LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

One night while stationed in Hope, B.C., RCMP Const. Jack Van Steensel strapped himself to the boom of a large mobile crane and had it swing him over the raging Coquihalla River to rescue a freezing driver who had plunged his car into the tributary of the mighty Fraser.

His stressful job fostered eager appreciation of vacations.

In 2007, Jack and his wife, Rose, bought a motorhome, a 38-foot Newmar Dutch Star, drove it south across the border from Abbotsford, B.C., into Sumas, Wash.

“Everywhere we looked, we saw the American flag on so many homes,” said Rose. “The patriotism was so evident.”

They loved that trip and most years since, they’ve packed that motorhome, made room for Sangria, their rescue dog, and headed south from their home in Knutsford, on the outskirts of Kamloops. Their trips stretched longer and further, especially after Jack retired from the force.

“We’ve hit every state — other than Hawaii. We couldn’t pump those tires up enough to get to Hawaii,” Rose said. “We loved it. Wherever we went, we loved it. I loved South Dakota. It was so different. Maine was so beautiful in the fall, like nothing I’d ever seen in my life. We made friends in Florida, California, Washington State, Oregon and Arizona.”

They put 110,000 kilometres on their Dutch Star.

“We have such wonderful memories,” Rose said. “We are glad we have them, as we are not sure if we will return.”

Like many Canadians, Jack and Rose are falling out of love with America.

There’ve been rocky months recently in the long relationship between Canada and the United States, ever since the election of U.S. President Donald Trump. Even before his inauguration in January, Trump showed an unsettling attitude toward his country’s next-door neighbour and largest trading partner.

Trump’s insulting and belittling

musings

, threats of punishing economic warfare to push annexation, and aggressive tariffs on Canada’s goods are causing anger, uncertainty and fear. Anyone who has watched a relationship sour knows those emotions are a recipe for shattered trust.

Economic integration, trading partnerships, treaties and multilateral agreements all take time to untangle, but love can evaporate with an overnight tweet.

If Canadian feelings for America aren’t always love, exactly, there has been a broad affinity for the United States; for some, it’s been admiration, but for most there has at least been a sense of serenity that came from generations of close social and cultural integration.

That cosiness is suddenly endangered.

Interviews with people across Canada show that different folks are responding in different ways to the changes Trump brings, and they have different reasons for it, too, but empirical and anecdotal evidence suggest there is an unsubtle and unsettling trend: A cross-border social unravelling is underway as connections wilt and wither; a decoupling, in the modern language of relationship therapists.

The signs of a split are all around us, in politics, business, shopping, travel, sports, and in endless social niceties and interactions that were once routine.

Canadian flags have become so popular lately it reminded Jack and Rose Van Steensel of their first impressions of America when driving through the United States. Although Rose throws in an “elbows up” joke, they aren’t the most strident soldiers in this war. She said they don’t want their distaste for Trump’s policies to make them anti-American. She deplores when Canadian sports fans boo the U.S. national anthem.

“That is so not Canadian,” Rose said. “You’re booing the wrong thing if you’re booing the national anthem. If Trump walked out there, OK, boo him. He’s the one that’s doing this. But don’t boo the whole United States of America. Not fair, not fair.”

Americans, she said, are mostly wonderful.

“From our first trip into the States, we were treated kindly and learned to really respect the American people,” Rose said. “I don’t want to see those people lose their jobs. They didn’t all vote for him and lots of the ones that did are now regretting it.”

When shopping, she looks for products made in Canada but if she needs romaine lettuce and the only romaine is from the U.S., well, she’ll still put it in her cart.

Her travel plans are different. Trump’s actions are “a real slap in the face,” she said, but the major reason they don’t want to motor south is mainly because she’s no longer sure it’s safe.

“We’re scared to go down,” she said.

She doesn’t like what she’s heard of border scrutiny and new rules for the treatment of Canadian travellers, including fingerprinting. She’s afraid someone might see their B.C. licence plate and lash out. There is, she said, “fear of retribution because the MAGA people have heard nothing but negative things about Canada from Trump.

“It brings tears to my eyes when I think that the amazing country I loved coming to might no longer be safe.”

🍁🍁🍁🍁

Allan MacEachern has spent his life in St. Stephen, a town on the banks of the St. Croix River that separates New Brunswick from Maine.

“I guess my arm’s not that good anymore, but I could almost throw a rock and hit the American soil from the shoreline. It’s literally right there. You could holler across,” he said. MacEachern was elected to St. Stephen’s town council in 2012, as mayor in 2016, and has been re-elected twice more since.

For as long as he remembers, for much longer, in fact, his town and the U.S. town across the water, Calais, Maine, have been like one community. They share a fire service, businesses, and genetics and have for generations.

When COVID-19 shut the border, people in both towns headed to the riverfront and stood on the shoreline waving to friends and family in the other town. And when a man from St. Stephen married a woman from Calais, lockdown meant most of the bride’s family couldn’t cross over for it, so MacEachern helped arrange their ceremony at the tip of the town’s wharf, with American guests watching from the shore of Calais, and from boats bobbing in the river.

Despite a population of about 8,500 in St. Stephen and 3,000 in Calais, there are three bridges with international border crossings connecting them. During the War of 1812, British soldiers delivered gunpowder to St. Stephen so residents could protect their town from the Americans across the river. The town instead gave the barrel of gunpowder to Calais to use in their Fourth of July celebration fireworks. Now that’s trust. Calais later replaced the gunpowder, and that barrel still sits in the St. Stephen mayor’s office, MacEachern said.

Tightening border controls after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States made it harder for people to flow back and forth, and the pandemic caused further division, but they kept their strong bonds. Now there is a new barrier: Donald Trump.

“It’s challenging because us in border communities are looking at our neighbours right in the eyes,” MacEachern said of the border tension.

Across the St. Croix River, which narrows to 40 metres in spots, MacEachern’s American counterpart is Marcia Rogers. She has lived in Calais for 35 years. For 11 of them, she sat on town council and, since November, has been mayor.

“It’s French,” Rogers said of her town’s name, “but it’s not pronounced that way here. We pronounce it callous.”

Border communities are different than other towns.

“Living on a border, people that have lived here for generations have family on both sides. It’s generations of families that have crossed the borders, so we’re not just talking about Americans and Canadians, we are family and friends that go back and forth,” Rogers said.

She owns horses and buys her hay in Canada. One of her horses is stabled in Canada. And across the river lies other enticements: “In St. Stephen, they have a Kentucky Fried Chicken and a Burger King that we do not have over here,” she said.

Rogers is worried. As soon as Trump started taunting Canada and threatening tariffs, Canadians began to stay away.

“We have serious concerns. Some of our businesses have taken a serious setback in revenues,” Rogers said. “Our general feed store, which also is the packaging hub for Canada, their revenues are down 50 per cent. The local IGA, the food stores, are down across the board. And you know, the tariffs hadn’t even gone into effect when those things started. It’s because our Canadian friends — rightly so — decided not to come across the border. I don’t think they want to be a 51st state.”

She keeps hoping it blows over, but it’s only getting worse. Friendships are fraying.

“I’ve seen it both ways, both Americans saying, ‘Too bad for the Canadians, you’re going to start paying instead of, you know, screwing us over,’ and Canadians saying, ‘We’re not coming over there if you think we’ll be the 51st state.’ But there’s also people that speak up and say, ‘Hey, remember that we’ve all been here for each other for years and years, for generations.’

“When this first started, I was nervous about going across the border,” Rogers said. “I was a little nervous about going over because I had an American licence plate.” When she crossed, she had no problems.

“What we keep reminding each other is, it’s not coming from our communities, it’s not our decision, it’s way above our pay grade. Don’t let one man divide us,” Rogers said of Trump.

