LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Conservative MP and Opposition House Leader Andrew Scheer speaks with reporters in the foyer of the House of Commons in Ottawa, Tuesday, Jan 7, 2025.

OTTAWA — Re-elected Conservative Andrew Scheer says the party is taking things “one step at a time” following its election loss, and expressed support for the party’s campaign manager sticking around.

“Jenni (Byrne) has a tremendous amount of support, and she did an incredible job,” he told National Post.

Scheer led the party from 2017 until 2019. He last served as the Conservatives’ house leader and has held his Regina seat since 2004, the same year Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre first entered Parliament.

Poilievre lost his Ottawa-area seat in Monday’s election and now plans to run for one in rural Alberta, following the party’s announcement that Damien Kurek, its MP-elect in Battle River-Crowfoot, would resign to allow the Conservative leader to return to Parliament.

Kurek, who was first elected in 2019, said he was resigning “temporarily” and planned to run in the safe Conservative seat in the next election.

Asked whether that means Poilievre will find a new riding for that race, Scheer referred to the statement, saying that Conservatives were taking things “one step at a time.”

“We’ll take the time to look at what happened specifically in Carleton, and along with what happened in many other areas where, with a couple of minor adjustments, we might have been able to win the seat.”

Poilievre has spent the days since Monday’s election speaking to those who were on the campaign, including candidates and MPs. He will meet his caucus for the first time next Tuesday, where it is also expected that the party will discuss who will replace Poilievre as Opposition leader in the House of Commons, with Scheer rumoured to be the favourite.

He declined to comment on the discussions, saying those matters are internal.

At Tuesday’s meeting, Conservatives will decide whether to adopt rules under the Reform Act, including one that would allow caucus to trigger a leadership vote.

Conservative MPs did so back in February 2022 after months of frustration under former party leader Erin O’Toole, which led to his ousting.

This time around, Poilievre enjoys a much higher level of support within caucus and the party more broadly.

Despite Monday’s loss, Conservatives made gains in the key battleground of Ontario, breaking through in areas like the Greater Toronto Area and southern Ontario. The party also reached historic heights in terms of how many votes it received, capturing 41.3 per cent of the vote, compared to the Liberals’ 43.7 per cent.

Supporters also point to how Poilievre animated many young people and workers in the trades to vote Conservative, which they traditionally have not, signalling the start of a new voter coalition for the party.

Still, the race Conservatives’ fought was much closer than the commanding lead the party enjoyed for the year-and-a-half leading to the election, which was collapsed by Canadians’ attitudes about U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade war and the arrival of Prime Minister Mark Carney, who replaced deeply unpopular former prime minister Justin Trudeau.

“If you had told anybody in that Conservative caucus, two-and-a-half years ago, three years ago, when Pierre took over leadership, that we’d get 42 per cent in the next election, we’d all be thrilled.”

In terms of any changes the party might make, Scheer emphasized it still remains early days.

“We’re going to go over those results, and then we’re going to figure out where we need to make adjustments,” he said.

“We just need to find what are the missing pieces that will get us the next four or five per cent to form government, but to build on this incredible base that Pierre has built.”

 Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and his wife, Anaida, rally with hundreds of supporters in Calgary on April 25, 2025.

Some insiders and others within the party have expressed frustration over the national campaign, including decisions around nominations made in the lead up to the election. Debates also took place over how much Poilievre should focus on the carbon tax and affordability issues versus Trump’s tariffs.

Asked whether Byrne, a longtime Conservative operative who worked as the party’s national campaign director and was senior advisor to Poilievre before the election, had the support of Conservatives to remain in her role, Scheer said she has “tremendous support.”

“She led an incredible team,” he said. “She has given so much for the movement and for the party.”

Scheer said he “hopes” she sticks around. “These are early days after the election and she’s worked so hard for the party. She’s continuing to work. She’s continuing to do everything she can to help Pierre become prime minister and help the Conservatives form governments.”

Since election night, long-simmering tensions between the federal Conservatives and Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservatives have blown into open. Ontario MP-elect Jami Jivani t

old CBC News on Monday

that Ford inserted himself into the election through comments he made about the Conservatives’ campaign, calling him a “hype man” for the Liberals.

His comments were met with applause at the Conservatives’ election night headquarters.

