LP_468x60
ontario news watch
on-the-record-468x60-white
and-another-thing-468x60

Akbar at her exhibit; each empty chair cradles the picture of a person killed by extremists (Kiana Hayeri/The New York Times)

Rada Akbar's personal nightmare began late last year with what seemed, at least at first, like prank calls to her cellphone. Unlike the usual phishing calls a woman might receive in Afghanistan, where lonely men randomly dial a mobile phone number and hope a female voice picks up, these calls were from women—and they knew her name.

For Akbar, a 32-year-old artist and outspoken proponent of women's rights, the calls were chilling. For many young Afghans like her, 2020 was not the year a deadly virus swept through their country but the year they became the targets of an unprecedented assassination campaign. COVID-19 hunted Afghanistan's elderly and vulnerable; the Taliban and other extremists were hunting its youth.

"The killings intensified around the end of the year, to the point where they would kill as many as five people in a day," Akbar tells me by telephone from Kabul. "I was warned that there were women working for ISIS, or the Taliban, or criminal groups who were following targets for months."

When two women posing as tutors managed to get past the security guards posted at Akbar's apartment complex and showed up at her front door asking detailed questions about her life—Is she married? Does she live alone?—Akbar felt the walls closing in. By early January, she was so terrified that she had locked herself away at home and abandoned work on her next exhibition, Abarzanan, meaning "superwomen," slated to open in March. It was supposed to be the third instalment of the yearly exhibition, celebrating the strength and power of Afghan women. But this year, Akbar felt powerless, and her strength had been drained.

By early February, she had left Afghanistan for India.

Akbar was not alone in seeking an escape from Afghanistan's suffocating war. Since the U.S. signed its withdrawal agreement with the Taliban in February last year, violence against Afghan civilians has escalated. According to a recent United Nations report, civilian deaths, particularly the targeted killings of journalists, intellectuals, professionals and civil society leaders, many of them women, spiked in September, after the Afghan government opened peace negotiations with the Taliban. This year, more than 60 people have been assassinated.

Many of the victims belong to Afghanistan's new generation of leaders and activists. I wrote about this group back in 2017, when they were taking the lead in Kabul's municipal government and setting up their own civil society organizations and businesses. They were hopeful and energized; and they were pleading with the international community not to abandon them. Today, many of them have left Afghanistan, or are planning to leave. On a near daily basis, I hear about another businessperson or young Afghan scholar arriving in Istanbul. Every week, there is a gathering where these young people tell stories about the threats they face, about the sticky bombs attached to the undercarriages of cars, about the friends they have lost.

The assassination campaign follows a pattern, one journalist (requesting anonymity because she plans to return to Kabul) told me. Like the communists who took power in Afghanistan in 1978, and the warlords who took power in 1992, the Taliban are eliminating the country's young intellectuals and activists. "There are not many of us in the country," she said. "So they just have to kill a few hundred and the rest will go either silent or flee."

The implication is that the Taliban are convinced they have won the war and are now eliminating any potential opposition. It's what anyone who has followed Afghanistan's trajectory closely has been warning would happen after the Trump administration signed its ill-conceived withdrawal agreement with the Taliban. If it wasn't for that deal, many of the young Afghans I talked to believe, there would be no assassination campaign.

With the May 1 deadline for the U.S. withdrawal looming, the prospect of even more violence has put Afghanistan's future leaders and activists in a state of near panic. Recent attempts by the Afghan government to curb women's rights are seen as a test of how much room it has to manoeuvre in its negotiations with the Taliban over a future power-sharing agreement. And it seems girls' education and women's rights are negotiable.

That fact is particularly frustrating for me, as a Canadian who spent years in Afghanistan listening to Canada's military commanders and diplomats talk about how they were in the country to help Afghanistan's women and girls. But since Canada's withdrawal in 2011, its attention has ricocheted from Iraq to Mali, proving that the Canadian government is more interested in playing whack-a-mole with terrorism than doing the hard work of helping a country devastated by terrorism ensure terrorists never take root on its soil again.

