LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Senate on Tuesday confirmed Doug Collins as secretary of veterans affairs, putting the former congressman and Iraq War veteran at the helm of a department that provides crucial care to America’s veterans.

Collins, a former Air Force chaplain, was confirmed on a 77-23 vote, becoming the latest addition to President Donald Trump’s Cabinet.

“We must take care of our brave men and women in uniform, and Doug will be a great advocate for our active duty servicemembers, veterans, and military families to ensure they have the support they need,” Trump said in a November statement announcing Collins’ nomination.

The Department of Veterans Affairs manages a more than $350 billion budget and oversees nearly 200 medical centers and hospitals nationwide. It also manages national cemeteries and works closely with the Defense Department on personnel matters.

Collins has promised to cut regulations across the department and elevate the quality of care for veterans.

The challenges facing the department have evolved in recent years, with a younger generation of veterans bringing new health challenges from their service in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

“I’m an Iraq War veteran. I understand burn pits because I slept next to one for many months,” Collins said in his opening remarks during his January confirmation hearing. Collins said that he understand the challenges facing veterans today who “went time and time again, deployment after deployment” to conflict zones.

Collins served in the House of Representatives from 2013 to 2021. He has been an outspoken conservative since his time in the Georgia state legislature and was a close Trump ally during the president’s first term. He ran unsuccessfully for Senate in 2020 but lost the Republican primary to Kelly Loeffler, a major GOP donor who Trump has tapped to lead the U.S. Small Business Association.

Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., called Collins a “friend” who has “an engaging personality that attracts people to what he’s working on.”

“It’s not that they’re better doctors or better psychiatrists or better nurses or technicians. It’s that they’re empathetic,” Cramer said. “While they appreciate access to community care, they appreciate the empathy of a fellow veteran, and Doug brings that. But, guys, he’s a chaplain. I mean, come on, how perfect is that?”

Collins’ nomination sailed through the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee in a 18-1 vote. The lone dissenter, Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, said she was concerned that Collins would limit access to reproductive care like IVF or abortion for veterans.

Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., said she had a productive conversation with Collins during his confirmation hearing but pressed him on whether he’d commit to working with Congress to “strengthen and refine” the department “rather than resorting to privatization.”

Collins said he would be focused on addressing wait times and increasing preventative care.

Matt Brown, The Associated Press



OTTAWA — To justify his executive order imposing stiff tariffs on goods from Canada, Mexico and China, U.S. President Donald Trump cited an “extraordinary threat posed by illegal aliens and drugs, including deadly fentanyl.”

Trump agreed Monday to pause the planned tariffs against Canada and Mexico for 30 days in response to both countries promising to bolster border security.

Here’s a look at some of the claims Trump made in his recent executive order and an accompanying fact sheet.

Trade deficit

The Trump administration has expressed concerns about the United States’ trade deficit in goods, saying it’s the world’s largest — over $1 trillion in 2023 — and linking it to the president’s plan to impose tariffs.

“Tariffs are a powerful, proven source of leverage for protecting the national interest,” says the Feb. 1 fact sheet from the White House. “President Trump is using the tools at hand and taking decisive action that puts Americans’ safety and our national security first.”

Trump has claimed the U.S. can no longer suffer the massive trade deficits and subsidies that he says Canada needs to stay afloat. He also has claimed his country is losing $200 billion a year to its northern neighbour.

A recent analysis by TD Economics says Canada is the largest export market for the U.S. and accounts for one of the United States’ smallest trade deficits, largely due to U.S. demand for energy-related products.

Based on Statistics Canada data, Canada’s merchandise trade surplus with the U.S. last year was on track to reach $100 billion, the analysis says.

“The U.S., however, enjoys an edge in services trade, mainly related to Canadians flowing over the American border,” TD Economics says. That reduces the trade surplus to $85 billion, or 2.8 per cent of Canadian gross domestic product.

Citing U.S. Census Bureau figures, the TD analysis says America was on track to record an even lower trade deficit with Canada of about US$45 billion in 2024, or $65 billion in Canadian dollars.

TD says it’s not clear how Trump came up with his $200 billion figure (presumably in U.S. dollars).