Asked about Jivani’s comments, Scheer says he understands the frustration felt by Ontario MPs. It is “always disappointing” when conservatives at “any levels” are not “as helpful as they can be during elections,” he said.

“The election’s over, we’ve got some period of time before the next election starts and the sooner that conservatives can get together, dissect what happened during the campaign, what needs to be done next, the better for the entire conservative movement.”

National Post

staylor@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.


Bradley Lowe died Dec. 15, 2023, after overdosing in a tent pitched in front of Halifax's City Hall.

A tent does not qualify as an accommodation, according to a Nova Scotia judge who ruled against the estate of a homeless man who died

in one

of an overdose in downtown Halifax ten days before the Christmas of 2023.

Bradley Lowe had been living off $380 per month in social assistance. Two months before he died, he applied for the enhanced standard household rate of $950 per month. But a caseworker with the province rejected his application, as did Nova Scotia’s Assistance Appeal Board, four days after his death. His estate pressed on with the fight, taking it to the Nova Scotia Supreme Court.

“The applicant’s request for a declaration that Mr. Lowe was living in a tent that he owned, had a disability, and was otherwise in need, meant that he qualified (for the larger rate) from the date of his application (Oct. 23, 2023) until his death … is denied,” Justice John Keith wrote in a recent decision.

“A tent does not qualify as an ‘accommodation’ (under the province’s) regulations. As such, Mr. Lowe did not own accommodation for the purpose of receiving enhanced benefits under this section.”

The judge’s May 1 decision notes Lowe “lived in poverty, suffered from chronic psychological disabilities, and survived off the minimal level of social assistance ($380 per month) available under Nova Scotia’s Employment Support and Income Assistance Act.”

While Lowe had been camping on the grounds of Victoria Park, he died in one of the many tents pitched at the time on the Grand Parade in front of Halifax’s City Hall, about a 10-minutes’ walk away from where he’d been sleeping.

“On Friday, December 15, 2023, Mr. Lowe died destitute in this tent,” Keith said. “He was 30 years old.”

To qualify for the enhanced standard household rate of $950 per month, applicants must be a “single recipient” and “must rent or own their own ‘accommodation,’” said the decision.

They must also fall within one of the following categories: be a person with a disability; “a chronic mental, cognitive or physical condition that limits participation in employment services;” be “fleeing an abusive situation, be 55 or older; or be “a young person receiving assistance.”

Lowe made his application for enhanced benefits under the disability category.

“The medical evidence before the board confirmed that Mr. Lowe suffered from chronic disabilities including a ‘generalized anxiety disorder’ and ‘polysubstance use disorder,’” Keith said.

“A dispute arose around the third and final precondition and, in particular, whether Mr. Lowe was renting or owning his ‘accommodation.’ The question narrowed further to whether the word ‘accommodation’ in (Nova Scotia’s) regulations included Mr. Lowe’s tent.”

After Lowe died, his lawyer, Vince Calderhead, “asked that the (Assistance Appeal Board) still render a decision because, he correctly observed, his estate retained an entitlement to past benefits should the appeal succeed,” said the judge. “During these proceedings, counsel added that the personal representatives for Mr. Lowe hoped that this legal challenge might also bring a measure of additional meaning to Mr. Lowe’s unfortunate death and highlight the plight of others caught in similar circumstances.”

But the board dismissed Lowe’s appeal six days before the Christmas of 2023.

“It confirmed that Mr. Lowe was entitled to minimum benefits for ‘essentials’ but not enhanced benefits,” Keith said.

Lowe’s estate filed an application for judicial review.

“The central question that the confronted the board is the same in this application for judicial review: does the word ‘accommodation’ (in the province’s regulations) properly interpreted, include a tent? If so, any ‘single recipient’ who owns a tent and otherwise falls within the specific categories (Lowe applied under) would be entitled to enhanced benefits.”

The court had to define the word accommodation, said the judge. “And that is certainly the dominant consideration in these reasons. However, beyond the principles and constraints which guide the court’s authority to interpret legislation, a more profound debate quickly emerges around distributive justice and the related legal, societal, practical, and moral challenges which arise when sharing the province’s wealth with those who are vulnerable, suffering, or have fallen behind.”

Many of those “broader issues go beyond the court’s jurisdiction to interpret legislation and, as well, the court’s authority to grant the relief sought,” Keith said. “Of course, this does not diminish their importance, but it does mean the legislature assumes greater responsibility for developing a more comprehensive response, if appropriate.”

