LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

Zohran Mamdani, Democratic candidate for mayor, leaves a press conference celebrating his primary victory with leaders and members of the city's labor unions on July 2, 2025 in New York. (Photo by ANGELA WEISS/AFP via Getty Images)

Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani is on a mission to bring race socialism to New York City. That is not speculation, it’s in his public campaign platform.

“Shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighbourhoods.”

Were it a throwaway line designed to appeal to unhappy, dyed-hair baristas and the local faculty lounges, Mamdani might have quietly removed it, but it turns out that it is essential to his vision. When called out on it on live television, he

doubled down

on the policy while bewilderingly denying it was race-based.

“That is just a description of what we see right now. It’s not driven by race. It’s more of an assessment of what neighbourhoods are being under-taxed versus over-taxed,” Mamdani stated on NBC News.

Despite the blatant attempt at gaslighting, this could be the start of a tremendous shift in global left-wing politics, considering the influence of the United States. The buildup to race socialism has been decades in the making, and Mamdani could be the politician to make it mainstream.

These ideas have been gaining traction in the West, including in Canada.

The far-left publication Canadian Dimension

published

a column in February that called for a wealth tax and explicitly linked it to race: “It’s no secret that extreme wealth in western democracies is overwhelmingly held by white people, and Canada is no exception.”

There is even a

“critical tax theory”

movement arising in North America that argues that white taxpayers should pay higher rates in the name of equity.

For those who want a policy of racial socialism and revolution in the West, Mamdani is their role model for the foreseeable future. If New Yorkers want to consign themselves to stagnation, racial animosity and more bad governance, that is their decision. The burden is on everyone else to reject race socialism wherever it arises.

There is no doubt that Mamdani is a charismatic figure, with a readily deployable smile and a soft millennial bearing that makes him appear rather harmless. It is an excellent shield for a man whose ideology strays sharply from that of Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, or even Barack Obama.

For all his faults, it is clear that Obama has

at least a basic,

albeit very critical, respect for the American Founding Fathers and the country’s constitutional principles. Mamdani’s

thinking

has been

deeply shaped

by his family, who are heavyweights in the world of far-left academia.

His father in particular, Mahmood Mamdani, is one of the western world’s more well-known scholars in the field of “postcolonial studies,” with a special interest in Africa.

The Africa Report, an award-winning quarterly focusing on the continent’s current affairs,

reported

in June that the Mamdanis were awash with “diasporic intellectualism, where ideas about justice, decolonization and identity were household conversations.”

How exactly did decolonization play out in Africa following the collapse of European rule? There was great enthusiasm for wealth redistribution and the scapegoating of ethnic minorities, led by charismatic figures like Uganda’s Idi Amin and Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe.

Following the British departure in 1962, Idi Amin demonized and

purged

the country’s mostly South Asian merchant class in the 1970s, Mamdani’s father among them. Their businesses were expropriated, and their assets confiscated.

In the 1980s in Zimbabwe, formerly Rhodesia, Robert Mugabe

seized the lands

of the remaining white farmers in an attempt to loot and redistribute the wealth associated with it.

Concurrent to that, Mugabe began a

violent repression

of the country’s sizable Ndebele minority, whom he accused of subversion and sabotage. It resulted in the deaths of up to 30,000 Zimbabwean citizens.

The Ndebele remember it as a time when their people were singled out and slaughtered. Mahmood Mamdani

described this period

as one of “massive social change,” in which “very little turmoil” took place. For those who champion decolonization, the violent cleansing of certain ethnic groups is immaterial if it furthers the cause.

According to Africa Report,

his son Zohran would be

“the first to carry the intellectual legacy of postcolonial Africa into the political heart of the West.”

Right now, the West’s cultural zeitgeist is perfectly aligned for the arrival of this sort of decolonial race socialism in New York City.

It is impossible to ignore the newly emerged, constructed narrative of the “colonizers” and the “colonized.” Resentment and the assignment of ancestral guilt are at the core of it, and it has spread throughout the English-speaking world.

Statues of explorers, monarchs and historical business and political leaders are common targets for radicals who despise the countries they helped to found. They have been toppled, smashed or vandalized in Victoria, Hamilton, and Melbourne, usually without legal repercussions.

