decades hence.

“Someday,” an author named Max Gladstone responded, “a human mind in a robot body will run the 100-metre dash in a second. But for a long time, we’ll say that doesn’t count.”

That “long time” is about to expire.

As evidence, we look back to April 2022, when a small plane thudded and crumpled short of the runway at Springbank, Alta., just off the berm of the Trans-Canada Highway between Calgary and Banff. The propeller was sheared off and the wings of the Mooney M20K dredged themselves into the brown prairie turf.

One pilot died, and 22-year-old

Megan Gallagher

— a flight instructor who had come down from Fort St. John, B.C., for a check-out ride in the Mooney — well, as James Taylor once sang, Megan, “the plans they made put an end to you” as well, at least as an active, fully-functioning woman.

“Don’t get your hopes up on walking again. It’s very unlikely with your level of injury,” Global News reported back then, quoting Gallagher’s doctors.

But the physicians, born in an earlier century, were too pessimistic; they dealt in nerves and tendons, not in graphite and gears.

Three years after the crash at Springbank, I am in Southeast Calgary with the same Megan Gallagher, watching the epoch of Supermachinery arise. Headless and battery-powered, purposeful and confident, the contraption unfolds itself from the sitting position and stands upright and obedient, awaiting instructions from a hand-held remote.

Take a woman whose legs no longer function, or a striving young survivor of unspeakable tragedy, and strap her or him in, and you have Max Gladstone’s prophecy fulfilled: a human brain in a robot’s bones.

The machine I have come to see, designed and built in British Columbia, is called the

XoMotion

. It costs US$250,000 and gets a million smiles to the gallon. There is a woman in Vancouver who has taken more than 250,000 steps in this self-levitating, self-supporting, self-balancing, two-footed prototype — one of the most advanced and agile “exoskeletons” ever engineered. She fully expects tomorrow’s XoMotion to jump, race and dance. We’ll hear from her in a moment.

For the intrepid and cheerful Megan Gallagher, and for the other spinal-cord injury patients who have used the XoMotion as part of their slow return to verticality, just the first step alone was transformational.

“It was a little scary having a device move your body, not with your own will, right?” Gallagher tells me at the Synaptic Neurorehabilitation Centre, one of the first clinics in Canada to receive the XoMotion. “I mean, it’s hard enough to have your body break and to not be able to use your body, but then to have a device come in and move your body for you is pretty scary.

“I would say it’s kind of like a carnival ride, the anticipation and waiting as it’s standing me up, right? And it happens pretty quickly.

“I was able to give my dad a hug standing up. I was able to play catch with my mom. So, a lot of stuff that I’m not able to do.

“It’s still a little weird, but it feels very secure. If anything, it’s maybe too secure and not in a bad way, because it moves you in the exact proper patterning that you’re supposed to walk. It’s awesome because I don’t feel like I’m going to fall over.

“I think they have three speeds on it. They had me doing the fastest one, and it is weird. It got me thinking of sci-fi movies and how I could go racing into battle with robot legs, but it felt pretty cool. I haven’t moved that fast in three years. But it does feel quite unnatural.”

It’s not natural. It’s a human mind in a robot body.

“It has helped me become, I don’t want to say fully human, but mechanically more human,” she says. “And I feel like we have already gotten so removed from humanity with our phones and now, are we all going to be cyborgs?”

The answer is yes.

The original human cyborg

Twenty years ago, a congenitally colour-blind young Catalonian named

Neil Harbisson

found a surgeon who was willing to drill a hole in his skull and implant a sensor that can convert colour temperature into an auditory signal. Beep-beep for red, bloop-bloop for green, and so on. It even works where human eyes can’t: in the infrared and ultraviolet zones of the spectrum.

Soon afterward, Harbisson, who is a dual U.K.-Spanish citizen, went to renew his travel documents at the British passport office and was told that applicants with metallic antennae sprouting from their craniums were not eligible.

Unable to simply unscrew his hardwired appendage like a light bulb, Harbisson protested and eventually won his case, thereby earning the privilege of calling himself the first cyborg to be issued a passport. A popular TED-Talker and painter of portraits tinted by the hues he hears, he has been dining out on his trans-sensory uniqueness ever since. In the ensuing decades, his device has been upgraded to receive phone calls and connect to the Web.

In contemplating our future as flesh-and-metal hybrids, I thought it would be instructional to speak with Cyborg One.

“Do you consider yourself a superhuman?” I ask Harbisson, who resides in Barcelona.

“I don’t like the term ‘super’ because it feels like it means superior, and that’s not necessarily true,” he replies. “If you have more senses, organs or intelligence, that doesn’t mean you’re better. You might have new abilities but still not use them in an intelligent or meaningful way.”

“Did you do this for money?” I wonder, lucre being the overt reason for the Enhanced Games.

“For me, no,” Harbisson says. “My aim has never been to enhance the body itself but to expand the brain — specifically, to add new senses. The word ‘enhancement’ in my case is about expanding human perception, creating new ways to interact with reality. The Enhanced Games are an interesting idea but not necessarily aligned with my philosophy, which is about perception, not performance.

“Breaking the 100-metre record,” he says, “depends on why you’re running. The reason behind using that speed matters — it doesn’t automatically make it ‘better.’”

Most of us need an exterior antenna like we need a hole in the head, but Harbisson was hardly satisfied with just one bit of aftermarket hardware. He has had a sort of compass implanted in his knee that senses the direction he is travelling — “I don’t need to see the sun to know where I am” — and he says he is working on a so-called Solar Crown that would follow the sun in its daily arc. He calls this “an organ-in-progress” and explains that “it creates a point of heat that takes 24 hours to move around my head, allowing me to feel the passage of time and the Earth’s rotation. It could eventually help modulate jet lag.

“These implants aren’t about having a ‘better’ body — they’re about having a different perception of reality.”

Harbisson tells me about a woman he knows who had a seismic detector embedded in her leg, and someone else with a device that can measure cosmic rays.

“I think about Einstein’s Theory of Relativity in practice,” he says, “using new organs that allow us to 

feel

time differently, the way we create optical illusions visually.”