MacEachern is full of sympathy for residents of Calais. He doesn’t want his neighbours to suffer.

“We’ve got businesses in Calais putting out ads saying, ‘We miss you, Canadians, we love you, please come back,’ and they’re even offering Canadian money at par at some of the restaurants. And that hurts to see. We went through that in COVID and it’s very upsetting,” he said.

MacEachern and Rogers encourage their communities to keep their cross-border bonds from unravelling further, but things are beyond their control.

Schools and sports teams around St. Stephen recently cut off travel to the United States, including for long-established cross-border leagues and tournaments. It was not done in protest: “Some of our school students are immigrants and they definitely don’t want to take a chance crossing the border right now, because they don’t know how that will be handled,” said MacEachern.

The border boycott hurts on both sides of the river. This is the gateway between Atlantic Canada and the United States. Most of the traffic comes from farther away and those travellers are steering clear of the border, which means they’re staying away from both towns.

“It’s also hurting St. Stephen because we rely on people and product crossing our border. I’m really concerned about tourist season coming. What’s that going to look like?”

Each summer for more than 50 years, the two towns have co-hosted the International Homecoming Festival, a summer festival celebrating their ties. A highlight is a parade that crosses the border. The towns are still planning to hold the August festival, this time with an eye to mending obvious fractures. A poster for the event says: “We are family … we hug it out.”

“We’ve been friends and allies for years and years and years — and they’ve been hurtful words that have been said and that’s pretty tough for Canadians to hear — but what we keep reminding each other is it’s not coming from our communities,” MacEachern said. “But that doesn’t make it easier. They’re still pretty angry.”

🍁🍁🍁🍁

Brian Rathbun is new to Canada. As an international relations and political science professor, he arrived in July from the University of Southern California to teach at the University of Toronto.

In his classrooms in the United States each year, he used the same example to help him explain the role of trust in diplomacy and the global realm.

“The example I always used when teaching this to our undergrads is the Canadian-U.S. relationship. It takes a tremendous amount of trust to have the longest undefended land border in the world,” Rathbun said.

“Why is it undefended? Because they entirely trust the United States and its motivations. They think that the United States, even if it were to have certain designs on things that Canada has, would not make use of that power, and that’s the assumption that you and I grew up with, and has probably existed for the last 100 years.”

He is looking at that differently now. One hundred years of trust jeopardized within 100 days of Trump’s second term.

“To shatter that with a couple of tweets, that’s quite a remarkable feat. It is so alarming and so radical that this trust is declining so quickly.”

Rathbun was at a Toronto Raptors game in March, a home game at Toronto’s Scotiabank Arena. As the only NBA team based outside the United States, the Raptors play both national anthems before tipoff. Rathbun was shocked to hear people around him booing The Star-Spangled Banner.

“I haven’t seen people booing the national anthem,” he said. “You hear the boos but then you also hear the loud cheers for O Canada, and everyone’s singing together, and that part was quite touching.

“If I had started talking to one of the fans near me at the Raptors game and I said, ‘Hey, I’m an American,’ that Raptors fan would have probably said, ‘I hate your government, but we love you.’ That’s my guess, that people are distinguishing between the government and the people.

“I don’t think people in Canada, when they’re choosing Canadian products over American products, are saying, ‘I’m going to stick it to an American farmer.’ They’re trying to hit the pocketbooks of Americans only because they feel that’s the only way that they can send a message to the administration. They want to do their bit to contribute to the welfare of their country that they feel is being unfairly picked on,” Rathbun said.

While Rathbun, the person, was startled, for Rathbun, the scholar, it made sense. When Canadians talk about falling out of love with America, he said it really means losing trust in the U.S. government.

“The multilateral world order is premised, to a large degree, on a trusting worldview that the United States had after the Second World War,” Rathbun said. The Western world had seen the might of the United States and the difference it made in the war. The United States showed itself to be the leader of a multinational ideology built on democratic principles. It valued that role and other countries learned to trust it.

“Most of what keeps international co-operation going is not hard law or hard security, it’s trust,” but Trump takes a different world view, he said.

The reaction from many around the world to Trump picking on Canada is similar to when people see a bully beat on a weakling, Rathbun said. “It’s precisely because of an asymmetry in power,” and a natural response to it is to try to punish the behaviour. “We’re still going to resist the bully, even if we’re very small. And I think that’s what you’re seeing.”

Typically, most Americans probably don’t think about Canada twice in the same year, and now suddenly they see Canadians booing their anthem, yanking their booze out of stores and, out of the mouth of Ontario Premier Doug Ford, threatening to shut off their lights in communities that buy electricity from the province. No wonder some return the social chill.

“What do Americans think about Canadians? We don’t think very much about Canada at all. That could lead to a certain amount of indifference. It creates a vacuum. We’ve seen how people can do 180-degree turns on their views. What if you only need to make a 90-degree turn?” said Rathbun. “I think that Trump could pretty easily turn Americans, or at least his supporters, against Canadians.”

It seems to already be happening.

Joe Rogan, an influential American commentator among young conservatives, might be a barometer on the issue. At first, he expressed derision at Trump picking a fight with Canada: “Why are we upset at Canada? This is stupid,”

he said

on the March 14 episode of his podcast, The Joe Rogan Experience. “It’s the dumbest f-cking feud.”

On his

March 22 podcast,

though, Rogan’s stance seemed to have changed. When a guest mentioned an upcoming event in Montreal, Rogan said he wouldn’t be there: “I don’t go to Canada anymore,” he said. “Nor should you,” his guest replied.

🍁🍁🍁🍁

Falling out with the United States is not confined to progressives, or those opposed to Trump or Elon Musk or Trump’s Make America Great Again ideology.

A couple from Saskatchewan spent many years globe-hopping for work. They have lived in six countries through 10 international moves in their careers in the energy-technology sector, including in the United States.

“Living and working in the U.S. twice over a total of 10 years found us very fond of the U.S.A., to the point of having almost a split Canadian-American identity,” the husband said. They asked for their names not to be published because of pending real estate deals and unresolved business relationships.

Some years ago, the couple bought property on a ski hill in Montana with plans to build a retirement home there. Recently, with the husband retired but his wife still working, they hired an architect and had house plans drawn in anticipation of starting construction on a lavish home.

It was during a conversation with the proposed builder, who was their friend, that their plan started to fall apart. They were talking about hockey. In February, after hockey fans in Montreal booed the U.S. anthem at the 4 Nations Face-Off game between Canada and the United States, their builder said how unacceptable that was.

“I tried to point out how upset Canadians must be to act so uncharacteristically rude, given our collective politeness. I tried to explain that threats on our sovereignty were extreme and perhaps good reason for Canadians to become uncharacteristically rude to our neighbours,” the husband said. “My argument fell on such deaf ears that the conversational door was slammed shut. I began falling out of love with America.”

At the same time, they were hearing from friends and family still in Canada about a shift to patriotic shopping.

“That opened our minds to reconsidering Canadian ski hills after a decade and a half of focusing on our plans to build in the U.S.,” he said. They shelved their Montana land development and made an offer for a lot on a ski hill in British Columbia.

“We are buying Canadian,” he said. “We have chosen to direct our capital and future back into Canada.” He said the decision cost Montana between $3 million and $5 million for the house alone, plus lost future revenue from their spending.

The couple, though, are not liberals or Liberals. He complains of “woke benevolence” spoiling Canada.

“We think highly of the work Trump and Musk are doing in the U.S., although we could do without some of the shock negotiation strategies,” the husband said.

“Recent political and social shifts have made us well aware that we are not Americans,” he said. “We aren’t down on America as much as we are aware that we are guests in the United States and that our welcome can be withdrawn at any point. We see that risk as ultimately a reason to favour the certainty of always being able to live in Canada, regardless of how broken it is.”

