LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Screen grab from video shows a person shooting in the Piper Arms pub in Toronto, on March 7, 2025.

A shocking mass shooting inside a Toronto pub in March, when three masked men shot wildly into the crowd during the establishment’s grand opening, is linked to an ongoing tow truck turf war that included other shootings and a robbery, Toronto police said when announcing charges against 11 people.

Ten suspects have been arrested, and another is considered a wanted fugitive, after a fervid spree of gun violence by what investigators believe might be a shoot-em-up band for hire.

“The indiscriminate nature of this gun violence is hard to comprehend,” Toronto’s Chief of Police Myron Demkiw said Wednesday. “This kind of brazen violence, this disregard for human life, is completely unacceptable.”

An intense investigation of the March 7 shooting at the Piper Arms pub near Scarborough Town Centre, one of Canada’s largest shopping malls, led police to four other shootings and a robbery they say are linked to a violent turf war over tow trucking business that has been hitting the Greater Toronto Area with shootings and arsons for several years.

The pub shooting, however, which saw an organized assault on a mainstream establishment in a popular public area by three masked men — one armed with an assault-style rifle and two with handguns — took public concern and fury to a new level.

“That night, three suspects entered the pub and opened fire inside. Nine people were shot, and other people were injured as a result. No one was killed, which is truly a miracle, but the effects of this mass shooting remain devastating for the victims and for the sense of safety in our communities,” said Demkiw.

Supt. Paul MacIntyre, commander of Toronto police’s Organized Crime Enforcement unit, said pain and damage from the attacks continues.

“This was a terrifying series of events for the victims and for our city — a group of individuals opening fire in public spaces, seemingly without hesitation,” he said.

“We’ve stayed in contact with the victims and their families throughout. Many continue to recover from serious physical and emotional trauma. Some were shot multiple times. One person was shot six times and survived. The strength and resilience has been remarkable.”

Police said their probe into the pub attack led them to a series of attacks and other crimes with common links.

Investigators from several Toronto police units used old-school investigative techniques of speaking to people, chasing leads, knocking on doors, and cooperating with neighbouring police forces that have experienced their own tow-truck war violence, Demkiw said.

MacIntyre said it became a complex and resource-intensive investigation.

Police allege investigators linked the gunmen in the pub attack to other crimes both before and after the mass shooting.

 Guns seized by Toronto police in probe of mass shooting.

On March 1, two suspects travelled in a stolen car to a Toronto plaza at Markham Road and Eglinton Avenue East. One suspect got out and shot at a victim standing nearby, who was injured. The pair then fled.

On March 4, three different suspects drove a stolen car to a towing yard near Weston Road and St. Clair Avenue West, police said. A gunman got out and shot and injured someone who was walking away from the yard. They drove to the towing yard and shot a second person who was in the towing yard in a drive-by attack. They then turned the car around and made a second pass, firing another salvo from the car windows.

Later that same night, police said the same three suspects, still in the stolen car, drove to a gas station near Lawrence Avenue East and Warden Avenue. One suspect got out and ambushed a man who was washing a pickup truck in one of the car wash bays. The victim ran off and was being chased by the gunman when he was intercepted by a second gunman who jumped from the car and also started shooting him. The victim was injured but survived.

On March 6, the two suspects accused of the plaza shooting five days earlier, arrived at a towing yard near the West Mall and The Queensway in a stolen car and shot at a vehicle leaving the yard. No injuries were reported.

It was the next night, police say, that one of the suspects from the pair of March 4 shootings was joined by two other men in a stolen car that arrived at the Piper Arms pub on Progress Avenue at Corporate Drive.

They parked and all three got out. One carried what looks like an assault-style rifle and the others had pistols.

Inside, patrons milled about. CCTV video footage from inside the pub shows four men standing near the doorway greeting each other when suddenly they dive in different directions when the door bursts open and shots blast inside.

Three men, with hoodies pulled up over their heads then move into the pub. The first one in carries a rifle with the distinctive long ammunition magazine curved like a banana; he turns to his left firing repeatedly as patrons at tables dive for cover.

The second gunman crouches as he moves inside, holding a handgun extended out sideways; he turns to his right, firing into a second room and then moves out of view of the camera into the side room.

The third gunman hangs back, barely past the door frame, and soon scurries out the door as the others briefly look around and then fire another volley.

The rifleman then jogs out the door. A few seconds later the second gunman emerges from the side room and follows the others outside.

Twelve people were injured, police said.

 Daykwon Joseph, 20, of Toronto, is wanted by Toronto police for shootings linked to the violence spree.

The reasons behind the pub shooting remain unknown, police said.

While the other shootings were connected to the tow truck industry, with victims being tow truck employees or targets being tow truck businesses, that doesn’t apply to the pub as far as police know, MacIntyre said.

The link to the turf war comes through the alleged gunmen.

“The shooting at the pub, we haven’t linked it to any tow truck violence at this point,” he said. “Where it is connected is the group of people that we identified as being part of the tow truck shootings have also done the pub shooting. Whether that was a one off, the reasons that they did it, we’re still investigating that,” MacIntyre said.

“We’re still looking at reasons why they did that and that’s still a very active investigation.”

Police are investigating whether the shooters were a band of hired guns, whose clients usually wanted them to target tow truck businesses and once targeted the pub.

The shooters were brazen, but not marksmen or skilled hitmen. The gunmen, MacIntyre said, were not a street gang in the usual sense.

