LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Minister of Foreign Affairs Anita Anand speaks to journalists as she arrives for a meeting of the federal cabinet in West Block on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Wednesday, May 14, 2025.

OTTAWA — The federal government has summoned Israel’s ambassador to Canada to explain why Israeli soldiers shot in the vicinity of a delegation of diplomats — including four Canadian representatives — touring the West Bank Wednesday.

“I spoke with Canada’s Head of Mission in Ramallah earlier today. I can confirm 4 of our personnel were part of the delegation in West Bank when the IDF fired shots in their vicinity. Relieved to know our team is safe,”

Foreign Minister Anita Anand

wrote on social media Wednesday afternoon.

“I have asked my officials to summon Israel’s Ambassador to convey Canada’s serious concerns. We expect a full investigation and accountability,” her statement continued.

On Wednesday morning, the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) confirmed that its soldiers had fired “warning shots” towards a delegation of individuals whom it claimed had strayed away from a pre-authorized route.

But the group was a diplomatic delegation with representatives from over a dozen countries including Canada, France, Italy, Germany and the European Union. The incident sparked widespread condemnation.

Videos of the incident circulating online show a delegation of dozens of foreign diplomats as well as West Bank and United Nations officials standing on a road blocked off by a large yellow gate in the West Bank city of Jenin Wednesday morning.

The video shows IDF soldiers suddenly firing their weapons in the vicinity of the group, which quickly dispersed back towards diplomatic and armoured vehicles parked around the corner.

The tour was organized by the Palestinian Authority and was authorized by Israel, according to foreign media reports. There were four Canadian representatives among the delegation, including the head of mission in Ramallah Graham Dattels.

In a statement, the IDF said it “regrets the inconvenience caused” by the incident and said it launched an inquiry after realizing that its soldiers had fired towards a diplomatic delegation.

“According to an initial inquiry, the delegation deviated from the approved route and entered an area where they were not authorized to be. IDF soldiers operating in the area fired warning shots to distance them away. No injuries or damages were reported,” t

he IDF wrote on social media

.

The claim that the delegation was in an unauthorized area is being met with skepticism within the Canadian government.

Representatives from France, Germany and Italy also expressed their outrage at the shots towards their diplomats and called on the Israeli government to explain itself.

“A visit to Jenin, in which one of our diplomats was participating, was fired upon by Israeli soldiers. This is unacceptable. The Israeli ambassador will be summoned to explain himself,” French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said in a statement.

The German Foreign Office “strongly” condemned the “unprovoked fire” and noted that it was lucky that “nothing more serious occurred.”

“The group was travelling in the West Bank in the course of its diplomatic work and in coordination with the Palestinian Authority and the Israeli army. The role of diplomats as independent observers on the ground is indispensable and in no way represents a threat to Israeli security interests,” read the statement.

The incident comes amid increasing pressure from countries like Canada, the United Kingdom and France for Israel to stop expanding its military operations in Gaza and restricting humanitarian aid into the territory.

The three countries released a joint statement on Monday threatening action against Israel if Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not stop its military actions in Gaza.

In their statement, Prime Minister Mark Carney, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron cited the “intolerable suffering” unfolding in Gaza, calling the announcement Israel made the day before to allow basic quantities of food into the area “wholly inadequate.”

They demanded Israel’s government halt its military operations and for Hamas to release the remaining hostages taken captive when terrorists stormed into southern Israel in October 2023.

Tuesday, Israel’s ambassador to Canada Iddo Moed told National Post his country is “quite taken aback” by Canada’s threat.

“This is unprecedented,” Moed said. “This has never happened in the past and so this is why we are taken aback. That’s an understatement, I would say.”

National Post, with files from Stephanie Taylor.

cnardi@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


U.S. President Donald Trump says Canada wants

Inside the Oval Office on Tuesday, U.S. President Donald Trump told the world he’d decided on a design for the Golden Dome, a multilayered missile defence program to counter threats to America, even those coming from foreign-controlled satellites.

The president also said that Canada wants in on a system the White House estimates

will cost US$175 billion.

Here’s what you need to know.

What is the Golden Dome?

The system is needed, Trump said, in order to protect the country from “hypersonic missiles, ballistic missiles and advanced cruise missiles.” He said it would also use “space-based sensors and interceptors,” marking the first time the U.S. will have weapons in orbit around the planet.

It will be overseen by Gen. Michael Guetlein, currently the vice chief of space operations, or Space Force, which Trump launched in 2019 as a stand-alone, sixth branch of the U.S. military.

He anticipates the “next generation technologies across the land, sea and space” to be integrated with the existing defence systems and be up and running by 2029. His second term is set to end that January.

“In about three years, once fully constructed, the Golden Dome will be capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from other sides of the world and even if they’re launched from space,” Trump said.

 The Golden Dome, envisioned by U.S. President Donald Trump, would put U.S. weapons in space for the first time.

According to a U.S. official who spoke with the Associated Press on the condition of anonymity, Trump chose from three options developed by military planners in recent months, each with a different price tag depending on the amount of equipment required. It’s not clear which option Trump chose.

Initial funding for the project is embedded in a massive bill currently making its way through Congress — the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which, if passed, would kick-start Golden Dome work with $25 billion.

A Congressional Budget Office report

released in May exploring the cost of maintaining just space-based interceptors for 20 years estimated it at between $161 billion for the “lowest-cost alternative” and $542 billion for the top tier.

In a hearing on Tuesday, Air Force Secretary Troy Meink said Golden Dome plans are “still in the conceptual stage” and no funds have been allotted.

What inspired the Golden Dome?

Amid a flurry of executive orders during his first week in office was one that called for the creation of “a state-of-the-art Iron Dome,” referencing the name often given to the systems which have been protecting Israel from missile attacks since 2011.

Unlike Trump’s ambitious plan to stop missiles from anywhere, Israel’s all-weather air defence system only intercepts short-range projectiles.

It consists of a series of surface-to-air missile batteries that use radar to detect incoming attacks and gauge whether they will hit civilian or military areas before deploying countermeasures.

Over the past 14 years, it has intercepted thousands of missiles and rockets, most fired by Hamas and Hezbollah. The success rate for dangerous threats is over 85 to 90 per cent,

according to the Israel Defence Forces (IDF).

 The Israeli Iron Dome air defense system fires to intercept an attack from Lebanon over the Galilee region as seen from the Israeli-annexed Golan Heights, on Aug. 4, 2024.

The Iron Dome was made possible thanks to substantial financial assistance and support from the U.S. The same applies to two other components of Israel’s multitiered system — the Arrow and David’s Sling.

The former is designed for medium-range missiles and has been used against Hezbollah, while the latter handles long-range ballistic missiles and has been used to thwart those fired by Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen and by Iran itself in 2024.

The cost of a single Iron Dome interception is reportedly about $50,000, but the Arrow and David’s Sling are steeper at up to $2 million per missile.

It’s also possible that Trump was inspired by former president Ronald Reagan’s 1983 Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI), which aimed to develop a space-based defence program to protect against nuclear attack.

“The idea was dependent on futuristic technology, including space-based laser systems that had not yet been developed, although the idea had been portrayed as real in science fiction,”

the U.S. Department of State once wrote

. “As a result, critics of the proposal nicknamed SDI ‘Star Wars’ after the movie of the same name.”

Both Trump and Pete Hegseth, U.S. Secretary of Defence, referenced Reagan and SDI on Tuesday.

