LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

A newly installed flag pole stands on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, Wednesday, June 18, 2025.

Now that Canada’s trade war with America has surged back into public consciousness like a blast from the recent past, a new poll suggests Canadian frustration with and mistrust of the U.S. remains high, despite a slight easing.

In March, for example, polling showed a dramatic realignment of Canadian attitudes toward its southern neighbour. Europe and Britain were suddenly the countries Canadians felt best about, and Canadians were starting to feel about America the way they felt about Russia.

But lately, with U.S. President Donald Trump’s attention mostly elsewhere, there are signs of a slight bump back from this low point, despite troubling news developments like the death of a Canadian citizen in U.S. immigration custody.

More than half of Canadians now say they “no longer feel welcome in the United States,” for example, and this sentiment is strongest among women and older people.

During the recent Canadian election campaign with its looming threat of crippling tariffs and annexation, there was a “worrisome intersection” in the Canadian mind of the American government and the American people, according to Jack Jedwab, president of the Montreal-based Association for Canadian Studies (ACS).

But in this latest poll, he sees a “healthy development” of Canadian anger and frustration being focused primarily on the American government, and less so the American people.

Back in April, barely one Canadian in five (21 per cent) said they trust Americans in a similar poll. But in the latest poll, that figure has rebounded to 34 per cent, which is historically normal, about the same as it was near the end of Trump’s first term, but still considerably lower than the 59 per cent it reached in October 2023, Jedwab said.

Asked if they trust the United States, the country as opposed to the American people, those numbers drop substantially. A majority of 53 per cent said the country could not be trusted, and only 21 per cent said it could. That distrust is greater among Canadians older than 65. It is also stronger among residents of British Columbia, and lowest among Albertans and Atlantic Canadians.

The poll was taken by Leger for the ACS between June 20 and 22, so it does not reflect Canadian reaction to Donald Trump’s latest cancellation of trade talks last weekend, which prompted Prime Minister Mark Carney to rescind a digital industries tax, which targeted American tech firms, in order to restart negotiations.

But the poll shows a silver lining in an otherwise gloomy picture of this longstanding national friendship, military alliance, and economic partnership.

“We just don’t trust the motivation behind the re-opening of trade,” Jedwab said. “We’re persuaded we’re the kindler, gentler nation, and we’re being bullied by their president.”

Overall, a majority of Canadians feel unwelcome in the United States, the poll suggests. They regard the borders as secure, but 45 per cent of Canadians say the United States is not a trusted security and defence partner, compared to just 32 per cent who say it is.

The poll also shows Canadians overwhelmingly feel Canada’s trade rules for the U.S. are fair, but the U.S. trade rules for Canada are unfair. Fully 75 per cent say American rules governing trade are unfair to Canada, whereas only 12 per cent feel Canada’s rules are unfair.

“I think that trust is the key predictor of Canadians feeling unwelcome in the United States and it also hampers our ability to fix perceived problems between our two countries,” Jedwab said. “The lack of trust a key indicator in trade negotiations and we will need to build or re-build trust if we re going to succeed. That won’t be simple because in effect the U.S. President is not perceived to be a trusted ally by Canadians.”

Despite all that, the poll also shows a majority of Canadians believe they have more in common with Americans than with any other people in the world.

This poll was conducted through an online panel survey, so a margin of error cannot be calculated. But a randomized poll of similar size, with 1,579 respondents, would be considered accurate to within 2.5 per cent, 19 times out of 20.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


RCMP Sikorsky UH-60  Black Hawk helicopter, which is used for patrols along the Canada--U.S. border in southern B.C.

OTTAWA — The RCMP has renewed the contracts for three Black Hawk helicopters to patrol the Canada-U.S. border, despite

accusations by the industry association that the contracts

are the opposite of the government’s “elbows up” approach and that the choppers don’t meet the government’s own safety regulations.

RCMP spokesman Andrew DiRienzo confirmed that the federal police has decided to rehire the three helicopters for at least the next three months. The contracts for the second-hand helicopters, purchased by private contractors after the U.S. military decided to update much of its own fleet, kicked in on Canada Day.

The new contracts follow a National Post investigation that revealed that four Black Hawks were purchased by Canadian contractors who then signed patrolling contracts with the RCMP for three of them. The other was hired by the Alberta government.

The existing RCMP contracts for three of the choppers, worth an estimated $16 million, expired June 30.

Documents showed that the Canadian helicopter industry had accused Ottawa of breaking its own rules, for example, by allowing the used choppers to carry passengers or even flying over developed areas. The Black Hawks have been used mostly to patrol the border in search of illegal migrants, drug smugglers and other illicit activities.

Trevor Mitchell, chief executive of the Helicopter Association of Canada (HAC), said he was very surprised that the RCMP would sign another contract to lease the American Black Hawks, while Canadian manufacturers offer rival products that can do at least as good a job. “I can’t see how any of this transpires into an elbows-up policy, or a Canada-first policy.”

According to the government’s Canadian Civil Aircraft Register, the four Sikorsky Black Hawk UH 60As were imported into Canada between 2022 and last year. They were granted highly unusual special exemptions by Transport Canada that, according to a series of letters to senior government officials from the Canadian helicopter association, allowed the four choppers to do non-military jobs in Canadian air space.

In a March 20 letter to Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland, the association said even the conditions attached to the exemptions have not been followed. “We urge you to direct your department to ensure the safety restrictions attached to these aircraft are strictly enforced for the balance of the RCMP’s contract and that the Force be urged to select a certified aircraft before the contract expires.”

HAC also says that the twin-engine Black Hawks didn’t come with “type certificates,” which act like recipe books for new owners in that they provide details about the aircraft’s parts and how it should be maintained.

Freeland has not responded to interview requests on this subject for the last three weeks. A spokesperson has not responded to specific questions but instead released a prepared statement that emphasized the importance of safety. The statement also said that the exemptions from Transport Canada allowed the aircraft to operate in Canada in specialized roles “subject to strict conditions,” such as not being allowed to carry fare-paying passengers or cargo.

Despite its reluctance to discuss the matter, the federal government is well aware of the situation involving the Black Hawks and the industry’s concerns.

 An RCMP Black Hawk helicopter patrols the border in Emerson, Manitoba in January.

In the spring of 2024, following interactions with HAC, former Transport Minister Pablo Rodriguez directed his officials to pause the issuing of special exemptions for the Black Hawks. But in September of that year, Rodriguez resigned from the federal cabinet to run for leader of the Quebec Liberal party.

He was replaced at Transport for about seven months by Anita Anand, now the Foreign Affairs minister. She was then replaced in the new year by Chrystia Freeland, after Mark Carney became prime minister. Neither Anand nor Freeland has clarified the government’s view of the situation or publicly commented on the special exemptions for the Black Hawks.

Although the Black Hawk contracts pre-date the re-election earlier this year of U.S. President Donald Trump, Canada’s enhanced border patrol is in sync with the White House’s escalation of concern about illegal migrants and illegal drugs entering the U.S. from Canada, Mexico and elsewhere.

But it’s not like there aren’t other – even domestic – options beyond Black Hawks.

Mitchell says Canada has about 200 companies that offer helicopter services and pilots to fly them. Their collective fleets comprise about 1,700 choppers, many of which might be better suited than Black Hawks for patrol duties because they’re smaller and equipped with infra-red cameras that allow them to work in the dark.

The military and the RCMP also have their own fleets. But if the RCMP’s own helicopters weren’t enough, Mitchell said, it would have no problem finding private contractors to help them patrol.

Helicopters are valued for their versatility and mobility. In Canada, they’re mostly used for search and rescue, fighting forest fires, helping combat floods, and commercial applications in remote areas such as mining and electrical lines.