“They’re not a gang, they’re not the definition of a gang, they’re just a collective of a bunch of guys that got together and are doing these shootings.”

Police connected two more incidents after the pub shooting to those arrested.

On April 11, four suspects in a stolen car attempted to rob a financial institution but failed, police said. Police later stopped the vehicle they fled in near Rexdale Boulevard and Highway 427 and two were arrested after a foot chase. Police found a loaded handgun with an extended magazine was recovered.

Finally, on May 26, police spotted a stolen vehicle and arrested two people inside and seized a loaded handgun, police said.

Of the 11 suspects charged, one remains a fugitive: Daykwon Joseph, 20, of Toronto. He is accused in the March 4 incidents — the double shooting at the tow yard and car wash ambush — and facing charges of attempt murder, six gun charges and other counts.

The three men accused in the pub shooting are Sheldon Gordon, 19, Juevar Griffith, 19, and Kayjean Morrison, 22, all from Toronto.

The others arrested range in age from 15 to 22 years old.

Demkiw said the shootings show the need for changes to Canada’s criminal code.

“These events underscore the importance of the law reform we’ve asked for in the past, including law reform concerning shootings in public spaces. Gunfire in our public spaces must be recognized for the harm it causes not just for those involved directly, but for the bystanders and the public at large,” he said.

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | Twitter:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Prime Minister Mark Carney in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on May 6, 2025.

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney is directly involved in the negotiations with U.S. President Donald Trump for a new trade and security deal in exchange for the lifting of all tariffs on Canadian goods — in particular the crippling levies on steel and aluminum.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford told reporters at Queen’s Park on Thursday he spoke directly to Carney the day prior and said the prime minister is in “deep, deep discussions right now with the administration in the U.S. and President Trump.”

In Ottawa, federal Industry Minister Mélanie Joly also confirmed the ongoing discussions.

“First of all, we are for sure in a trade war. It’s normal that, at the same moment that this trade war is happening, there are also diplomatic discussions, so Prime Minister Carney and President Trump are talking,” she said in French during a brief media scrum.

Trump signed an executive order this week doubling the tariffs on steel and aluminum — from 25 to 50 per cent — which is causing massive anxiety in Canadian sectors.

So far, Carney said his government would take “some time but not much” to respond to Trump’s latest tariffs if the Canadian and American side do not arrive at a deal.

“We are in intensive discussions right now with the Americans on the trading relationship. Those discussions are progressing,” he told reporters on Wednesday morning.

Carney did not specify if he was directly involved in those “intensive discussions.”

Ford reiterated that matching retaliatory tariffs need to happen as soon as possible should those talks fail, and said he conveyed that message directly to Carney on Wednesday.

“The ideal situation is to get a deal, and if that deal does not happen in the next few days, then we have to slap another 25 per cent tariff on top of the existing 25 per cent tariff on our aluminum and steel,” Ford said.

“But I think the prime minister is doing an incredible job of negotiating along with (Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic) LeBlanc as well,” he added.

LeBlanc was in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday meeting with U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick as Trump prepared to sign the tariff order on steel and aluminum.

Ford said it was his understanding the federal government has been “working hard around the clock” to sign a deal with Trump and that it might be “right at the brink” of doing so.

“Now, we know President Trump, he wakes up in the morning, he could change his mind, and we’ll be monitoring and discussing this with the prime minister on a daily basis until they get a deal, or they don’t get a deal,” he said.

“If they don’t, we have to come out guns blazing,” he said.

Meanwhile, Canadian steel company CEOS and union representatives were in Ottawa on Thursday to meet with federal ministers and officials to convince them to act fast before the inevitable job losses that could occur in the coming days and weeks.

Joly, who met with them, said she was in “solution mode” and said her goal was to make sure to “support the sector” at such a critical time.

“A lot of the conversation was about how we can make sure that we protect our domestic market, and we’re working on solutions. That’s why the industry and myself will continue to engage in the coming hours and days, because we need to get to a good plan together.”

Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne also said he was also looking forward to meeting with the industry, and said they were “all on the same page.”

“We all want a very strong steel and aluminum industry in this country. They are committed. We are committed. We’re going to work hand in hand,” he said.

The federal government has

committed to use Canadian steel and aluminum

in national infrastructure and defence projects in hopes of countering the lost revenue and drop in exports due to tariffs. But the industry is wondering if it will be able to survive until then.

In order to speed up the process, the government is expected to table its “One Canadian Economy” bill on Friday which is expected to fast-track projects in the national interest.

All 13 provincial and territorial premiers

met with Carney over the weekend

to discuss which of their projects, from ports and offshore wind development to oil pipelines and critical mineral mines, could potentially be selected for the government’s new process.

The federal government is hoping the legislation will receive unanimous support from all parties to fast-track its adoption, but some in the opposition are reticent to the idea.

Bloc Québécois House leader Christine Normandin said her party will want to study the bill in detail in parliamentary committees, which are not yet up and running.

“For the interest of the population that we represent, we’re going to do the work.”

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Award-winning author and Canadian Senator David Adams Richards has joined the Conservative Party of Canada's Senate caucus.

Less than two weeks after becoming a non-affiliated member of Canada’s Senate, New Brunswick Sen. David Adams Richards elected to join the Conservative Party of Canada’s caucus in Parliament’s Upper House this week.

The 74-year-old declined an interview with National Post, but an emailed statement illustrated an obvious frustration with both Justin Trudeau and Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal Party of Canada.