It isn’t just one family in one house on a ski hill that unwinding social ties has cost. Across the United States, many Canadians own vacation property and second homes where they live part-time, and some of those Canadians are calling it quits.

“Canadians are half the reason we are what we are,” said Melanie Pritchard, a real estate broker in Ellicottville, N.Y., a town famous for its skiing that’s an hour’s drive south of the Peace Bridge border crossing between Fort Erie, Ont., and Buffalo, N.Y.

Canadian skiers started buying holiday homes in and around Ellicottville decades ago and have become an important part of the community. Many of the region’s events are timed for Canadians: A summer festival is over Canada Day and a fall festival over Canada’s Thanksgiving.

“I can’t tell you the number of Canadians that have become our friends, very good friends,” Pritchard said.

Wrinkles and tears are now in that social fabric. As a Realtor, she sees the damage firsthand: there has been a sudden and unusual increase in Canadians selling their homes. She has several on the market now.

“They do express concerns about the situation, not only with the tariffs, per se, but just the general environment,” Pritchard said. “A lot of them have expressed dismay with the rhetoric that’s been going on from our country’s leaders. You know, taking Canada over, making Canada the 51st state — none of that goes over very well.”

Pritchard is worried about the finality that comes with Canadians selling rather than just renting the house to someone else for a while.

“We understand their concerns and we just hate to see it become too much of a thing.” She said the town has called a meeting to discuss the change.

Not every Canadian has come to the same conclusion.

🍁🍁🍁🍁

Lyle Zdunich had only been back in Saskatoon a week after flying in from his winter house 3,100 kilometres from the gnawing bite of Saskatchewan’s winter. He had time to talk about it while waiting for the Winnipeg Jets to hit the ice.

A retired chartered accountant, Zdunich has owned property near Palm Springs, Calif., since 1998 and has spent the last 21 of his 75 winters there. He and his wife, Arlene, fly down to their condo in a gated community each October.

“As soon as we get off the plane, it’s like we’re at home down there,” he said. “We’ve met tons of people. Between golf and tennis and whatnot, and we know other Canadians down there, so it’s been a very enjoyable experience.”

The Zdunichs are among thousands of Canadian snowbirds who arrive each winter in Palm Springs. The desert city’s population triples come November and deflates back to about 45,000 in March. Most of that surge comes from Canada.

“I am definitely not anti-American,” Zdunich said.

“If you get away from Donald Trump and some of the things he’s said, the Americans are still our allies and friends. Having lived in the States for just about half the year, whether somebody’s from Saskatchewan or somebody’s from Palm Springs, to me, they’re all the same.”

For sure, he doesn’t like what he’s hearing about Canada from the White House, but he considers it to only be Trump’s ranting, more publicity than policy.

“I’m of the point of view that I think it’s totally an unfortunate situation, but in the short term it’s not going to change my view of going down there. Forget all the noise going around, it’ll get sorted out. Do I want to forgo the friendships I have formed just because of something that may or may not occur?”

He said he hasn’t experienced animosity from people down south. “Absolutely zero negative response from the Americans towards Canada — if they felt that way, they sure would be willing to say it, but nobody does.”

Zdunich said he hears people in Canada talk about boycotting the United States, but that’s not for him.

“I agree with most people, that if (Trump) would just not say a lot of things he does, it would be a lot better. But I’m not going to sell my place. It’s a welcoming environment from everybody I know down there.”

Businesses in Palm Springs will love hearing his response.

Tourism from Canada

is way down across the United States. Border crossings from Canada dropped by close to a million travellers this March compared to last, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data. It’s the biggest decline since COVID-19 shut down travel.

Flight bookings from Canada to the United States have collapsed. In March, advanced airline bookings were down more than 70 per cent for each month April to September compared to last year, according to airline data from OAG Aviation.

There has been less traffic going the other direction as well, with the number of trips by U.S. residents driving to Canada down 10.6 per cent this March over last.

While Canadians are falling out of love with America, Palm Springs wants them to know the feeling isn’t mutual. In April, the city hung banners from downtown street-lights and put up billboards at the airport saying: “Palm Springs ♥️ Canada.”

Photos of the signs in the airport with few passengers in sight attracted harsh comments on Facebook: “Are all the passengers detained in facilities? It’s really empty there,” said one. “They’re on a connecting flight to El Salvador,” came a reply.

All of California is feeling the impact of being spurned by Canadians, and its governor, Gavin Newsom, knows why his usual flood of tourist is drying up.

California launched a statewide campaign

to lure Canadians back, and Newsom’s pitch is to distance California from Trump, physically and ideologically.

“The state of mind in the United States of America has dramatically changed as it relates to the approach to Canada, and we want to make sure we send a message to our Canadian friends up north to come to a state where two million Canadians visited last year,” Newsom said in a promotion.

A video ad makes a sharper point.

“Sure, you know who’s trying to stir things up back in D.C.,” the ad says, and then cuts to a photo of a tilting White House, “but don’t let that ruin your beach plans. California’s the ultimate playground, 2,000 miles from Washington and a world away in mindset … We’ve got plenty of sunshine and a whole lot of love for our neighbours up north.”

🍁🍁🍁🍁

Statistics back up anecdotes of a broad social unravelling.

A recent

YouGov survey

of Canadians found a remarkable decoupling: 44 per cent said they consider the U.S. to be unfriendly; 20 per cent said it was an enemy. Only 15 per cent said it was an ally and 10 per cent said friendly, with 11 per cent saying they weren’t sure.

That’s a huge tumble since the

same question was asked in 2020

, when 18 per cent described the United States as unfriendly and only four per cent said an enemy.

The survey also found 61 per cent of Canadian respondents were already boycotting American companies. The most boycotted items were fruits and vegetables, booze, personal care items and household goods.

A survey of American citizens

by the same research company found U.S. citizens’ view of Canada was also deteriorating. In late March, 16 per cent of Americans polled said Canada was an enemy of the United States. That seems low, but it’s the highest level of animosity since data started in 2017, when only five per cent said it. The same poll showed 73.7 per cent of Americans said Canada was an ally, a drop from almost 86 per cent in 2017.

It’s hard to trust an enemy, so this is a big problem.

In our personal lives, trust is an important part of how we interact with others. It’s how we choose whom to leave a spare house key with, whom we invite to our party. It is how we decide whom to loan money to or accept a ride from; whom to date and whom to dump; whom we share secrets with and whom we believe.

It’s similar on the world stage. What country is trusted to come to your aid and to hold up their end of an agreement? Where do you feel safe visiting? What country do you want to succeed?

Tuuli-Marja Kleiner researches why nations trust each other at Germany’s Thünen Institute of Rural Studies by analyzing cross-country survey data.

She said that at its heart, international trust means belief that expectations and commitments will be fulfilled, or at least not purposely violated. As a starting point, she said, similarities in cultural values fosters familiarity, which can trigger trust because similarity suggests each group can predict how the other will act.

Familiarity and similarity describe Canada and the United States; despite many differences, both have similar historic, demographic and religious roots, with population growth through immigration. Both have democratic governance and English as an official language. Once differences over connection to the monarchy in Britain settled down, the two countries have been close allies.

Until 2009, Canadians didn’t even need a passport to drive into the United States. Generations of cross-border social and cultural connections solidified the affinity.

“My analysis showed that cultural proximity between nations increases trust but only if their proximity is a qualified one,” said Kleiner. Her study of Europe, which she thinks is likely the same across the Western world, showed the biggest qualifiers for trust were democratic values and global reputation.

“So, if there’s a violation of those as massive as under the Trump administration, then the relationship is effectively harmed or even terminated, because what he is saying is, you and I do not belong together morally any longer.”