Canada may have given up on Afghanistan, but young people like Akbar haven't. After two weeks in Delhi, clearing her mind and building up her courage, she returned to Kabul, determined to complete her exhibition. It launched on March 8 and ran for two weeks at Kabul's iconic Darul Aman Palace. Akbar decided to dedicate the exhibition to eight Afghan women who have been killed in recent years. In a video installation, she delivers a speech to those killed by the Taliban and other extremists, each lost life represented by an empty chair cradling a picture of the deceased and a burning candle.

"The world no longer seems to be shaken as our human bodies collapse, one after the other," she tells her spectral audience. "I wish I could tell you we are living better lives. I wish I could say humanity is kinder, more compassionate, more loving. I wish we never lost any of you. I hope you are resting in peace, because we are still not living in peace."


This article appears in print in the May 2021 issue of Maclean's magazine with the headline, "The women Canada failed." Subscribe to the monthly print magazine here.

The post The Afghan women Canada failed appeared first on Macleans.ca.


"Comedy is acting out optimism," Robin Williams once said.  The late comedian tackled controversial topics, and did it with a wit, charm, brilliance and firm belief that humour was there to entertain and uplift others.

Many modern comedians view their chosen profession in a different light, however.

They believe there are restrictions and boundaries to the art of joke telling.  They're afraid to get into certain topics because it could trigger someone to call them racist or sexist.  Some have even felt the need to apologize for past actions to keep cancel culture and the woke mob at bay.

Case in point, Hank Azaria.

The actor/comedian recently apologized (again) for voicing Apu Nahasapeemapetilon in the long-running animated sitcom The Simpsons.  Azaria had originally expressed concern after Hari Kondabolu's 2017 documentary The Problem with Apu highlighted some perceived South Asian stereotypes associated with this popular character.  He formally stepped away from Apu's voice in 2020 as well as Carl Carlson, a black friend and work colleague of Homer Simpson's.

Azaria appeared on Dax Shepherd's podcast Armchair Expert on April 13 and apologized some more.  He said Apu was created with good intentions but had become an object of "structural racism."  He went on, "I was unaware how much relative advantage I had received in this country as a white kid from Queens."

The former voice of Apu then apologized to the podcast's Indian-American co-host, Monica Padman who hadn't even asked for one, for heaven's sake and claimed "part of me feels like I need to go around to every single Indian person in this country and personally apologise."

Oh, brother.  Would Azaria like some cheese to go with that whine?

Thankfully, one prominent comedian spoke out against this ridiculous tour d'apologia.  John Cleese, an original member of the legendary Monty Python's Flying Circus, tweeted on April 13, "Not wishing to be left behind by Hank Azaria, I would like to apologise on behalf on Monty Python for all the many sketches we did making fun of white English people.  We're sorry for any distress we may have caused."

Cleese's decision to hilariously mock Azaria's umpteenth Apu apology was widely praised.  Some pushed back, and he engaged with gusto.  When one Twitter user suggested on April 14 that "all humour is based on pain," the 81-year-old comedian wrote in response, "I don't agree.  All humour is critical of human foibles, except for wordplay.  But criticism, in the form of affectionate teasing, is not painful at all.  To pretend that it is is gross exaggeration."

It appears that Cleese, unlike Azaria, is anything but a woke bore.  Based on his time and work with Monty Python, that's unsurprising.

The UK comedy troupe was formed in 1969. Cleese, Graham Chapman, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones and Michael Palin served as charter members.  The Pythons broke new ground by using surreal, off-the-wall humour in their TV skits and movies.  Whether searching for the Holy Grail, singing about lumberjacks, trying to figure out the meaning of life, listing the faux election result of Silly Party candidate Tarquin Fin-tim-lim-bim-lim-bin-bim-bin-bim bus stop F'tang F'tang Ole Biscuitbarrel, or telling a pet shop owner that Polly was an "ex-Parrot," this absurd, farcical brand of comedy remains fresh, exciting and bloody hilarious.

