LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

The winner of a complete set of medals and Canada’s Olympic flag-bearer in Beijing’s closing ceremonies is in debt.

Isabelle Weidemann wasn’t comfortable stating how far she’s in the red. The 29-year-old from Ottawa is paying for things her national sport organization can no longer afford.

“Even at this top level, three Olympic medals, got to carry the flag, the hope is you come out the other side and you’re not too far from zero, that you don’t have to spend years digging yourself out of this hole,” Weidemann said.

“To think we struggle to buy groceries, struggle to maintain equipment or purchase training necessities, all these expenses just to be able to compete with the rest of the world, there’s such a discrepancy there.”

Speed Skating Canada’s chief executive officer Joe Morissette acknowledged his organization has cut back.

“Over many years, we’ve retreated in certain areas,” he stated. “If funding is stagnant, we can only do so much.”

The last increase in core federal funding for Canada’s 62 summer and winter national sport organizations was in 2005.

Core funding is money all NSOs count on to fund operations, athletes, coaches and support staff. Freestyle Canada’s chief executive officer Peter Judge called it the “blood in the veins” of his organization.

It’s different from Own The Podium money, which is targeted to sports demonstrating medal potential.

A year out from the 2026 Winter Olympic Games in Milan-Cortina, Italy, Canadian athletes are winning World Cup medals every weekend across multiple sports.

Canada’s nine gold medals and 27 total last year in Paris were both records for a non-boycotted Summer Olympics.

But many sport leaders say those results aren’t sustainable because of ballooning scarcity beneath them.

“What you’re seeing is the last of the blood pumped through the veins,” Judge said. “We’re running a $600,000 deficit this year and we probably will have to again next year. Otherwise we just start firing people. We’re down to skin and bones.”

Reduced services for top athletes, such as fewer paid travel meals and less access to a team doctor on the road, and diminished support for the next generation were common themes. Two decades’ worth of inflation since 2005 was cited as an aggravating factor.

The Canadian Olympic and Paralympic committees lobbied on behalf of national sport organizations for a $104-million increase in annual core funding in the 2024 budget.

The money was not forthcoming, although athletes received a 23-per-cent increase in their monthly Athletes Assistance Program (AAP) cheques, from $1,765 per month to about $2,170.

That raise is getting eaten up by athletes paying for more training and competition costs, and for an increase in “team fees”, which is what athletes pay their federations.

Bobsledders fork anywhere from $20,000 to $60,000 from their own pockets to Bobsleigh Canada Skeleton, which CEO Kien Tran said was a five-fold increase over the previous year.

“If I could sum it up, because of this lack of funding, sports in Canada is becoming just pay to play,” Tran said. “It falls on the athletes. You may be not be getting the best athletes. You may be getting the best athletes that can afford this.”

Speed Skating Canada has dropped team fees marginally, but “we’ve also downloaded so many new costs to our participants,” Morissette said.

The COC and CPC are again lobbying the federal government on behalf of NSOs. The ask now is now for a $144-million annual increase in core funding in the 2025 budget.

Survey data indicates 80 per cent of NSOs are skipping competitions athletes would normally attend, 70 per cent have paused, scaled back or eliminated programming, 90 per cent have reduced or eliminated training camps and 80 per cent have increased athlete fees, said COC CEO David Shoemaker.

“This is not guesswork. We had Deloitte run a study, and it’s now gotten to the point where Deloitte’s forecast shows that these NSOs will run an aggregate deficit of $329 million over the next five years,” Shoemaker said.

Federal politics is in flux, and an election could bring a seventh ministerial change in eight years to the sports portfolio.

“Our government remains committed to supporting our national sport organizations (NSOs) and the athletes who inspire us,” said a statement from the office of federal sports minister Terry Duguid, who was appointed in December. “We recognize the financial challenge they face, including rising training and competition costs.”

The statement referred to the raise in athletes’ “carding” money last year, as well as $16 million committed to safe sport and $15 million for removing barriers to community sport programs over two years.

Olympic champion freestyle skier Cassie Sharpe and speedskater Ivanie Blondin are alarmed by what they see when they look over their shoulders.

“The B and C athletes on the national team, they’re on the national circuit to be at World Cups and world championships, but where those athletes used to have funding for flights and accommodation, the budget for that is much smaller,” said Sharpe.

Where once Speed Skating Canada sent a full contingent of 24 long-track skaters to international World Cups, it’s now 16.

“We’re seeing a lot of young, talented athletes lose the motivation because the NSO doesn’t have the means and the funds to be able to send them to international events or send them on training camps,” Blondin said.

Alpine Canada CEO Therese Brisson says the focus on preparing Olympic athletes leaves NextGen athletes to fund themselves.

“Only athletes with means can participate when you have team fees in the $45,000 range,” she said.
“That keeps me up at night.”

Shoemaker says government could direct more sports-betting revenue to NSOs. A Deloitte report released in 2024 stated the second year of regulated gambling in Ontario alone produced $380 million in federal government revenue.

