LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks to construction workers in Edmonton after making a housing announcement on March 20, 2025.

Most Canadians support Prime Minister Mark Carney’s new legislation to fast-track infrastructure projects deemed in the “national interest,” according to a new poll, but the federal government has a long way to go if it wants to convince voters that it should be able to unilaterally approve such big projects without buy-in from other groups.

The

Leger poll released Friday

found that 56 per cent of respondents nationally view the One Canadian Economy Act, the Carney government’s signature piece of legislation to date, as a positive step, compared to 25 per cent who said it’s a bad idea. Support was strongest in B.C., the Atlantic provinces, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, at around two-thirds, while just over half supported the new legislation in Ontario, Quebec and Alberta.

The legislation,

which became law last month

, has been criticized for giving Ottawa too much power and discretion because it allows the federal cabinet to fast-track major infrastructure projects by bypassing the usual environmental and approval processes.

A plurality of respondents (42 per cent) to the Leger poll said that such projects should require the support of federal and provincial governments as well as impacted First Nations. Only eight per cent of respondents said that the federal government’s support alone should be enough, while 27 per cent said projects should go ahead if the federal and affected provincial governments are in favour.

Ten per cent said the decision belonged to Ottawa and affected Indigenous governments.

Andrew Enns, Leger’s executive vice-president, said the public seems to be sending Ottawa a two-track message.

“In theory, it gives the federal government strong latitude to move forward on projects of national interest,” he said. “But for the public, it’s going to be a collaborative process.”

Since the legislation became law late last month,

the federal government has tried to work behind the scenes

to convince Indigenous leaders, provinces and others that their concerns won’t be steamrolled in the push to get big projects built.

Carney announced late last month that the government will host a series of summits with Indigenous leaders, beginning July 17 with First Nations. Summits with Inuit and Metis leaders will soon follow.

Some provinces, notably Quebec and British Columbia, have also

pushed back on Ottawa’s new rights to fast-track pipelines in particular

, while environmental groups and First Nations have called for a more inclusive process for big projects than what they believe is in the works.

The poll also found that the Carney government’s post-election honeymoon shows no signs of ending yet. After winning the popular vote in the April federal election by 2.5 percentage points, the Liberals now enjoy a 13-percentage-point lead (48 per cent versus 35 per cent) over the second-place Conservatives among decided voters.

More than half of all respondents (58 per cent) also said they approve of Carney’s performance so far.

The poll sampled 1,546 adult Canadians between July 4-6. A probability sample of this size yields a margin of error no greater than plus or minus 2.49 per cent 19 times out of 20.

National Post

stuck@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Flooding in London, Ont., in 2024. When Canadians were asked about what they thought were the biggest challenges facing Canada, only 4 per cent said climate change.

OTTAWA — One of the key barriers that seemed to be facing the Carney government’s plans to fast-track big projects designed to boost the Canadian economy — namely, climate concerns — appears now to be not much of an obstacle at all when it comes to public opinion.

A

new Leger poll released Friday asked Canadians

about what they thought were the biggest challenges facing Canada. Trade and tariff issues and U.S. relations were No. 1, at 20 per cent. But climate change, one of the federal government’s key objections in recent years to building or expanding pipelines, ports and other big projects, was way down the list, a “third tier” issue, said Leger executive vice-president Andrew Enns.

Prime Minister Mark Carney could find the shift makes his life easier as he faces calls to

roll back the imposing climate policies of the previous prime minister

, including a planned emissions cap on oil and gas production, electric vehicle mandates, an oil tanker ban off the B.C. coast, plans to force fossil fuels off the electricity grid, and hostility to oil development and pipelines.

Just four per cent of respondents listed “climate change/extreme weather” as the No. 1 issue facing Canada today, putting it in eighth place among the 14 top issues offered as choices.

That’s in sharp contrast to a similar Leger poll conducted in 2019, Enns said. Back then his data show that “fighting climate change” ranked as the third most frequently cited priority (by 30 per cent), just a few points behind taxation and “jobs and the economy” (both 35 per cent). In that poll — conducted prior to prior to the pandemic, six years of mostly sluggish economic growth, rising prices and a trade war with the United States — respondents were asked to choose the two issues most important to them.

Enns said environmental issues have tumbled over the ensuing six years into the “third tier” of public concerns, as Canadians are seized with economic issues, including tariffs, housing prices, immigration and inflation — all of which were ranked by poll respondents as more pressing than climate concerns.

“These things hit people directly,” said Enns. “We all prioritize.”

While 20 per cent of poll respondents identified “tariffs/(President Donald)Trump/U.S. aggression” as the top issue; inflation and rising prices were given top spot by 18 per cent; housing affordability by 11 per cent; “state of the economy” by 10 per cent; health care by nine per cent; and immigration by six per cent. “Government debt/deficit” and “high taxes” tied with “climate change/extreme weather,” as chosen by four per cent. The poll was taken well after weeks of news of huge wildfires this summer in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, and Central Canadian heat waves in June.

