LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Molten copper is poured into molds at the Horne copper smelter in Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec.

OTTAWA —

U.S. President Donald Trump’s vow this week that he will impose heavy tariffs on copper imports

on Aug. 1 is of particular cause for concern in Quebec, which harbours Canada’s only copper smelting facility and a major refinery that do significant business across the border.

“There’s an impression of déjà vu,” said Emmanuelle Toussaint, president and CEO of the Quebec Mining Association. “Since the start of the year, there have been on several occasions declarations made about tariffs, and some of them have materialized.”

“Our first reaction is to say that we will follow the situation closely,” she added. “We’re really in a context where we are vigilant and preparing for this possibility.”

Industry players told National Post they are keeping a close eye on when Trump will sign an executive order imposing the tariffs, when they will come into force, whether they’ll be at the 50 per cent rate Trump promised, and how they could potentially affect both countries’ deeply integrated structures.

“Today we are doing copper,” Trump declared to reporters covering his cabinet meeting on Tuesday. “I believe the tariff on copper, we are going to make it 50 per cent.”

In February, the president

launched investigations under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962

into multiple products, including copper and pharmaceuticals, citing national security concerns.

The Commerce Department investigation was originally set to conclude by November 2025.

On Wednesday evening, Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social the tariffs would be effective Aug. 1.

Pierre Gratton, head of the Mining Association of Canada, said those tariffs would not have a great effect on copper mines, many of which are in British Columbia, as they sell to other markets in Europe and Asia. But he said it was concerning for the “midstream” operators in Quebec who refine and smelt copper.

The province is home to the Horne Smelter in Rouyn-Noranda — the only copper smelter in the country — and to the Canadian Copper Refinery (CCR) in Montreal East. Both facilities are owned by the Swiss multinational Glencore, which declined an interview for this article.

“Canada and the United States benefit from a robust and highly integrated copper supply chain — one that Glencore plays an active part in,” said Fabrice de Dongo, spokesperson for Glencore Canada, in a written statement.

“This is an important issue for our business, and we continue to watch developments closely,” he added.

In essence, Horne Smelter processes concentrate and recycled copper from mining operations and third parties, including from the U.S. The material is then shipped to CCR to be transformed into copper cathodes and sold on world markets, according to Glencore.

The U.S. only has a few active smelters in Utah and in Arizona. Sung Choi, metals and mining analyst at BloombergNEF, said it would take two to three years to build up more American smelting capacity.

Jean-Denis Charest, CEO of the Chamber of Commerce in Montreal East, said that CCR creates more than 1,300 direct and indirect jobs and generates around $300 million in economic benefits for the Montreal region alone.

“Of course, this is worrisome, but at the same time, we have to keep a cool head because there are lots of changes and lots of negotiations at play,” he said of the tariffs. “That being said, what happened in the steel and aluminum sectors is making me a bit more worried,” he said referring to

mass layoffs and production cutbacks in those sectors

after Trump raised tariffs to 50 per cent tariffs on Canadian aluminum and steel in June, from 25 per cent in March.

“We find ourselves in a movie in which we have already played but which is very problematic, and which will weaken our copper supply chains in North America,” Charest said.

The federal government has so far refused to comment on the copper threats until Trump has signed an executive order to enforce the tariffs and more details are available.

Toussaint, from the Quebec Mining Association, said it is still too early to speculate on job losses in Quebec should these new tariffs on copper move ahead. But she said prices are sure to jump if the U.S. imposes them and even more if Canada decides to retaliate. Copper prices this week have already hit record highs in the U.S., surging 13 per cent on Tuesday.

That means a spike in prices for electrical wires, telecommunications and electronic devices, but also plumbing, machinery, and construction materials, Toussaint said.

Prime Minister Mark Carney has already said he is prepared to match tariffs on steel and aluminum should Canada and the U.S. not come to a new economic and security agreement by July 21. But Toussaint said Carney should spare copper from any counter tariffs because the two countries’ supply chains are so heavily integrated.

Charles Cooper, head of copper research at Wood Mackenzie, agreed retaliation would be “counterproductive.” “I think once you start going into tit for tat, in that sense, eventually, everybody’s going to lose out,” he said.

Cooper said Carney probably recognizes that the U.S. might receive some weaker economic news over the next month or so, such as higher inflation numbers, which could make it a lot more difficult for Trump to continue hammering more tariffs.

“Once the reality sort of sets in… it’s a bit of a waiting game as well.”

— With additional files from Tracy Moran in Washington.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


Along with facing

OTTAWA— With Canada Post facing a dire fiscal future, the federal government is taking the first steps towards a possible overhaul of its mandate.

Public Services and Procurement Canada, the department responsible for Canada Post Corp. and the charter that dictates how often it delivers letters and parcels, is planning to launch consultations about the future of the Crown corporation.

