LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

The provincial courthouse in Vernon, B.C.

A driver who has racked up 32 driving prohibitions or suspensions, as well as 16 24-hour driving bans, failed to convince a British Columbia judge he should get a lighter sentence than normal for drunk driving because more than six months in jail could get him deported to India.

Vernon’s Gurinder Pal Singh Bajwa, a permanent resident of Canada who escaped deportation in 2019 on an impaired driving conviction with a sentence of five months and 29 days, got a reduced sentence this time around because Mounties

captured him on surveillance cameras using the toilet

in a holding cell after he was arrested for impaired driving again on May 11, 2022, after rear-ending a white Hyundai Tucson with his Mercedes sport utility vehicle in the parking lot of a Wholesale Club. His blood alcohol level was more than twice the legal limit.

But the judge refused to lighten Bajwa’s sentence on convictions for impaired and prohibited driving to a level that wouldn’t have immigration consequences for the 57-year-old. Any sentence over six months can result in deportation from Canada.

“To accede to Mr. Bajwa’s request for a (conditional sentence) or a reduction of the jail time on either count for the impact of the collateral immigration consequences to Mr. Bajwa and as a remedy (for breaching his Charter right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure), would bring the administration of justice into disrepute and result in an inappropriate and artificial sentence; in other words, an unfit sentence,” Judge David Patterson of B.C.’s provincial court wrote in a recent decision.

Bajwa immigrated to Canada from India’s Punjab region over 34 years ago.

“He received his first British Columbia driving prohibition on March 19, 1993,” said the judge. “He has also accumulated a substantial number of additional Criminal Code convictions and Motor Vehicle Act infractions.”

The Crown recommended Bajwa get between nine and 12 months in jail, a $2,500 fine and a five-year driving prohibition for the impaired driving charge, plus another four months behind bars for getting behind the wheel while he “was subject to five separate driving prohibitions” or suspensions.

“I am flabbergasted that Crown counsel has only sought a four-month consecutive jail sentence (for driving while prohibited),” Patterson said in his decision dated June 2. “Given the circumstances of the offence, it is hard to imagine a more suitable case for the two-year less-a-day maximum sentence allowed.”

Bajwa’s lawyer argued for a conditional sentence or no more jail time than he got in 2019 — five months and 29 days behind bars. He noted that would allow Bajwa to remain in Canada.

The court heard Bajwa “has no one in India” and that he’s in the process of getting a divorce “as his alcohol usage ruined his relationship with his estranged wife and his children,” said the judge, who noted they live in Canada.

Eight days after he was caught drunk driving in May of 2022, Bajwa “was very intoxicated at his daughter’s wedding and smacked a plate of food out of her hand,” said the decision.

“He was subsequently convicted of assault … and handed a 60-day jail sentence followed by an 18-month probation order, which included having no contact with his estranged wife or children.”

That was “the last straw for the family, essentially,” said the decision.

Bajwa “claims that his problems with alcohol started when he was a roofer,” it said. “He had a group of co-workers and they would often go drinking alcohol together. His alcohol consumption spiralled out of control.”

After he was caught driving drunk in 2022, Bajwa “began the process of getting his life together,” said the decision. “He gave up drinking alcohol and took a few counselling sessions. He now lives with a close friend … and he is an active participant in the Vernon Sikh community.”

Bajwa’s “moral blameworthiness is at the highest end of the spectrum,” said the judge.

Patterson said he had “considered the potential impact of a jail sentence of six months or more on him, including the possibility that he may be removed from Canada, his home for more than 34 years.”

Bajwa got a letter from the Canada Border Services Agency in February of 2024 “alleging he may be inadmissible to Canada” for serious criminality.

“Removal from Canada would lead to dire consequences for Mr. Bajwa,” said the judge.

“He would be forced to leave the country he has called home for more than 34 years. He would face the prospect of returning to India, which has changed since he last resided there. A country that now may be as foreign to him as Canada was when Mr. Bajwa immigrated to Canada.”

After considering the Charter breach, Patterson sentenced Bajwa to 198 days (just over six months) in jail for the impaired driving conviction, fined him $2,000 and banned him from driving for three years.

For driving while prohibited, the judge handed Bajwa another 120 days behind bars (about four months) to be served consecutively, for a total of about 10 months in jail.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


File photo of Rosedale Heights School of the Arts, a place students and parents say is special.

For more than three decades, Barrie Sketchley has led Rosedale Heights, an art-focused high school near Toronto’s tony Rosedale-Moore Park neighbourhood.

Now more than 80 years old, Sketchley’s fate will be decided on Monday when the board of trustees votes to approve — or reject — suggestions on principal assignments made by Toronto District School Board (TDSB) staff. Sketchley is expected to be forced to leave the school he helped build into something students and parents say is pretty special. And they are outraged and upset, racing against the clock to save his job. This is all happening against a backdrop of a number of controversies involving Canada’s largest school district.

Just last week, Ontario’s Progressive Conservative government introduced legislation to give the province more oversight over local school boards.

It was two weeks ago that parents and students first heard that Sketchley was expected to leave. The TDSB has a policy on transferring principals between schools; while this is meant to ensure that good principals are being moved around, parents haven’t always been happy with the decisions.