“For years, so many of the concerns I and others had about our country were dismissed by an insular, self-absorbed government, with an almost blind indifference to ordinary men and women,” wrote Richards, an award-winning and celebrated Canadian writer.

“Now the Liberals are insisting on policies that certain senators pleaded for and who were so often ridiculed and refused.”

Richards didn’t elaborate on specific policies, but Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre said during the recent federal election campaign that Carney and the Liberals were

“plagiarizing” ideas from the Tory platform.

In a statement posted to X, Sen. Leo Housakos, newly acclaimed Leader of the Opposition in the Senate, welcomed Richards to a group “that is home to diverse opinions and healthy debate, consensus and cooperation, grounded in common-sense principles and committed to the important work of a robust and healthy opposition.”

Here’s what to know about Richards.

Richards the writer

Born in 1950, Richards was raised in New Castle, N.B., a suburb of Miramichi, where his parents operated a local movie theatre.

He’s married to Peggy McIntyre, with whom he has two sons, John Thomas and Anton Richards.

While his first published work after studying literature and philosophy at St. Thomas University in the early 1970s was a small book of poems, Richards became an acclaimed Canadian novelist with 16 titles on his resume, along with six non-fiction books and two collections of short stories.

His writings have been translated into 12 languages and are part of the curriculum of Canadian and U.S. universities, according to

the Senate of Canada.

In a style said to be influenced by the likes of Leo Tolstoy and compared to William Blake, his fiction work is mostly set in the Miramichi Valley where he grew up and the characters are inspired by the lives and experiences of its poor and working-class people.

“Through the characters of his fictionalized Miramichi, David Adams Richards explores conflicts between families with long community histories, the long-term consequences of errors in judgment, the complexity of making moral choices, and humanity’s unfortunate willingness to remember faults sooner than virtues,” per his

bio in the Canadian Encyclopedia.

 David Adams Richards was invested into the Order of Canada by Governor General Michaëlle Jeanau in 2009.

Richards has been a writer-in-residence at multiple universities and colleges across Canada, three of which have awarded him honorary doctorates — the University of New Brunswick (1995), Mount Allison University in Sackville (2008), and St. Thomas University in Fredericton (1990). He received the same honour from the Atlantic School of Theology in 2010.

In 1998, he became one of just three Canadian writers to win a Governor General’s Literary Award in both fiction and non-fiction for Nights Below Station Street (1988) and Lines on the Water: A Fisherman’s Life on the Miramichi (1998). Writers Laura G. Salverson and Hugh MacLennan are the others. Meanwhile, his 1993 fiction novel For Those Who Hunt the Wounded Down and 2007’s The Lost Highway were also nominated for the government honour.

In 2000, his Mercy Among the Children was a co-winner of the Giller Prize along with Anil’s Ghost by Michael Ondaatje, the only time two recipients have shared the honour in its 31-year history. Lost Highway and The Friends of Meager Fortune (2006) were both longlisted for the Giller.

Richards has also been awarded two Gemini Awards for scriptwriting (Small Gifts and For Those Who Hunt the Wounded Down), the Alden Nowlan Award for Excellence in the Arts, the Canadian Authors Association Award for his novel Evening Snow Will Bring Such Peace, the 2011 Matt Cohen Award for a distinguished lifetime of contribution to Canadian literature and the Canada-Australia Literary Prize.

He is a member of the Order of New Brunswick (2005) and the Order of Canada (2009).

Richards the Senator 

When

first appointed to the Senate by Trudeau in 2017

, two years after the then-prime minister established the Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointments to make the Upper House less partisan, Richards joined the relatively new Independent Senators Group (ISG).

The cohort had come together the year prior, not as a political party, but to work together on procedural and administrative matters, and had quickly grown to be the largest group in the Senate at 43 members.

Its size is what led to his departure to sit as a non-affiliated senator.

“There was certainly a leaning toward government bills which I thought at certain times I didn’t completely support,” he told Jason VandenBeukel in

an interview for his doctoral thesis in political science from the University of Toronto.

“And so I decided I will be an independent and come to my own conclusions about things.”

In November 2019, he was one of the founding members of the new Canadian Senators Group (CSG), which was established in part to address centralization within the Senate, particularly in the ISG, and to reinforce senators’ roles as regional representatives.

He remained with the second-largest ensemble in the upper house until May 21 this year, when he left to again sit as a non-affiliated member. He’s the only Liberal-appointed Senator to have joined the Conservative caucus, which now counts 12

s

enators.

As of Thursday, ISG leads the way with 45 members, CSG follows with 21, the Progressive Senator Group has 18, and there are eight non-affiliated. There’s one vacancy — the seat left behind upon Don Plet’s

mandatory retirement at the age of 75 earlier last month.

He’ll soon be joined in retirement by Richards, who turns 75 on Oct. 17.

In the Senate, Richards has been critical of Trudeau’s Liberal government at times, particularly regarding Bills C-11, the Online Streaming Act, and C-22, Ottawa’s controversial firearms legislation.

On the latter, in June of 2023,

he stood in the Senate

to lament Canadians being lectured “by a government that assumes and presupposes a superior moral nature against certain members of its own citizenry, and acts with uppity condescension toward so many who have done no wrong, suspecting them — without evidence — of things they would not do, while being unable to stop those who will continue to do wrong despite the regulations they continuously and tiresomely propose.”

 In 2023, Senator David Adams Richards sounded off against government legislation that aims to police streaming giants, calling it ‘censorship passing as national inclusion.’