“The goal is to engage Canadians and stakeholders to redefine the government’s service-oriented vision for Canada Post, in a context where the postal industry landscape has changed, the needs of Canadians have evolved, and the volume of mail and letters has declined significantly to the point where Canada Post’s sustainability has been undermined,” reads a department notice.

It said the consultations are meant to “Inform the analysis of the future of Canada Post and make recommendations to (the) cabinet.”

National Post requested clarification from the office of Joel Lightbound, the minister of the department, but did not receive one on Wednesday.

The department says the consultation plan has not yet been finalized, but it has identified this fall as the time when it could begin consultations.

“As part of its portfolio responsibilities, Public Services and Procurement Canada is exploring options to modernize Canada Post’s operations to best suit the needs of Canadians,” wrote ministry spokeswoman Nicole Allen, in a statement.

“Canada Post has a mandate to provide quality postal services to all Canadians in a secure and financially self-sustaining manner. Canada Post must be efficient and financially sustainable for the long term, and the government is exploring all options to that effect.”

A spokeswoman for Canada Post said the Canadian Postal Service Charter must be reviewed every five years. However, the last time the federal government did so was in 2018, meaning a review is now two years overdue.

The Crown corporation has underlined the need for the government to make major changes to the charter to alter the service standards that mandate Canada Post deliver mail to Canadians five days a week, given how few Canadians now send mail. It has also flagged concerns over rules preventing rural post office closures and stipulating the geographic density of postal outlets.

The current mandate has largely been unchanged since 2009, according to the corporation. It cited the mandate in a submission to the Industrial Inquiry Commission,

tasked earlier this year with handling a dispute between the corporation and its unions.

In it, Canada Post said the mandate has become a hindrance that prevents the postal service from modernizing.

Ian Lee, a professor at Carleton University’s business school, who has authored two reports on Canada Post’s situation over the past decade, sees the upcoming consultation as the “front end” of a process to restructure and “completely and radically reinvent the post office.”

Lee says a review into Canada Post’s operations is “inevitable” given how the corporation’s figures show it to be “hemorrhaging cash,” with losses only predicted to get worse as fewer and fewer Canadians send letters. Canada Post has also faced intensifying competition for parcels from private delivery companies.

Last year, Canada Post cited a loss of around $1.3 billion, on top of a $750 million loss in 2023. It said its back-to-back losses since 2018 amounted to around $4.5 billion. Earlier this year,

the federal government loaned the Crown corporation $1 billion

to continue operating as it faces “significant financial challenges.” Without it, Canada Post said it would have depleted its financial reserves this year.

Lee says that admission makes clear that operating the postal service as is is no longer sustainable.

Coupled with Canada finding itself in a trade war with the U.S., and Prime Minister Mark Carney promising to spend billions more on defence, Lee said the federal government won’t want to spend billions propping up the post office.

“This is a luxury we can no longer afford,” Lee said.

Adding to the postal service’s troubles has been a labour dispute with its workers that has dragged out for 18 months.

Last month, Employment Minister Patty Hajdu approved the corporation’s request to

force a vote on its final offer to the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW)

, which the union called an attack on workers’ rights. Hajdu had said she wanted it as “soon as possible,” but the union asked for more time, citing confusion over the voting process. The union has been in a legal strike position since May 2.

The dispute resulted in a strike

late last year that disrupted Christmas mail

, before the government intervened with forced arbitration in mid-December. It has led to other labour action, including workers refusing overtime. Canada Post

settled a contract dispute with its second-largest union

, the Canadian Postmasters and Assistants Association, in June.

When it comes to a mandate review, CUPW said in a statement it was aware of the government’s intention to consult about the postal service’s future, calling it a “critical opportunity for Canadians to help shape a Canada Post that truly serves the public interest.”

It said it wanted to ensure “all voices are heard,” saying that in past reviews, it has made submissions and sought input from seniors’ groups and students, as well as rural and remote communities, farmers, and other unions.

Lee said one risk the government runs by embarking on consultations is hearing from those “who care the most” about maintaining postal service, such as people living in rural areas and older people.

The task for the government, he says, is to “temper” the feedback it receives with the reality that “mail volumes have collapsed.” In 2006, Canada Post delivered 5.5 billion letters, but just 2 billion letters in 2024,

its annual report said

.

“I think that they’re going to change the mandate,” Lee said. “The only question is, are they going to go to what, three days a week, two days a week, one day a week, and that’s yet to be determined.”

National Post

staylor@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


A cat sleeps in an apartment window beside an air conditioner, in Burnaby, B.C.

A new report from

Statistics Canada

says just over two-thirds, or 68 per cent, of Canadian household are reporting use of air conditioning or cooling systems such as heat pumps to beat the heat of summer. That’s up from 64 per cent in 2021.

