LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

OTTAWA — The Canada Revenue Agency says taxpayers who already paid the now-defunct digital services tax will have to wait for Ottawa to pass new legislation before they can get their refund.

Prime Minister Mark Carney announced late Sunday that, in a bid to restart trade negotiations with the United States, Canada was dropping the tax on global tech giants.

The first payment was due Monday and could have cost American companies like Amazon and Uber billions of dollars.

A CRA spokesperson says the agency already collected some revenue from the digital services tax before Ottawa’s reversal but didn’t cite an amount.

MPs are now on their summer break and the spokesperson says they’ll need to pass legislation formally revoking the tax when Parliament returns in order for taxpayers to get their money back.

The CRA waived the requirement for taxpayers to file a DST return ahead of the June 30 deadline and will not ask for any related payments in the meantime.

— With files from Anja Karadeglija

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 2, 2025.

Craig Lord, The Canadian Press


OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney is set to meet with automotive sector CEOs this morning.

The sector is a key front in the trade war between the United States and Canada.

A spokeswoman for the Prime Minister’s Office said the CEOs of Ford Canada, Stellantis Canada and GM Canada will be in attendance, along with Brian Kingston of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers’ Association.

U.S. President Donald Trump has said repeatedly that the U.S. does not need Canadian cars and he wants to see automotive companies move all production to the U.S.

The U.S. has imposed 25 per cent tariffs on vehicles manufactured in Canada, with a carve-out for components built in the U.S. through the highly integrated vehicle supply chain.

Canada and the U.S. are back at the bargaining table after Trump called a halt to trade talks over Canada’s plan to impose a digital services tax on multinational tech firms — a plan the Carney government called off Sunday evening.

Carney has said he wants a new Canada-U.S. trade deal in place by July 21 and if that deadline isn’t met, he’ll boost Canadian trade countermeasures.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 2, 2025.

David Baxter, The Canadian Press


Antoinette Twiver, 28, snaps a selfie of herself with her first hormonal shot for egg freezing.

The first time Shania Bhopa considered freezing her eggs was over dessert during Christmas Day dinner with her family a couple of years ago.

Bhopa was only 24 years old at the time but already had a promising career ahead as a published children’s author, running a non-profit organization with her sister and was pursuing a PhD in global health.

Her older sister, a physician, broached the topic.

“Shania, you don’t seem like you would have kids early,” Bhopa recalls her sister saying. “But I know you’ve always wanted to be a mom. Have you ever given any consideration as to what your plan looks like?”

“No,” Bhopa replied.

Her sister asked a new question. “Well, have you thought about freezing your eggs?”

The question caught Bhopa by surprise. She had heard of egg freezing before — overhearing conversations between her sister and her friends — but until that moment had never talked about it or thought of it as a family planning or fertility option. She had always assumed egg freezing was a last resort for those who had already tried and failed to have a child by traditional means.

“Why would I be proactive when it’s a reactive procedure?” she recalled thinking. Her sister, however, was persistent and so Bhopa decided to investigate the topic.

As an academic accustomed to research, she dove deep. She read every paper she could find, and by the end of it she was convinced.

“It was kind of like just a really logical decision,” she said. “I researched, statistically, at age 35 the egg quality and count, and the risk of abnormalities there, and if that’s the age I perceive my career starting to stabilize, then I should probably freeze my eggs.”

Bhopa’s story is an unusual one and for good reason: There aren’t a lot of stories told publicly of women in their early 20s who have considered or decided to freeze their eggs as a way to preserve their fertility down the road.

Encouraged by her sister and partner, Bhopa, a well-established influencer with over 108,000 followers on Instagram and even more on TikTok, vlogged her

egg freezing journey online

and became a viral sensation for her story, hailed as the “girl who decided to freeze her eggs at 25.”

Along with her own vlogs, she has hosted Q&As, interviews with experts and inspirational reels meant to shed light on the process and educate her followers on the concept.

Looking back, Bhopa is surprised that she and her friends, many of whom are in medicine and academia, had never thought to talk about egg freezing before.

“We all have such long roads ahead of us,” she said. “In retrospect, I’m like, ‘Oh, I can’t believe none of us were talking about it.”

Egg freezing — known medically as oocyte preservation — has been in the works since the 1980s, primarily as a last resort for those undergoing major surgeries or with serious medical illnesses. Rarely was it considered as a family planning alternative. The latter, better known as social egg freezing, became more mainstream after the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) deemed the procedure “non-experimental” in 2012.

“It definitely raised the awareness that egg freezing is now commercially available,” said Dr. Ari Baratz, one of Canada’s leading fertility experts and part of the medical team at the Create Fertility Centre in Toronto. “That really sparked demand.”

In the years since, it has increasingly become an option in family planning. This has forced a re-examination of “fertility” — what that means and how it is discussed among individuals and couples, and patients and their doctors.

For those with ovaries, it has meant being able to “realize their reproductive autonomy” and providing a sense of agency in one’s own reproductive aging — in other words, being liberated from their biological clocks. For couples, both heterosexual and those within in the LGBTQ+ community, it has meant being able to be more strategic about parenthood in terms of timing or priorities such as careers or financial stability or even relationship stability.

It’s a conversation of the modern age, bolstered by lifestyle, career and societal changes. As recently as 2022, social media platforms saw a surge of videos, vlogs and posts shared on the topic, by doctors looking to educate, and by people who have gone through the process and wanted to share their experiences.

Reproductive rights were hotly contested during the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Donald Trump made headlines when he proposed expanding access to invitro fertilization (IVF) treatments by having them paid for either by government or by insurance companies, a move criticized by some conservative groups for the practice of discarding unused embryos after a successful live birth via IVF.

The U.S. president issued an executive order in February to expand IVF access, although it’s unclear how long it could take to see changes to out-of-pocket costs.

Any conversation about reproductive rights comes with ethical quandaries, and in the case of egg freezing, it’s the thorny matter of “biological insurance.” What level of autonomy does it truly offer those considering it?