“In any event, a trade deficit is not a subsidy,” the analysis says. “That would ring true, if for example, the U.S. government transferred US$45 billion annually to Canadian companies out of goodwill, but Americans are receiving value for the dollars spent in the form of goods and services.”

Migrants

The fact sheet claims more than 10 million illegal aliens attempted to enter the United States under former president Joe Biden’s leadership, including a growing number of Chinese nationals and people on the terror watch list.

“This problem is not confined to the southern border — encounters at the northern border with Canada are rising as well,” it says.

The number of people apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol along the northern border did indeed climb to 23,721 in the 2024 fiscal year, from 2,238 in 2022, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection statistics.

But the numbers have been steadily dropping since peaking last June.

By comparison, there were more than 1.5 million encounters with the Border Patrol along the U.S. border with Mexico in 2024.

Fentanyl

The fact sheet says that in the last fiscal year, U.S. Customs and Border Protection seized more than 21,000 pounds of fentanyl at the United States’ borders, enough to kill more than four billion people.

Almost all of that fentanyl was apprehended at the southwest border.

According to U.S. border agency figures, a mere 43 pounds of fentanyl was seized from people crossing the northern border during the same period.

“At present, most U.S.-destined illicit fentanyl appears to be produced clandestinely in Mexico, using chemical precursors from China,” says a December 2024 report by the U.S. Congressional Research Service.

Fintrac report

The executive order says Canada’s Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre, known as Fintrac, recently published a study on the laundering of proceeds from illicit synthetic opioids — recognizing Canada’s heightened domestic production of fentanyl, largely in British Columbia, and its growing footprint within international narcotics distribution.

The Fintrac alert released in January says that before 2020, North America was primarily a consumer and destination continent for illicit-market opioids, specifically fentanyl, which was largely imported from China.

“In more recent years, trafficking networks have increased the production of fentanyl and other synthetic opioids as well as their distribution both domestically and internationally from North America, including Canada, the United States and Mexico,” the report says.

Fintrac provides few details on the scope or destination of such international exports.

Public Safety Minister David McGuinty has repeatedly pointed to the relatively small amount of fentanyl crossing into the U.S. from Canada.

“Despite evidence of domestic production occurring in Canada, there is little to no evidence from either Canadian or U.S. law enforcement that Canadian-produced fentanyl is an increasing threat to the United States,” says a Dec. 10, 2024 briefing note from Public Safety.

Co-operation

“Gang members, smugglers, human traffickers, and illicit drugs of all kinds have poured across our borders and into our communities,” says the executive order.

“Canada has played a central role in these challenges, including by failing to devote sufficient attention and resources or meaningfully co-ordinate with United States law enforcement partners to effectively stem the tide of illicit drugs.”

The record shows Ottawa has made efforts to tackle the scourge of opioids.

Canada has worked with the United States and Mexico through the North American Drug Dialogue to co-ordinate policy, exchange information on drug trends and develop tactical responses to help protect people from the trafficking of substances and drug-related harms, the Fintrac alert says.

In addition, the RCMP works to detect, investigate and disrupt criminal threats to public safety by targeting transnational and serious organized crime groups involved in the production and trafficking of illegal substances, including opioids, says the Public Safety briefing note.

“As a result, 44 clandestine drug labs have been dismantled by the RCMP and local police services since 2018, protecting Canadians from millions of potentially harmful doses of drugs,” says the briefing note.

Late last year, in response to Trump’s threatened tariffs, Canada announced a $1.3-billion upgrade to border security and monitoring.

The initiative included plans to create an aerial intelligence task force to provide round-the-clock surveillance of Canada’s border using helicopters, drones and surveillance towers.

In addition, Canada has proposed the creation of a North American “joint strike force” to target organized crime groups that work across borders.

The government also intends to provide new technology, tools and resources to the Canada Border Services Agency to seek out deadly fentanyl using chemical detection, artificial intelligence and canine teams.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 4, 2025.

Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press


BEIJING (AP) — China announced retaliatory tariffs on select American imports and an antitrust investigation into Google on Tuesday, just minutes after a sweeping levy on Chinese products imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump took effect.

American tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico were also set to go into effect Tuesday before Trump agreed to a 30-day pause, as the two countries acted to address his concerns about border security and drug trafficking. Trump planned to talk with Chinese President Xi Jinping in the next few days.

This isn’t the first round of tit-for-tat actions between the two countries. China and the U.S. engaged in an escalating trade war in 2018, when Trump repeatedly raised tariffs on Chinese goods and China responded each time.

This time, analysts said, China is much better prepared, announcing a slew of measures that go beyond tariffs and cut across different sectors of the U.S. economy. The government is also more wary of upsetting its own fragile and heavily trade-dependent economy.

“It’s aiming for finding measures that maximize the impact and also minimize the risk that the Chinese economy may face,” said Gary Ng, a senior economist at Natixis Corporate and Investment Banking in Hong Kong. “At the same time … China is trying to increase its bargaining chips.”

John Gong, a professor at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing, called the response a “measured” one. “I don’t think they want the trade war escalating,” he said. “And they see this example from Canada and Mexico and probably they are hoping for the same thing.”

Counter-tariffs

China said it would implement a 15% tariff on coal and liquefied natural gas products as well as a 10% tariff on crude oil, agricultural machinery and large-engine cars imported from the U.S. The tariffs would take effect next Monday.

“The U.S.’s unilateral tariff increase seriously violates the rules of the World Trade Organization,” the State Council Tariff Commission said in a statement. “It is not only unhelpful in solving its own problems, but also damages normal economic and trade cooperation between China and the U.S.”

The impact on U.S. exports may be limited. Though the U.S. is the biggest exporter of liquid natural gas globally, it does not export much to China. In 2023, the U.S. exported 173,247 million cubic feet of LNG to China, about 2.3% of its total natural gas exports, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

China imported less than 110,000 vehicles from the U.S. last year, though auto market analyst Lei Xing thinks the tariffs will be painful for GM, which is adding the Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon to its China line-up, and for Ford, which exports the Mustang and F-150 Raptor pickup.

The response from China appears calculated and measured, said Stephen Dover, chief market strategist and head of the Franklin Templeton Institute, a financial research firm. However, he said, the world is bracing for further impact.

“A risk is that this is the beginning of a tit-for-tat trade war, which could result in lower GDP growth everywhere, higher U.S. inflation, a stronger dollar and upside pressure on U.S. interest rates,” Dover said.

Further export controls on critical minerals

China announced export controls on several elements critical to the production of modern high-tech products.

They include tungsten, tellurium, bismuth, molybdenum and indium, many of which are designated as critical minerals by the U.S. Geological Survey, meaning they are essential to U.S. economic or national security that have supply chains vulnerable to disruption.

The export controls are in addition to ones China placed in December on key elements such as gallium.

“They have a much more developed export control regime,” Philip Luck, an economist at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and former State Department official, said at a panel discussion on Monday.

“We depend on them for a lot of critical minerals: gallium, germanium, graphite, a host of others,” he said. “They could put some significant harm on our economy.”

Going after Google

China’s State Administration for Market Regulation said Tuesday it is investigating Google on suspicion of violating antitrust laws. The announcement did not mention the tariffs but came just minutes after Trump’s 10% tariffs on China were to take effect.

It is unclear how the probe will affect Google’s operations. The company has long faced complaints from Chinese smartphone makers over its business practices surrounding the Android operating system, Gong said.

Overall, Google has a smaller presence in China than many markets, with its search engine blocked like many other Western platforms. Google exited the Chinese market in 2010, after refusing to comply with censorship requests from the Chinese government and following a series of cyberattacks on the company.

Google did not immediately comment.

Tommy Hilfiger in the crosshairs

The Commerce Ministry also placed two American companies on an unreliable entities list: PVH Group, which owns Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, and Illumina, which is a biotechnology company with offices in China. The listing could bar them from engaging in China-related import or export activities and from making new investments in the country.

Beijing began investigating PVH Group in September last year over “improper Xinjiang-related behavior” after the company allegedly boycotted the use of Xinjiang cotton.