He voted against it, but C-21 would receive royal assent in December.

As for the Online Streaming Act, he called it “censorship passing as national inclusion” and then read from an essay explaining how it puts freedom of speech and thought under threat.

“This is not opening the gate to greatness but only to compliance,”

he said.

“The writers I know don’t need to advance to fit an agenda, and neither do the songwriters or bloggers. When this bill mentions how we have evolved, it is simply a suggestion to comply.”

It, too, received Royal Assent.

Years earlier, it wasn’t legislation that Richards fervently spoke out against; it was how the uninformed vernacular used by U.S. hockey play-by-play broadcasters was changing how their Canadian counterparts call a game.

Reading from a statement, he said players don’t wear jerseys, they wear sweaters, and they put them on in the dressing room, not the locker room. There’s no such thing as a half wall, he insisted, it’s just the boards. And don’t call it a slapper, it’s a slapshot.

“These odious phrases are all momentary inventions by American play-by-play announcers who have never played or understood the game, and worse, almost sacrilegious, have no respect for millions of Canadians who do understand and love the game. Sayings now adopted by Canadians who have no sense of tradition,” Richards said.

“The first thing lost is the game’s essential genius.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Marc Garneau hands out pamphlets on Monkland Avenue in Montreal on July 8, 2008.

OTTAWA — Meili Faille couldn’t believe her ears when she heard the news. Marc Garneau, the first Canadian to have visited space, was preparing to run against her in the 2006 election.

A few weeks later, she won. And Garneau never forgot it.

Twenty years ago, the Bloc Québécois MP at the time held sway in Vaudreuil—Soulanges. This riding, located on the west side of the island of Montreal, near the Ontario border, had elected Faille in 2004 following the sponsorship scandal.

In a riding where former NDP Jack Layton grew up, having a separatist represent a bilingual and multicultural community was an odd fit.

“We had an incredible team on the ground. We were dedicated to the community… Honestly, I didn’t even count the number of events I attended at the time, it was every single day,” Faille recalled in an interview with National Post.

But then, the race was shaken up

by then prime minister Paul Martin

.

Garneau, the then-president of the Canadian Space Agency was not launching his shuttle into space, but rather into the political sphere.

“Marc Garneau, I am convinced, will be a star in the parliamentary firmament,” said Martin at the time.

He was not.

Faille easily beat him by more than 9,000 votes in 2006, when the Conservatives took power. Garneau was a neophyte who went so far as to predict that the Bloc would disappear, “like dinosaur,” when he launched his political career.

“Marc Garneau was Canada, Canada, and simply Canada. It was his image. He was a Canadian figure. I mean, in the midst of the sponsorship scandal, it was a no-win situation for him,” Faille said.

“Basically, he was not able to convince people that he could prioritize Quebec positions over federal positions,” she added. “He was captain Canada.”

 Liberal Leader Paul Martin, left, arrives for a campaign stop with former astronaut Marc Garneau, the Liberals’ new candidate in Vaudreuil-Soulanges riding, Nov. 30, 2005.

His relationship with Quebec was not always easy. After 14 years in the House of Commons, he resigned in 2023, before his own government passed Bill C-13, an overhaul of the Official Languages Act, which included references to Quebec’s Charter of the French Language, known as Bill 96.

He found this inappropriate.

Garneau, a francophone, feared that the rights of Quebec’s English-speaking minorities were threatened by a conflicting interpretation of federal and provincial laws. “I’ve said this was a hill to die on. It is,” Garneau

told the Montreal Gazette

at the time.

It took hours for Quebec Premier François Legault to acknowledge Garneau’s death at the age of 76.

Parti Québécois leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon did not offer his condolences, relaying instead a message from one of his PQ colleagues.

Meanwhile, in Ottawa, former colleagues described Garneau as a “gentleman,” “very serious,” “down to earth,” who’s reputation was unlike anybody else.

“He was so serious and took everything so seriously, to get him to loosen up a little bit was very difficult. Rarely did he take time to laugh and smile,” said his former liberal colleague MP Judy Sgro.

Even Faille was shaken. During his first election in 2008, Garneau ran into Faille, who had just defeated another star candidate: former Conservative senator and cabinet minister Michael Fortier.

The two exchanged pleasantries and ended up sitting together in opposition for three years, before Faille lost her seat in 2011.

“He was a good man. Listen, we weren’t in the same political family, but we respected each other. Marc was very nice,” said Faille.

In 2007, after then leader Stéphane Dion refused to allow Garneau to run in a byelection in Outremont against the NDP’s Thomas Mulcair, Garneau left politics.

He had previously supported Michael Ignatieff in the leadership race that Dion won and many Liberals suggested at the time that the two men weren’t necessarily the best of friends.

“By land or in space, through science and democracy, Marc Garneau has moved Canada and France, Canada and Europe, forward in the same direction. His memory will inspire us in our future endeavours,” Dion, who is now Canada’s ambassador to France,

wrote on Wednesday night

.

But the former astronaut ended up running in 2008 in the general election anyway.

Marcel Proulx, then Dion’s lieutenant in Quebec, met with Garneau to formalize his candidacy and present himself in a Montreal Liberal stronghold.

“It was a big deal that he would consider a run for us in Westmount-Ville-Marie. A huge deal. Let’s not forget that the LPC was not exactly popular in Quebec at the time,” Proulx told the Post.

