LP_468x60
on-the-record-468x60-white

The federal Liberals should probably tone down the smug when it comes to their pandemic response.

This week, when Public Safety Minister Bill Blair tweet-gloated that less than two percent of COVID cases are due to travel, it was more than a bit much.

The quarantine measures the government enacted at the border have had massive holes from the beginning.  People will happily walk out of the airport and — maybe — pay a fine for skipping out on quarantine hotel.  Or they'll just come across the land border and not have to quarantine at all.

It is, how do you say it, really not great.

This is a federal government that has done better than its (non-Atlantic) provincial counterparts, yes.  But it is not a government that has done anything particularly well.  The initial response of Health Minister Patty Hajdu was that "The risk is low to Canadians," which may be news to 24,000 dead people.

While the disastrous explosion of variant cases of COVID-19 is largely the fault of the provinces, it was the federal government's patchwork of half-assed border measures that allowed those variants in.

While the provincial failures have been enormous — Ontario Premier Doug Ford should be run out on a rail at the absolute minimum — they do not absolve the federal government of its various and assorted inadequacies.

This is a government, remember, that was happy to let corporations take money for wage subsidies, while still paying out bonuses to CEOs and dividends to shareholders.  At the very same time, it was threatening the self-employed to pay back tens of thousands of dollars because those people had been misled by Revenue Canada.

It is a government that waited until this year to even put in place mandatory quarantine protocols, that we've seen have been inadequate.

Only last week did it impose travel bans from India and Pakistan — which accounted for some 20 percent of incoming international flights — and where, in India at least, COVID is rampaging out of control.

Waffling and indecision have marked the federal response for much of the pandemic.

It is a government far too high on its own supply of hot air, far too willing to buy into its own vocal BS about believing in science, that it is incapable of seeing — never mind fixing — what it has done badly.  The Liberals have succeeded only by comparison to the provinces, which is no measure for success.  It is only a gradient of failure.

Now, granted, the provinces have made things worse.  By not containing what the feds have let in, the virus has been able to explode in provinces across the country.  You can see the difference that provincial leadership makes in Nova Scotia, which imposed a sharp series of lockdown measures this week after increasing cases were seen in the province, many of them COVID variants.

Ninety-six cases was all it took for this circuit-breaker lockdown to come into play.  This is the sort of things other provincial governments have been unwilling to do, and shows the ability of a province to cover for federal screw ups.

That variants are quickly becoming the dominant strains of COVID in the country is ultimately an indictment of the whole country.  It is the fault of the federal government for letting it in our borders, and it is the fault of the provinces for letting it run out of control.

In a system such as ours where responsibility is divided along hard lines between the federal and provincial level, it's not enough for one side to do pretty well and put the blame on the other.

This is why the Liberal smugness at their performance is so maddening.  Sure, they've done well with vaccines — at nearly a third of the population with at least once dose, things are looking up — but vaccines are only a part of what's going to get us out of the pandemic.

Poorly designed financial supports — the federal sick benefit instead of shovelling billions out the door, is only costing a fraction of that because it's too slow and too stingy — have real consequences in the real world.  And by so often putting money into the pockets of business, rather than the people working there, the government makes clear who it supports.

None of these are hallmarks of a government that should be celebrated.  At best, this a government outperforming the worst performing leaders within our borders.

In that way, it is the story of how we look at Canadian health care more broadly.  A broken system constantly on the precipice of collapse, but not the nightmare hellscape of the United States.

We only ever compare ourselves to our closest neighbours, never somewhere where things might actually be better.  This is how we allow our society to stagnate and crumble.

In that sense, you can see why a guy like Blair would seem so congratulatory of his half-hearted efforts.  He's not there to do a good job, he's just there to do a good-enough job.

Photo Credit: CBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


As the COVID-19 third wave was creeping up and the vaccination roll-out was having hiccups, our elected officials wanted to make sure that people would show up to get their jab.  The confusion surrounding AstraZeneca abounded as different experts provided contradicting advice, around the world and here in Canada.

Deaths of people who had received the vaccine in Austria, Norway and Denmark, possibly linked to blood clots, led many countries to put a stop to the AZ distribution.  Italy, Germany, France and Spain notably suspended the use of the vaccine on March 15th as a precaution, following several other countries in the previous weeks.

No one had yet established a direct link between the administration of AZ and these deaths, but fear was spreading, even in Canada.  In Quebec vaccination centres, some people were refusing it on the spot.  It was time to calm people down.

On March 15th, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was in Montreal for a joint economic announcement with Quebec Premier François Legault.  But the journalists were more concerned about the vaccination and the potential risks of taking AstraZeneca.

Trudeau spouted nonsense about a specific batch of AstraZeneca causing all the trouble in Europe.  "We can reassure all Canadians that there is no dose of AstraZeneca that came from the same batches that are of concern in Europe", he said.  It sounded dubious.  Regardless, Justin Trudeau was urging all Canadians to receive this vaccine if it was available to them: "The best vaccine for you is the first one available to you.  This is the one you should take."  More convincing.

Premier Legault went even further in his defense of AstraZeneca:

"Quebec public health is monitoring, I would say hourly, and telling us that there is no risk with the AstraZeneca vaccine, that it is safe.  We trust specialists, experts, and they assure us that there is no risk with the AstraZeneca vaccine.  Public health tells us that there is no risk, that it is safe.  Now it becomes a question of organization.  It is easier to give some vaccines at home.  This is how we are organizing.  But I repeat and it is important that all Quebecers understand that all the vaccines that are offered are safe."

No risk?  Not so.  At the time, I found these statements by François Legault quite problematic.  With a vaccine, there is no such thing as zero risk.  Something was bound to happen that would prove Legault wrong.  Fast forward 6 weeks, and sadly, it happened.  A Quebecer died of cerebral thrombosis after receiving a dose of AstraZeneca vaccine, an otherwise healthy 54-year old woman.  There is a risk.

Simply put, Premier Legault was lying to people in his enthusiasm to get people vaccinated.  In doing so, in not being straight with Quebecers, he directly undermined the entire operation and undermined the trust people will have in what he will now say.

Because zero risk is not a thing.  At this stage of the pandemic, our elected leaders need to be truthful and straightforward.  Much to their chagrin, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization has updated its analysis and currently recommends that AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine should not be used in adults under 55 years.  Yet the vaccine is being pushed by British Columbia, Manitoba, Alberta and Ontario to people over 40, (45 in Quebec).  Uptake is slower than they hoped and may slow down even more.

Statistically, AstraZeneca remains very safe. 1 case of complications for each 100 000 jabs.  You have more chance of developing blood clots by taking hormonal birth control.  By hopping on a plane.  By smoking.  Or by catching COVID-19.  But fear is often irrational, easily fed by confusing messages, and is now higher than it was.

On Wednesday, PQ MNA Pascal Bérubé was pushing the CAQ government for a broader information campaign to reassure the population.  Bérubé compared the AstraZeneca vaccine to a lottery: "Who can reassure us?  Well, the scientists, saying, "Here is the lottery, here is the rate of possible complications," he said.

Bérubé is right, AstraZeneca is a lottery.  Any vaccine is.  And 99,999 out of 100,000 players will win.  So I took an AZ ticket.  There is no risk of losing.  Right?

Photo Credit: CBC News

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.