LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

WINNIPEG — The former head of Manitoba Hydro was paid just over $881,000 last year, despite being dismissed six weeks into the year.

Jay Grewal’s earnings in previous years, where she had worked a full year, ranged from $500,000 to $546,000.

The amount last year, revealed in an annual Manitoba Hydro compensation report, suggests a large lump sum payment when Grewal was let go as president and chief executive officer.

Crown-owned Manitoba Hydro is not releasing details, saying only that Grewal was paid out according to the terms of her contract and that no severance was issued.

Grewal was appointed by the former Progressive Conservative government and ruffled feathers last year when she said Manitoba would reach out to independent producers to supply power from wind and other sources.

The NDP government said new energy resources would have to be publicly owned.

The two also appeared to be at odds over the government’s aim of having Manitoba Hydro at net zero emissions by 2035.

The NDP replaced the Manitoba Hydro board soon after winning the October 2023 election, and the board parted ways with Grewal.

Grewal, who could not be reached for comment, was replaced by Allan Danroth in the summer of last year.

Danroth was paid a total of $192,454 for the months he worked, the compensation report says.

The Canadian Press applied under Manitoba’s freedom of information law last year for details of Grewal’s package after she was let go.

The request was refused under a section of the law that allows the government to not release personal information about a third party.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 2, 2025

Steve Lambert, The Canadian Press


WASHINGTON (AP) — Roughly 11.8 million adults and children will be at risk for losing health insurance if Republicans’ domestic policy package becomes a law.

The losses won’t come all at once. The GOP’s “ One Big, Beautiful Bill Act ” makes changes that will whittle away at enrollment through federal health care programs like Medicaid and Obamacare over a decade in order to wrest nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid, the Affordable Care Act, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

The bill is likely to reverse years of escalating health insurance rates in the U.S., gains that have also been marked by record spending on federally-funded health care coverage. Roughly 78 million adults and children are enrolled in Medicaid’s programs while 24 million people are enrolled in the ACA’s marketplaces.

Medicaid is a joint federal-state venture that is administered by the states. The program goes by different names in some states, like Medi-Cal in California, BadgerCare in Wisconsin, or MassHealth in Massachusetts.

A look at some of the ways in which people may lose health care coverage under the GOP’s plan:

Medicaid or Obamacare enrollee? Your income and eligibility will be checked closely and more often.

Under the GOP’s plan, states will need to verify a person’s income to check Medicaid eligibility every six months.

People who are homeless or transient may miss notices from the government to fill out paperwork more frequently, said Martha Santana-Chin, the CEO of L.A. Care Health Plan, which provides Medicaid for millions of Los Angelenos. They’ll lose their coverage if they don’t respond.

“The life experience of these individuals is not necessarily one that allows them the luxury of having to work through onerous paperwork,” Santana-Chin said.

When Texas increased income eligibility checks between 2014 and 2019, for example, thousands of kids lost coverage in the state. Critics faulted the frequent checks, too, for the state having the highest rate of uninsured children in the nation at the time.

States will also be required to check enrollees’ addresses and death records more frequently.

People enrolled in the ACA’s marketplace coverage will also be subject to more scrutiny over their reported income and face penalties if they end up earning more than they expected when signing up for the coverage. They’ll have to wait for the government to verify their information, too, before getting coverage.

It will be a sharp contrast from employer-based coverage, where people are re-enrolled every year unless they opt out.

Is your child enrolled in coverage?

States will be allowed to delay kids from enrolling in the Children’s Health Insurance Program in some cases.

They will be allowed to temporarily block parents from enrolling their children if they are behind on paying the premiums for the coverage. Those premiums for kids’ coverage can run as much as $100 a month in some states, according to health policy research firm KFF. States will also be able to introduce a waiting period for kids who are being transitioned from private health insurance plans to Medicaid.

The Biden administration prohibited states from locking out parents from enrolling their kids in coverage over missed payments or a waiting period when transitioning from private health insurance.

Are you an immigrant? Getting coverage may get harder.

The bill narrows the definition of who qualifies for lower Obamacare, restricting access for thousands of refugees and asylum seekers who come to the U.S. every year.

States that offer Medicaid coverage to cover immigrants who may not be here legally will also receive less money from the federal government. Several states allow immigrants to enroll in Medicaid, paid for only using state tax dollars. But the bill threatens that coverage by lowering the rate the federal government pays for all legal residents from 90% to 80%.

That will lead some states to drop their program for immigrants entirely rather than lose federal funding. Already, California has announced a freeze on any new enrollment for the state funded Medi-Cal for all immigrants. Illinois, meanwhile, halted its program this month.

Able-bodied? You’ll have to work, volunteer or go to school.

Most coverage losses are expected to come from the GOP’s proposed work requirement. People aged 19 through 64 will be required to work, volunteer or go to school for 80 hours per month in order to qualify for Medicaid under the new law. They’ll be exempt if they’re disabled, pregnant or parent a child who is 14 or younger.

Ultimately, some people will decide they don’t want to work and don’t need the coverage, said Michael F. Cannon, director of health policy studies at the libertarian think tank Cato Institute.

“It can encourage people who don’t value Medicaid coverage not to sign up for it,” Cannon said. “And that saves the government money.”

Most Medicaid enrollees already work, attend school, have a disability or are caregivers, which should exempt them from the requirement. Only about 8% of enrollees report not working or being unable to find work.

