LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Jimmy Kimmel arrives for

Joe Rogan discussed the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel’s show on his podcast released on Tuesday. He called the situation “wild” and even said the joke that Kimmel made about U.S. President Donald Trump grieving Charlie Kirk was funny.

Rogan spoke to comic Andrew Santino during

a three-hour episode

, in which both the host and his guest touched upon what happened to Kimmel many times.

“This whole Jimmy Kimmel situation that is happening right now…Very wild.” said Rogan. “I definitely don’t think that the government should be involved ever in dictating what a comedian can or cannot say in a monologue.”

He warned that allowing this to happen to Kimmel meant that it could happen to anyone. “You don’t want to give that power away all of the sudden,” he said.

Kimmel’s show, Jimmy Kimmel Live!, was pulled from the air on Sept. 17 after he made comments about the murder of Kirk. The 31-year-old political activist and Trump ally was fatally shot while speaking at an event at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10 in Orem, UT. His alleged killer,

Tyler James Robinson

, has been charged with aggravated murder.

Kimmel’s

comments made in monologues

on Sept. 15 and Sept. 16 poked fun at how Trump was grieving, comparing him to how a “four-year-old mourns a goldfish.” Kimmel also accused the “MAGA gang” of trying to “characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

“It was funny,” said Rogan, referring to the goldfish joke. Kimmel showed a video clip of Trump being asked about Kirk’s death by reporters. Rather than discussing Kirk, the president flipped the conversation to discuss a new ballroom being constructed at the White House.

It was the set up to the joke that was the problem, said Rogan. Kimmel tried to make it a “knock on MAGA people” and the insinuation that the suspect was part of the “MAGA gang” was “inaccurate according to the narrative.” A day before the monologue, Rogan said

family members

of the alleged killer said he had been “wrapped up in hardcore leftist ideology.”

After six days, Kimmel’s show was

back on the air on Tuesday evening

.

Speaking to the audience,

he said

it was not his intention to “make light of the murder of a young man.” He also said that his show is not important, rather, what is important is that “we get to live in a country that allows us to have a show like this.” (Some stations barred the episode from airing and would continue to do so, the

New York Times reported

.)

Rogan said it was “crazy” for “people on the right” to be supporting the suspension, “because this will be used on you.”

“That’s the most toxic s–t I keep seeing online, where people are like, ‘Yeah, shut ’em down,’” said Santino.

Later in the episode, Rogan said he believed that the suspension helped Kimmel.

“It makes his show bigger. There’s much more support. I’m sure there’s a lot of hate as well, which is not fun,” he said. “My suspicion is they suspend it for a short amount of time and then they bring it back. He comes back to a standing ovation.”

Kimmel did receive a standing ovation on Tuesday night after his monologue.

He didn’t back down from making jokes about Trump. He mentioned the

escalator stopping

while Trump and First Lady Melania Trump were in New York for the UN General Assembly, as well as a teleprompter mishap. Kimmel referred to Trump as “Ramble-stiltskin,” for his wide-ranging, off-the-cuff “rant” at the UN.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Karen Espersen, right, the co-owner of Universal Ostrich Farms, speaks with supporters with her daughter, Katie Pasitney, at the farm in Edgewood, B.C., on Monday, Sept. 22, 2025. The farm has received a stay of a cull order.

Nearly 400 ostriches on the Universal Ostrich Farm in southern B.C. will be temporarily spared from slaughter while the Supreme Court of Canada decides whether to hear the farm owners’ appeal against the Canadian Food Inspection Agency cull order.

The court has granted a stay, which will prevent a cull from going forward until it decides whether it will grant the farm’s appeal application. If the appeal is heard, the stay will remain in place until a decision is finally rendered by the SCC justices, which could take

more than six months

.

Word of the

SCC stay arrived on the farm,

midday on Wednesday. Cheers went up from supporters as spokeswoman Katie Pasitney shared the news.

“Our lawyer called. The Supreme Court of Canada has granted us an interim stay,” she

posted to her Facebook

.

The development came a day after Pasitney and her mother, Karen Esperson, a co-owner of the farm, were arrested for refusing to leave the birds’ pen. They were later released.

In a statement given on Tuesday, the RCMP said two people were arrested for obstructing the CFIA agents from undertaking their duties.

The CFIA had served a

warrant on the owners

Monday and told the owners to leave.