“That tax revenue could more than cover what we need as a contribution to the national sports system,” Shoemaker said.

The four revenue pillars for an NSO are registration fees, corporate sponsorship, hosting events and government funding.

Mass-participation sports such as hockey and soccer can increase membership fees to compensate for the funding gap. In a niche sport like luge, the situation is dire.

“You always found a way to make it through. It’s at the point where I don’t know where else to cut,” Luge Canada CEO Tim Farstad said. “I’ve been here for 20 years and I’ve never felt this way before.

“The athletes aren’t just paying for their travel. They’re having to pay for us to have an organization.”

Making sport safe from maltreatment and abuse costs money, from the hiring of a safe-sport officer to educating coaches, athletes and support staff. Money spent on lawyers in complaint tribunals is also money not spent on athletes, coaches and competition.

“The line that was used was underfunded sport is not safe sport. We hired someone to be our safe sport officer. That will be a job at Curling Canada forever now, but funding hasn’t changed since 2005,” said Curling Canada CEO Nolan Thiessen.

“When you have limited resources, you have to make decisions. Those are the hard discussions that the sport system has to make. The costs get driven down to the end user.”

Corporate sponsorship is a tougher get amid both the proliferation of pro leagues and what’s been called a safe-sport crisis in Canada.

Sensational headlines, including Canada Soccer’s drone spying scandal in last year’s Olympic Games and Hockey Canada’s handling of sexual assault allegations against members of its 2018 junior hockey team, has a knock-on effect.

“We’re all trying to find sponsors. There’s this kind of feeling right now in Canada you know ‘Canadian sport, do we trust them anymore?’ Every time those things happen, it knocks all of us down a notch,” Farstad said.

“The government doesn’t understand how critical it is right now. It’s not just us asking for more money again. We’re at the end of the rope.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 5, 2025.

Donna Spencer, The Canadian Press



Political financing reports show that the collapsed BC United party collected more than $223,000 in donations after it suspended campaigning in last year’s provincial election, including tens of thousands received after the Oct. 19 vote.

Financial reports filed with Elections BC show almost all of the donations appear to be automatic bank transfers, occurring on the 20th of each month.

BC United was the official Opposition heading into the election but leader Kevin Falcon suspended its campaign on Aug. 28 and urged supporters to switch their votes to the B.C. Conservative Party, which came close to defeating the NDP government.

The Elections BC report shows BC United received more than $86,000 after the election.

While BC United did not run any candidates, it does not appear to have been deregistered, and its online donations portal has been updated to reflect donation limits that came into effect in 2025.

The party’s financial agent, Aaron Fedora, didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment, and phone numbers listed on the party’s financial reports and website are not connected.

The Elections BC reports show that in the last three months of 2024, the Conservatives raked in about $1.5 million, the NDP $1.79 million and the BC Green Party collected more than $558,000 in donations.

After Falcon’s party bowed out of the election, the NDP and Conservatives were nearly tied dollar for dollar in donations.

Between Aug. 29 and Dec. 31, the BC Conservatives took in just under $3.93 million from 4,534 contributions, while the NDP received just over $3.93 million from 7,439 contributions.

Provincial political contributions in B.C. are capped at about $1,484 in 2025, up from just over $1,450 last year.

Former BC United candidate Kevin Acton, who ran in the election as an independent, sued the party in small claims court for reimbursement of election expenses last month.

The party appealed for donations after suspending its campaign, warning that without support it would “be very difficult to continue as a registered political party.”

“There is no alternative. Either we raise the funds required to meet our commitments, or BC United will be unable to continue,” the party’s online donation portal said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 5, 2025.

Darryl Greer, The Canadian Press



Here’s where the leaders of Ontario’s main political parties are on Wednesday, Feb. 5:

Progressive Conservative Leader Doug Ford

Pickering: Ford will make an announcement at 1 p.m. in Pickering. He will also visit workers and tour a Kubota Canada facility. He will then go to Oshawa for an event with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.

NDP Leader Marit Stiles

Toronto: Stiles will make an announcement at 10 a.m. She will then speak at the TMU Democracy Forum at noon.

Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie

Hamilton: Crombie will join local candidate Dawn Danko at a Hamilton coffee shop to speak with residents at 9 a.m. She will then make an announcement at 11:30 a.m.

Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner

Guelph: Schreiner is set to make an announcement at Gorweir Farms at 1 p.m. with local candidate Bronwynne Wilton. He will then spend time canvassing in the community.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 5, 2025.

The Canadian Press


FREDERICTON — McGill University undergrad Daniel Miksha made a significant decision over the weekend.

After hearing the news that U.S. President Donald Trump planned to impose 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian exports, Miksha shelved his plans to apply to Boston University, Yale and Harvard for graduate studies.

“I feel like the social and political climate in Canada is far better than what I’m seeing in the United States,” the fourth-year philosophy student said in an interview Tuesday. “If I can make a choice about where I’m going to spend probably many years of my life in grad school and afterwards, I would prefer to stay here.”