Air conditioning can offset some of the health and safety effects of heat waves, says StatCan but the agency is also urging Canadians to conserve energy by turning the a/c down when they aren’t home.

Who has air conditioning in Canada?

Air conditioner ownership varies across Canada.

Ontario households (83 per cent) were the most likely to air conditioning, while households in British Columbia (45 per cent) were least likely. This is due in part to climate. Meanwhile, says StatCan, “the most densely populated areas of Southern Ontario reaching higher average summer temperatures than other regions of Canada.“

People in newer homes were predictably more likely to have an air conditioner: 80 per cent of homes built in 2001 and later, compared with 58 per cent of homes built before 1960.

Air conditioning was also more prevalent among homeowners (76 per cent) than renters (52 per cent). It was also more likely in households with higher incomes (82 per cent of those earning more than $150,000 before taxes) than by households with lower incomes (55 per cent among those earning less than $50,000).

There were no differences based on age.

Atlantic Canadians prefer to maintain slightly cooler temperatures than other regions of the country, at 19.8 C.

Natural Resources Canada

suggests an indoor thermostat range of 22 C to 25 C.

Who is most likely to turn their a/c down or off when away from home?

As of 2025, just over half (51 per cent) of Canadians with an air conditioner reported turning it off or down when they go away on vacation for one week or longer, says StatCan. Households in the Prairies (56 per cent) and British Columbia (56 per cent) are most likely to do so.

Meanwhile, only a third (28 per cent) of folks out of town for the weekend reported turning air conditioning off or down while away. Adults aged 30 to 44 years were most likely, compared with people 60 years and older. About 26 per cent of people aged 15 to 64 years reported turning it off or down while at work or school.

People aged 75 years and older (25 per cent) were more likely to turn down their air conditioning for short absences, compared to people aged 45 to 59 (18 per cent).

Why do people turn their a/c off?

The vast majority (82 per cent) of Canadians said they want to avoid wasting energy.

The second most-cited reason was to prolong the lifespan of their cooling equipment (7 per cent). This answer was more prevalent among people aged 30 to 59 years.

A further 5 per cent of Canadians mentioned that their main reason for turning down their a/c was to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

What is the impact of air conditioning on health?

A 2023 study released by

Health Canada

linked air conditioning and prevention of deaths, as well as a variety of heat-related illnesses. Heat-related illnesses include heatstroke, exhaustion, dehydration and hospitalization resulting from respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.

Approximately 280 deaths occurred during the 2010 Quebec heat wave, and 619 deaths occurred in British Columbia during the 2021 heat dome in Western North America.

Who is most vulnerable to heat?

Health Canada has identified the most vulnerable groups when it comes to heat-related health challenges. First was older adults (more than 65 years old). The second was older adults living alone. Third was older adults with health conditions such as high blood pressure, heart and respiratory diseases.

What challenges do renters face over a/c?

Air conditioning is more of an issue for renters, where units are only sometimes provided by the landlord. Generally, if your rental contains air-conditioning, then your landlord is legally obligated to maintain it, as with any other equipment in the home.

Ontario law

simply states that a rental unit “must be fit for habitation.”

However, in Toronto the legal obligation for landlords has tightened. Against a backdrop of heat waves that have increasingly hit central Canada, the

city amended its bylaws

as of April 30, 2025.

For rental units equipped with air conditioning provided by the property owner, the Property Standards Bylaw was updated to require landlords to operate air conditioning from June 1 to September 30 (instead of June 2 to September 14).

Meanwhile, federal regulations focus more on air-conditioning types, efficiency, and equipment standards. See the federal government’s guidance

here

.

 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Travis Dhanraj reporting for the CBC in St. John’s, N.L., in 2023.

The Conservative party is calling for a parliamentary committee to investigate the

CBC

after

journalist Travis Dhanraj resigned

over the public broadcaster’s alleged “performative diversity, tokenism, a system designed to elevate certain voices and diminish others.”

Dhanraj was the host of Canada Tonight: With Travis Dhanraj on CBC. But he resigned on Monday, involuntarily, he says, because the CBC “has made it impossible for me to continue my work with integrity.”

“I have been systematically sidelined, retaliated against, and denied the editorial access and institutional support necessary to fulfill my public service role,” he wrote in his resignation letter. “I stayed as long as I could, but CBC leadership left me with no reasonable path forward.”

On Wednesday, Rachel Thomas, an Alberta Conservative member of Parliament, wrote a letter to the chair of the House of Commons standing committee on Canadian heritage, saying that Dhanraj’s claims have “reignited concerns about the organization’s workplace culture.”

The letter calls on the chair, Ontario Liberal MP Lisa Hepfner, to recall the committee.

“It is critical that we hear testimony from Mr. Dhanraj, CBC executives and Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture, Steven Guilbeault,” the letter states.

Kathryn Marshall, Dhanraj’s lawyer, told National Post in an interview that they welcome the attempt to recall the committee for hearings.