Brian Lee Crowley, managing director of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, said that more Canadians are becoming aware of the costs of years of climate change policy, particularly when it comes to developing the country’s energy and other natural resources industries. The previous prime minister, Justin Trudeau, had made climate change a top priority, often downgrading other considerations at its expense, particularly economic development and resource exploitation, making sacrifices other countries were not.

“They’re saying it’s not a trade-off I want to make,” Crowley said.

By contrast,

one of the Carney government’s first pieces of legislation

is the One Canadian Economy Act, It allows the federal cabinet to fast-track major infrastructure projects, including resource development, by identifying them as being in the “national interest” and bypassing the normal environmental regulations and approvals. (The specific laws to that effect are in the Building Canada Act, contained within the larger One Canadian Economy Act.)

The legislation, which has been criticized for giving the federal government too much power and discretion, became law late last month.

Upon taking office in March, Carney moved quickly to scrap the consumer portion of Canada’s carbon tax. He has indicated he would be open to approving a new oil export pipeline. And he met earlier this month with the chief executives of Canada’s major auto producers, who pressed him to cancel or delay the federal mandate that electric vehicles must comprise at least 20 per cent of new auto sales by 2026 and 100 per cent by 2035.

In March, when Carney was first sworn in after winning the federal Liberal leadership, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith presented a list of

nine demands that would be necessary to reset relations with the West

that had been battered during the Trudeau years. All of them were related to cancelling Liberal environmental policies.

Last week, the environment ministers of Alberta and Ontario issued a joint letter asking Carney to abandon “net zero” policies

they say are holding back Canada economically.

“We are hopeful that (the Carney government) will move away from policies and legislation that undermine competitiveness, delay project development, and disproportionately harm certain (regions) without any quantifiable benefit to the natural environment,” they wrote.

Crowley said Canadians are now more aware that Canadian wealth and jobs are tied directly to its natural resources and its ability to get them to market as efficiently as possible.

“I think that message is starting to get through to a lot of people.”

Crowley added that the Carney government is still in its honeymoon phase but that these helpful poll indicators show the prime minister — who recently won an election victory from the jaws of certain Liberal defeat, thanks to a fortunate turn of external events — once again has timing on his side.

“I think he’s led a bit of a charmed life politically,” Crowley said.

The poll sampled 1,546 adult Canadians between July 4-6. A probability sample of this size yields a margin of error no greater than plus or minus 2.49 per cent 19 times out of 20.

stuck@postmedia.com

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


An RCMP officer adjusts his Stetson hat before the start of march.

OTTAWA —  Go to any event featuring RCMP in ceremonial dress, and you’re bound to see Mounties wearing the red serge, blue and yellow breeches, a Sam Browne belt, brown Strathcona boots, and a wide-brimmed, beige Stetson.

The hat, nicknamed the “red Stetson,” has appeared as part of the RCMP uniform on

stamps

, posters, promotional videos and even documentaries. It is a core piece of the Mounties’ iconic image and an internationally recognizable piece of Canadiana.

It’s also made in the U.S.A.

On its website

, the B.C. RCMP boast that no other element of the Mountie uniform “has the mystique of the Stetson hat,” apart from maybe the red serge.

The RCMP’s official page on the Stetson

also notes that the hat is Canadian from its inception as it is “exclusively crafted by the Biltmore Stetson Canada Company in Guelph, Ontario.”

Except that the Biltmore Stetson Canada Company plant in Guelph shut down in early 2012 after it was purchased by Dorfman-Pacific (now Dorfman Milano),

according to the Guelph Mercury newspaper.

Since then, the iconic Canadian hat has been built at the Dorfman plant — in Garland, Texas.

“Absolutely, I believe that they should be manufactured in Canada,” says Holly Allen, general manager and head of millinery design at Smithbilt Hats, a Calgary-based manufacturer that makes the traditional “white hat” given to visitors during the Calgary Stampede.

The Stetson appears to be the only part of the RCMP uniform that is not made in Canada. For example, the red serge is manufactured in Quebec, the boots are made by the Alberta Boot company, and bidding on a 2015 contract for RCMP breeches was “conditionally

limited to Canadian Goods.

In a statement, Erica Prince, RCMP deputy director of communications, suggested that the RCMP was not aware of the wrong information on its webpage about the Stetson until the inquiry by the National Post.

She said the webpage had not been updated in a long time and that the date of the update was due to aesthetic changes to the website.

“We appreciate you bringing this to our attention and have flagged the page for review,” Prince said in an emailed reply.

Despite its website and 

social media posts

reiterating the false claim that the hats are manufactured in Guelph, the

RCMP noted that its Stetsons

are made in Texas in a 2024 press release about a visit to the Dorfman Milano Hat Factory.

“What better place to have our iconic Stetsons made than a state known for their ten-gallon hats?!,” reads the press release.

But at a time when Canada is in a trade war with the United States and President Donald Trump frequently proposes to make Canada the 51st American state, is the government comfortable that such an iconic piece of Canadiana is being produced in Texas?

The office of Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree referred the question to the RCMP, which demurred.

The RCMP also did not respond to questions about if and when it had last proactively sought out a Canadian manufacturer for the Stetson.

Prince said that open tenders for the hat contract were completed in 2013 and 2017 and only Biltmore (now Dorfman Milano) submitted a bid.

