LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

A man wears a pro-pipelines t-shirt as Prime Minister Mark Carney announces five megaprojects under consideration for fast-tracking during a news conference in Edmonton, Sept. 11, 2025.

A near-majority of Canadians support the development of a new oil pipeline to meet international demands for energy, and economic demands at home, while nearly three-quarters say pipelines are important to Canada’s economic future,

new polling from Leger shows

.

In an online survey of just over 4,000 Canadian adults from coast-to-coast, 49 per cent said they support the Alberta government’s plan for a new oil pipeline connecting the province to the northwest coast of British Columbia, opening up markets for Canadian energy in Asia.

In early October, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced that Alberta would submit a proposal to the federal government’s Major Project Office to build a crude-oil pipeline from Alberta to the West Coast for export. The province is putting $14 million towards early study and regulatory work, but is hoping that a private company will take over the project. It has reignited head-butting between Alberta and B.C., provinces that have feuded in the past over energy developments.

Whatever politics are at play, 72 per cent of poll respondents, agreed that new pipelines are “important to Canada’s economic future.” A further 55 per cent are confident that pipelines can be built while adequately protecting the environment.

When asked about prioritizing pipeline development or climate goals, 45 per cent of respondents answered that they’d like “A balance of both.”

“Canadians don’t see this as a black and white issue,” said Jennifer McLeod Macey, senior vice-president of public affairs at Leger. “They want to grow the economy and protect the environment at the same time.”

Leger’s survey also showed significant differences of opinion, depending on region. Support for pipeline development is strongest in Alberta at 63 per cent, and lowest in Quebec, at 41 per cent.

“The data shows just how regional this debate remains in our country,” Macey said. “Alberta and the Prairie provinces certainly differ from the rest of Canada, and Quebec is very much a distinct society.”

Support for new pipelines also differed significantly between genders. At 58 per cent, men were far more likely to support Alberta’s new pipeline project, compared to just 40 per cent of women.

“It’s really surprising to me when we look at the sentiments of men versus women on a number of issues, and we see this in the energy space as well,” Macey said. “Men tend to lean more conservative, and women are more likely to hold a neutral or unsure opinion on a given issue.”

Macey said the data also reflects a “generational shift in priorities” when it comes to energy and the environment. Support for Alberta’s new project was just 40 per cent among 18-34 year olds, compared with 56 per cent among their counterparts aged 55 and older.

Macey added that sentiments have shifted significantly in the past 25 years, particularly when it comes to balancing the environment with Canada’s energy needs: “It’s no longer the case of environmental impact versus the economy. It’s really all intertwined and I think there is a greater understanding among Canadians of a balanced mix between the two.”

The data also suggests support for pipelines is being influenced by the ongoing trade war between Canada and the United States.

“People are concerned about the reliability of our energy, and recognize the growth that pipelines bring for Canada as a whole. Natural resources are a huge piece of the puzzle,” Macey said. “We’re in unprecedented times, and Canadians are concerned about energy bills, and this country’s economic future.”

“Canadians want things that are both practical and principled,” Macey said. “Energy progress is a part of that. We’re not looking for an extreme. We’re looking for balance.”

The polling was conducted among an online panel of 4,099 respondents between Oct. 17 and Oct. 19, 2025. Results were weighted according to age, gender, mother tongue, region, education and presence of children in the household in order to ensure a representative sample of the Canadian population.​ For comparison purposes, a probability sample ​of this size yields a margin of error no greater than ±1.5 per cent, (19 times out of 20).

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Canadians will soon join other non-American citizens in being photographed when entering and leaving the U.S. The biometric data collection will used to improve identity verification, combat visa overstays and reduce passport fraud, says the Department of Homeland Security. This photo shows the Transportation Security Administration's new facial recognition technology.

The U.S. will soon require all non-citizens, including Canadians, entering and leaving the country

to be photographed

as part of new Department of Homeland Security regulations.

The security initiative is intended to build a comprehensive biometric data collection aimed at improving identity verification, combatting visa overstays and reducing passport fraud. It will involve the use of facial recognition technology matching live images of travellers with government records at all entry and exit points, including airports, seaports, and land borders.

The new regulations state that “the best tool to combat passport fraud is to utilize the digital photos contained in e-passports to biometrically verify that a person who presents a travel document is the true bearer of that document.”

And, further, that U.S. Customs and Border Protection biometric tests using facial comparison technology “support this conclusion.”

The DHS has been mandated by various federal statutes, notes the new regulations, “to create an integrated, automated biometric entry and exit system that records the arrival and departure of aliens, compares the biometric data of aliens to verify their identity, and authenticates travel documents.”

A reference to 9/11 and the continued threat of global terrorism is cited in the regulations, as well as “a

United Nations Security Council resolution

adopted in 2017, calling on member nations to increase aviation security and implement systems to collect biometric data to identify terrorists.

Biometric data collection can involve use of an advance passenger information system (APIS), common to airline security, for example. The CBP intends on building galleries of an individual’s photographs using such systems. But for crossings on foot or in privately owned vehicles that may not be possible, so it may build galleries using photographs of non-citizens who “frequently cross” a specific entry point, taken there to “become part of a localized photographic gallery.”

Biometric data collected at land borders will be retained for future verifications.

