OTTAWA

— Less than two weeks after the Liberal cabinet was sworn in, the presidents of the five major automakers appealed directly to Prime Minister Mark Carney, requesting him to “urgently” repeal the federal zero-emission vehicle sales mandate, warning of industry-wide repercussions if it is not. 

More than two months later, and with no public indication as to whether the government will listen, frustration is only building, says Brian Kingston, president and CEO of the

Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers’ Association, which sent the May 26 letter and represents Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis. 

The letter was signed by Ford Canada CEO Bev Goodman, General Motors Canada President Kristian Aquilina, Honda Canada President and CEO Dave Jamieson, as well as Stellantis Canada CEO Jeff Hines and Toyota Canada President and CEO Cyril Dimitris.

“If the mandate is not urgently repealed, it will inflict serious damage on automakers, the dealership network, and the hundreds of thousands of Canadians employed in the sector,” the letter reads.

Kingston said the fact that all five CEOs signed their names was noteworthy and speaks to how pressing they view the matter.

“When all five CEOs of the (original equipment manufacturers) that build and employ Canadians write in on a single issue, that signifies the level of urgency regarding the (electric vehicle) mandate.”

A response from the Prime Minister’s Office has not yet been returned. Back in July, Carney met with several of the auto CEOs to discuss the ongoing trade war with U.S. President Donald Trump, who has targeted the auto industry with tariffs.

During the meeting, they raised the need to revoke the mandate.

In the private letter, which was sent to other ministers and government officials, and released to National Post under federal access-to-information legislation, the five automakers outline their commitments to electrification and cite the “tens of billions” of investments announced in Canada.

It points out that Canadians have access to more than 100 different types of zero-emission vehicles and that Transport Canada’s figures show the availability of these vehicles to be “meeting or exceeding” consumer demand.

The letter states that despite these efforts, electric vehicle sales have plummeted, referencing the latest available Statistics Canada figures for March, which showed sales fell to around 6.5 per cent of total vehicle sales.

In the first quarter of this year, 
Statistics Canada recorded zero-emission vehicle sales
 in Canada, representing 8.7 per cent of new vehicle registrations, down 23 per cent from the previous year.

The CEOs said the drop was “in direct response” to the federal and provincial governments either “weakening or eliminating purchase incentive programs that had been supporting demand.” Ottawa ended its program back in January, as did Quebec, which has since introduced a rebate.

Flavio Nienow, a

spokesman for Transport Canada, the department responsible for developing the rebate, said in a statement that the government “

understands that the higher purchase price of (electric vehicles) remains a key barrier to mass zero-emission vehicle adoption.” 

Laura Scaffidi, a spokeswoman for Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland, said the government was looking at ways to reintroduce a rebate of up to $5,000, but did not provide a timeline. 

In their letter from May, the CEOs cast doubt on the ability of a new rebate to cause electric vehicle sales to make a turnaround, citing other challenges such as “natural consumer demand,” as well as the lack of infrastructure and challenges around affordability and slow adoption by commercial and government sectors.

These factors combined “make the current targets unrealistic and unattainable.” The letter requests that the mandate be repealed, given there was “no longer a pathway” to reach its first target of seeing 20 per cent of new vehicle sales be zero-emission vehicles by 2026.

Transport Canada defines a zero-emission vehicle as a fully electric, plug-in battery hybrid, or one powered by hydrogen fuel cells.

The mandate, which the federal government formalized in 2023 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the transportation sector, sets out sales targets companies must hit, beginning with 20 per cent in 2026 and then rising to 60 per cent by 2030 before hitting 100 per cent by 2035.

“Given the impending 20 per cent requirement for 2026, the federal mandate is already forcing automakers to either limit combustion engine (ICE) and hybrid vehicle sales in Canada, or purchase credits from automakers like Tesla that do not produce vehicles in Canada,” the letter reads.

It warns that the regulation would result in lower vehicle sales and fewer jobs in the sector and higher prices for consumers.

“This will undermine consumer affordability and choice at a time of rising costs, limited demand, and growing uncertainty about infrastructure readiness.”

It argues that existing regulations for greenhouse gas emissions would drive the transition to electric vehicles and provide more flexibility.

Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin and other ministers have been meeting with industry to discuss their concerns, with Dabrusin’s office saying it was exploring “flexibility.”