“We will truly be completing the job that President Reagan started 40 years ago, forever ending the missile threat to the American homeland,” Trump told reporters.

“Reagan, 40 years ago, cast the vision for it. The technology wasn’t there; now it is, and you’re following through to say ‘We will protect the homeland,’” Hegseth said to his boss.

What does Canada have to do with the Golden Dome?

During his presentation, Trump noted on three occasions that Canada wants to get in on the Golden Dome.

“So we’ll be talking to them, they want to have protection also, so as usual, we help Canada, do the best we can,” Trump said.

When asked about criticism of the project’s potential costs, Trump said Canada will “pay their fair share.”

“Canada wants to be a part of it, which will be … a fairly small expansion. But we’ll work with them on pricing. They know about it very much.”

In a statement provided to The Canadian Press and multiple other media outlets, a spokesperson for Prime Minister Mark Carney’s office confirmed talks about the Golden Dome and strengthening North American Aerospace Defence Command (Norad), but didn’t share any specifics or costs.

“Canadians gave the prime minister a strong mandate to negotiate a comprehensive new security and economic relationship with the United States,” the spokesperson wrote.

“To that end, the prime minister and his ministers are having wide-ranging and constructive discussions with their American counterparts.”

National Post has contacted the Prime Minister’s Office for more information.

Since returning to office and amid his rhetoric about making Canada the 51st state, Trump has repeatedly griped about Canada not spending enough on defence, particularly within NATO. Canada is one of eight member nations not meeting the two per cent of GDP benchmark first agreed to in 2014. Carney has pledged to meet the target by 2030.

— With files from The Canadian Press and The Associated Press

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Liberal leader Mark Carney speaks briefly with media before making his way to caucus meeting on Monday, March 10, 2025 in Ottawa.

OTTAWA — Liberal MPs are considering adopting for the first time Reform Act rules that would give them the power to trigger a leadership review of their new leader Mark Carney.

As first reported by POLITICO

, Liberal MPs have been quietly discussing going ahead with the rule changes in a vote — with some wanting it to happen via a secret ballot — that is set to happen at their Sunday caucus meeting, which is the first since the April election.

Liberal MPs told the National Post they are satisfied with Carney’s leadership and have no reason to believe they will be using the new powers to remove him anytime soon but want to avoid a repeat of the escalation that led to then prime minister Justin Trudeau’s resignation in January.

One MP said they have not seen any serious effort within caucus to ensure that the Reform Act rules pass, but that many want the option of using a leadership review in the future.

“I’ll tell you, the Trudeau experience is the key reason for that,” said the MP.

“We didn’t vote in favour of the Reform Act,” the person added, pointing to the caucus meeting following the 2021 election. “Had we done so, we would have avoided a lot of the problems I think, that we experienced, particularly in the past couple of years with Trudeau.”

Another MP said they did not want to “relive the situation that we just went through.”

“Everything was done sloppily,” they said of MPs’ efforts to oust Trudeau.

If adopted, the rules under the Reform Act — a law introduced by Conservative MP Michael Chong in 2015 — allow caucus to trigger a leadership review of a party leader, expel or readmit a caucus member, elect or remove a caucus chair, and to elect an interim leader.

Conservatives have adopted the rules — in part or in full — repeatedly since the 2015 election as a manner of routine. The first and only time they used them was to trigger a leadership review that led to the exit of then Conservative leader Erin O’Toole in 2022.

On May 6,

a majority of Conservative MPs voted

to adopt the option to trigger a leadership review but said it should not be seen as a warning to current leader Pierre Poilievre.

Alex Marland, a professor at Acadia University who specializes in political party discipline, said it is “refreshing” to see the Liberal caucus consider taking back some of its power.

“It really shows that Justin Trudeau had an incredible hold over the caucus,” he said. “The fact that they’re having an open conversation about it shows some scarring resulting from what happened with the end of his leadership.”

There are, however, some limitations to this newfound freedom. Voting on the Reform Act rules usually happens in public, for everyone to see, which could deter some MPs who have their sights on a promotion from openly seeking a future leadership review.

As one MP explained, if the vote is open, Carney’s first impression of some MPs voting in favour of the Reform Act might be that those caucus members will want to throw him out.

“I’ll be honest with you: I’ll vote for the Reform Act if it’s a secret ballot. If it’s not a secret ballot, then our hands are tied, because we have ambitions,” said the MP.

Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith — who was just recently dropped out of cabinet and wrote on X

it was “impossible not to feel disrespected”

— said he has always voted in favour of the Reform Act and will be voting once again to enact the rules on Sunday.

“This isn’t about casting doubt on anyone’s leadership, whether it was Trudeau or Carney,” said the Toronto MP. “I mean, I think the idea is accountability to caucus on an ongoing basis. I think that’s a good thing. So, I’ve always supported the measures and will continue to.”

Unlike some of his Liberal colleagues, Erskine-Smith said that his view on the Act “isn’t coloured by recent experience.”

Marland said in many ways, the Liberals’ vote on the Reform Act will be a “test.”

“If we see that the Liberal caucus votes to empower itself, then the Liberal caucus is saying to everybody that we do not want to have a prime minister who has all this power centralized in the Prime Minister’s Office, as has been the case in the past,” he said.

“But the very fact that we’re talking about it and questioning whether the Liberals will go along with it really supports the general pattern, and the general pattern is of MPs relinquishing their power to the centre,” he added.

Despite wanting to vote for the Reform Act rules, some MPs are quietly hoping that the prime minister will give them permission to empower themselves.

“We’re quite enthusiastic about Carney, and we would be even more enthusiastic if he came out and said, ‘Look, I’m going to show you just one more way I’m different from Justin Trudeau. Go ahead, let’s pass this Reform Act, because I think that caucus matters and there should be a check on the power of a leader,’” said one of the MPs.

“That would really blow people away.”

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A Canada Post mailbox is shown in this December 2024 photo.

Canada Post has been

notified of a possible strike

on Friday after negotiations between the corporation and its workers have proven to be unsuccessful.

On Wednesday, the

union said it would be reviewing proposals

from the corporation. However, the two sides have not been able to agree on basic terms thus far. According to

a recently released report

, they have “diametrically opposed world views and assessments of the challenges to be faced and the solutions to them.” The report, called the Industrial Inquiry Commission (IIC), is the result of a series of hearings held between Canada Post and its union, the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW).

In its

latest proposals

, Canada Post is offering a 13 per cent total wage increase for current employees, as well as “better income replacement for leave under the short-term disability program, and six added personal days locked into the collective agreements.”

The union said its decision to strike was made as the collective agreements for its bargaining units are set to expire on May 23 at midnight.

These agreements were extended by the government in December 2024, after the union’s last strike, which lasted 32 days. It came to an end after intervention from then

minister of labour Steven MacKinnon

, who requested that the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) order Canada Post employees back to work if it believed that an agreement wouldn’t be reached by the end of the year.

Union workers were ordered to get back on the job on Dec. 17, 2024. Although it put an end to striking, the issues remained unresolved. What followed were ongoing negotiations, which have continued until the eve of the expiration of the latest collective agreements.

Here’s what to know.

What does the union want?

The

union has maintained

that it wants “fair wages, safe working conditions, the right to retire with dignity, and the expansion of services at the public post office.”

