LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

The Canada Border Services Agency turned away an American with alleged ties to white supremacy.

An American man, named as a member of a whites-only group and twice turned away from Canada, complained border agents were aggressive and mean to him after finding “Nazi memorabilia” in his truck as well as animal skins painted with symbols authorities believed were rooted in European paganism.

Cormag Jaime Alainn took Canada’s Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree to Federal Court asking for a judicial review of the way the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) handled his complaint about officers who refused him entry at the New Brunswick border when he attempted to enter Canada from the United States last year with his pregnant Canadian wife.

“The complaint alleges that (CBSA officers) verbally abused and physically assaulted him, mistreated his wife and his pets and damaged his property,” Justice Whyte Nowak wrote in a recent decision.

The court heard that when Alainn tried to drive into New Brunswick, the U.S. citizen “declared that he was staying in Canada for two months and his pregnant wife (a Canadian citizen) advised that she had been outside Canada for the past five months. The couple were referred to secondary inspection.”

There Alainn “advised that he was newly married and intended to return to Maine to stay with friends after the birth of their first child,” said the Federal Court decision, dated Oct. 27.

Alainn told border guards “that he was unemployed and had no United States residence or significant family ties in the United States,” it said.

When border guards found a slide lock cable for firearms inside the box of the couple’s truck they “became concerned about the possibility” that Alainn might have a gun, which led border guards to conduct pat-down searches on the pair.

Border guards questioned Alainn about the contents of his truck, which included what they “considered to be ‘Nazi memorabilia’ as well as animal skins with spray painted symbols which the (CBSA agents) believed were rooted in European paganism,” said the court.

After Googling Alainn’s name, border guards confronted him “regarding his association with the Asatru Folk Assembly, which (they) believed to be a recognized hate group who advocate for white supremacy. According to a (border agent, Alainn) claimed that the items had no special meaning and he was simply interested in Nordic culture.”

The Asatru Folk Assembly (AFA) says its members must be “traditionally-minded” and of “Ethnic European” stock. “Let us be clear: by Ethnic European Folk, we mean white people,” their website says.

The AFA is registered as a religion in the United States but has also been branded “the largest neo-Völkisch hate organization in the United States” by extremism monitoring group Southern Poverty Law Center. The centre says the AFA has almost two dozen groups in the United States as well as affiliates in Canada.

The AFA espouse Ásatrú, described as a pre-Christian religion of Europe, and evoke the Norse imagery of Vikings. Their “religious imperative” is to ensure “the survival and welfare” of white people, their website says. Many of their public messages use a speaking style popularized in movies and TV as the way Vikings might talk: “Victory never sleeps”; “Hail Ragnvald”; “the gathered Folk spoke to personal victories before Honour was given to the Allfather with resounding energy.”

In a 2021 AFA newsletter, Cormag Àlainn was introduced to the organization’s membership: “Please welcome Christopher Taylor (Now named Cormag Àlainn) of North Dakota as our newest Apprentice Folkbuilder in the Baldrshof District. Chris has been very active in his District thus far.” The post ends: “Hail Chris Taylor! Hail the AFA! Hail Baldr!”

A Facebook page for a man with the same name and similar photographs shows a smiling man in a jacket and tie with two lapel pins; one is the three interlocking horns logo of the AFA and the other appears to be the symbol of Baldrshof, the AFA division that includes North Dakota. A LinkedIn profile gives his most recent employment status as a career break for full-time parenting — based in Nova Scotia — after leaving a job in North Dakota as an industrial machinery operator.

A CBSA officer issued a report denying Alainn entry to Canada “based on a finding that he was unlikely to depart Canada, and his circumstances were not indicative of a temporary stay.” He was allowed to voluntarily turn around and leave Canada.

Two months later, he again tried to come to Canada, to visit his wife. He was again refused entry. He then filed a formal complaint saying that “the reason given by the CBSA for his previous refusal was that he is the leader of a white nationalist group, which (Alainn) states is both untrue and not the reason that he was denied entry,” the court decision says.

In his complaint, Alainn alleged that during his March border stop the officers: “verbally abused him; physically assaulted him in conducting the pat-down search; denied him and his wife food and water for six hours; refused to allow the couple to care for their special needs dog and cat; and damaged his belongings in carrying out their search of his truck.”

During the agency’s investigation of his complaint, CBSA officials viewed video of the border interaction and spoke with Alainn’s lawyer, said the judge, and “when this informal attempt to resolve the complaint did not succeed” the CBSA issued a “final disposition letter” dismissing the complaint.

