LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

The Canada-US border crossing at Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle, Quebec, in April 2025.

Before heading off on a Caribbean cruise, Dennis Murphy and his wife had a stopover in Florida. But they didn’t intend for it to be a proper Florida vacation.

“We kind of plan on spending as little of our money in the U.S., based on everything that happened,” Murphy said in an interview.

The couple are just two of the many Canadians who have modified travel plans to the United States, voting with their wallets to express distaste over the policies of U.S. President Donald Trump, including his trade war with his northern neighbour and his comments about making Canada the 51st state. And tourism hotspots are feeling the weight of Canadians’ displeasure.

Canadian visitation to Florida has dropped more than 18 per cent over the first two quarters of 2025 and other states, including Louisiana, California and Nevada have seen sharp drops in the number of Canadians willing to vacation south of the border.

Originally, Murphy and his wife were going to go to Las Vegas, but decided against it. The final straw for the couple was when, in late February, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy visited the Oval Office to finalize a deal for Ukrainian minerals in exchange for American military support. The meeting — with the media present and broadcast globally — ended with Trump and U.S. Vice-President JD Vance berating Zelenskyy for supposed ingratitude.

“When we saw that, we said, ‘There’s no way that we’re going to put any of our money into their economy.’ So we immediately canceled our trip,” said Murphy.

Hard data bears out that there are fewer Canadians travelling to the United States in 2025. Data from Statistics Canada shows that Canadian trips by car decreased by nearly 36 per cent in July 2025, compared to July 2024, and air travel to the United States dropped by more than 16 per cent.

Data from the west coast show

that at four border crossings from Canada into Washington state, there has been significant declines in vehicle traffic in 2025 compared to 2024. In September 2024, 322,024 personal vehicles entered Washington. In September 2025, 228,580 vehicles entered the state — a decline of 29 per cent. In August, there was a 27 per cent decline compared to 2024. In March, April, May and June, entrance figures had dropped by 30 per cent or more compared to the year prior.

In recent weeks, several politicians in the United States have noted that declining Canadian tourism numbers are hurting them. Both Florida and California, major wintertime destinations for Canadians, have seen declines in the number of Canadian tourists, as has Louisiana and the gambling hub of Las Vegas, which has seen such a decline in visitation figures — including Canadian — that one local union called the strip’s struggles the “

Trump slump

.”

Canada, says Louisiana Lt.-Gov. Billy Nungesser, is the largest international market for visitors to the state, and the state is noticing a drop in its tourism numbers from Canada.

“But to me, it’s more than just the tourism,” Nungesser said in an interview. “I really enjoy the friendships. Canadians are much like Louisianans. They treat strangers like family, and you leave there with a friend for life.”

“I don’t want the comments — the stupid comments — of a president and the tariffs to destroy those friendships.”

Nungesser, a Republican, recently visited Canada to promote tourism. His trip included meeting with travel agents and handing out tabasco ice cream — a little taste of home — in Canadian train stations.

“We were just up there to say … when you feel comfortable traveling again, we’d love to have you back in Louisiana,” Nungesser said.

He added that he heard from many Canadians who said they would not travel to the U.S. until Trump apologizes or is out of office. Nungesser also called on Trump to apologize for his 51st state comments.

“It’s how I feel, it’s how the Canadian people feel,” Nungesser said.

Does he think the president will apologize? “Not a chance in hell.”

“If the Canadian prime minister said he wanted to make America the 51st or make it Canadian, what would you think? It’s offensive. They can’t defend it, in my opinion,” Nungesser said.

In Las Vegas, where Murphy had intended to visit, Canadian air travel has dropped off precipitously. Data from Harry Reid International Airport show that the number of passengers travelling by Air Canada and Westjet to Vegas dropped by nearly one-third in June, compared to June 2024, and the number of passengers visiting Sin City on Flair Airlines flights dropped by 62 per cent.

“International travel is way down. People are not coming to the United States,” Las Vegas Mayor Shelley Berkley said recently. “We have a rather large market with the Canadians. It’s gone from, you know, a faucet to a drip.”

In California, another major tourism destination for Canadians, Canadian visitation is projected to be down by 19 per cent compared to 2024, according to Visit California, the official state tourism organization, and spending is expected to be down by 17 per cent.

For California, Canada is the second-biggest source of tourists, after Mexico. Visit California attributes the decline in Canadian tourism to a number of factors, including economic conditions and an unfavourable exchange rate keeping Canadians away.

“At the same time, geopolitical tension also impacted Canadian visitation in the winter and spring,” Visit California said in an emailed response to questions from National Post.

All around California, there are signs that tourism has dropped off, the Los Angeles Times reported. Not only are Hollywood souvenir shops and sightseeing tours seeing fewer visitors, but towns such as Palm Springs, a frequent second-home spot for Canadians, particularly out west, have seen a drop in visitors from out of country (although Mayor Ron deHarte said that domestic tourism has made up the shortfall).

“We’ve hurt our Canadian friends with actions that the administration has taken. It’s understandable,” he told the Times. “We don’t know how long they won’t want to travel to the States, but we’re hopeful that it is short-term.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A Federal Court sign.

A permanent resident of Canada with multiple assault convictions under his belt who was ordered deported more than eight years ago after striking another nightclub patron with a bottle, breaking his tooth and injuring his face, is fighting for his release from the Toronto Immigration Holding Centre.

Ryan Anthon Fyfield, who used scissors to cut off an ankle monitor he was issued in the fall of 2023 and employed an axe in March of 2024 to tear up the basement where he was living, is slated for a detention review next week.

Fyfield, who was born in St. Kitts and Nevis in 1994 and came to Canada when he was 11, won a recent judicial review of the Immigration and Refugee Board’s Aug. 29 order keeping him at the Rexdale Boulevard detention centre. But the judge sent the matter back to a different detention panel for reconsideration in the last week of September.

The Canada Border Services Agency refused this week to divulge the outcome of that hearing, citing privacy reasons, but Fyfield has another detention review slated for Oct. 10 and that wouldn’t happen if he’d been released last month.

Legal Aid Ontario, which represents Fyfield, refused Friday to comment on his case.

