LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Pierre Moreau, Quebec Liberal Party candidate in the riding of Châteauguay in the 2018 Quebec general election..

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney has picked a veteran Quebec politician who joined the Senate less than a year ago to become his representative in the upper chamber.

Pierre Moreau, who held a variety of cabinet roles in Quebec’s Liberal governments for 15 years, was appointed to the Senate in September 2024. He will be replacing former senator Marc Gold as the government’s representative. Gold bid farewell to the Senate in June at the mandatory retirement age of 75.

“Senator Moreau’s expertise and experience will advance the government’s legislative agenda to bring down costs, keep communities safe, and build one strong Canadian economy,” said a press release issued Friday morning by Carney’s office.

Carney thanked Gold for his “many years of service” standing for the government in the Senate, which Gold has been doing since 2020, and wished him well on his retirement.

The government representative in the Senate is usually the main point of contact between the government and the upper chamber. His main role is to bring forward the government’s legislation in the Senate and shepherd its passage through the chamber.

The representative can also attend cabinet meetings and is responsible for answering questions on behalf of the government in the Senate,

according to the Senate’s website.

Even though Moreau is new to the Senate, his experience in legal and political circles spans over four decades. He worked as a lawyer in Montreal before he was first elected in 2003 as a member of the Quebec legislature under then premier Jean Charest.

Moreau was defeated in the 2007 provincial election, but was re-elected in 2008, 2012 and 2014. During those years, he served as minister of intergovernmental affairs, transport, education, energy and natural resources and as president of the province’s Treasury Board.

After Charest resigned in 2012, Moreau was a candidate in the Liberal Party of Quebec’s leadership race to succeed him in 2013. Moreau ended up in second place, after Philippe Couillard.

Couillard would go on to serve only one term as Liberal premier, from 2014 to 2018. His government was defeated over spending cuts that ultimately balanced the province’s books, but paved the way for CAQ Leader François Legault’s first majority mandate in 2018.

Moreau lost his seat that year and returned to practice law, while occasionally appearing as a political commentator on Radio-Canada’s television and radio programs.

Moreau was appointed to the Senate by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in September 2024 and represents the Laurentian region, north of Montreal. He will turn 68 in December, which means he is more than seven years away from the Senate’s mandatory retirement age.

In his maiden speech in the Senate, on June 10, Moreau thanked Gold, his predecessor, for his help and advice in the early stages of his time in the Senate.

“Parliamentarism implies that we can sometimes oppose the ideas of others, even vehemently. However, such opposition must never come at the cost of respect for those who express them,” Moreau said.

“I will therefore draw on your teachings and, like you, I will always keep my door open to talk and discuss with my colleagues,” he added.

Last year, Moreau tabled

Bill S-219 in hopes of establishing a “judicial independence day”

in Canada each year on January 11. He said current events around the world make it necessary, more than ever, to reinforce the independence of the judiciary in Canada.

“In Canada, it is easy to take for granted that these cardinal rules are part of the founding principles of any democratic society. However, as we know, all democracies are fragile, and Canada is no exception,” he said.

Moreau also claimed in his speech that there are Canadian politicians “who have suddenly and inexplicably thought it wise to criticize the courts and judges and publicly challenge their decisions.”

“The direct consequence of these criticisms and attacks is to erode public confidence in the administration of justice and undermine the authority of the courts,” he said.

Moreau was a member of the Progressive Senate Group caucus until his nomination as the government representative.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Residential buildings rise up in Dartmouth, N.S., on June 17, 2025.



TIM KROCHAK PHOTO

Canada is struggling with the effects of an unprecedented immigration boom: Housing shortages, youth unemployment, overtaxed social programs and more.

But in Atlantic Canada, those irritants are largely overshadowed by a much different story: the transformation of moribund and stagnant economies that made the region Canada’s poor cousin.

The authors of a new book detail the dramatic improvements newcomers are bringing to the East Coast — and argue this is no time to swerve. They argue only for a more strategic immigration policy, one that reflects the region’s economic needs.

In Toward Prosperity, The Transformation of Atlantic Canada’s Economy, former pollster Don Mills and economist David Campbell highlight how increasing immigration in the past five years has boosted the economy of a stagnant region with the oldest population in the country.

“Provincial governments across Atlantic Canada have finally understood the implications for an aging population and the need for population growth: all four provinces in the region now have population growth strategies, with immigration as a core focus of those strategies,” they write.

Nova Scotia seeks to double its population to two million by 2060, and New Brunswick, where the population was pegged at 854,355 last year, is aiming for one million people within the decade, according to their 2025 book published by Halifax-based Nimbus.

“Most of the region’s largest municipalities now have their own population growth strategies as well,” Mills and Campbell write. “All these population strategies acknowledge the critical role of immigration to drive labour force and population growth.”

Last year, after three years of especially rapid growth in Canada’s immigration population, the Liberals under Justin Trudeau announced they were reducing the number of permanent residents admitted to the country by 21 per cent. Earlier this year, Prime Minister Mark Carney pledged to cap the total number of temporary workers and international students to less than five per cent of Canada’s population within two years.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre this month called for “very hard caps” on the number of newcomers allowed into the country. He told reporters the country has struggled to integrate newcomers and he wants to see more people leaving than coming in “while we catch up.”

“We have millions of people whose permits will expire over the next couple of years, and many of them will leave,” Poilievre said. “We need more people leaving than coming for the next couple years.”

In 2022, the Canadian population rose by over a million people for the first time in history — and then kept growing faster. According to Statistics Canada, the population reached 40,769,890 on Jan. 1, 2024. That was an increase of 1,271,872 people in a single year — a 3.2 per cent jump, marking the highest annual population growth rate in Canada since 1957.

In an interview, Mills said Atlantic Canada needs smarter and targeted immigration.

“I believe in growth under control,” Mills said. “It got a little out of hand under the Trudeau Liberals. They opened the gates too quickly and it really hurt the housing market and put strains on our health-care and education systems for sure.”

Prince Edward Island was the first Atlantic province to boost immigration levels, he said. The littlest province has been among the country’s leaders in economic growth since. But the island’s population growth rate peaked at three per cent in 2023 — too much, too fast, Mills says.

“We argue in the book for growth under control — somewhere between one and 1.5 per cent is something that we can manage. We still have an ageing population in Atlantic Canada; we need people to fill the jobs of the large group of Baby Boomers who are retiring from the workforce and there’s simply not enough people behind to fill the jobs that we already have. Not just what we have, but what we need to further grow the economy.”

Mills sees the current immigration rethink as a wise thing, as Ottawa figures out the right number of newcomers. It would be a mistake though, both he and Campbell argue, if the Carney government didn’t listen to individual provinces about their immigration needs, including on international student numbers.