It is, as the popular lexicon goes, "Pythonesque" in nature.

Cleese is far from being a conservative, too.  The comedian described himself as "slightly left-of-centre" in 2011.  He's a longtime supporter of the Liberal Democrats (having abandoned the more left-wing Labour Party in 1981), and has been critical of Tory prime ministers like Margaret Thatcher and Boris Johnson.

Yet the fact that he's pushing back against like-minded people who have drifted into the sea of political correctness and woke culture is intriguing.  Comedians like Jerry Seinfeld and Chris Rock have both spoken out in a similar fashion, but Cleese has expressed his point of view with more authority.

During a BBC Radio 4 interview last year, he said, "PC people simply don't understand this business about context because they tend to be very literal-minded.  I would love to debate this with a 'woke.'  The first question I would say is, 'Can you tell me a woke joke?'  I don't know what a woke joke would be like other than very, very nice people being kind to each other.  It might be heart-warming but it's not going to be very funny."

Cleese, to his credit, understands what comedy is supposed to be: abrasive, controversial, hilarious and thought-provoking.  He won't be restricted when making a joke, and won't apologize for his absurdist brand of comedy.  Rather, his goal is to make people laugh out loud whether it's on stage, Twitter or in the local pub.

That's what Azaria and The Simpsons used to do and rather well, truth be told.  The show's once-sterling Nielsen ratings have plummeted in recent years.  Maybe it's because they're spending more time walking on eggshells than being, you know, funny.

Photo Credit: The Scotsman

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Monday's federal budget was expansive the largest on record, and it had both a focus on getting the country through the rest of this pandemic, with supports extended to through to September, and a blueprint for how the government plans to guide the recovery from the current economic downturn in a way that doesn't simply return us to how things were before the pandemic struck, because the aim is to fix some of the structural problems in our economy that were not only exposed but magnified over the past year.  Part of this recovery is about inclusive growth, which means ensuring that more women and minorities can fully participate in the economy but for that to happen, the barriers to that participation need to be dealt with.

One of those barriers is, of course, child care.  It's hard to underestimate the significance of what is being put on offer here, with $30 billion over five years to establish a national early learning and child care system with an average cost of $10/day.  Of course, this is contingent upon negotiation with provinces, given that this is an area of provincial jurisdiction, but rather than presuming that this can be achieved by simply putting on Green Lantern's ring and willpowering it into existence, it's clearly making the economic case for it.  It's a big number because it needs to be in order to give the provinces an offer that they can't refuse, and given the political composition of several of our largest provinces, that is a very real danger.

Part of the reluctance by any province is the creation of permanent spending programs that they are forced to administer, no matter how much the federal government plays an upfront role.  The obvious cautionary tale that many provinces like to cite is healthcare, where they talk about the initial 50-50 cost-share with the federal government, and then they portray it like the federal government walked back from that commitment, which isn't the case at all.  In 1977, provinces renegotiated the deal so that the federal contribution would be 25 percent cash transfers, and 25 percent of the value of tax points transferred from the federal to provincial governments, so that they would become responsible for 75 percent of healthcare costs, but with a greater ability to raise their own revenue.  With child care, there is a clear and direct economic benefit from this kind of spending program.

While the $30 billion in federal funds is new money that doesn't need to be matched by provinces, the goal as stated in the budget is 50/50 federal-provincial cost-sharing by 2026 in the area of $8.3 billion per year, to be guided by "principles" rather than "national standards" (as with their plans around long-term care funding).  The thing to remember, however, is that Quebec's model has proven that it will pay for itself thanks to the tax revenues of having more of these women in the workforce.  This is the kind of thing that brings down barriers for women, and it's 50 years too late, given what was written in the Royal Commission on the Status of Women in their December 1970 final report.

This pandemic has shown that the barrier of child care is a very real one, as women's participation in the workforce has been set back by decades after the lack of child care due to COVID drove any women to quitting their jobs.