When Zara Kheiriddin, a 15-year-old Grade 10 student at the school, first found out that Sketchley was going to be moved, she acted quickly: with a friend, she organized a petition to keep him — and secured nearly 300 signatures from fellow students and teachers before Sketchley himself shut it down.

“It’s like, resounding, that most of students and parents and the staff, too, want him to stay,” said Zara. “It’s the school where I’ve felt the safest personally from, like, bullying and typical other — the kind of stuff you get in other schools.”

Zara is the daughter of National Post columnist Tasha Kheiriddin, who, in turn, wrote to Ontario Education Minister Paul Calandra expressing concern over Sketchley’s transfer.

“The community is asking for fairness, respect for a principal who has given everything to public education, and the right to maintain leadership that reflects the school’s unique mission and values,” Kheiriddin wrote. “I urge you to look into this matter immediately.”

Calandra’s office did not respond by press time to National Post’s request for comment.

“It just shows that not only do they disrespect parents, they’re disrespecting a valued educator who’s given so much to the community. That they would force him out in this way is appalling,” said Kheiriddin in an interview.

On Monday, trustees from the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) will meet to discuss Sketchley’s future. Given Sketchley’s age, some are concerned that a transfer would be a de-facto forced retirement.

Weidong Pei, the trustee for Willowdale, wrote last Thursday to Clayton La Touche, the director of education at the TDSB, formally arguing that Sketchley should be allowed to remain at Rosedale.

“Transferring Mr. Sketchley at this stage of his career — which would in effect amount to a forced retirement — would not only be undignified, it would also deprive RHSA and the TDSB of one of our most valued and effective school leaders,” he wrote.

In an interview, Pei said that he’s hoping the decision can be reversed, and if Sketchley chooses to retire, he can do so “on his own terms.” Scores of parents and students have emailed trustees to protest Sketchley’s transfer.

“This is not the right thing to do,” said Pei.

Deborah Williams, the trustee who represents the area of Toronto where Rosedale is located, declined to comment on the specifics of Sketchley’s case.

Katrina Matheson, the chair of the parents’ council at Rosedale, said people are “just really shocked at how disrespectful it is,” to be moving Sketchley after so many decades of service. He has been a TDSB teacher and principal for more than 40 years.

But there’s another lingering issue, too. Within the walls of Rosedale, there’s a burgeoning controversy about the student selection lottery. Since Rosedale is an arts-focused school, students are required to submit expressions of interest in attending. However, 20 per cent of seats are reserved for people from visible minority communities and First Nation, Inuit and Métis students receive priority admissions.

In the past, Rosedale itself made decisions about which students would attend the school, but now it’s handled centrally, at the TDSB. Parents and staff told National Post that Sketchley allegedly objected to this loss of control, and is perceived as a troublemaker by the TDSB. Sketchley himself declined to comment, citing TDSB policy.

“There’s people who skip classes and talk about how annoying it is to go to an art school and that they’re only there because their friends are there, or their parents make them go there,” said Zara.

The TDSB declined to comment on Sketchley’s case, saying it cannot comment on “any decisions that have not been approved by the Board.”

“The next round of decisions with regard to principal assignments — which happens routinely across our system throughout the year — will be made at upcoming Board meetings in June,” wrote TDSB spokesperson Ryan Bird in an email.


A Canadian Armed Forces member sends a radio message during a live fire exercise with members of enhanced Forward Presence Battle Group Poland in Bemowo Piskie, Poland on Nov. 7, 2023.

A new multilateral defence bank aims to help Canada and its allies build their militaries to meet looming threats in an increasingly hostile world while also giving Canadian industry a leg up when it comes to producing weaponry and military kit to tackle those threats head on.

And its Canadian president is hoping it will have a major presence in Toronto.

Announced this past spring, the new Defence, Security and Resilience Bank could solve financial problems for countries, including Canada, that are under pressure to increase military spending beyond two per cent of their gross domestic product (GDP). Some estimates peg the more likely target as five per cent of GDP as Russia and China grow increasingly belligerent on the world stage.

“We have to use our capital markets of allied nations for overwhelming force against our foes,” Kevin D. Reed, the new bank’s president and chief operating officer, said in a recent interview.

The theory is the bank would allow Canada and other countries to re-arm, said Reed, who has helped start nine companies including Equity Transfer & Trust.

“Hopefully that acts as a form of deterrent against big conflicts.”

The United Kingdom “has emerged as the lead candidate to take this on,” according to Reed.

“That being said, we’ve … advocated to our Canadian government that there’s a window here for Canada to take a co-leadership role with the U.K.”

Reed would like to see a branch of the bank located in Toronto.

If Canada chose to be the bank’s host nation, or to co-host with London, “you’re probably looking at 2,500-3,500” banking jobs in Toronto, he said.

The bank would be owned by member nations, including NATO and Indo-Pacific countries.

“They would capitalize the bank, we would get a triple-A rating, and we would take it to the bond market to raise money,” Reed said.

“If we have all 40 nations in, we would expect about $60 billion of equity into the bank over time, and then subject to the bond markets we would seek to raise $100 billion at first, taking that up to about $400-500 billion over time.”

For countries that don’t have a triple-A credit rating, it would mean a lower cost to capital, he said.

It would also allow nations in immediate need of more defence dollars to tap the bank for money, rather than waiting for annual budget cycles.