Spokeswoman Jenna Ghassabeh reiterated that position in a new statement, saying the government was engaging with industry to ensure measures “reflect times we are in.”

Kingston, who met with Dabrusin last month, said the minister appears committed to the policy.

He said some at Environment Canada have been “pushing back” against their concerns that the matter is urgent.

“We need a clear public signal that it will be repealed, or automakers are going to continue to have to make disastrous choices, which is restricting vehicle sales and buying credits from Tesla.”

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.

OTTAWA — The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) is taking so long to decide whether Quebecor’s online radio station can continue to broadcast on 99.5 FM in Montreal that Cogeco Communication is threatening to sue the federal agency to speed things up.

In a letter sent Monday to the CRTC’s secretary general and obtained by National Post, Cogeco accused the commission of “not ensuring the proper progress” in the file, not “assuming the responsibilities incumbent upon it” and “not fulfilling its duty towards the public and the Canadian broadcasting system.”

Moreover, it states that both companies involved in broadcasting the station are operating in an “illegal situation.” Quebecor replied in its own letter on Wednesday, accusing Cogeco of making “false and defamatory statements about Quebecor Media, baselessly accusing it of multiple violations and of operating illegally.”

It all started a year ago when Quebecor, Quebec’s largest media empire and owner of powerful news outlets such as Le Journal de Montréal and TVA, announced the broadcast of its QUB digital radio programs on 99.5 FM, owned by Leclerc Communication.

The deal raised some eyebrows at the time in the industry. When it launched QUB Radio in 2018, Quebecor announced it was “the new way to do radio.” The company had long been aiming for a breakthrough in Montreal’s lucrative and cutthroat radio market.

In fact, the CRTC had already blocked Quebecor from entering the Montreal radio market in the past. In 2008, it prohibited single companies from owning newspapers, television and radio stations in the same market.

So, Quebecor turned to an unregulated digital platform.

Until August 2024 when QUB’s most popular talk radio shows then became available on a conventional weekday radio frequency, resulting in the demise of music station WKND 99.5 FM.  This was without requiring regulatory approval.

“This agreement is solely a programming agreement providing for live, simultaneous rebroadcast of the QUB radio station’s programming on the 99.5 FM frequency, Monday through Friday, 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.,” said Quebecor’s vice president of regulatory and environmental affairs Peggy Tabet in a letter to the CRTC.

Leclerc Communication’s license stipulates that it is required to broadcast a majority of hours of French-language vocal music on weekdays. The company claims to be meeting its obligations but the CRTC recently challenged this claim in a letter after receiving complaints.

Quebec’s music industry

criticized the change while competitors argued that the move was outright illegal.

Cogeco and Bell Media, the two most important players in the market, asked the CRTC to enforce its regulatory requirements regarding concentrated media ownership and wants the commission to “recognize that the agreement between Quebecor and Leclerc contravenes the CRTC’s multi-media ownership policy” and that it “issues an order prohibiting Quebecor and Leclerc from broadcasting the programming of QUB Radio (…) in prime time.”

Since the complaint was filed, stakeholders from across Canada have taken an interest in this matter, generally in favour of Cogeco and Bell.

“As a smaller market private broadcaster operating AM and FM radio stations across the prairies, these developments are concerning to Golden West,” wrote Golden West Broadcasting Ltd. vice-president Robin Hildebrand 

in a submission to the CRTC.

“If the commission fails to act, it will shake the confidence of broadcasters in the fair, transparent and timely enforcement of the rules and regulations governing our private broadcasting system,” he added.

Gordon Rawlson from Rawlco Radio in Saskatchewan also supported Cogeco.

On the other hand, Quebecor Media “firmly believes that the programming agreement… is in the public interest of Quebecers and promotes diversity by adding a new voice to over-the-air radio in a largely globalized news market.”

The union representing the workers at Cogeco said it is “concerning to see a digital broadcaster whose current operations are not subject to CRTC regulation circumvent the commission’s regulatory framework.”

“Our position on this matter has been clear and consistent since the day this agreement was publicly announced: we rigorously comply at all times with all of our regulatory obligations and licensing conditions,” said Leclerc Communication’s spokesperson Stéphanie Friess.

These stakeholders are now awaiting a decision. In an email exchange with National Post, CRTC spokesperson Leigh Cameron said a decision would be issued in due course.

The application was filed in November and comments officially opened in December.