His gesture was one example of what observers say has been a growing wave of patriotic sentiment among Canadians since Trump took office and ratcheted up his anti-Canadian rhetoric, repeatedly saying the nation should become the 51st American state. Online, people are sharing lists of products made in Canada and posting about cancelling trips to the United States. Pro-Canadian, anti-Trump memes are flooding social media. And at professional hockey and basketball games on the weekend, the American national anthem was booed.

“If you look at people booing the Star Spangled Banner at sporting events, circulating information about how to boycott American-made products, generally, voicing their frustration at the Trump administration, it’s pretty unmistakable that there’s been a rise in patriotic sentiment,” said Edward Schatz, political science professor at the University of Toronto. And although Trump agreed Monday to a month-long tariff reprieve after discussions with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Schatz does not expect the patriotic flame to die away.

The Calgary-born Miksha celebrates Canada Day and marks Remembrance Day. Although he has always felt a “quiet pride” in being Canadian, he said he has never been given to overt displays of patriotism. But after hearing Trump’s attacks, he has decided not only to forego American universities but also to buy Canadian whenever possible.

“With the 51st state statement, I find that profoundly insulting,” Miksha said. “Canada has a unique cultural history and a unique heritage … we have things like universal health care, which I think is a great triumph of Canadian society.”

A Leger online poll that surveyed 1,520 Canadians between Dec. 6 and 9, found just 13 per cent wanted Canada to become part of the United States, compared with 82 per cent who rejected the notion.

New Brunswick Premier Susan Holt said Monday that Trump’s threats have brought a “beautiful” Maple Leaf surge, with people actively looking for ways they can celebrate Canadian producers and products. “I think that comes alongside a bit of an anti-American sentiment,” she said, “a frustration that our closest neighbour and trading partner has decided to treat us this way.”

Bradley Miller, associate professor of history at the University of British Columbia, said the “stew of things” that Canadians have had to deal with in recent weeks has brought patriotic feelings, tinged with anger at the Trump administration, to the forefront.

Rightly or wrongly, he said, Canadians feel like they’ve held up their end of the bargain reached when the countries signed their 1988 free trade agreement. Now they feel taken advantage of.

“Things that we thought that we could count on are being thrown into question, and we’re left trying to anticipate where President Trump’s moods and his sense of political advantage will take us next,” Miller said. “There’s madness in the air.”

In a speech Saturday night after Trump had signed an executive order saying tariffs would take effect Tuesday, Trudeau invoked the resilience of “Team Canada,” called on Canadians to stand united and asked everyone to do their bit.

“It’s rally around the leader time,” said Stewart Prest, political science lecturer at the University of British Columbia. “There is a saying that politics ends at the water’s edge — that there’s a sense of a need to pull together and represent the country with the united front .… We have seen any number of examples of that now.”

He noted that patriotic sentiment is not uniform, and there are pockets of the country where strong undercurrents of right-wing populism make a politician like Trump appealing. “Some of this is economic, but some of it is undoubtedly a function of political culture and ideological affinity,” Prest said.

Trump’s threats of tariffs or annexation play out differently depending on whether someone is working in the oil sector, fisheries or finances, said the University of Toronto’s Schatz. And being Canadian means something different to those living in Ontario, Quebec, B.C. or Newfoundland and Labrador.

“Maybe it’s less to do with different provinces and more to do with different kinds of livelihoods,” he said. “But everywhere, what you’ve seen is a shift in that direction of ‘Aha! We’re all Canadians. We’re going to disagree, even loudly sometimes, over the best way to counter these kinds of threats. But we’re all in this together.'”

Carmen Celestini, religious studies lecturer at the University of Waterloo, said Trump’s on-again, off-again threats are likely to leave emotional scars on Canadians.

“His sort of carpet bombing of executive orders, and it’s almost like he’s tried to economically annex a NATO country, and that is problematic. People are on edge. I don’t think that fear will go away easily,” she said.

“It’s like this dark cloud looming over us, because where does one threat end and when does another one begin with this 51st state situation?”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 5, 2025.

Hina Alam, The Canadian Press


OTTAWA — A new independent commission tasked by the federal government with reviewing miscarriages of justice could discover that more people than expected are serving prison sentences for crimes they didn’t commit.

Other countries that launched similar commissions have found that “the degree of wrongful convictions certainly was much more significant than they knew,” said Sen. Kim Pate, a prominent advocate for the wrongfully convicted.

“I suspect we will see much the same.”

Former justice minister David Lametti introduced the legislation to set up the Miscarriage of Justice Review Commission. His successor, Justice Minister Arif Virani, is now in the process of implementing that legislation.

The commission won’t be able to overturn a conviction but will have the power to order a new trial or appeal.

Lametti said we don’t know how common wrongful convictions are in Canada.

“It simply stands to reason statistically that there have to be more wrongful convictions out there,” he said. “We’re hoping that by creating a more accessible commission, a less costly commission and a more efficient commission, that we will get to some of those cases as well.”

But some warn the long-awaited, long-recommended review body won’t be prepared for the influx of applications it’s expected to receive.