“The real driver in this is that it would provide credit guarantees to commercial banks to lend into the defence sector,” Reed said. “Most commercial banks … unless you’re a big prime (like Boeing), if you’re a number two or three or four in the supply chain, you’re almost unbankable, historically, because of ESG (an investing principle that prioritizes environmental and social issues, as well as corporate governance) and just a view of defence.”

The Defence, Security and Resilience Bank would be similar to Export Development Canada, a Crown corporation that provides financial and risk management services to Canadian exporters and investors, “but way bigger,” Reed said.

It would offer large banks such as RBC and BMO credit guarantees “that would loosen up capital so they could offer lines of credit, trade finance, you name it, but we can grow the industrial base a lot faster,” Reed said.

That would, in turn, speed up military procurement, he said.

“It takes nine years to get a jet or seven years to get a shoulder-fired rocket launcher,” Reed said. “It’s because the industrial base just isn’t big enough. It’s been constrained. So, this would push liquidity into the commercial banks.”

Sovereign countries could also “enhance procurement” by borrowing from the Defence, Security and Resilience Bank on the promise that they “have to execute within two years,” Reed said. “We want to foster that rapid-fire procurement that we know has been a problem for all member nations.”

Right now, it takes 16 years for startups to go from selling the Department of National Defence on their products to procurement, he said.

“Companies just can’t live in that

they call that the Valley of Death,” Reed said.

“That is a problem. If you want to invent a new bullet … in your garage, you’re going to wait a long time.”

Rob Murray, NATO’s inaugural head of innovation and a former U.K. army officer, started writing the blueprint for the bank about five years ago.

But, at the time, interest rates were flat, Russia hadn’t launched its full-scale war in Ukraine, and U.S. President Donald Trump was not in power.

When the Ukraine war began, interest rates started climbing and people started recognizing “threat levels are changing around the world,” Reed said.

Then Trump came to power in his second term and started “forcing the hand of many NATO nations” to increase their defence spending, Reed said.

Murray published his blueprint last December.

“On the back of that he was invited down to brief the president elect down at Mar-a-Lago,” Reed said, “and Rob’s world just started to expand rapidly with proposed member nations seeking him out, asking how would this work? How can we get involved?”

Murray asked Reed to step in as the bank’s president in early February “to help stitch together the coalition of governments” needed to bring the idea to fruition.

“Every European nation has been briefed,” Reed said.

“And we did the briefing for Canada right after the election” with senior people in Prime Minister Mark Carney’s office, the Privy Council Office, and departments including National Defence, Finance, Global Affairs and Treasury Board.

Reed also briefed officials in Singapore last week and plans to do the same in Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand this week.

“We’re trying to drive this around a consensus of a dozen anchor nations,” he said.

NATO figures from last June suggest Canada spent just 1.37 per cent of its GDP on defence in 2024. The Liberals have said they expect it to reach two per cent by 2030 “at the latest.”

But that’s not fast enough for Trump, who has complained repeatedly about Canada piggybacking on the U.S. for military protection.

“While I don’t like what he’s saying, I see this as an opportunity to get ourselves going,” Reed said. “We have not done our job in a long time. We’ve not fulfilled our commitments, and this a kick in the pants to say who are we, and what do we stand for?”

Later this month, Reed expects NATO countries to accept a new spending minimum of 3.5 per cent of GDP for defence and 1.5 per cent for border security.

“To go from our base today … it’s another $100-110 billion a year to ramp up to that,” he said of Canada. “And that’s not in future dollars. That’s in last year’s dollars. So, any available mechanism that can help grow the industrial base and get them towards those NATO soon-to-be targets is going to be well received.”

Founding members of the bank will start meeting in the fall to hammer out details. Reed anticipates standing up the bank next year.

“I like the idea of another mechanism, and a very powerful and large one, and I think a very influential one, that can help us do more in the defence and security domain in Western democracies,” said retired general Rick Hillier, Canada’s former top soldier, who has joined the Defence, Security and Resilience Bank’s board of directors.

 Canada’s former top soldier, general Rick Hillier, when he was still in uniform.

He predicts Canada is going to need “a revolution in defence and security procurement” to solve the Canadian Forces’ equipment woes.

More money could accelerate the acquisition of new aircraft, warships and submarines, he said.

“The component I’m most worried about is the army,” Hillier said. “The army is broken. We’re down people. Our bases and our infrastructure are in very sad condition. And we lack every kind of capability that a force needs in the kind of areas where we would find ourselves fighting right now. If things go south in Eastern Europe and (Vladimir) Putin and Russia get into some kind of thing they can’t extract themselves from and start heading into Lithuania and Latvia, where there are several thousand Canadians, our sons and daughters, we are ill-prepared to insure that they’re ready to look after themselves.”

The army lacks self-propelled artillery pieces, air defence systems, technology that can detect, track, and neutralize drones, and equipment to remove minefields, Hillier said. “We need to focus a huge amount of that defence spend on the army.”

Canada has also been lagging in spending to defend our north, he said. “We’ve got to know what’s going on in the Arctic, to be able to see what’s going on specifically, to be able to communicate what’s going on and then to be able to respond to what’s going, whether its air, land, or depending on the time of year, sea forces. Right now, we can only do a very small part of that.”

The country needs satellites and ultra-long endurance drones to cover the north, Hillier said. Bases should be built in Inuvik, Rankin Inlet, and Iqaluit, he said. “Then you have to connect … those spots by upgrading the airfields across the north.”