Under the regulation, set to take effect on Dec. 26, U.S. authorities could also require the submission of other biometrics, such as fingerprints or DNA.

The new regulations will apply to all non-citizens, including minors under 14 and seniors over 79, who were previously exempt from some biometric requirements.

The CBP has been collecting biometric data from certain non-citizens upon arrival in the U.S. since 2004, says

Bloomberg

, but the new rule marks a significant expansion of that data collection. New advances in facial comparison technology allow the agency to roll out broader inspections for entry and departure, the CBP told Bloomberg.

The new regulation will eventually apply to Canadian travellers entering and exiting the U.S., including at vehicle border crossings. However, DHS is still working out the technical challenges involved in doing so, as

noted in the regulations

. “CBP has not analyzed the costs and benefits for implementing a facial comparison-based biometric entry-exit program for vehicles at land ports and private aircraft, or for exit at sea ports and pedestrians at land ports because CBP is still in the process of determining the best way to implement biometric entry-exit within each of these unique environments.”

Canadians staying in the U.S. for over 30 days, including snowbirds, must already comply with

fingerprinting and registration

requirements.

Most public comments submitted in response to the 2021 proposed regulations opposed them, with many people citing privacy concerns. However, the final rule released today by DHS doesn’t make substantive changes to that proposal.

DHS will open a new public comment period for 30 days after the regulation is published in the U.S. Federal Register on Oct. 27.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


General view of production along the Honda CRV production line is shown during a tour of a Honda manufacturing plant in Alliston, Ont., Wednesday, Apr. 5, 2023.

OTTAWA — An Ontario government anti-tariff ad posthumously narrated by Ronald Reagan is no doubt racking up plenty of views after being cited by Donald Trump as a rationale for cutting off cross-border trade talks. One thing viewers won’t learn from the controversial TV spot is that Ontarians can thank Reagan’s protectionism for the province’s thriving network of Japanese-owned auto plants and parts manufacturers.

“It’s hard to draw a direct line, but Reagan used a careful blend of carrots (and) sticks in his dealings with the Japanese that Canada was able to emulate,” said Greig Mordue, an expert in automotive and advanced manufacturing policy at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont.

When Reagan took office in the early 1980s, Detroit’s “Big Three” automakers were getting decimated by a new generation of cheaper, more fuel-efficient Japanese vehicles. Rather than continue to watch the American auto sector bleed out, Reagan decided, in one of his first major foreign policy manpeuvres, to cut a deal with Tokyo.

Wielding the threat of a hard import quota, Reagan convinced Japanese officials in May 1981 to voluntarily limit auto exports to the U.S. by

roughly 33 per cent

, equivalent to a

tariff rate exceeding 60 per cent

.

Canada’s then trade minister Ed Lumley negotiated a

cap on Japanese vehicles

entering the Canadian market the same year.

To skirt the de facto tariff, the Japanese automakers set up their own plants in North America. The first of these sprung up

in the American Midwest

, but it wouldn’t be long before they spread north of the border.

Honda became the first Japanese entrant in Canada in 1984, announcing

a new plant in Alliston, Ont

. Toyota broke ground on

its first Canadian plant

in Cambridge, Ont., two years later.

Mordue said that a number of factors made Southern Ontario an attractive destination for Japanese car manufacturers.

“Just basic stuff, like lots of cheap land, no neighbours, close to rail and highways,” said Mordue.

He added that Japanese car companies have historically preferred to set up shop in small towns where they can be the primary employer.

Today, Southern Ontario is home to seven Japanese-owned auto plants and dozens of Japanese car parts manufacturers, supporting

roughly 30,000 jobs.

Mordue said that lessons from Reagan-era auto sector diplomacy can be applied to Canada today.

“Historically, Canada’s auto sector has done the best when it’s attached itself to the ascendant automaking power: in the 1960s, that was the U.S., in the 1980s it was Japan, today it’s China,” said Mordue.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Former U.S. president Ronald Reagan's 1987 remarks on trade have sparked controversy after being used in an Ontario ad.

Canadian and American politicians are reacting after Donald Trump condemned an anti-tariff advertisement by the Ontario government.

The ad, which features an audio clip from a radio address of the late former U.S. president Ronald Reagan, was

called “fake”

by the current U.S. president. Trump also said all trade negotiations with Canada are “hereby terminated.” Reagan

made the radio address in April 1987

.

In a

statement

, the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute said the ad “misrepresents” Reagan’s address. It also said that the Ontario government “did not seek nor receive permission to use and edit the remarks.”

But former Alberta premier Jason Kenney disagreed in a post on X.

He said the foundation does not “own copyright on the public domain statements of a president uttered 40 years ago, and disseminated by the White House.” He called it “laughably ridiculous” that such statements were subject to copyright limitations.

He asserted that the ad did not misrepresent Reagan’s address at all.

“In fact, everything he ever said about trade, before and after becoming President, is consistent with his principled opposition to tariffs,” he wrote.

The foundation “knows these things” he said, “but it is obvious” that their leadership is “easily intimidated by a call from the White House.”

Former Quebec premier Jean Charest posted a video of Reagan’s address on X, thanking Trump for “drawing our attention to a historic and foundational document in the Canada-U.S. economic relationship.”

“I invite everyone, especially our American friends, to listen to President Reagan’s full speech and form their own opinion about what he was truly saying,” said Charest.