The owners of Universal Ostrich Farms have been fighting the CFIA cull order prompted by an outbreak of avian influenza in December 2024 that killed 69 of their ostriches.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney is seen in a file photo from Aug. 26.

OTTAWA — The RCMP arrested a former Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) employee over the summer after he allegedly accessed Prime Minister Mark Carney’s personal data.

The federal police force confirmed on Wednesday that Ibrahim El-Hakim, a 23-year-old man living in Ottawa, has been charged with fraud over $5,000, an unauthorized use of his work computer, identity theft and trafficking in identity information.

News of the fraud was

first revealed by Quebec media outlets,

which accessed court documents in Montreal. National Post has not independently viewed these documents.

Cheryl Brean, director of communications of personal and commercial banking at RBC, said that the bank “independently identified unauthorized system access” and “took immediate action to engage authorities.” She said El-Hakim is no longer an employee.

The Mounties opened an investigation in early July 2025 following a complaint from RBC.

The findings showed that El-Hakim allegedly used the bank’s IT services for “criminal purposes, including consulting several bank profiles without authorization and participating in fraud,” RCMP Corporal Erique Gasse wrote in an email.

“Mr. El-Hakim is believed to have accessed, among other things, the personal data of Prime Minister Mark Carney,” said Gasse.

The RCMP spokesperson said El-Hakim was arrested on July 10, 2025, and released on a promise to appear with conditions. El-Hakim appeared at the Ottawa courthouse on Aug. 6, 2025, and is set to appear again on Oct. 1, 2025, in Ottawa, he said.

Gasse said further charges may be laid against the former RBC employee.

The investigation is being led by the Integrated National Security Enforcement Team (INSET), composed of specially trained members of the RCMP and other law enforcement partners, in Montreal because it involves the Prime Minister of Canada, he added.

“Our investigation did not lead us to believe there was any threat to the prime ninister’s safety or to national security in this case,” said Gasse.

RBC said it is working closely with law enforcement to support their investigation, something that the RCMP has confirmed.

The RCMP said that El-Hakim was not known to the police, but was unwilling to say at this time if he was part of a criminal organization.

“As the investigation is still ongoing, we cannot provide further details,” said Gasse.

The Prime Minister’s Office declined to provide any comment, referring the matter to the RCMP.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


A NordSpace crew member checks over the Taiga suborbital rocket during the first launch window in late August, 2025.

The first commercial rocket to blast off from Canadian soil doesn’t look like much.

Less than five metres tall — not even as tall as a two-storey house — the rocket, dubbed Taiga by its Canadian makers at Nordspace, will lift off from a scrubby corner of coastal Newfoundland, just outside the small town of St. Lawrence, about 350 km southwest of St. John’s. Its maiden voyage is expected to last about a minute, and it won’t even reach orbit.

Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield calls that a good start.

“I’m really impressed with the way that Nordspace is going about their business,” Hadfield said in an interview with National Post. “Not just building rockets, but also building a launch centre, a launch site, and working with municipal, provincial and federal government, Transport Canada, all the regulatory bodies, as well as doing a really good job of developing the technology.”

Nordspace’s first launch attempt was at the end of August. It was delayed at first by the close passage of Hurricane Erin, and then by a misfire detection mechanism that triggered prematurely and put the rocket into a safe state just before it was to lift off. Nordspace then had to obtain a new launch licence from Transport Canada.

“We are pleased to have arrived at this absolute final point which is difficult to test precisely, even with static fires, until the rocket is actually flown,” the company said on its website, announcing the scrub of the first attempt. “We will be back very soon!”

 Chris Hadfield helped Nordspace get off the ground. In return, they named a rocket engine after him.

The new launch window began on Sept. 20 and opens daily until Sept. 27 from 6:30 a.m. until noon and again from 3 p.m. to 7 p.m. local time. (Newfoundland’s time zone is 90 minutes ahead of Toronto and Montreal.)

High winds and clouds have been the main reasons for the delays this time. The rocket almost blasted off on Tuesday, “but was delayed for most of the launch window due to two fishing vessels entering the marine exclusion zone at different points, and a pad anomaly which caused a minor fire that required cleanup and inspection in collaboration with the local authorities and inspectors,” the company said on its website.

