LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

An Air Canada plane leaves Vancouver International Airport on Sept. 13, 2025. The airline says it has put in place a policy to allow passengers connecting to a United Airlines flight to change or defer their travel with no change fee.

This week, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration announced that it would reduce air traffic by 10 per cent at 40 “high-volume” airports beginning Friday. Here’s what that could mean for Canadians.

Why are flights being reduced?

The U.S. government has been shut down since Oct. 1 in what is now the longest such event in the nation’s history. Air traffic controllers in the U.S. have thus been working unpaid for almost six weeks, leading to staffing shortages and flight delays.

FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford, citing staffing pressures and safety reports from pilots indicating growing fatigue among controllers, said he and U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy did not want to wait until the situation reached a crisis point.

“There’ll be frustration,”

Duffy said

. “But in the end, our sole role is to make sure that we keep this airspace as safe as possible.”

 FILE: People wait in a security checkpoint line at George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston, Texas, on November 4, 2025.

What airports are affected?

CBS News

has reported

receiving a list of the affected airports. They include major hubs such as Dallas/Forth Worth, Chicago O’Hare and all three New York area airports (Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark), as well as destinations as far-flung as Anchorage and Honolulu.

What are Canadian airlines doing?

Air Canada told National Post: “We are monitoring the situation and awaiting more details on the planned reductions.”

It added: “At this point, we are maintaining our normal schedule but for customers who may be connecting onto U.S. domestic flights operated by our partner, United Airlines, we have put in place a goodwill policy to allow them to change or defer their travel with no change fee.”

Porter Airlines said there have been delays at some destinations, adding: “
Our team is managing the disruptions and we encourage passengers to check their flight status
before leaving for the airport. For those who have flexibility, complimentary moves to some U.S. destinations are available through Monday, when space permits.”

A spokesperson for WestJet told National Post: “WestJet’s operations have not been impacted by the ongoing government shutdown in the U.S. We are continuing to monitor the situation and proactively manage our operations to minimize any potential disruptions going forward.”

What does this mean for Canadian travellers not headed to the U.S.?

John Gradek, a lecturer in aviation management at McGill University in Montreal, pointed out that it’s not just a flight from Toronto to New York that could be affected.

“We have an integrated airspace … between Canada and the U.S., and we have Canadian carriers flying domestic routes in Canada using the American airspace,” he told National Post. “So when you’re flying from Toronto to Vancouver, quite a bit of your trip is over U.S. airspace, and requires U.S. air traffic control to basically clear you through that space.”

He noted that upon leaving Pearson airport in Toronto, “within about 30 minutes you’re over U.S. airspace, and you basically leave U.S. airspace somewhere over either North Dakota or maybe Montana.”

Similarly, flights to the Caribbean, Latin America and other southern destinations will usually fly over U.S. airspace on the way.

 FILE: Cancelled flights are seen on a screen at Orlando International Airport in Orlando, Florida on October 30, 2025.

Can Canadian airlines avoid U.S. airspace?

They can, but it’s not cheap.

“I can take a flight from Toronto to Vancouver and route over Canadian airspace,” said Gradek. “The only problem is it’s an extra hour.” That means additional fuel costs, staffing costs and scheduling issues.

“So the answer is, yeah, we can still fly it, but it’s not going to be something that the Canadian carriers want to do. They’re basically looking at trying to make money on these flights. And their margins are pretty thin as it is.”

What can Canadian travellers do?

Not much, other than avoiding travel to America entirely, including any flights that feature a U.S. stopover on the way to another country.

Flights that cross U.S. airspace could be delayed or even cancelled, but Gradek said it’s too early to know for sure.

“My suggestion is to make sure that whatever activity you have planned at your destination, there’s a bit of flexibility,” he said. “That you’re not trying to connect to a cruise ship 45 minutes after you arrive; that’s not going to work. You’re going to have to build in what I call a buffer into your arrival time, to take into account that there is a higher risk now of the flights being late.”

He added: “In general terms, Canadians can rest assured that the trans-border operations between Canada and the U.S. will happen. But they will probably be late.”

Could there be more closures?

Gradek thinks so. “Yeah, at this point in time, unfortunately, it’s going to get worse. I don’t think this 10 per cent is going to stand. I think we’re not done.”

But he’d rather be safe than sorry. “I don’t want a stressed out air traffic controller,” he said. “I want that controller to pay attention to everything that’s going on in and around my flight into the U.S. So if they’re not showing up for work I say: ‘Thank you very much. We’ll make do with what we’ve got.’”

Bedford hasn’t ruled out additional measures.

“The system is extremely safe today and will be extremely safe tomorrow,” he said. “If the pressures continue to build even after we take these measures, we’ll come back and take additional measures.”

 FILE: The air traffic control tower is seen at Orlando International Airport in Orlando, Florida early morning on October 31, 2025.

What is Transport Canada’s reaction?

In an emailed statement to National Post, a spokesperson said: “

Transport Canada is aware of the situation in the United States and is closely monitoring it through its 24/7 Operations Centre.” 

They added: “

Travellers departing from Canadian airports are advised to check the status of their flights in advance.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Rom Braslavski reveals what it was like in captivity in Gaza after being abducted on Oct. 7, 2023.

A former hostage is speaking out about the sexual violence he endured while being held captive in Gaza for two years.

“They stripped me of all my clothes — underwear, everything. They tied me up from my… while I was completely naked. I was torn apart, dying, with no food,” Rom Braslavski said,

according to the Daily Mail

. The news outlet published excerpts from an interview with the 21-year-old who was featured in the Israeli television program Hazinor.

Braslavski was kidnapped by terrorists while he was working as a security guard at the Nova Music Festival on Oct. 7, 2023. The same day, 1,200 people were murdered by Hamas in Israel. The attack, the deadliest for the Jewish community since the Holocaust, sparked a war in the Middle East that has been ongoing until a ceasefire last month.

Braslavski was

one of 20 hostages

who was released as part of the deal. He had been held in Gaza for 738 days.

The group who “violently abducted” Braslavski, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), is an ally of Hamas. They are 

described by the Canadian government

as the one of the most violent Palestinian terrorist groups. One of their main goals is the destruction of Israel.

In one video shared by PIJ in April, Braslavski appeared sick and unrecognizable, his family said,

according to CNN

.

 Israeli soldiers accompany Rom Braslavski, formerly held hostage in Gaza since October 2023 by Palestinian terrorists, upon his arrival at the Sheba Tel-HaShomer Medical Centre in Ramat Gan on October 13, 2025.

In the interview, Braslavski said he prayed to God to save him while he was in captivity. He also spoke of the torture inflicted upon him by the terrorists. He said it was “sexual violence” and the purpose was to humiliate him.