But five-seat helicopters are typically used for patrol because they’re more nimble and cheaper to operate than a larger, 14-seater such as Sikorsky’s Black Hawk.

According to a February 10 letter by HAC to RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme, the choppers have not been approved by Canadian or American authorities for civilian purposes.

The RCMP’s Black Hawk contracts overlap with Carney’s vow to increase Canada’s military spending so that it reaches the NATO target of 2 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP). Carney has also vowed to do more to support Canadian business and to rely less on the U.S.

Industry sources say the older Black Hawks were selling in recent months for about $1 million each, as the market became flooded with supply. The market for used helicopters has grown in recent years as the U.S. military has modernized its fleet, including the purchase of a newer model of Black Hawks, called the UH-60M.

That has pushed a number of older, but still functional Black Hawks to the second-hand market. Prices of new and used aircraft vary widely, depending on a range of factors. But a new five-seat helicopter, including those made in Canada, sells for about $6.5 million, while a new 14-seater, similar in size to the Black Hawks, goes for about $12 million.

Bell Textron, a subsidiary of Fort Worth, Tex.-based Textron, makes commercial helicopters at its Mirabel, Que. facilities. Its lineup of models includes the Bell 412, which could be used for border patrol.

Airbus Helicopters Canada, formerly MBB Helicopter Canada, has a 300-employee site at Fort Erie, Ont. That location focuses largely on sales, repair, engineering and composite manufacturing.

The Black Hawk, made by Sikorsky Aircraft, is a four-blade, twin-engine, medium-lift chopper in the “military utility” product niche. Stratford, Conn.-based Sikorsky was founded by the Russian-American aviation pioneer Igor Sikorsky in 1923.

Carney, meanwhile, issued a statement earlier this month saying that Canada plans to boost its defence spending by $9.3 billion to $54.3 billion. The money will be used on a range of items, including submarines, ships, armoured vehicles and aircraft, as well as new drones and sensors for monitoring the Arctic and seafloor.

In the government’s latest signal that it intends to create some distance from the U.S. since Trump imposed a wide range of debilitating tariffs on Canadian exports, Carney said Canada wants to reduce how much of its defence budget goes to purchases of American equipment. The prime minister has said that about 75 per cent of Canada’s capital spending on defence heads to the U.S.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Nosakhare Ohenhen has lost his bid to recover $32,000 Toronto police seized from his home during the investigation of a deadly hit and run.

A man who claimed $32,000 police found at his home was casino winnings, after he was allegedly spotted in the passenger seat of a car that killed a pedestrian in downtown Toronto in April 2022, has lost his bid to get the cash back.

And the fact that Nosakhare Ohenhen appears to have used artificial intelligence in his legal fight against forfeiture likely didn’t help his case in Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice.

“Mr. Ohenhen submitted a statement of legal argument to the court in support of his arguments. In those documents, he referred to at least two non-existent or fake precedent court cases, one ostensibly from the Court of Appeal for Ontario and another ostensibly from the British Columbia Court of Appeal. In reviewing his materials after argument, I tried to access these cases and was unable to find them,” Justice Lisa Brownstone wrote in a recent decision.

When the judge asked Ohenhen to provide her with the cases, he “responded with a ‘clarification,’ providing different citations to different cases.”

Brownstone asked for an explanation as to where the original citations came from, and whether they were generated by artificial intelligence.

“I have received no response to that query,” said the judge.

“While Mr. Ohenhen is not a lawyer with articulated professional responsibilities to the court, every person who submits authorities to the court has an obligation to ensure that those authorities exist…. Putting fictitious citations before the court misleads the court. It is unacceptable. Whether the cases are put forward by a lawyer or self-represented party, the adverse effect on the administration of justice is the same.”

Brownstone said she didn’t attach “any consequences to this conduct in this case,” but if Ohenhen does it again, he should “expect” some. “Other self-represented litigants should be aware that serious consequences from such conduct may well flow.”

The Attorney General of Ontario applied to the court to keep the cash police seized on April 22, 2022, from Ohenhen’s home, arguing it was proceeds of crime.

The search came about after a hit and run 10 days earlier killed a 30-year-old woman near Spadina Avenue and King Street West.

“After the accident, the car entered the underground parking garage at 295 Dufferin Street Toronto, where Mr. Ohenhen lived. Mr. Ohenhen came out of the car and handed something that appeared to be a set of keys to the driver,” Brownstone said. “The two then sat in another car, which was registered in Mr. Ohenhen’s name.”

According to the Toronto Police Service, Ohenhen “provided the other person, the driver, with access to his car to enable the driver to escape after the hit-and-run.”

Investigators arrested the driver the next day “for failure to stop at the scene of an accident that caused death, dangerous driving causing death, obstruction and public mischief,” Brownstone said.

They also arrested Ohenhen as a result of the hit and run and searched his home “where they found six cellular phones and $32,000 in cash, in $100 bills. There were three bundles that total $30,000 bound with elastics in the safe, and $2,000 in two bundles on a table.”

Ohenhen was charged with failure to stop at the scene after an accident resulting in death, obstructing a peace officer, public mischief, and being an accessory after the fact to commit an indictable offence, said the judge, noting those charges are pending.

According to Ontario’s Attorney General, “Ohenhen has an extensive criminal history involving convictions for possession for the purpose of trafficking, possession of schedule 1 substances, assault, assault with intent to resist arrest, failure to comply with a recognizance, possession of prohibited or restricted firearms, assault causing bodily harm, robbery, and conspiracy to commit an indictable offence.”

The AG argued that, “on a balance of probabilities, the currency at issue here … was likely acquired as a result of, and used in the commission of, the unlawful activity of trafficking and possession for the purpose of trafficking, and possession of the proceeds of crime.”

But “Ohenhen states that the money comes from casino winnings and from his business.”

However, according to the judge, “the records provided do not in any way support Mr. Ohenhen’s statements that the cash was from his business or casino winnings. The records show that his business income, like his casino winnings, was received electronically, not in cash.”

Brownstone found “there is no credible and reasonable answer for the suspicious circumstances in which the money was found.”

The judge was “satisfied that the Attorney General has established on a balance of probabilities that the funds were proceeds of and an instrument of unlawful activity. There has been no ‘credible and reasonable’ answer to the suspicious circumstances outlined above, that is, that the significant amount of funds was in 100-dollar bills, bundled together, in cash in Mr. Ohenhen’s home, not in a bank.”

According to court documents, police arrested Ohenhen on Aug. 21, 2008, in the Parkdale area of Toronto after they stopped his dark green Jaguar. “He was charged with seventeen offences: assault police, resist lawful arrest, eleven charges in relation to illegal possession of a loaded restricted firearm and breach of prior prohibition orders, two counts of possession of cocaine and one of marijuana for the purposes of trafficking, and possession of proceeds of crime.”

Ohenhen was sentenced to nine years in prison. But he successfully appealed that conviction after serving nearly five years in prison, and a judge acquitted him in a new trial.

In September 2016, Justice Michael Quigley found that Ohenhen had been arbitrarily detained, unreasonably searched, and that his constitutional right to retain and instruct a lawyer without delay “was totally and shockingly ignored by the police.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Bonnie Critchley.

OTTAWA — Bonnie Critchley is used to breaking the mould.

A trailblazer in uniform,

Critchley

was just 17 years old when she became the second woman ever to serve as an armoured crewman in her unit. She and reservist dad Steve later made history as the first father–daughter gunnery crew in the Royal Canadian Armoured Corps.

She’s now looking to take out Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre in one of the safest Conservative ridings in Canada, running as an independent in the upcoming Battle River—Crowfoot byelection.