“We’ve had really great immigration into places like Miramichi (N.B.), into places like Summerside (P.E.I.), and even in places like Yarmouth (N.S.) and I worry that’s all going to be lost if they keep clamping down on these numbers,” Campbell said.

“Cutting workforce, in our opinion, is like cutting capital. You need three things to have a strong economy. You need capital, you need people, and you need ideas. And if you don’t have one of those three, you’re going to be in trouble.”

Mills uses his own business as an example: When he sold his polling firm, now known as Narrative Research, in late 2018, Mills, along with his son and brother, acquired Cabco, an infrastructure cabling business. Since the purchase in the spring of 2019, the company has grown from 40 to 100 employees.

“We’re continuously recruiting for people,” he said. “It’s hard to find skilled people.”

The company turned to immigrants to help fill the gap. “They’re great workers,” Mills said. “They have a certain ambition that sometimes seems lacking in native-born Canadians.”

In the early 2000s, as young, educated and ambitious immigrants flocked to other parts of Canada, Atlantic Canada had a workforce problem, which left businesses reluctant to invest in the region. “They were not sure there was going to be enough workers,” Campbell said.

In their book, the authors describe Atlantic Canada as being “in the early stage of an economic renaissance” fueled by immigration.

“One of the main reasons why we’re optimistic is because we’ve seen … record levels of population growth across the region, even in Newfoundland and Labrador now, and we feel that will be the impetus for the rest of what needs to happen, such as natural resources development,” Campbell said.

If the region could maintain a “modest level of population growth through immigration,” its future would be “fairly bright,” Campbell said.

The authors point again to P.E.I. The province was able to leverage a greater share of the federal immigration allotment to develop its biosciences and aerospace sectors.

Mills points to the island’s BioAlliance, a private sector-led not-for-profit organization dedicated to building the bioscience industry in P.E.I. that just celebrated its 20th anniversary. “Over that period of time they’ve grown it to … 60 companies and the last time I looked their annual revenues were exceeding $600 million — mostly export dollars, which are really valuable.”

As many as 3,000 people are employed in the cluster, Mills said, equating it to auto manufacturing in Ontario.

The authors make a series of other recommendations to maintain East Coast economic momentum, including “becoming a green energy superpower” by setting up offshore wind power platforms off places like Sable Island, and developing small modular nuclear reactors. Nova Scotia’s Progressive Conservative government has introduced legislation allowing the province’s power utility to own a nuclear plant.

Campbell and Mills also push for measures easing natural resource development, which could help Atlantic Canada move away from its dependence on equalization payments.

“If you really want to eliminate or significantly reduce transfer payments you’ve got to develop your natural resources, including natural gas, and if you have it, oil,” Campbell said. “Because the reality is, if you look at the provinces in Canada that are the strongest, they are the provinces that have oil and gas.”

A Fraser Institute survey last year of senior mining executives found that, in terms of government policy, Nova Scotia was “the least-attractive province, ranking 36th out of 86 jurisdictions, with only the Northwest Territories and Nunavut performing worse in Canada.”

“Miners are skittish because every time somebody wants to do a mine, the pitchforks come out,” Campbell said. “People are really, really nervous about mining, oil and gas, and aquaculture — anything that might have any kind of an impact on the environment. And we’ve got to find a way to get people beyond that and accept the fact that you’ve got to develop your natural resources. You have to have high environmental standards, but if they can do it in Saskatchewan, if they can do it in B.C., if they can do it in Alberta, we have to be able to do it down here.”

The authors also argue the region needs to “become more tax competitive” by lowering personal income tax rates and ensuring corporate taxes are competitive.

A recent Fraser Institute study indicates that “Nova Scotia (at 21 per cent) and Newfoundland & Labrador (at 21.8 per cent) have the highest top marginal provincial personal income tax rates in Canada. New Brunswick (at 19.5 per cent) and Prince Edward Island (at 19 per cent) are also higher than most other provinces.”

Growing the population with new immigrants adds more taxpayers, Mills said.

“This should be an opportunity to bring our taxes in line with other provinces in the country,” Mills said. “But the biggest problem that we still have is governments continue to spend way over what they bring in. That is a systemic problem. Until we get that under control, it’s going to be very difficult to get our taxes under control.”

This is the latest in a National Post series on How Canada Wins. Read earlier instalments here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


President Donald Trump speaks to reporters before boarding the Marine One presidential helicopter and departing the White House on June 24, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Donald Trump, 79, has been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency after he was examined for swelling in his lower legs, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday. Although the swelling was “mild,” the condition caused blood to pool in the U.S. president’s legs.

Leavitt addressed Trump’s condition at a press conference briefly, calling it “benign” and common in people over the age of 70. She added that there is no evidence of Trump’s condition being serious or life-threatening, as confirmed by further and “compressive” tests. The tests revealed there is no evidence Trump has deep vein thrombosis, a serious medical condition where blood clots form in the veins, usually the legs.

Here’s what we know about Trump’s medical condition, how it is treated and what the letter from Trump’s doctor says.

What is chronic venous insufficiency, the symptoms and how is it treated?

Blood is normally pumped all over the body. Veins in the body then take the blood insufficient in oxygen back to the heart to refuel. In some cases, veins aren’t able to carry out that function properly and as a result the blood pools in the legs.

Cleveland Clinic

notes that “this increases pressure in the leg veins and causes symptoms like swelling.” This condition is known as chronic venous insufficiency.

Other than blood pooling around the legs, symptoms for this condition include legs that are achy or tingly. The condition, if severe, can also lead to ulcers.

Leavitt said the condition hasn’t caused Trump any discomfort.

The academic centre based in Cleveland encourages lifestyle changes as the first method of treatment for this condition.

 The left foot and swollen of President Donald Trump are pictured as he sits with Bahrain’s Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa in the Oval Office of the White House, Wednesday, July 16, 2025, in Washington.

Lifestyle changes, per Cleveland Clinic, may include walking as a form of exercise, losing weight and elevating legs periodically. Leavitt didn’t reveal how the president was treating the condition.

“If these measures aren’t enough, your provider may recommend a procedure or surgery. The best treatment for you depends on how far your condition has progressed and other medical conditions you have,” according to Cleveland Clinic.

What did the White House physician’s letter say?

The letter by Trump’s doctor explained that the diagnosis came after Trump underwent a comprehensive examination as the president noted mild swelling his legs. Results for other tests “were within normal limits,” physician Capt. Sean Barbabella wrote. “No signs of heart failure, renal impairment, or systemic illness were identified,” the letter continued.

Barbabella also addressed the recent photos of Trump that showed the president with minor bruising on his hand.