“Since then, the CRTC has received a series of extension and confidentiality requests from multiple parties,” added Cameron.

But Cogeco’s patience is running out. In the letter obtained by National Post, Paul Cowling, the company’s chief legal and corporate affairs officer, writes that competitors are losing revenue because of this business agreement and that the CRTC is taking too long to act.

“This inertia is unfounded, unreasonable and harms the entire Canadian media ecosystem, while Quebecor and Leclerc continue to blatantly ignore the regulations put in place by the commission,” he wrote.

The CRTC did not respond to National Post’s questions regarding a possible lawsuit.

If the regulator does not issue a decision within 30 business days, Cogeco intends to file an application for a writ of mandamus with the Federal Court of Appeal, which would speed up the process and force a decision from the CRTC.

“As the Council shirks its obligations and responsibilities, this legal avenue seems particularly opportune to us,” wrote Cowling.

Meanwhile, Quebecor is asking the CRTC “to categorically and expeditiously dismiss the baseless application to prohibit Quebecor Media and Leclerc from broadcasting QUB content on 99.5 FM.”

National Post

atrepanier@postmedia.com

• Music streamer Spotify tells CRTC not to regulate it like radio
• Heritage officials asked if CBC and Radio-Canada should be split, internal document shows

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.

The Howard Stern Show, which has been on the air now for more than 40 years, first on terrestrial radio and since 2005 on SiriusXM satellite radio, is said to be on the verge of ending.

Reports in

Britain’s tabloid The Sun

and elsewhere say that the host’s latest five-year contract expires in the fall, but that it won’t be renewed.

“Stern’s contract is up in the fall and while Sirius is planning to make him an offer, they don’t intend for him to take it,” an unnamed insider told the paper. “Sirius and Stern are never going to meet on the money he is going to want. It’s no longer worth the investment.”

The insider added that Sirius may strike a deal for Stern’s library of content. “But as far as him coming back to doing the show, there’s no way they can keep paying his salary.”

A separate source said Stern’s political leanings may be a factor in the cancellation.

“If Sirius isn’t going to give Stern a good offer, I don’t think it would have anything to do with his ratings,” the source said. “It’s more likely everything to do with the political climate.”

The source added: “After you saw what happened with Stephen Colbert, it’s like they just can’t afford to keep him going.”

The comparison is an apt one. Colbert, host of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, was told last month that the show would end in May 2026. It was a move that many — not least

Donald Trump himself

— suggested was influenced by Colbert’s criticism of the now U.S. president over the years.

Similarly, Stern has in recent years become openly critical of Trump. In 2020 he

called on Trump to resign

from his first term as president for his response to the COVID-19 pandemic. When Trump’s son Donald Trump Jr. mocked him, he sarcastically referred to the the younger Trump as a “wit” and a “genius.”

And in 2023, Trump

posted on social media

that “The real Howard Stern is a weak, pathetic, and disloyal guy, who lost his friends and MUCH of his audience.” He added: “I did his show many times in the good old days, and then he went Woke, and nobody cares about him any longer.”

Stern’s radio persona has evolved over the decades. Originally known as a “shock jock” broadcaster — his move to SiriusXM was in part a way to get away from the censorship regulations of terrestrial radio — he gradually became a more serious and politically savvy interviewer.

Guests

on his show

have included U.S. President Joe Biden, who gave his first on-air interview while in office to Stern in April 2024, and U.S. Vice-President Kamala Harris, who spoke to him last October, just weeks before the nation went to the polls.

Stern, 71, got his start on radio in the late 1970s, with The Howard Stern Show beginning in 1981 on WWDC, a radio station near Washington, D.C. It moved to WNBC in New York the following year, and in 1985 landed at WXRK, where it stayed until its move to SiriusXM in 2005.

Stern signed a US$500-million contract with Sirius the following year, and his contracts with the platform over the last two decades are estimated to be between US$80 million and US$100 million a year.

Amid all the rumours, Stern

made a surprise

appearance (the show was on summer hiatus) on Wednesday to talk to Lars Ulrich of Metallica about the death of Ozzy Osbourne, and a new Metallica channel on SiriusXM. The topic of cancellation did not arise.

• Trump calls Howard Stern a ‘broken weirdo’ as woke feud explodes
• Howard Stern asks Meat Loaf’s family to help sway anti-vaxxers

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.

A Florida city got a surprise last week when a new statue of Martin Luther King Jr. was unveiled.