The military also needs billions of dollars to repair and replace old buildings, Hillier said.

Canada’s military has a shortfall of about 15,000 people right now, Hillier said. “You do not attract first rate people with third rate infrastructure. And right now, you go to any garrison, any base, any wing across Canada and the infrastructure is crumbling.”

At CFB Trenton, the military’s hub for air transport operations in Canada and abroad, people can’t even drink the water on the base “because it’s contaminated,” Hillier said.

At CFB Petawawa, “the fire hall they’ve been trying to replace for years floods in any kind of a rainstorm,” he said. “As soon as it shuts down, you shut down operations in that training area, in that garrison, for the brigade, for the helicopter squadron and for the special forces training centre.”

Hillier believes the Defence, Security and Resilience Bank could help alleviate all of these problems.

“There’s an enormous amount of momentum because the inherent good in it is evident to most people as soon as they sit and think about what it could achieve,” he said.

This is the latest in a National Post series on How Canada Wins. Read earlier instalments here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses the gathering during an event marking 20 years of the Gujarat Urban Growth Story at Gandhinagar, in India's state of Gujarat, on May 27, 2025.

OTTAWA

— A Liberal MP says he intends to raise concerns to Prime Minister Mark Carney about the decision to invite India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Canada as part of a meeting of G7 leaders later this month. 

Sukh Dhaliwal represents

the Surrey, B.C., riding that was home to Sikh activist and Canadian citizen Hardeep Singh Nijjar, whom Canada said in 2023 was killed by agents acting on behalf of the Indian government. Nijjar was gunned down outside a temple in June 2023. 

India

has denied the accusation but had considered Nijjar to be a terrorist. Nijjar was a prominent activist in the Khalistan movement, which has pushed to establish a separate Sikh state in India’s Punjab province. 

The accusation from former prime minister Justin Trudeau in September 2023 sparked a wave of tension in the Canada-India relationship, including last fall when the RCMP said it believed Modi’s government was linked to violence unfolding in Canada, including organized crime and murders.

A breakthrough appeared on Friday

when Modi confirmed he would be attending the upcoming G7 summit in Alberta, at Carney’s invitation.

Since then, Dhaliwal says he has received dozens of calls and more than 100 emails from constituents expressing concern. 

“They’re worried. They’re worried about their safety, they’re concerned about the justice in Mr. Nijjar’s case, as well,” he told

National Post

in an interview late Friday.

Dhaliwal said he has heard from other Liberal MPs also expressing concern, but said he would not divulge details to protect their privacy. 

He said he intends to raise the concerns he has been hearing from constituents with Carney or members of his team, and will be in Ottawa next week for the ongoing sitting of Parliament. 

“He’s willing to talk,”

Dhaliwal said of the prime minister.

“He’s willing to listen to his MPs, that’s what he has promised because he has always said that he’s interested in the voice from the grassroots, not the message coming from the top to the grassroots.”

“I will certainly raise this with him or his team.”

A statement from Carney’s office in response to questions from National Post didn’t directly address Dhaliwal’s concerns, but said “Canada’s sovereignty and national security is paramount.”

“As Prime Minister of the fifth largest economy and the world’s most populous country, Prime Minister Modi was invited to participate in these critical discussions,” the statement reads.

The prime minister also defended his decision to invite Modi to the G7 at a Friday press conference earlier in the day.

He said it was a matter he discussed with other G7 countries and, given that the group plans to discuss issues ranging from energy security to critical minerals and infrastructure, “there are certain countries that should be at the table for those discussions.”

Carney said India is central to a number of supply chains and has the fifth largest economy in the world and the largest population.

“So it makes sense.”

Modi said in a statement on social media that “I

ndia and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests.” 

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre backed the decision for Modi to attend, saying Canada needs to work with India on security and trade.

Meanwhile, the World Sikh Organization, which advocates for Sikh Canadians, denounced the decision, with its legal counsel, Balpreet Singh, saying it amounts to a “betrayal.”

Carney declined to say on Friday whether he believed Modi was involved in Nijjar’s assassination, saying it would be inappropriate for him to comment on the matter given the fact that legal proceedings were underway.

Four Indian nationals have been charged in his death.

Dhaliwal said he does not support the decision to have Modi in Canada, but said he should offer a “commitment that his government or his agents of India, will never, ever intervene into the lives of Canadians.”

India’s prime minister should also agree to “full cooperation” in the investigation into Niijar’s death.

Last fall, Canada and India expelled each other’s diplomats after it cited RCMP evidence linking Indian government agents to crimes in Canada.

Canada had requested that India waive diplomatic immunity to allow police to investigate, which the federal government said did not happen.

Carney said on Friday that he and Modi in their discussion agreed to

“law enforcement to law enforcement dialogue. He also noted that
“some progress” had been made on issues of “accountability.”

Dhaliwal said the RCMP has been clear in its concerns about the links between the Indian government and violent crimes taking place in Canada.

He also pointed to Justice Marie-Josée Hogue’s report into foreign interference that named India as one of the top countries attempting to meddle in Canada’s democratic process.

The invitation to Modi touches on issues of the rule of law and fundamental rights, he added. 

“We cannot sacrifice those values.”