“The goal was to crush my dignity,” he said. “And that’s exactly what he did.”

He said there were multiple assaults and that it was difficult to talk about. “It’s hard. It was the most horrific thing,” he said.

“It’s something even the Nazis didn’t do. During Hitler’s time, they wouldn’t have done things like this. You just pray for it to stop. And while I was there — every day, every beating — I’d say to myself, ‘I survived another day in hell. Tomorrow morning, I’ll wake up to another hell. And another. And another. It doesn’t end.’ I came back from meeting the devil.”

After Braslavski returned home, his mother Tami Braslavski

told the Times of Israel

that he was whipped and beaten, among other things she wouldn’t mention. His terrorist captors also used psychological torture to try to break him, she said. They told him that his family was “broken” and that they “didn’t have the strength” to join other hostage families and Israelis to protest against his captivity. Terrorists tried to get him to convert to Islam, saying he would get more food and better treatment if he did.

They said he had “nowhere to go back to,” she said. “They told him Israel had fallen, that almost 3,000 soldiers had fallen.”

However, within the depths of darkness, Tami said there was a vision of hope.

“He told me, ‘Mom, I always knew it would end,’” she

said

.


Cape Breton-Canso-Antigonish MP Jaime Battiste.

OTTAWA — The federal elections watchdog has fined Liberal MP Jaime Battiste for a battery of electoral offences in 2019, including donating over the legal limit to his campaign and filing a “false and misleading” financial statement.
 

Thursday morning, the Commissioner of Canada Elections said he issued fines totalling $600 against Battiste for four different violations of federal electoral laws.
Battiste is the parliamentary secretary to the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations.

All the offences were linked to the 2019 Liberal nomination race in the Nova Scotia riding of Cape Breton—Canso—Antigonish, which he won. Months later, Battiste was elected for the first time to the House of Commons.
 

The commissioner found that Battiste donated nearly $1,500 over the legal limit when he contributed $4,051 in a single day to his own nomination campaign in May 2019.
 

The Canada Elections Act states that only a candidate’s financial agent can accept political donations or pay for expenses on behalf of a campaign.
 

Yet Battiste admitted to the commissioner during a 2023 interview that he accepted over $8,000 in campaign contributions and e-transfers to his personal bank account.
 

Battiste and his agent also confirmed to the federal watchdog at the time that he had paid for $722.32 in campaign expenses on his personal credit card.
 

Finally, the commissioner fined Battiste for signing a declaration attesting that his final nomination campaign return was complete and accurate when he likely knew it contained “false and misleading” Information.
 

Battiste namely reported a total of $8,201 in donations while a total of $9,701 was deposited in campaign bank account during the nomination race.
 

“There are therefore reasonable grounds to believe that Jaime Battiste signed a declaration that he knew, or ought reasonably to have known, to be false or misleading,” reads a summary of the violation.
 

The fines originally totalled $1,600, but the commissioner reduced them because Battiste cooperated with the investigation and because of unidentified “personal circumstances in Jaime Battiste’s life”.
 

Battiste’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the four fines.
 

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Karen Espersen, centre, the co-owner of Universal Ostrich Farms, speaks with supporters with her daughter, Katie Pasitney, at the farm in Edgewood, B.C., on Monday, Sept. 22, 2025.

OTTAWA — The Supreme Court plucked the last hope for survival of the now-famous flock of over 300 B.C. ostriches whose owner was hoping to save from being culled by the federal food inspection agency.

On Thursday morning, Canada’s top court declined to hear the final appeal from Universal Ostrich Farms of a series of lower court decisions confirming that the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) had fairly determined the flock of exotic birds needed to be culled.

The court does not issue reasons for its decisions on applications for leave to appeal.

Within minutes of the decision,

the CFIA confirmed in a statement

that it would be going forward with a “complete depopulation” of the flock linked to an outbreak of avian influenza on the farm in December 2024.

The virus killed 69 of the farm’s ostriches within the last year. Though the remaining flock is said to be displaying no symptoms, CFIA fears they could still be shedding the virus or be the source of further spread of infection to people, livestock and wildlife.

The ostriches have become a flashpoint for U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration, right-wing anti-government and left-wing environmental activists in both Canada and the U.S.

U.S. Secretary for Health and Human Services Robert Kennedy Jr. and Mehmet Oz, a former T.V. star and current administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, have publicly called for the ostriches to be spared.

In a sign that the government fears protesters will still try to prevent the cull, CFIA spelled out in its statement that it is illegal to interfere with their agents’ work.

“Any such actions may result in enforcement measures or prosecution,” the agency said.

The farm owner did not immediately issue a statement on the Supreme Court’s decision.

National Post, with files by Stewart Lewis.

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Wayne Gretkzy, right, was on hand when Alexander Ovechkin broke his 31-year NHL goal-scoring record in April 2025. The Great One jokingly offered that night to buy the Great 8 a car if he was able to notch 900 career goals, a feat he accomplished Wednesday in Washington.

After Alexander Ovechkin notched his 895th career goal last season, breaking Wayne Gretzky’s long-standing NHL record, the Great One quipped that should the Russian sniper become the first to hit the 900-goal plateau, he might buy him a car.

On Wednesday in Washington, the Great 8 accomplished the once unimaginable feat in a win over the St. Louis Blues, raising the question as to whether Gretzky will make good on his offer.

“You get to 900 and I might buy you a car,” Gretzky told Ovechkin after the 31-year record fell in an April game against the New York Islanders.

“I will try,” the future Hall of Famer replied.

In making his playful offer on the ice that night, Gretzky was referring to his own experience of breaking Gordie Howe’s goal record in 1994 while playing for the Los Angeles Kings.

Upon setting the new benchmark, then Kings owner Bruce McNall presented him with a 1994 Rolls-Royce Cornish IV — only 219 of which were ever produced — during an on-ice ceremony.

Gretzky reminded Ovechkin of his boss’s generous gift twice on the night.“

“When I set the record, they bought me a Rolls-Royce, so you got your work cut out,” he said to Capitals owner Ted Leonsis during his on-ice remarks.

In the locker room after the game, Gretzky brought it up again, prompting Ovechkin to look to Leonsis.

“Talk to him,” the owner said, gesturing to Bettman, who responded, “We’ll talk.”

Gretzky’s Rolls-Royce, meanwhile, hasn’t been in his possession for at least two decades and

was being auctioned by Sotheby’s

around the time of Ovechkin’s record-breaking goal, where it was expected to fetch in excess of US$500,000. National Post has contacted the auctioneer about the vehicle’s current status.