“Obviously, the issues that Travis has highlighted in his resignation letter and which will be part of a future legal proceeding are very serious, and they’re not just isolated to Travis,” Marshall said. “I’ve heard from a lot of other CBC employees who have similar stories. It’s a systemic issue, and it’s a workplace culture issue that goes very deep at CBC, which is very concerning given the amount of public funds going to the corporation and its public-interest mandate.”

CBC has denied Dhanraj’s allegations.

“CBC categorically rejects the accusations made about CBC News, our staff and management,” Kerry Kelly, a CBC spokesperson, said in an email.

On Wednesday, National Post reported that Dhanraj is still considered an employee by CBC, although he is on leave.

“CBC is refusing to accept his resignation,” Marshall

told National Post

, in an emailed statement. “This refusal is indicative of their abusive work culture. However, to be clear, Travis has resigned, albeit involuntarily. We intend to commence a human rights lawsuit.”

Marshall alleged earlier this week that Dhanraj had been discouraged from booking “Conservative voices” on his show.

Dhanraj had been on leave last July but returned to full-time hours last December. At that point, Marshall said, he was pressured to sign a non-disclosure agreement regarding a tweet he posted in April 2024 about former CBC president Catherine Tait declining an interview request for his show.

“Within basically the first week of his return he was immediately retaliated against by CBC for not signing the NDA,” Marshall said. “He was, at that point, permanently removed as the host of Canada Tonight, and his salary got slashed, and it was evident at that point that he had no future or career at the CBC.”

In his resignation letter, Dhanraj said the experience at CBC has “taken a real toll — on my health, my career, and my trust in an institution I once believed I could help reform from within.”

“But the greater harm is to the public: a broadcaster that no longer lives up to its mandate, a culture that resists accountability, and a system that punishes those who dare to challenge it.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


The Canada Revenue Agency.

July is the start of the fiscal year for the

Ontario Trillium Benefit

(OTB), which means those who are registered and qualified to receive it should be seeing a deposit in their bank accounts on Thursday, July 10.

What is the Ontario Trillium Benefit?

The OTB combines three government payments: the Ontario Energy and Property Tax Credit, the Northern Ontario Energy Credit and the Ontario Sales Tax Credit. You must be eligible for at least one of the three to receive it.

Who is eligible?

To qualify for the Ontario Energy and Property Tax Credit you must have been an Ontario resident on Dec. 31, 2024, and one of the following must apply before June 1, 2026: you’re over the age of 18, you’re in (or have been in) a marriage or common-law relationship, or you live with (or have lived with) your child.

For the Ontario Sales Tax Credit, the qualifications are the same except the age limit is 19 and over.

For the Northern Ontario Energy Credit, the same qualifications apply (18 and over in this case), but you must also live in one of the designated northern communities: Algoma, Cochrane, Kenora, Manitoulin, Nipissing, Parry Sound, Rainy River, Sudbury, Thunder Bay or Timiskaming.

How does one apply?

You must have filed your tax return for the previous year (2024 in this case) to be eligible, even if you have no income to report. The government will then calculate the amount you’re owed.

What is the benefit worth?

The Ontario Energy and Property Tax Credit tops out at $1,283 for those under 65 and $1,461 for seniors, while the Northern Ontario Energy Credit can be up to $185 for single people and $285 for families. The Ontario Sales Tax Credit has a maximum payout of $371 for each qualified individual.

The government has a

calculator you can use

to determine your own payout. Variables include age, income, family size, residence, and amount paid in rent or property tax. You can also use the calculator to figure out child benefit payments.

When does the benefit arrive?

If your benefit is under $360, it will arrive in a lump sum on July 10. If it’s more, it will arrive in monthly instalments on the 10th of each month (or the last working day before that if the 10th is a weekend or holiday).

What should you do if it doesn’t show up?

The Canada Revenue Agency requests that you wait 10 working days from the payment due date before contacting them if it didn’t arrive.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Higher copper prices could lead to more theft, and stolen copper is hard to trace.

This week, Ontario Provincial Police arrested four men and charged them with stealing copper wire from 33 decommissioned hydro police that were cut down in a rural region in northern Ontario.

Police said the copper

, with an estimated value of $100,000, was taken in May from Coleman Township, some 200 kilometres northeast of Sudbury.

The news comes at the same time that U.S. President Donald Trump is announcing a possible

50 per cent tariff

on Canadian copper.

“Today we are doing copper,” he told reporters during a cabinet meeting on Tuesday. “I believe the tariff on copper, we are going to make it 50 per cent.” U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who was in the meeting, later confirmed the amount.

What does the new tariff mean?

It’s a major hit. According to Natural Resources Canada, Canada’s exports of copper and copper-based products were valued at $9.3 billion in 2023, with the United States accounting for more than half the total export value that year.