What is going on in Canada in reaction to Trump — more public patriotism, boycotts, reduced U.S. visits — is a natural response, Kleiner said. “If you no longer see the other as part of your cultural similarity and no longer trust them, you don’t want to co-operate with them and you don’t want to live among them.”

How much the friendship between Canada and the United States unravels, and how long that will last, is impossible to know.

Is it divorce, separation or a few nights spent sleeping on the couch?

As breakups go, Canada is in an awkward spot. It can date other people, sure, but can’t pack up and move. It is forever stuck living beside an ex — one who regularly points at your house saying you’re a cheater and a freeloader and your house really should be their house.

Can they get back together?

Kleiner is pessimistic, at least in the short term. “Once the trust is destroyed, it is very difficult to rebuild,” she said. Canadians now know that extending trust automatically based on similarities doesn’t always work.

Rathbun, the American professor living in Canada, is more optimistic. He believes broken trust can mend as circumstances change, but perhaps not quickly and it won’t be as deep as it was. Trump won’t be in office forever; maybe the next president will view Canada differently, or maybe Trump will change course.

While many Canadians said they will never feel comfortable with the United States again, Rathbun thinks feelings will improve over time, though he predicts countries will retain a “hedging strategy.”

Jack and Rose Van Steensel, the motorhome couple, are applying their own version of a hedging strategy to their relationship with the United States.

They’re watching and waiting to see if things get better, if Trump settles down, if a deal can ease tension. They made a tentative reservation for their motorhome in Arizona for November, in case things improve. Rose said the woman who runs the RV park understands their position.

Over on the banks of the St. Croix River, the two cross-border mayors hope their joint festival lights a path to keeping their communities united, despite what swirls around them. Maybe, said Mayor MacEachern, getting through this will eventually make their bonds even stronger.

”There’s always good things that come out of bad,” MacEachern said.

“I think it will take time to get us back, but I think we’ll get back. I hope so. But I think it depends where it goes with Trump.”


King Charles III and Queen Camilla greet Mounties after a visit to mark the 100th anniversary of Canada House in London on Tuesday.

If you find yourself in Canada’s capital next week, there are a handful of opportunities to see King Charles III and Queen Camilla.

Their Majesties’ itineraries for the two-day visit, May 26-27, were released on Tuesday.

“This will be His Majesty’s first visit to Canada since his Coronation — a momentous and historic occasion that underscores Canada’s identity and sovereignty as a constitutional monarchy,”

Canada Heritage wrote.

In addition to

delivering the first throne speech from a monarch since 1977

, here’s what the King and Queen are scheduled to attend on their quick trip.

Monday, May 26

After arriving in Ottawa, where they’ll be greeted by troops from the Royal Canadian Dragoons — the most senior armoured regiment in the Canadian Forces — the royal pair are set to attend an early-afternoon community gathering at Landsdowne Park, which will be open to the general public.

“Their Majesties will meet and engage with Canadian individuals and organizations showcasing Canadian identity and diversity and take part in various activities,” according to the itinerary.

Within an hour, it’s off to Governor General of Canada Mary Simon’s residence at Rideau Hall, where the provincial Lieutenant Governors and Territorial Commissioners will have a chance to meet with the monarchs.

King Charles will also be joined by Viceregal representatives, community groups and school groups for a ceremonial tree planting.

The rest of the day includes an audience with Simon and Prime Minister Mark Carney.

The Liberal leader extended the invitation to King Charles on a visit to the U.K. immediately after his swearing in as Canada’s prime minister in mid-March.

“That clearly underscores the sovereignty of our country,” Carney said when

the visit was first announced.

Tuesday, May 27

Day two of their visit begins at the Bank of Canada with a ride down Wellington Street aboard Canada’s State Landau — a luxury 19th-century carriage — and accompanied by RCMP Musical Ride horses.

On their last visit in 2022 to mark the Platinum Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II, Charles and Camilla visited the home of the ceremonial equine team to meet riders and attend a special performance. His Majesty was appointed an honorary commissioner of the RCMP in 2012. In 2023, he was presented with Noble, a horse given to him by the RCMP to mark his acceptance of the role of Commissioner-in-Chief of the RCMP during a ceremony at Windsor Castle in England.

 King Charles III greets Noble the horse alongside RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme.

Both the scheduled 25-minute ride and their arrival at the Senate of Canada are open to the public.

Outside the Senate, “The King will receive full military honours which will include a Royal Salute, a 100-person guard of honour from the 3rd Battalion of the Royal Canadian Regiment, an inspection of the guard and the band, and a 21-gun salute.”

The speech from the Throne to open Canada’s 45th parliament is scheduled for 11 a.m. from the Senate Chamber.

The last monarch to do so was the King’s mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II, in 1977.

Philippe Lagassé: A Canadian King in Parliament

The pair will close out their morning with a public wreath-laying at the National War Memorial to mark the 25th anniversary of the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.

Their Majesties are scheduled to depart later that day.

How many times have King Charles and Queen Camilla visited Canada?

This will be King Charles’ 20th official and personal documented trip to Canada. His first came alongside his late parents, Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh, in 1970 when he was 22.

Their last visit in 2022, when Charles was still Prince of Wales, lasted three days and saw them arrive in St. John’s before visiting Ottawa and then the Northwest Territories.

 Then Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, and Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, meet local market producers and merchants at ByWard Market in Ottawa in 2022.

A trip in 2017 was also three days long, starting in Iqaluit, Nunavut, before moving on to Ontario’s Prince Edward County and finishing up in Ottawa and Gatineau, Que.

Visits in 2014 and 2012 lasted four days, while a trip in 2009, their first to Canada as an official couple and the Queen’s first of five visits to date, was a nine-day excursion that brought them from Newfoundland, through Ontario and Quebec, to British Columbia.

The King’s longest stay in Canada came in 1975 when he was serving aboard the

HMS Hermes. The longest official visit was the first leg of a cross-Canada Royal Couple tour with the late Princess Diana in 1983 — an 18-day stay throughout Atlantic Canada. 

Warming up at Canada House 

In advance of this visit, Their Majesties visited Canada House in London on Tuesday to mark the 100th anniversary of the High Commission of Canada in the United Kingdom.

After viewing an enormous floor map of Canada, His Majesty was presented with keys to the building first opened by his great-grandfather, King George V, in 1925.

“Your presence here today launches your journey to Canada next week. This will be your 20th visit, but your first as reigning monarch,” said Ralph Goodale, High Commissioner for Canada in the U.K., per

the Daily Mail.

‘Your dear mother Queen Elizabeth II often said to the delight of Canadians that a journey to Canada felt like coming home. We hope that you feel exactly the same way.”

 King Charles III is presented with a Key to Canada House, the High Commission of Canada in the United Kingdom, by High Commissioner Ralph Goodale, Tuesday in London.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A Glock 17 was one of the firearms the manicurist reported stolen after officials asked for photos of her gun collection.

An Ontario manicurist authorities believe to be a “straw purchaser” of handguns reported that her safe full of weapons, silver bars and cash was burgled the day after the province’s chief firearms officer requested photos of the arsenal.

Chi Do was convicted in Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice on three counts of transferring a firearm knowing that she was unauthorized to do so, 12 counts of possession of a firearm for the purpose of trafficking, and one count of public mischief, with the intent to mislead, by reporting she’d been robbed by a boyfriend whose last name she couldn’t remember.

“I find the timing of the report of theft to be suspicious,” Justice Judy Fowler Byrne wrote in a recent decision.

“The report of a theft came on the very day that she was supposed to provide evidence that she had possession of the fifteen firearms. While viewed alone, it may make sense, but considered with the other evidence, it appears to be the only option open to Ms. Do who needed a reasonable explanation as to why her firearms were missing. Viewing this theft report in light of all the evidence, Ms. Do was motivated to fabricate a story about being robbed.”