Critchley, who’s been traversing the rural Alberta riding for about a month, says she sees a path to an upset victory over Poilievre.

“Honestly, a good result for us would be a win,”

Critchley told the National Post on Wednesday.

She said that Poilievre is starting off on the wrong foot after yanking popular incumbent MP Damien Kurek out of the seat and

creating a hefty byelection

bill for taxpayers.

“I’ve been talking to a lot of ‘small-c’ conservatives around here who aren’t thrilled that the ‘big-C’ Conservatives are spending an extra two million dollars on a mulligan for a guy who failed in his duty to his constituents and was fired,” said Critchley.

Poilievre lost his Ottawa-area riding to Liberal Bruce Fanjoy by a five-point margin in April’s federal election, after holding the seat for two decades.

Critchley also says that the Calgary-born Poilievre has put off residents by donning western-style cowboy attire in his visits to the riding.

“Whether it’s

the backwards cowboy hat

at the Wainwright Stampede or sitting in a truck in Drumheller, it just isn’t landing,” said Critchley.

A 22-year army reservist who later rode her bike across Europe to raise money for veterans and first responders, Critchley has a CV that would be attractive to any major political party.

She says she’s running an an independent because she’s grown disillusioned with partisan politics.

“One of the things that I think we’re having issues with is team politics. It’s my team versus your team, and it doesn’t matter what my team does or says, my team is better than your team,” said Critchley.

She added that she’s finds it especially concerning when party politics prevents constituents from being properly represented, pointing to the Poilivre-Kurek switcheroo as a prime example of this problem.

Critchley calls herself a centrist and says she objects to “performative policies” on both the left and right.

She was one of many who welcomed the termination of the Liberals’ consumer carbon tax, calling it more symbolic than substantive.

“I’m not going to offer soft, easy answers to complex questions,” said Critchley.

She’s also said that she’ll work to repeal Trudeau-era gun control laws if elected to Parliament.

Critchley, who is a lesbian, says she also objects to right-wing points of view on trans issues.

She said that a

recent Alberta court injunction

stalling the province’s ban on transgender medicine for minors was “good news.”

“The (previous) supports for trans youth were in place to prevent youth suicides,” said Critchley.

Critchley said that she’ll be spending the next few weeks convening town halls to hear from voters in the riding.

She’s pre-emptively putting out an invitation to both Poilievre and Liberal candidate Darcy Spady to join her at one of these town halls.

“I will be welcoming those two for sure,” said Critchley.

Critchley has been less welcoming to some other potential candidates, though. She

released an open letter to the Longest Ballot Committee

— an activist group protesting former prime minister Justin Trudeau’s broken 2015 election promise on electoral reform — asking the group to “not come here and muddy the waters further.”

The group, which

gets headlines by swamping the ballot

with dozens of candidates, also targeted Poilievre’s Ottawa-area riding of Carleton during the federal election in April.

Critchley said the “tomfoolery” would only make it harder for a candidate like her to knock off Poilievre in  the August byelection.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Data from Flightrader24.com shows the point where the Boeing aircraft suddenly dropped and reduced speed.

A Japan Airlines flight from Shanghai to Tokyo made an emergency landing this week after plummeting almost 8 kilometres in less than 10 minutes. Once the plane was safely on the ground, passengers were given 15,000 yen (Cdn $142) in compensation, plus a free night’s accommodation, according to reports.

According to

People magazine

, Monday’s flight JL8696 was operated by Spring Japan, a low-cost subsidiary of Japan Airlines, and was scheduled to fly from Shanghai to Tokyo, a two and a half hour journey.

However, about an hour into the flight the plane

descended rapidly

from a cruising altitude of about 11,700 metres down to just 3,000 metres while reducing its speed from 880 kph to 560 kph. It then levelled out at the new altitude and, about 45 minutes later, made an emergency landing in Osaka, Japan.

None of the 191 passengers and crew on board the Boeing 737-800 was injured. Reports said the pilots contacted air traffic controllers when the aircraft triggered an alert about an irregularity in the pressurization system that maintains cabin air pressure.

Reports noted that oxygen masks dropped from the ceiling during the descent, and that passengers feared the plane might crash.

According to the Hong Kong news site

The Standard

, one passenger said she drafted a farewell note to her husband during the descent, while another described the cabin falling eerily silent as the masks dropped and she imagined she might perish. A third recalled being on “the verge of tears” as they scribbled a will and wrote down details of their insurance and bank card PINs.

The aircraft was diverted to Kansai International Airport in Osaka and landed at about 8:50 p.m. local time. It then spent about an hour on the tarmac before passengers were able to deplane.

Spring Japan subsequently posted a

notice on its website

, cancelling the Shanghai-to-Tokyo run and its return flight for the next two days, citing “aircraft scheduling.” It apologized for the inconvenience and offered full refunds within 30 days, or no-charge rebooking in the same time period.

The Associated Press reports that an investigation into the cause of the incident has begun as of Wednesday morning. National Post has reached out to Spring Japan for more information.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Antoinette Twiver, 28, snaps a selfie of herself with her first hormonal shot for egg freezing.

The first time Shania Bhopa considered freezing her eggs was over dessert during Christmas Day dinner with her family a couple of years ago.

Bhopa was only 24 years old at the time but already had a promising career ahead as a published children’s author, running a non-profit organization with her sister and was pursuing a PhD in global health.

Her older sister, a physician, broached the topic.

“Shania, you don’t seem like you would have kids early,” Bhopa recalls her sister saying. “But I know you’ve always wanted to be a mom. Have you ever given any consideration as to what your plan looks like?”

“No,” Bhopa replied.

Her sister asked a new question. “Well, have you thought about freezing your eggs?”

The question caught Bhopa by surprise. She had heard of egg freezing before — overhearing conversations between her sister and her friends — but until that moment had never talked about it or thought of it as a family planning or fertility option. She had always assumed egg freezing was a last resort for those who had already tried and failed to have a child by traditional means.

“Why would I be proactive when it’s a reactive procedure?” she recalled thinking. Her sister, however, was persistent and so Bhopa decided to investigate the topic.

As an academic accustomed to research, she dove deep. She read every paper she could find, and by the end of it she was convinced.

“It was kind of like just a really logical decision,” she said. “I researched, statistically, at age 35 the egg quality and count, and the risk of abnormalities there, and if that’s the age I perceive my career starting to stabilize, then I should probably freeze my eggs.”

Bhopa’s story is an unusual one and for good reason: There aren’t a lot of stories told publicly of women in their early 20s who have considered or decided to freeze their eggs as a way to preserve their fertility down the road.

Encouraged by her sister and partner, Bhopa, a well-established influencer with over 108,000 followers on Instagram and even more on TikTok, vlogged her

egg freezing journey online

and became a viral sensation for her story, hailed as the “girl who decided to freeze her eggs at 25.”

Along with her own vlogs, she has hosted Q&As, interviews with experts and inspirational reels meant to shed light on the process and educate her followers on the concept.

Looking back, Bhopa is surprised that she and her friends, many of whom are in medicine and academia, had never thought to talk about egg freezing before.

“We all have such long roads ahead of us,” she said. “In retrospect, I’m like, ‘Oh, I can’t believe none of us were talking about it.”

Egg freezing — known medically as oocyte preservation — has been in the works since the 1980s, primarily as a last resort for those undergoing major surgeries or with serious medical illnesses. Rarely was it considered as a family planning alternative. The latter, better known as social egg freezing, became more mainstream after the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) deemed the procedure “non-experimental” in 2012.