Before renewing the contract to the company in 2021, the RCMP issued a notice of the impending deal, and no other company said it could meet the Mounties’ requirements, Prince added.

Allen of Calgary’s Smithbilt Hats said the company’s CEO, Cam Clark, was in the process of receiving the necessary equipment to bid on the next contract and bring back production of the RCMP’s Stetson to Canada.

“Mr. Clark is fiercely Canadian and he believes that the hat should be manufactured here,” Allen said. “We’re seriously looking at it.”

The Stetson was adopted formally by the force in 1904, making it one of the oldest pieces of the Mounties’ ceremonial uniform.

But it was an unofficial mainstay for Mounties long before that because its large brim offers riders protection from the sun as well as the rain and snow.

“Members incurred the cost of purchasing a Stetson because it was preferred to the official pith helmet for practical policing. While the official headgear was de rigueur on the parade ground, the Stetson’s wide brim was better suited to protect the riders from the harsh elements,” reads the RCMP’s website.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. MP pensions are up 11.4 per cent, according to a new report from the Treasury Board.

New numbers from the federal

Treasury Board

indicate that annual MP pensions averaged $81,140 last year.

That’s up 11.4 per cent, compounded over the last two years due to inflation indexing, according to

Blacklock’s Reporter

.

The indexation covers retirement allowances, survivor benefits, and disability pensions based on cost-of-living increases.

1,193 MPs, retirees and family members

are enrolled

in the benefits plan. Payments last year included benefits to 192 widows and orphans.

“A plan member’s benefits are based on the number of years of pensionable service at retirement, where that service was accrued, the age at which they start receiving benefits and whether they retire because of a disability,” states the Treasury Board report.

To get a pension, MPs must serve for at least six years.

Six MPs fell short

of that after losing in the recent federal election. That includes ex-Liberals Han Dong (Don Valley North, ON) and Irek Kusmierczyk (Windsor—Tecumseh, ON), and New Democrats Taylor Bachrach (Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC), Laurel Collins (Victoria), Matthew Green (Hamilton Centre, ON) and Lyndsay Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe, ON).

In 2000, parliament mandated

all MPs to enroll in the pension plan

.

Then in 2005, parliament passed An Act To Amend The Parliament Of Canada Act

mandating automatic annual pay hikes for MPs

based on inflation and a labour department index of wage settlements in the unionized private sector.

Cabinet has

waived the automatic April 1 raises only once,

for three years following the 2008 financial panic.

 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Canada Post denies it is using “drip pricing” in the mandatory “fuel surcharge” for its delivery services.

A B.C. small business owner’s complaint that Canada Post uses illegal “drip pricing” in online shipping services has been certified by the Federal Court as a class-action lawsuit.

The lawsuit seeks compensation from the troubled national postal service for adding a mandatory “fuel surcharge” late in the purchase process, after showing shipping rates. If successful, customers who used Canada Post’s online shipping tools in the last few years could be eligible for reimbursement.

Marci Deane filed a civil lawsuit in Federal Court last year alleging that three of Canada Post’s online shipping services failed to disclose the full price of shipping by adding a required additional charge for fuel after advertising a purchase price, in violation of the Competition Act.

She accused the Crown corporation of using banned “drip pricing” and “double ticketing” in its sales.

The additional charge to the price is significant.

The cost of the fuel surcharge is calculated as a percentage of the price of the shipping job — from a high of 26 per cent to a low of 13.75 per cent in April 2024, depending on service type and destination. Canada Post adjusts it weekly based on the price of fuel

Canada Post denies using “drip pricing” or “double ticketing.” The Crown corporation opposed the certification of Deane’s lawsuit as a class action.

Making it a class-action case means that if the lawsuit is successful, any damages assessed by a judge can apply to a wide group of people who suffered similar losses, rather than just Deane.

In court, Canada Post argued all pricing information is disclosed on a single webpage, during a single stage of the purchasing process. The company said customers are unable to complete their purchase without agreeing to the fuel surcharge, so they can change their mind before paying if they objected. They also argued that when opening an account to use its services, customers agree to terms that would allow fuel surcharges.

Deane complained of three of Canada Post’s online shipping services, called Snap Ship, Ship Online, and Shipping Manager. They allow online users to create, pay, and print shipping labels to send parcels.

Deane, as a small business owner, has been using Canada Post services and programs for businesses for more than 15 years, court heard.

While deciding whether Deane’s lawsuit should be a class-action suit, Justice Jocelyne Gagné was shown screen shots and videos of the Canada Post online purchase process and parsed the experience.

Deane showed the Snap Ship service in action. The video showed that after logging into her account and entering shipping information and destination, Canada Post displays four shipping options with prices, from regular parcel shipping to priority shipping. None of the quoted prices include a fuel surcharge.

Canada Post said that the onscreen box Deane showed was only part of a single, longer page of four successive stages where surcharges are shown in a separate summary box.

The judge found neither of their descriptions to be adequately accurate, noting that each successive box must be closed for the next to open and by the time the destination information is entered in a box, triggering a fuel surcharge being listed in the summary box, that summary is no longer visible onscreen. A user must scroll up to see it.