Do was “flagged as a high-volume purchaser” by the province’s chief firearms office after buying four handguns within four days.

When an officer with the outfit started to investigate, “he learned that Ms. Do had 15 handguns and one long gun registered to her,” the judge wrote in a decision dated May 16.

The officer contacted Do on Valentines Day of 2022.

“He wanted assurances that all of the firearms were still in her possession. Ms. Do assured him that all of her firearms were safely stored in her safe at her home.”

The officer asked her to take photos of the guns stored at her home. “Ms. Do said she was rushed and on her way to work, but promised to email him the photos of all 16 firearms later that day.

The officer later learned “that she had reported the theft of the guns (to Peel Regional Police) early in the morning on February 15, 2022,” said the decision.

“She told the police that she had just got home from work and went into her safe to take photos of the firearms for the firearms officer, when she discovered that her firearms, ammunition, ($5,000 in cash she was saving up for her brother’s birthday), and silver bars were missing. All of her firearms were missing except for two long guns.”

Do told investigators that she’d been in her safe a few weeks earlier and all her guns were there at the time, said the decision. “The only person she believed could have committed the theft was a man she was having an affair with (for a year and a half) and who she had just broke up with. His name was Alex. He was a Sri Lankan man, who she met in Barrie. His last name was too long for her to remember. She believed Alex knew where she kept the key to her safe. She had deleted any contact information for him after the breakup. She did not have camera surveillance.”

Do lived in the basement of her parents’ home.

Her safe, hidden in the back of her closet, was opened when police arrived, said the decision. “It showed no visual signs of damage. She still had one shot gun and one long gun, and some empty firearm cases.”

Do told investigators “that she liked to collect guns,” said the decision. “She explained that she had a lot of the same type of guns because she wanted to gift some to her husband when he got his (possession and acquisition licence).”

Police didn’t see any “signs of forced entry” at the home and the only windows in the basement where Do lived were too small for anyone to fit through, said the decision.

“When asked what she liked about the firearms, she said she liked that they ‘go pow,’ and she liked the loud noise. She stated that she has not shot any of her guns, but she wanted a collection. She planned to eventually go to a range and fire them.”

A few weeks later, Peel Regional Police learned that on Nov. 18, 2021, the Hamilton Police Service searched a home in Scarborough and found 11 firearms in a safe.

“This was three months before Ms. Do reported the theft of her firearms,” said the decision.

Several of the guns had their serial numbers filed off, but police were able to identify three of them as registered to Do.

On May 13, 2022, an officer with the specialized enforcement bureau, which focuses on major drug investigations, gangs and firearms, got involved.

“He was advised of the reported theft from Ms. Do’s apartment, the number of guns that she had and how three of them were recovered prior to the reported theft,” said the decision.

“There were suspicions that she was ‘straw purchaser’ — someone who purchases firearms legally, but then provides them illegally to others.”

In an interview with investigators, when asked why she had so many firearms, Do “said that she likes to practice target shooting. She purchased three Glock 19’s because she was going to give one to her husband and the other for her 13-year-old son, when he got older. She wanted to purchase her firearms then in case the government banned them all later.”

In 2020 and 2021, Do worked in a nail salon in Barrie and at the Marriot Hotel in Toronto. “In total, Ms. Do declared gross earnings of $60,742 over 2020 and 2021. During the same period, she spent $12,678.46 on a combination of restricted and unrestricted weapons, and ammunition,” said the judge. “In January 2022, she paid for an (additional five) firearms, which totalled $3,410.31. From this, I can infer that she spent approximately one-third of her net income from 2020 to early 2022 on firearm purchases.”

Do “testified that she was able to afford the firearms because she didn’t have many expenses,” said the decision.

She claimed to have a problem with “impulse purchasing.”

Do never made an insurance claim for the missing cash or silver bars she said were stolen with her guns.

“I do not accept Ms. Do’s evidence that she was robbed of her firearms,” Fowler Byrne said. “Nor does her evidence leave me with a reasonable doubt about any of the elements of the offences.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Israeli Ambassador to Canada Iddo Moed on September 4, 2024.

OTTAWA

— Israel’s ambassador in Ottawa says his country is “quite taken aback” by Canada’s decision to threaten action alongside the United Kingdom and France, over its war against Hamas and believes Prime Minister Mark Carney ought to pay the Israel a visit. 

“This is unprecedented,”

Iddo Moed,

 

Israel’s ambassador to Canada, told National Post in an interview Tuesday. 

“This has never happened in the past and so this is why we are taken aback. That’s an understatement, I would say.”

On Monday, Canada, the U.K., and France released a joint statement to say they “strongly

oppose the expansion of 
Israel
’s military operations in Gaza,” calling its latest actions “wholly disproportionate.”

It came after Israel announced it was launching an “extensive” ground offensive in Gaza and would be allowing more basic aid into the area, where thousands are starving and the threat of widespread famine has only worsened.

The countries’ leaders took aim at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, warning that, should Israel not stop its military actions and restricting of humanitarian aid, they would take “further concrete actions in response.”

On Tuesday, the British government announced it was hitting settlers in the West Bank with sanctions and suspending talks about a free trade agreement with Israel.

Carney, who is spending the day meeting behind closed-doors with his cabinet, has not yet announced whether Canada would take further action.

Canada has previously levied sanctions against those responsible for settler violence in the West Bank and opposes further settlements.

In their statement, Carney, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President

Emmanuel Macron

cited the “intolerable suffering” unfolding in Gaza, calling the announcement Israel made the day before to allow basic quantities of food into the area “

wholly inadequate.”

They demanded Israel’s government halt its military operations and for Hamas to release the remaining hostages taken captive when militants stormed into southern Israel in October 2023.

Their statement said Israel must also “

immediately allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza,” including by working with the United Nations. 

In a post on X,

Netanyahu said by asking Israel to stop its “defensive war,” the leaders were giving a “huge prize” to Hamas, a designated terrorist entity which governs the Gaza Strip and carried out the October 2023 attacks, which killed around 1,200 civilians and saw 251 people taken hostage. 

There remain 58 hostages in Hamas captivity.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre rejected Carney’s statement, pointing to how Hamas had thanked Canada for its statement on Israel by calling it a “step in the right direction.”

“Threatening Israel with sanctions and “further concrete actions” while a terrorist group on their borders holds their citizens hostage and refuses to stop attacking Israel is wrong,” Poilievre posted on X.

The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, a Canadian Jewish advocacy organization, said Carney’s statement undercuts earlier remarks he made that Hamas ought to lay down its weapons and have no role in governing Gaza.

Pressure from the international community has been mounting on Israel to cease its war with Hamas, with agencies like the United Nations citing figures from the Gaza Health Ministry that more than 53,000 Palestinians, including many women and children, have been killed since Israel began its offensive.

The Gaza Healthy Ministry does not differentiate between combatants and civilians.

Moed said on Tuesday that no country will tell Israel how to conduct its war that it is focused on trying to eliminate the designated terror group and securing the release of the remaining 58 hostages.  

The ambassador declined to speculate on what Israel may do should Canada follow through on its threat of taking further action against Israel.

He said channels of communication between Israel and Canada remain open and that both countries spent the past weekend exchanging messages about efforts Israel is making to get aid to people in Gaza “and not into the hands of Hamas.”

As of Tuesday, Israel said dozens more trucks entered Gaza. It also said that Hamas is responsible for stealing aid that enters Gaza.

Tom Fletcher, U.N. humanitarian chief, has called the aid that has been allowed to enter a

“drop in the ocean of what is urgently needed.” 