“Westmount was the perfect riding for him. The riding needed a candidate of his caliber, perfectly bilingual and who cared about its needs and aspiration. And it worked,” he added.

The party wanted him to succeed. Marc Roy, a longtime Liberal collaborator from the Chrétien and Martin era, was sent by the party to evaluate the star candidate.

“We needed to help him,” Roy told us. As an astronaut, Garneau gave hundreds of interviews without any problem. In politics, it was different.

“Let’s just say he’s come a long way, like any politician, but it was a learning curve for him,” said Roy who later went on to become his director of communications and chief of staff while he was minister of Transports.

In 2008, Garneau won the election and spent 14 years on the Hill.

Roy saw firsthand his boss’s dedication and why he would never lose another election.

For example, Garneau left Montreal on a Saturday morning by train to visit Marc-Garneau School in Trenton, Ont., and returned home the same day.

He also met with the residents of Lac-Mégantic at a very emotional town hall meeting following the 2013 train derailment that destroyed the town.

“He always took the time, no matter the circumstances, to give that small amount of time to answer a question because he recognized the great privilege he had and the duty to give back and share it,” Roy said.

Garneau, he said, was an eternal student. He never forgot his first loss in Vaudreuil—Soulanges. It was not a regret. It was a noble experience, he thought.

“No matter the outcome, (all those who run in elections) never lose in such circumstances. Democracy is always well served,” Garneau said in

his farewell speech

on the floor of the House of Commons.

National Post

atrepanier@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon speaks with reporters outside of the Liberal caucus meeting in West Block on Wednesday, June 4, 2025.

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal government used an obscure parliamentary maneuver to sidestep its first major test of confidence on Wednesday, adopting its reply to the throne speech by division.

The measure sailed through the House of Commons without a vote after Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux, the parliamentary secretary to government House leader Steven MacKinnon, moved without objection for the government reply to be

sent to the King

via Governor General Mary Simon.

Conservative Leader in the House of Commons Andrew Scheer was one of the MPs on hand to watch the motion carry.

Ian Brodie, a political scientist and former chief of staff to ex-prime minister Stephen Harper, said that the procedural set piece likely reflected a tacit agreement between the new government and opposition parties.

“I’m sure the opposition parties thought this through and have consented to let the Carney government continue on,” said Brodie.

According to the

House rules of procedure

, motions like

the throne speech reply

may be adopted without a vote under two circumstances: by unanimous consent and “on division.”

The latter happens when support for the motion isn’t unanimous but no member of a recognized party moves for a recorded vote on its passage to be taken.

Interim NDP leader Don Davies said in the preceding hours that he’d instruct

his seven-member caucus

to vote against the motion but wasn’t in a position to make good on the threat, with the NDP not having enough seats to count as a “recognized party” for the

the purposes of parliamentary proceedings.

The minority Liberal government

suffered a minor scare

on Monday evening when it didn’t have the votes blocking a hostile amendment to the throne speech reply calling on it to present an economic update before Parliament breaks for the summer. The procedural vote was not a matter of confidence and the government has said it doesn’t consider it binding.

Liberal MPs downplayed

the narrowly lost vote

, saying that they weren’t surprised by the result.

Brodie says that a new election would not necessarily have been triggered if the Liberal throne speech reply was voted down.

“The Governor General could reasonably ask (Conservative Leader Pierre) Poilievre to form a government. It’s possible he could command the confidence of the House,” said Brodie.

He pointed out that the Liberal government has yet to clearly establish that it enjoys the confidence of the House since Parliament was prorogued by Carney’s predecessor Justin Trudeau several months ago.

— With additional reporting from the Canadian Press

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Gad Hagai and Judy Weinstein Hagai, residents of the Nir Oz kibbutz, came under attack while taking a morning walk on Saturday 7 October.

The bodies of Gadi Hagai and Judy Weinstein Hagai, who were murdered by Hamas terrorists during the October 7 attack were recovered from Gaza and returned to Israel on Wednesday night after 607 days.

“My beautiful parents have been released. We have certainty,” wrote daughter Iris on social media. “We welcome the closing of the circle and their return to a proper burial at home, in Israel. We want to thank the IDF and security forces who were involved in the complex rescue operation and for fighting for us for more than a year and a half. However, our hearts will not be whole until all 12 hostages from Nir Oz are returned, and all 56 hostages in total.”

 This undated photo provided by Hostage’s Family Forum shows Israeli hostage Judy Weinstein and Gad Hagai, whose bodies have been recovered from Gaza by Israeli security forces.

Gadi Hagai, 72, and Judy Weinstein Hagai, 70, were both longtime residents of Kibbutz Nir Oz. Gadi, a dual US-Israeli citizen, was described as “a sharp man, a gifted wind instrument player since the age of three,” a chef who left his position at the Dan Hotel in Tel Aviv to manage Nir Oz’s dining hall, and a committed vegan who loved sports and the land. He had served in the IDF’s elite Sayeret Shaked unit before joining the army orchestra. In the 1980s, he founded a band called Brit Jazz. After the couple’s abduction, the family released some of the band’s recordings.

Judy immigrated to Israel from Toronto age 24 and met Gadi at Kibbutz Ein HaShofet. A dual Canadian-Israeli citizen, she later became an English teacher with a focus on children with special needs and anxiety, and had recently studied mindfulness to help children through puppet theater. She was remembered as a “poet, entrepreneur, and peace activist.”

“We are grateful to see them brought home for a proper burial in Israel,” the kibbutz said. “Yet our hearts remain incomplete until all 12 hostages from Nir Oz — and all 56 hostages still held — return home.”