Already the

Guardian newspaper

is reporting that the tariffs have driven copper prices in the U.S. to an all-time high, with copper futures jumping more than 10 per cent to $5.682 a pound overnight. Conversely, it noted that prices elsewhere in the world fell amid fears that high U.S. prices could reduce demand globally.

Is copper theft tied to the new tariffs?

Yes and no. Anything that increases the price of copper will mean more theft of the material, but it’s long been a problem in Canada and elsewhere.

Back in 2014 the industry group

Electricity Canada

released a paper, “Copper Theft from Canada’s Electricity Infrastructure: Dangerous, Expensive and a Threat to Reliability,” highlighting what was even then a $40-million-a-year problem.

How big a problem is it today?

Last year,

Caliber Communications

highlighted the cost of copper as a factor driving thefts, and also noted the peril faced by criminals: “In addition to the illegal aspect of copper theft, it can also be an extremely dangerous crime, as thieves may put themselves at great risk when stealing copper wires. Stealing live wires from hydro sites, telephone poles or underground wiring systems can result in serious injury, or even death.”

And just this month a

release from Bell Canada

noted that copper theft is up 23 per cent year-over-year, with over 500 cases this year alone, and more than 2,270 since 2022. It noted that Ontario leads the country with 63 per cent of copper thefts, but that New Brunswick and Quebec are also hot spots.

Where do thieves steal copper?

Electrical transmission wires, such as the recent case in Coleman Township, are one source. Depots are another: Caliber related an October 2024 incident in which thieves broke into a business in Cambridge, Ont., and made off with copper wire valued at approximately $50,000.

In 2006, the Canadian Press reported a crime in which criminals climbed to the roofs of four Quebec City churches, carting away several hundreds dollars worth of copper from the roofs, gutters and wiring, and leaving behind tens of thousands of dollars in damages to the buildings.

And just this week a man in Brantford, Ont., was

sentenced to six months

in jail for dismantling the air conditioning units of two local businesses to get at the copper inside.

How is stolen copper sold?

Scrap metal dealers are the main source for selling copper, which is difficult to trace and thus hard to detect as stolen.

In January,

an Alberta judge struck down

a 10-year-old law called the Scrap Metal Dealers and Recyclers Identification Act that required dealers to record home addresses of sellers, and for sellers to show the dealer government-issued ID.

“Further, these individuals must provide detailed information about the vehicle used to transport the metal to the dealer, the make, model, license plate, and colour,” the law stated.

Justice Heather Lamoureux concluded the act amounted to unreasonable search and seizure by the state, and violated Section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Other jurisdictions have set up similar laws, however. Last year, Brantford city council

passed a law

that scrap metal dealers receiving “restricted scrap metal” (a list that includes copper) must have police permission to do so, and have to gather information about the transaction, and not pay out in cash.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Residents of the Peace region have filed a complaint against the David Suzuki Foundation for allegedly using a picture of Wyoming (above) to depict the Montney region in B.C. (Bruce Gordon/EcoFlight)

OTTAWA — The David Suzuki Foundation has repeatedly used false and alarmist imagery to exaggerate the ecological impacts of natural gas development in northeastern British Columbia, a new complaint to Canada’s Competition Bureau alleges.

The complaint, put forward by eight B.C. residents, says that the Vancouver-based environmental charity repeatedly misled the public by using an aerial image depicting

a dense cluster of natural gas wells scarring a landscape in Wyoming

, taken in 2006, to falsely depict modern natural gas development in British Columbia’s northeast.

“(T)he Wyoming image paints a picture (that is) dirty, desolate and packed with natural gas well pads, as opposed the reality of a green area where natural gas development takes place around farms and public infrastructure,” reads the complaint.

The 11-page complaint includes multiple screenshots of foundation materials that use the Wyoming photo, dating back to 2019. In one case, the foundation included text acknowledging the photo was from Wyoming, but it did not do so in other cases, the complaint alleges.

One June 2024 Instagram post, for example, uses the image to promote an investigative report into the Montney Formation in northeastern B.C. and northwestern Alberta, a region that accounts for roughly half of

Canada’s natural gas production

.

The foundation continued to use the image after being made aware of concerns surrounding its use that summer, according to the complaint.

The complaint also says the outdated image fails to reflect present-day horizontal drilling techniques being used to extract natural gas from the Montney Formation.

“Many horizontal drills can be performed from one site, taking away any need for the densely packed wells shown in the Wyoming image used by David Suzuki Foundation.”

Deena Del Giusto, one of the complainants, said in a statement to the media that the principle of truth in advertising should apply equally to charities.

“This is about fairness and truth. The people of Northeast B.C. … deserve honest debate, not scare tactics and misleading imagery used to raise millions in donations,” said Del Giusto, a resident of Fort St. John, B.C.