 Discolouration is seen on the hand of U.S. President Donald Trump as he welcomes Bahrain’s Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad al-Khalifa to the White House at the West Wing entrance in Washington, DC, on July 16, 2025.

“This is consistent with minor soft tissue irritation from frequent handshaking and the use of aspirin, which is taken as part of a standard cardiovascular prevention regimen,” Barbabella wrote. “This is a well-known and benign side effect of aspirin therapy.”

In summary, the letter addressed to Leavitt concluded, “President Trump remains in excellent health.”

Read the full letter here: Trump’s health status update

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


TOPSHOT - Shiite Muslim mourners hold portraits of Iran's Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during a religious procession held to mark Ashura, on the tenth day of the Islamic holy month of Muharram in Karachi on July 6, 2025. (Photo by Asif HASSAN / AFP) (Photo by ASIF HASSAN/AFP via Getty Images)

Toronto resident Daniel was not in Iran’s good books even before Israel and the United States showered the country with missiles and bombs last month.

While working as a telecommunications supplier in Iran, he says he deliberately sabotaged schemes to evade sanctions and import equipment for military use, earning the regime’s ire. A member of Iran’s tiny Jewish community, he eventually fled the Islamic Republic and ended up in Canada a decade ago.

But in the wake of the short-lived Iran-Israel war, military officials called in his brother, mother and sister-in-law for hours of interrogation about their Canadian relative. The officials claimed Daniel, who asked that his last name be withheld for security reasons, was a spy for Israel. As evidence, they cited the reports he contributed to

Israel Pars

, an online TV station catering to Israel’s Farsi-speaking minority.

“They told my brother, ‘We know where he is, where he is living with his family, and we are going to execute him,’ ” Daniel quoted his relatives as telling him by phone. “ ’We got the order from the court to execute him.’ ”

Daniel, who has a wife and two-year-old boy, takes the officials’ violent threat seriously.

“I don’t care about myself. (But) I have been living in a state of fear because of my son. If something happened to me his life really would be destroyed.”

It may be an extreme case, but such dread is not uncommon within Canada’s Iranian diaspora, a group estimated to number 400,000 people. As Iran once more becomes a focal point of Middle East tensions, many Iranian Canadians live with a troubling anxiety.

They typically emigrated to escape a system marked by rampant human-rights abuses, stifling censorship and harshly enforced religious edicts. Now some feel like they never truly left the Islamic Republic behind.

No Iranian official has been based here since Canada cut off diplomatic ties in 2012. But there are numerous reports of intimidation of Canadians who speak out against the regime, evidence of planned kidnapping and assassination plots — at least one contracted out to Hell’s Angels — a steady stream of senior Iranian government figures entering Canada, and suspicions of widespread money laundering by the regime and its proxies.

A would-be Conservative candidate for Parliament believes a nomination contest was tainted by misinformation orchestrated by Iran. And a prominent human-rights lawyer even warned that Iranian sleeper cells may be activated in the recent war’s aftermath. Anita Anand, Canada’s foreign affairs minister,

said she shared Irwin Cotler’s concern.

The Iranian-Canadian experience has been double-edged: it’s an impressive immigration success story, unfolding under a dark shadow cast from 10,000 kilometres away.

“I was supposed to live in Canada in safety, in peace, enjoying my life, enjoying my freedoms,” said Ardeshir Zarezadeh, a Toronto legal advisor and human-rights activist who spent years in prison in Iran. “But in Canada itself we can’t live in peace and freedom.”

Even those who lost loved ones in

Iran’s shooting down of an airliner

packed with Canadian citizens and permanent residents have felt Tehran’s grip, citing threatening calls and demands to stay quiet.

The Iranian newspaper Farheekhtegan — Farsi for intellectuals — published a full-page spread last October headlined by the statement “United Iran against the murderers.” The piece featured photos of six alleged “murderers” with targets superimposed over their faces. They included then-U.S. vice president Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli defence minister at the time, and Reza Pahlavi, son of the late Shah of Iran. The sixth person? Hamed Esmaeilion, a Toronto dentist.

The Canadian citizen has been an outspoken critic of the regime but, he says with a wry laugh, “I have never murdered anybody.” Esmaeilion can state without question, though, that Tehran killed his wife and nine-year-old daughter. They were on Ukrainian International Airlines flight PS752, shot down by Iran just outside Tehran in 2020. Iran says it was an accident; family members and others suspect the attack was deliberate.

“I call it the borderless empire of terror and fear,” says Esmaeilion of Iran’s worldwide tentacles.

At the same time, Iranian Canadians subjected to harassment and worried about a steady stream of regime officials settling in or visiting Canada, say security services don’t pay enough heed to their complaints.

“I would argue Canada is the most infiltrated country in the western world,” says Alireza Nader, a Washington, D.C.-based Iran analyst who prepared a study on Tehran’s interference in Canada for the conservative Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “Canada is actually well-known as a haven for the regime. People (in the Iranian community) joke about it. It is part of the popular culture.”

RCMP spokesman Marie-Eve Breton declined to say how many complaints it has received about interference from Iran or to detail how it responds to them, citing “operational reasons.” That said, the Mounties take threats “very seriously” and will investigate if there is a suspicion of criminal or other illegal activity, she said.

But the diaspora that has grown up here since the 1979 Islamic revolution — full of professionals, entrepreneurs and academics — is not unanimous in its dim view of the Iranian government. Some groups have tended to avoid stiff criticism of Tehran, and sometimes echoed its viewpoints.

A rally against Israeli attacks last month — called

“Hands-off Iran

” — included people waving the Islamic Republic flag, a symbol of oppression to some expatriates. Competing vigils for the PS752 victims in 2020 — one involving regime critics, the other factions more sympathetic to Tehran —

ended in a physical fight

that required police intervention.

Organizations like the Iranian Canadian Congress (ICC), a co-sponsor of Hands-off Iran, have been accused of being apologists for the Islamic Republic. The ICC denies the charge and says it simply wants peace, the end to sanctions against Iran and restoration of Canada-Iran diplomatic ties.

“Iranian Canadian activists who oppose military action or sanctions, citing their detrimental impact on the Iranian populace and regional peace and stability, are frequently discredited by hardline political factions,”

the ICC told the federal Foreign Interference Commission.

“These factions prioritize regime change in Tehran over all else, disregarding both Canada’s interests and the potential harm that increased instability may inflict on the people of Iran.”

Complicating the divisions right now are events in the Middle East. Even some staunch opponents of the Iranian regime and its allies like Hamas and Hezbollah are disturbed by the Gaza war. After Iranian-backed Hamas crossed over from the strip and massacred 1,200 Israelis, Israel’s armed forces responded with operations that have killed more than 50,000 Palestinian fighters and civilians and laid waste to much of the territory.

There are “mixed feelings,” says Esmaeilion.