 Judy Weinstein Hagai. Family Handout

President Isaac Herzog called the moment “one of deep pain, but also one of solace and the resolution of uncertainty.” In a statement, he said: “Judih and Gadi were murdered and abducted together from their home in the peace-loving Kibbutz Nir Oz – the place where they lived, raised a large family, and built their lives. Now, thanks to the rescue operation, they will be laid to rest together in dignity, in the land they so deeply loved.”

The couple was killed during the initial Hamas assault on Nir Oz. While taking one of their routine morning walks, they encountered a terrorist squad in the fields. They were shot and kidnapped to Gaza. Army intelligence confirmed their deaths in December 2023.

According to the Israel Defense Forces and the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet), the couple’s remains were held by the Al Mujahideen Brigades, the same group responsible for the abduction of Yarden and Shiri Bibas and their two children, Ariel and Kfir.

The Hagais are survived by four children and seven grandchildren.

At least 1,180 people were killed, and 252 Israelis and foreigners were taken hostage in Hamas’s attacks on Israeli communities near the Gaza border on October 7. Of the 56 remaining hostages, 33 are believed to be dead.


Ontarians have mixed feelings about Premier Doug Ford, and more than half say Ontario is 'on the wrong track,' according to a new Leger poll.

Roughly three months into his third consecutive majority mandate, Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s championing of Canada in its trade war with the U.S. has helped his star shine brighter. But a majority of poll respondents say the province is on the wrong track.

The latest Ontario Report Card from Leger found that almost half of residents (47 per cent) — and more than half of all men (52 per cent) — approved of the work Ford has done, compared to a third of respondents for NDP Leader Marit Stiles and Liberal boss Bonnie Crombie (33 per cent each). The pollster said Ford’s favourability was about on par with that of B.C. NDP Premier David Eby (51 per cent) and Danielle Smith (44 per cent), leader of Alberta’s governing United Conservative Party.

However, the proportion of Ontarians whose opinion of Ford has worsened over the last six months is 27 per cent — compared to just 14 per cent who say it has improved — and 11 per cent of Conservative voters said their feelings toward Ford have deteriorated.

Furthermore, more than half the respondents (51 per cent) said the province is either strongly or somewhat on the wrong track. A paltry four per cent deemed the trajectory as strongly trending in the right direction, and only five per cent of those identifying as Conservative supporters concurred.

‘A new Conservative dynasty?’ Here’s how rare Doug Ford’s third Ontario majority really is

Having one in two people thinking that way is not something to be overlooked, Jennifer McLeod Macey, Leger’s senior vice-president, told National Post.

“When we look at this, we know that the most important issues to Ontarians right now boil down to housing prices and affordability (18 per cent), closely followed by health care (17 per cent), which, of course, rises in some regions where access to primary care is of the utmost concern.

“There are definitely some issues that need some attention.”

Inflation and rising ​interest rates (12 per cent), the economy (11 per cent) and the U.S.-Canada trade relationship round out the top five issues of concern to Ontarians.

With the exception of the latter, a greater proportion of respondents said Ford and company were doing a bad job than a good job on each of those files, particularly the two most important issues.

In fact, government was only judged to be doing a good job in four areas: U.S. trade and tariff response (53 per cent), federal government relations (51 per cent), energy (41 per cent) and interprovincial relations with municipalities (39 per cent).

All of this, Macleod Macey said, points to voters being concerned with “a multitude of issues” beyond the beef with Donald Trump and his administration.

“While we’re focusing a lot on the U.S., and that is important, there are a number of things that need to be taken care of,” she told National Post. “I think if we could make some improvements in that direction, maybe we’d see a shift in those numbers.”

Ontario Place and Ontario Science Centre plans

Two local Toronto issues that have dogged Ford and his governments since June 2023 are the redevelopment of Ontario Place and the relocation of the Ontario Science Centre (OSC) to the former, which is planned to begin this year following the Don Mills Road facility’s abrupt closure last June due to structural integrity concerns.

Questions about the two were added at the behest of McLeod Macey, who said she wanted to filter out the “loud voices” in traditional and social media so as to measure the feelings of “everyday Ontarians.”

Leger polling found that while 30 per cent either somewhat or strongly support moving OSC to the waterfront, 47 per cent are opposed, 27 per cent of whom felt strongly about it.

 An artist’s rendering of the redesign of Ontario Place.

McLeod Macey also highlighted a 23 per cent cohort who are unsure.

“I think this speaks to the fact that many Ontarians don’t really know the back story. They don’t know all the conversations that have been happening,” she suggested.

When it comes to Ontario Place’s redevelopment to include a mix of public parkland and private facilities, favourability goes up (38 per cent) but is still overshadowed by unfavourability (43 per cent) at this time.

“There are some people who just aren’t going to get behind private development, but perhaps with some more communication, some more understanding, folks would be more supportive of the changes that are happening there and maybe seeing the waterfront being used to its fullest,” McLeod Macey said.

The entirety of work at Ontario Place — which includes a spa and wellness facility, a new Budweiser stage, among other projects — is expected to be complete by 2030.

Leger’s survey was conducted online on May 23-25 and polled 1,025 Ontario residents, almost half of whom reside in the GTA.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Toronto Raptors guard Norman Powell reacts after dunking for a basket against Charlotte Hornets at Scotiabank Arena, on Nov. 18, 2019.