Ovechkin’s 900th goal, scored in the second period to give his team a 2-0 lead over the host Blues, would stand as the game-winner in a 6-1 victory.

“Pretty cool, first player ever to do that, so it’s a special moment,”

Ovechkin told reporters after the game

. “It’s nice to get it.. at home so the fans, the family, can be here.”

After the goal was scored, Blues goalie Jordan Binnington appeared to keep the record-setting puck, tucking it inside his equipment as the Capitals celebrated on the ice. One of the linesmen eventually came over to retrieve it.

“I’m not going to comment on it,” Ovechkin said when asked.

Binnington, who was pulled from the game after giving up four goals on 15 shots, also declined to comment, according to

The Athletic.

Ovechkin was later photographed with the puck in the locker room.

 Alex Ovechkin poses the puck he shot to score his 900th career NHL goal Wednesday night in Washington.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A Canada goose lands on the Hawrelak Park Pavillion while migrating through the region in Edmonton, on Friday, March 18, 2022. Photo by Ian Kucerak

It’s early fall on a shallow stretch of the Rideau River in Ottawa, a few hundred metres below Hog’s Back Falls. That’s the point where the Rideau Canal splits off from the once-natural waterway it has commandeered as a boat channel for almost 200 years, and where the liberated river finally reasserts its wildness.

In this remnant feral section of the Rideau, which runs past Carleton University, hundreds of Canada geese — showing an untamed spirit, like the stream that has drawn them here — are massing in a honking, splashing, fluttering maelstrom of exuberance.

They arrive on this mid-October day every few minutes in gaggles of five, eight, 12. There’s a sense of urgency, it seems, as they descend rapidly from the sky, some of them “whiffling” — performing a mid-air body twist that sends the bird plunging sharply — to hit their chosen landing spot on the water.

Now and then, an individual frantically skims across the surface of the water in pursuit of another — half-flying, half-swimming, long black neck aimed low and beak flared — in what looks like a vigorous game of chase. The behaviour, perhaps a mating or bullying display, will subtly reset the social order within this congress of Branta canadensis, Canada’s iconic white-cheeked goose.

Who knows exactly why they do what they do? Who could say how the alert was spread amongst these birds — which arrive from different directions, over the course of several hours — to flock here and now? What magic so finely attunes them to each other, to the rhythms of the day and the cycle of the seasons?

A commuter train rumbles over a bridge above the water. Cars whiz past. We can watch, but the geese are in their own world.

Ottawa naturalist and author

Michael Runtz

, a Carleton biology professor for 40 years before his retirement this year, explains that the

city’s population of Canada geese

in the fall is a combination of stopover birds from the north — briefly feeding and roosting in Ottawa on their epic migration between sub-Arctic Canada and the U.S. South — and “resident” birds that stick around for all or most of the year.

Different subspecies of Canada geese are hard to distinguish, especially when they’re in the water. If, among the river birds, there are some true migrants, they would be in the midst of a classic Canada goose odyssey — 2,500 kilometres, say, from breeding grounds off the east coast of Hudson Bay to wintering sites in the Carolinas or neighbouring states.

Such transient geese would probably belong to the subspecies Branta canadensis interior, ancient travellers of the Atlantic Flyway, with Canada’s capital region a convenient, river-rich, midway pit stop.

But it’s likely these birds on the Rideau River on this particular day are mostly “giant” Canada geese —

Branta canadensis maxima

— the dominant breed in many cities across Southern Canada and the Northern U.S. The journey for these “maxima” might be a mere 1.5-km short-hop flight to a widening of the river just above the Hog’s Back dam at Mooney’s Bay, a popular nighttime roosting site for waterfowl.

This heftier subspecies makes up the resident populations Runtz described — and they are the so-called “nuisance” geese that almost never travel far from any of their home cities, even in the depths of winter.

And even though we often wish they would.

‘We can only blame ourselves’

Geese of the maxima breed have become a scourge of urban Canada and the United States. Typically weighing 12 to 18 pounds, they will sometimes commingle with their migrating cousins and even influence the behaviour of the visitors, altering their traditional travel patterns.

The giant Canadas are infamous for swarming parks and golf courses to graze on mowed lawns, for befouling recreational pathways and public beaches, and for hissing or even charging at humans who dare to walk or cycle too close to them.

These big geese drop gooey, greenish poop in prodigious quantities almost everywhere they go. They can be vectors for avian influenza and other pathogens. They can damage crops, degrade landscapes and even threaten vulnerable plant species because of their overabundance in many places. Around airports, they pose one of the most serious risks of all bird species for colliding with planes — their great size and flying behaviours intensifying the danger.

Not surprisingly, across the continent, nuisance populations of giant Canada geese have prompted extensive and expensive

municipal campaigns

of harassment using drones and dogs, birth control by egg-oiling or egg-addling (shaking) and — in relatively few instances, so far — straight-up killing of birds where numbers have swollen to unmanageable excess.

The birds can be hunted across Canada, typically in the fall — but only outside urban boundaries, of course. Hunting limits are sometimes eased to reduce goose populations, but the giant Canadas have learned that city living offers ample food supplies and affords excellent protection from predators — including humans with guns.

Many times, Runtz says, he has watched geese gather on the Rideau next to Carleton’s campus. Like everyone else at the university in recent years, he’s also seen the surfeit of nuisance geese clustered on campus green spaces, munching grass and relentlessly dumping turds on lawns and sidewalks, bike paths and parking lots.

For now, they are tolerated. But summing up the long-term challenge facing many Canadian and U.S. cities, Runtz says, “It may come to a point where the annoyance factor exceeds the desire to protect the animal.”

Like all Canada geese, the giants have some endearing traits. They mate for life and dote on their fuzzball yellow young. Their flocks form postcard armadas on mirror-like lakes, and they sometimes fly — even short distances — in those breathtaking phalanxes of honking vees.

Among the main reasons we have so many giant Canada geese in their namesake nation is because families love to watch them, hunters love to harvest them and — for about 25 years in the late 20th century — wildlife advocates eager to satisfy those two constituencies, as well as their own mandates, loved launching programs to build up Canada goose numbers.

“The animals are the innocent participants in this,” Runtz says of the continent’s giant Canada goose overpopulation crisis. “They never asked to be bred and nurtured. And so, we can only blame ourselves.”

The giant Canada geese on the river this day might be gathering to fly only a few minutes upstream, or to a stubbly cornfield on the outskirts of the city, or to an overnight roost on a cottage lake. They may well be coming soon to a playground or fairway near you.

But it’s easier to appreciate Branta canadensis maxima after learning that the giant Canada goose was thought to be vanished from the Earth less than a human lifetime ago.