When the last box is filled out and closed, the page still doesn’t return to the summary page, the judge noted.

That stationary summary box was a change to the site made in July 2023, court heard. Before that, the summary box was dynamic, meaning it moved along with the cascading order process and was always visible.

The mechanics of the three online shipping tools are basically the same, but some have additional business options.

Ship Online is a service anyone can use to create paid shipping labels. Snap Ship is designed for small businesses doing regular low-volume shipping. Shipping Manager is designed for large volume commercial clients.

The Competition Act bans several sales tricks that are considered false or misleading representations in transactions.

“Drip pricing” is when a price is presented that is never attainable because obligatory charges are automatically added later in the purchase process (unless the fee is government mandated, such as a sales tax).

“Double ticketing” is when a product costs more than the lowest of two or more advertised prices, such as the same items having different price tags offered for sale at the same time.

For a claim to be certified as a class action, a court must rule that there is a reasonable cause of action, meaning a sound legal basis for complaining, and there must also be an identifiable group of people suffering the same alleged loss, among other considerations.

The damages claimed by Deane is the cost of the fuel surcharge in all transactions in the time frame, plus the cost of investigating and launching her lawsuit.

If Deane is successful, Canada Post could be forced to reimburse the fuel surcharges.

Certifying a suit as a class action does not assess the merits of it, only that it can appropriately move forward as a court action.

The parties and the judge looked carefully through previous class action competition-related complaints: one against Airbnb over service fees, one against Cineplex over buying online movie tickets, and the third against internet phone service provider Ooma.

Gagné, the judge, questioned how the same shipping transaction could be guilty of both drip pricing and double ticketing.

“One cannot say that Canada Post is, on one hand, adding price elements as the sale process unfolds, and, on the other hand, charging the higher of two or more prices clearly expressed,” Gagné wrote in her ruling, published Thursday.

Gagné rejected Deane’s claim against Canada Post of double ticketing but accepted her claim over drip pricing could proceed as a class action.

She defined the eligible class of claimants as Canadian residents charged fuel surcharges through Canada Post’s online shipping tools Snap Ship, Ship Online, and Shipping Manager after June 23, 2022.

The judge said who was a member of the group and how large it might be should be sorted out at trial. Receipts from customers show a fuel surcharge and Canada Post has online records of some users, she said.

• Email: ahumphreys@postmedia.com | X:

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.


A U.S. Customs and Border Patrol officer on the Maine-N.B. border.

A New Hampshire man is stuck in Canada after the U.S. Customs and Border patrol refused him reentry.

Chris Landry is a legal U.S. resident and a Canadian citizen. He lives in Peterborough, New Hampshire with his partner and five children, and is employed as a manufacturing machine operator.

On Sunday, he was stopped while trying to cross the border in Houlton, Maine. He and his three of his children (two under 18 and one aged 20) were visiting his father, grandmother and extended relatives in New Brunswick. He says this is an annual trip, with returns across the N.B.-Maine border. He was born in Canada and has lived in the “Granite State” since he was 3 years old, when his family moved there. But he never pursued becoming a U.S. citizen.

The CBP pulled him aside and questioned past misdemeanor convictions that date back to 2004 and 2007, he told the

Boston NBC News affiliate

this week. Under the American criminal justice system, a person can be charged with a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the offence and its severity. Misdemeanors are lesser offence, resulting in lesser penalties.

Landry was charged with marijuana possession and driving with a suspended license. He was given 60-day sentences (both suspended) and fined for both offences, which he paid.

In the past, he said he would cross without issue. Border authorities would scan his green card, ask a few questions and send him on his way, Landry told New Hampshire newspaper,

The Keene Sentinel

.

However, after three hours at the border, the 46-year-old was told by the CBP that he wouldn’t be allowed back into the U.S. Instead, he was instructed to return to Canada and warned if he tried again to reenter the U.S., he would be immediately arrested. The only way for him to get back in would be to go before an immigration judge, Landry told NBC10 Boston from a relative’s home in New Brunswick.

The CBP told NBC Boston that “possessing a green card is a privilege, not a right, and under our nation’s laws, our government has the authority to revoke a green card if our laws are broken and abused. Lawful permanent residents presenting at a U.S. port of entry with previous criminal convictions may be subject to mandatory detention and/or may be asked to provide additional documentation to be set up for an immigration hearing.”

The CBP posted the same statement on its X account on Tuesday.

As a Canadian citizen, Landry couldn’t vote for president, but he says he supported Donald Trump. Now he blames the

Trump administration’s crackdown on immigration

for his dilemma.

“A misdemeanor shouldn’t be a deciding factor on the rest of my life,” Landry told the Sentinel. However, multiple convictions can, in some cases, be a reason not to grant a non-citizen entry to the U.S., according to American

federal law

.

After being contacted by Landry, New Hampshire Democratic Senator Maggie Hassan released a statement to the Sentinel: “Helping constituents navigate federal agencies and processes is a core function of Senator Hassan’s office. We can confirm that Mr. Landry reached out to our office and our constituent services team has been in touch with him. We won’t have any additional comment on specific details as is our general policy around ongoing constituent matters.” (The statement was not posted to Senator Hassan’s official website or her X account.)