Former judge Harry LaForme, who was appointed by the government to co-lead federal consultations on setting up the new commission, predicted the number of applications for conviction reviews could be “far more than they think it is.”

“That has proven to be the case in virtually every commission that started around the world,” he said, citing the commissions in the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Scotland and Norway.

LaForme said the government failed to ensure the new review body has enough commissioners to do the work. He’s calling for at least eight to 11 commissioners, while the law provides for five to nine in total.

He predicted the commission will see “hundreds” of cases from across the country.

Currently, the process for reviewing a possible wrongful conviction goes through the federal justice minister’s office, where a criminal conviction review group investigates applications and makes recommendations to the minister.

Lawyer Tony Paisana, who teaches a course on wrongful convictions at the University of British Columbia, said it takes “far too long for these cases to make their way through the (current) system. Years and years and years.”

Paisana said that if the new commission is “not adequately resourced, the obvious and likely outcome is that we’re going to revert right back to what we were trying to avoid.”

He said the new commission is still long overdue and people who work in this field are “heartened by the change that’s coming.”

“I think there’s a sense of optimism,” he said. “Like anything else, there’s also a sense of unpredictability at this transition phase.”

Lametti said that, under the current process, there “are many wrongful conviction reviews that will never see the light of day, because for whatever reason it moves very slowly in the current process … I saw roughly seven cases, I believe, over four and a half years.”

The United Kingdom’s commission reviews hundreds of cases each year.

The bill setting up the commission was one of the last pieces of legislation to make it through the House of Commons before Parliament rose for the holiday break — and could be one of the last ahead of what’s likely to be a spring election. Funding was already outlined in the 2023 federal budget, which set aside $83.9 million over five years and $18.7 million in ongoing funding.

Getting the legislation passed was a personal goal for Lametti, who introduced the bill in 2023.

“When I was named minister of justice, this was nowhere on anyone’s radar screen and I saw an opportunity to put this on the radar screen,” he said.

The late David Milgaard, who served 23 years behind bars for a murder he didn’t commit, advocated for the wrongfully convicted and supported the bill. Lametti said he promised Milgaard he would “get it done.”

Lametti said that since there already had been a number of reports calling for a commission, he tasked LaForme and former judge Juanita Westmoreland-Traoré with looking at the “architecture” of such a review body. A number of jurisdictions, including the U.K., Australia and New Zealand, show the commission model works, he said.

Lametti acknowledged the new commission will face a backlog at first, but said the hope is that the numbers will stabilize.

Justice Minister Virani’s office said “work is already underway to establish the commission promptly, beginning with the appointment of commissioners,” and the minister is “focused on ensuring the commission is operational as soon as possible.”

With an election expected this spring, the task of establishing the review body could fall to a Conservative government. Asked whether he has any concerns about a party that has pledged a tough-on-crime approach being in charge of implementing the review body, Lametti responded, “God, I hope not.”

“Tough on crime is not stupid on crime, and this isn’t crime. These are wrongful convictions,” he said. “There isn’t any benefit to the system to convicting innocent people.”

The Conservative party did not respond to multiple requests for comment about how a Conservative government might approach setting up a commission.

LaForme agreed the issue isn’t crime but innocent people “languishing in prison.”

“I don’t think that this Conservative government will think that way,” he added.

The Liberal government has said the new system will help racialized and Indigenous Peoples, who are overrepresented in the criminal justice system.

Over the past 20 years, there have been 200 applications arguing wrongful conviction and 30 cases were eventually overturned, Virani said in December.

Speaking at a recent annual general meeting of the Canadian Bar Association, Virani noted that only seven of those cases involved racialized people and called those numbers “fundamentally unfair.”

“We all know, as lawyers, what systemic overrepresentation in the criminal justice system looks like. It is frankly a national shame,” he said.

None of those 30 overturned cases included women. Virani said “the notion that there isn’t a single female person who is an offender in a correctional facility in this country who’s been wrongfully convicted is just statistically improbable.”

Sen. Kim Pate was one of the senators behind a 2022 report arguing for the group review and exoneration of 12 Indigenous women it said suffered miscarriages of justice. The report noted that Indigenous women make up less than four per cent of women in Canada, but account for half of all women in federal prisons.

The report said Indigenous women “disproportionately experience miscarriages of justice: they are charged, prosecuted, convicted and imprisoned following systemic and discriminatory failures of the criminal legal and prison systems to adequately recognize, contextualize or address the inequities, racism, sexism, violence and ongoing trauma of their lives.”

Pate said a lot remains to be seen when it comes to the makeup of the new commission.

“If the same sort of folks are hired who have been involved in these processes up until now, then it’s not evident that we would see a very different reality,” she said.

LaForme said the chair of the commission needs to be an Indigenous or Black individual, to reflect the overrepresentation of those populations in prisons. He also said that if the commission isn’t independent of government, Indigenous individuals won’t want to apply to serve on it.

Sen. Pate said the new commission could “result in a massive change and… a vital movement within the current criminal legal system to rectify and remedy wrongful convictions and other kinds of injustices.”