“It definitely raised the awareness that egg freezing is now commercially available,” said Dr. Ari Baratz, one of Canada’s leading fertility experts and part of the medical team at the Create Fertility Centre in Toronto. “That really sparked demand.”

In the years since, it has increasingly become an option in family planning. This has forced a re-examination of “fertility” — what that means and how it is discussed among individuals and couples, and patients and their doctors.

For those with ovaries, it has meant being able to “realize their reproductive autonomy” and providing a sense of agency in one’s own reproductive aging — in other words, being liberated from their biological clocks. For couples, both heterosexual and those within in the LGBTQ+ community, it has meant being able to be more strategic about parenthood in terms of timing or priorities such as careers or financial stability or even relationship stability.

It’s a conversation of the modern age, bolstered by lifestyle, career and societal changes. As recently as 2022, social media platforms saw a surge of videos, vlogs and posts shared on the topic, by doctors looking to educate, and by people who have gone through the process and wanted to share their experiences.

Reproductive rights were hotly contested during the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Donald Trump made headlines when he proposed expanding access to invitro fertilization (IVF) treatments by having them paid for either by government or by insurance companies, a move criticized by some conservative groups for the practice of discarding unused embryos after a successful live birth via IVF.

The U.S. president issued an executive order in February to expand IVF access, although it’s unclear how long it could take to see changes to out-of-pocket costs.

Any conversation about reproductive rights comes with ethical quandaries, and in the case of egg freezing, it’s the thorny matter of “biological insurance.” What level of autonomy does it truly offer those considering it?

“I don’t think we’re completely going to put the brakes on fertility,” Baratz said, adding that egg freezing was always meant to be viewed as a way to “augment the ability to have a baby or even a larger family.”

The ‘stigma’

Bhopa is no stranger to the spotlight. As a child, she acted in television shows and currently teaches a curriculum on artificial intelligence. “I always did public stuff,” she said.

Her persona on social media, before posting about her egg freezing, was “more guarded,” she said. “This is the place where I have to be professional.”

If it hadn’t been for her sister and her boyfriend encouraging her, Bhopa said she wouldn’t have considered sharing her egg-freezing story on a public platform.

Bhopa recalled her sister telling her: “You know, when I was your age, I just wish I had someone to look up to, to even start this conversation.”

Her boyfriend, also a physician, had stressed that being vocal about her journey would be “pushing so many barriers for women.”

“For example,” Bhopa adds, “talking about not having kids right after you get married or not having to get married right after you’ve done school, and just pushing the gender norms that are often circulated.”

She was initially reluctant — “I was very, very, very hesitant to share this journey online,” Bhopa explained in a YouTube video. “It’s a very intimate thing.” But she decided to

share her journey

to encourage more open conversations around fertility and family planning and postponing pregnancy.

“I think that fertility, women’s health and planning for a family can be quite taboo for very many people and many cultures worldwide,” she continued. “And breaking down that stigma a little bit and opening up the conversation about fertility … and taking control and being empowered about making the plans necessary, to allow you to feel comfortable about your decisions.”

It was the same stigma and lack of public conversation that kept Missy Modell, an American comedian, influencer and businesswoman from deciding to go through egg freezing until her late 30s.

“The reason I waited so long was because I didn’t see anyone captured in this way … like, the day-to-day,” she said. “I run a company. I have to be high functioning. I was also terrified of doing that to myself. What are the hormones going to do to me?”

Like Bhopa, Modell decided to publicly vlog her journey to push back against the social stigma and take control of the conversation.

“I was terrified to freeze my eggs because of all the unknowns and questions and shame and insert my excuse,” she posted to

her stories on Instagram

on the first day of her egg-freezing journey. “I wanted to pull back the curtain and hope that if some people were really on the fence for reasons that had nothing to do with the outcome … I wanted to help people feel comfortable with it.”

The stigma, while much less palpable than it might have been five or 10 years ago, “is not completely smashed,” Baratz said. “Obviously, it is still a personal issue.”

In 2018, U.K. researchers interviewed 31 women who had undergone egg freezing to better understand their experiences. “Few women perceived freezing as involving physical risks,” the researchers wrote. “However, many participants reported the process of egg freezing as emotionally challenging, primarily linked to feelings of isolation and stigma due to their single status.”

A 2021 Canadian study yielded similar results. It found that 89 per cent of the 224 women who took part said they chose to freeze their eggs because they were single and had not yet found a partner.

By the time social egg freezing arrived on the scene, a woman was statistically more likely to have her first child by the age of 28, according to Statistics Canada — a noticeable jump from the 1970s, when a woman would typically have her first child by the age of 24.

However, unlike men, who remain fertile long into their senior years, a woman’s fertility peaks between her teen years and late 20s, and is likely to decline after age 30, presenting a conundrum for those looking to balance their professional lives with their desire for parenthood.

For those looking to further their careers without the fear of running out the biological clock, social egg freezing became an attractive opportunity to have it all. Initially, women, mostly in their late 30s and 40s, attended consultations, information sessions and “egg-freezing cocktail parties” hosted by fertility clinics wanting to rebrand egg freezing as something positive, rather than a bleak last resort.

“Originally, it started as a way for the older demographic of people with ovaries to hold on to their fertility,” said Carolynn Dube, the executive director for Fertility Matters Canada. “And people still use it for that reason now, but we’re seeing a younger group of people considering it for future use. It’s like an insurance plan.”

Jeanette Chen, 40, who works in human resources, said she first considered freezing her eggs a decade ago, around the time of a big breakup.

The breakup, she said, played a part, but her decision to pursue egg freezing was largely motivated by age. Chen was turning 28 and getting older meant becoming more conscious of “social conventions” around marriage and motherhood, as well as thinking about her fertility aging, she said.

However, the newness of the idea and lack of access around it curtailed her understanding of what egg freezing really meant. “I knew this idea of egg freezing existed, conceptually what it was like and what it was intended for,” she said of her conversations with friends back then. “Some of my friends might say, ‘Oh, I’m thinking about egg freezing,’ but that’s it. It’s like a blanket statement.”

By the time she finally decided to go ahead with the process at 38, the scene had shifted substantially, she said. Several of her friends had frozen their eggs, either as part of an IVF treatment or otherwise. “I do think it’s a bit better now because people are more open about it,” Chen added.

Access to information, both socially and regionally, can play a big role in an individual’s understanding and willingness to talk openly about fertility, Dube explained. For big urban centres such as Toronto and Montreal, the conversation might be more prominent than in less-populated regions, where access to fertility specialists and clinics may not be as easy.

“It’s still a relatively new process in a lot of parts of the country outside of these bigger cities,” Dube explained. “I think just having access to the knowledge and experts geographically is one piece.”

Dube notes the surge in conversations about egg freezing online, especially among young professionals. “But openly sharing it, especially in a place where an employer or a potential employer could find you, is problematic,” she said. “Because it opens you up to someone saying, ‘Oh, she’s thinking about having children someday,’ and you’re internally thinking about how that might impact your growth at the company.”

Bhopa acknowledged that much of her own hesitation to share her story came from the same place. “I’m going to be an academic and have students and colleagues and principal investigators for grants that could potentially

see this

,” she said.

Even among friends and acquaintances, the subject isn’t exactly a trending topic. Antoinette Twiver said she learned about egg freezing in university while watching an episode of The Mindy Project, a popular sitcom on the life of a lovelorn gynecologist. She didn’t know how many of her own friends had considered or had gone through the process until she made the decision to freeze her own eggs at age 29, in 2023.

She was “surprised” when she learned a number of friends “have been going through this process as well and maybe not sharing it.”