California Governor Gavin Newsom, who had previously run a

campaign inviting Canadians to travel

to the western state, quoted Reagan in a post on X.

“Here are the words Trump doesn’t want you to see,” he wrote.

A quote from Reagan followed that said:  “When someone says, ‘Let’s impose tariffs on foreign imports,’ it looks like they’re doing the patriotic thing by protecting American products… Markets shrink and collapse, industries shut down and millions of people lose their jobs.”

Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew showed his support for the Ford government’s ad.

“President Trump’s tariffs go against Ronald Reagan’s legacy. Doug Ford’s ads are good — keep them on TV,” he said.

A video shared by Kinew in the post shows him appearing on the screen of an old television. He addresses Manitoba residents, saying that the ad is accurate and powerful. “It’s clear that these ads are working,” he said. “If you throw a rock at a lake, and you don’t hear a splash, you’ve probably missed.”

Michael Reagan, the son of the late president, is the president of The Reagan Legacy Foundation. He

said

he watched a news story about Trump cancelling tariff negotiations with Canada. “However they left out that the ad that was used was a lie,” he wrote in a post on X.

In a separate tweet, he

said

“Trump responded correctly” with a thumbs up emoji.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A still from the movie John Candy: I Like Me, TIFF's opening-night film.

It’s an incident that tells you a lot about John Candy. He was hard at work on Only the Lonely, the 1991 film that would help affirm his credibility as a dramatic actor. But it also marked an occasion when the famously affable Candy lost his cool when he realized that his legendary co-star, Maureen O’Hara, was not receiving the respect she deserved.

His top billing and seven-figure salary ensured luxury treatment for Candy during the shoot. That included the provision of an opulent trailer on location. Such was not the case for O’Hara: despite her status as a reigning queen of Hollywood during the 1940s and 1950s, she had been assigned something insultingly basic.

Thanks to a meticulously researched biography of the revered Canadian comic, we now have the straight goods on what happened.

An angry Candy demanded the producers find a better trailer for O’Hara who had been coaxed out of retirement to play his mother. Otherwise, he warned, he would turn over his own celebrity trailer to her.

Shortly afterwards, a huge trailer “magically” arrived for the 71-year-old O’Hara.

The incident may show Candy exercising a hard-edged display of star power, but he was no prima donna. That’s the judgment of veteran entertainment writer Paul Myers, whose new biography of the Canadian superstar arrives this month. Indeed, Candy was greatly loved by those who knew and worked with him, and it was entirely characteristic of him that he should distribute some 200 free Thanksgiving turkeys to cast and crew members during the Only the Lonely shoot.

“But he did have issues whenever he saw injustice,” Myers tells Postmedia. “I’m not equating him with Mother Teresa but he was certainly very high-minded over how he was treated and how people around him were treated.”

So coming to Maureen O’Hara’s defence was part of Candy’s nature. He was similarly protective of crew members: if he saw one of them subjected to unfair abuse by a producer or director, he would intervene. “If he saw that someone was being paid less than they should have been he would speak to a producer. Whenever he had issues with anybody, it was because of some perceived core of injustice. There have not been that many people in the industry who were as personally caring as John Candy.”

As for Candy’s artistry, both with his defining work in comedy, going back to his early triumphs with Second City Toronto and television’s SCTV, and his later emergence as a dramatic actor: “He was very intelligent, very intuitive, very creative.”

John Candy: A Life In Comedy

Paul Myers

Anansi

But above all Candy liked people. “He loved his family, but he also loved the teamwork. He was in his happiest place interchanging with others.”

More than three decades have passed since John Candy died in his sleep at the age of 43 in Durango, Mexico. He had been filming Wagons East, the last of a dreary list of carelessly chosen projects redeemed only by his formidable comic presence. It was an unhappy coda to a career cruelly cut short.

Yet, he had an acute awareness of his own mortality, and he would express surprise when he turned 40 that he was still alive. The warning signals were always there: a father who had died at the age of 35; a lifelong struggle with his weight that at one point saw it balloon to 375 pounds; anxiety attacks that often forced him to summon up all his willpower to overcome them; an innate fear of loneliness.

He was never self-destructive in the reckless vein of a Charlie Sheen or Chris Farley. He was too dedicated to his craft for that but he was also dangerously careless about his health — and that troubled Steve Martin, his co-star in the hugely popular Planes, Trains & Automobiles. Martin, who admired Candy greatly, worried that he was on an “uncontrollable spiral of damaging his health … that he was betraying himself for some reason that I don’t know.”

Some earlier writings about Candy have suggested that he was imprisoned in a very dark place psychologically and that the refusal of friends and colleagues to talk about him following his death is indicative of a coverup. Myers encountered no such stonewalling in researching the present book. He wanted to create a “narrative of truth” and there was no shortage of people willing to help in an outpouring of affection.

“I got close to people like Dan Aykroyd, Steve Martin, Catherine O’Hara, Martin Short, Eugene Levy, Chevy Chase, Tom Hanks — and they were all eager to tell me their memories of John Candy Yes, they were candid at times, yes they were alarmed about him at times, but the ‘darkness’ some people talk about has been overplayed.”

 Author Paul Myers said he wanted to create a “narrative of truth” when he was researching his book which eventually became John Candy: A Life in Comedy.

