LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Minister of AI and Digital Innovation Evan Solomon speaks to media following an announcement during a visit to Scale AI, in Montreal on Thursday, July 10, 2025.

OTTAWA — A Canadian organization focused on combatting the spread of child sex abuse images says a new analysis has found the presence of such images in a dataset used to train AI models.

The Canadian Centre for Child Protection said the findings include images of more than 120 victims across Canada and the United States and raise serious ethical concerns when it comes to the development of AI technologies.

“Many of the AI models used to support features in applications and research initiatives have been trained on data that has been collected indiscriminately or in ethically questionable ways,” Lloyd Richardson, the Winnipeg-based centre’s director of technology, said in a statement on Wednesday.

“This lack of due diligence has led to the appearance of known child sexual abuse and exploitation material in these types of datasets, something that is largely preventable.”

The centre for child protection said its analysis focused on an image collection known as NudeNet, which features tens of thousands of images used by researchers to develop AI tools for detecting nudity and whose images are collected from sources like social media and adult porn sites

It says its analysis found around 680 images known to the centre as being suspected or verified as child sex abuse and exploitation material.

Of those images, the centre reported that more than 120 images show victims in Canada and the U.S. Other images included minors in sexually explicit acts.

As a result of its findings, the centre said it issued a removal notification to Academic Torrents, a website used by researchers and universities to download datasets, adding that the flagged images were no longer available.

It says additional steps ought to be taken by those distributing datasets, used by researchers and academics, to ensure they do not include child sex abuse images and calls for regulation when it comes to AI technologies.

The centre’s analysis comes after a

2023 investigation

by Stanford University’s Cyber Policy Centre, which found the presence of child sex abuse images in a dataset used in developing text-to-images AI models.

It warned that models being developed on that dataset were then being used to generate realistic-looking nudes, including those of minors.

Prime Minister Mark Carney has made developing Canada’s AI capacity a priority of his government’s approach to digital policy.

Artificial Intelligence Minister Evan Solomon, who became the first federal minister to hold such a title, has been tasked with steering that work, and so far signalled the government is not keen on pushing a regulation-focused approach.

He he said the government’s focus on an upcoming bill would be around privacy and data.

At the same time, Carney’s government has promised to criminalize the creation of non-consensual sexualized images known as “deepfakes,” which are generated by tools, including AI.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


The Calgary Courts Centre in Calgary.

Alberta’s top court has quashed the contempt conviction for a Crown attorney who ran afoul of a justice of the peace who wouldn’t listen to him at a bail hearing.

Justice of the Peace Diane T. Luttmer ejected prosecutor James D. Wilson from her courtroom and convicted him of contempt this past May. The Court of Appeal recently overturned Wilson’s conviction.

“The right of a party to be heard … is a fundamental principle of natural justice,” said a recent decision out of Calgary from the three-judge panel.

“Breach of that right leads to a denial of natural justice, harms the reputation of the administration of justice, and raises concerns regarding the appearance of impartiality. It is clear that the (justice of the peace) in this case — for reasons not apparent in the transcript — was simply not willing to hear Crown counsel’s submissions on the facts and the law. Judicial officers may accept or reject submissions of counsel, but only after hearing and considering them. We recognize that judicial officers are only human and subject to being frustrated or irritated. However, regardless of a judicial officer’s frame of mind, counsel must be given the opportunity to present their submissions. The JP’s overall conduct in this case prevented the Crown from fulfilling its important role in the bail hearing.”

The court heard Luttmer was conducting a bail hearing on May 11, 2025, for a young man charged with mischief for damaging his grandfather’s garage door. Wilson was the prosecutor.

The young man’s lawyer objected to an abstinence clause and a weapons prohibition in his proposed release conditions, said the Appeal Court decision, dated Oct. 16.

Wilson asked for an adjournment because the young man’s lawyer was disputing “the admissibility of certain information in the police bail package,” and he wanted to “marshal the relevant evidence,” said the decision.

Luttmer denied Wilson’s request. She asked the Crown for the facts that would support a drug prohibition while the young man was out on bail.

Wilson “read directly from the police synopsis. The JP interrupted him. She stated she was losing patience, accused (Wilson) of overstepping and asked him directly what the allegation was. He began to answer but she interrupted him again. The JP admonished the appellant for interrupting her, then asked him for the factual nexus between the allegation and drug involvement. When he began to answer, she interrupted him again. After some overtalk, she admonished the appellant for getting into ‘extraneous information.’”

The JP asked Wilson how the young man’s charge was linked to drug use.

Wilson began speaking and Luttmer “interrupted him again,” said the decision.

Wilson told the JP “he had an obligation to put forward credible, trustworthy evidence.”

He asked to “tender the circumstances of the police investigation that led to the criminal charge,” said the decision.

“Before he finished his sentence, the JP interrupted, stating: ‘That is denied, Mr. Wilson.’ The JP directed that he answer only her question, nothing more.”

Wilson told her “drug paraphernalia had been found,” at the scene of the crime.

“The JP interrupted, telling (Wilson) he was coming very close to being removed from the courtroom for contempt of court.”

Luttmer again asked for more proof drugs were involved.

As Wilson “began to respond, the JP interrupted, stating: ‘It is a very simple question. What is the allegation about drug use?’”

Wilson told her the young man “was a habitual meth user. The JP interrupted him again. She admonished him for being non-responsive, characterizing his conduct as a refusal to answer her questions.”