This fabricated Indigenous-colonizer conflict is not only permissible, but given space in respectable society across Australia, Canada and even Britain. The hustlers are given

prime- time

television slots or

academic tenure

to vent, and usually receive polite nods from the presenters in return.

In America, Zohran Mamdani’s rise to political stardom is where this wave of racial politics meets the socialist revival spearheaded by

Bernie Sanders

and

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

, who have wholeheartedly endorsed him.

The politics of the English-speaking world have always been connected, and the United States is its most powerful engine for driving new narratives. Mamdani’s team are

artful practitioners

of social media, and his presence is felt well beyond the U.S.

Already, Canadian NDP politicians like

Marit Stiles

and MP

Leah Gazan

are falling over each other trying to heap praise upon him.

Gazan, a leading voice

for radical decolonial

, anti-Western politics in Ottawa, posted on X: “Zohran Mamdani’s victory in New York is an inspiring example for how progressives can stand up to establishment liberals or authoritarians like Trump.”

Is it truly sticking it to Trump that has got Gazan and her ilk so fired up, or is it something else?

The majority of people in the U.S., Canada and its peer countries must have the courage to say no to race socialism, with strength and without fear.

National Post


Swimmer Lia Thomas holds a trophy after finishing first in the 500 free at the NCAA Womens Swimming and Diving Championships at Georgia Tech in March 2022.

Money talks, and when the sum being discussed is $175 million it starts speaking the language of common sense.

The University of Pennsylvania has — finally — been forced to see reason over Lia Thomas, the controversial transgender athlete who was allowed to compete against female swimmers.

In an embarrassing climbdown, the university has settled a civil rights case with the Department of Education by: apologizing to female athletes “disadvantaged” by Thomas taking part in swimming competitions; restoring individual records and titles to female athletes who lost to Thomas; sending a personalized apology to each of those female swimmers; agreeing it will not allow males to compete in female athletic programs and adopting a “biology-based” definition of male and female.

It was total capitulation.

“The University will not — on the basis of sex — exclude female students from participation in, deny female students the benefits of, or subject female students to discrimination under, any athletics programs,” reads a

statement

posted to the university’s website on Tuesday.

Crucially, it went on to say, “In addition, in providing to female student-athletes intimate facilities such as locker rooms and bathrooms in connection with Penn Athletics, such facilities shall be strictly separated on the basis of sex and comparably provided to each sex.”

Great, female locker rooms for women. Why was that ever a battle?

The issue of transgender athletes competing against women was always so much more than that, although that in itself mattered. It opened the door not just to unfairness in sport, but access to female spaces like locker rooms, prisons and rape shelters.

This wasn’t just about discrimination, but about how half the population was suddenly vulnerable to the depredations of anyone who wished to declare themselves a woman.

That’s not to accuse transgender people of being sex pests. It is, unfortunately, a recognition that too many predatory men will use whatever means necessary, even posing as a woman, to put themselves in a position where they can abuse women.

If the debate about transgender people had been less strident from the beginning, if supporters had adopted less of an all or nothing principle — all trans women are women — we might have come to a compromise or a reasonable accommodation.

But for trans activists, a simple misgendering was grounds to label you some kind of vocal terrorist.

Moved by “compassion” some people lost their collective minds.

In Scotland, they sent a double

rapist

to a women’s prison. That’s not compassion, that’s being willfully blind to the danger of putting such a dangerous criminal in the presence of women prisoners. It is the triumph of culture war activism over the virtue of common sense.

The University of Pennsylvania was able to parade its transgender credentials by allowing Thomas to compete against women. But it was always unfair.

Thomas went from a

ranking

of 554th in the 200 men’s freestyle in the 2018-19 season to being one of the top-ranked female swimmers in that event.

In 2022, Thomas won the women’s 500 freestyle at the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) championships, finished fifth in the women’s 200 freestyle and eighth in the women’s 100 freestyle.

While the transgender athlete had supporters, there were also detractors who complained about Thomas competing as well as using the female

locker rooms

.

Why is it always the women who have to suffer? The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is now

investigating

because a school in Denver converted a female restroom into an all-gender restroom. Boys, however, still get exclusive use of a male restroom.

Under the Biden administration, academia could get away with such conduct. But the Trump administration was always going to be different.