In a final disposition letter dated June 14, 2024, Dominic Mallette, the CBSA’s acting regional director general for the Atlantic Region, “concluded that (Alainn’s) complaint was unfounded.”

Nowak sided with Mallette.

Alainn “has not shown that the final disposition letter is unreasonable,” said the judge. “There is no merit to the applicant’s argument.” The letter “is intelligible and justified based on the facts and the law,” Nowak said.

She dismissed Alainn’s case, saying he “has not met his onus of demonstrating that the final disposition letter is unreasonable or that it was arrived at in a manner that was procedurally unfair to him.”

Requests for comment from Alainn, through his email address with the AFA, as well as from his lawyer in Canada, and from the AFA leadership in the United States were not answered prior to publication deadline.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


On Jan. 31, 2019, RCMP officers arrested Pastukhov in Montreal and Lalji in Toronto, charging both men with conspiracy to import cocaine into Australia.

Reviews and recommendations are unbiased and products are independently selected. Postmedia may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page.

The story of a former Vice Canada journalist who led an international drug smuggling ring made headlines a number of years ago, in part due to the notoriety of the person charged.

But we’re now learning more about another key figure in the case, another former Vice staffer who is alleged to have taken part.

National Post reporter Adrian Humphreys joins Dave Breakneridge to discuss how new information in the case came to light, what we know about the alleged “deputy”, and where his court case is at.

Background reading:
He grew up rich and joined the hottest media empire. Then came the cocaine mules

Subscribe to 10/3 on your favourite podcast app

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


United States President Donald Trump looks towards Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney as they raise their glasses during a toast at a working dinner in Gyeongju, South Korea on Wednesday,

Donald Trump may not have wanted to meet with Mark Carney “for a while,” but the U.S. President had no choice but to face the Canadian Prime Minister at a state dinner in South Korea on Wednesday.

The two world leaders are in the country this week for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in the city of Gyeongju, where South Korean President Lee Jae Myung held a separate special dinner in honour of Trump and other state leaders.

Carney was among the invitees at the event and was seated opposite Trump at a table that also included leaders from Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, Vietnam and Singapore, as reported by

Bloomberg.

Upon his arrival, Carney was asked if he had a message for the president and responded by pointing to Lee and saying, “I have a message for this president,” according to The

Canadian Press,

who noted that he and Trump smiled and pointed at one another as they sat down.

 (L-R) Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, US President Donald Trump, South Korea’s President Lee Jae Myung, Vietnam’s President Luong Cuong, New Zealand’s Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, and Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney pose for a family photo upon their arrival for a special dinner hosted in honour of US President Donald Trump and state leaders at the Hilton Gyeongju hotel in Gyeongju on October 29, 2025.

Asked by

Global News

if he spoke to Trump over their meal, Carney said they had “a very good conversation.”

Earlier in the day, as Air Force One was touching down at Gimhae International Airport, Trump said talks with Canada weren’t part of his itinerary.

“For those that are asking, we didn’t come to South Korea to see Canada,”

he wrote on Truth Social on Wednesday morning.

The relationship between the two world leaders turned frosty last Thursday after Ontario’s anti-tariff ad campaign using a 1987 Ronald Reagan radio address went live. Trump “

terminated

” trade talks late last week, called the ad “fake” and accused Canada of cheating.

“Canada is trying to illegally influence the United States Supreme Court in one of the most important rulings in the history of our Country,” he said, referring to a pending decision on the legalities of the tariffs his administration has applied to imported goods.

The next day, Ontario Premier Doug Ford, following a chat with Carney, said the campaign was paused, but not until it aired during the first two games of the World Series this past weekend.

That, too, drew Trump’s ire and led him to call for an additional 10 per cent tariff on Canada

“over and above what they are paying now.”

He has yet to clarify when the increased levy will take effect and to which goods it will apply, nor has the Canadian government been informed, according to Carney.

Speaking to reporters in Malaysia

the following day, Carney said Canada was ready to sit down with the U.S. officials to continue making “considerable progress in the areas of steel, aluminum and energy.” He also suggested a deal was close and that some term sheets had been exchanged.

 Thailand’s Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, Singapore’s Prime Minister Lawrence Wong, Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, US President Donald Trump, South Korea’s President Lee Jae Myung, Vietnam’s President Luong Cuong, New Zealand’s Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, and Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney attend a special dinner hosted in honour of US President Donald Trump and state leaders at the Hilton Gyeongju hotel in Gyeongju on October 29, 2025.

Monday morning, however, Trump said he had no desire to meet with Carney any time soon.

“No, I’m not going to be meeting with them for a while,”

he said.

“I’m very happy with the deal we have right now with Canada. We’re going to let it ride.”