It “remains to be seen” whether that will happen, she added.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 5, 2024.

Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press




A movement to oppose the early actions of President Donald Trump’s administration is taking off online, with plans to protest across the U.S. on Wednesday.

The movement has organized under the hashtags #buildtheresistance and #50501, which stands for 50 protests, 50 states, one day. Many of the protests are planned at state capitols, with some in other cities.

The movement has websites and accounts across social media. Flyers circulating online decry Project 2025, a hard-right playbook for American government and society, and include messages such as “reject fascism” and “defend our democracy.” In a coffee shop just a block from Michigan’s Capitol, organizers of a planned action there Wednesday pushed together tables, spreading out poster boards to write messages that read “No Deportations Ever!” and “Workers Unite!”

Kelsey Brianne, a key organizer of Michigan’s rally, called it a “real grassroots effort.” She learned about the movement Sunday night and has been coordinating speakers and safety protocols.

“I got involved because I knew that there was a need, and I knew what I could do,” Brianne said Tuesday. “But also I want to look back at this time and say that I did something and I didn’t just sit back.”

Trump has signed a series of executive orders in the first couple of weeks of his new term on everything from trade and immigration to climate change. As Democrats begin to raise their voice in opposition to Trump’s agenda, protests have also begun.

On Sunday, thousands of people marched against Trump’s plan for large-scale deportations in Southern California, including in downtown Los Angeles, where protests shut down a major freeway for hours. ___ Associated Press writers Joey Cappelletti in Lansing, Michigan, and Gabriel Sandoval in Phoenix contributed to this report. Sandoval is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

The Associated Press



WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump’s attack on diversity, equity and inclusion programs have led military and government agencies — along with some private companies — to roll back observances of diversity and celebrations of Black History Month, which goes through February.

Brandon Scott is pushing back against that trend. The mayor of Baltimore was the subject of racist attacks online last year after a major bridge collapsed near his city. Online commenters labeled Scott, who is Black, a “DEI mayor” and suggested his race was linked to the fatal accident.

Scott saw the attacks on him as part of a broader backlash against Black Americans and other historically disenfranchised groups in leadership. He said he heard echoes of those attacks last week when Trump blamed diversity hiring for the fatal collision at Reagan National Airport in Washington, D.C. The president acknowledged that the crash was still under investigation when pressed on his claims but then said he knew DEI was to blame because he had “common sense.”

“The Left’s divisive focus on DEI policies undermines decades of progress toward true equality,” White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement. “The Trump administration rejects this backward thinking and will pursue an agenda that lifts everyone up with the chance to achieve the American Dream.”

Scott, 40, said in an interview with The Associated Press that he wants Black History Month to be an opportunity to set the record straight on DEI policies, which he views as enacting American values.

Here are excerpts from that conversation:

Why — in your view — are Trump and Republicans blaming DEI for government failures and working to eliminate it from government agencies?

SCOTT: “When we had a horrendous tragedy here in Baltimore — we had a container ship run into a bridge, and the bridge is completely knocked down — we lost six lives. The fact that immediately, instantaneously, you had some of these far-right wing racists saying that it’s my fault — ‘It’s the DEI mayor’s fault, diversity, equity and inclusion caused this.’ Well, let’s break down how ridiculous that is. One, the bridge was built before I was born. Two, when you look at when that bridge was built here in Maryland, I can assure you that very few people that look like me and very few people who were not white males worked on building that bridge. Three, the ship that caused it isn’t from this country, let alone operated by some Black person.”

“We know what they mean when they say it to women. We know what it means when they say it to people from the LGBTQ+ community.”

“What these folks who unfortunately think that way think is that unless you are a straight white male from a certain background — because I want my poor white brothers and sisters to understand that they’re not talking about them either, right — unless you are from a certain background, wealthy historic families with straight white Christian men, then you should never be in a position of power and that your thoughts and opinions don’t matter. And that is the saddest part of it all.”

What do you make of Trump’s blaming of a recent plane and helicopter crash on DEI?

SCOTT: “When you’re in a moment of tragedy of that magnitude, leaders are supposed to lead and tell things as they are, not as we want them to be, not as a certain section of the country wants to hear from us, not for an agenda. Leaders lead in that moment. And it’s unfortunate that we’re discussing DEI when it comes to a horrendous tragedy that caused dozens of people to lose their lives.”

How should supporters of diversity and Black history respond to attacks on Black history?

SCOTT: “You have to fight in every single way with every breath in your body until there’s no more breath, no more blood in your body.”

“That’s why I decided to do a ‘Definitely Earned It’ campaign as we go through Black History Month, because we have to be bigger and Blacker and louder than ever. We cannot allow that darkness to try to come and overtake our light, because darkness can’t overtake light, only light can overcome darkness. Don’t run away, don’t hide, don’t shrink in the moment, be who you are and push back in every single way that you can.”

What does the ‘Definitely Earned It’ campaign look like?