“Will we all be cyborgs?” I pose.

“Yes, I think so, in a way,” Harbisson says. “All the code we’ve developed is open source. Anyone can recreate the sensory organs we’ve built. With AI, it’s becoming easier and cheaper.

“There’s still so much to explore. Technology opens up endless possibilities for perception. Merging with chips will soon feel old-fashioned. We’ll likely print new organs using our own DNA.

“In the future, we’ll modify our DNA to add new senses. We’ll use our own body’s energy to power implants, perhaps through turbines inside our blood vessels, removing the need for external electricity.

“There will be a diversity of humans,” says Harbisson, “some who merge with technology and some who don’t. What we call ‘diversity’ will expand. There will be many coexisting perceptions of reality. Just like now, when we switch between online and off-line worlds.”

‘I forgot how tall I was’

It was clear from the arrival of the first XoMotion at the Synaptic rehab centre in Calgary that there was one young man who was a perfect candidate to try it out.

This was Ryan Straschnitzki, who was just turning 19 when his

Humboldt Broncos

’ team bus was rammed by a tractor-trailer at a Saskatchewan crossroads in 2018, leaving him paralyzed below the waist and 10 of his beautiful teammates dead (16 people were killed in the crash including two coaches, an athletic therapist, statistician, radio announcer and bus driver).

Now there was a new machine that, though powerless to cleanse away the grief and the remembrance, could at least raise him for a moment from his two-wheeled life.

“I forgot how tall I was,” the young man beamed the first time the robot stood him up. A minute later he was throwing a football and stickhandling a plastic puck across the clinic floor.

“It was an incredible experience,” Straschnitzki tells me now. “I never had the opportunity to stand and use a hockey stick normally again.

“Words can’t describe the feeling. It helped me remain hopeful for the future. There were instances I thought I would be able to walk again. It’s been a while. It kind of gave me confidence. It gave me a bit of power back.”

This is only the infancy of the Age of Supermachinery. Even the XoMotion, though it strides more smoothly than Frankenstein’s monster, is a knuckle-dragging Neanderthal compared to what someday will be.

“The opportunities that could come from this in the future are endless,” Straschnitzki predicts. “Imagine running, playing soccer, being able to be an athlete again.”

“I did not think that this was going to happen in my lifetime,” says physiotherapist Uyen Nguyen, the co-founder and executive director of the Synaptic clinic. “I used to read all the medical books and the research and still think it was science fiction. I thought that we were so far away from having it in clinical use.”

“When you look at the XoMotion, what do you see?” I ask her.

“I see possibilities, I see potential and I see progress,” she replies. “It’s really exciting for me to see this in my lifetime, where the person cannot do it and the machine is doing it for them.

“From the beginning of time, humans found that our physical abilities diminished over our lifetimes based on all the external factors of health, socioeconomics, disease, all those different things. We found that the mind can outlast the body. Science, though, is actually closing the gap and we are probably looking at a state where the physical part is going to outlast the mental and the cognitive side of humanity.

“Ryan and I joke about him being able just to go get groceries and gas at Costco. That’s like the epitome and the ultimate. It’s a really uncontrolled environment. There are people in carts everywhere. And knowing that you can do that with confidence and safety — for Ryan to compete athletically in this is one thing, but it will be more meaningful for him to be able to get gas by himself.”

This is the first generation in clinical use. Nguyen imagines Generation Five. “It runs, it climbs, it jumps. It would be lighter, it would be stronger, right? It would have more degrees of movement. Maybe by Generation Five some of this will be controlled cognitively. Or just taking away the hand control, because not everybody has hand function. Could we voice-control this?”

“A human mind in a robot body will run the 100-metre dash in a second …” I quote.

“Does it count for who wins the Olympic 100 metres? I don’t know,” says Nguyen.

“I think the physical and the soul of humanity are two very, very different things.”

Humanoid robots versus humans

In April of this year, 21 soulless automatons and more than 10,000 members of Team Homo sapiens competed in a

half-marathon through the streets of Beijing

. It was said to be the first time that robots went mano-a-metal with actual people over such a punishing distance.

The humans won.

“Stumbling and overheating, most humanoid robots fail to finish half-marathon in Beijing,” headlined WIRED.

“Chinese robots ran against humans. They lost by a mile,” gloated CNN.

“Victory tastes like lithium,” riffed RUN.

“Chinese humanoid robots get reality check,” reported the Asia Times.

Here’s another reality check: When I lived and worked in Beijing 40 years ago, there were more horses in the streets than private motor cars, an antiquity invisible and risible to the millions of hard-driven Chinese who are growing up in the epoch of Supermachinery.

“Generally, these are interesting demonstrations, but they don’t demonstrate much regarding the utility of useful work,” a professor named Fern from Oregon State University was quoted by the television network France 24, remarking on the half-marathon.

Similar ridicule often follows other inhuman competitions that Chinese engineers have been staging to showcase their machines, including boxing matches and soccer games that send audiences into fits of hilarity each time a robot’s rheostats catch fire or its ankles ankylose.

“Several had to be carried off the field on stretchers by staff, adding to the realism of the experience,” The Associated Press noted of one football match in June.

But it is early in the game. Imagine if that race was not 13 miles, but 1,300. Robot keep running. Robot don’t care.

“Your accountant, your masseuse and your butler will service your needs via a symphonic confluence of circuits and hydraulics,” author Patrick Hemstreet predicted in that Huffington Post article, back in 2016. “Lightning-fast computation and enhanced processor precision will ensure all pertinent tasks are performed efficiently and free of error.

“But I still want to see humans interact with other humans to demonstrate abilities gained through training and talent alone. To see members of our species blow past seemingly insurmountable barriers is the greatest form of entertainment. Hearing a new story or marveling at the creativity of a new artist is an experience that is firmly enshrined in flesh and bone. This exchange between souls is, dare I say, sacred and will never be yielded to non-sentient metallic automatons.