Hadfield, who has been to space three times, including a stint as commander of the International Space Station, has more than a casual interest in Nordspace’s launch. He helped found a technology incubator company called the Creative Destruction Lab, which in turn helped Canadian entrepreneur

Rahul Goel

found the Markham, Ont.-based

Nordspace

, just three years ago.

Hadfield points out that space travel is a massively difficult endeavour, and Nordspace’s three years from start-up to nascent launch is something of which to be proud.

“It’s good to start small and build up,” he said. “If you look at perhaps the world’s most famous private launch company right now, which is SpaceX, they were founded a little under 25 years ago, and it took them … five years, maybe six years, to launch their first rocket.”

Point taken. SpaceX was founded in 2002, and its first Falcon 1 rocket reached orbit in 2008 — after three failed attempts to launch.

“When they successfully launched their first rocket, they still had all sorts of teething troubles,” Hadfield noted. “But they now dominate the world. In the United States, the National Reconnaissance Office and the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Space Command all regularly launch their extremely high net worth payloads on SpaceX.”

He added: “And we launch human beings on SpaceX. We trust their rockets now enough to take people to the space station and back, and the cost is low enough that some private citizens have bought flights flying SpaceX vehicles.”

The launch, when it happens, can be watched live here.

The launch itself couldn’t be more Canadian. The Taiga is named after a type of coniferous forest found at high northern latitudes, including the region of Newfoundland where the launch will take place.

The inaugural launch has been dubbed “Getting Screeched In,” a reference to the tradition of making those “from away” into honorary Newfoundlanders by having them kiss a cod and take a shot of local rum, known as screech. Taiga’s rocket fuel, a mix of kerosene and liquid oxygen, will be somewhat stronger stuff.

And of particular interest to Hadfield is the company’s 3D printed rocket engine, which has been named the Hadfield. Nordspace has two other rocket engines, Garneau and Bondar, named after Marc Garneau, the first Canadian to go to space, and

Roberta Bondar

, Canada’s first female astronaut and the first neurologist in space.

“We believe that it is critical for a Canadian launch capability to be supported by Canadian designed and manufactured rockets, launching from Canadian soil, by a 100% Canadian owned company,” Nordspace said on its website. “We welcome you to join us as we open this new frontier for Canada.”

Hadfield is happy to have his name on the engine that will take Taiga to the edge of space.

“When you invent something, you’re free to name it whatever you like,” he said. “But … the Hadfield engine is an immense compliment, and I’m very honoured that they would use my name for one of their rocket engines. That’s delightful. I hope it serves them well.”

Taiga is merely the first step in the company’s plans. If the sub-orbital flight — with a partially fuelled rocket, and a flight time of only about 60 seconds — goes well, the next step would be to fly the Tundra, named for the treeless region to the north of taiga areas in the Arctic.

The Tundra would be more than four times as tall as the Taiga, at about 22 metres, with two stages and multiple Hadfield engines. “Our goal is to fly Tundra for the first time as early as 2027,” the company said on its website.

“This historic launch from Canadian soil of our Taiga sub-orbital rocket, powered by our 3D printed Hadfield engines, will represent a massive leap forward for Canadian sovereignty, prosperity, and security and for assured access to space,” it added.

Hadfield has thoughts on that too. He noted that, as the geopolitical pendulum swings form internationalism to nationalism, “it becomes more important to be able to do things on our own, and not just through international co-operation, like we’ve been doing since Canada’s first satellite in space in 1962 with Alouette, which we co-operated with the U.S. to have one of their rockets launching.”

He added: “For Canada to stay sovereign and be competitive on the world stage, we need to shift what we’re doing and not just rely on the expertise and capability of others for some things, and one of those things is rocket launch. So I think this is a good, bold, necessary move in the right direction for Canada.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Perry MacDonald watched for eight days as his brother died from dementia. He wants MAID laws to change for similar cases.

When Perry MacDonald heard that Canadian author

Robert Munsch had requested

Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) after his diagnoses with dementia and Parkinson’s disease, it touched a nerve.

Munsch recently explained to the New York Times that, 

under Canadian law

, recipients of MAID must be able to actively consent on the day of their death. “I have to pick the moment when I can still ask for it,” he said. If he waited too long, he added, talking to his wife, “you’re stuck with me being a lump.”

Government regulations are clear: “The person must be given an opportunity to withdraw consent and must expressly confirm their consent immediately before receiving MAID.”

MacDonald is familiar with watching dementia take a loved one. Three months ago, his brother died after living with the disease for almost two decades.