“I don’t think we’re completely going to put the brakes on fertility,” Baratz said, adding that egg freezing was always meant to be viewed as a way to “augment the ability to have a baby or even a larger family.”

The ‘stigma’

Bhopa is no stranger to the spotlight. As a child, she acted in television shows and currently teaches a curriculum on artificial intelligence. “I always did public stuff,” she said.

Her persona on social media, before posting about her egg freezing, was “more guarded,” she said. “This is the place where I have to be professional.”

If it hadn’t been for her sister and her boyfriend encouraging her, Bhopa said she wouldn’t have considered sharing her egg-freezing story on a public platform.

Bhopa recalled her sister telling her: “You know, when I was your age, I just wish I had someone to look up to, to even start this conversation.”

Her boyfriend, also a physician, had stressed that being vocal about her journey would be “pushing so many barriers for women.”

“For example,” Bhopa adds, “talking about not having kids right after you get married or not having to get married right after you’ve done school, and just pushing the gender norms that are often circulated.”

She was initially reluctant — “I was very, very, very hesitant to share this journey online,” Bhopa explained in a YouTube video. “It’s a very intimate thing.” But she decided to

share her journey

to encourage more open conversations around fertility and family planning and postponing pregnancy.

“I think that fertility, women’s health and planning for a family can be quite taboo for very many people and many cultures worldwide,” she continued. “And breaking down that stigma a little bit and opening up the conversation about fertility … and taking control and being empowered about making the plans necessary, to allow you to feel comfortable about your decisions.”

It was the same stigma and lack of public conversation that kept Missy Modell, an American comedian, influencer and businesswoman from deciding to go through egg freezing until her late 30s.

“The reason I waited so long was because I didn’t see anyone captured in this way … like, the day-to-day,” she said. “I run a company. I have to be high functioning. I was also terrified of doing that to myself. What are the hormones going to do to me?”

Like Bhopa, Modell decided to publicly vlog her journey to push back against the social stigma and take control of the conversation.

“I was terrified to freeze my eggs because of all the unknowns and questions and shame and insert my excuse,” she posted to

her stories on Instagram

on the first day of her egg-freezing journey. “I wanted to pull back the curtain and hope that if some people were really on the fence for reasons that had nothing to do with the outcome … I wanted to help people feel comfortable with it.”

The stigma, while much less palpable than it might have been five or 10 years ago, “is not completely smashed,” Baratz said. “Obviously, it is still a personal issue.”

In 2018, U.K. researchers interviewed 31 women who had undergone egg freezing to better understand their experiences. “Few women perceived freezing as involving physical risks,” the researchers wrote. “However, many participants reported the process of egg freezing as emotionally challenging, primarily linked to feelings of isolation and stigma due to their single status.”

A 2021 Canadian study yielded similar results. It found that 89 per cent of the 224 women who took part said they chose to freeze their eggs because they were single and had not yet found a partner.

By the time social egg freezing arrived on the scene, a woman was statistically more likely to have her first child by the age of 28, according to Statistics Canada — a noticeable jump from the 1970s, when a woman would typically have her first child by the age of 24.

However, unlike men, who remain fertile long into their senior years, a woman’s fertility peaks between her teen years and late 20s, and is likely to decline after age 30, presenting a conundrum for those looking to balance their professional lives with their desire for parenthood.

For those looking to further their careers without the fear of running out the biological clock, social egg freezing became an attractive opportunity to have it all. Initially, women, mostly in their late 30s and 40s, attended consultations, information sessions and “egg-freezing cocktail parties” hosted by fertility clinics wanting to rebrand egg freezing as something positive, rather than a bleak last resort.

“Originally, it started as a way for the older demographic of people with ovaries to hold on to their fertility,” said Carolynn Dube, the executive director for Fertility Matters Canada. “And people still use it for that reason now, but we’re seeing a younger group of people considering it for future use. It’s like an insurance plan.”

Jeanette Chen, 40, who works in human resources, said she first considered freezing her eggs a decade ago, around the time of a big breakup.

The breakup, she said, played a part, but her decision to pursue egg freezing was largely motivated by age. Chen was turning 28 and getting older meant becoming more conscious of “social conventions” around marriage and motherhood, as well as thinking about her fertility aging, she said.

However, the newness of the idea and lack of access around it curtailed her understanding of what egg freezing really meant. “I knew this idea of egg freezing existed, conceptually what it was like and what it was intended for,” she said of her conversations with friends back then. “Some of my friends might say, ‘Oh, I’m thinking about egg freezing,’ but that’s it. It’s like a blanket statement.”

By the time she finally decided to go ahead with the process at 38, the scene had shifted substantially, she said. Several of her friends had frozen their eggs, either as part of an IVF treatment or otherwise. “I do think it’s a bit better now because people are more open about it,” Chen added.

Access to information, both socially and regionally, can play a big role in an individual’s understanding and willingness to talk openly about fertility, Dube explained. For big urban centres such as Toronto and Montreal, the conversation might be more prominent than in less-populated regions, where access to fertility specialists and clinics may not be as easy.

“It’s still a relatively new process in a lot of parts of the country outside of these bigger cities,” Dube explained. “I think just having access to the knowledge and experts geographically is one piece.”

Dube notes the surge in conversations about egg freezing online, especially among young professionals. “But openly sharing it, especially in a place where an employer or a potential employer could find you, is problematic,” she said. “Because it opens you up to someone saying, ‘Oh, she’s thinking about having children someday,’ and you’re internally thinking about how that might impact your growth at the company.”

Bhopa acknowledged that much of her own hesitation to share her story came from the same place. “I’m going to be an academic and have students and colleagues and principal investigators for grants that could potentially

see this

,” she said.

Even among friends and acquaintances, the subject isn’t exactly a trending topic. Antoinette Twiver said she learned about egg freezing in university while watching an episode of The Mindy Project, a popular sitcom on the life of a lovelorn gynecologist. She didn’t know how many of her own friends had considered or had gone through the process until she made the decision to freeze her own eggs at age 29, in 2023.