Fyfield, who has struggled with a crack cocaine addiction since 2014, has been detained since this past June “on the grounds that he is unlikely to appear for his removal and that he poses a danger to the Canadian public. This finding has been upheld at each of his detention review hearings to date,” Federal Court Justice Angus Grant wrote in a recent decision.

Before leaving his Caribbean birthplace, Fyfield’s “mother had a series of violent and abusive partners,” according to Grant’s Sept. 19 decision, which notes that when Fyfield was seven, “he witnessed his mother’s partner beat her so severely that she was hospitalized and ultimately died from her injuries.”

In 2005, when he was 11, his father and stepmother brought Fyfield to live with them in Leamington, Ont. “He became a permanent resident of Canada in 2010, when he was 16.”

Fyfield left home at 18 “and began having regular encounters with the criminal justice system,” Grant said. “Between 2012 and 2014, he was convicted of assault on four occasions, as well as multiple counts of ‘failure to comply’” with court orders.

“Over the past many years, (Fyfield) has had numerous encounters with immigration authorities, and with the criminal justice system.”

His June 2014 conviction for the nightclub bottle assault “triggered a review of his immigration status,” said the judge.

In February 2016, authorities found Fyfield was “inadmissible to Canada for serious criminality.”

The Canada Border Services Agency issued a deportation order for him in April 2017.

He “appealed his deportation order to the Immigration Appeal Division and was granted a four-year stay of removal in 2017 on several conditions, including completing an anger management program, abstaining from drugs, and keeping the peace,” Grant said.

But after that, Fyfield “experienced episodes of homelessness, and continued to struggle with substance use and his mental health,” said the judge. “He failed to keep the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) up to date on his address, to attend all of his mandatory CBSA check-in meetings, and to report new criminal charges to CBSA.”

As a result, in November 2019 “the CBSA requested an early reconsideration” of his stay of removal, but Fyfield didn’t show up for the hearing and the agency issued a warrant for his arrest.

“Since that time, (Fyfield) has had multiple encounters with the criminal justice and immigration systems, largely related to his failures to comply with orders,” Grant said.

Fyfield has “cycled between periods of living in immigration detention, some periods living in the community, and periods living in community residential facilities,” said the judge. “His stays at these facilities ended because of drug relapses, expressing suicidal ideation, associating with people with criminal histories, erratic behaviour, and altercations with other residents.”

As the CBSA tried to proceed with his removal from Canada, Fyfield was provided with multiple opportunities to submit a pre-removal risk assessment, his last-ditch bid to stay in Canada.

The judge noted a decision on one was still outstanding last month, leaving Fyfield’s immigration status in Canada “unclear.”

Fyfield was released from the IHC this past March, Grant said, “and placed at Launchpad, a residential drug treatment facility in Windsor.”

But he was kicked out in June after two drug relapses.

Fyfield “made arrangements to stay at an alternative facility called Essex Manor,” but just after he got there, a CBSA agent arrested him and took him back to the IHC.

Fyfield argued he should be allowed to live at Essex Manor.

But an immigration official decided to keep him at the IHC instead, saying Essex Manor doesn’t provide “structured supervision” for residents “and that individuals are free to come and go as they please.”

The same decision maker “went on to observe that the home is ‘essentially an arrangement where (the woman who runs it) provides room and board to people at what I perceive to be low-market rent.”

After several disputes with IHC guards, Fyfield was transferred this past August to Maplehurst Correctional Complex.

He was assaulted twice by Maplehurst inmates in August, said the judge. One of the assaults left him with a broken leg.

At his Aug. 29 detention review hearing, Fyfield “explained that the other inmates at Maplehurst frequently asked him why so many ‘cops’ were coming to speak with him. They were referring to the CBSA officers who conducted routine check-in visits with (Fyfield) on the range, in the presence of other inmates. (He) had tried to explain to the other inmates that these were immigration officials, but he felt that the other inmates still suspected him of being an informant.”

He was transferred back to the IHC.

During a review of his detention, Fyfield argued for his release, noting there was a spot for him at Essex Manor where he could wait to get into a residential treatment program.

But the CBSA said Fyfield “was still a danger to the Canadian public and unlikely to appear for his removal; and that the proposed release plan was similar to what had been presented at prior hearings.”

An immigration official determined Fyfield should stay put, concluding “that although being in medical isolation at the IHC may be a ‘difficult experience,’ that the IHC would be able to provide adequate conditions for (his) recovery.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Anti-Israel protesters in Ottawa in January 2024.

Former soldiers Richard Kemp and John Spencer are among the world’s leading experts on urban warfare. Kemp, a retired colonel who commanded a British infantry battalion, and Spencer, a retired U.S. major who serves as the chair of urban warfare studies at the Modern War Institute, spoke to Postmedia’s Brian Lilley for the Full Comment podcast ahead of the second anniversary of the October 7 attacks.

They discuss the groundbreaking lengths the Israel Defence Forces go to mitigate harm in Gaza, and wholeheartedly reject claims against Israel by Prime Minister Mark Carney and his confederates in the United Kingdom, France and Australia who last month recognized a Palestinian state. The West, Kemp and Spencer say, has “blood on its hands.”

Below are some edited highlights of their conversation:

Brian Lilley: Well, gentlemen, let me start with the simple question (on) the issue of genocide. This claim is being used over and over again to vilify Israel. You’ve both been there. What are your thoughts on genocide?

Richard Kemp:

I’ll let John speak more about the accusations of genocide against Israel. What I would say is that the accusations of genocide should be levelled against Hamas. Hamas is the genocidal entity in this particular conflict. They have, by the definition of their charter, which requires them to kill not just the Jews in Israel but Jews everywhere. By that definition, they are genocidal terrorists.

By their actions on the 7th of October, which itself was an act of genocide, by their words since the 7th of October, in which they promised to repeat the 7th of October again and again and again, those are genocidal words. Now, they’re not going to succeed in their genocide, but they certainly will have the best possible try they can. And the accusation against Israel is simply an obscenity. I’ll let John speak perhaps more about that.