Also on Monday,

Doug Ford defended

the ad and said the prime minister and his chief of staff saw it before it began airing on Oct. 14. The goal wasn’t to “poke the president” in the eye, he said, but to warn Americans of the dangers of tariffs and protectionism on both economies.

“Do you know why President Trump’s so upset right now? Because it was effective. It was working. It woke up the whole country,” Ford told reporters at Queen’s Park in Toronto.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra speaks before taking part in a discussion on Canada-U.S. relations with Colin Robertson, a fellow with the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, during the Global Business Forum in Banff, Alberta on Sept. 25, 2025.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford has called on U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra to apologize for shouting and cursing at Ontario’s trade representative to the United States.

“The cheese slipped off the cracker, I get it. You’re ticked off, but call the guy up,” Ford told reporters at a press conference on Wednesday morning.

Ford said Hoekstra’s behaviour at an event Monday night in Ottawa was “unbecoming of an ambassador” and said Hoekstra should phone David Paterson, Ontario’s trade representative to the United States.

“People get hot, they get heated — I get heated sometimes — just call the guy up and bury the hatchet,” Ford said.

The full details of what Hoekstra said have yet to be reported, but the comments were apparently laced with profanities, including the f-word, according to news reports. Paterson, a former senior executive with General Motors Canada, was appointed to his position in December 2023.

The incident occurred at an event to debate the Canada-U.S. trade relationship, at the annual Canadian American Business Council gala held at the National Gallery in Ottawa. Anonymous sources told a number of publications that Hoekstra was seen tearing into Paterson over the Ontario government’s ad that ran excerpts of a 1987 radio address from then U.S. president Ronald Reagan, in which he decries tariffs.

Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand was asked about Hoekstra’s tirade on Wednesday, but declined to answer directly.

“I know that Dominic LeBlanc is working very hard on this file,” said Anand, referring to the minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade. “I would like — we want to see an agreement when we can get it.”

In response to a reporter’s question, Anand also said that the Canadian government had not summoned Hoekstra to account for his behaviour. When pressed, she would not say if Canada planned to do so.

In an emailed message, Gabriel Brunet, LeBlanc’s press secretary, said, “We will not comment on this matter.”

The ad, which has since been pulled from the air, drew the ire of U.S. President Donald Trump, who said he would increase tariffs on Canadians goods by 10 per cent and called off trade talks with Canada. On TruthSocial, his social media platform,

Trump wrote that

“Canada was caught, red handed, putting up a fraudulent advertisement on Ronald Reagan’s Speech on Tariffs.”

“Ronald Reagan LOVED Tariffs for purposes of National Security and the Economy, but Canada said he didn’t!” Trump wrote.

Reagan is widely seen as a fervent believer in the benefits of free trade. In the ad, he says of tariffs that “over the long run, such trade barriers hurt every American worker and consumer.”

Ford has continued to defend the ad. “Ronald Reagan is telling the truth. A tariff on Canada is a tax on American people,” said Ford.

“What do they expect me to do? Sit back and roll over like every other person in the world? I’m going to fight like I’ve never fought before,” Ford said Wednesday. “Man, was it the right thing to do. It started a conversation like I’ve never seen before.”

Yet, Ford also told reporters that his intention wasn’t to “poke the president in the eye” but that his intention was to “get a conversation going.”

Canadians “love Americans. We don’t love President Trump, I’ll tell you that,” he said.

“Why doesn’t the president start being nice, playing nice in the sandbox?”

The Wall Street Journal, on Wednesday, ran a letter to the editor from Ford, in which he addresses the ad controversy. Tariffs, he wrote, are “driving a wedge between Canadians and Americans when we need to be united against external threats from such adversaries as Russia and China.”

“Mr. Trump called our ad a ‘hostile act,’ but it was meant as an encouragement to embrace what has made our nations great,” Ford wrote.

Paterson and the U.S. embassy in Ottawa did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

With additional reporting by Bloomberg News and the Toronto Sun

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Sleeping in the brightest conditions — equivalent to having an overhead light on in the room — led to a 56 per cent greater risk of developing heart failure or having a heart attack.

It’s long been known that darkness improves the length and quality of sleep. Studies have shown that even the

phase of the moon

can affect our sleeping patterns.

Now a new study has revealed a link between nighttime exposure to light and cardiovascular health. The research, posted last week in the journal

JAMA Network Open

, studied close to 90,000 people aged 40 and older to look for links between light and various cardiovascular conditions: coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction (heart attacks), heart failure, atrial fibrillation and stroke.