“When the day comes that we are surrounded by walking IBMs and Apples, we will come to a greater appreciation of what it means to be human, warts and all. Think of it, the sanctity of sportsmanship (and all human endeavour) resurrected and cherished.”

So, there are three finalists competing in the race for the future: the man fortified by wonder drugs; the woman re-engineered by wearable machines; and the stubborn natural clinging tight onto whatever, for better or for worse, his gods and his genetics gave him.

Which of the three are you betting on?

‘I don’t have hands’

In Part 1 of this series, I asked Aron D’Souza, the ultra-confident creator of the Enhanced Games, if he envisions a time when people will choose to have their feet amputated and replaced by carbon-fibre blades.

“I can see an age in which, just as we have hip replacement surgery and it’s commonplace today, that humans will choose to enhance themselves long before disability sets in, where the point of all technology is to enhance the human condition,” the Australian answered.

“Why should we accept our biological limits?”

At Synaptic, I meet a patient — and pioneer of bariatric surgery for the obese — named Dr. Richdeep Gill. Seven years ago, Gill suffered a grievous spinal-cord injury while boogie-boarding in Hawaii. Incisive and realistic, he operates now on the timetable of incremental rehabilitation and the fantasia of tomorrow’s Supermachinery.

“I don’t have hands,” he says. And he tells me that if — or when — a mechanical hand is perfected that can restore the fine-motor function that once allowed him to use his life-saving skills, he willingly would surrender his flesh to the machine.

“It’s just the idea of having something functional,” the surgeon says, waiting another day.

Chris Neilson is on the phone from Edmonton saying, “I’m a research partner, but I also call myself the guinea pig.”

Neilson, who lost his left arm to a workplace accident, recently returned from Zürich and the international competition for inventors and users of advanced prostheses and other such devices that is called CYBATHLON. Wearing a mechanical hand designed at the

BLINC

(“Bionic Limbs for Natural Control”) laboratory in the Department of Medicine at the University of Alberta, Neilson raced the clock in such mundane household tasks as stacking plastic cups and folding laundry, using the hand’s pressure-sensitive skin-to-silicon interface to manipulate the five-fingered bot.

Someday, a hand perfected at BLINC may restore Chris Neilson and Richdeep Gill to their professions and the fullness of their touch.

“What did you see at CYBATHLON that impressed you?” I ask Neilson.

“There was a lot of stuff using the brain that I thought was very cool,” he replies. “There were games that people were controlling with their minds — like, they’re literally just staring at a screen and they’re controlling an object on the screen just with some type of thought or something. I don’t fully understand it, but that’s what was impressing me.”

“The CYBATHLON didn’t just have, like, bionic arms competition,” says Michael Rory Dawson, lead research engineer at the BLINC lab. “There was a competition for bionic legs, for powered wheelchairs, exoskeletons, brain-computer interfaces. They had assistive technology for persons with vision difference, things like that.”

Neilson says, “When I was growing up and I was getting into computer gaming, one of my dreams was like, oh, man, how cool would it be to have a cellphone, you know, connected to the internet, and I could game wherever I wanted! Now I just keep seeing these huge leaps and bounds forward, and we are living in science fact, and science fiction just becomes more and more reality.”

Still, BLINC has not yet been able to engineer a mechanical hand that could persuade Richdeep Gill to opt for an irreversible trade-in or fully restore the appendage that Chris Neilson lost while at work.

“How far away is the tipping point?” Dawson ponders. “For as long as I’ve been doing this, it’s always seemed to be five to 10 years out for the interface technology that pushes towards peripheral implants — instead of just putting, you know, a little electronic sensor on the surface of the skin, actually implanting electrodes into the muscle or into the nerves directly. And people do this in the laboratory, but it has been very difficult to translate into something that can be used clinically.”

“I like being involved so I can kind of see a little bit further ahead than others,” says Neilson, the guinea pig. “But I still don’t see where that tipping point is, where all of a sudden I will get a prosthesis that is more life-changing than what I have now.”

There are millions of us

Like Ryan Straschnitzki, my university roommate was a heck of a hockey player.

Like Megan Gallagher, he was a pilot in love with the sky.

Like both of them, an ill-fated journey across our mortal Canada stole the use of his legs.

Kirby Rowe of Owen Sound, Ont., was 28 when the small plane his brother was piloting crashed in Northern Ontario the day before the brother’s wedding. Kirb had graduated with me from Rensselaer in 1971, after playing defence for the mighty Engineers at the NCAA Division I level. He assisted on the overtime goal that cost Cornell goalie Ken Dryden the only loss of his senior season. He was working for TD Bank in Toronto when the ship went down.

The groom and his best man suffered spinal cord injuries in the wreck. The brother healed. Kirb was in a wheelchair for more than 40 years. He still drove his car, he had a single-engine aircraft retrofitted with hand controls, he tuned his radio to the tower at YYZ and watched the big jets sail in, he joined the Air Reserve Wing of the Forces, and he served the Canadian Paraplegic Association with dignity and distinction in Ontario and B.C. — giving much, though so much already had been taken from him — but he never walked again. I will always remember skating with our wives on Grenadier Pond in Toronto and seeing him, gamely smiling, in his chair on the snowy shore.

Kirb died of cancer in 2017, too early to stickhandle in the XoMotion, and to benefit from all the Supermachine miracles that are yet — perhaps soon — to arrive.

“My heart aches every time I see someone get injured, because I know a better world is coming,” Chloë Angus is telling me now from Vancouver. Angus’s career as a designer of women’s apparel inspired by West Coast Indigenous art was, if you will pardon the sad simile, just taking off. Then, without any warning, after a short run, she began to experience tingling and numbness in her feet, then her legs.

Twenty-four hours later, diagnosed with a rare and inoperable tumour that had left four tiny drops of blood inside her spinal cord, she could no longer walk or even stand. Now she serves as “director of lived experience” for Human in Motion Robotics, the company founded by two professors from Simon Fraser University that developed the XoMotion.

“For the last 250, almost 300 years — ever since someone invented the wheelchair — mobility for the disabled has meant, ‘Here, sit in this,’” Angus says. “That shouldn’t be acceptable. We shouldn’t leave people seated, especially when they’re still able-bodied or recovering from injury or disability.