Calderhead argued “that the word ‘accommodation’ must be afforded a broad and liberal meaning, consistent with the law and, as well, the purpose and context of the legislation,” said the decision. “Applying this approach, the applicant concludes, results in an interpretation of the word ‘accommodation’ which is sufficiently expansive to include Mr. Lowe’s tent.”

Nova Scotia’s Department of Community Services (DCS) “insists that the board’s interpretation of ‘accommodation’ as being synonymous with ‘home’ is reasonable and should be upheld.”

The department argued “that the court must be pragmatic and realistic in its approach to statutory interpretation,” said the decision. “Broadening the interpretation of ‘accommodation’ to include a tent, DCS argues, would result in an unintended and absurd outcome in which entitlement to social assistance becomes so expansive as to be virtually incapable of effective oversight and responsible financial governance.”

The judge sided with the province.

“In my view and based on the wording and structure of the regulations, the word ‘accommodation’ is very clearly not so broad in scope,” Keith said. “A tent cannot qualify as an ‘accommodation’ and owning a tent does not entitle a recipient to household benefits.”

According to the judge, “it is unreasonable and illogical to conclude that a recipient would be entitled to receive greater assistance by living in a tent.”

While Keith found the Assistance Appeal Board “fell into error by mistakenly asserting that the word ‘accommodation’ in (the province’s regulations) was synonymous with the word ‘home,’” he dismissed the application.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre will be running in an Alberta byelection as a means to gain entrance to the House of Commons, after losing his seat in the recent general election.

Alberta MP Damien Kurek is stepping aside to allow the Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre to run in a byelection for the Battle River–Crowfoot riding. The move comes after Poilievre lost his Ottawa-area seat in this week’s general election.

The Battle River–Crowfoot seat is considered one of the

safest Conservative ridings in the country

, making it a strategic choice for a leader’s return. It’s not the first time a party leader has gained entry to the House of Commons this way.

The practice of an MP resigning to create a vacancy for a party leader generally occurs only when a major party leader does not hold a seat in the House of Commons after an election or leadership change. It usually follows an unexpected loss during an election or a leadership change outside of a general election cycle.

What is a federal byelection?

A federal byelection is

a special election

held in a single riding to fill a vacancy in the House of Commons that occurs between general elections.

Vacancies can arise when a sitting Member of Parliament (MP)

dies, resigns, or becomes ineligible

to serve for another reason, such as accepting a salaried position in the civil service.

The

process begins when

the Speaker of the House of Commons notifies the Chief Electoral Officer of the vacancy. The governor general acting on the advice of the prime minister and Cabinet then sets the date for the byelection, which must be at least 36 days after the writ is issued and no more than 50 days later.

If a vacancy occurs within nine months of a scheduled general election, no byelection is called and the seat remains vacant until the general election.

Byelections follow similar rules to general elections: political parties nominate candidates, campaigns are held, and eligible voters in the affected riding cast ballots to choose their new MP.

Why would an MP vacate his or her seat?

Most MPs who leave do so for reasons unrelated to accommodating a leader.

An MP may

resign at any time

by submitting a signed declaration of resignation, either by making a statement on the floor of the House of Commons or by delivering the declaration to the Speaker of the House.

If the Speaker is absent or there is no Speaker, the MP can deliver the signed resignation to any two Members of Parliament, who then inform the Chief Electoral Officer. Then a writ for a byelection is issued.

An MP cannot resign if their election is being contested or until the period for contesting the election has expired.

The government is expected to call a byelection, with the campaign period lasting at least 36 days. The earliest a byelection can be called is 11 days after the resignation.

What happens after an MP resigns?

Once an MP officially resigns, they immediately cease to be a Member of Parliament and

lose all associated rights and privileges

, including the ability to participate in debates, vote, or serve on committees. They no longer receive an MP’s salary, benefits, or access to parliamentary resources.

The riding is left without direct representation in the House of Commons until a new MP is elected in the byelection. Constituents may experience a gap in representation, although the outgoing MP may continue to assist informally until the byelection occurs.

Stepping aside can be seen as a loyal act to the party, potentially leading to future political opportunities, such as appointments

or future nominations

. However, there is no guarantee of re-nomination if the MP plans to return in a future election.