OTTAWA — On Feb. 4, 2022, former Toronto Raptors star guard Norman Powell received two pieces of news that would have a major impact on his life.

The first was from his agent telling him that he was part of a blockbuster trade that sent him from the Portland Trail Blazers to the Los Angeles Clippers.

The second was from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) claiming over $1.2 million in additional income tax on “inducements” paid by the Raptors in 2019 and 2020 to attract the star two-way guard to the surging Toronto team.

Powell, who was part of the Raptors’ 2019 championship team, is now appealing the CRA’s decision in the Tax Court of Canada.

Powell’s faceoff with the tax agency is over the same issue as ex-Toronto Maple Leafs

Patrick Marleau and John Tavares

, namely that his nearly $7 million in signing inducements should be taxed at only 15 per cent and not at the top income tax bracket (over 50 per cent).

A key question for the court to determine is if the inducement offered by the Raptors Powell’s contract to entice him to Toronto fits the definition of an “inducement” under the U.S.-Canada treaty that sets the tax rate at 15 per cent.

Powell says yes, but the CRA says no.

The case, like Marleau and Tavares’, could have a significant impact on how Canadian professional sports teams use signing bonuses or salary inducements as a tax incentive to attract foreign athletes to Canada instead of lower-taxed American organizations.

Powell’s lawsuit argues that the millions in inducements he signed with the Raptors to attract him to Toronto are covered by provisions of a Canada-U.S. tax treaty which set the tax rate for an “inducement to sign an agreement” at 15 per cent.

“The Toronto Raptors and the Appellant (Powell) both understood that the Inducement was a key component of the Appellant’s decision to sign” with the Canadian team, reads the appeal.

But, per Powell, the CRA disagreed. On Feb. 4, 2022, the agency issued notices of assessment to him for 2019 and 2020 that taxed his inducement payments at the ordinary federal and provincial income tax rates (likely over 50 per cent) instead of 15 per cent.

“The Toronto Raptors agreed to pay the Inducement to entice the Appellant ‘to sign an agreement relating to the performance of’ his services as an ‘athlete’,” Powell wrote, saying that CRA’s arguing otherwise is “to distort the legal and economic reality” of his contract with the Raptors.

Powell objected to the CRA, which he says accepted his objections “in full” on March 1, 2024.

But then to Powell’s surprise, six days later the CRA issued a reassessment that once again considered his inducements to be taxable at the full federal and provincial tax rates instead of 15 per cent.

Even more confusing is that one year later, the CRA “admitted and agreed” that the $7 million paid by the Raptors to Powell in 2019 and 2020 were in fact “an inducement… to choose the Toronto Raptors” under the terms of his NBA contract, his lawsuit states.

“The CRA has admitted that the Inducement was paid to the Appellant as an inducement for him to choose the Toronto Raptors. This should conclude the analysis,” reads his appeal.

In his lawsuit, Powell says the CRA made essentially the exact same arguments as they did in Tavares’ and Marleau’s cases without considering the differences between an NBA and NHL contract.

His appeal suggests that CRA copied its findings in the Tavares and Marleau cases and applied them to Powell, who plays a different sport in a different league with different player contracts.

“The position adopted by the (CRA) has been shaped following an audit conducted on an NHL player who received an inducement as per the terms outlined in his employment agreement. Subsequently, the (CRA) improperly extended the conclusions drawn from this particular NHL case to the Appellant” without considering the specificities of his NBA contract, Powell argued.

Both the CRA and Powell’s counsel, Marie-France Dompierre, declined to comment as the case is ongoing. The tax agency has not filed a statement of defence in court.

National Post has published a series of reports since 2024 detailing tax battles between former star players of Toronto’s three largest professional sports teams and the CRA.

Other than its fights with Powell, Tavares and Marleau, the CRA also battled ex-Maple Leaf Jake Muzzin over the tax rate imposed on his signing bonus in 2020.

The CRA also launched battles in 2023

with ex-Toronto Blue Jays all-stars José Bautista, Josh Donaldson and Russell Martin over multimillion tax bills. Late last year, the Tax Court ruled in favour of Donaldson and Martin, arguing that the

CRA’s calculation of their income tax owing was “faulty.”

cnardi@postmedia.com

National Post

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Quebec Premier Francois Legault speaks during the first ministers' meeting at TCU Place.

OTTAWA — At Quebec’s National Assembly and on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, pipelines have dominated the debates. The only issue? No projects involving the province are on the agenda.

“I think there is a fixation on pipelines on (Prime Minister Mark) Carney’s part at the moment, not on the part of Quebecers,” said Bloc Québécois MP and former Greenpeace activist Patrick Bonin.

Since taking office in May, Bonin has mentioned the pipeline issue more than 20 times in his speeches on the floor of the House of Commons.

“We will not allow the government to build a pipeline through Quebec,” he said on Monday.

According to Bonin, the prime minister is “rolling out the red carpet for the oil companies” by meeting with some 20 CEOs in Calgary the day before his meeting with the premiers in Saskatoon and by hoping to speed up environmental assessments.

Since the election, Carney has spoken cautiously about “conventional energy” infrastructure and has repeatedly stated that no decisions have been made at this stage regarding the major projects he wants to see come to fruition.

But he did take a step further on Wednesday, feeding Bonin’s worst fears.

“The consensus that’s required includes a consensus with the Indigenous people. We will stand with Indigenous Canadians, we will build pipelines and energy infrastructure in this great country,” Carney said on the floor of the House of Commons.