Canada Post employees who are part of CUPW are also fighting back against “drastic cuts,” such as closing post offices, ending door-to-door delivery, expanding Community Mailboxes, outsourcing to franchises, and even privatization. The union launched a campaign called

Hands Off My Post Office

to raise awareness about these issues.

“Competing with U.S. e-commerce giants shouldn’t mean lower standards. Workers deserve fair treatment, and Canadians deserve reliable, to-the-door service,” the union said.

What does Canada Post want?

Canada Post has suffered major financial losses, which seem to be playing a role in its demands. It has said that it wants to reach collective agreements that protect workers and enhance wages and benefits “while reflecting the Corporations’ current realities.”

“Since 2018, the Corporation has recorded more than $3 billion in losses before tax, and it will post another significant loss for 2024,” said Canada Post in

a news release on Monday

. “In early 2025, the Government of Canada announced repayable funding of up to $1.034 billion for Canada Post to prevent insolvency.”

A part-time weekend workforce and workweek efficiencies are an immediate priority for Canada Post, the IIC report stated.

Commissioner William Kaplan called the union’s proposals to grow its businesses “unrealistic,” as are its plans to duplicate services provided by other companies, such as “introducing postal banking, seniors check-ins, establishing artisanal markets at postal stations, and transforming postal stations into community social hubs.”

“In my view,” wrote Kaplan, “given the financial crisis, Canada Post must focus on saving its core business, not on providing new services.”

What are some of the sticking points between the union and Canada Post?

The report summarized the main sticking points between the union and Canada Post as the corporation’s financial situation, its need to diversify or alter its delivery models in response to current business demands, Canada Post’s viability as it is currently configured, the union’s negotiated commitments to job security and full-time employment and the need to protect the health and safety of employees.

Weekend work is a major sticking point that both parties cannot seem to agree upon. The new offers from Canada Post, which are now under review, maintain the need for part-time work, which increases “the company’s delivery flexibility, especially on weekends, while ensuring that letter carriers are not required to work weekend shifts.”

However, the union insists that “preference should be given to full-time work,” it said in its

weekend full-time concept and costing report

in March.

Canada Post also wants to end door-to-door delivery service, which is the first recommendation made in the IIC report, because it is a financial burden. The union says that the service is worth preserving because it meets the “needs of the Canadian people, particularly the elderly and disabled, while community mailboxes presented accessibility and other challenges.”

As part of its latest proposals, Canada Post said it wants to implement dynamic routing, which it says is an industry standard that involves planning and optimizing delivery routes daily and “creating more consistent, predictable service for customers.” The report stated that the union agreed it could be cost-saving. But after a failed pilot project in 2017, Canada Post said the company and union could “not agree on many of its core components.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A Canada Post mail carrier walks past a mailbox.

The Canada Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) said it was on its way to receive proposals from Canada Post on Wednesday, days after it notified the corporation of a possible strike at the end of the week.

“Our negotiating committee is currently on the way to receive the proposals,” said the union’s national president Jan Simpson in

a news release

on Wednesday. “Once the offers are officially presented, we will take the time to carefully review the details of the offers to ensure they align with the priorities and needs of our members. We will provide a comprehensive update once we’ve completed our review and analysis.”

Canada Post said its new offers include a wage increase of 6 per cent in year one for current employees, 3 per cent in year two, and 2 per cent in year three and year four respectively, or 13.59 per cent compounded,

per a news release on Wednesday

.

“The offers also provide employees with better income replacement for leave under the short-term disability program, and six added personal days locked into the collective agreements,” it said.

Under these offers, current employees would keep their defined benefit pension, industry leading job security provisions, health benefits and post-retirement benefits, vacation (up to seven weeks) and pre-retirement leave, cost of living allowance that protects against the effects of unforeseen inflation, and work schedules.

The corporation said it has also removed certain items from the new offers, including a new health benefits plan, changes to employees’ post-retirement benefits, or enrolling future employees in the defined contribution pension.

One of the major sticking points between the two parties has been weekend work. Canada Post said it will “create stable and predictable part-time jobs for people who are looking for flexible work,” despite the union’s preference for full-time work.

The proposals come after Canada Post received

strike notice from the union on May 19

. The union said it would go on strike on Friday at midnight after failed negotiations.

The union

went on strike last November

for 32 days after both parties could not come to an agreement.

The

union said

it wanted “fair wages, safe working conditions, the right to retire with dignity, and the expansion of services at the public post office.” Canada Post employees were ordered back to work on Dec. 17 by the Canada Industrial Relations Board.

Negotiations have continued since then with Canada Post saying it was committed to reaching an agreement to help it “better serve the changing needs of Canadians and provide good jobs to those who provide the service.”

What happens to the items Canada Post has already accepted as possible strike looms?

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Bell is working to restore service to thousands of customers in Ontario and Quebec.

Thousands of Canadians were offline Wednesday morning due to a widespread Bell internet outage.

The company confirmed on social media that service for some Quebec and Ontario customers may be interrupted and said it is working to resolve the issue.

“Our network team is investigating and we’ll provide updates as soon as they’re available,” a spokesperson told National Post via email.

At

downdetector.ca

, a website that relies on user reports to track service disruptions and outages, more than 140,000 reports were received by 9:37 a.m. ET.

Within 30 minutes, however, some people in the comment section noted their service had been restored.

Bell’s support page was also inactive for a time, but has since been restored.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A Canada Post letter carrier delivers mail in Montreal.

Canada Post needs to end door-to-door mail delivery, according to a recent

report by the Industrial Inquiry Commission

(IIC).

The seismic shift is one of the key tactics the post office can undertake to modernize, while maintaining solvency without being heavily subsidized by the taxpayer, writes the commission. The recommendation comes as the union representing Canada Post workers threatens to go on strike at the end of this week.

Is this a new consideration for Canada?

It’s not the first time the end of door-to-door mail delivery has been considered in Canada.

Canada Post announced

back in 2013

that it would be phasing out door-to-door delivery of regular mail to urban residents. Back then it cited financial losses due to declining mail volume and increased online/digital communication.

Two-thirds of Canadians

were already receiving mail through alternative means, such as rural mailboxes, group mailboxes, or centralized postal service points. Ultimately, the plan was to

end all urban door-to-door mail service to five million Canadians

within five years, replacing it with community mailboxes.

The transition began in 2014. The first phase

affected about 74,000 addresses in ten communities

, including Winnipeg, Calgary, the Ottawa suburb of Kanata and several northern suburbs in Montreal.

But the plan came to an abrupt end due to

public outcry and political pressure

. Seniors and disabled people who relied on the service argued that having to trek to community mailboxes would create hardship. Postal workers protested potential job losses. Then the federal opposition parties campaigned against the Harper government’s decision to overhaul the service during the 2015 election. When the Liberals won, the Trudeau government

halted the plan

, suspending the shift to community mailboxes.

Meanwhile, the recent IIC report also recommended the end of moratoriums on rural post office closures and community mailbox conversions. The moratoriums were adopted by the federal government in 1994 and prevented Canada Post from closing or franchising nearly 3,600 rural post offices.

What country has taken the lead in eliminating letter delivery?

Denmark is the only country, at present, with firm plans to stop door-to-door postal delivery of letters.

Denmark’s state-run postal service,

PostNord

, has announced it will stop delivering letters entirely by the end of 2025, terminating a 400-year tradition. It will include the removal of all post boxes and the cessation of all letter deliveries, meaning there will be no door-to-door postal delivery of letters anywhere in the country.