“You know how you feel after a 14-hour flight, how you can’t wait to get out of that little seat? Well, imagine living the rest of your life in an airplane seat. That’s what it feels like.

“I was told there was no point in trying to recover any lower-body function. A wheelchair and a handful of fentanyl for the pain? That didn’t seem right to me. I could already see the sedentary effects of being stuck in a chair. The limitations they talked about were based on a history where they’ve never seen recovery, so they assume it’s not possible. I thought: What if I look beyond what we have today? How do I get around this?

“Ten years ago, ‘wearable robotics’ sounded like science fiction — Iron Man, The Terminator. In the movies, the robot was always a threat. But now I look around a crowd and think, ’You’re all going to end up with a motion disability someday, because of aging.’”

“Imagine XoMotion 2.0 and 3.0,” I nudge her.

“It will be your everything,” Angus responds. “A device that walks out of your closet, sits beside your bed. I see it as my total gym, my physiotherapist, my trainer — everything. You’ll just customize it. Download the apps you want. Order it like a Tesla online. It shows up at your door and says, ‘How can I help you today?’

“Some people worry we’ll lose human connection to robots. But to me, they’ve given me back my connection. My husband spent so much time doing the things I couldn’t do. Now, I’m always trying to convince someone to race me. We’re not kidding around anymore. The future is now.”

She tells me about a lab at U of Alberta that just received $24 million to develop “soft robotics,” wearable, intelligent fabrics that sense weakness and actuate stiffness in artificial muscles.

“Is this ‘superhumanity’?” Angus asks. “Yes, absolutely. It gives people their lives back. It gives them strength — the ability to move themselves again. I’ve taken a quarter of a million steps across five countries. I can’t tell you the joy I feel when I’m in it. To see someone else get into an exoskeleton and stand up and walk — that is a superhuman feeling.

“To me, superhumanity means more than just augmenting your own strength or mobility. It’s about being strong enough to support others — to bring strength to the rest of humanity. People focusing more on one another.

“Sometimes I consider cutting off my legs — they’re a burden to me now. They don’t work. If I could get that motion another way, I would. You’re already attached to a piece of metal. I want it enhanced. I want it all.

“Getting from a great idea in the lab to reality is hard. They say there aren’t enough people like me to justify the cost. But there are millions of us. And we’re told that the next iPhone matters more?”

“How would you define superhumanity?” I ask Megan Gallagher, the plane-crash survivor, as we reach the end of this flight of pain and possibilities. “A robot waltzing you around, is that superhuman?”

“I would define it as more what’s on the inside,” she says. “Like finding the humanity within actual people.”

We’re in a quiet room at a Calgary clinic, in the summer of supermen.

“It’s places like this, you know, right? Places like this that are trying to make people into superhumans, but not through brain chips and through a bunch of drugs and stuff, but by helping people become the best versions of themselves.

“I think the biggest superhuman would be someone who’s giving back and helping other humans. Not worrying about making themselves stronger, but what can they do to help everyone else out.”


Former CBC host Travis Dhanraj in St. John's in June 2023.

A national CBC host who resigned this past summer, accusing Canada’s public broadcaster of “performative diversity, tokenism,” and of putting up resistance when he booked conservative voices on his show, has filed a human rights complaint against the Crown corporation alleging it discriminated against him on the basis of race, colour and disability.

Travis Dhanraj, the 43-year-old former host of Canada Tonight, who is of Caribbean heritage, alleges in a complaint filed with the Canadian Human Rights Commission that he was harassed and bullied out of his job.

“Mr. Dhanraj took on the role of host of Canada Tonight because, based on representations made by CBC, he would be the driving force of the show, booking guests, and reflecting the range of opinions, lived experiences and interests of contemporary Canada. He believed he would be able to shape the editorial direction and vision of the program,” says his complaint.

Instead, Dhanraj “quickly realized that diversity was not a true practice of the CBC and would never be a part of their agenda. Throughout his employment, Mr. Dhanraj attempted to push for diversity (particularly related to political voices on the show) and racial equality. However, Mr. Dhanraj was consistently met with resistance at every point, and a toxic work environment in which harassment, bullying, and retaliation went unchecked

leading to his constructive dismissal,” the complaint alleges.

Dhanraj alleges that when he “attempted to book guests, particularly conservatives; he was met with resistance. After having the Deputy CPC leader on his show, he was threatened with discipline, including being pulled off the air,” according to his complaint.

“When the network aired an interview with the federal housing minister on Power and Politics, highlighting government talking points, Mr. Dhanraj’s attempt to book the conservative housing critic to present balance on the network was blocked.”

A CBC spokesperson said Friday that the public broadcaster has yet to receive independent confirmation that Dhanraj’s complaint has been filed.

“At this time, we can only reiterate in the strongest terms possible that CBC rejects his version of events,” Kerry Kelly said in an email.

“We are dismayed by these attacks on our hosts and newsroom leaders. We will vigorously defend against false claims, including allegations of political bias in guest selection.”

Dhanraj’s complaint alleges that it was apparent “that the CBC had systemic inequities, diversity issues, and unequal access to resources. Mr. Dhanraj quickly realized he had been chosen to host Canada Tonight because the CBC expected him to be the ‘token’ brown man. As such, Mr. Dhanraj requested a (diversity, equity and inclusion) investigation on February 20, 2024, but no such investigation took place. When Mr. Dhanraj met with CBC management in February 2024, he was sidelined. Management accused him of putting up a ‘crusade’ and he was told to ‘work within the system’ rather than challenge it. In other words, he was expected to put his head down and be compliant.”

After Dhanraj took to the social media platform X on April 19, 2024, writing that CBC President Catherine Tait declined an invitation to be on his show, he alleges “CBC began an intense investigation against Mr. Dhanraj to explore possible violations of its policies and journalistic standards and temporarily removed Mr. Dhanraj from the air.”

That removal and its associated “humiliation,” along with pressure to sign a non-disclosure agreement, “all took a drastic toll on Mr. Dhanraj’s mental health,” his complaint alleges.