The back and forth continued, with Luttmer saying she wouldn’t impose a weapons ban on the young man because Wilson wasn’t answering her questions.

Wilson informed Luttmer that knives were found on the young man during his arrest and officers had to use force to get him in custody.

“He alleged that the accused was resisting and had a history of carrying knives,” said the decision. “The JP interrupted again, asking about the history for the accused who had no record.”

Wilson started to respond when the JP interrupted him again.

Luttmer told Wilson to stop interrupting her.

“Well, you are interrupting the Crown,” Wilson responded.

Luttmer then told Wilson he was going to be removed from her courtroom.

“You are asking questions and interrupting the Crown,” he responded.

“You are in contempt of court, Mr. Wilson,” Luttmer said.

“This hearing is concluded. I am going to have the matter assigned to an alternative Crown. We are finished.”

The bail hearing continued that afternoon “with no prosecutor present at which time the accused was released on conditions which did not include a weapons ban or a prohibition on possessing illegal drugs,” said the decision.

The Appeal Court noted “there was nothing urgent” about the case.

Wilson “had a right to be heard in order to speak to the public perspective and interest,” said the decision.

Luttmer wasn’t clear on how Wilson was acting contemptuous, it said. “In summarily ejecting the appellant from the proceedings, the JP created an appearance of partiality.”

Luttmer “made a palpable and overriding error in finding (Wilson) to be in contempt of court when he was acting within his role as a Crown prosecutor and attempting to fulfill his duties and obligations to the administration of justice,” said the decision.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Doug Ford's government has tabled legislation that would end the use of automated speed enforcement devices in Ontario.

Baked into a wide-ranging bill aimed at protecting and strengthening Ontario’s economy tabled by Doug Ford’s government on Monday, was a provision that would bring about the end of speed cameras province-wide.

If passed, the government would make good on the premier’s vow to ban the automated speed enforcement (ASE) devices he has bemoaned as nothing more than a “cash grab” from taxpayers.

Red Tape Reduction Minister Andrea Khanjin introduced the legislation as the House began a new session and as a handful of demonstrations decrying the government’s plans were held throughout the province, including several in Toronto where there are 150 active devices, many of which have been the target of vandals.

Here’s a snapshot of what’s the latest on speed cameras in Ontario.

What does the legislation say about speed cameras?

The

Building a More Competitive Economy Act

’s primary purpose is to bolster the economy by streamlining permits and approvals for businesses and municipalities. It also expands labour mobility by granting workers from other provinces — predominantly those in the health care sector — the right to work in Ontario.

However, it would also repeal a section of the

Highway Traffic Act

that allows for drivers to be penalized after being caught speeding by an ASE while also empowering the minister of transportation to require municipalities to install signage in school zones.

In a

news release

, the province said the goal is to protect taxpayers and focus on “alternative traffic-calming measures such as speed bumps, speed cushions and roundabouts, as well as enhanced signage and education campaigns.”

Asked on Monday why the amendments found their way into the economy-focused omnibus bill, Transportation Minister Prabmeet Sarkaria told reporters it was about “protecting the pocketbooks of Ontario” and government’s “focus has always been on preventing speeding at the point of entry into one of these zones, not by a ticket three weeks later.”

“This is the legislative vehicle we will use to get that done,” he said in

a press conference

from Queen’s Park.

What were Monday’s speed camera demonstrations about?

Elsewhere on Monday, parents, caregivers and road safety advocates held a coordinated province-wide day of action in support of ASE programs.

Save Our Safety Cameras demonstrations were held in west end Toronto, East York, Midland, Vaughan, Caledon, and Ottawa.

Organizers, ahead of the events, said ASEs in school and community safety zones have proven effective in reducing speeds. They also cited

new research by The Hospital for Sick Children and Toronto Metropolitan University

that found speed cameras reduced the number of speeding vehicles in urban school zones by 45 per cent.

The study also found that the maximum speed of 85 per cent of vehicles fell by more than 10 km/h.

Tom DeVito, who helped put together a demonstration in Toronto, told the

Canadian Press

that while the other proposed traffic calming measures are welcome, it doesn’t make sense to remove speed cameras from the “tool kit.”

“You still need a screwdriver, and that’s what speed safety cameras are,” he said. “This would be like a carpenter saying, I don’t need a screwdriver because I’m updating and improving the hammer that I own.”

 Hundreds of automated speed enforcement devices have been deployed throughout Ontario since 2019.

At an event outside a school near a busy Ottawa roadway where an ASE is deployed, participants also promoted the effectiveness of ASEs and questioned the premier and the government’s logic.

“I need (Ford) to explain to us why fines for bad behaviour — fines for breaking the law — is a problem in this area and not in others,” Elizabeth MacDonald told

CTV

.

“I need this camera to do its job, the job it’s already done and the job it continues to do.”

Sarkaria, when asked at the press conference if the demonstrations were giving government pause, said “we agree on the end purpose” but reiterated its opposition to the use of ASE technology as a tool.

What does the Ontario Traffic Council think?

Since the campaign against speed cameras began, Ford and Sarkaria have continued to point out that only 37 municipalities have introduced them, while more than 400 have chosen not to.

Geoff Wilkinson, executive director of the Ontario Traffic Council, said it’s more likely that those municipalities simply haven’t yet explored ASE or are early in the process.