The long-term study followed participants in the U.K. over a period of 9.5 years, from June 2013 to November 2022. Scientists gathered some 13 million hours of light exposure data tracked by wrist-worn sensors worn for a week at a time by participants.

The participants, 88,905 in total, were 57 per cent female and 43 per cent male, with a mean age of 62. Most (97 per cent) were white. Anyone with pre-existing cardiovascular health conditions was removed from the study.

The results found that, across all the conditions being studied, the risks were greater for those who slept in brighter conditions.

For instance, those sleeping in the brightest conditions — equivalent to having an overhead light on in the room — had a 56 per cent greater risk of developing heart failure or having a heart attack compared to those who slept in the darkest places.

Bright light also led to a 32 per cent higher risk of coronary artery disease, a 32 per cent higher risk of atrial fibrillation (irregular and often rapid heartbeat), and a 30 per cent higher risk of stroke than in the dark-sleeping group.

“These associations were robust after adjusting for established cardiovascular risk factors, including physical activity, smoking, alcohol, diet, sleep duration, socioeconomic status, and polygenic risk,” the study found.

It also noted that females were more susceptible than males for risks of heart failure and coronary artery disease after sleeping under bright light. Similarly, younger individuals were found to have a higher risk of heart failure and atrial fibrillation than older participants.

“Our findings are consistent with higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in people with brighter nights, observed in smaller cohorts with objective light data,” researchers wrote. They also found results consistent with higher cardiovascular risks observed in rotating shift workers, “a population that experiences frequent exposure to bright light during the biological night.”

Several drawbacks to the study were noted, despite its size and timescale. Researchers pointed out that participants tended to have higher education levels and income than the general populace, and that the study did not identify the source of the light, “meaning we could not adjust for behavioural correlates of night light exposure (e.g., light from stimulating digital content).”

The study also did not capture the causal relationship of night light with cardiovascular disease risk. “Long-term circadian-informed lighting interventions for reducing cardiovascular disease risk are needed,” they wrote.

However, they concluded: “Night light exposure was a significant risk factor for developing cardiovascular diseases among adults older than 40 years. These findings suggest that, in addition to current preventive measures, avoiding light at night may be a useful strategy for reducing risks of cardiovascular diseases.”


Minister of Finance and National Revenue Francois-Philippe Champagne listens to a reporter's question ahead of a cabinet meeting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on Tuesday, Oct. 21, 2025.

OTTAWA — Liberal members of Parliament lined up Wednesday to say Canadians are in no mood to go to the polls for a second time this year, as the government warns it lacks the votes needed to pass next week’s federal budget.

The spectre of a possible Christmas-time election has been raised as Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon accuses opposition parties of presenting demands that he says are unserious and signalling that the minority Liberals should not count on their support.

Opposition parties, in turn, have said the Liberals bear the responsibility of negotiating a way to stay afloat and that whatever happens lies at their feet. That leaves Canadians watching a game of parliamentary chicken, with some perhaps wondering if Santa Claus won’t be the only guest visiting their household this December.

“I think we’re tired of elections,” said Marcus Powlowski, Liberal MP for Thunder Bay—Rainy River. “We want a government that actually functions. I think it would be very premature to have an election just because we could have an election.”

Chris Bittle, MP for the Ontario riding of St. Catharines, added, “I can assure you that Canadians don’t want an election right now.”

“If the opposition parties want to force that, they’re going to risk Canadians blaming them for sending us the polls in December.”

Speaking to reporters ahead of the Liberals’ weekly caucus meeting on Wednesday, MacKinnion bluntly accused Opposition Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre of trying to trigger a “Christmas election,” suggesting it could be his way of avoiding scrutiny from some in his own caucus about his leadership.

Poilievre declined to say on Tuesday when asked if the Conservatives wanted to bring down the government by voting against the budget, which would constitute a confidence vote for the minority Liberal government.

With 169 seats in the House of Commons, the Liberals need to find another party, or at least three MPs, to vote with them, or simply not vote against.

Poilievre on Tuesday reiterated the calls he had put in writing to Prime Minister Mark Carney, which he says he also voiced to the prime minister during their most recent meeting, namely that the Liberals ought to deliver what Poilievre calls an “affordable budget.”

He has defined that as a spending plan containing a litany of tax cuts, including to the government’s own industrial carbon pricing system, as well as capping the federal deficit at $42 billion.

The Parliamentary Budget Officer, an independent watchdog of Parliament, has predicted the federal deficit for 2025-2026 could grow to around $70 billion.

On Wednesday, MacKinnon panned Poilievre’s proposition as “essentially stripping all revenues from the federal government.”

Multiple Conservative MPs heading to their own caucus meeting that morning told reporters the question of a possible election is one for the Liberals to answer.