And the exchange of missiles and drones between Iran and Israel, combined with the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, has triggered a vicious crackdown by Tehran on alleged “spies” and dissidents, noted Zarezadeh.

“Weakening the regime is good, but what’s next?” he asks. “If this is going to create a lot of damage (to the democracy movement) … mass executions … what is the point?”

Like so many other burgeoning ethnic communities in Canada, Iranians were a rare presence here for most of the 20th century. But that began to change as the revolution transformed their homeland into a theocratic state steered by unelected clerics.

First came people seeking political asylum, then middle-class strivers wanting a freer, more enriching life, especially for women whose existence is tightly constricted in Iran.

Many have settled in Vancouver and its suburbs, but the greatest concentration live in the northern reaches of the Greater Toronto Area. The enclave is predictably nicknamed Tehranto, the main streets in some neighbourhoods lined with Iranian restaurants and other businesses.

The group includes a surprising number of high achievers. Esmaeilion says he knew of a couple hundred dentists of Iranian extraction in Canada when he emigrated in 2010. Now they number well over 1,000, he said. “You can say the same thing about medical doctors, you can say the same about lawyers, about engineers.”

The make-up of the diaspora is partly a result of “selection bias,” says lawyer Kaveh Shahrooz, a rights activist in Toronto. Many are people who had the wherewithal and money to get out of Iran, while Canadian laws in the past favoured newcomers who could invest sizeable sums here, he said. Plus, the culture promotes education and career success.

Shahrooz believes the most recent waves include many people who did well economically under the Ayatollahs and retain a sympathy for the regime or even continued business links in Iran. Esmaeilion disagrees. If anything, he argues, the newest arrivals are more disenchanted than anyone about the Islamic autocracy.

There’s a lack of polling data breaking down exactly what portion of Iranian Canadians are staunch opponents of the Iranian regime. But critics insist it’s the majority, even if many are too afraid to speak out. The dissidents cite in part two rallies held in 2022. They supported protests in Iran over the death in custody of a young woman arrested for wearing an insufficiently modest hijab. Both “Woman Life Freedom” events in the Greater Toronto area attracted an estimated 50,000 people — a significant chunk of local Iranian Canadians — while cities across Canada held smaller demonstrations, noted Zarezadeh.

The Iranian Canadian Congress did not respond to requests for comment by deadline, but it has noted that a petition calling for renewed diplomatic relations with Iran gathered 16,000 signatures; one opposing the idea only a few hundred.

Still, for those Canadians who do publicly criticize the regime, the consequences can be chilling.

A

2021 U.S. indictment

accused Iranian intelligence operatives of planning to kidnap and fly to Iran Iranian-American journalist Masih Alinejad. The same group, prosecutors said, was plotting to snatch three unnamed Canadian opponents of the regime. The FBI has since charged multiple people tied to Iran with conspiring to actually assassinate Alinejad.

Last year, U.S. attorneys

indicted two Canadian Hell’s Angels members

, accusing them of working at the behest of Iranian intelligence to assassinate dissidents in Maryland.

The Canadian Security Intelligence Service’s most recent

annual report

says it continues to investigate “credible intelligence” about death threats against Canadians emanating from Iran, often using proxies like organized crime figures. The targets are “perceived enemies” living abroad, and the threats to Canadians may increase as tensions heighten in the Middle East, said the spy agency.

Iran also uses “malicious cyber activity” to repress and manipulate Canada-based opponents, the CSIS report said.

In its submissions to the Foreign Interference Commission, the Iranian Canadian Congress did not dwell on actions by Tehran. It focused instead on threats it says it and similar groups face closer to home, saying it should be “protected from information wars organized by media outlets established with foreign investments by authoritarian or democratic states.”

But individual Iranian Canadians have reported first-hand experience with a range of intimidation by Tehran.

Ardeshir Zarezadeh, the Toronto legal advisor, says he spent a total of seven years in prison, including two in solitary confinement, for helping organize student protests and the like in Iran. He fled through mountains to Turkey and ended up here in 2006. But he continues to be dogged by the regime, he says.

A suspicious Iranian man called from a pay phone, then showed up unannounced at his office in 2019. Zarezadeh notified both the RCMP and FBI. The Americans responded promptly, informing him that his visitor was an Iranian intelligence officer. Zerezadeh says he never heard back from the Mounties.

Then in 2022, he said Iranian intelligence contacted a friend of his, demanding the friend turn over Zerezadeh’s home address or see all his business interests in Iran destroyed.

Esmaeilion lost his family in Iran’s destruction of flight PS752 but he says that hasn’t stopped the regime from targeting him.

His 76-year-old father was interrogated for two hours in May 2024 about his son’s activities in Canada, while his parents were banned from leaving Iran for a year. Esmaeilion’s mother finally made it here earlier this year but after she returned to Iran two months ago, her passport was seized again.

Esmaeilion posted on X in 2023 when the community discovered by chance that Seyed Hassan Ghazizadeh Hashemi — a former Iranian health minister — was on vacation in Canada, even as Iran continued to evade accountability for the plane shoot-down. While in Toronto, the minister did an interview with Iranian media in which he vowed retaliation against Esmaeilion and others whose posts had interrupted his holiday. The federal government eventually

banned Hashemi from entering Canada

for 36 months, but Esmaeilion says police told him they could do nothing about the threat.

Shahrooz said he often receives threats online and gets regular warnings from Google that state-based actors have been trying to hack into his accounts. After he did an interview with the Voice of America’s Farsi-language service, relatives in Iran were taken in for interrogation about him.

But he considers his experience last year campaigning for the Conservative nomination in the federal riding of Richmond Hill as particularly troubling. He had not even officially announced he was running for the candidacy when posts started proliferating online that falsely accused him of being a member of Mojahedin-e-Khalq (MEK), the anti-regime group that Canada once designated as a terrorist entity. It’s widely unpopular with both regime opponents and supporters.

The smear campaign had an organized tone to it and included references to a particular relative who had been a MEK member, a fact that few people without access to Iranian security files would know, says Shahrooz.

“My name would trend on Twitter, for example, twice in a week — because I’m running for a nomination in a suburb of Toronto. It doesn’t make any sense unless there is an organized cyber army of Iran’s regime working to undermine me.”

He says Conservative Party officials were not receptive to his reports of intimidation and when they closed the nomination race early, before he had time to sign up many of the crucial new members, the Harvard law graduate ended his run.

Mariyam Shafipour was a prominent student activist in Iran and spent two years in Tehran’s notorious Evin Prison, making her way to Canada after being released.

She’s continued her opposition here, resulting in the intimidation of her sisters by Iranian security services, she told the

Human Rights Talks podcast

earlier this year. And there have been ominous signs of not just digital, but physical surveillance here in Canada.