"Long-standing gender inequities have only been amplified over the course of the pandemic—and it has put decades of hard-fought gains for women in the workplace at risk," the budget states.  "Today, more than 16,000 women have dropped out of the labour force completely, while the male labour force has grown by 91,000.  This is a she-cession."

The budget has other commitments to breaking down barriers than just childcare, and another one of those is getting more minorities into the workforce through training programs.  One of those is $960 million over three years to help deliver training geared for small and medium-sized businesses, that aims to connect 90,000 Canadians to employers looking for skilled workers.  Of those 90,000, they have set a goal of ensuring that 40 percent of those are visible minorities, women, Indigenous people, and people with disabilities.  There are also plans to boost incentives for employers in the Red Seal trades if they hire from underrepresented groups.  There are plans to better protect those gig economy workers who fall under areas of federal jurisdiction, as well as personal support workers, many of whom are racialized women.

The budget also recognizes problems in the entrepreneurial sector, which is largely dominated by and geared toward white men.  To that end, there are separate programs for both women entrepreneurs, and Black entrepreneurs, which include supports for financing (one of the biggest problems both groups face from traditional lenders), as well as dedicated support through regional development agencies, export development, and federal procurement opportunities.  This recognition by the government, and an attempt to identify and lower barriers, is one of those hallmarks that shows that, despite their tendency for big proclamations and back-patting, there are people within this government that get what the problems are and are trying to do something about eliminating those barriers.

Most of the narratives in this budget will be around the size of the planned spending, and the size of the projected deficits and debt over the next five years, but one of the most important ways to get out of those fiscal crunches is to grow the economy, and inclusive growth needs to be part of that strategy.  We saw before the pandemic, when we were at a period of statistical "full employment," that in many regions of the country, employers were going to need to make choices about finding ways about bringing more of these under-employed women and minorities into their workforces if they planned to grow and thrive.  The government here is giving these employers those tools to make that happen, so that we will see a better economy on the other side of this than we had going into it.

Photo Credit: Al Jazeera

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.


Premier John Horgan discusses plans for travel restrictions on Monday.

VICTORIA — On the day before the annual budget is tabled in the legislature, B.C. governments traditionally put the finance minister in the spotlight to build anticipation of spending announcements to come.

But there was Premier John Horgan Monday, presiding at a media conference where he announced a new round of pandemic-fighting restrictions to take the province through to the end of May.

No more recreational vehicle bookings on B.C. Ferries. No more extra sailings on holiday weekends. Ferry reservations screened for essential travel only.

Random checks on the highways to discourage travel among the five health regions. Cautionary signs at the Alberta border reminding tourists from other provinces that they aren’t wanted here just now.

Government enlisting the tourist industry “to eliminate bookings from people outside of a particular area.”

And all of this backed up by the threat of formal orders if it can’t be accomplished voluntarily.

“This is done with a heavy heart,” Horgan told reporters. “But it’s done with a resolute purpose that, together, for this next five weeks, we can get to the end.

Details to come later this week, according to the premier, who struggled at times to explain precisely how the new restrictions would work.

“We wanted to have this discussion today so people understood we’re not going to follow other provincial leads and bring forward proposals that can’t be enforced,” he added in apparent reference to the botched rollout by Ontario premier Doug Ford.

This by way of explanation for the timing of the decision to upstage Finance Minister Selina Robinson on the eve of the provincial budget.

He also said the New Democrats do not want to lunge into these issues. But it was hardly a lunge.

Horgan has been talking about crafting travel restrictions since the beginning of the year. Two months ago, he suggested the necessary plans and protocols were already in place.

Throughout the intervening weeks, the New Democrats repeatedly discounted the need for formal restrictions and downplayed the province’s ability to do anything in any event.

Government supporters scoffed earlier this month when Green Leader Sonia Furstenau called for checkpoints on the highways and restrictions on non-essential ferry travel “to get in front of this third wave” before “this third wave gets on top of us.”