In some cases, people will lose coverage even if they’re working. They will fall victim to bureaucratic errors, overlooked forms, or trouble getting all of the documents — like proof of employment and tax forms — together to prove to the government that they’re working. Verifying work will be especially difficult for people who don’t have access to the internet, a computer or phones.

That’s how some people lost coverage in Arkansas, which tried to enact work requirements in 2018. Roughly 18,000 people were pushed off Medicaid within seven months. A federal judge later blocked the requirement.

Enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid? It will be harder to apply

Millions of people qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid, often because of a disability.

The GOP bill will roll back requirements of the ways the Biden administration streamlined enrollment for those people, including a rule that required states to automatically enroll people into coverage if they qualify for supplemental income because of a disability.

“By rescinding these rules and no longer requiring states to make some of these simplifications, it’s likely that some people will lose coverage because they get caught up in these paperwork burdens,” said Jennifer Tolbert, director of state health policy at KFF.

Amanda Seitz, The Associated Press




Data from Flightrader24.com shows the point where the Boeing aircraft suddenly dropped and reduced speed.

A Japan Airlines flight from Shanghai to Tokyo made an emergency landing this week after plummeting almost 8 kilometres in less than 10 minutes. Once the plane was safely on the ground, passengers were given 15,000 yen (Cdn $142) in compensation, plus a free night’s accommodation, according to reports.

According to

People magazine

, Monday’s flight JL8696 was operated by Spring Japan, a low-cost subsidiary of Japan Airlines, and was scheduled to fly from Shanghai to Tokyo, a two and a half hour journey.

However, about an hour into the flight the plane

descended rapidly

from a cruising altitude of about 11,700 metres down to just 3,000 metres while reducing its speed from 880 kph to 560 kph. It then levelled out at the new altitude and, about 45 minutes later, made an emergency landing in Osaka, Japan.

None of the 191 passengers and crew on board the Boeing 737-800 was injured. Reports said the pilots contacted air traffic controllers when the aircraft triggered an alert about an irregularity in the pressurization system that maintains cabin air pressure.

Reports noted that oxygen masks dropped from the ceiling during the descent, and that passengers feared the plane might crash.

According to the Hong Kong news site

The Standard

, one passenger said she drafted a farewell note to her husband during the descent, while another described the cabin falling eerily silent as the masks dropped and she imagined she might perish. A third recalled being on “the verge of tears” as they scribbled a will and wrote down details of their insurance and bank card PINs.

The aircraft was diverted to Kansai International Airport in Osaka and landed at about 8:50 p.m. local time. It then spent about an hour on the tarmac before passengers were able to deplane.

Spring Japan subsequently posted a

notice on its website

, cancelling the Shanghai-to-Tokyo run and its return flight for the next two days, citing “aircraft scheduling.” It apologized for the inconvenience and offered full refunds within 30 days, or no-charge rebooking in the same time period.

The Associated Press reports that an investigation into the cause of the incident has begun as of Wednesday morning. National Post has reached out to Spring Japan for more information.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


OTTAWA — The Canada Revenue Agency says taxpayers who already paid the now-defunct digital services tax will have to wait for Ottawa to pass new legislation before they can get their refund.

Prime Minister Mark Carney announced late Sunday that, in a bid to restart trade negotiations with the United States, Canada was dropping the tax on global tech giants.

The first payment was due Monday and could have cost American companies like Amazon and Uber billions of dollars.

A CRA spokesperson says the agency already collected some revenue from the digital services tax before Ottawa’s reversal but didn’t cite an amount.

MPs are now on their summer break and the spokesperson says they’ll need to pass legislation formally revoking the tax when Parliament returns in order for taxpayers to get their money back.

The CRA waived the requirement for taxpayers to file a DST return ahead of the June 30 deadline and will not ask for any related payments in the meantime.

— With files from Anja Karadeglija

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 2, 2025.

Craig Lord, The Canadian Press


OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney is set to meet with automotive sector CEOs this morning.

The sector is a key front in the trade war between the United States and Canada.

A spokeswoman for the Prime Minister’s Office said the CEOs of Ford Canada, Stellantis Canada and GM Canada will be in attendance, along with Brian Kingston of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers’ Association.

U.S. President Donald Trump has said repeatedly that the U.S. does not need Canadian cars and he wants to see automotive companies move all production to the U.S.

The U.S. has imposed 25 per cent tariffs on vehicles manufactured in Canada, with a carve-out for components built in the U.S. through the highly integrated vehicle supply chain.

Canada and the U.S. are back at the bargaining table after Trump called a halt to trade talks over Canada’s plan to impose a digital services tax on multinational tech firms — a plan the Carney government called off Sunday evening.

Carney has said he wants a new Canada-U.S. trade deal in place by July 21 and if that deadline isn’t met, he’ll boost Canadian trade countermeasures.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 2, 2025.

David Baxter, The Canadian Press


Antoinette Twiver, 28, snaps a selfie of herself with her first hormonal shot for egg freezing.

The first time Shania Bhopa considered freezing her eggs was over dessert during Christmas Day dinner with her family a couple of years ago.

Bhopa was only 24 years old at the time but already had a promising career ahead as a published children’s author, running a non-profit organization with her sister and was pursuing a PhD in global health.

Her older sister, a physician, broached the topic.