“He was only 45 when he got dementia, and he just passed a few months ago at 63,” says MacDonald.

His brother had not applied for MAID, but MacDonald’s point is that it wouldn’t have mattered under current law, because at the end of his life, he wasn’t of sound enough mind to consent to the procedure. Instead, he was put into palliative care, and taken off food and water.

It took him eight days to die.

“Eight days him thrashing around on a bed, drying before he dehydrated to death,” MacDonald remembers. “With my mother, his kids and his wife there, for eight days.” He said his mother asked doctors to increase the morphine he was receiving. They refused on the grounds that it would hasten his death. “It’s moronic.”

A day or two, even three, he says, would have been different. “I would have been just a typical Canadian, and I would have walked away from it. I just would have said, ‘Holy cow, that was a rough go, but I’m glad he’s no longer suffering,’ and I would have went off into my life.”

But those five extra days gave him time to think: “There’s got to be a better way.”

“It wouldn’t leave my mind. I’m like, this is happening freaking everywhere. And then what about all the Alzheimer’s patients? Even if it’s only a couple of days or three days, they go out the same way, when, if they could ask for MAID, that’s done so peacefully and gentle and with dignity, and the family could be around, it could be a little bit planned.”

He adds: “So afterwards I started thinking, OK, you know what? I’m going to do something about this. Like, I truly believe that he survived from day three to day eight to send a message.”

MacDonald is now the force behind

Update MAID Laws, Canada

, a website that introduces itself with the phrase: “We support MAID. We just want the option to plan ahead.”

The site and its petition argue that those who apply for MAID should be able to provide advanced consent so that, if they lose the ability to confirm the procedure on the day, their pre-signed document can speak for them. It also says Canadians should be allowed to sign up for MAID before they are diagnosed with dementia, noting that half of those with the condition are already past the point of giving consent when diagnosed.

In fact, the first part of that change has already occurred — not in Alberta, where MacDonald resides and where his brother died, but in Quebec.

Last autumn, that province

adopted a law

to allow people with a serious and incurable illness, including Alzheimer’s, to make early requests for MAID. The advance requests mean a person with an illness that will eventually leave them unable to grant consent can agree to receive a medically assisted death when their condition worsens, months or even years in the future.

“Quebec doesn’t have it quite right yet, but they’re a step ahead with the advanced request,” says MacDonald. “That’s a step in the right direction.” He’d still like to see the option to apply for MAID — or a possible MAID — even before a life-ending diagnosis.

The

Montreal Gazette reported

that, from Oct. 30 last year, when Quebec’s new provisions took effect, to Sept. 4, some 1,425 advance requests for MAID had been added to a registry in the province. An additional 179 requests were rejected.

But MacDonald’s “step in the right direction” is very concerning to Trudo Lemmens, a law professor and bioethicist at the University of Toronto.

“We can understand that people are afraid of what will happen to them,” he says. “And there is this kind of discourse that we have seen, particularly in Canada, developing. ‘I don’t want to be a vegetable. I don’t want to be this. I don’t want to be that.’”

He continues: “But that kind of presumption, or even the discourse around that … sends a message to all people with cognitive disability, maybe not necessarily dementia, but other people with cognitive disability who may not fully understand what’s going on, that … life in that situation is is so horrible that we should be ending your life.”

These are murky waters, he maintains. He relates

the case of an Alzheimer’s patient

in The Netherlands, where euthanasia, as it’s called there, has been legal since 2002. Four years before her death in 2016, she wrote that she she wanted to die before she had to go into a care home, but also that she wanted to decide when the time was right.

“And at one point she no longer understood, really, what was going on,” says Lemmens. “She can no longer say yes, but she can also no longer say no, because she doesn’t really understand it. So they give her a sedative. She falls asleep with the family present. The doctor tries to enter the syringe in her arm and to inject her. She wakes up, and she tries to remove it, and the doctor asked the family member to keep her down.”

A 2019 trial found the doctor had acted lawfully, and that not carrying out the process would have undermined the patient’s wishes.

“It’s an ethical minefield,” Lemmens says, “psychologically difficult, difficult for physicians and family members.”

It’s worth noting that MacDonald contacted the National Post, eager to get his message to the public. “I’ve never done anything like this before,” he says. “And as I go and I’m stumbling and trip and I’m three steps ahead and one back, that kind of thing.”