Twiver, who has a following of over 42,000 on TikTok, shared her experience on her TikTok to help others learn more about the process — “if this video helps even one person learn a little bit about the process then it would be worth it,” she said.

“I do think that it is something that is tiptoed around a bit,” Chen said. “It’s a hard topic for people to initiate because people aren’t sure about the circumstances of the other people.”

The medical side of egg freezing

For close to 20 years, Dr. Sony Sierra has worked in the medical field as a reproductive endocrinologist and infertility specialist. The physician is deputy medical director with TRIO fertility, a chain of fertility clinics in the Greater Toronto Area that receives patients for a range of fertility issues.

She has seen the conversation around egg freezing and preserving fertility change dramatically in the years since the ASRM ruling to deem the procedure as non-experimental.

“Ten years ago, I barely did egg-freezing cases,” she said. “And now it’s hugely busy, our egg-freezing program. And I think a lot of it comes from the knowledge of it being an option.”

Before the ASRM 2012 decision, doctors and experts largely viewed the procedure as reactive rather than proactive, mostly suggested in cases of infertility or a serious illness or major surgery that could impact a person’s fertility.

Since the ruling, the number of cases around the country has soared — from 94 in 2013 to more than 1,500 in 2022, according to CARTR, a Canadian database that tracks fertility procedures performed in Canada.

Ten years ago, less than two per cent of patients who visited Sierra’s clinic came to consult or pursue egg freezing. By 2022, 15 per cent of patients visiting TRIO planned to pursue egg freezing, prompting the team to open

EVOLVE

, Canada’s first egg-freezing clinic, in March 2023.

As part of

the process,

a woman injects herself daily, for two weeks, in the belly or upper thighs with hormonal drugs to stimulate her ovaries to produce around 10 to 15 mature eggs. The more eggs to freeze, the more likely one of those eggs, once thawed, will be fertilized with sperm and lead to a pregnancy.

Once the optimal size and number of eggs has been generated, the eggs are retrieved from the ovaries via an ultrasound-guided needle, flash-frozen and stored in tanks of liquid nitrogen.

“We (get) about 200 inquiries a month,” Sierra said. “And that’s just people picking up the phone or emailing through the website. That doesn’t include physician referrals that come from doctors and gynecologists out there in the field.”

Opening up a separate clinic, she explained, allowed the team to be more proactive in offering support to people reluctant to come to a typical fertility lab, “where there are married couples who are very stressed out trying to conceive,” Sierra explained. “A waiting room in a fertility clinic, it’s a different environment.”

Reproductive awareness

Fertility education is a relatively new concept. As recently as 2017, the term “fertility awareness” was introduced as a definition in the International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care.

The fertility conversation, Baratz explained, has long focused around the don’ts rather than the dos. “A lot of sexual health education is based around infection prevention and healthy lifestyle, but also avoiding unwanted pregnancy. … We’ve forgotten how to turn that message off.”

Medical providers have become more aware of the proactive role they have to play in discussions with patients, he said, initiating conversations about reproductive health and asking questions such as, “Have you thought about how you’re going to approach building your family?”

Medical professionals are increasingly being invited to universities and schools to talk to younger people about their reproductive health and to heighten awareness around fertility. And more than 50 private fertility clinics have popped up across the country providing resources to individuals looking for fertility consultations.

The conversations about egg freezing, however, have an added layer of complexity. Not only are there the details of the process — the costs, the side-effects of hormone treatment, the risks — decisions must be made on how the eggs will be used and stored.

Baratz said that means asking a patient if they have a plan for their eggs: Do they plan to use the eggs as a first or last resort when trying to have a child? Are they able to afford the cost of yearly storage? How many children do they plan to have, with or without the eggs? Have they considered other alternatives to fertility planning?

“In a responsible consultation, egg freezing is just a handle to discuss the full spectrum of what’s available.”

It also means addressing the popular perception of egg freezing as biological insurance — “that’s part of informed consent,” Baratz added.

Maybe, baby

Freezing your eggs, experts stress, does not guarantee the birth of a child. The overall success rate of egg freezing can depend on any number of factors, such as a person’s age and the number and quality of eggs retrieved. It’s also possible for eggs to not survive the thawing process or not be successfully fertilized by sperm.

At EVOLVE, the rule of thumb is, the more, the better. “For example, individuals aged 30 to 34 have an 80 per cent chance or higher of a live birth later. In contrast, freezing between two and eight eggs results in a 20 to 52 per cent chance of a live birth,” the clinic explains on its website.

“At the same time, with increasing age, research shows it may take more frozen eggs to achieve a successful pregnancy”.

The American Society of Reproductive Medicine issued the same caution when announcing their decision to drop the “experimental” label — that the procedure is not a guarantee for having a baby.

“We think we should proceed cautiously in using this as an elective technique, especially in older patients,” stated Dr. Eric Widra, chairman of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology practice committee in 2012.

“There is an inherent conflict between the desire to freeze eggs and the need to freeze eggs. Freezing eggs for the future sounds like a good insurance policy but may not be an insurance policy that needs to be cashed in,” he stated.

Baratz chooses his words carefully when describing the risks and benefits of the procedure. “It can be referred to as biological insurance with big quotes around it, because that may not solve the story,” he said. “What we always tell you as part of the consent process is that you’re doing this as part of your fertility journey.”

And, compared to other procedures, which may involve greater medical risks, egg freezing is a relatively safe procedure, Baratz added.

“So, the downside is very minimal, other than the cost of the procedure … But if they’re in the right demographic where it’s feasible, it’s a great option.”

Insurance and the costs of egg freezing

For many, being able to afford the cost of freezing eggs is where the barrier to access comes in.

Below Bhopa’s TikTok video — titled, “4 takeaways after freezing my eggs at 25” — the most common question asked was about the cost.

“How much did this cost? I’m thinking of doing this?” one user asked.

“What’s the cost?” asked Leslie&Mj.

“How much was it? Does your insurance cover it?” a TikTok user who goes by Kathleen posted.

In a separate video, Bhopa broke down the costs of her egg freezing process. “Eighty per cent of my medication was covered by insurance,” she explained in the video, “but the total cost without insurance would have been $4,000.”

“My procedure was not covered by insurance, but for a lot of people it is,” she said, adding that the cost for her egg retrieval came to $9,750, which included the fees for storing the eggs for five years — $500 per year, according to Bhopa, who displayed her invoices in the background of the video as she detailed the costs of the process.

“So, the actual cost of the procedure alone, including anesthetic and everything like that, is $7,000.”

Bhopa went on to explain that she was able to afford it by getting a second job that same year and “saving up extremely well.”

“It’s an investment like any other and I’m really empowered by it,” she added.

But she acknowledged that without insurance covering the cost of medication, she would not have been able to afford the service. “That was my main driver,” she said in an interview with Postmedia.

Likewise, Twiver said she was “lucky to be able to tap into” her company’s health insurance benefits, which includes egg freezing.

Without insurance, Twiver said the entire cost would have come to $12,000, for the procedure and medication. If insurance wasn’t available, Twiver said she would have relied on support from her family, but “having access via coverage obviously made the decision much easier.”

In the past decade, Canadian and U.S. companies, mostly in banking and tech, have added fertility benefits to their employees’ insurance coverage.

Some Canadian banks now offer up to $60,000 in fertility treatments to be accessed over a lifetime, according to a report by Fertility Matters Canada. The Bank of Montreal increased the lifetime maximum for fertility drugs to $20,000 and reimburses employees $20,000 each in fertility treatment and surrogacy expenses. RBC and TD offer similar coverage plans with $20,000 for fertility treatments and medication, up to a lifetime maximum of $60,000, while CIBC recently began covering $15,000 for treatment drugs, to a lifetime maximum of $30,000. Scotiabank offers $10,000 in coverage for fertility treatment in addition to medication, and $10,000 for surrogacy expenses, for a maximum lifetime benefit of $30,000.