As digital mail services became established, the

use of letters fell dramatically in Denmark

, says PostNord. Letter numbers have fallen from 1.4 billion in 2000 to 110 million last year.

Public services send communications via a Digital Post app or other platforms. Bank statements, bills, and correspondence from local authorities are sent electronically, says PostNord, making the letter market unprofitable.

So, instead, PostNord is switching its focus to parcel deliveries. It means 1,500 workers out of a workforce of 4,600 face losing their jobs.

What is the U.S. doing to increase post office efficiency?

The U.S.

considered the end of door-to-door delivery

around the same time that Canada started to ponder it, the Associated Press reported back in 2013. But the U.S. Postal Service (USPS)

continues to deliver mail directly to homes

in places where this service is feasible and well-established.

However, more centralized delivery is increasing, mainly through the use of

cluster box units

or

curbside mailboxes

in new developments. These

centralized mailboxes

serve multiple residences and are designed to reduce delivery costs and improve efficiency.

Meanwhile, the USPS is

refining its service standards

and delivery operations to improve efficiency and reduce cost. That includes allowing postal carriers to travel greater distances and consolidating processing centres, but these changes have not equated to ending door-to-door delivery completely.

Have there been other international postal disruptions?

Some countries (e.g., Afghanistan, Libya, Russia, Sudan, Yemen) have experienced temporary suspensions of

international mail delivery

due to transportation or security issues, but these instances have not resulted in permanent policy changes regarding domestic door-to-door service.

How has the rise of courier competition affected postal service?

A principal source of post office competition comes from private courier companies, which deliver packages directly to homes or centralized locations.

In the U.K., the Royal Mail is drawing attention to the courier option as a potentially better means for package delivery abroad, while also promoting a new service to send

British-themed gift boxes

that include a range of popular food items.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


One night while stationed in Hope, B.C., RCMP Const. Jack Van Steensel strapped himself to the boom of a large mobile crane and had it swing him over the raging Coquihalla River to rescue a freezing driver who had plunged his car into the tributary of the mighty Fraser.

His stressful job fostered eager appreciation of vacations.

In 2007, Jack and his wife, Rose, bought a motorhome, a 38-foot Newmar Dutch Star, drove it south across the border from Abbotsford, B.C., into Sumas, Wash.

“Everywhere we looked, we saw the American flag on so many homes,” said Rose. “The patriotism was so evident.”

They loved that trip and most years since, they’ve packed that motorhome, made room for Sangria, their rescue dog, and headed south from their home in Knutsford, on the outskirts of Kamloops. Their trips stretched longer and further, especially after Jack retired from the force.

“We’ve hit every state — other than Hawaii. We couldn’t pump those tires up enough to get to Hawaii,” Rose said. “We loved it. Wherever we went, we loved it. I loved South Dakota. It was so different. Maine was so beautiful in the fall, like nothing I’d ever seen in my life. We made friends in Florida, California, Washington State, Oregon and Arizona.”

They put 110,000 kilometres on their Dutch Star.

“We have such wonderful memories,” Rose said. “We are glad we have them, as we are not sure if we will return.”

Like many Canadians, Jack and Rose are falling out of love with America.

There’ve been rocky months recently in the long relationship between Canada and the United States, ever since the election of U.S. President Donald Trump. Even before his inauguration in January, Trump showed an unsettling attitude toward his country’s next-door neighbour and largest trading partner.

Trump’s insulting and belittling

musings

, threats of punishing economic warfare to push annexation, and aggressive tariffs on Canada’s goods are causing anger, uncertainty and fear. Anyone who has watched a relationship sour knows those emotions are a recipe for shattered trust.

Economic integration, trading partnerships, treaties and multilateral agreements all take time to untangle, but love can evaporate with an overnight tweet.

If Canadian feelings for America aren’t always love, exactly, there has been a broad affinity for the United States; for some, it’s been admiration, but for most there has at least been a sense of serenity that came from generations of close social and cultural integration.

That cosiness is suddenly endangered.

Interviews with people across Canada show that different folks are responding in different ways to the changes Trump brings, and they have different reasons for it, too, but empirical and anecdotal evidence suggest there is an unsubtle and unsettling trend: A cross-border social unravelling is underway as connections wilt and wither; a decoupling, in the modern language of relationship therapists.

The signs of a split are all around us, in politics, business, shopping, travel, sports, and in endless social niceties and interactions that were once routine.

Canadian flags have become so popular lately it reminded Jack and Rose Van Steensel of their first impressions of America when driving through the United States. Although Rose throws in an “elbows up” joke, they aren’t the most strident soldiers in this war. She said they don’t want their distaste for Trump’s policies to make them anti-American. She deplores when Canadian sports fans boo the U.S. national anthem.

“That is so not Canadian,” Rose said. “You’re booing the wrong thing if you’re booing the national anthem. If Trump walked out there, OK, boo him. He’s the one that’s doing this. But don’t boo the whole United States of America. Not fair, not fair.”

Americans, she said, are mostly wonderful.

“From our first trip into the States, we were treated kindly and learned to really respect the American people,” Rose said. “I don’t want to see those people lose their jobs. They didn’t all vote for him and lots of the ones that did are now regretting it.”

When shopping, she looks for products made in Canada but if she needs romaine lettuce and the only romaine is from the U.S., well, she’ll still put it in her cart.

Her travel plans are different. Trump’s actions are “a real slap in the face,” she said, but the major reason they don’t want to motor south is mainly because she’s no longer sure it’s safe.

“We’re scared to go down,” she said.

She doesn’t like what she’s heard of border scrutiny and new rules for the treatment of Canadian travellers, including fingerprinting. She’s afraid someone might see their B.C. licence plate and lash out. There is, she said, “fear of retribution because the MAGA people have heard nothing but negative things about Canada from Trump.

“It brings tears to my eyes when I think that the amazing country I loved coming to might no longer be safe.”

🍁🍁🍁🍁

Allan MacEachern has spent his life in St. Stephen, a town on the banks of the St. Croix River that separates New Brunswick from Maine.

“I guess my arm’s not that good anymore, but I could almost throw a rock and hit the American soil from the shoreline. It’s literally right there. You could holler across,” he said. MacEachern was elected to St. Stephen’s town council in 2012, as mayor in 2016, and has been re-elected twice more since.

For as long as he remembers, for much longer, in fact, his town and the U.S. town across the water, Calais, Maine, have been like one community. They share a fire service, businesses, and genetics and have for generations.

When COVID-19 shut the border, people in both towns headed to the riverfront and stood on the shoreline waving to friends and family in the other town. And when a man from St. Stephen married a woman from Calais, lockdown meant most of the bride’s family couldn’t cross over for it, so MacEachern helped arrange their ceremony at the tip of the town’s wharf, with American guests watching from the shore of Calais, and from boats bobbing in the river.

Despite a population of about 8,500 in St. Stephen and 3,000 in Calais, there are three bridges with international border crossings connecting them. During the War of 1812, British soldiers delivered gunpowder to St. Stephen so residents could protect their town from the Americans across the river. The town instead gave the barrel of gunpowder to Calais to use in their Fourth of July celebration fireworks. Now that’s trust. Calais later replaced the gunpowder, and that barrel still sits in the St. Stephen mayor’s office, MacEachern said.