What is the process for stepping aside to let a party leader run?

There are

no special legal or parliamentary rules

for an MP stepping aside specifically to allow a party leader to run in his/her seat. The process is the same as any other resignation, though the decision is often strategically coordinated within the party.

Here’s how it works:

  • An MP voluntarily resigns, creating a vacancy.
  • The party leader then runs as the party’s candidate in the resulting byelection.
  • This is typically done in a “safe seat” to maximize the leader’s chances of winning.
  • The government is expected to call a byelection promptly. (In this instance, Prime Minister Mark Carney has indicated he will do this.)

What are the historical precedents for this?

Former prime minister and Conservative leader Arthur Meighen attempted to re-enter Parliament via the

1942 York South byelection

after becoming party leader for a second time. However, he was defeated by CCF candidate Joseph Noseworthy, marking a significant upset in Canadian political history. (So,

disillusioned with politics, he retired again to devote himself to his business interests.)

In 1983,

Brian Mulroney

needed a seat in the House. He had been newly elected as the leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada. Nova Scotia MP Elmer MacKay stepped aside in the riding of Central Nova (a riding he had held since 1971). This was not Mulroney’s first connection with the eastern province. As a teen, he studied political science at St. Francis Xavier University in Antigonish.

Stephen Harper

won a byelection in Calgary Southwest in 2002 after becoming leader of the Canadian Alliance, which later merged into the Conservative Party.

The federal Liberals have also taken advantage of this avenue to get a leader into the House.

Jean Chrétien

, after becoming Liberal leader in 1990, won a byelection in the riding of Beauséjour, New Brunswick, to enter the House of Commons.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


A sign pointing to a polling station Montreal on Monday. Not everything went smoothly with voting in the federal election.

Election days, both Canadian and especially American, are among the opportunities Canadians take to express publicly their belief in Canada’s general superiority to their southern neighbour.

None of America’s gerrymandered districts, malfunctioning technology, hanging chads, hours-long queues to vote or endless legal battles for us. Just a paper ballot and a golf pencil and hand counting, and a result within hours of the polls closing.

Alas, Elections Canada did not cover itself in glory on April 28.

First, with polls still open in most of the country and many Canadians eagerly in search of information — information as basic as where to vote —

Election Canada’s website crashed

. Officials confirmed it wasn’t any kind of outside attack (good?), but rather an internal error (bad!).

And when it implemented a “contingency website,”

apparently designed for just such an eventuality, it lacked that most basic function: The ability to enter your postal code to find out where to vote.

Elections Canada’s website isn’t what you would call slick, and slickness absolutely should not be a goal. The pursuit of “better” government websites, to say nothing of apps, is one of the many places where public money goes to die in terror. When the website works, it works just fine. But if its antiquated front end bespeaks an antiquated back end, especially knowing what we know about foreign interference, parliamentarians need to get to the bottom of that.

 Elections Canada’s outdated-looking website crashed one election day.

Also this week, Elections Canada had to issue an extraordinary (or so you would think) statement confirming that it “

deeply regrets that some electors in Nunavik (in Quebec) were not able to cast their vote.”

Voting in the Far North involves fly-in polling stations. It’s complicated, important work to which no one south of 60 would ever give any thought — and Elections Canada never seems to give it enough thought, either. “Federal election voting closing @ 2:30 p.m. due to unforeseen circumstances,” a sign on the polling station in Salluit, Que., population 1,580, 62 degrees north latitude. Ho hum, no big deal.

“In several cases, it was not possible to recruit local teams. In other cases, harsh weather conditions have prevented access to communities,” Elections Canada said in a statement Monday. It has a contingency website, but not a contingency for harsh weather or lack of local poll workers in Nunavik? Ludicrous. What happens in a 

winter

 election?

This happened last time around too, notably in the northwestern Ontario riding of Kenora. “There were no polling stations on election day in three fly-in First Nations, including Pikangikum, Poplar Hill and Cat Lake,”

CBC reported in 2021

. “(And) voter cards … had incorrect information about polling stations.”

“Any time an elector misses their opportunity to vote, it is something we take seriously — something we take personally — and we’re working to ensure this doesn’t happen again,” an Elections Canada spokesperson told the public broadcaster.

“Any time an elector misses their opportunity to vote”? This isn’t like Burger King giving you fries instead of onion rings. This is the most simple, comprehensive failure Elections Canada could possibly make … and they made it again this week.