While Moed said he has yet to speak to Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand since she was named to the post last week, he believes Carney should pay a visit to the country to see the situation for himself.

“I think that he should,” he said. “Seeing the reality on the ground brings perspective into opinions.”

Particularly, he said, to better understand Israel’s opposition to seeing a two-state solution, which has been Canada and other G7 countries’ longstanding position to bring peace to the region.

With additional reporting from The Associated Press

National Post
staylor@postmedia.com
Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Parti Quebecois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon presents his end of session results on June 7, 2024 at the legislature in Quebec City. St-Pierre Plamondon is accompanied by Pascal Paradis (right).

OTTAWA — Albertans may want to see more pipelines across the country, but Quebec politicians are still arguing about whether their constituents will welcome them.

“Where are the projects that are profitable for Quebec? If there were any, we would have known about it a long time ago. This is not the case currently,” said Parti Québécois MNA Pascal Paradis at a press conference Tuesday.

Premier François Legault’s comments last week in an hour-long podcast interview with host Stephan Bureau are still resonating in the National Assembly and in Alberta.

“Quebecers are saying, ‘There’s no way Trump is going to control the oil we produce in Alberta.’ So, can we export it to Europe through Quebec instead of being stuck with Trump? There’s openness. I feel things are shifting,” Legault said. But he also suggested that a potential project could pass through the northern part of the province and end at the port of Sept-Îles.

“There are projects like that which would have been unthinkable before Trump,” Legault said.

Some Quebec politicians don’t agree. Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet said that “we could discuss at length what constitutes openness among Quebecers or not.” Paradis argued that “there’s one poll showing a certain openness, but to what? ”

Making matters even more contentious, only a few public polls have been conducted on this question.

The most frequently cited one

dates back to February, during the tariff war with the United States.

At the time, a 

SOM-La Presse poll

suggested that 59 per cent of Quebecers would be in favour of a new Energy East project.

Another one by

Nanos Research

, conducted in April, found that nearly half of Quebecers said they somewhat or strongly supported the idea of a trans-Canada pipeline, the lowest rate in Canada.

Legault later told reporters that “we’re a long way from a concrete project” and that any potential environmental assessments would not be skipped.

“We remember there have been past projects that crossed several rivers. We need to look at the impacts and then look at the benefits. What’s positive in each of the projects, if any concrete ones are put forward,” Legault said.

Nonetheless, his comments infuriated separatist parties in the province.

While the Parti Québécois is asking “what’s in it for us” and “what are the proposed projects on the table” — so far, there aren’t any — the leftist separatist party Quebec Solidaire attacked the premier for making the mistake of “thinking that pipelines are the solution to the Trump tariff crisis.”

“It’s completely insane. It’s even dogmatic to think that,” said QS parliamentary leader Ruba Ghazal.

She said that pipelines “are destroying our environment,” that there are environmental, social and economic “risks” and that “it’s not profitable.”

She also echoed comments made last week by federal Liberal minister Steven Guilbeault about a peak in oil demand in the coming years, both in Canada and globally.

“When we look around the world, particularly in Europe, where there will be a decline in demand for hydrocarbon energy in the future, well, we’ll find ourselves with infrastructure that we won’t need later,” said Ghazal.

Those comments by separatists came as the PQ was tabling a motion in the National Assembly that called on the government “to use the fiscal means at its disposal to reduce the unfair gap in the price of gasoline with the border provinces, by June 24, 2025.”

The Quebec Liberal Party said that “people are now more open-minded than a couple of years ago.”

“The objective is to increase our independence with respect to the United States energy, with respect to the energy. So, that being said, again, it has to be an analysis project by project, with the environmental criteria being at the forefront,” said interim leader Marc Tanguay.

On Saturday, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith called Legault’s comments a “massive breakthrough” on her

weekend morning radio program

.

Smith said she believed the world’s perspective on natural gas and foreign demand may have swayed the Quebec Premier.

“I think there is a world understanding that natural gas is an important transition fuel. I think it’s a destination fuel, personally, but when you use natural gas, it means you’re not using other high-emitting fuels like coal and wood and, in some cases, even dung,” Smith said.

However, Legault’s comments were not about an LNG pipeline, but rather an oil pipeline.

The GNL Québec project was blocked by the Quebec government in 2021 due to environmental concerns. It was a $14 billion natural gas pipeline with a terminal in Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean.

Also, the premier’s office indicated Tuesday that any opening on the government’s part is conditional on the submission of “serious projects,” concrete economic benefits for Quebec and social acceptability.

There aren’t any proposed pipelines involving Quebec. A decade ago, Energy East, a 4,500 km pipeline that would have carried 1.1 million barrels of crude oil from Alberta to the Irving refinery in New Brunswick, was abandoned due to regulatory hurdles in Canada and strong opposition from environmental groups.

The $15-billion project was also unpopular in Quebec. The provincial government never signed on to it because it saw few benefits and the pipeline route would have to cross several rivers, which raised concerns among Quebecers.

National Post
atrepanier@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


A judicial recount to determine if Liberal candidate Anthony Germain, left, defeated Conservative hopeful Jonathan Rowe, right, in a tightly contested Newfoundland riding is now in its eighth day.

With a judicial recount now into its eighth day, the Victoria Day long weekend likely felt especially lengthy for a Newfoundland and Labrador judge, Elections Canada workers and scrutineers labouring to determine the result of a federal riding separated by a mere 12 votes.

The mandatory re-tallying of ballots for Terra Nova—The Peninsulas, where the Liberal candidate Anthony Germain squeaked past Conservative candidate Jonathan Rowe after results were validated, began on Monday, May 12, and has continued in earnest since.

On Wednesday, Elections Canada told the

Canadian Press

that more than 1,000 disputed ballots have arisen following a recount of all 41,670 cast by electors on election night or ahead of time via advanced polls and special-ballot voting. Disputed ballots are those questioned or challenged during the judicial recount because of how it was marked or otherwise interpreted when they were first counted or rejected.

A spokesperson said work overseen by N.L. Supreme Court Judge Justice Garrett Handrigan would continue through the weekend. In an email to National Post Tuesday morning, the independent agency said it was expecting results later that day and deferred specific questions on the recount to Handrigan and the court.

In an email to National Post on Tuesday afternoon, a spokesperson for the court in Grand Bank, which is near the site of the recount in Marystown, said no decision has been made and the judge will notify Elections Canada when it has.

“From there, it will be up to Elections Canada to make that announcement,” the spokesperson wrote. “Justice Handrigan will not be providing an oral or written decision, a report will be provided from Justice Handrigan to Elections Canada.”

The judge determines the number of recount teams that will re-examine all the ballots individually. The typical range is 15 to 20, but it’s not clear how many Handrigan has deployed for the 270 polls from the largely rural riding on Newfoundland’s Avalon Peninsula.

Each of those teams consists of two Elections Canada workers — a handler and a recorder — and a representative for each candidate, commonly known as scrutineers. As votes are examined, either of the scrutineers can dispute the interpretation.

It’s not clear if NDP candidate Liam Ryan, who finished a distant third with only 4.1 per cent of the vote, has been represented.

Because the process involves re-examining the 597 rejected ballots, some of those could be reclassified as disputed ballots if there’s unanimous agreement among the recount team. Common reasons for ballots to be rejected include improperly marking the candidate, extra markings on the ballot, damage or alteration to the ballot, or including identifying information of the elector.

After the disputed ballots are tallied, counsel for each candidate can make submissions to Handrigan on each, but he must make the ultimate ruling on whether it counts and to whom it is awarded.

Should Germain lose the seat, the Liberals will fall back to 169 in the House of Commons and the Conservatives will climb to 144 with Rowe’s addition.

Based on

Elections Canada’s judicial recount handbook

, it appears Handrigan and the parties elected to wait until all votes were recounted before making submissions and hearing decisions on disputed ballots, which “could slow down the process considerably.”