U.S. President Donald Trump has pledged to crack down on diversity, equity and inclusion policies and use Title IX (which prevents sex discrimination in education) to support women.

It was Title IX that landed Penn university in trouble. The Education Department threatened to withhold $175 million in federal funds from the university unless it complied with the law.

In a

statement

in March, Penn President Larry Jameson pledged, “We expect to continue to engage with OCR, vigorously defending our position.”

But he folded almost as fast as Prime Minister Mark Carney on the Digital Services Tax.

This week, the university said it would comply with two executive orders from Trump. The first,

Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government

, decries “efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex” because it deprives women “of their dignity, safety, and well-being.”

The second,

Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports

, states, “It shall also be the policy of the United States to oppose male competitive participation in women’s sports more broadly, as a matter of safety, fairness, dignity, and truth.”

In a statement, Jameson said the institution was only following the rules at that time, but would now, “apologize to those who experienced a competitive disadvantage or experienced anxiety because of the policies in effect.”

It was a craven statement that sought to deflect responsibility to those damnable rules at the time. It’s a pity Jameson didn’t have the courage just to admit that what happened was wrong.

Still, Jameson will now get the $175 million that Trump was threatening to withhold. And if he had to throw Lia Thomas under the bus to get it, so be it.

National Post


A file photo shows the sign for a speed camera that had been placed on Algonquin Avenue between Maurice Street and Field Street in Sudbury, Ont. The cameras have generated more than $700,000 in net revenue for the City of Greater Sudbury in 2024. John Lappa/Sudbury Star/Postmedia Network

Ontario Premier Doug Ford has been focused on improving traffic flow and reducing congestion on provincial roads and highways for several years. His gaze has now turned to an electronic device that can disrupt traffic and frustrate drivers: speed cameras.

Ford and his PC government have tackled this issue on several occasions.

A 2019 amendment to the Highway Traffic Act, for example,

stated

that municipal speed camera signs must be displayed in Ontario “not less than 60 centimetres in width and 75 centimetres in height.” Some

proposed amendments

to the Highway Traffic Act related to speed cameras were also included in Bill 24, Plan to Protect Ontario Act (Budget Measures), 2025. “Municipalities are required to publish the location of automated speed enforcement systems and red light camera systems,” according to the third point, “and, if required by the regulations, to display signs indicating that such systems may be in use.”

Ford was asked about the deployment of speed cameras during a recent press conference in Wasaga Beach, Ont. His immediate concern was this device was a “revenue tool” (as) “opposed to safety” on Toronto streets, roads and neighbourhoods.

“The city is using it as their revenue source, and it’s a little unfair,” he

told

reporters on May 16. “They hide them all over the place and if you’re going, you know, 10 kilometres an hour over, you’re getting dinged…People aren’t too happy when they get dinged for 10 kilometres over, five kilometres over. It’s a revenue tool.”

Ford and the Ontario PCs naturally recognize that speed cameras still serve an important purpose. In particular, using them in community safety zones and school zones. “Everyone should be crawling through a school zone,” the Premier told the media, “but they’re putting them all over the place and they’re creating endless amounts of money.”

Ford summed up the government’s position thusly. “All we’re saying is not to take them away — I don’t like them — but let’s put signs up. The whole purpose of a radar trap is to slow people down, so let’s slow people down by putting big signs that there’s a radar ahead and we’ll go from there.”

The Premier is absolutely right. He should pass legislation to massively reduce the use of speed cameras as a revenue tool on major streets and in residential areas in Toronto and across Ontario.

The sole purpose behind enacting speed cameras in Ontario’s municipalities was always about public safety. It was a means of warning drivers to slow down and help prevent accidents, injuries and fatalities involving fellow drivers and pedestrians. Families with young children would also, hopefully, feel more safe and secure in their neighbourhoods with slower and more responsible drivers on the roads.

Speed cameras were never designed to be a source of revenue. Ontario’s cities, towns and villages already collect more than enough money from taxpayers each year. Municipal and property taxes in Toronto have gone through the roof under left-wing Mayor Olivia Chow,

increasing

by 9.5 per cent in 2024 and 6.9 per cent in 2025. Does Toronto, or any other city, really desperately need a few extra bucks from drivers who went a fractional number of kilometres above the speed limit? The answer should be pretty obvious.