Not that this should make it any more or less concerning, since every vote is worth the same under law, but Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou is no sure-thing riding for any party. Only 2,197 votes

separated the Liberal winner

Mandy Gull-Masty from Bloc incumbent Sylvie Bérubé. It’s not inconceivable this disenfranchisement could at some point make the difference between a Liberal or Conservative government.

Voting by mail would be one obvious solution. But Canadians should never be forced to vote before election day. As is often the case nowadays, advanced polling opened for last Monday’s election before any party had even released its platform. Mail-in ballots must be received by election day to count, and while I’ve never been to Ivujivik, Que., 62 degrees north latitude, population 412, I’m guessing the mail service to Ottawa isn’t the most reliable thing in the world.

Perhaps the most obvious solution is to allow mail-in ballots postmarked no later than election day. If we have to wait a little longer for ridings with fly-in communities and other logistical challenges to be decided conclusively, so be it. But while voting by internet isn’t something we need or should be pursuing in general, surely that’s also a reasonable workaround option for places like Nunavik.

It’s not like we’re talking about very many people: just 89,087 in Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou, 61,962 in Kenora, 36,858 in Nunavut, 26,655 in Labrador. My Toronto riding has 121,703 people, incidentally. The population-per-riding across this vast democracy ranges from 36,858 in Nunavut to 38,583 in Prince Edward Island to 116,589 in Ontario. That’s not Elections Canada’s fault; that’s the not-very-compelling system they were given to administer. But it’s another great reason not to be too smug about our elections.

National Post

cselley@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.


Richard Le (47) (L), Linh Hoang (30) (R), and Katie Le (5) (M) died on the night of the Lapu Lapu Day Block Party in Vancouver, B.C. on April 26, 2025. Photo: GoFundMe page.

A B.C. teen who lost his parents and sister in the attack during the Lapu Lapu Day festival in Vancouver last Saturday has donated $266,000

raised from a GoFundMe page to other victims.

Andy Le, 16, lost his father Richard Le, 47, stepmom Linh Hoang, 30, and sister Katie Le, 5, after a driver allegedly rammed his SUV into the festival crowd, killing 11 people.

The annual event celebrates Filipino culture. Le was not there because he had

decided to stay home

to do his homework.

The

GoFundMe page

was set up to help raise money for Andy, the only surviving family member.

In a

YouTube clip

shared on the fundraising page, which has raised over $392,800, Andy said, “I would like to thank everyone who has donated to my GoFundMe campaign and from the bottom of my heart, thank you all so much…I truly appreciate each and every one of you, and I know that many other families are hurting too, which is why I’d like to donate $266,000 to other victims from my GoFundMe campaign.”

“I want to continue living with my grandparents, who (have) helped raise me, and truly love me. Thank you all so much for your support,” he added.

Toan Le — who set up the GoFundMe page — confirmed to

CBC Vancouver

that his sibling Richard (Andy’s father), Linh and Katie died in the attack. “(Andy’s) entire life just changed overnight,” Toan said.

Katie, who had just finished pre-school, was the youngest confirmed victim who died in the attack. “She was the life of the party. She was always so cheerful, happy. She always wants to play with her cousins,” Toan told the CBC. “We’re going to miss her so much.”

Paying tribute to Richard Le, Toan wrote on the GoFundMe page that his brother “was a dedicated father, badminton and tennis coach and real estate professional. He devoted his life to teaching young people the values of sportsmanship and team spirit. He served his community and clients with pride and always went out of his way to help others.”

He also wrote that Andy’s stepmother “was known for her kindness and gentle spirit. She had been planning a visit to see her family in Vietnam.”

Vancouver Police arrested Kai-Ji Adam Lo, 30, at the scene of the incident on Saturday. He was charged with eight counts of second-degree murder, though

police later said

they anticipate additional charges will be laid in the coming days or weeks.

New donations on the GoFundMe page for Andy were disabled

after raising $542,646.

An update on the page says its intention was “

to raise money to cover the funeral costs for Linh, Richard and Katie as well as to help pay for Andy’s education because he lost his dad who was the sole provider of the family and who was going to pay for his university costs … Once all costs related to this matter are accounted for, the remaining balance of the money will be donated to charity.”