Putting these U.S. companies on the unreliable entities list is “alarming” because it shows that the Chinese government is using the list to pressure U.S. companies to take a side, said George Chen, managing director for The Asia Group, a Washington D.C.-headquartered business policy consultancy.

“It’s almost like telling American companies, what your government is doing is bad, you need to tell the government that if you add more tariffs or hurt U.S.-China relations at the end of the day it’ll backfire on American companies,” Chen said.

___

Wu reported from Bangkok. Associated Press writers Zen Soo in Hong Kong and Christopher Bodeen in Taipei, Taiwan, contributed to this report.

Ken Moritsugu And Huizhong Wu, The Associated Press












HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro will seek more money for underfunded public schools and public transit in his budget proposal unveiled Tuesday, while he is also hoping to win support for legalizing marijuana and introducing taxes on skill games viewed as competitors to casinos and lottery contests.

The Democrat is also seeking more money for universities, offering hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks to encourage new power plant construction and relying on billions in surplus cash to balance spending.

To help unveil it, Shapiro was to deliver a budget speech to a joint session of the General Assembly in the state House of Representatives’ chamber.

Shapiro’s proposal surpasses $50 billion for a state budget in Pennsylvania for the first time, requesting $51.5 billion for the 2025-2026 fiscal year beginning July 1 as Shapiro gears up for his re-election campaign.

However, Shapiro’s hands are tied to a great extent, bound by a huge increase in costs for the medical care for the poor, as well as a slow-growing economy and a shrinking workforce that is delivering relatively meager gains in tax collections.

Passage will require approval from Pennsylvania’s Democratic-controlled House and its Republican-controlled Senate.

All told, Shapiro’s spending request would increase total authorized spending by 9% through the state’s main bank account, or about $3.8 billion, including a $230 million supplemental request for the current year’s spending.

Of that, about $2 billion would go to toward human services, including medical care for the poor, and another $1 billion would go toward K-12 schools and higher education institutions.

Most of the new education money — $526 million — is viewed as part of a multiyear, multibillion-dollar response to a court decision that found that Pennsylvania’s system of public school funding violates the constitutional rights of students in the poorest districts.

The budget proposal holds the line on personal income and sales tax rates, the state’s two largest sources of income. But it instead uses about $4.5 billion in reserve cash to balance — the second straight year of multibillion-dollar deficits.

Tax collections are projected to increase by $2.3 billion to $48.3 billion, or 5%, but a large portion of that rests on whether lawmakers will go along with several proposals by Shapiro.

That includes raising almost $1.2 billion from legalizing adult-use marijuana, expanding how the corporate net income tax is applied and introducing taxes on the skill games that are viewed as competitors to casinos and state lottery contests.

Still, lawyers for the schools that sued the state were asking for much more than Shapiro is proposing, while nursing home operators, home care providers and counties that maintain mental health networks would receive far less than what they are seeking in reimbursements.

Elsewhere in the plan, Shapiro is proposing to send nearly $300 million more, or about 20% more, to public transit agencies as he works to stave off cutbacks by the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, the Philadelphia region’s public transit agency struggling to regain ridership lost during the pandemic.

The plan also seeks to shave reimbursements to cyber charter schools, saving nearly $400 million in payments by public schools, and close two state prisons, with the state’s 24 prisons at about 82% capacity.

Shapiro does have a cushion of about $10.5 billion in reserve, thanks to federal COVID-19 relief and inflation-juiced tax collections over the past few years. Shapiro’s proposal would leave about $6.4 billion of that unspent.

This year’s $47.6 billion spending plan required about $3 billion of surplus cash to balance, eliciting warnings from Republicans that the state must slow the pace of spending or risk depleting its surplus within several years.

___

Follow Marc Levy on X at: https://x.com/timelywriter

Marc Levy, The Associated Press


South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, one of President Donald Trump’s closest congressional allies, is kicking off his pursuit of a fifth term with two of his home state’s top Republicans chairing his 2026 campaign, an early show of strength in a race where the longtime lawmaker is expected to face primary challengers.