“We’re asking the Competition Bureau to hold the David Suzuki Foundation to the same standard businesses face: tell the truth.”

Del Giusto told the National Post she was inspired to take action when a client of hers in the trucking industry brought the foundation’s use of the image to her attention.

“I just didn’t feel like it fairly reflected what was happening in the community, and felt strongly that I needed to do something about it,” said Del Giusto.

Representatives from the David Suzuki Foundation did not immediately respond to National Post questions about the Competition Bureau complaint.

The complaint also claims that the Wyoming image has in several instances appeared in close proximity to messages soliciting donations to the foundation.

“It is clear that (the image) is being used … to benefit the organization through donations.”

The group is asking that the foundation to issue a corrective notice informing the public of its deceptive practices and pay a fine of up to $15,000,000 per offence.

The environmental charity raised $12.1 million in Canadian donations and $38,000 from abroad last year, according

to publicly available filings

.

It has roughly $22.5 million in reserve funds, of which $8.9 million are donor-endowed.

The registered national charity is headquartered in Vancouver, with offices in Toronto and Montreal.

National Post

rmohamed@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


CBC host Travis Dhanraj announced his resignation Monday.

Despite journalist Travis Dhanraj’s very public resignation from CBC, the national broadcaster says that he is an employee.

He is “still an employee although he is currently on leave,” said CBC’s head of public affairs Chuck Thompson to National Post via email on Wednesday morning.

Dhanraj’s lawyer Kathryn Marshall told National Post that “CBC is refusing to accept his resignation.”

“This refusal is indicative of their abusive work culture. However, to be clear, Travis has resigned, albeit involuntarily. We intend to commence a human rights lawsuit,” she said in an emailed statement.

In a letter to CBC leadership on Monday, Dhanraj said he felt that he had to step down because CBC made it impossible for him to continue his work with integrity. He called out the broadcaster for its “performative diversity, tokenism, a system designed to elevate certain voices and diminish others.”

He said he was denied access to “key newsmakers,” and described an atmosphere where barriers were in place for some, while others were empowered. “When I questioned these imbalances, I was met with silence, resistance, and eventually, retaliation. I was fighting for balance and accused of being on a ‘crusade,’” he wrote.

CBC has denied Dhanraj’s allegations.

The broadcaster “categorically rejects” the claims, CBC spokesperson Kerry Kelly said

in an emailed statement to National Post

on Monday. In February, CBC

confirmed to publication Broadcast Dialogue

that Dhanraj was “on a leave,” as

speculation swirled online

after the time slot of the television show he hosted, Canada Tonight, was replaced with another show.

On Monday, Dhanraj shared a note with his followers on social media.

“The dream that turned into a nightmare,” he wrote.

He said his resignation was not just about him. It was about CBC being “a public institution” that is “supposed to serve” Canadians.

“It’s about voices being sidelined, hard truths avoided, and the public being left in the dark about what’s really happening inside their national broadcaster,” he wrote. “I have no doubt there will be efforts to discredit me — to paint me as bitter or disgruntled. That’s what happens when you challenge power.”

Dhanraj’s journalism career spans 20 years.

He was a reporter for CBC News in Edmonton and Toronto before continuing on to CP24, Global News and CTV News. In 2021, he returned to CBC as a senior parliamentary reporter. He eventually ended up as the host for CBC’s Marketplace and Canada Tonight.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A for sale sign is seen in front of a home on June 22, 2016 in Miami, Florida.

There has been a nationwide effort among Canadians to

buy local

and

travel domestically this year

, as a strained relationship with the United States continues. And now, a new report is suggesting that the number of Canadians interested in U.S. real estate has declined.

Nearly 30 per cent fewer Canadians searched for properties to buy or rent in the U.S. this May, compared to last year, according to a

report by real estate company RedFin

. The decline began in February. That was around the same time tensions were rising between the neighbouring countries, sparked by U.S. President Donald Trump’s heated rhetoric about Canada becoming the 51st state and the beginning of a trade war, when 25 per cent tariffs were implemented on Canadian goods going to the U.S.

“The Canadian dollar has been relatively weak this spring, making it harder for Canadians to afford already-expensive U.S. real estate,” RedFin said in its report.

The steepest drop came in April, when Canadian searches for U.S. homes fell by 34.2 per cent year over year.

The decline has affected 48 of the largest metro areas in the United States, according to RedFin. That includes Canadians searching for homes in Houston, which dropped 55.2 per cent year over year in May, as well as Philadelphia, by 53 per cent, and Chicago, by 47 per cent.

The report also noted that the housing market in Florida for both American and Canadian buyers “has cooled.” The state is a popular destination for Canadian snowbirds. In April, lawmakers in the U.S., including a Florida congresswoman,

cosponsored a bill that would allow Canadian snowbirds to visit for longer

. The report cited the lack of interest in the state was likely due to

a surge in insurance costs

in its coastal regions as well as intensifying climate disasters.