John Spencer:

I don’t mind as much the useful idiots, the sheer ignorance of the man or woman on the street wearing a Hamas headband and advocating for Hamas. But I do mind when governments join the bandwagon. Even if you don’t go to Gaza like Richard and I have multiple times, you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to say, OK, what’s the accusation? Because there is no evidence (or) information that you’re using to wage this libel against Israel, like genocidal specific intent.

And then the evidence if they can’t prove intent is the numbers, whether it’s the starvation claim, which is false, and they want to rule out everything Israel has done to feed the enemy’s population, to vaccinate everybody in Gaza. All of the information is an assault on critical thinking.

Lilley: Both of you are veterans of war. Have you ever fought in a war where you had to feed your enemy, provide them clean drinking water and electricity? Because I don’t think a lot of people know that, that Israel has been providing the power and the water and then the food and then told, well, you’re not giving them enough food. You’re committing genocide. I don’t know how you commit genocide against a people that you were feeding and watering.

Kemp:

I think the Israelis have been facilitating, sometimes by direct assistance, significantly more humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip than is required by the population of the Gaza Strip, significantly more. In my knowledge and my experience, this is the first time in history that any army has facilitated the delivery of aid to the enemy population at the same time as they’re fighting that enemy.

Lilley: Normally, you lay siege to a place. You cut off the access to food and water as a way to try and get them to surrender. Here, they’re actively delivering more aid than the UN will pick up at times.

Kemp:

Absolutely and we’ve seen stockpiles of aid waiting inside Gaza that have been permitted in by the IDF, have been checked, searched, allowed in. And then it’s waiting there because the UN has a completely inefficient distribution system. And the UN itself has admitted that the vast majority of the aid that it has brought into Gaza has been hijacked and taken over by Hamas and used for Hamas’s purposes.

Hamas aren’t interested in the population being fed. In fact, they’d rather the population weren’t fed so they can perpetrate their own lies about starvation. What Hamas want (is) to control the population through distribution of aid, which is often sold — free aid given by U.S. taxpayers’ dollars. Free aid. They want to sell that. They’ve been selling that at vastly inflated prices to those that can afford it.

And this is one of the main reasons why they have opposed so strongly the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has been the most effective organization, a U.S. initiative supported by Israel as well, mainly made up of former American soldiers, distributing aid directly to the Gazans, bypassing Hamas. So Hamas don’t get control of it and don’t use it to raise funds or control the population.

 A boy walks with humanitarian aid packages received from the U.S. and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.

Lilley: What should listeners make of the claims that Israel has used the aid being distributed by the Gaza Humanitarian Fund as a lure to get people to show up so they can shoot and kill them?

Spencer:

I mean, it’s as false as all the other claims. It doesn’t stand up against evidence. And it rules out any information from anybody but Hamas. And people won’t even listen to what Israel says. OK, fine. You think that Israel is lying, but they won’t (listen to) the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, not Israelis, mostly American, who are on the ground.

Lilley: Has Hamas effectively weaponized food in this war as another front? I would say while Hamas is not winning the war militarily, they appear to be winning on the PR side. They get a lot of great PR. To me, it feels like they really weaponize this food issue to turn hearts and minds even as they’re losing in the battlefield.

Kemp:

That’s exactly what they’ve done. Some of the most outstanding examples in the media of famine, starvation, etc. have been proven to be people who are not starving. They’ve been proven in some cases to be unfortunate children who are suffering from pre-existing diseases which give them a skeletal type appearance, which is that —

Lilley: I think you’re talking about the New York Times front page.

Kemp:

Right, the New York Times front page and many many other front pages on the internet and in print of the media including the BBC, which is one of the worst offenders I might say. Now if they need to do that, if they need to falsify it to that extent, that tells you something I think that’s quite important which is, why aren’t they just using the real evidence of it if there is real evidence? Well the reality is there isn’t real evidence.

I’m not saying there isn’t hunger in Gaza. I’m sure there is hunger in Gaza, largely brought about by Hamas. But I’ve spoken directly to at least 100 Gazans, civilians. Not one of them that I saw showed any sign of starvation. The people I saw were active, were moving around, were happy to be receiving for the first ever time free aid since the war began, and that came from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. These are just some of the examples of the way that Hamas have been manipulating, weaponizing food and starvation against Israel. And it’s been swallowed up by a gullible media and obviously people who don’t know any better who watch that media.

Spencer:

To say that Hamas has weaponized the food that’s gone into Gaza since October 7th is almost putting it lightly. For some reason in this war, Hamas gets a pass on any atrocity they commit or any violation of the law of armed conflict (by) using the hospitals, using the humanitarian zones. Where was (Hamas strategist) Mohammed Deif killed? Right next to the Al-Mawasi humanitarian zone.

Lilley: Israel’s offensive into Gaza City is getting a lot of attention now, gentlemen. And I’d like to get your thoughts. You know, I had a colleague say, why are they just going into Gaza now? Are they just trying to clear out remnants of Hamas?

Kemp:

 Gaza City may not be the final stronghold of Hamas, but it’s certainly now, I think, the largest concentration of Hamas terrorists inside Gaza, although I’m sure many of have left or tried to leave. And of course, without taking Gaza City, without destroying Hamas inside Gaza City, then you don’t destroy Hamas at all. So very clearly, they’ve got to deal with Gaza City.

And that is a tough problem. It wouldn’t be so tough if it wasn’t for the civilian presence there. The IDF, I think, are estimating now that maybe even up to 900,000 Gazans have left Gaza City and the IDF have been warning them by leaflet drops and by other means, numerous other means, to get out to safety and telling them where they can go to safety, to the south along designated routes. And a large number have been doing that. But of course, meanwhile, Hamas have been doing their best to prevent them from getting out of Gaza City because they want them there as human shields.

Another complexity, of course, is the presence there of at least some of the hostages inside Gaza City. On top of all that you then have the massive complexity of the massive tunnel system underneath Gaza City, the booby traps of very many of the buildings. Obviously a large number of the buildings have been taken over by Hamas to be used as military positions to command operations to attack the IDF. That of course includes hospitals, mosques, apartment buildings, schools and all the rest of the stuff we’ve seen in Gaza City.