He pointed to Windsor, which was about to introduce its program the day Ford announced a ban was coming down the pike.

“I would get inquiries from municipalities on a regular basis looking for more information on how to run a program within their communities,” Wilkinson told National Post.

The council feels ASE is effective and opposes an outright ban, suggesting adjusting the existing regulations to eliminate inconsistencies, such as the “threshold speeds at which a driver may receive a ticket.”

Thresholds can vary by municipality, and the fine is based on how much the driver was speeding — $3 per kilometre for less than 20 km/h over; $4.50 for 20 to 29, $7 for 30 to 50, and $9.75 for 50 km/h or more, according to

ASE Ontario.

Wilkinson said not only do the majority of participating municipalities follow a consistent threshold, legislation passed with the spring budget made it so that “the minister has an opportunity to request data from municipalities and can actually request that the programs be amended and potentially be shut down.”

 Ontario Traffic Council executive director Geoff Wilkinson.

As for the province’s proposed measures in place of cameras, Wilkinson said all those tools have been in place since ASE legislation was first introduced in 2017, a time when OTC and other advocates were already pleading for more ways to protect children, seniors and other vulnerable road users.

When it comes to speed reduction initiatives, Wilkinson said the OTC points to the three components — educating drivers, engineering solutions like those proposed by government, and environment, which are all unique.

“Where we might have speed humps that may work in one particular area, they might not work on another road environment where automated speed enforcement may be the better solution,” he said.

He said experts are more than willing to sit down with government to discuss implementing “a responsible, consistent and transparent program” that will reduce speed and save lives.

Others who’ve spoken in support of ASE use include the

Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police

— along with a group of retired chiefs from Peel, Halton, Niagara, Ottawa and other areas, according to the

Toronto Star

— and elected officials from various municipalities, including 20 mayors who co-signed

a letter

earlier this month urging Ford to divert course and find a compromise.

If the ban goes through, they said the province should cover the costs related to cancelling the programs, which could include increases to policing and staff severance expenses, as well as shortfalls to public safety programs already funded by ASE revenue.

That campaign was co-led by Brampton Mayor Patrick Brown, whose city has a province-high 185 cameras and a just-opened $46 million ticket-processing centre staffed by 30 enforcement officers and 12 others.

Ford responded with a letter of his own days later,

sharing it on X

where he wrote: “

To the mayors asking the government to continue to allow cash grab
speed

cameras
in Ontario, I have been absolutely clear: The answer is no.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A SkyWest jet of the type that made an emergency landing in Omaha on Monday.

A flight from Nebraska to Los Angeles made a quick turnaround just a few kilometres from the airport on Monday, after the pilot heard noises outside the cockpit and thought someone was trying to break in.

SkyWest flight 6569 took off 10 minutes early from from Omaha’s Eppley Airfield, leaving at 6:23 p.m. local time, according to information from FlightAware.com.

However, ABC and other news reports say there was a malfunction in the plane’s intercom system that meant flight attendants could not contact the cockpit, which was locked as is standard practice on flights.

Unable to reach the cockpit by intercom, they started banging on the cockpit door. The captain, hearing that sound and unable to reach the cabin crew from his end, declared an emergency and returned to the Omaha airfield, landing just 36 minutes after takeoff.

The plane, an Embraer ERJ 175 with a capacity of about 80 passengers, was still climbing and was only about 65 kilometres from the airport at an altitude of about 10,000 feet when it turned around.

Video shared with ABC News showed police cars outside the plane after it landed, and police officers boarding the plane. One of them asks: “Everybody’s OK?” A passenger replies: “We don’t know what’s going on but we’re OK.”

The captain is then heard on the cabin intercom, apologizing for the sudden return. “We weren’t sure if something was going on with the airplane so that’s why we’re coming back here,” he says. “It’s going to be a little bit. We’re going to have to figure out what’s going on.”

A statement from the Federal Aviation Administration said: “After landing, it was determined there was a problem with the inter-phone system and the flight crew was knocking on the cockpit door.”

The airport in Omaha posted on social media that “there was no security related incident at Eppley Airfield this evening.” It directed any questions to American Airlines, which contracts SKyWest for some regional flights.

American Airlines told National Post: “SkyWest flight 6469, operating as American Eagle from Omaha to Los Angeles on Monday night, returned to Omaha out of abundance of caution after experiencing communication issues with a flight crew mic. The flight later continued to Los Angeles. We apologize for the inconvenience.”

News reports said the plane was able to take off again about three hours later.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


CBC/Radio-Canada CEO Marie-Philippe Bouchard in their offices in Montreal, Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2025.

The head of CBC and Radio-Canada says there’s no need to “stop everything to do a full investigation” into antisemitism within its reporting and within the organization.

Marie-Philippe Bouchard, the president and CEO of the public broadcaster, attended a Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage meeting in Ottawa on Monday. Bouchard officially took over the role in January.

She faced a wide range of questions from MPs at the meeting. Conservative MP Rachael Thomas asked about antisemitism in the CBC’s reporting, in particular since Oct. 7, 2023, when more than a thousand people were killed and hundreds taken hostage in Israel in a terror attack by Hamas.