Lemmens was contacted as an expert, having written on the intersection between health care and the law. He is a member of the Chief Coroner of Ontario MAID Death Review Committee and co-editor of the book Unravelling MAID in Canada: Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide as Medical Care. In May he

published a paper

titled “Ontario Chief Coroner reports raise concerns that MAID policy and practice focus on access rather than protection.”

But both men have been personally touched by dementia. MacDonald watched his brother decline from a healthy individual to someone dying of dehydration in a hospital bed.

“And I’ve seen my own mother die with dementia,” says Lemmens. He’s also seen two others in his social circle die of the disease, and knows another with early stage dementia. “So I’ve seen what it is. It’s a devastating condition.”

But he adds: “very early onset dementia, people can have 10 years of life left, you know. So I’m very troubled that we are already having a practice developing, and that there is not more discussion about that. But we see already very lenient applications of these safeguards, where people that we’re not really sure whether they understand what’s going on are getting medical assistance and dying. So I’m troubled that we constantly seem to be stretching or moving the goal post.”

MacDonald is adamant. “We’re not trying to change MAID laws,” he says. “We’re not trying to expand them. We’re not trying to make them more lenient or anything. The only thing we’re trying to do is help people get access to the laws, or the ones that have access to keep access. Because that’s silly: you apply for MAID and you’re approved, and then at some later stage, you get unapproved. That doesn’t make sense.”

Says Lemmens: “The thing is, sometimes the ethical dilemmas are unsolvable. So you have to, as a society, think about what’s the most dangerous parts, what’s the most problematic practice?”

Meanwhile, Munsch has moved one day closer to death, whether by MAID or another way. So have we all. The discussion continues.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Ontario is pressing on with its goal of connecting all of the province's residents with primary care practitioners. (File photo/Postmedia)

Ontarians without a primary care practitioner may soon be relieved to connect with one in their community.

This week, the provincial government launched

a call for proposals

to create and expand approximately 75 primary care teams with the aim of connecting 500,000 more residents with primary care.

It’s an “over $250 million investment,” the Ontario government announced on Monday.

It’s also part of the government’s $2.1 billion

primary care action plan

to connect everyone in province to convenient primary care by 2029. The entire campaign stems from the

Primary Care Act

passed in May.

Communities across the province can apply for the recently announced funding. The teams, new or expanded, will be expected to prioritize connecting with individuals within their communities. The successful teams will be unveiled in spring 2026.

How many don’t have a primary care provider?

In mid-2024, the Ontario College of Family Physicians issued a press release about new data showing that

2.5 million Ontarians didn’t have a family doctor

, up from 1.8 million in 2020. Moreover, 670,000 Ontarians were living more than 50 kilometres from their family doctor. And more than 130,000 Ontarians live more than 200 km from their family doctor,

However, the Ontario government isn’t defining primary care providers as exclusively doctors. According to the Health Care Connect waitlist, primary care is delivered by

family doctors or nurse practitioners and their teams

of health professionals under one roof, including registered nurses, registered practical nurses, physician assistants, physiotherapists, social workers, dieticians, and pharmacists.

And according to the press release accompanying Ontario’s announcement this week, the Health Care Connect waitlist (as of January 1, 2025) decreased by more than 98,000 people or over 42 per cent.

This move is intended to add to the over 300 new primary care teams already across the province. And ultimately be part of connecting two million more Ontarians to publicly funded primary care by 2029.

The funding for the present initiative could go to

primary care teams

that organize themselves as family health teams, community health centres, nurse practitioner-led clinics or Indigenous primary health care organizations.

What has the Ontario government done before now to increase the number of primary care professionals?

In June 2025, the government unveiled $235 million in funding for over 130 new and expanded primary care teams, some of which have already begun accepting new patients.

That initiative focused on

communities, identified by postal code

, with the highest number of Ontarians who do not have access to primary care. Each successful team had to establish a plan to connect with a significant proportion of unattached people in their areas and demonstrate an ability to make significant progress within a year.

Other previous developments

in Ontario primary care include breaking down barriers for 100 internationally trained family physicians to practice medicine in a rural or northern community in 2025, through the

“Practice Ready Ontario”

program. The aim of that program is to connect licensed, foreign-trained doctors to an additional 120,000 people.