SCOTT: “Typically, every Black History Month, I normally have a video and then we go through the month highlighting people. We’re going to take that to the next level this year and really be highlighting folks, obviously starting here in Baltimore, with a significant role when it comes to Black history in this country. We’ll be noting that these people weren’t DEI — well, that they were DEI, but DEI in the sense that they definitely earned it. They earned every single thing that they accomplished because it wasn’t given to them. We can show people what it truly means when you have to work 10 times as hard, when you have to work through systems that were built up for you to fail, when you have to make sure that you leave the door open for other folks coming behind you. And in my case, DEI means duly elected incumbent, but I also definitely earned it.

“And we’re going to continue to highlight those folks throughout the month through every mode of communication that we have. We’re showing the folks who are right now wondering, ‘Will government still celebrate Black History Month?’, ‘Will everyone just run and hide because they’re not going to be doing it at the national level?’ No, we’re going to do it, and we’re going to be proud of doing it.”

Matt Brown, The Associated Press


TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — With an open presidential primary coming in 2028, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is launching an offensive to win back supporters of the Republican leader whom he dared to challenge in the last election. And he’s doing so by latching onto President Donald Trump’s most prominent issue — immigration.

The problem for DeSantis is his own state’s Republicans think they know Trump better.

DeSantis last week ordered lawmakers into a special legislative session to pass a raft of border-related proposals he floated, including criminal charges for officers if they didn’t enforce immigration measures and restrictions on people who send money to families outside the U.S.

Within minutes of the session convening, legislators tossed out the governor’s proposals and called their own special session. They ignored many of his requests and presented their own bill that cedes much of DeSantis’ power on immigration enforcement to the state’s agriculture commissioner. Lawmakers titled it the Tackling and Reforming Unlawful Migration Policy, or TRUMP, Act.

The battle has exposed the term-limited governor’s struggles to regain the power he lost in his first White House run as he prepares for a potential second try.

Having led Florida’s transformation from a perennial swing state to one that votes solidly Republican, DeSantis is betting on his feel for his state’s voters, who delivered a second term by a huge 19-point margin. But he has struggled to capture the unstoppable aura he had before he went against Trump — and his relative lack of relationships with lawmakers hasn’t helped.

“This is a relationship business,” Republican political consultant Jamie Miller said. “And he is not good at the relationship side.”

DeSantis’ office did not respond to a request for comment.

A chill takes hold in the Sunshine State

Back in 2023, when DeSantis braved the frigid Iowa winter to run for president — and brought some loyal legislators to campaign for him — he sold himself to voters as a brash, bold executive, a more effective version of Trump. And he could point to the results, thanks to the Florida legislature.

For six years, DeSantis kept lawmakers in line with his veto pen. But as DeSantis’ chances faded on his way to a blowout loss in the Iowa caucuses, the presidential sheen wore off.

In a sign DeSantis was not proving a threat to Trump, the Republican Party of Florida voted in September 2023 not to require participants in the state’s 2024 presidential primary to pledge to support the eventual nominee, which ensured Trump would not have to pledge support to DeSantis when the two were locked in a bitter campaign.

DeSantis would never gain the national traction his campaign had set out to demonstrate, and would be out of the race within a week of the leadoff Iowa caucuses. Despite a year of Trump’s taunts, they reached a public rapprochement last May, when DeSantis agreed to convene his top donors to raise money for Trump.

“Ron, I love that you’re back,” Trump said during a conference call to the donors as they gathered at a Fort Lauderdale hotel, raising $3 million in a day for Trump’s campaign.

By December, DeSantis had worked his way into the discussion for Trump’s defense secretary when Pete Hegseth encountered public resistance. Hegseth was ultimately confirmed.

DeSantis has never been comfortable with the backslapping and favor-trading side of politics, which some of his most influential supporters say may rub some lawmakers the wrong way. Even among his admirers, DeSantis is known for having little patience for greasing the wheels of government — shaking hands and making phone calls. Trump, meanwhile, is well-known for his personal touch, often calling lawmakers for their input and inviting current and would-be allies to his Mar-a-Lago estate or his other properties.

And now the governor’s attitude is costing him, some capitol watchers say.

Last month, when DeSantis announced he was calling lawmakers into special session, House Speaker Daniel Perez told The Associated Press the legislature was “blindsided.”

“I called him immediately,” Perez said. “He didn’t answer. He didn’t call me back.”

State Sen. Randy Fine is a former ally of the governor who later endorsed Trump in the 2024 primary. The president returned the favor after his victory by endorsing Fine in a Republican primary for the U.S. House seat previously held by Mike Waltz, who was picked to be national security adviser. Last week, Fine won the contest with more than 80% of the vote and is on track to win the seat in April, despite not living in the district he hopes to represent.

Fine compared his reward to the treatment of lawmakers who were loyal to DeSantis — and are now being attacked as “Republicans in name only.”

“I was loyal. I’m going to Congress. They were loyal. They get called RINOs who want amnesty,” Fine said. “There are female members of the Legislature who went to Iowa a year ago and walked through the snow to help him and got frostbite. And now a year later they’re RINOs who want amnesty? I think it’s hard to describe the sense of betrayal.”