“As a result of the CBC’s actions and refusal to address his toxic discriminatory and harassing workplace, Mr. Dhanraj had to take a medical leave in July 2024.”

That December he “returned to full-time hours after requiring months of treatment. Within the first week of his return, he was immediately retaliated against for not signing the NDA that CBC had tried to force him to sign before his medical leave. CBC permanently removed Mr. Dhanraj as the host of Canada Tonight and decreased his remuneration without the 30-day written notice stated in his contract, derailing his career,” his complaint alleges, which notes the Canada Tonight job paid Dhanraj “an annual base salary of $92,945.36,” plus a $43,000 top up, an overtime buyout of $10,000, and up to $10,000 in wardrobe allowance.

This past spring, his complaint alleges, “CBC once again attempted to coerce Mr. Dhanraj into signing an NDA. They erroneously claimed that Mr. Dhanraj ‘owed them’ $30,000 in ‘overpayments’ and attempted to weaponize this by trying to get him to sign an NDA and resign under duress while on medical leave by claiming that they would then waive ‘coming after him’ for the $30,000.”

According to Dhanraj, “he had no choice but to involuntarily resign.”

He’s seeking “damages for past and future wage loss as a result of discrimination and retaliation, in addition to damages for his pain and suffering.”

He also wants the CHRC to order CBC to “undergo a comprehensive investigation and review of its (diversity, equity and inclusion) and workplace harassment policies,” and ” implement a robust whistleblower policy to protect CBC employees … like Mr. Dhanraj who have blown the whistle on systemic issues of harassment, abuse, tokenism and intimidation.”

Dhanraj’s lawyer, Kathryn Marshall, said Friday she hopes to see a response from the CBC this fall.
She hasn’t put a dollar figure yet on what Dhanraj hopes to see out of the human rights case.
“His damages are still crystallizing,” Marshall said. “He actually is still being paid by the CBC because they haven’t accepted his resignation.”

Dhanraj “remains a unionized employee, currently on leave,” Kelly, the CBC spokesperson, said. “His lawyer has been aware for many weeks of what is required for CBC to process his resignation, however, CBC to this date has received no response on the matter.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


PQ leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon speaks as Alex Boissonneault is sworn-in as MNA for the riding of Arthabaska after a recent byelection at the National Assembly, in Quebec City on Thursday, Aug. 28, 2025.

OTTAWA — Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon told leaders of Alberta’s pro-independence movement that he’ll recognize a free and independent Alberta if he becomes Quebec’s Premier, the National Post has learned.

Plamondon’s office confirms that he met with three leaders of the pro-independence Alberta Prosperity Project (APP)

— Mitch Sylvestre,  Dennis Modry and Jeffrey Rath — in Calgary on Thursday evening and affirmed his support for an independent Alberta.

He also indicated that his government will back Alberta in separation negotiations with Ottawa, if a provincial referendum on independence succeeds.

Plamondon was in Calgary to kick off a two-day visit to Alberta.

Rath said he was “pleasantly surprised” by how like-minded Plamondon was on the subject of federal bloat and overreach.

“He seems to have come to the exact same conclusions that we have about provincial fiscal capacity being absorbed and wasted through the grossly bloated federal bureaucracy in Ottawa,” said Rath.

Plamondon has

vowed to redirect billions

in “wasteful” federal spending to Quebec’s coffers as premier.

Rath said that the audience with the PQ leader underscores the APP’s “significant leadership role” in the Alberta independence movement.

He added that Quebec’s backing could be a game changer in post-referendum negotiations with Ottawa.

“If you put Alberta and Quebec together, that’s more than a third of Canada’s population getting the ball rolling from the start,” said Rath.

Rath said he wasn’t worried about ideological or cultural differences derailing his group’s budding alliance with the social democratic PQ.

“What really struck me from that meeting yesterday is that there’s far more that unites us than divides us. And the big thing that we really have in common is being fed up with our (provincial) economies being raided by folks in Ottawa who are only interested in taking as much money as they can,” said Rath.

He added he’d gladly return the favour when the time comes and recognize an independent Quebec.

“(Quebec’s) entitled to whatever form of democracy they want to have,” said Rath.

Plamondon said earlier on Thursday, at a talk at the University of Calgary’s School of Public Policy, that Alberta’s future in Canada is “up to Albertans.”

He also

praised Alberta Premier Danielle Smith

for “play(ing) her cards very well” in representing Alberta’s interests on the national stage.

The PQ is

well ahead in the polls

, with a provincial election expected for next fall. Plamondon has promised to hold a referendum on Quebec’s independence in his first term as premier.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A container with frozen embryos and sperm stored in liquid nitrogen is removed at a fertility clinic in Fort Myers, Fla., Tuesday, Oct. 2, 2018.

Reviews and recommendations are unbiased and products are independently selected. Postmedia may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page.

Canadian women are changing the conversation around when and how they want to have babies, with many of them opting to freeze their eggs.

And more and more, led by Gen Z, they’re having the conversation online.

Calgary Herald reporter Devika Desai joins Dave Breakenridge to discuss why the women of Gen Z are freezing their eggs, and how social media communities on apps like Tik Tok are helping them foster conversation and find support.

Background reading:
Why Gen Zs are freezing their eggs and sharing their stories

Subscribe to 10/3 on your favourite podcast app

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Salt Media President and Nectar First CEO Jordan Bortolotti.

Like their partners in the Canadian news industry, the country’s media agencies are undergoing unprecedented transformation. The National Post is holding conversations with leaders of Canada’s largest agencies on the fast-changing fundamentals. This week, Rebecca Harris speaks to Jordan Bortolotti, co-founder of media services and technology company Nectar First (N1), which was recently acquired by Salt XC, a media and experience agency. Bortolotti was named president of Salt Media and remains CEO of Nectar First (a division of Salt Media):

What are your top priorities in your new role as president of Salt Media?

I see a once-in-a-generation opportunity. With consolidation among the media-holding companies, we’re seeing declining trust — and their model is stressed.