In its 2024 Fall Economic Statement, the province announced $88 million over three years to expand Learn and Stay grants for 1,360 eligible undergraduate students who commit to practicing family medicine in Ontario after they graduate.

Is the present initiative welcomed by health care professionals?

Ontario has been making it easier for U.S.-licensed nurses and board-certified physicians to move to and practice in Ontario. In 2025,

nearly 1,400 nurses and more than 260 doctors

have chosen to work in Ontario.

In May 2025, CEO of the

Ontario College of Family Physicians

, Deepy Sur, said: “Investments that support family physicians to thrive within a strong primary care foundation will lead to a healthier Ontario and less pressure on other parts of our health system.”

The government’s focus on a team approach has been welcomed by the province’s nurses.

“We commend the government for continuing to expand team-based care – a model that delivers better health outcomes and greater equity. Nurse practitioners, registered nurses, and our interprofessional colleagues are eager to contribute their expertise to these new and expanded teams so that more people across Ontario receive the high-quality, timely and person-centred care they need and deserve,” says Dr. Doris Grinspun, CEO of the

Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario

.

The same sentiment extends from nurse practitioners. They are “a largely untapped resource, and by working to their full scope they are uniquely positioned to lead the next phase of accessible, timely, and comprehensive care,” says Dr. NP Michelle Acorn, CEO of the Nurse Practitioners’ Association of Ontario.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Privacy Commissioner Philippe Dufresne.

OTTAWA — TikTok broke privacy laws by not doing enough to keep children off its platform and collecting sensitive information about users aged 12 and under to serve them with potentially harmful tailored ads and videos, according to a new report.
 

“TikTok must do more to keep underage children off its platform,” federal Privacy Commissioner Philippe Dufresne said Tuesday.
 

In 2023, Dufresne and his provincial counterparts in B.C., Alberta and Quebec launched an investigation into TikTok’s privacy practices, with a particular focus on underage users. The wildly popular video app’s terms of service do not allow users under 13 years old (14 in Quebec).
 

The privacy commissioners published the fruits of their probe on Tuesday, finding that the tools TikTok had implemented to keep underage children off its platform were “largely ineffective.”

They also found that TikTok was using biometric data — including tools to scan faces in uploaded videos — to “infer sensitive data” about its users such as their age range, gender and spending power.
 

The company used that data without having obtained meaningful consent to show users tailored ads and content, the report found.
 

“A user signing up for TikTok would have no reason to expect that TikTok would conduct an analysis on their facial features and for which purposes, nor are they likely to review TikTok’s lengthy privacy policy to learn about TikTok’s biometric practices,” reads the report.
 

During the press conference, B.C. Privacy Commissioner Michael Harvey said he and his colleagues were surprised by how deeply the app profiled its users and how that data was then used.
 

He described the current situation as an “unacceptable status quo.”

“I think we were certainly struck by exactly how elaborate the profiling that was being used by TikTok in their systems, exactly what information was being collected with these facial and voice analytics and how it was being used in combination with things like location information,” he said.
 

But despite having detailed, biometric-inspired information about its users, TikTok does not use the data to detect underage users and kick them off the platform, Dufresne told reporters.

“You’re using this innovation, these tools for certain purposes. You should at least be using them for the other purposes of protecting children,” he said.

The investigation also concluded that the tools TikTok does use to detect underage users on its platform are not working and need to be modernized.
 

“This resulted in the collection of the sensitive information of many children and the use of that information for purposes of ad targeting and content recommendations,” said Alberta Privacy Commissioner Diane McLeod.
 

“Children on TikTok are likely to see video content that is not age appropriate. Children on TikTok are likely to receive targeted ads that normalize gambling,” she added.
 

The report made multiple recommendations to TikTok, including enhanced age assurance mechanisms and improving its privacy policy to better explain its advertising and content personalization practices.
 

It also recommended TikTok stop allowing advertisers to target users under 18 years old and create “prominent up-front notices” about how user data — including biometrics — could be processed in China.

The commissioners noted in their report that while TikTok did not agree with all their findings, it agreed to implement all of their recommendations and regular follow-ups.
 

“We are pleased that TikTok is committed to making some more important privacy enhancements to their platform, including modern age assurance mechanisms and improved age-appropriate communications around privacy,” said
Harvey.
 

TikTok Canada did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

TikTok is suing the federal government to prevent it from forcefully shutting down its Canadian offices due to concerns about national security, though Ottawa has declined to ban the controversial application outright.