DeSantis and the legislature fight over who is closer to Trump

Both sides of the argument over Florida’s immigration battle say they are best capturing Trump’s desires.

The governor said the legislature’s measure is a “betrayal” of conservative voters and naming it after the president is a “misnomer.”

“President Trump has been very strong coming out of the gate on immigration enforcement. He wants to solve this problem once and for all. The bill they did is more window dressing,” DeSantis said in a video he posted on X. Transferring his power to the agriculture commissioner, he said, would be like putting the “fox in charge of the hen house,” implying farmers want to continue to hire immigrants who are in the country illegally.

But legislators say they have Trump’s blessing. The bill sponsor, the Florida House speaker and the state senator expected to be sent to Congress visited the White House on Monday to celebrate NHL’s defending Stanley Cup champion Florida Panthers.

“The whole goal of this bill is to help President Trump do his job,” said Republican state Sen. Joe Gruters, a bill sponsor and Trump ally. He said Stephen Miller, a senior adviser to the president and immigration hard-liner, gave lawmakers “technical guidance” and they made changes to the bill “to make sure we’re doing everything that the president’s team wants.”

DeSantis has picked up some support along the way. U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds, a key Trump ally who might run to replace the term-limited DeSantis next year, said his own relationship with the governor “got frayed” when Donalds backed Trump two years ago. But last week, Donalds said in a podcast the governor was “correct” that he needed to have enforcement powers over immigration.

Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, chimed in on social media to highlight DeSantis’ proposals. The think tank Roberts leads drafted Project 2025, the blueprint for a hard-right turn in American government and society that has inspired a number of Trump actions.

“Now is not the time for watered-down proposals,” Roberts posted on X, giving DeSantis a “bravo.”

Neither the president nor the White House has publicly expressed an opinion. The White House did not respond to a request for comment for this story.

For now, DeSantis appears to be winning the war on social media and conservative airwaves, said Miller, the political consultant.

“But we all know that that microphone can be taken away with one tweet,” he said.

___

Gomez Licon reported from Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Associated Press writer Thomas Beaumont in Des Moines, Iowa, contributed to this report.

Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

Kate Payne And Adriana Gomez Licon, The Associated Press


WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump offered a jaw-dropping performance during his joint news conference Tuesday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, suggesting that Palestinian refugees from the Gaza Strip could be permanently resettled elsewhere and that the U.S. might stage a long-term takeover of the vacated region — even leading redevelopment efforts to make it a seaside paradise in waiting.

He refused to rule out sending U.S. troops in to seal the deal, and said he himself — ever the real estate developer — might pay a personal visit.

Here are some takeaways from Trump’s remarks:

Trump’s comments could upend the ceasefire in Gaza

Negotiations to sustain the tenuous ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and Hamas — and secure the liberation of the remaining living hostages in captivity there, including at least one American — are set to begin in earnest this week. Trump’s audacious proposal to relocate roughly 1.8 million Palestinians from the land they have called home, and look to as part of a future state, could completely upend those negotiations.

The framework for the talks calls for surging humanitarian and reconstruction supplies to help the people of Gaza recover after more than 15 months of devastating conflict between Israel and Hamas. It was always going to be a challenge for mediators to try to win Hamas’ agreement to be uprooted as the governing authority in the territory.

Trump’s suggestions that the U.S. take ownership of the area and redevelop it, with the possible support of American troops, is a sure non-starter for the militant group. It is also likely to put new stress on Qatar and Egypt, the other mediators in the talks, who have long advocated for Palestinian statehood.

A breakdown in the negotiations could see the return to fighting in Gaza — jeopardizing the fates of the remaining living hostages held by Hamas and other militant groups in the territory.

The suggestions were quickly panned in the Middle East

Trump’s comments were immediately repudiated by Saudi Arabia, whose foreign ministry issued a sharply worded statement that the nation’s long call for an independent Palestinian state was a “firm, steadfast and unwavering position.”

Saudi Arabia has been in negotiations with the U.S. over a deal to diplomatically recognize Israel in exchange for a security pact and other terms. But the ministry’s statement noted Saudi Arabia’s “absolute rejection” of efforts to displace the Palestinian people from their land.

“The duty of the international community today,” the statement added, “is to work to alleviate the severe human suffering endured by the Palestinian people, who will remain committed to their land and will not budge from it.”

Hamas, in its own statement said, “We reject Trump’s statements in which he said that the residents of the Gaza Strip have no choice but to leave, and we consider them a recipe for creating chaos and tension in the region.”

An isolationist president is open to sending US troops to Gaza

Trump has built a political persona around an “America first” mantra that promotes isolationism, and is proud of the fact that the U.S. is currently not engaged in any foreign military conflicts.

So the fact that he might be ready to dispatch U.S. troops to Gaza is nothing short of stunning.

The president said he wants the U.S. to take “long-term” ownership of the Gaza and redevelop it after Palestinians are resettled elsewhere. Asked if that might involve American military forces, Trump replied, “As far as Gaza is concerned, we’ll do what is necessary.”