Tightening border controls after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States made it harder for people to flow back and forth, and the pandemic caused further division, but they kept their strong bonds. Now there is a new barrier: Donald Trump.

“It’s challenging because us in border communities are looking at our neighbours right in the eyes,” MacEachern said of the border tension.

Across the St. Croix River, which narrows to 40 metres in spots, MacEachern’s American counterpart is Marcia Rogers. She has lived in Calais for 35 years. For 11 of them, she sat on town council and, since November, has been mayor.

“It’s French,” Rogers said of her town’s name, “but it’s not pronounced that way here. We pronounce it callous.”

Border communities are different than other towns.

“Living on a border, people that have lived here for generations have family on both sides. It’s generations of families that have crossed the borders, so we’re not just talking about Americans and Canadians, we are family and friends that go back and forth,” Rogers said.

She owns horses and buys her hay in Canada. One of her horses is stabled in Canada. And across the river lies other enticements: “In St. Stephen, they have a Kentucky Fried Chicken and a Burger King that we do not have over here,” she said.

Rogers is worried. As soon as Trump started taunting Canada and threatening tariffs, Canadians began to stay away.

“We have serious concerns. Some of our businesses have taken a serious setback in revenues,” Rogers said. “Our general feed store, which also is the packaging hub for Canada, their revenues are down 50 per cent. The local IGA, the food stores, are down across the board. And you know, the tariffs hadn’t even gone into effect when those things started. It’s because our Canadian friends — rightly so — decided not to come across the border. I don’t think they want to be a 51st state.”

She keeps hoping it blows over, but it’s only getting worse. Friendships are fraying.

“I’ve seen it both ways, both Americans saying, ‘Too bad for the Canadians, you’re going to start paying instead of, you know, screwing us over,’ and Canadians saying, ‘We’re not coming over there if you think we’ll be the 51st state.’ But there’s also people that speak up and say, ‘Hey, remember that we’ve all been here for each other for years and years, for generations.’

“When this first started, I was nervous about going across the border,” Rogers said. “I was a little nervous about going over because I had an American licence plate.” When she crossed, she had no problems.

“What we keep reminding each other is, it’s not coming from our communities, it’s not our decision, it’s way above our pay grade. Don’t let one man divide us,” Rogers said of Trump.

MacEachern is full of sympathy for residents of Calais. He doesn’t want his neighbours to suffer.

“We’ve got businesses in Calais putting out ads saying, ‘We miss you, Canadians, we love you, please come back,’ and they’re even offering Canadian money at par at some of the restaurants. And that hurts to see. We went through that in COVID and it’s very upsetting,” he said.

MacEachern and Rogers encourage their communities to keep their cross-border bonds from unravelling further, but things are beyond their control.

Schools and sports teams around St. Stephen recently cut off travel to the United States, including for long-established cross-border leagues and tournaments. It was not done in protest: “Some of our school students are immigrants and they definitely don’t want to take a chance crossing the border right now, because they don’t know how that will be handled,” said MacEachern.

The border boycott hurts on both sides of the river. This is the gateway between Atlantic Canada and the United States. Most of the traffic comes from farther away and those travellers are steering clear of the border, which means they’re staying away from both towns.

“It’s also hurting St. Stephen because we rely on people and product crossing our border. I’m really concerned about tourist season coming. What’s that going to look like?”

Each summer for more than 50 years, the two towns have co-hosted the International Homecoming Festival, a summer festival celebrating their ties. A highlight is a parade that crosses the border. The towns are still planning to hold the August festival, this time with an eye to mending obvious fractures. A poster for the event says: “We are family … we hug it out.”

“We’ve been friends and allies for years and years and years — and they’ve been hurtful words that have been said and that’s pretty tough for Canadians to hear — but what we keep reminding each other is it’s not coming from our communities,” MacEachern said. “But that doesn’t make it easier. They’re still pretty angry.”

🍁🍁🍁🍁

Brian Rathbun is new to Canada. As an international relations and political science professor, he arrived in July from the University of Southern California to teach at the University of Toronto.

In his classrooms in the United States each year, he used the same example to help him explain the role of trust in diplomacy and the global realm.

“The example I always used when teaching this to our undergrads is the Canadian-U.S. relationship. It takes a tremendous amount of trust to have the longest undefended land border in the world,” Rathbun said.

“Why is it undefended? Because they entirely trust the United States and its motivations. They think that the United States, even if it were to have certain designs on things that Canada has, would not make use of that power, and that’s the assumption that you and I grew up with, and has probably existed for the last 100 years.”

He is looking at that differently now. One hundred years of trust jeopardized within 100 days of Trump’s second term.

“To shatter that with a couple of tweets, that’s quite a remarkable feat. It is so alarming and so radical that this trust is declining so quickly.”

Rathbun was at a Toronto Raptors game in March, a home game at Toronto’s Scotiabank Arena. As the only NBA team based outside the United States, the Raptors play both national anthems before tipoff. Rathbun was shocked to hear people around him booing The Star-Spangled Banner.

“I haven’t seen people booing the national anthem,” he said. “You hear the boos but then you also hear the loud cheers for O Canada, and everyone’s singing together, and that part was quite touching.

“If I had started talking to one of the fans near me at the Raptors game and I said, ‘Hey, I’m an American,’ that Raptors fan would have probably said, ‘I hate your government, but we love you.’ That’s my guess, that people are distinguishing between the government and the people.

“I don’t think people in Canada, when they’re choosing Canadian products over American products, are saying, ‘I’m going to stick it to an American farmer.’ They’re trying to hit the pocketbooks of Americans only because they feel that’s the only way that they can send a message to the administration. They want to do their bit to contribute to the welfare of their country that they feel is being unfairly picked on,” Rathbun said.

While Rathbun, the person, was startled, for Rathbun, the scholar, it made sense. When Canadians talk about falling out of love with America, he said it really means losing trust in the U.S. government.

“The multilateral world order is premised, to a large degree, on a trusting worldview that the United States had after the Second World War,” Rathbun said. The Western world had seen the might of the United States and the difference it made in the war. The United States showed itself to be the leader of a multinational ideology built on democratic principles. It valued that role and other countries learned to trust it.

“Most of what keeps international co-operation going is not hard law or hard security, it’s trust,” but Trump takes a different world view, he said.

The reaction from many around the world to Trump picking on Canada is similar to when people see a bully beat on a weakling, Rathbun said. “It’s precisely because of an asymmetry in power,” and a natural response to it is to try to punish the behaviour. “We’re still going to resist the bully, even if we’re very small. And I think that’s what you’re seeing.”

Typically, most Americans probably don’t think about Canada twice in the same year, and now suddenly they see Canadians booing their anthem, yanking their booze out of stores and, out of the mouth of Ontario Premier Doug Ford, threatening to shut off their lights in communities that buy electricity from the province. No wonder some return the social chill.

“What do Americans think about Canadians? We don’t think very much about Canada at all. That could lead to a certain amount of indifference. It creates a vacuum. We’ve seen how people can do 180-degree turns on their views. What if you only need to make a 90-degree turn?” said Rathbun. “I think that Trump could pretty easily turn Americans, or at least his supporters, against Canadians.”

It seems to already be happening.

Joe Rogan, an influential American commentator among young conservatives, might be a barometer on the issue. At first, he expressed derision at Trump picking a fight with Canada: “Why are we upset at Canada? This is stupid,”

he said

on the March 14 episode of his podcast, The Joe Rogan Experience. “It’s the dumbest f-cking feud.”