Canada’s intelligence agencies have repeatedly warned that the app’s owner, Chinese tech giant ByteDance, can be compelled by the Chinese government to collect and provide it with sensitive user data.

The application is currently banned on government devices.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Tim Hortons is opening its first-ever TimShop retail store at Toronto's Eaton Centre this November.

Shopping for the Tim fan in your life will get a little easier for people in the Toronto area when the chain’s first-ever retail store opens at the Eaton Centre soon.

The TimShop, an extension of the similarly named

online store

launched in September 2023, will be a pop-up location opening in early November and operating until “roughly the end of December,” according to a company spokesperson.

The store will sell the same items available online for the same prices, “along with some exclusive items.”

“The retail shop will allow shoppers to experience our merchandise in person, try items on, and there will be a range of items at different price points for holiday gifts,” the spokesperson said.

As reported by

6ix Retail

, the store is located in a former Bentley location next to a Bell Store on the first level of the mall, off of Yonge Street.

When it first launched ahead of

National Coffee Day in 2023

, TimShop.ca featured a mix of apparel that included retro and modern branded t-shirts and sweaters. Also available are select coffee and tea products.

A retro merchandise line in celebration of Tim Hortons 60th anniversary was added in

March 2024

, featuring more clothing and sundry collectables like coffee cups, a lunchbox, decorative throw pillows, a pen set, a keychain and notebooks.

 A selection of Tim Hortons 60th anniversary items released in 2024.

A few months later,

a line of dog and cat toys

was released, some of which are now restocked online after initially selling out.

The most recent new arrivals online are Halloween-themed items — including a costume for kids and one for dogs — a Tims Barbie Hoodie and a selection of new unisex sweaters, shirts and hats.

Today, all the products are listed under one of four collections: Workwear, Tims Canada, Retro and Varsity.

News of the retail location comes about a week after Tims announced a

new partnership with Canadian Tire

that allows customers to link their Triangle and Tims Rewards accounts to earn Canadian Tire money on eligible purchases at Tims.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump arrive for a photo during the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, on June 16, 2025.

On Friday, the Canadian government launched public consultations into the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) that is set for a joint review next year. But a new poll shows that a majority of Canadians don’t expect the U.S. president to respect any deal made between his country and ours.

The latest

Trump Tracker survey

by research firm Pollera asked 2,712 adult Canadians for their opinions on a number of political questions. One of those: “If Canada and the United States sign a new trade agreement in the coming months, how likely do you feel it is that President Trump will respect the agreement?”

Only seven per cent of Canadians said he definitely would respect a new deal, while 18 per cent said he likely would. A much larger portion of respondents were doubtful, with 35 per cent saying Trump would likely break any agreement, and 30 per cent saying he would definitely do so. Just 11 per cent said they didn’t know.

Liberal voters were more likely to predict that Trump would break a deal (74 per cent) compared to Conservatives (51 per cent), but no group had a majority that trusted the U.S. president.

Perhaps not surprisingly, the poll also showed that negative feelings about our neighbours to the south continue to grow. When asked: “What is your overall impression of the United States?” almost half (44 per cent) said their feelings were very negative, while a further 26 per cent said they were somewhat negative. Only 18 per cent chose somewhat positive, and a tiny fraction — just five per cent — went with very positive.

These numbers were the most negative in more than a year of tracking. A February poll found 41 per cent of Canadians held a very negative view of the United States, while a January poll showed only 34 per cent, and a December poll came back with 31 per cent.

In June of 2024, only 12 per cent reported very negative feelings, while more than half (53 per cent) said they felt somewhat or very positive about our nearest neighbours.

The newest poll also found that Quebecers were the likeliest to report negative feelings about the U.S. (78 per cent), as were seniors at 86 per cent.

Pollera also asked Canadians what, if anything, they were doing about those feelings — more specifically as a response to U.S. tariffs — and found that almost three-quarters (73 per cent) had taken one or more personal actions against the United States.

Most common at 52 per cent was to boycott some or all American products in grocery stores, while 38 per cent said they were boycotting non-grocery items from the U.S., and 36 per cent were delaying or cancelling travel south of the border. (The numbers add up to more than 100 per cent because some people chose more than one answer.)