Health Minister Adrian Dix was still scoffing as recently as Friday. “We need a ferry system and the idea that we could shut it down or dramatically limit it I think wouldn’t be in the interests of Vancouver Island,” he told host Gregor Craigie on CBC’s On the Island.

At one point, Dix even suggested that travel restrictions would be un-Canadian: “We don’t live in that kind of state here in B.C.”

Horgan professed “absolute outrage” at the out-of-towners flooding tourist spots on Vancouver Island over the Easter holiday weekend.

At the same time, he also suggested he was powerless to do anything to stop it: “What do we do? Arrest them?”

“We can restrict ferry travel,” Horgan conceded. “We’ve done that in the past, but not necessarily to good effect.”

What changed in the interval between those comments on April 7 and Monday’s press conference?

“We never said we couldn’t do it,” Horgan insisted Monday. “We said it would be logistically challenging, and it is and remains so.”

Logistics had nothing to do with it. The timing was prompted by the government’s grudging realization that it had to do something in the face of growing public outrage over the spectacle of so many rule breakers.

There was also the impact of the rising COVID-19 case count in hospitals, critical care units and especially on front-line doctors, nurses and other health care workers.

In their share of Monday’s briefing, Health Minister Dix and Dr. Bonnie Henry detailed the mounting evidence of a system in danger of being overwhelmed by the more transmissible variants.

While much of the presentation was charts, graphs and data, Dr. Henry had a catch in her voice in sharing the heartbreaking news of the death of B.C.’s youngest COVID-19 patient, just under two years old.

Persuasive as Monday’s presentation was in arguing for the restrictions, still it must have been galling for Horgan to have to do it on the eve of his vaunted postelection budget.

The budget was delayed for two full months because Horgan called a snap election back in September, putting the government into caretaker mode during the second wave of the pandemic.

From the beginning of this year, he’s been building expectations about a budget and legislation agenda that would position “B.C. to come back stronger on the other side of the pandemic.”

All the while the government has down played and/or disregarded the mounting evidence of the third wave that would prove to be worse than the second.

“We know the light is there at the end of the tunnel,” the premier declared in his first press conference of the new year. On throne speech day last week, the media release from his office claimed that “the finish line” was already in sight.

He was still on that theme Monday. “We’re so close we can taste it,” he said. “But we need people to follow these rules to the end.”

B.C. might have been there already, if Horgan had not taken a premature victory lap and instead acted sooner and more decisively to contain the third wave.

vpalmer@postmedia.com 


Mayor Naheed Nenshi speaks to reporters in Calgary. Thursday, Sept. 10, 2020.

The first federal budget in more than two years aims to pull Canada through the pandemic, but doesn’t go far enough to help Calgary’s post-COVID recovery, Mayor Naheed Nenshi said Monday.

More than $100 billion in new spending was announced in the 2021 budget for programs such as

national daycare

and

lifelines for struggling workers and businesses

.

But speaking after the budget was tabled, the mayor said several specific requests from the city weren’t fulfilled, especially as Calgary starts on a harder road to recovery than other cities.

Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland said the budget “is about finishing the fight against COVID” and “healing the economic wounds” in its wake.

But Nenshi said Calgary needs more specific investment to deal with the way Alberta’s economy has been uniquely battered.

“In some places, we anticipate that there will be enormous pent-up market demand, and the economy will boom very quickly,” he said.

“But in other places like Calgary, where the fundamentals were not as strong, we are concerned that the post-pandemic recovery will be a bit slower.”

Nenshi said the budget includes some steps forward for investment in Calgary’s downtown and affordable housing, but he wanted to see

additional recognition of Calgary's more difficult situation

compared to other major cities.

Alberta’s Minister of Finance Travis Toews also expressed concerns about details of the budget, “specifically the exclusion of enhanced oil recovery projects with a net-zero carbon profile.”

“The budget is light on increasing investment and productivity, increasing market access opportunities for Alberta and growing the economy,” said Toews in a statement.