Officials of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, which Canada designated as terrorist last year, told one of her sisters that Shafipour’s apartment overlooked a school and that she owned three cats,

she told CBC TV

in 2022. Both were accurate observations.

Such experiences help explain deep concern in the community about another phenomenon. Current or former officials of the regime routinely seem to show up in Canada, while some refugee claimants and relatives of ordinary people — including

family of the PS752 victims

— are regularly denied visitor visas.

Zarezadeh said he’s received numerous reports of former IRGC officials entering Canada, which he plans to pass on to authorities. Vancouver lawyer

Mojdeh Shahriari

has said she’s collected hundreds of reports of various senior officials obtaining Canadian visas.

Nader, the Washington-based analyst, said he was shocked to learn that

Mahdi Nasiri

, the head of hard-line newspaper Kayhan in late-1990s Iran, then an adviser to the government, had arrived in Canada earlier this spring. Nasiri told CBC News that he’d been a critic of the regime for six years and was a “liberal” now. Nader and other regime critics were doubtful.

Morteza Talaei, who as Tehran police chief oversaw a crackdown on women’s dress and took part in the bloody response to student protests in 1999,

was spotted in Richmond Hill

, north of Toronto, three years ago. Critics accused him of rank hypocrisy, with video showing him exercising in a local gym next to women in workout outfits, public attire he would have considered criminal in his old job.

The federal government is trying to stem the tide. A law passed in 2022 and updated last year now bars entry to Canada of anyone who was a senior Iranian official as far back as 2003. And there seems no shortage of cases.

Immigration Refugees and Citizenship Canada has cancelled 131 visas under the law, while Canada Border Services Agency has opened 115 investigations. Half of those were deemed to not be senior officials, but the rest are still being reviewed or enforcement action taken, said Luke Reimer, a CBSA spokesman.

The agency has reported 20 alleged senior officials who are in Canada for inadmissibility hearings. But as of June, only three had been ordered deported — and one of those actually removed from the country, Reimer said.

Coupled with the arrival of figures from the Iranian government are fears of rampant money laundering. The proliferation of money-exchange services in Iranian-Canadian neighbourhoods underscores the problem, says Esmaeilion. One such business told a friend that it processes millions of dollars in transfers to and from Iran every day, he said.

National Post was unable to verify that claim. But the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC), Ottawa’s anti-money-laundering watchdog, is planning to require financial institutions to more closely monitor cash flowing to and from Iran, the Globe and Mail reported recently. The number of “suspicious transaction reports” involving Iran and filed with the centre is already soaring, to 19,572 in 2024-25, from 6,866 in 2023-24, the Globe said.

All of this — intimidation, frequent visits by regime heavyweights and alleged money laundering — is transpiring 13 years after the Iranian embassy in Canada was shuttered.

But Daniel, for one, has no doubts about the regime’s ability to function here, with or without an official presence. As he contemplates the Iranian threat to “execute” him, Daniel notes IRGC officials showed his family photographs of him, his wife and son, and knew his correct Canadian address.

“When I was in Iran, because of my business, I knew a lot of high-level government people. One of those guys one time told me, ‘the hub of spying in North America is in Canada,’” he says, a suggestion the Post could not independently verify. “They have the financial support, they have the people to support them. They are capable of doing many things in Canada.”


Parliament Hill reflected on the Bank of Canada building in Ottawa on Sept. 18, 2024. A new report blames the Trudeau government’s spending — less than Bank of Canada interest rate policies — for soaring inflation during the pandemic.

The Trudeau government’s spending splurges — less than Bank of Canada interest rate policies — were largely responsible for soaring inflation during the pandemic, a new report has concluded.

The report, conducted by two economists at the C.D. Howe Institute, points the finger at Ottawa’s unfunded spending spree that acted as “helicopter drops” of money for the private sector.

In 2020, the report says, 20.7 million Canadians out of an adult population of 30.3 million received income from one of the federal pandemic-related programs. In 2020, the programs are estimated to have cost $270 billion — about 12.5 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product (GDP) — and have since grown to about $360 billion to date.

While the programs generally succeeded in providing relief to individuals and businesses, and buttressed the economy during a crisis, the think tank says injecting that much “nominal wealth” into an economy while unemployment has been relatively low led to an inflation burst and permanently higher prices.

“Whether this wealth takes the form of new money or new debt is largely irrelevant,” the report says.

Benjamin Tal, the deputy chief economist of CIBC World Markets, agreed that loose fiscal monetary policy contributed to the pandemic-era price hikes, but thinks the central bank’s low interest rates also played a role.

“There is no question about the fact that very accommodating fiscal and monetary policies were behind the acceleration in inflation,” Tal said.

According to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), prices rose 11.4 per cent between January 2020 and December 2022. Although the pandemic started in China in December 2019 and the first case was reported in Canada on January 25, 2020, inflation didn’t spike for more than a year. In fact, prices were rising at relatively normal rates until May 2021, and didn’t peak until June 2022 when inflation hit 8.1 per cent, the highest rate in almost four decades.

But while the C.D. Howe economists, David Andolfatto and Fernando Martin, are critical of the spending, their assessment of the Bank of Canada’s policies at that time are more nuanced. They agree with the Bank of Canada’s own assessment that it can be faulted for not raising interest rates quickly enough to suppress inflation at that time. They also argued that it could be criticized for not doing a better job communicating how it intends to achieve its inflation targets. But they conclude that there was ultimately little the central bank could have done to curb the price spikes.

The paper acknowledges that the pandemic was a unique situation that included a series of inflationary and deflationary pressures.

Prices rose in part because the supply of some products tightened, for example, due to factories being closed or experiencing reduced hours. Transportation became more expensive due to shipping delays and congestion at many ports. There were also shortages of some raw materials, such as lumber and metals, which also contributed to inflation.

There was also increased demand for certain things, such as real estate, furniture, exercise equipment and home entertainment gadgets.

Some of that demand increase was due to consumers having more disposable incomes. Many were saving money from working from home and not being able to go out or travel, while others got wage increases or (especially those in health care) were working longer hours. Income from government supports added to the demand. The result of reduced supply and rising demand was increased costs.

Gasoline was among the products hit hardest by inflation, with a price increase of more than 50 per cent over that two-year period. Food and transportation jumped between 15 and 20 per cent, while appliances and rent increased by between 10 and 15 per cent.

Finance Canada, the federal department responsible for fiscal policy, was not immediately available for comment.

Since the pandemic ended, however, prices have not come back down for a number of reasons.

Katherine Judge, senior economist at CIBC Capital Markets, said inflation remained a challenge after the pandemic because many consumers had pent-up demand and excess savings, while long-term changes such as more people working from home and the retirement of many baby boomers also played a role. In recent months, she added in an email, import tariffs imposed by Ottawa amid trade disputes have raised prices.