“If it’s necessary,” he added, “We’ll do that.”

Trump is in real estate developer mode

Trump, who became famous as a 1980s New York real estate developer, still often gleefully looks at the world that way — and it showed on Tuesday.

The president said he envisions “the world’s people” living in a redeveloped Gaza that he said could look like “the Riviera of the Middle East.”

“This could be something that could be so valuable. This could be so magnificent,” Trump said, adding that “most importantly,” the people that live there would be able to live in peace and, “We’ll make sure that it’s done world-class.”

Trump said that eventually he envisioned “Palestinians, mostly” living in the region but also described his vision for Gaza as “an international, unbelievable place.”

The president also said he planned to visit Israel during his second term in office and even suggested he might go to Gaza — a trip that would present unprecedented logistical and security challenges.

Trump keeps expressing reluctance about his own Iran stance

Amid precarious ceasefire and hostage negotiations, Trump has also begun expressing reluctance about the pressure his administration is seeking to put on Iran.

Trump made it clear he would like to negotiate with one of America’s top adversaries to allow it to prosper — as long as Iran commits to not developing a nuclear weapon. He twice said he “hated” signing an executive order earlier Tuesday instructing the U.S. to impose maximum pressure on Tehran.

“I want Iran to be peaceful and successful. I hated doing it,” the president said.

Trump then sought to address the people of Iran directly by saying he “would love to be able to make a great deal, a deal where you can get on with your lives. You’ll do wonderfully.”

That tone was a noticeable departure from unapologetically tough words Trump offered about some of America’s allies in recent days — threatening tariffs against Canada and Mexico and suggesting that similar levies could be coming against the European Union.

Trump praised the Iranians as “industrious, beautiful” and “incredible people,” and said his one requirement as he seeks a deal with them is that they don’t obtain a nuclear weapon. He also said if Iran can convince the U.S. that they won’t, “I think they’re going to have an unbelievable future.”

“I hope we’re going to be able to do something so that it doesn’t end up in a very catastrophic situation. I don’t want to see that happen,” Trump said. “I really want to see peace.”

Trump’s takeover list is growing

And now it’s designs on Gaza.

Trump’s suggestions that the U.S. could occupy Gaza, with the possible support of U.S. troops, follows his threatening to take the Panama Canal by military force. And that came after his repeated insistence the U.S. can somehow wrest control of Greenland from Denmark, and that Canadians would like to become the 51st state.

Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., didn’t mince words when asked about Trump’s suggestions for Gaza: “He’s completely lost it.”

“He wants a U.S. invasion of Gaza, which would cost thousands of American lives and set the Middle East on fire for 20 years?” asked the Democrat from Connecticut. “It’s sick.”

___

Associated Press writer Jon Gambrell in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, contributed to this report.

Will Weissert, Michelle L. Price And Zeke Miller, The Associated Press





LAWRENCEVILLE, N.J. (AP) — Four candidates competing in New Jersey’s Republican gubernatorial primary spared few punches Tuesday when they faced off in their first debate ahead of the June 10 vote.

State Sen. Jon Bramnick, former state Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, one-time state Sen. Ed Durr and radio host Bill Spadea sparred for nearly two hours at Rider University in Lawrenceville.

They all frequently talked over each other and faced interruption from the moderators as they continually launched attacks, with some of them at times competing for the mantle of who is the biggest supporter of President Donald Trump. Bramnick was the lone Trump skeptic on the stage.

In one attack, Ciattarelli started in on Spadea, saying Republicans who know Spadea the best endorsed him rather than the former radio host.

Spadea responded by offering sarcastic congratulations: “Jack’s talking about two-time losers,” Bramnick said, alluding to Ciattarelli’s two previous unsuccessful runs for governor.

The race comes during the first year of Trump’s second administration and as the GOP is angling to win back the governorship in a state that has toggled between the parties in gubernatorial elections but leans Democratic in presidential and midterm votes.

Spadea, Durr and Ciattarelli have each embraced the president, while Bramnick has kept his distance, arguing that to win New Jersey, a candidate has to appeal not just to Republican primary voters but to Democrats and independents as well.

Spadea said he has been with Trump since “he came down the escalator in 2015,” a reference to the launch of his presidential campaign that year.

Durr ran for state Senate as a pro-Trump candidate in 2021 and defeated the powerful Democratic Senate president. He lost reelection to a Democrat in 2023.

Each candidate said they oppose or would undo executive orders under current Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy barring local police from working with immigration officials.

Asked whether they would support an amendment enshrining abortion rights in the state constitution — New Jersey law currently establishes that it is legal — Bramnick said yes while Durr and Spadea said no. Ciattarelli said he supports abortion rights but did specify his position on an amendment.

Murphy is barred from seeking a third term. Gubernatorial hopefuls from his party held their first debate Sunday.

New Jersey and Virginia are the only two states with regularly scheduled gubernatorial races this year.

Mike Catalini, The Associated Press