For sure, however, there were struggles to keep personal demons at bay.

“I don’t think I realized at first how much he had to endure as a large person,” Myers says. ‘There were so many fat-shaming jokes. Even the press and other people would talk to him about being a large guy — and how painful that was for him. Yet he was expected to laugh along with it, especially since he was a comedian. A comedian doesn’t get angry — you go along with it … you don’t want to be labelled as difficult.”

Myers is not only celebrating the Candy legacy here. He’s also celebrating the remarkable explosion of creative comic talent that occurred more than half a century ago in Toronto. It was a flowering that had its roots in such disparate events as a local production of the musical, Godspell, and the decision to transplant Chicago’s famed Second City culture north of the border. It was productive soil for people as prodigiously gifted as Candy and his friends.

“Second City Toronto was uniquely different from Second City Chicago,” Myers says. “Their creativity was uniquely Canadian but also exportable. They ran in a different direction and created a very Canadian form of improv. Something amazing happened — and it would play well to the world. This is something I’ve always been interested in, especially now when we’re wondering what makes us different from the Americans.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Arizona's highest mountain, 12,634-foot Humphrey's Peak.  A Canadian man was one of two hikers struck by lightening there on Wednesday.

A Canadian man is one of two hikers who was struck by lightning on Humphreys Peak near the city of Flagstaff, Arizona, reports Northern Arizona radio news network,

Great Circle Media

(GMC).

The

Coconino County Sheriff’s Office

said two people were struck by lightning on Wednesday morning. The sheriff’s office told several local media outlets, including GMC,

AZ Central

(

USA Today Network

), as well as the local

FOX

and

ABC

affiliates that one of the hikers was from Flagstaff and the other was from Canada.

They were traveling separately and did not know each other, reports GMC.

According to the website,

Live Science

, 90 per cent of people survive lightning strikes without a mark, but are often left with nerve damage, neurologic symptoms akin to post-concussion injuries and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Hiking conditions in the area had worsened quickly due to storms throughout the morning.

According to the local

ABC News

affiliate search and rescue crews were deployed on foot to the area where the men were located. Helicopter rescue operations were grounded because of weather conditions.

First responders made contact with the men round mid-afternoon on Wednesday.

The man from Flagstaff was extracted, treated by medical personnel and released.

Later in the afternoon, the Canadian hiker was extracted by search and rescue teams.

According to the Sheriff’s office, the Canadian’s injuries made it more difficult for them to descend, says

GMC

. The rescue team had to get the man to a utility terrain vehicle with a stokes basket, which is a stretcher designed for use where there are physical obstacles that impair movement.

Sheriff’s Office spokesperson Jon Paxton told

AZ Central

confirmed late in the day that both hikers had been rescued and were being treated at a Flagstaff hospital.

At more than 12,600 feet, Humphreys Peak is the highest point in Arizona. It is a part of the San Francisco Peaks.

It’s not the first time someone has been struck by lightning on Humphreys Peak, reports the Arizona

FOX News

affiliate.

In July 2016, a 17-year-old hiker died and two other teens were injured after being struck by lightning on Humphreys Peak.

NP has reached out to the Sheriff’s Office for comment but did not hear back before publication.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


A portrait of former U.S. President Ronald Reagan hangs behind U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on September 30, 2025.

The decision of the Ford government to run an anti-tariff advertisement using the voice of former President Ronald Reagan has led to an abrupt halt to trade negotiations between Canada and the United States.

The ad, which was

shared on social media

by the Ontario premier on Oct. 16, borrowed

<a href="%7B%22provider_name%22:%22YouTube%22,%22provider_url%22:%22https:%5C/%5C/www.youtube.com%5C/%22,%22object_url%22:%22https:%5C/%5C/www.youtube.com%5C/watch?v=5t5QK03KXPc%22,%22html%22:%22%22,%22type%22:%22oembed%22,%22channels%22:%5B%22desktop%22,%22tablet%22,%22phone%22%5D%7D&t=181s” rel=”noopener noreferrer” target=”_blank”>an audio clip of Reagan’s radio address in April 1987

. U.S. President Donald Trump called it “fake.” He also said the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute announced that the advertisement was done “fraudulently.”

“Tariffs are very important to the national security and economy of the U.S.A.,” said Trump in a

post

on Truth Social on Thursday. “Based on the egregious behavior (sic), all trade negotiations with Canada are hereby terminated.”

“Canada cheated and got caught,” Trump said in another

post

, on Friday. “They fraudulently took a big buy ad saying that Ronald Reagan did not like tariffs, when actually he loved tariffs for our country, and its national security.”

Meanwhile, the Ronald Reagan foundation shared its own

statement

. It said the ad “misrepresents” the address, and added that the Ontario government “did not seek nor receive permission to use and edit the remarks.”

On Friday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford seemed to stand by the ad. “Canada and the United States are friends, neighbours and allies. President Ronald Reagan knew that we are stronger together. God bless Canada and God bless the United States,” he said in a

post

on X.

Read the Ontario advertisement and Reagan’s address in full.

What Ontario’s anti-tariff ad says

When someone says, “Let’s impose tariffs on foreign imports,” it looks like they’re doing the patriotic thing by protecting American products and jobs. And sometimes for a short while it works, but only for a short time.