Graham’s campaign told The Associated Press on Tuesday that Sen. Tim Scott and Gov. Henry McMaster will chair his 2026 run. Scott, the state’s junior senator, is current chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the chamber’s campaign arm and — after challenging Trump for the 2024 presidential nomination — campaigned for him during the GOP primary.

McMaster recently became the state’s longest-serving governor, having been elected to two terms of his own after serving the remaining two years of Nikki Haley’s term after she became Trump’s first ambassador to the United Nations.

Both McMaster and Scott were surrogates for Trump in the 2024 presidential campaign, and their early support for Graham in his own bid is intended as a signal of strength for the incumbent in a state where Trump has maintained high popularity since his 2016 run.

It’s also an early strike in the race, where Graham — as he typically does — is expected to face primary challengers. The Trump confidant has long been targeted by the far right in his state, critiqued by his own party and booed at a home-state rally.

County-level Republican parties have censured Graham a number of times for his willingness to work on bipartisan deals. One such measure derided Graham’s “condescending attitude” to the party’s grassroots organizers.

He has even drawn boos at some events of the party faithful in his home state. That includes a July 2023 Trump rally in Pickens — in the county where Graham grew up — where objections from the crowd drowned out more than five minutes of his remarks. When he took the stage, Trump also elicited boos when he mentioned Graham’s name, saying he was “going to have to work on these people” and adding that Graham is “there when you need him.”

Last month, Graham’s campaign said he had more than $15.6 million cash on hand for his reelection bid, including nearly a million raised in the last quarter of 2024 alone. In 2020, Graham bested several GOP challengers before going on to defeat Democratic nominee Jaime Harrison — who recently ended his term as Democratic National Committee chairman — by a margin of 10 percentage points.

Potential Republican primary challengers for this cycle include South Carolina Rep. Ralph Norman, a member of the House Freedom Caucus, and Adam Morgan, a former South Carolina legislator who lost a primary bid last year against U.S. Rep. William Timmons.

___

Kinnard reported from Houston and can be reached at http://x.com/MegKinnardAP

Meg Kinnard, The Associated Press


FREDERICTON — New Brunswick’s minister of post-secondary education, training and labour says she has been diagnosed with a brain tumour.

In a social media post, Alyson Townsend says she was diagnosed after a series of tests last weekend at the Dr. Everett Chalmers Hospital in Fredericton.

She says she will step back from her cabinet position while she undergoes surgery and other treatment.

Townsend says that about 10 years ago she was diagnosed with breast cancer and after treatment received a clean bill of health.

Premier Susan Holt says Townsend has her “full support and the love and care of our whole team as she tackles this treatment.”

Progressive Conservative Leader Glen Savoie says his team was sad to hear about Townsend’s health concerns and he wishes her a full recovery.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 4, 2025.

The Canadian Press


OTTAWA — The Canadian Chamber of Commerce says a decision by U.S. President Donald Trump to delay the implementation of tariffs on Canadian goods headed to the U.S. leaves businesses, workers, and families in the lurch.

Chamber chief executive Candace Laing says with the potential for tariffs still on the table, the turmoil and uncertainty persist.

Laing says the delay gives more time for Canadian businesses and governments to drive home the point that tariffs make no sense.

The U.S. was set to impose tariffs on Canadian imports before Trump announced a 30-day pause on Monday after two phone calls with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Trump had threatened the tariffs in response to what he called Canada’s failure to curb the illegal flow of people and drugs across the border.

The prime minister said he had a “good call” with Trump and talked about implementing a $1.3-billion border plan that includes helicopter patrols and commitments to appoint a “fentanyl czar,” list drug cartels as terrorist entities, and launch a Canada-U.S. joint strike force to combat organized crime.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 4, 2025.

The Canadian Press


WASHINGTON (AP) — Dozens of senior officials put on leave. Thousands of contractors laid off. A freeze put on billions of dollars in humanitarian assistance to other countries.

Over the last two weeks, President Donald Trump’s administration has made significant changes to the U.S. agency charged with delivering humanitarian assistance overseas that has left aid organizations agonizing over whether they can continue with programs such as nutritional assistance for malnourished infants and children.