‘Appears to be extinct’

Yes, you read that right. The largest subspecies of Canada goose that has overrun so many of our picnic grounds, soccer fields and business parks in the early 21st century was presumed extinct in the mid-20th, an apparent victim of generations of settlement-era overhunting and habitat destruction, particularly the draining of wetlands.

“The giant Canada goose appears to be extinct,” the renowned French-American ornithologist Jean Théodore Delacour wrote in his landmark 1954 treatise, The Waterfowl of the World. There were numerous such references to the bird’s demise in the scholarly literature of the time; the giant Canada was “forever gone,” as the distinguished Manitoba naturalist

Hans Albert Hochbaum

put it in his 1955 classic, Travels and Traditions of Waterfowl.

The backstory of B. canadensis maxima is complicated by the fact that research by Delacour and another famed ornithologist — California birder James Moffitt, namesake of a smaller West Coast subspecies called Branta canadensis moffitti — had only belatedly earned the scientific community’s recognition that the giant Canada goose ever existed at all, and wasn’t just a myth propagated by boastful hunters in the late 1800s and early 1900s.

Still, maxima was widely considered a lost life form until January 1962. That month, a group of wildlife experts in Minnesota sought the expertise of Dr. Harold Hanson — a goose specialist with the

Illinois Natural History Survey

— to help create a management plan for a mysterious flock of about 4,000 Canada geese wintering on a reservoir in the Upper Midwest state.

The geese had discovered an oasis of warm water in Silver Lake, an artificial widening of the Zumbro River just north of downtown Rochester, Minn. There, downstream discharges from an electrical power plant built in the 1930s kept the basin from freezing over even in the coldest weeks of the year.

The flock included a few dozen Canada geese originally kept in a nearby pond owned by the Mayo family — founders of Rochester’s world-famous medical clinic. Those ornamental birds had been relocated to Silver Lake in the 1940s, where they joined the migrant geese of unknown origin.

As the Rochester flock grew year after year in their “hot tub” reservoir, Minnesota wildlife officials became eager to know more about the habits and spring breeding grounds of the migrant birds — especially since local hunters were pushing for permission to start shooting.

Instead, state conservation authorities declared Silver Lake a wildlife refuge, protecting the flock. And when Hanson arrived in Rochester in mid-January 1962, a landmark moment in ornithological history was about to unfold.

He later wrote about his excitement at being given “the opportunity to solve this wildlife riddle … On that memorable day, the temperature held around zero and a strong wind blew, but this only added zest to the enterprise.” After firing a net gun to humanely trap some of the Silver Lake birds for study and banding, Hanson was struck by the enormous size of many of the geese, their six-foot-plus wing spans wider than those of the Illinois subspecies, B. canadensis interior, that he had been researching for years in his home state.

Some of the birds were weighed at a lakeside workstation. Hanson and his Minnesota colleagues were perplexed when the bigger geese they’d trapped tipped their scales at 14 pounds or more.

“The work proceeded smoothly, except for one hitch — we were obviously using faulty scales,” Hanson recounted in his 1965 masterwork,

The Giant Canada Goose

. “The only question was, ‘How faulty?’ ”

A team member purchased a 10-pound bag of flour and five pounds of sugar from a local grocer. Both weights were verified on a scale at the store.

“Upon our return to the banding site, a quick test of the scales revealed that the ‘impossible weights’ we had been getting were correct,” Hanson wrote. “Now we knew beyond question that we were dealing with a very large race. But what race? The giant Canada goose had been repeatedly written into extinction and could not be a possibility.”

Hanson reread the research by Delacour and other authorities who had gathered testimonials about giant Canada geese — some beyond 20 pounds — from birders and hunters a generation ago, or more. He compared their descriptions with the traits of the Silver Lake geese.

Only then, he wrote, “did I realize that the Rochester flock had to be Branta canadensis maxima!”

Scientists like Harold Hanson don’t use exclamation marks lightly. The discovery on Silver Lake was monumental, and he knew it.

The next step was identifying the spring nesting sites of the migrant birds and launching a full-scale recovery and repopulation effort.

Hanson traced the giant Canadas’ primary breeding grounds to south-central Manitoba — the Interlake region, a world-renowned habitat for ducks and geese between Lake Manitoba and Lake Winnipeg, and a few other waterfowl refuges in the southern part of the province.

News of Hanson’s discoveries was soon grabbing headlines across North America. “Extinct Canada Geese Found in Vast Flocks,” read a Hamilton Spectator story published Sept. 1, 1962. A Canadian Press reporter, who interviewed Hanson during his late-summer visit to the Delta Waterfowl Research Station on the south shore of Lake Manitoba, recounted the scientist’s eureka moment with the Silver Lake flock: “He discovered the birds were the rare giant Canada goose, believed for years to have gone the way of the Dodo.”

The news broke months before the U.S. Department of the Interior finally issued a formal statement celebrating Hanson’s accomplishment.

“The world’s largest wild goose, the giant Canada, which for over thirty years was thought to be extinct, has been rediscovered in Minnesota,” the agency proclaimed in April 1963. “… Dr. Hanson is credited with discovering that the giant goose is not only still around, but even appears to have a sizable population that is adapting to man’s changes of its environment.”

The U.S. government’s highlighting of the giant Canada goose’s apparent adaptability to human-altered landscapes was an omen that might have raised some red flags, or at least a few questions.

Honk if you see where this is going.

‘Play havoc with air traffic’

To say there was widespread excitement in North America over the rediscovery of the giant Canada goose is seriously understating the maxima fervour sparked by Hanson’s 1962 achievement. Over the next quarter-century, there was a concerted push by countless conservation groups, hunting clubs, local governments, state agencies, provincial ministries, research institutes, private landowners and others to ensure that the lost-and-found subspecies would rebound spectacularly from the brink of extinction.

But it was becoming clear as early as the mid-1970s that a potential problem was developing. A giant Canadas breeding project on Toronto Island offered a glimpse of what was to come after many well-intentioned stakeholders — including the Ontario government — secured breeding pairs and got into the game of raising wild geese.

“All wildlife agencies around the Great Lakes were electrified by the news and not the least of these was Ontario’s Department of Lands and Forests,” reported the Hamilton Spectator in March 1975, recalling Hanson’s discovery in Minnesota more than a decade earlier and the continental goose-reproduction juggernaut it set in motion.

“The few precious pairs of giant geese were divided among the various agencies, with Ontario being fortunate enough to acquire enough breeders and eggs to form the nucleus of what, today, is an ever-expanding giant Canada goose population that numbers in the thousands.”

On Toronto Island, though, the situation was “good and bad,” the Spectator reported.