She was “surprised” when she learned a number of friends “have been going through this process as well and maybe not sharing it.”

Twiver, who has a following of over 42,000 on TikTok, shared her experience on her TikTok to help others learn more about the process — “if this video helps even one person learn a little bit about the process then it would be worth it,” she said.

“I do think that it is something that is tiptoed around a bit,” Chen said. “It’s a hard topic for people to initiate because people aren’t sure about the circumstances of the other people.”

The medical side of egg freezing

For close to 20 years, Dr. Sony Sierra has worked in the medical field as a reproductive endocrinologist and infertility specialist. The physician is deputy medical director with TRIO fertility, a chain of fertility clinics in the Greater Toronto Area that receives patients for a range of fertility issues.

She has seen the conversation around egg freezing and preserving fertility change dramatically in the years since the ASRM ruling to deem the procedure as non-experimental.

“Ten years ago, I barely did egg-freezing cases,” she said. “And now it’s hugely busy, our egg-freezing program. And I think a lot of it comes from the knowledge of it being an option.”

Before the ASRM 2012 decision, doctors and experts largely viewed the procedure as reactive rather than proactive, mostly suggested in cases of infertility or a serious illness or major surgery that could impact a person’s fertility.

Since the ruling, the number of cases around the country has soared — from 94 in 2013 to more than 1,500 in 2022, according to CARTR, a Canadian database that tracks fertility procedures performed in Canada.

Ten years ago, less than two per cent of patients who visited Sierra’s clinic came to consult or pursue egg freezing. By 2022, 15 per cent of patients visiting TRIO planned to pursue egg freezing, prompting the team to open

EVOLVE

, Canada’s first egg-freezing clinic, in March 2023.

As part of

the process,

a woman injects herself daily, for two weeks, in the belly or upper thighs with hormonal drugs to stimulate her ovaries to produce around 10 to 15 mature eggs. The more eggs to freeze, the more likely one of those eggs, once thawed, will be fertilized with sperm and lead to a pregnancy.

Once the optimal size and number of eggs has been generated, the eggs are retrieved from the ovaries via an ultrasound-guided needle, flash-frozen and stored in tanks of liquid nitrogen.

“We (get) about 200 inquiries a month,” Sierra said. “And that’s just people picking up the phone or emailing through the website. That doesn’t include physician referrals that come from doctors and gynecologists out there in the field.”

Opening up a separate clinic, she explained, allowed the team to be more proactive in offering support to people reluctant to come to a typical fertility lab, “where there are married couples who are very stressed out trying to conceive,” Sierra explained. “A waiting room in a fertility clinic, it’s a different environment.”

Reproductive awareness

Fertility education is a relatively new concept. As recently as 2017, the term “fertility awareness” was introduced as a definition in the International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care.

The fertility conversation, Baratz explained, has long focused around the don’ts rather than the dos. “A lot of sexual health education is based around infection prevention and healthy lifestyle, but also avoiding unwanted pregnancy. … We’ve forgotten how to turn that message off.”

Medical providers have become more aware of the proactive role they have to play in discussions with patients, he said, initiating conversations about reproductive health and asking questions such as, “Have you thought about how you’re going to approach building your family?”

Medical professionals are increasingly being invited to universities and schools to talk to younger people about their reproductive health and to heighten awareness around fertility. And more than 50 private fertility clinics have popped up across the country providing resources to individuals looking for fertility consultations.

The conversations about egg freezing, however, have an added layer of complexity. Not only are there the details of the process — the costs, the side-effects of hormone treatment, the risks — decisions must be made on how the eggs will be used and stored.

Baratz said that means asking a patient if they have a plan for their eggs: Do they plan to use the eggs as a first or last resort when trying to have a child? Are they able to afford the cost of yearly storage? How many children do they plan to have, with or without the eggs? Have they considered other alternatives to fertility planning?

“In a responsible consultation, egg freezing is just a handle to discuss the full spectrum of what’s available.”

It also means addressing the popular perception of egg freezing as biological insurance — “that’s part of informed consent,” Baratz added.

Maybe, baby

Freezing your eggs, experts stress, does not guarantee the birth of a child. The overall success rate of egg freezing can depend on any number of factors, such as a person’s age and the number and quality of eggs retrieved. It’s also possible for eggs to not survive the thawing process or not be successfully fertilized by sperm.

At EVOLVE, the rule of thumb is, the more, the better. “For example, individuals aged 30 to 34 have an 80 per cent chance or higher of a live birth later. In contrast, freezing between two and eight eggs results in a 20 to 52 per cent chance of a live birth,” the clinic explains on its website.

“At the same time, with increasing age, research shows it may take more frozen eggs to achieve a successful pregnancy”.

The American Society of Reproductive Medicine issued the same caution when announcing their decision to drop the “experimental” label — that the procedure is not a guarantee for having a baby.

“We think we should proceed cautiously in using this as an elective technique, especially in older patients,” stated Dr. Eric Widra, chairman of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology practice committee in 2012.

“There is an inherent conflict between the desire to freeze eggs and the need to freeze eggs. Freezing eggs for the future sounds like a good insurance policy but may not be an insurance policy that needs to be cashed in,” he stated.

Baratz chooses his words carefully when describing the risks and benefits of the procedure. “It can be referred to as biological insurance with big quotes around it, because that may not solve the story,” he said. “What we always tell you as part of the consent process is that you’re doing this as part of your fertility journey.”

And, compared to other procedures, which may involve greater medical risks, egg freezing is a relatively safe procedure, Baratz added.

“So, the downside is very minimal, other than the cost of the procedure … But if they’re in the right demographic where it’s feasible, it’s a great option.”

Insurance and the costs of egg freezing

For many, being able to afford the cost of freezing eggs is where the barrier to access comes in.

Below Bhopa’s TikTok video — titled, “4 takeaways after freezing my eggs at 25” — the most common question asked was about the cost.