 Palestinians in the West Bank hold Hamas flags. Hamas are genocidal terrorists, Richard Kemp says, “by the definition of their charter, which requires them to kill not just the Jews in Israel but Jews everywhere.”

Lilley: We’re constantly hearing what the death toll is. When you’ve looked at civilian deaths, in this war as compared to others, what have you found?

Kemp:

Yeah, I mean, the first thing I’d say is, I don’t think anybody knows how many civilians have died inside Gaza. I certainly don’t. You hear these 65,000 figure or 100,000, wherever it might be. These figures all come from Hamas, the Gaza Health Ministry or whatever. Some people quote the UN’s figures but the UN’s figures come from Hamas everyone’s figures come from Hamas, so we don’t know the reality.

You have to deduct from those figures the number of fighters that have been killed, because obviously, IDF are going to have killed a lot of fighters. They’ve been targeting the fighters, not the civilians, and many fighters will have died.

Spencer:

Hamas has killed thousands of civilians. Twenty per cent of the 14,000-15,000 rockets that Hamas has launched have landed inside of Gaza killing Gazan civilians who go on the list. Everybody just blames Israel for this number. It’s not true. The number is not true. It could be more. It could be less.

I can tell you that I don’t mourn the death of Hamas combatants. I don’t. Israel views every civilian casualty as a tragedy. It’s awful. Hamas views it as their strategy and they state they want the death. They want the death of every child, elderly person, everything so they can achieve their goal in the afterlife.

Listen to the full podcast here.


Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, aka Mo Chara, a member of the Irish language band Kneecap, celebrates after he left Woolwich Crown Court in London, Friday, Sept. 26, 2025.

OTTAWA — Calls are intensifying from the Conservatives and New Democrats for Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government to answer for an announcement made by one of his parliamentary secretaries that an Irish hip-hop trio was banned from entering the country for allegations of amplifying “political violence.”

The situation started two weeks ago when Vince Gasparro, whom Carney appointed as a parliamentary secretary for combating crime, announced in a video posted to X that members of the group, Kneecap, had been deemed “ineligible to enter Canada.”

The Liberal MP from Toronto, who won his seat in the past spring federal election, alleged that the group had “engaged in actions” and made statements, which he said were “contrary to Canadian values and laws.”

Gasparro previously served as a Postmedia board member, but stepped down before the election.

Since his announcement, however, a cloud of confusion has settled in, following recent statements by the band’s manager to several media outlets that they had received no notification from the government.

The band has also said on social media that Gasparro’s comments were “wholly untrue and deeply malicious.” The band’s management has not yet responded to a question from National Post, but its upcoming shows in Toronto have been listed as cancelled.

Both the Conservatives and the New Democrats have now begun pressing the Carney government for answers, and in particular, Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab, who, along with her department, has repeatedly declined to comment, citing privacy concerns.

“Either the parliamentary secretary lied to his constituents and all Canadians knowingly, or the government is cowering now in the face of controversy,” Melissa Lantsman, deputy leader for the Opposition Conservatives, told National Post in a recent interview.

“But either way, Canadians deserve an answer from a government that has stood on both sides of this issue.”

The issue in question has been the Liberal government’s handling of the rise in antisemitism that police have reported since Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas militants attacked southern Israel, triggering two years of war.

Since then, the Liberals have faced calls from Jewish advocacy groups that it has failed to respond to the rise in acts of hate and intimidation towards the Jewish community. The Liberal caucus has also at times found itself divided over the Israel-Hamas conflict.

Gasparro made the announcement the same day that Justice Minister Sean Fraser tabled a bill aimed at cracking down on protests in front of places of worship and displaying certain hate symbols, such as flags linked to terrorist organizations.

The parliamentary secretary declined to speak to the issue when asked again about it by reporters this week, saying questions should be directed towards the government.

Previously, he told reporters that he had been acting on information that had been available to him.

The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, which welcomed Gasparro’s announcement, had raised concerns about Kneecap’s upcoming performances for weeks, launching an “action alert” back in July, saying it had written to the Canadian government seeking clarity on whether its members would be allowed to enter.

Among the concerns it listed, which Gasparro mentioned, was the alleged displaying of a Hezbollah flag by one of its members, Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, who goes by the stage name, Mo Chara, during a 2024 performance in London, captured on video.

Hezbollah is a listed terrorist organization in both Canada and the United Kingdom.

The incident resulted in a terrorism charge, which was recently dropped by a U.K. judge who cited the fact that it was filed passed the required deadline.

NDP MP Jenny Kwan, who this week wrote to Metlege Diab seeking answers on the issue, said the fact that Gasparro announced the government ban before the court case against one of the band members had been settled raises more questions about what transpired.

“Canada needs to make sure that such decisions are accountable and that they’re not subject to arbitrary and political weaponization,” she told National Post.

“It’s really important that we actually get clarity on what went on. Is this a sanctioned announcement from the government? Is the band Kneecap actually banned? Were they ever banned?”

A spokeswoman for Canada Border Services Agency said in a statement that it does not comment on individual cases, but said it works closely with international partners as well as officials in Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, which makes decisions regarding admissibility and visas.

That department also declined to comment on the specific case, saying in a statement that anyone looking to enter Canada must meet the criteria outlined under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

“Entry to Canada may be refused for a number of reasons, including concerns related to security, human or international rights violations, or criminal activity. Applicants are informed of their visa status through the email provided on their applications,” spokesman Matthew Krupovich said in a statement.

“An individual, whose electronic travel applications have been declined, can reapply for an (electronic travel authorization) once they have addressed the reason(s) leading to the refusal of their application.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Director of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget Russell Vought speaks to reporters outside the West Wing of the White House in July 2025. Donald Trump met with Vought on Oct. 2 to determine which federal agencies to cut amid a federal government shutdown that he has hailed as an

Donald Trump has decided to embrace

“Project 2025”

the blueprint for governance developed by American conservative thinkers.