On his

March 22 podcast,

though, Rogan’s stance seemed to have changed. When a guest mentioned an upcoming event in Montreal, Rogan said he wouldn’t be there: “I don’t go to Canada anymore,” he said. “Nor should you,” his guest replied.

🍁🍁🍁🍁

Falling out with the United States is not confined to progressives, or those opposed to Trump or Elon Musk or Trump’s Make America Great Again ideology.

A couple from Saskatchewan spent many years globe-hopping for work. They have lived in six countries through 10 international moves in their careers in the energy-technology sector, including in the United States.

“Living and working in the U.S. twice over a total of 10 years found us very fond of the U.S.A., to the point of having almost a split Canadian-American identity,” the husband said. They asked for their names not to be published because of pending real estate deals and unresolved business relationships.

Some years ago, the couple bought property on a ski hill in Montana with plans to build a retirement home there. Recently, with the husband retired but his wife still working, they hired an architect and had house plans drawn in anticipation of starting construction on a lavish home.

It was during a conversation with the proposed builder, who was their friend, that their plan started to fall apart. They were talking about hockey. In February, after hockey fans in Montreal booed the U.S. anthem at the 4 Nations Face-Off game between Canada and the United States, their builder said how unacceptable that was.

“I tried to point out how upset Canadians must be to act so uncharacteristically rude, given our collective politeness. I tried to explain that threats on our sovereignty were extreme and perhaps good reason for Canadians to become uncharacteristically rude to our neighbours,” the husband said. “My argument fell on such deaf ears that the conversational door was slammed shut. I began falling out of love with America.”

At the same time, they were hearing from friends and family still in Canada about a shift to patriotic shopping.

“That opened our minds to reconsidering Canadian ski hills after a decade and a half of focusing on our plans to build in the U.S.,” he said. They shelved their Montana land development and made an offer for a lot on a ski hill in British Columbia.

“We are buying Canadian,” he said. “We have chosen to direct our capital and future back into Canada.” He said the decision cost Montana between $3 million and $5 million for the house alone, plus lost future revenue from their spending.

The couple, though, are not liberals or Liberals. He complains of “woke benevolence” spoiling Canada.

“We think highly of the work Trump and Musk are doing in the U.S., although we could do without some of the shock negotiation strategies,” the husband said.

“Recent political and social shifts have made us well aware that we are not Americans,” he said. “We aren’t down on America as much as we are aware that we are guests in the United States and that our welcome can be withdrawn at any point. We see that risk as ultimately a reason to favour the certainty of always being able to live in Canada, regardless of how broken it is.”

It isn’t just one family in one house on a ski hill that unwinding social ties has cost. Across the United States, many Canadians own vacation property and second homes where they live part-time, and some of those Canadians are calling it quits.

“Canadians are half the reason we are what we are,” said Melanie Pritchard, a real estate broker in Ellicottville, N.Y., a town famous for its skiing that’s an hour’s drive south of the Peace Bridge border crossing between Fort Erie, Ont., and Buffalo, N.Y.

Canadian skiers started buying holiday homes in and around Ellicottville decades ago and have become an important part of the community. Many of the region’s events are timed for Canadians: A summer festival is over Canada Day and a fall festival over Canada’s Thanksgiving.

“I can’t tell you the number of Canadians that have become our friends, very good friends,” Pritchard said.

Wrinkles and tears are now in that social fabric. As a Realtor, she sees the damage firsthand: there has been a sudden and unusual increase in Canadians selling their homes. She has several on the market now.

“They do express concerns about the situation, not only with the tariffs, per se, but just the general environment,” Pritchard said. “A lot of them have expressed dismay with the rhetoric that’s been going on from our country’s leaders. You know, taking Canada over, making Canada the 51st state — none of that goes over very well.”

Pritchard is worried about the finality that comes with Canadians selling rather than just renting the house to someone else for a while.

“We understand their concerns and we just hate to see it become too much of a thing.” She said the town has called a meeting to discuss the change.

Not every Canadian has come to the same conclusion.

🍁🍁🍁🍁

Lyle Zdunich had only been back in Saskatoon a week after flying in from his winter house 3,100 kilometres from the gnawing bite of Saskatchewan’s winter. He had time to talk about it while waiting for the Winnipeg Jets to hit the ice.

A retired chartered accountant, Zdunich has owned property near Palm Springs, Calif., since 1998 and has spent the last 21 of his 75 winters there. He and his wife, Arlene, fly down to their condo in a gated community each October.

“As soon as we get off the plane, it’s like we’re at home down there,” he said. “We’ve met tons of people. Between golf and tennis and whatnot, and we know other Canadians down there, so it’s been a very enjoyable experience.”

The Zdunichs are among thousands of Canadian snowbirds who arrive each winter in Palm Springs. The desert city’s population triples come November and deflates back to about 45,000 in March. Most of that surge comes from Canada.

“I am definitely not anti-American,” Zdunich said.

“If you get away from Donald Trump and some of the things he’s said, the Americans are still our allies and friends. Having lived in the States for just about half the year, whether somebody’s from Saskatchewan or somebody’s from Palm Springs, to me, they’re all the same.”

For sure, he doesn’t like what he’s hearing about Canada from the White House, but he considers it to only be Trump’s ranting, more publicity than policy.

“I’m of the point of view that I think it’s totally an unfortunate situation, but in the short term it’s not going to change my view of going down there. Forget all the noise going around, it’ll get sorted out. Do I want to forgo the friendships I have formed just because of something that may or may not occur?”

He said he hasn’t experienced animosity from people down south. “Absolutely zero negative response from the Americans towards Canada — if they felt that way, they sure would be willing to say it, but nobody does.”

Zdunich said he hears people in Canada talk about boycotting the United States, but that’s not for him.

“I agree with most people, that if (Trump) would just not say a lot of things he does, it would be a lot better. But I’m not going to sell my place. It’s a welcoming environment from everybody I know down there.”

Businesses in Palm Springs will love hearing his response.

Tourism from Canada

is way down across the United States. Border crossings from Canada dropped by close to a million travellers this March compared to last, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data. It’s the biggest decline since COVID-19 shut down travel.

Flight bookings from Canada to the United States have collapsed. In March, advanced airline bookings were down more than 70 per cent for each month April to September compared to last year, according to airline data from OAG Aviation.

There has been less traffic going the other direction as well, with the number of trips by U.S. residents driving to Canada down 10.6 per cent this March over last.

While Canadians are falling out of love with America, Palm Springs wants them to know the feeling isn’t mutual. In April, the city hung banners from downtown street-lights and put up billboards at the airport saying: “Palm Springs ♥️ Canada.”

Photos of the signs in the airport with few passengers in sight attracted harsh comments on Facebook: “Are all the passengers detained in facilities? It’s really empty there,” said one. “They’re on a connecting flight to El Salvador,” came a reply.

All of California is feeling the impact of being spurned by Canadians, and its governor, Gavin Newsom, knows why his usual flood of tourist is drying up.

California launched a statewide campaign

to lure Canadians back, and Newsom’s pitch is to distance California from Trump, physically and ideologically.

“The state of mind in the United States of America has dramatically changed as it relates to the approach to Canada, and we want to make sure we send a message to our Canadian friends up north to come to a state where two million Canadians visited last year,” Newsom said in a promotion.