“Shania, you don’t seem like you would have kids early,” Bhopa recalls her sister saying. “But I know you’ve always wanted to be a mom. Have you ever given any consideration as to what your plan looks like?”

“No,” Bhopa replied.

Her sister asked a new question. “Well, have you thought about freezing your eggs?”

The question caught Bhopa by surprise. She had heard of egg freezing before — overhearing conversations between her sister and her friends — but until that moment had never talked about it or thought of it as a family planning or fertility option. She had always assumed egg freezing was a last resort for those who had already tried and failed to have a child by traditional means.

“Why would I be proactive when it’s a reactive procedure?” she recalled thinking. Her sister, however, was persistent and so Bhopa decided to investigate the topic.

As an academic accustomed to research, she dove deep. She read every paper she could find, and by the end of it she was convinced.

“It was kind of like just a really logical decision,” she said. “I researched, statistically, at age 35 the egg quality and count, and the risk of abnormalities there, and if that’s the age I perceive my career starting to stabilize, then I should probably freeze my eggs.”

Bhopa’s story is an unusual one and for good reason: There aren’t a lot of stories told publicly of women in their early 20s who have considered or decided to freeze their eggs as a way to preserve their fertility down the road.

Encouraged by her sister and partner, Bhopa, a well-established influencer with over 108,000 followers on Instagram and even more on TikTok, vlogged her

egg freezing journey online

and became a viral sensation for her story, hailed as the “girl who decided to freeze her eggs at 25.”

Along with her own vlogs, she has hosted Q&As, interviews with experts and inspirational reels meant to shed light on the process and educate her followers on the concept.

Looking back, Bhopa is surprised that she and her friends, many of whom are in medicine and academia, had never thought to talk about egg freezing before.

“We all have such long roads ahead of us,” she said. “In retrospect, I’m like, ‘Oh, I can’t believe none of us were talking about it.”

Egg freezing — known medically as oocyte preservation — has been in the works since the 1980s, primarily as a last resort for those undergoing major surgeries or with serious medical illnesses. Rarely was it considered as a family planning alternative. The latter, better known as social egg freezing, became more mainstream after the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) deemed the procedure “non-experimental” in 2012.

“It definitely raised the awareness that egg freezing is now commercially available,” said Dr. Ari Baratz, one of Canada’s leading fertility experts and part of the medical team at the Create Fertility Centre in Toronto. “That really sparked demand.”

In the years since, it has increasingly become an option in family planning. This has forced a re-examination of “fertility” — what that means and how it is discussed among individuals and couples, and patients and their doctors.

For those with ovaries, it has meant being able to “realize their reproductive autonomy” and providing a sense of agency in one’s own reproductive aging — in other words, being liberated from their biological clocks. For couples, both heterosexual and those within in the LGBTQ+ community, it has meant being able to be more strategic about parenthood in terms of timing or priorities such as careers or financial stability or even relationship stability.

It’s a conversation of the modern age, bolstered by lifestyle, career and societal changes. As recently as 2022, social media platforms saw a surge of videos, vlogs and posts shared on the topic, by doctors looking to educate, and by people who have gone through the process and wanted to share their experiences.

Reproductive rights were hotly contested during the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Donald Trump made headlines when he proposed expanding access to invitro fertilization (IVF) treatments by having them paid for either by government or by insurance companies, a move criticized by some conservative groups for the practice of discarding unused embryos after a successful live birth via IVF.

The U.S. president issued an executive order in February to expand IVF access, although it’s unclear how long it could take to see changes to out-of-pocket costs.

Any conversation about reproductive rights comes with ethical quandaries, and in the case of egg freezing, it’s the thorny matter of “biological insurance.” What level of autonomy does it truly offer those considering it?

“I don’t think we’re completely going to put the brakes on fertility,” Baratz said, adding that egg freezing was always meant to be viewed as a way to “augment the ability to have a baby or even a larger family.”

The ‘stigma’

Bhopa is no stranger to the spotlight. As a child, she acted in television shows and currently teaches a curriculum on artificial intelligence. “I always did public stuff,” she said.

Her persona on social media, before posting about her egg freezing, was “more guarded,” she said. “This is the place where I have to be professional.”

If it hadn’t been for her sister and her boyfriend encouraging her, Bhopa said she wouldn’t have considered sharing her egg-freezing story on a public platform.

Bhopa recalled her sister telling her: “You know, when I was your age, I just wish I had someone to look up to, to even start this conversation.”

Her boyfriend, also a physician, had stressed that being vocal about her journey would be “pushing so many barriers for women.”

“For example,” Bhopa adds, “talking about not having kids right after you get married or not having to get married right after you’ve done school, and just pushing the gender norms that are often circulated.”

She was initially reluctant — “I was very, very, very hesitant to share this journey online,” Bhopa explained in a YouTube video. “It’s a very intimate thing.” But she decided to

share her journey

to encourage more open conversations around fertility and family planning and postponing pregnancy.

“I think that fertility, women’s health and planning for a family can be quite taboo for very many people and many cultures worldwide,” she continued. “And breaking down that stigma a little bit and opening up the conversation about fertility … and taking control and being empowered about making the plans necessary, to allow you to feel comfortable about your decisions.”

It was the same stigma and lack of public conversation that kept Missy Modell, an American comedian, influencer and businesswoman from deciding to go through egg freezing until her late 30s.