Statistics Canada reported earlier this week that

Canada’s inflation rate accelerated to 1.9 per cent in June

, up from 1.7 per cent the previous month.

National Post

stuck@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


An Indian man claiming refugee status in Canada based on his fear of police persecution has won another shot at staying here, even though his story was 'strikingly similar' to hundreds of others who used the same consultant.

A young Indian man, denied refugee status in Canada because his story of being framed for his friend’s murder was “strikingly similar” to five people who travelled here with him and nearly 200 others who employed the same immigration consultant, has won another chance at staying in Canada.

Parwinder Singh took the decision from Canada’s Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) to a federal court judge for review. The judge granted the review and sent Singh’s case back to another decision-maker at the division for re-evaluation.

“Although narrative similarities between claimants may reasonably ground a negative credibility inference, discrete or incidental similarities in sentence structure and vocabulary do not — in and of themselves — impugn a claimant’s credibility,” Justice Guy Régimbald wrote in a recent decision out of Ottawa.

“Asylum narratives are not exercises in creative writing, and a lack of prosaic originality should not be confused for falsehood, fraud, or the deliberate plagiarism of another person’s story. In this case, the RAD put form over substance in its analysis of Mr. Singh’s narrative. Its conclusion that the narrative was not genuine is therefore unreasonable.”

While he was still in India, Singh “sought out the services” of an immigration consultant named Deepak Pawar, Régimbald wrote in his decision dated July 11.

Singh “maintains that the similarities between his basis of claim narrative and those of other claimants are not enough to impugn his credibility, and that what similarities do exist are more form than substance,” said the decision.

Lawyers representing Immigration Minister Lena Diab responded that “the RAD reasonably found Mr. Singh’s narrative to be fraudulent, insofar as his (basis of claim) was ‘strikingly similar’ to those of others, including individuals who travelled to Canada with him.”

Singh lived in the village of Basant Pura, in the Indian State of Haryana, said the decision.

“The events leading to his departure from India date back to the summer of 2019, when he was a sixteen-year-old boy attending secondary school.”

Singh testified that, on June 25, 2019, he was walking home from school with a group of friends “when they were suddenly accosted by another group of boys carrying knives,” said the decision. “A brawl breaks out and Mr. Singh flees, but the ensuing violence results in one of his friends being stabbed and killed. The group allegedly responsible for his death includes the nephew of a well-known politician.”

Three days later, Singh said local police visited his family home to investigate his friend’s death. “He is brought to the police station, where he is interrogated and provides a statement about the events of June 25, 2019.”

A week later, Singh said local police returned to his home and dragged him to the station, where he spied “the group of boys who had accosted him earlier, including the politician’s nephew,” according to the decision.

“The police force him into a small room, where they inform him that the other boys have all given statements accusing him of killing his friend. Mr. Singh is then beaten to the point of losing consciousness. The police keep him in custody for three days.”

Singh said his father rounded up “some influential people in the village” on July 3, 2019, to demand his son be released.

“The police agree to do so upon payment of a bribe. Before letting the boy go, the police take his signature and fingerprints and threaten him to stay quiet about what transpired. His father takes him to the nearest hospital for treatment.”

Nearly a week later, police called Singh and told him to report to the police station.

“He is afraid of being beaten again, but reports there with his father out of fear of further trouble with the authorities. They wait at the station for hours, being periodically insulted by the local officers, before being told to return there in two weeks’ time.”

Feeling that it was no longer safe to stay in India, Singh fled to New Delhi on July 12, 2019, where he met with Pawar, the immigration agent. “In the meantime, his father arranges the necessary funds and travel documents for Mr. Singh to travel to Canada, where he enters on Nov. 7, 2019, falsely claiming to be participating in a Tae Kwon Do tournament. He claims protection on the basis that he fears harm from the police and his deceased friend’s family.”

The immigration minister intervened in Singh’s case on Feb. 13, 2023, alleging his claim lacked credibility because his “narrative is strikingly similar to those of others, including individuals who travelled to Canada with him and, as such, is not genuine. In support of this allegation, they produce evidence to demonstrate that his narrative contains language, phrases and other similarities to five other claimants who travelled to Canada with the claimant from India, and nearly two hundred other (basis of claim) narratives disclosed by claimants from India. This evidence stems from a Canada Border Services Agency analysis of claims submitted with the assistance of Mr. Pawar, the immigration consultant who represented Mr. Singh.”

Singh amended the narrative that forms the basis of his claim for refugee protection on Feb. 23, 2023. “He now claims that he also fears persecution in India due to his active support of an independent Khalistan, a cause for which he has advocated since coming to Canada.”

Canada’s Refugee Protection Division granted that second claim “despite ‘credibility concerns about the incidents in India and the claimant’s motivation to come Canada,’” said the decision. “Overall, it finds that those concerns do not outweigh his testimony and corroborating evidence in support of his pro-Khalistan views and well-founded fear of persecution.”

Lawyers for the immigration minister appealed that decision and won.

“They reiterate that Mr. Singh’s narrative is fraudulent and that his claim should be accordingly rejected,” said the decision.

“The RAD agrees with the minister. Its analysis relies mainly on alleged similarities between Mr. Singh’s narrative and that of NS, an individual who travelled to Canada from India on the same flight, and who was also represented by Mr. Pawar. The RAD notes twenty-one similar passages between their respective narratives, concluding that the two (basis of claims) are likely duplicates of each other, and therefore fraudulent.”

The Refugee Appeal Division saw Singh’s claim that he was “engaging in pro-Khalistan activity” as “yet another fraudulent refugee claim,” said the decision.

It ruled Singh is neither a convention refugee nor a protected person, and set aside the Refugee Protection Division’s decision.

The Refugee Appeal Division based “its credibility finding on a list of similarities between Mr. Singh’s narrative and that of NS,” Régimbald said.

“It is entitled to do so: ‘courts have found that it is not unreasonable to draw a negative inference as to credibility from unwarranted similarities between a refugee claimant’s narrative and the narratives of other unrelated claimants.’”

“However, not all similarities are unwarranted. Valid reasons may explain the similarities, and in the presence of such reasons, it may be inappropriate to find that the similarities cast doubt on the claimant’s credibility.”

Régimbald said “there is no evidence on file demonstrating that Mr. Pawar uses a template for his client’s (basis of claim) narratives,” and neither the Refugee Protection Division nor the Refugee Appeal Division “seem to have considered that possibility.”

The RAD “fundamentally misapprehend some of the evidence before it and exhibit clear logical fallacies that render its decision unreasonable,” Régimbald said.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Alberta Premier Danielle Smith makes remarks at Sir Winston Churchill Square on Thursday, July 17, 2025, in Edmonton.