“The habitat must be good for geese, because the original flock of one goose, one gander and five goslings planted in 1969 has increased to approximately 1,000 birds,” the newspaper noted after interviewing provincial conservation officer Ken Faulkner.

“At the same time, the situation is bad for the geese. It would be fine if they confined their activities to the large parkland of lawns and trees, the numerous lagoons and some untouched islands. However, some of the geese nest and graze close to the Island airport.

“A negligent gosling can scare the daylights out of pilots and play havoc with air traffic, Mr. Faulkner said.”

The solution? According to the story, during nesting season each spring, more than 200 eggs were collected from Toronto Island and “packed in wood shavings and delivered the same day to the Orillia Rod and Gun Club for incubation.” After six or seven weeks, the 120 or so surviving hatchlings were “distributed to various points to strengthen or establish new flocks.”

Multiply that resounding success story a few thousand times across Canada and the U.S., and the origin of the 21st-century giant Canada goose crisis comes into sharp focus.

‘Exponential’ population growth

Return of the Giants, an award-winning Canadian nature documentary that aired nationally on CBC in 1972, perfectly captured the spirit of the times. Narrated by Ottawa-born actor Lorne Greene of Bonanza fame, the film chronicles the success of a Guelph, Ont.-based goose-breeding project and includes scenes where filmmakers John and Janet Foster hand-feed a friendly flock of giant Canadas from the shore of an urban lake.

By 1996, University of Western Ontario zoologist Davison Ankney was warning that North America’s maxima breeding programs had produced uncontrollably “exponential” population growth and “alarming” results, including the draining of wetlands by some private landowners as a “permanent solution to their ‘goose problems.’”

“Although current populations of these birds, once thought extinct, represent a major achievement of waterfowl management, it is clear that there are too many of these birds in many areas,” Ankney wrote in the Journal of Wildlife Management, advocating much looser restrictions on hunting the bids.

Illinois waterfowl ecologist Dr. Auriel Fournier, who conducts research with the same organization where Hanson carried out his groundbreaking work in the 1960s, acknowledges the failure of wildlife agencies, scientists and governments to foresee the runaway overpopulation of giant Canada geese.

“The problem we have is actually of our own making,” she said. “It is a conservation success story, even if it is also very much a problem.”

Hanson, who died at age 85 in 2003, was long gone before Fournier joined the INHS’s

Forbes Biological Station

in 2019. Now the station director, she said Hanson left a proud legacy among Illinois naturalists despite the modern-day fallout from his rediscovery of the giant Canada goose.

“Broadly across wildlife management, we have a lot of examples where we’ve moved animals around the landscape for a goal that was perhaps a good one, and it had some unintended consequences,” she said.

“I don’t think anyone predicted how well Canada geese would learn to take advantage of urban landscapes, right? I one-hundred-per-cent understand people’s frustration with Canada geese. I often try to help them see it, maybe, through a little more positive lens — like these animals are amazing adapters. They have learned how to live with us, and that’s not an easy thing to do.”

At the same time, Fournier says the ever-increasing numbers of nuisance geese in major cities — Chicago among them, in her state — likely means a difficult reckoning around the wider use of lethal goose-population controls in the future.

She says research has shown that goose deterrence strategies — whether dogs or

drones

or the

remote-control toy dune buggy

recently deployed by the City of Ottawa at the Mooney’s Bay beach — don’t seem to work effectively over the long term: “Especially smarter animals, like a goose, if they learn that the thing doesn’t kill them and the resource they want is still there, they’re going to come back.”

Dr. Stephen Havera

, a semi-retired emeritus scientist with the INHS, worked for decades with Hanson.

“We had a lot of interaction over the years, and camaraderie,” says Havera, remembering his late colleague’s inexhaustible passion for studying Canada geese, and collecting specimens of the various subspecies everywhere around the continent.

He describes Hanson’s rediscovery of maxima as “a major victory” for wildlife conservation, “to the point where now there’s several million of them, for something that was thought to be extinct … I mean, it’s like the comeback of the bald eagle once we got rid of DDT.”

Havera, author of his own landmark 1999 volume on ducks, geese and other Midwest bird life, The Waterfowl of Illinois, described the overpopulation challenge with giant Canada geese as “a tough nut to crack.”

“They’re so adaptive to interaction with humans,” says Havera, noting how giant Canadas have thrived thanks to the postwar expansion of manicured parkland, including golf courses and other sports fields, as well as ornamental ponds in urban and suburban America.

“There’s no hunting pressure on them or anything else,” he notes, running through some of the management efforts aimed at cutting the severe surplus of resident Canada geese in the Chicago area: harassment campaigns, landscape modification, even slaughtering some of the birds and supplying the meat to city food banks.

“They’ve tried everything they can, but a lot of times Mother Nature is a lot smarter than we are,” he says. Giant Canada geese “are so adaptive they’re nesting on the rooftops of those big buildings in Chicago.”

Nonetheless, Havera confesses to a deep affection for Canada geese. On a pond at his rural Illinois property, he’s built nesting structures to attract breeding pairs that produce goslings every year.

“I enjoy watching the young ones.”

Havera says Hanson “would not be surprised by the degree of adaptability of these creatures. Obviously, they were almost killed off because they were so big and probably somewhat vulnerable historically. But I would say that he’s probably kind of grinning a little bit.”

Accused of causing near-disaster

In January 2009, a collision with a flock of Canada geese famously knocked out both engines of United Airways Flight 1549 shortly after takeoff from New York City’s LaGuardia Airport. Pilot Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger, in what’s been hailed as one of the greatest feats of flying in aviation history, ditched the plane in the Hudson River and saved all 155 lives on board.

The “

Miracle on the Hudson

” ignited a debate in the weeks and months following the averted disaster about how New York and other cities — especially along airport flight paths — should deal with the overabundance of non-migrating giant Canada geese.

The debate led to swift action. Out of an estimated 20,000 resident maxima inhabiting New York City at the time, more than 1,200 were killed that summer.

“The exercise was politely termed a round up, not an extermination, but none of the geese herded out of the water with kayaks and corralled behind plastic barriers would live to see the autumn leaves,” the New York Times reported in October 2009. “Instead, they were packed in turkey crates and taken away to be gassed … The city had had its vengeance.”

But there was an interesting footnote to the cull. Ornithologists with the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C., and the Field Museum in Chicago compared the goose feathers recovered from the plane’s engines with the world’s largest research collection of Canada goose specimens in a bid to determine the geographic origin of the “culprit” birds in the downing of Flight 1549.

Using isotope analysis of the materials under study, the scientists were able to determine conclusively that the geese struck by the passenger jet were not, in fact, resident giant Canadas living year-round in New York, but a flock of migratory birds that had flown from Labrador to spend the winter of 2009 on the Atlantic shore in the southeast corner of New York state. The giants were innocent.