Poilievre was nevertheless set to stage an event in Toronto on Thursday that the Conservatives have billed as the “No More Sacrifices Youth Event,” which refers to a line from a speech Carney delivered to students at the University of Ottawa last week, where he said Canadians should brace for “sacrifices” as he prepares to present his first budget.

This week, the party also sent out a fundraising blast to supporters, saying Canadians could find themselves going to the polls “thanks to these Liberals.”

Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne told reporters on Wednesday that the government believes Canadians understand the “headwinds” it is facing, given the level of uncertainty in the world, but argued they see the country as still having “fiscal capacity.”

“We need to make generational investments,” Champagne said.

He also added the government needs to make “tough choices.”

“People understand that we need to do a number of things, make government more efficient, adopt technology, we need to make sure that we have a sustainable level when it comes to the public service, so all these things will be presented in the budget.”

The Liberals will table their budget on Nov. 4.

Interim federal NDP Leader Don Davies has said the party has no intention of voting for “austerity.”

Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet has presented what his party calls six “non-negotiable” demands, which include higher Old Age Security transfers to seniors aged 65 to 74 and sending those in Quebec around $800 million in what it says is owed in rebates from the cancelled consumer-carbon price, which other Canadians received during the April federal election, but Quebec did not, because it has its own system. 

Corey Hogan, a Calgary Liberal MP, dismissed any talk about a possible election as a “bit of an Ottawa conversation,” referring to the circle of endless chatter from MPs, staffers, lobbyists, and journalists, which consumes the blocks around Parliament Hill, but that Canadians elsewhere pay no mind.

Liberal caucus chair and Ontario MP James Maloney dismissed the ongoing back-and-forth as the normal posturing that happens before a government presents its budget.

“Let’s wait and see what happens. These things have a way of working themselves out.”

Asked whether he wanted an election, Maloney declined to sugarcoat matters.

“God no.”

-With files from Catherine Levesque

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Former senator Don Meredith walks into Ottawa Courthouse on Monday morning. Dec. 9, 2024.

OTTAWA — Former senator Don Meredith was found not guilty of all charges of sexual assault and criminal harassment that were brought forward by a former employee, according to a decision read by Superior Court Justice Narissa Somji on Wednesday.

The complainant, who is protected by a publication ban and therefore cannot be named, alleged that she was subject to constant fondling, unwanted touching and threatening remarks by Meredith over a period of six months when working for him over a decade ago.

When delivering her decision in Ottawa, the judge said she found “inconsistencies” which undermined the reliability of the complainant’s account, whereas she found Meredith’s evidence “to be straightforward and clear” and “not shaken” during cross-examination.

“The primary issue at trial is whether the Crown has proved beyond a reasonable doubt whether the offences occurred,” said Somji. “The law is clear that I cannot decide the case by determining which conflicting version of events is preferred.”

Meredith, a Pentecostal minister from Toronto, was appointed to the Senate by former prime minister Stephen Harper in 2010 and resigned from the upper chamber in 2017 after it was revealed that he had a sexual relationship with an underage girl.

He also faced allegations of harassment, including of a sexual nature, to abuse of authority including were the object of two separate reports. Ultimately, the Senate paid nearly half-a-million dollars to nine of his former employees, including the complainant.

During the trial, she alleged that Meredith hugged her, kissed her, and touched her buttocks and breasts with her consent in his Senate office. She also described three incidents which happened outside of the office — including exposing his erect penis.

Meredith denied all of the allegations of sexual nature brought forward during the trial.

Somji argued in her decision that there were contradictions that arose from the complainant — whom she described as a “very fragile witness” who was at times “very emotional and distressed” — which put in question the reliability of her testimony.

In describing an incident in a hotel room in Toronto, the complainant testified that she rejected Meredith’s advances by asking him if it was the first time he was unfaithful to his wife. However, in a statement to police in 2018, she said she feigned to be on her period.

During cross-examination, the complainant said that many thoughts were running through her mind as an excuse to get out of that alleged interaction “should things go further.”

The judge also noted that a Senate security guard who testified on trial recalled that the complainant had been neglecting her appearance when working for Meredith, contradicting testimony that she felt forced to wear skirts and dresses to please him.

Another time, the security guard testified that the complainant had confided in him that Meredith had touched her vagina, but the complainant said she did not recall saying that.

The complainant also alleged that the former senator made inappropriate and threatening remarks — including one instance where he allegedly said he would “stab” her in the back is she leaked information — that made her feel like she was at risk of losing her job.