Meanwhile, both GoFundMe and the Philippine Consulate General in Vancouver have been

warning of fraudulent fundraising efforts

by some people to make money off the tragedy by soliciting funds. The Consulate General said it found campaigns claiming to raise money for victims’ families using an image of the consulate’s “official message,” but it has not created or sanctioned any fundraising efforts.

GoFundMe created

a hub of verified fundraisers

, for the victims. The

B.C. government declared Friday, May 2 the provincial day of remembrance

and mourning for the victims of the attack.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney and his wife, Diana Fox Carney, leave Rideau Hall to cast their vote on Election Day on April 28, 2025 in Ottawa, Canada.

Prime Minister Mark Carney will soon move into Rideau Cottage, which was the home of Justin Trudeau from October 2015, when he was first elected as prime minister, to March 2025, when he resigned. Since 1951, every other prime minister preceding Trudeau has lived at 24 Sussex Drive. However, due to the need for extensive repairs, the official residence has not been in use since former prime minister Stephen Harper last resided there in 2015. Here’s what to know about Carney’s residences.

Where did Carney live when he ran for leader?

Carney is a longtime resident of Ottawa’s

Rockcliffe Park

, one of the wealthiest neighbourhoods in the country. His home there is just a 10-minute drive from Parliament Hill. The neighbourhood is home to politicians, diplomats, and business leaders. Its homes were designed by several famous architects and are surrounded by lush, spacious greenery.

 Ottawa’s Rockcliffe Park neighbourhood is a lush community with large estates.

What do we know about where he has been living since?

According to Daniel Savoie, a spokesperson for the Privy Council Office (PCO), since Carney first became prime minister when he was elected Liberal leader in March, he has been temporarily staying at an unspecified official guest residence, at the recommendation of the RCMP and other security officials.

Where is he moving?

After winning the federal election, Carney will be moving into Rideau Cottage, the PCO said.

 Rideau Cottage.

Why isn’t Rideau Cottage the official PM’s residence?

According to Parks Canada

, Rideau Cottage, which resides on the grounds of the Rideau Hall complex, was built in 1866 to 1867. Rideau Hall is the residence of the Governor General and Rideau Cottage was originally built as a residence for the Secretary of the Governor General.

The Cottage, which has generally been considered too small for official prime minister functions, would be

costly to turn into a permanent residence

for future prime ministers. It would require the creation of staff offices and other “residential infrastructure,” according to an internal government document obtained by The Canadian Press.

 The prime minister’s residence at 24 Sussex Drive in Ottawa as seen from a helicopter.

What’s wrong with 24 Sussex?

The building has been out of use since 2015. It was originally supposed to undergo repairs over the course of a few years, but a decade has since past. As of 2016, the building required significant upgrades to the windows, heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems, plumbing and electrical systems, fire suppression, universal accessibility, service area functionality and landscaping,

the Ottawa Citizen reported at the time.

The building was classified as being in “critical condition” in 2021.

According to the National Capital Commission

, in 2022, the building was closed for health and safety reasons. In May of 2023, the project to decommission the building started, with a planned finish of summer 2024. The project is now complete, and the building is empty. Some of what was included in the decommissioning was the removal and storage of heritage fabric, the removal of asbestos and the insulation of exterior walls.

What’s next for the prime minister’s official residence?

24 Sussex sits in disrepair despite it being completely decommissioned. Some believe it would be easier to pick a completely different residence as it would require tens of millions of dollars to make it usable as the official prime minister’s residence.

One of Trudeau’s final acts in office was to address the issue of 24 Sussex.

CBC reported

that the then prime minister asked Public Services and Procurement Canada to take over the project from the National Capital Commission and appoint an advisory committee to consider options for a new official residence, with a proposal due in January 2026.

Possible options include extensive renovations, building a new residence on the site of 24 Sussex, upgrading Rideau Cottage or choosing a different residence.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


A Southwest Airlines plane at San Francisco International Airport on April 24, 2025.

A Southwest Airlines flight from El Paso, Texas, to Houston was delayed by almost five hours on Wednesday after a passenger’s cellphone caught fire shortly before the planned takeoff time.

Southwest Airlines flight 2112 was due to depart El Paso at 7:20 AM local time, according to the

FlightAware website

.

In a statement to National Post, the Federal Aviation Administration said it would investigate the matter.