But over the long run, such trade barriers hurt every American worker and consumer. High tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars. Then the worst happens. Markets shrink and collapse. Businesses and industries shut down and millions of people lose their jobs.

Throughout the world, there’s a growing realization that the way to prosperity for all nations is rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and free competition.

America’s jobs and growth are at stake.

What Ronald Reagan said on April 25, 1987

My fellow Americans:

Prime Minister Nakasone of Japan will be visiting me here at the White House next week. It’s an important visit, because while I expect to take up our relations with our good friend Japan, which overall remain excellent, recent disagreements between our two countries on the issue of trade will also be high on our agenda.

As perhaps you’ve heard, last week I placed new duties on some Japanese products in response to Japan’s inability to enforce their trade agreement with us on electronic devices called semiconductors.

Now, imposing such tariffs or trade barriers and restrictions of any kind are steps that I am loath to take. And in a moment I’ll mention the sound economic reasons for this: that over the long run such trade barriers hurt every American worker and consumer. But the Japanese semiconductors were a special case. We had clear evidence that Japanese companies were engaging in unfair trade practices that violated an agreement between Japan and the United States. We expect our trading partners to live up to their agreements.

As I’ve often said: Our commitment to free trade is also a commitment to fair trade.

But you know, in imposing these tariffs we were just trying to deal with a particular problem, not begin a trade war.

So, next week I’ll be giving Prime Minister Nakasone this same message: We want to continue to work cooperatively on trade problems and want very much to lift these trade restrictions as soon as evidence permits. We want to do this, because we feel both Japan and the United States have an obligation to promote the prosperity and economic development that only free trade can bring.

Now, that message of free trade is one I conveyed to Canada’s leaders a few weeks ago, and it was warmly received there.

Indeed, throughout the world there’s a growing realization that the way to prosperity for all nations is rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and free competition. Now, there are sound historical reasons for this. For those of us who lived through the Great Depression, the memory of the suffering it caused is deep and searing. And today many economic analysts and historians argue that high tariff legislation passed back in that period called the Smoot-Hawley tariff greatly deepened the depression and prevented economic recovery.

You see, at first, when someone says, “Let’s impose tariffs on foreign imports,” it looks like they’re doing the patriotic thing by protecting American products and jobs. And sometimes for a short while it works — but only for a short time. What eventually occurs is: First, homegrown industries start relying on government protection in the form of high tariffs. They stop competing and stop making the innovative management and technological changes they need to succeed in world markets. And then, while all this is going on, something even worse occurs.

High tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars. The result is more and more tariffs, higher and higher trade barriers, and less and less competition. So, soon, because of the prices made artificially high by tariffs that subsidize inefficiency and poor management, people stop buying. Then the worst happens: Markets shrink and collapse; businesses and industries shut down; and millions of people lose their jobs.

The memory of all this occurring back in the thirties made me determined when I came to Washington to spare the American people the protectionist legislation that destroys prosperity.

Now, it hasn’t always been easy. There are those in the Congress, just as there were back in the thirties, who want to go for the quick political advantage, who will risk America’s prosperity for the sake of a short-term appeal to some special interest group, who forget that more than 5 million American jobs are directly tied to the foreign export business and additional millions are tied to imports.

Well, I’ve never forgotten those jobs. And on trade issues, by and large, we’ve done well. In certain select cases, like the Japanese semiconductors, we’ve taken steps to stop unfair practices against American products, but we’ve still maintained our basic, long-term commitment to free trade and economic growth.

So, with my meeting with Prime Minister Nakasone and the Venice economic summit coming up, it’s terribly important not to restrict a president’s options in such trade dealings with foreign governments. Unfortunately, some in the Congress are trying to do exactly that. I’ll keep you informed on this dangerous legislation, because it’s just another form of protectionism and I may need your help to stop it.

Remember, America’s jobs and growth are at stake.

Until next week, thanks for listening, and God bless you.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Vladimir Guerrero Jr. #27 of the Toronto Blue Jays celebrates defeating the Los Angeles Angels 3-1 at Rogers Centre on August 24, 2024 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

At the Toronto Blue Jays spring training home of Dunedin, Fla., almost nine years ago, a teenaged prospect walked into the front reception area of the team’s minor-league complex to meet a reporter.

He had medium-length dreadlocks poking out from under his Jays cap, didn’t look the least bit capable of growing a beard and was a little on the chubby side. But he was already one of the most fearsome would-be sluggers in the sport.

“Hello,” said Vladimir Guerrero Jr., in rehearsed English. “Nice to meet you.”

The Blue Jays of spring 2017 were in a bit of an odd spot. Two years earlier, a good Toronto team had exploded into a great one down the stretch, making baseball fans again out of a generation of lapsed supporters, who had lost interest over two moribund decades, and who now were bringing their kids along for the ride.

 Toronto Blue Jays first base Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (27) celebrates the team’s 4-3 win over the Seattle Mariners to win the MLB American League Championship Series in Toronto, Monday, Oct. 20, 2025.

But while that team made it to the American League Championship Series twice, it couldn’t get back to the World Series, couldn’t add to the two championship banners, from 1992 and 1993, that hung in the Rogers Centre. The roster was also a little old and creaky, and the competitive window was closing fast, if it hadn’t slammed shut already.