Canadians searching for homes in Miami and Orlando declined by about 30 per cent year over year in May, the report said.

Canadians have made up a large portion of international buyers in the United States. In 2024, they were listed as the top foreign buyers — at 13 per cent — spending US$5.9 billion,

according to the National Association of Realtors

.

The head of economics research for Redfin Chen Zhao told National Post in an emailed statement on Tuesday that the U.S. real estate market is “already weak.” She added that it has had historically low sales volume for the past three years and prices are starting to fall in many parts of the country.

“If Canadian demand continues to fall, then that means further weakness for the U.S. real estate market,” she said. “The importance of Canadian buyers will vary by geography, so the impact will be large in places like Florida, Palm Springs in California, Texas and Arizona.”

Zhao said she found it “striking” how the decrease in interest lined up so well with tariff volatility.

“The White House first announced tariffs on Canada at the beginning of February, and there was a sharp decline from January to February in traffic from Canada,” she said. “I think that it will take some time for the sentiment to change. Canadians will need to no longer feel like the U.S. is treating them unfairly in its trade policy.”

The percentages in the technology-based real estate brokerage’s report were calculated based on Redfin.com unique users located in Canada who conducted online searches of homes for sale and for rent in the U.S. Unique users refer to the “number of different people who access U.S. home listings” on the site or the app “within a defined period,” according to RedFin. The user is counted one time for that period.

The latest data from Statistics Canada shows that travel to the U.S. from Canadian airports has also been on

a downward trend

. In May, for the fourth consecutive month, the number of passengers on flights to the U.S. decreased year over year by 8.2 per cent.

Meanwhile, Canada’s largest airports saw higher volumes of passenger traffic. International travel, excluding the U.S., was on the rise — up 4.3 per cent this May, compared to 2024.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


People attend a large Idle No More protest on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, January 11, 2013.

If Liberal MPs experience the “long hot summer” of protest that some Aboriginal activist groups have promised in response to the federal government’s new major-projects legislation, they won’t be feeling that heat anywhere close to Parliament Hill.

Politicians were already starting to flee Ottawa, off to their home ridings or vacations for the summer break, before Bill C-5 received its rubber stamp from the Senate and royal assent on June 26. They left behind what could be a ticking time bomb: the Building Canada Act, allowing the federal cabinet to fast-track major infrastructure projects by identifying them as being in the “national interest” and bypassing the normal conditions and approval rules.

How to define “national interest” is shaping up to be an explosive question. The Liberal government, the Conservative Opposition and most business groups see the new law as a major step forward in allowing Canada to build badly needed projects, especially in mining, oil and gas, to improve lagging competitiveness. The legislation is at least in part a response to American tariffs that threaten much of the national economy, and a backlash to years of what seemed like paralysis in getting government approvals under the Trudeau government.

Aboriginal groups are less sure. Some are eager to see more economic growth too, but virtually all agree they need to be properly consulted and treated as partners when a project infringes on their land or their rights. Certain factions objected to the bill before it was passed, and are digging in for a fight. Some are predicting the revival of the 2014 Idle No More Indigenous protests. That movement led to flash mobs and blockades of critical rail lines and highways over the then Conservative government’s attempt roll back environmental regulations.

“Nothing’s off the table,” said Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, National Chief for the Assembly of First Nations (AFN), referring to options for resistance. Asked if Indigenous activists might rise up forcefully against the bill, she said, “I wouldn’t blame them.”

The legislation has been criticized, including by pro-development advocates, for giving the federal government too much power and discretion — to hurry along projects the cabinet considers important, while leaving behind unfavoured projects. And the Carney government has been trying to convince Aboriginal groups that the legislation in fact includes sufficient provisions to protect their rights, even as it rushed the bill through. It agreed to remove from the bill the initial power for cabinet to override the Indian Act, but the Senate declined to heed appeals from Indigenous representatives to slow the bill for more study, as the government aggressively pushed it through in time for summer.

The question to be answered now is whether the government has done enough to assure Aboriginal groups, or if Canada is weeks away from that “long, hot summer” of protests. What everyone agrees is that an ugly struggle could shatter years of steady progress in the relationships between governments and Indigenous Canadians, while spooking project backers and delaying critical infrastructure projects.

As Prime Minister Mark Carney suggested last week on a visit to Calgary, he can only

approve an oil pipeline if a private company is willing to try proposing one

. The government has the power to promote a project, but “the private sector is going to drive it,” he told Postmedia.

Interviewed last month after her appearance before the Senate in which she pressed senators to slow the bill, Woodhouse Nepinak said the legislation was “rammed through” without reasonable Indigenous consultation. She questioned why a bill backing more pipelines, ports and other projects gets passed in just weeks, while infrastructure needs on Indigenous reserves, such as schools, connectivity and clean water, have lingered for decades.