Then-President John F. Kennedy established the U.S. Agency for International Development, known as USAID, during the Cold War. In the decades since, Republicans and Democrats have fought over the agency and its funding.

Here’s a look at USAID, its history and the changes made since Trump took office.

What is USAID?

Kennedy created USAID at the height of the United States’ Cold War struggle with the Soviet Union. He wanted a more efficient way to counter Soviet influence abroad through foreign assistance and saw the State Department as frustratingly bureaucratic at doing that.

Congress passed the Foreign Assistance Act and Kennedy set up USAID as an independent agency in 1961.

USAID has outlived the Soviet Union, which fell in 1991. Today, supporters of USAID argue that U.S. assistance in countries counters Russian and Chinese influence. China has its own “belt and road” foreign aid program worldwide operating in many countries that the U.S. also wants as partners.

Critics say the programs are wasteful and promote a liberal agenda.

What’s going on with USAID?

On his first day in office Jan. 20, Trump implemented a 90-day freeze on foreign assistance. Four days later, Peter Marocco — a returning political appointee from Trump’s first term — drafted a tougher than expected interpretation of that order, a move that shut down thousands of programs around the world and forced furloughs and layoffs.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has since moved to keep more kinds of strictly life-saving emergency programs going during the freeze. But confusion over what programs are exempted from the Trump administration’s stop-work orders — and fear of losing U.S. aid permanently — is still freezing aid and development work globally.

Dozens of senior officials have been put on leave, thousands of contractors laid off, and employees were told Monday not to enter its Washington headquarters. And USAID’s website and its account on the X platform have been taken down.

It’s part of a Trump administration crackdown that’s hitting across the federal government and its programs. But USAID and foreign aid are among those hit the hardest.

Rubio said the administration’s aim was a program-by-program review of which projects make “America safer, stronger or more prosperous.”

The decision to shut down U.S.-funded programs during the 90-day review meant the U.S. was “getting a lot more cooperation” from recipients of humanitarian, development and security assistance, Rubio said.

What do critics of USAID say?

Republicans typically push to give the State Department — which provides overall foreign policy guidance to USAID — more control of its policy and funds. Democrats typically promote USAID autonomy and authority.

Funding for United Nations agencies, including peacekeeping, human rights and refugee agencies, have been traditional targets for Republican administrations to cut. The first Trump administration moved to reduce foreign aid spending, suspending payments to various U.N. agencies, including the U.N. Population Fund and funding to the Palestinian Authority.

In Trump’s first term, the U.S. pulled out of the U.N. Human Rights Council and its financial obligations to that body. The U.S. is also barred from funding the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees, or UNRWA, under a bill signed by then-President Joe Biden last March.

As a Florida senator, Rubio often called for more transparency on foreign assistance spending, but was generally supportive. In a 2017 social media post, Rubio said foreign assistance was “not charity,” that the U.S. “must make sure it is well spent” and called foreign aid “critical to our national security.”

In 2023, Rubio sponsored a bill that would have required U.S. foreign assistance agencies to include more information on what organizations were implementing the aid on the ground.

Why is Elon Musk going after USAID?

Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, has launched a sweeping effort empowered by Trump to fire government workers and cut trillions in government spending. USAID is one of his prime targets. Musk alleges USAID funding been used to launch deadly programs and called it a “criminal organization.”

What is being affected by the USAID freeze?

Sub-Saharan Africa could suffer more than any other region during the aid pause. The U.S. gave the region more than $6.5 billion in humanitarian assistance last year. HIV patients in Africa arriving at clinics funded by an acclaimed U.S. program that helped rein in the global AIDS epidemic of the 1980s found locked doors.

There are also already ramifications in Latin America. In Mexico, a busy shelter for migrants in southern Mexico has been left without a doctor. A program to provide mental health support for LGBTQ+ youth fleeing Venezuela was disbanded.

In Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador and Guatemala, so-called “Safe Mobility Offices” where migrants can apply to enter the U.S. legally have shuttered.

The aid community is struggling to get the full picture—how many thousands of programs have shut down and how many thousands of workers were furloughed and laid off under the freeze?

How much does the U.S. spend on foreign aid?