A video ad makes a sharper point.

“Sure, you know who’s trying to stir things up back in D.C.,” the ad says, and then cuts to a photo of a tilting White House, “but don’t let that ruin your beach plans. California’s the ultimate playground, 2,000 miles from Washington and a world away in mindset … We’ve got plenty of sunshine and a whole lot of love for our neighbours up north.”

🍁🍁🍁🍁

Statistics back up anecdotes of a broad social unravelling.

A recent

YouGov survey

of Canadians found a remarkable decoupling: 44 per cent said they consider the U.S. to be unfriendly; 20 per cent said it was an enemy. Only 15 per cent said it was an ally and 10 per cent said friendly, with 11 per cent saying they weren’t sure.

That’s a huge tumble since the

same question was asked in 2020

, when 18 per cent described the United States as unfriendly and only four per cent said an enemy.

The survey also found 61 per cent of Canadian respondents were already boycotting American companies. The most boycotted items were fruits and vegetables, booze, personal care items and household goods.

A survey of American citizens

by the same research company found U.S. citizens’ view of Canada was also deteriorating. In late March, 16 per cent of Americans polled said Canada was an enemy of the United States. That seems low, but it’s the highest level of animosity since data started in 2017, when only five per cent said it. The same poll showed 73.7 per cent of Americans said Canada was an ally, a drop from almost 86 per cent in 2017.

It’s hard to trust an enemy, so this is a big problem.

In our personal lives, trust is an important part of how we interact with others. It’s how we choose whom to leave a spare house key with, whom we invite to our party. It is how we decide whom to loan money to or accept a ride from; whom to date and whom to dump; whom we share secrets with and whom we believe.

It’s similar on the world stage. What country is trusted to come to your aid and to hold up their end of an agreement? Where do you feel safe visiting? What country do you want to succeed?

Tuuli-Marja Kleiner researches why nations trust each other at Germany’s Thünen Institute of Rural Studies by analyzing cross-country survey data.

She said that at its heart, international trust means belief that expectations and commitments will be fulfilled, or at least not purposely violated. As a starting point, she said, similarities in cultural values fosters familiarity, which can trigger trust because similarity suggests each group can predict how the other will act.

Familiarity and similarity describe Canada and the United States; despite many differences, both have similar historic, demographic and religious roots, with population growth through immigration. Both have democratic governance and English as an official language. Once differences over connection to the monarchy in Britain settled down, the two countries have been close allies.

Until 2009, Canadians didn’t even need a passport to drive into the United States. Generations of cross-border social and cultural connections solidified the affinity.

“My analysis showed that cultural proximity between nations increases trust but only if their proximity is a qualified one,” said Kleiner. Her study of Europe, which she thinks is likely the same across the Western world, showed the biggest qualifiers for trust were democratic values and global reputation.

“So, if there’s a violation of those as massive as under the Trump administration, then the relationship is effectively harmed or even terminated, because what he is saying is, you and I do not belong together morally any longer.”

What is going on in Canada in reaction to Trump — more public patriotism, boycotts, reduced U.S. visits — is a natural response, Kleiner said. “If you no longer see the other as part of your cultural similarity and no longer trust them, you don’t want to co-operate with them and you don’t want to live among them.”

How much the friendship between Canada and the United States unravels, and how long that will last, is impossible to know.

Is it divorce, separation or a few nights spent sleeping on the couch?

As breakups go, Canada is in an awkward spot. It can date other people, sure, but can’t pack up and move. It is forever stuck living beside an ex — one who regularly points at your house saying you’re a cheater and a freeloader and your house really should be their house.

Can they get back together?

Kleiner is pessimistic, at least in the short term. “Once the trust is destroyed, it is very difficult to rebuild,” she said. Canadians now know that extending trust automatically based on similarities doesn’t always work.

Rathbun, the American professor living in Canada, is more optimistic. He believes broken trust can mend as circumstances change, but perhaps not quickly and it won’t be as deep as it was. Trump won’t be in office forever; maybe the next president will view Canada differently, or maybe Trump will change course.

While many Canadians said they will never feel comfortable with the United States again, Rathbun thinks feelings will improve over time, though he predicts countries will retain a “hedging strategy.”

Jack and Rose Van Steensel, the motorhome couple, are applying their own version of a hedging strategy to their relationship with the United States.

They’re watching and waiting to see if things get better, if Trump settles down, if a deal can ease tension. They made a tentative reservation for their motorhome in Arizona for November, in case things improve. Rose said the woman who runs the RV park understands their position.

Over on the banks of the St. Croix River, the two cross-border mayors hope their joint festival lights a path to keeping their communities united, despite what swirls around them. Maybe, said Mayor MacEachern, getting through this will eventually make their bonds even stronger.

”There’s always good things that come out of bad,” MacEachern said.

“I think it will take time to get us back, but I think we’ll get back. I hope so. But I think it depends where it goes with Trump.”


King Charles III and Queen Camilla greet Mounties after a visit to mark the 100th anniversary of Canada House in London on Tuesday.

If you find yourself in Canada’s capital next week, there are a handful of opportunities to see King Charles III and Queen Camilla.

Their Majesties’ itineraries for the two-day visit, May 26-27, were released on Tuesday.

“This will be His Majesty’s first visit to Canada since his Coronation — a momentous and historic occasion that underscores Canada’s identity and sovereignty as a constitutional monarchy,”

Canada Heritage wrote.

In addition to

delivering the first throne speech from a monarch since 1977

, here’s what the King and Queen are scheduled to attend on their quick trip.

Monday, May 26

After arriving in Ottawa, where they’ll be greeted by troops from the Royal Canadian Dragoons — the most senior armoured regiment in the Canadian Forces — the royal pair are set to attend an early-afternoon community gathering at Landsdowne Park, which will be open to the general public.

“Their Majesties will meet and engage with Canadian individuals and organizations showcasing Canadian identity and diversity and take part in various activities,” according to the itinerary.

Within an hour, it’s off to Governor General of Canada Mary Simon’s residence at Rideau Hall, where the provincial Lieutenant Governors and Territorial Commissioners will have a chance to meet with the monarchs.

King Charles will also be joined by Viceregal representatives, community groups and school groups for a ceremonial tree planting.

The rest of the day includes an audience with Simon and Prime Minister Mark Carney.

The Liberal leader extended the invitation to King Charles on a visit to the U.K. immediately after his swearing in as Canada’s prime minister in mid-March.

“That clearly underscores the sovereignty of our country,” Carney said when

the visit was first announced.

Tuesday, May 27

Day two of their visit begins at the Bank of Canada with a ride down Wellington Street aboard Canada’s State Landau — a luxury 19th-century carriage — and accompanied by RCMP Musical Ride horses.

On their last visit in 2022 to mark the Platinum Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II, Charles and Camilla visited the home of the ceremonial equine team to meet riders and attend a special performance. His Majesty was appointed an honorary commissioner of the RCMP in 2012. In 2023, he was presented with Noble, a horse given to him by the RCMP to mark his acceptance of the role of Commissioner-in-Chief of the RCMP during a ceremony at Windsor Castle in England.

 King Charles III greets Noble the horse alongside RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme.

Both the scheduled 25-minute ride and their arrival at the Senate of Canada are open to the public.

Outside the Senate, “The King will receive full military honours which will include a Royal Salute, a 100-person guard of honour from the 3rd Battalion of the Royal Canadian Regiment, an inspection of the guard and the band, and a 21-gun salute.”