“How much did this cost? I’m thinking of doing this?” one user asked.

“What’s the cost?” asked Leslie&Mj.

“How much was it? Does your insurance cover it?” a TikTok user who goes by Kathleen posted.

In a separate video, Bhopa broke down the costs of her egg freezing process. “Eighty per cent of my medication was covered by insurance,” she explained in the video, “but the total cost without insurance would have been $4,000.”

“My procedure was not covered by insurance, but for a lot of people it is,” she said, adding that the cost for her egg retrieval came to $9,750, which included the fees for storing the eggs for five years — $500 per year, according to Bhopa, who displayed her invoices in the background of the video as she detailed the costs of the process.

“So, the actual cost of the procedure alone, including anesthetic and everything like that, is $7,000.”

Bhopa went on to explain that she was able to afford it by getting a second job that same year and “saving up extremely well.”

“It’s an investment like any other and I’m really empowered by it,” she added.

But she acknowledged that without insurance covering the cost of medication, she would not have been able to afford the service. “That was my main driver,” she said in an interview with Postmedia.

Likewise, Twiver said she was “lucky to be able to tap into” her company’s health insurance benefits, which includes egg freezing.

Without insurance, Twiver said the entire cost would have come to $12,000, for the procedure and medication. If insurance wasn’t available, Twiver said she would have relied on support from her family, but “having access via coverage obviously made the decision much easier.”

In the past decade, Canadian and U.S. companies, mostly in banking and tech, have added fertility benefits to their employees’ insurance coverage.

Some Canadian banks now offer up to $60,000 in fertility treatments to be accessed over a lifetime, according to a report by Fertility Matters Canada. The Bank of Montreal increased the lifetime maximum for fertility drugs to $20,000 and reimburses employees $20,000 each in fertility treatment and surrogacy expenses. RBC and TD offer similar coverage plans with $20,000 for fertility treatments and medication, up to a lifetime maximum of $60,000, while CIBC recently began covering $15,000 for treatment drugs, to a lifetime maximum of $30,000. Scotiabank offers $10,000 in coverage for fertility treatment in addition to medication, and $10,000 for surrogacy expenses, for a maximum lifetime benefit of $30,000.

Big technology companies such as Google, Meta, Amazon and Microsoft are leading the way in offering fertility coverage to their employees. Snap is among the most generous, with workers eligible for up to $65,000 in fertility and adoption coverage through Carrot Fertility, and up to $130,000 toward surrogacy expenses.

On the one hand, these company policies can be a big plus for employees interested in the service who fear emptying their bank accounts. And it can be a stress-reliever for women looking to balance their careers with future parenthood.

“If the cost of the investment is no longer an element to be taken into consideration, even women who are less worried about finding a partner ‘in time’ may become interested in banking, which will lower the average age and thus raise the quality of the banked eggs,” Heidi Mertes, an associate professor in medical ethics at Ghent University, wrote in a 2015 paper.

On the other hand, it can promote a bias around egg freezing as the golden ticket out of the claws of the biological clock and encourage women, sometimes “against their better judgment” to defer parenthood in lieu of a better professional reputation, Mertes wrote.

For those without the option of insurance, or a big enough bank account, costs remain a major barrier.

“My initial reaction was just pure shock,” Sehrish Qureshi, 31, said of her reaction when she researched the costs of egg freezing for herself. “I was highly disappointed, of course. And then anger … I’m not expecting it to be affordable, because it’s a luxury service, but up to $35,000 a year? That’s definitely not what I was expecting.”

She said the cost of the service put her off wanting to explore the idea. “I just never looked at it again.”

High costs are partly why it’s more common to see individuals in their mid- to late 30s look to egg freezing rather than those in their 20s, Baratz said.

“If someone was going to have to make significant financial decisions on whether to do egg freezing or not, then I would discourage them. But if it’s feasible, it’s a great option,” he said.

For Bhopa,

the road to freezing her eggs

was an arduous and expensive one, but she has no regrets. “I can’t control time, but I can control what I do with my time,” she said in a YouTube video.

“I only want children when I know I have the time for it. I just don’t think the career goals I have over the next couple of years are feasible in regard to my biological clock … knocking on my door.”


Happy Canada Day! As we enjoyed the annual celebration of our great country, complete with food, fireworks and plenty of fun, I decided to do what I like to occasionally do: shifted gears and focused on something different. Let’s deviate away from the (ahem) looniness of Canadian politics and explore the zaniness of animation and comics!

It’s only right that we start off with two older Canadian titles I was re-reading recently.

Karen Mazurkewich’s Cartoon Capers: The History of Canadian Animators is still one of the finest examinations of our local animation industry. There’s some analysis of great National Film Board animated shorts like The Log Driver’s WaltzThe Big Snit and Bob’s Birthday, successful animated TV series/specials like Tales of the Wizard of OzBabarand The Raccoons, and Canadian connections to Snow White, Elmer the Elephant and Bugs Bunny. “Insiders joke that Canucks are the gypsy kings of the animated world,” Mazurkewish wrote in the Introduction, but in fact, “Canadians are flexing their graphic muscle in every major international studio.”

Chester Brown’s Louis Riel: A Comic Strip Biography remains one of the more fascinating graphic novels ever produced in this country. It started as a ten-issue serialization published by Drawn & Quarterly between 1999 to 2003, and exploded in popularity when it was published in book form. Brown’s scholarly examination of Riel’s life as a politician and radical Métis leader includes historical references and an extensive series of endnotes from primary and secondary sources. Few graphic novels have ever come close to achieving this high standard.

Let’s move on to other books.

The University Press of Mississippi produces some of the most intelligent opinions and analyses of animation and comic strips. Two books that I recently requested fit this description perfectly. (My thanks to Courtney McCreary.)