This is not the first time a New England resident has faced trouble reentering the U.S. from eastern Canada. In April, a New Hampshire real estate attorney said he was returning home when he was

detained at the border

without an explanation.

Bachir Atallah and his wife, Jessica Fakhri, were traveling back from a quick family trip when they say U.S. Customs and Border Protection stopped them while reentering via the Quebec-Vermont border.

They had been visiting Canada for the weekend, but “on the way back, I was treated like a criminal,” Atallah told

NBC Boston

.

Atallah received his legal training in Maine,

founded his own law firm

and speaks English, French, Arabic and Russian. He has been a U.S. citizen for 10 years.

The U.S. Customs and Border Patrol

defended its actions

by calling Atallah’s account “blatantly false and sensationalized.”

 

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


A Palestinian flag flies near the Peace Tower during a march for Gaza rally on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Saturday, Nov. 4, 2023.

The embassy of Israel to Canada says that recognizing Palestinian statehood “at this time” would be a “grave mistake.”

“Such a step would amount to an unconscionable reward for the heinous Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023 — an attack marked by mass murder and the brutal kidnapping of innocent civilians, including Canadian citizens,” it said in an emailed statement to National Post on Wednesday.

“Rather than advancing peace, it would legitimize violence and severely undermine international efforts to restore stability and security in the region.”

The statement comes after chief representative of the Palestinian General Delegation to Canada Mona Abuamara told The Canadian Press she feels that Canada is getting closer to formally recognizing Palestinian statehood. In an article published on Wednesday, she said the recognition would “set in stone for Canadians the rights of the Palestinian people to self-determination.”

Abuamara has been in the role, which is to promote and strengthen relations between Palestinians and Canada, since 2021. It is coming to an end after her four-year term. She was appointed by a government that only has control of the West Bank, not the Gaza Strip, CP said. She is still pushing for Canada to take a harsher stance on Israel’s actions in Gaza, and has commended Canada for its recent use of “tougher language.”

“Accountability means everything to the Palestinian people. That’s all we are looking for,” said Abuamara. “Canada could have done better and must do better.”

Canada’s approach to the conflict in recent years has been to support Israel “without budging,” she said. Meanwhile, the Palestinian territories received funding for smaller projects, such as police training. The mentality was that the Palestinian territories would be “managed under the occupation,” she said, adding that she was looking to Canada to “get rid of that occupation instead, so we could make our own money.” Israel maintains that it withdrew from Gaza in 2005.

Abuamara praised the Carney government for making “stronger, clearer statements,” and mentioned comments made by Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand.

Speaking to reporters in May

, Anand said Israel used food as a political tool and that more than 50,000 people have died as a result of Israel’s “aggression.” That number, which cannot be independently verified, was provided by the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry.

In an

Instagram post on June 3

, Senator Marilou McPhedran thanked Abuamara for her “hard work and advocacy.” McPhedran, along with other senators from Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, British Columbia and Saskatchewan, urged the Canadian government to recognize a State of Palestine, among other demands, in a June 25 news release.

“Canada needs to just stand by international law,” Abuamara told CP. “It’s not about Palestine. It’s about the international rules-based order, about human rights, about values and principles.”

The

federal government said in May 2024

it is “prepared to recognize a Palestinian state at the time most conducive to lasting peace, not necessarily as the last step along the path to achieving the two-state solution.”

Prime Minister Mark Carney responded to questions about the Middle East during an interview with CNN in late June.

“Can there be a lasting peace in the Middle East without peace in Gaza, that takes into account Gaza and West Bank and effectively working on a path to a Palestinian state? I would agree with all of those,” he said. “(Palestinians) living side by side in security with Israel — a Zionist, if you will, Palestinian state that recognizes the right of Israel not just to exist, but to prosper and not live in fear — we can’t have peace unless we move towards that.”

Abuamara said talks with other countries, including a recent one between Canada, Qatar, and Mexico, are helping to push Canada toward recognizing Palestinian statehood. Although a United Nations conference set to be organized by France and Saudi Arabia was cancelled due to the Israel-Iran war, she said there would be conversations about how to achieve that goal when it’s rescheduled.

At a White House dinner this week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked whether or not he believed there could be an independent Palestine.

“I think Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves, but none of the powers to threaten us and that means that certain powers, like overall security, will always remain in our hands,” he said.

“After October 7th, people said the Palestinians have a state, a Hamas state in Gaza, and look what they did with it. They didn’t build it up. They built down into bunkers, into terror tunnels after which they massacred our people, raped our women, beheaded our men, invaded our cities and our towns, our kibbutzim and did horrendous massacres, the kind of which we didn’t see since World War Two and the Nazis, the Holocaust. So people aren’t likely to say, ‘Let’s just give them another state.’ It’ll be a platform to destroy Israel.”

Carney’s office did not respond to National Post’s request for comment.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Brad Marchand of the Florida Panthers skates with the Stanley Cup after defeating the Edmonton Oilers in Game 6 of the NHL hockey Stanley Cup Final Tuesday, June 17, 2025, in Sunrise, Fla.