Alvin Fiddler, the Grand Chief of Nishnawbe Aski Nation, which represents 51 First Nations communities in northern Ontario, has already said the legislation in Ottawa, as well as similar bills in Ontario and British Columbia, has decimated the trust that had been growing in recent years between those governments and Aboriginal communities.

After seeing progress improving life on remote reserves, and a more respectful tone from Ottawa, he said “Canada is going backwards” with the new law.

The Nishnawbe Aski Nation says its land covers about two-thirds of Ontario, including the mineral-rich Ring of Fire area in the northwestern part of the province. That area is often mentioned as a leading candidate to be the site of a big project that could get fast-tracked. But Fiddler has warned that a resistance movement will only unnerve mining investors.

Ontario’s Ring of Fire and Alberta’s oil sands are typically held up as two of the resource bounties that have been held back, or even thwarted, for years under the Trudeau government, whose attitude toward developing resources and infrastructure ranged at times from uninterested to hostile. The story of then environment minister Steven Guilbeault ordering a federal assessment of a planned Ontario highway because of a frog habitat served as a vivid exemplification of the atmosphere: it took a costly, time-consuming court battle to slap back another attempt by the federal government to overreach into provincial jurisdiction.

Plenty of economists agree that Canada needs to export its natural resources, as well as manufactured goods, as easily and efficiently as possible to reach its economic potential. But in many cases, those needed roads, rail lines, ports and pipelines don’t exist, or they’re antiquated and unable to compete, leaving resources in the ground and money and jobs in both native and non-native communities on the table.

The key to the new legislation, the Carney government maintains, is that it will reduce the process time for big projects that can meet all the necessary safety and environmental standards by reducing red tape, namely the assessments, challenges and overlapping regulations. So, in other words, all the regulatory effects without the regulatory runaround that Canada’s system was infamous for.

“Canadian jobs are at risk. Canadians’ livelihoods are at risk and, quite frankly, the prosperity of the country is at risk,” Tim Hodgson, the federal natural resources and energy minister, said earlier this month. “We need to do things that we have not done in a long time, in time frames we have not done since the end of World War Two.”

A lot of Indigenous leaders agree with the urgency of powering up the economy.

David Chartrand, president of the Manitoba Metis Federation, told the Senate that he supports the legislation because the tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump threaten the Canadian economy, which would cause hardship for his people. “We stand with you,” he said.

Natan Obed, president of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said he’s concerned about the legislation’s ability to limit native rights but he’s also hopeful that big projects could be very good for Far North communities. “There’s an incredible opportunity to really become an Arctic nation,” Obed said.

 Idle No More disrupt access to the Ambassador Bridge border crossing to the U.S., in Windsor, Ont., on January 11, 2013.

Whatever acrimony has erupted over the legislation obscures the improved relations between Indigenous groups and Canadian governments, said Shannon Joseph, chair of Energy for a Secure Future, a non-partisan group that focuses on energy policy.

One of the recent trends that had helped improve the relationship is the increase in the number of natural resources projects where Aboriginal communities have taken equity stakes, aided at times by government loan guarantee programs.

“Indigenous peoples are at the heart of this (process),” Joseph said.

Carney is now going to great lengths to show that he sees things that way too, emphasizing that Ottawa won’t deem projects to be in the national interest without first consulting with affected Aboriginal communities. The new office responsible for advancing big projects will include an Indigenous advisory council that he said will be responsible for ensuring that Aboriginal rights are respected.

After the federal bill was passed in Parliament, however, Carney acknowledged that there’s more work to be done and said that he plans to begin consultations with Indigenous groups July 17.

“The first thing we will do to launch the implementation of this legislation in the right way is through full-day summits,”

Carney said a week before the bill was passed

.

The federal legislation has company in its intent and controversy: Recent bills have also passed in Ontario and British Columbia that were designed to fast-track major projects. And both were criticized for inadequate consultation with First Nations. Ontario Premier Doug Ford made things worse when he opened old wounds around trust and paternalism when he boosted his provincial bill by arguing that Aboriginal communities can’t expect to continue to get economic support if they don’t support the infrastructure projects that the economy needs.

“You can’t just keep coming hat in hand all the time to government,” Ford said. “You gotta be able to take care of yourselves.” He soon after apologized.

Fiddler was among several Indigenous leaders who accused Ford of racism. Fiddler’s riposte was that native communities are tired of federal and provincial governments coming “hat in hand” for the resources on Aboriginal land.

Fiddler says it’s not too late to stop the damage to a slowly improving relationship between governments and First Nations. But that would mean slowing down legislation to give Aboriginal communities more time to review and consult with their communities and potentially push for changes. But politicians across Canada are suddenly in a hurry; they’re taking their chances.

National Post

stuck@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.