Katherine Moeder’s Wide Awake in Slumberland: Fantasy, Mass Culture, and Modernism in the Art of Winsor McCayis a superb exploration into the art and mindset of one of the world’s greatest cartoonists. Her in-depth study of McCay’s magical and highly imaginative comic strip, Little Nemo in Slumberland, is a joy to behold. Moeder suggested that his seminal work “attempted to broaden the audience for comics in several critical ways.” In particular, the strip’s main characters are “situated within a spectrum of childhood types defined in part by class.” Nemo is a “middle-class child of the suburbs,” for instance, and a “perpetual innocent, reminiscent of the gentle dreamers by Jessie Wilcox Smith, with his tousled hair and wide declarations of ‘Oh!,’ – he remains from week to week in a constant state of wonder.” Flip, a clown who is the “mischievous, cynical, cigar-smoking friend” of Nemo’s, has personality traits that distinctly resemble the “trickster street urchins embodied by the Yellow Kid.”

What about Impie, the young African jungle imp who befriends Nemo, Flip and the Princess of Slumberland? He speaks a “gibberish language” and is a stereotypical character whose “exaggerated features recall the theatrical blackface of minstrel performers.” This type of character would be frowned upon in today’s society, but was viewed in a different light in McCay’s time. This racialized example of “boyhood savagery was uplifted as both normal and necessary” and understood to be “an essential step in the journey to productive manhood.” Plus ça change, indeed.

Jean Lee Cole’s How the Other Half Laughs: The Comic Sensibility in American Culture, 1895-1920 is an equally thought-provoking analysis of the evolution of comic strip humour. There was a fundamental switch to a “particularly grotesque form of the comic sensibility” in this time period. George Luks, a talented artist and cartoonist with a Bohemian flair who used “‘schematic,’ suggestive sketching rather than close observation” to help readers “imagine what was happening,” spearheaded the early development of comic grotesque. His colleague Richard F. Outcault, creator of the brilliant Hogan’s Alley and The Yellow Kid, drew ethnic working-class scenes involving young children. His strips were dominated with text that was “written on objects – signs, boxes, fences, the Yellow Kid’s shirt – rather than being spoken by the characters themselves” and enabled the words to “act as labels, applied by Outcault, the mediating consciousness.” Cole also looked at the work of Rudolph Dirks, George Herriman, William Glackens and others to show how they influenced the “New Humour” movement in the newspaper funnies.

Let’s close things out with Fantagraphics, one of America’s finest comics publishers. (My thanks to Eric Reynolds and Tucker Stone.)

Rick Geary and Mathew Klickstein’s Daisy Goes to the Moon: A Daisy Ashford Adventure is an exquisite and unique comic volume. Ashford, an English writer whose most famous work was the 1919 novella The Young Visiters, served as the inspiration for a fantastical journey on a “rokitship.” She met a unique cast of characters, including a “rarther quear fellow” from the Moon named Zogolbythm, Servette the Robot, Mr. B. Blahdel and, in a strange twist, a second Daisy! Her adventure took many twists and turns, to the point where Daisy remarked, “So am I writing this story or is it writing me?”

There’s also Walt Disney’s Donald Duck Adventures Mini Collectionfeaturing the work of legendary cartoonist Carl Barks. Three of his classic comics, Ghost of the GrottoSheriff of Bullet Valley and The Golden Helmet, are included in this set. Barks, along with Don Rosa, was the most well-recognized illustrator of Donald Duck. He also created Scrooge McDuck, the wealthy “adventure-capitalist” who still ranks among the most memorable of Disney characters. All three stories hold up well, including my personal favourite, The Golden Helmet, which involves a search by Donald and his three nephews, Huey, Dewey and Louie, to find an ancient Viking helmet located somewhere on the coast of Labrador, Canada.

Comics on Canada Day? Why not, eh?

Michael Taube, a long-time newspaper columnist and political commentator, was a speechwriter for former Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


This content is restricted to subscribers

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Republican leaders in the House are sprinting toward a Wednesday vote on President Donald Trump’s tax and spending cuts package, determined to seize momentum from a hard-fought vote in the Senate while essentially daring members to defy their party’s leader and vote against it. It’s a risky gambit designed to meet Trump’s demand for a July 4 finish.

Here’s the latest:

Trump urges House Republicans to vote for his tax and spending cuts package

The encouragement comes as the Republican-controlled House sprints toward a vote Wednesday on the bill after it cleared the Senate by the narrowest of margins a day earlier.

Vice President JD Vance, in his role as Senate president, cast the tie-breaking vote on the measure.

Some House GOP members have voiced reservations about the bill. House Democrats are united in their opposition to the legislation.

“Republicans, don’t let the Radical Left Democrats push you around. We’ve got all the cards, and we are going to use them,” Trump said in a post on his social media site.

The Associated Press




Prime Minister Mark Carney winked at the start of his Oval Office meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump. And at the recent G7 leader's summit in Alberta, Carney, who had been watching Trump speak, turned his head slightly toward someone behind the camera and winked with his left eye.

The prime minister is a habitual winker. Once is once, two is a coincidence, three is a trend, and National Post counts at least four prominent public winks by

Mark Carney

since winning the top office — in Rideau Hall at his swearing in, in the Oval Office, and twice at the

G7

in Kananaskis, Alta. — plus many more going back to his governorship of the Bank of England.

Are these winks deliberate or have they become second nature? Do they mean something? Must they always? If they do, why not just say it? If they don’t, why risk causing misunderstanding or diplomatic insult? Winking around U.S. President

Donald Trump

, which accounts for three of the above examples, especially has an air of recklessness that clashes with Carney’s steady hands image.

A wink seems private even when it is public. It exudes self confidence, but it can seem sly. It can undermine carefully chosen words. It can literally mean “I am lying.” But it can also mean “I’ve got this.”

A wink as Carney does it “communicates a level of comfort with the idea of being noticed,” said Stewart Prest, lecturer in political science at the University of British Columbia. “But it could spiral badly if it is misconstrued.”