The responses have ranged from polite to outright dismissive. “It doesn’t look like him,” Winter Park resident Nora Koenecke told NBC News.

It was unveiled during the annual Heritage Unity Festival and the backlash has flooded social media, reports

The Root

, with residents saying the statue has a cartoonish vibe, awkward proportions, and a face that looks nothing like Dr. King.

“A Florida community is outraged after an unflattering statue of Martin Luther King Jr was unveiled in their city,” reads an Instagram post made on Tuesday.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by The Neighborhood Talk (@theneighborhoodtalk)

“It looks awkward. It just didn’t look up to the standards that Winter Park is so well known for,” Jonathan Blount, co-founder of Essence magazine, told Florida TV station,

WESH 2 News

. Blount underscored local dissatisfaction, saying the statue appeared to be more of a caricature of Dr. King than a proper depiction of the iconic civil rights leader.

The artist who created the controversial piece is Andrew Luy of Huntsville, Alabama. He was selected by a committee of members from the city’s arts and parks communities. The design was approved by the King family prior to its installation, he said in his defence.

“The feedback I got from the committee and also the majority, actually all of the attendees that came to the unveiling, was greatly positive,” Luy told

People Magazine

. “I didn’t have direct contact with the King estate, but from what I heard, they were very happy with the representation of the sculpture of Dr. King.”

“Do it over,” insisted Blount. “I mean, it just isn’t good enough for a permanent lifelong representation of someone who is so important to our history,” he said, even suggesting he would help raise money for a redo.

Winter Park’s mayor, Sheila DeCiccio, acknowledged the concerned feedback from residents during a city council meeting and also highlighted the funds that have already been spent.

“Maybe it just didn’t come out the way everybody had hoped it would,” she said. “I don’t know that there’s anything we can do about it at this point, because it was a very big investment.”

• Trump administration releases 240,000 pages of FBI records on Martin Luther King Jr. assassination
• Raymond J. de Souza: Martin Luther King’s letter from jail embodies the Christian story

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.

OTTAWA

— As the federal Liberal government publicly rejected the idea of splitting CBC and Radio-Canada, Canadian Heritage officials pondered whether it was worth exploring, a newly released document shows. 

The controversial question was raised when officials prepared a set of worksheets for members of an advisory committee appointed by the former minister to provide input on the future of the public broadcaster.

The document, released to National Post under federal access-to-information legislation, contains around 40 preliminary “discussion questions” that were drafted by officials to “serve as a point of departure for developing these worksheets,” which centred around the themes of CBC/ Radio-Canada’s funding, mandate, and governance.

It contained four “other potential questions,” which included the one about splitting its structure.

“Is there a case for considering a structural separation between CBC and Radio-Canada (e.g., with distinct funding, boards and leaders, etc.)? Why or why not? What would be the benefit and drawbacks of such a model,” officials wrote in the undated document, prepared between December 2023 and May 2024 for Pascale St-Onge, the former minister of Canadian Heritage, who did not seek re-election.

In a statement, a department spokeswoman did not directly say whether that issue was ultimately proposed or why officials raised it, but said the former minister met with the advisory committee to discuss “a range of questions” dealing with the public broadcaster, from its funding to transparency and programming.

Those meetings informed a set of reforms the former minister proposed back in February, where she did raise the need to better emphasize the separation between CBC and Radio-Canada, at least editorially.

Other “potential questions” included how often the corporation’s mandate should be reviewed, whether “public-value tests” were necessary to assess the impact of new initiatives over concerns about competing for audiences, and how timely it was to still have a “single national public broadcaster,” versus a more decentralized model.

The current CEO of CBC/Radio-Canada, Marie-Philippe Bouchard sat on the advisory panel before she was appointed to her role, but spokesman Leon Mar said in an email they understood that advisory committee members “

committed to keeping their discussions confidential — it was a condition of their participation.”

He deferred questions to Canadian Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault’s office. 

A spokeswoman for Guilbeault said the “close collaboration” between CBC and Radio-Canada was important to deliver programming and pointed to how they share resources.

“For these reasons, separating the two is not on the table,” Hermine Landry said in a statement.

“We are currently working on our plan to strengthen CBC/Radio-Canada, and will have more to say in the near future.”