“Statistics were often taken from

Hamas itself, which is a terrorist entity

, and used by the CBC as if it was from a government ministry itself,” said Thomas. Many articles by CBC include the

death toll of Palestinians

killed in the Israel-Hamas war as reported by Gaza’s Health Ministry,

an agency run by Hamas

. It

does not distinguish between civilian and terrorist

deaths.

A CBC article published as recently as Monday cited numbers from the Gaza ministry of Palestinians killed in a bombardment from Israel, which was prompted by a

deadly attack on two Israeli soldiers over the weekend

.

Thomas also mentioned that

CBC reported on the bombing of a hospital in Gaza last October, laying the blame on Israel for the death and destruction

. But it was later revealed the damage was

caused by a Hamas rocket that misfired

in a nearby parking lot.

“By that point you can imagine the hatred and the outrage that had already been targeted toward a vulnerable population that exists here in Canada already, of course the Jewish community,” said Thomas. “It’s been time after time after time…What are you doing to tackle this antisemitic rhetoric that exists in the CBC and its news reporting?”

Bouchard said there was a process in place for inaccurate reporting, which was upheld by the ombudsman. “This is how we get better. If there’s mistakes being made, then there is full transparency on that,” she said.

Thomas maintained that “it’s not getting better.” She brought up a more recent incident in mid-September, when a

Radio-Canada journalist made antisemitic comments on-air

.

“My understanding, and that of multiple analysts here in the United States, is that it is the Israelis, the Jews, that finance American politics a lot,” said Washington correspondent for Radio-Canada Elisa Serret. She made the comments while speaking on

sur le terrain

, a French-language show with a focus on politics.

“The big cities are run by Jews, Hollywood is run by Jews…” she said.

Bouchard called the comments “unacceptable, hurtful, and contrary to our journalist standards and practices.” She said she apologized to employees and news management apologized to viewers for the incident.

But when pressed if she would look into the matter further, Bouchard reiterated CBC’s dedication to the journalistic process. Thomas noted Bouchard’s “unwillingness to do a reexamination” to confront antisemitism within the organization.

“What I’m saying journalism is a continuous process of questions, of revisiting, of challenging. This is how we live. This is what we do. So we don’t have to stop everything to do a full investigation,” said Bouchard.

Canadian Jewish advocacy group, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, said it was disappointing that Bouchard would not “provide a clear commitment to Canadians.”

“At a time of rising hate, Canadians deserve accountability through an investigation into systemic racism and bias at the national public broadcaster,” the group said in

a post on X

.

Later in the conversation, Bouchard was pressed about the company’s hiring practices. Since 2015, Thomas said

it was reported

that 20 temporary foreign workers had been hired by the CBC in Ontario for “high-wage” positions. Bouchard said as far as she knows, there were no temporary foreign workers currently employed.

Some of the positions filled included computer programmers, computer network technicians, business management consulting, marketing researchers, announcers and broadcast technicians, said Thomas.

Thomas asked Bouchard if she would commit to not hiring any future temporary workers, given rising unemployment numbers.

“There might be incidents where, for very specific type of work, there’s a requirement. If there’s a process and it’s approved by the authority, I don’t exactly see what the issue is that you have with this process, but maybe I’m not familiar enough,” she said.

Unemployment rates in Canada are rising

and the CBC is looking elsewhere to fill its talents rather than right here at home,” said Thomas.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Liberal House Leader Steven MacKinnon.

OTTAWA — Liberal House Leader Steven MacKinnon said Tuesday he is starting to worry that Parliament’s two main opposition parties are signalling that the government should not count on their support for its upcoming budget.

Should that spending plan fail to pass, it would cause Parliament to fall and pave the way for Canadians to head back to the polls for a second time in the same year.

“If an election is necessary, we would obviously, reluctantly, because we don’t think Canadians want an election, but election there will be,” MacKinnon told reporters on his way into the government’s weekly cabinet meeting.

Carney’s government is set to table its first budget on Nov. 4.

“What I’m seeing in Parliament worries me,” MacKinnon said, noting that the date is two weeks away.

As a minority government, the Liberals must find another party willing to pass its budget.

Opposition Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre released a letter on Monday addressed to Carney, laying out his party’s demands.

Most notably, he said the Liberals must keep the federal deficit below $42 billion.

The Parliamentary Budget Officer, an independent watchdog of government, recently predicted the deficit could grow to nearly $70

billion for 2025-2026. That included the $5 billion in spending Carney promised last month to flow to industries hard hit by U.S. tariffs, including the auto sector. 

While his government has asked all federal departments, except for national defence, the RCMP, and Canada Border Services Agency, to find 15 per cent in savings over three years, Carney has also vowed to spend billions more on bolstering Canada’s military capabilities to meet its NATO spending target of two per cent of its GDP.

Poilievre, in his letter, also called for a slew of tax cuts, including to the industrial carbon price, which remains a core plank of the government’s plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Speaking to reporters, MacKinnon called the Conservatives’ demands “ludicrous.”

“We have two opposition parties, principally that aren’t taking this matter very seriously,” he said.

MacKinnon also criticized Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet, who has dampened expectations that his party would be willing to support the government’s budget.

The Bloc has also laid out a list of demands, including six that the party has presented as being “non-negotiable.”

They include an increase in provincial health transfers, as well as a 10 per cent increase in Old Age Security payments to those aged 64 to 75. Both proposals would result in billions of additional government spending.