At the recent G7 leader’s summit, for example, after lamenting Russia’s absence, Trump was answering a question about what was holding up a trade deal with Canada. “I have a tariff concept,” he said. “Mark has a different concept, which is something that some people like.”

Just then, at this awkward backhand compliment, Carney, who had been watching Trump speak, turned his head slightly toward someone behind the camera and

winked with his left eye

, which pulled the corner of his lip up into the briefest hint of a smile that threatened to become a smirk.

Soon after, Trump was leaving the summit and talking to the media alongside Carney and French President Emmanuel Macron. Just as Trump said they got a lot done, including a U.S. trade deal with the U.K., Carney looked away from Trump toward Macron and winked,

this time with his right eye

, but with the same risky ripple of humour crossing his face.

Some people wink at what they say themselves. Carney just as often winks at what other people say, and not to the speaker, but to their audience.

Prest’s view is that Carney’s winks in Trump’s presence are typical of his style, in that they operate on three levels. This offers a theoretical framework for how to understand Carney winks in general, what they mean, and who they are for, he said.

At one level, Carney is communicating with Trump, in public, quietly listening to him. At a higher level he is communicating with Macron about Trump, in a sort of privacy, signalling an internal reaction to Trump’s words that Carney has decided not to vocalize. At the highest level he is communicating with the all-seeing public on the other side of the camera lens, indicating his comfort in playing all these etiquette games at the same time.

“It’s a high-wire act,” said Prest. “If it goes badly, it could go very badly.”

He needs to be careful that the wink includes the public, not excludes it. “The subtext always has to bring the public along,” Prest said. They need to know what Carney is trying to communicate, that he is confidently in control, and they also have to believe him. Otherwise it’s just a cocky facial tic.

Some winks are simple, obvious. Some winks need to be accounted for more deeply. Winks are almost always ambiguous, but sometimes they mean something important. Criminal court judges have faced this problem more than most. For example, in a 2017 murder case against a Richmond Hill, Ont., man accused of beating his roommate to death, a judge had to decide whether to let a witness testify about the meaning of a wink, and was troubled by its uncertain air of “innuendo.”

A friend of the victim had told police he had seen bruising on the victim’s ribs a couple of weeks before the killing, so he asked what happened. The victim explained he fell down the stairs, or off his bike, but then he winked, and when the friend asked what that meant, the victim said “Kenny’s got a hard punch,” referring to the accused.

The key problem, the judge said, was that it was not clear the victim winked and spoke at the exact same time, such that the wink directly contradicted the claim of falling down the stairs, and implied that the truth was Kenny punched him. It wasn’t clear “whether the wink and the comment were part of a single, ongoing transaction.”

That jury never heard the wink story, and eventually found the accused guilty of manslaughter, not murder.

Winks have been admitted as criminal evidence, however, such as in the 2017 Montreal case of the undercover police agent who testified about getting a “101 course” in robbery of shopping mall jewellery stores from the suspected culprit that was so convincing, so finely detailed, that the undercover officer asked whether the suspect had actually ever robbed the target store he was describing, in the Carrefour Laval.

The accused laughed, winked, and said “no,” which the undercover took as “an implicit admission that the accused had indeed robbed the store in the past.”

So sometimes a wink can mean the opposite of what was just said, that I did not fall off my bike, that I did rob this jewellery store. What I have just said is not true, wink wink. You’ll just have to trust me, and I know you will.

 

 Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney winks during a press conference at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa on Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013.

For a national leader’s voting public, that strategy works until it doesn’t, Prest said. Carney is in something of a honeymoon phase, and his current winking spree coincides with surging approval numbers in his first months as prime minister. He can wink and trust that he will be understood in good faith. But that can change.

When she profiled Carney for the Sunday Times in 2020, as he took the United Nations job as Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance, Charlotte Edwardes told the amusing story of being on a group tour with him through a Picasso exhibit at the Tate Modern in London, led by a curator who kept pointing out hidden penises in the Cubist paintings, and on the fifth or sixth one (a reclining woman whom the curator explained had a penis extending from her head) she caught Carney’s eye and “corpsed,” which is to say she laughed at this inappropriate moment. He joked about it afterwards in a deadpan: “Are you absolutely sure that you could see the penises?” She did not mention whether he said so with a wink, but it seems possible, and later in the piece, she said Carney told her he took the job of governor of the Bank of England because he likes a challenge, and he said so “with a wink.”

Could the winking thus be a bit de trop? Could it get creepy? Or cheesy? With the accumulation of political baggage, could Carney’s winks ever grow as stale as Justin Trudeau’s novelty socks?

“The wink will be perceived as Mr. Carney is perceived,” Prest said.

So, maybe. One day, the winks might turn sour. It would only be then that the leader with a “winking problem,” as the

National Post’s John Ivison once called it

, becomes a winker with a leading problem. Until then, Prest said, Carney seems to be pulling it off.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


A Glock pistol. An Edmonton judge acquitted a man found with loaded Glock 9mm handgun, arguing the search was illegal. (Photo by JOE KLAMAR/AFP via Getty Images)

In Edmonton last month, a judge laid the groundwork to acquit a man who, while sporting clear hallmarks of drug dealing, was caught by police packing a loaded Glock. If you’re ever wondering why crime is on the rise in Canada, you can look straight to decisions like these by our courts.

This

recent example

comes to us from 30-year-old Haider Aftab Khan, who was recently acquitted of a pile of gun and drug charges. On June 11, he succeeded in convincing Justice Derek Jugnauth, a former criminal defence lawyer

appointed

by then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to the Alberta Court of King’s Bench, to exclude the gun and drug evidence from his trial. This collapsed the Crown’s case.

Khan had been pulled over in a Ford Explorer in the early hours of April 24, 2022. The vehicle had a license plate covering, an illegal addition that caught the attention of a pair of police on patrol. The officers ran the plate number and found the SUV was registered to a Calgary owner who was “subject to ‘a large paragraph’ of court ordered conditions related to weapons and violence.” They pulled Khan over, and both approached the car.