The Crown argued during the trial that the alleged sexual misconduct, coupled with his remarks, caused the complainant to fear for her psychological safety, resulting in criminal harassment, but the defence argued the elements of criminal harassment were not met.

“While Mr. Meredith acknowledges that he did provide (the complainant) job-related directives, he denies he ever threatened her physical or psychological safety,” said Somji.

Speaking to reporters after the verdict, Meredith thanked his family, God and his lawyer Paul Lewandowski. He expressed relief that this “cloud has been lifted” on him.

“It’s been several years of testing me and my family, and I’m glad that this day is finally over,” he said, adding that he would continue his work in his community.

Meredith said he did not have a message for the former employee who testified against him. He was standing next to his wife, who was in the courthouse for the verdict.

The Crown did not offer any comments immediately after the judge’s ruling.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Prince Harry and Meghan Markle look on during seventh inning of Game 4 in the World Series between the Los Angeles Dodgers and the Toronto Blue Jays Tuesday night in L.A.

Like most major sporting events in Los Angeles, Tuesday night’s World Series game between the host Dodgers and the Toronto Blue Jays lured a menagerie of celebrities, among them were Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.

But after the two were shown in their front row seats along the first-base line on the official Major League Baseball broadcast and photos began circulating on social media, some were aghast to see both wearing Los Angeles Dodgers hats

Especially Harry, who, while having relinquished his His Royal Highness and military titles, is still a member of royal lineage and remains fifth in line for the British crown after his brother, Prince William, and his three children. Canada is a sovereign country, but is one of 56 Commonwealth nations with historic links back to the U.K. and making the ruling British monarch the official head of state.

“His father is the King of Canada and this court jester has a Dodgers hat on… absolutely shameful,” deputy chief of staff for the Ontario premier Doug Ford’s office,

Cody Welton, said

, resharing MLB’s photo of the couple on X.

Andrew MacDougall, once the head of communications for former prime minister Stephen Harper, said it was “thick as mince” — an old British expression to mean an unintelligent idea — because the “song of the King of Canada” should cheer for the Canadian team.

“It’s a better/cuter media story if you’re off side with your wife,”

he added on X.

Ben Woodfine, a former director of communications for Conservative Party of Canada Leader Pierre Poilievre, accused them of

“dodging duty and responsibility.”

“I can’t think of what’s worse, betraying your father’s Dominion or cheering for the dodgers,” independent journalist

Chris Tomlinson opined

on MLB’s photo of the couple on X.

“The son of our King in a Dodgers hat … Great,”

added Alyn Kenji Marsh

, who works in Canada’s parliament as an executive assistant for Alberta member of parliament Blaine Calkins.

“Shouldn’t he be rooting for Toronto,”

wondered Jim Dalfino

, host of

redsoxdigest.com.

Dan Arnold, chief strategy officer at Ottawa-based Pollara Strategic Insights and a former pollster for prime minister Justin Trudeau, remarked that Harry’s fashion choice left the door open for his older brother to score some public relations points in Canada.

“I’m not one to encourage passive aggressive infighting in the royal family, but William is one insta post in a Jays cap away from the ultimate troll job,”

he wrote on X.

Other commentators on the photo called out Markle for having donned Jays gear in the past. Markle lived in Toronto for parts of seven years while filming the television series Suits, which she left upon her engagement to Harry in 2017.

“Meghan used to support Toronto…” retired CBC journalist

Simon Dingley wrote

in reply to Associated Press reporter Greg Beachham’s photo on X of the couple appearing on the stadium’s big screen. He added an undated photo of her wearing a Jays hat.

Podcast host Nancy Sidley also shared undated photos of Markle in a Toronto hat and suggested their photo opportunity in an L.A. hat “jinxed the Dodgers,” who would go on to lose 6-2.

Tara Greene of Toronto, meanwhile, called Markle a “traitor.”

“She got sorta famous for acting in Suits in Toronto, where she lives for 7 years and became a millionaire which led to her meeting Harry,”

she posted on X.

Even Sarnia Mayor Mike Bradley chimed in with a jab.

“The Masters of public relations Harry and Meghan endear themselves to Canadian Jays fans from Coast to Coast,” he wrote from

his personal X account.

The couple and their then-infant son Archie moved to Los Angeles, Markle’s hometown, in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic and around the time they stepped away from senior roles in the monarchy.

Markle’s Dodgers fandom isn’t well documented online, but she has been photographed wearing the team’s hats on occasion — including

during the wildfires earlier this year

— and

a website dedicated to her style

promotes a blue and green version.

But the celeb couple may have extra reason to support the Jays’ opponents in the Fall Classic: Markle is very likely a distant relative of Dodgers’ shortstop Mookie Betts.