Big technology companies such as Google, Meta, Amazon and Microsoft are leading the way in offering fertility coverage to their employees. Snap is among the most generous, with workers eligible for up to $65,000 in fertility and adoption coverage through Carrot Fertility, and up to $130,000 toward surrogacy expenses.

On the one hand, these company policies can be a big plus for employees interested in the service who fear emptying their bank accounts. And it can be a stress-reliever for women looking to balance their careers with future parenthood.

“If the cost of the investment is no longer an element to be taken into consideration, even women who are less worried about finding a partner ‘in time’ may become interested in banking, which will lower the average age and thus raise the quality of the banked eggs,” Heidi Mertes, an associate professor in medical ethics at Ghent University, wrote in a 2015 paper.

On the other hand, it can promote a bias around egg freezing as the golden ticket out of the claws of the biological clock and encourage women, sometimes “against their better judgment” to defer parenthood in lieu of a better professional reputation, Mertes wrote.

For those without the option of insurance, or a big enough bank account, costs remain a major barrier.

“My initial reaction was just pure shock,” Sehrish Qureshi, 31, said of her reaction when she researched the costs of egg freezing for herself. “I was highly disappointed, of course. And then anger … I’m not expecting it to be affordable, because it’s a luxury service, but up to $35,000 a year? That’s definitely not what I was expecting.”

She said the cost of the service put her off wanting to explore the idea. “I just never looked at it again.”

High costs are partly why it’s more common to see individuals in their mid- to late 30s look to egg freezing rather than those in their 20s, Baratz said.

“If someone was going to have to make significant financial decisions on whether to do egg freezing or not, then I would discourage them. But if it’s feasible, it’s a great option,” he said.

For Bhopa,

the road to freezing her eggs

was an arduous and expensive one, but she has no regrets. “I can’t control time, but I can control what I do with my time,” she said in a YouTube video.

“I only want children when I know I have the time for it. I just don’t think the career goals I have over the next couple of years are feasible in regard to my biological clock … knocking on my door.”


Prime Minister Mark Carney winked at the start of his Oval Office meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump. And at the recent G7 leader's summit in Alberta, Carney, who had been watching Trump speak, turned his head slightly toward someone behind the camera and winked with his left eye.

The prime minister is a habitual winker. Once is once, two is a coincidence, three is a trend, and National Post counts at least four prominent public winks by

Mark Carney

since winning the top office — in Rideau Hall at his swearing in, in the Oval Office, and twice at the

G7

in Kananaskis, Alta. — plus many more going back to his governorship of the Bank of England.

Are these winks deliberate or have they become second nature? Do they mean something? Must they always? If they do, why not just say it? If they don’t, why risk causing misunderstanding or diplomatic insult? Winking around U.S. President

Donald Trump

, which accounts for three of the above examples, especially has an air of recklessness that clashes with Carney’s steady hands image.

A wink seems private even when it is public. It exudes self confidence, but it can seem sly. It can undermine carefully chosen words. It can literally mean “I am lying.” But it can also mean “I’ve got this.”

A wink as Carney does it “communicates a level of comfort with the idea of being noticed,” said Stewart Prest, lecturer in political science at the University of British Columbia. “But it could spiral badly if it is misconstrued.”

At the recent G7 leader’s summit, for example, after lamenting Russia’s absence, Trump was answering a question about what was holding up a trade deal with Canada. “I have a tariff concept,” he said. “Mark has a different concept, which is something that some people like.”

Just then, at this awkward backhand compliment, Carney, who had been watching Trump speak, turned his head slightly toward someone behind the camera and

winked with his left eye

, which pulled the corner of his lip up into the briefest hint of a smile that threatened to become a smirk.

Soon after, Trump was leaving the summit and talking to the media alongside Carney and French President Emmanuel Macron. Just as Trump said they got a lot done, including a U.S. trade deal with the U.K., Carney looked away from Trump toward Macron and winked,

this time with his right eye

, but with the same risky ripple of humour crossing his face.

Some people wink at what they say themselves. Carney just as often winks at what other people say, and not to the speaker, but to their audience.

Prest’s view is that Carney’s winks in Trump’s presence are typical of his style, in that they operate on three levels. This offers a theoretical framework for how to understand Carney winks in general, what they mean, and who they are for, he said.

At one level, Carney is communicating with Trump, in public, quietly listening to him. At a higher level he is communicating with Macron about Trump, in a sort of privacy, signalling an internal reaction to Trump’s words that Carney has decided not to vocalize. At the highest level he is communicating with the all-seeing public on the other side of the camera lens, indicating his comfort in playing all these etiquette games at the same time.

“It’s a high-wire act,” said Prest. “If it goes badly, it could go very badly.”

He needs to be careful that the wink includes the public, not excludes it. “The subtext always has to bring the public along,” Prest said. They need to know what Carney is trying to communicate, that he is confidently in control, and they also have to believe him. Otherwise it’s just a cocky facial tic.

Some winks are simple, obvious. Some winks need to be accounted for more deeply. Winks are almost always ambiguous, but sometimes they mean something important. Criminal court judges have faced this problem more than most. For example, in a 2017 murder case against a Richmond Hill, Ont., man accused of beating his roommate to death, a judge had to decide whether to let a witness testify about the meaning of a wink, and was troubled by its uncertain air of “innuendo.”

A friend of the victim had told police he had seen bruising on the victim’s ribs a couple of weeks before the killing, so he asked what happened. The victim explained he fell down the stairs, or off his bike, but then he winked, and when the friend asked what that meant, the victim said “Kenny’s got a hard punch,” referring to the accused.

The key problem, the judge said, was that it was not clear the victim winked and spoke at the exact same time, such that the wink directly contradicted the claim of falling down the stairs, and implied that the truth was Kenny punched him. It wasn’t clear “whether the wink and the comment were part of a single, ongoing transaction.”

That jury never heard the wink story, and eventually found the accused guilty of manslaughter, not murder.

Winks have been admitted as criminal evidence, however, such as in the 2017 Montreal case of the undercover police agent who testified about getting a “101 course” in robbery of shopping mall jewellery stores from the suspected culprit that was so convincing, so finely detailed, that the undercover officer asked whether the suspect had actually ever robbed the target store he was describing, in the Carrefour Laval.

The accused laughed, winked, and said “no,” which the undercover took as “an implicit admission that the accused had indeed robbed the store in the past.”

So sometimes a wink can mean the opposite of what was just said, that I did not fall off my bike, that I did rob this jewellery store. What I have just said is not true, wink wink. You’ll just have to trust me, and I know you will.

 

 Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney winks during a press conference at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa on Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013.

For a national leader’s voting public, that strategy works until it doesn’t, Prest said. Carney is in something of a honeymoon phase, and his current winking spree coincides with surging approval numbers in his first months as prime minister. He can wink and trust that he will be understood in good faith. But that can change.

When she profiled Carney for the Sunday Times in 2020, as he took the United Nations job as Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance, Charlotte Edwardes told the amusing story of being on a group tour with him through a Picasso exhibit at the Tate Modern in London, led by a curator who kept pointing out hidden penises in the Cubist paintings, and on the fifth or sixth one (a reclining woman whom the curator explained had a penis extending from her head) she caught Carney’s eye and “corpsed,” which is to say she laughed at this inappropriate moment. He joked about it afterwards in a deadpan: “Are you absolutely sure that you could see the penises?” She did not mention whether he said so with a wink, but it seems possible, and later in the piece, she said Carney told her he took the job of governor of the Bank of England because he likes a challenge, and he said so “with a wink.”