In Quebec, many politicians remain on the edge of their seats.

“Any pipeline project, any kind, is bad for the environment, bad for the economy, bad for Quebec,” said Ruba Ghazal, the Quebec solidaire House leader at the National Assembly.

“If the premier doesn’t want to completely shut the door on a pipeline project, can he at least ensure that environmental sovereignty is defended?” she asked.

Quebec Premier François Legault seemed baffled by the question the day after

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith appeared resigned

about the prospect of a pipeline through Quebec, saying she would have more success with a corridor between Hudson Bay and Prince Rupert.

“The leader of Québec solidaire is getting excited about something that doesn’t exist,” replied Legault. “There is currently no project that is taking place in Quebec.”

But what worries many Quebec MPs, particularly from the Bloc Québécois, is that the prime minister is using pipeline expansion as a solution to U.S. President Donald Trump’s attacks on Canada.

“For us, it’s worrying because the government is currently focusing on the idea of developing more oil and gas, putting in pipelines when it should be focusing on making the energy transition and that’s the priority,” said Bonin in an interview.

Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault, who is also Carney’s Quebec lieutenant, said his boss insisted that for such a project to go ahead, “there would have to be social acceptability.”

Just like Guilbeault, Quebec Liberal MPs are also cautious about pipelines in their province.

“I can’t wait to see the appendix, the list of all the (major infrastructure) projects. I’m excited because we really need to build a strong economy”, said Pontiac MP Sophie Chatel. Does it take a pipeline? “We’ll see,” she told National Post while her Gatineau colleague and government House leader Steven MacKinnon said the country “must seize the moment.”

“We have major national projects, people are impatient for there to be a clear process to begin this work and see it through to completion, and so I am very, very confident that it will garner quite substantial support from Canadians,” he said, without pointing out specifically to pipelines.

MacKinnon said he would like to see the government’s bill to speed up construction of major national projects passed by the end of June.

Meanwhile, Conservative MPs are openly advocating for a pipeline crossing the province.

Quebec City MP Gérard Deltell pointed out in the House of Commons that a growing number of Quebecers support pipeline construction.

“We have had pipelines in Quebec since 1942. In 2012, a pipeline was built between Lévis and Montreal that crosses 26 waterways, including the St. Lawrence River. It is so good and works so well that no one knows about it, and no one talks about it,” he said.

National Post

atrepanier@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Edmonton Oilers captain Connor McDavid lifts the the Clarence S. Campbell Bowl presented by NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly after defeating the Dallas Stars in the Western Conference Final on May 29.

Whatever the outcome of this year’s Stanley Cup Final rematch between the Florida Panthers and Edmonton Oilers, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis won’t be wetting his whistle on whiskey courtesy Alberta Premier Danielle Smith again this summer.

On Tuesday, Smith told National Post she would not renew the friendly wager with her U.S. counterpart, who would have been required to send a bottle of Florida rum north had the Oilers completed their series comeback to defeat the Panthers last June.

“We are following the lead of Captain Connor and are going to do things a bit differently this year,” she wrote in a statement.

Smith is referring to Oilers’ captain Connor McDavid, who, after helping his team knock off the Dallas Stars 4-1 in the best-of-seven Western Conference final, hoisted the Clarence Campbell Bowl presented to him by deputy commissioner Bill Daly.

Oilers vs Panthers: Why this could be the most important hockey finals for Canadians in years

NHL players, not unlike most professional athletes, can be the superstitious sort, and one of the most enduring superstitions is that you don’t touch the Campbell or the Prince of Wales Trophy, its Eastern Conference equivalent, should your team win and advance to compete for Lord Stanley’s trophy.

Fearing it will somehow bring bad luck, team captains won’t touch it, and the team will only gather around it for an official photo. The fear is that celebrating with the trophy will jinx your chances in the final.

It’s not clear how far it dates back for either trophy, but it’s only grown in prominence as the sport has grown in North America.

Speaking to Sportsnet’s Gene Principe on the ice as teammates celebrated around him, McDavid said he didn’t “know what was going to happen when we got up there” but decided to “give it a go this year.”

In the post-game press conference, a No. 97 offered a similar and succinct reply.

“Pretty obvious, I think. Don’t touch it last year, we don’t win. Touch it this year, hopefully we win.”

The Panthers, meanwhile, also chose not to touch the Prince of Wales after finishing off the Carolina Hurricanes last week, marking the second straight year they’ve done so. When the Panthers swept the Carolina Hurricanes in the 2023 East final and touched the Prince of Wales, they went on to lose against the Las Vegas Knights in the final.

While it’s mostly hit and miss, plenty of teams who’ve touched their respective trophies have gone on to win the Cup, including some of the games’ greats,

according to the league.

After not doing so before his first Cup final in 2008, Sidney Crosby and his assistant captains did touch the Clarence Campbell in 2009 and went on to win. He would do so again in 2016 and 17 when the Pittsburgh Penguins went on to win back-to-back cups.

 Sidney Crosby touched the Prince of Wales Trophy all three times he captained the Pittsburgh Penguins to Stanley Cup championships.

Alex Ovechkin also did it in 2018, and his Washington Capitals would win the organization’s first-ever title.

The all-star loaded Tampa Bay Lightning touched it ahead of three straight finals from 2020-21, winning the first two and dropping the third.

The NHL said the last time another team chose to touch the Prince of Wales trophy and went on to win was the 2011 Boston Bruins.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.