Project 2025 was originally set out as a policy and personnel “playbook” should Trump win re-election, aiming to quickly implement sweeping changes across the federal government. During the 2024 election campaign, Trump

disavowed Project 2025,

distancing himself from the content and its creators, claiming he knew nothing about it or the people involved.

“I’m not going to read it,” Mr. Trump

said at his first presidential debate

against Vice President Kamala Harris. “Everybody knows what I am going to do.”

However, that has changed since his second-term inauguration. Key contributors and authors involved in Project 2025 have been placed in

influential roles

within the Trump administration, ensuring policy proposals are swiftly enacted.

What is in Project 2025?

Its origins are as a comprehensive conservative policy and personnel initiative designed to prepare for a transition into a new Republican administration. The present version was produced by

The Heritage Foundation

and an alliance of over 100 conservative organizations.

The 900-page playbook is being enacted, with

hundreds of objectives tracked and completed

by federal agencies and the White House. It has garnered widespread attention due to its scale and intent to replace thousands of civil servants with loyalists and roll back what are deems to be progressive regulations and programs. To date 48 per cent of its objectives have been implemented.

The

core aim is to impose sweeping changes

in U.S. government structure and policy. This includes dismantling the so-called “administrative state,” consolidating executive power under the president, eliminating certain federal agencies, dismissing senior civil servants, and rolling back regulations regarding environment, civil rights, and diversity. The project also calls for significant changes to abortion policies, LGBT rights, and education, among other areas.

Centralizing executive power in the White House, it consists of

four main components

: a policy guide (“Mandate for Leadership 2025”), a database of vetted conservative personnel, candidate training (the “Presidential Administration Academy”), and a 180-day playbook for executive actions.

What is the Republican party history behind it?

Project 2025

builds directly on
a tradition of conservative transition planning
, most notably the “Mandate for Leadership” framework first published by The Heritage Foundation in 1981 for Ronald Reagan’s incoming administration, influencing how Reagan reorganized the federal government.

Heritage and allied think tanks produced

similar blueprints for subsequent Republican transitions

, including those for George W. Bush in 2001 and Donald Trump in 2016, but Project 2025 is the most expansive to date.

How will it guide the Trump administration’s actions during the government shutdown?

A few days into the federal government shutdown, Trump has spoken on social media about meeting with

Russell Vought

— one of Project 2025’s chief architects and the director of the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) — to

coordinate his administration’s handling of federal workers

.

“I have a meeting today with Russ Vought, he of PROJECT 2025 Fame, to determine which of the many Democrat Agencies, most of which are a political SCAM, he recommends to be cut, and whether or not those cuts will be temporary or permanent,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, on Oct. 2.

He continued: “I can’t believe the Radical Left Democrats gave me this unprecedented opportunity.”

This prompted former Vice President Kamala Harris to tweet that this was “always” Trump’s plan and “he’s implementing it right in front of our eyes.”

Who is Russell Vought?

Vought is an American

government official

and conservative political strategist. He is recognized as creating a sweeping conservative policy agenda designed to reorganize the federal government according to Trump-aligned priorities.

He was

also director of the Office of Management and Budget

during the first Trump administration.

Vought’s career

spans over two decades in Washington, including key roles as deputy OMB director, vice president of Heritage Action for America, and in leadership positions with several Republican policy organizations. He has played a leading role in drafting budget reforms, pushing for executive branch power, and advocating for deep cuts in federal spending and restructuring several agencies.

His

tenure has been marked by efforts to centralize power within the executive

, utilize government shutdowns strategically, and implement far-reaching administrative changes.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Director of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget Russell Vought speaks to reporters outside the West Wing of the White House in July 2025. Donald Trump met with Vought on Oct. 2 to determine which federal agencies to cut amid a federal government shutdown that he has hailed as an

U.S. President Donald Trump appears to be warming to

“Project 2025,”

the blueprint for governance developed by American conservative thinkers that he distanced himself from during the election.

Project 2025 was originally set out as a policy and personnel “playbook” should Trump win re-election, aiming to quickly implement sweeping changes across the federal government. During the 2024 election campaign, Trump

disavowed Project 2025,

distancing himself from the content and its creators, claiming he knew nothing about it or the people involved.

“I’m not going to read it,” Trump

said at his first presidential debate

against then vice president Kamala Harris. “Everybody knows what I am going to do.”

However, that has changed since his second-term inauguration. Key contributors and authors involved in Project 2025 have been placed in

influential roles

within the Trump administration, a number of its policy proposals appear to have been enacted and Trump posted on social media about Project 2025 on Thursday.

Here’s what you need to know about Project 2025 and what Trump has said about it.

What is in Project 2025?

Its origins are as a comprehensive conservative policy and personnel initiative designed to prepare for a transition into a new Republican administration. The 900-page playbook was produced by

The Heritage Foundation

and an alliance of over 100 conservative organizations.

The Project 2025 website is tracking

318 objectives

across 34 federal agencies. It has garnered widespread attention due to its scale and intent to replace thousands of civil servants with loyalists and roll back what are deemed to be progressive regulations and programs. To date, the website states that 48 per cent of its objectives have been implemented, including some by the White House itself.

The

core aim is to impose sweeping changes

in U.S. government structure and policy. This includes dismantling the so-called “administrative state,” consolidating executive power under the president, eliminating certain federal agencies, dismissing senior civil servants, and rolling back regulations regarding environment, civil rights, and diversity. The project also calls for significant changes to abortion policies, LGBT rights, and education, among other areas.

It consists of

four main components

: a policy guide (“Mandate for Leadership 2025”), a database of vetted conservative personnel, candidate training (the “Presidential Administration Academy”), and a 180-day playbook for executive actions.

While many of the policies outlined in its 900-plus pages align closely with the agenda that Trump was proposing during the election — particularly on curbing immigration and dismantling certain federal agencies — others called for action Trump had never discussed, like banning pornography, or Trump’s team was actively trying to avoid, like withdrawing approval for abortion medication.

What did Trump and his team say about Project 2025 during the election?

“I know nothing about Project 2025,” Trump insisted in July 2024. “I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.”

Trump’s campaign chiefs were equally critical.