Jeffrey

Dvorkin, a former CBC Radio managing editor and longtime public broadcasting executive, who is now retired, said the idea of splitting the corporation was “radical” and that many would likely see it as “an admission of defeat.” 

“On the other hand,” he said in an interview, “Radio-Canada is a much more acceptable and popular, and successful organization compared to CBC television.” 

He added that he would not outright dismiss the idea and thinks “it needs to be explored.”

“

I think that what’s necessary now is for a mandate to be more adventuresome and more creative than they have been. My sense is that the CBC is running scared.”

Discussions around the feasibility of splitting the corporation have emerged in light of Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s pitch to “defund” CBC while promising to maintain Radio-Canada, which Liberals, including the former minister, said would lead to job losses.

The corporation has said that

changes would be needed to the Broadcasting Act,

which specifies that its mandate is to provide services in both official languages.

While Poilievre himself has never outright called for separation, one of his Quebec MPs, Joel Godin, told La Presse Canadienne at the time that it would be easier to cut CBC if Radio-Canada were its own Crown corporation.

In May 2024, the Bloc Québécois also sought assurances following a report by La Presse that a “modernization” plan the Crown corporation was advancing internally would not lead to a merger between the French and English programming wings.

Back in February, when St-Onge proposed her series of reforms, which were never advanced before Carney triggered an election in March, she called for “emphasis on the separation of French and English programming.”

A final report into her proposals elaborated that changes to the Broadcasting Act, “could emphasize the importance of the separation of editorial and programming decisions between CBC and Radio-Canada.”

It also argued that the English and French programming wings be “distinct” and meet the needs of the different communities, but underscored the need to keep the corporation as one.

“It is clear that a single organization provides a nationwide vision and a national approach while ensuring

administrative and operational efficiencies.”

Carney’s government has yet to advance the campaign promises he made to bolster the public broadcaster, which he emphasized was even more important for the Canadian institution in light of the ongoing trade war with U.S. President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly stated that he wants Canada to become its “51st state.”

While Carney adopted some of St-Onge’s ideas, he has dropped others. The spokeswoman for Canadian Heritage said efforts to modernize the broadcaster would be based on the Liberals’ platform. Nowhere in the document does it mention the issue of better emphasizing the separation between the French and English programming wings.

Carney during the platform panned Poilievre’s position on the broadcaster, saying “y

ou can’t split this baby.” 

While the former minister proposed bringing CBC/Radio-Canada’s per capita funding closer to the level that other countries fund public broadcasters — around $66 per year, up from the current $33 it costs Canadians each year — Carney has vowed to work towards that goal in the long term and pledged an “initial $150 million” upfront.

And while St-Onge proposed banning the corporation from running advertisements during newscasts, Carney’s plan would allow it to keep running ads

— generating another revenue source —

while also making it more difficult to unilaterally pull funding by enshrining in law that such changes would have to be approved by Parliament, not a government cabinet.

More stable funding has been a longstanding call of the corporation, which has said it is an outlier among its counterparts. It has seen declining revenues that led to a growing structural deficit of $36 million last year.

CBC/ Radio-Canada receives roughly $1.4 billion in annual funding, and in the 2024-25 budget, it received an extra $42 million, after warning it would have to cut jobs.

Trouble could still be brewing for the broadcaster under Carney’s request that all federal departments and Crown corporations come back with 15 per cent in “annual savings” over the next three years, which includes CBC/Radio-Canada.

“Such reductions will necessarily have an impact on programs and services, but we don’t have any information to share before the government’s decisions on potential reductions are announced,” said Mar.

-With files from La Presse Canadienne

National Post

• Carney suggests he’s considering rescinding Online News Act
• Kelly McParland: Carney thinks Canada is too weak to survive without the CBC

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.

A fire that cut the power to a B.C. village has attracted international attention for its bizarre cause: a fish that fell from the sky.

Ashcroft Fire Rescue responded to a fire located six kilometres south of town last Wednesday, just before noon. With support from BC Hydro staff and local ranchers, firefighters were able to stop the fire from spreading and fully extinguish it.

The fire department said firefighters and ranchers used about 4,800 gallons of water to put out the fire.

After the flames were put out, crews discovered the unlikely source: a charred fish lying at the base of a utility pole.

“The only possible source of ignition out in this field was a Hydro pole, and so we went over to the pole, and there at the pole was a fish that had been charred,” said Josh White, Fire chief of Ashcroft Fire Rescue.