The Bloc is also calling for the federal government to send Quebecers around $814 million to account for the rebates Canadians living in provinces subject to the now-cancelled federal consumer carbon tax received as the spring federal election got underway, which those in Quebec did not receive because the province has its own system.

Interim NDP Leader Don Davies has also called for more health spending and told reporters the party would not be willing to support a spending plan that takes an “austerity approach.”

Davies has met with Carney, with MacKinnon adding on Tuesday that Finance Minister

François-Philippe Champagne has had additional conversations. 

-With files from The Canadian Press and Financial Post’s Jordan Gowling

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Auditor General of Canada Karen Hogan waits to appear before the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates (OGGO) in West Block on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2025.

OTTAWA — Not only has the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) not recruited and trained the members it needs to meet its operational requirements, but the living accommodations of the existing CAF members have been found to lack basics like potable running water.

These are some of the latest findings in two alarming reports tabled in the House of Commons on Tuesday by Canada’s Auditor General Karen Hogan. She based the conclusions of her audits on government data spanning the last two or three years.

“The Canadian Armed Forces continued to have challenges attracting and training enough highly skilled recruits to staff many occupations such as pilots and ammunition technicians,” Hogan said in a press release accompanying the report.

“This could affect the army, navy and air force’s ability to respond to threats, emergencies or conflicts and accomplish their missions,” she added.

Hogan’s report on CAF recruitment revealed that nearly 192,000 people applied to join the CAF between April 1, 2022, and March 31, 2025. Of that number, only 15,000 new recruits successfully joined the forces — falling short of the CAF’s target by about 4,700 recruits.

That means that the average recruitment ratio for that period was around one in 13. The CAF blew past its overall recruitment targets in the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 fiscal years, according to the report, but slightly surpassed its target in the 2024-2025 fiscal year.

Hogan also found that, of the nearly 192,000 people who applied to join the military, more than half — 54 per cent or around 103,7000 — either voluntarily withdrew from or during the recruitment process or simply did not respond to the CAF’s outreach efforts.

However, the audit found the CAF did not conduct analyses to understand exactly why applicants had decided to drop out along the way.

“Without knowing why applicants left, it was difficult for the Canadian Armed Forces to identify what was needed to increase the number of applicants who complete the recruitment process,” read the report.

Even though recruitment has been slightly higher in the last year, the CAF’s internal analysis from 2024 predicts that 13 per cent of occupations are at risk of not reaching the minimum of 90 per cent authorized staffing levels unless “key challenges” are addressed.

Examples of these in-demand roles include pilots, combat engineers, and a number of technician roles — for aircraft structures, ammunition, aerospace telecommunications and information systems, among others.

Hogan noted in her report that the CAF has already highlighted these positions on its website as being more in demand and provided incentives, such as signing bonuses.

In a separate report, the Auditor General found that the Department of National Defence (DND) could be doing a lot more to ensure that CAF members have proper living accommodation that responds to their needs and the needs of their families.

“National Defence’s own research has shown that housing is an issue that can negatively affect the well-being of military families, with impacts on retention,” reads the report.

The Canadian Forces Housing Agency maintains approximately 11,700 residential housing units on bases and wings across the country. The CAF bases also maintain 26,000 bed spaces in 318 buildings that may be used for training courses or short-term assignments.

Hogan’s audit found that DND did not always provide bed spaces that met its own standards. Her team visited quarters that had issues such as insufficient living space, which could result in overcrowding, and a lack of modern amenities such as wi-fi access.

Her team also found that many of DND’s buildings are old, and present significant issues.

“Some of the issues we observed included quarters buildings that lacked potable water, had malfunctioning sanitary waste systems, or had deteriorating exterior walls,” reads the report.

Overall, the audit found that 25 per cent of living quarters needed “major repairs” or did not meet the operational needs of DND or CAF members staying in them.

More generally, there is a severe lack of units to meet the CAF’s needs, and that problem will only keep growing for future recruits. In spring of 2025, Hogan found that there were only 205 residential housing units available, while 3,706 applicants were still on wait lists.

“To meet operational needs, Canadian Armed Forces members can be required to move frequently. It is important for their morale and well-being that they can access affordable housing in good condition with sufficient living space for their needs,” reads the report.

The audit also found that the Canadian Forces Housing Agency — which manages those residential units — made mistakes in how it processed and prioritized applications.

In many cases, the wrong household size was entered in the agency’s system, resulting in further delays in getting the right unit, or agency staff assigned the wrong priority level to applicants, resulting in low-level priority applicants getting units before high-priority ones.

The agency is expected to spend $2.2 billion over 19 years to build 1,400 new residential units and renovate 2,500 more. DND has also been exploring options to obtain additional housing, such as partnering with the private sector to develop housing for the military.

However, the audit found that many of these initiatives are at different stages of implementation and have not yet been funded. The updated assessments also do not take into account the CAF’s plans to expand their forces to 71,500 members by 2028-2029.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Auditor General of Canada, Karen Hogan, holds a press conference at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa on Tuesday, June 10, 2025.

OTTAWA — Despite hundreds of millions of dollars of investments since a devastating 2017 audit, the Canada Revenue Agency’s call centres are still plagued with worsening reliability and accuracy problems as agents give wrong information as often as 87 per cent of the time.

That’s according to a new report by Auditor General Karen Hogan published on Tuesday. The audit found that Canadians are waiting far too long on hold to speak to an agent and, when they get through, they often receive inaccurate general information.