“The reason I waited so long was because I didn’t see anyone captured in this way … like, the day-to-day,” she said. “I run a company. I have to be high functioning. I was also terrified of doing that to myself. What are the hormones going to do to me?”

Like Bhopa, Modell decided to publicly vlog her journey to push back against the social stigma and take control of the conversation.

“I was terrified to freeze my eggs because of all the unknowns and questions and shame and insert my excuse,” she posted to

her stories on Instagram

on the first day of her egg-freezing journey. “I wanted to pull back the curtain and hope that if some people were really on the fence for reasons that had nothing to do with the outcome … I wanted to help people feel comfortable with it.”

The stigma, while much less palpable than it might have been five or 10 years ago, “is not completely smashed,” Baratz said. “Obviously, it is still a personal issue.”

In 2018, U.K. researchers interviewed 31 women who had undergone egg freezing to better understand their experiences. “Few women perceived freezing as involving physical risks,” the researchers wrote. “However, many participants reported the process of egg freezing as emotionally challenging, primarily linked to feelings of isolation and stigma due to their single status.”

A 2021 Canadian study yielded similar results. It found that 89 per cent of the 224 women who took part said they chose to freeze their eggs because they were single and had not yet found a partner.

By the time social egg freezing arrived on the scene, a woman was statistically more likely to have her first child by the age of 28, according to Statistics Canada — a noticeable jump from the 1970s, when a woman would typically have her first child by the age of 24.

However, unlike men, who remain fertile long into their senior years, a woman’s fertility peaks between her teen years and late 20s, and is likely to decline after age 30, presenting a conundrum for those looking to balance their professional lives with their desire for parenthood.

For those looking to further their careers without the fear of running out the biological clock, social egg freezing became an attractive opportunity to have it all. Initially, women, mostly in their late 30s and 40s, attended consultations, information sessions and “egg-freezing cocktail parties” hosted by fertility clinics wanting to rebrand egg freezing as something positive, rather than a bleak last resort.

“Originally, it started as a way for the older demographic of people with ovaries to hold on to their fertility,” said Carolynn Dube, the executive director for Fertility Matters Canada. “And people still use it for that reason now, but we’re seeing a younger group of people considering it for future use. It’s like an insurance plan.”

Jeanette Chen, 40, who works in human resources, said she first considered freezing her eggs a decade ago, around the time of a big breakup.

The breakup, she said, played a part, but her decision to pursue egg freezing was largely motivated by age. Chen was turning 28 and getting older meant becoming more conscious of “social conventions” around marriage and motherhood, as well as thinking about her fertility aging, she said.

However, the newness of the idea and lack of access around it curtailed her understanding of what egg freezing really meant. “I knew this idea of egg freezing existed, conceptually what it was like and what it was intended for,” she said of her conversations with friends back then. “Some of my friends might say, ‘Oh, I’m thinking about egg freezing,’ but that’s it. It’s like a blanket statement.”

By the time she finally decided to go ahead with the process at 38, the scene had shifted substantially, she said. Several of her friends had frozen their eggs, either as part of an IVF treatment or otherwise. “I do think it’s a bit better now because people are more open about it,” Chen added.

Access to information, both socially and regionally, can play a big role in an individual’s understanding and willingness to talk openly about fertility, Dube explained. For big urban centres such as Toronto and Montreal, the conversation might be more prominent than in less-populated regions, where access to fertility specialists and clinics may not be as easy.

“It’s still a relatively new process in a lot of parts of the country outside of these bigger cities,” Dube explained. “I think just having access to the knowledge and experts geographically is one piece.”

Dube notes the surge in conversations about egg freezing online, especially among young professionals. “But openly sharing it, especially in a place where an employer or a potential employer could find you, is problematic,” she said. “Because it opens you up to someone saying, ‘Oh, she’s thinking about having children someday,’ and you’re internally thinking about how that might impact your growth at the company.”

Bhopa acknowledged that much of her own hesitation to share her story came from the same place. “I’m going to be an academic and have students and colleagues and principal investigators for grants that could potentially

see this

,” she said.

Even among friends and acquaintances, the subject isn’t exactly a trending topic. Antoinette Twiver said she learned about egg freezing in university while watching an episode of The Mindy Project, a popular sitcom on the life of a lovelorn gynecologist. She didn’t know how many of her own friends had considered or had gone through the process until she made the decision to freeze her own eggs at age 29, in 2023.

She was “surprised” when she learned a number of friends “have been going through this process as well and maybe not sharing it.”

Twiver, who has a following of over 42,000 on TikTok, shared her experience on her TikTok to help others learn more about the process — “if this video helps even one person learn a little bit about the process then it would be worth it,” she said.

“I do think that it is something that is tiptoed around a bit,” Chen said. “It’s a hard topic for people to initiate because people aren’t sure about the circumstances of the other people.”

The medical side of egg freezing

For close to 20 years, Dr. Sony Sierra has worked in the medical field as a reproductive endocrinologist and infertility specialist. The physician is deputy medical director with TRIO fertility, a chain of fertility clinics in the Greater Toronto Area that receives patients for a range of fertility issues.

She has seen the conversation around egg freezing and preserving fertility change dramatically in the years since the ASRM ruling to deem the procedure as non-experimental.

“Ten years ago, I barely did egg-freezing cases,” she said. “And now it’s hugely busy, our egg-freezing program. And I think a lot of it comes from the knowledge of it being an option.”