But the agency said that with the hecticness of recounting around them complete, it “allows for disputed ballots to be discussed more calmly, often in a largely empty room” where counsel can come to an agreement on many of the ballots.

National Post contacted both Germain and Rowe to discuss the judicial recount and is awaiting responses.

We brought our serious faces for Mine & Ruth-Ann’s first (hopefully last) day before a judge. Unfortunately, the wait continues as the judge continues to review the ballots.

Posted by Jonathan Rowe – Federal Conservative Candidate, Terra Nova-The Peninsulas on Wednesday, May 14, 2025

Meanwhile, the last of four judicial recounts that arose from the election ashes begins today in Ontario’s Windsor—Tecumseh—Lakeshore. It was granted by a judge after Liberal incumbent Irek Kusmierczyk, who lost by 77 votes to Conservative Kathy Borrelli, said some of his scrutineers witnessed valid votes being rejected on election night.

In Ontario’s Milton East—Halton Hills South, a recount that began the day after Terra Nova—The Peninsulas, Kristina Tesser Derksen was confirmed as the new MP late last week, having beaten Tory Parm Gill by 21 votes.

The first judicial recount, in the Quebec riding of Terrebonne, was also completed last week, but it could head to a byelection depending on the outcome of a court case contesting the official result.

The riding was first claimed by the Liberals’ Tatiana Auguste on election night, but was awarded to Bloc Québécois incumbent Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné after results were validated. But with a margin of victory smaller than one one-thousandth of the total votes cast, a judicial recount was required, at the end of which Auguste emerged as the winner by a single vote. Two days later,

a Bloc supporter came forward saying her mail-in ballot was returned to her.

Elections Canada later ruled the lost ballot would not count, leading Sinclair-Desgagné and the Bloc to

challenge the outcome

“on the basis of a vote that was not taken into account, which constitutes an irregularity” in the electoral process.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Postal workers are

expected to go on strike

at the end of this week, after Canada Post received notice from the union on Monday.

The announcement comes more than six months after Canada Post workers went on strike in mid-November. The Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) said the decision to strike was due to a year of unresolved negotiations. The union said, in

a news release

at the time, that  workers wanted fair wages, safe working conditions, the right to retire with dignity, and the expansion of services at the public post office.

What happens to the parcels Canada Post has already accepted?

As the strike approached mid-December, many small businesses

were struggling to get their goods delivered

, said Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) executive vice president of advocacy Corinne Pohlmann. Canada Post said it missed delivering roughly

12 million parcels in early December

.

On Dec. 13, former minister of labour Steven MacKinnon, who is currently the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, said in a post on X that he had asked the Canadian Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) “to assess the likelihood of the parties reaching negotiated agreements by the end of 2024 under the current circumstances.”

If the CIRB found that the union and the corporation could not reach an agreement by the end of the year, MacKinnon said it would order Canada Post’s employees back to work. The union called the government’s involvement an “assault” on the constitutional right to collectively bargain and strike.

“Small businesses have written off Canada Post for this holiday season,” said CFIB president Dan Kelly in a

news release on Dec. 13

. He added that it would take weeks to clear backlogs in the system. According to CFIB data, 73 per cent of small business owners said

they would be using Canada Post less in the future because of the strike.

CFIB called for an “immediate truce” and for Canada Post and its employees to “resume operations while continuing to work through their differences.” Despite CFIB’s pleas and MacKinnon’s announcement, negotiations continued unsuccessfully.

The union condemned government involvement. “This order continues a deeply troubling pattern in which the government uses its arbitrary powers to let employers off the hook, drag their feet, and refuse to bargain in good faith with workers and their unions,”

the union said

.

However, MacKinnon said the ongoing conflict had reached a “critical point” that was affecting Canadians, including those who needed essential parcels such as medications and official documents.

 Canada Post said the corporation is accepting no new items until the end of the strike.

The CIRB held two days of hearings. It made the decision to order Canada Post employees back to work on Dec. 17, after a 32-day-long strike.

Canada Post

reasserted its commitment

to reaching negotiated agreements with CUPW that would help the company “better serve the changing needs of Canadians and provide good jobs to those who provide the service.” Meanwhile,

the union called the decision “disappointing.”

The terms of the collective agreement were extended until May 22.

Following the order, the union and the corporation have continued negotiations. “When the parties met in December, January, and March, many of our issues remained unresolved,” the union said on May 2. Just over 10 days later,

Canada Post said

it was taking a “temporary pause in discussions.”

On May 16, after hearings held this year between the union and Canada Post, a final report from the Industrial Inquiry Commission was released. It was presented as an “

objective assessment of the challenges

facing the postal system and the fundamental obstacles in the negotiations between Canada Post and CUPW.”

The commissioner of the report, William Kaplan, provided recommendations such as revising the Postal Charter’s delivery standards and ending the moratorium on post office closures and conversions to community mailboxes.

 A Canada Post employee delivers mail to homes in Montreal.

The union said the recommendations amounted “to service cuts, contracting out, and major rollbacks to important provisions in our existing collective agreements” and that Canada Post had still not presented them with concrete plans.

Canada Post said it received strike notice on Monday, and that operations will continue as usual at this time.

“The potential for another strike comes at a critical moment for the postal system,” it said in a news release on Monday. “Canada Post  Since 2018, the Corporation has recorded more than $3 billion in losses before tax, and it will post another significant loss for 2024. In early 2025, the Government of Canada announced repayable funding of up to $1.034 billion for Canada Post to prevent insolvency.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Canada Post said the corporation is accepting no new items until the end of the strike.

Postal workers could go on strike as early as midnight on Friday after a notice from the union was received by the Crown Corporation.

The Canada Union of Postal Workers (CUPW), which represents more than 55,000 postal workers, informed the management of its decision on Monday.

Canada Post said the corporation is accepting no new items until the end of the strike. “All mail and parcels in our network will be secured and delivered as quickly as possible once operations resume,” per

a May 19 news release

from Canada Post.

The corporation said it has had more than a $3 billion in losses before tax since 2018. There will be another significant loss for 2024. The federal government announced this year that it would offer repayable funding of up to $1.034 billion for Canada Post to prevent insolvency, per the news release.

Postal workers went

on strike ahead of Christmas last year

, delaying the deliveries of millions of holiday packages for Canadians. The possibility of a strike at the end of this week comes after recommendations from a report of the Industrial Inquiry Commission by Commissioner William Kaplan.

“The report provides an objective assessment of the challenges facing the postal system and the fundamental obstacles in the negotiations between Canada Post and CUPW. It also offers a series of recommendations for a sustainable path forward for our company,”

per the Canada Post

.

The union said the report “skews heavily” in favour of the corporation in

a May 16 news release

.

“These recommendations amount to service cuts, contracting out, and major rollbacks to important provisions in our existing collective agreements. There is also no guarantee that if these changes are made, Canada Post will increase its parcel business,” the union said. “Canada Post’s proposals have not been fully costed, nor have we been provided with concrete actionable plans. The recommendations also run counter to the demands you put forward and our years of campaigning to preserve and expand the public post office.”

What happened the last time Canada Post workers went on strike?

Postal workers went on strike at midnight on Nov. 15, 2024. The

union said it had been bargaining for a year

without results, therefore decided to strike. The union said its demands included fair wages, safe working conditions, the right to retire with dignity, and the expansion of services at the public post office. Although a strike was a “last resort,” it said that Canada Post “must be willing to resolve our new and outstanding issues.”

Bargaining continued with the help of mediators; however, no agreement was reached. After weeks of striking, Minister of Labour

Steve MacKinnon announced

that the government was asking the Canadian Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) to order postal workers to get back on the job.