“I’m worried that despite a new telephony system and other improvements, Canadians still wait too long to get answers to their questions on tax,” Hogan told MPs on the Public Accounts committee.

On average, Canadians waited over 31 minutes to speak to an agent last fiscal year, more than double the agency’s service standard of a 15-minute wait, her audit found.

“When those people were able to speak to an agent, they frequently received inaccurate responses,” Hogan added.

One remarkable finding is that the CRA’s call centre gave auditors inaccurate information 87 per cent of the time when they called asking for general individual tax information.

Enquiries about general benefits or business taxes fared only slightly better, with auditors receiving accurate responses roughly half the time.

The finding is in stark contrast to the agency’s own numbers. Since 2019, CRA has reported call accuracy and quality rates of over 87 per cent.

Hogan’s report found that accuracy rates jumped significantly on calls with account-specific inquiries, hitting up to 98 per cent.

But call center employees largely don’t have to fret about losing their job if they provide inaccurate information to taxpayers. That’s because the audit discovered that only 10 per cent of their performance review is related to accuracy.

The bulk of agent performance scores, Hogan says, are related to if they take their breaks and show up to work on time.

“Having only about 10% of an agent’s annual performance review based on the accuracy and completeness of their responses, in my mind, does not encourage a good culture where accuracy and completeness is top of mind,” Hogan told MPs.

Hogan said she also found so many red flags in the 2015 contract between the government and IBM for call center telephony services at CRA and two other departments that she will launch a standalone audit on the contract.

Her report found that the cost of the contract ballooned from a minimum guaranteed amount of $50 million to over $190 million.

In 2017, then-Auditor General Michael Ferguson revealed that the agency’s call centres blocked half the calls they received in order to say it met its service standard for wait times. He also concluded that taxpayers were given wrong information by agents 30 per cent of the time and that a large majority (64 per cent) of calls ultimately went “unanswered.”

In response, the Liberals committed $50 million to improve the call centre’s services and telephone systems and promised that Canadians would start seeing an improvement by 2018. In the meantime, the CRA dropped its service standard from 80 per cent of calls being answered within two minutes to answering 65 per cent of calls within 15 minutes.

Seven years later, the minister responsible for the CRA says the quality of service offered by agency’s call centres has

hit “rock bottom” and is “completely unacceptable”.

“It can’t get much worse than it is now,” the secretary of state responsible for the CRA Wayne Long told CTV last month. This summer, the government gave CRA 100 days to improve their services to Canadians.

The Liberals also promised an additional $400 million in the 2022 Fall Economic Statement to support the agency’s contact centres in that fiscal year and the next. The money, according to CRA, would allow the agency to “support the service standard of answering 65 per cent of calls within 15 minutes or less”.

But Hogan’s audit shows that both the number of contact centre employees and the percentage of calls answered within 15 minutes or less dropped between 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, raising questions about if that money was ever spent and, if so, how.

In June, CRA’s data showed that only five per cent of calls met the agency’s service standard.

“Since 2019–20, the agency has met its service standard only once — in the 2022–23 fiscal year,” reads the audit. “This shortfall limits callers’ access to an agent and compromises the agency’s ability to uphold its commitment stated in the Taxpayer Bill of Rights that callers have the right to complete, accurate, clear, and timely information”

Hogan says there is a link between the number of employees at the call centre and the agency’s responsiveness by phone. Call centre employee numbers have dropped progressively since 2022-2023, and so have the agency’s service standard rates.

Some issues highlighted in 2017 appear to have been addressed. Notably, the agency only blocks a small fraction of the calls it receives now (48,000 of over 32 million calls in 2024-2025).

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


A view of new homes under construction in Ontario.

OTTAWA — For every house being built in Canada’s largest metropolitan area, a new report says, there are 12 that have all of the necessary approvals but no shovels in the ground, which amounts to a backlog of about 1.2-million homes in that area alone.

The report, to be released Tuesday by cross-sectoral group CivicAction, says that backlog in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GHTA) and across the country is a major factor in Canada’s housing crisis.

The gulf between the planned homes and those actually getting built, CivicAction says, is a result of a wide variety of structural bottlenecks, including: municipal planning departments are designed for building levels of the past, not what is needed today; financing models favour high-priced developments, not the homes that middle-class Canadians can afford; and skills shortages in the construction industry.

Leslie Woo, CivicAction’s chief executive officer, said the housing crisis in the 26 municipalities that make up the Toronto-Hamilton area and other cities across the country won’t show much of a reprieve until these structural problems are resolved. The array of solutions will need to include new financial models that target affordable homes, mobilizing pension capital, and greater co-ordination and commitment among governments, developers, lenders and non-profits, she said.

“There is a solution but we’re just not getting our act together,” said Woo. “We’re just nibbling at the edges.”

Canada’s housing crisis is rooted in an unusual blend of forces that seems able to overwhelm a market where hundreds of thousands of potential buyers want to spend big bucks on something with countless social and economic benefits. The results of the disconnect between supply and demand in this case include rising home prices, foregone jobs and government revenue and homelessness. The average purchase price of a new home in Canada is now $1.07 million.

Many economists and analysts have portrayed Canada’s housing crisis as largely a function of a lack of supply, arguing that a greater stock of homes for both buyers and renters would mean more homes while also putting downward pressure on prices. They

trace the lack of supply to rising taxes and other input costs

, zoning chokeholds, and a tangled web of multi-jurisdictional bureaucracy.