Before the ASRM 2012 decision, doctors and experts largely viewed the procedure as reactive rather than proactive, mostly suggested in cases of infertility or a serious illness or major surgery that could impact a person’s fertility.

Since the ruling, the number of cases around the country has soared — from 94 in 2013 to more than 1,500 in 2022, according to CARTR, a Canadian database that tracks fertility procedures performed in Canada.

Ten years ago, less than two per cent of patients who visited Sierra’s clinic came to consult or pursue egg freezing. By 2022, 15 per cent of patients visiting TRIO planned to pursue egg freezing, prompting the team to open

EVOLVE

, Canada’s first egg-freezing clinic, in March 2023.

As part of

the process,

a woman injects herself daily, for two weeks, in the belly or upper thighs with hormonal drugs to stimulate her ovaries to produce around 10 to 15 mature eggs. The more eggs to freeze, the more likely one of those eggs, once thawed, will be fertilized with sperm and lead to a pregnancy.

Once the optimal size and number of eggs has been generated, the eggs are retrieved from the ovaries via an ultrasound-guided needle, flash-frozen and stored in tanks of liquid nitrogen.

“We (get) about 200 inquiries a month,” Sierra said. “And that’s just people picking up the phone or emailing through the website. That doesn’t include physician referrals that come from doctors and gynecologists out there in the field.”

Opening up a separate clinic, she explained, allowed the team to be more proactive in offering support to people reluctant to come to a typical fertility lab, “where there are married couples who are very stressed out trying to conceive,” Sierra explained. “A waiting room in a fertility clinic, it’s a different environment.”

Reproductive awareness

Fertility education is a relatively new concept. As recently as 2017, the term “fertility awareness” was introduced as a definition in the International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care.

The fertility conversation, Baratz explained, has long focused around the don’ts rather than the dos. “A lot of sexual health education is based around infection prevention and healthy lifestyle, but also avoiding unwanted pregnancy. … We’ve forgotten how to turn that message off.”

Medical providers have become more aware of the proactive role they have to play in discussions with patients, he said, initiating conversations about reproductive health and asking questions such as, “Have you thought about how you’re going to approach building your family?”

Medical professionals are increasingly being invited to universities and schools to talk to younger people about their reproductive health and to heighten awareness around fertility. And more than 50 private fertility clinics have popped up across the country providing resources to individuals looking for fertility consultations.

The conversations about egg freezing, however, have an added layer of complexity. Not only are there the details of the process — the costs, the side-effects of hormone treatment, the risks — decisions must be made on how the eggs will be used and stored.

Baratz said that means asking a patient if they have a plan for their eggs: Do they plan to use the eggs as a first or last resort when trying to have a child? Are they able to afford the cost of yearly storage? How many children do they plan to have, with or without the eggs? Have they considered other alternatives to fertility planning?

“In a responsible consultation, egg freezing is just a handle to discuss the full spectrum of what’s available.”

It also means addressing the popular perception of egg freezing as biological insurance — “that’s part of informed consent,” Baratz added.

Maybe, baby

Freezing your eggs, experts stress, does not guarantee the birth of a child. The overall success rate of egg freezing can depend on any number of factors, such as a person’s age and the number and quality of eggs retrieved. It’s also possible for eggs to not survive the thawing process or not be successfully fertilized by sperm.

At EVOLVE, the rule of thumb is, the more, the better. “For example, individuals aged 30 to 34 have an 80 per cent chance or higher of a live birth later. In contrast, freezing between two and eight eggs results in a 20 to 52 per cent chance of a live birth,” the clinic explains on its website.

“At the same time, with increasing age, research shows it may take more frozen eggs to achieve a successful pregnancy”.

The American Society of Reproductive Medicine issued the same caution when announcing their decision to drop the “experimental” label — that the procedure is not a guarantee for having a baby.

“We think we should proceed cautiously in using this as an elective technique, especially in older patients,” stated Dr. Eric Widra, chairman of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology practice committee in 2012.

“There is an inherent conflict between the desire to freeze eggs and the need to freeze eggs. Freezing eggs for the future sounds like a good insurance policy but may not be an insurance policy that needs to be cashed in,” he stated.

Baratz chooses his words carefully when describing the risks and benefits of the procedure. “It can be referred to as biological insurance with big quotes around it, because that may not solve the story,” he said. “What we always tell you as part of the consent process is that you’re doing this as part of your fertility journey.”

And, compared to other procedures, which may involve greater medical risks, egg freezing is a relatively safe procedure, Baratz added.

“So, the downside is very minimal, other than the cost of the procedure … But if they’re in the right demographic where it’s feasible, it’s a great option.”

Insurance and the costs of egg freezing

For many, being able to afford the cost of freezing eggs is where the barrier to access comes in.

Below Bhopa’s TikTok video — titled, “4 takeaways after freezing my eggs at 25” — the most common question asked was about the cost.

“How much did this cost? I’m thinking of doing this?” one user asked.

“What’s the cost?” asked Leslie&Mj.

“How much was it? Does your insurance cover it?” a TikTok user who goes by Kathleen posted.

In a separate video, Bhopa broke down the costs of her egg freezing process. “Eighty per cent of my medication was covered by insurance,” she explained in the video, “but the total cost without insurance would have been $4,000.”

“My procedure was not covered by insurance, but for a lot of people it is,” she said, adding that the cost for her egg retrieval came to $9,750, which included the fees for storing the eggs for five years — $500 per year, according to Bhopa, who displayed her invoices in the background of the video as she detailed the costs of the process.