Vladdy, as he has been known around baseball since he was toddling around the Olympic Stadium turf when his Hall of Fame-bound father was playing for the Montreal Expos, was the Blue Jays’ next big hope. An added bonus: he was Canadian, although as suggested by his halting English he grew up in the Dominican Republic.

Before he had even turned 18 he had gained a reputation for belting monster home runs. His coaches raved about his natural talent, the way he rarely swung and missed, the sound the ball made when it cracked off his bat.

A year later, still just 19, Guerrero ended a pre-season game in Montreal with a walk-off home run, circling the bases at Olympic Stadium, just like his dad did so many times during his playing career. Vladdy otherwise spent that year in the minors, where he would play one more season before getting called up to the big club in 2019.

 Toronto’s Vladimir Guerrero Jr. scores a run in the Blue Jays’ series-extending victory over the Seattle Mariners in MLB’s American League Championship Series Sunday night in Toronto.

The next era of Blue Jays baseball had arrived. Vladimir Guerrero, Jr., the north star of a roster that also included second-generation major leaguers like Bo Bichette and Cavan Biggio, would be the guy to lead the club, finally, back to the World Series.

It would take a little longer than expected. Game One is Friday night.

——–

On Monday night, tears streamed down Guerrero’s face soon after the Blue Jays clinched the American League pennant after a truly preposterous Game 7 victory over the Seattle Mariners.

Guerrero had been relatively quiet on the night, ceding the spotlight to George Springer, whose three-run home run in the seventh-inning instantly became the stuff of franchise lore on the way to a 4-3 Toronto win. But it was one of the few nights in the 2025 playoffs where the Blue Jays offence wasn’t powered by Guerrero’s mighty, controlled hacks.

The story of Toronto’s postseason success has been similar to their regular-season success in many ways. They are a team that puts a lot of balls in play and gets contributions from the entire lineup; two home runs from Andres Gimenez, the ninth hitter in the lineup, sparked crucial wins in Seattle.

 Toronto Blue Jays’ George Springer and Vladimir Guerrero Jr. celebrate after defeating the Seattle Mariners in MLB American League Championship Series game 7 baseball action in Toronto, Monday, Oct. 20, 2025.

The big difference is that Guerrero has exploded. He hit six home runs against New York and Seattle, tying him with Joe Carter and Jose Bautista as Toronto’s franchise leader in playoff home runs — with all of his coming in the past 11 games. Guerrero’s numbers in 2025 are the stuff of video games: a .442 batting average and 1.440 OPS. In his seven playoff seasons with the New York Yankees, Babe Ruth hit .347 with a 1.285 OPS.

The Vlad-splosion, though, has been a long time coming. Guerrero’s time with the Blue Jays has mostly been a story of promise unfulfilled, for both player and team. He had a huge 2021 season, with 48 home runs, but hasn’t come close to that total since. The Jays made the playoffs three times with him before this season, but lost all six games to exit quickly each time. In 2024, the team sagged to a last-place finish in the AL East, even as Guerrero got back some of his old swagger at the plate.

By the team the 2025 season dawned, there were legitimate questions over whether Toronto’s baseball team would end up following the lead of its hockey team, failing to do much of anything with a crop of generational talent.

The front-office duo of president Mark Shapiro and general manager Ross Atkins, brought in by Rogers to replace Paul Beeston, the last link to the World Series years, and Alex Anthopoulos, the (Canadian) architect of those fun 2015/16 teams, still couldn’t point to any playoff success, and were best known around the league for trying and failing to land big free-agent targets like Shohei Ohtani and Juan Soto over previous summers. Guerrero and Bichette were also entering the final years of their contracts, raising the possibility that they could leave in free agency. It was a disaster in the making.

 Vladimir Guerrero Jr. #27 of the Toronto Blue Jays celebrates scoring in the dugout against the St. Louis Cardinals during the seventh inning in their MLB game at the Rogers Centre on September 14, 2024 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

But then the team announced in early April that it had signed Guerrero to a monster contract extension of US$500-million over 14 years. Manager John Schneider has said that the deal lifted the mood around the team, as it showed that ownership intended to field a competitive team well into the future. The doomsday scenario of a Vladdy departure had been avoided, and the team wouldn’t have to spend the season listening to questions about where he might go.

And then they started winning. A lot. After trailing the Yankees by 5.5 games on June 1, they were up by 3.5 games two months later, keyed by a four-game sweep of New York over Canada Day weekend. Former bit players like Ernie Clement, Nathan Lukes and Addison Barger were playing significant roles, while several players who had rough 2024 seasons — Bichette, Alejandro Kirk and especially Springer — had bounced back at the plate.

As the Jays ripped through the summer months, the vibes of 2015 returned. For the first time in the Vladdy era, the team was leading its division, having a bunch of fun, and packing the Rogers Centre with multi-generational crowds. Dreams of a long playoff run no longer sounded crazy.

But first they had to win a playoff game.

 The Toronto Blue Jays’ Vladimir Guerrero Jr., right, celebrates with George Springer, left, after scoring a run on a double by Bo Bichette, not pictured, during the fifth inning of a 4-1 win over the New York Yankees at Rogers Centre on Monday in Toronto.

——-

The road to that long-awaited postseason victory began even before October, as the Jays won the last four games of their regular season to hold off the hard-charging Yankees and secure the AL East crown.