OTTAWA — Canada’s dairy and poultry supply management regime could face a major challenge from within with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith saying she could consider the province exiting the quota system.

Smith said at a town hall in Red Deer, Alta., that she found the idea of the province opting out of supply management intriguing.

“(C)reating our own Alberta version of supply management, maybe as a pathway to a market system and maybe just because it would stick our finger in the eye of Quebec … might be (something) we want to do a little consultation on,” said Smith.

Smith noted that Alberta’s share of the

Canada-wide quotas for dairy

and

egg production

allotted under supply management falls below its share of the population.

Her comments came after one of the attendees, Lee Eddy, a resident of Red Deer County, said earlier in the evening that pulling out of the system would be one way for Alberta to grab the attention of Laurentian power brokers. The town hall was being held as part of Smith’s Alberta Next panel, struck to consider tactics for enhancing Alberta’s sovereignty.

“If we really want to make the eastern politicians … change their underwear, we should remove our supply management from the Canadian system,” said Eddy.

Quebec producers hold

roughly 37 per cent

of Canada’s total milk quota, with

Ontario producers holding 32 per cent

, according to Agriculture and Agri-Foods Canada. Producers in the two provinces have exerted considerable clout over politicians, given their concentration in certain ridings.

Alberta producers hold just short of nine per cent, despite the province representing more than 11 per cent of the national population.

Eddy suggested that Alberta move first to a transitional provincial quota system and eventually to a market-based system.

Supply management has emerged as

a major trade irritant

with the U.S., further complicating already delicate cross-border trade negotiations.

U.S. President Donald Trump singled out Canada’s restricted dairy market

in a recent letter

to Prime Minister Mark Carney, threatening to slap 35 per cent tariffs on all Canadian products on August 1.

During the recent federal election,

Carney promised to keep supply management “off the table”

in new trade negotiations with the U.S.  Federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has also said

he supports supply management

.

Sylvain Charlebois, director of the Agri-Foods Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University, says that Alberta’s relative lack of skin in the dairy-quota game gives it a freer hand to take on supply management.

“I could potentially see Alberta become the quote-unquote ‘sh-t disturber’ that could actually get everyone, and politicians in particular, to think differently about supply management, instead of just (being) blindly supportive without knowing why,” said Charlebois.

He noted that dairy farmers in Alberta benefit relatively little from the existing scheme, paying up

to twice as much

as farmers in Quebec and Ontario for the same share of quota.

Charlebois said it was “absolutely possible” for Alberta to leave the federal system and set up its own dairy commission. But he said that provincial administration would come with its own challenges, such as selling Alberta dairy products elsewhere in Canada.

“Would they consider other provinces to be foreign markets? It’s hard to say,” said Charlebois.

Charlebois added that other provinces could also object to Alberta “dumping” less expensive, non-supply-managed products across provincial lines.

Alberta’s milk marketing board couldn’t be reached for comment.

Lawrence Herman, a lawyer and international trade expert based in Toronto, says that just because Alberta can unilaterally exit supply management doesn’t mean it should.

“There isn’t anything that legally requires a province to participate,” said Herman. “However, the province couldn’t change the import limits and (tariff-rate quota) system, so it’s difficult to see how it would work.”

“The better option is for the feds and the provinces to work together in phasing out the entire national (supply management) system,” he added.

Supply management in Alberta sparked a minor controversy in April, when an

egg farmer in the province

was jailed in a quota dispute with the egg marketing board.

Smith said in February

that she’d asked her agricultural minister to “start (a) conversation” about potential Canada-U.S. trade concessions relating to supply management.

The Red Deer town hall was the first of

ten scheduled in-person events

hosted by the Smith-chaired Alberta Next panel.

Supply management is not one of

the six formal topics

put up for discussion by the panel.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The Canadian Dental Care Plan expanded in June 2025.

Half of the requests for preauthorized complex dental work have reportedly been denied by Canada’s dental care plan.

Just over 50 per cent of requests for such dental work between November 2024 and June 2025 have been rejected, said Health Canada, per

CBC News

and

Daily Hive

. While 5.2 million people have been approved for coverage under the Canadian Dental Care Plan (CDCP), only about half  — 2.2 million people — have received care, according to the federal agency.

The CDCP, which launched in 2023, is intended to make dental care more affordable for eligible Canadians.

Any resident with an adjusted family net income below $90,000 a year and who does not have access to dental insurance can apply. It is administered by a contracted third-party, insurance provider Sun Life.

Complex dental work

can include procedures like putting in crowns or partial dentures, root canals, specialist examinations and other kinds of oral surgery. These services require preauthorization. The approval process is different than private insurance plans, per Health Canada. “T

he CDCP coverage criteria are more stringent,” it says online.

Supporting documentation is required to prove the work is medically necessary before it can be covered.

“There’s been a lot of confusion for dentists who send in what we would normally send in to a private plan, and it comes back rejected,” Vancouver dentist and president of the Canadian Dental Association Dr. Bruce Ward

told CBC News

. “It’s a much, much, much higher rejection rate than private plans.”

Ward still commended the plan, calling it “very good.” He added that despite its “growing pains” it was still remarkable and noted the influx of people who would have otherwise gone without oral health care because they couldn’t afford it.

Meanwhile, spokesperson for Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada Mark Johnson told Daily Hive that incomplete submissions made up a large part of the preauthorized requests that had been denied between November 2024 and June. The rejection rate went from 52 per cent to 38 per cent when the incomplete submissions were excluded.

“Common reasons for denial (were) incomplete submission, the patient’s needs not meeting the clinical criteria for coverage, the request being a duplicate submission that was already approved previously, or the service requested not being eligible under the plan,” Johnson said in a statement to the publication.

There was also a backlog causing preauthorization delays due to technical issues and a high volume of submissions. However, as of July 11, Johnson said 80 per cent of preauthorization requests are now being processed within seven days.

A new wave of applicants applied to the CDCP when it

expanded in June

. More than a million people signed up and 94,980 received care, according to Health Canada, CBC News reported.

Vice-president of the Canadian Dental Assistants Association Natalie Marsh, who is a dental assistant in North Sydney, N.S., told CBC that the plan was “wonderful” but it did put a strain on some providers.

“You’re seeing people who haven’t seen a dentist in a long time. So they’re coming in with a lot of work to be done,” she said.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney listens to a question at a news conference in the Foyer of the House of Commons in Ottawa, after Bill C-5 passed in the House, on Friday, June 20, 2025.

GATINEAU, Que.

— Prime Minister Mark Carney entered a high-stakes meeting with First Nations leaders Thursday, touting his government’s new law to fast-track major infrastructure projects as having “Indigenous economic growth” at its heart, saying he believes consensus can be reached on how to move forward.