Could the winking thus be a bit de trop? Could it get creepy? Or cheesy? With the accumulation of political baggage, could Carney’s winks ever grow as stale as Justin Trudeau’s novelty socks?

“The wink will be perceived as Mr. Carney is perceived,” Prest said.

So, maybe. One day, the winks might turn sour. It would only be then that the leader with a “winking problem,” as the

National Post’s John Ivison once called it

, becomes a winker with a leading problem. Until then, Prest said, Carney seems to be pulling it off.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Federal Industry Minister Mélanie Joly.

OTTAWA — The federal government is set to make a highly anticipated decision in the coming weeks regarding internet affordability.

The CRTC recently reiterated its decision

issued last year authorizing Canada’s three major telecommunications companies to resell fibre optics to internet service providers (ISP) on their respective networks.

At the time, then-Minister of Industry François-Philippe Champagne asked the regulator to review its decision, which notably grants Telus more options to access new markets.

According to the regulator, “several thousand Canadian households” are already benefiting from new plans offered by “dozens of providers that are using the access enabled by the Final Decision.”

“Changing course now would reverse the benefits of this increased competition and would prevent more Canadians from having new choices of ISPs in the future,” wrote the CRTC in its June 20 decision.

However, many telecommunications companies are fighting back and exerting pressure on the federal government, particularly Industry Minister Mélanie Joly, to overturn the CRTC’s decision, arguing that it will have a negative impact on investment and competition across the country.

For them, the case is not over and the final decision has not yet been rendered.

They have financial analyses, including from Bank of America and National Bank, that predict “a decline in future investments in telecommunications infrastructure” if the decision is maintained.

Federal cabinet is expected to confirm or overturn the CRTC decision by Aug. 13.

“We take note of the CRTC’s decision to retain mandated wholesale access to fibre networks,” said Joly’s spokesperson, Isabella Orozco-Madison, in a statement. “Cabinet will make its decision on the petition before it in due course.”

The battle between the telecom giants, which began years ago before the federal regulator, is highly political in nature. A source indicated that Telus is also making every effort to ensure that the CRTC’s decision is upheld by Ottawa.

In an interview with National Post, Cogeco Communications’ chief legal and corporate officer said that telecoms will play a crucial role in Canada’s defence, housing, energy, artificial intelligence and agriculture sectors, and that the government must adopt policies that will promote their prosperity.

“It’s really about the moment we’re in as a country, and we don’t have time for regulation that doesn’t make sense and defeats its own objectives,” said Paul Cowling.

Smaller providers like Cogeco, or even independent providers that don’t have their own facilities, could very well be threatened by this policy if Ottawa signs off on it, they say.

“We want to compete, and we want to offer more choice in the marketplace… That becomes very challenging when your biggest competitors, who have many advantages over you, are empowered by the regulator to compete unfairly against you,” said Cowling.

For example, this decision would give Telus, which is strong in Western Canada, the opportunity to use other providers’ networks to add thousands of customers in Ontario and Quebec instead of building its own infrastructure.

Bell Canada’s executive vice president, Robert Malcolmson, recently said that “as a direct result” of the policy, his company has reduced its capital expenditures by $500 million in 2025 alone and by over $1.2 billion since the CRTC’s initial decision in November 2023.

“The CRTC policy will continue to have major negative impacts well into the future,” he wrote in a

scathing statement

.

In the meantime, Telus keeps telling Canadians how important this policy is. The Vancouver-based provider launched a petition online that has gained over 300,000 signatures to support the CRTC decision.

In the petition description, Telus writes “the federal government tried to limit competition, and could do so again” and that “some home internet carriers are still trying to restrict the brands you can choose from.”

“Upholding the decision reinforces the independence of expert regulators, which is necessary to create the certainty needed for Canadian businesses to continue to invest with confidence,” said Telus director of public affairs Richard Gilhooley.

Recently, B.C. premier David Eby said he was “pleased to see CRTC’s decision to uphold its ruling allowing for greater competition.”

“This is great news for BC headquartered Telus and for jobs in BC,” he wrote on social media.

According to

a recent PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) report

, the telecommunications sector contributed an estimated $87.3 billion to Canada’s GDP last year.

Now, internet carriers like BCE and Cogeco argue that sustaining this level of economic impact requires a regulatory environment that supports continued investment.

“And what we need in this country right now is more investment. We need more investment in strong digital infrastructure, other telecommunications networks… Our economic ambition is really dependent on having strong connectivity in our economy today, nothing works without connectivity,” said Cowling.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Bobby Vylan of British duo Bob Vylan performs on the West Holts Stage on the fourth day of the Glastonbury festival at Worthy Farm in the village of Pilton in Somerset, south-west England, on June 28, 2025.

When Pascal Robinson-Foster, 34, a rapper from Ipswich, U.K., who goes by “Bobby Vylan” came on stage Saturday afternoon at Britain’s Glastonbury Festival of Contemporary Performing Arts in front of a Palestine flag, there was already tension in the festival’s executive offices.

It was not yet centred on Bob Vylan, the rap duo who are newly infamous for leading the audience at Britain’s leading summer pop cultural event in a chant calling for death to Israeli soldiers, but who on Saturday were a downticket entry on the West Holts stage, which showcases reggae, hip hop, jazz, beats and electronica.

The most pressing concern was about a similar protest from Kneecap, the Northern Irish rap trio, one of whose members faces a terrorism charge for flying a Hezbollah flag at a show in London last year. That charge prompted U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer to say Kneecap’s presence on this year’s Glastonbury lineup was “inappropriate.”

So when the British Broadcasting Corporation belatedly said it regrets not pulling its live broadcast during Bob Vylan’s anti-Israel provocations, it is not because it did not expect controversy over the Mideast at all. The BBC had already decided not to broadcast Kneecap live. And just last week, BBC Director-General Tim Davie announced new editorial guidelines about hate speech, including that broadcasting it could constitute a criminal offence, if it is “intended to stir up hatred relating to religious belief.”

What followed, then, was predictable if not specifically expected. Avon and Somerset Police have announced a criminal investigation under hate crime law into Bob Vylan’s performance, which is classed as a “public order incident.”

“Free! Free!” Vylan chanted into the mic, to which an audible portion of the crowd replied “Palestine!”

“All right, but have you heard this one though? Death Death to the IDF,” he said.

 Bobby Vylan of Bob Vylan crowdsurfs in front of the stage during day four of the annual Glastonbury Festival in Glastonbury, England, on June 28, 2025.

IDF is the Israel Defense Forces. He repeated it five times, backed similarly by some of the audience, then said, “hell yeah, from the river to the sea, Palestine must be, will be, inshallah, it will be free.”

He also spoke to the audience about working for “f—ing Zionists” at his record label.

Bob Vylan were followed in their performance by Kneecap, but not on the BBC live feed.

Festival organizers said they were “appalled,” and that Bob Vylan’s behaviour went against its mission of “hope, unity, peace and love.”

BBC staff have reported feeling ashamed at how long this diatribe was allowed to continue in the live stream. The BBC itself said in a statement Sunday: “The team were dealing with a live situation but with hindsight we should have pulled the stream during the performance. We regret this did not happen. The BBC respects freedom of expression but stands firmly against incitement to violence. The antisemitic sentiments expressed by Bob Vylan were utterly unacceptable and have no place on our airwaves.” The segment has been removed from streaming services, and the BBC has launched a review.

The British broadcast regulator Ofcom said the BBC “has questions to answer” and that it has been urgently investigating what procedures were in place to ensure the BBC complied with its own editorial guidelines.