“Southwest Airlines Flight 2112 returned to its gate at El Paso International Airport in Texas around 7:50 a.m. local time on Wednesday, April 30, after the crew reported a passenger disturbance during their departure taxi,” the FAA said. “The flight was headed to Houston Hobby Airport.”

Despite the agency’s statement,

CBS News reported

that the cause was in fact a cellphone blaze.

The airline confirmed as much in a statement to National Post.

“Southwest Airlines Flight 2112 returned to the gate at El Paso International Airport on April 30 after the battery inside a passenger’s cell phone apparently ignited,” the airline said. “The Flight Crew quickly extinguished (the fire) and the other passengers disembarked normally at the gate. Southwest is working with the appropriate federal and local investigative agencies.”

It added: “Nothing is more important to Southwest than the Safety of our Customers and Employees.”

The passengers eventually left El Paso at 12:09 p.m. on a different Southwest plane, arriving in Houston at 3:01 p.m. local time after a standard flight duration.

A similar incident occurred on a Southwest flight just over five months ago, when a cellphone caught fire while one of the airline’s planes was still at the gate at Denver International Airport. That flight was also headed to Houston.

The

AviationA2Z website reported

that passengers in the rear of that aircraft evacuated using emergency slides and that one passenger suffered a minor injury during the evacuation process, while the passenger whose phone battery ignited received medical attention for burn injuries.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Premier Danielle Smith discusses Bill 53, the Compassionate Intervention Act, during a press conference, in Edmonton Tuesday April 15, 2025.

OTTAWA — Alberta Premier Smith vowed on Thursday to move forward with a legal challenge to Ottawa’s incoming clean electricity regulations, rekindling a fight with the just re-elected Liberal government over its decarbonization agenda.

“Today we are taking another step to protect Albertans livelihoods by challenging the constitutionality of (these) regulations in the Court of Appeal of Alberta, and we look forward to making our case,” Smith told reporters in Edmonton.

Smith revealed she was

readying a court challenge

shortly after the Liberals released their final draft of the clean electricity regs in December.

Smith said on Thursday that the decarbonization regulations, set to

come into effect in 2035

, would wreak havoc on Alberta’s

fossil fuel-heavy electricity grid

.

“These regulations set an emission limit that is completely unattainable and would make Alberta’s electricity system… more than 100 times less reliable than the province’s supply adequacy standard,” said Smith, citing a report from the

Alberta Electric System Operator

.

Roughly two-thirds of Alberta’s electricity

comes from natural gas

, according to Canada’s energy regulator.

A smaller but not insubstantial amount of roughly a fifth comes from coal and coke.

Smith said that, in their current form, the clean electricity regs would put Alberta “at serious risk of regular brownouts and blackouts during the cold dead of winter through the dog days of summer.”

Smith stressed that the costs of an unreliable power grid would be “grim” for millions across the province.

“Albertans would be left to freeze in the dark. In the depths of a minus 40 degree winter cold snap, families would be bundled up in their winter coats while sitting down for (a candlelit) dinner,” Smith warned.

“In the heat of summer… hospitals would be overwhelmed by the influx of patients suffering from heatstroke while trusting that their generators keep the lights on for their lifesaving equipment.”

Alberta’s electricity grid

came under severe strain

during a January 2024 cold snap, forcing the province to import power from both Saskatchewan and Montana.

Scrapping the clean electricity regs was one of nine demands Smith put forward to the

federal party leaders in March

, saying whoever emerged from April’s election as prime minister would need to address these issues within his first six months in office to “avoid an unprecedented national unity crisis.”

Smith said on Thursday that Prime Minister Mark Carney, the election’s winner, must “immediately commence” working with her government to reset Ottawa-Alberta relations from their acrimonious state under predecessor Justin Trudeau.

Carney failed to improve significantly on Trudeau’s performance in Alberta, with the Liberals holding steady at two seats in the province after Monday’s federal election.

He wasn’t asked about Smith’s ultimatum, or Ottawa-Alberta relations, at his first press conference since the election on Thursday.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks to his supporters after losing the Canadian Federal Election on April 29, 2025 in Ottawa, Canada.

OTTAWA — Seatless Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre will run in an Alberta byelection as Conservative MP Damien Kurek “temporarily” steps aside.