National Post

staylor@postmedia.com

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


While those closest to the fires are most vulnerable, the fine particulates in wildfire smoke can travel 1,000 kilometres or more.

In addition to hearts and lungs, wildfire smoke may mess with the human brain, emerging research suggests.

Fine particulate matter carried in wildfire smoke can enter the brain via the bloodstream, causing inflammation and oxidative stress, a condition resulting from too many cell-damaging molecules called free radicals and not enough antioxidants to mop them up, one theory holds.

Recently, scientists have linked exposure to wildfire smoke to increased risks for impaired cognitive function, memory loss, greater odds of being

diagnosed with dementia

and an increase in

emergency department visits

for anxiety, depression, psychotic episodes and other mental-health problems.

Plumes of smoke from Prairie wildfires that have forced the evacuation of thousands of people from their homes led to air quality advisories issued for large swaths of the country Friday, with Environment Canada messages covering British Columbia, the Prairies and most of Ontario and Quebec, the

Montreal Gazette reported.

More toxic than other sources of pollution, wildfire smoke can cause a range of health effects, from mild coughs, itchy eyes and headaches to dizziness, wheezing, chest pains, asthma attacks, shortness of breath and heart palpitations.

And when heat and poor air quality combine, the health impacts are reached that much sooner, said Dr. Anna Gunz, a pediatric intensive care doctor at Children’s Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre and associate professor at Western University’s Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry.

While those at the doorstep of fires are most vulnerable, the fine particulates in wildfire smoke can travel 1,000 kilometres or more.

The National Post spoke to Gunz to help unpack how wildfire smoke can impact physical and mental health. This conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity and length.

What makes wildfire smoke particularly risky for human health?

We have over 40 years of air pollution health data and so some of this is grounded in the same principles.

We love the smell of campfires. But even the smoke that we breathe by a campfire contains lots of particulates that are actually really bad for us. It’s not stuff that we’re supposed to be breathing.

When we think about wildfires, it’s not just wood that’s been cut from trees that you maybe know. It’s everything else that’s burning — pesticides, herbicides, metals. Even allergens and fungus.

Because it moves so far, you don’t need to be right next to a wildfire to be affected. It’s high concentrations for shorter periods of time, but it is ubiquitous. Part of the problem with being away from the wildfire is that people don’t necessarily realize the air might be bad. It can be really deceiving.

And then you have the people who are near the fires who’ve been evacuated or are at risk of evacuation. And so, the fear, the trauma, the risks of PTSD and other emotional things. People are stressed. I’m always thinking about children and women and those who are vulnerable (such as) Indigenous folks who are disproportionately displaced by wildfires every year and removed from their community.

What are the immediate health effects from exposure to wildfire smoke?

The first contact we have with smoke is our eyes, our mucus membranes, and our upper airways.

If we think about breathing in smoke and where it goes next, it goes to our large airways and those are the airways that are affected by asthma. So, certainly the people at highest risk of becoming ill, or more ill and coming into hospital, are anyone with puffers. Asthma, absolutely. But people with COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), cystic fibrosis and lung issues are going to have a harder time breathing.

Your eyes and your upper airways and mucus membranes are going to see the larger particles of irritants, and they’re going to start reacting to those larger particles.

And then the things we can’t smell or see, or taste are these small micro-particles, and that’s what gets absorbed through our lungs and into our blood stream. And it causes a huge inflammation in the body. That’s at least the biological reason why we think that the other things we see in terms of heart and brain health are noted.

Once inside the blood, how do micro-particles trigger something like a heart attack?

There’s been a lot of research looking at trying to understand the mechanisms in the pathways in your blood vessels that could lead to this.

Our blood vessels travel in our brains and in our hearts. Even though we think about heart attacks and stroke differently — they present very differently — ultimately what is happening is your small blood vessels that are either supplying your heart or your brain can become clogged.

The lining of our blood vessels is called the endothelium, and it’s this really complex place where there are these active living cells. (Endothelial function helps control how well blood is balanced in terms of clotting and how thin it is.)

One theorized mechanism is that (exposure to wildfire smoke) activates different inflammatory pathways that affect your endothelium.

There is less long-term neural data right now around wildfires. (However, one 10-year study of more than one million people in southern California found persistent exposures to wildfire smoke increased the risk of dementia more than other forms of air pollution. Another group found that wildfire smoke exposure during the 2020 California wildfires was associated with higher odds of subsequent emergency visits for mental health conditions. Inhaled particulate matter, the researchers said, can reach the brain, potentially causing inflammation, oxidative stress and damage to the brain’s blood vessels.)

Why is excessive heat plus smoke particularly dangerous?

When it’s hot, you also get secondary air pollutants, like ozone. The heat and the air interact to create more pollution.

What can people do to reduce their health risks?

Anyone with a chronic illness, the elderly and children are always at higher risk.

If it’s smoky outside, shut the windows, turn on the AC. Know what the air quality is and understand that it changes at different times of the day.

If you’re going to be outside, try to plan according to air quality (people can check the federal

Air Quality Health Index

or special air quality statements or advisories for their area). If you’re going to be doing something that has more exertion and you’re going to be breathing faster, like exercise, better to do that when the air quality is better.

An N95 mask can help filter a number of these particles.