“In particular, we are gravely disappointed that the federal government once again missed an opportunity to fix the fiscal unfairness of the federation by acting on the unanimous request of provinces to retroactively lift the cap on the fiscal stabilization program.”

He said the provincial government will be working to ensure the best interests of Albertans are respected.

 Minister of Finance Travis Toews delivers the 2021 Alberta Provincial budget at the Alberta Legislature, in Edmonton Thursday Feb. 25, 2021.

Freeland’s budget plan focuses on helping some of those hit hardest in the last year — sectors such as tourism, as well as low-wage workers, small and medium-sized businesses, women and young people.

The plan seeks to invest $500 million in a tourism relief fund to support local tourism businesses adapting and recovering from COVID-19, and $300 million over two years to establish a recovery fund for the heritage, arts, culture and sports sectors.

Freeland — who made history as Canada’s first female finance minister to table a federal budget — acknowledged the weight the pandemic continues to bear on Canadians.

“We are all tired, and frustrated, and even afraid,” she said. “But we will get through this.”

The government will need to get at least one opposition party to support it to avoid a pandemic election this spring.

 Chrystia Freeland, Canada's deputy prime minister and minister of finance, walks to a news conference in Ottawa, on Monday.

Canada’s net debt is now over $1 trillion for the first time ever, after a $354-billion deficit for the pandemic year just over. It is expected to keep climbing with deficits of $155 billion this year, and $60 billion in 2022-23.

That is driven in part by more than $100 billion in new spending over the next three years, including costs to maintain federal wage and rent subsidies and aid for laid-off workers, until September.

Murray Sigler, the interim CEO of the Calgary Chamber of Commerce, said the chamber is grateful the federal government listened to some of its recommendations. However, he said they’ll be watching closely to ensure Calgary gets its fair share of the money.

“And its fair share has to be a large share because of all the metropolitan areas in this country, Calgary is the hardest hit. It was the hardest hit before COVID, it’s the hardest hit during COVID and it’s going to be the hardest hit after COVID,” said Sigler.

“We need to build our downtown and get a piece of all those infrastructure investments.”

He’s pleased there’s a commitment to getting Canada out of the crisis, especially in its decision to extend relief programs for workers and employers.

 Downtown office towers are seen in Calgary on Tuesday, April 13, 2021.

Adam Legge, president of the Business Council of Alberta, said in a statement that the budget addresses two key investments — a “robust” national child-care system and improvements to the innovation agenda — however, the council is overall disappointed.

“It has a significant price tag but comes up woefully short on the ambition and approach necessary for Canada to become an economic and climate leader coming out of the COVID pandemic,” said Legge.

Specifically, he said the budget under-invests in areas that could drive emissions down and competitiveness up, such as carbon capture, and it doesn’t provide a sufficient long-term growth agenda for jobs.

Calgary MP Michelle Rempel Garner said she had been expecting more support for Alberta, as the province continues to grapple with some of the highest unemployment rates in the country.

She was looking for a clearer plan for addressing the unsustainable deficit spending levels, and was hopeful the budget would include benchmarks for a plan to move towards safe, permanent lifting of COVID-19 restrictions.

“I think a lot of businesses are not thinking about hiring right now. They’re thinking about survival and without a clear line of sight on reopening and what benchmarks are used for that, it’s a tough call for businesses to make,” Rempel Garner said.

“Our province had a lot of economic needs prior to the pandemic and those certainly were made worse . . . last year. I was expecting something that spoke to some of the structural challenges we’ve been facing.”

 Michelle Rempel Garner.

One of the biggest promises in Freeland’s budget is billions in new spending for provinces to create spaces and drive down fees for child care, including a drop in fees by 50 per cent by next year and $10-a-day spaces across the country, outside of Quebec which has its own system, by 2026.

Jennifer Usher, spokeswoman for the Association of Early Childhood Educators of Alberta, said this will fill a gap in affordable child care for low- to middle-income families.