One officer approached the car asked Khan for his license, insurance and registration; Khan couldn’t find his license, however, and provided an expired insurance slip; frantic, he searched his car, then his phone. The officer followed Khan’s hands with his flashlight (this was around 1 a.m.) — and saw a blue pill bottle without a lid that “looked like it had the paper scratched off” under the radio dash. Inside the bottle, the officer testified, were two baggies: one with pills, another with white powder.

At that point, Khan was arrested for drug possession. He was then patted down by the other officer, who found a Glock 9mm handgun loaded with four bullets.

Officers then searched the SUV, finding 40 oxycodone tablets and a gram of cocaine in the pill bottle — the label that was worn, illegible in some places, but not torn — along with a box of 30 45-calibre rounds from the centre console.

Khan was charged with improper storage of a firearm, unauthorized possession of a firearm, unauthorized possession of a firearm in a vehicle, carrying a concealed weapon without authorization, and possession of a restricted firearm with ammunition (which carries a maximum sentence of 14 years). He was also slapped with two counts of drug possession.

When his day in court came along, Khan gave a different version of events — which the court didn’t buy. The SUV, he testified, was his cousin’s, and he had driven it to Edmonton to be worked on by a preferred mechanic; he’d been followed by three cruisers, not one; he had his phone recording during the traffic stop; he was dragged from his car, punched several times by the arresting officer, and then punched again several times by three other officers while handcuffed in the back of the cruiser; he’d sustained cuts to his face.

The pill bottle, Khan testified, wasn’t sitting under the radio in the front of the car — in fact, he claimed to have never seen it before.

The judge called BS: Khan’s story was “implausible” and “internally inconsistent.” No phone video was filed as evidence in his defence, the beat-down story didn’t make sense and no medical evidence supported the brutality allegations.

But on Khan’s side was the Charter — and Justice Jugnauth’s liberal reading of it.

To justify an arrest, an officer must have reasonable grounds to do so, supported by sufficient evidence that causes them to believe an offence has been committed.

The basis for Khan’s arrest was the pill bottle, which the officer believed had been tampered with. And, fair enough. Canadian police seize bottles with scratched labels in busts all the time. In

Sooke,

B.C., in

Grande Prairie,

Alta., in

Barrie,

Ont.,

London,

Ont., in

Corner Brook,

N.L. — to name a few cases. But it turned out the label in this case wasn’t scratched (though it was weathered), and its lidless quality with plastic sticking out the top

wasn’t enough

to satisfy the judge, who also thought the arresting officer didn’t have the training or experience to identify a suspicious bottle.

The cocaine baggie, in the judge’s view, was the only item that, if spotted, would have warranted a lawful arrest — but he didn’t believe that the officer could have seen it inside the bottle from his angle. No reasonable grounds were secured, which meant that all evidence stemming from the arrest — the gun, the drugs — was obtained illegally.

This wasn’t necessarily fatal to the case: judges have the option of allowing evidence borne from a Charter violation into trial if society’s interest in the prosecution is great enough. Heck, the Supreme Court of Canada

ruled in 2010

that unlawfully beating a non-compliant intoxicated driver to the point of breaking his ribs and puncturing a lung isn’t enough to get evidence tossed out.

However, Jugnauth found the police misconduct to be “serious,” and the breach of Khan’s rights to be on the extreme end of the state-intrusion spectrum. These factors were so heavy, in the judge’s view, they outweighed the

concealed loaded handgun

that posed an objective danger to society — and, in particular, the officers, had the traffic stop gone another way.

“Unlawfully carrying a loaded handgun on one’s person is an extremely serious offence that strikes at the heart of the community’s sense of security….

“In my view, society’s interest in bringing Mr. Khan to trial on the merits of this case strongly favours admitting the evidence. However, the strength of that pull is ameliorated to a degree by the importance of the public’s interest in knowing that citizens’ fundamental rights have meaning and the rule of law governs.”

And so, Jugnauth neutered the Crown’s case and acquitted Khan. The Alberta Crown Prosecution Service has not yet decided whether to appeal.

It’s not a major case, nor a bloody one, but it’s a decent demonstration of just how hard it is to manage public safety in Canada: even if a person is caught with a loaded gun strapped to the chest with illegal drugs semi-visible below the dash, that’s no guarantee they’ll be held to account for it.

We don’t need more gun bans targeting lawful owners — we need better judges.

National Post


Recently, I was a panellist at the Canadian Association of Journalists conference in Calgary. The session was titled, “Local Journalism in the Age of Cutbacks.” A great headline, sure, but that’s not why I was there. I was there to talk about our $8-billion class-action lawsuit against digital advertising giants Google and Facebook.

Alongside Sotos LLP, I launched a national class-action lawsuit in 2022. I’m the representative plaintiff in a case filed in the Federal Court of Canada on behalf of all Canadian newspaper publishers, big and small, independent and chain owned. We allege that Google and Facebook have engaged in anti-competitive practices in digital advertising and siphoned billions in ad revenue from Canadian journalism.

If we really want to talk about cutbacks, then let’s talk about what’s causing them. The bleed of advertising dollars away from Canadian newsrooms and straight into the pockets of two unregulated tech giants is the reason we are all hurting. We can’t stop the drain without getting to the root of the problem. That’s what this lawsuit is about.

Our case is one of the first of its kind in the world. Countries like Australia, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands have also picked up the cause, some with their own legal action, others with groundbreaking legislation forcing Big Tech to pay for journalism.

On that panel in Calgary, I listened to a lot of “woe is me.” Stories of shrinking newsrooms. Struggles to retain talent. Frustrations over government ad policy. It was the same old tune. The media in this country has become far too comfortable living with a victim mentality.

Well, I am nobody’s victim. I’m a fighter. And it’s time our industry remembered how to fight, too. What I didn’t hear on that stage was resolve. What I didn’t hear was fire. We’ve become so used to decline that we’ve forgotten how to push back and stand tall.