In all, the U.S. spent about roughly $40 billion in foreign aid in the 2023 fiscal year, according to a report published last month by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service.

The U.S. is the largest provider of humanitarian assistance globally, although some other countries spend a bigger share of their budget on it. Foreign assistance overall amounts to less than 1% of the U.S. budget.

What do Americans think of foreign aid?

About 6 in 10 U.S. adults said the U.S. government was spending “too much” overall on foreign aid, according to a March 2023 AP-NORC poll. Asked about specific costs, roughly 7 in 10 U.S. adults said the U.S. government was putting too much money toward assistance to other countries. About 9 in 10 Republicans and 55% of Democrats agreed that the country was overspending on foreign aid. At the time, about 6 in 10 U.S. adults said the government was spending “too little” on domestic issues that included education, health care, infrastructure, Social Security and Medicare.

Polling has shown that U.S. adults tend to overestimate the share of the federal budget that is spent on foreign aid. Surveys from the Kaiser Family Foundation have found that on average, Americans say spending on foreign aid makes up 31% of the federal budget rather than closer to 1% or less.

Could Trump dissolve USAID on his own?

Democrats say presidents lack the constitutional authority to eliminate USAID. But it’s not clear what would stop him from trying.

A mini-version of that legal battle played out in Trump’s first term, when he tried to cut the budget for foreign operations by a third.

When Congress refused, the Trump administration used freezes and other tactics to cut the flow of funds already appropriated by Congress for the foreign programs. The Government Accountability Office later ruled that violated a law known as the Impoundment Control Act.

It’s a law we may be hearing more of.

“Live by executive order, die by executive order,” Musk said on X Saturday in reference to USAID.

___

Kinnard reported from Houston. Associated Press writer Linley Sanders in Washington contributed to this report.

Knickmeyer can be reached at https://x.com/EllenKnickmeyer and Kinnard can be reached at http://x.com/MegKinnardAP.

Ellen Knickmeyer And Meg Kinnard, The Associated Press






OTTAWA — Uncertainty still hangs over the Canadian economy despite U.S. President Donald Trump announcing a 30-day pause in tariffs that were to take effect today.

The temporary reprieve halts — at least for now — a continental trade war that economists on both sides of the border warned would raise prices.

Trump’s decision meant Canada and the provinces also halted their moves to retaliate including with tariffs and bans on U.S. alcohol sales north of the border.

Trump on Saturday signed an order to impose 25 per cent across-the-board tariffs on Mexican and Canadian imports, with a lower 10 per cent tariff on Canadian energy.

On Monday, following two phone calls with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Trump said the tariffs would be off the table for 30 days to see if the two countries could reach a “final economic deal.”

In his own social media post, Trudeau outlined his government’s $1.3 billion plan to address Trump’s stated concerns about border security that Canada unveiled in December.

He also said nearly 10,000 front-line personnel “are and will” be protecting Canada’s border, and announced $200 million in new initiatives to address fentanyl trafficking including a “fentanyl czar.”

Some of the border measures will be on display today.

Public Safety Minister David McGuinty and Terry Duguid, minister responsible for Prairies Economic Development Canada, will join Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew later this morning at the Emerson port of entry, where they’ll see how the Canada Border Services Agency detects fentanyl and other toxic materials. They’ll also see a Black Hawk helicopter which the RCMP is now using to patrol the U.S. border in the province.

But the tariffs delay is not a long-term comfort for many in Canada’s labour and business communities.

Unifor, the country’s largest private sector union, insists that Trump’s threat of tariffs remains in effect, threatening Canadian jobs. National President Lana Payne calls for Canada to “use every single available lever to build a strong, resilient, and diverse economy.”

The Business Council of Canada also notes that “with a 30-day delay, much uncertainty remains.”

President and CEO Goldy Hyder said it remains clear that Canada must “act with urgency to improve our long-term economic prospects.”

Quebec Premier François Legault complained that “what’s annoying” about dealing with Trump “is that there’s always this sword hanging over our heads.”

He believes the events of the last few days emphasize the importance of diversifying markets and limiting Canadian dependence on American exports.