If you know some kids (with asthma or other lung conditions) are going to be triggered (by the smoke), make sure that the care for the lungs is really under control heading into wildfire season. (ER visits for

asthma spiked across Ontario during the 2023 Canadian wildfires.)

For people who are living near evacuation zones where they know this happens and they talk about “go bags,” it’s important to think about medications. Ask your doctor to prescribe in such a way that you can have stashes of medicines in your “go bag” so that if you’re evacuated you still have access to them.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


A citizenship ceremony takes place at Pearson International Airport in  Toronto on June 30, 2014.

A new bill introduced in the House of Commons is offering a way for some to obtain Canadian citizenship.

Bill C-3,

An Act to amend the Citizenship Act

, was tabled by Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship of Canada (IRCC) Lena Metlege Diab on Thursday. The bill would automatically grant Canadian citizenship to anyone who would be a citizen today if it weren’t for the first-generation limit or “outdated provisions,” the federal government said in

a news release

.

Currently, most Canadian citizens who are citizens by descent cannot pass their citizenship onto a child born or adopted outside the country.

The bill would also establish a new framework to allow for citizenship based on a Canadian parent’s connection to Canada. The connection can be proven by demonstrating they lived in the country for at least three years, or 1,095 cumulative days, before the birth or adoption of a child.

Here’s what to know.

What is the first-generation limit?

The limit refers to the fact that

someone does not automatically become a Canadian citizen

if they were born outside Canada and their parent was also born outside Canada to a Canadian parent, or adopted outside Canada by a Canadian parent.

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice declared that key provisions of the first-generation limit were unconstitutional in Dec. 2023.

“The Government of Canada did not appeal the ruling because we agree that the current law has unacceptable consequences for Canadians whose children were born outside the country,” per the news release.

The Court suspended its declaration until November 20, 2025, which means the current rules still apply until further notice,

according to the federal government

.

Why was the citizenship by descent bill introduced?

“The legislative amendments to the Citizenship Act made in 2009 by the Harper Conservatives restrict citizenship by descent to the first generation born abroad,” Diab’s office told National Post in an emailed statement.

“This has meant that individuals with a genuine connection to Canada are not recognized as Canadian citizens and has led to unacceptable consequences for Canadians whose children were born outside the country.”

The legislation was introduced to “correct this, to remove the first generation limit, extending Canadian citizenship to ‘Lost Canadians’ beyond the first generation,” per the minister’s office.

According to

a news release in 2008

, the amendments made by the Harper government were “to protect the value of Canadian citizenship for the future.”

“Canadian citizenship is more than a legal status, more than a passport,”

said

former 

Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Minister Jason

Kenney in 2010. “We expect citizens to have an ongoing commitment, connection and loyalty to Canada.”

What are “lost Canadians”?

The term refers to people who were born outside of the country to Canadian parents who were also born in another country.

In 1974, the first Canadian Citizenship Act contained provisions that cause many people to “either lose their Canadian citizenship or not acquire it in the first place,” the news release said.

Changes to the legislation in 2009 and 2015 restored or gave citizenship to some 20,000 “lost Canadians.” The new legislation proposes giving automatic citizenship to anyone denied citizenship under the current law.

“Citizenship is more than a legal status — it’s a profound connection to the values, history, and spirit of Canada,” said Diab, per the news release. “It reflects our belief that being Canadian means more than just a place of birth; it’s about belonging, shared experiences, and a commitment to the inclusive and diverse community we all call home.”

What could this mean for Canada?

The new bill could open up the possibility of many people applying for citizenship. Thousands of people could become Canadian, estimated immigration news website

Citizenship and Immigration Canada

.

With a potential surge of applications, Vancouver immigration lawyer Ryan Neely

told CTV News

that government should be certain that the IRCC’s systems are “equipped to handle the influx of applications.”

With additional reporting by The Canadian Press

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Dark chocolate contains flavonoids, a compound found in a variety of foods and beverages.

A new study reveals what drinking tea and eating dark chocolate and berries did for a group of more than 120,000 people.

Those foods, as well as fruits like grapes, apples, oranges, and beverages like red wine, all contain flavonoids, which are compounds found in many plant products. Flavonoids can “help your body function more efficiently while protecting it against everyday toxins and stressors,”

per Healthline

. The study’s authors said those who consumed a diverse range of foods containing flavonoids (such as berries, grapes and dark chocolate) “could lower their risk of developing serious health conditions and have the potential to live longer,” in

a news release

. The study has been peer-reviewed.

In the study, which was

recently published in the journal Nature Food

, researchers observed 124,805 participants between the ages of 40 and 70 from the UK Biobank, a large-scale database with biomedical information. The participants were tracked for roughly 10 years and their dietary information was collected using a questionnaire asking them about the frequency in which they ate approximately 200 types of food and 30 beverages.

Dr. Benjamin Parmenter, a research fellow at Edith Cowan University in Australia, was the study’s first author and co-lead. He said consuming roughly 500 mg of flavonoids a day or more was linked to a 16 per cent lower risk of “all-cause mortality” (meaning death from any cause).

It was also linked to a roughly 10 per cent lower risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and respiratory disease.