“So, the actual cost of the procedure alone, including anesthetic and everything like that, is $7,000.”

Bhopa went on to explain that she was able to afford it by getting a second job that same year and “saving up extremely well.”

“It’s an investment like any other and I’m really empowered by it,” she added.

But she acknowledged that without insurance covering the cost of medication, she would not have been able to afford the service. “That was my main driver,” she said in an interview with Postmedia.

Likewise, Twiver said she was “lucky to be able to tap into” her company’s health insurance benefits, which includes egg freezing.

Without insurance, Twiver said the entire cost would have come to $12,000, for the procedure and medication. If insurance wasn’t available, Twiver said she would have relied on support from her family, but “having access via coverage obviously made the decision much easier.”

In the past decade, Canadian and U.S. companies, mostly in banking and tech, have added fertility benefits to their employees’ insurance coverage.

Some Canadian banks now offer up to $60,000 in fertility treatments to be accessed over a lifetime, according to a report by Fertility Matters Canada. The Bank of Montreal increased the lifetime maximum for fertility drugs to $20,000 and reimburses employees $20,000 each in fertility treatment and surrogacy expenses. RBC and TD offer similar coverage plans with $20,000 for fertility treatments and medication, up to a lifetime maximum of $60,000, while CIBC recently began covering $15,000 for treatment drugs, to a lifetime maximum of $30,000. Scotiabank offers $10,000 in coverage for fertility treatment in addition to medication, and $10,000 for surrogacy expenses, for a maximum lifetime benefit of $30,000.

Big technology companies such as Google, Meta, Amazon and Microsoft are leading the way in offering fertility coverage to their employees. Snap is among the most generous, with workers eligible for up to $65,000 in fertility and adoption coverage through Carrot Fertility, and up to $130,000 toward surrogacy expenses.

On the one hand, these company policies can be a big plus for employees interested in the service who fear emptying their bank accounts. And it can be a stress-reliever for women looking to balance their careers with future parenthood.

“If the cost of the investment is no longer an element to be taken into consideration, even women who are less worried about finding a partner ‘in time’ may become interested in banking, which will lower the average age and thus raise the quality of the banked eggs,” Heidi Mertes, an associate professor in medical ethics at Ghent University, wrote in a 2015 paper.

On the other hand, it can promote a bias around egg freezing as the golden ticket out of the claws of the biological clock and encourage women, sometimes “against their better judgment” to defer parenthood in lieu of a better professional reputation, Mertes wrote.

For those without the option of insurance, or a big enough bank account, costs remain a major barrier.

“My initial reaction was just pure shock,” Sehrish Qureshi, 31, said of her reaction when she researched the costs of egg freezing for herself. “I was highly disappointed, of course. And then anger … I’m not expecting it to be affordable, because it’s a luxury service, but up to $35,000 a year? That’s definitely not what I was expecting.”

She said the cost of the service put her off wanting to explore the idea. “I just never looked at it again.”

High costs are partly why it’s more common to see individuals in their mid- to late 30s look to egg freezing rather than those in their 20s, Baratz said.

“If someone was going to have to make significant financial decisions on whether to do egg freezing or not, then I would discourage them. But if it’s feasible, it’s a great option,” he said.

For Bhopa,

the road to freezing her eggs

was an arduous and expensive one, but she has no regrets. “I can’t control time, but I can control what I do with my time,” she said in a YouTube video.

“I only want children when I know I have the time for it. I just don’t think the career goals I have over the next couple of years are feasible in regard to my biological clock … knocking on my door.”


Happy Canada Day! As we enjoyed the annual celebration of our great country, complete with food, fireworks and plenty of fun, I decided to do what I like to occasionally do: shifted gears and focused on something different. Let’s deviate away from the (ahem) looniness of Canadian politics and explore the zaniness of animation and comics!

It’s only right that we start off with two older Canadian titles I was re-reading recently.

Karen Mazurkewich’s Cartoon Capers: The History of Canadian Animators is still one of the finest examinations of our local animation industry. There’s some analysis of great National Film Board animated shorts like The Log Driver’s WaltzThe Big Snit and Bob’s Birthday, successful animated TV series/specials like Tales of the Wizard of OzBabarand The Raccoons, and Canadian connections to Snow White, Elmer the Elephant and Bugs Bunny. “Insiders joke that Canucks are the gypsy kings of the animated world,” Mazurkewish wrote in the Introduction, but in fact, “Canadians are flexing their graphic muscle in every major international studio.”

Chester Brown’s Louis Riel: A Comic Strip Biography remains one of the more fascinating graphic novels ever produced in this country. It started as a ten-issue serialization published by Drawn & Quarterly between 1999 to 2003, and exploded in popularity when it was published in book form. Brown’s scholarly examination of Riel’s life as a politician and radical Métis leader includes historical references and an extensive series of endnotes from primary and secondary sources. Few graphic novels have ever come close to achieving this high standard.

Let’s move on to other books.

The University Press of Mississippi produces some of the most intelligent opinions and analyses of animation and comic strips. Two books that I recently requested fit this description perfectly. (My thanks to Courtney McCreary.)