 Los Angeles Dodgers shortstop Mookie Betts.

According to a 2018 story in the Boston Globe,

per Bleacher Report

, an amateur genealogist discovered that the ball player’s great-great-grandfather, Joseph Betts, and Markle’s great-great-great-grandfather, Jacob Betts, both lived on the same Alabama plantation in the 1800s and are believed to be descendants of an Elisha Betts.

He also uncovered a 1920 marriage between Betts’ great uncle and Markle’s great-great aunt.

The two met in 2019 while Betts was playing for the Red Sox, as reported by

the Globe.


A Lufthansa Airlines flight prepares to land at Toronto Pearson International Airport in 2021.

A plane from Chicago to Germany was diverted after a man allegedly stabbed two teens with a metal fork.

The Lufthansa flight took off on Oct. 25, and was en route to Frankfurt when the incident occurred, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office. After the in-flight meal service, the man — a 28-year-old from India — allegedly stabbed a 17-year-old male passenger in the shoulder with a fork. The passenger had been sleeping lightly in a middle seat and woke up to see the man was standing over him, the attorney’s office said.

Then, the man allegedly lunged toward another passenger, also a 17-year-old male, who was in a middle seat in the centre row of the plane. He struck the 17-year-old in the back of the head with the same fork.

The man slapped a female passenger while flight crew members tried to subdue him. He also tried to slap a flight crew member. During this time, it is alleged that the man made a gun with his fingers, put it in his mouth and pulled an imaginary trigger, the attorney’s office said.

While he was handcuffed after being subdued, he yelled phrases such as “I am the reason for COVID” and “I am a sinner in the eyes of Siddhartha,” according to a criminal complaint obtained by National Post. (

Siddhartha Gautama

was the fifth-century founder of Buddhism. He was later known as the Buddha.)

The plane diverted to Boston approximately two hours into the flight, after the pilot was alerted to the incident. The 28-year-old man was taken into custody upon landing in Massachusetts.

The first victim, who was struck in the left clavicle, did not suffer from any visible injuries as he was wearing a large hoodie, the complaint said. The 17-year-old told authorities that he had “exchanged pleasantries” with the suspect while the flight was boarding, but otherwise they had no other interactions.

The second victim suffered from a laceration. He was treated by paramedics at the gate.

The man was charged with one count of assault with a dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily harm while traveling on an aircraft in the U.S. jurisdiction. That charge could lead to a 10-year prison sentence, up to three years of supervised release and a fine of up to US$250,000.

The attorney’s office said the man was let into the U.S. on a student visa and had been enrolled in a master’s program in biblical studies. However, he currently does not have lawful status in the U.S.

He is expected to appear in federal court in Boston.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Justice Minister Sean Fraser speaks to reporters on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2025.

OTTAWA — When Ontario’s two top judges took the stage during the opening of the province’s courts in September, they did something that hadn’t happened in years: they both pleaded for Ottawa to pay for more judges.

“There are not enough judges to meet the demands of the number of cases in the system,” said

Ontario Superior Court Chief Justice Geoffrey Morawetz

, who heads the country’s busiest federally appointed court. “The stakes are high.”

“The Court of Appeal’s complement remains significantly under-resourced compared to other provinces,” Court of Appeal for Ontario Chief Justice Michael Tulloch noted,

describing the challenge as “particularly pressing”

.

Their combined appeal was extraordinary in that both courts have seldom simultaneously pleaded openly for a larger complement. A former judicial affairs advisor in Justin Trudeau’s government said it only happens in “times of crisis.”

Ontario’s courts are far from the only federally appointed benches that say they are in dire need of more judges as the judicial system nationwide bends under the strain of growing and more complex caseloads combined with rapid population growth.

National Post contacted every provincial superior and appellate court in Canada as well as the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal to inquire if they faced the same challenges as in Ontario.

Among superior courts — which hear serious criminal cases as well as civil and family matters — and the Federal Court, the response was resoundingly yes.

In total, six of 10 provincial superior courts and the Federal Court said that they have pending requests for additional judge positions to the federal government, while the Quebec Superior Court pleaded for Mark Carney’s government to fill 15 vacant or new positions created by the province in 2024.

The heads of the P.E.I., Nova Scotia and Manitoba superior courts said they are satisfied with their current judicial complements.

At the appellate level, only the Ontario Court of Appeal said it had requested funding for more judges. But others, such as the Saskatchewan and B.C. courts of appeal, warned that the need could arise in coming years.

Chief justices from across the country told National Post that judges are overwhelmed by cases and litigants are increasingly frustrated by the lack of court dates and growing delays, all of which profoundly undermine access to justice.