What about the argument that keeping speed cameras hidden in Ontario’s municipalities would help ensure that drivers slow down?

Besides the fact that playing a game of “gotcha” with drivers is juvenile, it doesn’t make much of a difference. While popular navigation systems like GPS and Waze can

identify

hidden speed cameras and speed traps on certain routes, there are plenty of drivers who routinely ignore these warnings. There will always be drivers who ignore (or have ignored) municipal speed camera signs sitting in plain sight, too. The one silver lining? If any of these individuals get caught driving over the speed limit or worse, they’ll be punished to the furthest extent of the law.

Ford is right to suggest there should be certain exceptions to the use of speed cameras in the province. This includes school zones where caution should always be the better part of valour. That’s why speed limits are generally reduced to 30 km/h on Toronto streets located in and around our schools.

Here’s the thing. If you slightly adjust your foot on the pedal or shift around in your car seat, which most drivers do at some point during their journeys, the chances are your speed will briefly go up a few kilometres. This would be caught on a speed camera and, in effect, mean that you’ve broken a municipal law. An inanimate speed camera obviously can’t tell the difference. Are police and city officials going to care or take this into consideration? Of course not. Hence, it’s a bit much to expect everyone to drive their vehicles to the point of a basic crawl or get fined. There has to be a certain amount of rational thinking and leniency involved in the decision-making process.

Ford has the right idea when it comes to speed cameras. Toronto needs to use them as a public safety tool, and stop robbing Peter to pay Paul — and, in turn, pay Olivia.

National Post


U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers search vehicles with the help of a canine at the Peace Bridge Port of Entry in Buffalo, N.Y. on Tuesday, May 23, 2023. U.S. border agents used helicopters and a fixed-wing airplane to round up 124 people earlier this year along the Canada-U.S. border.

The latest data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection shows an uptick in the amount of fentanyl seized near the American northern border with Canada — but the quantities intercepted remain a tiny fraction of what’s coming from Mexico.


VANCOUVER — British Columbia infrastructure minister says in her eight years as a member of the legislature, she can recall receiving about half a dozen death threats, and considers herself “pretty fortunate” as a provincial politician.

Bowinn Ma says she knows it’s strange to say, but she is aware of other elected officials who have been the subject of many more such threats.

Ma’s comments come after an explosive blasted open the front door of her North Vancouver constituency office last week, setting off an RCMP investigation.

No one was hurt and police are saying little about a motive or suspects, but Ma says she won’t be intimidated from continuing her work and serving the community.

However, Ma says that she is worried about the lasting implications such a threat can have “on the way that politicians serve.”

When Ma was first elected, she says she took over a former members office and tore down a security wall that went across the room to make it more welcoming, but now says she’ll work with a Legislature security team for a threat assessment and ongoing safety advice.

But Ma says she is worried the blast can feed into a feeling among elected officials and the public that politicians are being more “frequently targeted.”

“I worry that will drive elected officials further away from these kinds of open approaches, and that’s not a criticism of elected officials.

“I mean, they’ve got to do what they need to do to keep themselves and their staff safe, but we also lose out as a democratic society when that happens.”

Ma says Mounties told her that “there is no indication of a repeat event” and an investigation is ongoing.

At the same time, Ma says she encourages anyone passionate about running for office not to be deterred.

“I really do not want these kinds of incidents to dissuade anyone from doing the incredibly important work of serving communities,” she says.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July, 5, 2025.

Nono Shen, The Canadian Press


International Trade Minister Maninder Sidhu says Canada has a chance to build new partnerships as U.S. tariffs continue to pummel world economies. But landing deeper ties with major markets like the U.K., India and China means overcoming irritants and fraught diplomatic relationships.


CALGARY — Canada’s new prime minister, best known as a buttoned-down banker, donned a cowboy hat and toured the stables Friday evening at the Calgary Stampede.

Over an hour-long tour winding through the rodeo grounds, Mark Carney crawled into a tank, snacked at food stations and posed for dozens of selfies, marking his first visit to the Stampede as prime minister.