The solving of the mystery and — in a sense — the exoneration of the giant Canada goose in the forced ditching of Flight 1549 would not have been possible, the researchers noted, without the “truly amazing collection of Canada geese made by wildfowl biologist Harold Hanson.” The hundreds of carcasses Hanson had collected during his career had been donated to the Field Museum after his death and before the Miracle on the Hudson.

Saving Wilson

In Ottawa, Runtz has recently begun clearing out his office at Carleton University, a one-of-a-kind workspace stuffed with dozens upon dozens of taxidermied mammal, reptile and bird specimens, including several Canada geese.

He’s one of the country’s keenest observers of animal behaviour — so widely regarded for his expertise that he served as

a wolf-howling consultant

on one of Sir David Attenborough’s nature documentaries, 2024’s Secret World of Sound.

He recently walked among a herd of several dozen giant Canadas feasting and lounging on mowed grass near the university’s main entrance. The birds exhibited only mild wariness, taking a few steps left or right as the bemused biologist passed by.

They were equally reluctant to move aside when a speeding cyclist sounded his horn, a mimicked goose honk. The cyclist was forced to brake as the birds sauntered too slowly off a bike path strewn with plops of their poop.

Scientific studies suggest the Canada goose has been around in roughly its current form for nearly three million years. That’s about one million years before human beings began to definitively distinguish themselves from their fellow apes.

Canada geese have been seriously annoying humans for about 30 years, or .0001 per cent of their evolutionary history. The birds have a backstory beyond our imagining.

Runtz, an award-winning wildlife advocate, said he’s reluctantly concluded that authorities in many North American jurisdictions will eventually have to carry out highly unpopular lethal culls to get their goose problems under control.

“It’s tough,” he says. “We played God with the species initially, bringing back its numbers way beyond what they were originally. But if you try to play God and control their numbers, then you’re the devil … It’s always going to be a conundrum.”

While killing nuisance geese might make sense to many Canadians, the

survival story of “Wilson”

— a wounded goose in British Columbia that became the focus of a high-profile, grassroots rescue mission earlier this year — offers another perspective.

Squamish nature photographer Tim Cyr says he first spotted the injured bird in July 2024. Someone had shot the goose with an arrow that became firmly lodged in its rump. Amazingly, the impaled animal was not severely disabled by the arrow’s tip or the long shaft sticking out of its backside. It had evidently flown with the embedded object to Squamish from Sechelt — a distance of nearly 100 km — based on an earlier sighting.

For seven months, Cyr tracked the goose’s movements in and around Squamish, making several failed attempts to capture the bird and get the arrow removed. The mission of mercy attracted media attention, cash donations and offers of help in the field. (Wilson was named by Cyr for the beat-up volleyball in the 2000 Tom Hanks film Cast Away, which keeps the Hanks character company during the years he is stranded on a remote island following a plane crash.)

There was an obvious question. Why, in an era when it’s conceivable many Canadians would approve of the lethal reduction of thousands of Canada geese across the country, would Cyr expend such effort to save a single wounded goose?

“I just love wildlife,” says Cyr, 68. “And it was an injury that was human-caused. Once I’d seen that, I thought, ‘There’s no way.’ I’ve got to help him, right? So, I tried.”

The breakthrough came in January, when Cyr was contacted by B.C. naturalist and wildlife consultant Myles Lamont, who offered his help. Critically, Lamont — owner of Surrey, B.C.-based TerraFauna Wildlife Consulting — said he could offer a net gun for safely trapping birds and decades of professional know-how in dealing with wild animals.

Lamont captured Wilson on Jan. 14 at the Furry Creek Golf and Country Club. The goose was initially cared for by Maple Ridge, B.C., veterinarian Dr. Adrian Walton — who removed the arrow and treated Wilson’s wound for possible infections — before the patient was transferred to a wildlife shelter on Vancouver Island for two months of recovery and rehabilitation.

In late March, the healed creature was released by Cyr at a park in Squamish, where the bird immediately flew across a field to join a flock of other Canada geese. The

bird’s release

and the team behind its rescue were featured that night on CBC’s The National.

“We have an inherent obligation to treat all animals with some sort of moral and ethical intention,” Lamont said of his role in the Wilson saga. “Why do we lend hands to anyone who’s in need of support? I think that’s just part of the human experience. In this particular case, somebody clearly went out of their way to cause harm to this particular goose and, fortunately, didn’t succeed. And, you know, a few dedicated folks took it upon themselves to try to make amends, I guess.”

Lamont echoes the views of Runtz and other experts who regret the circumstances that have led to so many giant Canada geese across the country living without their natural migratory instincts in urban environments that encourage “nuisance” behaviours and lead inevitably to human-wildlife conflicts.

“They’ve taken advantage of an environmental niche that we’ve created for them, and they’ve done very well at it. They’ve exploited that opportunity,” he said.

“We’ve kind of created a problem for ourselves — as well as the birds — because the amount of natural predation they’re facing is significantly less than what they would have faced before we arrived on the continent … We’ve thrown the ecosystem out of whack. Now we’re forced to do some human management and interfere.

“But we’re really just stuck picking up a mess that we created for ourselves.”


The John Sopinka Courthouse in Hamilton, Ont.

A Portuguese immigrant ordered deported six years ago for his role in the killing of a McMaster University mechanical engineering student has won a chance to restore his status as a permanent resident.

Luis Carlos Rebelo was initially convicted of manslaughter in 2017 and sentenced to over eight years in prison for his role in the group attack on Tyler Johnson, who died of a gunshot wound inflicted by another man. Johnson was gunned down in Hamilton during an early-morning altercation on Nov. 30, 2013, in front of Vida La Pita, a restaurant on King Street West at Caroline, just west of Hess Village.

Police described Johnson’s murder as a “co-ordinated attack carried out by a number of suspects.”

Three other men — Chad Davidson and brothers Brandon and Joshua Barreira — were convicted of first-degree murder for Johnson’s death. At least one of his killers, Joshua Barreira, claimed to have been in the area that night, driving a Jaguar and selling crack cocaine. He also claimed to have known Johnson since they were teens, and that Johnson had punched one of his assailants in the face before he was shot. His mother disputed that Johnson had known his killers.

Johnson, 30, was a fourth-year engineering student at McMaster when he died. He had reportedly just earned a scholarship for a master’s degree in mechanical engineering at the same school.

“He was taking school really seriously and had really high dreams and high hopes for himself,” a former girlfriend told CBC after his death.

In 2019, Canadian immigration authorities found Rebelo, a permanent resident at the time, “inadmissible for serious criminality and issued a deportation order that required him to leave Canada,” according to a recent Federal Court decision.