“President Trump’s campaign has been very clear for over a year that Project 2025 had nothing to do with the campaign, did not speak for the campaign, and should not be associated with the campaign or the President in any way,” wrote Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita in a campaign memo. They added, “Reports of Project 2025’s demise would be greatly welcomed and should serve as notice to anyone or any group trying to misrepresent their influence with President Trump and his campaign — it will not end well for you.”

What is the Republican party history behind it?

Project 2025

builds directly on
a tradition of conservative transition planning
, most notably the “Mandate for Leadership” framework first published by The Heritage Foundation in 1981 for Ronald Reagan’s incoming administration, influencing how Reagan reorganized the federal government.

Heritage and allied think tanks produced

similar blueprints for subsequent Republican transitions

, including those for George W. Bush in 2001 and Donald Trump in 2016, but Project 2025 is the most expansive to date.

How might it guide the Trump administration’s actions?

A few days into the federal government shutdown, Trump posted on social media about meeting with

Russell Vought

— one of Project 2025’s chief architects and the director of the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) — to

coordinate his administration’s handling of federal workers

.

“I have a meeting today with Russ Vought, he of PROJECT 2025 Fame, to determine which of the many Democrat Agencies, most of which are a political SCAM, he recommends to be cut, and whether or not those cuts will be temporary or permanent,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, on Oct. 2.

He continued: “I can’t believe the Radical Left Democrats gave me this unprecedented opportunity.”

The federal government was thrown into a shutdown on Oct. 1, as Democrats held firm to their demands to salvage health care subsidies that Trump and Republicans in Congress have dismissed as something to possibly discuss later.

Trump has seized on the government shutdown as an opportunity to reshape the federal workforce, threatening mass firings of workers and suggesting “irreversible” cuts to programs important to Democrats.

Trump’s post prompted former Vice President Kamala Harris to tweet that this was “always” Trump’s plan and “he’s implementing it right in front of our eyes.”

Asked about Trump’s reversal, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said, “Democrats are desperate to talk about anything aside from their decision to hurt the American people by shutting down the government.”

 

Who is Russell Vought?

Vought is an American

government official

and conservative political strategist. He is recognized as creating a sweeping conservative policy agenda designed to reorganize the federal government according to Trump-aligned priorities.

He was

also director of the Office of Management and Budget

during the first Trump administration.

Vought’s career

spans over two decades in Washington, including key roles as deputy OMB director, vice president of Heritage Action for America, and in leadership positions with several Republican policy organizations. He has played a leading role in drafting budget reforms, pushing for executive branch power, and advocating for deep cuts in federal spending and restructuring several agencies.

His

tenure has been marked by efforts to centralize power within the executive

, utilize government shutdowns strategically, and implement far-reaching administrative changes.

In his chapter in the blueprint, Vought made clear he wanted the president and OMB to wield more direct power.

“The Director must view his job as the best, most comprehensive approximation of the President’s mind,” he wrote. Vought described OMB as “a President’s air-traffic control system,” which should be “involved in all aspects of the White House policy process,” becoming “powerful enough to override implementing agencies’ bureaucracies.”

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, said on Fox News Channel that Vought “has a plan, and that plan is going to succeed in further empowering Trump. This is going to be the Democrats’ worst nightmare.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson echoed that message, insisting the government shutdown gives Trump and his budget director vast power over the federal government and the unilateral power to determine which personnel and policies are essential and which are not.

Who else is tied to Project 2025?

Trump has close ties with many of its authors, including John McEntee, his former director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office, and Paul Dans, former chief of staff at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

Trump has stocked his second administration with the project’s authors, including “border czar” Tom Homan, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, immigration hard-liner Stephen Miller and Brendan Carr, who wrote Project 2025’s chapter on the Federal Communications Commission and now chairs the panel.

Heritage did not respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press on Thursday. But Dans, the project’s former director, said it’s been “exciting” to see so much of what was laid out in the book put into action.

“It’s gratifying. We’re very proud of the work that was done for this express purpose: to have a doer like President Trump ready to roll on Day One,” said Dans, who is currently running for Senate against Lindsey Graham in South Carolina.

National Post, with additional reporting from The Associated Press

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson rises during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Friday, June 20, 2025.

OTTAWA — Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson declined to say if the federal government would consider repealing the oil tanker ban on British Columbia’s north coast

to make way for Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s pipeline project pitch

in a few months.

“It’s a hypothetical question right now, because there is no project before us,” Hodgson said on Friday on the margins of a battery investment announcement in Montreal.

Ottawa has been under pressure by the federal Conservatives, provinces and industry leaders to scrap some of its environmental regulations which they say have been stifling energy investments — while private businesses are building pipelines south of the border.

However, B.C. Energy Minister Adrian Dix said in a recent interview with National Post that the oil tanker moratorium has allowed the province the “social license” to develop liquified natural gas on the north coast.

“And secondly, of course, there’s the north coast itself. There’s a reason why the tanker ban was put in place to begin with. So, all of those are arguments we make,” he said.

Dix added the coastal First Nations have also made their position “clear.”

“There is no pipeline and oil tankers project or proponents that would be acceptable to us on the North Coast,” says Marilyn Slett, President of the Coastal First Nations-Great Bear Initiative and Chief Councillor of the Heiltsuk Tribal Council, in an open letter in July.

“Anything that proposes to send crude oil through our coastal waters is a non-starter.”

Dix said the province should have the final word on laws that concern its north coast.

“Should British Columbians, coastal First Nations, residents of the region, people of B..C, the government of B.C., have a role in a decision that’s about British Columbia and its coast? Yes,” Dix said. “As should the 20 federal Liberal MPs from British Columbia.”

One of those MPs, speaking on a not-for-attribution basis to discuss their views more freely, admitted Hodgson’s comments on the tanker ban were not at all reassuring.

“No, it’s not, because it means that we might consider it, and if we’re going to consider it, then that’s a problem,” they said.

The B.C. Liberal MP said it would be safe to assume that they, and many others within caucus, would be asking for the government to clarify its position on the issue.

The federal government will soon have to decide if it includes Smith’s new proposal to build an oil pipeline to British Columbia’s coastline on its list of nation-building projects.