In a press release, Kurek, the

Battle River—Crowfoot

MP-elect, said he was relinquishing his seat for Poilievre because it’s “what’s best for Canada” and the riding. Kurek was first elected in the Alberta riding in 2019.

Poilievre lost his Ottawa-area seat to a Liberal challenger by more than 4,000 votes in Monday’s election.

“The people of Battle River—Crowfoot will be represented well by Pierre for the remainder of this Parliamentary session, and I will keep working with our incredible local team to do everything I can to remain the strong voice for you as I support him in the process, and then run again here in Battle River—Crowfoot in the next general election,” Kurek said in a statement.

At a press conference in Ottawa on Friday, Prime Minister Mark Carney said he would call a byelection as soon as possible and that the government would play “no games” with Poilievre’s quest to win a seat.

The prime minister could theoretically wait six months after an MP resigns before calling a byelection, which would keep Poilievre out of the House Commons until nearly the end of the year, but Carney said that wasn’t on the table.

“I’ve already indicated to Mr. Poilievre that if it’s the decision of him and the Conservative Party to trigger… a byelection, I will ensure that it happens as soon as possible. No games, nothing,” Carney said Friday.

Poilievre has been unusually quiet since his party failed in its bid to form government and he surprisingly lost his seat on Monday. He has not made a public appearance nor posted anything on social media since his concession speech early Tuesday morning.

The fact Kurek intends to run again in Battle River—Crowfoot suggests Poilievre may intend to run again in his longtime Ottawa-area riding of Carleton in the next general election.

More to come

.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


J.D. Vance and Jamil Jivani in 2019.

Conservative MP Jamil Jivani, who is a longtime friend of the U.S. vice president, says JD Vance shouldn’t visit Canada.

The revelation came when Jivani spoke to

Politico in an article published on Thursday

. “Right now we have strong political disagreements, and that’s kind of how it is,” he told the publication. He said it would not be “constructive” for Vance to visit, specifically his  Bowmanville—Oshawa North riding in Ontario, given the political climate between the two countries.

The U.S. and Canada have been in a months-long trade war, since President Donald Trump implemented tariffs on Canadian goods. Tensions remain high due to Trump’s ongoing rhetoric about his northern neighbours, calling for Canada to become the 51st state.

‘Hype man for the Liberal party’: Ontario Tory Jamil Jivani unloads on Premier Doug Ford

“They need to probably reconsider some of their rhetoric and their policy before coming to Canada. Our country should deserve more respect before being able to welcome them,” said Jivani, who met Vance at law school at Yale University 15 years ago.

The pair were so close, Jivani wrote in

a 2020 National Post article

, that he performed a Bible reading at Vance’s wedding. Jivani drew comparisons between Vance’s upbringing in Appalachia and his own upbringing in Toronto, surrounded by “children of middle- and working-class immigrants.”

“But my friendship with J.D. taught me that his Appalachian family and friends aren’t so different from my own,” Jivani wrote. “The challenges that many Appalachians experience — poverty, addiction, fatherlessness, inadequate health care — are challenges seen and felt by my loved ones, too.”

Speaking to Politico this week, Jivani said he hadn’t spoken to Vance “in a while” as they were both busy; however, he took umbrage with how Trump and Vance have spoken about Canada. He said it was a “problem for me personally.”

“I’m a proud Canadian. I’m focused on my community, and we’ll see what happens next,” he said.

Also on Thursday,

Jivani told CBC News

he would be open to using his connection with Vance to help the Liberal government smooth over tensions between the U.S. and Canada.

“JD and I were friends before politics and will be friends after politics. But we do have very strong political disagreements,” he said.

He added that “if the opportunity came where I thought I would make a positive difference, of course I would take it” and that his constituents would want him to do so.

“At this point, with a new government elected, it’s going to be up to the Liberal Party and Prime Minister Mark Carney to lead on behalf of Canada and I hope they will have good policies and a good approach to look out for these families affected by tariffs,” he said.

Jamil Jivani: JD Vance, My friend the hillbilly

Jivani kept his seat in

Monday night’s federal election

, when Liberal leader Mark Carney officially became prime minister. Jivani’s riding is deeply entrenched in the North American auto industry — an area that was threatened by Trump’s tariffs.

A 25 per duty on “imports of certain automobile parts from all countries” was expected to go into effect on May 3, but

U.S. Customs and Border Protection announced

an exemption Thursday for parts that are compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.