Immigration officials dismissed Rebelo’s appeal of the deportation order at the time because, according to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), a “permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of serious criminality” if they are sentenced to more than six months in jail.

Rebelo launched an appeal of that decision in September 2020 after the Ontario Court of Appeal allowed his appeal of his criminal conviction and ordered a new trial on the manslaughter charge.

“Believing he was no longer barred by the (IRPA) Mr. Rebelo applied for an extension of time to appeal his deportation order to (Canada’s Immigration Appeal Division, known as IAD). The IAD denied the request. In a February 2022 decision, the IAD found it did not have jurisdiction ‘at the current time’” and that Rebelo’s “application was premature.”

Rebelo then “successfully appealed his manslaughter conviction,” Federal Court Justice Christine Pallotta wrote in a recent decision.

At Rebelo’s new criminal trial in December 2022, he pleaded guilty to the lesser offence of counselling to commit aggravated assault, Pallotta said in her decision, dated Oct. 29.

“The judge sentenced him to six months less a day in prison. The prosecutor withdrew the manslaughter charge.”

But in December 2023 the IAD dismissed Rebelo’s appeal of his removal order, deciding it didn’t have the jurisdiction to hear the case.

Rebelo is a Portuguese citizen who has lived in Canada for 35 years, “since he was three years old,” Pallotta said.

He was a permanent resident of Canada but lost that status when he was ordered deported in 2019.

At the heart of the matter lies a section of the IRPA that has been interpreted in two ways in legal precedents.

One interpretation indicates that if a person successfully appeals a criminal conviction that landed them in jail for more than six months, they have the right to appeal their removal order.

According to the other precedent, “the only relevant sentence is the one that existed at the time the person was found inadmissible,” Pallotta said. “In other words, the appeal right is lost when a permanent resident is found inadmissible and it cannot be restored by a successful criminal appeal; however, going forward, the Minister cannot use an order that is based on an overturned conviction to deport the person from Canada.”

According to Pallotta’s recent decision, the IAD “preferred” the second precedent. It “barred” Rebelo’s appeal of his deportation order handed down six years ago.

Rebelo argued not allowing him to appeal his deportation order leaves him “stuck in limbo” and “without immigration status because of an unappealable deportation order that cannot be used to deport him but still affects him. Now a foreign national, he has no legal right to work or access provincial health care, is ineligible for Canadian citizenship, and cannot obtain permanent resident status without the (Immigration) Minister’s approval,” said the recent decision.

“Foreign nationals also face a heightened risk of immigration detention and can be deported for less serious offences.”

Lawyers representing Immigration Minister Lena Diab argued Canada’s IAD considered Rebelo’s “arguments and properly rejected them,” said the recent Federal Court decision.

The Immigration Act, they argued, “expressly limits the availability of an IAD appeal, consistent with Parliament’s objective of prioritizing national security to expeditiously remove people who are ordered deported for serious criminality. Mr. Rebelo remains inadmissible for serious criminality and the change to his conviction and sentence did not restore his immigration status or the appeal rights he lost when he was found inadmissible.”

Pallotta sided with Rebelo.

“I am granting Mr. Rebelo’s application,” said the judge.

“In my opinion, the IAD’s reasoning process and the outcome it reached do not withstand reasonableness review. The decision exhibits two fundamental flaws that render it unreasonable: a failure of rationality in the reasoning process and a failure to justify the decision in view of the relevant constraints bearing on it.”

Pallotta sent Rebelo’s case back to a different IAD panel for “reconsideration.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The union that represents pilots at Air Transat says it will ask its members to give them the authority to go on strike if an agreement can’t be reached by Dec. 10.

In an email to National Post, the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) said it’s been in negotiations with the Canadian airline since the start of the year, and that the two sides entered conciliation on Sept. 19. That is expected to last until Nov. 18. If an agreement is not reached by then, a 21-day cooling-off period would begin, with a strike possible on Dec. 10.

“The pilots’ negotiating team reported that talks have been frustratingly slow, with the company spending minimal time at the bargaining table and taking months to submit counterproposals,”

the union said

.

“This slow pace has only widened the gap between the pilots’ demands — aimed at achieving industry-standard pay and working conditions — and the company’s inadequate and, at times, deeply disappointing offers.”

It’s been a busy couple of years for labour disruptions in the airline industry. In August, flight attendants at Air Canada staged a three-day strike and ignored a federal return-to-work order before returning to the bargaining table on their own accord.

The previous summer, a strike by airline mechanics at WestJet disrupted travel plans over the Canada Day long weekend. Flight attendants at that airline have a contract that ends Dec. 31, though there is no indication yet of a possible strike.

Meanwhile, most recent contract with Air Transat pilots had lasted 10 years

before expiring

at the end of April.

“Our pilots have carried this airline through a decade of challenges, often at the expense of their own quality of life,” said Air Transat Master Executive Council chair Capt. Bradley Small. “The result is that our members are still stuck with outdated working conditions and some of the weakest benefits in the industry.”

He added: “We lag behind our peers in virtually every aspect of pay, benefits, and job security. This is not about special treatment. It’s about catching up to 2025. It’s time to modernize the contract.”

National Post has reached out to Air Transat for comment.

Founded in 1931, ALPA represents more than 80,000 pilots at 43 airlines in the United States and Canada, including some 700 at Air Transat.

Headquartered in Montreal with a second hub in Toronto,

Air Transat

started operations in 1987 and operates a fleet of approximately

43 Airbus aircraft

. It is known for flying to holiday destinations in Europe in the summer, and warm-weather destinations in the winter.

“We do not want to strike,” Small said. “We want a modern contract that reflects the work we do. But if a walkout is what it takes, we are ready to do it, and we’re confident that our 700 members will overwhelmingly give us that authority.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The proportion of Torontonians who strongly disapprove of Mayor Olivia Chow's performance is now triple that who strongly approve, according to a new survey.

While Torontonians are evenly split on their mayor’s handling of the job, the proportion who strongly disapprove of Olivia Chow’s performance is rising, according to a

new Leger poll.

Older Torontonians also feel differently than younger ones about Chow’s performance.

The poll found that as many Metro Toronto residents generally approve (43 per cent) or disapprove (43 per cent) of the way Chow has managed the city’s affairs. In a June poll, 48 per cent of people approved of her performance.

The proportion that strongly disapprove (27 per cent) is up 10 points since then — now triple the nine per cent who strongly approve.

“These are unprecedented times and affordability is a huge issue across the board in this country and province, housing in particular in Toronto,” said Jennifer McLeod Macey, Leger’s senior vice-president of public affairs.