The speech from the Throne to open Canada’s 45th parliament is scheduled for 11 a.m. from the Senate Chamber.

The last monarch to do so was the King’s mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II, in 1977.

Philippe Lagassé: A Canadian King in Parliament

The pair will close out their morning with a public wreath-laying at the National War Memorial to mark the 25th anniversary of the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.

Their Majesties are scheduled to depart later that day.

How many times have King Charles and Queen Camilla visited Canada?

This will be King Charles’ 20th official and personal documented trip to Canada. His first came alongside his late parents, Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh, in 1970 when he was 22.

Their last visit in 2022, when Charles was still Prince of Wales, lasted three days and saw them arrive in St. John’s before visiting Ottawa and then the Northwest Territories.

 Then Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, and Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, meet local market producers and merchants at ByWard Market in Ottawa in 2022.

A trip in 2017 was also three days long, starting in Iqaluit, Nunavut, before moving on to Ontario’s Prince Edward County and finishing up in Ottawa and Gatineau, Que.

Visits in 2014 and 2012 lasted four days, while a trip in 2009, their first to Canada as an official couple and the Queen’s first of five visits to date, was a nine-day excursion that brought them from Newfoundland, through Ontario and Quebec, to British Columbia.

The King’s longest stay in Canada came in 1975 when he was serving aboard the

HMS Hermes. The longest official visit was the first leg of a cross-Canada Royal Couple tour with the late Princess Diana in 1983 — an 18-day stay throughout Atlantic Canada. 

Warming up at Canada House 

In advance of this visit, Their Majesties visited Canada House in London on Tuesday to mark the 100th anniversary of the High Commission of Canada in the United Kingdom.

After viewing an enormous floor map of Canada, His Majesty was presented with keys to the building first opened by his great-grandfather, King George V, in 1925.

“Your presence here today launches your journey to Canada next week. This will be your 20th visit, but your first as reigning monarch,” said Ralph Goodale, High Commissioner for Canada in the U.K., per

the Daily Mail.

‘Your dear mother Queen Elizabeth II often said to the delight of Canadians that a journey to Canada felt like coming home. We hope that you feel exactly the same way.”

 King Charles III is presented with a Key to Canada House, the High Commission of Canada in the United Kingdom, by High Commissioner Ralph Goodale, Tuesday in London.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A Glock 17 was one of the firearms the manicurist reported stolen after officials asked for photos of her gun collection.

An Ontario manicurist authorities believe to be a “straw purchaser” of handguns reported that her safe full of weapons, silver bars and cash was burgled the day after the province’s chief firearms officer requested photos of the arsenal.

Chi Do was convicted in Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice on three counts of transferring a firearm knowing that she was unauthorized to do so, 12 counts of possession of a firearm for the purpose of trafficking, and one count of public mischief, with the intent to mislead, by reporting she’d been robbed by a boyfriend whose last name she couldn’t remember.

“I find the timing of the report of theft to be suspicious,” Justice Judy Fowler Byrne wrote in a recent decision.

“The report of a theft came on the very day that she was supposed to provide evidence that she had possession of the fifteen firearms. While viewed alone, it may make sense, but considered with the other evidence, it appears to be the only option open to Ms. Do who needed a reasonable explanation as to why her firearms were missing. Viewing this theft report in light of all the evidence, Ms. Do was motivated to fabricate a story about being robbed.”

Do was “flagged as a high-volume purchaser” by the province’s chief firearms office after buying four handguns within four days.

When an officer with the outfit started to investigate, “he learned that Ms. Do had 15 handguns and one long gun registered to her,” the judge wrote in a decision dated May 16.

The officer contacted Do on Valentines Day of 2022.

“He wanted assurances that all of the firearms were still in her possession. Ms. Do assured him that all of her firearms were safely stored in her safe at her home.”

The officer asked her to take photos of the guns stored at her home. “Ms. Do said she was rushed and on her way to work, but promised to email him the photos of all 16 firearms later that day.

The officer later learned “that she had reported the theft of the guns (to Peel Regional Police) early in the morning on February 15, 2022,” said the decision.

“She told the police that she had just got home from work and went into her safe to take photos of the firearms for the firearms officer, when she discovered that her firearms, ammunition, ($5,000 in cash she was saving up for her brother’s birthday), and silver bars were missing. All of her firearms were missing except for two long guns.”

Do told investigators that she’d been in her safe a few weeks earlier and all her guns were there at the time, said the decision. “The only person she believed could have committed the theft was a man she was having an affair with (for a year and a half) and who she had just broke up with. His name was Alex. He was a Sri Lankan man, who she met in Barrie. His last name was too long for her to remember. She believed Alex knew where she kept the key to her safe. She had deleted any contact information for him after the breakup. She did not have camera surveillance.”

Do lived in the basement of her parents’ home.

Her safe, hidden in the back of her closet, was opened when police arrived, said the decision. “It showed no visual signs of damage. She still had one shot gun and one long gun, and some empty firearm cases.”

Do told investigators “that she liked to collect guns,” said the decision. “She explained that she had a lot of the same type of guns because she wanted to gift some to her husband when he got his (possession and acquisition licence).”

Police didn’t see any “signs of forced entry” at the home and the only windows in the basement where Do lived were too small for anyone to fit through, said the decision.

“When asked what she liked about the firearms, she said she liked that they ‘go pow,’ and she liked the loud noise. She stated that she has not shot any of her guns, but she wanted a collection. She planned to eventually go to a range and fire them.”

A few weeks later, Peel Regional Police learned that on Nov. 18, 2021, the Hamilton Police Service searched a home in Scarborough and found 11 firearms in a safe.

“This was three months before Ms. Do reported the theft of her firearms,” said the decision.

Several of the guns had their serial numbers filed off, but police were able to identify three of them as registered to Do.

On May 13, 2022, an officer with the specialized enforcement bureau, which focuses on major drug investigations, gangs and firearms, got involved.

“He was advised of the reported theft from Ms. Do’s apartment, the number of guns that she had and how three of them were recovered prior to the reported theft,” said the decision.

“There were suspicions that she was ‘straw purchaser’ — someone who purchases firearms legally, but then provides them illegally to others.”

In an interview with investigators, when asked why she had so many firearms, Do “said that she likes to practice target shooting. She purchased three Glock 19’s because she was going to give one to her husband and the other for her 13-year-old son, when he got older. She wanted to purchase her firearms then in case the government banned them all later.”

In 2020 and 2021, Do worked in a nail salon in Barrie and at the Marriot Hotel in Toronto. “In total, Ms. Do declared gross earnings of $60,742 over 2020 and 2021. During the same period, she spent $12,678.46 on a combination of restricted and unrestricted weapons, and ammunition,” said the judge. “In January 2022, she paid for an (additional five) firearms, which totalled $3,410.31. From this, I can infer that she spent approximately one-third of her net income from 2020 to early 2022 on firearm purchases.”

Do “testified that she was able to afford the firearms because she didn’t have many expenses,” said the decision.

She claimed to have a problem with “impulse purchasing.”

Do never made an insurance claim for the missing cash or silver bars she said were stolen with her guns.

“I do not accept Ms. Do’s evidence that she was robbed of her firearms,” Fowler Byrne said. “Nor does her evidence leave me with a reasonable doubt about any of the elements of the offences.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.