“This will allow families to get back to work and not have to worry about really high fees that they have to pay. It’ll impact women, in particular, because we know they have been disproportionately impacted by the pandemic, having to leave their jobs to care for children,” said Usher.

Early education and child care has been heavily hit during the pandemic, with many families keeping their kids at home and spaces adapting to provincial restrictions. Usher said this kind of federal funding will stabilize the sector and get early educators back to work.

 FILE PHOTO: A child-care centre in Calgary. Photo taken on Wednesday, March 2, 2016.

In what is the first budget in more than two years, Freeland topped up the Liberals’ 10-year, $40-billion housing strategy with an additional $2.5-billion commitment.

Some 60 per cent of that will go toward the construction of 4,500 new units under the so-called Rapid Housing Initiative, which seeks to provide vulnerable Canadians with affordable homes.

The budget’s plan to build or repair 35,000 units in total — with the help of a reallocated $1.3 billion in existing funding — makes only a small dent in the more than 1.6 million Canadians who “live in core housing need,” the budget states.

Nenshi said while it’s a big commitment, it’s less than he had anticipated for affordable housing. He’s been hoping for a major cash injection from the feds that, along with funding from the province, could end chronic homelessness in Calgary.

“This will get us down that road; I’m not sure it will get us all the way there,” he said.

With files from Madeline Smith and

The Canadian Press

sbabych@postmedia.com

Twitter:

@BabychStephanie


Canada Revenue Agency headquarters in Ottawa.

Some accountants who specialize in preparing personal income tax forms are calling for Ottawa to extend the April 30 filing deadline.

To illustrate why, Vicki Burgess points out the instrumental music in the background.

“That’s Revenue Canada on hold. It plays here probably half of every day,” said Burgess of Burgess Kilpatrick, a small accounting firm in east Vancouver.

In a normal year, her calls to the Canada Revenue Agency to clarify information for a client would take 20 minutes. This year, she might finally get “on hold” at 9 a.m., wait, get transferred, and then have to repeat before landing something around 3 p.m.

And that’s just one thing that’s abnormal, she said.

“Long ago, we used to sort of brag by sending our staff home at 3 o’clock on April 30. And in more recent years, it’s more like 5 or 6 o’clock. We have never had to work until midnight on April 30. We’re pretty organized. And I’m saying, I don’t think we can do it this year.”

Last year, the deadline for filing was extended to May 31 and late payment penalties were suspended until September. This year, Ottawa has said there are no plans to extend deadlines again. There are financial penalties for filing late and some benefits can be withheld.

About a week ago, prominent Vancouver income tax consultant Hugh Woolley started a

petition

on Change.org after his firm started hearing from smaller accounting firms that hire his to help with their higher level tax projects, such as estate planning and the purchase and sales of businesses.

Some 55,000 people have signed it. He estimates the first few thousand who signed the petition are people at accounting firms that prepare tax returns and then the others are people who do their own.

“Many expressed that things were much worse than last year when there was a lengthy extension,” said Woolley.

Being on hold with the Canada Revenue Agency for hours, as Burgess described, has become standard. As well, many accountants are still locked out of their online CRA accounts after it was a victim of a massive cyberattack last August. The issuing for tax slips this year was later due to more reporting required. Also, many clients may have computers and email access, but not necessarily the scanners needed to get digitized forms and receipts to accountants instead of delivering them in person.

Woolley said not all accounting firms want an extension. The major accounting firms focus on auditing big public companies rather than preparing personal tax returns, “so they are ambivalent.” Some firms are opposed to an extension because “they think it’s going to either ruin their summer or it’s going to impact the corporate work,” and they mostly have clients with scanners at home.

“It’s really the little guy (firm) that doesn’t have a huge voice,” said Woolley.

The petition is proposing an extension to June 15, but even a two-week extension or some relief from the penalties would help, said Burgess.

Woolley noticed the “vast majority that seemed overwhelmed with the pending deadline were women who worked as either sole proprietors or in smaller firms. I shared this with other organizations and they confirmed it was consistent with their feedback.”