Smaller numbers said they had reduced their investments in U.S. companies (13 per cent) or bought clothing to show Canadian pride (10 per cent). Just 27 per cent answered “none of the above.” The poll also found that Albertans were the least likely to have done something to protest tariffs (66 per cent), while Manitobans and Quebecers were most likely, at 77 per cent and 76 per cent, respectively.

Because the poll was conducted online, it cannot be given a margin of error, but Pollera said a sample of this size would normally have a margin of error of plus or minus 1.9 per cent, 19 times out of 20.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) at the United Nations headquarters on September 23, 2025 in New York City.

OTTAWA — U.S. President Donald Trump slammed allied nations for unilaterally recognizing Palestinian statehood — which he said is a “reward” for Hamas terrorists — during a lengthy speech at the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday.

While Trump did not call out specific countries, like

Canada which made its formal announcement ahead of the summit in New York,

he accused member states of seemingly encouraging “continued conflict” in the region by giving into Hamas’ demands.

“The rewards would be too great for Hamas terrorists for their atrocities. This would be a reward for these horrible atrocities, including October 7, even while they refused to release the hostages or accept a ceasefire,” Trump said in a more than 50-minute speech.

“Instead of giving in to Hamas’ ransom demands, those who want peace should be united with one message: release the hostages now,” he added.

Nearly two years after Hamas’ terrorist attacks against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, it is believed that 48 men and women are still held hostage in the Gaza Strip. Of that number, Israel believes that 20 of them may still be alive along with the bodies of 30 others.

Trump called on all member states to “come together” to stop the war in Gaza, negotiate lasting peace and get the remaining hostages back — whether they are alive or dead.

“We have to get them back now. We don’t want to get back two, then another two, and then one and then three… No, we want them all back. And we want the… dead bodies back too. Those parents came to me, and they want them back… as though they were alive.”

Trump said he has always claimed “the last 20 (hostages) were going to be the hardest (to bring back home), and that’s exactly what happened.”

Prime Minister Mark Carney has consistently said it is “imperative” for Hamas to release all hostages, and that the terrorist group can play no role in the future governance of the Palestinian state — even though it has been nearly 20 years since there has been an election.

At the same time, Carney has chastised Israel for preventing “the prospect of a Palestinian state from ever being established” and of pursuing “an unrelenting policy of settlement expansion in the West Bank, which is illegal under international law.”

The decisions of Canada, along with the United Kingdom, France, Australia and others, to recognize Palestinian statehood bring to 156 the number of countries that have done so.

That happened despite

a recent letter from a group of U.S. Republicans threatening those countries

of “punitive measures” if they did not reconsider their decision to recognize Palestinian statehood which would put them at odds with longstanding U.S. foreign policy.

“This is a reckless policy that undermines prospects for peace,” they wrote in a letter sent on Sept. 19. “It sets the dangerous precedent that violence, not diplomacy, is the most expedient means for terrorist groups like Hamas to achieve their political aims.”

Speaking at an event in New York on Monday, Carney admitted that his government’s goal in recognizing Palestinian statehood is to keep the topic “front and centre” at the United Nations General Assembly with a host of “influential but not decisive countries.”

“We’re under no illusions that this is any sort of panacea, but it’s necessary, in our judgment, and the judgment of most other countries in the world, that we have to push on this now,” he said during a fireside chat with the Council on Foreign Relations.

“So, we’re doing what we can, but recognizing limitations.”

Later that day, Carney said that Canada is acting as part of a “coordinated international effort to preserve the possibility of a two-state solution.” He made those remarks at a conference, organized by France and Saudi Arabia, in support of the two-state solution.

“Recognizing the State of Palestine, led by the Palestinian Authority, empowers those who seek peaceful coexistence and the end of Hamas,” he said.

“This in no way legitimizes terrorism, nor is it any reward for it.”

Meanwhile, back home, Conservatives offered even harsher words to the Liberal government for their decision to recognize Palestinian statehood.

“Doing this on the eve of Rosh Hashanah (Jewish New Year), emboldening mobs and violence upon our Jewish communities, is evil,” said Conservative MP Shuvaloy Majumdar in the House of Commons. “This is not diplomacy. It is appeasement. It is betrayal.”

“The Prime Minister has dispensed with human dignity and the rule of law. He has emboldened terror with the state. It is evil,” he added.

Carney was set to hold a press conference Tuesday evening, before attending a reception held by Trump in New York.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.