Katie Black, the Liberals’ main advisor for judicial appointments from 2016 to 2018, said that the sheer number of courts requesting additional judges underscores the gravity of the situation.

“It is rare for Chief Justices to explicitly call on the provincial and federal governments to increase their complement.  It is only done in times of crisis,” Black, founder of law firm Black & Associates, said in an email.

“An increase to the judicial complement and court resources cannot be avoided if the objective is to achieve timely access to justice. Neither have kept up with the increase in population density seen in many regions across Canada.”

B.C. Supreme Court Chief Justice Ron Skolrood told National Post he put in a request to the federal government for seven new judicial positions in September.

He cited “increasing volume and complexity of criminal cases” combined with ongoing delays in civil and family matters as the reason his court needs more magistrates.

The superior court of Newfoundland and Labrador said it has requested two new judges and New Brunswick’s said three.

Both Alberta’s and Saskatchewan’s superior courts confirmed they had also requested funding for more judges but did not say how many.

“Alberta’s population is increasing faster than any other province. The pressures on the system promise to intensify,” said Court of King’s Bench of Alberta executive legal counsel Darryl Ruether. He noted that the province has the fewest judges per capita of the country.

In the meantime, many courts said they are prioritizing criminal cases to the detriment of civil or family matters because of the 30-month trial deadline imposed by the Supreme Court of Canada’s Jordan ruling in 2016.

“In many instances the Jordan ceilings for criminal cases require the Court to prioritize criminal matters at the expense of hearing civil and family cases, which can have devastating consequences to the parties,” the chief justices of the B.C. Supreme Court and Court of Appeal said in a joint statement.

The head of the Federal Court — which hears administrative issues such as immigration appeals, military discipline, tax bill appeals and competition cases — said that the court needs two more full-time and two part-time judges to deal with an explosion of cases.

“The Federal Court’s workload has increased by approximately 500 per cent compared to the five-year average before the pandemic,” Federal Court Chief Justice Paul Crampton wrote in a statement.

Through a spokesperson, Chief Justice of Canada Richard Wagner called on the federal government to adequately resource Canadian courts.

“Canadians deserve to have their legal matters heard without unnecessary delay, and that requires having enough judges in place and ensuring they are appointed in a timely manner,” Wagner’s chief of staff, Daniel Byma, said in a statement.

But not all chief justices believe that more judges are the main solution to the issues that plague Canadian courts.

Glenn Joyal, the top judge of the Manitoba Court of King’s Bench, told National Post in a statement that his court implemented a “significant and transformative” reform of its case scheduling system over the last 15 years.

The changes made his court more efficient and made service delivery faster, less expensive and less complex, he said.

“Not all crises in the court system, can or should be expected to be resolved with more judges without a corresponding self-examination as to where systemic and court improvements can take place,” read Joyal’s statement.

In the same vein, Ontario’s Superior Court has recently embarked on a historic reform of its civil procedure rules, a first in over four decades.

“The current state of our civil justice system requires wholesale reform,” Chief Justice Morawetz said during the September opening of the courts ceremony.

Justice Minister Sean Fraser told National Post last week that his office was reviewing each request for new judges but declined to say if there would be money to increase bench sizes in the upcoming Nov. 4 budget.

“We’re currently assessing the validity of the asks that we’ve received to ensure that we agree. When we complete that exercise, and the answer will vary between province and province, we will come to a conclusion,” he responded during a press conference.

In a separate statement, Department of Justice spokesperson Ian McLeod said the federal government had funded 116 new judicial positions across Canada since 2017. That includes money for 54 new judges in superior courts since the 2021 budget.

Courts have to submit a business case to the federal government to justify the increased complement.

But creating a new judge job in a superior or appellate court cannot be done with a wave of a magical budget wand by the federal government.

In fact, every new judicial position requires funding from both the federal and provincial governments.

Ottawa pays for a magistrate’s salary (roughly $415,000 in 2025), while each province covers the salary of their staff and overhead such as equipment, an office and courtrooms.

Since the size of most benches are set by provincial law, a province must generally amend its legislation or regulations to account for the new judges.

That can lead to situations like in Quebec where the province creates new positions that sit vacant because Ottawa hasn’t agreed to fund the additional judge salary.

“On average, each vacancy results in approximately 11 lost trial days per month, depriving the public of timely hearings,” Quebec Superior Court Chief Justice Marie-Anne Paquette said in a statement.

“Including the 6 unfilled additional positions, the total number of lost trial days rises to 165 per month, which represents a significant number of trials and hearings for the citizens we serve.”

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.