Britain’s Chief Rabbi, Sir Ephraim Mirvis, said the episode was “a time of national shame” that “brings confidence in our national broadcaster’s ability to treat antisemitism seriously to a new low.”

“It should trouble all decent people that now, one need only couch their outright incitement to violence and hatred as edgy political commentary, for ordinary people to not only fail to see it for what it is, but also to cheer it, chant it and celebrate it,” Mirvis wrote.

In response to the fallout, which now includes a ban from the United States, the band Bob Vylan posted a statement that read, in part: “We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use “unnecessary lethal force” against innocent civilians waiting for aid.”

That is a reference to a news report Friday in the left-wing Israeli newspaper Haaretz that claimed Israel’s Military Advocate General has opened an investigation into possible war crimes over the allegedly deliberate shooting of Gazan civilians in chaotic scenes near aid distribution stations.

Hundreds of people have been killed in Gaza in the past month attempting to access food aid, according to Hamas-run Gazan health authorities whose accounts cannot be independently verified. After Israel lifted its 10-week blockade of food shipments into Gaza in May, emergency aid has been delivered by the newly created U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, whose security is overseen by the Israeli military.

Speaking to the Reuters news agency, the Israeli military denied the claim of deliberate shooting of civilians at aid distribution centres. It said it was trying to improve the “operational response” in these areas, and said some incidents were being reviewed by appropriate authorities. “Any allegation of a deviation from the law or IDF directives will be thoroughly examined, and further action will be taken as necessary,” it said, according to Reuters.

International reactions were swift to the live broadcasting of Bob Vylan’s “Death to the IDF” chant.

The U.S. Deputy Secretary of State, Christopher Landau, announced Monday the State Department has revoked visas for the performers “in light of their hateful tirade at Glastonbury, including leading the crowd in death chants. Foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country.”

In Canada, Liberal MP Anthony Housefather said this was a good idea, and said on social media he had been in touch with Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree to recommend Canada follow the American lead. Opposition Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner said Canada should do the same, and tagged the minister of immigration, refugees and citizenship, Lena Diab, in a social media post.

A Public Safety spokesperson said he could not say whether that would happen, and that this would be a question for border services. The Canada Border Services Agency said it was not in a position to comment on this specific case, and said admissibility decisions are made “case-by-case,” based on information available at a person’s time of entry, and by sharing relevant information on border and national security issues with other agencies and countries.

It is not clear Bob Vylan has any plans to come to Canada. Their website lists upcoming tour dates in Britain and Europe, and American stops later in the fall, now presumably cancelled. Promotional material for a tour by the American-Canadian rapper Grandson with stops in Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Toronto and Montreal lists Bob Vylan as a co-headliner on American dates, but not the Canadian ones.

The group was also dropped by their agent, United Talent Agency.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump depart following a group photo in front of the Canadian Rockies at the Kananaskis Country Golf Course during the G7 Leaders' Summit on June 16, 2025 in Kananaskis, Alberta.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Ottawa could almost taste the tax revenues.

For nearly five years, Canada has been planning a digital services tax (DST) that

would generate billions in revenue by taxing

large tech firms on their Canadian digital revenues. Just hours before the first DST payments were due on Monday, however, Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government called the whole thing off.

Carney’s move late Sunday was a capitulation to the White House — and he had little choice after President Donald Trump abruptly cancelled trade negotiations on Friday over the DST, calling it “a direct and blatant attack on our country.”

Faced with 25 per cent tariffs on most Canadian exports to the U.S. and 50 per cent tariffs on its steel and aluminum, Canada needed to keep the trade talks alive. So Carney did what had to be done, stating that the move “will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025, timeline set out at this month’s G7 Leaders’ Summit in Kananaskis.”

What led to the DST, and why did Washington oppose it?

The Liberals first introduced the DST in 2020 — a 3 per cent tax on big tech companies with Canadian digital revenues above $20 million per year — as a stopgap, with the real goal of pushing for a multilateral, OECD-led overhaul of the international tax system to curb multinational tax avoidance.

Several countries, including France, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Spain, had begun implementing DSTs in 2019 and 2020, raising alarm bells for large U.S. tech firms and advocacy groups.

The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), a U.S.-based trade association representing technology and communications companies, was one that pushed back, calling the DSTs discriminatory. The taxes “hit U.S. companies but are designed to exempt local companies, putting U.S. firms at a competitive disadvantage in the market,” said Jonathan McHale, VP of digital trade at CCIA.

President Joe Biden supported an OECD approach to reforming the international tax system – and its moratorium halting the rollout of unilateral DSTs, adopted by the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework in late 2021. Canada waited in hopes of there being an international tax reform, but by July 11, 2023, when the OECD agreed to another year-long extension on the moratorium, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government decided it had waited long enough. It pushed ahead unilaterally to pass the Digital Services Tax Act last summer, despite warnings from U.S. diplomats and risk experts that it could spark a trade war.

While Canada’s approach was meant to tax both foreign and domestic firms, McHale said that’s simply how countries go about saying they are not formally targeting American companies. He referred to “disguised techno-trade” and proportionality, noting that “on the surface, [the DST] looks neutral, but the impact is essentially focused on a particular foreign country.” Canada’s DST, he said, would’ve mostly impacted U.S. tech firms.

But there was opposition to it at home, too, he noted, because the tax would have hurt would-be startups trying to establish themselves in the Canadian market.

“There were lots of Canadian companies that were vocal in their opposition to this, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce chief among them,” he said, noting that they didn’t want it to upset their strong startup culture and digital economy.

Biden’s team pushed back last year when the tax was passed, arguing repeatedly for a multilateral solution, and then-U.S. Ambassador to Canada David Cohen labelled it “discriminatory.”

Trump, in turn, had more leverage and threatened the cessation of trade talks and even higher tariffs, but many saw this coming.

“If you don’t push back against Canada’s [DST], isn’t that a green light for other countries to move ahead?” asked McHale. Opposition to DSTs has been a “longstanding bipartisan issue” in the U.S., he noted.

Could dropping the DST lift trade?

It can’t hurt. Besides, it was necessary to get back to the negotiating table.

After Canada rescinded the tax, Trump and Carney agreed to resume trade talks with an eye toward reaching a deal by July 21, 2025. “Canada’s preference has always been a multilateral agreement related to digital services taxation,” Carney’s statement said, reminding folks that the DST was only ever meant to be a short-term solution.

His government also remains “engaged in discussions with the U.S. and other countries to find a workable solution on international taxation that achieves our common objectives,” a Department of Finance official told National Post.

The Canada Revenue Agency issued a statement on Monday confirming the tax was suspended and noting that reimbursements will be made to companies that already paid “if legislation is tabled in Parliament and receives royal assent.”

The White House, meanwhile, viewed the decision to drop the DST as positive. Trump officials also hope the move will encourage other countries to eliminate similar taxes to avoid U.S. retaliation moving forward.

Canada’s DST “would’ve been the most burdensome tax for U.S. companies — topping the list of revenues extracted from U.S. firms,” McHale said.

But DSTs are still in effect in several countries that have strong trade links with the U.S., including the U.K., Spain, and France, and they should expect similar pushback from Washington.

“The U.S. government has been pretty clear that they oppose the policy … so it stands to reason that it would push back against these others as well,” McHale added.

France and Spain are still working to secure a favourable trade agreement with the U.S.. Although the U.K. managed to forge a deal last month, the Trump administration has publicly stated that getting Britain to rescind its DST remains a top priority.

In the meantime, while Ottawa may be left thirsty for big tech revenues, U.S.-Canada trade relations are finally getting a much-needed drink.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.