Whether Carney’s pitch lands with the more than 200 chiefs and other First Nations leaders who attended the gathering remains to be seen, given the vocal pushback the law, known as Bill C-5, has received over concerns about its impact on First Nations’ territories and the legal obligation the government has to consult communities.

“I don’t think … that a lot of people are happy right now in terms of the way that the government has gone about ramming through legislation without respecting the current … protections within the environment, the current protections on our water,” said

Southern Chiefs’ Organization Grand Chief Jerry Daniels.

Chiefs who attended the gathering came armed with concerns and questions about the government’s new law, which ushers in a new process for approving major infrastructure projects from ports to pipelines. It aims to bring down the federal approval process necessary for projects to receive the green light to two years, down from the current five.

Introducing and passing what Carney coined as his “One Canadian Economy” bill fulfilled a campaign promise he made during the spring federal election, where he pledged to remove all federal internal trade barriers by Canada Day and get more large infrastructure projects off the ground to bolster Canada’s economy against U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

Even before it was introduced, the Assembly of First Nations, the main advocacy organization representing more than 600 First Nations across the country, voiced concerns about the lack of involvement of Indigenous-rights holders in developing the bill, which it said directly impacts communities that have a constitutional right to be consulted before projects get approved.

Carney, who announced he would meet with chiefs in response to their concerns, has promised that the government would properly consult, as it decides on which projects would be deemed as benefiting the “national interest.” Those that Carney’s cabinet deems to be would be added to a list and qualify for the faster approvals process, to be coordinated through a yet-to-be-established major projects office.

Before Thursday’s meeting got underway, Carney told reporters they are not yet at the stage of picking projects, but at the beginning stages of hearing from First Nations leaders about how best to proceed.

“Today is about the how, not the what,” the prime minister said, who added that he planned to focus on listening.

Assembly of First Nations National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak has acknowledged she has heard a diversity of opinion from chiefs about the law, with some in support of having more major resource projects built, while others stand opposed.

Asked whether he believed consensus was achievable, Carney said, “Yes, I do.”

“That’s the purpose of having a discussion, because this is the first step of a process.”

Carney is set to meet at a later date with Inuit and Metis leaders.

He used his opening remarks on Thursday to highlight how he sees the powers ushered in through the new law as opening the door for more economic opportunities for First Nations, saying that a “new chapter” could be written in the relationship between the federal government and communities.

“One of the points is that the economic value of these projects will be shared with First Nations as partners. You will help build the prosperity of your communities for generations to come.”

“In many respects, this is the first federal legislation to put Indigenous economic growth at its core. We now have the opportunity to realize it.”

Indigenous participation is one of the criteria Carney has pledged the government will use in determining what projects would be considered in the national interest.

The planning for Thursday’s meeting was done by the Privy Council Office, the arm of the government that supports the Prime Minister’s Office.

The agenda for the day included panels on the issue of “meaningful consultation” as well as a discussion around the Indigenous advisory council that the government has committed to appoint.

Besides Carney, senior ministers speaking at the closed-door event included Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc and Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty.

Some chiefs expressed frustration at only receiving the agenda late Tuesday, given that leaders had been invited to briefings about the legislation from senior government officials.

Paper copies of a slide presentation prepared by the Privy Council Office, which were available to Thursday’s attendees, showed the government had heard there was “inadequate time to consult” about the new bill and the “importance of respecting Indigenous rights,” as well as the United Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

The media itself was not permitted to cover the discussions and was instructed to leave the building by departmental staff following the prime minister’s opening remarks.

Having the gathering in the first place was pitched by Woodhouse Nepinak, who used her opening address to the chiefs gathered to highlight ongoing challenges First Nations face when it comes to a lack of adequate infrastructure in communities, from housing to clean drinking water, as well as past legal challenges Ottawa has faced when it has not properly consulted Indigenous communities.

She highlighted in her speech, a copy of which was circulated to media, that it was “not clear” to First Nations what the government was intending when it came to speeding up the building of major infrastructure projects and that “until an appropriate process is established with First Nations rights holders and founded in free, prior and informed consent, the Crown’s legal obligations can not be met.”

Woodhouse Nepinak told reporters afterwards she wants Carney to make solid commitments, including to stage another gathering with chiefs next year.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


A rare bacteria that lives in brackish seawater has left four dead in Florida this year, according to health officials.

Four people in Florida are dead after being infected with a rare, flesh-eating bacteria found in coastal waters.

According to the latest data from

state health officials

, there have also been 11 non-fatal cases of Vibrio vulnificus reported in 2025. The deaths occurred in the Bay, Broward, Hillsborough and St. Johns counties, respectively. The data does not include how the people came into contact with the bacteria, but it can be transmitted when an open wound is exposed to infected seawater or by eating raw shellfish that has been infected.

Florida health officials have warned anyone with fresh cuts or scrapes to avoid going into the water, saying “water and wounds do not mix.”

Here’s what to know.

What is Vibrio vulnificus?

Vibrio vulnificus is part of the Vibrio group of bacteria that can cause illness in humans, per Health Canada. Although the illness can be mild, it is “more often severe with rapid progression requiring intensive care.” It often causes septicemia, an infection of the bloodstream, that can be fatal.

Symptoms include fever, chills, skin lesions and low blood pressure, and can appear 12 to 72 hours after exposure.

It can also cause skin infections if it comes into contact with an open wound, which can lead to skin breakdown and ulcers, according to Florida Health. If it is ingested, it can cause vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain.

Vibrio vulnificus infections can be especially harmful for those with weakened immune systems, in particular, those with chronic liver disease, Florida Health says. Those who get infected with Vibrio vulnificus may even need limb amputation in order to recover. Infections are fatal 50 per cent of the time.

It has been called “flesh-eating” because some Vibrio vulnificus infections can lead to necrotizing fasciitis, described as a “severe rapidly spreading bacterial infection that can cause death” by the Cleveland Clinic. It is when the flesh around the open wound dies, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) explains.

Where and when are people most likely to be infected with Vibrio vulnificus?

Vibrio vulnificus lives in warm, brackish seawater, according to Florida Health. The CDC says that the bacteria is more likely to be found in high numbers in May through October, due to warmer water temperatures.

There was a surge of Vibrio vulnificus-related deaths in Florida last year, with 19 fatalities reported. Florida Health noted that the “unusual increase” was due to the impacts of Hurricane Helene. In 2022, officials noted that there was another surge due to Hurricane Ian.

The concentration of the bacteria can rise due to heavy rain or flooding,

CNN reported

when the cases increased last year.

Outbreaks in Canada have been linked to eating raw or undercooked shellfish, particularly oysters, Health Canada said.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.