“When we look at affordability, any mayor is going to have a honeymoon phase, and that honeymoon phase on affordability is going to be short,” she said.

“People want to see change they can feel, not just hear. I think perhaps not enough has happened since June.”

“(Chow’s) approval is solid. It’s just now that it’s evenly matched by disapproval. And I think in this case, what’s standing out is the increase in strong disapproval,” McLeod Macey said.

A former NDP member of parliament, Chow was elected mayor of Canada’s largest city in 2023 following the sudden resignation of John Tory over an affair with a political staffer only a few short months after winning his third term. Chow took a previous run for the post in 2014, placing third behind Doug Ford, now premier of Ontario, and Tory, who became mayor.

 Olivia Chow is applauded by supporters as she celebrates her win at an election night event in Toronto on Monday, June 26, 2023.

Chow campaigned on a pledge to work to build a city “more caring, affordable and safe.” In a city where half rent their homes, Chow promised to fight renovictions, boost support for renters and build more affordable rental homes.

She’s pushed back against the Ford government’s plan to restrict bike lanes and ban speed cameras. “Do we just let them rip away our best tool for protecting our kids,” Chow asked at a recent school safety zone summit.

This week,

she faced backlash for comments on Israel and Gaza

made at a weekend fundraising gala held by the National Council of Canadian Muslims. In a brief clip circulating on social media, Chow said, “the genocide in Gaza impacts us all.”

“A common bond to shared humanity is tested and I will speak out when children anywhere are feeling the pain and violence and hunger,” she added.

In a social media post, Tafsik Organization, a Canadian Jewish civil rights group, denounced Chow’s comments as “disgraceful, reckless and dangerously irresponsible.”

Leger’s survey measuring Chow’s approval was part of a

broader Leger poll on Ontario politics

that found Ontarians are growing more pessimistic, with the majority convinced their province is heading in the wrong direction.

When Metro Toronto respondents were asked their opinion of Chow’s performance, 43 per cent strongly (nine per cent) or somewhat (34 per cent) said they approve of the way she has performed in her job, while 43 per cent somewhat (16 per cent) or strongly (27 per cent) disapproved. Fourteen per cent said they weren’t sure how they felt, up four points.

Those age 35 and older were more likely to dislike Chow’s handling of municipal affairs since becoming Toronto’s 66th mayor, “while young adults 18-34 are more likely to have soft approval,” Leger reported. Forty-five per cent of the 18-34 age cohort said they “somewhat approve” of Chow’s performance, compared to just 28 per cent of the 55-plus group.

Fifty-nine per cent of those 55 and older were somewhat (24 per cent) or strongly (35 per cent) unhappy with Chow’s performance as mayor.

“Younger Torontonians like the ideas. Older Torontonians want to see the delivery,” McLeod Macey said.

“I think it comes down to what she stands for. So, affordability, housing — it’s the younger Torontonians who are feeling the crunch more than those who are older,” McLeod Macey said. “It’s more her empathy and compassion in this space that speaks directly to them. Older Torontonians are perhaps more likely to be established, to have a home and not be feeling the higher cost of living as painfully.

“The older you are than 35, the more skeptical you’re going to be. It’s a generational divide in terms of patience,” McLeod Macey said. “But housing is Chow’s strong suit. And Torontonians are still behind her on that.”

Those who endorsed Chow’s performance were more likely to support housing policies like freezing rent increases for one year in cities where rents rise more than five per cent annually, or clearing homeless encampments only if alternative shelter or housing is available for everyone who is displaced.

Overall, women were twice as likely (18 per cent) as men (nine per cent) to say they were unsure how they felt about Chow.

Toronto’s next mayoral election will be held Oct. 26, 2026.

The polling was conducted between Oct. 10 and 13 and Oct. 17 and 20, among an online survey of 1,052 Ontario residents aged 18 and older. The sample included 461 Greater Toronto Area residents and 591 Toronto (metro) residents.

While no margin of error can be associated with a non-probability sample (a web panel in this case), for comparative purposes, a probability sample of 1,052 respondents would have a margin of error of plus or minus three per cent, 19 times out of 20.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Anti-Israel protesters disrupted an event organized by Students Supporting Israel and held near the Toronto Metropolitan University campus on Wednesday afternoon. This photo shows protesters holding a rally against Israel at TMU in April 2024.

An event sponsored by Toronto Metropolitan University student group Students Supporting Israel was disrupted Wednesday afternoon by a group of anti-Israel demonstrators who forced their way into the building.

The event was part of an annual tour where Israel Defence Forces soldiers speak on university campuses.

At approximately 2 p.m. the Toronto Police Service posted on X that officers had responded to “reports that a group of demonstrators has forced their way into a building” at Elm and Bay streets, near the TMU campus.

One person had reported injuries, states the post.

A female TMU student who does not wish to be identified, fearing for her safety, told NP that she was accosted as she tried to enter the event. She says a young woman was shouting at her and videoing her. She said she could not identify her assailant, as the other woman was fully masked except for her eyes.

The protest against the event was organized by another TMU student group known as Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP).

An

Instagram post from SJP

provided details about when and where to protest. The post stated: “TMU has once again allowed a registered student group to invite Zionist murderers to our city. Students will not have it.”

The National Post reached out to TMU for comment but was unable to reach anyone in the administration before publication.

The female student is supportive of SJP’s right to protest, but not in a violent manner. “It was chaos outside. The police were taking the protesters out, but they were pushing against the police to get back in.”

She did not see any arrests.

However, she wants TMU’s administration to take the violence seriously. “I would like the university to take action against these students. The SJP should not be allowed to act this way.”

Hillel Ontario

represents Jewish students on university campuses.

Jay Solomon, the organization’s chief advancement officer told NP that “a lot of students came to Hillel (after the protest) with concerns for their safety.”

Since the October 7 attacks in Israel, Jewish students have faced “virulent anti-Semitism,” he says. “Jewish students need to have a safe place to learn.”

He says Hillel is calling on TMU to hold the students responsible for today’s events accountable.

An X post from Am Yisrael Chai posted late Wednesday afternoon stated that a “masked mob” stormed the private event and one person was hurt by shattered glass and several students had to be hospitalized.

Neither of these statements or accompanying video is verifiable at the present time.

A Wednesday afternoon

Instagram post

by a user who identifies himself as Michael Kaminisky claims to show a bleeding wrist of someone who was allegedly hurt in the protest. This video is also unconfirmed.

The post states: “Masked attackers have violently caused serious injury to soldiers who were invited as guest speakers by @ssi_tmu as a part of the annual IDF soldiers speaking on campus tour. Police are on scene and there is no current update on any arrests.”

The National Post has reached out to the Toronto Police Service for comment.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.