Canada has spent the last three months on a full-court press in Washington, D.C. and Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s Florida resort, trying to push its case against tariffs. Despite the pause, that work continues.

Energy and Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson will be in Washington today to deliver a speech on the future of energy in North America.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 4, 2025.

Michel Saba, The Canadian Press


VANCOUVER — Finance worker Michael Atkinson is a fan of electric cars, but lately he found himself embarrassed to drive his Tesla Model 3 around Vancouver.

Dismayed by Tesla CEO Elon Musk and his association with U.S. President Donald Trump, Atkinson now drives an electric Volkswagen ID.4 after returning his Tesla to the dealership with two months left on the lease.

The final straw was Trump’s planned tariffs on Canadian products, which struck Atkinson as a “horrible economic idea.”

“It’s gonna hurt Americans, it’s certainly going to hurt Canadians and he is using it as essentially blackmail to try to make us consider being a 51st state,” said Atkinson about the threatened tariffs.

He was speaking just before Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Trump said on Monday that the tariffs were on hold for a month.

Atkinson, who works for a credit union, is part of a wave of Canadians turning their backs on an array of American products, big and small, to express displeasure at politics and policies south of the border — most notably Trump’s tariff plan.

Andrea Mitchell said outside a supermarket in downtown Vancouver that she “did pretty good” by purchasing mushrooms grown in Canada.

“I think it’s important to show sovereignty and that we stick together. I think it’s an opportunity for us to think about our country and the value of our future,” said Mitchell, adding that Canadians are “really patriotic people.”

Mitchell said the news coming out of the U.S. made her feel that Americans don’t realize “how valuable we are as an ally,” pointing out that Canada had recently sent water bombers and firefighters to California to help battle devastating wildfires.

“These threats of taking over our country and imposing tariffs that are absolutely ridiculous … I think it’s absolutely irresponsible what they’re doing, and they’re blaming it on fentanyl crossing the border, which doesn’t make any sense,” said Mitchell, speaking before news of the tariff delay.

Fellow Vancouver shopper Rick Piccolo, also speaking before the tariff delay announcement, said he had a new habit of carefully reading product labels to make sure they were not made in the U.S.

“Trump is an idiot,” said Piccolo, “He is like a builder who has only one tool. If you’ve got a nail, he has got a hammer. You’ve got a piece of wood that needs cutting, he’s got a hammer. It’s the only thing he knows. Eventually people will get tired of him being an idiot, but people are going to suffer until that happens.”

Keri Kettle, associate professor of marketing at the University of Ottawa’s Telfer school of management, said that with groceries so expensive, and some American products cheaper than local ones, it could seem like a luxury to choose brands based on where they are manufactured.

But he said it was good to see Canadians rally around their identity by “making more conscious choices about the brands that they support.”

“Some of the provincial governments are taking very strong stances and removing U.S. from the shelf,” he said, referring to measures including the removal of some U.S. liquor from government-run stores in B.C. and Ontario.

“So, I think it’s very much driven by our identity … As a proud Canadian, I think it’s a great thing to have something like this every once in a while to remind people that they’re Canadian first and for a real strong sense of national identity for Canada.”

Atkinson said he grew increasingly displeased by Musk’s meddling in foreign politics, support for right-wing groups, and what he saw as Trump’s threats on Canadian sovereignty.

He’s now paying for his two cars, with about $1,800 left in lease payments on the Tesla while he’s paying $800 a month for the purchase of his new Volkswagen that he picked up 10 days ago.

His only disappointment is that when he went to the Tesla dealer to return his car, many others were waiting to pick up new Teslas.

Tesla does not release sales figures for Canada but rebate data from Transport Canada’s zero-emission vehicle program suggest about 33,000 Teslas received rebates in the nine months to Dec. 31. On a per-month basis, that is down about 15 per cent compared to the approximately 50,000 Teslas that received the rebates in the full 2023-2024 fiscal year.

Atkinson is now rethinking other expenditures.

“I think we should start thinking about considering not travelling to the United States … and it’s hard, I recognize that, but wherever possible, buy Canadian rather than goods imported from the U.S.,” said Atkinson.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 4, 2025.

Nono Shen, The Canadian Press