Katherine Moeder’s Wide Awake in Slumberland: Fantasy, Mass Culture, and Modernism in the Art of Winsor McCayis a superb exploration into the art and mindset of one of the world’s greatest cartoonists. Her in-depth study of McCay’s magical and highly imaginative comic strip, Little Nemo in Slumberland, is a joy to behold. Moeder suggested that his seminal work “attempted to broaden the audience for comics in several critical ways.” In particular, the strip’s main characters are “situated within a spectrum of childhood types defined in part by class.” Nemo is a “middle-class child of the suburbs,” for instance, and a “perpetual innocent, reminiscent of the gentle dreamers by Jessie Wilcox Smith, with his tousled hair and wide declarations of ‘Oh!,’ – he remains from week to week in a constant state of wonder.” Flip, a clown who is the “mischievous, cynical, cigar-smoking friend” of Nemo’s, has personality traits that distinctly resemble the “trickster street urchins embodied by the Yellow Kid.”

What about Impie, the young African jungle imp who befriends Nemo, Flip and the Princess of Slumberland? He speaks a “gibberish language” and is a stereotypical character whose “exaggerated features recall the theatrical blackface of minstrel performers.” This type of character would be frowned upon in today’s society, but was viewed in a different light in McCay’s time. This racialized example of “boyhood savagery was uplifted as both normal and necessary” and understood to be “an essential step in the journey to productive manhood.” Plus ça change, indeed.

Jean Lee Cole’s How the Other Half Laughs: The Comic Sensibility in American Culture, 1895-1920 is an equally thought-provoking analysis of the evolution of comic strip humour. There was a fundamental switch to a “particularly grotesque form of the comic sensibility” in this time period. George Luks, a talented artist and cartoonist with a Bohemian flair who used “‘schematic,’ suggestive sketching rather than close observation” to help readers “imagine what was happening,” spearheaded the early development of comic grotesque. His colleague Richard F. Outcault, creator of the brilliant Hogan’s Alley and The Yellow Kid, drew ethnic working-class scenes involving young children. His strips were dominated with text that was “written on objects – signs, boxes, fences, the Yellow Kid’s shirt – rather than being spoken by the characters themselves” and enabled the words to “act as labels, applied by Outcault, the mediating consciousness.” Cole also looked at the work of Rudolph Dirks, George Herriman, William Glackens and others to show how they influenced the “New Humour” movement in the newspaper funnies.

Let’s close things out with Fantagraphics, one of America’s finest comics publishers. (My thanks to Eric Reynolds and Tucker Stone.)

Rick Geary and Mathew Klickstein’s Daisy Goes to the Moon: A Daisy Ashford Adventure is an exquisite and unique comic volume. Ashford, an English writer whose most famous work was the 1919 novella The Young Visiters, served as the inspiration for a fantastical journey on a “rokitship.” She met a unique cast of characters, including a “rarther quear fellow” from the Moon named Zogolbythm, Servette the Robot, Mr. B. Blahdel and, in a strange twist, a second Daisy! Her adventure took many twists and turns, to the point where Daisy remarked, “So am I writing this story or is it writing me?”

There’s also Walt Disney’s Donald Duck Adventures Mini Collectionfeaturing the work of legendary cartoonist Carl Barks. Three of his classic comics, Ghost of the GrottoSheriff of Bullet Valley and The Golden Helmet, are included in this set. Barks, along with Don Rosa, was the most well-recognized illustrator of Donald Duck. He also created Scrooge McDuck, the wealthy “adventure-capitalist” who still ranks among the most memorable of Disney characters. All three stories hold up well, including my personal favourite, The Golden Helmet, which involves a search by Donald and his three nephews, Huey, Dewey and Louie, to find an ancient Viking helmet located somewhere on the coast of Labrador, Canada.

Comics on Canada Day? Why not, eh?

Michael Taube, a long-time newspaper columnist and political commentator, was a speechwriter for former Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


This content is restricted to subscribers

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Republican leaders in the House are sprinting toward a Wednesday vote on President Donald Trump’s tax and spending cuts package, determined to seize momentum from a hard-fought vote in the Senate while essentially daring members to defy their party’s leader and vote against it. It’s a risky gambit designed to meet Trump’s demand for a July 4 finish.

Here’s the latest:

Trump urges House Republicans to vote for his tax and spending cuts package

The encouragement comes as the Republican-controlled House sprints toward a vote Wednesday on the bill after it cleared the Senate by the narrowest of margins a day earlier.

Vice President JD Vance, in his role as Senate president, cast the tie-breaking vote on the measure.

Some House GOP members have voiced reservations about the bill. House Democrats are united in their opposition to the legislation.

“Republicans, don’t let the Radical Left Democrats push you around. We’ve got all the cards, and we are going to use them,” Trump said in a post on his social media site.

The Associated Press




Prime Minister Mark Carney winked at the start of his Oval Office meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump. And at the recent G7 leader's summit in Alberta, Carney, who had been watching Trump speak, turned his head slightly toward someone behind the camera and winked with his left eye.

The prime minister is a habitual winker. Once is once, two is a coincidence, three is a trend, and National Post counts at least four prominent public winks by

Mark Carney

since winning the top office — in Rideau Hall at his swearing in, in the Oval Office, and twice at the

G7

in Kananaskis, Alta. — plus many more going back to his governorship of the Bank of England.

Are these winks deliberate or have they become second nature? Do they mean something? Must they always? If they do, why not just say it? If they don’t, why risk causing misunderstanding or diplomatic insult? Winking around U.S. President

Donald Trump

, which accounts for three of the above examples, especially has an air of recklessness that clashes with Carney’s steady hands image.