The union called the government’s involvement an “assault” on the constitutional right to collectively bargain and strike.

After two days of hearings, the CIRB confirmed that the corporation and its workers would not be able to come to an agreement. Employees were ordered back to work on Dec. 17.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Private vehicles enter the United States from Canada at the Peace Arch border crossing on February 1, 2025 in Blaine, Washington.

EDMONTON — With fentanyl smuggling cited by U.S. President Donald Trump as a central motivation behind tariffs slapped on Canadian goods, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency has listed fentanyl “super laboratories” in Canada as a “growing concern” to American authorities.

“These operations have the potential to expand and fill any supply void created by disruptions to Mexico-sourced fentanyl production and trafficking,” the report says.

On Thursday, the DEA released its 2025 report detailing threats posed to the United States by illegal drugs and the actions of drug traffickers and cartels. Between October 2023 and October 2024, more than 84,000 Americans died from drug overdoses.

 Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., joined by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., left, talks to reporters ahead of announcements by President Donald Trump on tariffs and why he has put forward a resolution that would end an emergency Fentanyl declaration that Trump used to impose tariffs on Canada, at the Capitol, in Washington, Tuesday, April 1, 2025.

In addition to noting Canada’s production of fentanyl, the report covers the actions of major Mexican drug cartels and China’s role in exporting the ingredients needed to manufacture fentanyl in North America.

“In addition to the synthetic drug threat from Mexico, elevated synthetic drug production in Canada — particularly from sophisticated fentanyl ‘super laboratories’ such as the type seized by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in October 2024 — presents a growing concern for the United States,” the report says.

While the report doesn’t specify the precise drug bust it was referring to, in late October, the RCMP broke up the “largest and most sophisticated fentanyl and methamphetamine drug superlab in Canada,” which was in Falkland, B.C., a community between Kamloops and Kelowna, and is otherwise known for hosting one of the largest Canadian flags.

The RCMP said the lab could have produced 95 million doses of fentanyl. Investigators seized 54 kilograms of fentanyl, “massive amounts of precursor chemicals,” and hundreds of kilograms in other drugs, including methamphetamine, cocaine and MDMA, better known as ecstasy.

Police also found 89 guns, including 45 handguns, 21 “Ar-15-style rifles” and submachine guns. Nine of the weapons were stolen.

 A sign marks the border between the United States and Canada at Peace Arch Park on February 1, 2025 in Blaine, Washington.

The data on drugs flowing from Canada to the United States show that while there are drugs flowing north to south, the overwhelming majority of drugs smuggled into the U.S. come from the southwestern border with Mexico. In 2024, U.S. border officials seized 21,000 kilograms of fentanyl, 158,000 kilograms of methamphetamine and more than 56,000 kilograms of cannabis.

By comparison, American authorities seized 43 kilograms of fentanyl and 72 kilograms of heroin flowing from Canada to the United States in 2024, statistics from U.S. Customs and Border Protection show. So far in 2025, 26 kilograms of fentanyl have been seized, as has less than one kilo of heroin. Rates of cannabis smuggling are far higher: nearly 7,000 kilograms were seized last year, and this year more than 2,500 kilograms have been seized.

Additionally, more than 2,000 kilograms of cocaine have been seized at the northern border this year.

National Post asked the RCMP for comment on the DEA’s threat assessment, but the agency was unable to provide comment by press time. Public Safety Canada referred the Post’s inquiry to the Privy Council Office, where Canada’s new fentanyl czar, Kevin Brosseau, a former Mountie and national security adviser to the Prime Minister’s Office, works.

The DEA declined to comment on the report, but noted that Canada has been mentioned in previous threat assessments. Canada received no mention in the 2024 report, but in 2020, Canada was identified as a major source of high-quality cannabis. The report also

identified Indigenous reserves

on both sides of the border as significant routes for drug smuggling.

Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. Vice President JD Vance, both in Rome for the Pope’s inaugural mass on Sunday, discussed border security, a crackdown on fentanyl and increased investments in defence, the Prime Minister’s Office said in a  statement.

Carney said on X he had a “good conversation” with Vance.

“Canada and the United States share a common goal of saving lives and protecting communities from the devastating impacts of the illegal fentanyl trade,” said Pierre-Alain Bujold, a spokesperson with Canada’s Privy Council Office, in an email. “Canadian law enforcement agencies at all levels — municipal, provincial, and federal — are focused on dismantling organized crime networks and shutting down illegal drug production operations.”

In February, Trump declared a state of emergency on his country’s northern border, using that to justify the imposition of tariffs on Canadian imports.

“I determined that the failure of Canada to arrest, seize, detain, or otherwise intercept drug trafficking organizations, other drug and human traffickers, criminals at large, and illicit drugs constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States,” the

president said in a press release

.

In response to Trump’s comments on fentanyl made last year before the emergency declaration, Ottawa amped up drug-enforcement along the border. The

federal government announced

a $1.3-billion border security plan, including appointing Brosseau as fentanyl czar and starting aerial patrols and a special intelligence unit to track down precursor chemicals. The government says that a 56-per-cent increase in the number of RCMP officers and targeted enforcement operations by Canada Border Services Agency officials have increased the number of investigations.

A further crackdown on fentanyl trafficking within Canada, the federal government says, has taken 46 kilograms of fentanyl, and 15,765 fentanyl and other

opioid pills off Canadian streets

.

“The DEA report reinforces what we already know — the fight against fentanyl must be relentless, coordinated, and evidence-based. Canada will continue working closely with our U.S. counterparts to secure our shared borders and safeguard our communities,” said Bujold.

National Post, with additional reporting by The Canadian Press

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Asked about the comments in a briefing with Canadian reporters in Tel Aviv, Lt. Col Nadav Shoshani (pictured) said Hamas figures do not distinguish between civilians and non-combatants.

TEL AVIV — The international spokesman for the Israeli Defence Forces has clapped back against Foreign Minister

Anita Anand’s criticism of the Gaza war

, even as the Liberal government broadened its messaging to call for Hamas to disarm and cede power.

In a scrum with reporters after being sworn in last week, Anand described Israel’s post-October 7 war on Hamas as “aggression,” accusing the Jewish state of using food as a political toll. She cited a death toll of 50,000 in the war, a

figure released by the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry.

Asked about the comments in a briefing with Canadian reporters in Tel Aviv, Lt. Col Nadav Shoshani said Hamas figures do not distinguish between civilians and non-combatants. Israel works hard to limit civilian deaths, he said, often issuing warnings beforehand so they can get out of harms way.

“Israel is only country in the world that could be attacked on seven fronts and described as being the aggressor,” he told the reporters on Sunday, travelling in Israel on a trip sponsored by the Exigent Foundation. The seven fronts he named include

Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran,

the Houthis and other enemies.

On the X social media platform on Monday, Anand revealed that Prime Minister Mark Carney had spoken to Israeli President Isaac Herzog and “discussed the urgent need” for Hamas to release the remaining 58 hostages, “lay down its weapons and have no role in Gaza.”

The two leaders also discussed a ceasefire,

“a two-state solution”

and the resumption of humanitarian aid to Gaza, she said. On Sunday, Israel announced a resumption of aid.

Shoshani said he had “a lot of respect for Canada,” but said Hamas started the war and could end it by laying down their weapons and releasing the hostages.

“We’re doing everything we can to fight a terrorist organization and we’re not going to fight it in a non-aggressive way,” he said.

“We’re differentiating and targeting terrorists who have said they want to kill us, kill my family. We have to act against these terrorists to make sure they can’t do that.”

The Hamas-led attack on southern Israel killed about 1,200 people and saw

251 hostages taken to Gaza.

Most have since been returned to Israel or died. Many of the remaining hostages are believed to have died.