While Woo emphasized the need for affordable housing, there’s little dispute that Canada needs to approximately double housing output to about 500,000 units a year by the mid-2030s.

But the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), a Crown corporation that acts as the country’s national housing agency, says housing output hasn’t shown much progress so far, despite the attention that the issue has received in recent years. CMHC recently forecast that the total number of housing starts this year will be about 237,800, down from 245,367 in 2024. The agency also forecasts a drop to about 227,734 next year and 220,016 in 2027.

The challenge has many faces, including access to land in the right places, lack of skilled trades, and, of course, rising costs.

The biggest cost in the price of a new home is taxation, with all three levels of government taking a healthy cut in the price of a new home. A recent study found that taxes and fees now comprise an average of about 35.6 per cent of the price of a new home — 16 per cent (or five percentage points) higher than at the start of the decade. About 70 per cent of those charges are for development charges for sewer, water and electricity, land-transfer taxes, and HST. The other 30 per cent is for the indirect income and corporate taxes paid throughout the supply chain, but ultimately passed on to buyers.

But the other major costs that go into a new home have also been on the rise. Those include the value of land and materials (21.2 per cent), the cost of the workers who provide home essentials such as flooring and cabinets (16.9 per cent), construction workers (12.9 per cent), developers’ margins (9.1 per cent) and supplier margins (4.2 per cent).

All three levels of government say they recognize the need for more homes and want to fix the problem. But housing industry executives, economists and groups such as CivicAction agree that there’s a long road ahead.

The federal government, which set the 500,000 target and is responsible for national housing strategies, signing cheques to provincial non-profits and indigenous housing, unveiled last month Build Canada Homes. The new $13 billion program is intended to help more homes get built more quickly, especially more affordable homes.

Prime Minister Mark Carney said the program will reduce the upfront building costs by providing flexible financial incentives to attract private investment and trigger large projects. The new organization would also use federal land in six cities for the construction of 4,000 factory-built homes. Ottawa has also eliminated the GST for first-time homebuyers who purchase homes valued at less than $1 million and tried to shave demand for housing by cutting immigration and foreign student numbers.

Some provinces and territories, the primary provider of housing delivery and public housing, are also taking steps, including making better use of underused land and cutting red tape.

Municipalities are seen as the biggest players in housing. They control zoning, land use, urban planning, and must approve housing developments. They’re also responsible for water, sewer and other services that form a costly and time-consuming part of the process for new builds.

Some municipalities have taken recent steps to spur more housing. More than a dozen municipalities in the Toronto area, for example, have temporarily trimmed or eliminated those development charges.

Demand for housing has also been on the rise for many decades, putting further pressure on prices. Population growth, fuelled largely by immigration, internal migration from rural to urban areas, and the reduction in the number of people who live in the average Canadian home are major drivers.

Beyond the social importance of housing, the lack of supply also comes with a huge economic cost.

Economists point out that home construction also creates economic activity and jobs through construction and the various purchases of furniture, appliances and other items that new homeowners typically make.

The new report by CivicAction, which was funded by TD Bank Group, also points to another another cost, saying that 68 per cent of GTHA businesses report difficulty attracting talent because of the area’s housing costs.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A cyclist rides past the University of Toronto Student Commons building, Tuesday November 7, 2023.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Thanks to changing government policies and political rhetoric in both the United States and Canada, prospective foreign students looking to North America for schooling may have more risks to worry about than benefits when choosing a school.

This is increasingly leading fewer to hop the pond.

The two countries have been able to offer strong schools with a wide variety of majors and flexibility, as well as work-study and post-graduation opportunities. In recent years, that has led to a record number of foreign students in Canada — with nearly 470,000 enrolled in postsecondary institutions in 2023, more than double what it was a decade earlier. American universities in 2024, meanwhile, had between 1.1 and 1.58 million international students enrolled in undergraduate and graduate programmes combined (sources vary), over a 50 per cent rise since 2014.

For both countries, the No. 1 country of origin for their foreign students is India — representing nearly 30 per cent of international pupils at U.S. universities and 40 per cent at Canadian ones.

“I would say there’s been about a 40 per cent drop in the interest in American schools and going to the U.S. (this year),” said Mrinalini Batra, founder and CEO of Delhi-based International Educational Exchange.

Batra has helped thousands of Indian students navigate the process of applying for schools abroad, and while her clients’ number one foreign destination has long been the U.S., she has also helped students land in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and other parts of Europe.

Indian students are drawn to studying in the U.S. and Canada, Batra said, because the programmes are world-class and allow them to learn a wider array of subjects, switch majors as needed, and study topics beyond their majors for minors and electives.

“These things made the U.S. extremely attractive — you could study what you wanted and how you wanted,” she said.

But now, “it has become really hard” for U.S.-bound students, she added, noting that there’s also been a dip for Canada. Batra noted that she’s seen an uptick in applications for the U.K. as a result of this trend away from North America, but some Indian students are also just deciding to stay home.

Canadian changes

In 2024, Canada introduced a two-year cap on new study permit approvals (though some student categories were exempt) and postgraduate work permit changes amid a national housing shortage and pushback on immigration. The government’s objective, according to Larissa Bezo, president and CEO of Canadian Bureau for International Education (CBIE), was to stabilize growth in the international student population, equating to roughly a 35 per cent decline in new study permit approvals.