Our vision is to build a hybrid model that puts clients first and democratizes technology like AI rather than gatekeeping. We believe in building inside our clients’ business to help them create competitive advantage and power the next generation of media.

We have two brands: Salt is our full-service hybrid media agency built for 2030. Nectar builds the technology backbone — AI agents, workflow automation, measurement products like our next generation AI-powered MMM (mixed media modelling) and an ROI forecasting tool. We’re doing a lot of work with AI as it pertains to media planning, buying and optimizing. Together, we’re a new kind of media group: fully integrated, tech-enabled and designed to scale globally. So, I’m trying to build a culture, both internally and with our clients, to embrace this revolutionary time.

How are you integrating AI and where do you see it making the biggest impact in media planning and buying?

AI is not just a buzzword for us — it’s already in production. We’ve built and shipped an AI Agent Layer that handles everything from creative production and audience segmentation to trafficking, campaign optimization, measurement, quality assurance and governance. It’s live today with clients across categories like CPG, retail and pets.

Looking ahead, I think AI is going to 10 times the output of human media teams. It’s really good at automating the work people don’t like to do, so they can focus on the work they do like to do. My vision is a hybrid world where we have creative and strategic thinkers plugged into systems that help us work faster, deploy more personalized, strategic marketing communications and tackle our clients’ diverse business challenges. Previously, we’ve been limited by how much capacity our human beings can work on their business.

For us, hybridity means keeping humans in the loop but scaling our expertise, so every single client gets the benefit of our smartest thinkers. We also know that robots make mistakes. Part of our vision for the future is allowing human beings to supervise, enhance and continue adding to the world of AI. Our flywheel includes multiple checkpoints to keep our AI agents on track.

I do believe that we’ll be able to take on more work for less cost. One example is what we’re doing in media planning. We built a fully automated media planner that’s integrated into several major platforms, and we train it on our clients’ data. What’s interesting is what used to take agencies weeks, we’re now doing in a matter of seconds. It gets us 80 per cent of the way there and then humans do the 20 per cent, the hard work — looking at it and thinking strategically.

With so many platforms fighting for consumer attention — from social media to streaming services — what’s helping brands break through today?

There’s a systemic shift happening; we’ve moved into an incredibly fragmented world where attention is fractured. At the same time, we have content overload. There are so many things happening in so many different feeds, all at the same time.

We have focused on two key areas. First, we believe live experiences and events are going to become much more prominent for brands. So, we’ve separated our business into two groups: experiences and media. We think experiences — tied to carefully targeted and placed media, with strong measurement capabilities — are going to be a unique offering and a way to break through in the future. In a world where we can easily generate AI videos, I think there will be a swing the other way. People are going to crave authentic, real human experiences.

Secondly, there is no longer “One message to hit them all.” We need to break through during the times and places where people are paying attention, using storytelling tactics and entertainment tailored to their needs. The everyday consumer is so used to seeing a personalized feed — whether it’s in their Netflix, YouTube or TikTok algorithm — that when an advertiser tries to infiltrate or hang out in that ecosystem, it can be awkward if you don’t do it authentically and don’t move at a speed that consumers are used to, with a cultural lens that consumers expect.

Our client Kraft Heinz has done an incredible job of doing marketing that matters. One example is the ‘Wienie 500,’ where Oscar Mayer Wienermobiles raced ahead of the Indy 500. It came out of their internal group and their CMO, Todd Kaplan, who is a visionary creative. This became a must-watch event. It’s a very short news cycle — these things come and go in 24 hours — but the impressions they were able to generate, and the brand love they were able to build, were huge. For brands, it’s about understanding the community — like racing fans — looking at your brand assets and where you can authentically play, and the Wienermobile is a perfect example of that.

Can you share your predictions for what’s next for the industry?

Retail media is powering a third wave of digital, alongside search and social. The media world has focused a lot on following people around the internet — building, tracking and selling profiles to advertisers. Now, we’re moving from identity to opportunity — not to follow individuals personally, but to focus on the opportunities when people are making purchase decisions. Retailers have been successful at monetizing their data and creating multi-billion-dollar advertising products, and that’s just the beginning. We’re going to see banks and financial institutions enter this space and put out compelling media offerings. I think we’ll see anyone that owns the point of sale or transaction get into the space. We’re calling it retail media, but it’s more about commerce media or unified media.

As we enter the age of AI, it will become almost impossible for consumers to know what’s real versus generated. So, another trend that’s going to be prominent is this idea of live moments in the real world. A great example is our current fan zone experience at Rogers Stadium. Consumers can film and share their live experiences at the event, and we’re able to create a curated, customized video that blends their content with real, authentic footage from that day at the concert. This custom video can then be shared with their friends.

We talk a lot about people as media. In a new world that’s a sharing economy and has endless amounts of content, people become your greatest and most important sources of media because they’re at your event with their cellphones. They’re capturing and posting it organically online, and as a brand, you’re able to intercept those moments of brand love and amplify them.

Read the rest of the series of conversations with leaders of Canada’s largest media agencies on where the business is going next: 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


As the manhunt for Charlie Kirk's killer continues, new video appears to show the suspected shooter fleeing the roof of a nearby building.

“I think, with a high degree of certainty, we have him in custody,” the U.S. president said on Fox News Friday morning.

Donald Trump appeared on the daily talk show Fox & Friends and was asked if there had been any developments in the assassination of Conservative activist Charlie Kirk in Utah. Although Trump didn’t reveal any details he said someone very close to the suspect is said to have turned him in. That person went to the suspect’s father, who is said to have approached a U.S. Marshal.

The suspect is aged 28 or 29 years old, Trump said.

Trump said the information was made available to him five minutes before he was set to appear on the Fox News show. He said he hopes the killer gets death penalty. “Kirk was the finest person and he didn’t deserve this,” the U.S. president said, adding that Kirk was like a son to him.

The investigators released a

series of photos and video of the suspect

they believed assassinated the 31-year-old Trump ally as he spoke to students gathered in the courtyard of the Utah Valley University in Orem.