No Canadian NHL team has won a Stanley Cup in 32 years, meaning no Canadian NHL city has hosted a Stanley Cup parade for its hometown team in more than three decades.

But one Canadian city, too small to host an NHL team, is in early discussions for what could be its remarkable sixth Stanley Cup parade since 2007.

Halifax has produced some of the most exciting — and successful — hockey players of our time. And with them has come a tradition of bringing the Cup to their NHL-less hometown for parades that can draw tens of thousands of people.

Pittsburgh Penguins captain Sidney Crosby brought the coveted National Hockey League trophy back to his hometown of Cole Harbour, a suburb of Halifax, and toured it around the city, in 2009. He then repeated it in 2016, and again in 2017.

“All three of his parades were unbelievable,” Phil Pritchard, the “Keeper of the Cup” and legendary Hockey Hall of Fame curator, said in a recent interview.

“Most guys don’t really have parades and things like that. They have little town celebrations or community things. But Halifax went all-in.”

An estimated 25,000 people attended Crosby’s first hometown parade in 2009, with fans reportedly lining up 10 deep in some places to cheer on their hockey hero.

A similar parade route for Crosby in 2016 drew about 30,000 people. And when Sid the Kid was the marshal for the city’s 2017 Natal Day parade, that number reportedly doubled.

“What I found amazing about it was the people who came out in support, not just to watch the parade, but volunteered, that helped with security, that just helped out,” Pritchard said.

Thousands of people also showed up for Nathan MacKinnon’s 2022 parade in Halifax when he won the Stanley Cup with the Colorado Avalanche, which Pritchard dubbed “equally as amazing” as the Crosby celebrations.

“Not to take anything away from Sidney or Nathan, but maybe it’s the people of Halifax – they’re hockey crazy,” Pritchard said. “And they’ve got two of the best players in the world playing, so maybe it all falls in together.”

 Pittsburgh Penguin captain Sidney Crosby lifts the Stanley Cup over his head as thousands of hockey fans watch in Cole Harbour, Nova Scotia, Saturday, July 16, 2016.

Pritchard’s quick to point out that Joe DiPenta was the first hockey player to bring the Stanley Cup back to his hometown of Cole Harbour in 2007, as a member of the Anaheim Ducks. But his celebrations and parade were “a lot smaller,” Pritchard said.

Official Stanley Cup parades have been going on for more than a century. The first one the Hockey Hall of Fame could confirm marched down Winnipeg’s Main Street after the Winnipeg Victorias won the Cup in 1896, three years after it was first awarded.

For the past 30 years, players on Cup-winning teams each get at least a day with the storied trophy, to do with it as they please.

This year’s Cup champion, the Florida Panthers, has 100 days with the Stanley Cup, from the night they won it, June 17, until the NHL’s opening night in early October.

One of the breakout stars of this year’s Panthers is Halifax’s Brad Marchand. He won the Cup in 2011 with the Boston Bruins, but chose to celebrate with smaller events at Halifax City Hall and a visit to the local children’s hospital.

“He didn’t have a parade,” Pritchard said. “Not a lot of them do actual parades. The community has to get that going and Halifax has been great at it.”

The 37-year-old right winger, who hails from the Halifax suburb of Hammonds Plains, deserves a parade, according to Jason Wilson, who teaches a course about hockey in Canadian history at the University of Guelph.

“Marchand has proven himself to hockey fans everywhere. He has even convinced long-suffering Leafs fans like myself that he’s the real deal,” said Wilson, co-author of Lord Stanley: The Man Behind the Cup.

“His commitment to focusing on the game and shredding — though perhaps not altogether — his sometimes-bizarre non-hockey play on the ice, is a declaration of maturity. When you consider the Four Nations Cup and this past Stanley Cup playoffs, I think there’s an argument to be made that he has to be included among the top five most impactful players of 2025. An impact that surely has the good people of Hammonds Plains, N.S., planning a parade route for their ice warrior.”

 Colorado Avalanche forward Nathan MacKinnon holds up the Stanley Cup during his parade in Halifax on Saturday, August 20, 2022.

Marchand scored six goals in five games for the Panthers during the 2025 Stanley Cup Final, including game-winning goals in both of their road wins, to help Florida take their second straight championship against the Edmonton Oilers.

“Brad doesn’t have a date picked yet” for his personal day with the Stanley Cup, Pritchard said.

That begs the question: should Halifax throw Marchand a parade?

“It takes more than one guy to have the parade,” Pritchard said, “the community’s got to get behind it.”

Halifax Mayor Andy Fillmore sounds keen on hosting a Marchand parade.

“Brad Marchand is a hometown legend and now a two-time Stanley Cup champion and Halifax couldn’t be prouder,” Fillmore said in an email.

“As mayor of Halifax, I’d love to welcome Brad home to celebrate this incredible win, with the Cup, of course. We’re in early discussions at the city about how to help make that happen. It’s entirely up to him, but if he’s game, we’d be thrilled to host him here in Halifax this summer.”