That step, however, would require lifting the tanker ban that has been in place since 2019.

Smith said she would like to see her project listed in the federal government’s next tranche of projects, set to be announced by mid-November. This week, she claimed that the actual proposal will only be ready to be submitted to the Major Projects Office in May 2026.

Hodgson said that the government will only consider Smith’s project once it meets the federal criteria set out for projects to be considered for more streamlined approvals.

That includes having a high likelihood of successful execution, advancing the interests of Indigenous peoples, strengthening Canada’s autonomy and resilience, providing economic benefits to the country, and showing “clean growth potential.”

“They don’t think they’re ready to do that until next spring,” said Hodgson.

“When they bring it forward, like every other project, at that point, we’ll take a look at where they are, and we’ll evaluate it at that time,” he said.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

staylor@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


David Parker, left, and and Mark Grantham, right, were assaulted on Sept. 6, police say.

The moon over the Bay of Fundy along Nova Scotia’s coast on Sept. 6 was one night shy of full but showy enough to attract attention from Mark Grantham, a professional artist, and his partner David Parker, a musician who has played with symphonies around the world.

Outside their home on Highway 1 near Clementsport, about 200 kilometres west of Halifax, they were photographing the moon around 9 p.m., when a Mazda 3 smashed into a guardrail nearby.

The RCMP said Grantham and Parker offered to help the male driver inside, who had allegedly been drinking, but things went crazy.

The driver is accused of beating the two men severely, causing what police described as life-threatening injuries for both, one aged 61 and the other 58.

“Without warning or provocation, a stranger brutally attacked them and left them,” Grantham’s sisters said online.

That’s what the RCMP believe as well.

“I think they were in the wrong place at the wrong time,” Constable Mandy Edwards said. Police say the accused driver is known to police for past acts of violence.

What neither Grantham nor Parker knew at the time is that shortly before the Mazda crashed, the driver was allegedly involved in a different altercation, with someone he knew, and then left the scene in the car. A 46-year-old man, also from Clementsport, received non-life-threatening injuries in that prior incident, police said.

After the assault on Grantham and Parker, the driver allegedly abandoned the car and ran.

The two older men’s injuries were significant. They were taken to a local hospital and then transferred to Halifax for a major trauma centre because of the severity of their injuries.

Grantham is an architect whose paintings of urban and rural landscapes have been shown and celebrated throughout Atlantic Canada. Parker has worked with symphonies around the world, including the Kitchener-Waterloo Symphony, the Barcelona Symphony Orchestra, the Israel Sinfonietta and the Quebec Symphony Orchestra, as well as principal horn with Symphony Nova Scotia.

Almost a month since, they remain unable to return to work, family said on a GoFundMe fundraising campaign to help the two men recover and support them as self-employed artists who currently cannot work.

“They both required surgeries to repair their severe facial injuries. Mark also sustained a fractured arm. David received serious head trauma and spent three days in the ICU. Mark was discharged to be cared for at home, but David remains in hospital,” the fundraiser said.

The afternoon after the attack, Sept. 7, in nearby Digby, police arrested 25-year-old William Cedric Douglas Windsor, of Clementsport.

He has been charged with two counts of aggravated assault, assault causing bodily harm, assault, uttering threats, dangerous operation of a motor vehicle, operation while impaired and two counts of failing to comply with a probation order.

Windsor is scheduled to appear in Annapolis Royal provincial court for a bail hearing on Oct. 8.

A family friend of Grantham and Parker said they are not speaking with media at this time.

“They have begun what doctors expect will be a long and challenging road to recovery. While the suspect has been arrested … it doesn’t undo the trauma and damage inflicted on these two innocent people,” reads a statement.

“Mark and David will both require ongoing medical care, physical therapy, and dietary support. David will also require cognitive rehabilitation. They will be unable to work for the foreseeable future…. The financial burden of this senseless attack is creating serious challenges during an already traumatic time.”

As of Friday,

the fundraiser

had raised $127,969 from 334 people.

“Mark and David have been touched by the support from friends, family, colleagues, and strangers alike. Your kindness has made a real difference during a difficult time,” Grantham’s sisters, Monica Grantham and Jenn Ferguson, wrote.

Chronicle-Herald and National Post 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Rob Ashton, president of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union is joined by supporters in Toronto on Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2025, as he announces that he's running for the federal NDP leadership.

OTTAWA — British Columbia union leader Rob Ashton says he’s happy to take NDP icon Jack Layton’s mantle of the guy you’d have a beer with, but there’s one important caveat.

“It doesn’t have to be over a beer because we have a lot of people in this country who are in recovery and can’t do alcohol. I’m happy to meet anyone over a coffee, too

I kind of like tea myself,” said Ashton in an interview with the National Post.

Ashton, a burly career dock worker who heads up the International Longshore and Warehouse Union Canada, said that genuine one-on-one conversations will be key to rebuilding the NDP from the ground up, after the party had

its worst result ever

in April’s federal election.

“We’ve forgotten how to communicate with workers, for whatever reason, and that’s something we’ll have to re-learn,” said Ashton.

The NDP bled seats in blue-collar strongholds like Hamilton and Windsor, Ont., retaining just seven MPs, five short of the number needed for official party status.

Ashton became the third official candidate to enter the NDP leadership race on Wednesday, joining filmmaker Avi Lewis and Edmonton MP Heather McPherson.

He said in a short launch video that he wanted to make the NDP a workers’ party again.

“I’m running because I want our party to get back to its roots, putting regular working Canadians first,” says Ashton, speaking from a dock in B.C.’s Lower Mainland.

 

Ashton told the National Post that he hoped his blue-collar bona fides would make up for his lack of name recognition relative to the other two contenders.

“The difference between me and the other candidates is I’ve been a longshoreman for 30 years (and) I’ve represented workers for the last 20 years,” said Ashton.

He added that the first step to reconnecting with workers will be to stop talking down to them.

“Look, every industry has its type of language, whether it’s, let’s call it colourful language or parliamentary language, and I don’t think you fault workers for speaking a way in which they were brought up in their workplace,” said Ashton.