“We cannot do our job without the public’s help right now,” Utah’s Governor Spencer Cox said during a press conference on Thursday. “The public has answered our call for action.”

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has received over 7,000 tips and leads, Cox said.

The 31-year-old activist was killed by a single shot on Wednesday in a “targeted attack” that the governor of Utah called a political assassination. The suspected gunman fired from the rooftop, investigators said.

Kirk was the co-founder of Turning Point USA, a nonprofit political organization. At the time of the fatal incident, he was speaking at a debate at Utah Valley University. He was shot in broad daylight on the university campus and pronounced dead at a hospital a few hours later.

Kirk’s casket aboard Air Force Two arrived in Phoenix Thursday night. Vice president JD Vance helped carry the casket alongside other uniformed service personnel. Vance’s wife Usha stepped off the plane holding the hand of Kirk’s widow Erika.

Vance on social media talked about his friendship with Kirk that began in 2017 when Kirk sent a message to Vance on X after his appearance on Tucker Carlson show. He “told me I did a great job … and that moment of kindness began a friendship that lasted until today,”

Vance posted online

on Wednesday.

 Vice President JD Vance, right, Second Lady Usha Vance, center, and Erika Kirk, holding a cross on a chain, deplane Air Force Two, carrying the body of Charlie Kirk, the CEO and co-founder of Turning Point USA who was shot and killed, Thursday, Sept. 11, 2025, in Phoenix.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A general view of a wreath laid by mourners outside the U.S. Embassy in Pretoria on September 11, 2025 following the fatal shooting of US youth activist and influencer Charlie Kirk while speaking during an event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, United States.

It had been more than a day since Charlie Kirk was gunned down and the main clues so far were a palm print, a shoe impression and a high-powered rifle found in a wooded area promoting authorities to seek the public’s help. That was until Donald Trump made the announcement that the suspect is in custody.

Here are the latest updates in the fatal shooting of 31-year-old Conservative activist Charlie Kirk:

People celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death could lose their U.S. visas

Existing visas could be revoked or denied of people celebrating Kirk’s death, Deputy Secretary of State

Christopher Landau posted on X

Thursday.

“In light of yesterday’s horrific assassination of a leading political figure, I want to underscore that foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country. I have been disgusted to see some on social media praising, rationalizing, or making light of the event, and have directed our consular officials to undertake appropriate action,” Landau posted on X.

He urged the people on the social media platform to highlight such comments by “foreigners to my attention so that the State Department can protect the American people.”

Trump says Kirk’s suspected killer is in custody

“I think, with a high degree of certainty, we have him in custody,” the U.S. president said on Fox News Friday morning.

Donald Trump appeared on the daily talk show Fox & Friends and was asked if there had been any developments in the assassination of Conservative activist Charlie Kirk in Utah. Although Trump didn’t reveal any details he said someone very close to the suspect is said to have turned him in.

Trump said the information was made available to him five minutes before he was set to appear on the Fox News show. He said he hopes the killer gets death penalty. “Kirk was the finest person and he didn’t deserve this,” the U.S. president said, adding that Kirk was like a son to him.

Utah governor’s plea for help to catch Kirk’s killer

The investigators released a series of photos and video of the suspect they believed assassinated the 31-year-old Trump ally as he spoke to students gathered in the courtyard of the Utah Valley University in Orem.

“We cannot do our job without the public’s help right now,” Utah’s Governor Spencer Cox said during a press conference on Thursday. “The public has answered our call for action.”

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has received over 7,000 tips and leads, Cox said. Director of FBI Kash Patel was also in attendance but did not speak. Cox said that the last time authorities received this many tips was during the Boston Marathon bombing in 2013.

A US$1,00,000 award is being offered for information leading to the arrest, Cox said.

 A video posted Wednesday appears to show a person fleeing a rooftop at Utah Valley University moments after Charlie Kirk was shot.

The 31-year-old activist was killed by a single shot on Wednesday in a “targeted attack” that the governor of Utah called a political assassination. The suspected gunman fired from the rooftop, investigators said. Images of the suspect were released Thursday.

Kirk was the co-founder of Turning Point USA, a nonprofit political organization. At the time of the fatal incident, he was speaking at a debate at Utah Valley University. He was shot in broad daylight on the university campus and pronounced dead at a hospital a few hours later.

Kirk’s casket aboard Air Force Two arrived in Phoenix Thursday night. Vice president JD Vance helped carry the casket alongside other uniformed service personnel. Vance’s wife Usha stepped off the plane holding the hand of Kirk’s widow Erika.

Vance on social media talked about his friendship with Kirk that began in 2017 when Kirk sent a message to Vance on X after his appearance on Tucker Carlson show. He “told me I did a great job … and that moment of kindness began a friendship that lasted until today,”

Vance posted online

on Wednesday.

 Vice President JD Vance, right, Second Lady Usha Vance, center, and Erika Kirk, holding a cross on a chain, deplane Air Force Two, carrying the body of Charlie Kirk, the CEO and co-founder of Turning Point USA who was shot and killed, Thursday, Sept. 11, 2025, in Phoenix.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Charlotte Kates, a co-founder of Vancouver-based Samidoun, which has been declared a terrorist entity by the Canadian government, at the funeral of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in Lebanon in February 2025.

OTTAWA — The Canadian government is “urgently” looking for a way to dissolve the not-for-profit status of Samidoun, a Vancouver-based anti-Israel organization that has been designed as a terror group, Industry Minister Mélanie Joly

announced on social media on Thursday

.

“It is completely unacceptable that any organization listed as a terrorist entity by the Government of Canada continues to exist as a federally registered not-for-profit organization,” wrote Joly. “I have therefore directed government officials to urgently look at any and all options to formally dissolve Samidoun as well as any and all listed terrorist entities in Canada.”

A year ago, Samidoun was designated as a terror group in both Canada and the United States. At the time, Khaled Barakat, whose wife Charlotte Kates is a director of Samidoun,

was also designated a terrorist

by the United States’ government. The group’s not-for-profit status has remained intact, though, infuriating Jewish advocacy groups.