A

study published in 2025

in peer-reviewed food science journal Foods said, as it pertains to human health, “flavonoids are recognized for their ability to combat aging, mitigate inflammation, safeguard the nervous system, and promote overall well-being.” However, in another study published in

2022 in the Nutrition Journal

, researchers “observed an increased risk of prostate cancer by higher intake of total flavonoids.” In a

study published in 2016 in the Journal of Nutritional Science

, researchers called for further studies on flavonoids so their usefulness “in the diet could be improved for better human health.”

“Over 30 different types of flavonoids are regularly consumed in the human diet. These are found in different types of everyday foods,” Parmenter told National Post over email.

A few squares of dark chocolate could be roughly 25 mg of flavonoids. One apple is equal to roughly 100 mg of flavonoids, while one orange is roughly 60 mg. For tea drinkers, one cup of black tea is roughly 300 mg of flavonoids, while the same amount of green tea is roughly 150 mg.

“We observed that consuming a higher quantity and wider diversity of dietary flavonoids, when consumed together, may represent the optimal approach for improving long-term health, compared with increasing either flavonoid quantity or diversity alone,” Parmenter said.

Those with the highest flavonoid diversity were more likely to be female, older, have a lower body mass index (BMI), be more physically active and have a higher education and were less likely to be current smokers, according to the study.

“We also know from lab data and clinical studies that different flavonoids work in different ways, some improve blood pressure, others help with cholesterol levels and decrease inflammation,” said study co-lead professor Aedín Cassidy, per the news release. Cassidy is from the Co-Centre for Sustainable Food Systems and Institute for Global Food Security at Queen’s University Belfast.

The findings of the study show how “simple and achievable dietary dietary swaps” can “potentially improve health in the long-term,” she said.

“Dietary swaps, such as drinking more tea and eating more berries and apples for example, can help increase the variety and intake of flavonoid-rich foods, and potentially improve health in the long-term,” said Cassidy.

According to researchers, no previous works appear to have reported on the human health benefits of a flavonoid-diverse diet.

“Consequently, replication of our findings in other cohorts and clinical trials will be critical, as will the exploration of flavonoid diversity with other disease outcomes. Interpretation, however, requires careful consideration,” said researchers, in the study.

The study was led by researchers from Queen’s University Belfast, Edith Cowan University Perth, and the Medical University of Vienna and Universitat Wien.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Crowds gathered on Parliament Hill today for the

Against a backdrop of fresh talk of Alberta separation and the constant spectre of Quebec’s sovereignty movement, a new national opinion poll found that most Canadians say breaking up will be hard to do.

A large majority of respondents nationally said any secession by one province would require negotiation with all provinces and must be supported by a clear majority of voters in the province, and most said separation cannot be a unilateral decision, and it should require approval by the federal House of Commons.

A

national opinion survey

, conducted by Leger Marketing for the Association for Canadian Studies and provided to Postmedia, was designed to probe Canadians attitudes about the process for separation, rather than their views on separation itself, and what should follow a successful provincial leave referendum.

“The bottom line is that Canadians across the country envision the process as much more complex than a simple majority vote on a referendum question,” said Jack Jedwab, president of the Montreal-based Association for Canadian Studies.

Public discussion about Alberta separating from Canada drew more mainstream attention in May, after the federal election returned the Liberal Party to government and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith tabled provincial legislation to make it easier for Albertans to trigger a referendum on the province leaving the rest of Canada. Smith said she would hold such a referendum if a citizen petition called for it.

Separatists in Quebec hope the renewed discourse on separation will boost their long-standing desire for independent statehood, which twice went to provincial referendum which failed to support sovereignty, in 1980 and 1995. The Parti Québécois plans another provincial sovereignty referendum in the years ahead.

That creates plenty of secessionist talk and debate, but it has been 30 years since Canada has seen an actual separation referendum.

“Many Canadians of voting age and, of course, most immigrants didn’t experience the last referendum 30 years ago, but there is a growing consensus that the rest of the country would want a say in the process and secession would not be simple,” said Jedwab.

The poll asked 1,537 people across Canada a series of questions on the mechanism of a possible separation.

 Alberta Premier Danielle Smith tabled provincial legislation to make it easier for Albertans to trigger a referendum on the province leaving the rest of Canada.

A majority of Canadians said any referendum question regarding provincial separation from Canada must be unambiguous, with 59 per cent of respondents agreeing with that, with only 11 per cent disagreeing, and 30 per cent saying they don’t know or declined to answer.

Respondents in Quebec and Alberta showed the strongest support for an unambiguous question, at 71 and 62 per cent, respectively.

A clear majority of Canadians, 66 per cent, said there must be a clear majority of voters supporting separation in a separatist referendum for it to be considered — with Quebecers the softest on the issue.

The poll showed that 76 per cent in Atlantic Canada, 75 per cent in B.C., 72 per cent in Alberta, 66 per cent in Ontario, and 62 per cent in Manitoba-Saskatchewan agreed that there must be a clear majority of voter support for separation. In Quebec it was 55 per cent, still a majority, with 26 per cent saying it was not necessary, by far the highest in the country.

A majority of respondents in every region agreed that a province separating from Canada would require negotiations with all provinces — even respondents in Quebec, although they were the softest on the issue.

Nationally, 62 per cent of respondents agreed that negotiation was necessary for provincial separation, with 19 per cent saying it wasn’t needed and another 19 per cent saying they didn’t know or declined to answer.