According to White, about half a kilometre south of the pole, there was an osprey nest, and inside the nest there was “an unhappy camper” looking at what was going to be his dinner.

It was determined that the fish was dropped by the osprey, a fish-eating bird of prey common in the area, who was bringing back its catch from the nearby river, which runs about three kilometres from the fire site.

When it fell, the fish hit the hydro line, causing embers to fall onto the dry grass below, and sparking a fire.

“We do suspect the size of the fish and the heat of the day probably caused the rather tired bird to drop its catch. Or another suspicion could be that it’s tired of raw fish and wanted to give cooked a try,” Ashcroft Fire Rescue joked in a colourful Facebook post that has more than a thousand likes, leading to stories by The New York Times, The New York Post, the U.K.’s The Independent and others.

White said that upon discovering what caused the fire, he was in disbelief. “It was kind of just like, ‘Oh my goodness, I can’t believe this just happened.’ So I went and wrote a funny story about it on Facebook thinking, you know, my typical 10 to 20 people give it the old thumbs up. I didn’t expect this to really go as far as it did.”

The fire temporarily knocked out power for Ashcroft and, according to White, it could have been really serious if they had winds that afternoon or if the people in the area hadn’t stepped up.

“The quick actions of the Hydros, through the Ashcroft ranch and the highways department, really helped big time in keeping that fire contained,” said White.

“I just wholeheartedly can’t say enough about the people that stopped, along with my fire department crew and our dispatching team, all these people made this work and we were able to have a successful win here.”

As for the culprit, on Aug.1, Ashcroft Fire Rescue released an update via their Facebook saying, “The suspect osprey has been caught and is being held in custody for questioning. The judge has not granted bail as the suspect poses an extreme….flight risk!”

• BC Wildfire Service warns of very dynamic fire situations
• Special air-quality warnings, statements across Canada from Prairies wildfire smoke

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney suggested Tuesday he is considering substituting or rescinding the Online News Act to ensure local news is disseminated wider and faster two years after Meta banned access to news on its platforms.
 

Carney made the unexpected suggestion while announcing over $1 billion in loan guaranteed and long-term supports for the softwood lumber industry at a mill in West Kelowna, B.C.
 

At the start of the news conference, Carney highlighted the brutal impact of wildfires this summer, including one that recently forced the evacuation of roughly 400 properties near West Kelowna.
 

Asked if his government is considering an alternative to the Online News Act — previously known as C-18 — or simply rescinding it so that Web giant Meta would lift its ban on news articles being shared on its platforms, Carney suggested that was “part of our thinking around” improving the reach of local media.

“This government is a big believer in the value of … local news and the importance of ensuring that that is disseminated as widely and as quickly as possible. So, we will look for all avenues to do that,” he said.
 

The prime minister’s office did not immediately respond to questions about which avenues specifically the government is considering to improve the dissemination of local news.
 

Meta controversially banned news articles
from its Canadian users two years ago in response to the federal government’s Online News Act, which compels social media giants to negotiate revenue-sharing deals with news publishers for the use of their content.

The bill specifically impacted Meta and Google, though both have taken diametrically opposing routes to get exempt from the Act. The former banned news content outright on its platforms when the bill became law, while the latter signed a $100 million annual deal with Canadian publishers last year.
 

Meta has argued against the “false premise” that it benefits from free online news articles and says that media companies are the ones that benefit from sharing their content to Facebook and Instagram audiences.
 

Shortly after Meta barred Canadian news articles on Facebook and Instagram, then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused the web giant of “putting corporate profits ahead of people’s safety”.
 

“Instead of making sure that local journalists are fairly paid for keeping Canadians informed on things like wildfires, Facebook is blocking news from its sites,”
he said in August 2023
.
 

“Right now in an emergency situation where up-to-date local information is more important than ever, Facebook’s putting corporate profits ahead of people’s safety, ahead of supporting quality local journalism,” he added.
 

During his press conference, Carney also reiterated his government’s campaign commitment to boost funding for CBC/Radio-Canada and change its governance so that it could provide “unbiased, immediate, local information” during crises such the ongoing B.C. wildfires.
 

During the campaign, Carney committed to boosting the public broadcaster’s funding by $150 million yearly.

Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com 

• Trudeau slams Facebook for removal of news during wildfire season
• Why Meta is blocking news, and what it means for Canadians

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.