Even so, Ashton says he rejects the notion that there’s any inherent tension between plain language and inclusive language, pointing to

the media’s recent fixation

on the use of the term “cis man” in

the NDP’s leadership rules

.

“I’ve had this exact conversation with people, about the ‘cis man’ thing, and I’ve never had any trouble getting the concept across: ‘cis man’ means you were born with a penis and identify as a male. That’s it,” said Ashton.

He added that he announces his pronouns when he speaks at conferences because “everybody should feel welcome in the house of labour.”

Ashton conceded that conservatives like Ontario Premier Doug Ford and U.S. President Donald Trump have eaten into the left’s traditional blue-collar base in recent years, but said it would be a mistake for the NDP to follow the populist right’s lead into performative “anti-woke” politics.

“(Conservatives) rule on fear, and they rule on the unknown … They say, because that person doesn’t look like you, they’re stealing your jobs, and I’m going to make it better when I get elected. But when you actually look at what happens when they get into power, they don’t make anything better,” said Ashton.

“Division is the weapon of the boss, and any division always creates chaos and havoc within the working class,” he added.

Former NDP strategist Erin Morrison, now a

vice-president at Texture Communications

, said that Ashton’s everyman appeal could be a huge asset for him in what’s shaping up to be a wide-open race.

”Authenticity matters. Feeling like the person who is speaking is telling you the truth about who they are, where they come from, and what they are going to do for you is very important in politics. You want to feel like the person who is speaking understands what you’re going through,” said Morrison.

Ashton will make his debut on the national stage at the NDP’s first leadership candidate forum, set for later this month.

National Post


rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Melvin Cravitz, left, and Adrian Daulby were killed during an attack at a synagogue in Manchester on Yom Kippur, Oct. 2, 2025. A suspect was shot dead by police at the scene.

Adrian Daulby lived near the Manchester synagogue where he was killed on Thursday after a terror attack.

The Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation was a 10-minute walk from the 53-year-old’s home,

The Telegraph reported

. On the morning of Yom Kippur, Judaism’s holiest day, he “lost his life in the act of courage to save others,” his

family said

. It is believed that Daulby died after being accidentally shot by police, who were trying to stop a suspect wielding a knife from entering the synagogue.

Another victim, Melvin Cravitz, 66, who was working as a security guard at the synagogue at the time of the attack, also died.

A man identified as

Jihad Al-Shamie

rammed passersby with his car outside the building and then stabbed people. He tried to get inside the synagogue, but Daulby, Cravitz and others, prevented him from entering.

 Flowers and tributes are pictured on the main road outside Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue in Crumpsall, north Manchester, on October 3, 2025, following an attack at the synagogue the day before.

Daulby’s family called him a hero. “He was a beloved brother, loving uncle to his four nieces and one nephew and a cherished cousin,” they said.

Both Cravitz and Daulby were regular members of the community, Brian Bell

told The Times

. He said Daulby “rose to the terrible danger, because he ran to close all the doors, back and front,” and it was while he was holding onto one of the doors that a bullet struck him.

A neighbour, Abdul Rahimi, who lived near Daulby for more than 20 years, said he was “like an angel,”

BBC News reported

. “He was a very good neighbour, very good guy, always helpful.”

Rahimi said Daulby was loved by his children, who would exchange gifts with him on holidays like Christmas and Eid.

Another neighbour, John Kelly, had known Daulby since they were young children. He called him “a lovely guy,”

The Telegraph reported

. The day before the attack, Daulby was captured on CCTV video going to Kelly’s home to feed his cat, which he did while Kelly was away. “I used to do his garden,” he said. Daulby’s father, who died three years ago, worked as a tailor, said Kelly.

Hussain, a member of a Muslim family who lived next door to Daulby and only wanted to provide his first name,

told The Times

that Daulby was a cancer survivor. He enjoyed tending to his garden and adored children. Daulby started going to synagogue again after his father died, said Hussain.

“I spoke to him on Tuesday and he was talking about how it was going to be a big celebration day but because he was not feeling too good he was not going to fast. But he was debating if he was going to the synagogue or not,” he said.

Cravitz was the security guard on duty at the synagogue when the suspect attacked, police revealed Friday. He “bravely prevented the attacker from gaining access” to the building.

“Melvin would do anything to help anyone. He was so kind, caring and always wanted to chat and get to know people,”

his family said

in a statement. “He was devoted to his wife, family and loved his food. He will be sorely missed by his wife, family, friends and community.”

 Members of the Jewish community comfort each other near to the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue, in Crumpsall, Manchester, England, Thursday, Oct. 2, 2025 after Police reported that two people were killed and three others were seriously injured in a synagogue attack in northern England.

Friends of Cravitz, Elchonon and Hindi Cohen, said he would visit them often, The Times reported.

“Before every festival we would have him over for a meal,” said Hindi. “He was very beloved. He was a figure round here. If you saw Melvin you stopped and talked.”

She added that he had health issues, but “he was always with a joke and a smile.”

The couple told The Telegraph that Cravitz didn’t have his own children, but his wife Karen’s children from another marriage looked up to him as “a beloved uncle figure.”

Andy Kordas, who lived near Cravitz for many years, said he “always had a kind word,”

BBC reported

.

“He always used to come over and have a chat and ask me what I was up to,” said Kordas. “He always had a smile on his face. It’s just terrible.”

Three other victims who were injured during the attack remain in hospital.

One has been identified as Yoni Finlay by

BBC

and

Sky News

. According to reports, he was believed to be the victim accidentally shot by officers. Another victim, Andrew Franks, was identified by Sky News. Police have not confirmed who the injured victims are.

In an effort to prevent the suspect from entering the synagogue, Finlay was holding the doors of the building closed, BBC reported. He was injured in the gunfire and left the scene in a stretcher. He underwent surgery at the hospital.

A man speaking at a vigil held near the synagogue to honour victims said that his second cousin, whom he referred to as Andrew, was in a “really bad way” after being was stabbed in the neck and chest during the attack,

BBC reported

. He was trying to stop the attacker. He is “fighting for his life” in a critical care unit, said Robert Rosenfield.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.