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


Hundreds of kilometres of pipes meant for the Keystone XL pipeline lie in a yard in North Dakota. Canada agreeing to go back to Keystone XL is “sort of like going back to an abusive partner,” one observer says.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — It’s “build, baby, build” versus “drill, baby, drill.”

Prime Minister Mark Carney has promised to transform Canada into an “energy superpower.” His build-baby rallying cry for a construction boom even echoes U.S. President Donald Trump’s drill-baby slogan for increased oil and gas. But when it comes to a new pipeline for Canada, their two visions could clash.

“Canada has a tremendous opportunity to be the world’s leading energy superpower, in both clean and conventional energy,” Carney said in April. “We can lead the energy transition while ensuring affordable energy at home and building the strongest economy in the G7.”

The prime minister

said this month that it’s “highly, highly likely” that a new oil pipeline to the Pacific Coast

will be proposed as a nation-building project and fast-tracked under new federal legislation aimed at accelerating projects of “national interest.” Boosters of the pipeline plan see Canada maximizing its oil export revenues and diversifying its customer base after decades of being captive to U.S. buyers, perhaps reshaping North American energy flows.

Trump, meanwhile, has said he wants to resuscitate the Keystone XL pipeline, the long-contested project that was supposed to carry nearly a million barrels of Alberta oil a day to the U.S. Midwest. He promised “easy approvals” for investors willing to try it again, after it was blocked twice by two different Democratic presidents and its original backer, TC Energy, gave up.

Any new pipeline will face political and regulatory hurdles on both sides of the border, and in March Trump

hit Canadian oil imports with a 10 per cent tariff.

The pipeline politicking could deepen the trade-war rift between Ottawa and Washington. It could also unexpectedly reshape the future of a North American energy market that has been increasingly tightly integrated since the middle of the last century.

Trump or Tidewater

Last weekend, while attending the Calgary Stampede, Carney said that Ottawa is prepared to prioritize a new pipeline from Alberta to the Pacific. During the recent federal election, he had promised to reduce Canada’s reliance on the U.S. — a whopping 93 per cent of Canada’s crude oil is shipped south of the border each year — by launching infrastructure projects and diversifying to new markets. Ottawa is keen to reduce Canada’s dependence on a single customer, especially amid Trump’s trade war.

Building a new pipeline would signal that Canada is getting serious about reaching Asian markets with its oil. China has become

the second-largest buyer of oil shipped through the new Trans Mountain expansion

, which opened just over a year ago (the U.S. is still buying the most). And the extra market access has shrunk the typical discount Canadian oil long had to give its sole buyer by around a third.

Getting more efficient at producing crude oil while ensuring sales go to more than just one export partner gives Canada “a little more stability,” said Graeme Thompson, a senior analyst with Eurasia Group’s global macro practice.

But it could also annoy Trump, who puts a premium on loyalty to the U.S., said Kent Fellows, a professor of economics at the University of Calgary School of Public Policy, who specializes in energy issues.

 Prime Minister Mark Carney has vowed to transform Canada into an “energy superpower.”

If building the pipeline is all about supplying demand in new markets without disrupting the flow to the U.S., then “that’s not really threatening to the United States in any way,” said Dan Stein, a former senior advisor at the Bureau of Energy Resources for the U.S. State Department. But if the idea is to divert supplies away from the U.S., “then it’s a different story.”

Washington “might not love the politics of Canada saying ‘Hey, we’re going to find some other export partners’,” added Thompson. “But the amount being exported to the U.S. has gone up substantially in recent years, and there’s no reason to think that would decline.” On the other hand, if China becomes one of those export markets for Canadian energy, that could cause a bigger diplomatic challenge, he warned.

But Carney isn’t the only leader with pipeline dreams.

Keystone to success?

Trump suggested in February that he wanted to revive the Keystone XL project. The president sees it as a way to strengthen the American energy security market by ramping up oil deliveries from Canada while reducing U.S. reliance on oil imports from volatile regions around the world.

But Trump’s push for Keystone XL also fits with a broader strategy to create a bargaining chip in U.S.-Canada trade relations. By signalling support for the pipeline, Trump is offering Carney a potential win — with expanded access to the U.S. market — in exchange for concessions.

President Joe Biden cancelled Keystone XL in 2021 (after Trump approved it in his first term, after president Barack Obama blocked it in his second term). So promoting it again has the added benefit for Trump of undermining his predecessor’s legacy. In February, Trump urged TC Energy to come back to the plan and “get it built — NOW.” But TC has since spun off its oil business and the subsidiary has said it’s not interested.

Resurrecting Keystone XL would be a “tougher decision for Carney than it would be for (Alberta Premier Danielle) Smith,” says Fellows, because Carney is supposed to balance the interests of all provinces. Smith, meanwhile, is representing Alberta’s interest, and crude oil is the province’s biggest sector.

Thompson isn’t so sure. “If there was an economic case for (Keystone XL), if there was a private actor who came and said ‘let’s resuscitate this project,’ in the current environment, maybe there’s a better chance of it getting done,” he says.

 Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump in Alberta for a G7 meeting, June 16, 2025.