Samidoun has been a prominent organizer of protests in Canada since the October 7 Hamas attacks in Israel.

B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish rights advocacy group,

thanked Joly for the move on social media

.

“For almost a year, B’nai Brith Canada has been calling for Samidoun’s not-for-profit corporation to be dissolved… Their continued existence as a corporation has made a mockery of our nation’s efforts to combat terrorism. Every day that the corporation exists is a blight on our society,” the group wrote.

“We look forward to the end of this sordid saga and to the implementation of legislative reform that will ensure that Canada never again finds itself in such an odious predicament.”

After Samidoun was designated a terror group last year, the Criminal Code prohibits anyone from providing financial services, money or property to the group. But Samidoun was still a registered not-for-profit in Canada with its registration page on the government of Canada website noting that it is a designated terrorist organization.

Advocates expressed cautious optimism about the move on Thursday.

“This is a welcome and long overdue move. For decades, terrorist groups, criminal organizations, and various other hostile actors have used Canada like an ATM to fundraise, mobilize, and carry on business in ways that undermine Canada’s national security,” said Casey Babb is the director of the Promised Land Project at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.

“There’s no reason whatsoever that organizations like Samidoun should be able to operate freely in this country while being a listed terrorist entity. It makes absolutely no sense, it undermines our security, it hurts our international reputation, and sends the message to other organizations that Canada is a great place if you want to get away with virtually anything — even terrorism.”

— With additional reporting from Tyler Dawson

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Parti Quebecois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon replies to Premier Legault's statement on U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs at the legislature in Quebec City, Tuesday, Feb. 4, 2025.

OTTAWA — Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon admits that the

 assassination

of U.S. conservative activist Charlie Kirk at a Utah university campus on Wednesday hit him extraordinarily close to home.

After all, Plamondon helped launch a group not too dissimilar from

Kirk’s Turning Point USA

as a young adult in the 2000s.

In 2007, he and two co-founders — now federal Industry Minister Melanie Joly and Stéphanie Raymond-Bougie —

launched Génération d’idées

: a civic organization dedicated to engaging 20 to 35-year-olds in the political process through healthy debate.

Plamondon moderated dozens of robust discussions on college campuses and other youth-filled venues across Quebec during his six years with the group.

Looking back, he acknowledges that the initiative is a relic of a lost era.

“I don’t think we could achieve today the culture of thinking and debating we had at Génération d’idées at the time, because it was a pre-social media period,” Plamondon told National Post on Thursday.

“The impact of social media, and socialization through social media … is it allows people to distort reality to fit their ideology and, afterwards, people who don’t agree become enemies,” said Plamondon.

Plamondon was speaking from Calgary, where he kicked off a

two-day visit to Alberta

with a talk at the University of Calgary’s School of Public Policy.

He said it was only fitting for him to open his remarks in Calgary with a nod to the bloodshed south of the border.

“It was important for me to mention that what happened to Utah was a stark reminder of how critical it was for me to be able to stand there at the University of Calgary and respectfully engage with a roomful of people who disagreed with me,” said Plamondon.

On the topic of higher education, Plamondon said that the corrosive effect of social media on our discourse goes hand-in-hand with the diminished emphasis on objective truth in certain corners of academia.

“If you’re not looking for the truth anymore, because you think the truth doesn’t exist or doesn’t matter, you can’t be a civilized and respectful environment for debate; it just doesn’t match,” said Plamondon.

Plamondon said that he hoped Kirk’s shocking assassination will be a wake-up call on both sides of the border.

“We need to acknowledge that there is a problem. And we need to acknowledge it right now, given what happened yesterday,” said Plamondon.

Plamondon said that part of his rationale for visiting Alberta was to engage with viewpoints that differed from his own.

“It struck me that Alberta is one of the most interesting places right now to answer questions about why Quebec’s sovereigntist movement is back and what we want,” said Plamondon.

“We might have differences as well, but that’s, in any case, very useful.”

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The post on X made by Ruth Marshall, an associate professor of religious studies and political science at University of Toronto, after the shooting death of U.S. conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

The University of Toronto says one of its professors who made a seemingly violent comment on social media in the wake of the assassination of influential American conservative activist Charlie Kirk is now on leave.

Kirk was speaking to a large crowd Wednesday on the campus of Utah Valley University when he was killed by a single shot to the neck.

Ruth Marshall, an associate professor of religious studies and political science at U of T, who posts on the platform X under the name “Dr Ruth Marshall is Kicking Against the Pricks,” allegedly took to the social media platform at 5:40 p.m. ET Wednesday to write: “Shooting is honestly too good for so many of you fascist c–ts.”

Kirk was shot at about 2:20 p.m. ET and U.S. President Donald Trump announced that he had died at around 4:40 p.m.

Marshall later reportedly deleted her post.

“The university took immediate action upon learning of the concerning social media posts of a University of Toronto professor,” said a written statement from U of T.

“The faculty member is now on leave and not on campus. The matter is being looked into and the university will not be commenting further.”

Marshall’s Wednesday shooting comment drew the ire of Ontario’s minister of colleges, universities, research excellence and security.

“Universities and their professors are supposed to foster critical thought, respectful debate, and be safe learning environments — and this professor’s violent rhetoric flagrantly flies in the face of that,” Nolan Quinn wrote on the social media platform X.

“I’ve been clear with the University of Toronto: they need to act.”

Marshall, who did not respond to interview requests Thursday, wrote later on X that her comment was not in response to Kirk’s assassination.

She also wrote that her shooting comment is an expression “referring to the vile and abject character of the person, not an act of killing.”

But the initial shooting comment from Marshall drew a lot of criticism on the platform where it originated.

“Fire Dr. Ruth Marshall, or I am pulling my kid from your university,” wrote one critic. “I won’t stand for this!”

“The evil of these people is almost too much to comprehend,” typed another.

One commenter urged people to write to U of T’s dean of arts to complain about Marshall’s shooting comment.

“Dr. Ruth Marshall is an excellent display of what is wrong in our education system,” another commenter said on X. “It is this kind of rot that needs to be purged.”