“We gotta see some chuckwagons, huh,” Carney said as he strolled down the Midway with an entourage of security and cameras, sampling mini doughnuts and pretzels as he made his way to the grandstand stadium for the chuckwagon races.

The Stampede visit is a long-running tradition for sitting prime ministers no matter their political stripe. But it’s not guaranteed: former prime minister Justin Trudeau didn’t appear at last summer’s rodeo, coming as his party struggled in the polls.

One year later, the Liberals’ political fortunes have flipped, with Carney leading the party to a minority government in the recent federal election. The party has two Albertans sitting in the House of Commons despite predictions the party could nab more seats in the true-blue provinces.

Wearing dark-blue jeans, a navy sport coat and cream-coloured cowboy hat, Carney was met with a warm reception on the grounds, shaking hands with surprised Stampede-goers and taking photos with employees behind food stands. He did not wear cowboy boots or a belt buckle, instead wearing brown sneakers and a thin belt.

“What are you doing here?” Carney jokingly said to a group of women on the Midway.

“What are you doing here?” one of them yelled back.

Later, as he walked on the stage before the chuckwagon races at GMC Stadium, Carney was met with a mix of boos and applause from the crowd of approximately 17,000 people.

“They’re saying woo. I heard woo,” the announcer said.

Carney is scheduled to attend a pancake breakfast on Saturday morning and is hosting a party fundraiser in Calgary later in the day.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 4, 2025.

Matthew Scace, The Canadian Press


YELLOWKNIFE — Canada’s environment ministers have endorsed stronger air quality standards for fine particulate matter, while acknowledging the struggles caused by wildfires that can blanket the country in smoke advisories.

Provincial, territorial and federal environment ministers met in Yellowknife for the annual meeting of the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.

In a joint communique released Friday, they say wildfires are one of the major contributors to air pollution, which can adversely affect the health of Canadians.

They say by approving updated Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate matter, they are “supporting actions that will continue to improve air quality in Canada.”

The standards measure the amount of a given pollutant in outdoor air, and while they are not legally binding, the ministers call them a key element of managing air quality.

The council’s website lists the updated standards for fine particulate at 23 micrograms per cubic metre in 24 hours by 2030, a decrease from the 2020 standards of 27 micrograms per cubic metre.

The statement says the standards were developed by federal, provincial and territorial governments collaboratively with representatives from industry, environmental, Indigenous groups and health non-governmental organizations.

Northwest Territories Environment Minister Jay Macdonald, who hosted the meeting, told a news conference that the new standards will help all jurisdictions better protect communities from the growing health impacts of poor air quality.

He said climate change is increasing wildfire risk.

“Strong, science-based, national standards help ensure we’re prepared for these challenges and support long-term health and resilience,” he said.

Next year’s council meeting is scheduled to take place in Alberta.

— By Ashley Joannou in Vancouver

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 4, 2025.

The Canadian Press


Cases of a disease affecting oysters have been confirmed in Quebec and Prince Edward Island for the first time.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency says dermo was detected in oyster samples from Chaleur Bay in Quebec and Egmont Bay, P.E.I.

It says a different disease affecting oysters, known as MSX, was also confirmed in the Quebec samples, another first in the province.

The agency says dermo and MSX don’t pose risks to human health or food safety but can cause increased oyster mortality and decreased growth rates.

Officials say dermo, also known as perkinsosis, can be transmitted from oyster to oyster or from water contaminated with the parasite.

However, they say with MSX it’s presumed there is an unknown intermediary host, making it harder to determine how it’s spread.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 4, 2025.

The Canadian Press


WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump signed his package of tax breaks and spending cuts into law Friday in front of Fourth of July picnickers after his cajoling produced almost unanimous Republican support in Congress for the domestic priority that could cement his second-term legacy.

Flanked by Republican legislators and members of his Cabinet, Trump signed the multitrillion-dollar legislation at a desk on the White House driveway, then banged down a gavel gifted to him by House Speaker Mike Johnson that was used during the bill’s final passage Thursday.

Against odds that at times seemed improbable, Trump achieved his goal of celebrating a historic — and divisive — legislative victory in time for the nation’s birthday, which also was his self-imposed deadline for Congress to send the legislation to his desk. Fighter jets and stealth bombers streaked through the sky over the annual White House Fourth of July picnic.