The age of respondents impacted how strongly that feeling was, with the youngest cohort of 18 to 34 year olds showing a low of 56 per cent agreement, the middle cohort of 35 to 54 year olds rising to 61 per cent agreement, and the oldest cohort, those 55 years old and above, being the strongest in agreement at 67 per cent.

The regional breakdown on the need for negotiations was lowest in the two provinces most active with separatist ambition — Alberta at 52 per cent and Quebec at 57. The highest support for the need for negotiation was in Atlantic Canada (67 per cent), followed by Ontario (66), B.C. (65), and Manitoba-Saskatchewan (61).

Most Canadians said that even after a favourable provincial vote for separation, a province cannot unilaterally leave Canada, the poll found, although there is a lot of uncertainty about the issue.

Nationally, 42 per cent said a province cannot make its own decision to separate from Canada while 22 per cent said such a decision by a province was enough. A large number, 36 per cent, said they didn’t know or didn’t answer the question.

Only respondents in B.C. delivered a majority response dismissing unilateral departure — barely — at 51 per cent. Other regions followed: Ontario (46 per cent), Atlantic Canada (44), Alberta (43), Manitoba-Saskatchewan (42), and Quebec (31).

Quebec was the only region with more people embracing unilateral separation than dismissing the idea: 32 per cent said it was OK, while 37 per cent said they weren’t sure or didn’t answer.

While a majority of those in British Columbia, Atlantic Canada, and Ontario said a referendum question on separation should require the approval of the federal House of Commons, most Quebecers and Albertans disagreed.

In Alberta, 43 per cent said a referendum question should not require a federal parliamentary vote, while 35 per cent agreed it should. That’s even stronger than in Quebec, where 36 per cent said it should not require a federal approval, with 34 per cent saying it should.

Those in B.C. showed the strongest support for federal input, at 60 per cent, followed by Atlantic Canada at 58 per cent, and Ontario at 55 per cent. In Manitoba and Saskatchewan, pooled together in the poll, 43 per cent agreed there should be parliamentary approval, with 21 per cent saying it shouldn’t be required and 36 per cent saying they didn’t know or declined to answer.

“Canadians will want agreement on the question and will seemingly not be inclined to allow an outcome that involves a breakup to be established as set out solely by a province that wishes to separate,” said Jedwab.

“Without previous discussion around the process and the desired outcome, the risk is that results will not secure required recognition.”

The public opinion survey was conducted online with 1,537 respondents in Canada from May 16 to 18. As a non-probability sample in a panel survey, traditional margins of error do not apply.

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | Twitter:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi attends the 19th East Asia Summit during the 44th and 45th Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Summits in Vientiane on October 11, 2024.

OTTAWA — India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi says he will attend the G7 meeting in Kananaskis this month after receiving an invitation from Prime Minister Mark Carney.

“As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests. Look forward to our meeting at the Summit,”

said Modi, on social media

.

Modi wrote that he spoke to Carney on the phone and congratulated him on his recent election victory.

Carney’s office confirmed the invitation on Friday morning, saying “the two leaders discussed the longstanding relationship between Canada and India.”

“Importantly, there was agreement to continued law enforcement dialogue and discussions addressing security concerns,” the statement reads.

Relations between the two countries have been tense since 2023, when a local Sikh leader was shot and killed outside the Guru Nanak Sikh temple in Surrey, B.C. Former prime minister Justin Trudeau

told the House of Commons

that there was credible evidence that agents of the Indian government were behind the murder.

More to come.

National Post

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Prime Minister Mark Carney walks through the foyer of the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Wednesday, June 4, 2025.

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government plans to remove federal trade barriers by recognizing the rules provinces have in place, National Post has learned.

The measures are set to be introduced in a “One Canadian Economy” bill aimed at knocking down federal trade barriers and fast-tracking the approvals process for major energy and infrastructure projects to be introduced Friday.

The full title of the bill is “An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act.”

The proposed legislation takes aim at the overlap that exists between rules at the provincial and federal levels of government, including when it comes to workers.

The federal government is hoping the legislation will receive unanimous support from all parties to fast-track its adoption, but at least one opposition party has said that will not happen.

Bloc Québécois House leader Christine Normandin said on Wednesday her party will want to study the bill in great detail and hear from experts in parliamentary committees, which are not yet up and running.

“For the interest of the population that we represent, we’re going to do the work,” she said.

Carney is expected to hold a media availability to answer questions about the legislation around 12:30.

Besides addressing trade barriers, the bill will usher in a new process to fast-track approvals for major projects by creating a new federal major projects office.

By creating the new office, the government promises to streamline the regulatory process and cut the approval timeline from five to two years.

Carney and the premiers met earlier this week and agreed on the criteria for what constitutes a project to be in the “national interest,” which would allow it to be fast-tracked.

Requirements include Indigenous participation, the potential for clean growth, and a high likelihood of success.

The federal government has promised that the proposed bill to fast-track resource project approvals would follow the constitutional duty to consult First Nations.

However, the Assembly of First Nations has said it needs to see the full text of the bill to analyze it legally and has warned the approach

poses a “serious threat” to treaty rights

. On Friday, they reiterated that concern.

“The Assembly of First Nations remains deeply concerned about the lack of time and appropriate process to carry out the Crown’s consultation and consent obligations, especially given the potentially massive impact on the rights of First Nations,” the AFN said, in a statement to National Post.

National Post

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.