But the changes led to a 48 per cent decline from 2023, or nearly 100,000 study permits below the official targets.

“So, from our perspective, this was a severe overcorrection that, as we warned, is having a much more deleterious impact in terms of international student flow to Canada,” said Bezo.

By the end of that first year, Canada’s international student population had declined by 4 per cent relative to 2023, following the 29 per cent increase from 2022-2023, according to CBIE.

And even though the graduate level was initially excluded from the cap, “we saw graduate numbers drop by 25 per cent or more due to the reputational damage of the overall decision to implement a study permit cap,” said Bezo.

Between January and June 2025, there was a 50 per cent decline in study-permit applications, according to ICEF Monitor, and while the fall numbers have not been released, they are expected to be even worse.

The impact has not been universal. Rural and smaller colleges have been hit harder by a lack of interest, leading to more than 35 campus closures, hundreds of programme suspensions, and 10,000 job losses in higher education since last autumn, according to Bezo.

Meanwhile, top schools like the University of British Columbia and the University of Toronto are seeing a dip in international applicants and doing their best to manage the subsequent drop in revenue.

“While domestic enrolment increased, the University of Toronto has seen modest declines in applications from some key international markets for a variety of reasons, including damage to Canada’s reputation as an education destination, evolving demographics and changing patterns in global student mobility,” said a statement from a spokesperson for university, noting that the anticipated 1.5 per cent drop in revenue will be managed with “existing contingencies and reserves” in the school’s budget plan.

UBC, meanwhile, said that like all Canadian post-secondary institutions, it has also seen a decline in international enrolment since 2023 and is doing its best to mitigate the impact. “As of this time, there are no university-wide plans to implement systemic cuts,” Kurt Heinrich, associate VP of communications at UBC, shared by email. But he did note that operating budgets and staff reductions have resulted from the decline in international students.

CBIE is calling on Ottawa for no further changes to international student policies to allow for some stability, and it wants to see a comprehensive plan for cultivating talent and a regional and institutional tailoring of international recruitment priorities. “We would like to see a global talent strategy for Canada that helps us support the country’s future economic innovation and demographic skills,” said Bezo.

“Our future prosperity hinges on that talent pipeline. So we need to get this right and we’re not getting it right at the moment.”

U.S. changes

The U.S., meanwhile, has ramped up its visa vetting this year, including reviewing applicants’ social media profiles, narrowing access to F-1 and J-1 visas for several countries, and revoking thousands of student visas on national security grounds. It has also introduced travel restrictions, affecting nationals from about 19 countries that make it harder for students from those nations to visit home and re-enter the U.S. Separately, Washington has imposed a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visa applications, the type of visas many international students aspire to obtain for work placement and residency in the U.S.

“This is the first year I found that kids could not get a slot for visas,” said Batra. “I’m not talking about visa rejections; they just could not get a slot,” noting that this didn’t even happen during the pandemic.

The White House has also made significant cuts to federal research funding and higher education support programs.

According to a recent Keystone survey of 42,000 prospective students in more than 150 countries, 57 per cent said they were less likely to study in the U.S. owing to the prospect of having their social media accounts scanned by U.S. authorities. The number one factor thwarting their interest, however, was funding cuts to higher education.

As a result of visa uncertainties and concerns about being able to complete their degrees, international enrolment in U.S. undergraduate and graduate programs has fallen by at least 19 per cent — and possibly as much as 40 per cent — from a year ago. As in Canada, elite institutions are more insulated from these declines, though some are beginning to see drops as well.

“In Boston, which has many top colleges, they’ve actually seen a downturn in the housing market and apartment rentals, which they believe is because they have fewer international students coming to the Boston area to go to school,” said Sarah Spreitzer, VP and chief of staff of government relations at the American Council on Education.

Spreitzer said the data for this year should come out next month. “If it is the [anticipated] 40 per cent drop, then it’s likely going to hit every school in some way,” she added.

Right now, if you are enrolled and making academic progress, your student visa remains valid, Spreitzer explained. But that could soon change as well, adding even more uncertainty to the process.

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed the elimination of the “duration of status” rule that allows foreign students with F-1 visas to remain in the country if they maintain their academic status. DHS wants international students limited to just four years, with limited options for changes one major or transferring schools – those key attractions for Indian students that Batra mentioned.

To extend, “you would have to apply for an extension of status, which the administration has said will be granted very rarely,” Spreitzer added, noting that she expects the measure to be implemented later this year.

Studying in the U.S. or Canada as a foreigner is expensive — not an investment decision to make lightly.

“Our international students have to demonstrate as part of the visa process that they have enough money to support themselves during their studies,” said Spreitzer, noting that there are very few exceptions allowing them to work while they’re in the U.S. That means they have to prove they can pay for four years of tuition, housing, and supporting themselves just to get into the country.

As a result of this spending, international students contributed a whopping $43.8 billion to the U.S. economy last year, propping up 378,000 jobs. Since they tend to pay higher tuition and fees, many schools rely on international tuitions being paid.

But with all the uncertainty over visas and the ability to finish one’s degree, parents of prospective students are growing wary of sending their children abroad and risking such a big investment.

“They’re reconsidering whether they want to spend about $90,000 per year to go there for the next four years,” said Batra.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.