A wink seems private even when it is public. It exudes self confidence, but it can seem sly. It can undermine carefully chosen words. It can literally mean “I am lying.” But it can also mean “I’ve got this.”

A wink as Carney does it “communicates a level of comfort with the idea of being noticed,” said Stewart Prest, lecturer in political science at the University of British Columbia. “But it could spiral badly if it is misconstrued.”

At the recent G7 leader’s summit, for example, after lamenting Russia’s absence, Trump was answering a question about what was holding up a trade deal with Canada. “I have a tariff concept,” he said. “Mark has a different concept, which is something that some people like.”

Just then, at this awkward backhand compliment, Carney, who had been watching Trump speak, turned his head slightly toward someone behind the camera and

winked with his left eye

, which pulled the corner of his lip up into the briefest hint of a smile that threatened to become a smirk.

Soon after, Trump was leaving the summit and talking to the media alongside Carney and French President Emmanuel Macron. Just as Trump said they got a lot done, including a U.S. trade deal with the U.K., Carney looked away from Trump toward Macron and winked,

this time with his right eye

, but with the same risky ripple of humour crossing his face.

Some people wink at what they say themselves. Carney just as often winks at what other people say, and not to the speaker, but to their audience.

Prest’s view is that Carney’s winks in Trump’s presence are typical of his style, in that they operate on three levels. This offers a theoretical framework for how to understand Carney winks in general, what they mean, and who they are for, he said.

At one level, Carney is communicating with Trump, in public, quietly listening to him. At a higher level he is communicating with Macron about Trump, in a sort of privacy, signalling an internal reaction to Trump’s words that Carney has decided not to vocalize. At the highest level he is communicating with the all-seeing public on the other side of the camera lens, indicating his comfort in playing all these etiquette games at the same time.

“It’s a high-wire act,” said Prest. “If it goes badly, it could go very badly.”

He needs to be careful that the wink includes the public, not excludes it. “The subtext always has to bring the public along,” Prest said. They need to know what Carney is trying to communicate, that he is confidently in control, and they also have to believe him. Otherwise it’s just a cocky facial tic.

Some winks are simple, obvious. Some winks need to be accounted for more deeply. Winks are almost always ambiguous, but sometimes they mean something important. Criminal court judges have faced this problem more than most. For example, in a 2017 murder case against a Richmond Hill, Ont., man accused of beating his roommate to death, a judge had to decide whether to let a witness testify about the meaning of a wink, and was troubled by its uncertain air of “innuendo.”

A friend of the victim had told police he had seen bruising on the victim’s ribs a couple of weeks before the killing, so he asked what happened. The victim explained he fell down the stairs, or off his bike, but then he winked, and when the friend asked what that meant, the victim said “Kenny’s got a hard punch,” referring to the accused.

The key problem, the judge said, was that it was not clear the victim winked and spoke at the exact same time, such that the wink directly contradicted the claim of falling down the stairs, and implied that the truth was Kenny punched him. It wasn’t clear “whether the wink and the comment were part of a single, ongoing transaction.”

That jury never heard the wink story, and eventually found the accused guilty of manslaughter, not murder.

Winks have been admitted as criminal evidence, however, such as in the 2017 Montreal case of the undercover police agent who testified about getting a “101 course” in robbery of shopping mall jewellery stores from the suspected culprit that was so convincing, so finely detailed, that the undercover officer asked whether the suspect had actually ever robbed the target store he was describing, in the Carrefour Laval.

The accused laughed, winked, and said “no,” which the undercover took as “an implicit admission that the accused had indeed robbed the store in the past.”

So sometimes a wink can mean the opposite of what was just said, that I did not fall off my bike, that I did rob this jewellery store. What I have just said is not true, wink wink. You’ll just have to trust me, and I know you will.

 

 Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney winks during a press conference at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa on Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013.

For a national leader’s voting public, that strategy works until it doesn’t, Prest said. Carney is in something of a honeymoon phase, and his current winking spree coincides with surging approval numbers in his first months as prime minister. He can wink and trust that he will be understood in good faith. But that can change.

When she profiled Carney for the Sunday Times in 2020, as he took the United Nations job as Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance, Charlotte Edwardes told the amusing story of being on a group tour with him through a Picasso exhibit at the Tate Modern in London, led by a curator who kept pointing out hidden penises in the Cubist paintings, and on the fifth or sixth one (a reclining woman whom the curator explained had a penis extending from her head) she caught Carney’s eye and “corpsed,” which is to say she laughed at this inappropriate moment. He joked about it afterwards in a deadpan: “Are you absolutely sure that you could see the penises?” She did not mention whether he said so with a wink, but it seems possible, and later in the piece, she said Carney told her he took the job of governor of the Bank of England because he likes a challenge, and he said so “with a wink.”

Could the winking thus be a bit de trop? Could it get creepy? Or cheesy? With the accumulation of political baggage, could Carney’s winks ever grow as stale as Justin Trudeau’s novelty socks?

“The wink will be perceived as Mr. Carney is perceived,” Prest said.

So, maybe. One day, the winks might turn sour. It would only be then that the leader with a “winking problem,” as the

National Post’s John Ivison once called it

, becomes a winker with a leading problem. Until then, Prest said, Carney seems to be pulling it off.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.