That gave them a first-round playoff bye, and allowed them to open the American League Division Series at home, where they hosted New York. And the Jays, who had built their success on steady offensive performance, suddenly exploded, scoring 23 runs over two games. Guerrero homered in his first at-bat, the first home run of his playoff career, which now seems like a signal of intent.

Toronto dispatched New York relatively easily, and moved on to the ALCS against Seattle. That series gave Jays fans a lesson in one of the realities of playoff baseball, which is that it often makes you want to throw up.

Toronto lost two at home as the offence cooled off, then won two after it came alive in Seattle. The Mariners struck what seemed like it might be a death blow in Game 5, hitting a pair of late home runs in a comeback win, but the Jays’ bats woke up again in Game 6, another Guerrero home run included. Cue Game 7, and the Springer dinger that takes its place among the Blue Jays other immortal swats: Jose Bautista’s 2015 bat-flip homer against Texas and Joe Carter’s World Series-winning shot against Philadelphia in 1993.

 Toronto Blue Jays’ Isiah Kiner-Falefa (7), George Springer (4), Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (27), Tyler Heineman (55) and members of the bullpen line up for the singing of the national anthems ahead of first inning MLB American League Championship Series game 7 baseball action against the Seattle Mariners in Toronto, Monday, Oct. 20, 2025.

The Blue Jays will return to the World Series on Friday night, at home, against the Los Angeles Dodgers. It’s their first time getting that far since “touch-‘em-all-Joe” Carter sent what was then called SkyDome into pandemonium 32 years ago. Back then, the Jays were a model franchise, and few would have imagined it would take this long to make the final series again.

But that is the thing about team sports: this stuff isn’t easy. Toronto is the only Canadian city with more than one franchise in the big four North American leagues. The Raptors have made the NBA Finals once in their 30 seasons. The Maple Leafs, infamously, haven’t been to the Stanley Cup Final in 58 years. And now the Jays are back in the Fall Classic for just the third time in their 48-year history.

For some, it will bring back memories of Carter, and guys like Devon White and John Olerud. Older fans will think back to those first great teams — Dave Stieb, Jesse Barfield, George Bell — who never made it this far.

But for many more, all of this will be new. The final stage of baseball’s terrifying playoff high-wire act.

 Vladimir Guerrero Jr. #27 of the Toronto Blue Jays looks on after game six of the American League Championship Series against the Seattle Mariners at Rogers Centre on October 19, 2025 in Toronto, Ontario.

As he wiped the tears from his eyes on Monday night, Guerrero told a delirious Rogers Centre what he was thinking about: “Four more,” he said.

Wins, that is.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


An Air Canada aircraft arrives at Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport in Montreal on Sept. 10, 2024.

Air Canada has cut around 400 management positions, or 1 per cent of its workforce, according to reports.

The airline said Thursday that it had made the cuts, Reuters reported.

A spokesperson confirmed the cuts to

CTV News

and

CBC News

. “As a global company, Air Canada regularly reviews its resources and processes to ensure they are optimized to efficiently support business operations and its customers,” said spokesperson Christophe Hennebelle to CTV.

He told CBC that the flights would not impact day-to-day operations and said the “difficult decision” was made after an extensive review.

The airline will be presenting its

earnings on Nov. 5.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


“You are on Iran’s radar,” Iranian dissidents told human rights activist Raheel Raza.

A Muslim Pakistani-Canadian activist journalist who is critical of Islamic fundamentalism fears for her life after fielding two warnings recently that she’s in the digital crosshairs of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Raheel Raza, a 75-year-old Toronto grandmother, had just lost a friend and fellow journalist in Pakistan to sectarian violence. Then she learned from Iranian dissidents in California and an analyst in New York that her email had been infiltrated by IRGC hackers — known as APT35, or Charming Kitten — who produced a report detailing her work.

“You are on Iran’s radar,” wrote one of the dissidents who warned Raza about the leak.

That warning, she said, came with a description of the Iranian hacking group’s activities. “They hire hundreds of people who do nothing else but track people (like me) and they’re paid very well for it,” Raza said.

Knowing she was being monitored was chilling for Raza, as she’d just learned her friend, Pakistani journalist Imtiaz Mir, was attacked this past September by gunmen in the Malir area and later died from his injuries.

“In September 2022, Imtiaz was part of a delegation that visited Israel to know and learn with the goal of fostering interfaith dialogue and people-to-people understanding. Last year, he bagged the Ambassador of Peace Award for his work,” said a statement from the International Religious Freedom Roundtable. “Unfortunately, on September 17, this year Imtiaz was ambushed by armed assailants for voicing his opinions. He couldn’t survive the assault and tragically died on September 24, 2025. The terrorist group Lashkar e TharAllah (Al-Hosseini Resistance) claimed responsibility, explicitly citing his interfaith work and participation in the Israel peace mission. This act was not an act of random violence — it was a calculated attempt to silence a voice that wanted dialogue and bridge-building.”

Mir “was an excellent journalist,” Raza said in a recent interview.

“How it connects to me, is that the murderers of Imtiaz Mir were a terrorist outfit, closely linked with the Iranian regime. And the day after Imtiaz Mir’s assassination, my family and friends received phone calls asking for my whereabouts,” she said. “Is this a coincidence? I think not.”