“America’s winning, winning, winning like never before,” Trump said, noting last month’s bombing campaign against Iran’s nuclear program, which he said the flyover was meant to honor. “Promises made, promises kept, and we’ve kept them.”

The White House was hung with red, white and blue bunting for the Independence Day festivities. The U.S. Marine Band played patriotic marches — and, in a typical Trumpian touch, tunes by 1980s pop icons Chaka Khan and Huey Lewis. There were three separate flyovers.

Trump spoke for a relatively brief 22 minutes before signing the bill, but was clearly energized as the legislation’s passage topped a recent winning streak for his administration. That included the Iran campaign and a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulingshe’s fought for.

Vice President JD Vance was traveling in the Dakotas with his family and missed the ceremony. A line on the bill where he would have signed because of his role as president of the Senate was crossed out and Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., added his name instead, photographs show. Cotton has the responsibility of stepping in when the vice president isn’t available for his Senate duties.

The budget legislation is the president’s highest-profile win yet. It includes key campaign pledges like no tax on tips or Social Security income. Trump, who spent an unusual amount of time thanking individual Republican lawmakers who shepherded the measure through Congress, contended “our country is going to be a rocket ship, economically,” because of the legislation.

Big cuts to Medicaid and food stamps

Critics assailed the package as a giveaway to the rich that will rob millions more lower-income people of their health insurance, food assistance and financial stability.

“Today, Donald Trump signed into law the worst job-killing bill in American history. It will rip health care from 17 million workers to pay for massive tax giveaways to the wealthy and big corporations, amounting to the country’s largest money grab from the working class to the ultra-rich,” AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler said in a statement. “Every member of Congress who voted for this devastating bill picked the pockets of working people to hand billionaires a $5 trillion gift.”

The legislation extends Trump’s 2017 multitrillion-dollar tax cuts and cuts Medicaid and food stamps by $1.2 trillion. It provides for a massive increase in immigration enforcement. Congress’ nonpartisan scorekeeper projects that nearly 12 million more people will lose health insurance under the law.

The legislation passed the House on a largely party-line vote Thursday, culminating a monthslong push by the GOP to cram most of its legislative priorities into a single budget bill that could be enacted without Senate Democrats being able to block it indefinitely by filibustering.

It passed by a single vote in the Senate, where North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis announced he would not run for reelection after incurring Trump’s wrath in opposing it. Vance had to cast the tie-breaking vote.

In the House, where two Republicans voted against it, one, conservative maverick Tom Massie of Kentucky, has also become a target of Trump’s well-funded political operation.

The legislation amounts to a repudiation of the agendas of the past two Democratic presidents, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, in rolling back Obama’s Medicaid expansion under his signature health law and Biden’s tax credits for renewable energy.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage.

Democrats vow to make bill a midterm issue

Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin on Friday called the bill “devastating” and said in a statement that Trump’s signature on the legislation “sealed the fate of the Republican Party, cementing them as the party for billionaires and special interests — not working families.”

He predicted Republicans would lose their majority in Congress over it. “This was a full betrayal of the American people,” Martin said.

Trump exulted in his political victory Thursday night in Iowa, where he attended a kickoff of events celebrating the country’s 250th birthday next year.

“I want to thank Republican congressmen and women, because what they did is incredible,” he said. The president complained that Democrats voted against the bill because “they hate Trump — but I hate them, too.”

The package is certain to be a flashpoint in next year’s midterm elections, and Democrats are making ambitious plans for rallies, voter registration drives, attack ads, bus tours and even a multiday vigil, all intended to highlight the most controversial elements.

Upon his return to Washington early Friday, Trump described the package as “very popular,” though polling suggests that public opinion is mixed at best.

For example, a Washington Post/Ipsos poll found that majorities of U.S. adults support increasing the annual child tax credit and eliminating taxes on earnings from tips, and about half support work requirements for some adults who receive Medicaid.

But the poll found majorities oppose reducing federal funding for food assistance to low-income families and spending about $45 billion to build and maintain migrant detention centers. About 60% said it was “unacceptable” that the bill is expected to increase the $36 trillion U.S. debt by more than $3 trillion over the next decade.

Darlene Superville And Nicholas Riccardi, The Associated Press