Even if Trump and Carney could agree on a path forward for Keystone XL, it would still be a struggle to get the pipeline built. Government permits have expired and initial construction has been dismantled. Still, with the plan well advanced, it wouldn’t start from scratch.

But Canada agreeing to go back to Keystone XL is “sort of like going back to an abusive partner,” Fellows said, given the political football it was made into by Democratic and Republican presidents.

And something else Carney and Trump have in common is it seems they’re both racing to maximize their country’s strategic position as they tussle over trade. For Trump, a revived Keystone XL pipeline locking in more Canadian oil for U.S. use must look like an advantage. With no one eagerly stepping up to build it, Carney might be just as happy if it stays dead.

National Post

tmoran@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


Molten copper is poured into molds at the Horne copper smelter in Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec.

OTTAWA —

U.S. President Donald Trump’s vow this week that he will impose heavy tariffs on copper imports

on Aug. 1 is of particular cause for concern in Quebec, which harbours Canada’s only copper smelting facility and a major refinery that do significant business across the border.

“There’s an impression of déjà vu,” said Emmanuelle Toussaint, president and CEO of the Quebec Mining Association. “Since the start of the year, there have been on several occasions declarations made about tariffs, and some of them have materialized.”

“Our first reaction is to say that we will follow the situation closely,” she added. “We’re really in a context where we are vigilant and preparing for this possibility.”

Industry players told National Post they are keeping a close eye on when Trump will sign an executive order imposing the tariffs, when they will come into force, whether they’ll be at the 50 per cent rate Trump promised, and how they could potentially affect both countries’ deeply integrated structures.

“Today we are doing copper,” Trump declared to reporters covering his cabinet meeting on Tuesday. “I believe the tariff on copper, we are going to make it 50 per cent.”

In February, the president

launched investigations under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962

into multiple products, including copper and pharmaceuticals, citing national security concerns.

The Commerce Department investigation was originally set to conclude by November 2025.

On Wednesday evening, Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social the tariffs would be effective Aug. 1.

Pierre Gratton, head of the Mining Association of Canada, said those tariffs would not have a great effect on copper mines, many of which are in British Columbia, as they sell to other markets in Europe and Asia. But he said it was concerning for the “midstream” operators in Quebec who refine and smelt copper.

The province is home to the Horne Smelter in Rouyn-Noranda — the only copper smelter in the country — and to the Canadian Copper Refinery (CCR) in Montreal East. Both facilities are owned by the Swiss multinational Glencore, which declined an interview for this article.

“Canada and the United States benefit from a robust and highly integrated copper supply chain — one that Glencore plays an active part in,” said Fabrice de Dongo, spokesperson for Glencore Canada, in a written statement.

“This is an important issue for our business, and we continue to watch developments closely,” he added.

In essence, Horne Smelter processes concentrate and recycled copper from mining operations and third parties, including from the U.S. The material is then shipped to CCR to be transformed into copper cathodes and sold on world markets, according to Glencore.

The U.S. only has a few active smelters in Utah and in Arizona. Sung Choi, metals and mining analyst at BloombergNEF, said it would take two to three years to build up more American smelting capacity.

Jean-Denis Charest, CEO of the Chamber of Commerce in Montreal East, said that CCR creates more than 1,300 direct and indirect jobs and generates around $300 million in economic benefits for the Montreal region alone.

“Of course, this is worrisome, but at the same time, we have to keep a cool head because there are lots of changes and lots of negotiations at play,” he said of the tariffs. “That being said, what happened in the steel and aluminum sectors is making me a bit more worried,” he said referring to

mass layoffs and production cutbacks in those sectors

after Trump raised tariffs to 50 per cent tariffs on Canadian aluminum and steel in June, from 25 per cent in March.

“We find ourselves in a movie in which we have already played but which is very problematic, and which will weaken our copper supply chains in North America,” Charest said.

The federal government has so far refused to comment on the copper threats until Trump has signed an executive order to enforce the tariffs and more details are available.

Toussaint, from the Quebec Mining Association, said it is still too early to speculate on job losses in Quebec should these new tariffs on copper move ahead. But she said prices are sure to jump if the U.S. imposes them and even more if Canada decides to retaliate. Copper prices this week have already hit record highs in the U.S., surging 13 per cent on Tuesday.

That means a spike in prices for electrical wires, telecommunications and electronic devices, but also plumbing, machinery, and construction materials, Toussaint said.

Prime Minister Mark Carney has already said he is prepared to match tariffs on steel and aluminum should Canada and the U.S. not come to a new economic and security agreement by July 21. But Toussaint said Carney should spare copper from any counter tariffs because the two countries’ supply chains are so heavily integrated.

Charles Cooper, head of copper research at Wood Mackenzie, agreed retaliation would be “counterproductive.” “I think once you start going into tit for tat, in that sense, eventually, everybody’s going to lose out,” he said.

Cooper said Carney probably recognizes that the U.S. might receive some weaker economic news over the next month or so, such as higher inflation numbers, which could make it a lot more difficult for Trump to continue hammering more tariffs.

“Once the reality sort of sets in… it’s a bit of a waiting game as well.”

— With additional files from Tracy Moran in Washington.

National Post

calevesque@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.