Anyone who suspects Raza’s surveillance at the hands of the IRGC is an empty threat would do well to recall this past March, when two men were convicted in a plot to kill Masih Alinejad, an Iranian-American journalist and women’s rights activist living in New York. PBS reported at the time that Alinejad’s “attempted assassination was orchestrated by the Iranian government, part of more than a decade of violent plots targeting its critics abroad.”

The leaks that contained a profile of Raza were published on an anonymous account dubbed KittenBusters, according to Raaznet, a publication that promises to expose mass surveillance.

“The Charming Kitten leaks are more than a window into Iran’s cyber command, they are a rare glimpse into the bureaucratic soul of digital authoritarianism: structured, methodical, and quietly ruthless,” it reported on Oct. 17.

The IRGC profile of Raza doesn’t contain any threats “in terms of saying, ‘go out and kill her,’ or ‘we are going to kill her,’” she said.

“But what they do is they expose you,” Raza said.

“I’m a 75-year-old grandmother who’s just had a kidney transplant. Why would they want to have my photo out there?”

 Iranian-American activist Masih Alinejad, who was the target of a failed murder plot reportedly linked to the Iranian government.

Raza answers her own question about IRGC exposure: “It’s the Salman Rushdie syndrome. They put it out there and then some young Islamist looks at it and thinks this woman is against Iran and against the regime. Ergo she is against Islam, so she’s a heretic, and I go to heaven if I kill her.”

Hadi Matar, a 27-year-old New Jersey man who stabbed and partially blinded Rushdie on a New York lecture stage in August 2022 was sentenced earlier this year to 25 years in prison.

The novelist had been in hiding for years since his novel, The Satanic Verses, prompted Iran’s religious leader to issue a fatwa calling for the author’s death for writing the book, which was inspired by the life of the Muslim Prophet Muhammad.

“That’s definitely my fear,” Raza said.

“In countries like Pakistan and Iran, where you have religious fanatics, they just go hysterical crazy; they don’t think. They basically think that they’re doing their faith a favour by getting rid of so-called heretics like me.”

The report IRGC hackers produced on Raza contains her photo and, in Farsi, it explains it was prepared with information gleaned by infiltrating her emails from 2017 until 2021.

It notes that amongst the 23,938 emails she sent over that time frame, she’s corresponded with Iranians.

“She is an advocate for banning the Islamic hijab and burqa in public places,” according to a translation from the original Farsi.

“In 2012, Raza called on the Canadian government to block immigration from ‘terrorist’ countries like Iran. She is a supporter of Islamic reform and is the author of the book Their Jihad, Not My Jihad.”

The IRGC report also notes Raza’s involvement in a group called the Muslims Facing Tomorrow Association. “The motto of this association is to create reforms in Islam, confront violence and bigotry, and defend human rights,” it says. “She has introduced herself as a liberal Muslim and believes in gender equality, especially for Muslim women.”

Since learning she’d been hacked, Raza has changed all her passwords and beefed up her internet security.

Raza also reached out to a senior member of the Toronto Police Service to ask what she should do about the hack. He told her to check in with her local division about the security breach.

“They sent two officers over (on Oct. 9), but they couldn’t quite figure out what this ideology’s about,” Raza said.

“One of them asked me: ‘Have you reported this to the Iranian embassy?’ I just looked at her and said, ‘There is no Iranian embassy.’”

Canada severed diplomatic ties with Iran in 2012, citing concerns over the safety of Canadian diplomats in Iran and the Islamic Republic’s support for terrorist organizations. Iran responded in kind by closing its Ottawa embassy and expelling Canadian diplomats.

Raza has also reached out to the RCMP through a lawyer about the IRGC hack, but she hasn’t heard back yet.

“This is absolutely consistent with a much broader pattern that we see systematically with Iran,” said Thomas Juneau, a professor of public and international affairs at the University of Ottawa, who is researching a book on Iran’s transnational repression activities.

“The idea of intimidation tactics to silence, tactics to smear, tactics to discredit journalists, activists, human rights militants and so on — this is something that Iran does on a very large scale.”

The attack on Rushdie “is an extreme case, in the sense that there was an actual fatwa from the ruler,” Juneau said. “It came from the very top.”

He’s not particularly worried Raza could experience the same fate.

But “the intensity of the tactics” Iran uses against journalists and activists “puts a massive toll on them, a physical toll, an emotional toll, a psychological toll,” Juneau said. “It slows down their work. It discredits them.”

Targeting Raza and others like her “sows fear,” he said.

“There’s no reason to try to find a specific logic in the sense that what matters is the message that is being sent, even if it’s not clear to you or me why is she targeted and not somebody else who is more prominent,” Juneau said. “That’s kind of the point.”

Raza was born in Pakistan and moved to Canada in 1988 with her family.

“I have been a human rights activist all my life,” she said.

“My main work has been to speak out against radicalization and extremism and Islamism. This has been the constant battle.”

Since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attacks on Israel that killed about 1,200 people and took another 251 hostage, Raza has “also been a very vocal advocate of Israel’s right to exist and to defend itself. I’ve been there 13 times and I work very closely with the Jewish community.”

Raza has no plans to stop that work.

“The more they try to intimidate me, the stronger my resolve to speak out,” she said of the IRGC.

“I will speak out against violence, against extremism, against hate.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.