Burgess said at her firm, “we have 10 of us working here. One is my partner who is a man and everybody else is women.”

“A lot of them have children in school and we’ve constantly had somebody off because there’s a (COVID) case in the baby’s daycare or there’s a case at school or people have families with (other) work exposures. There’s always someone missing, and then we’ve had two staff members lose fathers-in-law. These are deaths in our community, not just numbers on a page.”

jlee-young@postmedia.com


Dr. Isaac Bogoch.

COVID-19 frustration usually sets in about 10 a.m. Monday, after I’ve checked about 20 digital and human sources to figure out what the heck’s going on now.

This pandemic and all the responses to it are so complex that it’s almost impossible to get a grip.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford seems to be melting down before our eyes, actually phoning foreign consulates to beg for vaccine.

B.C has

shut down non-essential travel

outside health regions. On Monday Alberta reported

1,391 new cases

.

And yet, vaccination is picking up across the country.

Albertans 40 and over can now book for AstraZeneca doses.

B.C. expects to be vaccinating everyone over age 18 by June.

Should we be encouraged, or more worried than ever?

I asked

Dr. Isaac Bogoch

, a Calgarian who went on from Henry Wise Wood High School to University of Calgary and Harvard.

Now a leading infectious disease expert at the University of Toronto, his humane, positive posts have earned him 102,000 followers on Twitter (

@bogochisaac

).

Is Canada really winning this fight?

“The answer is yes,” Bogoch said.

“We are going to get out of this. We are going to significantly improve from where we are right now.”

Bogoch is a COVID optimist, but he also recognizes that vaccination alone can’t win the battle. It’s still running too far behind the virus.

“We have to acknowledge that in many parts of the country we’re in a very, very difficult position.

“I’m here in Ontario, where our health-care system is

stretched beyond capacity

and we’re

obviously in trouble

. The next few weeks will have obvious challenges.

“But the medium-term and long-term future absolutely look very good. We have vaccine and the rate of vaccination is going to go up with greater access.”

Bogoch points to three countries that had weak initial health measures — the U.S., the U.K. and Israel — but quickly achieved high vaccination rates.

“We’ve seen those other countries with poor pandemic actions. But they show that if you throw enough vaccine at the problem, the problem tends to go away.

“It’s just going to take us a couple of months longer than it did for them, but we’ll realize the exact same benefits that they have realized with vaccination.”

 People line up as they wait to get immunized at the large COVID-19 vaccination site at the Telus Convention Centre on Monday, April 12, 2021.

Before that happens, though, a lot of people will get COVID and health systems will be further challenged.

“We can’t ignore the fact that it’s been over a year with very stringent measures,” he said.

“COVID fatigue is real. Much of the communication has been confusing and people are fed up.

“In many parts of the country we are losing some of the public — not everyone, but some.

“We have to do better with transparent, focused pragmatic public health measures that are communicated in a meaningful way.”

As long as vaccination lags behind infection, he says, it’s crucial to vaccinate groups in high-infection areas, and provide income support and safe ways to isolate for those who must leave home to work.

“These are public health measures that will truly make things better. It’s the moral thing to do and will also get us through this pandemic much faster.”

Ontario and B.C., more than Alberta, are targeting vaccination in neighbourhoods with high infection rates.

Premier Ford, in fact, seems to be suggesting that all of Ontario is a hotspot and should get more vaccine immediately.

That’s an explosive idea. It would mean abandoning Ottawa’s per-capita vaccine supply to provinces. Those with low caseloads would have their supply cut.

Of course, targeted quotas would also help Alberta. But there’s no sign the Kenney government would endorse such a divisive move.

Isaac Bogoch, meanwhile, remains optimistic — as long as people get vaccinated.

Don Braid's column appears regularly in the Herald

dbraid@postmedia.com

Twitter:

@DonBraid

Facebook:

Don Braid Politics