We forgot that newspapers aren’t just businesses. We’re institutions. We are the watchdogs. The check and balance. The public record. And somewhere along the way, we let Silicon Valley billionaires convince us we didn’t matter anymore.

Well, I haven’t forgotten. And I haven’t given up.

I run a small-town newspaper in Crowsnest Pass, Alta. I don’t have a national platform or a multimillion-dollar budget. But I have a spine, and I’m not afraid to use it. If a small community newspaper can step up and take on the giants, then so can every publisher in this country. Because if we don’t stand up for our work, our readers and our communities, who will?

Let me remind you: Canadians still believe in us. News Media Canada found that 81 per cent of Canadians read newspapers weekly, and 63 per cent trust newspaper advertising far more than ads on Facebook or Instagram. Even young readers are returning to trusted sources. So why are we acting like we’ve already lost?

This lawsuit isn’t just about money. It’s about restoring a fair playing field. It’s about holding the powerful accountable. It’s about saying “enough.”

If one local newspaper from a mountain town in southern Alberta can take on Google and Facebook, then maybe, just maybe, all of us can fight for Canadian culture and identity.

Under the leadership of its tenacious commissioner, Matthew Boswell, the Competition Bureau of Canada is doing its job and taking Google to court. It deserves our full support and all the resources it needs to protect Canadians from tech giants tilting the field in their favour.

I am a proud, independent, second-generation community newspaper publisher, a proud Conservative, a proud Albertan, but most of all I am a very proud Canadian. This pro-coal, pro-oil, pro-gas, pro-pipeline gal has been pleasantly surprised and impressed by Prime Minister Mark Carney’s willingness and determination to get stuff done and move our economy forward and unlock our promise and potential after a decade of dithering. He, and all of us, have the power to lead the world in this fight if we choose to do so.

Let Canada be the democratic beacon in an increasingly autocratic world by standing up to Big Tech giants and safeguarding local news and our digital sovereignty.

National Post

Lisa Sygutek is the publisher of the Crowsnest Pass Herald.


Federal Industry Minister Mélanie Joly.

OTTAWA — The federal government is set to make a highly anticipated decision in the coming weeks regarding internet affordability.

The CRTC recently reiterated its decision

issued last year authorizing Canada’s three major telecommunications companies to resell fibre optics to internet service providers (ISP) on their respective networks.

At the time, then-Minister of Industry François-Philippe Champagne asked the regulator to review its decision, which notably grants Telus more options to access new markets.

According to the regulator, “several thousand Canadian households” are already benefiting from new plans offered by “dozens of providers that are using the access enabled by the Final Decision.”

“Changing course now would reverse the benefits of this increased competition and would prevent more Canadians from having new choices of ISPs in the future,” wrote the CRTC in its June 20 decision.

However, many telecommunications companies are fighting back and exerting pressure on the federal government, particularly Industry Minister Mélanie Joly, to overturn the CRTC’s decision, arguing that it will have a negative impact on investment and competition across the country.

For them, the case is not over and the final decision has not yet been rendered.

They have financial analyses, including from Bank of America and National Bank, that predict “a decline in future investments in telecommunications infrastructure” if the decision is maintained.

Federal cabinet is expected to confirm or overturn the CRTC decision by Aug. 13.

“We take note of the CRTC’s decision to retain mandated wholesale access to fibre networks,” said Joly’s spokesperson, Isabella Orozco-Madison, in a statement. “Cabinet will make its decision on the petition before it in due course.”

The battle between the telecom giants, which began years ago before the federal regulator, is highly political in nature. A source indicated that Telus is also making every effort to ensure that the CRTC’s decision is upheld by Ottawa.

In an interview with National Post, Cogeco Communications’ chief legal and corporate officer said that telecoms will play a crucial role in Canada’s defence, housing, energy, artificial intelligence and agriculture sectors, and that the government must adopt policies that will promote their prosperity.

“It’s really about the moment we’re in as a country, and we don’t have time for regulation that doesn’t make sense and defeats its own objectives,” said Paul Cowling.

Smaller providers like Cogeco, or even independent providers that don’t have their own facilities, could very well be threatened by this policy if Ottawa signs off on it, they say.

“We want to compete, and we want to offer more choice in the marketplace… That becomes very challenging when your biggest competitors, who have many advantages over you, are empowered by the regulator to compete unfairly against you,” said Cowling.

For example, this decision would give Telus, which is strong in Western Canada, the opportunity to use other providers’ networks to add thousands of customers in Ontario and Quebec instead of building its own infrastructure.

Bell Canada’s executive vice president, Robert Malcolmson, recently said that “as a direct result” of the policy, his company has reduced its capital expenditures by $500 million in 2025 alone and by over $1.2 billion since the CRTC’s initial decision in November 2023.

“The CRTC policy will continue to have major negative impacts well into the future,” he wrote in a

scathing statement

.

In the meantime, Telus keeps telling Canadians how important this policy is. The Vancouver-based provider launched a petition online that has gained over 300,000 signatures to support the CRTC decision.

In the petition description, Telus writes “the federal government tried to limit competition, and could do so again” and that “some home internet carriers are still trying to restrict the brands you can choose from.”

“Upholding the decision reinforces the independence of expert regulators, which is necessary to create the certainty needed for Canadian businesses to continue to invest with confidence,” said Telus director of public affairs Richard Gilhooley.

Recently, B.C. premier David Eby said he was “pleased to see CRTC’s decision to uphold its ruling allowing for greater competition.”

“This is great news for BC headquartered Telus and for jobs in BC,” he wrote on social media.

According to

a recent PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) report

, the telecommunications sector contributed an estimated $87.3 billion to Canada’s GDP last year.

Now, internet carriers like BCE and Cogeco argue that sustaining this level of economic impact requires a regulatory environment that supports continued investment.

“And what we need in this country right now is more investment. We need more investment in strong digital infrastructure, other telecommunications networks… Our economic ambition is really dependent on having strong connectivity in our economy today, nothing works without connectivity,” said Cowling.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.